Slashdot Mirror


FCC Requires Backup Power For 210K Cell Towers

1sockchuck alerts us to an article in Data Center Knowledge that explores ramifications from the FCC's decision a couple of months back to require backup power for cell sites and other parts of the telecom infrastructure. The new rule was prompted by wireless outages during Hurricane Katrina. There are more than 210,000 cell towers in the US, as well as 20,000 telecom central offices that will also need generators or batteries. Municipalities are bracing for disputes as carriers try to add generators or batteries to cell sites on rooftops or water towers. The rules will further boost demand in the market for generators, where there are already lengthy delivery backlogs for some models.

248 comments

  1. You mean they didn't before? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yikes!

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    1. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cellphones weren't considered vital infrastructure before. And even now it is hard to argue that they can be since you can't always guarantee a usable signal in all locations (which makes it less useful to emergency responders) and since cellphone networks can easily be overwhelmed in emergencies where everybody gets on the phone at once, like during the 9/11 attacks.

      At the same time, when cellphones are usable, they can be very helpful. If many of the cell towers didn't fail during Katrina, it would have been much easier to help many of the victims and coordinate the rescue in a more efficient manner.

    2. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon does. Here in Iowa City when a tornado went through, GSM users were out of luck -- AT&T and Iowa Wireless ("A T-Mobile affiliate") both had no battery backup. CDMA calls were pretty garbly as you headed downtown -- Sprint and US Cellular were not battery backed either, so all 3 CDMA carrier's traffic went through on Verizon's sites. (Given the amount of damage, I'd assume some of VZW's building-top sites were probably damaged or at least misaimed too.) VZW must have cleaned up on roaming revenues, given the power was out downtown for almost a week, and that downtown is both full of university students and additionally was full of contractors.

                  I was on the cell phone right after this happened; my call dropped when the local cell site switched from battery backup to generator power (maybe the power dipped just a little too much before the generator caught?) but I made a call fine right after that. Later when I was downtown, it was amazing to see all these rather drunken looking students taking cell phone photos, then starting waving their phones around in the air, shaking them, etc. to try to make the phone get service to send the photos 8-).

    3. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Forge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find this whole discusion hilarius.

      Here in Jamaica one celphone company spnt a year advertising it's performance during huricane Ivan. What's worse is that the other major competitor had everything. Batterys, Generators etc... The mistake thy made was in the size fuel tanks at each site. They figured a couple days suply would be enogh.

      With the number of Cellsites they have , this ment a small army roaming the country with botles of gasoline to keap the network at least partialy running.

      And here are you yanks panicking over government esentialy saying to cell companies "Excersize some common sence or we will kick your bots"

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    4. Re:You mean they didn't before? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most critical unmanned infrastructure uses natural gas generators onsite, not stored diesel, so they're not going to run out unless the natural gas infrastructure is damaged as well (which is a definite possibility in cases such as Katrina).

    5. Re:You mean they didn't before? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      We had a mild quake here in the Bay Area a few weeks ago and AT&T's cell sites all went into some weird lockdown mode. You could call other AT&T customers, but couldn't call anything offsite. I asked someone who is familiar with the cell infrastructure, and he said that some cell sites actually do that intentionally in a disaster situation to increase bandwidth for emergency calls. Not sure if that's what happened or if they just lost power to some critical call routing facility, though.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:You mean they didn't before? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      They are panicking over the wrong thing anyway.

      Who cares if the cell site has power or not if one of the "huts" on the backhaul to the network has run out of juice.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    7. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Not most. Diesel is the fuel of choice for emergency power, always, end of story, full stop. Natural gas is nice because it doesn't run out, but for truly critical infrastructure you will find a diesel generator. Diesel, with a big tank, and a robust emergency delivery contract. Even if the contract fails you can take matters into your own hands and try to get some diesel there yourself. If the natural gas lines go down, you're completely out of options. You don't even have time to truck in a diesel generator because your batteries won't last that long. Natural gas generators are a very poor choice for disaster recovery. They're great for cheap and relatively maintenance free "always on" power, but that's not the same thing as disaster planning.

      With diesel, no matter what the scale of the disaster is, you've got options, and you've got time. And diesel fuel is omnipresent and usually easy to find, even in a disaster. Farmers keep large stocks of it, usually.

    8. Re:You mean they didn't before? by xaxa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACCOLC -- The article says that in Britain, the emergency services (or anyone else important, e.g. doctors) can register their phone to be given priority during an emergency. Other users have to take it in turns to use the network.

      I don't know if they have backup power though... I've never noticed either my mobile or the land line phone to be down during a power cut, but then there aren't many.

    9. Re:You mean they didn't before? by monsted · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only problem with diesel is that it goes bad after a while. We provide emergency power with three V12 diesel engines (providing roughly 300 kW at full capacity), but only keep about four days worth of diesel in the tank so we don't have to replace as much when it degrades. We do have special agreements with the gas companies, being a vital infrastructure site, though.

      IANAS (scientist), but i believe it is microbial growth in the fuel that ruins it.

    10. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      he said that some cell sites actually do that intentionally in a disaster situation to increase bandwidth for emergency calls. Not sure if that's what happened or if they just lost power to some critical call routing facility, though.

      In Australia calls to 000 (Our Emergency Number) take priority and on a busy cell other users can be disconnected to allow emergency call through.
      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    11. Re:You mean they didn't before? by SmoothTom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the United States that sort of priority exists for hospitals, police, fire, doctors, military, and other "essential" personnel/agencies and is called "essential service." The standard was to have three levels of "essential service" lines: initially all lines would have service, if it got really bad, only the essential service lines would be operational, and as things got even worse it would progressively shut down the lessor priority lines until only the critical public safety lines were left. (In the 30,000 line office I worked in, at worst case only one percent of the lines would be operational - "Essential Service 1A."

      Coin phones were essential service: The thought there was that when Hell let out for lunch and only a few phones could be kept working, the public ones would make the most sense to keep going. Now that cellphones have all but wiped out the coin phone, they need to be kept running.

      I spent a quarter century working as a tech, engineer, and eventually engineering manager in the old Bell System. Say what you will about old Ma Bell, but she did believe in backups.

      The central office I worked at for about 8 years had complete battery backup for over eight hours, and twin diesels (megawatt) with a 30,000 gallon tank to provide backup power. This was an urban central office.

      Everything in the Old Bell System constantly ran on battery, and the commercial power coming into the building was used to keep those batteries charged. When we lost power there wasn't even a "click" on the line, because there was no switching to backup. All that happened is the batteries were no longer being charged.

      If the power remained out for thirty seconds the big diesels started up and took over charging the batteries three minutes later.

      Some of our more "inaccessible" microwave towers ("Tieton" in the Cascade mountains comes to mind) had fuel for 30 days... "Just in case."

      Should cell towers have backup power? Hell yes! Should the equipment huts out in the middle (or ends) of the cable runs have emergency power? Of course!

      In the days when every phone was tied to a central office by a long, thin, copper wire, every phone was directly powered by the central office over that wire. Now days that just isn't so.

      EVERY commercially provided communication system should have backup for commercial power such that it can hang on for at least four hours on battery, longer on a generator.

      --
      Tomas

    12. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Bravoc · · Score: 1

      I'm an amateur radio operator (Ham). A few years back, here in North Carolina we had a pretty unusual ice storm. It took out power for several hundred thousand people. The county office of emergency services called us in to handle message traffic between the Red Cross shelters, the county offices, and the Red Cross main office. We were busy for almost 4 days.

      The cell towers around here died middle of the first day. Probably averaged 4-6 hours or so before we (the hams) were the only game in town.

      Kinda scary really - people rely on their cell phones and don't realize how fragile the system really is.

      Oh, one more thing - get an answering machine on your land-line. That way, when you're off somewhere huddled in a shelter, when the cell towers or phone lines DO come back up, you can call your answering machine to check the status of power at your house before you go slogging through the ice and snow (ask me how I konw this)

    13. Re:You mean they didn't before? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      um the regular POTS telephone network always runs off it's own power supply the phone network itself rarely goes down. You should always have a cheap plugin non battery powered phone around for when power goes down.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    14. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bite :)

      How did you know to use an answering machine as a power indicator?

      Posting AC because I did a bit of moderating.

    15. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jamaica: 4,244 sq. mi.
      USA: 3,793,079 sq. mi.

      If we assume cell tower density is approximately proportional to land area, you are looking at ~240 towers on a small island compared to 215,000 towers on a large country. (Even if not exactly proportional, you are probably talking about less than one-hundredth the towers of the US.) I always hate when people try to compare small country X to large country Y.

      It should also be noted this mandate appears to affect towers and central offices that are very unlikely to be affected by a "major" disaster. Perhaps I have been lucky, but I have never been in a location affected by a "major disaster". The worst thing I probably lived through was an ice storm that shut down my state and closed the major highway; however, we never lost power and never did we need "emergency assistance".

    16. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Windom+Earle · · Score: 1

      Yes, but some people don't have any hard-wired phone service at all. I know, I know. But they made that choice.

    17. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Stormgren · · Score: 1

      It's nominally on utility line power, through rectifiers, with batteries floating on the bus. There's diesels or gas turbines driving it, so yes, you are correct, there is extensive power backup for these.

      But the original poster was right, if the backhauls to the cell-switches go down during a major disaster, which did happen during hurricane Katrina, it's not going to matter how many cell sites have generators. Especially when their parent MTSO (cell switch office) is UNDERWATER, which can and did happen, during Katrina.

      It's quite disconcerting to find out that the reason you can't get an office's WAN links restored is because the CO that the office is homed from has a foot or two of water over the roof.

      Secondarily, with many ILECs putting in remote terminals (SLCs, DLCs, Litespans, etc, instead of copper back to the CO) in new construction and retrofits for DSL, FIOS and whatnot, the problem actually gets worse. Your phone line may end up terminating on one of those, not run back to the CO. The problem comes in because the RTs only have a few hours of battery, up to 8 hours max, typically. There's generator outlets on a lot of them, but during an outage over an extended area, it's not uncommon for a few to go down as the phone crews can't move the generator trailers around fast enough to keep all of them charged.

      Oh, and the T1s to some of these cell sites? Are on remote terminals. Multiple points of failure, anyone?

      --

      "All those tubes and wires and careful notes!"

    18. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Stormgren · · Score: 1

      Well, if there's no power, the answering machine won't answer, right?

      *grin*

      --

      "All those tubes and wires and careful notes!"

    19. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Chicken04GTO · · Score: 0

      If it answers, its on. Duh?

    20. Re:You mean they didn't before? by BBandCMKRNL · · Score: 1

      Yes, but some people don't have any hard-wired phone service at all. I know, I know. But they made that choice. Why should I pay for a phone I'd never use when all my neighbors have POTS?
      --
      Without the 2nd Amendment, the others are just suggestions.
    21. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Crazy+Brian · · Score: 1

      Well, I know that here in eastern Nebraska, the telco had HUGH batteries at the main office, and most, if not all of the smaller CO's has batteries as well. The main office has 2 or 3 giant generators, (one of which is a gas turbine). They have numerous generator trailers, to drag out to the remote offices. This is for the land lines...I don't know about their cell sites. I know all this because I worked there for 4 years, and my father worked there for ~30 years. And in fact, when he had a big snow storm in October of 1998, my dad and I got to babysit one of the trailer generators, as it was out near his house.

      --
      "Do what you can, with what you have, where you are."
    22. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      The only problem with diesel is that it goes bad after a while.
      There's fuel polishing to address things like that. Your fuel supplier should be able to perform this service for you as needed (or on a scheduled basis) if you don't put the systems in place from the start. Also, proper monitoring of the fuel in your tank(s) can keep track of moisture/contaminant content.
    23. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      and since cellphone networks can easily be overwhelmed in emergencies where everybody gets on the phone at once

      That's a design decision, not a limitation of the technology. They could provide enough slots on the network to handle that amount of load, they just don't want to spend the money on the required equipment (and spectrum licenses) that it would entail. It's also not unique to cellular -- POTS can max out just as easily as cellular, as anybody who has ever heard the words "all circuits are busy" knows.

      It's also stupidity on the part of the masses -- during the 9/11 attacks I voluntarily restricted my calling activity. The few calls that I made were all local (i.e: within the same exchange) calls that shouldn't have imposed a load on the larger telephone network. I can understand pulling out the phone if you have family in the attacked (or disaster) area, but is it really necessary to call all your friends and family can say "Can you believe this?" over and over?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    24. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Multiple points of failure, anyone?

      All of what you say is true, but it's still unacceptable to not provide at least a basic provision for the cellular network to not operate during something as simple as a power outage.

      I don't blame the carriers for my cell phone not working during Katrina (had I lived there). I do blame them for my cell phone not working during the 2003 blackout (this did happen to me). When companies with critical infrastructure and multi billion dollar market caps can't buy something as simple as UPS I start to get a little worried.

      For better or worse, wireless service will largely replace the landline network for voice service. It needs to be treated as a utility and held to the same standards of reliability.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    25. Re:You mean they didn't before? by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      If cell companies DID use a UPS to backup their equipment, I'd be very worried. Luckily, they use high grade rectifiers and large battery packs.

    26. Re:You mean they didn't before? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but some people don't have any hard-wired phone service at all. I know, I know. But they made that choice.

      Why should I pay for a phone I'd never use when all my neighbors have POTS?

      Besides, the cable network also has backup power. As long as I keep my cable modem, router, and ATA on a UPS, my VoIP line will keep running in a power outage. Since that equipment doesn't draw much power, even a small UPS would keep it running for some time.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    27. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Forge · · Score: 1

      Cell tower density is far from proportional to either land area or population.

      Jamaica is very hilly and towers have to be positioned to get your signal around those obstructions without too much overlap.

      Our larger and newer (6 years) cellphone provider has over 1,000 towers with coverage of around 98% of the population and around 92% of the land mass.

      They are forever expanding the network but have now hit the point of diminishing returns. Some homes may never be served by the GSM network but they are looking at alternatives (sorry. not allowed to spill more)

      Full Disclosure: I work for that cell provider now.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    28. Re:You mean they didn't before? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
      Try getting large diesel tanks approved by the EPA at unmanned towers/locations. Now try to get a gas line dragged there.

      Disclaimer: I use to work for a large cellular carrier. They used natural gas at all their remote locations, except their datacenter (which was diesel).

    29. Re:You mean they didn't before? by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      but ATT is ripping out the last of the pay phones...who ya gonna call if you can't call at all?

      the 210k number is a moving target...coverage is still lousy in ex-urbs but getting better. By the time the 210k all have backup, the number will be 250k or something.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    30. Re:You mean they didn't before? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Everything in the Old Bell System constantly ran on battery, and the commercial power coming into the building was used to keep those batteries charged. When we lost power there wasn't even a "click" on the line, because there was no switching to backup. All that happened is the batteries were no longer being charged.

      Apparently, that isn't the case nearly as consistently anymore. IIRC, in one of the major NYC blackouts of the last decade, it was followed about twelve hours later by a massive telephone outage in... Manhattan, I think. The cause was reportedly that some major remote terminal or unmanned switching station of some sort failed to switch back from battery backup to mains power after power was restored.

      Unfortunately, while I remember hearing about it on TV when it happened, I can't find anything on the 'net about the incident to verify the details.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    31. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Molochi · · Score: 1

      When I had Comcast(2 years ago) the cable always went down when the power failed. I haven't had that problem with Charter, however they go down 2-3 times a week for 30 minutes all by themselves.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    32. Re:You mean they didn't before? by UninvitedCompany · · Score: 1

      Cellular tower equipment doesn't draw significantly less power when there are fewer active calls, so limiting calls to 911 would not extend the battery life by much. I know, I used to do power monitoring systems for the industry.

      The problem for carriers is that many sites won't allow generators. Tower sites usually will, although cost is a problem and in California getting a discharge permit from the air quality board is a problem. Getting fuel hauled in can be a problem for some of the more remote sites. Office buildings, apartment buildings, and so on usually will not allow generators because of safety problems with exhaust and fire code compliance problems with fuel storage. Water towers have contamination concerns from fuel storage.

      Most cellular carriers up until now have designed noncritical cell sites at tower locations for 2 hours battery time and usually have a transfer switch wired in place for external power from a trailer-mounted generator. Then they have generator trailers at a rate of about one trailer per 10 cell sites. When power losses aren't widespread and the roads are passable, that works OK except that you have techs spending their whole day driving around fueling up generators. Inside a building they will try to get emergency power from the building owner, and depending on the history of the site and the size of the coverage footprint they will increase battery capacity considerably.

      There are practical limits to how much battery capacity can be installed, because batteries are big and heavy. And batteries by themselves are not a guarantee, because the HVAC is not ordinarily on an inverter, and on a hot day in a rooftop installation you'll see the site shut down due to overtemp before it shuts down due to the low voltage disconnect for the battery string.

      On site generators aren't the perfect answer either. These sites are unattended. Generators don't always start, and unless a site has natural gas as one of its fuel sources (few do) you have a limited fuel supply, usually 3-7 days. With greater reliance on generators, and impassible roads, the fuel haulers may not be able to serve everyone that frequently.

    33. Re:You mean they didn't before? by SmoothTom · · Score: 1

      The cause was reportedly that some major remote terminal or unmanned switching station of some sort failed to switch back from battery backup to mains power after power was restored.


      That can happen, though it's not a failure to switch back from battery backup, its a failure to switch back to charging the batteries with commercial power.


      When there is a power failure, not only does everything continue to run on the batteries, a switch disconnects the incoming commercial power lines and another connects the generator(s). If the power driven switches don't change over from generator back to commercial power, and the generator shuts down, you are just on battery until they finally go flat.


      I've seen one failure where the switch disconnected the generator, but the other switch hung, and didn't reconnect commercial power. That was a staffed site, so it was caught.


      Actually, the most exciting power switch problem I saw what when the commercial power switch didn't open during a power failure, and when power came back, it was out of phase with the emergency power and two 1MW generators tried to jump off the floor and a good portion of the switch vaporized...


      I should mention that these "switches" are essentially giant relays about the size of a Volkswagen... Switching them was actually spring driven, and the springs were tensioned by big electric motors that wound them up. When the switch was tripped the pre-tensioned springs slammed the contacts open or closed.


      (Just to give an idea of the power levels involved, the "main battery discharge fuse" for the -48V in that office - the one that battery power went through first - was an 8400 Amp fuse... and there were five separate battery plants in that office: -48V, -24V, +67V, -130V and +130V. Normal draw on the -48V plant was 4100-4500 amps, and this was a fairly small urban office built in 1931... We could handle 30,000 lines. We also had a toll switch [long distance], a lot of microwave, an "0" operator center and a "411" information center in the central office building. All running on the batteries in the basement.)


      --

      Tomas

    34. Re:You mean they didn't before? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      This is a lot different. I bet you could pick a couple city blocks in the US with more cell towers than the whole island of Jamaica.

      The government telling people to exercise common sense would sound something more like: "Stop expecting the government and corporations to save you from every little thing. If you don't have phone service for a while, suck it up. You should have been better prepared yourself."

    35. Re:You mean they didn't before? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      You make it sound like it "goes bad" in just a few days. That's not at all true. It takes months, if not years. And it has nothing to do with microbes. It chemically degrades over time -- the result of modern high volume processing (see also: "cracking".) There are numerous commercial stabalizers that can keep fuels viable for decades. (some better than others.)

    36. Re:You mean they didn't before? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      After the 2003 blackout( I never lost my cell service but I know many who did. Many cell companies began a process of adding generators to as many towers as they could. the process lasted maybe 18 months and they missed a whole bunch but they did do some.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  2. That's alright, I know a guy by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know a guy, he can get you all the batteries you want, alike the brade of your choice, at 1/5 the price!

    --
    Just -1, Troll talking to another.
  3. At last by weorthe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Millions of people will be able to call each other to ask "is your power out too?"

    --
    cat * >> sig
    1. Re:At last by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      That is the most insightful comment I've seen today. It's like the users who call you and ask if the mail server is down as if I wouldn't notice something like the most critical service in the company stopping...

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    2. Re:At last by Kent+Recal · · Score: 4, Funny

      I usually just say "Yes, and the phone system is down, too. We're working on it, can you get back to me later?".
      Usually they just say ok and hang up, without even noticing...

    3. Re:At last by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I have a PP phone now that my company does not sponsor my phone. My boss insisted I give him my phone number for emergencies, upon which I explained to him I was on a metered line and that I have no "free" minutes. Each one costs $0.33. Since I'm often in a lab with only one desk phone (which is usually busy install more phones anyone?) my boss IMs me. One day IM was down. Thanks to a call timer, when he called me to ask if my IM was down as well I submitted an expense report for 66 cents.

      And I wonder why no-one calls :-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:At last by jamesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not quite as silly as you might think. In rural locations, it is quite possible that the power failure is very local (eg a possum climbed up the pole the night before and cooked a fuse (and itself)), and the power company won't know about it unless you tell them. Phoning up a neighbor is a reasonable thing to do in that case.

      This used to happen all the time at my mums place. The outage would affect her and the weekend house across the road (who would most likely be away). The neighbor up the hill would be a good indicator to it being a possum induced fuse failure or something more widespread.

      Ditto for a failure in your fusebox. If everyone else has power and you don't, there isn't much use calling the power company... I know most people reading this would have a tripped breaker fixed in a few seconds, but maybe your grandmother wouldn't know how to, and in fact she might still have fuse wire instead of a resettable breaker.

      Even for the mail server case, a user in a remote branch who hasn't received any email all morning would probably ask if the server was down before bothering you with their specific issue. Of course a good helpdesk would put up a recorded message in that case eg 'We are currently experiencing problems with our email server, we expect the problem to be fixed in xxx minutes'.

    5. Re:At last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we do it all the time here in India...:-D

    6. Re:At last by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Next time, do what I do, just send them an email that the email is down . . . oh, wait.

    7. Re:At last by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Of course a good helpdesk would put up a recorded message in that case eg 'We are currently experiencing problems with our email server, we expect the problem to be fixed in xxx minutes'. Here, let me fix that for ya:

      Of course the typical helpdesk would have emailed out a message in that case eg 'We are currently experiencing problems with our email server, we expect the problem to be fixed in xxx minutes'.
    8. Re:At last by Altus · · Score: 1


      I had a blackout this weekend and I called the power companies blackout line. While reporting the blackout to them was very easy (im sure I wasnt even the first one to do that) the automated system didnt have any information about the current blackout. You would think they could record a message that said "We are experienceing a blackout in some parts of (list towns here) we are working on it and expect to have it fixed in (insert inflated time estimate here)"

      But no such luck.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  4. Still have a problem by ninjapiratemonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The backup generators will probably not be very effective in preventing outages during natural disasters. Consider New Orleans: how many of generators can work while submerged underwater? Or California, where should an earthquake knock out the original power to a tower, it is just as likely to knock out the generator.

    --
    01110000 01010111 01101110 00110011 01100100
    1. Re:Still have a problem by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Informative
      Or California, where should an earthquake knock out the original power to a tower, it is just as likely to knock out the generator.


      Not so. That all depends on where the damage is. If it's at, or fairly near the tower, quite possibly. If the power's out because a power line was dropped by the temblor, there's a good chance that the cell tower and any generator are just fine. I remember after the Northridge Quake there were major power outages, but the equipment worked just fine as soon as the power was back. As far as floods go, there's no reason not to install them in waterproof rooms to make sure they're OK even if that room's under water.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Still have a problem by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well duh, how many US cities are built under sea level?

      New Orleans should be used as a land fill, till it is sufficiently raised to be viable again.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re:Still have a problem by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Funny

      The backup generators will probably not be very effective in preventing outages during natural disasters. Consider New Orleans: how many of generators can work while submerged underwater? Or California, where should an earthquake knock out the original power to a tower, it is just as likely to knock out the generator.

      Consider... Backup power good for just 72 hours, (batteries, etc) and connections by directional microwave. (common) Most disasters are short-lived events. It only takes one cell tower to provide communication coverage for a few square miles. Imagine what having such a system, even in NOLA, could do. That's 3 days of backup power, providing much-needed information to emergency first-responders and/or military response units.

      That's a big, big, big deal.

      Oh, and your California example is just silly. You mean, that an earthquake is just as likely to destroy a pack of batteries in a shielded metal box as it is to topple any of the thousands of power line towers (think tall, spindly,) or trees near power lines? That's ridiculous, and I'm surprised you posted it.

      What, for me, is surprising is that this wasn't already the case. This strikes me as so fundamental and so basic, and shows just how much profiteering is going on in the cellular industry. Despite having infrastructure investment costs orders of magnitude cheaper than copper, and a less-than-complete requirement for cellular coverage, (Can you hear me now, anyone?) I pay MORE for cellular than I do for land lines? That's just absurd...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:Still have a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even areas that were above sea level still got substantial flooding -- as in 10+ feet in some areas. I lived in an area in Mississippi affected by Katrina, and very near the huge areas that were totally flooded. I know. :)

      Being below sea level just means it takes longer to get the water out. A major hurricane "pushes" a substantial amount of water in front of it called the storm surge. In Katrina's case, the storm surge shattered records and flooded not only lower-lying areas in Mississippi (which are also the most populous in the state), but many higher areas. Thousands of people who had been told they would never need flood insurance lost their homes. Thus the squabble today.

    5. Re:Still have a problem by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Or more likely knock out (over) the tower.

    6. Re:Still have a problem by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Funny
      That's ridiculous, and I'm surprised you posted it.


      You must be new here.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    7. Re:Still have a problem by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Or California, where should an earthquake knock out the original power to a tower, it is just as likely to knock out the generator.

      iM iN aN EaRtHqUaKe rIgHt NoW, aNd i DoN'T SeE aNy Pro%~`1#& , .

    8. Re:Still have a problem by sponga · · Score: 1

      Earthquakes are not as devastating as they used to be or as people make them out to be in California mainly because of home building code improvements and overall infrastructure improvement; mainly just in San Fransisco area where the big one is coming. Cal Edison is doing massive upgrades to the electrical infrastructure in California, so most of the power remains on even in a bad earthquake. Electric towers(strong A-frames/etc) and poles are buried deep(20 ft+) in the ground; they will not be easily knocked down unless you are at the epicenter.

      Hell during the North Ridge quake we didn't lose power but instead watched the news people in the morning start looking around as the studio shook and than you heard the earthquake approaching which sounded like a 100 freight trains coming at you, pretty hilarious and later on that day we went to Knott's Berry Farm where all the rides were still working.

      I don't see why a generator would be knocked out of commission when it is most likely bolted to the ground and the worst that would happen is it would move a foot or so during movement, most cords are flexible anyways and we Californians can easily survive up to a 9.0+ for most homes.

      New Orleans is just basically uninhabitable geographically and it would be pointless to provide power to a flooded city where everything would short out in the water, unless you raise the whole city and electrical lines in homes out of the water. They just have to ride it out unless they can get a temporary cell tower in the air somehow on a blimp/plane.

      Living in the Midwest is a completely different story because of the intense storms and freezes they get; even if they had generators you would have to have huge reserve tanks of gas because you would most likely not be able to get out to it to refill. They basically just have to ride it out like they have been doing and find some good neighbors to hang tough with.

      How do some of the colder European countries handle some of these situations, although it is hard to compare since the U.S. is a lot larger and some of the communities might be closer together?

    9. Re:Still have a problem by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      Presumably the tower would be located on high land or on top of buildings, putting it and the generators at lower risk of rising floodwaters. And during earthquakes, large amounts of buildings don't usually collapse. A few older buildings and structures collapse and large numbers of buildings receive light to moderate damage. Power failures are caused mostly by ruptured transmission lines, not by knocking out the actual power source.

    10. Re:Still have a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I had always assumed we were already using New Orleans as a landfill.

    11. Re:Still have a problem by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      um...
      Exhaust and intake?
      can't exactly run them up the same tower can you? Engines don't work so well sucking on their own exhaust fumes, whiteness my merc diesel and the brain-dead California EPA putting an EGR valve on it.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    12. Re:Still have a problem by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I don't see why a generator would be knocked out of commission when it is most likely bolted to the ground and the worst that would happen is it would move a foot or so during movement, most cords are flexible anyways and we Californians can easily survive up to a 9.0+ for most homes You give most homes in Ca too much credit. Most people too. High 7's no prob, 8's start getting touchy, 9.anything is gonna suck... bad.
      -nB
      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    13. Re:Still have a problem by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Or California, where should an earthquake knock out the original power to a tower, it is just as likely to knock out the generator. No earthquake ever had as much effect to the power grid as that forest fire several states away did in the mid 1990s which knocked out the power grid to most of the Western United States. The Big Bear/Landers quake lit off those cannister thingies on power poles around me like fireworks, but power was restored faster than in that later fire.

      Oh and *my* servers stayed up because we had generators when the fire took out Silicon Valley and everyone else. My first +1 year Linux server uptime was split before and after that fire.
    14. Re:Still have a problem by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Hell during the North Ridge quake we didn't lose power but instead watched the news people in the morning start looking around as the studio shook and than you heard the earthquake approaching which sounded like a 100 freight trains coming at you, pretty hilarious and later on that day we went to Knott's Berry Farm where all the rides were still working. I was in a 7-11 buying gasoline when that thing struck and it felt like a big giant had taken hold of the building and was slamming it up and down. But you're right, power was only out for a little bit if at all and I was something like a mile or two from Knott's Berry Farm.
    15. Re:Still have a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's just overflow for New Jersey.

    16. Re:Still have a problem by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Plus, cell towers are usually built on hillsides (where available) for signal propagation reasons, so they tend to be A. above the water line in all but the most extreme floods, and B. built on bedrock, and thus less susceptible to quake damage.

      Your biggest problems are likely to be lack of working generators, lack of enough fuel to keep them running, failure of batteries to function correctly due to improper testing, and in some climates, failure of generators to start due to low temperatures (causing both thicker oil around the crankshafts and weaker battery performance to spin the starter). In hot (particularly desert) climates, you might also add in the risk of LiIon batter explosions, dried out insulators that no longer insulate, and other similar issues. I guess we could lump all of those last few under "failure to anticipate typical local weather conditions".... :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    17. Re:Still have a problem by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      Exhaust and intake?


      Simply a matter of proper design so that they're far enough apart that the intake isn't sucking in the exhaust. Of course, there's always the possibility that the flood water will be deep enough to submerge them, but as long as they're above the surface the generators could keep working. (Yes, refueling them might also be a problem. Nothing's perfect.)

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    18. Re:Still have a problem by Technician · · Score: 1

      Power failures are caused mostly by ruptured transmission lines, not by knocking out the actual power source.

      Not anymore. After an earthquake the down power lines cause fires and secondary hazzards. As a safety upgrade many power plants are designed to shutdown in an earthquake, not to protect the generation plant, but to protect the city.

      "When the earthquake struck, Intermountain's two 800-million-watt stations at the Delta plant automatically shut down, cutting off 50 percent of the power for the cities of Burbank, Anaheim, Glendale, Pasadena and Riverside. Intermountain's system is designed to shut down automatically in such incidents to avoid flooding Los Angeles with electricity that would have nowhere to go, causing the remaining generating stations in Utah to burn up because so many facilities and transmission lines would be down and the generators would speed up. "

      http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E06E0DB1630F93BA25752C0A962958260

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    19. Re:Still have a problem by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Log scales are a bitch. 10 is total destruction, full stop.

    20. Re:Still have a problem by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      How do some of the colder European countries handle some of these situations, although it is hard to compare since the U.S. is a lot larger and some of the communities might be closer together?

      Not really a straight comparison. Europe hasn't been doing the whole "Growing fast in relatively untested waters" thing that the US has been doing. I live in Florida right now, the city 7 miles to my North didn't exist 35 years ago, and it's now one of the most populous cities in Florida.

      Florida. A huge swamp. In the middle of a major Hurricane zone. With lots of tornadoes.

      Now, I used to live in Britain. Britain gets hit by hurricane force winds once every five to ten years - but we're so used to it that most British people reading this are right now thinking "WTF is he talking about?" I recall my mother once calling me while the eye of a storm went over her home in Wales around 5 years ago. The next day she told me about a brick wall that had fallen on her business partner's car and other such damage.

      And a few months later she asked me what I was talking about when I mentioned it to her. It only clicked when I mentioned the wall.

      BTW guess which country supposedly has the largest number of tornadoes per square mile? More than Texas? Unbelievably to me, it's the UK. They're not very big, and rarely do that much damage, but obviously they amount to a hazard.

      Here's the thing: it's not that you can't live in a hurricane and tornado infested swamp. You can. It's just Floridians are still trying to make it work. We don't have hundreds of years of experience of getting large numbers of people to live well in this kind of environment. In Britain, homes are generally built to withstand the winds we have hundreds of years of experience dealing with. In Florida, most homes are barely ten years old, and those that are older are very often not built to modern codes. Roofs are frequently put on homes that in the UK would be considered temporary, needing to be completely replaced every 10-20 years. In the UK most cabling (power, phone, etc) is put underground or attached to the outside of buildings except for remote rural areas. In this part of Florida, there are poles carrying power, phone, and cable TV everywhere, there are few if any underground wires. During the last four years we were hit by major hurricanes in this area three times, each time taking out the power as trees toppled on lines, and older, rotting, poles were broken.

      These decisions are made - the temporary roofs, the fragile power lines, etc - because everything is being rebuilt from scratch with little experience of the area's unique conditions and with cost always being a factor, especially when you're talking about a high growth area like Florida. Over time, these issues will be resolved. But for now, the disasters will always feel a little worse and the infrastructure screwed up more than it could be because we just haven't had the time to get everything right. In 2107, when a Cat 5 Hurricane Bush hits this area of Florida, I suspect there'll be a few people upset that their flying car got hit by trees, or garden walls that collapsed, but the power will stay on, the phones will work, the roofs will stay on.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    21. Re:Still have a problem by BBandCMKRNL · · Score: 1

      One place I worked had a diesel generator backup installed. When the first power outage hit, it was discovered that that the diesel exhaust was upwind of the HVAC intake for the data center. Shortly thereafter, the diesel exhaust stack was extended enough so that it no longer fed the HVAC intake.

      --
      Without the 2nd Amendment, the others are just suggestions.
    22. Re:Still have a problem by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "not to protect the generation plant, but to protect the city."

      That's not what the article said. The problem is that, when power lines and substations go down, the electrical load on the powerplant is drastically lightened. This decreases the load on the generator, which will want to start spining faster. Since the controls for large powerplants simply aren't designed to react that fast, you dump the steam from the boiler to atmosphere or the condenser, which lets the turbine and generator spin down on their own but also takes the plant off line. Then, when the load stabilizes, adjust the boiler output appropriately, re-sync to the grid, and connect.

      Imagine driving up a very steep hill, with the engine under heavy load. Now, for some reason, you transmission shifts to neutral. The engine will typically hit redline before you can lift your foot off the accelerator. If this were to happen with relative frequency, you might install a rev limiter on the engine that kills power before hitting the redline, but it doesn't do it particularly gracefully. (I actually just descibed rev limiters in teh days before electronic engine management).

      I think the line about "to avoid flooding Los Angeles with electricity that would have nowhere to go", may have mislead you - that's right up there with "a series of tubes" .

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    23. Re:Still have a problem by alienw · · Score: 1

      Um... is there any reason why you can't put the exhaust and intake snorkels 6 feet above the roof of the generator room?

    24. Re:Still have a problem by alienw · · Score: 1

      Profiteering? More like competition gone out of control. Imagine how much it would cost if wireline communications had like 20 different companies running wires to the same building, and fighting with each other for the privilege. That is what's happening in the US. Getting spectrum and locating towers is kind of a bitch, in case you didn't know. And of course you need 5 times as many towers and spectrum, since Sprint can't exactly use Verizon or AT&T cell towers/frequencies.

      In any case, the US probably has the cheapest landline phone service of any industrialized country. In Europe, landlines were always billed at assrape prices, which explains the popularity of cellphones over there (despite the fact that they are about the same price as prepaid phones in the US).

    25. Re:Still have a problem by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      What, for me, is surprising is that this wasn't already the case. This strikes me as so fundamental and so basic, and shows just how much profiteering is going on in the cellular industry. Despite having infrastructure investment costs orders of magnitude cheaper than copper, and a less-than-complete requirement for cellular coverage,

      You don't even have to go that far. The decision not to provide battery backup is economically foolish. The bastards CHARGE BY THE MINUTE. A power outage means that you're not making money. Money that could be used to pay for batteries that will keep your tower running when the mains go out.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  5. Solar by proudfoot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe self powering solar paneled towers might be better. You'd be helping the environment as well as providing backup. And the height of these towers are perfect for a wind turbine + battery installation as well.
    Even if it's not perfectly reliable, such a tower could be connected to the grid, and in the event of emergency, it'll be at the very least, intermittent,which is enough for some traffic to flow out for a very long time. With a battery/generator, you'd only have power, while reliable, for a limited amount of time.

    1. Re:Solar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I move that in any situation where more environment friendly sources of power could be used we use the phrase 'less harmful to' instead of 'helping'. Seriously, this bugs me almost as much as companies trying to be "CO2 Neutral". Stuff we want costs energy, not just the usage of it but also the manufacturing, distribution, installation and maintenance. Now make all these solar powered.. and you're still not 'helping', you're just going for par. and that's not counting the energy costs of producing the solar cells.

      Not that there's anything wrong with using solar powered cell towers. But it's in no way 'helpful' to the environment.

    2. Re:Solar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop breathing. You are wasting the Earth's precious oxygen. - Al Gore

    3. Re:Solar by dasunst3r · · Score: 1

      I was also going to suggest adding solar, but that was taken. Doing so would bring about lots of benefits:
      1. Less power draw from the power grid (or even contribute to the power grid)
      2. (slightly) Lower generator power requirement (if the company so chooses to add one anyway)
      3. Green image for the company

      As for the battery pack, one might want to use super/ultra capacitors.

    4. Re:Solar by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      1) Wind is stronger higher up.
      2) There is a fairly constant wind all along the coastlines.
      3) Solar panels can be used over virtually the entire outer surface of a tower.
      4) Alternatives to batteries are coming up fast.

      Although I agree that wind and solar would ultimately be impractical.

    5. Re:Solar by Dahamma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right, I'm sure all those churches, schools, etc that agreed (with compensation, of course) to put a cleverly inconspicuous cell tower in their steeples and flag poles are going to love 1000 sq feet of solar panels, or a giant wind turbine in the middle of town.

      Though as the article mentions, it's not like they are going to allow a big generator and battery, either...

    6. Re:Solar by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Solar panels cannot be used on the outside of the tower. Wind loading would pull the tower to the ground. It's not built to support that, only to support a frame structure and RF equipment.

    7. Re:Solar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The disparity between the amount of wind on the ground to the top of the tower isn't as great as those giant wind turbines you see. We're talking about non trivial, consistent power here, not the occasional strong breeze.

      your second point restricts the towers to certain geographical areas. That won't help much in Des Moines.

      Both your suggestions about panels and wind turbines significantly add more weight to the tower. Now to be able to support those structures we will need to pour more money into each and every tower. Not very efficient.

      The alternatives to batteries I will give you. But can't you wind and solar enthusiasts come to terms that they can't just be tacked on everything and just work. And just like you said "coming soon", efficient small scale wind and solar with adequate output at the right time (read Emergencies) just aren't there yet. Maybe in the coming years but not now. We'd be better off with perhaps having a small scale hydrogen fuel cell pack.

  6. This was a reason I still have a landline.... by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    During the east coast power failure a couple of years back, cell phones were useless because the towers were dead. Landlines worked just fine. I've always felt that the cell companies weren't doing enough to build out their infrastructure to support big events. They'd just have enough in place to provide average service.

    Ma Bell and the landline service has been built out for generations and it shows.

    1. Re:This was a reason I still have a landline.... by XO · · Score: 1

      Verizon and Sprint had generators operating many of their cell sites into the 3rd day. Unfortunatly, after the 3rd day, gasoline supplies began to run out, and the gas stations were pretty much all closed, unless you could bring it in from the nearest places outside the blackout zone, which to where I was was about 90 miles.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    2. Re:This was a reason I still have a landline.... by Dantu · · Score: 1

      During the east coast power failure a couple of years back, cell phones were useless because the towers were dead.

      Depends where you lived. I was in Waterloo Ontario at the time, and never lost a signal with my provider (Telus). The signal started getting weaker after the first day or so, presumably as the backups on some of the towers started to die. On the other hand, I had friends with another provider (Rogers) who's phones went dead or got only a poor signal when the power went out, but started to get a signal later as the provider dispatched generators to the towers. For me a bigger problem was that I had no way of charging my phone, so in another day or two it wouldn't have really mattered to me +if the towers were up or now.

    3. Re:This was a reason I still have a landline.... by kevorkian · · Score: 1

      Now ... I may be a little out of it but the way I remember "the east coast outage a few years back" most of the power was back on that night. Where were you that it took more then 3 days to get the power back on ?

    4. Re:This was a reason I still have a landline.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak for him, but I lived near Cleveland, OH at the time and though I don't remember exactly how long the power was out, it was definitely measured in days not hours.

    5. Re:This was a reason I still have a landline.... by XO · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I was referring to the "northeast" power outage, that affected Ohio, Michigan, New York, and bits of Canada.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    6. Re:This was a reason I still have a landline.... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Ma Bell and the landline service has been built out for generations and it shows.

      Ma Bell works when no one else does because it's a requirement by law. Cellular networks are not deemed monopolies like Ma Bell, and therefore are unencumbered by the reliability expectations incumbent local exchange carriers are required to provide.

      I don't believe cellular providers should have the cost burden thrust upon them because people demand to be able to use their phones after huge disasters occur. If you want that level of service, be prepared for the cost of cellular service to rise, as the cost is just going to be tacked on to your existing service.

    7. Re:This was a reason I still have a landline.... by negative3 · · Score: 1

      I've always felt that the cell companies weren't doing enough to build out their infrastructure to support big events. They'd just have enough in place to provide average service.

      That's exactly how cellular networks are designed. Do you know why? MONEY. Cell providers build just enough capacity in certain areas to get as much money as they can while providing adequate service. Their delivered quality of service is just good enough to not drive people to other carriers. Their networks get completely saturated during emergencies like 9/11? Of course, because they never intended for them to be used by everyone at the same time. They never tried to be part of a critical infrastructure - there isn't any money in that.

      If the POTS system had been put in place today, would we have the same level of service that we have with the system put in place by AT&T? No. The level of redundancy and reliability in the landline system would never have been profitable to anyone but a monopoly.

      --
      "Physics is to math what sex is to masturbation." - Richard Feynman
  7. A problem that won't exist by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
    Municipalities are bracing for disputes as carriers try to add generators or batteries to cell sites on rooftops or water towers.


    I find it hard to believe that this is going to be an issue. The batteries don't have to be up on the roof, or on top of the water tower to be effective. Yes, the closer the better, but I doubt there will be more than a handful of places where there's no other place for them.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:A problem that won't exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kdawson nailed this correctly when he tagged it as the generating-controversy. What a complete non-issue.
      Honestly I half expected a few Slashpeople to rail against the FCC for requiring backup power, but I'm glad I haven't seen any such posts.

    2. Re:A problem that won't exist by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Honestly I half expected a few Slashpeople to rail against the FCC for requiring backup power, but I'm glad I haven't seen any such posts. Having lived my entire life on the ring of fire on either side of the ocean, I consider such a law to be in the same vein as one requiring people to breathe a certain number of times per minute. What kind of idiots does the FCC think Americans are?

      It's common sense, required and shouldn't need to be a law. How stupid do they want the American IT industry to look to the world?

      What next? Do we need a law requiring American IT professionals to not stick their fingers into light sockets while in the bathtub? Or maybe a law requiring people not to carry and use a notebook computer while swimming in a swimming pool?

      Breathe in, breathe out. Breathe in, breathe out ...

      There, are you happy now?
    3. Re:A problem that won't exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No law required if kindly worded letters were sent out. That'd work, right?

    4. Re:A problem that won't exist by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The problem is most cellphone customers don't think about reliability and those that do have no way of getting good data on the backup measures in place for the areas they use thier cellphone in so it is not in the cell providers interests to provide robust service just to provide service that works most of the time.

      But people not thinking about something doesn't mean it's not important. With more and more people abandoning conventional landlines reliability of other communication services during disasters is going to become more and more important.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  8. All CDMA are backed up already by XO · · Score: 1

    All CDMA systems have power backup facilities built into their equipment. ALL of them have battery power to some degree, and have interfaces for generators to be connected to them as well.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    1. Re:All CDMA are backed up already by SaDan · · Score: 1

      I can believe this. I've never had a problem using my CDMA cell phone during a widespread outage, where some of my co-workers with iPhones can't get a signal until the lights come back in a lot of places.

      I work for a wireless ISP. Hell, even WE have battery backup at most of our towers (working on getting battery to ALL of the towers), and even have several generators that we can run around for a couple hours at a time to charge up batteries during an extended outage. Getting ready for another ice storm in the midwest!

    2. Re:All CDMA are backed up already by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      GSM systems are often mixed between two frequencies. It would not be at all surprising if they only backed up primary towers (850/900) and don't back up extra towers (1800/1900) that just provide fill coverage for weak areas, as these are more likely to be in places where a hefty backup system would be impractical (on church bell towers, corporate rooftops, etc.). The main towers should be backed up though. If that isn't the case in your area, that's just sad.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:All CDMA are backed up already by SaDan · · Score: 1

      It isn't the case in our area. We have a 300' tower across the street from AT&T's 450' tower. We have battery (5-6 hours) and generator, they have very limited battery (2 hours or less, from what I can tell).

    4. Re:All CDMA are backed up already by papasui · · Score: 1

      Where there's a way to save a dollar there's a dude willing to take that chance. All is a big word to toss around.

    5. Re:All CDMA are backed up already by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      What area, if I might ask, so I can make sure I don't move there? :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  9. Disaster response? by brownsteve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am a ham radio operator and concern myself with disaster preparedness. With POTS (plain old telephone system) everyone is guaranteed their own connection, complete with line backup power so you can use the phone even if the power's out. Sometimes the switches overload and "all circuits are busy" but in most situations it's worked pretty well for the last century.

    I worry about the trend to move to cell phones. We rely on both our cell phone's battery and the cell tower to stay powered. We also rely on available frequencies to use the tower. In Katrina and recently the San Diego fires, everyone immediately got on their cell phones and jammed all of the towers. Is there enough redundancy, power, and capacity to handle the next disaster? I don't think we should wait for the next hurricane to prove if cell towers can handle an emergency.

    1. Re:Disaster response? by JavaManJim · · Score: 1

      Hammy, your mind is in the right place. The current paradigm is for flash and dash on the cheap. Business continuity is an orphan project at companies. We need to roll back to 1960 and plan for outages! For just the reasons you describe.

      When I worked for ARCO Oil and Gas in the 1980's, they counted on the power being out. So they spent 13 million 1980 dollars to run a duplicate high power line from another grid to back up their data center. So their data center was served by two separate power grids. Also ARCO had an empty data center in Independence KS and an agreement with IBM to ship big iron if the Plano data center was ever zapped.

      Cheers,
      Jim

    2. Re:Disaster response? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Well technically it should be simpler and more effective to run a "small" single-site tower (esp. in an emergency) than to run a grid that covers the same area that has random lines running under and above ground that could randomly be cut, over- or abused, short circuited, damaged and that needs extensive operations to be totally replaced. That the cell phone companies cheaped out on their customers while landlines have been installed, regulated and supported historically by local and federal governments (so lots of taxpayers money was sunk in those things) in the time that businesses still were run by a human (and not by an organization of crooks and lawyers (redundant)) that can be held accountable.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:Disaster response? by smchris · · Score: 1

      Count me in as old and crusty too.

      Seems like something promoted by the generator manufacturers' association. 210,000? I guess that's why they're the FCC and I'm not. Big thinking.

      So, they'll sit in their boxes at each cell company's disaster-fortified warehouse until needed? Or it will provide jobs for people to change the oil and gas and test (and guard?) them periodically on or off site? I'm assuming the former. So it's sort of like the big Pharma handouts we give them to stock warehouses of drugs that get thrown out because we didn't need them over the course of their expiration.

      Hey, it's only money. Soooo much better than POTS.

    4. Re:Disaster response? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      oh yes. the backup systems on the POTS around here is quite stunning. the batteries alone (a few racks of 48V ones about the size of beer kegs) will run the system for about 8 hours and they have a pair of nice big diesel generators for after that (one is more than enough to run everything (including the offices!), but redundancy is good in emergency systems), with about 2 weeks worth of fuel, with electrical and manual pumps to the gravity-feed day tanks. redundancy in spades.

      significantly less backup for rural areas (the concentrators have about 10 hours of battery), but they'll usually be out with a generator within 5 hours if the power co. says it'll be out longer than 8.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    5. Re:Disaster response? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Almost all of Verizon's cell (ok, PCS) sites have backup power. That's why they advertise "most reliable network." But, like you, I have my own back-up power for my station for when it gets really nasty.

      73, de w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    6. Re:Disaster response? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I don't think we should wait for the next hurricane to prove if cell towers can handle an emergency.


      We don't have too. Try making several calls while stuck on the freeway during rush-hour traffic. All surrounding towers get jammed up calling family and the office. But with at least three attempts, you'll get through and obtain a connection.

      I can only imagine the impact of a major natural event.
      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Disaster response? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the cell tower is a central point of failure. A disaster hits and the cell tower goes out... oops, everyone in the area loses service. Forget about a power outage, the disaster is likely to take out the tower itself.

      POTS? It's like the Internet. Yeah, your line might get cut, but then you run next door and use your neighbor's.

    8. Re:Disaster response? by $random_var · · Score: 1

      Maybe cell phones should have a "power emergency" mode in which the processor is sharply downclocked, the only radio that is turned on is the GSM, and it boots into a low-demand OS which just has a contact list and dialing interface (and maybe SMS too). And it has strict power-saving, with the screen and radio turning off after x seconds of disuse. Maybe you could hook a crank up to the vibrator motor to generate a weak current. Cell coverage could be provided in a disaster by a fleet of blimps. That wouldn't work in stormy conditions, but it would probably be great following a nice big California earthquake. How cool would that be... look on the horizon, see this fleet of blimps powering your way, and think "finally! the blimps are here, so everything's all right!"

    9. Re:Disaster response? by bananaendian · · Score: 1

      I'm also a ham radio operator involved in emergency comms.

      Here in Europe the adoption of cell phones has by now caused POTS to be being reduced in some areas. People are cancelling their POTS subscriptions because every family member has a cell phone.

      People don't realize how vulnerable the cell phone network is. Towers here have very small UPS's, usually enough for a few minute outages, and the connectors for external generators are there just for the image. Nobody seriesly thinks that we could hook up generators to the towers and keep refueling them when a disaster takes out a large area.

      The problem is series around cities where there's a lot of people with cell phones. Those towers will be completely jammed immediately since there is very little extra capacity. The whole cell network is designed expecting only a fraction of users to use it at any given time. When there is a large gathering of people like a sports event, cell companies routinely upgrade their towers to cope or even bring in extra mobile towers.

      The few emergencies we've has around here, the cell network has always jammed. And to make matters worse, emergency personnel have gotten used to using their cell phones for co-ordination. The fire department has stubornly kept their old VHF-radios since they learned of the situation the hard way. And VHF actually works more reliably inside buildings then any of the digital modulations schemes developed so far.

      --
      www.tribalnetworks.org - helping tribal people around the world to own their own means of high-tech communications
    10. Re:Disaster response? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have you been? There are thousands of small remote switches (SLCs) with nothing but local battery power. After uncounted times where my POTS line was out because the SLC ran down its battery, I gave up on POTS. They trundle out a portable generator to recharge the batteries on a cell site serving hundreds of people long before they bother with remote switches with 20 or 40 land lines.

    11. Re:Disaster response? by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      I am a ham radio operator and concern myself with disaster preparedness.

      Am a ham with a general license. While it would be bad for everyone looking to hit a cell tower...I have my 5W handheld VHF/UHF with an extra battery pack & a mobile 50W unit I can take out of my shack & put in my car in a matter of minutes. Am waiting for the time when this does happen. Sure...either one of these bands won't get me very far...at least in an emergency...I will have communications & can help my neighbors & be doing my talking the way it's been done for the past 100+ years.

      I don't think we should wait for the next hurricane to prove if cell towers can handle an emergency.

      As we've seen over & over again...the cell or any commercial "broadcast" industry will never be to the point of being fully ready for any type of large scale emergency like Katrina or worse. (The cost & benefit for them isn't worth the cost or expense to them...since many commercial stations are on satellite links anyway.) That's why hams are even more important in emergencies. Sure...our equipment can't fit in our pockets...play the latest tunes & not in the latest trendy colors...but in an emergency...I don't care how new the equipment is...just as long as it gets a signal from point A to point B.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    12. Re:Disaster response? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "With POTS (plain old telephone system) everyone is guaranteed their own" Is a HUGE misnomer. In the US there is NO place where you such exists. You DO have a physical Connection. You are NOT guaranteed even a connection to the Local upstream Phone Switch. In almost all cases the blocking ratio (number of lines of subscribers to actual lines usable at once) is at LEAST 10:1 and most places its well over 15:1 or 25:1. That is _JUST_ at your local upstream phone switch. Blocking from there to the other interconnected switchs exists as well. This is EXACTLY why during any sort of "disaster" situation you HAVE so much "all circuits are busy". Because people are ALL trying to make a call at the same time, which is NOT the usual case.

      Another point there are VERY VERY few Central Offices [COs] and Local Switching Offices [LSO] that DO _NOT_ already have battery backup systems _AND_ generator systems. Typical run times on most of these is 24 hrs or longer at full load WITHOUT the generator.

      Cellular Towers is an entirely different issue.

    13. Re:Disaster response? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute buddy. I am also a ham, and since two or more hams never agree on anything, please allow me to point out that nobody is "guaranteed" anything in telecom. Never has been. Never will be.

      POTS runs on poles in most places. Same poles that carry power. Ice storms have a habit of knocking out those poles which will knock out POTS, power, CATV, whatever else is tacked on. If

      There's not some God of telecom standing around saying "Oh, that's a POTS pole... can't ice and fail that one... tsk..tsk... but that one over there is electricity so it's DOOM for that one! ha ha!"

      The real trick to telephony is that most people really don't have anything to say and the system would deal with emergencies better if those people would simply shut the heck up and resist the urge to call the entire world to let them know it's raining, or worse, that the power has gone out.

      Son: Hello?
      Grandma: My power is out.
      Son: I am 4000 miles away. WHAT do you expect me to do about it.
      Grandma: Wheel comes on in an hour. I can't heat up my oatmeal. Where is my knitting?
      Son: !@#$%

      For me it's more like this:

      Outside sound: kzzzztzzztttzztttzz zzaaAAAAPP BOOM! (transformer explodes)
      Lights go out. In my home, multiple UPS systems kick on, beeping.
      Me: WHAT DID YOU SAY!?! I CAN'T HEAR YOU OVER ALL THE BEEPING AND THE TV IS (STILL) ON TOO LOUD!
      Me: I COULD CALL SOMEONE ... if I had any friends. In fact, I haven't actually placed a call from my home line in six months. Who cares if it goes out?

    14. Re:Disaster response? by seann · · Score: 1

      Don't talk on your cell phone while driving, bitch.

      Just yesterday night I had somebody cut me off on the freeway while talking on their cell phone, ten minutes later a gigantic deer jumped in front of my car. I swerved to the right, I'll never forget the sound that night, The screamin' tires, the bustin' glass, The painful scream that I heard last.

      Oh, where oh where can my baby be? The Lord took her away from me. She's gone to heaven, so I got to be good. So I can see my baby when I leave this world.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    15. Re:Disaster response? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      POTS has central points of failure too. There's a single switch someplace near you that serves you and 10,000 of your closest friends. It's got some redundancy against equipment failure (just like cell towers), but if the site was physically damaged in some significant way you'd all lose your phone service at the same time.

    16. Re:Disaster response? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it's got less points of failure. Which sounds like an oxy-moron... I suppose the problem with cell networks is that they're semi-distributed, just enough to be a problem. With a POTS switching station there are few enough that you can easily have redundant systems and if it goes down you can get people there to repair it quickly, like the main DNS servers, for example. If your cell tower goes down, particularly during a disaster, there are lots of them, and it'll take longer to get people there to fix, yet each one still serves a big enough area that it could be difficult to get to the next cell.

      Someone else mentioned that POTS tends to stay up during things like ice storms (and hurricanes I'd imagine) because most of the lines are buried these days. It's hard to bury a cell antenna.

    17. Re:Disaster response? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I'm sure we'll soon see ads for devices to charge your cell phone using power from your POTS line so you can make emergency calls!

    18. Re:Disaster response? by All+Names+Have+Been · · Score: 1

      POTS doesn't guarantee anything. I have a house in a good-sized city. During two power outages that were longer than four hours, I've lost phone service because a local phone box had it's batteries fail. Not all POTS lines are CO powered. This was also the reason why I couldn't get DSL there. Not to mention that this is an older neighborhood with lots of overhead lines and trees, which themselves have caused me to lose phone and power more times than I can count.

      The only thing that's worked consistently in these situations was my net connection (dual-fuel generator FTW!) and my cell phone.

      With any real disaster (like Katrina) you really can't rely on anything working, POTS, cell, 'net, or grid power. Of course, you hams are some of the few people concerned about disaster preparedness and actually have the gear necessary to remain useful.

  10. I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service! by Zymergy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am currently in a power outage with NO Cellular Service (of any type)! This actually *sucks* and is inexcusable (considering what I pay!)
    Those Damn Ice Storms here in the Central US (today and yesterday). (Generators/UPS are so so nice!)
    Had Cell Service (with AT&T/Cingular) for about 3 hours following the outage (currently the largest single outage in my state's history)... but apparently the cell-site UPS batteries drained and the tower site did not have a generator...
    I am going to ask for a prorated refund for my service plan (and they will legally HAVE TO give me that discount for my contracted service being out).
    If EVERYONE called up their service providers and asked specifically for their prorated discount for service being out (on that given day)... I bet they would invest in UPS/Generator combos at the cell tower sites... -Z

  11. Thief Opportunity by JavaManJim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    EASY PICKINGS? In Texas and the nearby states like OK, KS, NM, etc, there are zillions of cell towers in the middle of nowhere. What an opportunity for thieves if these all had little generators nearby. I hope a better paradigm that what I describe is used.

    NEW CASH COW? Its bad enough in Dallas where miles lights were out along the divided highways in the Summer of 2006 because thieves pulled out the connecting. This was bad in the summer of 2006 and its better now since openings have been welded shut. I can see generators being the new cash cow for thieves.

    Thanks
    Jim

    1. Re:Thief Opportunity by doon · · Score: 1

      Don't laugh. I've worked for a rural telco, and when the power went out, we had enough batteries to run for a bunch of hours (8+) at our remotes. So we had some time before we had to go and put the generators on (they where not automatic, unlike the CO). We had a couple of cases where someone would actually steal the gen off the side of the remote. It had happened enough time, that as part of our y2k plan, we actually had armed members of the line crew set to stand guard at some of the more remote, remotes.

      --
      To E-mail me, replace the first period in my domain with an @
    2. Re:Thief Opportunity by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      That should be easy to prevent. Just have an intrusion alarm that calls via the cell tower. Maybe add a concealed webcam.

    3. Re:Thief Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so that you can watch them steal the generator over the web?

    4. Re:Thief Opportunity by ap7 · · Score: 1

      Here in India, all cellphone towers sport backup facilities like batteries and generator sets despite the dangers of theft, expense of diesel and maintenance of gensets and always have. Mobile phone service here is extremely reliable despite all the power outages (5 hrs daily where I live in the city and 12 hrs daily in rural areas), thanks to stupid fucking politicians who didn't allow powerplants to come up for years.

      A huge number of people have surrenedered their fixed line phones and now rely completely on cellphones. Having generator backups is a good thing, especially if you are aiming for a network that can stay alive for atleast some time during natural disasters.

    5. Re:Thief Opportunity by JavaManJim · · Score: 1

      Hi Doon (and you like Lorna Doone cookies?)

      Interesting and most likely a good idea to have an armed line crew watching your generators. Its a funny world when the comfortable standard society fades and the edge of society comes to the forefront. Like after the Katrina hurricanes and in Blade Runner.

      It might not be a good idea to have armed line crew when and if the union strikes. As you know, telco strikes can be subtly nasty affairs.

      Have a great Christmas,
      Jim

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. 24 hours is not enough by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Informative
    A generator is far less likely to get knocked out that power lines. Consider how many points of failure there are in grid-provided power.

    24 hours is sufficent to cover for brief, minor outages. It is not enough to cover for anything close to a natural disaster where many sites lose power and there are not enough resources to fix them all in 24 hours.

    Here in New Zealand, all our telecom has 24 hour battery backup but it is sized "just right". Last year we lost power for approx 40 hours due to a severe snow storm. The phones lasted for appeox 25 hours.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:24 hours is not enough by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      If I was designing the system I'd mandate a week minimum.

      Too many things can knock out power for 24 hours.
      If something knocks out power for a week, and you haven't made a emergency phone call yet, then your fine.

    2. Re:24 hours is not enough by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that earlier this year in July? In Northland my work was out for 24hrs, but at home it was out for over three days! IIRC every generator in the country sold out on the first day.

    3. Re:24 hours is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh, the fools! If only they'd built it with 6001 hulls! When will they ever learn!

  14. Looting by Tilzs · · Score: 1

    Since power and generators in particular are in very short supply after a disaster such as a major hurricane, what is going to prevent people from just looting the generators for their own needs? Seems to me they would be high priority targets. Hey need some way to watch that new flat panel

    1. Re:Looting by headbulb · · Score: 1

      The generators are large and bolted to the concrete.

      They arn't going to be looted. Then a thief would have to know how to hookup a permanent installation generator. (It could be a 3 phase generator which requires a equal load. On all the phases)

      Plus something worth that much would have it's own serial # So if they tried to sell it. They run the risk of getting caught.

      But then I have heard stories of people trying to steal copper from live mains. Getting killed in the process.

    2. Re:Looting by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      I think you just summed up nicely how the antitheft devices will work.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    3. Re:Looting by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The simplest way would be to make them provide a non-standard output, and make it clear in the news that the generators are completely useless for anything but running a cell tower.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Looting by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      Non-standard output? You mean like 110 volts at 60 Hz?

    5. Re:Looting by Technician · · Score: 1

      The simplest way would be to make them provide a non-standard output, and make it clear in the news that the generators are completely useless for anything but running a cell tower.

      I like it. Cell towers should simply be configured to use 440 volt 3 phase power. I can see someone with a stolen generator connecting one phase to ground thinking it's nutral and connecting their loads up to the other 2 phases.. Can you say instant smoke?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    6. Re:Looting by xaxa · · Score: 1

      People have stolen power lines for the copper, I assume they'd do the same with a generator.
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/5088222.stm

    7. Re:Looting by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Hey, we figured it out first, bucko. See Tesla and Westinghouse. You guys were still using gaslight. Not our fault if you couldn't copy our efforts properly.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    8. Re:Looting by smchris · · Score: 1

      The generators are large and bolted to the concrete.

      If there's a flood, I would rather they were bolted to the tower instead of the base.

    9. Re:Looting by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

      They're not going to wash away in a flood. Bigger worries would be water in the fuel tank, which typically sits underneath the generator. As far as looting is concerned, portables are prime targets, but no one steals the big fixed installations. It takes to much work and equipment to move them and then get them running in a new location. Also, they're kind of consipcuous.

  15. Only makes things worse by punka · · Score: 1

    If the power was knocked out to a cell phone tower due to a natural disaster, wouldn't the phone lines/trunk also be knocked out? So with battery back ups we'll have a bunch of towers broadcasting with no lines to call out!

    1. Re:Only makes things worse by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      If the power was knocked out to a cell phone tower due to a natural disaster, wouldn't the phone lines/trunk also be knocked out

      That's not strictly true. Power is often trunked in from considerable distance away. If the natural disaster effects the generation area and not the cell tower then the cell tower can be out even though it still has connectivity to the world.

      Further, a lot of cell towers use microwave links to the nearby towers and even back to the phone company base; particularly towers in remote areas. Even if the natural disaster killed out the power the UPS/generator could be sufficiently protected as to keep the tower on the air.

      I have to agree with all the other sentiments in this thread. With the impending xmas day any new year pay attention to how difficult it is to get a slot on the tower and also a line out of it when everyone is on the phone saying "hey it's new year here but we're an hour ahead of you isn't it cool we're in different years?".

      The same would apply in a disaster situation I am imagining with every man, woman and their dog calling every other man, woman and their dog they know to see who is OK and who isn't.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    2. Re:Only makes things worse by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Most wireless towers use wireless backbones - all they need is backup power. The POTS has backup power already.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re:Only makes things worse by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      No. The landline companies have their own battery/generator systems and have had them for years. I don't know if they were ever mandated to have them or if they just considered it good business sense. Even during a major, prolonged, power outage landlines are almost certain to work. Now if the phone lines go down due to storm damage, that's a different story.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    4. Re:Only makes things worse by headbulb · · Score: 1

      A cell tower can be any miles of distance away from the central office. A single central office can have a whole city or multiple cities that it covers.

      Just because power is out in one town does not mean it would be off in another where that office is located. Even if the power was off where the central office is the equipment there is power backed up. Afterall it's providing service for a large area.

      If power goes out in one town and takes out the towers for that town it's annoying, But nothing like having the whole network down.

      All telecom equipment is made to be easily backup powered. Running off of 48 volts DC.

    5. Re:Only makes things worse by nwhitehorn · · Score: 1

      The telcos used lead-acid batteries as a filter for the line in addition to back-up. If you have an analog signal riding on top of a constant current source like with POTS, you need an *extremely* stable DC level or else people will hear buzzing. For a very long time (and maybe even now), the cheapest and easiest way to do this was to run the whole system off batteries.

      So I think this could be classified as "good business sense", though for reasons completely unrelated to reliability.

    6. Re:Only makes things worse by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

      Generally phone/data links don't get knocked out the same way power does. For starters, the phone lines are often buried end to end. Power, on the other hand, is fed from a substation that's sitting out exposed to the elements. Power gets knocked out far more often.

      But that doesn't change the fact that this is still a dumb policy. Most cell towers include a generator in the installation already, so long as it's practical to do so. The penalties they pay to cell carriers for outages makes this pretty much a business requirement. But there are a lot of cell towers in locations where it just isn't realistic to put a generator in place. If that's the case, you might create a situation where you either have to abandon a tower or locate a tower in a less than ideal location.

      The bigger problem than backup power is that when disasters strike, there usually isn't enough bandwith for everyone who's trying to use their phones.

    7. Re:Only makes things worse by tech_guru5182 · · Score: 1

      As far as managing the situation in a disaster, there is a solution already in place for the bandwidth issues - WPS and GETS. These simply cause certain phones or calls to have priority over other calls. The protocols that manage phone networks always leave space for a few calls available when they begin to provide a congestion tone on a normal call. GETS and WPS bypass these phone company imposed restrictions. This allows for about a 90% call completion rate for priority calls.

        "When the going gets tough, GETS keeps you going."

      --
      BAN BPL! Keep the radio spectrum free fro
  16. ambient power by mattr · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They should require some kind of ambient power generation also to be included. Solar cells are well understood perhaps but IIRC they do not have long lifetimes. So either some special long-lifetime solar cell, or something that uses environmental (humidity, electrostatic charge, temperature, gas, wind, etc.) gradients. It only has to be able to provide a very short window of time, perhaps only 30 min. per day, in which it can operate without any input from the power grid. If such a thing exists/can be developed it could be installed in really distant palces without infrastructure too, on an ad-hoc networking basis. I would feel a lot safer especially this would be useful for massive hurricaines and earthquakes, etc. I would not feel so safe if the backup batteries they talk about will run down in a few days, that's not enough time to restore all infrastructure as we have seen.

    An option to receive microwave power from planes or from orbit would also be a very smart thing, a tiny rectenna (or just top surface of the battery) ought to do it.

    1. Re:ambient power by inKubus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you're saying for a worst case situation, where the batteries die, the generators are out of fuel, everything is down--and this solar panel or whatever sits there all day gathering sun and then at a predetermined time it runs the tower for 30 minutes so people can text their parents or whatever. Not bad idea, it would be extremely cheap to implement, and in the worst case scenario, it would continue to allow some communications. Coupled with fuel cell or hand-crank power for the cell phones themselves you could have a fairly reliable temporary 30 minute-per-day communication service.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:ambient power by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Or you could just look up your local hams and ask one of them to pass a message on for you. We still do that, ya know. Or better, geek, get your ham license.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re:ambient power by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

      Solar cells last a long time (20+ years) and as long as the connections are done properly, require little or no maintenance. They can get hammered by hail or by ice falling from higher on the mast, though.

    4. Re:ambient power by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      That still have licenses? I remember when they dropped the morse code requirement and though "What is the world coming to!?"

    5. Re:ambient power by mattr · · Score: 1

      Right. I suppose texting parents might be part of it but I was thinking more like, "Help!" It might be the only way for people stuck in a drowned city, or freezing without food, fuel or power somewhere might be able to actually talk to rescuers. I'd love to learn ham radio if I had the time and money, and maybe a cheap ham apparatus would be useful to get households to keep. Maybe ham as part of the equation. I just think people are more likely to have cell phones. You can get cheap chargers that use double a batteries too, so as long as the cell tower is powered and networked, you could probably call for help. It might be good for helping communities to help themselves too. No reason the infrastructure has to go out. I remember in the Kobe 1995 earthquake the net was up but everything else was down (maybe power was up though I don't remember well). Which is why the foreign language school was the place that told the world about it and then a Stanford undergrad organized it, and me and a lot of others mirrored it.

    6. Re:ambient power by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Solar panels have *very* long lifetimes. The one I have has a 25 year warranty that it will produce 80% of new power in 25 years time. A properly constructed panel should last for decades.

    7. Re:ambient power by mattr · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply and sorry to be late.

      I knew solar cells lasted around 20 years, it is good to hear they last longer.

      If they operate okay in 25 years that's fine.
      But if they have to be replaced every 20-30 years that isn't so good, infrastructre should last longer.

      Matt

  17. I dont see the theft as an issue. by Jonesy69 · · Score: 1

    Gensets that would be 'enterprise class' are big monolithic machines that are most likely not walking away unless equally big machinery is brought in to move them off the concrete pads they are bolted down to.

    Its not like its some 1KW 'garage' special we're talking about here.

    Furthermore if it did prove to be a problem stick, a renewable source like solar or a wind turbine up on the tower where permissible to lower the risk of theft so only the truly desperate would partake

    --
    Bought the ticket, taking the ride.
  18. Probably not an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cell towers in my area already have some kind of power backup. I think that's been the norm for a while now.

    Plus, any disaster of hurricane katrina's level will undoubtedly overtax the network bandwidth anyway and most calls will fail.

    1. Re:Probably not an issue by jayp00001 · · Score: 1

      Plus, any disaster of hurricane katrina's level will undoubtedly overtax the network bandwidth anyway and most calls will fail.


      I don't think that point can be stressed enough. I'd rather see the FCC mandate more bandwidth so that during the first few hours of an emergency at most calls go out rather than the situtation they have mandated which is that the tower will be running without any likelyhood that the calls you need to make will go through.
  19. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by Ksevio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're in a power outage posting to slashdot? Do you have a backup satalite link and generator just in case you lose internet for a few hours?

  20. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Hey, a geek has to have his priorities!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  21. Australian Cyclone Experience by robbak · · Score: 1

    As an Australian who recently cam through a major cyclone (Larry), I too am surprised to learn that Americans were installing mobile phone sites _without_ backup power. If anyone is complaining about the cost to retrofit, then go complain to the person who installed the site without it in the first place!! (Oh, that was you too? Poor little idiot.)
    There was major problems with the telephone systems. The landline systems had 24 hour battery backups, but beyond that, they had to rely on workers delivering gen sets to recharge the batteries. Delivery of these was made difficult by flooding in many cases.
    There were some cellphone sites out, and, with the large amount of relief work going on, the remaining ones were often congested. (CDMA and GSM were working then).
    All told, though, everything was done very well by all concerned. No doubt lessons were learned, but, well, lets go deliver a good, solid larting to anyone who decided _not_ to provide backup power to all telecoms stuff!

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  22. In Argentina ... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

    ALL cell towers operate usually on two different power sources, plus a generator as a backup.

    Needing a law to require something so obvious as a backup power source is sad, but true ...

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  23. Why is it up to the FCC? by log1385 · · Score: 1

    It seems unfair that the FCC gets to tell corporations what to do. Not that a huge fan of large corporations, but I still don't think that the FCC should have that kind of control. If a cell service provider thinks that it's valuable to have backup power, then they will provide backup power themselves.

    --
    Seek and ye shall find.
    1. Re:Why is it up to the FCC? by T_O_M · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because the Communications Act of 1934 (and as ammended) requires the FCC to regulate telephone companies as part of Interstate Commerce.
      Also because cell phones use radio frequencies, also regulated by the FCC.

    2. Re:Why is it up to the FCC? by PPH · · Score: 1
      Because, when the FCC sold (gave away) the licenses to operate such systems using r.f. bandwidth, they did so with certain conditions. I'm not familiar with the exact language of the licenses, but providing emergency communications services is probably in there someplace.

      Is it fair for the FCC to impose such a backup power requirement so long after licenses were granted? Maybe, maybe not. The cellular operators should have done some initial analysis to address license obligations for emergency services. If they didn't figure out that, during emergencies, power often goes out, then they probably aren't technically competent to hold the license at all.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Why is it up to the FCC? by wickning1 · · Score: 1

      Radio frequencies are a limited resource and not just something anybody can use at will. We the people own the frequencies the cell companies use to make money. We made a deal with the cell companies. They get exclusive access to the applicable frequencies in return for providing a service we want. Cell phone availability on those frequencies during a disaster is a public good that we demand. If cell companies can't provide service the way we want it, we can cancel the deal and find someone else who can. Therefore the FCC (our representatives) can shut you down (cancel the deal) unless you follow its (our) rules.

      It's pure capitalism, you just forgot one of the parties in the arrangement.

  24. Lots o' problems by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

    Having gone through pager/cellular outages in the almost-all-California almost-all-day power outage a few years back as well as through rolling blackouts I applaud this effort. It's even more important as more and more people go wireless only. But it's gonna hoit...

    There are already plenty of hand-wringers who try to block any cell site due to "harmful radiation". Now that same group is going to be heading to city hall to complain about noisy/polluting/etc. generators and stacks of batteries full of lead and sulphuric acid.

    And to some extent they will have a point. Emergency generators need regular testing - some critical units have weekly test requirements. It might fly in the office complex or industrial area but there are plenty of cell towers hidden in church steeples and residential areas. Others are in the middle of the desert. And no matter where they are, they will need to be regularly tested, maintained and fueled. For some sites like those covering desert areas, solar may prove attractive. In other cases it may be cheaper to just rip out the site if it only provides coverage in some desolate spot.

    And where you might get away with a small/medium cabinet for your equipment, now you need to have more space for batteries and easy access for regular replacement or, alternately, a site for a generator, noise enclosure, fuel tank, and access for refuling and maintenance. Rent costs are likely to rise.

    It's all going to be passed on to us users anyway. But I would far prefer to pay a tad more for reliability than for cool wallpaper and rad ringtones. Guess I'm getting old.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:Lots o' problems by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      If gensets are installed at remote cellular sites, the testing can all be done remotely (genset startup, short runtime for monitoring, and then shutdown). Fuel level can also be monitored remotely (via TCP/IP even if you want, with a slim web server). Plenty of unmanned data centers do this sort of remote monitoring/testing already.

  25. Good idea, but... by dfm3 · · Score: 1

    As a Mississippi resident who came through Katrina, I fully understand the necessity of a working system of cell towers, but it's not just power that's important in an emergency- you also need adequate bandwidth/capacity. Our power was only out for 1-4 days after the storm (depending on the neighborhood), but it was a full two weeks before you could actually dial out and get something other than a "network busy" message.

    Admittedly, landlines were no better, but cell service here was already known for it's limited capacity and poor coverage. It didn't help that on top of all the coordination of emergency and relief efforts, everybody had to continually tie up the circuits to let all the relatives know how they were doing.

    Even the day before the storm hit, I remember that the cell lines were jammed beyond capacity... nobody could make or receive calls. Landlines worked perfectly fine.

    1. Re:Good idea, but... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't SMS help with that? I'd think that one SMS message would use a tiny fraction of the resources needed for a short voice call.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Good idea, but... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      SMS messages actually are more resource-intensive then voice calls. The reason behind this is voice calls can be allocated to designated voice channels (typically 24 per cell site, give or take a few depending on GSM, CDMA, iDen, etc.). All SMS messages are transmitted over the control channel, which there is only one of per cell site. That same control channel also provides heartbeat info to the phone, as well as call buildup/teardown information.

  26. I've dealt with this.... by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

    My job requires me to spring into action when disaster strikes. On my way to an unfamiliar site, I was completely lost due to a closed road. Power was off so long the battery backup at the cell tower failed. Luckily, I was able to get there after a whole lot of driving in circles.

    We're putting too many eggs in one basket. That's one of the reasons why I'm an amateur radio operator (ham). If I had my license during the aforementioned problem, I could have easily gotten the other engineer on the airwaves because he's a ham as well.

    What's interesting is that there's a HUGE (100kw or bigger) generator about 50 feet from this cell tower which powers the Comcast cable headend (the place that distributes cable to the entire metro area). Maybe they'd finally be able to working something out if the battery issue is pushed.

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by 3p1ph4ny · · Score: 1

    No, but power and communication lines are often buried in the upper Midwest due to the incredible ice storms we get. Those that aren't have many extra poles/unit length to hold them up for exactly this reason. His phone/cable lines are probably live, but the power lines aren't.

  29. Re:Solar and Wind Turbine by Tisha_AH · · Score: 5, Informative

    To provide solar power to a cell site would require several hundred square feet of space to mount the panels. Sizing a solar power system for infrastructure requires planning for when the amount of sun is at the minimum (approx 2 hours during wintertime at northern latitudes). A aolar system must put a full charge on the battery system to account for charging losses, battery inefficiency, and the continual demand of the load. To match up to a solar power system you need a very significant battery string (when I do system calculations I assume that the system can go for three days without sun). Mounting a wind turbine on a cell tower is problematic too. An antenna structure has a loading (ANSI 222 (f or g)) that has to account for ice, maximum wind and the surface area of the tower, feedline, antennas, etc... A wind turbine adds ALOT of loading to a structure. I suspect that 90% of the cell towers out there right now could not pass the structural analysis under ANSI.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
  30. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by Telecommando · · Score: 1

    Hey, I feel for you. Back in `93 (I think, don't quote me), we had an ice storm hit our area pretty hard. Some people were without power for over 2 weeks. And the cell phones were useless after the first couple of hours when the batteries at the towers went dead. Only the police, fire and utilities had any radio communications at the time because they had planned their systems for just this type of emergency.

    Oh, some cell sites had generators, but the cell co.'s had assumed they could just grab a gas can at the local hardware store and buy some gas to refill the generators until the utility hooked them back up.

    Which would have been fine if the utility didn't have 100K other customers who also needed to be hooked back up. Not to mention that the utility couldn't even get power to their own substations because of all the downed trees and lines. Heck, most roads were impassable because of downed limbs.

    And none of the stores in the area that sold gas cans could take checks or credit cards because they didn't have power, cash sales only! And most banks and ATMs were offline as well. As were all the gas stations within a 100 mile radius. It was a mess. Widespread power outages are a bitch. I was fortunate as my power was only out for about 10 hours. We dug out the candles and my kerosene garage heater for the duration.

    A co-worker drove 4 hours round-trip to his father-in-law's place just to borrow a generator. When he got home he discovered there wasn't a gas can to be bought nor a gas station open to sell him gas. His borrowed generator was useless. We still give him a hard time at work about that one. There were even some fist fights at the few places that had generators for sale and a couple of stores were gouging people heavily to buy them. Hard times seem to bring out the worst in some people.

    Last spring after a storm I was without power for over half a day. I went out and bought a generator the next day but have never had to use it.

    Hmm, just checked the weather service at http://radar.weather.gov/Conus/full_loop.php. Looks like that storm might make it this far after all. I think I'll go fill up both my 5 gallon gas cans.

    Good luck to everyone in the storm's path! Hope it doesn't hit you!

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
  31. Re:power isn't the only problem by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

    What about it?

    If every person in the US turned on everything electric in their house, the grid would be brought to it's knees.
    If every person in the US tried to fill up their car at once, the fuel industry would be brought to it's knees.
    If every person in the US tried to fly at once, the airline industry would be brought to it's knees.
    If every person in the US hit slashdot at once, slashdot would be brought to it's knees.

    You can't build infrastructure to handle everyone at once, all the time. It just doesn't make sense.

    --
    Gone!
  32. Re:power isn't the only problem by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    No, but with a computer-controlled system like the cellular network it would be perfectly possible to prioritize traffic in an emergency. It surprises me that they apparently can't do that.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  33. Whine, Whine, Whine... by T_O_M · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ..." saying it will cost the industry hundreds of millions of dollars to implement the new rules"

    Aww,,, Sniff, sniff. I co-manage 5 remote 2-way radio sites and, due to increased power needs, we have to upgrade the backup generator at one of our sites. Our primary electrical contractor quoted $38,000 for a COMPLETE installation: 35KW generator, transfer switch and installation.
    And that's for ONE generator. The cellular folks will be buying them by the trainload and should be able to weasel a significant discount.

    ..." it will be "very difficult" for cellular operators and tower companies to meet the new FCC backup power rule. "It will take a lot of cooperation and innovation,"...
    More crap! The electrical connections are the simplest part of the installation. Our contractor installs full-site transfer switches. They connect between the power meter and the disconnect switch or main fuse box. Two electricians do that part in under a day. The generator itself, OTOH, can take up to a week depending if there is a concrete base to be poured, fuel tank and EPA issues. Still, there's nothing new enough here to require "innovation".

    1. Re:Whine, Whine, Whine... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Would you like the translation from marketspeak? Here:

      "This is going to be really, really hard and expensive, but we're going to be doing all this clever stuff to make sure it costs MUCH less than it really should. That's why your service fees are only going up by 30%."

    2. Re:Whine, Whine, Whine... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      So, nothing extremely new, or even resource extensive, per site. It's when you multiply it by the thousands of sites that they'll have to do this for that it gets expensive.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Whine, Whine, Whine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difficulty isn't buying generators and knowing how to hook the power up. (Well, I don't know if they can get 'em at a discount, considering there's a backlog.. but even $50K is almost nothing compared to the cost of a cell site itself.) The problem is actually getting the generator installed. Some sites may not have enough space, there's the NIMBY problem (if they don't like an inert bit of electronics in their neighborhood, they may well shit a brick over a *generator* 8-) ), and the building problem (for sites on someone else's building, there'd could be all sorts of issues over having a generator and fuel tank sitting about.)

                I agree, the cell cos should have thought of that ahead of time. Personally I have Verizon Wireless, which seems pretty good about having power backup on sites.. I've never had service go out during several ice storms which knocked power out for a day or so. And during the tornado that knocked out power downtown for about a week, VZW stayed up too... I had one dropped call while I heard the nearest site's generator kick on, but could call again right after that.. the power was out downtown for about a week, and serivce was a little garbly but I didn't get any network busies or lose service.

  34. solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    microturbines .. like those produced by Capstone Microturbine (CPST) amazing tech would be perfect.

  35. Re:Solar and Wind Turbine by afidel · · Score: 1

    How many KVA does a typical cellsite(single provider) need? I'm wondering what sized generators are going to be harder to get. We recently had an almost 90 day wait for our 100KVA set, but I assume that's much larger than a cellsite needs.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  36. Re:power isn't the only problem by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    If every person in the US turned on everything electric in their house, the grid would be brought to it's knees.
    I would think that local breakers would trip, cutting off branches that are drawing excessive power. The grid would be fine, but there would be a lot of unhappy customers.

    If every person in the US tried to fill up their car at once, the fuel industry would be brought to it's knees.
    The fuel industry would be celebrating. That just means that they can raise the price of gas to $79 a gallon. This in turn would probably prevent a lot of people from filling up their cars...

    If every person in the US tried to fly at once, the airline industry would be brought to it's knees.
    Somehow, I don't think that enough people would be able to get through security to adversely affect the airlines. It's more likely that the price of gas from the previous scenario would have a worse affect on the industry.

    If every person in the US hit slashdot at once, slashdot would be brought to it's knees.
    Well, you're right.
  37. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by Zymergy · · Score: 1

    For the record, cell service just came back up... well, actually it didn't ...it now says 'network busy'. Probably a puny mobile cell site trailer... have to go look for it in the morning.
    Speaking of which, I have been looking around but I still don't see that Aussie-accented-guy standing in any ponds or holes around here touting the new 'AT&T Wireless Broadband Network'...

    Sure, what else to do after an Ice storm (after getting your power working).. but Post on /.
    I have remarkably reliable Cable Internet/Digital Cable service and it is *always* working.
    My Cable provider's nodes have UPS battery boxes w/Natural Gas generators attached to each fiber/analog node breakout box (sitting beside it).
    One of these nodes happens to be located 30 feet from my house in my yard's edge. (I know this because I lifted off its plastic cover to see what the hell I have been mowing around...) I truly enjoy the low latency (LPB) of having my cable provider's fiber-to-coax node so close to my home. (And the DOCSIS loop sharing, etc.. is not an issue (yet) in my neighborhood. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS)
    And yes, I have a decent 5kw generator and several UPS' of my own doing frequent 'line conditioning' operations on the sags and spikes of the generator's voltage regulators being slow. Extension cords abound. (Apparently some ice covered trees took out the feed lines going to the sub-station (which is one block away).. according to my power utility provider. That will probably take days to fix... Crews have been called in from other states to 'help'...
    Let's just say that I now know where that extra money went when I purchased one of these... http://www.apc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=SUA1000XL
    It may only be 1000VA, but it has a monster battery and is very responsive to line conditions (plus has lots of indicator lights on the front that finally I get to see in action)... -Z

  38. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by afidel · · Score: 1

    I have a Matrix 5000 with 4 batteries about the size of a large truck battery that came out of our old DR site when we upgraded the UPS there. I'm planning to have it wired in by an electrician to run my blower, sump and fridge during such emergencies. It's always either an ice storm (thus the blower for heat) or a hell of a thunderstorm (thus the sump) that takes out power around here for any length of time. I figure that it will power 2 of the 3 for a day or so as long as I don't open the fridge during the outage.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  39. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    "You're in a power outage posting to slashdot? Do you have a backup satalite link and generator just in case you lose internet for a few hours?"

    Cripes. Does this really need to even be asked? He could simply be at a friend's house or at the library or something. Maybe he took his laptop to Starbucks and logged on there. Maybe he has a generator.

    Use your brain, yeesh.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  40. If they worked together by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    or were forced to pick one standard like in the rest of the world, you wouldn't need 5+ masts in one place, each with it's own backup, all to support all the different proprietary standards.

    Where's that invisible hand of the free market that is supposed to magically make our disjointed, antiquated mobile system more efficient than the rest of the world's?

    Mod me down for being a commie bastard.

  41. Re:power isn't the only problem by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 3, Informative
    GSM does allow you to prioritize emergency traffic:

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:cwTrqX9BMl8J:www.cse.umkc.edu/~beardc/WorkSummary.pdf+GSM+emergency+priority+traffic&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=9&gl=us&client=firefox-a

    Wireless Priority Services
    - Became a high priority after September 11, 2001.
    Extension of the U.S. wireline GETS system that had been around for many years.
    Used the same call queuing approach.
    Only available from GSM providers
    - Only GSM has priority call identifiers.

  42. Sounds like a load of FUD to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From TFA:

    The new rules cover most local exchange carriers (LECs) and mobile service providers, who must provide backup power systems for central offices, cell sites, and remote switches and terminals.

    From http://aboutus.vzw.com/bestnetwork/network_facts.html:

    The Verizon Wireless network is built for reliability in emergencies, with battery back-up power at all facilities and for additional reliability, generators installed at all switching facilities, and many cell site locations. The company also owns a fleet of portable generators that can be deployed to provide emergency power during extended power outages to those cell sites without permanent generators.

    So, let's see, it sounds like for...
    ...central offices? Yup, batteries already there.
    ...remote switches? Yup, they've got batteries and generators.
    ...cell sites? Yup, they've got batteries, and some have generators as well.

  43. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by Zymergy · · Score: 1

    A business colleague I once worked with was *given* a brand new Matrix 5000 by APC for writing an actually true Kudos real-life-APC's-UPS-saved-my-IT-ass letter to APC following another major Ice Storm back in '01. (I think those matrix 5000 batteries may actually be heavier than car batteries.) I am looking forward to the UPS industry offering LiON or LiPO batteries (at least to those of us who actually have to install/move the darn things...) Of course we all remember this: http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=109923

    And Yes, that's exactly what my generator is doing at this moment... powering the blower and thermostat on my *gas* furnace. and powering my APC UPS et al. (too bad NG is so high!) I think your Matrix 5000 would be a very good standard item for most homes (plus an automatic transfer switch and generator tie-in)... but just like burglar alarms in homes, people don't change the batteries.

  44. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by Technician · · Score: 1

    Maybe he has a generator.

    Many people have a generator that they never consider using. It's called a car. Unlike a standby generator, it is most likely have been recently serviced, has a working battery, fresh fuel and oil, and tested in the last week. Dig out your pocket inverter, and extension cord and laptop. Fire up the car once in a while to recharge the battery.

    I wanted more power than a lighter socket inverter will provide so I installed a trunk mount inverter.

    I have a Prius. It takes care of shutting down the engine when the traction battery is charged and restarting it when it is drawn down. I use that at my advantage. My Prius is my emergency genertator. I picked up one of these from Costco and trunk mounted it.

    http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?Prodid=11240887&whse=BC&Ne=4000000&eCat=BC|3960|21273|59839&N=4018442&Mo=5&pos=8&No=3&Nr=P_CatalogName:BC&cat=59839&Ns=P_Price|1||P_SignDesc1&lang=en-US&Sp=C&ec=BC-EC10613-Cat21269&topnav=

    It's a bargin at under $70.00 I have used it camping and for emergencies. I use about 1/4 tank of gas/weekend. It beats filling a portable noisy generator every 3-8 hours.
    It has enough surge capacity to start my fridge as well as run a few CF lights, and my computer. In using the car for emergency power, it typicaly runs for about 5 minutes, then it shuts down for about 1/2 hour and then repeats the cycle.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  45. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    Maybe he lives in the woods. When I lived with my parents, we had a 10KW generator on a concrete slab out back. If we didn't have it, there's no water and no heat - doesn't matter that usually the cable and phone still works. Once it kicks on, it restarts the cable modem, so even though it's black all around for miles, we're still connected.

    Pretty convenient, it'd be nice to have it here, where when some asshole hits one of the curbside transformers and the power goes out for 6 hours we don't have internet! :(

  46. isn't this already law? by ebs16 · · Score: 1

    i was under the impression that this was already required. this came up back in 2003 when the entire northeast went dark for several hours. we did have cell service for the entire outage, although the system was overloaded with calls for most of it. does anyone know if new york state already has this type of law in place?

  47. Re:power isn't the only problem by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

    If every person in the US tried to fly at once, the airline industry would be brought to it's knees. There's a fixed capacity and since you cannot get inside an airport without a ticket any more, I don't think that would be much of a problem. I think the days of routine overbooking ended six years ago. The terminals might get a tad full if every flight was fully booked, but whatever there's enough space at each gate for a fully booked flight.

    You people who don't have your plane tickets already are out of luck, but the airlines won't melt down. People who find thin Sn headgear fashionable should take note ...
  48. Just went through a power outage, this makes sense by screff · · Score: 1

    After having just gone through a 2 day power outage after a strong wind storm I can say that it sucked not having any ability to contact anyone on my cell phone.

  49. CO batteries and generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work (splicer before the CT days) for Michigan Bell (then Ameritech and then SBC). Central Offices have had battery and generator backup for years (for LECs though, not sure about CLECs). I've also done quite a bit of telecomms work here in Australia too and every exchange I have been in has battery backup as well as an on site generator. I did not RTFA but the description indicates that this is not the case. Worth mentioning though.

  50. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am going to ask for a prorated refund for my service plan (and they will legally HAVE TO give me that discount for my contracted service being out).

    Yeah right. Go read your contract again. They don't guaranty service. I'm sure the contract makes allowance for acts of God (eg weather), war, strikes, insurrection, vandalism, radio interference, concrete buildings, etc, etc.

    Now, they might give you a refund as a goodwill gesture, but I think the law is firmly on their side.

    After all, you said this is "the largest single outage in my state's history". Chill out dude.

    If you want a reliable phone, get a POTS landline.

  51. Europe already has it by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    In Europe, well in Italy at least, they already have this as mandatory!
    This is why all that -48VDC thing in telco.

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  52. Verizon by Skates1616 · · Score: 1

    I have serviced Verizon Cell Towers throughout the Midwest (500+) and they all had backup power sources attached to their towers. The backup sources depended on location, but a great majority of them included massive batteries along with generators.

  53. Re:power isn't the only problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I turned on everything electric in my house my primary breaker would blow and I'd be without power.

  54. British Telecom won't need power backup anymore by kingtonm · · Score: 1

    I think they had the requirement removed from landline exchanges so they could move to IPV6

    1. Re:British Telecom won't need power backup anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't true. In the EU any provider of public telephony has to make sure the system works even under force majeure (such as a flood).

  55. Katrina by tsotha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Regarding hurricane Katrina:

    I work for a large cell carrier. We had backup power to every single cell in the area. In fact, after the hurricane we were doing pretty well, though some of the towers were taken out by debris. Only a couple were actually submerged. We lost a few trunk lines, but for the most part the system was working.

    The problem was we didn't have any way to get gas to the generators. The roads were impassible, and based on news reports we were reluctant to send crews in to the sites we could reach for security reasons. So after a couple days the cell sites started going offline one at a time as the generators ran out of power.

    As far as I know every one of our sites, in the entire country, already has a couple days worth of backup power.

  56. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by dbitter1 · · Score: 1

    There are also water powered sump pumps available if you are in a municipality with city water. Used to have a fridge that was powered by natural gas, too...

    --
    For us carnivores, "Sucking the marrow out of life" isn't a transcendentalist philosophy but a practical instruction.
  57. third choice by zogger · · Score: 1

    Propane. I see a lot of big propane generators at farms, fairly common now along with diesel, but propane lasts indefinitely and doesn't go bad. And most of the phone company huts use propane generators now for backups (at least that is what I see around my state). A good industrial engine and propane is about as reliable as diesel. Tradeoffs mostly. Diesel engines are more robust, but much more expensive. Diesel has to be used and replaced often,even with additional treatments like anti gel and anti microbial, propane doesn't, meaning you could get the propane now at cheap prices (relatively speaking) and ten years from now it would still be good fuel.

    With that said we have three large diesel gensets to keep the farm running here in case of power outtage,(and they certainly get used for that as well, quite often) but joe farmer boss said if he was building the farm today he'd use propane. The last large poultry farm I worked on used propane generators though (nissan engines actually). We're not a massive data center or cell phone company, but as farms around here go we are the largest. We store several thousand gallons of diesel in tanks, but have well over 100,000 gallons of propane in huge tanks at any one time.

    So I agree with you in a sense, diesels are by far just more robust and longer running engines, but given how infrequently the cell towers would have to be running purely on generators I think propane powered generators and large storage tanks and some solar panels to keep the starter batteries charged constantly (as an independent backup) along with periodic test running might be more useful and come in a lot cheaper in terms of dollars and still be able to do the job as required, probably two for one or better there in cost.

    1. Re:third choice by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      A good industrial engine and propane is about as reliable as diesel

      You dig down deep enough, frequently they'd be the same engine, just with different injection systems. You can run propane through a suitably configured diesel engine.

      some solar panels to keep the starter batteries charged constantly (as an independent backup)

      I'd think that it'd be cheaper to hook up a battery charger system to dedicated power line to keep it charged. Unless you're likely to let the system sit for months without power, then go to turn it on.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  58. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Had Cell Service (with AT&T/Cingular) for about 3 hours following the outage [...] but apparently the cell-site UPS batteries drained and the tower site did not have a generator...

    This FCC rule only requires towers have 8 hour capacity anyhow, so you're only going to see at most 3X the run time over your current situation.

    The article talks a lot about diesel generators--nothing about natural gas generators, solar cells, wind turbines, etc.--so you can pretty safely assume cell towers will have just enough fuel to run for 8 hours before shutting down, and remain that way until power is restored.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  59. phone company batteries by zogger · · Score: 1

    Those things are great! Last for freaking decades. In ye olden days of alternative energy they were the scrounged batteries of choice (do they still sell them used at scrap prices?) if you could get them*. Old beat on and used they were a better deal than brand new from other sources.

    *I've heard submarine batteries were nice too, but I have never seen or used them myself. With that said, whenever my personal storage batts need replacing now I would probably go with an electric forklift battery pack.

  60. VoIP reliability orders of magnitude worse by gelfling · · Score: 1

    VoIP reliability and uptime are orders of magnitude worse than POTS. And the cable company has no uptime commitment or time to fix standard AT ALL. On Saturday my cable was out for 11hrs. If I needed that VoIP line I'd be screwed.

  61. There is only one real solution for this. by F34nor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Electromechanical Batteries or EMB or Flywheel Batteries by their old name. These have the highest power density of any energy storage system. They are so reliable they can be buried or sent into space. They can hole huge amounts of power. They can be recharged very quickly. They do not burst into fire. They are not hazardous.

    Specific Power EMB (5-10 kW/kg) Lead Acid (0.1-0.5 kW/kg)
    Energy Recovery EMB (90%-95%) Lead Acid (60%-70%)
    Specific Energy EMB (100 Wh/kg) Lead Acid (30-35 Wh/kg)
    Service Lifetime EMB (>10 years) Lead Acid (3-5 years)
    Self Discharge Time EMB (Weeks to months) Lead Acid (variable)
    Hazardous Chemicals EMB (none) Lead Acid (Lead, Sulfur, & Acid)
    "A new look at an Old Idea the Electromechanical Battery" Science and Technology Review April 1996 by
    Dangerous EMB (possibly in massive physical impact) Lead Acid (High fire danger)

    Caterpillar and Beacon power already sell off the shelf UPS based on EMB for anything up to a whole grid substation. These are the answer to balancing the output of solar and wind power as well, far better than ice batteries or lead acid. These are the answer to solving our reliability problems with the national power grid (if each substation could self power for even a few 1/10s of a second you can reroute the grid. In fact these are even a possible answer to batteries for cars thanks to new fiber based flywheels instead of steel. There is literally no sound reason to use Lead acid to backup a data center, a telephone switch, or a cell tower anymore.

    The FCC should demand that the power backup meets a certain level of reliability and power density within a top percentile of the most cost effective solution so that people don't use old outdated technology just because it is a system that they are accustomed to.

  62. Grid balancing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not install batteries and use them to do the sort of grid balancing trick that we used to have to with electric cars?

  63. Cost Control by Kuma-chang · · Score: 1

    That's exactly how cellular networks are designed. Do you know why? MONEY. Cell providers build just enough capacity in certain areas to get as much money as they can while providing adequate service. Their delivered quality of service is just good enough to not drive people to other carriers. Their networks get completely saturated during emergencies like 9/11? Of course, because they never intended for them to be used by everyone at the same time. You say this likes it's a bad thing. If the mobile phone carriers built the capacity to support an event like 9/11, it would cost a metric crapload, and 99% of the time that capacity would sit unused. But we'd all share the costs in increased rates and charges and the rate increase would be substantial. Do you really want to pay for that? I'd rather not... This issue with the backup power is similar. This is going to cost a ton of money and be absurdly inefficient. It will buy us 8 hours before the transmitter sites run out of gas and shut down. Then teams will have to arrive and refuel them. In general these wireless carriers already have made disaster preparations and pre-stage equipment and personnel to respond to outages. During Katrina, the teams from the telecom providers were not permitted access to the disaster zone, but they were standing by with backup power generators and repair crews. This backup power mandate doesn't really buy us much, but it is sure going to cost us...

  64. No they don't by Kuma-chang · · Score: 1

    As far as I know every one of our sites, in the entire country, already has a couple days worth of backup power.

    I'm not sure who you work for, but I can guarantee you that none of the big wireless carriers is currently in compliance with the 8-hour backup power requirement for transmitter sites, much less having several days worth of fuel. The national wireless carriers all believe that compliance would be extremely difficult and expensive and are currently in the process of appealing this order in the DC Circuit through their industry association (CTIA). If your cell sites stayed up for several days, that was likely due to specific pre-hurricane preparations. Kudos on that.

    BTW, the reason that the refueling crews could not reach the equipment was not so much that the roads were impassible. It was a credentialing problem. The national guard had closed off the disaster area and weren't letting anyone in, including telecom fueling and repair crews. It took days to get the mess straightened out.

    1. Re:No they don't by tsotha · · Score: 1

      I admit there may be sites without backup power that I don't know about. All the majors except Sprint were created by merger, so there may be some markets where the original installers didn't put in generators. But that certainly wasn't the case in NO. I watched them go out one at a time more than a day after the hurricane struck.

      As far as the refueling goes, I don't remember anybody complaining about the national guard. I do remember crews complaining they they couldn't physically get to the generators because of debris on the roads.

    2. Re:No they don't by Phist · · Score: 1

      Makes sense that the national guard would let that sort of equipment through especially considering the purpose that it serves. Checking to see if the driver is legit is one thing but the equipment itself would have to be about all the credentials needed. I bet some of that impassable debris were abandoned vehicles.

      while I am on this subject I have to ask: Who exactly owns the equipment on the tower? Is the equipment leased by the providers from a cell tower owner or is space for the carriers equipment rented by the cell tower owner? Or who even owns those towers? I ask because I am kinda heavily reliant on EVDO and I just have to know these things.

  65. redundancy by zogger · · Score: 1

    That's why I said an independent backup. I tell you, I've seen automatic generators not start before,despite being "plugged in", but my batteries attached to solar panels always "just work" and stay in tip top shape, mostly because I think the other devices associated with solar panels (charge controllers and desulphators primarily) are of such good a quality. With a genset, having three ways to keep the starter batteries charged is a good deal, grid supplied trickle/float/smart charger, the alternator on the engine itself once it is running, and I would add a panel or two and a charge controller, just for redundancy and backup insurance. Perhaps on another starter battery attached through an isolator circuit and transfer switch in case the primary fails for some reason.

      I'm a *big* fan of solar, having used it so much and seeing how solid it is. IMO, the government needs to do a manhattan project scale R&D effort with solar, not a joke level, a real level,, serious multiple billions, because I think "practical fusion power" is just a winner. The other fusion power projects are decades away and are costing tons of cash, they are extremely complex and delicate advanced rube goldberg efforts at this point (eventually might pay off but we need stuff that works now, not 50 years from now). Solar fits that bill, it works now, it really is fusion power ( I have started a one guy campaign, like with this post and others I have made to call it practical fusion power), and it is already proving that it can work day in and day out with extreme minimal maintenance all over the planet (got to love zero moving parts for example), so now we need to get economies of scale going to a much greater extent (put a ton of rust belt guys back to work, manufacturing and installing/servicing) and keep improving the efficiencies of both the panels and storage technologies-along with keeping work going on improving electric device power demands and various other conservation issues.

      I think our society would be well served right now to stop wasting so much good silicon on crap like cellphones that get thrown away every year (I bet everyone here has a box full of them) and throw away music players and *forced computer upgrades from operating system bloat-age* and so on. That's the biggest problem the solar manufacturers are having now, and what is keeping prices high, they have orders up the wazoo, demand is just fantastic, but they can't get the silicon because of throw away cheap gadgets sucking it up.

      I know they are working on ultra thin film and different composites and so forth for solar (like nanosolar company), but that stuff is still mostly unobtanium. Silicon based panels just work and can be built now and will produce good power for 30 years or better. the process will evolve, but we can't wait until oil cracks two hundred a barrel and so on to think about maybe using some alternatives and doing a massive decentralization of power production so we don't need to waste money on upgrading the grid infrastructure, we have to do it while it is still cheap and not an ecological and economic emergency situation. Just like with this article and backup power for the cell towers, you need your backup power plan in place and operational and in "normal-working" status *before* it is needed, not think about it once the emergency hits. That concept is valid on any scale imaginable.

    1. Re:redundancy by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I think the other devices associated with solar panels (charge controllers and desulphators primarily) are of such good a quality.

      In other words, it's not just the solar panels, is like talking about how great a surge protector is, then only mentioning that there's also an UPS in the circuit.

      Don't get me wrong, next time I'm looking at a long trip I'll probably get one of those solar float chargers to keep my car battery alive(went dead last time).

      It's just that something that's constantly hooked up and using commercial power should probably use that to keep the starter battery charged - if you have a solar float, no need for the tap from commercial power.

      I think our society would be well served right now to stop wasting so much good silicon on crap like cellphones that get thrown away every year (I bet everyone here has a box full of them)

      I, at least, am not party to that. I've owned three of them, and have only upgraded voluntarily once. I bought my first cellphone in Germany, and it wouldn't work in the USA, so I got a different one.

      Of course, I'm the exact opposite of the 'thin&pretty crowd'. I want a cell phone that's got a big enough antenna(and transmitter) to reach a state away, armored enough to beat somebody trying to steal it to death, with enough battery that even in a remote area it won't die for a week. Oh yeah, and extended range(or whatever it's called) bluetooth so I can dump the beast on the passanger seat, my belt, desk, or whatever and still be able to make a phone call.

      and throw away music players and *forced computer upgrades from operating system bloat-age* and so on. That's the biggest problem the solar manufacturers are having now, and what is keeping prices high, they have orders up the wazoo, demand is just fantastic, but they can't get the silicon because of throw away cheap gadgets sucking it up.

      I'm still using my original 256MB thumb drive(it's a pretty big thumb, too), 1 GB MP3 player with a broken screen(I just play it on random/repeat), and my 5 year old machine.

      Still, a dedicated fab or ten might be able to drop the price of solar quite a bit.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  66. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    I've considered this myself, even though I'd have to do the car starting myself - get a big inverter and hook it up to provide power in an outage, using the gasoline engine(and battery) in my car for power.

    I'd just have to be careful not to kill my inverter, which isn't very heavy duty compared to a hybrid car's.

    Heck, for ~$500 I could get a 5000 watt inverter and an extra deep cycle battery to power it, keeping my car(and it's battery) out of the cycle so I don't risk killing my starting capacity.

    If I ever find the diesel pickup I'm looking for, this wouldn't be a problem - a diesel normally not only has two larger batteries but a much more capable inverter to keep the batteries charged.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  67. So? by neowolf · · Score: 1

    Telecom COs have always had backup power.

    Cell providers SHOULD have been required to have backup power a long time ago. I suppose the big problem here is it took the FCC this long to mandate it. It seems like a poor business decision on the part of the cellular providers not to have backup power to begin with. What's one of the first things someone picks up when the power goes out? Cell phone!

  68. What do you think you're doing? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    Injecting expertise and intelligence into threads here on Slashdot is simply not done, ESPECIALLY when dicussing Linux, alternative energy sources, or the Satanic nature of the current President.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  69. Cell by artg · · Score: 1

    Did you read Stephen King's "Cell" ?

  70. Try using a cordless phone without power by sheldon · · Score: 1

    Not going to work.

    I used to keep a plain old phone around for just in case. But then I switched to Vonage, and doesn't matter much anyway. Even though my equipment is on a UPS, the Comcast stuff is not.

  71. One thing about Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a former employee in the network segment of Verizon Wireless. Say what you will about Verizon's customer service, coverage, or whatever, but they have a company wide policy that ALL sites have both UPS backup for short outages and on site emergency generators to last for several days. No other carrier that i'm aware of is as rigorous in implementing this. I worked at a switch site (served maybe 150 towers) and they had a generator the size of a small house and enough fuel to run it for like a week. Not going to save you forever in a Katrina situation, but when other carriers sites went out immediately, verizon was on the air still for several days, and then they brought in mobile towers to help the emergency workers. One of the best things that company did, in my opinion.

  72. Cell phones weren't down in east coast outage! by RaySt · · Score: 1

    Actually, VOICE was down during the east coast power outage, but I used my cell phone (Verizon) all night to TEXT with a friend stranded at the airport! And I'm pretty sure her phone was on a different carrier, as she came from Europe.

    IMHO this makes a lot of sense. Texting uses far less bandwidth than voice, so why bother backing up voice when all people will do is to call everybody else they know and bring down the system in the process anyway.

  73. Ummmm - No. by CallFinalClass · · Score: 1

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but this just isn't true, and I have first-hand knowledge that it isn't true. I know of many CDMA cell sites with NO backup power (across all of the major CDMA providers, and in multiple markets), I'm damn confident this will be true for GSM/UMTS as well.

  74. COs already have backup power!!! by brainchill · · Score: 1

    Think about it ... when was the last time you lost your hard line because of a power outage? They have been outfitting the COs with backup power by default for at least the last 30 years. The real issue here is the wireless telcos that want to play telco but not have the same service level as the real thing ;)

  75. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by afidel · · Score: 1

    The problem is in a general blackout you often lose water pressure as well. During the great NE blackout my community has power because of a local generation station and a smart technician who isolated us from the grid. (Which led to LOTS of fun getting home because we were the only place for hundreds of miles with working gas stations). The Cleveland Water Commission decided that generators big enough to run the huge water pumps that power the entire metro area were too expensive and that they would go with multiple power feeds at each of the redundant pumping stations, never planning for a general grid problem. I'm not sure if they've fixed that since but I'm not using my water sump as the only emergency backup =)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  76. FCC + FAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe due to FAA starting to use cell towers to track planes....

  77. Well... I guess we'll be waiting longer by Punker22 · · Score: 1

    We've been waiting months for another 2Megawatt diesel... It's amazing how back logged all generator manufacturers are. Especially for the big stuff.

  78. why just generators by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    Why just Generators? Does someone on the FCC have a friend in the generator business? This sounds more like an opportunity to accelerate the photovoltaics market and production learning curve. and some of those cell towers are up on towers that could also support small scale wind power generation...they don't all have to be a colossus with 150 foot blades.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  79. Reality from Fiction by Arkiel · · Score: 1

    So uh... anyone read Cell by Stephen King?

  80. Cell phones in the Bay Area Quake by billstewart · · Score: 1

    AFAICT, there wasn't any technical problem with the equipment - this quake was the type where the worst damage that happened was a bunch of pickle-jars got smashed in one grocery store. But everybody and their mom was on the phone saying "Did you just get an earthquake? Are you ok? The TV said California just fell into the ocean!" and the cellphone network can't reliably support emergency services under that kind of load. I don't know if the switchover is manual or if it's automatic (presumably load-driven.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  81. Opportunity knocking? by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    How much power does a typical cellsite require? Is it small enough that they could use solar panels charging batteries, and would they have enough solar capacity to generate a surplus and sell some of that power back to the public power grid?

  82. Generator quaked out - Tower probably dead too by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Generators for cell towers aren't that big or unstable - if there's a quake big enough to knock that out, it's likely to have trashed the cell tower as well, or the phone lines connecting to it, or whatever. The more serious problems are how much spare fuel they've got, and whether you can get to them to refill if needed. (There are exception cases - the telco office under the World Trade Center building had a couple of days worth of battery, and kept running fine until that was gone.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  83. Phone Companies and Batteries by billstewart · · Score: 1
    One thing that made telco batteries especially effective was that when they switched from old electromechanical switching equipment to "modern" electronic switching, the new stuff used a lot less power, so the batteries could last a lot longer (plus you got lots of floor space back!) Everything was way overkill even before the ESS, and it was just fine. There were occasional problems every couple of decades (the fire in Hinsdale IL, or that power problem in Manhattan where the "Battery Low" light on the backup system was burned out, nobody noticed, and everybody was out at a (ahem) battery maintenance class when the main power failed and it switched over to the dead backup.)


    Eventually the outside world has caught up with us, though - as telco offices are also serving as Internet hosting centers in many cases, there's been increasing demand for power and space again.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  84. Diesel storage in big cities is a problem by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Diesel storage for backup generators is a problem in big cities, though we're seeing that more for new internet hosting centers and corporate data centers than for older telco offices. Do you store the fuel on the roof, which is a Really Really Bad Thing if there's a fire? Do you store it in the basement where you not only have to worry about fumes and ventilation from the storage and also the generator operation (so it's a safety issue), but you also have to worry about floods? Do you have enough room for a separate ground-floor generator and fuel storage building out back (yes in the suburbs, no in the city.)


    I don't know if there's a consistent answer, other than "your city's building and fire departments will run your ass ragged getting it approved".

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Diesel storage in big cities is a problem by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Diesel vapor pressure is too low to be anywhere near as dangerous as you're making it out to be. Unless it's under pressure or boiling, it won't burn. Get yourself a cup of diesel, a match (lots of them), and a blow torch and go see just how hard it is to get it to burn (and keep burning on it's own.) Likewise, it doesn't evaporate quickly so there's little issue of fumes.

      The big problems with generators are their exhaust and noise. Noise being what most people take issue with -- i.e. why many HOA's ban them (in addition to being ugly.)

    2. Re:Diesel storage in big cities is a problem by monsted · · Score: 1

      Ours are in a separate building out back, underground, with good cooling and ventilation. The tank itself is in a separate room, also vented. We're in a commercial area on the outskirts of a major city. The building has argonite fire suppression.

      The building is placed fairly high, so flooding is not very likely.

  85. Re:I am in a Outage RIGHT NOW with NO Cell Service by fermion · · Score: 1
    This is just a level of service. We all switch to VOIP/Cell phones because it is cheaper than land lines. This phone service is cheaper because unlike land line service, there are literally no service guarantees. I also wonder how much they actually have to refund as you pay a monthly fee for a number of minutes, not a flat montly fee as in most land line service.

    What scares me is the number of people with just a cable phone or just a cell phone. I don't have cable due to the lack or reliability. Cell phones are reliable, but not anywhere the near 99% uptime with landlines.

    If everyone began to demand landline quality from the cell phones, there would just be uptime guarantees in cell phone contracts(no refund unless out for 48 continuous hours, 72 hours in the case of natural disaster), and prices would increase for all of us, even if we use our cell phone as a cell phone, and not a home land line.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  86. FCC Requires Backup Power by Minturn · · Score: 1

    That is a good idea and great news for Phoenix Broadband. They have a state of the art battery monitoring system that will make sure those batteries are ready to go when the time comes. Pity the FCC can't figure out a way to get gas to the generators...

  87. CO's by Cramer · · Score: 1

    I've gotta ask: Who the h*** builds a CO without battery and generator backup? (The CO itself should already be battery powered... -48VDC) I've never noticed in other states, but in NC I've never seen a CO without a generator sitting outside.