Slashdot Mirror


China Anti-Corruption Web Site Crashes On First Day

An anonymous reader tips us to news out of China that the Web site of the National Bureau of Corruption Prevention crashed on Tuesday, just hours after its launch, as droves of people logged on to complain about corruption among officials. "The number of visitors was very large and beyond our expectations," an anonymous NBCP official said.

169 comments

  1. Boom today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And boom tomorrow... always boom tomorrow.

  2. Hmmm.... by cheater512 · · Score: 1

    Looks like they have their work cut out for them.

  3. doh by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    China Anti-Corruption Web Site Crashes On First Day

    It didn't crash. it just got corrupted.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China Anti-Corruption Web Site Crashes On First Day

      It didn't crash. it just got corrupted.
      Windows into serving the government?
    2. Re:doh by Chrisje · · Score: 0, Troll

      Laugh about it... :-D What worries me more is that they actually have a minister of Supervision.

      What does he Supervise? That people celebrate the "Two minutes' Hate"?

    3. Re:doh by s1d · · Score: 1

      The saga of bad QoS on Chinese products continues. Perhaps they bribed the testing team?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, everything runs linux.
    4. Re:doh by Mathinker · · Score: 2, Funny

      > What does he Supervise? That people ....

      No, duh, he makes sure Superman doesn't go around peeping, of course!

      His next project is to extract lead from toy manufacturer's paints to make lead-shielded underwear....

    5. Re:doh by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

      Could this be a new version of Mao's Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom fiasco?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:doh by hedwards · · Score: 1

      More likely they're dealing with all the complaints which the people could make due to the corruption of the local officials that were supposed to be dealing with the corruption complaints.

      It seems silly to me to bother bribing the local officials if one isn't also bribing the people that are checking for corruption as well.

      The traffic will go down after a period, but it isn't surprising that they would have this kind of difficulty estimating how much public interest there would be. There probably won't be a DDOS component of this until the legitimate traffic dies down enough for people to be able to get through.

    7. Re:doh by mppm · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. I just spent the last month in Shenzhen. The only remnant of Mao is his picture on the Yuan, and an image on an ashtray I saw in a flea market. What a legacy. Corruption issues are the Party trying to get a handle on the economy which has exploded. But, from what I could tell, corruption is rampant. I guess you just need to know who and when to bribe. BTW, no sign of Linux on the desktop, but it's there in the back end. FWIW, a knock off copy of XP or Vista can be had on the street for less than 10 yuan ( less than a couple of dollars), and in a very official looking package. I don't know how they deal with the authentication issues if you try and install it, though. Most of the PCs sold appear to be a mix of XP and a little Vista. No one seemed to care about Vista--XP was the highway.

  4. We didn't know that many people cared. by Jack9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We didn't expect too many people to know about the corruption, or the website. Damn."

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
    1. Re:We didn't know that many people cared. by ari+wins · · Score: 1

      They quickly realized the website they built could lead to residents of China thinking, hence it was moved outside of their firewall.

      --
      Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
  5. URL? by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

    TFA doesn't have a URL. Can someone post to help load test their server.

    1. Re:URL? by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:URL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:URL? by Machinus · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to reading?

      Everyone head on over to yfj.mos.gov.cn. It's up.

      Right in the article, too.

    4. Re:URL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They seem to have some gigantic jpegs on their website. Maybe that's why it could not handle the load.

    5. Re:URL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They seem to have some gigantic jpegs on their website. Maybe that's why it could not handle the load. http://yfj.mos.gov.cn/yfj/1.jpg <- They used this for a thumbnail and just scaled it down with HTML. It's a freaking 3504x2336 JPEG.

      -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody nogroup 3173056 2007-12-24 05:59 chinafails.jpg
      Ho ri shi toh bat man.
    6. Re:URL? by rucs_hack · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think its still crashed, it's got all these wierd squiggles instead of proper writing...

    7. Re:URL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing the 3MB jpg image on the front page might have something to do with this...

    8. Re:URL? by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder if the 3 meg jpeg on the front page had anything to do with the crash.

      Nice to know that, no matter what part of the world you're in, people are willing to listen to "my brother's little kid, he's great with this world wide web stuff!" and actually pay them to do some work.

    9. Re:URL? by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      That was my hunch. But, no sense in putting a artifact corrupted JPG image on there, eh?

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    10. Re:URL? by Krupuk · · Score: 1

      Corruption goes with cronyism.

    11. Re:URL? by ArikTheRed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh yeah, let's slashdot it... that'll help.

    12. Re:URL? by Alsee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh christ.

      It sends a 3504 pixel by 2336 pixel JPEG with quality level 97(excessively high), and the page directs the browser to scale it down to generate the final 200 by 142 image.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    13. Re:URL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious.. I couldn't believe you, so I had to see for myself. 1.jpg is 3504x2336 pixels, "resized" using html image tags.

    14. Re:URL? by Reivec · · Score: 1

      Oh my lord.. that is the worst atrocity you can do on a website in my opinion. A 3meg high res pic scaled down to a tiny image without just actually reducing the filesize itself is a crime worth capital punishment. And China is just the country to carry it out.

    15. Re:URL? by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      I see giant jpegs like these all the time from Chinese businesses. It's almost as if they're
      bragging about their 20+ megapixel cameras (or whatever they're up to) :(
      It doesn't help that they're taken with shitty mobile phone camera lenses, so no matter how
      big it is, it looks like the insides of an outhouse.

      (Rant mode off. We love them for their business, but we hate having the email client
      hog our bandwidth while downloading their latest product catalogs!)

    16. Re:URL? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Oh well, you can bet it doesn't show artifacts as did all the pictures (foreground, background and logo) of the website of the company I work for. That cost a lot of cash as well.

    17. Re:URL? by Quantam · · Score: 1

      Hey, that was how I got my first job (when I was 13)! :P

      --
      You have tried to support your argument with faulty reasoning! Go directly to jail; do not pass Go, do not collect $200!
  6. China and Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    the website is showing chinks in its armor

    1. Re:China and Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While not very politically correct, that is by far the funniest thing I've read all day.

      Gratz.

    2. Re:China and Technology by HotFat · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Get serious, it's just plain racist and should be modded accordingly.

    3. Re:China and Technology by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Racism is in the intention, not the word.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:China and Technology by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      That is one of the most intelligent comments I've read on Slashdot. Most people confuse the two.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:China and Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke itself in this context does not lack the intent that you are implying. The use of the word chinks is a double entendre in this context. It certainly is intended as a racist comment. If the original poster did not imply harm or so no harm then the original poster is ignorant of the implications of the word. Many racists are ignorant of the fact that they are being racists.

    6. Re:China and Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      What do you get when you set up an infinite alternating series of 5 Chinese people, one Mexican person, and 5 African-American people?

      The perfect sprinkler system!

      Chink-chink-chink-chink-chink Spic! Nigga-nigga-nigga-nigga-nigga. Chink-chink-chink-chink-chink Spic! Nigga-nigga-nigga-nigga-nigga.

    7. Re:China and Technology by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Well, that certainly puts a different slant on things.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    8. Re:China and Technology by Alsee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The joke itself in this context does not lack the intent that you are implying. The use of the word chinks is a double entendre in this context. It certainly is intended as a racist comment.

      No. As Opportunist said, "Racism is in the intention, not the word". Someone noticed that a double entendre existed. The fact that the word the word has a history of racist usage is entirely incidental to unique linguistic coincidence arranging that double entendre. The poster noticed a funny twist of language, and the linguistic facts pretty much precluded any freedom in how to construct the joke.

      The poster was anonymous, so it is certainly possible he's a flaming racist, however I see nothing in his post indicating the presence of any ill will intent to disparage Chinese.

      I just got through with a post raking someone over the racism coals for objecting to "interbreeding". I am disgusted by racists and people who actively use racist language. However I am also sick of politically correct epileptic fits treating words themselves as radioactively infectious. I am sick and tired of hearing TV reporters say "the N-word". If some racist yahoo calls a black congresswoman a Nigger Bitch, then the news reporter should damn well SAY a racist yahoo called a congress woman a Nigger Bitch. A news reporter using a word in accurate factual reporting of a literal quotation does not make the reporter a racist. And if someone viewing that news show finds it offensive - good. But their anger should be at the racist yahoo, NOT at the reporter or the news show.

      A reporter going on TV and saying someone called the congress woman an "N-word B-word" sounds like an absolute moron. What are we, little kids in 6th grade? Is the reporter going to "catch cooties" if he says more than the first letter?

      The word is "nigger".
      The word is "bitch".

      Someone who hates a congresswoman and goes ranting niggerbitch-this and niggerbitch-that desperately needs a brainwipe, but I am not going to put up with the notion that there is anything wrong or racist about the way I used the word nigger the six times I used it in this post.

      Grow up people.
      Hate racists, but get over the childish idea that a word itself "gives you cooties".

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    9. Re:China and Technology by Sergeant+Pepper · · Score: 1

      Many racists are ignorant of the fact that they are being racists. If someone doesn't know that they're a racist, they're not racist. You can't say that a word by itself is racist, it's the intent behind it. Hence why when a black person says "nigger," they're NOT racist. It would be ridiculous for them to be racist against their own race. When a white person says it, on the other hand, you never know. By your logic, black people who say "nigger" are filled with self-loathing.
    10. Re:China and Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly is intended as a racist comment.
      Oh, so you're a fucking mindreader now, are you?
    11. Re:China and Technology by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 1

      The word is "nigger".
      The word is "bitch".
      The word is "niggerfaggot"

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2nTbqbtGug
      --
      Just -1, Troll talking to another.
    12. Re:China and Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, are you saying they aren't? Because I can certainly argue different. Try this, go to google and type "rap lyrics." Just try it! If you can say there's no self-loathing in at least 5 of the top 6 pages you read then you are living in a different world than I.

    13. Re:China and Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you be racist if there are no races...

    14. Re:China and Technology by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It depends on whom you're asking. Anthropologists say there are no races. Biochemists (and in particular pharmacists) say that they sure do exist.

    15. Re:China and Technology by LandruBek · · Score: 1

      I disagree with you. I think I understand your position, which I'd say is based on a firm commitment to the use-mention distinction: that I can repeat any nasty remark by quoting the speaker, and it reflects nothing on me. Frankly I don't agree it is so simple.

      I would bet my bottom dollar that you are not a black woman who has suffered under grinding racism and misogyny: words are used to hurt, to oppress, to label and confine, to teach people they are worthless, bad and stupid, to drill in that fact over and over again. The language of oppression uses labels as one-word lessons. So what I am saying is, words have power, and can be tools of oppression. When I hear a word or an image, my mind starts working automatically to think about or picture what I hear. It's involuntary, although most of the time it is no problem. But the words you choose do trigger thoughts in my head, whether I want them or not. Your word choice exercises considerable power.

      It is naive to think that just by wrapping up one of these oppressive words in quotation marks that it is made safe. So when someone, say Mel Gibson, says something really hateful and hurtful, I would think twice about repeating it. Do I have some sort of duty to repeat his remarks? Would it serve a good purpose? Would it hurt the people around me? I agree we need to be adults, and keep our eyes open to reality, and there are plenty of occasions when foul words need to be recorded, repeated, and discussed. But in the scenario you describe, there ARE young children listening to the news, much younger than 6th grade. I think it is perfectly appropriate for the newscasters to add a level of indirection and say "n-word" or whatever.

      --
      $META_SIG_JOKE
    16. Re:China and Technology by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      How can a black person using the word nigger to describe himself or other people of the same skin color be a racist? I agree with George Carlin here, Eddie Murphy talking about niggers ain't a racist. He's a nigger.

      Now, while THIS may be considered a racist remark, I don't think it's supposed to be. It's in the intention, not the word. A racist using the most PC-possible word to describe a person of different skin color will still use it with the intention to depict that person of lower value. Would it be less racist to say "All people of african heritage and black skin are worthless"? Just because you avoided any racial slur?

      It's in the intention. Not the word.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:China and Technology by Sergeant+Pepper · · Score: 1

      That's what I just said...

    18. Re:China and Technology by Reziac · · Score: 1

      And if I believe someone IS a "nigger bitch" I also should be free to express that opinion without censure. Maybe said opinion is bogus, or maybe it's correct. But that should have no bearing on my right to use the words just as I would use any other words. Anything less is censorship.

      (BTW I checked out the CoR stuff... the idea is great, but the founder comes off as a loon.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    19. Re:China and Technology by Alsee · · Score: 1

      So what I am saying is, words have power

      I am saying almost exactly the opposite.

      Words only have the power we give them. A reporter who goes on TV and says "N-word" is saying that they are reacting in fear of the word "nigger", that they consider the word itself to have power, and that in fact it has the power to control their emotions, to control their thoughts, to control their language, to control their behavior.

      a black woman who has suffered under grinding racism

      Such a woman certain has a much better case to complain about being offended, but throughout society we are littered with examples of people being offended by everything from cartoons of Mohammad to Swimsuit Models to Santa Clause's unhealthy waistline. People are offended by anything and everything. There is no "Right not to be offended", and we should not run society as if there were. We cannot not-put-a-leprechaun on the cover of a box of Lucky Charms children's cereal out of fear that somewhere out there there's someone of Irish descent who might decide to take offense.

      I certainly have no desire to inflict harm or emotional distress upon "a black woman who has suffered under grinding racism", and if my post has had that sort of effect on someone out there then I'm sorry and I regret that. However I am not going to allow racists to win. I am not going to give racists power. I am not going to give racists control. I am not going to personally grant the word "nigger" power, I am not going to grant it control, I am not going indicate to other people that they should consider it to have power and control. I am not going to behave like a 6th grade child saying silly "letter-word"s.

      Racism needs to be dead and buried in the history books along with slavery, and in my opinion one of the steps in that direction is to deny power to racists and deny power to racism. If racists start using the word "chocolate" as a slur, I am not going to start saying "C-word milk" and "C-word cookies".

      Words have the meaning we give them, words can only hurt or control us if we allow them too. The primary definition *I* place on the word "nigger" is "one of a variety of meaningless grunts and howls commonly uttered in the wild by species Neanderthal".

      It is naive to think that just by wrapping up one of these oppressive words in quotation marks that it is made safe.

      No no no no.
      YOU just said the word was dangerous. I'm saying that is exactly the problem right there. Wrapping the word in quotes can't "make it safe" if it was never dangerous in the first place. You are placing power and danger in the word.

      So when someone, say Mel Gibson, says something really hateful and hurtful, I would think twice about repeating it. Do I have some sort of duty to repeat his remarks?

      Of course not.

      All I am saying is that if you *do* for some reason quote him or otherwise discuss the subject, that it is childish and counterproductive to say "N-word".

      Would it serve a good purpose?

      I think publicizing and discussion the Mel Gibson situation to have a very good purpose in facing and attempting to deal with the social problem of racism and racists. The only debate here is whether we should or must edit and re-write our words with "N-word" before we say them.

      But in the scenario you describe, there ARE young children listening to the news, much younger than 6th grade.

      And we have a choice.
      The child can hear the reporter say "nigger" and learn that mommy and daddy's reaction and understanding of that word is it means there's something wrong with Mel Gibson.
      Or the child can hear "N-word" and learn that is a powerful forbidden word, and that he can provoke a powerful reaction from people by using it.

      No matter how hard you try, you are not going to conceal the real word from a child very long at all. When they do figure it out, they are mentally going to bind it with the backlog of "N-word" built up in that young language sponge brain and load it with all the more significance.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    20. Re:China and Technology by LandruBek · · Score: 1

      I meant this to be a brief reply -- oh well. The short version is, we disagree about "power" -- with that, you can skip the rest of this post if you want.

      First, I am not objecting to your use of any offensive terms in your comment. I detest censorship and I certainly think Slashdot is an appropriate venue to discuss these social and linguistic questions -- ignoring the fact that we are off topic! You didn't offend me, and I don't want to imply otherwise.

      Second, I wasn't being rhetorical when I asked, "Do I have some sort of duty to repeat them?" I meant that as a plain question; you said "of course not," but I say it depends on the circumstances. If I were the officer who arrested Gibson, or if I was a witness on the stand, or if I were a sociology professor, or a hundred other situations, I might indeed have such a duty. What I mean is, I don't want nasty speech to be quashed just because it is offensive. There are times for euphemisms, and times to speak plainly.

      Words only have the power we give them.
      The word "only" here is misleading, but I fervently agree -- and it is for that reason I would handle the sharp ones with special care: we as a society have invested power into them. Many words have centuries of history backing them up, and they will be around for centuries after you and I are dead and forgotten. They have power indeed. Like it or not, some words really hurt other people, and wishing does not make it otherwise. I don't fire guns on the street, in fact I only ever shoot at a range. Likewise I don't shoot my mouth off just anywhere with certain words.

      However, I fear I am twisting your intent. I take it you meant something like, "I the individual can choose how I react to a word. I needn't grant any privilege or power to any word to hurt me. It rolls off my back." If I read you aright, that is great if you can really do that. But not everyone is so strong. The power of a word to transmit meaning, suggest images, dredge up memories, and hint at other words is fundamentally a social construction, not an individual decision.

      If racists start trying to turn "chocolate" into a slur, they are in the position of every entrepreneur: starting something new, they will probably fail. They have history against them. I will join you in ignoring them. We weren't talking about fresh coinages though, we were talking about well established words.

      I agree there is no right not to be offended, and some people are too easily offended. But that doesn't mean I (metaphorically) get to shovel shit in folks' ears and then say "grow up!" when they claim offense. Some words have profound historical and yet vital contemporary associations with hideous forms of injustice. "Nigger" is still just too potent a word to be bandied about in public: it still has way, way too much power; it is still far too hurtful for the six o'clock news. Lots of people still remember lynching; some still fear it. This word is still alive. Only recently did that bastard Strom Thurmond go off to his reward. He was in the Senate! He helped run the country! What does that say about the country, or the Senate, or the rule of law here? This country was absolutely steeped in institutionalized racism for centuries, and it has only been for a few decades, only a few presidents, a couple eyeblinks, that racism is getting frowned upon here and there. The language of those murderous and hateful centuries still has a LOT of baggage, a lot of power, and I respectfully think you are naive to disregard its past and present. I at least won't repeat that language unless the context really demands it.

      I say wait 150-200 years and then reconsider whether the n word has faded in power enough for the daily news. Currently it's still too fetid to throw around just anywhere. (Enough said by me -- you can have the last word if you want it.)

      --
      $META_SIG_JOKE
    21. Re:China and Technology by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Strom Thurmond [] in the Senate! [] What does that say about the country

      Unfortunately I think I'm about to cause you some pain. It's worse than that.

      In during the 2000 election process, in Alabama there was a state ballot item...
      40% of Alabama voters voted to keep an archaic state constitution article prohibiting interracial marriage. 38% in South Carolina voted the same on their state constitution just 2 years earlier. They were last two states to officially remove such articles, but still quite appalling that it took so long to clean up, and that in the worst-of-the-worst states that the percentage who still support such a thing is so atrociously high.

      So yeah, I am sadly aware racism is still alive and kicking.

      I believe and seriously hope that your "wait 150-200 years" figure is far off mark.

      I understand your concern, and I think you understand my reasoning that building an elaborate linguistic dance around the word empowers and perpetuates it. One point I would like to clarify though... "I the individual can choose how I react to a word. I needn't grant any privilege or power to any word to hurt me. It rolls off my back." yes I do believe that is an important thing people should know... but that is not what I am suggesting and asking here. I realize that maybe I'm a bit freakish in the way I do disregard information that I evaluate to be meaningless or invalid. I realize most people find that difficult or completely beyond their ken. What I am suggesting and asking here is far easier and far more reasonable than that. I am saying it is not reasonable to take offense from something that is not used in offense. Not reasonable to take offense from a word used in an inoffensive manner.

      Taking injury when under hateful verbal assault is one thing. It is a very different thing to taking injury because a word properly and inoffensively appears in a dictionary, is properly and inoffensively used in linguistic discussion, is properly and inoffensively used in a discussion of the ills of society, or is properly and inoffensively used in a literal news quotation.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  7. Oh no! by DeltaQH · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The number of visitors was very large and beyond our expectations,"

    Oh no. And now the slashdotters are comming!!!!

    1. Re:Oh no! by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 1

      my thoughts exactly.
      the first time it crashed the statistics were
      99% users from china
      1% Others
      the second time it crashes it will be:
      28% USA
      24% UK
      22% Germany
      19% Sweden
      5% France
      2% other
      ------
      Referer:
      98% www.slashdot.org
      2% other

    2. Re:Oh no! by pipatron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sadly, I think the number of chinese internet users that has been subject to corrupt government far outweighs the mere millions of slashdotters.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    3. Re:Oh no! by Enlightenment · · Score: 1

      Are those really slashdot's demographics? If so, how did you come by this information? If not--what led you to guess them?

    4. Re:Oh no! by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 1

      no method...just an (un)educated guess...tho in retrospect..i don't think france has such a high percentage, french people tend to stick to french websites, probably Canada would appear somewhere there as well.

    5. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Behold, the AC POWER!!!

  8. The USA should get one of these... by netsharc · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... and capital punishment for officials caught corrupting.

    (I hope the above isn't construed as a death threat against Bush! And his staff. And Congress. And the Senate. DHS... TSA...)

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:The USA should get one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Your reservation for a flight to Quantamo Bay has been confirmed.)

    2. Re:The USA should get one of these... by RattFink · · Score: 1

      ... and capital punishment for officials caught corrupting.


      There ain't enough power in America to power that many electric chairs.
      --
      "I don't necessarily agree with everything I say." - Marshall McLuhan
    3. Re:The USA should get one of these... by houghi · · Score: 1

      Yeah and with the PATRIOT act, you do not even need to log in. People just can contact you like that to, uhm, verify your claim.

      Hey, with Echalon, you do not even need such a website as they already know.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:The USA should get one of these... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      ...but reported indefinitely delayed by Delta Airlines.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:The USA should get one of these... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      that wouldn't be a bad idea. it'd be like reverse-gestapo tactics. the nazis were able to keep the public in line, not with surveillance or domestic spies, but by simply placing gestapo offices in every town and encouraging the public to spy on each other and rat each other out to the local gestapo offices. most of the information they gathered was through public denouncements, and this system was quite effective in controlling the population. so why couldn't we turn the same idea around and use public denunciations to control our government officials/civil servants?

    6. Re:The USA should get one of these... by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Not if we start using nuclear power again.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    7. Re:The USA should get one of these... by Straussberg · · Score: 1

      There ain't enough power in America to power that many electric chairs. Ain't that the truth...
  9. Corruption by Sigvatr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They were probably hosted by netfirms.com

  10. The USA should get one of these...Alive Citizens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Well let's see. The geek solution is a technical one (website.) While the common sense solution involves people physically doing something, like their civic duty (do I really need to explain what those are?).

  11. Re:The USA should get one of these...Alive Citizen by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The common sense solution involves getting arrested or tased? I somehow doubt that. It may in fact involve blogging on the net about it until your voice is heard. Standing out in the cold and waving signs is the -old- way to protest. You can get a LOT more attention with a good blog, or bunch of bloggers blogging the same blog. Blog blog blog.

    Do I have a blog? No, I don't have any extra time in my day to talk to myself. I've better things to do.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  12. /code? by dltaylor · · Score: 1

    If they use the code that runs /., and enough commodity computers, the web site wouldn't crash due to load. Can't say about it's pipes to the 'net, though.

    Is it "helping" the regime there to have the corruption reported, as in providing a place for the populace to report the corruption, which allows the central government to get a bigger cut, or is it, in the long run, likely to open that government more, which autocrats tend to perceive as "not helping", but which could improve the lives of the proletariat by freeing what wealth and income they have to be spent on themselves?

    1. Re:/code? by DeltaQH · · Score: 0

      Another 100 flowers campaign?

      "Let a hundred flowers bloom, let the hundred schools of thought contend."

      Just another way to solve the corruption problem. Lets people complain openly and afterwards identify them to make them..... stop complaining.

      Problem solved.. and business can go on as usual.... Ok... Just kidding ;-)

  13. Oh no!-Tensile Strength. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh no. And now the slashdotters are comming!!!!"

    Yup! All 500 Tons of them.

  14. In soviet China ... by MPAB · · Score: 1

    ... corruption web crashes you!

    (Somehow makes too much sense)

  15. Reactions to be expected by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Interesting

    First of all, they'll try to find out why the heck so many people knew about it. I'm fairly sure it was planned as a publicity stunt, showing that only a handful of people will actually use the page, and this in turn was likely tried by not announcing it too widely.

    I guess the result of the examination will be the blogging about government activity should be curtailed.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Reactions to be expected by jandersen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm fairly sure it was planned as a publicity stunt

      Or perhaps they actually want to do something about corruption, but hadn't counted on just how many would try access the site. Corruption is widespread in China, and very unpopular. The only people who want is the people - the criminals - who benefit from it. This is the people, nor is it the national government, because it causes unrest, which the national government has to deal with; and I don't think they want that.

      The chinese government are like most governments in most modern nations - they by and large want to do what is best for the people, or what they think is best. They are not monsters that enjoy making the population as unhappy as possible, despite the picture that gets painted in the more reactionary media in the west. The big problem they have is that they have an incredibly vast country to control and simply not enough resources; that and the fact that corruption has been part of the Chinese society for well over 5000 years. It will probably take at least a generation of modernisation to change this.

      Every time there are news from China, it is interpreted in the worst possible light - if they put a man on the moon, it must be because they starve their poor and want to rain death on America, if they tighten copyright laws, it is 'repression', if they don't, they are 'thieves'. Try to be fair - criticize where there is genuinely something to criticize, praise where that is due. That's what we expect for ourselves, isn't it?

    2. Re:Reactions to be expected by djupedal · · Score: 1

      "First of all, they'll try to find out why the heck so many people knew about it."

      One announcement on TV to, oh say, 200 or so million viewers, and then a few seconds of fast paced texting and in less time than you can make instant noodles you've got, oh say 200 or so million clients hitting the site. No mystery why...

      They have announcements down pat. However, they are still learning about the risks involved in hiring the first guy that claims he knows how to run a website.

    3. Re:Reactions to be expected by Sigismundo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I totally agree with what you've said. Especially on Slashdot, news stories about China tend to be interpreted negatively, and in a very 1-dimensional way. The things that Slashdotters associate with China are always negative: the Great Firewall, jailing dissenters, censorship. I don't agree with these things either, but this is just a very small part of China, which is an extraordinarily vast country. For a country that has been growing so fast since Deng Xiaoping took office, there are bound to be some growing pains.

      Furthermore, it should be obvious that parties within the government are making an earnest attempt at stifling corruption. Witness the death sentence of the head of the Chinese FDA, who was charged with corruption. China's current president has a reputation for being strongly against corruption, and is well-liked because of it.

      It's unfortunate that the anti-corruption website was so poorly designed, but I don't doubt that the intention behind it was genuine.

    4. Re:Reactions to be expected by DavidShor · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "The chinese government are like most governments in most modern nations - they by and large want to do what is best for the people, or what they think is best."

      No, they are not. They want to stay in power, and keeping to people from starving is necessary to do that. Everything they do for their people is to keep them from rebellion.

      "The big problem they have is that they have an incredibly vast country to control and simply not enough resources;"

      If they wanted to help the people, they wouldn't spend huge sums of money on monitoring their population, torturing dissidents, and building the world's most advanced censorship regime. India has a billion people too, but they seem to run their country without wide scale torture.

      Their big "problem", is that their people are only being kept from rebellion because of unsustainable economic growth, which the Chinese government is pursuing by inflationary monetary policy and environmental degradation on a scale unseen since the industrial revolution.

      At some point, the growth will stop, and China's ethnically fractured population, made insane by generations of propaganda, will assert their power. I don't imagine it will be pretty.

      "Try to be fair - criticize where there is genuinely something to criticize, praise where that is due. That's what we expect for ourselves, isn't it?"

      Hitler did an amazing job building Germany's Autobahn network, Pinochet lead Chile to a path of economic prosperity, and China has build a great deal of infrastructure. We don't talk about these things, because they are far outweighed by the overall evil of the perpetrators.

    5. Re:Reactions to be expected by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They want to stay in power, and keeping to people from starving is necessary to do that. Everything they do for their people is to keep them from rebellion.
      I hope you do realize that applies to every government of every country on Earth, democratic or otherwise.
    6. Re:Reactions to be expected by DavidShor · · Score: 1

      Yes, fully. Sadly, the equilibrium level of welfare for the population is lower for dictatorships then democracies.

    7. Re:Reactions to be expected by rcw-home · · Score: 1

      The chinese government are like most governments in most modern nations - they by and large want to do what is best for the people, or what they think is best.

      "99 percent of everything done in the world, good or bad, is done to pay a mortgage." -- Thank You For Smoking

      They by and large want to succeed.

    8. Re:Reactions to be expected by wdebruij · · Score: 1

      Try to be fair - criticize where there is genuinely something to criticize, praise where that is due

      Welcome to Slashdot! You must be new here.

    9. Re:Reactions to be expected by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      The things that Slashdotters associate with China are always negative: the Great Firewall, jailing dissenters, censorship. I don't agree with these things either, but this is just a very small part of China,

      And a fairly important part. It's your government, I'd think that's important, right? (Furthermore, the original post here was not making a sweeping statement about China itself, they were making a statement about what is obviously a move by the Chinese government -- which is the very organization which does all these things you say you don't agree with.)

      Although I think I get your point. I'm an American, and I don't at all agree with Bush. But hey, at least I'm allowed to say that here.

      but this is just a very small part of China, which is an extraordinarily vast country.

      So surely, some other part of this extraordinarily vast country must be working to correct that situation?

      For a country that has been growing so fast since Deng Xiaoping took office, there are bound to be some growing pains.

      That is not an excuse, and you know it.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    10. Re:Reactions to be expected by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      This is the people, nor is it the national government, because it causes unrest, which the national government has to deal with; and I don't think they want that.

      Wrong.

      As I'm sure the Chinese government has discovered, it is not the corruption which causes unrest, it is news about the corruption. And when the corrupt control the news, it becomes very easy to make you believe everything's alright.

      To some extent, that goes for the US, also, but there are things the government here cannot control. We have bloggers, for instance. You effectively don't, or at least, your government can silence anyone who disagrees.

      This very conversation is something which, I'm fairly sure, cannot take place in China.

      The chinese government are like most governments in most modern nations - they by and large want to do what is best for the people, or what they think is best.

      Also wrong.

      Any government -- any organization, any organism -- does what's best for itself. There are exceptions, but the larger the organization is, or the more powerful the person, the less likely you are to find these exceptions. The very qualities which cause a person or entity to be in power are qualities which would tend to make them unsuitable for that position.

      Now, a good system of government will generally be set up such that what's best for the people is best for the government, but that is very tricky to do. Freedom of speech is something I would imagine most Slashdotters consider to be essential to limit the government -- if the government is allowed to control the news, the Internet, and basically all forms of communication, then, suppose, for a moment, that it is corrupt. How would you ever know?

      This website? Hah. Suppose, for a moment, that the people directly responsible for running the website are corrupt. There goes that theory.

      Every time there are news from China, it is interpreted in the worst possible light - if they put a man on the moon, it must be because they starve their poor and want to rain death on America, if they tighten copyright laws, it is 'repression', if they don't, they are 'thieves'.

      Are you sure it is the same people making these interpretations?

      Put simply: The RIAA/MPAA would rather you tighten copyright laws. The FSF/EFF and most of Slashdot would rather you loosen them -- but even on Slashdot, there are different people with different views.

      That's right: Different people with different views, and opinions all their own. I suppose that might be a novel concept if you're coming from China.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    11. Re:Reactions to be expected by doctorfaustus · · Score: 1

      The chinese government are like most governments in most modern nations - they by and large want to do what is best for the people, or what they think is best.
       
      You must be new around here.....

    12. Re:Reactions to be expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sadly, the equilibrium level of welfare for the population is lower for dictatorships then democracies.

      Then India should be richer than China, since India is a democracy. Sixty years ago, India was wealthier per capita, but now China has the edge by far (by a factor of three in almost any measure). Sixty years should be long enough to establish an equilibrium, don't you think? So how do you explain India's democratic poverty?

    13. Re:Reactions to be expected by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Now, I'm fairly sure the Chinese government is by no means different from ours. No matter what country you're in, so "ours" may apply to whatever government you're under.

      But I don't agree with the "serve the people best" part. I'd rather guess the goal is to "line your own pockets best". Again, not a hit at China, that's just what I expect from any government. Most of all from mine.

      The difference is just that I get every 4 years to choose my favorite thief.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Reactions to be expected by DavidShor · · Score: 1

      Free Speech is not included in GDP calculations.

  16. Windows site? by MPAB · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps it failed the WGA check

  17. /dev/null by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This web site was only meant to pacify the citizenry, by making them feel heard. It's no different than here in the USA when you write your Senator or e-mail a company's technical support address: it's not like anyone really cares what you have to say, or will actually read it or do anything about it.

    If anything, the corrupt Chinese government officials were just going to use the information to decide which citizens to throw in prison next.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    1. Re:/dev/null by Das+Modell · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I seem to remember that they executed a corrupt government official this year or in 2006.

    2. Re:/dev/null by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Government officials that are corrupt, and embarass the party, often end up with a bullet in the head. A certain amount of corruption can be overlooked, damaging the reputation of the party is far more serious.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:/dev/null by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      This web site was only meant to pacify the citizenry, by making them feel heard. There's no reason to immediately jump to that conclusion. Many Chinese officials actually do care about the citizens of China and want to work hard to make China a better place. Their ideas of what is best may be very different from yours and mine, but that doesn't mean they get off an making people suffer. Why is it so difficult to believe that the Chinese government is serious about this, that it really wants to improve?
    4. Re:/dev/null by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Insightful

      China is making insane amounts of money from its new capital markets. The government has 51% ownership in many of these corporations. Investors will pull their money out of China if they perceive corruption to be on the rise. An "Enron" in China could cause many billions in the government's money to evaporate overnight. It is in the government's interest minimize corruption in its publicly-traded companies.

      I don't share your cynicism. Feel free to criticize China for being authoritarian and for opposing what the Western world considers to be fundamental human rights, but don't assume that everything about China is bad. Corruption will cause the top of China's "Communist" party to lose power and money; they will fight it out of self-interest, not altruism. Government leaders acting out of any other motivation is a rarity in human history.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    5. Re:/dev/null by maraist · · Score: 1

      Why is it so difficult to believe that the Chinese government is serious about this, that it really wants to improve?

      Because then they'd have a free press. Consider the direction of the information. In a free press, the information moves from the people through the controlled media back to the people. The degree of control is inversely proportional to the number of media outlets - a government can not quickly curtail embarrasing information across thousands of independent news channels and news papers, but it can, for example, control the BBC or any other state-run institution. I'm not implying that control IS exerted, just probability of effective control.

      Now, consider a taddle-tale web site. Who sees the information? Not the public. It's not a blog (unless I'm mistaken). Information moves from the people to the government - it's a form of free information gathering (as opposed to expensive spying efforts). Command and Control oriented socities always want to have their pulse on the attitudes of it's citizenry. Ever play a civ-city type game? Lack of knowledge of your own people is fatal.

      I applaud this web site, because, if for no other reason, the government will have a new avenue of information gathering which will allow them to make more informed decisions, and thus more optimal.. The remaining questions are of their goals and intentions. As other posters have stated, any political party wishes to hide embarrasing information.. Party leaders who embarass the party are - well, to say the lease, removed. There is no further embarrasement that a 'secret' ballot like this can provide, but it would shed light on potentially embarrasing activities of regional governors. The rule is passed down through the command heirarchy of what is acceptible behavior, and when tattled on, members are brought into line more quickly. But I don't imagine that all agregious offenses would trigger punishment. Despotic rule which quells uprisings, for example would trigger taddle-tales, but the heirarchy would smile on such feedback and likely reward the governor.. So the public's interest is not fully at interest here. At least, not to the same degree that other feedback systems might provide.

      --
      -Michael
    6. Re:/dev/null by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My local senator has directly replied to emails that I have sent as part of online petitions against pending state legislation. If yours doesnt you should get out there and vote for someone who will.

    7. Re:/dev/null by Korveck · · Score: 1

      Yes it happens, but only if the corrupted official has no friends in the power circle.

    8. Re:/dev/null by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      The Chinese government may have different ideas about what is better, but that doesn't mean they don't want to get better.

      We should consider the possibility that the reason China doesn't have a free press is because for whatever reason the Chinese government really thinks a free press would be bad. Maybe they actually just want to control the public, to keep themselves in power, but anybody who believes that should arrive at that belief after consideration of evidence, and they should be willing to change their mind after discovering new evidence.

      The poster I replied to said, "This web site was only meant to pacify the citizenry". That may be true, but from what I've heard about China, it certainly seems quite possible that the Chinese government has good intentions with this website.

      All I'm really saying is that we shouldn't jump to conclusions.

    9. Re:/dev/null by A_Chinese · · Score: 1

      "Corruption will cause the top of China's "Communist" party to lose power and money" No. Only the lose of power by Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will fully expose how corrupt it is. The Hope Project, the most important charity organization in China, which is closely associated with the current CCP leader Hu Jintao, misused significant amount of its funds. Jiang Mianhen, the son of the former CCP leader Jiang Zemin, founded billon dollar chip manufacturing empire by acquiring its major company previously owned by the government at less than 1% of its value and many more subsequent stunts. You now see the government acknowledges that the entire leadership of Shanghai City was corrupt to its core including the now jailed former CCP secretary Chen Liangyu (this was disclosed after their bosses Jiang Zemin gradually lost power of course). The 150 billion dollar corruption case of Zhou Zhenyi is still stalled for years because the CCP official behind it, Jiang Zemin is not completely out of power yet. Due to the high concentration of money within CCP, corruptions that can sentence western officials to millions of years can be well kept for as long as needed. In fact, CCP leaders need corruption to attract their gangs, eh, their comrades, to work for them to keep power over the people. Only those who lost power or those whose boss lost power in the intense internal CCP power war will be kicked down by disclosing their corruption. To fully understand what CCP is, read the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party at http://ninecommentaries.com/

    10. Re:/dev/null by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      OK, you would know more about it than I! I am only familiar with Wall Street's perspective. The financial analysts think that China is working to decrease corruption that affects corporations. Corruption against the Citizens of China seems like a silly thing to care about when you are looking at a country which slaughters students for wanting democracy.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  18. A good sign by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In a part of the world where government corruption is hideously rampant, I think this is a wonderful sign. I suggests that China's national government and many citizens want to reduce corruption. This program might not take down highly connected corrupted officials (only a free press can do that, I think), but I bet it could make lots of people's lives better.

    Assuming that the complaints are actually investigated, that the investigations are fair, and that most people don't make false accusations of corruption, that is.

    1. Re:A good sign by kaiwai · · Score: 1

      Alot of people think that Chinese actually care about democracy, heck, many people here think people care about democracy - and yet, demonstrated over and over again in the US elections, no one can be bothered exercising that right.

      Back to China, what pisses the average Joe off there isn't so much corruption between high profile people, its when they find that their land, house, cow, donkey, car or some other piece of property is stolen by the government in the name of progress - and worse still, none of the laws designed to protect them, are actually followed.

      PS. For those who are dense, there is a difference between having a law and actually enforcing it. There are alot of laws and constitutional rights which are not being held up - China's constitution allows freedom of speech, for example.

    2. Re:A good sign by owlnation · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In a part of the world where government corruption is hideously rampant, I think this is a wonderful sign. I suggests that China's national government and many citizens want to reduce corruption. This program might not take down highly connected corrupted officials (only a free press can do that, I think), but I bet it could make lots of people's lives better.
      Yes, but why is this restricted to China? I am 100% for-sure-certain that if a similar website was put up for the UK exactly the same thing would happen.

      And in the UK, were such a thing to happen the Government would make promises to tackle the issue. They'd appoint some sort of quasi-governmental commission that was essentially accountable to no-one and "investigate". They'd then generate large and frequent reports that hid problems in obscure language deep into the report to ensure no-one ever read them, and occasionally set targets that no-one would ever reach. No-one would be held accountable or punished for those charges not being reached. This, despite vast amounts of tax payers money being used in the whole fiasco. The logo for the new commission alone would cost a few million just to start with.

      The "free" press (the government owned) BBC and the more than 50% that's owned by New Corps International wouldn't report much as usual.

      No, this is not unique to China -- but on the bright side, in China the people don't have 5 million security cameras following their every move.
    3. Re:A good sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wrong. All countries are not equally corrupt. I'm from the United States. I live in Latin America. Here, for $100, you can buy just about any gov't document, get out of any ticket, etc. Try doing that in California (or London).

    4. Re:A good sign by Macthorpe · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can see how they've held back on reporting on the recent issues regarding the data that the government lost.

      They didn't report much about that, did they?

      Yes, the government are incompetent, but to claim the BBC "wouldn't report much" is false and can be demonstrated as such.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    5. Re:A good sign by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      I live in Latin America. Here, for $100, you can buy just about any gov't document, get out of any ticket, etc.
      "Latin America" is a big place buddy
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    6. Re:A good sign by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a sign at the motor vehicle emissions testing facility. Similar to the "Shoplifters will be prosecuted" sign seen in many stores except it read "Bribing a state inspection official is a crime. Violators may be prosecuted." With the word 'may' in place of 'will'.

      I figured that just meant, make sure your bribe is high enough.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:A good sign by Korveck · · Score: 1

      Kind of interesting that former-British colony Hong Kong has something almost exactly as you described (called the ICAC I think). It worked very well and largely ended the corruption in government some decades ago. And no, corruption in UK is not nearly comparable to that in China.

  19. Who would be brave enough? by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To complain 'on paper' like that?

    With that government, i know i wouldn't. Hell, I'm almost afraid to complain about mine these days..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Who would be brave enough? by kwoff · · Score: 1

      You get the government you deserve.

    2. Re:Who would be brave enough? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      If you live in a country where simply speaking out earns you instant imprisonment or death, you have to pick your battles more carefully. ( i.e. do your work more covertly then just spraying ineffective words onto a forum that can ultimately be traced back to you. )

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  20. The UK should get one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On second thoughts, the data would just go missing...

    1. Re:The UK should get one of these... by serialdogma · · Score: 1

      But at least it will still be in a government building, the House of Lords one would presume.

  21. "The Manager's Wife" by Circlotron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speaking of China and corruption, I had to laugh out loud when I read the quote at the bottom of the [Slashdot] page: "Mencken and Nathan's Fifteenth Law of The Average American: The worst actress in the company is always the manager's wife." There once was an actress named Jiang Qing... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiang_Qing

  22. Does anyone know... by Perseid · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the Chinese character for 'pwnt'?

    1. Re:Does anyone know... by earlgrey1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm the slashdot text box does not support unicode. "bei zhan you" is the romanized pronounciation.

    2. Re:Does anyone know... by maciarc · · Score: 1

      ...the Chinese character for 'pwnt'?
      Isn't it the same character as the one that means 'teabag'?
    3. Re:Does anyone know... by ybfelix · · Score: 1

      "bei zhan you" is silly, that's the conventional meaning for "owned"

      IMHO it's "miao" , lit."second". It's short for "miao sha", i.e "slay somebody within seconds".(here's a picture of the characters http://i3.tinypic.com/6kqmirc.gif )

      ---

      hell I forget I even got a username on slashdot...surprise for a Chinese non-nerd

      --
      London bridge is falling down, falling down, falling down~
    4. Re:Does anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out the tone information, noob. Should be miao3 sha4, IIRC

    5. Re:Does anyone know... by ybfelix · · Score: 1

      Should be miao3 sha1 in Mandarin.

      And the lolcat idea is not that bad :),except that considering the tone "miao3" not "miao1~~", that would sounds more like an furious pussy..
      --
      London bridge is falling down, falling down, falling down~
    6. Re:Does anyone know... by Ignatius+D'Lusional · · Score: 1

      That depends. What's the ENGLISH translation for "pwnt"?

    7. Re:Does anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nay, I'm sure it's "bei4 he2 xie2".

    8. Re:Does anyone know... by ybfelix · · Score: 1

      River crab...

      --
      London bridge is falling down, falling down, falling down~
  23. As a general rule ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    one should install pristine officials right from the original CD, and then periodically CRC them to make sure they haven't been corrupted. It's especially important not to download your officials from any old site on the Web, because they might have been deliberately corrupted.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  24. Absolute power... by ahodgkinson · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the article:
    • The bureau has been entrusted to collect and analyze information from the banking, land use, medicine and telecommunications sectors, among others, and to share it with prosecuting organs, courts and the police.
    Share the information with police, who might actually come after the people making the most complaints?

    The cynic in me says that this is probably merely an initiative by the government to see where the problems are, rather than a true attempt to end corruption. A few high profile cases will be dealt with, but the rest will be window dressing. I wouldn't be surprised if a few of the loudest complainers are quietly dealt with.

    I think the Chinese authorities are realistic enough to know that they face an impossible task. Witness the first 'death penalty for corruption' laws enacted, with great fanfare, well over ten years ago. In spite of much PR and many executions, corruption remains as widespread as ever. The death penalty certainly doesn't seem to be a deterrent against corruption.

    One of biggest problems facing China's government is ensuring its own long-term survival, and corruption is a big danger to the government's survival. They should know. The communist revolution itself was a reaction against corruption.

    As they say: Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    --
    ---- It won't be as bad as you fear or as good as you hope, but it will take twice as long as you plan.
    1. Re:Absolute power... by Circlotron · · Score: 1

      "Share the information with police, who might actually come after the people making the most complaints?" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundred_Flowers_Campaign

    2. Re:Absolute power... by orzetto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The death penalty certainly doesn't seem to be a deterrent against corruption.

      The death penalty is not a deterrent for anything. There are some pretty draconian laws for capital punishment for street crimes in the US, but it's not like those US states are safer than Canada because of that.

      Corruption is deterred by transparency, street crime by welfare, equal opportunities and affirmative action, but the death penalty is a so much more spectacular way of convincing voters you are doing something about it when you are actually not.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    3. Re:Absolute power... by jotok · · Score: 1

      Yes, by this is why cynicism and despair are enemies of democracy as much as corruption. All that has to happen for corrupt governments to remain in power is for people to say "Well, there's nothing that can be done, I'm just going to look out for myself."

      Check out the ongoing election process in (e.g.) Morocco. There are tons of encouraging news articles but in the comments everyone says "Eh, our government is corrupt, nothing will change." It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

      Hopefully out of China's ~1.3b people there are some with the courage to stand up to widespread corruption. Hopefully we can say the same about America and the rest of the world, too.

    4. Re:Absolute power... by quacking+duck · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a critical difference with your capital punishment comparison.

      China has executed some people fairly high up the food chain, like their FDA chief, or a bank official. These are not your regular, fairly anonymous people like those executed in US states, but are among the small, wealthy minority of people who wielded significant influence and power.

      Slashdotters are always complaining about how laws never get passed that touch the wealthy in western countries, or they skip out of the country and retire in the Carribean, or how they always get cushy sentences. While there's still a lot wrong with the Chinese government, backing up your anti-corruption campaign by executing high-profile officials says to everyone that money and power are not enough to shield you from your crimes, and goes a long way to curbing such behaviour.

    5. Re:Absolute power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too. (Saw it on a despair.com poster)
    6. Re:Absolute power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope some Chinese stand up also...
      although when they do stand up they will still not be seen

      bad..dum ching...

    7. Re:Absolute power... by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      The death penalty is not a deterrent for anything. There are some pretty draconian laws for capital punishment for street crimes in the US, but it's not like those US states are safer than Canada because of that.
      Reminds me of Freakonomics, which showed evidence that drug dealers on the street in one area have a higher chance of getting killed in a year than death row inmates are.
    8. Re:Absolute power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The death penalty is not a deterrent for anything.

      That's because it's infrequently and inconsistently used that even hardened criminals know they have next to no chance of facing it. Set up efficient, fast-track capital punishment and lower the bar for using it dramatically and it will be an extremely effective deterrent.

    9. Re:Absolute power... by Alomex · · Score: 1

      The death penalty is not a deterrent for anything.

      The death penalty is a deterrent for reincidence.

      So are prison sentences for that matter: they make reincidences less frequent.

  25. 2007 is ten years ago? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1, Informative

    Find out what happened to Zheng Xiaoyu, former head of product safety in China.

    That was july THIS year, so with one simple googling I basically shot down your entire rant. This story even made it to slashdot, so I not only show you to be incapable of googling, I show you incapable of recollecting events reported on a site you read. Why then shoud I take anything else you write serious?

    Get your facts straight, then I might take your opinions serious.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:2007 is ten years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you have missed the parents point completely. The parent mentioned that a few examples would be made but that there would be no fight against overall corruption. Remember, the plural form of anecdote is not data.

    2. Re:2007 is ten years ago? by ahodgkinson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • So 2007 is ten years ago?

      No. 2007 is now. And yes, in 2007 another public official was executed for corruption in China. Zheng Xiaoyu was probably not the only, nor will he be the last, government official to be executed in China for corruption. Believe it or not, I am aware that China still executes govenment officials (and also the occasional businessman) for corruption.

      Please re-read what I wrote:

      • A few high profile cases will be dealt with, but the rest will be window dressing.
      The death penalty for corruption was enacted over a decade ago, and, as you correctly imply, remains in force to this day. I didn't mean to imply that executions for corruption have stopped, my point was, that in spite of the the death penalty, corruption is still widespread in China.

      I further believe that, as one of the other replies also stated, the fix for corruption is transparency. Unfortunately, barring a major shake up in China, massive transparency is not likely to happen in China anytime soon (think about the Great Firewall).

      I don't believe that the death penalty for corruption is being applied consistently or fairly (in the sense of all people being equal under the law), and consequently it loses its deterrent effect.

      This doesn't invalidate my points:

      1. That the Chinese government is facing an insurmountable task in attempting to stop corruption.
      2. That the Chinese government is quite concerned with staying in power, and this means that its goals of collecting information about corruption may not be limited to identifying corrupt officials.
      --
      ---- It won't be as bad as you fear or as good as you hope, but it will take twice as long as you plan.
    3. Re:2007 is ten years ago? by DavidShor · · Score: 1
      "In spite of much PR and many executions, corruption remains as widespread as ever. The death penalty certainly doesn't seem to be a deterrent against corruption."

      All he is saying is that executions don't seem to effect corruption. Zheng Xiaoyu was just one of those executions.

      Learn to read, then I might take your opinions "serious".

  26. tagged "humor"? by AlgorithMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how can people tag this article with "humor"?
    corrupt public servants are being executed in china,
    so we are talking about a webinterface to a death-list here!

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
    1. Re:tagged "humor"? by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Maybe if we did that in the States, we wouldn't be so screwed up right now.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:tagged "humor"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because an "anti corruption" website mysteriously does not work? China has a lot of things against corruption, like the museum set to shame people convicted in the past of corruption. They even have instilled the death penalty yet corruption persists. Is anyone going to really be executed because of THIS LIST? hardly. Just like I highly doubt this website is run by the one government official in China that isn't corrupt... that's the amusing part.

    3. Re:tagged "humor"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >corrupt public servants are being executed in china, so we are talking about a webinterface to a death-list here!

      If so, it's proof positive of China's superior level of civilization. I wish every country would rapidly and efficiently execute officials convicted of corruption.

  27. Re:The USA should get one of these...Alive Citizen by jmac1492 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well let's see. The geek solution is a technical one (website.) While the common sense solution involves people physically doing something, like their civic duty (do I really need to explain what those are?).

    Wow. I'm reading this comment at -1. W00T for the Slashdot groupthink. Apparently, AC, you should have mentioned what the civic duties are. If you live in a democracy, as this poster (though not TFA) is referring to, and you don't like the people in charge, you VOTE FOR THE OTHER GUY in the next election.

    Whine about things on the internet is +3 Insightful and this is -1?

    --
    Jenny's got a new number! 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  28. IT'S A TRAP (with historical precent). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PRC has a poor track-record with government-endorsed whistleblower campaigns. Poor, as in thrown in jail.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundred_Flowers_Campaign

    1. Re:IT'S A TRAP (with historical precent). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...

      This type of campaign has loads of recent precedent, if the table at the bottom of the Three-Anti/Five-Anti campaign page is any indication (it's linked from the one you cited). And, yes, in the past this sort of appeal for input/criticism has been turned around to identify and silence the critics.

    2. Re:IT'S A TRAP (with historical precent). by Jim+in+Buffalo · · Score: 1

      I believe you are exactly right. "Outing" corrupt public officials in China is, in and of itself, a punishable crime, for which people are jailed and tortured, and I'm sure this "website" is only an attempt to root out those with the temerity to do so in order to round them up and imprison them.

      --
      This sig, aah-ah, is comin' like a ghost-sig...
    3. Re:IT'S A TRAP (with historical precent). by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      You do understand the major differences between Mao's China, and China of today, do you?

      Besides, the Hundred Flowers wasn't about "whistleblowing". It was about free speech.

  29. No Wonder, a 3MB Image on the Front Page by njhunter · · Score: 1

    Curious icons of people, I've never before noticed many fair skinned, blond haired folks from the Middle Kingdom.

  30. Death penalty for corruption - is this the game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the fact that for corruption there is a death penalty in China, I wouldn't be surprised if it would be the case for most complaints. If somebody wants to get rid of an enemy, there is no more convenient way to achieve it than this.

    Similarly, it was a very popular game in Czechoslovakia during socialism, although no death penalty there. Lot of innocent people landed in jails afterwards.

    Long live the wisdom of crowds (anonymous)!

    Just funny, I don't want to login to slashdot, so I am posting this also anonymously. Merry Christmas to everyone :)

  31. Bug in the calendar code by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

    One of the most ancient sites.
    The calendar on their index page reads "December 24, 107" (The calendar is at the bottom-right corner. Chinese reads dates in Y-M-D order.)
    Well, there has been a historical tradition of corruption in China.

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. great... by superwiz · · Score: 1

    China leading US on civil rights.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  34. Re:The USA should get one of these...Alive Citizen by DavidShor · · Score: 1
    "While the common sense solution involves people physically doing something, like their civic duty (do I really need to explain what those are?)."

    Yes, that would be great. This is China, a lot of people died the last time they tried the "common sense solution".

  35. Why the site is so slow by Animats · · Score: 2

    The site has too much junk on it. No wonder the server is overloaded.

    There are several .swf objects. Some are movies. There's a Javascript picture rotator. There seems to be server-side Java; if you try vote.jsp on the site, you get a Java backtrace.

    The "vote" script is amusing. The web designer seems to have copied a "suggestion box" script from somewhere, then commented out the "vote" capability. It's so PRC. The government is terrified of their people voting on anything.

  36. one pic over 3 MB (3504x2336) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone needs to help em out, that is crazy
    this file: http://yfj.mos.gov.cn/yfj/1.jpg
    in this frame: http://yfj.mos.gov.cn/yfj/ScrollImg.htm

    m10

  37. Re:The USA should get one of these...Alive Citizen by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    If you live in a democracy, as this poster (though not TFA) is referring to, and you don't like the people in charge, you VOTE FOR THE OTHER GUY in the next election.
    So what do you do when the other guy is just as bad?
  38. In other news... by waa · · Score: 1
    In other news
    The anti-corruption web server in the United States of America, housed in the vice presidient's office BLEW UP and started a 2 alarm fire last week.

    --
    Windows is not the answer.
    Windows is the question.
    The answer is "NO."
  39. I apologize for this... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    But "miao" is PERFECT! Fits with lolcats...

    I'm going to burn for this :(

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:I apologize for this... by ybfelix · · Score: 1

      Actually we use the same syllable with a different tone(miao1) to discribe cat "mew"s, another common one is "mi 1", I think I must have came by one million chinese cats named "Mimi"..

      --
      London bridge is falling down, falling down, falling down~
  40. I think you are missing a point there by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    Guy was ... dealt with because he messed up with country's image. That's all. Corruption was just an excuse.
    In purely internal affairs nobody gives a damn - all china cares these days is to crush any internal commentary and keep up appearances for the west.

  41. I was sure the software was robust. by ocie · · Score: 1

    I mean, the developers sent me on all those trips, organized dinners for me and sent me and my family cars, tickets to the opera, etc. I was sure that meant the software would be robust.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  42. DoS? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    as droves of people logged on to complain about corruption among officials

    Could this have been a denial of service attack?

    I mean, a lot of people out there would have cause to mess with China.

  43. Does democracy solve corruption? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    Corruption is widespread in China, and very unpopular.

    As I have lived in both China and the US, I found that: corruption is widespread in China and is mostly illegal, whereas in the US, corruption is not as widespread but is ,b>mostly legal -- in name of campaign and political contribution.

    While democracy sounds something wonderful, I actually doubt it can be carried out effectively in China when everyone from officials to average person on the street. There are now limited form of elections in China (vote for the heads of villages.) From what I heard, even that, the candidates will invite their constituents to banquets and give them gifts to "buy" more votes -- like what candidates will do in Taiwan

    Looking abroad, where can I find any good examples of democracies in developing countries? Mexico? India? Philippine? Thailand? Russia? Taiwan? None of the important issues -- corruption, equality, fairness, poverty, environment protection -- have been solved any better than in China or Vietnam.

    "Democracy" has become a marketing scheme for politicians and become as unrealistic as communism.

    1. Re:Does democracy solve corruption? by Sergeant+Pepper · · Score: 1

      corruption is widespread in China and is mostly illegal, whereas in the US, corruption is not as widespread but is mostly legal That's one of the most insightful things I've seen in a long time.
  44. Racism based on "OFFENDERs" demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As anyone who has attended a college/corporate diversity class knows, only white people can be racist. And usually only white males.

    It doesn't matter what you think.
    It doesn't matter what you do.
    It matters what demographic you belong to.
    White == Bad

    The term "racism" almost always means "the right kind of racism".

    Is your hate politically correct hate?
    Do you believe that racism is wrong unless you hate white people?
    Do you believe that sexism is wrong unless you hate men?
    Do you believe that sexual discrimination is wrong unless you hate heterosexuals?
    Do you believe that religious intolerance is wrong unless you hate Christians?
    Do you believe that freedom of speech involves censoring offensive non-Politically Correct speech?
    Do you believe that DoubleThink is hard and that DoubleThink is easy?
    Do you keep such an open mind that your brain fell out?
    Are you a hypocrite and a bigot? Do your friends praise you for it and call you morally superior? Do you think that your bigotry makes you a better person than others?

  45. ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ha, I was expecting "National Bureau of ROTTING Prevention".

  46. Re:The USA should get one of these...Alive Citizen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yes, that would be great. This is China, a lot of people died the last time they tried the "common sense solution"."

    Yeah! And a lot of people died in the US when it was tried. What's your point?

  47. The tracking of disidents by Backieotamy · · Score: 1

    I'd be worried as a Chinese citizen that this was nothing more than a new way for the Chinese government to track those who have the audacity to publicize\critique or question the governments authoriti. The exit page of the questionaire \ blog forum probably read's:

    Thank you for voicing your concern. Your opinion, IP address, home address, names of all friends and relatives have been gathered and your concerned government will be "contacting" you shortly.