Slashdot Mirror


Mars Asteroid Impact More Likely Than Before

sheldie writes "The probability of asteroid 2007 WD5 impacting Mars has been revised following further observations. The chance of impact has increased from 1.3% to 3.9%" This is a follow-up to earlier coverage of this asteroid from last week.

51 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Wow by snowraver1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That would truly be an amazing event. The science that could be learned in the event of a collision would be massive! I, for one, welcome our planet smashing overlord!

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've experiments to be run. There is research to be done. On the planets who are still alive...

    2. Re:Wow by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, the slashdot crowd gets younger every year (and I'm so old I was a beta tester for dirt. We never did get all the bugs out).

      Does nobody remember Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 hitting Jupiter in 1994? Hell I even remember that and there was a catastrophe in my home town... oh wait, no that was 1993. The comet hitting Jupiter was a year later.

      But at any rate, we had a extinction-causing (if it would have happened on Earth) impact in less than the last fifteen years!

      How many collisions do you guys need, anyway? Jees! Leave poor little Mars alone!

      -mcgrew
      A letter from Linda

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Wow by snowraver1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It would cause alot of dust and dirt to become airborne, allowing spectral analysis to determine the presence of substances. The argument about water existing on the planet would likely be answered, and we could get a good look on what resources might be available on mars if humans were ever able to establish a base camp.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  2. Preview of news media coverage by bwintx · · Score: 5, Funny

    "BREAKING NEWS! [SFX: Ridiculously melodramatic sounder]

    "NASA now says an asteroid impact on Mars is now three times more likely than previously thought.

    "At this rate, the impact's likelihood will exceed 150% in just a few days."

    --
    Discussion System prefs link: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
    1. Re:Preview of news media coverage by Smidge204 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To be fair, a "1 in 24" is much better odds than "1 in 76." So yes, It is three times more likely and yes, that is a pretty big deal.

      A fresh impact crater would reveal all sorts of valuable, once-in-a-lifetime data about the planet that is likely to be the first humans will tred on since Earth. Don't underestimate the science.
      =Smidge=

    2. Re:Preview of news media coverage by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Informative

      What "science" do you have in mind? Mars has already a bazillion craters to look at

      But no FRESH ones. All the craters are millions of years old and have been weathered and contaminated. A fresh divot would expose deeper soils and rocks that have not previously been exposed to the atmosphere.

      Also, there are things to learn about the mechanics of larger impacts on Earth-like planets. Since comparisons have been drawn between this and the Tunguska explosion, perhaps studying this will help prove or disprove that theory.
      =Smidge=

    3. Re:Preview of news media coverage by calebt3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They said the rovers would only last a few months, too. We all see how badly they botched that timeline up.

    4. Re:Preview of news media coverage by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      I doubt NASA would tell the rovers if there was a chance anyways.

      Better to just allow the rover to see a shadow, look up, and emit:
      0x68 0x6f 0x6c 0x79 0x20 0x63 0x72 0x61 0x70 0x21

    5. Re:Preview of news media coverage by JetJaguar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But no FRESH ones.

      That's not really true. The orbital cameras around Mars have detected new craters from impacts that occurred in just the last few years. Here's just one example.

      --

      Shop Smart, Shop S-mart!

    6. Re:Preview of news media coverage by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 2, Funny

      One difference is that the atmospheric shock wave on Mars is expected to knock down many fewer trees than an impact on Earth would.

    7. Re:Preview of news media coverage by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not sure if it is the same crater but I did see a picture of a new Mars crater which was just a smudge in the sand. The impactor had fallen apart before impact and just spread some darker dust around. I think it would be very interesting to see how much of this object actually hits the ground, and how much mass gets thrown into the atmosphere.

      Maybe I am counting on this too much. 4% is not that high. Cross fingers. Touch chipboard.

  3. Do your duty, people by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
    C'mon, people, it's our duty as annoying geeks to raise paranoia amongst our friends and family.

    Tell them that if the asteroid just barely misses Mars that its gravitational pull could actually slingshot the rock straight towards earth! You just don't have to tell them what the chances of that are (astronomical would be an accurate value.)

    Lets see how many people who failed math we can get to go hide in caves till it passes. :-)

    --
    John
  4. That first picture... by dattaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    See that first picture where the arc of the asteroid makes a flyby right into our orbit, while just passing Mars?

  5. Versus Jupiter by us7892 · · Score: 3, Interesting


    How come the experts cannot mathematically say for certain whether this rock will hit Mars? What's the wildcard in this calculation that injects uncertainty?

    1. Re:Versus Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're waiting to see whether or not John McEnroe will volley it back. If he whiffs it we'll still be in for one helluva show, so it's win/win as far as I'm concerned.

    2. Re:Versus Jupiter by plover · · Score: 5, Informative
      Measurement inaccuracies in the observations of its current trajectory. It's not like we can hold a tape measure up to it and figure out its precise position, or put it on a scale to check its mass.

      The more it moves, however, the higher the precision of the measurements can be. So as time progresses, the astronomers will be able to reduce the circle of uncertainty.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Versus Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Accuracy of measurements, mainly.

      Also, regarding Jupiter and Shoemaker-Levy 9: Jupiter is a much larger target with a much larger gravitational field. In fact, Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 was actually orbiting Jupiter (not the Sun), and it was easy enough to see that its orbit was decaying. That fact alone means a collision was near certain.

    4. Re:Versus Jupiter by blhack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yes, there is. It is called the:

      "not knowing the exact position, velocity, and mass of the object due to inadequate funding that has been, instead, spent on countless "beautification" projects around major cities uncertainty principal"

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    5. Re:Versus Jupiter by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      The more it moves, however, the higher the precision of the measurements can be. So as time progresses, the astronomers will be able to reduce the circle of uncertainty.

      "The data's in. Let's see, it's going to miss Mars, and on Dec. 31 hit the 3rd pla[NO CARRIER]

    6. Re:Versus Jupiter by Markrian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, since the asteroid's mass is negligible to that of the planets, its mass is irrelevant to its trajectory as it can be considered a test particle. We only need to know six pieces of information - three spatial coordinates, and three velocity components. It's easy to measure four of these very accurately, but the radial distance and velocity of the asteroid with respect to us are harder. These are where the majority of the uncertainty comes from.

    7. Re:Versus Jupiter by samkass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it's worth noting that if it's this hard to predict whether a rock is going to hit a planet when there's confidence in the computational model but uncertainty in the observations, then it's absurd to talk about the climate in 2030-2100 when we have neither certainty that our models are accurate nor do we have very good data.

      I disagree that that's worth noting. There is absolutely no doubt that the distance between this asteroid and Mars is going to continue to decline for awhile. That type of qualitative statement is much closer to making climate predictions. The analogy of whether it will hit is closer to making weather predictions for 2 decades out, which I agree is absurd.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    8. Re:Versus Jupiter by slashname3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And you don't even mention Mars' version of Bruce Willis taking off in a flying saucer with a team of wild cat water drillers to plant nuclear weapons in the asteroid in an attempt to divert it from a direct strike on Mars. They have to factor in the possibility of that happening too.

    9. Re:Versus Jupiter by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the tone in the question, I would guess that you've never taken a proper science class.

      The basic point with scientific measurement is that you can take measurements, but you need to have realistic expectations as to the accuracy of those measurements and retain the error bounds throughout the calculations. For example, 1cm read from an ordinary ruler shouldn't be taken as 1.00000000000000 cm. It should be taken as something like 1cm plus or minus 0.05 cm. That's a possible error bound of plus or minus 5%.

    10. Re:Versus Jupiter by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A sig I saw here a few days ago fits that comment (im)perfectly: "I have measured my velcity with such exquisit perfection that I have no idea where I am".

      Ok, so that applies to particles and not astronomy. Fuck up a perfectly good joke...

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    11. Re:Versus Jupiter by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, blame OUR government! Like there aren't any other governments, or like Europe doesn't have a space agency, or China, or Russia. Or like ours is the ONLY inefficient government.

      I mean, my government (with the best legislators money can buy) really sucks, but it's not like any of the others do such a great job, either. Maybe ours sucks worst but they all suck.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    12. Re:Versus Jupiter by AgentPaper · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wrong unit of measure - the school bus is the accepted unit for items longer than a Beetle but smaller than a football field. 1/3 field = 1 bus = 3 Beetles. Alternately, 30 meters equals about 60% of the height of the Library of Congress' dome.

      Figures aren't available on how many light bulbs it will power, though.

      --
      First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
  6. General Buck Turgeson Is On It, Sir! by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Funny

    we can get to go hide in caves till it passes ... My God! The rooskies could be working on the very same thing right now!

    Mr. President, we must not allow a gravitationally slingshotted asteroid cave society gap!
    --
    My work here is dung.
  7. Look at it this way... by ToSeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As the Bad Astronomer notes, the odds of nothing happening have shrunk from 99% to 96%.

    1. Re:Look at it this way... by cplusplus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, I'm a "My glass is 3.9% full" kind of guy.

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
  8. Increasing probability by Will_Malverson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Remember how these things work - they made a few observations, from which they made a cone through which they're 95% (or whatever) sure that the asteroid will pass. Mars filled up about 1.3% of that cone, and so they can say that there's a 1.3% chance that Mars will be hit by the asteroid.

    A few days later, with better observations, the cone shrinks, and now Mars takes up 3.9% of the cone. As the cone shrinks, Mars will continue to consume a larger and larger portion of it, right up until the time (maybe) that the cone shrinks outside of Mars and they determine that there will be no impact.

    So remember, this is not unusual, and *every* non-impact event follows this pattern: Scientists find potential impact. Impact probability increases. Impact probability increases. (maybe a few more repetitions, too) Suddenly, they decide that it's not going to hit, and impact probability goes to zero.

  9. Is that asteroid by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    from Klendathu? /Service guarantees citizenship //Would you like to know more?

  10. Impact results by lpangelrob · · Score: 3, Informative
    No one's brought up the consequences of a collision yet, so here it is, from the first press release:

    If the asteroid is indeed on a collision course, it would hit Mars with a velocity of about 13.5 km/s (8.4 miles per second), and would produce an explosion equivalent to about 3 MT of TNT. We can only speculate as to the effects of such an impact, but it would be reasonable to expect a crater nearly a kilometer across and a significant amount of dust lifted into the atmosphere.
    It also notes the asteroid is 160 ft / 50 m across, and any impact probably will not be observed (by human eyes, anyways) because it will impact Mars where there are no instruments.
  11. Large Object Also Heading For Earth by Ed+Almos · · Score: 5, Informative

    2007 TU24 - approaching
    Approximate diameter: 319 meters (H=20.131)
    Closest Earth approach: 1.44 LD at 0826 UTC on 29 Jan. -----
    Inside ten LD of Earth: 24 Jan. until 3 Feb.
    Inside Earth's Hill sphere: 27 to 31 Jan.
    Closest Moon approach: 2.20 LD at 1533 UTC 29 Jan.
    Data based on: JPL SSD orbit solution #13 downloaded 6 Dec.
    based on 87 observations spanning 54 days
    Optical observation: observed from 13 locations during 53.8661 days
    discovered at 0626 UTC on 11 Oct. by the Catalina Sky Survey
    last observed at 0313 UTC on 4 Dec. by the Spacewatch 1.8m telescope

    This shows that a rock 319m in diameter will pass by the Earth on January 29th 2008, it's closest point will be about 1.4 times the moons orbit or about 357,000 miles. This is VERY VERY close.

    Regards

    Ed Almos

    --
    The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus, 56-120 A.D.
    1. Re:Large Object Also Heading For Earth by AbsoluteXyro · · Score: 5, Funny

      If 357,000 miles is "VERY VERY close" then I am practically inside Angelina Jolie's vagina, considering my proximity to her and what I assume you propose for varying degrees of closeness.

    2. Re:Large Object Also Heading For Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, close is a relative term. You see, the Earth is very, very big, so a distance of "only" 357,000 miles is very, very close when compared to the size of the Earth. Angelina Jolie, however, probably several hundred miles away from you, so when we calculate the relative distance, factoring in the size of your penis ... ;-)

  12. Re:This is going to decimate all life on Mars by jombeewoof · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would imagine 1/10 of the stories it will be used incorrectly on today.

    --
    Linux Zealots: Smarter than Mac Zealots, but still zealots.
  13. Good thing by bytesex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well then, it's a good thing we're not living there yet, isn't it ?

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  14. The rovers by ACS+Solver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is there any information yet on whether Spirit and Opportunity might see anything if there actually is impact - such as maybe seeing the dust rise or even capturing a glimpse of the asteroid in the Martian atmosphere?

    1. Re:The rovers by Ardipithecus · · Score: 2, Funny

      A calculation using Murphy's law suggests direct impact on Spirit with a sub-orbital bounce to Opportunity.

  15. But what about... by martyb · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The probability of asteroid 2007 WD5 impacting Mars has been revised [CC] following further observations. The chance of impact has increased from 1.3% to 3.9%"

    But what about 2007 WD40? My bet is that one WILL slip past us! <grin>

  16. What terrifies me about the potential impact by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is the tons of utter bullshit that Richard Hoagland will then spew about all the fantastic discoveries revealed by the impact, proving that there was an advanced civilization on Mars, that NASA is suppressing.

    Dear Jeebus, please let the asteroid hit the "Face On Mars" dead center, just to piss off that con artist Hoagland.

    Thanks!

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  17. i know what will happen. by xENoLocO · · Score: 3, Funny

    The asteroid will bust through the surface crust, exposting Mars' nougatty, caramel-filled center.

    Yummy.

    --
    "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
  18. Re:Helping the Asteroid... by railman99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Of course this would probably cause an interstellar war with the Martians, but still..."

    Nah, that war with the Martians ended 65 million years ago, when they blew up the home (5th) planet with their worm hole doomsday device, and both camps of survivors in space settled the only viable candidate planet in this Solar System, Earth. Yes, we are their descendants. LETS TRY REAL HARD NOT TO REPEAT THE SAME MISTAKE TWICE IN A ROW, PEOPLE!

  19. Odds of astroid impact by WalletBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Never tell me the odds!"

  20. Re:scared for earth by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Informative

    The same object missed us by 5 million miles -- about 1/8 the separation between Earth and Mars orbits -- two months ago and we didn't see it until two weeks later.

    rj

  21. Re:Taking All Bets by ladoga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there any sensible reason to care about moderations? It's something that has escaped me,
    but I'm relatively new here so maybe someone could elaborate.

  22. Murphy's Law Re:Taking All Bets by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, Murphy's law says that not only will the asteroid miss Mars, it says that the asteroid miss will be precisely enough to whip the rock around to a new orbit. One precisely timed and angled to aim it towards Earth where it will impact on some particularly inconvenient location. Like the 2008 Olympics, the city of Jerusalem, or something else of political import.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  23. Re:Taking All Bets by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If a comment is modded down far enough, it won't be seen. If a funny or interesting comment is modded "troll" or "offtopic" there's a chance I'll miss a chuckle or worse, Ill miss being enlightened about something.

    Then there's the karma thing. I'm not worried about mine, as it seems (so far knock on wood) to be impervious to anything; I get modded troll and offtopic all the time (sometimes they mod me offtopic and they're right, like this one should be) but someone whose karma is merely "good" could miss a chance to have that talk he wants with his fellow slashdotters.

    But what rankles me is the ones who mod you down for seemingly no reason. They especially do it to ACs, thinking (I guess) that a negative mod won't hurt someone not logged in, but forgetting that you can check a little box to post AC.

    I especially hate being called a troll. Mod me offtopic but damn it, I do NOT troll.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  24. A non-event of an event by celtic_hackr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unfortunately, they don't tell you everything. Sure there's now a 1:25 chance of it striking Mars, but what they don't tell you is that there is 4:1 chance it'll strike somewhere on Mars' darkside. Only those lucky Saturnian Overlords will get a view of it, and we'll have to pay hefty fees for the copyrighted DRMed videos of the impact. And then only on low-def capable viewers. :'(

    We should send some of our ELO defense missiles up there and shove a few more 'roids toward Mars. Hey, if we shoot enough at them maybe we can bust up the planet. Be some great fireworks then.

    Oh sure, you say, well maybe one of those 'roids will get shoved the wrong way and wind up wiping out Washington state, but hey, there's no great loss there is there?

  25. Re:Wait... by gilboad · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... In case someone doesn't know what the OP meant [1].

    - Gilboa
    [1] http://www.nss.org/resources/books/fiction/SF_018_lucifershammer.html