Slashdot Mirror


The Starbucks/AT&T Deal To Change Perception of Public Wi-Fi?

ericatcw writes "According to ComputerWorld, with two hours of free Wi-Fi soon to arrive at Starbucks consumers should expect more hotspots to go free as well as more attractive bundles from the likes of AT&T, Verizon and providers. While T-Mobile is hurting, indie coffeehouses and chains such as Caribou Coffee, Tully's and others that already offered free Wi-Fi, insist they are not, saying their ambiance and superior brew will help them retain customers."

170 comments

  1. Information wants to be free... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

    ...it would seem that access to said information also wants to be free.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Information wants to be free... by omeomi · · Score: 1

      This is awesome. I'd love to be able to get free WiFi access at Starbucks. Just to check my email on my iTouch. A lot of McDonalds and Paneras already have it. And I don't know what the summary is talking about because a lot of indie coffee shops around me have free WiFi. I've always kind of wondered why Starbucks and B&N charge for WiFi. Maybe just to discourage campers. Not that it isn't their right to do so, and they're certainly not hurting for business, but it's not like offering free WiFi is especially expensive. A couple hundred a month for a decent business connection. It's a drop in the bucket for Starbucks.

    2. Re:Information wants to be free... by isotactic · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's only 2 Free hours - you have to buy a card for $15, and then the first 2 hours are "free", after that you start paying again.

    3. Re:Information wants to be free... by poetmatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so basically its not free. Not a surprise there. Also means its not going to generate any more business than the current plan does, which is not exactly extravagant I'm sure. I guess it's going to be a while before they figure out that catering to customers is a good thing.

    4. Re:Information wants to be free... by jac89 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its actually 2 free hours a day, which for a one off fee of 15 dollars is really not too bad.

    5. Re:Information wants to be free... by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      NEWSFLASH: wifi access is already free in most locations, I purposefully avoid Starbucks because of their lack of free wifi. Both are a bit late to the party, hell even McDonald's has free wifi these days.

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    6. Re:Information wants to be free... by mrxak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a lot of airports have free wifi too. Some of them still charge something though, quite unfortunately. Now if only airports had more power plugs about!

    7. Re:Information wants to be free... by isotactic · · Score: 1

      Ack! You're right, the article did say per day. I stand corrected.

    8. Re:Information wants to be free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds pretty bad compared to the 25 other coffee shops in town, all of which are completely free, even if you buy no coffee.

      Of course, the coffee is better than Starbucks, so you might as well buy a cup while you're there.

    9. Re:Information wants to be free... by syphaxplh · · Score: 1

      But why pay any fee at all if there are free alternatives? Almost every indie coffee shop I know of where I live, plus a few big ones (Caribou was mentioned) offers free wifi... Given the choice between one of those and Starbucks, I will choose the alternative every time. And I like Starbucks' coffee! If small local shops see fit to provide this service to their customers, then I think they deserve to be rewarded with my business, even if I am not necessarily using the wifi service. It just seems that if little guys can find afford to provide free wifi, the likes of Starbucks certainly can and should.

    10. Re:Information wants to be free... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      It sounds pretty bad compared to the 25 other coffee shops in town, all of which are completely free, even if you buy no coffee. Starbucks is known for its numerous locations. Coffee Shops with free wifi, however, are dependent on the layout of where you happen to be nearby.

      Of course, the coffee is better than Starbucks, so you might as well buy a cup while you're there. Uh huh. Just like the TV shows I watch are better than the TV shows you watch.
      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:Information wants to be free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Up to two hours of free Wi-Fi service per day will be available for Starbucks Card holders"

      Maybe read again ?

    12. Re:Information wants to be free... by chooks · · Score: 1

      It's actually 2 free hours a day, which for one coffee of 15 dollars is really not too bad.

      Fixed that for you. No charge.

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    13. Re:Information wants to be free... by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      Of all the irony, midway airport in chicago has plenty of power plugs but they charge for wifi.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  2. Who else agrees by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That ubiquitous, free (if slow) wifi is going to be the way of the future?

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Who else agrees by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed (although I would qualify the adjective 'slow' with the adverb 'relatively'). Wi-Fi is fast becoming an expected service, as ubiquitous and taken for granted as electricity and running water. When you go out to eat, do you get charged for using the restroom? Do you pay a fee for the electricity used while you ate your meal? The pay-for-WiFi model is becoming just as ridiculous.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    2. Re:Who else agrees by misleb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not if it continues to utilize the 2.4Ghz range. In most urban areas the 2.4Ghz band is already saturated. I went to install Wifi in one of our satelite offices here in Portland I was able to see 50... that's right 50! other APs in the area. That sucks when there are 3 (4 if you push it) non-overlapping channels available.

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    3. Re:Who else agrees by badran · · Score: 0

      You actually do pay for those things unless you dine and dash...

    4. Re:Who else agrees by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Well technically, you do pay a fee for the electricity used while you ate your meal, but it's bundled into the cost of the meal. Considering how much a cable line and a WiFi router for customer use would cost businesses, I'd be willing to pay an extra cent for my meal if it translated to 'free' WiFi access.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    5. Re:Who else agrees by Spleen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Coffee shops and restaurants are somewhat different businesses. Coffee shops want people to hang around because they'll buy another cup or two. Restaurants on the other hand know that once people have had their meal they are doing spending money there. There are exceptions to that, but it is generally true. If a Restaurant's tables are generally full they want people to eat and then leave. Ever have to wait for a table? Imagine if that place had free WiFi and people stuck around after they ate. People maybe coming to expect it like water and electricity, but having a restroom with running water and electricity isn't going to keep people occupying tables for longer periods of time.

    6. Re:Who else agrees by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      That happened to me recently except 90% of the APs were on channel 6. Channel 11 was clear sailing. You'd think manufacturers would randomize this stuff at the factory.

    7. Re:Who else agrees by adolf · · Score: 1

      If they were factory-randomized, you and I (being clued at such mojo) would never have a chance at finding a clear channel. And while it would improve the greater good, it would also eliminate a competitive advantage that we currently have.

      That said, in regards to OP's reference to frequency bands, I've actually had far better luck with 2.4GHz gear than 5.7GHz, at least for medium-to-long distance links (up to 16 miles).

      5.7 seems to bounce around/get absorbed almost like light, and a single minor obstruction will mean the difference between a good, solid connection and nothing at all. At $day_job, I've "fixed" a number of scenarios where our sales guy has specified 5.7GHz stuff that didn't work at all by using 2.4GHz equivalents instead.

      There's a shitload of interference, sure, but a noisy signal is way more usable than none at all. 2.4GHz penetrates things like trees far, far better.

    8. Re:Who else agrees by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      You'd only need 3 or 4 if you shared.

      Bet they're all locked down... if linux firmware for routers started having sane sharing rules (5 k up 25 down shared) and people banded together to buy big bandwidth the telecos would be happy and everything would be nice... But scheduling is still expensive, and routers are generally garbage because people don't demand better (Though apparently enough people clued to the WRT54G that you can't find those anymore).

      Sharing works when people share, sharing doesn't work when people don't.

      You could mustard gas a city and sell clean air... but it'd be nice if people didn't. Limits on the free market and all that.

    9. Re:Who else agrees by misleb · · Score: 1

      You'd only need 3 or 4 if you shared.


      Share?? Why would I want to share an office WiFi with others? News flash: WiFi is used for more than just internet access. Even at home I transfer files between computers.

      Bet they're all locked down... if linux firmware for routers started having sane sharing rules (5 k up 25 down shared) and people banded together to buy big bandwidth the telecos would be happy and everything would be nice...


      Why would people band together and limit themselves to 256/56 internet access? Users "band together" through ISPs which then buy big pipe from the telcos.

      Sharing works when people share, sharing doesn't work when people don't.


      Well duh.

      You could mustard gas a city and sell clean air... but it'd be nice if people didn't. Limits on the free market and all that.


      WTF are you smoking? Not mustard gas, I hope.

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    10. Re:Who else agrees by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      restroom with running water and electricity isn't going to keep people occupying tables for longer periods of time. I disagree. If you're at a buffet- having a bathroom makes all the difference in the world between 3 plates and 6 plates. It's in a buffet's best interest to limit bathroom usage.
      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    11. Re:Who else agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to sell a slow version of what most of us already get for free? ! AT&T should be spending more time fixing it's totally crappy network. I can barely make a call without dropping it much less surf the web at a reasonable speed. At&T, I am embarrassed for you.

  3. What? Americans PAY? by Shuntros · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wifi in European Starbucks has been free for a long time now. Buy a coffee, get a free wifi scratchcard. When credit runs out, go back to counter and get another one.....

    1. Re:What? Americans PAY? by ArikTheRed · · Score: 1

      Some places do that. Everywhere I go it's completely free. Starbucks is about as indicative of American coffeehouse norms as McDonald's is to restaurant norms. Take away from it what you will.

    2. Re:What? Americans PAY? by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      And even McDonald's offers free wifi in most of their locations now.

      Every coffee house I know of within 500 miles of me that ISN'T a Starbucks has free totally open wifi 24/7, no codes or purchase required.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    3. Re:What? Americans PAY? by jwietelmann · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For every Starbucks here in the USA that charges for Wifi, there's a mom 'n' pop or local chain coffeehouse across the street that offers it for free.

      In fact, I've heard that a sure way to open a successful independent coffee shop is to open one right by a Starbucks. They've already done all the research on the location for you, and given a choice, I think a lot of people prefer to support the little guy and enjoy a less commercial atmosphere.

    4. Re:What? Americans PAY? by nintendo_is_a_cereal · · Score: 1

      What fantasy land do you live in? In Los Angeles I think I've found maybe one McDonalds with free WiFi and 0 Starbucks with free WiFi.

    5. Re:What? Americans PAY? by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1

      That's actually a really good idea. It keeps campers off and encourages people to keep chugging.

    6. Re:What? Americans PAY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everywhere. Most of Downtown Denver has free WiFi for ANYONE, whether or not you are buying anything from any of the stores. You don't even have to sign up. Granted, it may not be as secure as using a scratchcard, which at least limits the users to customers of a particular place only, but it's really convenient and they say there is a degree of encryption on the connection. I believe other cities are planning on adopting similar networks.

    7. Re:What? Americans PAY? by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      In fact, I've heard that a sure way to open a successful independent coffee shop is to open one right by a Starbucks.

      Indeed, that may be true and is a good point. A weekly Portland newspaper did a story about how the increasing number of Starbucks stores in the city actually helped increase the number of independant chains, by effectively lifting the popularity of coffee across consumer groups: http://wweek.com/story.php?story=5137.

      I myself don't hate Starbcusk at all. They treat their employees well, and their coffee is "ok" in my opinion. The only thing I don't like is that many Starbucks' don't feel very welcoming to stay in for a long period of time, which seems strange to me considering Howard Shultz's theory of Starbucks as the "third space". I find many mom and pop coffee stores just feel more inviting (plus have free WiFi).

    8. Re:What? Americans PAY? by cromar · · Score: 1

      I know I go to local coffee houses anytime it's convenient. Where I live we have a lot of great coffee houses and even a local roaster, so I am usually not very far from a locally roasted cappuccino or cuppa organic coffee.

      I would like to see more local coffee houses with a drive through, though!

    9. Re:What? Americans PAY? by vajaradakini · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's free in Canada too, but without real time limits (well, a time limit of until the store closes I suppose). One of my friends used to go into Starbuck's, buy one coffee, get their wireless password for the day and then he'd leave and if he needed internet later would sit on a bench outside and use the same password for free.

      --
      what's that now?
    10. Re:What? Americans PAY? by imthesponge · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then people buy their coffee from Starbucks and walk across the street to park their laptop at your place.

    11. Re:What? Americans PAY? by syzler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In fact, I've heard that a sure way to open a successful independent coffee shop is to open one right by a Starbucks. They've already done all the research on the location for you, and given a choice, I think a lot of people prefer to support the little guy and enjoy a less commercial atmosphere.

      That is funny since where I live, Starbucks is the little guy. In Anchorage, AK the big coffee shop player is Kaladis Brothers. Kaladis has been offering free wireless to anyone since I came to Anchorage seven years ago. They also have a nicer atmosphere with big over stuffed couches and chairs, plenty of tables, and power outlets for computers every where. Most of the local restaurants and grocers feature "Kaladi Coffee" instead of Starbucks.

    12. Re:What? Americans PAY? by dwater · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's not the 'Los Angeles' fantasy land...it isn't the only place in the world.

      I've yet to see a McDonald's with free wifi, but I read on AllAboutSymbian that they have it in the UK. I wouldn't be surprised if it were in other countries too.

      --
      Max.
    13. Re:What? Americans PAY? by dn15 · · Score: 1

      I would like to see more local coffee houses with a drive through, though!
      Here in Oregon it's hard to drive more than a couple blocks without seeing a drive-up coffee shack in the parking lot of a larger store. :)
    14. Re:What? Americans PAY? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      European Starbucks?

      Yeah, I saw a few. I don't see why anyone wants to go there if you can get good coffee cheaper pretty much everywhere else. I refuse to go into a Starbucks, simply for it being the overpriced equivalent of what MacDonalds is to food.

    15. Re:What? Americans PAY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the shop In Bel Air, actually across from the community collage. where after you buy a coffee and you prefer to use your laptop in the car and they call the police on you. http://www.mcshanesgourmet.com/

    16. Re:What? Americans PAY? by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      Starbucks was charging for WiFi in Cambridge, UK last month.

  4. Tullys is just another franchise by anagama · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Tullys is just another franchise. That isn't an independent coffee house at all. This is a great independent coffee house: http://www.theblackdrop.com/

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    1. Re:Tullys is just another franchise by LMacG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right, that's what it says:

      TFS: "indie coffeehouses and chains such as Caribou Coffee, Tully's ..."

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    2. Re:Tullys is just another franchise by techpawn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't think this Starbucks thing is going to pull me away from the Dunkin Donuts next door or the caribou coffee from down the street. At least till they get better coffee...

      --
      Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    3. Re:Tullys is just another franchise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not an independent coffee house, its just an independent house that sells coffee. My house is an independent *coffee* house. The coffee is grown on my friends coffee plantation in the Central America. I planted the particular plants that produced the beans that I'm drinking of right now.

    4. Re:Tullys is just another franchise by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      At least till they get better coffee... I like Starbucks coffee personally, I just don't like having to explain myself for ordering a regular cup of joe.
      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  5. I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by vondo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aside from airports* and some hotels, wireless is free everywhere that has it. (And what are you going to do, use another airport?)

    Seemingly everywhere now has free wireless: coffee shops, my car dealership, bars, etc. Why on earth would I go to Starbucks and pay $2 for a coffee (not a double soy quad shot latte, a COFFEE) and then pay an extra $10 for a wireless connection?

    That deal was doomed from the start and in today's climate is just silly. The new one is quite realistic.

    * Fort Lauderdale and Jacksonville, I believe, have free wireless at the airport. Nice of them!

    1. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by vondo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In other words, the "perception" of public wireless is already that it's free.

    2. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by lonesome_coder · · Score: 1

      * Fort Lauderdale and Jacksonville, I believe, have free wireless at the airport. Nice of them! Another big Florida airport, Tampa International, has free WiFi...plenty fast too.
      Dayton International also has free WiFi, albeit slow.

      Good to see some places really making an effort to accomodate their audience.
      --
      If you'd just do what we tell you and quit yer gripin' everything would be chocolate sprinkles and rainbows! -AC
    3. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by vondo · · Score: 1

      Probably Tampa I was thinking of. I know I stopped of somewhere on Southwest coming from FLL. Come to think of it, I stopped in Jacksonville a couple of times but never got off the plane.

    4. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by EMeta · · Score: 1

      JAX does as well.

    5. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by samkass · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Aside from airports* and some hotels, wireless is free everywhere that has it. (And what are you going to do, use another airport?)

      Actually, yes. It's one of several reasons that, living in mid-NJ, I drive down to Philadelphia instead of up to Newark for my flights (the other being substantially fewer delays, of course). Philadelphia has free wireless (as does Pittsburgh), but Newark charges $8... someone would have to be really desperate to pay that.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    6. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Why on earth would I go to Starbucks and pay $2 for a coffee (not a double soy quad shot latte, a
      COFFEE) and then pay an extra $10 for a wireless connection?"

      The second part can be answered by the same reason in the first part... $2 for a coffee indeed! Coffee is free or way cheaper than $2 at many locations, and yet starbucks has built an empire selling $2 coffee with $1-2 in extra sugar and calories dumped in for good measure. Maybe the $10 wireless comes with a big cookie.

      --
      stuff |
    7. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by schwanerhill · · Score: 1

      Among airports I've been to recently, Tucson, Phoenix, Albuquerque, Denver (a recent change from a pay service), and Kansas City all have free wi-fi. When it's a hub you're changing in, you can (to a limited extent) choose your airport.

      (But never change planes in Kansas City if you can avoid it -- the gate areas are so small that you have to leave security to change planes!)

    8. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by pak9rabid · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You wouldn't..just steal the fscking service. It's not very hard. Follow these simple steps:
      1. Establish layer 2 connectivity (connect to the wifi network)
      2. Populate your arp cache with other MACs/IPs on the network (nmap -sP 192.168.1.0/24 works nicely..substitute the proper subnet of course)
      3. Pick a MAC/IP pair at random, and set your MAC/IP to these values, but don't use the MAC/IP of the firewall
      4. Test connection (ping google.com or try browser)
      5. Repeat the last 2 steps as necessary until you get past their firewall
      6. ...
      7. Profit!
      The idea here is that you're going to keep tryign MAC/IPs on the network until you find a pair that belongs to someone that's already paid for a connection, thus their IP is already being let through the firewall. The MAC spoofing is necessary because eventually the firewall will refresh itself based on a list of MACs that are registered as having already paid for a connection. Enjoy!
    9. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by GiMP · · Score: 1

      You don't fly internationally much, huh? Not many Intl. flights out of Philadelphia, not for a decent price.. or maybe you spend more on your flight, to save the $8?

      Personally, I've paid $10/day for wireless plenty of times. I actually spent about $20 in Berlin for internet, when I was stuck there waiting for a layover. I wouldn't consider myself desperate when paying, but I do use it for business, not pleasure.

    10. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      http://www.jiwire.com/ Look for the FREE providers, but the site lists all, so if you are desperate, you can look for pay providers, too.

      Layne

    11. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Huntsville (HSV) has it, and I believe Bush Intercontinental (IAH) also has it.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      $2? Where?
      A tall(10/12 ounces) is about $1.67 I think. If you bring your USED Starbucks cup or a starbucks mug it's a $.35 refill. Did you know that?

      Where are you getting $2???? I live and work in Boston/Cambridge area and that's what I pay. Well worth it for free wi fi. ALL StarBucks I go to the service is so friendly and helpful it's crazy. Places I go to routinely know me and are even more friendly. I don't even go everyday, I mostly brew starbucks or other brands at home. But when I have to go into a starbucks, I don't mind it at all.

      Starbucks will always get my money because of the user friendly attitude and many other things they do right.

      All these people talking about the Starbucks elitest mentality need to lose it. Not everyone gets a double fat chai triple shot espresso macchiato.

      I won't even go into a Dunkin Donuts. Half the staff sometimes doesn't even speak ENGLISH and the coffee is NOT the same everywhere you go.

    13. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by Brieeyebarr · · Score: 0

      Here in Portland, OR we have free (previously Ad-supported) Wi-Fi pretty much everywhere in the city provided by MetroFi. They joined with Microsoft in January to provide the service ad-free but with the catch of downloading MSN's "SideGuide" program, which is pretty much just a search bar that directs to windows live search. So here in Portland the general idea is that Wi-Fi access *is* free.
      And hell, if you don't want to bother with MetroFi, I've never been in an area downtown that doesn't have at least 5 unsecured APs.

    14. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Diego, Dallas and JFK have free wireless too as do a few other I flew through last year.

    15. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by Pinback · · Score: 1

      PDX has free wifi, and Micron sponsors it in BOI.

    16. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know Starbucks always gets a bad rap for being too expensive. The regular coffee price is pretty competitive with the likes of Dunkin Donuts or Panera. The reality is that you pay a premium at SB because they treat their employees fairly well. They actually spend more on health care for their employees than they do on coffee beans on a yearly basis. I worked there because I could get a full health plan for a 20 hour work week. How many other part time jobs do that for you? I agree I always thought it was BS that they didn't offer free WiFi but it sure didn't hurt business.

    17. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by sricetx · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, pak9rabid, number 7 is not "Profit". It's "Go to Jail" for stealing service. It's one thing to piggyback on someone's unsecured wifi router (if they have it open in this day and age, they are obviously intending to share it), and another thing entirely to hack into a commercial and secured pay internet service. Just because you have the technical knowledge to do so doesn't mean that you should...

    18. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by milsoRgen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay I like the refill tip you provided, but let's stop. Breath in, exhale... Calm down. It's just coffee. Not really it is, some is good, some is bad. And some people just don't like the Starbucks jive. Shhhh... It's going to be Okay...

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    19. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That deal was doomed from the start and in today's climate is just silly. The new one is quite realistic."

      The advantage of Starbuck's pay wifi was that you could be sure it was there. If you need internet access on the road you can go to a Starbuck's instead of stopping to check every business you pass to see who might have wifi available. For someone who travels a lot that would be worth paying for, particularly outside of cities. Still doesn't make sense for the local regulars though. :-)

    20. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      Last two times I passed through IAH, the WiFi wasn't free. Not a big deal, tho. I've got one of those pay-as-you-go Boingo accounts and really couldn't complain. If I want free Wi-Fi, I'll check into a hotel.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    21. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by samkass · · Score: 1

      You don't fly internationally much, huh?

      Nope. Almost all my business travel is domestic.

      or maybe you spend more on your flight

      Actually slightly less. And that's not considering the hours of useless time I've spent waiting for flights to or from Newark, sitting on the Newark tarmac, circling above Newark, or trying to figure out how to get to Newark when you get flown to another NY airport instead. (How can an airline *coughUSAirwayscough* consider their job done when they switch you to a flight going to the wrong city in the wrong state... LGA is 45 minutes from Newark!)

      --
      E pluribus unum
    22. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by FatJuggles · · Score: 1

      First, I don't know which Starbucks you go to get coffee, but what you said is not true! If you bring in your own mug, it's only .10 cents off the price of the coffee. Once you buy coffee and then ask for a re-fill, then it's like .50 cents or something. Also, it does have an elitist attitude. Have you ever been to a local diner or something and bought a cup of coffee? It's still under $1 and they don't force feed you hippy music and call the f*kin' coffee "Americana" It's still ordered coffee with cream and sugar. Don't hate the desi brothers at Dunkin... I take you it you never eat at McDonald's or Subway either because they take your order and make the sandwich WITHOUT asking you for a TIP to do their damn job. peeesshhh... As for the Wi-Fi... nothing is free. Get used to it. Leeches!

    23. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by internic · · Score: 1

      Aside from airports* and some hotels, wireless is free everywhere that has it. (And what are you going to do, use another airport?)

      I live in the DC area where there are 3 major international airports within reasonable driving distance, so I can quite conceivably use a different one. So, of course, you'd expect market forces to ensure that all 3 have free wifi. Thankfully for them, the regional airport authority decided to ban free wifi in any of the area airports based on totally preposterous safety arguments, thus ensuring their revenue stream.

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    24. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      "All these people talking about the Starbucks elitest mentality need to lose it."

      by _PimpDaddy7_

      If anyone is qualified to speak of elitist mentalities, it would be someone with a user name congaing the word "Pimp" and/or "daddy" in it.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    25. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Hence the "I believe". It's been a while since I was in IAH.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    26. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      As long as we're all in the mood to bitch about air travel, US Airways is indeed the worst airline followed closely by Delta. However, in terms of the airport, Dulles takes the cake as the worst airport in this country by far.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    27. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      ...But keep in mind that you have to be caught before you go to jail. What are they going to do, point directly at your laptop, say "A-HA!", then chase you out of the store?

    28. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by Zephyr14z · · Score: 1

      I work at Starbucks. A grande(medium, regular, whatever) coffee is $2.00, after taxes. So, that is where he got that number. Also, while it is true that not everybody gets really complicated drinks, most people do. The people who order just black coffee are few and far between. To those of you who do, god bless you. It's nice to not have to write a goddamned essay on every single cup.

    29. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by dwater · · Score: 1

      Well, I've yet to find a decent US airline....oh, apart from that one...what's it called?...ah, right, JetBlue. I used them a few times and was pleasantly surprised. My sister, who was traveling with her child, had a different opinion though - she said the leg room was minimal.

      Still, the best airline I've traveled on is Virgin, and that was back in 1990. IMO, Singapore airlines are equal to them though - I flied with them just recently.

      --
      Max.
    30. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by node+3 · · Score: 1

      If I want free Wi-Fi, I'll check into a hotel. If you want free WiFi, you pay for a hotel room?

      Who is John Galt? An imaginary man with impossible traits idealized by people who claim their highest value is objective reality?
    31. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Then you just play dumb and say "I don't what this computer doohicky is doing - I just turned it on and it started working. Did it do something wrong? I'll take it back to Best Buy and get the Geek Squad to fix it again. Sorry about that."

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    32. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Las Vegas too.. has had it in all terminals for about 5 years....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    33. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Lots of places have "free" wifi around Seattle, but it's not uncommon for them to have a WEP password that they give you when you buy something. Mind you many of them never change it. Finding an unrestricted open network is getting increasingly harder. When I need connectivity I don't want to have to search around for it and squat in someone's doorway when it's 40 degrees F. Presuming that AT&T implements this better than the worthless infrastructure that T-Mobile deployed (and better than the flaky shit that Tully's has) , this will rock -- $20/mo is pretty good when most airports and many hotels still seem to charge as much as $15 per DAY. $20/mo for wifi at the nearly-ubiquitous Charbucks will rawk, and it may well be bundled with the AT&T aircard I may be getting soon. Car dealers and bars are hardly useful for frequent or real use. It'll be at least 5 years before I need to buy a new car, and I'm not a junkie. Bars also tend not to be open at 8am. In many regions, both actually STILL let people smoke and thus are uninhabitable anyway.

    34. Re:I never understood the T-Mobile/Starbucks deal by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      Downtown Vegas has a drought of free Wi-Fi --- the casinos don't offer it, even in the rooms. They have these 'office' areas downstairs with pay-by-the-minute fees. Yecch!

  6. Not in Australia by crispi · · Score: 2, Informative

    WiFi in Oz is charged at exorbitant rates ($15/hr). Starbucks has got Telstra to put in the WiFi infrastructure. Telstra is the incumbant ex-public telco.

    In Melbourne where I live I can name one free WiFi _location_ which is a food court.

    With the advent of HSDPA/3G (Telstra call it NextG), I can see WiFi NEVER taking off. (Why be limited to 50m radius of a hotspot when you cal roam all throughout the capital city)?

    Crispi

    1. Re:Not in Australia by Mike89 · · Score: 1

      In Melbourne where I live I can name one free WiFi _location_ which is a food court.
      Thank you, RMIT :). (for those of you wondering where it is, it's part of 'Melbourne Central')
    2. Re:Not in Australia by adona1 · · Score: 1

      I made a list and map for a friend a while ago detailing free wifi around Melbourne. Some places expect you to buy a coffee or beer, but seeing as caffiene & alcohol go well with computing, that's not such a drag. Do a google search, there's a few pages compiled with the locations.

      --
      Between the falling angel and the rising ape
    3. Re:Not in Australia by marafa · · Score: 0

      ack! in egypt, mcdonalds, beano's, celantro and other notable coffee shops have offered free wifi for almost 2 years now. i dint realise we had it good compared to others.
      but then again. an unlimited 256k dsl connection is only 95le per month.

      --
      _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
  7. huh? by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    Uh, wasn't there an article posted just the other day full of people bitching about how the new wifi service @ Starbucks is not going to be free?

    1. Re:huh? by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Ah, nevermind...free to AT&T broadband subscribers...ghey.

  8. Panera Has Had Free WiFi For Years by cbowland · · Score: 5, Informative

    Panera Bread has had free wifi for years. You can use this page to find one near you. They typically don't hassle you even if you are camped out and not buying much.

    --

    Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
    Teach him to eat and he will fish forever.

    1. Re:Panera Has Had Free WiFi For Years by Bourbon+Man · · Score: 1

      The Panera closest to me shares a building with Starbucks. I always found it humorous that Panera's free wireless is bound to stop anyone from paying for Starbuck's. Panera has better coffee, too.

    2. Re:Panera Has Had Free WiFi For Years by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      So does Atlanta Bread and Camilles cafe's. Not to mentions a ton of other places.
      I am not a big Starbucks fan.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Panera Has Had Free WiFi For Years by cbowland · · Score: 1

      Sure, lots of places offer free wifi. I used Panera as an example as there are some 1000+ of those cafes across the country. Not quite to Starbucks' scale, but probably more available than the other mom and pops or smaller chains. I think I read somewhere that they had the largest free wifi network in the states.

      --

      Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
      Teach him to eat and he will fish forever.

    4. Re:Panera Has Had Free WiFi For Years by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I agree Atlanta Bread Company is also a pretty big chain. As is the other place a mentioned. The funny thing is I both Panera and Atlanta Bread much more that Starbucks. They have a lot better food. Coffee? Well I don't drink Coffee so what do I know?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Panera Has Had Free WiFi For Years by whovian · · Score: 1

      Panera Bread has had free wifi for years. You can use this page to find one near you. They typically don't hassle you even if you are camped out and not buying much.

      At our two (2) Paneras you have a maximum 30-minutes' use during lunch hours (I believe it's 11:30 am to 1:00 pm). It's MAC address based, and it performs for crap with my linux laptop when everybody is trying to use the wifi.

      One alternative is our Atlanta Bread Company, which TURNS OFF the wifi during lunchtime. Other times, it's free and without hiccups.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    6. Re:Panera Has Had Free WiFi For Years by tresho · · Score: 1

      Panera Bread on the Ohio Turnpike does not have free Wi-Fi.

  9. and now they are closing shops by maryjanecapri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    just announced today that starbucks here in KY is closing some of their shops. they are closing 100 stores across the country because they opened too many of them (and the economy stinks).

    --
    nature loves variety::society hates it get your variety at http://www.monkeypantz.net
    1. Re:and now they are closing shops by techpawn · · Score: 1

      starbucks here in KY is closing some of their shops
      I hope they're smart about it and close the ones in places like the Kroger stores and the Starbucks across from a Starbucks in Covington...

      Why am I going to buy coffee at a place I'm going to buy groceries at?
      --
      Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    2. Re:and now they are closing shops by hansonc · · Score: 2, Informative

      so you can have a cup of coffee while you shop?

    3. Re:and now they are closing shops by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if this wasn't in the plan for a while now. It's been known that Starbucks would open a store not too far from another Starbucks (sometimes even across the street) to help drive out competition. Once the competition is gone, why would you need two (or more)Starbucks, unless the traffic between the stores was more than one could handle.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    4. Re:and now they are closing shops by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      They've need to close stores for awhile. I was in the airport, I think Dallas and from where I was standing I could see 3 Starbucks. Keep in mind that I could walk to all 3 w/o going through a security checkpoint or anything like that. I hope whoever was making decisions about where to expand has been replaced.

    5. Re:and now they are closing shops by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1
      Starbucks is closing shops? Good. F 'em. Their service sucks, and I've always avoided them because I can think of at least three instances, right off the top of my head, when Starbucks opened shops literally across the street from local indie coffee shops. And that's just in my local area. In one of those cases they actually bought out a very well-established local shop that was a half a block from another older local shop. The latter has remained in business but has suffered (even though it is top-notch) because so many of the local sheep now flock to the big brand people in big cities patronize. Some of us are still staunchly opposed to Starbucks, though.

      Besides, we have a local chain here in my part of OH with a fair number of unique, very comfortable shops that offer FREE wifi, better prices, and friendlier, more knowledgeable service.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    6. Re:and now they are closing shops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of places where having more then one starbucks within viewing distance makes sense.

      One example is in penn station ( major rail station in nyc ) there are TWO on the main lirr level. one on the eastern side of the concourse and one on the western. So now most people will pass by one no matter which way they are leaving the station.

      If they closed one , then its doubtful that all of the normal customers would walk in the other direction to buy coffee. Most likely they will look for something 'on the way' which might be another starbucks , might not.

      If they closed that one , I do not think I would use the one on the 'wrong' side. Or at the very least there may be days that I am a few minutes later and cant afford the extra 3 minutes getting into / out of the parking lot. While the one down the block allows me a quick entry / exit.

  10. T-Mobile Hotspot@Home service? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    What I want to know, is: will the agreement between T-Mobile and AT&T allow the T-Mobile Hotspot@Home WiFi phone service to work?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:T-Mobile Hotspot@Home service? by all5n · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. One of the things that T-Mobile got as a concession for Starbucks breaking the contract early was protection for the T-Mobile UMA (HotSpot@Home) service to remain accessible to T-Mobile customers. T-Mobile wifi customers will still be able to access the wifi at starbucks for some period of years at no additional cost. Since AT&T provides many of the T1 connections to the starbucks locations, they can offer SBUX a sweeter deal than T-Mobile could. Going to the 2 hour pass would have been the offering regardless of the wi-fi provider. Plus they want to do some gimmicky stuff related to ordering coffee from your iphone. So they are betting their current wi-fi revenue stream is less than the coffee sales that the new offering will provide.

    2. Re:T-Mobile Hotspot@Home service? by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 1
      Works for me.

      UMA basically sets up an IPSec VPN to carry the VoIP traffic. If the wireless router hasn't firewalled the ports, you're golden.

      Now, what I really wish is that I could use the unencrypted network the phone connects to to run it's UMA/VPN tunnel to browse, etc. It's silly to connect to the web server I have running at home, connected to my wireless router, from my phone via t-mobile's VPN. Waste of their traffic load, to boot.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
    3. Re:T-Mobile Hotspot@Home service? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Now, what I really wish is that I could use the unencrypted network the phone connects to to run it's UMA/VPN tunnel to browse, etc. It's silly to connect to the web server I have running at home, connected to my wireless router, from my phone via t-mobile's VPN. Waste of their traffic load, to boot.

      HUGE SECURITY HOLE. Which is probably why they only allow GSM-over-IP traffic over the encrypted tunnel. You don't want any sort of data being passed through your core, when you can just get by with the voice data.

      /t-mobile user with UMA BB Curve
      //I love UMA
      ///and T-mobile

    4. Re:T-Mobile Hotspot@Home service? by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 1
      HUGE SECURITY HOLE. Which is probably why they only allow GSM-over-IP traffic over the encrypted tunnel. You don't want any sort of data being passed through your core, when you can just get by with the voice data.

      Huh?

      As far as I can tell, my data sessions are also are carried through the UMA VPN tunnel.

      What I wanted was a means to connect to a local web server -- as long as the client browser in the phone was careful about how it interpreted content received, that should be fine. A bit of Java and Flash support could have made the phone a great universal remote control. But, going to t-mobile's servers and back to mine would probably add too much latency.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
  11. Such a crock by Bombula · · Score: 2, Insightful
    While T-Mobile is hurting

    Somebody call a whaaaaaambulance. For God's sake, the only reason T-Mobile's service had any operating costs was because they were trying to charge customers money. When you give away wi-fi for free, as most places are doing now - and not just coffee houses - it costs virtually nothing. What, $400 for a cheap PC and wireless router that any 15 year old employee knows how to run backwards and forwards?

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Such a crock by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Informative

      WRT-54Gl with suitable firmware. $60 per unit.
      (My favorite firmware is Tomato Firmware)
      Have them flashed and set up at a central point, and there would be no configuration at the deployment point.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  12. In Soviet Russia by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... we charge you outrageous prices for the WiFi and give you free coffee.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  13. Only a temporary measure by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    A profit motive is generally a good way to start the ball rolling. It paid for the initial setup of infrastructure too.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  14. Damn it. by Average · · Score: 1

    Now I may actually have a reason to care about Starbucks. I'm on AT&T DSL (it's slow, but the cable company here has not-too-liberal bandwidth caps/exorbitant over-your-limit fees, plus I don't want cable TV). The fact that DSL also gets me local dial-in numbers in quite a few places and occasional WiFi (typically McDonald's and Barnes&Noble) have been real nice additions. Adding Starbucks to the list helps even more.

    Of course, the bad for them is that getting more ubiquitious WiFi means I'm less inclined to buy a cellphone with data. (I'm a $100 a year pre-paid guy myself).

    Hey... that'd be a real neat trick. Could they get WiFi enabled ATTWireless phones (iPhones among others) to automatically register (no login) to these access points and push data that way whenever possible? Damn good idea.

    Damn you AT&T. I want to hate you, but you're so damn convenient.

  15. Dunn Bros is #1 in Minneapolis by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 3, Informative


    Fellow Minneapolis chain Dunn Brothers offers free Wi-Fi with *no strings attached* at its 90 locations.

    Caribou is 2nd (one hour free).

    1. Re:Dunn Bros is #1 in Minneapolis by garcia · · Score: 1

      But then there is this issue where the entire setup of the shop is changed and people are coming in just to leech the wifi. While chains can handle that, the small guys are getting fucked.

      If you want to skip the blog post, go straight to the Flickr pic here.

    2. Re:Dunn Bros is #1 in Minneapolis by Seltsam · · Score: 1

      The Caribou near my house is completely free WiFi. No sign-ins, time-outs, etc. Other Caribous do require sign-ins and time-outs.

    3. Re:Dunn Bros is #1 in Minneapolis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90 locations? You, sir, are a moron.

      There are 76 in the whole state.

      http://www.dunnbros.com/storelocator/locate_all.asp

      I'm a huge fan of Dunn Brothers, but there's no reason to be a moron about it.

  16. Liberal Conspiracy! by ArikTheRed · · Score: 4, Funny

    First AT&T makes major deals with Apple, now with Starbucks? What's next - NPR, Prius and The Daily Show?

    ps: joke.

    1. Re:Liberal Conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First AT&T makes major deals with Apple, now with Starbucks? What's next - NPR, Prius and The Daily Show?

      Last weekend I took my Prius in for maintenance. The waiting room had a Starbucks vending machine, which I used several times. And I spent the time on my Mac.

      Sometime in the middle of all this it struck me that I was spending the morning as a cliche.

  17. Is this right? by blumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Up to two hours of free Wi-Fi service per day will be available for Starbucks Card holders"

    If I understand this correctly, if you go get yourself a card, fill it up with a minimal $5, you pretty much can get 2 hours of free wireless anytime?

    Sounds like a good deal, most of the time you really only need to check your mail or "look something up" quickly anyway... and with Starbucks being pretty much everywhere, this seems like a nice convenience. Great for people like me with an iPod Touch.

    1. Re:Is this right? by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much how I've interpreted all of the things I've read.....buy the cheapest card and get two years of free (2hrs per day) wi-fi at $tarbucks......not sure of the implications of having TWO cards.

      Layne

    2. Re:Is this right? by SQLGuru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know, replying to your own post is bad form, but I just thought of this.....

      Instead of buying a card, find someone who is done with their card (esp. if it has just a few cents on it) and get free wi-fi without paying anything......maybe start an after-market market for Starbucks cards.

      Layne

    3. Re:Is this right? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure they mean the Starbucks credit card, not the pre-paid cards.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  18. Didn't have a choice - everyone has it by MooseTick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now many McDonalds, Krystals, Atlanta Bread Companys, Burger King, Denny's, Dunkin' Donuts, IHOP, Jack-in-the-Box, KFC, Subway, Taco Bell, Quiznos, and Wendy's offer free WIFI.

    'Bucks will start losing customers who want to surf and schmooze. I'm sure they especially don't want to lose that extra $6 cupcake sale when someone has been hanging around the store for an hour and starts to get hungry.

    1. Re:Didn't have a choice - everyone has it by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      Not quite. McDonalds charges somewhere around 6$ an hour IIRC. However, they have a deal set up with Nintendo for free access for the DS (and it happens to work with Opera DS). I wouldn't be surprised if you couldn't change your MAC to appear to be a DS, and the system give you a free pass.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:Didn't have a choice - everyone has it by Allador · · Score: 1

      Yeah, lovely. Just what I want to do is sit in a grease-shack and work in a hard plastic chair smelling french fries, while sharing the space with homeless people (speaking to the fast food joints offering wifi).

  19. Fonera, idea not working. by eiapoce · · Score: 1

    It's one month since I installed a Fonera router (http://www.fon.com/) in a pub. People does not connect. They just don't go to the place for WiFi. Most people have internet access at work and at home, accessing the internet even when relaxing in front of a coffee is actually nonsense.... well... hmmmm.... I shoulnd't be posting this on slashdot, right?

    1. Re:Fonera, idea not working. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, there's a pub near me that offers free WiFi and has very comfy chairs and good beer. I'm planning on taking everyone who turns up to the Étoilé hackathon there, and I expect at least a few people to brink laptops...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  20. Hold the phone... by grocer · · Score: 1

    I see bars offering free WiFi to attract fantasy sports nuts, WiFi is becoming more and mainstream every day...soon everybody will be expected to offer it as service to their customers. That's the real news...WiFi has gone mainstream to the point that charging for it will cause people to choose one establishment over another...

  21. No no no by blueZ3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia, WiFi charges coffee for you!

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  22. Wifi should be free by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And if anyone tries to charge, they should be hacked, or their establishment burnt to the ground.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Wifi should be free by flanksteak · · Score: 1

      Um, who modded this insightful?

    2. Re:Wifi should be free by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      If i had to guess, it was people that agree with me. :)

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Wifi should be free by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if anyone tries to charge, they should be hacked, or their establishment burnt to the ground.
      Or you could just chose to do business with a more wifi-friendly place, instead of being psychotic and thinking of physical damage.

      Sheesh.

    4. Re:Wifi should be free by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be as much fun, nor would it be as strong of a statement of displeasure with their action.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:Wifi should be free by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Next you'll be objecting to putting strychnine in the pina coladas...

  23. Odd quote from article by techstar25 · · Score: 1
    I know Starbucks are ubiquitous with all those jokes about them being across the street from each other, but read this quote:

    Bauhaus has thrived despite all of the Starbucks shops that have popped up around it: 15 within half a mile, and 38 within one mile.
    So that's 38 Starbucks in one square mile? That's what it sounds like.
    1. Re:Odd quote from article by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      Don't plan on winning big on Are You Smarter Than A Fifth Grader?...that's pi square miles.

      rj

    2. Re:Odd quote from article by jimlintott · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like 3.14 square miles.

    3. Re:Odd quote from article by prestonmichaelh · · Score: 1

      So that's 38 Starbucks in one square mile? That's what it sounds like.

      Actually, without exact locations/distances, the best you could assume is two square miles. Think of it this way, you are in the middle, there is one Starbucks 1 mile to the east, one Starbucks 1 mile to the west, one 1 mile to the north, and one 1 mile to the south. If you take these as being on the perimeter of your area, the distance from the "east" Starbucks to the "west" Starbucks is 2 miles (one mile to get to you and one mile from you to get to the other starbucks). That would give you a square with 2 mile sides.

      I know you probably just meant to point out how ridiculous the concentration of Starbucks is, but after all this is slashdot where everyone wants to be "technically correct, which is the best kind of correct." (futurama quote)
    4. Re:Odd quote from article by goofballs · · Score: 1

      Actually, without exact locations/distances, the best you could assume is two square miles. Think of it this way, you are in the middle, there is one Starbucks 1 mile to the east, one Starbucks 1 mile to the west, one 1 mile to the north, and one 1 mile to the south. If you take these as being on the perimeter of your area, the distance from the "east" Starbucks to the "west" Starbucks is 2 miles (one mile to get to you and one mile from you to get to the other starbucks). That would give you a square with 2 mile sides.

      I know you probably just meant to point out how ridiculous the concentration of Starbucks is, but after all this is slashdot where everyone wants to be "technically correct, which is the best kind of correct." (futurama quote) hehehe, and then you go and don't be technically correct. a sqare with 2 mile sides would not be 2 square miles- it'd be 2 miles squared, or 4 square miles...
    5. Re:Odd quote from article by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't plan on winning big on Are You Smarter Than A Fifth Grader?...that's pi square miles.

      rj

      Only when using Euclidean geometry, I get sqrt(1) using taxicab geometry, assuming radius measurements were taken using a car odometer.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxicab_geometry

      According to Google Bauhaus Books & Coffee(301 E Pine St, Seattle, WA 98122), and the startbucks located at 2200 Alaskan Way # 120, Seattle, WA 98121 are 1 mile apart but it would take 1.9 miles to drive between them.

      Both of our calculations are based on the 1 mile figure being a radius,but measured differently, do you know how they measured? Would fifth graders know non-Euclidean geometry?
    6. Re:Odd quote from article by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      OK, a circle of taxicab radius 1 would be, in Euclidean terms, a square of side sqrt(2) and area 2 -- unless you have a definition of "taxicab area".

      rj

    7. Re:Odd quote from article by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

      You are correct. Yahoo has an answer to finding taxicab area. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070413193626AAkdw1w

  24. WiFi is free in Portland, OR by TurboStar · · Score: 1

    I have yet to go to a coffee shop or pub without free and unlimited WiFi access (keep in mind I never go to starbucks). Either they drop the $50 or so to get an access point or ask the Personal Telco Project (http://www.personaltelco.net/) to hook them up at no cost. And then there's the MetroFi free network (http://www.metrofi.com/) if you're really desperate. I'm sure there's ways you could spend money for WiFi access but I can't imagine why anyone would.

    1. Re:WiFi is free in Portland, OR by Allador · · Score: 1

      Dont forget about the $100+ per month forever for commercial dsl to serve the wifi.

  25. Re:tags by maxume · · Score: 1

    How's that corporate free life treating you?

    I see you finally finished building your computer. Which was more time consuming, smelting the metals, building the components or writing/adapting the software?

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  26. Telstra sucks by MattW · · Score: 1

    Even people who are stuck with craptastic telcos in the US thank the heavens they're not stuck in Oz with Telstra.

  27. Sugar is Free. Cream is Free. WiFi SHOULD be too. by wernst · · Score: 1

    I've often wondered about the wisdom of charging for WiFi at Starbucks.

    When you buy a coffee, the sugar is free. The creamer is free. The newspapers people bought earlier in the day and then left in the "already read" newspaper bin are free. The bathrooms are free. The lights are free. The heating/cooling is free. The electrical sockets (when available) are free.

    WiFi should be just like these - free. It's just another element of the building these days.

    Charging for Wifi creates a viscous circle: you need to pay for tech support people because of users having trouble accessing their accounts, but users only need accounts in order to pay for the tech support people. When Wifi is free, you don't need accounts, and you therefore don't need a huge support infrastructure, so you don't need to charge anything.

    But what about the DSL line and electricity, you ask? Well, all I can say is that you aren't paying extra for the electricity that powers the lights, or the water that make the toilets flush, and there aren't slots for nickels and dimes by the sugar and creamer. Those costs are baked into the prices of your coffee. Wifi shouldn't be any different.

    So it's about freaking time, says I.

  28. re: coffee shops vs. restaurants by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nah, I don't really agree. At one time, I would have sided with you on this one. But at least from what I've observed, coffee shops have evolved in recent years to become much more like restaurants. The idea of a coffee shop being a social hang-out is dying off. (Just like restaurants, they also figured out people are only going to drink so much coffee during a visit.) When you encourage people to hang around playing board or card games, reading books, etc. - you wind up with a place that's half full of people who are done buying things, instead of freeing the space up for the next round of customers-to-be, who are all ready to buy that first cup of joe when they walk in.

    On the other hand, what I think *is* happening that encourages free wi-fi is a restaurant (or coffee shop) design with a variation of the traditional restaurant theme. Places like Panera Bread Company are good examples. They give just enough of a "personal touch" (things like calling your first name when your food/drink order is up, instead of giving you a number) to make people feel welcome there. They encourage the feel of "We give you more reasons to come here than the competitors do!" with bonuses like free wi-fi and wall outlets conveniently placed at the booths. Yet they still lay everything out so you feel a little "uncomfortable" if you spend TOO much time there. You have that distinct sense that you're taking up space that other customers want, and they're taking notice of you. They carefully avoid things like placing too many couches around their restaurants, since those encourage the concept of sitting around longer. They don't provide any reading material or other visual cues that it's "ok" to spend the rest of the afternoon there. Yet, you do feel like it's "the norm" to go ahead and pull out your laptop and check your email while you're eating your sandwich. THIS is the balance that makes it all fit together.

  29. Tully's by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    ...is actually not doing well and is rumored to be shopping for a buyer.

    It's probably not due to WiFi, in all fairness, but to say they're not hurting isn't true either.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  30. Free WiFi is not so new... by Volatar · · Score: 1

    My local public library offers public WiFi. Anyone can just walk in and use it.

  31. Internet Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Man this internet's something else"

    [Verse]

    Cuttin' it close, Let the dishes turn green,
    Everyone chasin' their Internet dream,

    Some like it hot, In a triple X funk,
    Winnin' the auction, Turnin' money to junk,

    Cappin' the flag in a virtual dash,
    Skippin' your wedding to play in a match,

    [Chorus]

    Shut all the blinds
    You mighta been seen
    Sittin' alone
    With your internet dream

    Winning the race
    For your digital fix
    Living your life
    With a clickity-click
    (Repeat)

    "So every day I swear I'm gonna go to bed at like eleven.
    And all of a sudden its 4AM . . .
    And I was just watching Youtube and reading Wikipedia for five hours.
    It's like MAN . . . you ask me the next day. I can't even remember
    what I was doin. Crazy."

    [Verse ]

    [Chorus]

    "I was talkin to my mom the other day
    And she's like 'Oh,
    My computer's been acting up again!'
    So I'm thinkin she got a virus
    or something . . .
    And I'm like 'ok what's wrong?'
    And she's like 'You know that bar that
    you type the website in! It disappeared!
    I can never remember how to get it back!'
    I'm like 'ok Mom. We did this last week.'
    I love my Mom and Dad. "

    [Chorus X 2]


    FREE MP3! Right-click and SAVE!*
    *All rights reserved.

  32. They're charging because they can by InlawBiker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in the Seattle area, and I work from Tully's pretty regularly because it's free. The coffee is good too. But they're not absolutely *everywhere*. Starbucks is, and so it's the de-facto meeting place to do business. If you're meeting a client, partner, friend, study-mate or whatever in this town the standard is, "I'll meet you at the Starbucks at X-o'clock." Then it's usually, "Which one, there are 3 in that neighborhood." They're ubiquitous, and it's a nice atmosphere to be in for an hour or so. And you can have a treat. Imagine saying, "I want to pitch this idea to you, I'll meet you at the McDonalds." Yeah right.

    Starbucks is doing well enough without laptop campers, but offering semi-free access must mean that at least part of their business is being taken by the shops with free WiFi. Believe me they don't make a move without studying the numbers.

  33. Re:Sugar is Free. Cream is Free. WiFi SHOULD be to by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

    They would probably make a lot more money if they stopped putting your money that is going towards water and electricity into the coffee.... I also imagine the coffee wouldn't be that great either

    --
    My UID is prime... is yours?
  34. Starbucks can/does charge what they want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starbucks' hook is the same as McDonalds'. It has worldwide recognition (at least to americans). People, at least americans, overwhelmingly tend to go to familiar places.

    Business travelers have no issue with paying $2.10 for a venti coffee, or $9.99 for a couple of minutes of wifi so they can check email.

    They pay what whatever amount and submit the receipt to their company.

  35. Pi are square, but still more than 10/square mile. by argent · · Score: 1

    In other words, pi are square, but that's still better than 10 Starbucks per square mile.

    And I thought the Onion article about the Starbucks in the restroom of another Starbucks was a joke.

  36. Wow! by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Overpriced, burnt coffee AND two whole HOURS of free shitty Wi-Fi! How can we lose? Do they offer an extended warranty to go with it?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  37. Austin. by JKConsult · · Score: 1

    I'm not so up on how it is in other places, but in Austin, basically every place has free wi-fi. The bars, the restaurants, everywhere. Except for Starbucks, before now. It being Austin, I knew this probably wasn't standard everywhere else, but I'm surprised to hear that it's that far off. I am 100% used to going to basically any place I want, including a dive bar, and being able to pull out my laptop and dick around on the internet. (Though that only lasts a few minutes until the beer starts.)

  38. Re:Sugar is Free. Cream is Free. WiFi SHOULD be to by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

    So, you get a bunch of cheapskates sitting around your tables using the free Wi-Fi without having to buy anything, while your paying customers may have trouble finding a seat. If I'm a business owner, I like this why?

    I recently turned around and found another place to have lunch when there were no seats at a cafe with Free Wi-Fi near my office. At least half of the table-occupants didn't seem to have purchased anything, or had finished consuming it some time before.

  39. yeah right.. by TOI_0x00 · · Score: 1

    Now at Starbucks, Free wireless internet with the neighbours password...

  40. Solve one problem, create another... by Botweiser · · Score: 1

    Offering free wi-fi will most likely attract those customers who would ordinarily chose another establishment that already offers free wi-fi. I work at Caribou Coffee, where we already offer one free hour of wi-fi. If you need more time, you have to make a purchase (anything over $1.50) and you'll get a passcode for another hour. I've heard so many people complain about S'bucks and how they "rip you off" by charging you for wi-fi. I'm sure that we will lose some business when S'bucks goes with the free wi-fi, but they will inherit our problems along with our customers.

    It's not uncommon for our the seating in our store to fill completely up with people sitting at their laptops clickity-clacking away. People will buy a cup of regular coffee (~$2.00) and camp out for, I kid you not, 8 hours! These same people will demand a new card every hour as if they are entitled to it because they "support our store". Unfortunately, this costs the store business. People will walk in the door to sit down and have a cup of coffee, see that there isn't an open seat in the place, and turn around and walk back out.

    You might say I should do a better job enforcing the policy of only handing out cards when the guest makes a purchase. Well, I had a lady nearly bite my head off just for telling her what the actual policy was (I was handing her a card anyway, and just letting her know for the future). It's not worth the headache.

    rant...Come on people, this isn't your office or your home. We aren't your ISP. We are in the business of selling coffee, not giving away internet access. It's provided as a courtesy and convenience. If one hour (in the case of S'bucks, 2 hours) of free access without having purchased a single thing isn't good enough for you, then you need to get your sense of entitlement in check./rant

    Starbucks is going to find that their patrons stay longer and may end up buying more, but any profit will be negated by other customers not being able to find seating. The seating in most S'bucks is sparse already...

  41. already free in a lot of Starbucks by dwater · · Score: 1

    In every Starbucks I've been to in the last few years they've had free wifi.

    All other coffee shops I've been to (outside the US) have also had free wifi (when I've tried). If I go to one that didn't have it, I'd go to another one (but that's not happened yet).

    Max.

    --
    Max.
  42. CALEA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you provide free WIFI in the states, you have to be CALEA compliant. I haven't heard of anyone charged the 10,000 a day for non compliance if the feds want to investigate something, but once that happens I expect the mom + pop shops offering free wifi to dry right up.

    That's right, free WIFI makes the last person responsible. It doesn't matter if your ISP is CALEA complaint, the last mile/last foot has to also be complaint. Live TCP streaming connections in a wacky format to the feds - wiretapping at its finest.

  43. Re:Coffee is NOT the business... by neBelcnU · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um, sorry: Caribou, S'bucks et al are NOT really in the coffee business. Coffee's the apparent center, I'll agree, but the real foundations of the business are very different. S'bucks--at one time--said they wanted to form the basis of a new civil forum. A place to share with other people. Oh yeah, and have some coffee.

    Look, movie theaters stopped being in the "movie business" when Hollywood took 100% of the door. (70's in major markets, ubiquitous by mid 80's) That's when they became "Quik E Marts with moving pictures on the back wall." McDonalds, I'm told, is not principally in the burger biz: they own/control so much primo real estate that their worth is not in meat served but in land owned.

    Your store is trying to make a place for meeting, and hoping to capitalize on that by selling coffee and sundries to those who chose to meet there. So it's the place first, then the coffee. Wifi's part of the decor, do it right, sell more coffee.

    Put another way: if WiFi were a cost in excess of return, your bosses would be enforcing that "one card per purchase" rule with an iron fist. So like you said, it's not worth the hassle: give it away upon request. That's a high enough bar for the boardroom, it should be for you too.

    And relax about the schlubs in the seats. If turnover were an issue, your bosses' bonuses would depend on solving the problem. (Imagine: A norovirus policy, wherein the whole place needs to be bleached every 90 minutes. Turnover problem solved.)

  44. Public WIFI by opennetworks · · Score: 1

    I have been following the public WIFIs that are spreading around the world and my experience tells me that in the end they ended closing and the model is not sustainable, due to the overall costs and the balance between security and freedom of the connection. Regards, O. http://www.open-networks.org/ Open Ideas for Open Minds

  45. Inevitability by cgrayson · · Score: 1

    This outcome was inevitable since I began my boycott of Starbucks' usurious T-Mobile wifi service several years ago. And yes, it will be available everywhere for free soon enough. This is as God intended, when he Created wifi. Thanks be to God.

  46. Re:Coffee is NOT the business... by Botweiser · · Score: 1

    You make a valid point. Both companies are selling an "experience". In fact, Caribou's mission statement is "...an experience that makes the day better". That being said, I doubt people would come into an establishment and pay to have internet access and a seat without coffee (I'm disregarding internet cafes as the provide computers). A vast majority of our sales is either coffee beans or prepared drinks. Starbucks is probably the same, though they may have a larger percentage of merchandise sales that sell the "lifestyle".

    I suppose I was a bit ranty (word?) before. Stressful day + open forum = free for all. :)

    And I like you're idea about throwing bleach on the campers. Wait, that was what you were suggesting, right? (kidding)