Slashdot Mirror


The Arthur C. Clarke Gamma Ray Burst

Larry Sessions, a columnist for Earth & Sky, has suggested in his blog that the gamma-ray event whose radiation reached us a few hours before Arthur C. Clarke died, and which occurred 7.5 billion years ago, be named the Clarke Event. The outburst, which produced enough visible light to render it a naked-eye object across half the universe, is officially designated GRB 080319B. What more fitting tribute to Clarke than to associate his name with the greatest bang since the big one? Sessions suggests writing to any astronomers, heads of physics departments, or planetarium operators you know and talking up the proposal.

120 comments

  1. no, don't care for it by jollyreaper · · Score: 0, Troll

    The Clarke Event makes it sound like he was involved in it some way. Show that his death triggered the burst and I will be most impressed.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:no, don't care for it by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How does that follow? Astronomical bodies get named after famous people or scientists frequently. No one is saying Clarke caused it (after all, it did happen over seven billion years ago), but it's a way of recognizing one of the most influential science/sci-fi writers who has ever lived.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:no, don't care for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Clarke Event makes it sound like he was involved in it some way. Show that his death triggered the burst and I will be most impressed.

      "Look," whispered a Slashdotter, and Jollyreaper lifted his eyes to heaven. (There is always a last time for everything.)

      Overhead, in glorious blazes of gamma radiation, the stars were going out.

    3. Re:no, don't care for it by hansamurai · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ever since I was a kid I wondered who this Haley was that first threw a comet out of our atmosphere.

    4. Re:no, don't care for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively you could try to prove that the burst triggered his death...

    5. Re:no, don't care for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which one? The Swift satellite detected a record four GRBs that day.

    6. Re:no, don't care for it by q-the-impaler · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...the gamma-ray event whose radiation reached us a few hours before Arthur C. Clarke died... I suspect it was Carl Sagan who fired that gamma-ray, knowing all to well Mr. Clarke was not wearing his tinfoil hat.
      --
      Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
    7. Re:no, don't care for it by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Look," whispered a Slashdotter, and Jollyreaper lifted his eyes to heaven. (There is always a last time for everything.)

      Overhead, in glorious blazes of gamma radiation, the stars were going out. "No, you dolt," said Jollyreaper. "It is a passing cloud." (The simplest explanation is usually the best.)

      "Ah, so it is," replied the Anonymous Coward, and crawled back into his cave.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    8. Re:no, don't care for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well-played, and worthy of Clarke himself.

      /salute!

    9. Re:no, don't care for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it. It's paraphrased from a Clarke story, in which astronauts find remains of a civilization destroyed in a supernova explosion that would've appeared in the sky above bethlehem at a time coinciding with the birth of Jesus.

    10. Re:no, don't care for it by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      But... he did. After his death his soul, released from the confines of its mortal shell, used a black hole to travel back 7.5 billion years. There it caused two supernovas to crash into each other releasing this radiation event that was timed to reach Earth at the moment of his ascension. Unfortunately he miscaculated the variability of c over the millenia so it arrived a few hours too early.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    11. Re:no, don't care for it by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Dude, he's Arthur C Clarke, not Obi-Wan Kenobi.

    12. Re:no, don't care for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try reading some of the man's stories. Start with The Star

  2. I'm waiting for the lunar obelisk by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Clarke event, a gamma ray burst? I don't think so. I'm holding out for the lunar obelisk.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:I'm waiting for the lunar obelisk by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Clarke event, a gamma ray burst? I don't think so. I'm holding out for the lunar obelisk.

      Despite being best known as a SF writer, Clarke was always an engineer first and foremost. So I suspect he'd have been much more interested in having a real, tangible, visible event named for him than having his works of fiction as his contribution to posterity.

      Besides, the lunar obelisk already has a name. It's TMA-1. Maybe not as snappy as "The Clarke Obelisk", but to the cognoscenti, that is definitely it's name. And to the cognoscenti, the opinions of the rest of the world don't matter at all.

      There are plenty other things called TMA-1, and part of the fun is trying to guess which of them had their name manipulated by their designers so that the one SF fan in the room so that the acronym was correct. (Examining the first page returned by Google for "TMA-1" : ) A Soyuz mission? Obviously someone playing to the in joke. A tax management company? Probably one of the partners having a quiet laugh which the rest of the partners don't understand (beancounters, y'know!). The Tutor Marked Assignments at the Open University? Certainly a backronym.
      And the other 96-odd thousand hits - mostly SF fans, I'd guess.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. No Europa Landings! by explosivejared · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just don't name any missions to Europa after him! That would probably upset him.

    --
    I got a catholic block.
    1. Re:No Europa Landings! by volcanopele · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, I think he would enjoy the irony if the landing site of the first Europa lander is named the "Arthur C. Clarke Station".

      --
      The Gish Bar Times - Blog covering Jupiter's moon Io
    2. Re:No Europa Landings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just coincidentally finished reading a short story by him about a priest/astronomer visiting a leftover star from a GRB that turned out to be the Star of Bethelaham. It would be fitting to name this event for him.

      But what if this GRB was what killed him as a punishment by the Almighty?
      lol, after all. The priest in the story lost his faith.

    3. Re:No Europa Landings! by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      This is all bunk, he's already got something 'spacy' named after him:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke_belt

      -Jar

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  4. If they find a new cluster of stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they find a large cluster of stars in the near future, I'll recommend "The Dick Cheney Clusterfuck."

    1. Re:If they find a new cluster of stars by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      If they find a large cluster of stars in the near future, I'll recommend "The Dick Cheney Clusterfuck."
      Needs to be more specific. Maybe a cluster being torn apart by a massive black hole? One cluster invading another? A cluster of old stars?

      Maybe abbreviate it to "DC Cluster F" to get it accepted by a naming committee.
      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    2. Re:If they find a new cluster of stars by Enlightenment · · Score: 1

      A cluster whose peculiar arrangement is such that, periodically, stars are fired at extremely high velocities straight into a fellow star cluster. That other star cluster should, if possible, be named the Whittington Cluster.

    3. Re:If they find a new cluster of stars by webduck · · Score: 1

      If I had been drinking milk it would have spewed out of my nose when I read that. As it was, I laughed out loud! Good one!

  5. it won't take much convincing by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    clarke is well known venerable saint in astronomical and science circles

    if you wanted to call it the eliot spitzer event, or the march madness event, you might have some trouble convincing

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:it won't take much convincing by Gat0r30y · · Score: 2, Funny

      the eliot spitzer event That one's already taken, don't worry though, she got a towel to clean that mess out of her hair.

      On a serious note, I do hope we can name it after Clarke, he has inspired many (including myself). And this seems as fitting a tribute as any.
      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  6. Minor correction... by diesel66 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What more fitting tribute to Clarke than to associate his name with the greatest bang since the big one? With all respect due Mr. Clarke and his burst, I would like to point out that Eccentrica Gallumbits is already well know as "the best bang since the big one".

    So long, Mr. Clarke, and thanks for all the fiction...
    --



    eleven plus two / twelve plus one
    1. Re:Minor correction... by Dik+Zak · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, no, no, no, no! Eccentrica Gallumbits described Zaphod Beeblebrox as "the best bang since the big one." It says so right in your link.

    2. Re:Minor correction... by jmagar.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only a comment as well crafted as that one could draw a lurker like me. Well done!

    3. Re:Minor correction... by dedalus2000 · · Score: 1

      Well then this may not be a sun going nova at all but rather the finally of a Disaster Area concert.

      --
      My keyboads not woking popely.
    4. Re:Minor correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Sir Arthur to you, mister.

  7. In numbers I can understand, please by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1, Funny

    The outburst, whick produced enough visible light to render it a naked-eye object across half the universe

    What would that be in Teraballmers?

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:In numbers I can understand, please by Zymergy · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about Light-Ballmerchairs?

    2. Re:In numbers I can understand, please by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Nearly two!

      -Peter

    3. Re:In numbers I can understand, please by andy314159pi · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about Light-Ballmerchairs?
      First you'd have to find some experimentalists that were courageous enough to want to measure the the speed of a Ballmer thrown chair.
    4. Re:In numbers I can understand, please by snl2587 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's simple! Get a hand-held radar gun, find Steve Ballmer in a public place and ensure there's an easily-throwable chair nearby. Then point to someone and tell Steve that the guy said the iPod was inferior to the Zune. Viola! All that suffers is your conscience.

    5. Re:In numbers I can understand, please by IceD'Bear · · Score: 1

      tell Steve that the guy said the iPod was inferior to the Zune.

      Why would Balmer be upset by that? Oh, you meant superior.
    6. Re:In numbers I can understand, please by Cecil · · Score: 1

      No, he meant to tell Steve Jobs that "the guy" (pointing at Ballmer) said the iPod was inferior.

      Then Ballmer would need to throw a chair to defend himself.

    7. Re:In numbers I can understand, please by Zymergy · · Score: 1

      Correction: BallmerChair-Years.
      (had to consider the units)

  8. Best bang since the big one by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 3, Funny

    What more fitting tribute to Clarke than to associate his name with the greatest bang since the big one?

    But Zaphod Beeblebrox already has a name. :)

    1. Re:Best bang since the big one by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      What more fitting tribute to Clarke than to associate his name with the greatest bang since the big one?


      But Zaphod Beeblebrox already has a name. :)

      That's OK, from now on he'll just be known as "Zaphod Beeblebrox, who is associated with the name Clarke"
      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  9. MOD PARENT UP by CRCulver · · Score: 0

    I don't think the parent was trolling as much as bringing up a good point. Why don't we wait a while for all the facts to come out before we start naming things after Clarke?

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Repeating the libelous (and since retracted) fiction of British tabloids to insult a dead man is pretty low.

      Do you also believe in Bat Boy?

  10. Some say that Arthur C. Clarke isn't really dead.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but that he must let the world believe he is dead--until he can control the raging beast within. **DUH DUH DAH DUH DUUUUUUUUHN**

  11. I'm not sure... by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

    Is Arthur C. Clarke capable of wiping out all life on Earth? If not, I don't think it would be right to equate him with GRB 080319B.

    1. Re:I'm not sure... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      Is Arthur C. Clarke capable of wiping out all life on Earth? If not, I don't think it would be right to equate him with GRB 080319B.

      Neither is GRB 080319B since it is too far away. Haley's comet at least comes closer to us than GRB 080319B and it got named after someone. If it did hit Earth it definitely would do some damage too. What does the level of catastrophe associated with a celestial event/object have to do with whether it is named after someone?

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  12. Re:Major correction... by diesel66 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh no! I'm stupid!

    It was Ms. Gallumbits describing Zaphod Beeblebrox

    How embarrassing!

    --



    eleven plus two / twelve plus one
  13. GRB naming? by Minimum_Wage · · Score: 1

    I may be wrong, but I don't think there is any protocol for giving proper names to GRB events and no international body to recognize such a name - like the IAU does with minor planets. It's a nice gesture put probably not something that would end up in common usage...

    1. Re:GRB naming? by syntaxeater · · Score: 1

      Unless we were to make it a meme...

    2. Re:GRB naming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gamma-ray bursts are given catalogue names based on the date they were discovered. There is no mechanism for naming bursts beyond that. Occasionally a burst is given an informal name. For example, one burst is sometimes called the Superbowl burst because it went off during the Superbowl (which is the name of an annual championship US football game). However, there is nothing official about these names, and the IAU does not recognize them. I like the idea of informally naming GRB 080319B after Sir Arthur C. Clarke. In fact, it is already being referred to that way by some people in the gamma-ray burst community. We will see if it catches on.

  14. Old news... by Chapter80 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're just seeing this news on Slashdot now? This hit digg 7.49 Billion years ago.

    1. Re:Old news... by EMeta · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Yes, Digg is rather alien, isn't it?

    2. Re:Old news... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Troll? You guys have no sense of humor. I thought it was pretty funny, myself.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    3. Re:Old news... by phreakincool · · Score: 0

      Yep, saw that one coming.

  15. Overdoing it by isomeme · · Score: 4, Informative

    What, having the single most valuable orbit type named after him isn't enough? The orbit has the further advantage of actually being his idea.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    1. Re:Overdoing it by Jonathunder · · Score: 5, Informative

      It wasn't his idea, though he did popularize it in a 1945 story. Herman Potocnik published a paper on geosynchronous satellites for communication in 1928.

    2. Re:Overdoing it by rmsande · · Score: 1

      Discovering a continent is something that you can logically assume would happen. Likewise the wheel. Electric lights? Those took some serious thinking. Computers? They would've come around eventually, but perhaps in a drastically different way.

      Naming something after someone who came up with the idea doesn't accredit them as being the only person ever (before, now, later) to possibly be able to think of it. It just means that they did first. It's just like a patenting system - you get credit for your idea, but you let other people use it too, if it suits you.

    3. Re:Overdoing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're so right dude! Cos like, after Babbage, computers were like, everywhere!!

    4. Re:Overdoing it by isomeme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It wasn't a story; it was a technical article, I believe for the magazine Wireless World.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    5. Re:Overdoing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've read some of Clarke's books, but I never read any of Mr. Geostationary's books. I'll look for him in the Gs, the next time I'm at the bookstore.

    6. Re:Overdoing it by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      Just like he didn't invent "Space Elevators" but did popularise them with Fountains of Paradise. I rather preferred the idea of the first "O'Neill" style space colony or hotel to be built being called "Clarke County" 8)

    7. Re:Overdoing it by setagllib · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's Prof. Geostationary to you, you insensitive clod.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
  16. The Objective is to Remember by moore.dustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With all due respect, should we not remember him by naming something after him that itself will be remembered? I mean really, this Gamma Ray Burst is not going to be a topic for many people in even a couple weeks, let alone several years from now. We remember Kennedy via the Kennedy Space Center, Hawking gets Hawking Radiation, Einstein/Galileo has some satellites and the examples are really endless here. Why not name something after him which will carry his namesake more actively throughout the future. Of course this is not the only thing that will bear his name, but out of all the possibilities people want to spend their effort on this one? I'd like to see that enthusiasm directed towards something better than getting a GRB event named after him. Cool? Maybe. Lasting? No.

    1. Re:The Objective is to Remember by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with this point of view, but the gamma ray burst is actually quite appropriate for the man who wrote, The Star, which received the Hugo for best short story in 1956. It remains one of the most memorable stories by Clarke that I've ever read.

    2. Re:The Objective is to Remember by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      He already has one of those, it's the Clarke orbit named because he came up with the idea.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    3. Re:The Objective is to Remember by reverseengineer · · Score: 3, Informative

      In terms of more lasting recognition for Arthur C. Clarke, he already has asteroid 4923 Clarke, a dinosaur, Serendipaceratops arthurcclarkei, Clarke orbits (an IAU recognized term for geostationary orbit), , a bunch of space stuff has already been named for his Odyssey works, and if we ever build a space elevator, it's likely his name will be connected in some way with that. The man has already been much honored, and deservedly so.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    4. Re:The Objective is to Remember by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If this GRB is as rare as it appears to be, it will likely serve as a reference magnitude for other GRBs observed in the future (i.e., today's burst was the largest ever - 1.3x the magnitude of the Clarke Event observed in 2008, etc.)

      As an aside, I'm surprised no comments (that I've read) follow this line of logic:

      Of course Clarke's death didn't cause the burst, but wouldn't it be remarkable if somehow, even if by seeming coincidence, the burst caused his death?

    5. Re:The Objective is to Remember by moore.dustin · · Score: 1

      If this GRB is as rare as it appears to be, it will likely serve as a reference magnitude for other GRBs observed in the future (i.e., today's burst was the largest ever - 1.3x the magnitude of the Clarke Event observed in 2008, etc.) "If" that is true then it would be fine. Really, it is fine either way; my quarrel is with the effort being directed towards this objective when surely there are others far better. Provided what you said ends up being true, then chalk it up as another fitting thing baring his namesake. We can add it to the list others have replied with above me; but it still doesn't change the fact that the effort to remember him could focus its attention on something much more memorable for those of use still around.
    6. Re:The Objective is to Remember by rastilin · · Score: 1

      He's an author right? He already has his works which will live beyond his death.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    7. Re:The Objective is to Remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hawking gets Hawking radiation?! You dope!

      He postulated it!

    8. Re:The Objective is to Remember by doubletruncation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that it's not clear that this GRB will be that significant of an outlier after a decade or so of observations. Three of the four intrinsically brightest events ever observed occurred in the last 3 years and were discovered by Swift (050904, 061007 and 080319B which is this one). This one is also not an order of magnitude brighter (intrinsically) than any other GRB - more like a factor of 2 (the next brightest was 050904 which in turn was a factor of ~2 brighter than the third most luminous GRB, see figure 4 in http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.3215 ). Certainly it's a really cool event, neat to think that you could have seen something 7 billion light years away with the naked eye, but I'd be surprised if we don't see even more luminous ones in the next few decades.

    9. Re:The Objective is to Remember by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, they will.
      I have enjoyed, and have been inspired by, his many excellent stories.
      I will tell my children about them, and I believe they will read them and feel the same about them.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    10. Re:The Objective is to Remember by budgenator · · Score: 1

      because it's so obvious that you could be mod'ed redundant for mentioning it the first time in the thread

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    11. Re:The Objective is to Remember by rapoZa · · Score: 1

      How about the http://www.clarksvillage.co.uk/ Clarkes Village Outlet Shopping Centre in Street, Somerset?

  17. Re:Not only that... by Somegeek · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can you back up the pedophile claim? Thought not. As far as I can tell not one shred of evidence for the claim has ever been found. He was still knighted, after a two year delay caused by these claims. That shows pretty clearly that the claims were investigated and found to be false.

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  18. No need to mod anything in this thread up. by Somegeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    The facts have come out. Years ago. He never did anything. No one ever came forward. No evidence was ever found. This is old news.

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    1. Re:No need to mod anything in this thread up. by xtracto · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, for all the people that still think it might be true, the fact is that all the Sir Arthur C. Clarke paeophilia issue was brought forward by no less than The Sunday Mirror (or dailiy mirror) which is just a tabloid "news" paper in the UK. They even printed an apology and retraction.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  19. The Star by Guy+Harris · · Score: 3, Funny

    An explosive event in space named after Clarke? Oh, great....

  20. A good slashdot poll by MECC · · Score: 1

    This would make.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:A good slashdot poll by Amiralul · · Score: 1

      Would you like that the massive gamma burst to be named after Sir Arthur C. Clarke?
      ( ) Hell yes!
      ( ) Yes
      ( ) No
      ( ) Don't really care
      ( ) It's up to Cowboy Neal

  21. The Star by Ranger · · Score: 1

    No doubt Larry had read Clarke's short story "The Star".

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  22. Geosynchronous orbit is already named after him by pclark999 · · Score: 1

    Due to his prediction of geosynchronous communications satelites, this type of orbit is already named after him.

    1. Re:Geosynchronous orbit is already named after him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, 'Clarke' was a pen name?

  23. An alternative proposal by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about making sure Clarke Orbit becomes the common name for the geostationary orbit?

    1. Re:An alternative proposal by Loki+P · · Score: 1
      >How about making sure Clarke Orbit becomes the common name for the geostationary orbit?

      No, how about making sure geostationary orbit is the common name for the geostationary orbit.

      It's descriptive, it makes sense, it's already the common name for it. Why change it?

      An issue I've always had with scientific and mathematical theorems is the tendency of scientists to name them after themselves, or after some reason which ultimately sheds little light on the underlying nature of the system. I mean, why? It actually makes such ideas harder for students to learn and understand because the students must learn the various names then put them aside to understand the deeper interconnections. For example, atomic orbitals are named s, p, d, f, g, h... It's basically alphabetical order without s, p, and d, and missing a to e (except d). Great naming scheme there. Now sure, they need to be named somehow, and in this case there is indeed an empirical reason for those first few letters, which is far better than what you're proposing: replacing an explicable term with a human name. Please, let's prefer logical, explicable names for scientific matters. Like geostationary orbits for orbits that are stationary with respect to the ground.

  24. greatest bang since the big one? by Atari400 · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that be "greatest *observed* bang since the big one?" /nitpick

    --
    IBM doesn't play chess with the Universe.
    1. Re:greatest bang since the big one? by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      The big one wasnt observed. At least not directly.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    2. Re:greatest bang since the big one? by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Even though the radiation from the start of "the big one" isn't observed, the "fireball" (ie. CMBR) can still be seen, even though very faintly. And I'd argue that having a direct line of sight to a fireball of any explosion is directly observing that explosion.

  25. Re:Major correction... by db32 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please proceed to the counter to have your geek card revoked for the combined failure in incorrectly citing a classic AND incorrectly using a hyperlink and inadvertently pointing out your own first failure.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  26. It's an alien conspiracy by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

    How do we know this gamma ray burst isn't what finally did him in?

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
    1. Re:It's an alien conspiracy by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 2, Funny

      You killed Arthur! You bastards!

  27. Why God? by STrinity · · Score: 3, Funny

    There were so many stars you could have used. What was the need to give those people to the fire, so the symbol of their passing might shine above Sri Lanka?

    --
    Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    1. Re:Why God? by anonypus_user · · Score: 1

      LOL at this being modded troll!

    2. Re:Why God? by STrinity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whoever modded me a troll should immediately lose all geek cred. My post was word-for-word from a Clarke story, except I changed Bethleham to Sri Lanka.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  28. So, what do you have against stars? by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously, what if there's a inhabited planet around one of those stars and they find out what we think of them some day? We might be the ones who end up getting the shock-and-awe treatment, with a Mother Of All Nova Bombs.

    The only collection of objects that might deserve the name Cheney might be a scattering of parasite-ridden coyote droppings. Although given that scavenger dung may have better poll ratings . . .

  29. And I paraphrase... by xactuary · · Score: 1
    Any gamma-ray burst sufficiently powerful enough to be named after Clarke is, to me, indistinguishable from magic.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
  30. Enough already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arty Clark is gone. Fer fux sake!

  31. Eccentrica Gallumbits by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...was the biggest bang since the big one so this burst should be named after her.

    OTH if a seven billion year old gamma ray burst could be used to debunk Christian mythology I think then maybe there is a case for naming it after Clarke.

    1. Re:Eccentrica Gallumbits by enoz · · Score: 1

      Thankyou, that made my day.

      I haven't read a paperback years, yet now I am determined to catch up on more of Clarke's writings.

  32. It already exists, and visible with the naked eye. by Dopamine,+Redacted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make sure you use a telescope with a clock drive and a filter. Declination: Undisclosed Right Ascension: Undisclosed

  33. Beeblebrox by E1v!$ · · Score: 1

    "to associate his name with the greatest bang since the big one?..." I thought Zaphod had that title.

  34. bigggest ever? by 602 · · Score: 1

    I'm not impressed with the supposed uniqueness of this event. We've had the ability to detect GRBs for only about 10 years and initially that ability was pretty crude. To make a big deal of this being the biggest one "ever" is quite presumptuous.

    Reminds me of when Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 collided with Jupiter. Levy said (during the live TV coverage) that it was a once-in-a-hundred-million-year (I forget the exact number, but it was big) event. What a remarkable coincidence that it happened just a handful of years after we developed the ability to detect it.

  35. No,it wasn't by jd · · Score: 1

    But it's a good name given the work he put into the theory of geostationary satellites. However, I would like to make a suggestion: that where a marker, be it physical or electronic, is clearly designed with the intent of indicating the presence of alien life in the galaxy, the information type be measured in a ten-point scale of Clarkes. (A basic signal is one Clarke, up to a sufficiently advanced signal that makes it indistinguishable from magic, which would be ten Clarkes. In honour of Arthur C. Clarke's series on the supernatural, complex numbers are permitted.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  36. Let's Rename Europa "Clarke's Moon" by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Clarke merits something more substantial and permanent. I'm advocating renaming Europa as Clarke's Moon.

    Re: "the greatest bang since the big one..." Seems unlikely. It's only the biggest one since we've been watching.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Let's Rename Europa "Clarke's Moon" by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      Or the first perminant off-earth base - "Clarketown"

  37. Can someone please fix the modding on the parent? by PaganRitual · · Score: 1, Informative

    What the hell is the person that modded this a troll even doing in this article?

    This is not a troll, unless you have no geek cred whatsoever. It's a small segment from one of the best sci-fi short stories you'll read.

    I'm as anti-religion as the next nerd, but just because a post mentions a god, you can't immediately presume it to be trolling.

    Besides, it's a science-fiction article, if there was ever going to be a perfectly suitable place to make reference to gods, it's here.

  38. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all due respect to science fiction writers, are we already out of astronomers to honor?

  39. There wasn't just *one* burst by RandallSmith · · Score: 1

    There were actually *four*, a new record for Swift for bursts in a single day. I believe a more apt reference is 'The Nine Billion Names of God'; see 'A Cosmic Coincidence' at http://www.clarkefoundation.org

  40. Biggest bang since the big one by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

    Hey, that's Eccentrica Gallumbits!!!

    ZWithaPGGB=Zaphod With A Pan Galactic Gargleblaster. Imagine a very soused two headed guy wandering around a bar having conversations with all and sundry.

  41. Re:I'm confused... by dave420 · · Score: 1

    That story was fabricated. The newspaper retracted its comments, and made a full public apology.

  42. Re:I'm confused... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    Why let the truth get in the way of an opportunity to troll?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  43. Cool! A Minnie Driver/Anne Hathaway love scene! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > Larry Sessions, a columnist for Earth & Sky, has suggested in his blog that the gamma-ray
    > event whose radiation reached us a few hours before Arthur C. Clarke died, and which
    > occurred 7.5 billion years ago, be named the Clarke Event.

    However, the discoverer of the burst quickly responded, saying "That's a nice thought, but I was planning on naming it the Anne Hathaway Event in hopes of getting some premium ass."

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  44. "Arthur is NOT Dead..... by Lute · · Score: 1

    ... He just went Home!"

    K [Men in Black]