Slashdot Mirror


Sony to Buy Gracenote

Ian Lamont writes "Sony is buying Gracenote for $260 million. Sony will use Gracenote's online music database in its own digital content and devices, but Gracenote will operate separately and keep its own management. It's an interesting move, because many other entertainment companies and services depend on the Gracenote database, including iTunes, Yahoo, Winamp, and even the onboard stereo system used in some new Cadillacs. Gracenote has been criticized for turning the once-open CDDB project into a 'quagmire of heavy contracts, licensing fees, forced user registration and anti-competition clauses.'"

146 comments

  1. You've Got It All Wrong! by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gracenote has been criticized for turning the once open CDDB project into a 'quagmire of heavy contracts, licensing fees, forced user registration and anti-competition clauses.' No no, you've got it all wrong! Sony's changing all that! I just installed a client that they started hosting that allows me to access the compact disc database. No contract, no licensing, no registration, just had to run a simple file called 'sony-mp3-finder-RIAA-notifying-kernel-rootkit.exe.'

    Seriously, where does all this distrust and hate for Sony come from?
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 1, Informative

      All the hate and distrust comes from the fact that they have done things like that before. But without the users knowledge. Sure they apologized, but it still shows the mentality of their corporation when things like that get signed off on and put into action. Even if the entire upper management claim plausible denial it still stinks.

      --
      My humor is probably your flamebait
    2. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      just had to run a simple file called 'sony-mp3-finder-RIAA-notifying-kernel-rootkit.exe.' All the hate and distrust comes from the fact that they have done things like that before.

      Hmm... Yes... I think you might be on to something here, gumshoe.



    3. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by allcar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Show me a technology where they did not try to seek to tie people into their proprietary solution - Betamax, Memory Stick, MiniDisc, UMD, BlueRay, to name just a few.

    4. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 1

      'sony-mp3-finder-RIAA-notifying-kernel-rootkit.exe.' while your at it, download 'sony-mpg-finder-MPAA-notifiying-kernal-rootkit.exe'
      --
      If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    5. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Blu-Ray isn't all Sony, and isn't 100% proprietary, as it uses Java and other company's technologies. It's not some Sony VM and Sony Video Format.

    6. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, alright, but the only reason I'm believing you is you seem to know all about hating things. :)

    7. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just had to run a simple file called 'sony-mp3-finder-RIAA-notifying-kernel-rootkit.exe.Seriously, where does all this distrust and hate for Sony come from?

      It's simply because they cannot afford a PS3. When you consider slashdot is entirely populated with apple fanboys and linux zealots, the root kit didn't affect them or anyone they know.

    8. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by dakameleon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Walkman. Discman. Arguably both Sony's most successful consumer electronics products.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    9. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by SeePage87 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but does it run on linux?

    10. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      You'd think they'd learn something from the success of those...

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    11. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by Arivia · · Score: 3, Informative

      The PS3 (with the exception of Blu-Ray) is pretty open. It's all Bluetooth/USB (including support for the plug and play standard for keyboards, mice, USB keys, external hard disks, and so on). The ones with MemoryStick slots don't care if you use it or not - you are free to do things that you would do with external storage (backing up game saves, copying media, and copying firmware updates) on USB keys, MemorySticks, SD cards, or whatever, depending upon your fancy. The only case in which it overtly favors something proprietary is that certain features (DVD upscaling, for example) are limited or not available unless you're using the HDMI port for video. However, it doesn't complain if you simply switch out for a HDMI to DVI cable and run audio on RCA cables.

      In fact, it's downright weird to find proprietary things on the PS3 - GHIII's proprietary wireless dongles just make no sense in the context of how the system operates.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    12. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      3.5" floppy
      CD

      And the PS2 had a Linux distro made for it - by Sony.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    13. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by staticneuron · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why is there a problem to that? First and foremost they are an electronics company. Don't like the fact that their camera's use memory sticks, or their PSP use UMD's? Don't by the hardware. It is that simple. For those who do not care, it isn't a big deal. What I am trying to figure out is where is the hate for the DRM on itunes media, the social for the zune, XD memory? Why is it ok to hate only on Sony for doing something that other companies do?

    14. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure they apologized

      So did Kevin Mitnick, but he still went to prison. Why didn't anybody go to prison for XCP (alternate less serious link)?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    15. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      The best thing about these new bits of Sony software is that you don't even need to type in your name, DoB, SSN or any of the rest of it - it finds it all out for you! Nonsensical Bullshit Paradigm Shift 2.0 is SO cool!

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    16. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by rvw · · Score: 1

      Walkman. Discman. Arguably both Sony's most successful consumer electronics products. You forget Trinitron.
    17. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

      PS2 DVD player. PS1 CD player. Any Sony TV with a build in VCR.

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    18. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by mweather · · Score: 1

      They, and most other labels have done it before. Sony just got caught because their rootkit broke computers. The autorun DRM schemes used by other companies work (if you don't hold down shift), and thus, are not complained about.

    19. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by anexkahn · · Score: 1

      All the hate and distrust comes from the fact that they have done things like that before. But without the users knowledge. Sure they apologized, but it still shows the mentality of their corporation when things like that get signed off on and put into action. Even if the entire upper management claim plausible denial it still stinks. I think you missed the sarcasm in their post.
      --
      Curious about Storage and Virtualization? Check out
    20. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they probably make sense in the context of making universal designs for all 4 systems (PS2, PS3, 360 and Wii) and keeping costs down.

    21. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by EXMSFT · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Trinitron wasn't a product, it was a tech tradename... Sony TV's featured Trinitron...

    22. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      Correct. Blu-ray is a *group*, similar to how DVD/HD DVD is part of a group, not just one company.

      Also:

      Show me ANY company that has not tried to introduce proprietary standards. Wii/Gamecube is owned by Nintendo. Compact Disc is a Philips-owned property; ditto the ubiquitous audio cassette. VHS is owned by JVC/Matsushita. It's rare to find a format that is "public domain" for everybody to use. Nearly all formats are owned by some company.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    23. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      it wasn't a product per-se, more of an improvement on shadow mask technology for colour tvs using CRTs.

    24. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS3 is made by a separate company, Sony Computer Entertainment or 'SCE'. SCE hates Sony HQ and that is why they avoid Sony HQ's proprietary bullsh*t.

    25. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      So did Kevin Mitnick, but he still went to prison. Why didn't anybody go to prison for XCP [wikipedia.org] (alternate less serious link [uncyclopedia.org])?

      Kevin had less gold.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    26. Re:You've Got It All Wrong! by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      I "forgot" Trinitron because TVs aren't exactly something you can have a proprietary format for, or at least not if you want to sell any.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
  2. Yay! by segedunum · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this is destined to be yet another rip-roaring success in the area of online music company purchases in the same manner as, errrrm, Napster, errrrr. Hang on a minute and I'll be able to think of one.

  3. I guess... by owlnation · · Score: 1

    ... that's the end of that then...

  4. freedb by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is this CDDB you speak of? Some crufty, proprietary version of freedb? I'm sorry, how is this relevant again?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:freedb by Bazman · · Score: 1

      For the same reason that Internet Explorer is a crufty, proprietary version of Firefox :) Try and kill off the free stuff and then charge for what they've got?

    2. Re:freedb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah sure, until the current administrators of FreeDB sell out as Ti Kan and Steve Scherf did, and another grubby little company tells lies about it's "open" intentions then locks out the existing users by changing formats and switching to a draconian license.

      If you want to protect something like FreeDB from sell outs you need to

      1) Ensure that the data format and service protocol is wide WIDE open (XML, standard query structures), but the license prohibits switching the service protocol to the same data set if you fork. In other words, if you fork you have a backwards commitment to the established collective.

      2) Have a poisoning proof distributed database synchronisation network that makes sure the actual data has *multiple* owners and a licence that allows any of the multiple owners to fork. With enough active maintainers a cohesive effect will keep them all working to expand a common data set.

      Any monolithic data set maintained by one body/org is prone to weasels selling it out.

    3. Re:freedb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will argue, in support of a "professionally" "managed" database, you do get a modicum of consistency in terms of formatting -- "The" or no "The," differentiating between different discs in an album, etc. At least, if they're doing their jobs, which is always the kicker.

    4. Re:freedb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thread wants a freedb tag.

    5. Re:freedb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you want to protect something like FreeDB from sell outs you need to" just let it die already. Seriously, the sooner freedb bites the dust, the sooner we can move on to a DB that isn't crippled by legacy genres (rock, rock, rock, rock, classical, rock, rock, rock) and a shitty hash with even shittier collision handling. Shitty users using shitty clients to erase UTF8 entries and replace them with 01 - ?????? ??? ???? aren't helping their cause either.

      So let it pine for its lost fjords, push up all the daisies it wants, grow stone cold, rot away... please, stick a fork in it and call it done!

    6. Re:freedb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FreeDB *did* sell out, too. Use Musicbrainz.

    7. Re:freedb by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      I imagine you know this, but it's relevant because of history. CDDB came first and was free. FreeDB only appeared to fill the hole left when CDDB was commercialized. It was exactly the same as if FreeDB were purchased tomorrow and then required a $50/month registration fee.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    8. Re:freedb by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      It's where the nine-out-of-ten people in Sony, Apple, M$, and most of the big name proprietary companies's target demographics get their Freedb functionality.

    9. Re:freedb by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      What is this freedb you speak of? Some watered-down version of MusicBrainz? I'm sorry, how is this relevant again? ;)

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    10. Re:freedb by zjbs14 · · Score: 1

      One difference though. You can go right now and download the GPL2-licensed freedb data to fork the service if you wish.

      --
      No sig, sorry.
    11. Re:freedb by mweather · · Score: 1

      They're charging for IE now?

    12. Re:freedb by hondo77 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is this CDDB you speak of? Some crufty, proprietary version of freedb? I'm sorry, how is this relevant again? <realitycheck>It's relevant because most of us are using iTunes.</realitycheck>
      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    13. Re:freedb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this freedb you speak of? Some crufty version of MusicBrainz?

    14. Re:freedb by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, how is this relevant again? Well, if you didn't *already* despise CDDB/Gracenote, *now* you have a reason to.
      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    15. Re:freedb by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      FreeDB is under the GPL. If the license is changed, then someone can fork from the last GPL-licensed version. Thus is unlike CDDB, which only offered the CDDB software under the GPL but not the database itself.

    16. Re:freedb by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      What is this iTunes you speak of? Some crufty, proprietary version of Amarok? I'm sorry, how is this relevant again?

    17. Re:freedb by yoasif · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://musicbrainz.org/ The data is either public domain or covered under Creative Commons. I believe the software is GPL. Definitely a better alternative to CDDB and freedb.

    18. Re:freedb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember talking with Gracenote to build a music service. Of course, their pricing was outrageous and someone proposed using freedb on the project instead, which was perfectly apt for the service we needed. They threatened to sue us for patent infringement immediately after we pronounced the word "freedb" .

      Their contracts forbid to even use a bit of freedb in any service if you use their product.

      Look, how many products are using freedb ? how many use cddb ? Winamp, iTunes, as the article said. Nero was sued for providing freedb. (gracenote lost)

      Things can have changed by now, but I really was wondering who the customer was and why we were doing any business with such a company. Unfortunately, hardly irrelevant.

    19. Re:freedb by nerdacus · · Score: 1

      Nero was sued by Gracenote? Never heard about that. Can you provide case information so we can look it up?

    20. Re:freedb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which you never get in Gracenote or freedb or any other purely user submitted system.

  5. It's been said before ... by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    I've got a bad feeling about this.

  6. SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by webword · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sony's Obsession with Proprietary Formats -- "Obsessed with owning proprietary formats, Sony keeps picking fights. It keeps losing. And yet it keeps coming back for more, convinced that all it needs to do is push a bigger stack of chips to the center of the table."

    1. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by njfuzzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Losses like BluRay, you mean?

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    2. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by webword · · Score: 1

      I was pointing out that SONY has a certain type of positioning. An attitude. Their posture is to choose 'closed' systems and formats when they can, so they can control.

    3. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      How is that relevant in any way, shape or form to the purchase of Gracenote?

      I'm no Sony apologist, but whenever Sony appears here, people point out that Sony always push for proprietary formats. If and when Sony is launching a new consumer product which uses a proprietary format, I can see the validity of raising the formats. However, in this case, the burden of proof is on the people raising it. Gracenote CDDB has an entrenched market position - Sony can't exactly introduce a new proprietary format here.

      Other questions, such as the ongoing independence of the Gracenote system, would be entirely relevant to ask here, but they have something to do with the topic, so I guess my expectations are too high.

      So I ask: why are proprietary formats relevant to the discussion of this purchase?

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    4. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Blue-ray's hardly a win, yet. Sure, they beat HD-DVD. Good for them.

      Then prices on Blue-ray shot up (gee, who'd have ever expected that to happen), early adopters have discovered that their expensive players can't play new Blue-ray discs thanks to Sony continuing to muck with the spec, leaving the PS3 the only future-proof Blue-ray player.

      But thanks to Sony purposely crippling the PS3 in order to try and leverage what they viewed as their console monopoly into winning the HD format war, they lost out to Nintendo and Microsoft. Every game release that has a PS3 version and an XBox360 version is better on the XBox360, without fail. Check the reviews.

      As an added bonus to Sony, just when they were starting to get close to actually making money on the PS3, the US economy started to collapse. Since Sony is a Japanese company which is based in yen, the falling US dollar is causing them to lose even more on every US sale than they were before. The US won't be seeing a price cut until the dollar stops its nosedive. The way the US economy is going, Sony may have to actually increase prices.

      They did manage to "win" the Blue-ray war. They won by losing their strength in the console market, and they won just in time to have the US economy collapse so that they can no longer count on sales there.

      To top it all off, the war they "won" wasn't really worth winning. HDTV adoption is picking up, but it's still a trifling fraction of the viewing population. Blue-ray became more expensive. DVD is good enough: Blue-ray won a meaningless war, at a great cost for Sony.

      Blue-ray's victory is meaningless.

    5. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      Nah, more like Beta, CRVdisc, UMD or Minidisc.

    6. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by staticneuron · · Score: 1

      And the problem in that is? It is very simple. For some reason people get in a tizzy about proprietary media but then I sat down and thought about it. Why is it a big deal? The truth is.... it isn't. If you look at a device and it doesn't do what you want it to do, including the way you handle your own media, do not buy it. Second of all their formats are only as successful as their hardware... because that is what they are aiming for. So all this amounts to is people trying to find a reason to hate Sony. Most run without all the information. If you call blu-ray proprietary then you are wrong. If you think UMD has failed.... then you are wrong. If you look toward something as a "failure" then make sure it has failed both in the personal and professional markets. Step up and give valid reasons instead of promoting a beating stick.

    7. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by staticneuron · · Score: 1

      Beta and Minidisc were used in the professional industry ( the last beta recorder was made in 2002). And explain how umd's are a failur with more than 15 mill PSP's worldwide and growing? Didn't Capcom just sell 2 millions copies of Monster hunter..... on UMD's? I have no Idea what CRVdisc is, I guess that must really be a failure.

    8. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, Sony finally won one of their format wars. Finally, after years of failing to achieve market dominance, they have a success.

      Now what?

      They have lots of experience making money with consumer electronics that leverage open formats - Walkman, Discman, and the metric assloads of VHS and DVD players they have sold. They have ZERO experience leveraging a market dominant position into profit.

      Their attitude seems to have been "We make X dollars with Y percent of the market. So we will make X*(1/Y) dollars with 100% of the market." They ignore the case where the market with open standards is (1/Y) times BIGGER than the whole market with proprietary standards.

      They are like the ass who goes out with the gang and always orders the personal pizza because they want it just the way they want, even though no one else wants it that way. He doesn't see that if he had pitched in he could have gotten a slice of the giant sized pie and still eaten more for less money than he paid for the pie that is "all his."

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    9. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beta and Minidisc were used in the professional industry ( the last beta recorder was made in 2002). Wrong, wrong, wrong.

      Betacam was used in the professional industry, but "Beta" (in reference to Betamax) was not. Trying to conflate the two would be like trying to claim that a Pinto won the 2003 grand prix because the engines were both made by Ford.
    10. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      Beta and Minidisc were used in the professional industry... Remember way back when they were marketed to consumers? That's how they were failures. As far as most non-industry folk are concerned the last beta recorder was made in the mid 80s, the last minidisc was pressed toward the end of the 90s, and the letters, "UMD" stand for Univeristy of MarylanD unless said hypothetical person owns a PSP.
    11. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      The purchase of Gracenote puts SONY in an excellent position to squeeze online mp3 vendors. They also now have the power to introduce their own, "standard," for which they charge ludicrous licensing fees and kill the CDDB standard. If you look at SONY's past behavior this does seem likely, and even though there are several benign reasons they'd make a move like this one has to consider all the likely options.

    12. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      >>>"Beta and Minidisc were used in the professional industry"

      False. Well, half-false. I don't know much about minidisc, but I do know the pros did NOT use the Betamax standard. They used the Betacam standard with component video recording that produced a higher-resolution image. (Today the pros use Digital Betacam.)

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    13. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      >>>"Finally, after years of failing to achieve market dominance, they have a success."

      Incorrect. Sony already achieved success with:

      Betacam (professionals)
      Compact Disc
      3.5" floppy
      DVD (Sony is a founding member of the consortium which developed the format)

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    14. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by Espen+Skoglund · · Score: 1
      Geez. I know people love Sony bashing and all that, but does that mean that obvious trolls need to be modded as "insightful". Some comments:
      • Blu-ray prices shooting up --- You can hardly blame Sony for retailers taking advantage of the situation and increasing their profit margins. I suspect the same would have been true if HD-DVD had emerged as the winning format.
      • Incompatible early BD players --- You're talking complete and utter rubbish. Older players can still play newer movies. They will just not be able to take advantage of Profile 2.0 features such as viewing online contents related to the movie.
      • PS3 crippled by Blu-ray --- While people might argue that quality of PS3 games is outshined by its rivals, putting the blame on the Blu-ray drive is wide off target. Do you seriously believe the quality of games would magically get better if they were distributed on DVDs?
      Oh, and by the way, it's called "Blu-ray", not "Blue-ray". If you mean to go on a rant about something you should at least have the decency to call it by its proper name.
    15. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. The CD was mostly Phillips. It was based on the Phillips laserdisc, Phillips contributed the manufacturing process, and the first units were manufactured by Phillips.

      All sony contributed was the (bad) error correction.

      Betacam is just a product line, not a media standard. DVD is another example of a joint effort that sony did not control.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    16. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Every game release that has a PS3 version and an XBox360 version is better on the XBox360, without fail. Check the reviews. This simply isn't true. For example, the preferred version of Assassin's Creed is the PS3 version. The big problem is that Blu-Ray is very slow at loading data off the disc (compared to DVD-ROM) and designers have to take that into account, usually by caching data on the hard disc. In theory, this means that PS3 games can actually perform better, but only when they're loading game data off the hard disc.

      The 360's online service is also generally regarded as better than the PS3's, so online-heavy games (like Call of Duty 4) tend to have an edge on the 360.

      But for games that don't have an large online component and know how to leverage the hard drive, the PS3 can have an edge in performance and playability.

    17. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incompatible early BD players --- You're talking complete and utter rubbish. Older players can still play newer movies. They will just not be able to take advantage of Profile 2.0 features such as viewing online contents related to the movie. You're quite wrong, sadly.

      The first-gen players manage not to be able to play profile 2.0 discs at all.

      You're right that they should be able to do so. But - oops - they can't. This is apparently due to the enhanced DRM features on newer discs.
    18. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by staticneuron · · Score: 1

      "UMD" stand for Univeristy of MarylanD unless said hypothetical person owns a PSP." And that's the point. There are over 30 million PSP owners out there. Thats all Sony cares about. What did you think it was a bid to take over the market? Take for instance beta......... only sony machines ha the ability to play them. The minidisc (which still has consumer grade model for sale) was their vehicle for atrac a form of lossless that other companies still use. And the UMD's are ment for PSP's only. No home players, no burners in PC. For sony it is about control not fame, So whether the average person knows what it is or not, it is irrelevant.

    19. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by staticneuron · · Score: 1

      Theoretically they are the same. Betamax and betacam are still based off of the same tech. In the older machines you could have put betamax tapes in the cameras and used them. In later years they discouraged this use because of betacam speeds. Why do you think they share the same beta moniker.

    20. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by staticneuron · · Score: 1

      Theoretically they are the same. Betamax and betacam are still based off of the same tech. In the older machines you could have put betamax tapes in the cameras and used them. In later years they discouraged this use because of betacam speeds. Why do you think they share the same beta moniker. I think a better analogy is to compare digital betacam to MPEG IMX or HDCAM. The same technology that is slightly repurposed is still the same technology.

    21. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      "Beta and Minidisc were used in the professional industry ( the last beta recorder was made in 2002). And explain how umd's are a failur with more than 15 mill PSP's worldwide and growing? Didn't Capcom just sell 2 millions copies of Monster hunter..... on UMD's?"

      Beta is pretty obvious. Ask anyone who owned one who didn't switch to VHS a few years after purchase. Since then you can probably find remaining Beta tapes and players rotting in attics across the world, despite the higher video quality.

      Minidisc could be considered professional, though I've not known too many artist who stuck with it over the old multi-track tapes; but any buyer off the street who purchased a DiscMan ended up feeling the burn from having to deal with ATRAC conversion so it was dropped like a pile of bricks when MP3 players became the norm. Data MiniDisc had an even poorer record. When it came around the bend, Sony went on the warpath to create a piss poor product. It promised to be a bridge between tape backup and a portable HD, but instead was so crippled by DRM that the poor thing was downright useless for the applications it was designed for.

      UMD for games doesn't really count in this one. As long as they continue making PSPs it will be fine. UMD as a non-game media format and follow up to the minidisc will be a failure because Sony (and in the end Wal-Mart) has already decided it will be. If they really were going to support it they would have had playback built into the PS3 (and yes, the RCA output for the PSP Slim was too little too late). Instead they would rather have you repurchase that movie on Blu-Ray.

      Had Sony decided to stick with hardware and not go into the content business they would be in a much better position to actually sell consumers what they want. Instead, they became a company that gave us the root-kit fiasco and the opportunity to re-purchase the same media in their new, new format 6 months after purchase.

      Oh yea, I've owned all of these except the Beta and I got burned every time.

    22. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by staticneuron · · Score: 1

      Blu ray is also a joint effort. So is the PS3. What ever is most convenient to bash Sony right? Blu ray became a beating stick because it was another Sony proprietary format (even though it is not) but now that it has won i wonder how long until people catch on that it was a joint process? It was not 'Mostly Philips', even according to them it was a joint effort that it took to create the Red Book. The first was Philip and then a month and a half came sony's version. Same thing with blu ray. Philips is the head of the BDa, Samsung released the first BD player but people still have sony on the tip of their tongues when talking about blu ray.

    23. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      >>>"Theoretically they are the same. Betamax and betacam are still based off of the same tech."

      Saying that Betamax/Betacam are the same is like saying HD DVD/Blu-ray or NTSC/PAL are the same. It doesn't make logical sense, because you cannot play a HD DVD inside a Bluray, you cannot watch an NTSC broadcast using a PAL set, nor can you play a Betacam tape inside a Betamax machine. It just won't work.

      Betamax and Betacam don't even record at the same speed (Betacam runs pproximately three faster than Betamax). Read more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betacam

      Bottom Line:
      - Betamax flopped for Sony's Consumer division (VHS won instead).
      - But Betacam was a success for Sony Professional.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    24. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      >>>"despite the higher video quality."

      Betamax-II (used by Hollywood for commercial release) was 240 horizontal analog resolution.
      VHS-SP (again, used by Hollywood for their releases) was 240 on standard VHS and 250 on VHS HQ.

      There's no difference in video quality. They are virtually identical.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    25. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... you posted the same message twice. Well, I'm not going to do that, so I'll just summarize:

      Saying Betamax/Betacam are the same is just as incorrect as to say that Betamax/VHS is the same, or HD DVD/Bluray is the same. It is Not correct. They are incompatible formats, and they will not play each other's recordings.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    26. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      >>>"Betacam is just a product line, not a media standard."

      To say Betacam is not a "media standard" is akin to saying VHS is not a media standard (or more accurately: formats). They are both a type of media format, with VHS dominating the consumer world, and Betacam dominating the professional world (almost every show between 1985-2000 is stored on Betacam-format)(example: Star Trek TNG and DS9).

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    27. Re:SONY Loves Closed, Proprietary Systems by staticneuron · · Score: 1

      I just said it. You COULD have put betamax into betacams and they would work. For reliability purposes sony advised against this and obviously ti no longer held true after many betacam revisions. Beta and VHS were not compatable but believe it or not HD-DVD and Blu ray are. The difference is in the discs themselves . In those combo drives did you think that they had two different lasers? The smaller numerical aperature had no issues reading the HD-DVD disks. Again you say they are just "different" but I have repeatedly pointed out to you that specificaly betamax and betacam were interchangable.

  7. Yes, they would sell you access to what you own. by westbake · · Score: 1

    That is the crime but it's more Gracenote's than Sony's. The CDDB was created by it's users and Gracenote has no right to treat it like an exclusively owned resource. The database itself is everyone's property and the free alternatives, of course, will be easier to use and better kept. Gracenote's new deal with Sony is a low point but one that was entirely predictable when they started acting like they owned the CDDB. Sony should be ashamed of this too unless they turn it back into an unrestricted resource.

    --
    I am a name troll of Westlake. Visit my homepage to learn why.
  8. What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People still buy Sony, even after they do all these things.

    1. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 1

      People still buy Sony, even after they do all these things.
      I don't. The only music I buy online is from Wal-Mart where they sell me unlocked MP3 files and never from Sony or EMI.

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    2. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the part of Sony that makes the PS3 has nothing to do with the part of Sony that sues people for making mp3 files?

    3. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by JPeMu · · Score: 1

      I've voted with my feet too, actually. I don't own a PS3, nor a PSP, despite actually quite fancying a PSP for emulation purposes. My own decision was "triggered" by the Lik-Sang suefest, but the rootkit debacle certainly wasn't forgotten in my decision. I'm sure they couldn't care less, but I'd rather "go without" than fund such corporate shenanigans. Sidenote: Creative Labs, of course, recently joined my "no buy" list. Each to their own though, naturally.

    4. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      If you're that adamant. You might want to review your retirements funds and your company 401K.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    5. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Because the part of Sony that makes the PS3 has nothing to do with the part of Sony that sues people for making mp3 files?

      This line of reasoning cracks me up. The legal papers say "Sony" on them, don't they -- or at least RIAA, of which Sony's a member. The rootkit was distributed with CDs that said "Sony BMG," correct? The PS3 says "Sony" on it, doesn't it?

      That means they are using the same corporate goodwill to sell you all three products -- lawsuits, rootkits, and shiny baubles. The name "Sony" carries value above and beyond what's on the balance sheet, and the reputation of the entire corporation depends on it. All you're doing when you make excuses for their behavior is insulating the entity called "Sony" from the consequences of its actions.

      Why would you do them a favor like that, when they're (probably) not even paying you?

    6. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 1

      But in fact, Sony/BMG and Sony Corp. are two different entities, hence the BMG part. Where do you think the BMG comes from? It comes from Bertelsmann Music Group, which used to be a major record co. that was wholly owned by a large conglomerate (Bertelsmann obviously). These two large conglomerates Sony and Bertelsmann decided to merge and spin-off their music business. Now sometimes the spinoff and the parent company maintain a good relationship, other times they have very little to do with each other. An example is the CW network, which is a merger of CBS's UPN and Time-Warner's WB network. The CW had a hard time getting many Time-Warner Cable operators to carry their network in various local markets.

      As for why I care, I personally knew someone who was screwed by a BMG label (before the merger). I was hoping the rootkit behavior would make people go after BMG and possibly Bertelsmann, but it looks like Sony gets all the hate.

    7. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      "Why would you do them a favor like that...?"

      Cause they make cool shit... duhh...lol

    8. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I do, I love sony kit. It's both shiny and capable.

      Vaio laptops are great.
      The PS3 is a fantastic machine. So was the PS2.

      I'd buy a Sony TV but they're damned expensive.

      So sod the ethics. I guess I'm not a music customer though.

    9. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Who gives a flying rat's ass? Again, the CD case said "Sony."

      As long as the revenue from selling the tainted products appears on Sony's balance sheet, it's their responsibility.

    10. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 1

      So what about Bertelsmann? Are you going to advocate for their responsibility in this as well? Cause I seem to be the only one who's doing that.

    11. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      At this risk of Godwinning the thread, that's just like Hitler excusing his actions by saying "B...b...b...but it was all Himmler's idea!"

    12. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by mosch · · Score: 1

      I specifically avoid Sony on electronics and computers, specifically because of their behavior.

      Pioneer, Yamaha and Apple have all done well by Sony's nonsense. And say what you want about those companies, none of them are even close to Sony levels of dumb and evil.

      I have a PS2, but I'm skipping the PS3 even though I'd love to play the new Gran Turismo.

    13. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting less antagonism for Sony, I'm suggesting an equal (or preferrably greater) hate for BMG and some for Bertelsmann as well. Isn't their enough room in your heart to hate another corporate conglomerate who were just as (if not more) culpable?

    14. Re:What about the mentalty of their customers ? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Nah, I really feel that we're talking about just one corporate entity here, not two independent ones. Wall Street doesn't see two separate companies, and neither does Joe Six-Pack. Sorry.

      If it'll help, I'll dedicate tomorrow's Two Minute Hate session to BMG, just for a change of pace. But after that, it'll be all about Sony again.

  9. The CDDB I contributed to?!!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder how big the check Sony will be sending me is!

    1. Re:The CDDB I contributed to?!!?!? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      As big as the check you asked all the users of CDDB to send you for your contribution.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  10. Musicbrainz by AceJohnny · · Score: 4, Informative

    Use MusicBrainz. All the cool kids are doing it!

    Seriously. Musicbrainz was created after the CDDB fiasco (and FreeDB had its own share of problems). It operates under a non-profit organization to guarantee its freedom.
    And on that feature bullet-point list, they add an API to recognize what that "Unknown Artist - Unknown Title.mp3" file you have.

    --
    Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
    1. Re:Musicbrainz by himself · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So how can I tell iTunes to use it?

            I already have tens of GB of MP3s in iTunes that I burned from CDs myself -- and iTunes automatically looks up the tags in CDDB. I see that I can short-circuit that lookup and manually tag all the files myself via unchecking the "Look up CD names from the Internet?" option in the Advanced pane of the preferences, but is there a tool (e.g., an AppleScript) that'll update my Library from Musicbrainz or FreeDB or whatever?

    2. Re:Musicbrainz by artels · · Score: 2, Informative

      but is there a tool (e.g., an AppleScript) that'll update my Library from Musicbrainz or FreeDB or whatever? http://musicbrainz.org/doc/PicardTagger
      http://musicbrainz.org/doc/FreeDBGateway
    3. Re:Musicbrainz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yep, it's a little tool called Picard and it's available for Linux, Mac and Windows. You can get it here at the MusicBrainz website:
      http://musicbrainz.org/doc/PicardDownload
      I have to agree with the parent poster, MusicBrainz is by far the best thing going ethically and practically. Enjoy!

    4. Re:Musicbrainz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how can I tell iTunes to use it?

            I already have tens of GB of MP3s in iTunes that I burned from CDs myself -- and iTunes automatically looks up the tags in CDDB. I see that I can short-circuit that lookup and manually tag all the files myself via unchecking the "Look up CD names from the Internet?" option in the Advanced pane of the preferences, but is there a tool (e.g., an AppleScript) that'll update my Library from Musicbrainz or FreeDB or whatever? http://musicbrainz.org/doc/PicardTagger
    5. Re:Musicbrainz by Zanth_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      The comments regarding Picardtagger are good but if you want something automatic use ieatbrainz:
      http://sourceforge.net/projects/ieatbrainz/

    6. Re:Musicbrainz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've tried Picard a couple years back, my complaints as of that attempt were as follows:
      1A) my taste in music is apparently more obscure than other musicbrainz users' and
      1B) If Picard can't figure out the album, I can't figure out how to just tag it myself and move on, while I can type in the fields displayed on the screen, there's no "save" button, and whatever I entered just disappears when I switch to another track. Helpfully it lets me know that I can go to their website and submit the information and in one or two days it will be approved and I might be able to actually tag my music, eventually.
      2) I also seem to be unable to override the tags when musicbrainz CAN find the album... despite their "style guide", I still get multi-cd sets with tags like "The Foobars: The Footastic Years" "Foobars: Footastic Years CD 2" "Footastic Years" (with track numbers starting from 53) Even when they ARE consistent, their style guide conflicts with MY style guide.

    7. Re:Musicbrainz by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      Use MusicBrainz. All the cool kids are doing it! As per The Fine Summary, this isn't as simple as it seems. For instance, all of the multimedia radios in the Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep lineup use Gracenote. Harman-Becker are the only ones who can change how the data lookup works. End-users get screwed yet again.

      *Admittedly it's possible Sony won't close off access to Gracenote for other companies.
      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
  11. The Motivation for Proprietary Systems is Simple: by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1
    Wait for it...

    Profit (with fewer lawyers).

    Who can't understand and endorse something the requires fewer lawyers?

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  12. Re:Yes, they would sell you access to what you own by pipatron · · Score: 1

    Sony should be ashamed

    :DDDDD

    Hilarious!

    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  13. Did you hear the sound loop on by zappepcs · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    the news announcement of the purchase? Yep, it was the sound of a flushing toilet (American Standard if I heard it right). Why a flushing toilet? Because Sony just flushed another part of the Internet multimedia experience down the shitter. All we can do now is watch it slowly slide into oblivion.

    These days, even though Sony is huge and not all parts or employees are particularly evil, I don't think I'd even use their batteries as a paperweight on my desk.

    1. Re:Did you hear the sound loop on by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I think American Standard should send their lawyers after Sony for using their sound without permission.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Did you hear the sound loop on by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      Because they'd roll away?

    3. Re:Did you hear the sound loop on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart move; they'd set your papers on fire.

      http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml07/07011.html

    4. Re:Did you hear the sound loop on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you would be violating the fire code.

    5. Re:Did you hear the sound loop on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they'd roll away?

      I'm more curious about how he got an office with opening windows and significant paperwork.
    6. Re:Did you hear the sound loop on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American Standard doesn't exist anymore, and they previously sold their bath and kitchen division, which had been performing poorly.

    7. Re:Did you hear the sound loop on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days, even though Sony is huge and not all parts or employees are particularly evil, I don't think I'd even use their batteries as a paperweight on my desk. Because they'd roll away? Batteries that burst into flames and sheets of paper are not a good match.
    8. Re:Did you hear the sound loop on by Kamineko · · Score: 1
      On the contrary, I think they make an excellent match.

      Granted, the combination isn't as portable as a book of matches, but they have a larger area of effect and can be activated at a distance, so you don't accidentally burn your fingers.

  14. In the words of Dr. Evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit.

  15. Down the Gary Glitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony just flushed another part of the Internet multimedia experience down the shitter. Down the Gary Glitter? That's maybe a bit extreme.

    OTOH, I was ripping a CD last night and very nearly uploaded the information to Gracenote, as it didn't have it. If I'd known Sony was going to be the owner I wouldn't have gone to the trouble.

    In general, I stay away from anything Sony touch. I loathe them.
  16. SHIT!!! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    Anybody know of a good media player, now that I can't use Winamp any more? One that's like XMMS would be my first choice.

    Or better yet, get Winamp to not use Gracenote? If it's using Gracenote to get song titles, why won't it use FreeDB?

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:SHIT!!! by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Just a guess, but trash these:

      Filenames: Plugins\Gracenote dir: CDDBControlWinamp.dll | CDDBUIWinamp.dll | CddbMusicIDWinamp.dll | CddbWOManagerWinamp.dll | Cddb*.dll (misc libraries).
      Adds support for looking up Artist/Album/Title/etc info for Audio CD's.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    2. Re:SHIT!!! by MadKeithV · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can't you just redirect the gracenote CDDB URLs in your hosts file, to the FreeDB ones?
      (See Point 4 here. )

    3. Re:SHIT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a thread for this at http://www.last.fm/group/MusicBrainz.org/forum/1785/_/346334/1#f6270321 although they're talking about tricking the Winamp CD plug-in to use the MusicBrainz FreeDB gateway instead of FreeDB.

    4. Re:SHIT!!! by stormguard2099 · · Score: 1

      Can't you just redirect the gracenote CDDB URLs in your hosts file, to the FreeDB ones? (See Point 4 here. ) For those of you too lazy to click the link:
      4. Profit!!!!
      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
    5. Re:SHIT!!! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Songbird may be to "heavy" for you, but it's pretty cool.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  17. Thank beby jebus for... by livingdeadline · · Score: 1
  18. Ti Kan by Cobalt+Jacket · · Score: 1

    Did Ti Kan get a stake in Gracenote when they bought CDDB? Hope he made out well on the deal, since he was the genesis for the whole thing.

  19. snoy's heavy breathing by spasm · · Score: 1

    "a 'quagmire of heavy contracts, licensing fees, forced user registration and anti-competition clauses.'"

    Wow, I can see the boner in Sony's pants all the way from here.

  20. Wow. So what will Apple do... by EXMSFT · · Score: 1

    now that iTunes is reliant on Sony for it's data? Sony will surely extort their way into becoming part of the chain - forcing Apple to use something other than Gracenote.

    1. Re:Wow. So what will Apple do... by nerdacus · · Score: 1

      That would be a retarded thing to do. While Sony has made many blunders in the past, they are not stupid. I cannot imagine that they would lord Gracenote over companies like Apple, lest Sony competitors abandon Gracenote. Keep in mind, Sony invented the CD (with Philips), and the technology is licensed to anyone and everyone. Bluray seems to be working out in a similar way. For their sake, I hope they use Gracenote the same way.

    2. Re:Wow. So what will Apple do... by incer · · Score: 1

      Personally, I believe that Sony might be more intrested in keeping the service as it is now and just extract statistics for their own use, other than messing with it and losing many users....
      The information in Gracenote's databases (not the ones with song titles, but the ones with net traffic and query statistics) is more valuable than the service the company provides, I believe.

    3. Re:Wow. So what will Apple do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I believe Apple and other Sony competitors are not stupid. They will drop Gracenote and move to some other service to avoid Sony knowing everything about their competitors customers.

  21. Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Seriously, where does all this distrust and hate for Sony come from?"

    From experience with Sony.

  22. Ebook Reader by technoextreme · · Score: 1

    Sony's ebook reader can use SD cards or their Memory Stick.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  23. Some ideas. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    1) If you *really* want to use Winamp, and assuming Gracenote and FreeDb use the same protocol (I'm not sure about that?), you might be able to trick Winamp into *thinking* that it's using Gracenote, by redirecting DNS queries from Gracenote to FreeDb - e.g hack your hosts file, or setup your own nameserver and hack it to alias the Gracenote URL to to FreeDb.

    2) If that's not possible, there are several open source media players (I'm not sure if they all use freedb or can be configured to, but. . .), including VLC Player, Media Player Classic, MPlayer, and others. Search engines are your friend here. Personallly, I've used VLC and Media Player Classic - MPC has a simpler interface and set of options, but VLC allows configuration to an extreme. If VLC supports song lookups at all , I suspect it uses Freedb, and also probably allows you to configure what URL to use for cd lookups (I no longer have VLC installed, so can't say for sure).

    3) I don't play CD's very often, honestly - usually I rip them to wav, ogg, or flac, using AudioGrabber (which does track lookups using freedb) and store the disc safely away. You might consider doing that - then the files are tagged by AudioGrabber, and you can keep using WinAmp to listen to them, without depending on Gracenote. =)

    1. Re:Some ideas. . . by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      1) I'm getting senile in my old age, I should have thought of the hosts file

      2) Search engines will give you a list of players, and I'm sure there are hundreds of them at least, but the search engines won't tell you which ones are like XMMS (My favorite, it's on the Linux side of the PC) or which ones suck. Having a few dozen friends (fans? slashdot is weird) give reccomendations is far, far more useful than any search engine.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  24. CDDB's Missing Features by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you mean the version of FreeDB that is missing the spelling errors and the duplicates?

    1. Re:CDDB's Missing Features by dasunt · · Score: 1

      You forgot the most entertaining part -- genres.

      FreeDB is like having the idiot know-it-all-friend that provides hours of conversation after he's gone.

  25. Sony Ericsson TrackID connection by Mof-Tan · · Score: 1

    Doesn't all Sony Ericsson phones that have TackID installed use gracenote?

    I have used TrackID on my phone many times and it's just fantastic! I can't understand why Sony Ericsson is not promoting that service more!! Especially since the seem to be really keen to ride the Walkman wave..

    I show this service every time I see a friend or colleague who has a Sony Ericsson phone. Every single time the person didn't know he/she had it in the phone, and every time they just love it.

    Sony Ericsson marketing people: Get to work, damnit!!!

    --
    Die dulci fruere. Have a nice day.
    1. Re:Sony Ericsson TrackID connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have tried it an it is useless. Are you a Gracenote or Sony shill?

    2. Re:Sony Ericsson TrackID connection by BoboB-69 · · Score: 1

      I have tried it an it is useless. Are you a Gracenote or Sony shill? Agreed.
  26. Color me surprised... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    ... that Gracenote still exists with FDDB around.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  27. Now I know what to call my new band by RexDevious · · Score: 1

    I was originally going to go with "~ Ant & the Aaaampersands" so that I'd always show up first in any playlist - but now I think I'll call us "Unknown Artist". And I understand our debut album, "Unknown Album" is already one of the most popular in the world.

    I'm looking forward to wasting a $h!7load of the RIAA's money while they try to sue people for pirating our many, many tracks.

  28. They worked hard to earn my distrust... by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    I was part of the original cddb free database project. Gracenote dropped me an email one day notifying me they had wiped it all off my server, thanking me for helping out the internet, and promising me a gift for my troubles. No gift ever showed up, nor did email queries about the state of things get answered.

    So they made sure I didn't trust them out of the box.

  29. ps3 drive slower than standard DVD drive by dafing · · Score: 1
    I used to really like sony, and recently got a secondhand 60GB PS3 because here in New Zealand we can only get the 40GB which is just terrible. (anyone with a 40GB, whats next to the drive, where the memorycard slots are on mine, does it still have a door that opens?)

    Im annoyed hearing how the PS3s 2x speed BD drive is slower than the far cheaper Xbox 360 DVD drive. Its about 9MB per second vs the Xbox's 15MB, basically half the speed! For things like loading times, this is not a good thing.

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    1. Re:ps3 drive slower than standard DVD drive by Espen+Skoglund · · Score: 1

      Im annoyed hearing how the PS3s 2x speed BD drive is slower than the far cheaper Xbox 360 DVD drive. Its about 9MB per second vs the Xbox's 15MB, basically half the speed! For things like loading times, this is not a good thing.
      True. This is a bit annoying. The 2x BD driver in the PS3 is slower (72Mbps) than the 12x DVD driver in XBox360 (66--22Mbps) for the most part of the disc.
  30. Ebook Reader by clint999 · · Score: 0

    I'm not suggesting less antagonism for Sony, I'm suggesting an equal (or preferrably greater) hate for BMG and some for Bertelsmann as well. Isn't their enough room in your heart to hate another corporate conglomerate who were just as (if not more) culpab