Slashdot Mirror


Blake's 7 Remake In the Works

bowman9991 writes "Remember the BBC's Blake's 7? Looks like the classic space adventure series is being reworked by Sky One. If they get it right (like the recent Battlestar Galactica revamp), this one has massive potential. 'As part of a drive to invest more in homegrown drama, Sky One has ordered scripts for two 60-minute pilot episodes. If successful, it will be expanded into a six-part series.' Created by Terry Nation, the man responsible for the Daleks in Doctor Who, Blake's 7 ran from 1978 to 1981 and had cult appeal. The effects were average, but the story and characters were compelling."

212 comments

  1. can hardly wait by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IIRC for most of the series there was only five of them, and none of them was Blake. Cervelat the villainess was hot though.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:can hardly wait by shogun · · Score: 2

      IIRC for most of the series there was only five of them, and none of them was Blake. Cervelat the villainess was hot though. From wiki: Cervelat, also spelled cervelas, servelat or zervelat, is a type of cooked sausage produced mainly in Switzerland and in parts of Germany. In its modern Swiss variety, it consists of a mixture of beef, bacon and pork rind that is packed into zebu intestines, slightly smoked and then boiled.

      I'm sure there a joke in your sausage appreciation somewhere...
    2. Re:can hardly wait by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's Servalan.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:can hardly wait by hughk · · Score: 1

      Her name was Servalan, played by the Jacqueline Pearce. If you want to see more, she also appeared in the film "White Mischief", topless.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    4. Re:can hardly wait by Cally · · Score: 1
      Blake disappeared between series 2 and 3 (of four.) Several other members of the crew had "rotated out" (Gan got a rock on the head, my eponymous first crush died in an exploding sabotaged underground bunker.

      CervalaN, the chief villain, was "just" a superb S&M Dominatrix-stroke-polician; in the last two series, she's backstabbed and betrayed her way to the position of Supreme Commander (a job title she pronounced with lip-curling and lacivious precision... though I didn't quite get it at the time. I was 8 when the first series was shown, and I remember my father dubbed her "Mrs Thatcher Syndrome". Years later a survey of the generation of boys who were 13-14 in 1977-81 "revealed" that Cervelan was their favourite masturbatory fantasy; the actress who played to role has said that this is the best accolade of her career. Now Cally... Cally was GEEK sexy, and probably my first ever crush. It's the combination of vulnerability with enormous strength of character (and being a hardened revolutionary killer, of course :) ) Her death was probably the first time a TV show had really shaken my core assumptions about how the world worked. (The idea that you could kill off one of your main characters, and a "goodie" at that, was pretty earth-shaking!)

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    5. Re:can hardly wait by imipak · · Score: 5, Informative
      Two great things about B7:
      • (1) (a) In Star Trek, the galaxy is ruled by the Federation, a benevolent democratic agglomeration of worlds united for the common good. The protagonists are the crew of a Federation starship; although there's enough conflict to generate drama (plot), they are normally function as a well-oiled unit, with everyone committed to working alongside their crew mates to, generally, Do Good. (ISTR Gene Roddenberry saying something about wanting to show liberal democracy as a benevolent force for good - I'm sure ST fans out there can quote me chapter and verse or correct me. Whether it was intentional or not, the Enterprise is a clear metaphor for American geopolitical values and objectives in the 60s, or at any rate for the high school textbook version of same at any rate.)
      • (1) (b): In Blake's 7, the galaxy is ruled by the Federation, a authoritarian, semi-fascistic state with heavy Orwellian overtones of manipulation of the masses by propaganda and brainwashing technologies of various types. The agglomerate many worlds for colonial purposes; many planets are Occupied by the Federation whilst they are stripped of their resources, often by enslaving the local population. The protagonists are the crew of a spacecraft who all have their own agendas, but chiefly thrown together because they escaped from the same prison ship. Whilst Blake is a committed freedom fighter type, and attacking and destroying the Federation is their chief goal, several of the crew were imprisoned for non-political crimes. (Avon and Vila, computer fraudster and lockpick respectively, in particular.) The crew barely hold together at times, with Avon in particular openly plotting to leave Blake at various times. And who can forget Avon preparing to throw Vila out of an airlock to lighten an overloading ship?) The tensions amongst the crew, of which this is only the most obvious, are the motor that drives much of the dramatic tension.
      • (2) -- all the technology! The cardboard sets and props were totally believable at the time, most of the time (there were some stunningly lame "view out of a porthole" effects, and the supposedly computer-generated animations of things like scanner plots were completely lacking stuff that would be essential these days, like spurious data readouts and vernier markings, blinking alerts, etc. But this was before the days of mass-market GUIs, remember; it was only a year since the wooden mouth demo at PARC, IIRC. But the great thing about the tech was that it was almost never gratuitous; it served plot and/or character, sometimes in amazingly imaginative and ideas-based manner. Witness Vila's lock-picking tools, Cally's personal digital music player (in 1978!), Travis' James Bond hand (character devices); teleport - ok not original, but a fundamental plot device in many episodes (Avon getting himself captured, and holding out against torture until he's referred up to the Chief LaserProbe Merchant - at which point he triggers a beacon, and the crew teleport into the torture cell and kidnap the head torturer; and dare I mention IMIPAK, a gun which has no effect at all on the person shot (who may not even notice if they're not looking), until the user uses a remote control device to trigger the irradiated victim, who then curls up and disappears in a puff of bad light (or something - the nature of how the thing actually kills them is never described, because it's the McGuffin-like usefulness to the plot of having the audience knowing who's marked for death and who isn't, etc etc. Just to name one, at the start of series 3 Avon is stuck on a beach on a remote planet, with the empty Liberator in orbit but uncrewed. He has Orac with him though (luggable supercomputer, which incidentally is a quantum computer although the term hadn't been coined then AFAIK!) Avon fires up Orac, uses it's long range comms to log into Zen, the Liberator's shipboard computer, and command it remotely to teleport him back on board. ISTR that there is mention of Orac's using encrypted communication protocols as well, so as far as I'm concerned that the first appearance of Ssh.
    6. Re:can hardly wait by OriginalArlen · · Score: 2, Funny
      I must say the practice of picking your Slashdot username from cheesy British science fiction TV of the 70s is totally lame, and betrays a pathetic obsession with nostalgia at the expense of personal development.

      Also, Arlen was by far the sexiest female character in the whole show. A lot of women on the B7 slash fanfic list I accidentally ended up subscribed to for a while had different ideas about the most attractive characters on the show, though. Not to mention leather trousers...

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    7. Re:can hardly wait by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      IIRC for most of the series there was only five of them


      They counted the two computers too. (Aurac and Zen)

      I still love the way they introduced the "ding-dong" teleport bracelets, then strung us along for almost a whole series before using the immortal line "[Ding-Dong] Avon calling". (v.funny British advertising slogan reference...)
    8. Re:can hardly wait by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 2, Funny

      I must say the practice of picking your Slashdot username from cheesy British science fiction TV of the 70s is totally lame, and betrays a pathetic obsession with nostalgia at the expense of personal development.

      Nerd! Neeeeerd! ...

      Oh, wait.
      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    9. Re:can hardly wait by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      The Blonde was very hot (forgot name). Servalan was a bit too mature and thin for my tastes....

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    10. Re:can hardly wait by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      Jenna Stannis, played by Sally Knyvette. In the immortal words of Austin Powers: "Yeaaahhhh, Baaaaaaaaaby!!"

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    11. Re:can hardly wait by nategoose · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly the IMIPAK seemed to turn victims into brown vomit puddles once they had been "told" that they were dead. I imagined that it turned their entire bodies into cancer or something, but I was a kid when I saw it. It was a pretty creative weapon, and that was one of the few episodes that I saw :-) Hope the new version is good and gets picked up.

    12. Re:can hardly wait by nategoose · · Score: 1

      More than just the humans were counted in the 7. The computer made out of Plexiglas was one of the 7.

    13. Re:can hardly wait by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I was hoping for a full body shot...
      Her site: http://www.sallyknyvette.co.uk/actingshowreel.php?scheme=brown has a 5 min compilation vid which contains a few secs of her in a black swimsuit still looking gorgeous.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    14. Re:can hardly wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For the benefit of those of you who have never seen this show, I present a complete concise summary as follows:

      Whinging Brits in space.

      More whinging Brits on a planet.

      Someone is betrayed or shot or both, or two groups shoot at each other, dramatically.

      Back to whinging Brits in space.

      Small plastic box complains about being badly treated, as his brain is almost the size of a small planet.

      Avon makes sardonic remark.

      (Dramatic music)

      Thank you, thank you.

    15. Re:can hardly wait by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      Her death was probably the first time a TV show had really shaken my core assumptions about how the world worked. (The idea that you could kill off one of your main characters, and a "goodie" at that, was pretty earth-shaking!) Actually the first series ( to kill off a main character was Hawaii 5-0 which gave Dan Ho the dirt nap when the actor left the show.
    16. Re:can hardly wait by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      They counted the two computers too. (Aurac and Zen) Orac, as in oracle, not gold. There was also Slave in the last series/season.

      I particularly enjoyed how Slave was obsequious to the human crew, but still saw himself superior to other computers, even Orac. And that both were voiced by the same person:

      Orac: A formal application was laid before the High Council on Earth within the last thirty days. I could get you the exact date--
      Slave: Uh, I don't wish to interrupt, Master...
      Orac: Then kindly don't.
      Slave: I wasn't talking to you.
      Orac: You were attempting to override a superior system. Be silent!
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    17. Re:can hardly wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Bismarck said, there are two things people should never make jokes about - the law, and sausages.

    18. Re:can hardly wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She fell on hard times and was working in a "massage" parlour at one point. Wicked with a strap-on, I tell you.

    19. Re:can hardly wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CervalaN
      If you must be a pedantic fucktard, at least try to be a correct pedantic fucktard.

      - Rousseau.
  2. The effects were 'average'? by damburger · · Score: 2, Informative

    That is being quite kind if I remember Blake's 7 correctly (unless NASA have suddenly discovered that cardboard is a really good material to make spacecraft out of)

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:The effects were 'average'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets not also forget, the "futuristic" kill-o-zap rayguns (actually toy guns purchased from some shop somewhere).
      Still, I always had a bit of a soft spot for the Liberator design..don't arsk, a wasted youth reading space-opera &etc warps one's sensibilities..

    2. Re:The effects were 'average'? by damburger · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, it did look pretty cool. I just hope they don't do what they've done with Doctor Who, try and upgrade the special effects and some of the original character of the series. New Doctor Who is very hit and miss, depending on who writes a particular episode, and reeks of just trying to hard.

      The fact is, UK productions will never be able to match the budget of US productions so we can't expect to produce the same standard of special effects. Trying to inevitably fails and, to make things worse, usually causes the story, character and humour to suffer.

      This is apparent to me every Sunday morning, when I watch Doctor Who on iPlayer back to back with a torrented episode of Battlestar Galactica. Makes me wonder why so many Americans love Doctor Who.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    3. Re:The effects were 'average'? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure what your complaint about the current Dr. Who special affects are. They are quite decent. Not to the level of a Hollywood movie, but quite decent for current TV budget sci-fi. They are definitley not to the level of Battlestar, but that's really high-end compared to about anything else you will see on TV instead of the big screen. They are much more on-par with U.S. efforts than the old days of Blake's 7.

      I'm an American who loves Dr. Who, and I'm very excited to hear about a possible return of Blake's 7. Maybe because that's because I grew up watching Captain Kirk throwing styrofoam boulders at aliens. Cheesy special effects don't bother me if the script and characters are worth watching.

    4. Re:The effects were 'average'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The writing of british sci-fi series(in general, BSG is better, but getting worse, while Dr.Who has been hit or miss almost from the start) just blows out of the water most anything written in the states since X-Files third season or so, IMHO. I think that's why...

    5. Re:The effects were 'average'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Cheesy special effects don't bother me if the script and characters are worth watching.

      That's what made it good, it was it experimental drama at the time and I think the BBC gave the crew a long leash to play about. An interesting programme partly because of the story of Blake which had to written around real life events. Gareth Thomas was an actor from the RSC (same schooling as Patrick Stewart - and my cousin knew him enough to nod to). AFAIK, though this may be rubbish, the story was something like Gareth did the pilot/first episode then fell out with the writers, didn't like the story/scripts or whatever. He came back at the end to do the final episode.

      The characters (not the actors) hated one another. And several new actors joined/left in the short run.

      There were no heros in Blakes 7. Everyone was faulted and mostly they were nasty people.

      It's a story of criminals, theives, terrorists and a fascict Federation. Possibly inspired by Lucas' Empire in Star Wars.

      Even Blake, the heroic namesake eventually sells out the crew.

      There's a conspicuous absence of moralising in it - complete opposite of Star Trek

      They had a lot of derivative plot devices and were obviously sci-fi geeks who understood the genre history, like the interracial kiss (Trekies will understand the significance of this) which they actually made quite sexy.

      There were some original ideas. Teleport bracelets seemed a nice plausible device and added some script potential.

      As mentioned above, the Liberator design was really something cool.

      I hope Sky don't massacre it. As an old sci-fi nerd who watched them all I expect something along the lines of The Sopranos in space if they are to do it well and grasp the original ethos.

    6. Re:The effects were 'average'? by blincoln · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Makes me wonder why so many Americans love Doctor Who.

      I'm American, and I love Doctor Who because of the stories and the quirky British feel of the whole thing. I'm not sure any other culture could have come up with a series that bounces between funny, sad, and surreal constantly throughout an episode and doesn't fall on its face.

      There have been one or two episodes I thought were weak, but that's true of any series. I wouldn't complain if the effects were better, but they're not a critical flaw any more than a stage play is critically flawed because the sets aren't good enough to use for a feature film.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    7. Re:The effects were 'average'? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Informative

      You missed the point of the last episode. Blake didn't sell out the crew. He was faking that to recruit new members for his revolution.

      It was Avon's equal misunderstanding of this that caused him to shoot Blake in the last episode. And I think Avon at that point realized everything was over, which is why he apparently committed suicide by pointing his gun at the surrounding troops.

      Of course, it would be nice if they could rescue that whole scene in a new version, but probably best to let it lay and ret-con the whole series.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    8. Re:The effects were 'average'? by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      They are definitley not to the level of Battlestar, but that's really high-end compared

      Yet BG still seems to hire exclusively hungover camera operators with delirium tremens.

    9. Re:The effects were 'average'? by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's a story of criminals, theives, terrorists and a fascict Federation. Possibly inspired by Lucas' Empire in Star Wars.


      If you'll take a look, you'll see that the Federation symbol in Blake is the Trek communicator turned on it's side. That's because it's roughly based on the Trek Federation gone bad. Instead of everybody works together, you have constant backstabbing; instead of electric razors that stun, you have cattle prods that kill.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    10. Re:The effects were 'average'? by AnotherDaveB · · Score: 1

      I remember Blue Peter doing a 'how to make a Blakes 7 handgun', from an old washing up liquid bottle.

      Looked very convincing as I recall :-)

    11. Re:The effects were 'average'? by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Maybe because that's because I grew up watching Captain Kirk throwing styrofoam boulders at aliens."

      There were also several alien world sets that consisted of little more than styrofoam boulders cut in half and placed on a studio floor.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    12. Re:The effects were 'average'? by archen · · Score: 1

      Strange, I remember the ending being more ambiguous. I was fairly young when I saw the show (in reruns), so I may not recall everything 100%. You never really knew what Avon was up to and the last part where he sort of turns and smiles sort of stuck with me more than any other ending I've ever seen. Like it could have been the sort of smile where he knew his time was up, and there was nothing left but to be gunned down. OR it could have been the sort of smile you get when you've won - by betraying everyone because you had been working with the federation. To me this meant you had to decide how the show ended by what sort of person Avon was, and what you thought his motives were.

    13. Re:The effects were 'average'? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      You can see the final scene here:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LY10pMsq3N8

      I think the important part of the ending that explains it is when Avon accuses Blake of "betraying us - betraying me". That was the key. He thought Blake had sold them out. He had turned from a cynical selfish criminal into a revolutionary and follower of Blake. Then when he thought Blake had sold them out, his world collapsed. So he killed Blake in anger and disappointment.

      It was then revealed that it was all a ploy of Blake's to recruit new members - but it might not have been entirely clear to Avon. But the smile and the over the credits gun shots indicated that he chose to go down fighting the Federation troops as either penance for killing Blake or for having failed altogether.

      As you can see in the scene, Blake never made it totally clear TO AVON that he was still on the side of the Federation, although both the resistance fellow who gets shot and the Federation officer who was posing as a revolutionary knew. Blake was trying by telling Avon he was "waiting for you". And I think from the eye contact with Avon when he was dying that Avon realized the truth.

      In any event, standing over Blake's body and raising his gun while VERY closely surrounded by Federation troops seems to make it clear that he deliberately killed himself by resisting.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    14. Re:The effects were 'average'? by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      They also did the liberators teleport braclet:

      1. Take a plastic squash bottle that has the indented rings around the body.
      2. Cut out one of the rings
      3. Paint the inside of the ring in brown.
      4. Stick coloured plastic blobs or stickers on the ouside of the ring.
      5. Slide onto wrist
      6. Profit!

      (Pic of bracelets from the show: http://www.martinbowersmodelworld.com/Copy_of_bracelets1.jpg )

      -Jar

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  3. It's Servalan by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And she'd have you killed for that.

    1. Re:It's Servalan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a spotty teeneager when it was on the BBC I have to say that I wanked myself sore at the thought of being humiliated and disciplined by Servalan. She was the woman who started my lifelong interest in female dominatrices.

      Tony Blair

  4. Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting
    So I recently was turned on to modern BBC programmes (I'll spell it their way) with much joy resulting from watching The Mighty Boosh ... on YouTube. I realize that this is in all likelihood illegal which is unfortunate because I like to pay credit where credit is due.

    I moseyed on over to the BBC website in hopes of a NBC, ABC or even Comedy Central style of ad based hosting. No luck. I couldn't download and install the iPlayer either. I realized that cost Brits a pretty pound to produce so no hard feelings there. But there wasn't a low quality flash version for me. None. Nothing. I cannot figure out how to enjoy this programme legally.

    Their site has two questions in their FAQ in regard to this:

    Can I download programmes from outside the UK?

    The BBC uses Geo-IP technology to identify where your are based on the location of your internet service provider (ISP). This ensures that only internet users in the UK can enjoy programmes on BBC iPlayer.

    If you download a programme to your laptop or a portable hard drive, you can watch this wherever you are in the world. However, you will only be able to download new programmes once you return to the UK. And

    Can I use BBC iPlayer outside the UK?

    Rights agreements mean that BBC iPlayer television programmes are only available to users to download or stream (Click to Play) in the UK. However, BBC Worldwide is working on an international version, which we will make available as soon as possible.

    Radio programmes are available outside the UK in addition to podcasts at http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/podcasts/directory/. ÂMany BBC News programmes are available for viewers outside the UK at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/video_and_audio/default.stm and BBC Sport highlights are available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport.

    Do make sure you check for news on BBC iPlayer at http://www.bbc.co.uk/. I do hope that changes in the near future. In the meantime, does anyone know the best way to get ahold of episodes of new Dr. Who, The Mighty Boosh & (soon) Blake's 7?
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Your best bet would be to find an open proxy in the UK... If one exists.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not being made by the BBC, it's being made by Sky, which is part of Murdock's empire and so will, no doubt, be widely distributed to anyone who wants to buy it (unless it's a cable company that competes with Sky).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by robably · · Score: 1

      All three TV series of The Mighty Boosh and the radio series are available on iTunes.

    4. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by mlk · · Score: 1

      Sky not BBC.

      Move to the UK, and pay the tax? ;)

      BitTorrent, Not sure the Mighty Boosh is on BT, but Dr Who is.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    5. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by christurkel · · Score: 1

      The new Doctor Who is running on Sci-fi Friday at 9pm Eastern. Just started the new season.

      --

      CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    6. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Most broadcasters that provide free access to their library online take a similar approach. I can't use NBC's site at all without proxying through a gateway in the US. As for comedy central, I can view old episodes of The Daily Show, but that's about it. BBC World might eventually provide a similar ad-supported service (BBC in the UK is prhibited from using advertising to generate revenue, they're funded by the 'Television Tax' a compulsory annual cost of about £120 , roughly $240 at todays exchange rates). But that'd be limited to programmes already shown on BBC world, which contains a subset of the programmes broadcast int he BBC, and often much later. Annoying, I know; I get most of the shows I watch from news groups. Can anyone comment on the legality of downloading (ie not sharing) from newsgroups?

    7. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Telvin_3d · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just so you know, all those NBC and ABC clips you like don't play for people outside of the United States. I'm not sure about the Comedy Central ones. Sometimes they work for me (in Canada) and sometimes not, so I'm not sure if they have sketchy ID technology or a sketchy server streaming the clips.

      Same reason as the BBC; they licence by region.

      Really, it's a losing battle. Everyone I know who enjoys BBC shows grabs them from torrents as they come out then picks up the DVD sets when they get released. Most of us don't even bother watching the North American broadcast if it even gets one. Not only do they tend to be six months to a year behind but they are also edited. The BBC doesn't have advertisements like our TV does so when they get broadcast over here they have to be cut for time to make more room for the commercials. Also the occasional content or swear word.

      For anyone who likes Doctor Who it is particularly bad. They had to cut an entire B plot from last season along with many, many character scenes. It's great on the forums. Every once in a while you get a new poster who can't figure out what the hell everyone else is talking about and it usually comes out that they have only seen the American cut.

    8. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      You need to watch Hyperdrive. It's like some kind of cross between Blake 7 and The Mighty Boosh. Sort of.

      --
      Azural - instrumentals
    9. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by multisync · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I moseyed on over to the BBC website ... I cannot figure out how to enjoy this programme legally.


      This is what the rest of the world experiences when they try to watch shows on the websites of U.S. networks. It's a shame, too, as the alternatives - downloading high-quality torrnets you can watch in your player of choice, for example - is already more attractive than being forced to watch a lower quality stream in an embedded player, complete with commercials. I would truly like to support the producers of these shows (or those who finance their production) but I don't want to compromise on quality, and I don't want to be forced to watch some crappy stream in an embedded player that doesn't work in my browser/operating system of choice.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    10. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by owlnation · · Score: 1

      It's not being made by the BBC, it's being made by Sky, which is part of Murdock's empire and so will, no doubt, be widely distributed to anyone who wants to buy it
      And, ironically, another example of Murdoch hiding in plain site. Blake's 7 was about rebels fighting an evil empire (as was Firefly also paid for by the Murdoch Empire). The irony being that News Corps International is, in fact, THE contemporary evil empire.
    11. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      It was an inverted star trek - even the federation logo is a star trek federation logo on its side.

      Of course star trek themselves have done basically the same concept in the DS9 parallel universe, so I'm not sure how well it'll work this time around.

    12. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      *does anyone know the best way to get ahold of episodes of new Dr. Who, The Mighty Boosh & (soon) Blake's 7*

      I'm guessing you're American, so tune in the the SciFi channel for the new Doctor Who. Grumble and whine at them if they're not offering streaming within the USA (after all, the reason that the BBC doesn't allow international streaming is to protect its international partners, who pay the Beeb for broadcast rights in their region). It's available on DVD as well. As far as the new Blake's 7 goes, it's being produced by Sky - the UK's largest satellite broadcaster - not the BBC. I suspect Sky will partner with the SciFi channel as they have in the past. There. You have lots of legal options.

    14. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your best bet would be to find an open proxy in the UK... If one exists. And how is this more legal?
    15. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of, as in, It's more like a poor man's Red Dwarf, or,

      Red Dwarf 'reimagined' by some 'clever' Oxbridge types who wouldn't know a joke if it jumped up and performed a prefrontal lobotomy on them using a carrot that had been frozen in liquid helium for a week...gnash chomp snarl.

      Hyperdrive is/was/will be god-awful, I tried hard to like it, considering the people behind it also had a hand in Black Books.

      But,I couldn't, crap characters, crap stories, crap acting, banal/pedestrian CG, you could see the spoor of a "lets-write-a-sf-comedy-in-space-by-the-numbers-a-wee-bit-like-the-office-as-people-think-thats-funny-and-well-get-paid" thought process going on in the minds of the perpretators.

      Someone once said 'just because it's set in a spaceship, and in the future, doesn't mean its science fiction' (or something like that), to this should be added, 'just because something touts itself as a comedy, doesn't mean its funny.'

    16. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Galaga88 · · Score: 1

      For anyone who likes Doctor Who it is particularly bad. They had to cut an entire B plot from last season along with many, many character scenes. It's great on the forums. Every once in a while you get a new poster who can't figure out what the hell everyone else is talking about and it usually comes out that they have only seen the American cut. Curious; which B plot was that? I haven't watched Doctor Who on Sci-Fi since the first half of the first season of the new series.
    17. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Bageloid · · Score: 1

      Yes, DS9 first explored the concept of a an evil parallel universe. mmm... nope http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror%2C_Mirror_(Star_Trek)

    18. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Yeah, tell me if he tells you :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    19. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Well, taste is subjective - I think it's a great show.

      I wouldn't compare it to The Office, which I didn't like, and seemed to be centred on terrible characters unknowningly embarrassing themselves by virtue of their lousy personalities.

      It's more about incompetently dealing with events. Events in space.

      Yes, it's less joke-centred then Red Dwarf, but then it doesn't have a laughter-track, which is a plus, and has a bit of political satire thrown in (Britain playing second fiddle to the US, etc). Two entirely different, equally entertaining shows, IMO.

      --
      Azural - instrumentals
    20. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's enough decent stuff in the UK that's not available in the US that I wanted a way to watch it all as well. I invested in a multi-region DVD player with a PAL-NTSC converter in it. I ordered it from a place in Chicago called 220 Electronics. Now I can order region 2 DVDs of these shows from England (try www.sendit.com or www.amazon.co.uk). Ah, to be able to watch Blake's 7, Star Cops, Moonbase 3, ....

    21. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.thebox.bz

    22. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by sproketboy · · Score: 1

      Get the torrent. Oh sorry did you say Legal?

    23. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by user · · Score: 1

      Curious; which B plot was that? I haven't watched Doctor Who on Sci-Fi since the first half of the first season of the new series.

      Well... it's a bit of a spoiler... but the Doctor is actually the twelveth Cylon.
      --

      Emacs is for experts. Pico is for beginners. VI is a disease.

    24. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Changing your browser's user agent string to that of the iphone sometime's helps

      Finding a UK based open proxy would also help - although IANAL, spoofing your location could hardly be considered illegal. Unfair, possibly. Short-sighted of the mandarins at the Beeb, again, maybe. But not illegal.

    25. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by paedobear · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, the US site are all just as guilty of blocking non-American IP addresses.

    26. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      ...considering the people behind it also had a hand in Black Books. That'd be the third series of Black Books that wasn't as funny as the other two...

      Actually, some episodes of Hyperdrive aren't bad, honest (the second series). It'd be a bit of a chore to sit through the others to find them though.
    27. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      The new Doctor Who series are being released on DVD in the US and aired on the Sci-Fi Channel and BBC America. It has also been made available for regional PBS stations to air.

      Another mentioned The Mighty Boosh being available on iTunes. I'm not familiar with the series.

      Blakes 7 is available on DVD from Amazon.co.uk and they will ship to the US. You can change the region on a computer's DVD player to region 2 to play it (typically only five times), which should fall within the realm of legality. Or even install two drives, keeping one on region 1 and another on region 2, if you can find player software that won't complain about it. Some DVD players have ability to change their regions built-in, some to region-free, and will perform the necessary conversion of the PAL content.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    28. Re:Good Luck Watching It Outside the UK by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      *Cough* AnyDVD *Cough*

      -Jar

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  5. Average? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Describing the effects as 'average' is a bit of an exaggeration - they were absolutely terrible. Some of the acting was pretty dire too. The really compelling thing about the series was the fact that the characters were believable. Vila, for example, was the archetypal coward and was rewarded for his cowardice by being the only character in all of the episodes, while more aggressive characters tended to die off quite quickly. Blake was on a mission to save everyone, but everyone else was out for themselves. The people behaved like people and the politicians were interested in expanding their own power, rather than acting in the interests of their people (except on Auron, but they all died). It was a refreshing counterpoint to Star Trek.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Average? by mpe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Describing the effects as 'average' is a bit of an exaggeration - they were absolutely terrible.

      Actually the effects were "state of the art". Just that they were nearly 30 years ago.

    2. Re:Average? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, sorry, but they *could* manage better SFX 30 years ago, just the budget for Blake's 7 (and Dr Who as well) was so pathetically minimalist, they did their best with limited resources available.
      (There was always the fun of spotting which bits of Airfix kit they'd incorporated in the latest spaceships etc)

      The eternal problem with the BBC is its attitude to SF, that the buggers in charge at the Beeb never quite did 'get' SF...but are more than happy to rake in the monies from the sales of these programs.

      Regarding the current Dr. Who and it's SFX, well, let's just say I stopped watching Dr Who after Tom Baker's stint, what little I've seen of the new stuff reinforces the opinion that its no longer worth thinking about.
      (same applies to the Torchwood guff)

      The CG effects and animations are more than a bit pedestrian, if they're still not willing to put up a proper budget for the damn thing, they shouldn't try, besides, they can't cover the terrible choice of actors (well, I suppose they've equity cards, so we have to dignify them with that title) and naff stories.

      The new Cattlecar Galaxica, again, the episodes I've seen of it, bored the mammaries off me, to the point I gave up after three of them. No matter how cheesy the old one is, I prefer it, its ropey FX, and its ropey&hokey morality to the new one.

      I suspect it'll be the same with a new Blake's 7, after all, this is nuLabour Britain and it's being touted by a Murdoch media outlet, we can't have something glamourising rebels ffs!

      I just hope and pray they never get around to doing a 'reimagined' Clangers..the Astronaut comes back, Tiny Clanger turns into a face-hugger, Astronaut gets back to earth, with the inevitable results...cue mass swanee whistles of death and gore.....

    3. Re:Average? by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      There were a few fairly deep science / technology injokes and references hidden away as well. Servalan? Server / LAN? Coincidence? I don't think so.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    4. Re:Average? by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

      Some of the acting was pretty dire too.

      Part of the problem was the director/Editor I think because they seemed to keep mistakes in rather than do another take. You see Jenna fluffing her lines and looking at the camera quite a bit, but they keep it in!

      Avon (Paul Darrow) did a very good job I thought.
    5. Re:Average? by MrSteveSD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually the effects were "state of the art". Just that they were nearly 30 years ago.

      No chance. "State of the art" at the time was moving the camera instead of having the flimsy spaceship models moving around on sticks. They clearly did not move the cameras, because that would be a very smooth gliding movement, not the horrible wobble you see in the series. Another thing that struck me was how awful some of the matte paintings were. There's a backdrop in "Voices From The Past" that looks like a 3-year old's finger painting. It was all down to the crappy BBC budget I suppose. It's a shame, because the design of the Liberator is very nice.
    6. Re:Average? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Some of the acting was pretty dire too. Part of the problem was the director/Editor I think because they seemed to keep mistakes in rather than do another take. You see Jenna fluffing her lines and looking at the camera quite a bit, but they keep it in!

      Avon (Paul Darrow) did a very good job I thought. In the good old days (20+ years back), when BBC2 used to show the Open University stuff, there were a couple of programmes on it dedicated to the dark arts of TV production etc, featuring Blakes 7 as a 'case study' or something.
      I can remember coming across them one boring afternoon, and mirthily-making-the-yellow-water-in-my-pants at how totally amateurish the whole shebang was.

      There was one sequence where the Dayna character's gun sight on her pistol had been bent at a 45 degree angle (after a bit of bad holstering, no doubt), but they carried on filming as if nowt had happened..interrupting the scene to retake a couple of fluffed lines, only, I think, because they were being filmed by the OU crew.

      As commented elsewhere, it was so low a budget, I don't think they'd dare have retaken anything lest the BBC beancounters descended upon them in all their pinstriped Opera an' Proms an' Archers lovin' wrath..

      Some of the acting was ham (Mr Darrow, take a bow!), some of it poor, some of it just plain wrong...despite it's flaws, in both the acting and SFX, maybe even because of them, it was enjoyable.
    7. Re:Average? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "Describing the effects as 'average' is a bit of an exaggeration - they were absolutely terrible.

      Actually the effects were "state of the art". Just that they were nearly 30 years ago."

      Yes they were state of the art 30 years before they made the series.

      15 year old Star Trek had better effects, but then it has always seemed to me that BBC's special effects has always been really really really really lousy. Its only lately when they could afford to buy a computer and hire some render guy that some of it actually comes close to looking good.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    8. Re:Average? by malkavian · · Score: 1

      They were a long way from State of the Art.. I used to subscribe to the old Fanzine of Blakes 7 when it originally ran, and they had a lot of interviews with the Special Effects teams.. And the budget was almost non-existant. I seem to remember that one of the space ships was made from a pair of hair dryers glued together, and then had pieces added on from the old airfix kits, then painted up..
      They did miracles with the lack of cash they had.. But the story was what really drove it..

    9. Re:Average? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think the interesting aspect of the characters was that they were all at least a bit double-layered, and better than the one-dimensional characters offered to us by other SciFi series. Vila may have been "the archetypical coward" but his cowardice was also a rational survival strategy, and his last action in the series (if I remember it well) was surprising and knocking down a federation trooper.

      But it was most striking and carefully modelled in the character of Avon, superficially a ruthless rationalist with an eye only for his own interest. But beneath the cynicism Avon does care about the others, only, as he points out at one time, "I have never understood why it is necessary to be irrational to prove that you care, or indeed why it is necessary to prove it at all." He later spends three seasons looking for Blake, the leader he pretends to despise.

      Of course, one of the attractions of Blake's 7 was and is its sarcastic humour. "This is Vila. I really should introduce him to you now. He's at his best when he is unconscious."

    10. Re:Average? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      haha, I watched the show 30 years ago, the effects were atrocious. Especially the cartooned-in white lines around the transporting people. Somewhere the show came into a bigger budget and the effect became somewhat better though still corny.

    11. Re:Average? by labnet · · Score: 1

      Well, I think I was just a wee teenager when blake 7 was on, and remember having the cr$# scared out of me by the bubbling skin effect when they went to warp speed... I'm sure though today it would all look pedestrian amongst 30 years of sfx progress.

      --
      46137
    12. Re:Average? by STrinity · · Score: 1

      No, the FX on B7 were state of the art 50 years ago when "Tom Corbett - Space Cadet!" and "Rocky Jones - Space Ranger" were the height of sci-fi television. 30 years ago, when B7 was actually produced, they looked laughably bad when put next to "Battlestar Galactica" and "Buck Rogers". Hell, even compared to "Lost In Space" and "Voyage to the Bottom of the Bathtub," B7 was pretty dire.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    13. Re:Average? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was probably this ship

      I read that the uniforms for the Federation guards was based on the state-of-the-art in riot control gear at the time.

      The Blakes Seven caption competition is also another good website.

    14. Re:Average? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Describing the effects as 'average' is a bit of an exaggeration - they were absolutely terrible

      I remember being happy that I had the same type of desk lamp that was used for the controls of the Liberator. Shiny props are nice but the story is the important bit. The plots and some decent acting shone through and made up for some bad acting (eg. Sulin), poor characterisation (what could a good actor have done with Tarrant?) and limited resources for props, sets and costumes. Personally I think a lot of the effects were very well done given small resources - teleporter sound and visual effects were paticularly simple but dramatic. In the tradition of Dr Who they raided the historical costume department as much as possible which shaped a few plots - but I think even Trek did that.

    15. Re:Average? by lysse · · Score: 1

      Yes, but remember that in the BBC of 30 years ago, the "state of the art" could be found in the meeting of genius and junk. Look at the Radiophonic Workshop...

    16. Re:Average? by foxylad · · Score: 1

      Actually the effects were terrible - I remember a review snidely saying that "the sets must have cost several pounds".

      Not that we cared - any sci-fi was lapped up without complaint.

      --
      Do as you would be done to.
    17. Re:Average? by davidbofinger · · Score: 1

      Describing the effects as 'average' is a bit of an exaggeration - they were absolutely terrible.

      They were cheap. They had to get rid of the Liberator set because it creaked audibly when the actors walked on it.

      Some of the acting was pretty dire too.

      And some was superb. Darrow and Keating in particular, with support from Thomas and Pierce.

      It had other problems as well. The arc plotting was awful, though that was standard in its day: gadgets would be introduced and then never used again; ORAC was absurdly powerful and underused; the brilliant ending of Season Two (the destruction of the Federation) was undercut by a pathetic reversion to business-as-usual in Season Three (oh look, the Federation's back).

      more aggressive characters tended to die off quite quickly.

      Not really. The only crewperson to die on camera before the final episode was Gan.

      Blake was on a mission to save everyone, but everyone else was out for themselves.

      Again, not really. Even Avon stuck around when he could have run. In some ways a weakness: why did Vila stay, for instance?

      For a long time this was the best SF there'd ever been on television. By comparison we're spoilt for choice these days. I'm trying not to get my hopes up too much.

    18. Re:Average? by SamSim · · Score: 1

      They were a lot worse than Star Trek, despite coming a decade later. I'd say they were pretty bad even for their time.

    19. Re:Average? by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      I was 18 when B7 started its original run, and the effects (and indeed sets) were laughably bad even by the standards of TV series at the time, let alone the SF movies made for the cinema.

      The original Battlestar Galactica series came out the same year B7 did, and although many of its special effects look cheesy now, they're _vastly_ better than anything in B7, even though many of the models were, as in B7, also made from household appliances with bits of commercial model kits stuck to them.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    20. Re:Average? by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1

      Just that they were nearly 30 years ago

      I think it was also budget (or lack of it). Have a look at Space 1999 which was made around 5 years before B7. The effects and sets were fantastic. I think I recall they had a budget of 250K per episode which obviously helps.

    21. Re:Average? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that suggests a really constrained shooting schedule, not a bad editor. An editor can only do so much with the material you give him, and if your show is shooting at a breakneck pace (i.e. only time for two or three takes of a given scene), the editor will be stuck with a lot of low-quality takes to work from. Mistakes and bad acting will inevitably slip in, since the editor is often in a position of using the "least worse" take.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    22. Re:Average? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that one of the space ships was made from a pair of hair dryers glued together That would be the ship Space Commander Travis arrived on Star One in. It was on screen for mere seconds, yet it is always the one brought up.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    23. Re:Average? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      the effects were atrocious. Especially the cartooned-in white lines around the transporting people. Actually its a quite ingenious use of the color-keying process to highlight the outline of the remaining content and an expanding or contracting circle wipe. It also neatly covers over flaws in the border of the color-keying process where some of the keyed-out background shows up as a slight halo effect in whatever color background was removed (usually blue or green).

      No, the video wobble effect for dematerialization in a teleport bay was cheesier.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    24. Re:Average? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      They had to get rid of the Liberator set because it creaked audibly when the actors walked on it. Interesting then that the demolition scenes of both The Liberator and Scorpio revealed them to be identically rigged, as if they were on the same set.

      the brilliant ending of Season Two (the destruction of the Federation) was undercut by a pathetic reversion to business-as-usual in Season Three (oh look, the Federation's back). Surely that would be down to the brilliant leadership of Servalan, within a year ruthlessly seizing the resources necessary to rebuild the Federation, even neglecting the Liberator and its crew in order to rebuild her rule of law.

      A major turning point had to be the episode "Moloch" where she acquired replication technology to rebuild the fleet, as well as expert systems to control them.

      Servalan: And how many of these devices are there?
      Grose: Dozens. Hundreds. I use them for everything. Food, clothing, building, engineering -- oh, yes, some of them are very big. You'd be surprised.
      Servalan: Very well, Section Leader, you've convinced me. There are ways I could put this system to profitable use.
      Grose: A great many ways, Madam President. More ways than you've begun to realize. But that isn't why I summoned you to Sardos.
      [Grose nods at Lector and hands him a card. Lector moves to the machine, and inserts the card.]
      Servalan: Would you say that again?
      Grose: I brought you here because you had something I hadn't. Something I needed. A pattern.
      [He gestures at the hemisphere's screen, which now shows a Federation starship.]
      Servalan: A Mark Two star- -- That's my ship.
      Grose: My ship. The flagship of a fleet that grows with every hour.

      Indeed, a logical extension of replication technology that Star Trek never really pursued. Not even the Borg tried using replication technology to turn entire worlds into energy and then into more ships.

      Their only saving grace was that the Sardoans hadn't managed to record the pattern of the Liberator!
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    25. Re:Average? by davidbofinger · · Score: 1

      Surely that would be down to the brilliant leadership of Servalan

      Except:

      1. 1. she wasn't in charge. The high council got restored. She was just a bureaucrat in charge of drugging rebellious colonies.
      2. 2. That never made sense either. What, every single person who'd ever seen her was killed? Every photograph, every painting? Ridiculous. It's like Adolf Hitler coming back to be a senior bureaucrat in West Germany.

      A major turning point had to be the episode "Moloch" where she acquired replication technology to rebuild the fleet

      And yet we never hear of it again.

      There are lots of good reasons to like Blake's 7, but continuity isn't one of them.

      My dream third season has Servalan captured and locked up on the Liberator, being used by Avon to help him build a replacement state for the federation. I guess this got made later and called Andromeda, except it didn't have enough Servalan in it.

    26. Re:Average? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1
      She was President in that episode. It was third season, the Liberator was still around, and she hadn't presumably been killed in its destruction and adopted the identity of Commissioner Sleer.

      However, "Moloch" was three episodes after "Rumors of Death" in which Dayna questioned what happened to the Rebellion and why Earth was still being ruled by creatures like Servalan. I've taken that as they have not been paying attention, they've only gone up against the Federation deliberately once (and just in name of piracy), and their meddling in RoD actually helped crush a major victory of the Rebellion, and killed the latest rebel leader.

      And speaking of Bartolemew, perhaps she too was careful to stay in the shadows, never seen, stalking each person who knew her as Servalan and personally killing them off. The Federation certainly wasn't up to modern standards of tracking everyone everywhere in everything they do, given how many people successfully went into hiding throughout the run of series. They were more THX 1138 than they were 1984.

      And yet we never hear of [replication technology] again. Perhaps we would have if we followed the Federation storyline, or the storyline of the Rebellion, rather than the limited perspective of Blake, Avon, and the rest.

      And perhaps they should restart the series with more perspective. I've had a thought of seeing two concurrent TV series that were tied to each other more tightly. Instead of the occasional crossover of characters, events in both series would be concurrent but portrayed from opposing perspectives. A new Batman series with a companion series Gotham P.D. where you could get two perspectives on the same events. I think this would be even more interesting in a Blakes 7 remake as two series: one following the crew, the other The Federation.

      And TV is trending this way now, though the closest they've gotten to actually doing it on television are Battlestar Galactica: Razor and certain episodes of Lost. There's Trois couleurs: Rouge, Trois couleurs: Bleu, and Trzy kolory: Bialy that reference each other, but I have seen only "Rouge", and from what I understand their connections are just tangential.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  6. Great show by ivano · · Score: 1

    It was the Firefly of its day. Avon was the epitome of sarcasm.

    1. Re:Great show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first time I saw Firefly I thought this could be a modern day retelling of Blake 7. If Firefly had lasted long enough I could even see the series ending the way Blakes 7 did.

      I am hoping the new series follows the same principle of the original B7 and the current series MI-5. Keep most of the main characters rotating out(killed, quit, go nuts) to keep the series fresh and evolving.

  7. I hate remakes by Hojima · · Score: 1

    There is no sense in copying someone's work with better graphics and crappier (yet 'hip') actors. For the love of god is it so difficult to make a rip off rather than a remake? At least a rip off has a greater chance of deviating from a cookie cutter plot and having more dynamic characters. Maybe it's just because Hollywood screws over all its writers with 'creative accounting'. Hell, even Cloverfield was a Godzilla rip-off, yet is was done extremely well and with enough deviations to merit it's own new title. Don't even get me started about how much crap the comic book movie craze is. How much crap about genetic mutation can you have? The only good movie based on a super hero so far is "Spawn", and it was done way before the craze.

    1. Re:I hate remakes by linesma · · Score: 1

      I agree on the comic book movie craze. I do think that a re-imagining is a goos thing. We can take a show or a movie, especially one that was popular or attained cult status, and perpetuate them and bring them to a whole new audience. In my opinion, if a remake is done well, it pays homage to its original.

    2. Re:I hate remakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? The Spawn film was a diabolical mess, truly horrible. Bad script, bad acting, bad directing, shallow pointless script and rubbish special effects. It had it all. It pales in comparison to even the likes of Blade and it isn't even in the same league as X-Men, Spider-man and Batman begins. I know personal preference and all that be you will not convince me that dog shit tastes better than peanut butter personal preference or no.

    3. Re:I hate remakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what bad script? It hardly had any cheesy punch lines or catch phrases like all the other movies. As for bad acting, I honestly was pretty convinced. Rubbish special effects? Maybe for our time, but for the money they put into it, it was pretty awesome. The one thing that was great about it was the plot. It had something clever done, and the diabolical scheme didn't go along the lines of: nothing. Seriously, how much planning did the enemies of the main characters make? Now compare it to Spiderman's 30 minute emo tantrum, all the crappy "ZOMFG 1 g0t p0w3rZ" intros, all the cheesy lines that made me want to commit vehicular homicide, and the gay character designs that rendered the special effects as useful as a limp cock, and take into account that it is more than a decade old, and you have yourself a classic.

  8. Fond memories by desmondhaynes · · Score: 1

    From http://techwatch.reviewk.com/2008/04/blakes-7-poised-for-sky-comeback/ I feel sure that if you can remember the TV series âBlakeâ(TM)s 7â then you most probably have fond memories of it. It was, on balance, an interesting mix of adventurous television making on a very low budget. In fact, I well recall a comment made, I believe, by the producers that a single episode of âBlakeâ(TM) had about the same budget as a âStar Trekâ(TM) coffee break. So letâ(TM)s see. What do I remember. I recall flimsy sets and even flimsier acting; grandiose title music; perhaps one of the first series where the writers felt free to kill off main characters; at least one whole series of âBlakeâ(TM)s 7â with no Blake, or, for that matter, only 6 of them (I believe); the irascible ORAC; Servalan (who could forget her or her haircut?) and, of course, Avon - to mention just a few.

  9. Thoughts by maroberts · · Score: 1

    Thought the Liberator looked a cool design for a spaceship. Who would've thought that an air freshener and some washing up bottles could make a great looking spaceship. Blake was a deeply cynical space opera, with every character angling for their own objectives. I get the impression that is what Whedon tried to do with Firefly.

    The new Doctor Who is a huge leap forward too, Ecclestone and particularly Tennant have been good Doctors, and the special effects have been good enough to capture the audience, which is all thats required. Some episodes (e.g. Blink, The Satan Pit and just about any other Stephen Moffat script) have been superlative.

    I'm afraid that I haven't got into Battlestar Galactica. The production values are excellent, and the plot is good too, so I don't know why I can't get to love it. Maybe what's wrong is that it just takes itself too seriously.

    Star Trek is much too clinical. Only the Ferengi seemed to have anything resembling a true to life approach to matters, but unfortunately they were also the comic relief.

    I hope they manage to preserve the essence of Blakes 7 (idealism corrupted?) in the remake.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Thoughts by mpe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Blake was a deeply cynical space opera, with every character angling for their own objectives. I get the impression that is what Whedon tried to do with Firefly.

      There are plenty of parallels between Firefly and B7. Indeed Firefly might have done better had it been made outside of the US, especially considering the amount of character development involved.

    2. Re:Thoughts by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that I haven't got into Battlestar Galactica. The production values are excellent, and the plot is good too, so I don't know why I can't get to love it. Well, you're not alone. I loved it when watching it the first season. Then they broke it. All the plots and subplots that had been set up, and which I was anticipating to be resolved, were basically set in stone, not to be resolved, because the series were a success and it needed to be able to go for 5 years, or more. Now it's a series about nothing, or everything except the stories that mattered. They broke it for a tv-contract. The paradox is, as long as there are enough fans that don't mind watching a broken sf-show, it will remain that way, and perhaps when they stop watching, the series could proceed (before being cancelled). I wonder what would have happened with Star Wars if they had frozen it after the A New Hope, to be endlessly chased by the imperials, with endless bickering about leadership.
    3. Re:Thoughts by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Well that should be fixed this season, since this is the LAST season of the current series :)

      The next project is called New Caprica, a prequel series to BSG.

      (I watch it for Grace Park, yummmmm)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    4. Re:Thoughts by vitaflo · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of parallels between Firefly and B7.

      I had never actually heard of Firefly until I saw an interview with Paul Darrow (who played Avon on B7) on the B7 DVDs. He mentioned the similarities of Firefly and B7, so of course I had to check out Firefly after that (B7 being one of my favorite series ever). Indeed there are many parallels between the two, though I would say B7 is a bit darker overall. It certainly made me an immediate Firefly fan though and very sad the series run was so short.

  10. Blake/servalan/avon by fermion · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The Battlestar Galatica remake was not great, and not better than the original. What makes it interesting is that the remake is updated so it fits with current norms, most notably that the protagonists are fight their own creations. However, in both shows most of the tension came from whatever immediate threat existed, which means that the show can continue as long as immediate threats are created. Problems are solved with guns, and at the end of the day, one person is in charge.

    In Blakes 7, however, while there are monsters of the week, and problems are solved with guns, The drama depended upon the characters and the actors ability to convey tension. At first this was Blake and Avalon, and then we were lucky and go Servalan. A magical ship flying around the universe would not be as interesting if it were a simple military order. I suspect there are few females who can look dangerous in an evening gown. The show had it's reprieve when it was allowed to continued after series two. It was given a honorable end when all major characters that were not dead died in the correct fashion and in the correct order, most critically by the death of Blake at the hands of you know who. I know that deaths were left ambiguous in case the show continued, but for me it was the end, as poignant as Black Adder Goes Forth.

    There must be a new idea somewhere in TV land. I fear this will ruin a perfectly happy, though corny, idea, just like the Bionic Women is now ruined. And it will be the same reason. Trying to send in a child to do an adult's job.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Blake/servalan/avon by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did you even watch the last season of BSG?

      Half of the last season was the build up to and trial of former President Gaius Baltar, Ph.D

      The main bad-guy for the current season is President Laura Roslin.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Blake/servalan/avon by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you about BSG if it wasn't for the second and third seasons (I hated the first season too)... the third particularly has developed to the point that you're not even sure who the bad guys are any more... it's more like everybody/nobody.. you even get sympathetic to the plight of the cylons. It's also not about the threat of the week any more - there's a pretty strong story arc.

      Bionic woman isn't bad in itself.. it's still corny but I don't think it aims for anything else. What I do hate is the flash gordon remake - can't see what they were trying to do there at all... their 'ming the merciless' is now 'ming the slightly upset but not very evil actually'.

      There's a lot of scope for ruining blakes 7, but might just turn out OK. I'd be more confident if it wasn't Sky doing it, whose only solo productions so far have been terrible renditions of terry pratchet books (they contributed to BSG but it was mainly a US produciton).

    3. Re:Blake/servalan/avon by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "Did you even watch the last season of BSG?"

      Hell no, stupid amoral evil creeps in a sick environment. When i started rooting for the cylons to blow up the ship I quit!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    4. Re:Blake/servalan/avon by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Did you even watch the last season of BSG?

      Nope; the flashback-ridden boxing match was the last straw for me. WTF?

    5. Re:Blake/servalan/avon by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Try finding the extended version of the episode and give it a chance. It makes a whole lot more sense than the original and it really sets up character development for Apollo and Starbuck down the road. I still don't like the episode (I still think it's unnecessary) but I like it more now having seen the extended version and seeing what it was meant to be.

      Another problem is that the third season consisted of a lot of stand alone episodes. Some were good and others weren't. It really sort of hurt the season as there was a lot of nothing going on because of budget constraints due to Exodus.

      It's tough this season because I know Moore wanted to sum everything up in 2 seasons rather than 1 but that's how things go. It will hopefully end in an interesting way regardless as it has been enjoyable so far even through the bad. Grandparent is right about Roslin being the bad guy this season - at least so far. Everytime she's on camera, I want to punch her through my TV. There's a lot of setup for the ending - searching for Earth, final 5 Cylons, internal Cylon conflicts, getting skeletons out of the closet, and probably other unforeseen things. I can't promise you would like it - I don't know if I will either - but I'd like to stick through to the end to see how it goes.

      I also can't rip too hard on BSG without writing an essay on Lost after having gotten through the second season two years ago. Lost has rebounded but at this point, I have no idea how it will end and don't actively recommend people start watching the show (from the beginning). I'll tell people what I think but it's not all good.

    6. Re:Blake/servalan/avon by Oldav · · Score: 0

      Wish I didnt watch new BSG-it was crap

    7. Re:Blake/servalan/avon by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Did you even watch the last season of BSG?

      Unfortunately yes. After they found earth they sent kids there to be superheroes. The series could go nowhere after that without starting from scratch.

    8. Re:Blake/servalan/avon by master_p · · Score: 1

      The new BSG sucks big time.

      First of all, it's a strictly american view of the world (post 9/11 world etc - only the US connects with that), but as a show they took everything the original was fun about and turned it upside down.

      The original Starbuck was one of the coolest characters around, mainly because the actor knew how to do it, the new Starbuck sucks big time.

      The connection to ancient civilizations (Mayans, Azteks etc) was totally lost, and hence any 'real' connection to Earth whatsoever.

      The settings in the new BSG are totally unbelievable as alien, because they are exactly the same as modern day Earth: people use shotguns, wear 3-piece suits and there is a 'president' that everyone (or almost everyone) looks upon as some kind of hero. In the original, the clothes were silly but at least were different, the guns were not something we can buy at shops and the social hierarchy could only be found in ancient societies, and the leader was a wise man that was respected by all because of his wisdom...

      I know many, if not all, will disagree with this, but it's the truth. Sorry guys, in the history of television, the new BSG will go down the toilet as one example of not how to do sci-fi...

  11. All around the world by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    There ought to be a way to link up all TV stations on the same network, like how all web sites from all over the world are linked on the internet. This way, TV stations can offer their programming and compete internationally. You can subscribe to magazines from around the world, get newspapers from around the world, you can buy books from around the world and see movies from around the world. There's also the internet. It seems all media is internationally available except TV channels and even certain TV programs.

    Living in Canada, I would very much like to subscribe to channels such as Nickelodeon, TV Time, Disney Channel, Comedy Central, and Cartoon Network. I don't want Teletoon or any approximations, I don't even want a Canadian branded version or whatever. I want the original with the original programs, because that's the aesthetic that I like, that's the content that I like, and that's the presentation that I like. I know there are certain regulations in regards to how much local content must accompany foreign content, but that's just bullshit. If you want Canada to get some equal funding, then tax the foreign channels or make better programs so people actually want to pay for them and watch them too. But don't limit what I have access to, that's a little fascist for my taste.

    On another note, it would even be helpful to get local news broadcast all over the world, it would give people insight and perspective, as well as allow people from abroad to stay more in touch with their roots and their friends and family who they may have left behind.

    1. Re:All around the world by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      Actually a lot of TV channels do broadcast on the web, for free. Do a search, you'll find a lot. Whether you'll find a lot worth watching is another matter and depends on your taste.

    2. Re:All around the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah but like the grandparent(s) are saying they are trying to make it region specific anyway. :(

  12. Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dr. Who wasn't a remake, it was a revival. It's all still part of the same continuity and often quite good. I wish they'd pry the keyboard away from Davis' cold, dead hands and let other writers do more episodes. Some of the strongest episodes were penned by who was it, Moffit? Moffat? The guy who wrote "Girl in the Fireplace" and that other one with the stone angels that could kill you when you weren't looking. That's some classic who right there!

    But this remake frenzy, why? After a while, nostalgia just ain't what it used to be. Galactica died an early death and so I can understand the urge to see it again. The current effort's been a mixed bag, some are in love with it and some are just shaking their heads wondering what RDM was smoking when he came up with that shit. But please, where are the new ideas?

    When Babylon 5 came about, JMS didn't say "Ok, so I'm going to rip off Star Trek and put it on a space station." Hell, no. He said "Look, I'm going to borrow a bunch of shit from the best brains in the field, I'm going to mortar those bricks together with a bunch of my own ideas and then I'm going to put something on the screen that nobody's ever seen before outside of a novel." And sure enough, that's just what he did. Firefly was the same way.

    I guess what the suits are thinking is "hey, this concept was good enough to get the greenlight decades ago, maybe we'll be able to make money with it now. Certainly less risky than trying to do anything completely original, right?"

    I can't wait until we can start financing this stuff directly, no more need to involve fuckhead suits. Pull 10,000 geeks together on the net and we can back the damn project, $20 at a time.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the ending of Blake's 7? Totally cut in it's prime. I would love to see a remake.

    2. Re:Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait until we can start financing this stuff directly, no more need to involve fuckhead suits. Pull 10,000 geeks together on the net and we can back the damn project, $20 at a time.
      For music, it's already done.
    3. Re:Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by exhilaration · · Score: 1
      The guy who wrote "Girl in the Fireplace" and that other one with the stone angels that could kill you when you weren't looking. That's some classic who right there!

      That Stone Angels episode - it was called Blink is some of the scariest TV I've ever seen. Definitely one of the best episodes.

    4. Re:Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      When Babylon 5 came about, JMS didn't say "Ok, so I'm going to rip off Star Trek and put it on a space station." Hell, no. He said "Look, I'm going to borrow a bunch of shit from the best brains in the field, I'm going to mortar those bricks together with a bunch of my own ideas and then I'm going to put something on the screen that nobody's ever seen before outside of a novel." And sure enough, that's just what he did. Firefly was the same way.

      Concern Firefly (well, Serenity, specifically), have you ever seen Cowboy Bebop? Oh, and I'm also pretty sure Cowboy Bebop isn't the first "space wild west confined to a solar system". In short, even if Firefly/Serenity *was* an attempt at originality and not just an attempt to clone existing works, I'd have to say it failed.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    5. Re:Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the ending of Blake's 7?


      Yup.

      Avon ducked.
    6. Re:Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      Firefly was the same way.
      Ironically, Whedon has explicitly said that Firefly was heavily influenced by B7. Of course, to be fair, he also threw a bunch of other ideas into the mix. And he certainly didn't try to bank on an established brand the way the "reimaginings" do.
    7. Re:Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but that $200,000 doesn't even buy you one episode of most decent ongoing series, let alone a pilot episode.

      Audience financing is going to happen, but realistically it is more likely to center around producers, much like every other form of entertainment has for the last century. One or two producers get together and put up the 1-2 million needed to green light a 6 episode miniseries. Those shows get sold over iTunes or some other service as they come out. DVD sets with bonus material/commentary follow right after that.

      If those episodes pay for themselves then series 2 gets the go. If not, they move on to other projects.

      Let's figure that for that 6 episode 'season' they can get an average of $10 per viewer. For a two million dollar production that's 200,000 viewers needed to break even. Why do it this way? Because it's far easier to get 200,000+ people to pony up their $10 for something already made than it is to get that many people to effectively preorder something that does not exist in any way shape or form.

      I suspect that in the coming years we are going to see a move towards short 2-4 month seasons that stand alone. More like the current Japanese and British model than the traditional American studio/network system.

    8. Re:Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      I don't necessary think what you are saying is 100% accurate. IMHO and if you look into the history of Blake's 7 - it too suffered a premature death as well. In fact the final season was done by another writer and was originally suppose to end the season prior. While I do agree that the "suits" need to quit rehashing old concepts (both on the small and on the big screen), I also think it will be interesting to see how time and new blood will tell the old tale.

    9. Re:Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      Sorry to break this to you, but $20,000 doesn't buy more than ten or fifteen minutes' broadcast-quality TV.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    10. Re:Why the frickin' remake frenzy? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the ending of Blake's 7? The ending has to be more than seen. It must also be heard, specifically, the sound effects used after the camera goes black and the credits roll.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  13. Obligatory Wikipedia Link by mmurphy000 · · Score: 1

    For those of us on the other side of the pond, who haven't a clue who Blake is, let alone his 7: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blake's_7.

    1. Re:Obligatory Wikipedia Link by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      it was shown in the U.S. also in the 80s on many city's PBS stations

    2. Re:Obligatory Wikipedia Link by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 1

      KTEH Channel 54 FTW! :) I watched it in high school, so for me that was early 1990s. I watched through it at least twice before our cable service decided 54 wasn't worth having, probably to give us another shopping channel, or some shit.

      I found a pair of random VHS copies of episodes at a video store in Davis, Calif that _just happened_ to be going out of business the next day, so swiped them up. I needs to get me the entire series on DVD, damnit. They originally promised they'd have it for the US market, but that never panned out.

    3. Re:Obligatory Wikipedia Link by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I needs to get me the entire series on DVD, damnit. They originally promised they'd have it for the US market, but that never panned out. I imported the UK releases from Amazon.co.uk. I actually have two copies of Season 3 because I just had to get the one with the Liberator model in the blister pack. (I would have ordered it in the first place if Amazon had properly described it or included a picture.) I have two DVD players switched to region-free mode and RPC-1 firmware on the drives in my computers.

      I wish they'd put more into the CG they used for the disks (how about something unique for each disk instead of one graphic for each season), and didn't linger so long on the series logo at the end. And whose idea was it to turn the two overlapping circles into a twisted ribbon?

      If I get a BD-R drive, I'll probably burn myself a Blu-Ray SD set of disks. But I still need a ripper that will break up menus into reassemble-able assets.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  14. Stationed in the UK by WED+Fan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was stationed in the UK with the USAF and caught the last 2 seasons of B7. I loved it. Sure, the production value wasn't great, but I loved the dark characters, especially Darrow's Avon. These weren't the clean white knights of some quest, these were the gritty, angst riddent, heavily flawed humans. There were no clearly the white knight hero, but there was clearly one single evil, Servilan. God, for the longest time, anyone mentioned "clip haired bitch" I would picture her.

    When the show ended with the dreamscape shoot out, I was among the thousands that sent in a plea to continue the show. Even offering a way out of the apparent slaughter of all the crew.

    Now, I appreciate the killing off of major characters for the sake of the story. Love "MI-5" ("Spooks"), "Life on Mars" (oh, isn't there a 80's follow on to "Life on Mars"?), and "Torchwood". But, can't stand the new "Robin Hood" with ninjas, an arab female version of Wesley Crusher, and way too much modern crud.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    1. Re:Stationed in the UK by WED+Fan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, have to mention something from when I was in Japan in the mid-70's that ties in with B7.

      Most outdoor battles done on B7 and Japanese hero shows, Kamen Rider, Rainbow Man, Diamond Eye, etc, were filmed in quarries. Need a place where you can set off explosions, a quarry is a great place. Some were jarring, our heros are in a park or on a beach, then suddenly bad guys show up and we're in a quarry.

      Of course, you knew when our heroes were walking through piles of rock the shooting was going to start soon.

      I took a tour of Toho Studios in '76 and saw the very short suit for Godzilla, one of the Ultraman suits, and saw the filming of a samurai movie. The production value of a lot of the Toho TV stuff was like the BBC's.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    2. Re:Stationed in the UK by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Informative

      B7 did a fair bit of shooting in nuclear power stations and oil refineries.

      Obviously there's only so far you can go with the explosion effects in such places though :p

    3. Re:Stationed in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an 80's follow on to Life on Mars - it's called Ashes to Ashes and IMHO it's vastly inferior.

    4. Re:Stationed in the UK by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      Has there ever been another TV show (in any genre) that ended unexpectedly with the villain getting all six main "goodies", plus the eponymous hero, shot dead in the last 30 seconds of the last show? That ending was absolutely extraordinary.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    5. Re:Stationed in the UK by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

      Has there ever been another TV show (in any genre) that ended unexpectedly with the villain getting all six main "goodies", plus the eponymous hero, shot dead in the last 30 seconds of the last show? That ending was absolutely extraordinary.

      And, because it wasn't that well known in the U.S., more than a few number of geeks thought they were being terribly original by choosing "ORAC" as part of their screen/hacker/account names.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    6. Re:Stationed in the UK by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've heard that B7 once had to stop shooting in a quarry because of noise. The director (I think) went over a ridge to find out what was going on and found that Dr. Who was using the same quarry.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    7. Re:Stationed in the UK by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      There are good reasons for how the show ended. First, from all I've heard, Gareth Thomas only came back on the understanding that Blake would be killed off in such a way that he couldn't be brought back. Second, the show was supposed to be a season-ending cliffhanger, leaving the fans wondering who would survive and how. Then, during the hiatus, the show was canceled, leaving the cliffhanger unresolved. Unlike Farscape, there was never a TV movie resolving the story.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    8. Re:Stationed in the UK by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      There was some charm to the cardboard props, space ship walls that moved when the doors open, etc.

    9. Re:Stationed in the UK by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      Back in those days, continuing a cancelled series with a 'tv movie' was unheard of. Once a show was gone, it was gone (Even Dr. Who!).

      It's only since DVDs have become a MAJOR influence on a shows popularity, have the concept of TV Movies to finish off story arcs become popular.

      -Jar

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    10. Re:Stationed in the UK by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Of course. I was using that as an example that the average Slashdotter would probably recognize so that they could understand what it's like having an unresolved cliffhanger.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  15. 'ere ya go mate ;) by biscon · · Score: 1
  16. Wrong show to do this with by Snowspinner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is frankly a poor idea - the sole substantial flaw in the original B7 was its production values, and that's always the flaw in aging sci-fi. The writing was basically spotless, and there's very, very little room to improve on it. B7 has aged pretty well, aside from its effects.

    That's a very different situation from BSG, where the original was a good idea that was undone by pretty relentlessly cheesy aesthetics and a sense of writing that often did leave something to be desired. BSG aged poorly and rapidly. A re-imagining thus made sense there, because there was room to work and stuff to jettison as well as keep. It was possible to make a new BSG that a fan could look at and say "Wow, that's better than the original." Not all fans did, but a lot did, and that's significant.

    That's going to be very, very hard to do with B7. Frankly, it'll be hard to get a casual fan to say that, little yet a hard core one.

    And the other route for a SF revival - the Doctor Who/Star Trek:TNG route where you just continue in-continuity from where the old one left off is, as the article notes, closed to B7.

    Making this a poor property to revive.

    1. Re:Wrong show to do this with by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Because unlike the original "Battlestar Galactica" and "Star Trek", "Blake's Seven" never went back to battle the Nazis. That's the secret to a long-running sci-fi. ;-)

    2. Re:Wrong show to do this with by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      They never did need to do the "Scary Nazis" plot line because the Federation were 100X times as scary. If the Nazis ever showed up they would have had their asses kicked by Villa and that is weith Villa being a complete and utter coward.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  17. Remade by Sky... by xiox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is being done by Sky, that channel with such great programmes, such as..... mmmm..... Simpsons repeats, Star trek repeats...

    Have they actually made anything worthwhile before?

    1. Re:Remade by Sky... by plingboot · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Colour of magic and Hogfather weren't too bad.

    2. Re:Remade by Sky... by mrsmiggs · · Score: 1

      Sky financed the first series of Battlestar reimaging, and they've done some good work bringing the Discworld novels to tv. When they do drama they actually tend to do it quite well, unfortunately they very rarely actually get the budget to do anything. They only have a very small share of the UK audience so it's understandable.

    3. Re:Remade by Sky... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      They co-financed it, and they didn't have a lot to do with the production itself.

      The discworld stuff was horrible.. basically an excuse to stick the name David Jason on the promo material (no idea why, he didn't even have a major role). They just tried to put the book on the screen, but half the jokes don't work and it really needed a good writer to write a proper screenplay for it.

    4. Re:Remade by Sky... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Sky was central to the Battle Star Galactica remake - they financed the mini series and most of the first season, which was why the UK got it before the US and Canada. I enjoy the BSG remake, so the B7 remake should be worth at least the benefit of the doubt.

    5. Re:Remade by Sky... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Sky do produce some of their own stuff. Which is why I'm a little wary. Brainiac was quite funny. Galactica managed to impress. Apart from that, Sky co-productions have been average to poor, with things like Hex, and The Strangerers. And personally I wasn't all that taken with the Terry Pratchett adaptations.

    6. Re:Remade by Sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But only for a given value of bad...

      Ok, so TCOM and HF are ok(ish), Pterry had input into them, but I'd much have preferred a Peter Jackson and the requisite sized budget being spent on the adaptations, but at least they got done.

      Still, at least they were not the HoS that is Earthsea..

      To paraphrase a well known saying "One Vendeeni scout ship doesn't make an invasion.."

      The point is, I suppose, Sky also produce the biggest heaps o' keich imaginable (New Gladiators &etc), their gowd to keich ratio is pretty low, so the odds are in the favour of it being keich.

      But then, I'm a cynic..

    7. Re:Remade by Sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pratchett two-parters were pretty good, but the rest is pretty much rubbish (which is why I have cable). And the philistines don't even show TOS!

    8. Re:Remade by Sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hogfather? Colour of Magic?

    9. Re:Remade by Sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, they co-funded the first season of the Battlestar remake, along with the SciFi channel. Which is why the show originally aired in the UK slightly before the US.

      So yes, Sky have done something worthwhile recently.

      (Although Sky dropped out after season 1, leaving the show to be run by SciFi alone.)

    10. Re:Remade by Sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They DID show the discworld miniseries, ut i didnt think much of the Colour of magic/Light fantastic miniseries. Hogfather was great though.

    11. Re:Remade by Sky... by billybob2001 · · Score: 1
      Colour of magic and Hogfather weren't too bad

      ...unless you wanted to watch something funny

      Sky managed to suck out almost all of the humo(u)r, turning some of the funniest books ever written into quite sad TV fare.

    12. Re:Remade by Sky... by m50d · · Score: 1

      They did the only good adaptation of Dune.

      --
      I am trolling
    13. Re:Remade by Sky... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Didn't they do "Space Island One"? Obvious low budget, Red Dwarf style scutters being used as an excuse to get low angle shots of actresses but still a pretty good story with a conclusive ending.

    14. Re:Remade by Sky... by acb · · Score: 1

      Sky are also doing a remake of The Prisoner. It's believed to do away with all the weird politics and stuff and have more naked female breasts instead.

    15. Re:Remade by Sky... by paedobear · · Score: 1

      You'll be glad to know that the production staff for the B7 remake are the same people who made Hex

    16. Re:Remade by Sky... by Andrew1963 · · Score: 1

      This is being done by Sky, that channel with such great programmes, such as..... mmmm..... Simpsons repeats, Star trek repeats... Have they actually made anything worthwhile before? I believe "Hex" was original to Sky. Modern urban fantasy with a witch (student in university) fighting demons. OK, it was an inferior Buffy ...
    17. Re:Remade by Sky... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      To be honest, that doesn't sound so bad. Hex wasn't great but it was okay, and the same company did Sugar Rush, which I quite liked.

  18. The number of SAT dishes bolted onto homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    would seem to contradict your statement
    They only have a very small share of the UK audience so it's understandable
    Then I remembered, there are just so many channels to choose from, that each one gets a very small percentage of the viewing people who cought up wads of dosh to Rupert Murdoch's empire every month.

    Oh, thats for the footy(soccer to US readers).

    Disclaimer, I don't have SKY and will never do so. In a former life, I was a printer who lost his job when the times went to Wapping.

    Ironically, today,marks the closure of the News Corp Wapping site.

    What goes around etc..

  19. Surprised nobody's mentioned this... by solios · · Score: 1

    ... but awhile back, both Terry Nation (who created B7) and Paul Darrow (who played Avon) talked about the idea of a revival. Not a remake a la BSG but a continuation a la the new Doctor Who. The premise I've heard talked about by both was to be that Avon - and only Avon - had survived the final scene, and, years later (20-30, I'd say!) escapes from a Federation prison and takes one last can't-win-but-try-anyway shot at it.

    Think Napoleon escaping Elba and the battle of Waterloo, only hopefully without the hemorrhoids.

    If this is what Sky is commissioning, and if it's done well (and with Paul Darrow and hopefully Jacqueline Pearce reprising Servalan), then it'll be the fitting finale to Blake's 7 that fans have been waiting for since the series wrapped decades ago.

    The series doesn't need a remake or a reboot - what it does need is for the loose ends to be tied up.

    1. Re:Surprised nobody's mentioned this... by Aussie · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought too. I really hope that Nation/Darrow are involved, between the 2 of them they are B7.

    2. Re:Surprised nobody's mentioned this... by Musrum · · Score: 1

      Is the irrational belief that TN will return from the dead to help write new B7 scripts Nationalism?

      --
      In Soviet Amerika the ballot boxes YOU!
    3. Re:Surprised nobody's mentioned this... by Aussie · · Score: 1

      Is the irrational belief that TN will return from the dead to help write new B7 scripts Nationalism? Bugger, I hadn't realised he had died.
    4. Re:Surprised nobody's mentioned this... by solios · · Score: 1

      If this ISN'T what they're developing..... it makes me wonder what they WOULD be. To my understanding, the holding company with the rights had been working on just this idea for quite awhile now!

  20. Remember the BBC's Blake's 7? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope.

  21. Ashes to Ashes; and its bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The 80s follow-up to Life on Mars is Ashes to Ashes and it is bad.
    1) The main character (female John Simms replacement) is unlikable. Not a bang on the actor but the writers.
    2) Gene Hunt et al are given too many hero shots. Long pauses while they strike a pose and music plays for them. It turns what was believable and enjoyable in LoM into a parody.
    3) The ambiguity is gone. In LoM was he dead, coma, actual time travel? In AtA, there is no mystery. So, one of the dimensions of LoM is instantly gone.

    As for B7, I agree Avon was the best part of the show. I got the DVDs a few years ago but the show had aged so badly I couldn`t make it through the first season. I assume the remake will be like most new SciFi remakes. The producer will have a political agenda to push that will distract and undermine the show.

    1. Re:Ashes to Ashes; and its bad by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I got the DVDs a few years ago but the show had aged so badly I couldn`t make it through the first season. I got the DVDs sent from Amazon UK to the US. Even purchased Season 3 a second time to get the blister pack with a model of The Liberator included (an apparent loophole in the inability to get UK toys shipped to the US). I convert what DVD players and drives I can to be region-free for this and other imported PAL titles (some of which eventually saw NTSC release in the US, often for much less money like The Tomorrow People).

      I'm trying to introduce a friend to the series, who likes Farscape which I found to be similar in some respects to Blakes 7, but he seems to consider watching B7 torture.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  22. Already remade it once... it was called Farscape by FatRatBastard · · Score: 1

    I always thought that Farscape was Blake's 7 done right. Same basic story idea, same basic characters, much, much better execution.

    Loved Blake's 7 as a kid, but saw it again a few years ago and it hadn't held up as well as my memory of it had led me to believe.

  23. Great Show, But What About Paul Darrow? by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

    Last I'd heard Paul Darrow (who played Avon) had bought the rights to the series from Terry Nation's estate and that he was looking to restart the series. That was at least three years ago and I haven't heard anything since. I'd love to see this back on the air but I really think that he's too old to play the same character.

  24. No shakeycam! by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    Here's hoping they don't ruin the remake like Battlestar Galactic did, by relying so heavily upon "shakeycam" to try and achieve a "you are there" effect. It's been done, it's not novel any more, it's just annoying and distracting. Let your writing, acting, and special effects carry themselves without making the viewers nauseous...

    Thanks...

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  25. Watched the original with breathless enthusiasm by vorlich · · Score: 1

    Of course the baby boomers now colonising slashdot will surely remember that Gareth wotsisname Thomas screwed the whole series when he went off on a Luvvie sabbatical to spout Welsh poetry somewhere probably in Rhondda Cynon Taf. Then the BBC shot everyone in the end - yes everyone, which I considered abuse of the audience at the time.

    BSG was on around that time and to be honest, I think the re-imagineered version is quite good, if you can make a cup of tea during the scenes where characters engage in Shatneresque soul-searching. But once again, like so many American shows it is no more than a post modernist metaphor for the present day.

    A bit like Doctor Who, the continuing story where you can't be a character unless your wearing Burberry or are representative of some minority group. You can tell it is Science Fiction though, cos although it is all shot in Wales, it never seems to rain...(obligatory old-git section now follows.)

    Doctor who was of course much scarier in the sixties, when I were a lad, long before slasher movies Sam Rami, Tobe Hooper and Hannibal Lector - but then we were all so young and innocent then....

    I wish, I wish I had said something funny or informative in this post... No wait! They should do a remake of Dr Who and the Web of Fear. Now that was classic tv and curiously coincided with England winning the World Cup in 1966.

    CUE: sounds of the fourth wall breaking. With apologies to the elipsis.

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
    1. Re:Watched the original with breathless enthusiasm by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      Actually a lot of B7 was shot on my home world of Tha Vorest o' Dean, something that was used to entice me into believing the moving down here aged 10 would be a Good Idea. (It wasn't... which had dawned on me within a couple of years, when half my school were given pudding bowl haircuts and 40s style clothing to be extras for Singing Detective. They looked much smarter that way...

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  26. No Paul Darrow (Avon) - I won't watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobody, but NOBODY can replace that voice. As iconic a voice as Tom Baker. I'd rather see the original "remastered" with digital effects that loose Paul Darrow.

  27. Set a course for Earth, Maximum Wobble! by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    They made a spoof a while back called "Blake's Junction 7", but I've never managed to find it anywhere. The series actually has a lot of potential. They need to make it gritty. e.g. Are they freedom fighters or terrorists? (think Aeon Flux, the Animation). It shouldn't be black and white. There could be a lot of excitement and intrigue with operations behind enemy lines etc. I suppose it all depends on the budget they get. Will there be enough money to make a decent series, or will it be wobbly spaceships again?

    The worst thing they can do is aim it at kids, with Orac as a cute robot or something awful like that.

    1. Re:Set a course for Earth, Maximum Wobble! by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      At the time, they were clearly freedom fighters, but by today's standards, they're terrorists. Consider -- they don't wear uniforms, they're a guerilla group fighting the established state, and they blow shit up (and kill Federation people, both military and civilian, usually without warning.) However they don't try to terrorise the public.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    2. Re:Set a course for Earth, Maximum Wobble! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      The worst thing they can do is aim it at kids, with Orac as a cute robot or something awful like that. How about Orac as a bald dwarf who keeps himself to himself so no one knows what kinds of arms (weapons) he has?
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  28. I hope they don't! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    I hope they don't go the BSG route. We don't need any more Star Trek Voyager character rehashes with extremely poor writing that is slipped past it's audience by confusing them with unnecessary zooms.

    Much better would be to give it the Dr. Who treatment. The special effects can be total crap, but make the writing good, and do be to pretentious.

    1. Re:I hope they don't! by Peet42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Much better would be to give it the Dr. Who treatment. The special effects can be total crap, but make the writing good


      Er, sorry, have you watched the new "Doctor Who"? The SFX are better than average, which can't be said for some/many of the scripts. I agree there are some good ones, but there are a few stinkers too.
    2. Re:I hope they don't! by BigBadBus · · Score: 2, Informative
      The B7 Fan Club, Horizon, might have more info: they're at http://www.horizon.org.uk/

  29. There were always 7. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    There were always seven on the "good guys" team. However, you sometimes had to count the AI running the Liberator and/or the obnoxiously arrogant computer they stole and put to use. One way or another, there were always 7.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  30. Dr. Who so true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bit like Doctor Who, the continuing story where you can't be a character unless your wearing Burberry or are representative of some minority group.
    Christ, hit the nail straight on the head you did.

  31. Hah! by Tono_Fyr · · Score: 1

    I just recently started in on the show. I grabbed the first season, and I'm about half way into the second episode. When I saw the Blake's 7 title, I decided it was finally time to get a Slashdot account and start speaking.

    It seems like a pretty cool (if a bit campy) show so far. It's definitely living up to the song that got me into it (Intergalactic Space Crusaders by Star One).

    Far as the remake goes, I may watch it, I may not. If it's successful, I imagine the sci-fi channel will be all over it, as they seem to have a good viewership for "Doctor Who". I might watch it if I don't have to go through any effort to see it, basically.

  32. They need to change the imagery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure Murdochs Sky TV will change the imagery. The opening sequence and episode that introduced the federation as bad guys did it by showing ubiquitous surveillance. In fact some of the stuff the federation got up to wasn't half as bad as things the good guys do on TV now. At least they made the effort of giving Blake a trial before being sent off to prison camp...

    1. Re:They need to change the imagery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they made the effort of giving Blake a trial before being sent off to prison camp...
      That was terrifying, actually -- that they didn't even try him for terrorism, but smeared him with allegations of paedophilia. Totally plausible, brilliant plot. Why don't we get scripts that good any more?
  33. Fox has picked up Terminator by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    for a second season. In case anyone didn't know.

    It will be in the fall lineup, not the mid-season lineup next year. Day and time will probably change.

    Cameron will be back!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  34. Roj Blake Was Totally a Terrorist. by NickIQ · · Score: 1

    I'm a little surprised, though not disappointed, they chose to remake this, as the show's protagonists are essentially a small group of terrorists hell-bent on revenge against the government. They were rebels, underdogs, and guerrillas; committed to fucking The Federation's shit up, proper.

    I'd like to see the new creators replicate the sense of mortality and dread they had in the original. The audience had enough time to grow attached to the characters and maybe form a favorite crew member, just to watch them die in Blake's Ahab-like quest for blood and vengeance.

    1. Re:Roj Blake Was Totally a Terrorist. by James+VAR · · Score: 1

      I'm a little surprised, though not disappointed, they chose to remake this, as the show's protagonists are essentially a small group of terrorists hell-bent on revenge against the government. They were rebels, underdogs, and guerrillas; committed to fucking The Federation's shit up, proper. Surely that was and is the point. The Federation with all its horrors is what many on the Left like to think Bush's America is, or Thatcher's Britain was.
  35. Could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blake was convicted of child abuse in the TV series. The Federation using it to silence political dessent since it is a crime so dificult to defend against. Wonder if a remake will keep that?

    And ORAC the bloody minded AI computer who went out of his way to show how stupid the rest of the crew were, like a super IQ Victor Meldrew.

    A remake could be very good but has to be done carefully.

  36. ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    didn't blake disappear for most of the series then reappear the last episode just in time for everyone to be killed?

    i might be remembering wrong though. i watched it on PBS when i was quite young.

  37. Life on mars, great show! by Oldav · · Score: 0

    Have to agree about Life on Mars, easily the most ineresting plot, and acted brilliantly. Ending was just awesome, new show is called ashes to ashes and features Phillip Glenister as Gene Hunt.

    1. Re:Life on mars, great show! by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, they were Americanizing "Life on Mars" with Colm Meany as Gene Hunt. It's supposed to be a script for script transplant with American locations and slang. Scheduled for a Fall replacement slot from what I heard.

      I do not have high hopes.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    2. Re:Life on mars, great show! by Oldav · · Score: 0

      Yeh I can imagine how that will go-ghastly That show was as close to TV perfection as I have seen, particularly the awesome ending. If US slashdotters havent seen it do yourselves a favour and have a look. Genuine quality is so rare in TV these days!

  38. Already been done by Joss Whedon by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    It's called _Firefly_.

  39. Bring back Chris Boucher! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For my money, the guy who made the original series hang together was the script editor, Chris Boucher. He was the one with the knack for razor-sharp dialog, who guided the stories to remain as true to the characters as possible, and generally kept things on track.

    He went on to make "Starcops", one of the best grown-up SF series ever (despite the cheesy title), with even sharper scripts and characters.

    If he's still available to keep an eye on things, then the B7 formula has a great deal of potential to be "updated" for contemporary sensibilities and politics...

    1. Re:Bring back Chris Boucher! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      He went on to make "Starcops", one of the best grown-up SF series ever (despite the cheesy title), with even sharper scripts and characters.

      One of the most appealing things about "Starcops" are the long sections of dialogue where everyone is just throwing snappy, one-line & smug answers back & forth at each other. I do like the series because it's basically a bunch of smart-arsed miserable British in space and there's no way the Yanks could remake it as they just wouldn't understand it!

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  40. You know you're an old nerd when... by Blittzed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your two home computers are called 'orac' and 'zen' :)

    I remember that one of the very few occassions as a youngster that I was allowed to stay up 'late' was to watch Blakes 7 on the TV. Fortunately my Mum was into Sci-Fi so she used to let me stay up past my bed-time to watch it. It was usually on an hour or so after Doctor Who had finished, so it used to be a double dose of Sci-fi goodness. Watched the first episode of Blakes again a year or so ago and my god has it aged! I am not really sure a re-make is a good idea - I think it may just ruin the memory.
    --
    "They looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined"
    1. Re:You know you're an old nerd when... by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 1

      *cough* *blush* My desktop is still Orac. My home server is Stewie, but previous servers were Slave and Zen.
      Frankly, I'm amazed this "Seven Blokes?" stuff got mentioned on Slashdot.

  41. Dark Dark Dark by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I loved the dark characters, especially Darrow's Avon. Darrow's Avon was the main reason to watch. Nobody can sneer better than Paul Darrow. Alas, he has completely disowned this version.
    1. Re:Dark Dark Dark by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 1

      Err, what you linked to says: "Statement by Paul Darrow with regard to the proposed Movie" and is from 2003. That movie never happened. This new Sky thing is a new proposal. I'm not sure how Darrow feels about it, but I'd love to hear it, since he's been keeping the B7 fire burning for _years_, bless his heart. :)

  42. YES!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    INFORMATION!

    All they have to do, is improved the special effects and hire actors as go as the originals (if the originals are not available). This was one of the most underrated shows in TV history!!!

    END OF LINE

  43. Where was Blake? Lame ending too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a spoiler. Blake finally shows up at the end of the last episode. Everyone dies in the last few seconds of the last episode.

    I'm still bitter about the whole ending. Lamest ending for any series ever.

  44. Has to be said... by brassman · · Score: 1

    "I'm not stupid, I'm not expendable, and I'm NOT GOING." - Kerr Avon

    --
    "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
  45. Parent Spoiler alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for ruining it, turkeybreath.

  46. sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never seen (or actually even heard of) Blake's 7 before today, but from your description, it sounds like some of the basic plot of FarScape came from this show. No?

  47. Surely you jest. by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    And don't say I can't call you Shirly.

    Blake never went around acting crazy for no good reason at all....
    He did it for freedom....
    Certainly no character on Farscape can rival Avon.

    With B7, I could not predict how the plot will move, who will live and die.
    With Farscape, I didn't care. It was interesting, but not worth any emotional investment.