Slashdot Mirror


Parent-Friendly Wireless Bridge To Span 500 Meters?

GonnaBRichYeahYeah! writes "My dad lives down a dirt road 500 meters off the main road. The cable company will not put cable down his lane for any less than the ridiculous sum of $10,000. And he cannot get phone line DSL since he is so far away from the central terminal, so he relied on painful 22k/sec dial-up for access to the Internet. He got sick of it and relies on Hughes satellite Internet, at $60/month, but he still has to be connected to a phone line to upload to the Internet. It's not a good solution, but better than dial-up. His friend lives on the corner of the main drag with his lane and has cable, thus hi-speed Internet. I suggested that he get a wireless access point, and put it at his friend's house and then get a wireless card for access. The problem is that no wireless routers go that far (max range of -N is 200 feet) and WiMax is too complex for a 70-year old man. Any suggestions from Slashdot crowd would be helpful." Plenty of people make wireless links over longer distances, but often they're not suited for people who want simplicity and reliability. What's the best out there right now?

125 of 558 comments (clear)

  1. Consider the do it yourself way... by avronius · · Score: 5, Informative

    Supplies:
    Hoe (one per helper)
    500 meters of heavy duty conduit
    500 meters of cable (recommend that you lay fiber at the same time)

    Solution 1:
    1a: Dig a long trench from the cable termination point down the dirt road to your father's house
    1b: Dig a long trench from "the closest neighbour with cable internet" down the dirt road to your father's hose
          Ensure that the trench is at least 18 inches deep, roughly 8 inches wide

    2. Lay 500 meters of heavy duty conduit. Ensure that you are threading your cable through the conduit all the way along. Attempting to thread the cable AFTER the counduit has been completed may prove to be problematic.

    3a: Call the cable company to connect the cable to the cable termination point. Begin paying monthly subscription to cable internet provider.
    3b: If you've chosen to run the connection to your neighbhour's home, ensure that you don't piss him/her off. They are now your cable internet provider.

    4. Profit $$$

    1. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by avronius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh yeah...
      Don't forget to fill the trench after you've installed the conduit!

      Failing to do so, may turn this solution into a bigger problem than simple "internet access"...

    2. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Supplies:
      Hoe (one per helper)


      For 500 meters?!?

      Christ on a cracker.. rent a ditch witch!
    3. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      Corollary: What he said.. only rent a backhoe to do your digging.

      David

    4. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was going to suggest a pair of WRT54GLs running Tomato with some 15dBi antennas, but ethernet like that is going to be a much more reliable solution, if a bit harder to install.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    5. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by GateGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you might be working too hard.

      Cable is considered low voltage, so in some states it does not have to be buried 18 inches. Also why would you dig a trench 8 inches wide? Rent a small trencher, it make about trench about 3-4 inches wide. Use a trench shovel to clear out the trench.

      Also, if you are using PVC, if you pull the line through as you are gluing the conduit together, you stand a great chance of gluing your pull string in place. Best thing to do is to shoot a mouse through the pipe (a mouse is a special plug that almost exactly fits a conduit that you attach a very light weight pull string to. On the other end you use a shop-vac to suck it out).

      I would also have a pull box installed every 100 meters. 500 meters would be one heck of a pull.

      --
      Maryland State Motto: If you can dream it, we can tax it.
    6. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Holi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Forget the backhoe what he needs is a Ditch Witch. We had the same issue in Oregon, we lived on 280 acres and lived 1/2 a mile from the main road. It really is your only option if you are going to live in the boondocks.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    7. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      2. Lay 500 meters of heavy duty conduit. Ensure that you are threading your cable through the conduit all the way along. Attempting to thread the cable AFTER the counduit has been completed may prove to be problematic.

      nope. spool of string, a soft poofy to tie on then fo string that fits easily in conduit and a wet-dry vac. works great. I suggest pulling a string along with the wire so you can easily re-do it later or add another wire.

      BTW: 1500 feet of cat 5 does not work well for ethernet. get a pair of sdsl modems and put one at each end of the wire and you can go for 20 miles.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by maino82 · · Score: 4, Informative

      pullbox every 30m if you're a stickler for EIA/TIA/BiCSI standards

    9. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hoe (one per helper)

      The mark of true friendship is helping you lay cable even when you don't hire them prostitutes in return.

    10. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by JonWan · · Score: 2, Informative

      But .....

      1. Make sure you have permission from the land owners to dig the trench and lay the line.

      2. Stay away from the state/city/county right of way, or the next time they work on something your line will be torn up.

      3. ???

      4. Profit

    11. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by avronius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that digging this ditch 'the old fashioned way' would take a large amount of time.

      If it were me, I'd probably bring in a contractor to do it.

      If you do consider this route, get local utilities to locate underground services for you - so that you don't accidentally dig up power/water. You shouldn't - we're talking a foot and a half, but...

    12. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by char70ger · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why not just get an aircard? You can get wireless EVDO routers like this one from keyocera. http://www.evdoinfo.com/content/view/264/63/ Or even get a pci to pcmcia adapter, this will allow you to use one in your PC. They sell them at newegg for under $20.00. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815124021Y I used a Verizon air card for over a year and ran a 5 computer network off it. I had to use an external antenna as I had no signal with my pc on the floor in the corner of my room.It was made by Wilson they call it their "Trucker Cellular Antenna" http://www.wpsantennas.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=3 It cost me 100 bucks but was well worth the investment. It wasn't cable but it sure beat dial-up. I now have a wireless setup that uses Motorola Canopy technology that rocks!!!

    13. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You forgot get permits and right of way access to even begin doing this. Thats why people use wireless. Not to mention the cost (includes labor x your_time) of doing this would crazy compared to getting two directional wifi antennas and a couple of routers.

    14. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Thelasko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Cable is considered low voltage, so in some states it does not have to be buried 18 inches. I've noticed here in Illinois the cable companies stopped burying cable all together. They just lay it along the ground.

      Just the other day I saw two geniuses from Comcast running cable through the lawn of my condo complex. I'm just waiting to see what happens when the landscapers come by to mow the lawn. I hope they don't charge $10k to do that.
      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    15. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by spazdor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Witches and hoes.

      Aww yeah.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    16. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting


        I just emailed him, but .... you're right.

          I actually did this before. It was with a pair of WAP11's (current at the time), a 24dBi parabolic, and a 19dBi panel. It was 100% reliable, except for a few circumstances.

          After a year, a bamboo tree grew up through the line of site.
          One end was in an office, and the WAP11 would overheat because the A/C was turned off on the weekends, and the cleaning crew would shut off the fan blowing on the AP.
          In one strong wind, I found I hadn't secured the antenna well enough, and it turned. :)

          They were all easy, obvious problems.

          In his case, an AP with a high gain antenna on one end, and a decent antenna on the distant end attached to his wireless device would be fine.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    17. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by nfk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course the low tech solution would be to tie a string to a real mouse and put some cheese on the other end.

    18. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hope you understand (before digging) that the range limit for ethernet (even cat 6) is 100 metres. And 100BaseFx (ie fibre) is 400 metres.

      Howeverm if you lay multimode-fibre then you can get a length of 2km out of it. I have no idea what kind of routers you'd need to make that work, but I guess they'd be expensive.

    19. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Amouth · · Score: 3, Funny

      keep watching - aroudn where i am that is standard for the tech whom is reparing serivce.. they will run it on top and leave slack.. then a few days later a contractor will come by and bury it 2-3in with a (some odd looking tool)..

      but it allows them to get service up to you now and bank on you not mowing your lawn for a few days..

      what is fun is when that contractor never shows up.. and told the cable company he did..

      i had a similar issue with my power last year.. one of the 120v legs went bad.. so they slapped a transformer on the side of my house -next day techs came out and identified where the leg was bad.. ripped up part of my neighbors driveway to fix the cable.. told them a contractor would come by in a day or so to poor a new patch slab... two weeks later the neighbor is pissed and the power company says it has beenfixed.. all because a contractor never bothered to do the job and jsut said he did it...

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    20. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Informative

      "He's in a rural area. Permits and right of way access are either not on the books or not enforced in rural areas."

      Is this supposed to be a joke? Or do you really not know just how seriously people (and municipalities) in rural areas take things like property lines and rights of way? I do. I grew up on a farm, in a place where a property owner would have a right to shoot you if you started trenching on his land...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    21. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by kargur · · Score: 2, Informative

      Something to consider is signal degradation over that distance. I worked a a high speed data cable technician for 3 years before my current job and we always avoided going over 1000 ft. While it is possible to reach 1500 ft, it is likely you would need a powered amp of some sort to make the distance. It is important to note that the amp would need to be at the termination point rather than the serviced house, otherwise you would just be amplifying noise. Also, and more importantly, you need a thick cable. RG6 (standard cable TV cable) will not cut it. You need RG11 and appropriate fittings. This would decrease the signal loss over the distance. Also note that every time you split a cable signal, you lose signal, so making the line strictly for HSD and keeping the TV on the satellite would also increase the chances of a good data connection

    22. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tried DD-WRT, and in my situation, where I am using WDS along with QOS on one of my 3 wifi routers, Tomato was much more stable than OpenWRT and DD-WRT.

      If you find DD-WRT to be stable (enough) for you, then I would suggest not changing.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    23. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Informative

      As the cat5 ethernet standard says 100 metres distance limitation, 5 times that length is not going to work.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    24. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I saw an article where a guy did that with his ferret. The food at the other end? Strawberry pop tarts.

    25. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by thogard · · Score: 2, Informative

      But the sprinkler pipe wasn't labeled on the dig plan was it? A solution to that problem is put some metal locater foil over the sprinkler pipe or just ignore the problem until it gets cut and go out and put a $2 joint over the two bits of pipe with the right glue. I'm guessing the leak is very close to where ground was cut.

    26. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by nfk · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a good idea, so long as you don't burn the string. I had my own method for speeding up the mouse, but I figured it would be silly to make the conduit big enough to send a cat through.

    27. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Znork · · Score: 4, Informative

      For this type of installation it might be simpler and cheaper just getting two smartswitches with mini-gbic or built-in 1000base-LX port. Cheap, consumer-grade stuff with trivial configuration, good for 5km, and using fibre you avoid any possible grounding issues between the houses.

    28. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you do consider this route, get local utilities to locate underground services for you - so that you don't accidentally dig up power/water. You shouldn't - we're talking a foot and a half, but... On that same note, how does one go about registering their home made conduit with http://www.call811.com/ (which routes you to your State's "One Call" center)

      And they recommend calling before you do any digging.
      Better safe than sorry.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    29. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by cjb658 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One assumption you are all making is that he owns all 500 meters of the land between his place and his friend's place.


      If you want to go the wireless route, I've had good luck with the antenna "amplifier" I built from this site.

    30. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.aeiwireless.com/

      Directional radio or laser is the way to solve this problem. If you build it right, you won't need to maintain it much - the only condition is if something breaks or moves. Again, once everything is sighted, lock it down - to the point of building a box around the thing with only the openings you require.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    31. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Thirdsin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey sonny... Back in my day we dug trenches many miles long, uphill both ways, in the snow and tumultuous weather! Them days we were layin them there telegraph wires, but the lesson applies!

      --
      No words of wisedom here.
    32. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably not. When I worked at Cisco we tested a bunch of stuff out to 150m and most equipment worked even over cat3. However almost none worked at 200m even over cat5e.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    33. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have proof of that? because I have solid proof that it in fact does "work". do I get 100bps? no. but I DO get a connection and I do get data transfer. just not reliably. What the "spec" says and what happen in reality are two very different things.

      I have tried this on two seperate occasions. One worked decently (300m)Util humidity changes caused connection and data loss. Both situations dirt cheap used SDLS modems off ebay solved the issue. in fact one we used 4 SDsl modems and bonded them at the switches and got very close to 25mbps over 300meters.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    34. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by BUL2294 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget to fill the trench after you've installed the conduit!
      Failing to do so, may turn this solution into a bigger problem than simple "internet access"...
      You sure about that? Having a moat would be cool!
      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    35. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by cjb658 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What exactly was unreliable? Would it crash and have to be rebooted? Did it drop packets or introduce high latency?

      The only problem I have with it is that its QOS controls don't seem to work. When I run BitTorrent and eMule and play CS, my pings still go to shit. (And I've increased the maximum number of established connectios to 4096 so that's not the issue.)

    36. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by bendodge · · Score: 4, Informative

      500mW Signal Booster at both ends ($57 each)
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833130039

      Two 19 dBi directional outdoor antennas ($82 each)
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833980012

      Various Cabling:
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812146013
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833164143

      Two WRT54GL's ($60 each) to be equipped with Linux firmware (recommend DD-WRT)
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833124190

      I'm sure there will be all sorts of adapters (M to F and TNC to N-type) needed, so plan on making several batches of purchases before you go to the site. Also disable the unused antenna in DD-WRT.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    37. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by eu4ik · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a good idea, so long as you don't burn the string. I had my own method for speeding up the mouse, but I figured it would be silly to make the conduit big enough to send a cat through.

      Mouse, string, mouse, string; which do I want to play with now? I know, I'll take a nap!

    38. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by LehiNephi · · Score: 4, Informative

      A couple years ago I was looking to do something similar. A bit of research shows that it's actually fairly easy to do, and with remarkably long ranges. Pretty much anything roughly parabolic will do, and a satellite dish is a great way to start. Here's a post with several useful links: http://www.seattlewireless.net/pipermail/dev/2003-June/012784.html

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    39. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by iamhassi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wow this is getting expensive! Renting equipment, hiring contractors... just diy long distance wifi

      don't people google anymore before asking /.? This has even been on /. before.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    40. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by LehiNephi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about this: run some electrical cable down the pipe in parallel with the signal cable (assuming ethernet/Cat5/6 here). Every 100m, install a cheap hub. Since each hub will only be drawing a few watts, the voltage drop, even over 500m, will be quite small (14AWG has a resistance of about 4Ohms over 500m). This would allow you to run ethernet the entire distance while keeping costs down.

      I know you're all about to scream "don't run power in parallel with data", but hear me out. I never said to use 120VAC. Why not run, say, 24VDC down 14AWG cable, with a DC-DC converter alongside each hub?

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    41. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by meatspray · · Score: 2, Informative

      Single-mode is the long haul stuff, not multi-mode.

      You need:
      1. Power at both ends of the line
      2. a ditch with conduit
      3. a spool of single-mode
      4. a professional with the tools to terminate the ends of the fiber
      5. two single mode to ethernet media converters, http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=884092

    42. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by mrops · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think WRT54GL with a 500mW booster may do the trick.

      http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.12215

      Not sure if this is a gimmiky product or if it will really work.

    43. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...and don't forget to pull a spare length of pull-string with the cable!

      New capacity, repairs, new technology (fiber?), etc. There's not much more frustrating than having to completely redo a good cable run 10 years down the road because someone neglected to pull a spare strand of string.

      Also, responding to someone further up, just because you aren't required by code to bury your conduit 18" or more doesn't mean it's not a really good idea to do so. When someone decides to develop the acreage next door and the concrete trucks break up your cable in multiple spots, or it's so shallow that you dig into it planting trees, you won't be happy camper.

    44. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by carrett · · Score: 5, Funny

      I put on my robe and wizard hat..

      --
      I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
    45. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by gregbot9000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A day labour can trench about 50 ft. an hour by hand, which would be about 4 days, which would be about 800 dollars, check trencher rental prices. It will take another 3 days for laying the pipe and back filling which would probably cost you $600, less if you now how to pull wire(easy). PVC conduit is about $10 per 10 ft. so that would be about $1500. Odds and ends aside (insuriance j-boxes, fish-tape, you could probalby get it done for about 4k. That does not count the cost of data cable ($2 ft. plus sounds likely) and tech parts, and if you hired a Contractor they would want a cut too. In the end the utilitys companys 10k estimate doesn't seem to far off for a hardware install. You should just get a wave guide.

    46. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by mrbooze · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just speaking for myself, when I was running DD-WRT it would lock up every few days requiring a reboot. I finally just put a scheduled daily reboot in cron and it worked mostly fine after that, though it did have one or two lockups still over the course of a couple months.

      I eventually switched to tomato for better QoS support and tomato has been rock solid.

      It also seemed like dd-wrt development wasn't progressing very much, as there hadn't been an update in quite a while. Though I do note now that they finally made v24 an official release just recently, so things may have improved since then.

      DD-WRT does have some features that tomato doesn't, though. If I needed any of those features I wouldn't hesitate using DD-WRT again. Though I might try OpenWRT first just because I haven't tried it yet.

    47. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonym1ty · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amplifying wifi signals is pretty much always a bad idea, because the signal is two-way. It's like having a conversation with someone far away - if you have a megaphone they can hear you, but no matter how loud your megaphone is, you still won't be able to hear them.

      However, if you have a point-to-point wireless link with the same amplification on both ends, it can be useful. Don't overuse it though, as too much amplification will distort the signal, and disrupt other people's attempts to use nearby frequencies (even pretty far away). But if you put your megaphone up to your ear, you can hear them.... Hence the amplifiers are bi-directional
    48. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Informative
      The pressure that a shop vac can issue is limited by physics - you have a pressure of 1 atmosphere and a vacuum cleaner can only decrease that by a fraction.

      A compressor on the other hand that's blowing air has no problem blowing more than an atmosphere pressure. And in a 500m pipe that can make a huge difference.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    49. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by willy_me · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cables are generally run using a "Ditch WItch" or some other piece of trenching equipment. You can rent them just about anywhere and they can finish a 500m job in a couple of hours.

    50. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Crackez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Screw digging a ditch.

      Lay zero cable:
      http://www.lightpointe.com/products/fl_100.cfm

    51. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Thelasko · · Score: 3

      I came home tonight and guess what? They had started to bury the cable. So far it only goes as far as the sidewalk. Let's see what tomorrow brings.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    52. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by conureman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Plowing, eh? Sounds efficient. Can't seem to get Spear&Jackson shovels here anymore. I guess 'murkins aren't supposed to dig trenches by hand. (I should move.) The standard for High Voltage is four feet deep, keeps it a bit safer than 18". Low Voltage or Fiber, the onus is on you. I did 400' of four-inch conduit four foot deep by hand once. Last time, I went with the ditch-witch. Found a sewer line with that. (I knew it was there but the contractor who buried it said it was too deep to worry about, and would not mark it for me. Schmuck.) Once you lay the conduit you can use a shop-vac to blow a cotton puff or a rag with a thread tied to it, to pull a fatter string, then your signal element through the conduit. IIRC Cat-5e is usable for 100 meters. Personally, I'd use fiber or try to engineer a wireless solution. If you run a 18 or 20 ga. copper wire alongside in your trench, the finder guy from the utilities can use it for his signal to mark the location for you. I think orange is the color code for communications, it doesn't matter much.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    53. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by WobindWonderdog · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, 15 people with backhoes in a synchronous dance of digging would be kinda cool to watch...

    54. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Informative

      And.. with your extra-directional antenna and boosted signal, you fried someone?

      I mean.. You did consult the FCC tables for uncontrolled exposure at 2.4 GHz when setting up your little science project, right?

      Of course you did. Or they wouldn't have approved your license request to run an experimental, (i.e. modified to no longer be type-accepted), (and ERP>1W ) setup in the 2.4 GHz band.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    55. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

      dammit, I wrote a long reply, but my browser crashed. That's what I get for using Windows on occasion. :)

          Yes, I consulted the charts, and even did the math myself to confirm that the charts were right. :)

          a 20mw transmitter and 24dBi antenna puts it .5dBm below the FCC max for a point to multipoint application. Since this was point to point, they have higher tolerances, which still is fine.

          Now, my 200mw transmitter with the 24dBi antenna is a wee bit against FCC rules in theory, but with loss in the cables, it may just be at the limit.

          Since they were very directional antennas, it was a fairly safe bet they'd never notice anyways. Sitting behind either antenna, I could hear the signal (encrypted, of course). Standing on the ground immediately under the antenna, still with a clear view of the remote side, I couldn't detect it, nor anything at that particular frequency. I even did that with the 200mw transmitter and a 4.5dBi antenna. Only being maybe 15 feet or so below the real antenna was enough to be outside of the beam of the more diverse antenna.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    56. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by djohnso · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are some nice instructions on how to do this here: http://www.jawug.za.net/ just click on How-to's. It is well explained with pictures (for dummies like me)

    57. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      One assumption you are all making is that he owns all 500 meters of the land between his place and his friend's place.


      If you want to go the wireless route, I've had good luck with the antenna "amplifier" I built from this site.

      IAMALBISIIL* Just get some well armed men to occupy the 500m stretch and pay off a couple of households to recognize that it has always been yours but upto that date had been illegally occupied by foreign imperialists. Send more armed men to kill anyone who complains and confiscate their possesions are womenfolk. Pay academics to write papers that backup your territorial claim.

      You can pay me in slaves or loot.

      * I am a lawyer but I specialise in International Law
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    58. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh huh. Then there's the little matter of getting the right-of-way. I don't imagine that all that 500 meters is on their property.

  2. Proper Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just get a proper directional antenna to replace the one on the router. Do the same for your neighbor and link'em together I got one when I was living back Prague and connected with a 200kb/s link to an access point about 300 meters away (that was the speed of the connection - not the actual link). Actually, it's quite common for people to construct neighborhood networks that way (well at least in CZ)

    1. Re:Proper Antenna by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      We've done 5 mile links with a pair of *old* wallmount AT&T Wavelan bridges and proper antennas on 915 Mhz. Those units were 400mw.
      Ticking along for years. 2 MBPS, faster than T1 speed. And proprietary FHSS, no freeloaders. Heh.

      You have to get the antenna up above the fresnel effect and any obstructions at the frequency in use, about 60' for 915 Mhz, more like 30' for 2.4 Ghz. Which is why 2.4 Ghz is easier. I would have no problem running that link at either frequency. It'll work fine.
      You can do it. No problems at all.
      Give good attention to the antennas, that's what you need to get it to work.

      --
      .
    2. Re:Proper Antenna by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have done well over 500 yards many times. In one case obstrusted with masts, and over water. I used the wrt54gl with Thybor firmware, and Hawking a Antenna http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/productlist.php?CatID=32&FamID=58&ProdID=152 (no problem outside) and amplifier http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/productlist.php?CatID=32&FamID=72&ProdID=187 with no issues at all. Well under $400 and 1 hour of time.

    3. Re:Proper Antenna by Sique · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Zillertal Valley in Austria has a 54 MBit/sec WLAN network, that just uses WLAN-antennas on all the mountain tops. The antennas bridge up to 15 mls (25 km), even though they use classic WLAN, just focussed to a beam to the next mountain top. The antennas are mostly from Alvarion (ex BreezeCOM).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  3. Did he lose his marbles? by pigiron · · Score: 5, Funny

    "WiMax is too complex for a 70-year old man." At what age does WiMax dementia set in?

    1. Re:Did he lose his marbles? by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 5, Funny

      If your folks can understand WiMax, you may want to mod your parents up

      [Ducks]

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
  4. From Engadget... by bagboy · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:From Engadget... by madsenj37 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Its the HD26200 from HD Communications Corp. I went to Engadget to find this myself. Its the $318, 5 mile solution that only requires a line of sight. The HD26200 is made up of two high performance Ubiquiti network radios with integrated 17dbi dual polarity antennas that are configured in wireless bridge mode. The HD26200 bridge is also powered over ethernet, so no RF cables are required, only an outdoor CAT5 cable to bring both data and power to the radios. HD Corp also has non-line of sight outdoor products.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
  5. Doable with 802.11g by rs6krox · · Score: 5, Informative

    500 meters is about 1,640 feet. I do that to my parents place now. I just got two Linksys routers running dd-wrt and two good outdoor antennas. With dd-wrt I cranked up the radio output a bit and have no problem getting full throughput over about that same distance.

    1. Re:Doable with 802.11g by BlargIAmDead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn. You parents have their basement 500 meters from the house? :)

    2. Re:Doable with 802.11g by chill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but unless he has a swimming pool, where does he keep the sharks?

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  6. Legislation? by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Check local legislation. Where I live, the government must provide electricity, water, and telephone service to any legal building built, no matter how far into the boondocks it is built. I don't know if the law specifically applies to high-speed internet access, but I'm fairly confident that a good lawyer could make it seem that way.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    1. Re:Legislation? by iroll · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Reeally? If you build a cabin in the woods, the gov't has to come dig you a well? Something tells me you haven't looked into this local legislation as deeply as you think you have.

      Where I live, if you don't live in town, you pay the electric company to plant poles to deliver the power. You pay the well digger to dig you a well. And you pay the telephone company to string some line along those electric co. poles. If you don't like the above, you sit in the dark and use an outhouse.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    2. Re:Legislation? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      read the question more carefully. In particular, the part about "cable company" and the part about him currently having phone service. However, cable companies are generally granted a monopoly in exchange for certain requirements, such as paying for the cable to be laid when population density exceeds xx% or the building is within xx feet of a main road.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  7. You can use wireless by Exstatica · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live near lax, but my building has really old wiring and i can't get dsl at this location, but i'm a mile from the office and once on the roof i found i had line of sight. I bought two wireless access points from ascendance, I bought the heavy ones cause i wanted to use the high performance radios so i can get 100mbit. (i work for an isp and i was able to just bring it right into my colo. But if you get http://www.ascendance.net/storefront/detail.aspx?ID=788 that should work two, you need two of them. Configuration isn't difficult, you set one as an AP and the other as a client, set your encryption and static /30 ip. and aim them at eachother. All done. On average with the standard radio you can get 20mbits up and down, and its solid enough to put voip calls over. The max range is just under 5 miles, that should cover you. Hope that helps.

  8. Directional High-Gain Antenna by 0p7imu5_P2im3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Linksys (I don't know about others) come with a standard antenna port. With a directional, high-gain antenna pointed at your dad's house from the neighbor's, you could probably make the connection. Worst case, you might need to get some custom firmware and turn up the transmission strength a tad. (I suggest Tomato.)

    Look up "coffee can wifi antennas" on google. This will make it cheap and "easy."

    --
    Resistance is futile. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. You will become one with the morgue
    1. Re:Directional High-Gain Antenna by johneee · · Score: 4, Informative

      Linksys (I don't know about others) come with a standard antenna port

      Careful. Not ALL Linksys have antenna ports. Some do, some don't. I just bought one that doesn't. Not a concern for me, but don't buy one online without looking closely expecting them to have ports.

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
    2. Re:Directional High-Gain Antenna by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Look up "coffee can wifi antennas" on google

      Just as an aside, the famous Rob Flickenger "Pringles Tube" antenna with all the washers up the inside sucks elephants through very fine gauze.

      The stopped waveguide "coffee can" antennas work much better, but finding a suitable 85mm diameter can might be tricky. There are a lot of simple patch antenna designs out there, too. Helicals are too much hassle, really.

      You might get good results with a couple of USB wifi sticks mounted in place of the LNB of some old satellite dishes.

  9. Cantenna? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can buy or build a cantenna. They're illegal. But with a bit of work and patience, they function well. I dunno if a simple can-based setup can handle half a kilometer (and if it can, it's going to need a good solid connection to the house to keep it aligned) but I do know that a cantenna operated at the focal point of a used satellite dish will work fine up into the several kilometer range.
    They're really cheap to build. You generally need to find reverse-polarity RF connectors to hook to the card in the computer. Digikey.com, newark.com, and mouser.com all sell reverse-polarity rf connectors. Traditionally people put n-type rf connectors on the antenna but that's a pain: I built mine using a bnc bulkhead connector on the can, and a rp-sma-to-bnc converter connector on my wireless adapter card, and just ran bnc cable from one to the other.

    Mine only runs 40 meters through a couple of walls. Hopefully other people will correct this if it's the wrong solution for 500 meters.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:Cantenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since when have cantenna's been illegal? Outside of pushing your transmit strength above the legal limit I've never heard of them being illegal...

    2. Re:Cantenna? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Funny

      1. I build flamethrowers for fun: I see your toothbrush and raise you 2000 degrees.

      2. It was my understanding that modifying the antenna on an FCC-licensed device was illegal. I may be wrong.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:Cantenna? by kg9ov · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How is ignoring the Part 97 rules any better than ignoring the Part 15 rules?

  10. Hawking external antennas by drachenstern · · Score: 3, Informative

    Have you seen these? I think they would require LoS for maximum efficiency, but it's worth a peak. You could use two directional high gain antennas and point them at each other if LoS is nearly there... But bear in mind that nothing about their doc requires LoS, just that we all know it works better if there is.

    http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/productlist.php?CatID=32&FamID=58&ProdID=133

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
  11. ALL wireless routers go that far. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I suggest learning about antennas.

    Wireless access point at each end, directional antennas, wifi goodness ensues.

    I've done 1000 meters with simple patch antennas and wrt54g routers running dd-wrt to create a wireless ethernet extension. Only heavy rain will drop the connection.

    Otherwise look up the laser types. there are hundreds of websites on how to do this simple and common task.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  12. $318 WiFi network bridge connects two locations up by mnslinky · · Score: 5, Informative
    See if this works for you:

    There is an article at engadget about this sort of thing. It requires line-of-site, but I'm sure you could manage that.

    If you've tried every antenna and extender on the market today with subpar results, HD Communications is apt to become your new best friend. The outfit has just revealed its HD26200, a "complete outdoor wireless network bridge in the 802.11b/g unlicensed 2.4GHz band that sells for only $318." Said device bridges wireless internet between two locales up to 5 miles apart without requiring a single RF cable, being that both Ubiquiti network radios are powered over Ethernet. If you're looking for the catch, the bridge does require a direct line of sight between the two locations, but the firm is reportedly looking to expand its non-line of sight family by the summer's end.


    Link to the Article

    Hope this helps.

  13. Use Mikrotik boards, which run Linux by transporter_ii · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm just about to the point where I hate wireless, but for a non-commercial shot like this, mikrotik should work well. You could get into it for 300.00 - 600.00 for a couple of units configured as a wireless bridge.

    I recommend using Ubiquity sR2 or SR5 mini-pci cards...and ground everything especially well.

    Mikrotik boards run Linux and are extremely roboust and feature rich. But you can follow this wiki and have a transparent bridge running in no time flat:

    http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Transparently_Bridge_two_Networks

    We use mikrotik a lot in a wireless WISP situation. If someone thinks they are going to throw a bunch of this stuff hundreds of feet in the air and make a lot of money doing wireless Internet, they are in for a wild ride...that ends somewhere between hairloss and a straight jacket...but I do something almost exactly like what you are wanting to do with your father using Mikrotik, and it has worked very well and wasn't super expensive.

    Again, ground everything as best you can, and use directional, not omni antennas (cheap omni antennas often have grounding issues than can pop the radio card really easy).

    See also: wisp-router.com

    Transporter_ii

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  14. SMC 2891W by JumboMessiah · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know these look pricey, but they're worth it (aka: save yourself the trouble of cheap indoor access points in a box). They have everything you need, all in a rugged outdoor enclosure. And yes, they run Linux.

    SMC2891W-AG Wireless Outdoor Bridge

    Data Sheet

    Manual

  15. Novaroam stuff works well (900Mhz no license band) by VoxBoston · · Score: 4, Interesting
    http://novaroam.com/ - used by police, fire, etc. Good penetration through trees and foliage, unlike WiFi. Mesh networking capable if you need it (although your setup sounds like point-to-point).

    -Karl
    A rock record: http://www.instarmusic.com/

  16. Re:Get a long cord by Cerberus7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uh... that's a little out of spec for Ethernet. Would need a repeater. Or two. Or five.

    --
    I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
  17. It would be nice.. by FamineMonk · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you gave a little more info. If you have line of sight then its no problem at all just buy 2 routers that can be flashed to DD-WRT. (I suggest the Asus WL-500G Premium or the Linksys WRT54GL I own both and they both work like a charm just make sure you buy the right connector Asus: rp-SMC/linksys: rp-TNC)

    After you figure that out go to http://www.hyperlinktech.com/familylist.aspx?id=146 or where ever you want to get an Antenna.

    my guess is your going to want to grab the 24db one seeing as how the 30 jumps quite a bit in price. after that mount them both with line of sight connect everything up and you should be good to go. If you don't have line of sight then its going to depend on whats in the way if its possible at all.

  18. Doing it professionally for $10K by davidwr · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are companies out there who will do a professional job of installing fixed-wireless from point A to point B.

    You may want to pay your neighbor for a utilities easement to either run a cable down his property or install point A for fixed-wireless on his property. Then, pay the cable company as normal for them to connect Point A to their hookup. You will also need to get electrical service. The up-front costs won't be cheap but it will be a lot less than $10K.

    If there are several neighbors affected, you may want to form a co-op or contract with a company who will own the easement.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  19. Call Huges by SrJsignal · · Score: 2, Informative

    All of the new Hugesnet installs have bi-directional to the satelight, so then you don't have to use the phone line. I think the up is 64kbps.
    All of the Wifi sharing ideas are going to be against the TOS of the company that is being "shared"

  20. Make your own antenna by tknd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Research satellite dish antennas or cantennas. Both are cheap directional antennas (buy someone's used satellite dish) and of course you will want direct line of sight between the two antennas.

  21. Wireless by retro128 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I first moved to my city, DSL and cable were not available. 6 years ago I started a job located about 4 miles away from my home, and they had a T1. Turns out my condo had radio line of sight to work. What I did was set up two Linux boxes on peer to peer wireless using Orinico cards since they had the jack for an external antenna. To those I hooked up the appropriate pigtails and LMR-400 microwave cable to the parabolic grid antennas on the roof of each location. After configuring Linux to handle the routing, bam I was the first guy in my city with broadband. Actually, I'm still running on it though cable and DSL is now available.

    Now granted this was the old school way of doing it. The other problem was that I was using 75 feet of LMR-400 cable on each end to bring the signal from the antenna to my card. That's generally not a good idea since long runs of cable attenuate the signal, so it's always best to have your network equipment as close to the antenna as possible. But back then that type of stuff was hella expensive - Just between the grid antennas, the cards, the dongles, and the cables it came out to about $600. You don't even want to know what the network equipment would have cost, which is why I ran it on the cheap using Linux.

    But now this stuff practically grows on trees. There are kits around that let you do long distance point-to-point hookups, but I don't know where to get them off the top of my head since I haven't researched it in awhile. You might want to start with Radio Labs to get an idea of the type of equipment that's out there. Bottom line is that if I can get a decent wifi signal from four miles away with a non-optimal configuration, you should be able to do 500m as long as you have line of sight. I think you should be able to get away with it for around $500 or less.

    --
    -R
  22. Go Optical ? by Quietlife2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you have :-

    1) Clear line of sight.
    2) A soldering iron (and know how to use it *properly*)
    3) Basic metalwork skills.
    4) Spare time **LOTS**

    http://ronja.twibright.com/

    "Ronja is a free technology project for reliable optical data links with a current range of 1.4km and a communication speed of 10Mbps full duplex."

    10 Megabit free space optical complete with designs & pcb layouts.

    Can't get more DIY than this :-)

  23. Re:Are you serious? by Applekid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let A = cost of beers for able-bodied friends
    B = cost of equipment (free because you already have it? Power tool rental?)
    C = cost of submitting a request to the county
    D = cost of cables, conduits, etc that gets buried.

    If A + B + C + D $10,000 that the cable company is quoting, then it's a good deal. If it gets a permit and is all done to code there's nothing the cable company can sue about... especially since he'd just basically extended their infrastructure at no cost to them.

    There's always inviting a cell tower to be built on your property. In such a case the cell companies would wind up buring some kind of infrastructure anyway to support it. When that happens, call again and all of a sudden, wouldn't you know it, you've got cabling all up to practically your doorstep.

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  24. this may work... by Wornstrom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    maybe a verizon broadband access card? they sell it in usb format too... 5GB monthly cap is kinda small though so it might not suit your needs.

  25. Tranzeo by rebelcan · · Score: 2, Informative

    https://tranzeo.com/

    For 500 meters, you can use the 802.11a or 802.11bg ( TR-5a series and TR-6000 series respectively ) without too many problems, as long as you have good line of sight. If there are a few trees, then the 900MHz stuff might be a better idea, but if there's a forest or a lot of buildings between your friend and your dad, you're boned. Just make sure that regardless of what kind of radio you get ( and regardless of what manufacturer you buy from ), use an antenna with as narrow beamwidth as you can get, ESPECIALLY for the 900MHz. For a point-to-point install, omni antennas are not your friend. Yagi or dish antennas might be a bitch to setup, but you'll have very little noise or interference.

    Disclaimer: yes, I work for this company, but I really don't give two hoots if you use our stuff. Just make sure you get the right equipment ( ie: NO OMNI ANTENNAS ). I can't believe how many people think that omni antennas are a good idea ( especially for 900Mhz, ouch ).

    --
    God is dead -- Nietzsche
    Nietzsche is dead -- God
    Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
  26. Linksys WRT54GLx2 + 2 14dBi directional antenna by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get 2 Linksys WRT54GL rounters, one for each site, and replace an antenna on each with a Hawking [HAO14SDP] directional antenna, and align them to point at each other. Might be best to roof mount the antenna, but aligning them will be the hardest part. You might only need to buy one of the directionals and get an omni for the other antenna at the other site, and rely on the directional to make the connection. I own one of the directionals and it is in my "travel kit", i.e., whenever I go on the road, I have a laptop, a WRT54GL, and the 14dBi directional and do a quick scan around where-ever I am so I can get on the web for a quick fix if the hotel/friend/etc., doesn't have a network connection.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  27. Do it like Cox. by gnutoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The guy who serviced my house had what looked like a big pizza cutter on a stick. It buried the cable about two inches deep.

    Conduit is neither required nor used for cable and phone in a residential setting. If you break it you patch it. This is simple and low cost.

    1. Re:Do it like Cox. by wal9001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But finding where it's broken on a 500m cable is a pain in the ass. If you don't mind the initial investment, conduit does have benefits in the long run. Nobody wants to be replacing a long cable like that every few years, it's just another little thing to worry about.

    2. Re:Do it like Cox. by thogard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Finding it when it breaks means hooking it up to a device that every installer should have that will say the break is N feet or meters away.
      TDR and OTDR is great for that.

    3. Re:Do it like Cox. by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Expensive cable testers have some means of "bouncing" a signal down a conductor and measuring the return, using that along with knowing what the conductor is made of, they calculate the distance to the fault. It's quite neat, but unless you've dropped more than $500 on a tester you don't have that option.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:Do it like Cox. by Sandbags · · Score: 2, Interesting

      500 meters? unless you're using fiber and a pair of switches that support FDDI tranceivers, you can't do it. No ethernet standard can go that far. You'd have to bury a repeater (at least 1) half way between the 2 points... and get power to that repeater. Of course, this is all dependent on you owning all the property betwrrn yours and his, and getting the apporpriate permits to drop the cable across a property line.

      Since cables, even fiber, don't come in 500 meter lengths (1000' is standard for a box. With fiber you can also buy a 5000 spool, but that's not only overkill, but then you're not just renting a ditch which, but a spool truck as well, and adding rediculous delivery fees for the cable.

      The only really managalbe solution is to use P2P wireless. You can get parabolic antaneas that are FCC licensed for those distances for a few hundred bucks each, and a pair of outdoor rated Cisco Aeronet APs. Your total would run you less than $2000, which is less than the fiber would cost (including someone with a splice kit to make the distance run feasable). You can find other products out there other than Cisco cheaper, but ourdoor rated units are hard to find, and antannea extenders to place an link outside for an inside located router would mitigate the cost difference.

      Your biggest issue will likely be latency across that distance, combined with a strict requirement for line of sight.

      On the other hand, your BEST option is likely cellular based broadband. Add a access card to your PC with a PCMCIA adapter and get an unlimited access account from your provider (should be less than $60/month) Use ICS in windows (I'd recomend linux, but this guy needed a SIMPLE solution, not a reliable and secure one...) to have multiple computers share the connection. Place the card in an el-cheapo PC that you don't use for anything else that runs quiet and green. For less than $400 in parts and the same per month rate, you can have decent speed internet (3G if you're licky, but even edge is better than nothing), at least until the FCC forces your cable company or phone company to hook you up, since the USF will eventually require it.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  28. This wouldn't be on Cape Cod now would it? by notthepainter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe a 300 year old cottage? Just asking...

  29. DIY vdsl/aerial cable by borcharc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just run phone quality twisted pair (cat 3) if you have adjacent land or can get permission from any adjacent land owners. Just buy low cost VDSL Ethernet bridges, they can be obtained for less then $200. Also 2000 ft of cat 3 can be obtained for less then $200 (just bridge two 1000ft spools vdsl doesn't care).

    Then go aerial, affix the cat 3 to a wire (for support) and put a 10 ft pole every 10 meters or so. Aerial is most likely the easiest to install, maintain, and upgrade. It also allows for the running of coax for a future cable tv install that will require additional amplification to reach your fathers house.

    The nice thing about running cat 3 is vdsl has a nice upgrade path to 100 mbps and beyond.

    1. Re:DIY vdsl/aerial cable by number11 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then go aerial, affix the cat 3 to a wire (for support) and put a 10 ft pole every 10 meters or so.

      For 500 meters? Better have some good lightning protection, or things will get exciting first time a thunderstorm comes along.

  30. Run a string through it as well by bigtrike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you're running conduit, it makes sense to run a string through it at the same time. That way you can pull another cable (and another string) through later if needed.

  31. Re:Just a thought... by darkone · · Score: 2, Informative
  32. Re:Metric shibboleth by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It just means you live anywhere outside the Commonwealth. Most non-native English speakers use AmE on the internet. Don't assume that only native speakers read Slashdot.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  33. $318 WiFi network bridge by rptally · · Score: 2, Informative

    $318 WiFi network bridge (HD26200) connects two locations up to 5 miles apart http://www.wirelessnetworkproducts.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=1899&HS=1

  34. Obligatory Ken Jennings Jeopardy clip by Solandri · · Score: 2, Funny
  35. Obligatory Chris Rock Joke Rewrite by wsanders · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ho: "For $20 I'll do anything you want."

    Dad: "Here's twenty bucks, lay 500 meters of conduit to my house, b****!"

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  36. Omni antenna question by gobbo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a bunch of clients in a remote valley (self-generated hydro, radiophones/skype) who are sharing a satellite connection via 802.11b. The setup is simple enough, a vanilla buffalo router connected to a line amp and omni monopole antenna raised 35ft at the highest residence--and at one edge of the reception area. Great. Farthest client is about 2km away across the valley, reception with a small panel antenna OK; worst reception is under the antenna (no surprise) and down the hill towards the river. Nine households and low budget (so setting up 9 direct antenna links too costly).

    My question: would tipping the angle of the antenna towards the reception area improve the take-off angle enough to make a difference? No-one has given me a straight answer on this.

    Anyway, I was surprised at how well this !cheap! system works when they asked me to check it out. It just needs some minor reception adjustments.

  37. Such antennas are cheap and small. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Informative

    We've done 5 mile links with a pair of *old* wallmount AT&T Wavelan bridges and proper antennas on 915 Mhz. Those units were 400mw.

    Such antennas are cheap and small, too. Under $100 in singles at a number of companies with online ordering facilities.

    A 24db skeleton-parabola can get you miles of range even without a high-gain antenna on the other end, and is about the size of a UHF TV antenna. (I know one guy who war-scans the business district of San Francisco with one - from his apartment deck in Berkeley. B-) ) With antennas on both ends you should be able to go with the little lozenge types.

    To give you an idea of range: My Nevada house is about 5 miles from the cell tower where the local WiSP has its POP, with a directional antenna pointed generally my way. His customers normally use a lozenge antenna with built in AP mounted on an outside wall, and I'll probably do that when I sign up (because my computer room is on the far side of the house). But my picture window faces the tower and my laptop catches the ID beacon just fine sitting in my lap using the builtin antenna.

    So for a half-mile putting an AP in each attic and even a low-gain external antenna on the roof or outside wall should do the job just fine.

    Want a cheap do-it-yourself high-gain directional antenna? Get a big wok strainer (woks and their strainers are pretty good parabolas), put a USB-stick WiFI adapter on a USB extension cord, and mount it with its backside at the focus of the strainer. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  38. WildBlue? by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Umm WildBlue is hardly a solution. 1200ms ping times...let me rephrase that 1.2 second ping times and low usage quotas (7.5GB/mo) make it a non-starter. Wireless to a neighbor's should be really easy with a pair or directional antennas- you could even throw a parabolic behind a rubber ducky and hit 300 meters at 11mbit- I've done it over 2km at 100mw tx power.

    You might have a look at Engenius's outdoor APs. A pair of EOC-3220s should work well. Cheaper than most outdoor gear, supports POE, stable (at least mine has been rock solid, I have the external antenna version). And it support bridging natively!

    Cheers,

  39. Re:Options by WhiteDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you have line of sight and you're one to tinker at all, there's also an optical link like RONJA I want to second this. RONJA seems like a perfect project if you have line of sight. The performance is apparently quite good, and the plans are totally open and free. I think that would be much better than trying to pull / blow 1km of cabling. There is more info on the project page or on wikipedia's article on RONJA
    --
    Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  40. Re:Metric shibboleth by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In English I use "meter", not "metre", though I also use "colour" not "color". And I don't live in the US.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  41. Re:Doing it professionally for $10K by Tomun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or you can do it yourself for $318

  42. Re:Why not hoes? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    make sure they know you want to 'lay some pipe'

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  43. RONJA by wikinerd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What you need is RONJA, a free space optics link, with the technology being under your control (open source).

  44. 500m is nothing... what matters is line-of-sight by jurgen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wireless links with plain old 802.11 have been done over FAR longer distances (over 10km is common and I've seen links over 40km) with simple directional antennas. What's much more important than distance is line-of-sight. Basically if you can see the other antenna without a telescope, you can connect to it. However, there must NOT be any trees in between, even if you can see the other antenna in the gaps of the foliage. Trees are very good radio-wave shields. (Actually, water is the shield, but like all living things, trees are full of water.)

    If you do not have line of sight from the ground, try the roof. If you still don't your next option would be to build a mast. You can make a mast up to 10 or 12m cheaply by telescoping several pieces of steel pipe and bracing the whole thing with 3 steel cables. I have a 9m mast like this that I built for about $100.

    Make sure to get a router with antennas that you can disconnect and replace (not all have those, but many do). Then connect a directional antenna... for 500m you don't need anything fancy, the cheapest directional antenna you can buy or a home-made "cantenna" will do just fine.

    Same for the other end of the connection... if you don't want to put a router on both ends, make sure your wifi card has an antenna connector. Or you can use a USB wifi adapter with a "stub" antenna, and stick that little stub directly into a "cantenna" type can (you'll need to calculate the position of the hole for the antenna... there are calculators for this on the net, google "cantenna calculator"). That will turn a little $25 USB dongle into a directional Wifi powerhouse, using nothing but a can with hole drilled in the right place! I've gotten a strong connection over 1km between two of those and I'm sure it could have gone much further but we didn't try because 1km was enough.

    For your short distance of 500m, given line of sight, you may even be able to get away with a directional antenna only on one end, and the regular omni antenna on the other. I.e. if you have window-to-window sight, you may be able to put an unmodified router on the windowsill of one house and a usb-dongle-cantenna on a windowsill of the other and have your link.

    Good luck! :j

  45. Wifry: Less than $100 by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  46. Use DSL by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2, Informative
    I had a similar problem at a ski resort - The distance was too 'far' for CAT5, and Wireless / Fiber was too difficult due to weather and cost. I wound up using a couple of "Tut Systems" DSL ethernet bridge boxes, hooked together with about 750 meters of cat 5. Worked like a charm.

    Here's the kind of boxes I'm talking about:

    http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=190224334652

  47. Remote broadband by jkirby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I lived on a remote mountain and was 100% off-grid. I used Starband (www.starband.com). I had it for six years and it was flawless. Up speeds were not awesome, but better than dial up. The service was the most reliable I have ever had. Down speeds were great (1+ meg). I had the SOHO plan. I ran a souce control server on it and an Exchange server. Worked awesome. Again, VSAT is a little different and you soon get use to the diferences. No phone line required.

    Also, I head from a friend that Wild Blue (www.wildblue.com) is also very good. I am going to get VSAT again (I moved) as a backup because it was very reliable. I have an RV082 and I know it works with VSAT on one of the WAN ports.

    This is probably going to be a more reliable mechanism than a long-haul wireless setup.

    Just my .02

    Jamey

    --
    Jamey Kirby
  48. Use a couple of cans as antennas by mikhailitsky · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can boost the range of your wifi router/card by using an external antenna. The simplest option for you would be to construct a couple of antennas out of cans. The whole thing will cost you a couple of bucks and will be more than enough to cover 500 meters (I used such antennas for 3-km long links, and it worked like a charm). Hit Google with 'cantenna' to get more info on the subjet. If you decide to go this way, make sure your wifi card and router are equipped with detachable antennas so that you can hook an external one.