Slashdot Mirror


Bye Bye Bananas — the Return of Panama Disease

Ant sends in a disturbing report in The Scientist on an imminent threat to worldwide banana production. "The banana we eat today is not the one your grandparents ate. That one — known as the Gros Michel — was, by all accounts, bigger, tastier, and hardier than the variety we know and love, which is called the Cavendish. The unavailability of the Gros Michel is easily explained: it is virtually extinct. Introduced to our hemisphere in the late 19th century, the Gros Michel was almost immediately hit by a blight that wiped it out by 1960. The Cavendish was adopted at the last minute by the big banana companies — Chiquita and Dole — because it was resistant to that blight, a fungus known as Panama disease... [Now] Panama disease — or Fusarium wilt of banana — is back, and the Cavendish does not appear to be safe from this new strain, which appeared two decades ago in Malaysia, spread slowly at first, but is now moving at a geometrically quicker pace. There is no cure, and nearly every banana scientist says that though Panama disease has yet to hit the banana crops of Latin America, which feed our hemisphere, the question is not if this will happen, but when. Even worse, the malady has the potential to spread to dozens of other banana varieties, including African bananas, the primary source of nutrition for millions..."

119 of 519 comments (clear)

  1. Look on the bright side of... by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will this finally be the end of "Peanut Butter Jelly Time"?

    1. Re:Look on the bright side of... by pubjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can someone please explain this to those of us that are not from the USA.

    2. Re:Look on the bright side of... by edbob · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:Look on the bright side of... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

      First hit on google

      Meme that went around the internet 4-5 years ago.

    4. Re:Look on the bright side of... by SpinningCone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Family guy was spoofing the Internet meme, and was actually quite late to the party. PB&J time was on the decline by then.

  2. out of season by ionix5891 · · Score: 2

    Great we can then but locally produced bananas! oh wait nvm

    Gordon Ramsay has must be loving this latest development
    http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/open_thread/2008/05/seasonal_disorder.html

  3. monoculture is a problem by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but it is also solved by genetic variation. the story is a little hysterical, as african varieties are also genetically different enough to resist the new cavendish-hungry fungus. not that the african varieties can't be attacked, but the emphasis is on african VARIETIES: more genetic variation means more resistance to the weakness of monoculture

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:monoculture is a problem by onion2k · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem is that all banana plants around today are sterile. The only way to cultivate new plants is by cuttings (taking a small section of an existing plant and growing it into a big plant). Consequently there is no way to introduce new variations. If all the varieties around today become susceptible to disease then that's it, they're gone. For those of us in the west that's just one less choice in the supermarket, but there are vast swathes of the world where the banana is the staple carbohydrate source for millions of people. It'd be like the west no longer having anything to make flour for bread, and having no alternative. Anyone who thinks this isn't a huge problem is wrong.

    2. Re:monoculture is a problem by tehdaemon · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are not all quite sterile... you do get a seed for every few hundred pounds of bananas.

      That said, you are essentially right. All cavendish bananas are clones, this makes them very vulnerable to disease.

      T

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    3. Re:monoculture is a problem by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, New Scientist did a story about this, maybe five years ago, which was worried about the bananas' genetic variation, but didn't have any specific threat attached. They pointed out that although the current banana plants is pretty hardy, they're cultivated by cloning, so there's very little capacity for adaptation there. I forget the details of the story, but it was something like "there may not be any bananas as we know them in 25 years". Now the threat actually exists...

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:monoculture is a problem by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And what do you think will happen when all rich countries will buy bananas from africa? This happens with all kinds of food already, this aint good news for the poor people of africa.

    5. Re:monoculture is a problem by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That said, you are essentially right. All cavendish bananas are clones, this makes them very vulnerable to disease.

      and they taste like wet paper bags. I haven't eaten a Chiquita in over 10 years, I prefer any other which at least taste like a banana. Chiquitas were only bred for looks.

    6. Re:monoculture is a problem by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And what do you think will happen when all rich countries will buy bananas from africa?


      For the most part, they (we?) won't. Most varieties of Banana's are rather small and nasty. They're not the kind of thing your average westerner is likely to enjoy.

      On the other hand, assuming they can find a variety of Banana which is easy to cultivate, resistant to this disease, AND tasty, then it'll be a huge boon to their economy. It could do more good for Africa than all the foreign aid of the last three decades combined.
    7. Re:monoculture is a problem by aproposofwhat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most varieties of Banana's are rather small and nasty

      Yay!

      The Grocers' apostrophe strikes!

      Sorry - your post was otherwise insightful, but those bloody Grocer's piss me right off :P

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    8. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, monoculture is a HUGE problem.

      At the moment I'm working in the bio/ag-tech industry and can see the same thing coming down the road in the wheat/corn/soybeans/milo industry, where big industry players have foolishly limited the gene pool in the name of profit.

      The worst part about it is the fact that many of the people driving monoculture are trained scientists who, for some reason, are oblivious to its negative ramifications.

      Posting as AC to avoid other, uh, negative ramifications

    9. Re:monoculture is a problem by vidarh · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Go to your local African food store and ask for Plaintain. Eat it (note that Plaintains are usually cooked first). Now you see why this is not going to be a problem.

      Being married to an African woman (Nigerian to be precise), I've had the misfortune of tasting Plaintain, and while I don't mind most of her food (it's usually either too bland and uniformely textured or too spicy for me, but generally edible), with Plaintain I see no redeemable qualities.

      It's a very acquired taste, as a lot of African staple food, and it's certainly no replacement for the types of Banana exported to the west.

    10. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 5, Interesting
      And here is why I *never* *ever* buy Chiquita (new name for United Fruit Company) products: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company

      I find it funny how the wikipedia article on Chiquita just mentions the name change but none of the history it was meant to hide http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiquita_Brands_International

      At least now you slashdotters know how the expression banana republic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic came to be. A republic that a criminal banana company would be capable of destroying.

    11. Re:monoculture is a problem by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, assuming they can find a variety of Banana which is easy to cultivate, resistant to this disease, AND tasty, then it'll be a huge boon to their economy. It could do more good for Africa than all the foreign aid of the last three decades combined. Or, of course, the 3 or 4 big banana companies of the earth (which are all 'western'), will jump into the void and start exploiting African banana farmers, let them work in dangerous conditions, using chemicals, and not nearly paying them enough to make a proper living. So more or less re-create the current status quo in latin-american banana farming but now in africa...
    12. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The wild banana has genetic variation aplenty, but it's also disgusting."

      that's genetic variation to prevent the fruit from being eaten by two-legged straight-walking simians who do not spread the seeds/pollen. :-)

    13. Re:monoculture is a problem by aproposofwhat · · Score: 4, Funny

      that's "seem's", you insensitive clod!

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    14. Re:monoculture is a problem by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2

      MMmmmm... tostones (green plaintains, fried, then smashed, then fried again), maduros (pan fried ripe plaintains), mofongo (greenish plantains smashed up with chunks of bacon and chicken broth)... mmm... plantains.

      Of course, this is from my Puerto Rican wife - are the African plantains the same ones with the same possibilities?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    15. Re:monoculture is a problem by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
      The problem is that all banana plants around today are sterile. The only way to cultivate new plants is by cuttings (taking a small section of an existing plant and growing it into a big plant). Consequently there is no way to introduce new variations. If all the varieties around today become susceptible to disease then that's it, they're gone.

      It's like I am Legend, if the movie was made with bananas, instead of people!

    16. Re:monoculture is a problem by Arccot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And here is why I *never* *ever* buy Chiquita (new name for United Fruit Company) products: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company I can't understand this sort of thinking. Sure, if the company did this within the last 10 or maybe even 20 years, I would understand a boycott. But it happened almost 80 years ago. It's not the same company now. I would be surprised if more than a couple of people working for the company at the time were even still alive.

      It's like boycotting Japanese products because of Pearl Harbor.
    17. Re:monoculture is a problem by Dextrously · · Score: 3, Funny

      Has anyone tried eating the fungus yet? Perhaps it and the bananas do not taste very different.

    18. Re:monoculture is a problem by vorpal22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Then you've only had plantains one of the two ways in which they're eaten. I agree that green plantains aren't my cup of tea. In my opinion they're like overly firm and starchy potatoes with a hint of banana flavouring to them. After a week of traveling Panama, I never wanted to see them again.

      However, if you let plantains ripen until they're black (at which point, they're still perfectly edible, unlike bananas) and then peel them, cut them into long slices, and cook them in butter, they're incredibly sweet and delicate.

      More in line with the original post, there are several varieties of bananas that I find much more delicious than the Cavendish variety. I've had the pleasure of eating several other varieties while abroad that I really enjoyed; for example, apple bananas have got a firmer, more flavourful meat to them, and I strongly prefer them to Cavendish. Cavendish bananas, although I love them, can be a bit dull tasting and mushy.

    19. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You have a valid point.

      It is hard to compare such distinct events. But I would say that the damage caused by Pearl Harbor was "contained", and later "repaired". The US did not suffer that much from that war, and Japan was given conditions to rebuild.

      Pearl Harbor did not destroy the US democracy.

      The damage caused by the United Fruit Company, to that region (Central America) stability, to those countries democracies is still an issue to this day.

      The land that many of those countries tried to nationalize, and died for trying it, is still in the hands of the "United Fruit Company". Now renamed "Chiquita".

      The grandchildren of those who died in the 50s, 60s for it, are still workers in that same land, and did not become land-owners.

      Those sitting at Chiquita today did not cause the offense. But they still make profits out of it, and the mess caused by that offense perpetuates to this day.

    20. Re:monoculture is a problem by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea if you are boycotting Chiquita you dang well better be boycott Bayer, BASF, Mitsubishi, and Volkswagen to name just a few.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    21. Re:monoculture is a problem by metlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slice off the skin of a plantain, cut it into slices and leave the slices in some curried, salt water for a few hours.

      Take it out, add some ginger and spices and oil and fry the plantains with some cilantro and coriander.

      Voila! You've one of the best south Indian delicacies - plantain curry - which is usually eaten with rice and some sauce/yogurt on the side.

    22. Re:monoculture is a problem by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      A little of Cinnamon, cloves, chili powder, a couple of green chilies, a clove of garlic, a pinch of turmeric and a little bit of coriander powder and mint leaves if you can find them.

      I'd recommend mixing the spices and adding some mustard seeds to the oil before frying the plantains.

      Also, adding grated coconut after the spice is settled in adds a nice flavor. You could either cook it in oil, or add butter for a slightly different flavor.

      Or, if you know of an Indian store nearby, you could buy a generic brand of curry powder or Sambar powder and that will save you the trouble of the first section altogether. Your choice of spice will quite obviously affect the taste, but I've found that varying the spices provides me with variety, and plantains seem to taste alright as long as you don't over-spice or over-cook them.

      Cheers.

    23. Re:monoculture is a problem by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And hundreds of years ago the American Indians were forced off their land by evil British colonists. Boycott Americans until they return the land to the natives! This same heinous act was done by the Dutch, French, and Spanish too. Boycott Danish goods because they were made by the descendents of African slaves!

      Only Klingons blame descendants for 7 generations.

    24. Re:monoculture is a problem by Inda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is same for most fruits; the ones I grow at home, anyway.

      If anyone has tried to grow an apple tree from a seed, they will know that the tree will not produce the same fruit that the seed came from. My apple trees are actually grafted on to quince root stocks. They are self-pollinating and disease resistant. I see no problems in monoculture - the breeders will adapt.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    25. Re:monoculture is a problem by Mathieu+Lu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On a different scale, but they still do it today: Chiquita to plead guilty to ties with terrorists (March 14 2007)

      On the other hand, you can easily get fair trade biological bananas on the market. They taste better and encourage better ethics.

    26. Re:monoculture is a problem by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's not quite true. Cavendish bananas are the Wonder Bread of bananas. Most people who have tried other varieties think they're a bland shadow of what bananas should be.

      On the other hand, they're easy to grow and ship in large quantities. They're the only variety that you can harvest, ship half way around the world, and have then all ripen at the same time (right after they get to your local megamart).

    27. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the case you haven't noticed there is a lot more to Slashdot than just US-educated readers.

      Chiquitas sell a lot in, for instance, Europe; and I haven't met many Europeans familiar with the actual meaning of "banana republics".

    28. Re:monoculture is a problem by Falkkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not that scientists are oblivious to negative ramifications -- it's economics, specifically tragedy of the commons.

      If everyone else is cloning Tasty Profitable Banana, and you don't, you go out of business because either your bananas aren't Tasty or your bananas aren't Profitable. Therefore there's a penalty for maintaining variation, and the only potential benefit -- not having your whole crop wiped out by a blight -- isn't something you can bet on. Most likely, economic forces will drive you out of business long before your more varied gene pool can have any beneficial effect.

      There's a benefit to society (and the entire banana-growing industry) if there is a diverse gene pool, but no individual business has an incentive to maintain such a gene pool.

    29. Re:monoculture is a problem by lilomar · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oops, read that backwards, I thought he meant:

      Cavendish bananas are the Wonder Bread of bananas. Most people who have tried other varieties think they're(other varieties) a bland shadow of what bananas should be.
      Please post in lojban to avoid this problem. ;-D
      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
    30. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Get a sense of perspective will you? It is not as if Chiquita stopped doing dirty operations a long time ago: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doe_v._Chiquita_Brands_International

    31. Re:monoculture is a problem by torkus · · Score: 2, Funny

      slashdot - international cuisine for nerds

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    32. Re:monoculture is a problem by pthisis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe you weren't eating the right ones. e.g. red bananas certainly have a different flavor from yellow Cavendishes.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    33. Re:monoculture is a problem by Yath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In other words, raise their standard of living, but not enough to suit you.

      --
      I always mod up spelling trolls.
    34. Re:monoculture is a problem by nuzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If a Japanese company built their business on the fact that they manufactured the bombs that destroyed Pearl Harbor, you might boycott them even though it happened 67 years ago.

      I take it Mitsubishi is off your list then?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    35. Re:monoculture is a problem by nuzak · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a soil fungus, it only goes as far as the roots. It kills the whole banana plant -- there's no fruit for you to try, fungus or not.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    36. Re:monoculture is a problem by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that's because all commercially valuable apple trees are hybrids. They're also grafted onto different rootstock, but that's s different issue: the varieties that have good root systems aren't the ones that produce the best fruit.

      The "crab apple" is simply an apple that is either not hybridized or if hybridized, selected for its flowering properties. They are often used to pollinate orchard trees. The fruit of the crab apple is often quite flavorful, it's just small and usually not very sweet. They make excellent additions to cider.

      All the apple varieties are genetic clones of each other: every Cortland Apple tree comes from cuttings of a single, ancestral Cortland.

      The phenomenon you describe is the reason for this. It is also a good illustration of the purpose of sexual reproduction: to increase genetic diversity by shuffling genes. You can try to inbreed genetic lines from McIntosh stock, but most fruit won't be edible, and those that are won't resemble McIntosh apples.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    37. Re:monoculture is a problem by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Once upon a time I called Bonita to complain about bananas that rather than ripening from green through the spotted stage and finally to the sweet black phase (best for banana bread!) the green bananas would simply rot without ever becoming ripe.

      Bonita told me it was because they were not being ripened properly in storage (remember, bananas are picked VERY green), which involves keeping them in (ethylene? I forget too) gas at a particular temperature, so they will start to and continue to ripen correctly. If they're just stored in the plain air during the green phase, they will rot instead of ripening.

      ======

      I hadn't realised til I RTFA that the bananas of my childhood were gone... but it does explain the change I noticed starting in the 1960s, where the average banana was smaller and not as good anymore, and the brief period where I consider them edible as-is got even shorter (it had been a couple days, now it's only about 4 hours).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    38. Re:monoculture is a problem by nebosuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At the moment I'm working in the bio/ag-tech industry and can see the same thing coming down the road in the wheat/corn/soybeans/milo industry, where big industry players have foolishly limited the gene pool in the name of profit.

      Sorry if I seem rude here, but you must not have a very good understanding of your company, or it must be one of the few smaller companies who generally only maintain/propagate existing varieties, or you are being intentionally vague when you say 'bio/ag-tech industry' and don't work in any directly relevant field at all.

      Either that or I better tell a bunch of my coworkers that I heard on the internets that their entire international department, dedicated to allelic diversity, does not exist. In that case a bunch of my former coworkers at a previous place of employment will be facing a serious existential crisis as well.

  4. Re:Oh noes! by lordofthechia · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slow news day? I think any story about a major threat to our food supply to be a major one, plus it mentions "Banana Scientists"! What is there not to love?

    --
    Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
  5. 300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to Banana.com there are over 300 different species of bananas, not all edible. I'm fairly certain that not all the edible species will be susceptibe to the blight. This might actually be a good thing in the long run as different species have different flavors and textures. They may even be better for us from a nutritional perspective than the Cavendish. The growers will need to adapt if the blight can't be stopped or contained.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
    1. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      And that is the key to this.

      The Cavendish is actually a very inferior banana. It's simply tougher and cheap to transport compared to the other varieties. the Banana companies are panicking because they will have to change how they do business and they dont want to.

      Honestly, if you can get to try some of the other bananas out there, you'll never EVER touch the bland yucky Cavendish again. The growers brought this on themselves, the same way the last blight took out the favorite that was EVEN easier to ship and transport but had the advantage of tasting way better than the current offering.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news, there's a Banana.com.

  6. Seriously people? by Netochka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This story pops up every 6 months or so (I guess not here, but in general)... Has no one else heard about this banana scare story about 10 times before?? There's even a snopes article about it. Banana Extinction

    1. Re:Seriously people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Snopes basically said the exact same thing. The cavendish bananna will be extinct. Snopes is playing semantics by saying that all bananas won't be effected, but the only one eaten by americans is the cavendish, so yes, the bananna as we know it will be extinct. Just like the bananna your grandparents knew is already extinct.

    2. Re:Seriously people? by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your correct. But the US Media is running out of things to scare the people about.

      The article is less to do on bananas going extinct then rather trying to sell GM crops to the public.

    3. Re:Seriously people? by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      but the only one eaten by americans is the cavendish

      When I was in Bali I ate several different varieties of banana, and they were all much more tasty than the "bog-standard" Cavendish. So maybe this isn't such a bad thing after all.

      Rich.

    4. Re:Seriously people? by datapharmer · · Score: 5, Informative

      bananas are supposed to be picked green. they get woody (tough with bitter flavor) if left on the tree to ripen. To get them to be sweeter the blossom is cut off after an incomplete row of banana hands is made which concentrates the growth into the existing bananas instead of attempts to make more.

      --
      Get a web developer
    5. Re:Seriously people? by rwiggers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      looks like you never ate one banana that got ripen on the tree. It is much sweeter and tastes much better. Now, if you are doing it commercially, you better find a way of keeping birds and some other animals very far of it, as they tend to make holes in every single banana they find.

  7. Hmm. by ledow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Single, cloned fruit, unable to reproduce except by human intervention, with identical genetic structure in virtually all examples, cloned and distributed worldwide for decades is susceptible to the same attacking fungus that attacked the previous single, cloned fruit with identical genetic structure, but which has mutated slightly (my conjecture) in order to attack it's replacement.

    And all because people don't like seeds in their fruit? (I would guess this isn't true, most probably people wouldn't really care much anyway, given that the fruit has an inedible skin too and a lot of popular fruits have seeds).

    It's hardly surprising, it's only "catastrophic" because we've deliberately propogated a single, genetically-identical (and I would hazard "faulty", due to it's inability to reproduce) plant over and over and over again.

    1. Re:Hmm. by Cairnarvon · · Score: 5, Informative

      One word: http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/pics/wildbanana.jpg

      There's a reason modern bananas have been bred to be seedless.

    2. Re:Hmm. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yikes!

      That's like those horror images you see, like the ones the dentist shows you - "clean your teeth children, or they'll look like... THIS!".

      Eat your vegetables children, or you'll have to eat bananas.. like THIS!

  8. Will someone... by draxredd · · Score: 5, Funny

    think of the monkeys !

    --
    --- Back to the trees, back to the trees !
  9. Call DK by cybereal · · Score: 3, Funny

    All I can think of is the cave at the beginning of the first level in Donkey Kong Country for SNES. When you enter the cave, DK sees that his banana pile is all gone and is sad.

    Clearly this is a viral commercial for the next DK Country! DK Country Wii: Panama Disease Adventure!

    --
    I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
  10. Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by DingerX · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, was granpa's banana more slippery? 'Cos that would explain their widespread use as comic devices in the pre-television era. (And, no, I never thought about asking Grandma about Granpa's banana, codenamed "Big Mike." Pervert.)

    1. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by ThreeGigs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, was granpa's banana more slippery?
      Actually, that's a slightly hedged 'yes'.
      Grampa's banana had a thicker, more durable skin, in addition to being larger than the bananas we youngun's know so well.
      The other reason it's so popular as comic relief is because it actually was a real hazard back around 1915-ish. As a 'portable' fruit, they were handy to carry anywhere, and without streetcorner trash cans, the peels got tossed on the sidewalk as often as not. And considering bananas are (and were) the most popular fruit in the US (almost twice as popular as the good ol' apple), it really was a normal hazard. The Boy Scout handbook of 1914 actually listed removing a banana peel from the sidewalk as a 'good deed', it was that common an occurence.

      As a side effect though, it *did* start many cities putting trash cans on busy streets, and enacting littering laws.

    2. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny enough, I almost had an incident about a year ago with the current bananas. I was walking home from campus and my foot slipped out from under me. I almost took a spill but managed to regain composure. Turns out it was a decomposing banana that the trash guys had happened to knock onto the ground.

      I had to sit down because I was laughing so hard. I never expected to ever slip on a banana peel in my life time. I laughed ever harder when I remembered I saw the banana in the morning walking to campus and thought 'Silly banana peels. You just aren't so effective of a threat anymore.' Watch out - those guys are a busted ankle or hip just lying in wait.

  11. Clone! by krischik · · Score: 2, Informative

    This post 2 down the row will answer you question nicely:

    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=570567&cid=23624829

    We just don't eat - or get offered to eat - the other 299 species.

  12. Yes, we have no bananas! by Arancaytar · · Score: 2, Funny

    We have no bananas today!

  13. RTFA... There's actually more to it! by stormguard2099 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know it's against the rules but if you RTFA the interesting part isn't about the blight spreading through the bananas. As others have posted this is not something that sprang up over night, it's been coming for quite a while now.
    The truly interesting part is that the banana companies in S. America still don't see this as a problem. TFA says that in their anual summaries they don't even mention this disease much less list it as a threat. I think the issue is much more about these companies' failure to act before it's too late than that nature is running its course.

    --
    http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
  14. Re:Oh noes! by aliquis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly, how does extinction / loss of a food supply / mutating desease which have earlier almost killed a whole industry become small news? I would more likely find it the biggest news this day on Slashdot, time will tell.

    I guess he just don't eat bananas.

  15. Finally we may get some variety ... by Big+Jojo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having traveled in some tropical countries, one of the things I most remember about their fruits are the sheer NUMBER of different banana varieties. No monoculture. Your average roadside stand would have half a dozen varieties, and the one a mile down the road would have a few more. Tomorrow the mix would be different. And most of them would taste a lot better than the crap that's so widely available elsewhere!

    I for one will welcome our new polycultural bananalords.

    1. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by value_added · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And most of them would taste a lot better than the crap that's so widely available elsewhere!

      I've done the same and I'll wholeheartedly agree. The only saving grace, at least for me, is that one can typically find plantain available in most supermarkets. Let them ripen (until black) in a paper bag, fry them, and add to a plate of black beans and rice with some Cuban-style coffee on the side, and Bob's (or maybe Fidel) yer uncle.

      As a side note, I do think the tendency for westerners to buy bananas out of habit is a disease. People have written essays and even books on why fruits and vetegables should be bought local, and then, only when in season. The idea of eating summer fruits when there's snow on the ground might be novel, but hardly appropriate, or interesting. Conversely, seeing a California supermarket in the middle of summer selling bananas (and their customers lining up to buy them) when just about every type of fruit is ripe for the picking is, well, no less than absurd.

      Me, I typically shop at farmer's markets, but that doesn't preclude me from noticing that the increasing reliance by the general public on cheap third-world produce (Walmart for the dinner table!) can and does have unfortunate side effects.

    2. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a side note, I do think the tendency for westerners to buy bananas out of habit is a disease. People have written essays and even books on why fruits and vetegables should be bought local, and then, only when in season.
      Strange that, I do think the tendency for westerners to tell people how to live is a far more virulent disease.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    3. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by bgat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The idea of eating summer fruits when there's snow on the ground might be novel, but hardly appropriate, or interesting. I'll grant you the "novel" and "interesting" parts, but not "appropriate". I don't see the point in limiting variety in my diet, particularly in the midwestern USA in the wintertime--- when the only locally-grown produce is snow!

      I hate a produce monoculture as much as the next guy, and I've even owned shares in a few local farmer's co-ops (and yes, their food does taste better when in season). But I'll take that along with my summer-fruits-in-wintertime disease anytime!
      --
      b.g.
    4. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by flyingfsck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhh, tropical fruit have no 'seasons'. Also, what is wrong about importing fruit from the southern hemisphere? Given that most of the southern hemisphere is water and most people live on the northern land mass, supplying food out of season to the north is a major and lucrative source of income to the southern countries.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    5. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a side note, I do think the tendency for westerners to buy bananas out of habit is a disease. Why is it a disease? I like bananas. Why should I not eat bananas? I understand that you want everyone to live according to your standards and morality, but really, why should I not eat bananas?

      People have written essays and even books on why fruits and vetegables should be bought local, and then, only when in season. The idea of eating summer fruits when there's snow on the ground might be novel, but hardly appropriate, or interesting. This is absolutely bonkers. My wife's family lives in Wisconsin. You want them to survive on local produce over the winter? You want them to hoard dry goods so they can eat 6 months out of the year? Not to mention the exciting selection of nutritional deficits that most of the world suffered from before cheap year round fresh food selections. Really, this type of judgmental viewpoint bothers me so much. I really see your "EAT THIS WAY OR YOU HAVE A DISEASE!" moralism as no different from right wingers who think homosexuality is a disease.

      Conversely, seeing a California supermarket in the middle of summer selling bananas (and their customers lining up to buy them) when just about every type of fruit is ripe for the picking is, well, no less than absurd. Are you just making this up as you go along? Watching people "line up" for bananas in a supermarket? Food scarcity hasn't exactly been a problem in America in a number of years, I would be very interested in where you've seen people "line up" to get bananas, while bypassing all other fruits.

      Me, I typically shop at farmer's markets, Good for you! We should all be more like you, thanks for holding yourself out there as an example of the Right Way to live!
    6. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by Yath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      People have written essays and even books on how they were given rides by little gray aliens.

      Who are you to decide what's "appropriate"? Wow, people buying fruits they enjoy annoys you? Maybe you should mind your own business. It isn't "interesting"?! WTF? Who modded this tripe up?

      Me, I typically shop at farmer's markets, but that doesn't preclude me from noticing that the increasing reliance by the general public on cheap third-world produce (Walmart for the dinner table!) can and does have unfortunate side effects.


      You mean like creating additional markets for those third-world growers to sell their goods in? God forbid they should try to increase their standards of living!
      --
      I always mod up spelling trolls.
  16. I for one... by mrbluze · · Score: 2, Funny

    more genetic variation means more resistance to the weakness of monoculture Well I for one will be the first to welcome our new superior-banana-being overlords, if they ever happen to evolve.
    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  17. What will happen to the dancing banana? by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    What other animated emoticon can I use to signal that I have an erection?

  18. Gros Michel? by lysse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is anyone else wondering what exactly it was about this Big Michael guy that caused someone to name a large and tasty banana after him...?

  19. Read more carefully by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Snopes basically said the exact same thing. The cavendish bananna will be extinct. Snopes is playing semantics by saying that all bananas won't be effected, but the only one eaten by americans is the cavendish, so yes, the bananna as we know it will be extinct. Just like the bananna your grandparents knew is already extinct.


    Read more carefully. There's more than that in there.

    The fungus discussed here grows in the earth, and spreads through earth. In fact, it is a problem _because_ it's in the ground, so you can't just spray the leaves with some fungicide.

    So the only way this fungus could make the jump across the ocean to Latin America is either by

    A) someone bringing an infected plant and planting it in the middle of a plantation, or

    B) someone bringing a sack of infected earth and dumping it in a plantation. That's it, really.

    And the cultivars _are_ aware of the threat, so they:

    A) don't import any plants, but only clone plants which are known to be healthy. (They actually check, yes.) And

    B) don't import soil from anywhere. And apparently the countries which depend on bananas for their economy, have special customs regulations to forbid exactly that.

    Just about the only realistic scenario I can think of where that jump could happen, is, basically, an act of terror or sabotage. I.e., someone deliberately bringing some infected soil and spreading it around in Latin America. It could happen, I guess, but it's hardly something that the cultivars can do much about in advance.

    At any rate, that's the failure point of the "OMG, it's spreading exponentially" scare. It can spread all it want somewhere else, as long as it can't cross the ocean by itself, it's even less of a threat to the Latin American plantation than Al Qaeda deciding to crash an airplane into a plantation.
    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Read more carefully by IkeTo · · Score: 4, Informative

      > So the only way this fungus could make the jump across the ocean to Latin America is either by

      > A) someone bringing an infected plant and planting it in the middle of a plantation, or

      > B) someone bringing a sack of infected earth and dumping it in a plantation. That's it, really.

      I think it is much easier than that. The fungus spread by insects like aphid. All it takes is a single one left alone in a container to somehow land in anywhere close to plantation to begin the spread of the disease.

    2. Re:Read more carefully by God'sDuck · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or a bit of dirt in somebody's shoe after travelling, or on an imported potato, or...

      Easier done than said.

  20. Another "Ant" submission...now to Slashdot by sgant · · Score: 2

    I'm convinced that "Ant" doesn't have a job. Not only does he submit stories here, but also to Blues News EVERY day, also to VideoSift and other sites not to mention his own.

    So not only does he have to go out and actually find these stories to submit to all these different sites, he has to take the time to write a submission. And I don't think he's getting compensated for it...I mean, how would he?

    Would love to know the story behind "Ant".

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  21. One word? by RossumsChild · · Score: 5, Funny

    Technically, that was worth a thousand words.

    1. Re:One word? by tgd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Technically that was worth 18526 words, 37052 bytes, 74104 nybbles, or 296416 bits.

    2. Re:One word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're still using a 16-bit CPU in this day and age?? I feel sorry for you.

    3. Re:One word? by X_Bones · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's that in Libraries of Congress?

    4. Re:One word? by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      Handy Libraries of Congress conversion chart

      1 picture = 37052 words

      1 library of congress = 28 million books = 2 ^ 42.6 bytes = 6.208375 Terabytes

      The picture is that worth 5.558195779 x 10-9 libraries of congress

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  22. There's one problem by Siener · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unfortunately none of those dozens of varieties have the attributes that make the Cavendish banana by far the most successful and important fruit crop in the world:

    1. Long shelf life
    2. Very uniform and predictable ripening times

    That is why you can get bananas cheaply, even though they might be grown thousands of miles from where they are eventually sold.

    Most, if not all the other varieties are only viable crops when they are sold very close to where they were grown.

  23. There are many kinds of bananas by mangu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    more genetic variation means more resistance to the weakness of monoculture

    I live in Brazil where there are many types of bananas available. Any supermarket has at least three different types. Just off my head, I can name at least six types of Brazilian bananas: Ouro ("gold"), Prata ("silver"), d'Agua ("water"), Maçã ("apple"), Nanica ("dwarf"), da Terra ("earth").
    1. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by beadfulthings · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Somebody with points should mod your post up as "interesting." I lived in the Far East when I was a child and remember the same thing--at least three readily available bananas with different characteristics--one yellow, one that was green in color even when ripe, and one that was reddish, kind of small, and intensely sweet.

      --
      "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    2. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by mwanaheri · · Score: 3, Informative

      So true. If I remember correctly, Uganda has about 40 different kinds of banana. Not all of them are for eating, but still the variety is pretty big. Except for those which are for cooking, most bananas aren't as big as we are used to get them, but certainly more tasty.

      --
      Idha khatabahum lijahiluna qalu salaman
    3. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by maxume · · Score: 2

      Any national chain worth its game in the US will now have a dozen plus varieties of bagged lettuce, and 3 or 4 for the picking. My supermarket usually has 8-10 varieties of bagged apples too. Go Fuji, down with Braeburn. Sure, they all have the same 8-10 varieties of Apples, but honestly, the big 5 varieties of Apples are so much more worth eating out of the hand that it actually makes sense.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by metlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell me about it.

      Growing up in India, I remember all the different varieties and flavors - they came in pink, red, yellow, green, violet/purple etc, and in all shapes and size (ridiculously small ones to *huge* ones). And they all tasted very distinctly different from one another and were quite delicious.

      In the US, all fruits taste the same to me, and bananas are so flavorless that I've stopped eating them altogether.

      Hell, you even had varieties of plantains that could be used in several spicy dishes, and you used the stem of the banana tree in some dishes, as well. Hard to find anything outside of the mainstream here. And even if you do, it tends to taste hopelessly "factory made".

    5. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by RealErmine · · Score: 5, Funny

      If I remember correctly, Uganda has about 40 different kinds of banana. Not all of them are for eating... Indeed, some are for dueling.
      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    6. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 5, Funny

      From what I can tell from watching my wife buy melons and tasting the result, the technique is to hit them with the flat of your hand, listen to the sound they make, and then after doing this to about a dozen, choose one completely at random and hope for the best.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    7. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by el_gordo101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While what you say is true as far as the big supermarket chains carrying a much better variety of produce, these "exotic" varieties sell in much smaller numbers. I was a produce department manager for a large chain in the Northeast for several years and I can tell you that 99.99% of the bananas we sold were the plain old Cavendish variety. We would average around 600 pounds of Cavendish a day compared to around 10 pounds a week of the other varieties combined. Cavendish bananas were our #1 selling fruit item, hands down. The chains love the Cavendish because it can be harvested green, shipped long distances by boat, and stored for (fairly) long periods. When it was time to ship to the store, they would flood the storerooms at the warehouse with ethylene gas to kick-start the ripening process, ensuring that there would be some yellow-ish bananas on the shelf.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
  24. Alaska Science Forum by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Alaska Science Forum did an article on this problem back in 1990. Unfortunately I haven't found the promised followup. This contains a lot more information than the wikipedia articles.

    Basically it involves information on why the bananas are hard to breed for a better strain. (they have no seeds) The Honduras Foundation for Agricultural Research has found way of crossbreeding in wild strains to produce seeds. Looks like it's slow going, but genetic mutation is pretty much the only way to engineer in resistance to new disease, and that will require seeds, not cuttings.

    I wasn't able to find any updates on the HFAR's progress. Anyone else have any luck?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  25. Re:Oh noes! by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny

    Slow news day? I think any story about a major threat to our food supply to be a major one, plus it mentions "Banana Scientists"! What is there not to love? Not to mention that bananas wouldn't go extinct if they'd had a space program ! How much more technical can you get ?
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  26. Re:Oh noes! by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why? because this news is OVER 3 months old. I heard it on NPR "science friday" back in Late April early May! it has been covered heavily in all the earth science and microbiological journals for nearly 3 months now and yes those have covered how it's spreading even faster.

    It's like Slashdot waiting until the end of the month to announce, "Mars polar lander made it to the ground and is sending pictures!"

    So yes, it's a slow news day as it's a rehash of old news that has had wide coverage.

    Next up, The MIR space station is going to be decommissioned, and spacelab will fall from the sky.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  27. I just couldnt help it... by denton420 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "There is no cure, and nearly every banana scientist says..."

    Anyone else burst out laughing after reading the title of banana scientist? This picture came to mind...

    http://www.zenbutoh.com/charactergallery/images/gorilla-bananas.jpg

  28. Yes, we have no bananas by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I've got a lovely bunch of coconuts....

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  29. Popular Science article is better by iamstuffed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought the Popular Science article was much better: http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2005-06/can-fruit-be-saved

  30. Bananas the World's 4th Largest Staple Crop by Starky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While this might not seem so serious to consumers in the U.S., in fact the banana family (including plantains) is the 4th largest food staple crop in the world (or at least it was several years ago when I was researching the banana industry for a litigation matter) behind wheat, rice, and corn.

    Food for thought.

    --
    -- My choice of computing platform is a symbol of my individuality and belief in personal freedom.
  31. Re:Oh noes! by zifferent · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's older than that. I read about it in a magazine years ago. The smallish bananas that you see in the supermarket are part of an aggressive breeding program to get ahead of the disease.

    The truth is banana plants haven't been propagated by seed, and only recently (past five years) have there been attempts to find new cultivars, before the bottom falls out of the banana industry.

    --
    cat sig > /dev/null
  32. Banana Scientist? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, the correct term is 'Bananologist'!

  33. Holding off judgement by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm holding off judgment until I hear what Sharon Stone has to say about this!

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Holding off judgement by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Funny

      The bananas had it coming to them. Karma anyone? They've been spinning out karts for far too long.

  34. Re:Oh noes! by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 5, Informative

    But while I disagree about this being a major threat to our food supply (I think we should be fine even without bananas)

    If you RTFS then you will see that while 'we' in developed countries will be ok without bananas they make up a large part of the food supply for some people in Africa. This will likely have a massive effect on people who don't have the luxury to choose what they eat day to day.

  35. Re:Fruit considered dangerous by midnighttoadstool · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Meat and saturated fat were linked to heart disease which is now considered non-causative: contributory only. Only highly processed meats are still linked to cancers. Red meat is linked to male infertility but only because of beef hormone usage.

    Salmonella infects 1 in 20,000 eggs, and generally only if the shell is cracked. For years it was supposed to cause heart disease, onyl for the WHO to establish that the more you eat the longer you live.

    Margarine was supposed to be heart healthy and turned out to be the opposite.

    Same with vegetable oils, but which cause cancer in lab animals (triggering an attempt to industrially convert polyunsaturates to monounsaturated oils).

    I reckon there are two general rules: when is doubt do the opposite of what the experts tell you, and the second to establish what is anthropologically natural to us rather than chasing novel elixirs. After all, you can't be moderate or balanced with poisons (like margarine, a sort of plasticised oil).

  36. Re:Oh noes! by JosKarith · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... which would be preferable to bananas falling out of your bottom I suppose...

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
  37. Re:Oh noes! by DarenN · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, first of all, here's an article from 2003 that looks like it might have been on the money

    Second of all, most banana plants are grown from cuttings - without the reproduction mutations resistant to these fungal infections are simply not happening on any kind of scale. "The problem is that the banana we eat is a seedless, sterile article which could slip the way of its predecessor which was wiped out by blight half a century ago."

    They're sequencing the genome of the bananas eaten in africa (which HAVE seeds) but there are problems because people aren't interested in the GM varieties, saying they taste more like apple (no bad thing to me)

    --
    Rational thought is the only true freedom
  38. Re:Oh noes! by Malevolyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget making the bananas grow arms and legs, then rise up against humanity.

    I, for one, welcome our new yellow overlords.

    --
    Your ad here.
  39. Recent History: Paying off Terrorists by Arakageeta · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Chiquita Brands International still isn't a "harmless" international company. The company was fined by the US Justice Department, to the tune of $25 million, for paying extortion fees to Colombian rebels between 1997 and 2004 (though the company has a history of doing this back to 1989). Granted, perhaps Chiquita was screwed if it did or screwed if it didn't-- I am not familiar with the details.

  40. Re:Oh noes! by thue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But the Africans do not use cloned copies of a single tree, which is what the Cavendish bananas are. So presumably only a part of the banana palms in Africa will be affected.

  41. Scientific American podcast by mdd4696 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was a Scientific American podcast about the demise of the banana on April 23, 2008. It was interesting--they actually went down to South America and took a tour of a banana farm. There are some photos on the site as well.

    http://www.sciam.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=7BA7726C-EBE6-29DB-B21F7FF464B293E9

  42. Create alarm, plant GM crops, Profit!!! by MacDork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Exactly, how does extinction / loss of a food supply / mutating desease which have earlier almost killed a whole industry become small news?

    This "news" has been around for a long time. Even the summary says so. It's an old story: monoculture -> disease -> no more bananas. Unless you have zero knowledge of bananas, you heard about this years ago. Hmm, I wonder why they'd be raising the alarm now, even when the banana companies like Dole and Chiquita don't care?

    Right now, regulations have prevented even publicly funded research organizations from testing more than a handful of transformed bananas in the field.

    Oh, I see. Somebody wants to skirt regulations regarding transgenic crops. "Won't somebody think of the bananas!!" ... Suckers.

  43. Re:Oh noes! by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is correct. There are hundreds, if not thousands of varieties of bananas. The reason we don't see them is that many of them aren't as good as the Cavendish; and none of the many varieties that are better store and ship well. So consumers in India and Central America will continue to have access to superior, locally grown varieties.

    However -- this doesn't mean that we should blithely accept the extinction of an important food crop. This is a warning. What if it were rice? Or sweet corn?

    The properties that make bananas vulnerable are shared by many other, more important food crops. Mainly these amount to one thing: the crop in question is economically attractive to plant on a large scale and ship around the world.

    It's important that we look at this as both a lesson, and an opportunity to try out different strategies to respond. The global food supply is already under pressure from energy prices and population growth. It should be manageable over the coming decades, but we shouldn't trust our luck too much.

    This also bears watching because bananas are an extremely important food source in areas where they grow. Even though this is not a variety that is used as a basic staple by anybody, the biology of banana diseases is very important.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  44. New Hit Song on the Way by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, we have no bananas tomorrow.

  45. Re:Implications for cloning in general by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why is this story relevant to Slashdot?

    I think you answered it yourself, but to make it perfectly clear....

    But now imagine the same thing happens to cloned cattle

    No cheezburger. Soy Burgers don't cut it.

    corn

    No Doritos. Although keyboards all of the world would rejoice, programming would never be the same

    rice

    No Rice Krispie Marshmallow treats.

    and wheat.

    No Cinnamon Rolls, No Twinkies, No Doughnuts.

    I think you get the idea now: The End of The World As We Know it.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  46. Re:Lest we forget... by Moridineas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At the end of the 19th century, with the help of the US government, food companies like Dole and Chiquita helped create and prop up "banana republics" in latin america, which were in fact figurehead dictatorships geared towards producing raw materials and crops for US consumption, like bananas. In fact, before that time, the #1 most popular fruit in the US was the apple, but thanks to these companies, they turned that part of our culture on it's head and created a massive campaign to make the banana #1, using the pricing power of cheap bananas and government influence to steamroll a fruit that was, and still is, produced locally by US farmers. You have come up with this incredibly complicated reason to explain why...wait for it...people like bananas. Why does it have to be sinister? They taste good. Why do you have to try to explain simple human behavior by a sinister corporate conspiracy? Whatever happened to Ockham's razor? Yes, Some terrible things have been done in the past, I'm not going to stop eating a food I like because of some actions by people dead for 50 years. I like apples too.

    The reason why they did this is not because bananas are better tasting or better for you, but because they were cheaper than local produce when you factor in highly cheap labor of the impoverished populace and favorable political conditions gained by less than ethical means. Damn those evil corporations for forcing us to eat a food we all hate!

    And to be honest, Apples taste better than bananas. An apple is more durable, and can be made into more things, and supports your local economy . De gustibus non est disputandum. Once the conversation gets to the absurd point of "well, apples taste better, so there!" you can't really keep it going rationally.

    I also have to question apples being more durable? Ever been to an apple orchard?

    there are tons of places within the continental US where you can get produce shipped north. You can cross the US from top to bottom by train or 18 wheeler in two days without trying very hard, And we ship things more fragile than fruit by truck these days. Of course--that's the point. "In season" has no meaning anymore. The GP's point was that it is somehow wrong to eat fruit except in the height of summer wherever you are. I think that is utterly ludicrous. I absolutely agree with what you say here.

    You are taking the metaphor the GP is making way too far. Those who say "homosexuality is a disease" come from an illogical and bigoted stance about the inequality of "races I wasn't aware sexuality and race were linked... GP is just as bigoted about those who choose to live life differently than he/she wants them to..

    Food scarcity isn't a problem, but living in the middle and not on the more populated coasts, perhaps you simply don't see that sometimes the bananas on the shelves get sold out and they haven't restocked the shelves yet. I've seen that plenty of times. Then some people have to wait. It particularly happens in less affluent areas with high population density. Doesn't happen every day, but it's simply a matter of shelf space not food scarcity. I actually live on the east coast, but have lived in Chicago. Can't ever remember seeing a run on bananas... I'll concede the grandparent wasn't speaking literally but was just making yet another hyperbole.

    You're welcome. Perhaps I can show you how to live better by trying to reduce your carbon footprint. After all, buying product locally as well as reducing my carbon footprint has positive impacts on my fellow human beings that I should be concerned with. You're welcome? are you the GP as well? I actually have a garden in my yard with about a dozen tomato plants, etc. I don't have to expend any petrocarbon to get them! guess what, I compost and am 100% organic too. I can play the yuppie/hippie game wth the best of them, I just can't stand sanctimonious holier than thou, for lack of a better word, morons who want us back in the stone age!