Slashdot Mirror


Google's Brin Books a Space Flight

coondoggie writes "Google largely conquered the Earth — now it is taking aim at space. At least co-founder Sergei Brin is. Brin today said he put down $5 million toward a flight to the International Space Station in 2011. Brin's space travel will be brokered by Space Adventures, the space outfit that sent billionaire software developer Charles Simonyi to the station in 2007. Computer game developer (and son of a former NASA astronaut) Richard Garriott is currently planning a mission to the ISS in October 2008. Garriott is paying at least $30 million to launch toward the space station aboard a Russian Soyuz spaceship according to Space Adventures." Make sure to wave when you are over Michigan, man. I'll be the one on my lawn, green with envy.

170 comments

  1. give him more than that by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make sure to wave when you are over Michigan man. I'll be the one on my lawn green with envy. I hope you'll be wearing at least a bright red shirt or something, because otherwise you're going to blend right in.
    1. Re:give him more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell him to wear a red shirt! The shuttle will probably crash into him or something!

  2. Rather too risky for me by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While this may sound like a nice adventure, going into space, if I had a billion, its the last thing I would ever want to do, because it is so risky. There are a million things that can go wrong, space flight has a high rate of occurance of accidents, when you are in orbit, as well, there is not much anyone on ground can do to help you when you get into trouble. So certainly, it is a huge gamble, and not one I would be comfortable with.

    1. Re:Rather too risky for me by dontPanik · · Score: 1

      Totally worth it IMO

      --
      "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:Rather too risky for me by Rams�s+Morales · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

    3. Re:Rather too risky for me by Nimey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Good thing space exploration isn't in your hands, then.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:Rather too risky for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And that is one reason you do not have a billion.

    5. Re:Rather too risky for me by joelwyland · · Score: 1

      Utterly worth it. In every single way. Risk <<< Reward.

    6. Re:Rather too risky for me by MarkKnopfler · · Score: 1

      The fact that he is doing it although it is risky, is probably the reason he has the billion dollars in the first place.

    7. Re:Rather too risky for me by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

      I would be terrified going up and coming back. But it would hands down be worth every penny!!!

      --
      oogly boogly!
    8. Re:Rather too risky for me by somersault · · Score: 1

      If I had a billion I might think about it, but if I 'only' had $5-30 million I could think of things that would give much more satisfaction overall. It would be cool to experience Zero G, see the earth from space, see the stars more clearly, etc, but personally I think I'd probably find SCUBA diving in the carribean much more fun.. you don't have to pee into a bottle when you're in the sea.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:Rather too risky for me by Lord_Frederick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Living is about what you experience. Everyone's risk-to-experience tolerance is different. Some people only feel alive and free when they sky dive, while others think it's a silly risk. Some people have full and happy lives doing nothing more than playing scrabble. Space travel is a huge risk for an amazing experience that only a handful of humans have. You could die, but the dead don't feel regret for failing to take a chance on a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

    10. Re:Rather too risky for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have a billion nanodollars.

    11. Re:Rather too risky for me by loudawg · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'd do it in a heartbeat.

    12. Re:Rather too risky for me by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      Well, juat to be sure, you could rent a whole floor of a hotel and never go out and disinfect everything you touch...

    13. Re:Rather too risky for me by afabbro · · Score: 1

      There's a bitwise operator joke in there but I can't do the math in my head.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    14. Re:Rather too risky for me by afabbro · · Score: 1

      Oh, horseshit. For every guy who's risked everything and made a billion, there are thousands who did the same and did not. Fearlessness does not equal success in any way, shape, or form.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    15. Re:Rather too risky for me by MarkKnopfler · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I totally agree with you. But all people who have succeeded, have risked.

    16. Re:Rather too risky for me by isorox · · Score: 1

      Good thing space exploration isn't in your hands, then. Or anything that pushes the boundaries. Medicine, Flight, Getting down from the trees....
    17. Re:Rather too risky for me by eikonos · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I totally agree with you. But all people who have succeeded, have risked. Except for the ones who used their parent's money and/or connections. GWB, for example, doesn't seem to have a lot of business sense and it seems almost certain he wouldn't be anywhere near where his is today without his father. Same for Paris Hilton. Not everyone works hard or takes risks to get wealthy.
    18. Re:Rather too risky for me by MarkKnopfler · · Score: 1

      Please note that I used the word "succeeded". Whether Bush and Paris Hilton are successful individuals is a debatable point.

    19. Re:Rather too risky for me by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could die, but the dead don't feel regret for failing to take a chance on a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

      Yes, but if the dead could feel regret they probably would, as in, "Christ, that was stupid. What the hell was I thinking?" That's because most people don't bother to think very hard about their own mortality. If they did, they wouldn't do things like smoke and drive SUVs at a hundred miles an hour with a cell phone jammed in their ear. It's always the other guy that will get smeared. AT least, that's what we all think until the instant we say "Ah, shit!" and it's all over.

      Furthermore, you don't necessarily come back dead from such amazing experiences: sometimes you just come back maimed or paralyzed or otherwise permanently fucked up. For myself, my life isn't so boring that I'd risk spaceflight at the current state-of-the-art, as appealing as such a fantasy might be.

      On the other hand, human life does become more valuable the further we get from Earth. I mean, how many have died from spaceflight versus the number of people that are cremated each year in aircraft that prematurely hit the ground. Hell, we mow each other down in cars by the hundreds of thousands every year.

      I guess maybe Superman was right after all. Flying is still the safest way to travel.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    20. Re:Rather too risky for me by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      While this may sound like a nice adventure, going into space, if I had a billion, its the last thing I would ever want to do, because it is so risky.
      [SNIP]
      So certainly, it is a huge gamble, and not one I would be comfortable with.
      Chill out man, he's not asking you to go, he's planning to go himself.
      Not knowing the guy personally I can't say for sure, but there's a high probability that he's big enough, old enough and ugly enough to make these choices for himself.
      IIRC, he was a graduate student when starting up Google, which was over 10 years ago ; with the age of majority in the States being 21, that means that he's either a citizen with the right to assess risks for himself, or he got his bachelors degree before he was 11. I don't recall any news stories about the latter, so I deduce that he is actually not a minor. That means that he can make these choices for himself.

      (I'm taking the age when you're allowed to buy intoxicants as being an indicator of when the state really thinks that you're responsible for your own actions. In many countries there are anomalies in the age at which this is set, and in associated obligations and restrictions. For example, some countries will allow you to join the army to die before they'll allow you to vote to choose the politicians who will tell you where to go and die.)
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. one step closer by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google is now just one step closer to founding the Copernicus Center,... ;-)

    1. Re:one step closer by a-zarkon! · · Score: 1
      I agree - this is definitely a cover story for the real mission: establishing an evil lunar base. With their control of the Internets and a moon base, they will become unstoppable.

      I for one welcome my new Google overlords!

    2. Re:one step closer by youtellme · · Score: 1

      Ridiculous indulgence, aristocratic nonsense.

    3. Re:one step closer by Pope · · Score: 1

      I believe you mean you welcome out new galactic over-Lord British!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    4. Re:one step closer by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      Pssh, Rainz'll take him out sooner or later.

    5. Re:one step closer by neumayr · · Score: 1

      If google were seriously considering this, you'd be right.
      But "ridiculous indulgence, aristocratic nonsense" has often given people opportunities they wouldn't have had otherwise.
      Many very influential scientists had aristocratic patrons, and many of those sponsored science as a form of status symbol.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
  4. Green Space Adventures by jason.sweet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kinda offsets driving a Prius, doesn't it?

    1. Re:Green Space Adventures by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      If the shuttle or the soyuz is going up anyway, it's not like paying for a ticket is going to change much. I guess Brin could pay a carbon offset for the fuel required for the delta-v of his mass (~150-250lbs).

    2. Re:Green Space Adventures by cashman73 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I never really understood the purpose of "buying carbon offsets". To me, it's just a total advertising gimmick. I mean, people aren't actually changing their behaviors and lifestyle choices to live a more environmentally-friendly life. It's basically just a way to say, "Fine! Go ahead and keep polluting the earth and destroying the ozone! But as long as you give lots of money to , it's all ok!"

    3. Re:Green Space Adventures by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 2, Informative

      Suppose that the cash goes toward planting trees, research, efficiency upgrades -- something like that. Then it might make sense. But cutting out the middle man might make a lot more sense. I suppose it depends on how much you trust your carbon offset broker.

      Personally, I've yet to hear a compelling case as to why (and to whom) I should be making this sort of donation.

    4. Re:Green Space Adventures by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the hole-in-the-ozone thing, caused by CFC propellants, is very "eighties". Yes, it's real, and yes, it probably going to be giving penguins cancer for many years to come -- but the crisis that in the headlines these days is the greenhouse effect aka global warming aka global climate change. No weird chemicals involved, just regular "harmless" CO2.

      This is part of the reason that global warming took a while to catch on as something to panic about. It's easy to condemn nasty things like sulfur, lead, and carbon monoxide. It's pretty easy to make a case against not-found-in-nature compounds like CFCs. But CO2 is naturally occuring, not stinky or poisonous, and has been described as a harmless (or even beneficial) byproduct of combustion for many decades.

    5. Re:Green Space Adventures by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Guess you've never heard of plenary indulgences.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    6. Re:Green Space Adventures by Firehed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's just outsourcing your environmental concerns :)

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    7. Re:Green Space Adventures by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      ^5

      I'm right there with you. My more in-tune-with-yuppiedom friends spoke feverishly about how they 'buy carbon offsets', yet I noted they still drive 10-15mpg vehicles and have poor insulation with all the glamorous wall sized windows to maximize the view of the lake outside their place.

      Paying a 'non profit' to plant a tree will not reduce the amount of energy they consume. Level of consumption is the problem, not just additional trees.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    8. Re:Green Space Adventures by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
      Actually, it's pretty easy to understand buying carbon offsets (if you're an intelligent, altruistic human being). If you're the kind of person who enjoys pushing the externalities of oil consumption onto other people, resulting in a tragedy of the commons situation, than you wouldn't see the point of carbon offsets.

      I've reduced my carbon emissions as much as possible in my home, at the business I own, and with my vehicles (2 hybrids and an all electric on the way). Carbon offsets let me offset that last bit of carbon I have no choice in emitting due to current technologies (I use terrapass.com, not a plug, just anecdotal info).

      Feel free not to offset your carbon emissions if that's how you feel about it. I expect to see it built into the price of fuel sooner than later (adds about 6-8 cents/gallon).

    9. Re:Green Space Adventures by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
      http://www.terrapass.com/projects/

      I buy offsets because I think it's the right thing to do to work towards a solution regarding climate change. Eventually, it'll either be legislated (i.e: required, via a tax on fuel) or the price of oil will go so high that consumption will drop drastically on it's on (i.e. the current situation in the US).

    10. Re:Green Space Adventures by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Anything in large amounts can be deadly.

    11. Re:Green Space Adventures by old+and+new+again · · Score: 0

      as if we give a crap about being green, he is going to the ISS with a scheduled flight, there is nothing added to what was previously calculated and , will people let go that stupid carbon thing, it's starting to get boring

    12. Re:Green Space Adventures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually CO2 is quite poisonous in high concetrations.

    13. Re:Green Space Adventures by josieprogramme · · Score: 1

      Maybe it helps that some of the emissions are dispelled into space and therefore don't contribute to global warming.

    14. Re:Green Space Adventures by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well the shuttle is close carbon free last time I checked. 2LH2+Lo2= 2 H20 and a lot of heat.
      Now the SRBs probably do produce some CO2 but I am not sure of the exact chemistry of the binder.

      Now Soyuz isn't carbon free at all but then it will probably burn less full than Brin burns in private 767 in a year.
      It is good to be the king.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    15. Re:Green Space Adventures by rk · · Score: 1

      Nice strawman you've constructed to make yourself feel smug and superior. I think the point the GP was making is that money != CO2 in the atmosphere, and just because you throw money at a problem doesn't automatically make the problem go away.

      If buying a carbon offset really reduces net greenhouse effects in the atmosphere, then that's terrific, and I wholeheartedly support it. If it doesn't, then all its doing is making people feel good about themselves while we continue to stick our planet in an E-Z-Bake oven, and that's arguably worse than doing nothing.

    16. Re:Green Space Adventures by neumayr · · Score: 1

      Well, as evidenced by the general lack of huge honking cars in Europe, at least compared to how common they are in the States, it seems some monetary incentive does help encourage environmentally responsible behavior.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    17. Re:Green Space Adventures by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
      Nice try regarding the "strawman argument". I was simply pointing out that most people who don't buy (or don't care about) carbon offsets are the same kind of people who don't care about anyone but themselves (tragedy of the commons, and all that jazz).

      Carbon offsets do indeed effect the amount of carbon in the atmosphere:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_offset#References

      I mean, really, how hard is it to spend some time to research a subject with such profound implications? An hour or two reading into it wouldn't kill anyone (OMG!?! AMERICAN IDOL IS ON!). /rant off

    18. Re:Green Space Adventures by isorox · · Score: 1

      They plant a tree, everyone's happy. 10 years later, someone else comes along and chops down the tree to make some paper (or worse, burns the tree down for room for cattle)

    19. Re:Green Space Adventures by mfrank · · Score: 1

      And the industrial processes used to make rocket fuel are fueled by what, exactly?

    20. Re:Green Space Adventures by rk · · Score: 1

      Wow, you presume to know SO much about everyone. You assume that I don't buy carbon offsets (I do) and that I watch American Idol (I don't, and never have). For every decent carbon credit system out there, there's two that are fly-by-night confidence schemes and if you think only an hour or two of research is enough for anyone to make an informed decision, then the chances that YOU'RE getting taken in are not insignificant.

    21. Re:Green Space Adventures by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      I'd mod u up if I could. I think it is better to spend where it counts. I bought a decent sized solar array that will take nearly forever to pay for. But by buying it, it makes a bigger market for solar, which pushes research into cheaper solar, which may get solar cheap enough some day. I think the key is to buy things like panels, high eff. A/C & heat, low energy lighting etc to push corp world to make these objects in mass. If it is profitable to be green, we will be green.

    22. Re:Green Space Adventures by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Bzzt. Wrong. Anything emitted by a spacecraft in (or on its way to) low earth orbit will eventually descend into the atmosphere.

      The ISS loses about 1 kilometer in altitude every week due to atmospheric drag. Without periodic boosts, it would surely fall into the atmosphere in a matter of years. Every molecule of exhaust gas from an ascending rocket will end up in the upper atmosphere.

    23. Re:Green Space Adventures by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      That DMHO is some pretty nasty stuff too.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    24. Re:Green Space Adventures by emlyncorrin · · Score: 1

      Especially DHMO!

  5. In Michigan? by larpon · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia bright red will blend you man.

    1. Re:In Michigan? by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      In Florida, CmdrTaco would be telling Sergey Brin to get off his lawn, man.

    2. Re:In Michigan? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Yep. He's right. I live in Florida.

      Now get off my lawn!

    3. Re:In Michigan? by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      Right after molesting his sceintologist grandparents and 'rastlin' a gator that snuck into his above ground pool behind his trailer.

      Its Florida, it deserves more credit than that.

      (Disclaimer: I'm from Florida)

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    4. Re:In Michigan? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Will this be a one-way ticket?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:In Michigan? by Enleth · · Score: 1

      So... It Will Blend, right?

      --
      This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
  6. 2nd Generation of the Space Age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Richard Garriott will be America's first 2nd generation astronaut and will be onboard with Russia's first 2nd generation cosmonaut - Sergey Volkov. A great way to express the new space age of international cooperation.

  7. Google landscaping by Manchot · · Score: 1

    Make sure to wave when you are over Michigan man. I'll be the one on my lawn green with envy. Am I the only one who read that as "I'll be the one on my green lawn with envy?"
    1. Re:Google landscaping by somersault · · Score: 1

      You must be new here - I for one know that in Soviet Slashdot Meme-phrase, green is people, and lawn envies you!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Google landscaping by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Now get off my lawn!

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
  8. Lord British does it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad to see that Lord British has $30 million dollars to his name that he can blow on this. I wish he would buy Origin back and make another game worth playing.

    1. Re:Lord British does it! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see that Lord British has $30 million dollars to his name that he can blow on this. I wish he would buy Origin back and make another game worth playing.
      He's probably made so much money from the Ultima games at this point, he never needs to make another game again.

      As a side note: I met him once at a convention. We talked about gaming, computers, this and that. I had a friend who was with me.

      As we walked away, said "Do you know who that was?"
      Me: "Uh, no".
      Friend: "Lord British!"
      "Me: "No way. He was just some guy."
      Friend: "No, really it was Lord British!"

      It wasn't till I saw a picture of his picture a long time after that I realized that it was Lord British! Doh!
  9. How do we calculate MPG? by Bearpaw · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do we calculate MPG? Sure, it's a shitload of fuel just to go 213 miles up (*), but then you can coast for ~3 million miles!

    1. Re:How do we calculate MPG? by jason.sweet · · Score: 3, Funny

      In that case, he'll have a negative carbon footprint.
      Goodbye Tesla.
      Hello Lamborghini!

    2. Re:How do we calculate MPG? by Wisconsingod · · Score: 1

      That's how hypermilers do it.

  10. Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by moore.dustin · · Score: 1

    Chalk me up on someone who is quite jealous of S. Brin over this! I mean the vast richest he has _earned_ is of no concern to me. The fact that he gets to not only go into space, but he gets to be tagged with being the first person in space via a private venture is enough to make even the modest geek envious. Thanks for helping the door for the rest of us to follow you through in the future though.

    I hope to follow the same path someday and pay for myself to float around for a few days in space ;) - Then again, who doesn't?

    1. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by Kevin72594 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Informative

      Simony went up on a Soyuz. We're not talking about the same thing with Brin. If things go as planned he'll get there via a privately owned and operated flight. It will still be a Soyuz but it won't be owned and operated by any government agency. Hence it's the first private spaceflight.

    3. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

      It's ok, I know reading is very hard!

      --
      oogly boogly!
    4. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      I could give a shit either way. Do you know how many people you could HELP with $5 million, like real bonified food on the table for dinner kind of help?

      His little toy trip into space is not going to benefit mankind, unless he is explicitly going to perform dangerous experiments that could put his life at risk other than just riding along or pressing a few buttons at the direction of an astronaut, in which case perhaps I could feel a need to encourage him.

      Or on a more greedily humorous note, he could just give it to me and I'd provide for my wife and kids, get a house, open a business, buy a vacation home in Costa Rica, and happily contribute to the economies of both the US and Costa Rica. Oh and probably buy some food for some of the poor people that I would force to work for me. Then eventually when I make untold riches in real estate and government bonds, buy my own trip to space, point and laugh at all the rest of the poor people still on earth. When in Rome, eh? ;)

      I hope to christ that if I ever DO get that much money, I'll still be mentally competent and human enough to actually spend a good chunk of it helping others, and not subtly justify helping myself under the guise of helping others. I'm of course referring to Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation, with the MS linked school technology 'donations'.

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    5. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by everphilski · · Score: 3, Informative

      It'll be flown by a Russian commander, out of the Russian launch complex in Balkinour.

      Call it whatever makes you feel warm and fuzzy, but it's a Russian rocket, piloted by a Russian commander, launched out of a Russian spaceport. I guarantee you communications are run through Korolev. Space Adventures purchased a flight, not the flight hardware. This is not privatized space travel. Look to small companies in the southeast US - SpaceX, XCOR, Armadillo, Blue Origin if you want to see "private spaceflight"

    6. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I could give a shit either way. Do you know how many people you could HELP with $5 million, like real bonified food on the table for dinner kind of help?

      It's not like the money just vanishes into thin air, you know. Sergei gives it to someone else, who ends up giving it to someone else, who gives it to someone else, who gives it to someone else... and so the economy rolls on. You could argue that spending the money does a lot more good for society than just leaving it in the bank.

      BTW, why are you sitting there reading Slashdot when you could be volunteering at your local homeless shelter?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    7. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by db32 · · Score: 1

      To be fair spending large sums of money actually does help lots of people. Its the money hoarding that is the real problem. Now granted it is a little less direct, and the people it helps aren't exactly in dire need of help. But, the fact remains, there are a shitton of people who benefit as a result of this. It takes a ton of people to get a spacecraft off the ground, and a significant chunk of that money goes to pay all of those people that make it possible.

      Now, at the same time, the ammount of people it helps is also directly proportionate to the complexity of the purchase. Purchase a flight into space = lots of people get a piece of the cost. Purchase a $5million diamond encrusted golden codpiece and only a few people will really see that wealth.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    8. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by IdeaMan · · Score: 1

      Do you know how many people you could HELP with $5 million, like real bonified food on the table for dinner kind of help? You don't understand what motivates humans.

      Dreams and Hope.
      The hope that there is more out there to find that just my little space. The dream that someday my kids or my grandchildren can visit the stars.

      Wonder.
      The wonder of the vastness of the universe. The awe that inspired at the power required to cross such vast distances and the beauty of orbit.

      Love.
      N/A for this one.

      Greed.
      Space has huge quantities of resources. Unfortunately there are staggeringly large distances to cross get to them.

      Envy.
      Envy that this guy got to do something so incredible.

      All these things will motivate the rest of us to work harder and to help each other. Then those taxes to feed Paul won't be such a big burden. Without hope or dreams you'll have to rob Peter to pay Paul because without hope Paul won't be motivated to pull his own weight.

      The short version: Space = Hope = Motivation = Bigger GDP = More "food on the table for dinner" for everyone.
      --
      They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
    9. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by akuma(x86) · · Score: 1

      If you keep your money in a bank, it doesn't just sit there. The bank lends it out to other people or businesses - so leaving it in a bank isn't so detrimental to society. If you are unwilling to spend it, the bank will spend it on your behalf - while paying you an interest rate for the privilege.

    10. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      It was somewhat a tongue in cheek reply on my part. Where do you think his $5 million will go? I bet it goes a quarter to the private ventures costs, the rest to a select group of capital investors who will keep it entrenched in capital gains markets. As a result, the taxable footprint that would've mitigated additional costs for public services or money towards employee wages (not even including stock options) is greatly reduced, and the idea that the money will move on down the line towards lower income people seems unlikely.

      Pretend that any significant amount of that money could somehow make it down the line to others, every step of the way, every piece of equipment or fuel that is paid for with it, has amounts of money siphoned off into investment havens. It only takes a good 3 or 4 minutes of consideration to realize just how little Serg's trip into space matters in the scheme of things.

      Its kinda depressing if you think too much about it, but I'll be getting up in the morning and going to work anyway.

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    11. Re:Now THAT is a vacation - I for one am jealous by dsmall · · Score: 1

      After the (very) rough rides during re-entry that the Soyuz return crafts have had, I'd have to suggest that Sergey take along a satellite phone and GPS tracker so he can phone in where they land.

      Taking along a G-suit and training for 8-G's wouldn't be a bad idea, either; that's what the last crew got.

      If I had the money I'd go in an instant. No question. I suspect this is one of those things that either you "get" or you just don't. But then, I got up very early in Mountain Time to watch the Gemini and Apollo launches, which were often early morning Florida time.

      Space was the career and life I never got to have.

      Congratulations to Sergey and Godspeed.

      David M. Small

  11. Smart Guy by sammyo · · Score: 1

    Oh yea duh... but waiting for all the modules to be installed should make it even more fun. I wonder what it would cost to make a space walk? Gotta get going on that web3.0 killer app.

  12. sergei's house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Hey Sergei, when do we get to see your house, and vehicles, and kids, and visitors, on Google Earth? If it's not evil, then you should have no objections. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.


    yeah I know it's off-topic- I just hate seeing billionaire hypocrites lauded as heroes.

    1. Re:sergei's house by galoise · · Score: 1

      do you know where he lives? because hiding his house is one thing, but not disclosing his address to the first slashdot troll that asks to see his house in goolge earth doesn't sound as a terribly hipocrytic thing to me...

      --
      entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
    2. Re:sergei's house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even know what Google Earth is? Please go figure that out before commenting again.

  13. A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by Subm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would be great if he would spend at least a comparable amount of money to plant trees or something else to help the environment for the amount of CO2 and other pollution he's going to cause to be put into the atmosphere.

    I guess he has the right to pollute all he wants, but launching yourself into orbit dwarfs the effect on the environmental most people would ever cause. People get the value of protecting the Earth from viewing it from space. Usually that perspective ends up happening afterward. I hope Brin gets it beforehand.

    "...From up there, it looks finite and it looks fragile and it really looks like just a tiny little place on which we live in a vast expanse of space. It gave me the feeling of really wanting us all to take care of the Earth. I got more of a sense of Earth as home, a place where we live. And of course you want to take care of your home. You want it clean. You want it safe."
    -- Winston Scott, two-time shuttle astronaut

    "You change because you see your life differently than when you live on the surface everyday. ... We are so involved in our own little lives and our own little concerns and problems. I don't think the average person realizes the global environment that we really live in. I certainly am more aware of how fragile our Earth is, and, frankly, I think that I care more about our Earth because of the experiences I've had traveling in space."
    -- Eileen Collins, first female space shuttle commander.

    I'm sure he has friends who read Slashdot. If you are one of them, could you ask him to think and do something about how his actions will affect the rest of us?

    1. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I get your point, but I think people need to actually experience that 'aha moment'. It's not enough in my opinion to say someone should understand something before they've experienced it. Also, someone with his means and influence is just the type of person that should have this kind of experience because he has the ability to come back and do something big.

    2. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by khallow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Alternately, we could stop giving in to global warming hysteria and recognize that there are carbon producing activities more important than eliminating positive carbon emissions. Space tourism, for example, easily meets this weak threshhold. Yes, sending rich guys on joy rides in space is more important than token gestures of support for environmentalism.

    3. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by Microlith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess he has the right to pollute all he wants, but launching yourself into orbit dwarfs the effect on the environmental most people would ever cause.

      So because he's going up it's bad, even if the rocket were headed up anyway? By that logic the space program should be ended entirely. Never mind that he'll probably do it once in his life whereas millions of cars keep dumping crap into the atmosphere every day at an order of magnitude more per day.

      Usually that perspective ends up happening afterward. I hope Brin gets it beforehand.

      And not go. Right. Fuck that. Given the chance I'd go in a heartbeat, as would most slashdot readers. But of course they should not go. Because rocket launches are such horrible, horrible sources of pollution.
    4. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 1
      How is riding along on a flight already taking place expending more energy & emitting more CO2?

      Besides, Google has spent more money already on alternative energy research & other environmental friendliness than Brin is spending on this space flight.

      http://www.google.com/corporate/green/energy/reducing.html

      As part of that responsibility, Google has committed to being carbon-neutral for 2007 and beyond. To honor our pledge, we're taking a three-step approach. First, we're increasing the energy efficiency of our own operations. Second, we're actively pursuing the use and creation of clean and renewable sources of electricity. Third, for the emissions we can't reduce directly at this time, we're investing in projects that help offset carbon generated.

      "Our goal is to build 1 gigawatt of renewable energy capacity that is cheaper than coal, and we are optimistic that this can be done within years, not decades." - Larry Page
    5. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by old+and+new+again · · Score: 0

      will you people please stop it with these green crap thing, can't we just be jealous/happy for a second without hippies barfing on our parade all the time?

    6. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by Digital+End · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While you are saying that, would you mind disabling your cellphone, gps, tv, and anything else space travel has given you? k thx

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    7. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well... aren't those rocket fueled by "harmless" hydrogen?

    8. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by DThorne · · Score: 1

      Conspicuous consumption is always an ugly business, it's hard to find a bright side. OTOH, I don't begrudge a Google billionaire his fantasy trip, but it really grinds my gears that some of the $50 I paid for trying out that crap Tabula Rasa helped pay for Garriot's indulgement.

      DT

    9. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1

      launching yourself into orbit dwarfs the effect on the environmental most people would ever cause. The technological advancements achieved from space programs alone offset any sort of emissions chemically powered rockets emitted in order to get us into orbit (and that's not to mention the potential for human unity that trans-national space programs have nor any other human benefits technological advancements space programs have introduced). If we (as a human race) had never engaged in the challenging exercise of optimizing existing technologies or creating new technologies in a way that is necessary for operations in space, we may instead be using technologies that are much less efficient with resources and thus the net effect would be MORE carbon emissions.

      NASA has a site dedicated to listing some of these technologies that have been a direct result of the space program (never mind the somewhat awkward UI).

      Are we (as a human race) damaging this planet? Yes. Are we (again as a whole) being irresponsible in some ways with our resources? Yes. Is the net effect of human space activity anywhere near a leading contributor towards atmospheric pollution? No!

      Now, you may not have been challenging the ethics of space programs, but space tourism (let alone space programs in general) are the wrong environmental trees to bark up.
      --
      Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    10. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a selfish asshole you are. It must suck to be you, being unable to recognize 'delight' and 'wonder' and 'inspiration' and 'achieving lifelong goals' as valid motivators. If you even those aren't enough, do you really think it is better to plant a tree than it is to show a kid that yes, you really CAN be successful enough to become an astronaut? Either lose your egocentric smallminded selfish income redistribution bullshit head in a hole superior attitude or else quit wasting power on your computer since it could be "better used" in almost any other way than browsing slashdot.

    11. Re:A lot of energy and CO2 for one guy's amusement by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      While you are saying that, would you mind disabling your cellphone, gps, tv, and anything else space travel has given you? k thx
      What, cellphones work in space? Cool. I bet the roaming charges are a bitch though.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  14. Front lawn by CowboyNealOption · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you live in Michigan and still have a front lawn that hasn't washed away, consider yourself lucky.

  15. What a waste. by Last_Available_Usern · · Score: 1, Interesting

    $30 million to go into space. Yea, it's a great adventure [for him], but do you know how much good you could do with that money? I won't bother to seach the web for how many children he could feed or how many mosquito nets he could purchase, but it shames me to think how much good that money could do instead of giving him a slight adrenaline rush and a story for his grandkids. I'm sure someone will reply with a "relative" comment regarding money I and others who are less fiscally successful spend on things like MMOG's and flat panels, but on a person-by-person basis that's a very small chunk compared to the giant barrel of money he's giving away here.

    1. Re:What a waste. by khallow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure someone will reply with a "relative" comment regarding money I and others who are less fiscally successful spend on things like MMOG's and flat panels, but on a person-by-person basis that's a very small chunk compared to the giant barrel of money he's giving away here. Yes, this usually is the nail in the coffin for this sort of argument. Why should you expect someone else to donate any extra cash they happen to have when you aren't willing to? It does strike me as odd that you go ahead with the argument even though you already know why it's flawed.
    2. Re:What a waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how much he has spent on feeding children and buying mosquito nets? I'm assuming you know otherwise you can't really make make the complaint, or does he have to spend *all* his money on feeding children?

    3. Re:What a waste. by Nemilar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're acting like the Russians are just going to take his dollars and burn them in a furnace, or that somehow those dollars are going to be taken out of circulation, never to be used for anything ever again.

      Realize that his $30 million is going to be spent by the Russians; on the development of new technology, on fuel (and hence, on employees of the energy companies), on paying engineers and scientists; on all the things required to maintain a space program.

      If you want to support an industry - and most people on slashdot probably believe the space industry is one worth supporting - the best thing you can do is to buy their product. That's exactly what he's doing.

      --
      Nemilar http://www.techthrob.com - Visit Me!
    4. Re:What a waste. by blahk_lyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, to be honest, it isn't your money to spend. The man busted his ass to give him self the life he wanted. If he wants to spend his money by taking a rediculously expensive vacation, then good for him. Richard Garriot has done a lot in revolutionizing one of the biggest markets on the gamefront with his ideas and I can guarantee you he deserves it. I have worked with him in Austin on the UO project and he deserves it. [/end opinionated rantflame]

    5. Re:What a waste. by Miladinoski · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to google.org Google has donated $33 milion from AdSense adverts to more than 850 nonprofit organisations in 10 countries throught the world.

      The Make-A-Wish foundation has received more than 25% of all the online donations from Google.

      Google has given more than 30% of all the yearly donations to the Doctors without borders program.

      Google has also donated to the Grameen Foundation located in the US and $2 mils to the OLPC project...

      Read more here
      --
      [insert lame sig here]
    6. Re:What a waste. by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure someone will reply with a "relative" comment regarding money I and others who are less fiscally successful spend on things like MMOG's and flat panels, but on a person-by-person basis that's a very small chunk compared to the giant barrel of money he's giving away here. Here's your "relative" comment.

      Sergey Brin's net worth is reported at $18.7 billion dollars. That $30 million ticket is 0.16% of his net worth.

      If you have a $200K net worth, e.g. investments, home equity, etc..., that space flight ticket is the equivalent of you buying a PS3.
    7. Re:What a waste. by Last_Available_Usern · · Score: 1

      I can't even retire with my current savings, yet I should be expected to donate rediculous sums? We're talking about someone who has so much money that he could live more comfortable then 99.5% of Americans on less then one-tenth of one percent of his net worth. I'm not sure you can really compare our situations.

    8. Re:What a waste. by Last_Available_Usern · · Score: 1

      Please, this is really a weak argument for hoarding more cash then you know what to do with. If people who exceeded a certain finanical status could apply Forrest Gump's logic the world would be a better place. I'll paraphrase for those that haven't seen the movie: "Momma said there's only so much fortune a man really needs and the rest is just for showing off."

    9. Re:What a waste. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay but how much money is he already giving away to charity? I do understand what you are saying and I think it would be better for him to spend that money on sending say a scientist up instead of himself but it is his money to with as he chooses.
      As long as I don't have to hear him say how people need to save energy while he zips around in his private 767.

      But yes if you yourself are not donating money to charity then you have no right to speak. Every little bit counts.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:What a waste. by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

      So you're incompetent when it comes to making money but terrific at wisely spending it.

      Where can I invest in your fund?

    11. Re:What a waste. by khallow · · Score: 1

      You got it right. Starving people in the world need your money. Why aren't you giving it to them? Leading by example and all that.

    12. Re:What a waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like our US presidential candidates didn't spend more than that on advertising.

    13. Re:What a waste. by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck are you or anyone else to try and force someone else to spend THEIR money that they EARNED the way YOU want them to? He's not the greedy fuck, it's people like you who want to force others to spend their money in ways that you think they should. If I ever become wealthy, I fully intend to light my cigarettes by lighting 100 dollar bills on fire in front of the poor. Mostly out of the fact that I could afford to, and because I have no sympathy for the poor, atleast in the US. Gonna get modded troll/flamebait, and I don't really care cause if you are unemployed in america and not royally fucked physically/mentally, it's your own damn fault and I really don't care. And if you're poor, it's your own fault for not taking better job opportunities or trying to educate yourself to open up better opportunities.

    14. Re:What a waste. by neumayr · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter that your situations are different, the principle remains:
      You expect him to donate those 5 million, but really you don't have any moral ground to stand on unless you donate a comparable amount (something like <your net worth>*(5*10^6/<his net worth>).

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    15. Re:What a waste. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Realize that his $30 million is going to be spent by the Russians; on luxury cars, polonium and caviar.


      Fixed your post.
  16. Risky business. by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm jealous and also quite in awe of how brave people are to venture into space. Some sobering stats on manned space flight: 18 of the 430 people who've ventured into space didn't make it back alive. Of course, quite a few astronauts and cosmonauts have flown more than once, but I calculate that the shuttle's overall fatality rate is running at around 1.8%. IOW, the chance of dying is about the same as my chance of winning $10 in this week's 6/49 Lotto. I hope he has a fantastic trip and that he blogs about his experience.

    Would I be willing to venture into space if given the chance? I'm not sure. I'd love to have the opportunity to consider it, though.

    1. Re:Risky business. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well, as someone who said above I don't see the point for that kind of money, if I could do it for free then I'd definitely consider it. I do vaguely remember hearing about a Soyuz blowing up though? The benefits would probably outweigh the cost if it cost up to 1000 pounds for me, but over that I wouldn't consider it worth it :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Risky business. by LeoDavinci578 · · Score: 1

      Would I be willing to venture into space if given the chance? I'm not sure. I'd love to have the opportunity to consider it, though.

      Are you a politician? Because you sound a hell of a lot like Congress : )

    3. Re:Risky business. by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      "Would I be willing to venture into space if given the chance? I'm not s-"

      If you spoke this out loud, you'd be interrupted by billions of people who would be willing to go into space at the drop of a hat.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    4. Re:Risky business. by ELProphet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most interesting in that line of statistics: no human has died outside the confines of Earth's atmosphere. Apollo 1 was a fire on the pad, Challenger hadn't crossed 50 miles, and Columbia was under 50 miles. The Russian space program has similar circumstances. 18 didn't walk out of the craft alive, but all 420 who have crossed into space have made it back inside the atmosphere.

    5. Re:Risky business. by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      *If you spoke this out loud, you'd be interrupted by billions of people who would be willing to go into space at the drop of a hat.*

      I think you're significantly overestimating. Merrill Lynch estimated that there were about 95,000 people in the world with personal fortunes of $30 million or more in 2006. If even 1% of those people wanted to book a trip to the ISS, Space Adventures would have almost 1000 applications piled on their desks. But they don't.
    6. Re:Risky business. by guruevi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would like to see those numbers over the years. I think (wild speculation) space travel would be (on a relative yearly basis) safer than both cars and airplanes. Also compare Russian, European, Chinese and US based space programs. AFAIK most crashes and malfunctions happen on the Shuttle program with the Soyuz program having the lowest cost and casualties.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    7. Re:Risky business. by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about being able to afford it.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    8. Re:Risky business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly that's not quite correct, unless lifeless bodies returning to the atmosphere passes your criteria:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_11

    9. Re:Risky business. by neumayr · · Score: 1

      Without knowing the numbers, I highly doubt it's safer than airplanes.
      Those are very safe, fatalities/number of passengers wise.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    10. Re:Risky business. by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I think you're significantly overestimating. Merrill Lynch estimated that there were about 95,000 people in the world with personal fortunes of $30 million or more in 2006. If even 1% of those people wanted to book a trip to the ISS, Space Adventures would have almost 1000 applications piled on their desks. But they don't.

      I suspect that for the people who can financially afford it, the concern isn't so much the $30 million fee. It's more the several months of dedicated training in Russia you have to do, isolated from your work and family.

    11. Re:Risky business. by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you're a dog, your odds are not that good. Of the 13 launched, five died (38.5% death rate). Four of the five died in the atmosphere, and one died in space. So if you're a dog, you have about an 8% chance of dying in space.

      RIP Laika!

  17. Re:ISS Space "Tourism" is a waste of money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not Futurama yet. I hope these tourists get bored of the dark space in there and come back $30m poorer.

  18. Huh? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

    I thought the Russians announced that they were no longer doing the space tourism gig, and that space tourism was going to be the realm of private industry from that point forward.

    I know he's booking through a separate agency, but the Russians are still hauling the meat in the seat.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:Huh? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I thought the Russians announced that they were no longer doing the space tourism gig, and that space tourism was going to be the realm of private industry from that point forward.

      They had previously announced that they would no longer sell individual seats, but it looks like in this case Space Adventures is booking the entire capsule.

  19. In a hearbeat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would go in a heartbeat. It isn't financially possible for me (yet) but given the chance - I'd go.

    There's a 4.1% chance of dying (thanks to the editable Wikipedia).

    In perspective, police officers have a 3.06% chance of being injured or killed.

    I enjoy life but it isn't for the weak. I've climbed mountains, swam in shark water, explored 3rd world countries alone, camped in the jungle, explored the remote regions of Alaska.

    I've almost died many times. If I ever did die, my family would understand I enjoy life and understood the risks. I can't live a life of safety and comfort. That's just existing.

    captcha: careen

    D~y

    1. Re:In a hearbeat. by neumayr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a 4.1% chance of dying (thanks to the editable Wikipedia). Sorry, but editing Wikipedia doesn't edit reality.
      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
  20. And so it comes to this.. by consonant · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • Mark Shuttleworth
    • Charles Simonyi
    • Richard Garriott
    • Sergey Brin

    Earth or not, the geek are sure inheriting space!

  21. Ummm...excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry...Google 'largely conquered Earth'? WTF is that supposed to mean?

  22. NOT NEWS, DOESN'T MATTER by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 0, Troll

    This story desperately needed to be rejected before it got this far. Just because it says Google doesn't mean it should be posted.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  23. carbon offsets by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 1

    It can be a total advertising gimmick and money-shuffling scam, just like any other activity. However, the concept carbon offsets, and any deceit promulgated in its name, is based on is valid.

    Carbon dioxide is a globally well-mixed gas. Hence, removing CO2 from the atmosphere at any point on the planet balances out adding CO2 to the atmosphere at any other point on the planet. How, and even if, that CO2 removal is accomplished is where the duplicity & deceitfulness comes into play.

    CO2 physically removed ("captured") from the atmosphere, e.g. GRT's ACCESS system, is wholly different than campaigns to plant a tree (short term organic storage) or invest in solar/wind/etc... R&D (high potential of flaky accounting). There is also the case of outright fraud, where money is taken & no service performed.

    Carbon offsets are the stopgap for the fact that change takes time and an acknowledgment that you are creating a mess and paying to clean it up.

  24. What are Google's "Brin Books" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does it mean that the Brin Books are a space flight??

  25. Garriott by moskrin · · Score: 1


    I'd think if Lord British wanted to go into space, he'd just use a moongate

  26. Re:ISS Space "Tourism" is a waste of money... by Martin65 · · Score: 1

    I think that the revenue from the tourists is a good thing. It helps keep the Russian space program going, which will be the only way to get to/from the station for 5+ years after 2010.

  27. Should have sold out by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    Make sure to wave when you are over Michigan, man. I'll be the one on my lawn, green with envy.


    Well Taco, you should have sold your VA stock right after the IPO then.

    (I keed. I Keed.)
  28. similar to Everest stats (to year 2000) by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Up to the turn of the century about as many people summited Everest and went into space with a similar fatality rate. With pampered guided tours recently, the Everest summits are about triple.

  29. Spend it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better spend the money now before the government takes it away.

  30. If I had the money... by lantastik · · Score: 1

    If I had the money, I might do it, but since I don't...what an egomaniacal, opulent ass.

  31. DéjÃ-vu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like Brin will be soon backing a brand new awesome Linux distribution.

  32. The space hotel my tax dollars built by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Whoa, when did the IIS become a space hotel? Are the russians kicking out real sceintists so they can jam a billionaire in there for a quick infusion of cash? How is that in the spirit of space research and exploration?

    1. Re:The space hotel my tax dollars built by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Whoa, when did the IIS become a space hotel?

      Better that than a Web server.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  33. Michigan Man by jerryodom · · Score: 1
    Who is Michigan Man and why are you mowing his lawn?

    Very cool that Brin is taking the flight. I suppose the financial comparison is something like me splurging on going skydiving.

    --
    For some reason I refuse to use either spell check or the spacebar properly.
  34. Where is the source of the quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could not find a reference to where the quote came from, can any one point me at the source ?

  35. Google Earth Budget Cuts? by L3J · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps its easier for Google to fire Brin into space with a Canon Point-and-Shoot to update those ever changing Google Earth maps...

  36. NASA's guest astronaut program based on merit by peter303 · · Score: 1

    NASA has let non-astronauts into space. Rather than selling these positions, NASA has sought citizens with a special slant. One was a Senator. Two were teachers( one didnt quite make it, and one converted into a full-fledge astronaut). And there was a slot for a journalist/author/poet that I dont think was ever realized after the accidents.

  37. Boy, is he going to be dissapointed by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1

    When he gets up there and realizes that he can't make the world move in any direction he wants like he can using Google Earth.

  38. Wealth and the Wealthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Money obtained through questionable means is often spent in questionable ways. Extremely wealthy people tend to believe that they have earned the right to do anything they want, no matter the circumstances of their wealth. Don't think for a moment that they consider themselves the same as us lowly peasants. If anything, the view from space will reinforce their grandiose beliefs.

  39. $5 Million Is Just The Beginning, Though by Illbay · · Score: 3, Funny
    Since the cost of fuel has gone up, NASA has started adding surcharges on everything.

    For instance, now you get only one carry-on bag free of charge. Any extra bags cost $100,000 apiece.

    You no longer get free beverage service on the shuttle. Soft Drinks are $3,000 each, beer and wine $5,000 and mixed drinks are $10,000.

    If you want an in-flight magazine, that'll be an extra $4,000.

    Pretty soon, only the really wealthy or business customers will be flying to the ISS, at these prices.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:$5 Million Is Just The Beginning, Though by neumayr · · Score: 1

      Bring your own food if you don't like the prices, gee.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
  40. Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one, welcome our new Google Space Overlords.

  41. Trickle Down by witherstaff · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, the trickle down Reagonimics.

    The inverse of this is how a $600 check from the government to all tax payers will revitalize the entire US economy.

    1. Re:Trickle Down by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      No, that's not the same thing. Trickle-down theory largely relates to tax policy. It's about putting more money into the pockets of businesses and the wealthy as a means of spurring overall economic growth (whether you personally believe in that or not).

      In contrast, Brin has just done the opposite. He's volunteered to take $5 million out of his own pocket and give it to someone else. That's not trickle-down economics, that's plain ol' ordinary economics.

      BTW, even if you don't believe that spending $5 million affects the overall economy in any meaningful way, surely some portion of that money will be spent not on Brin's own personal voyage but to further the cause of commercial space travel. If you're trying to grow a business, you don't take the profits and run; you re-invest them. In this case, it seems likely that Brin's money will be invested in ways that benefit future space exploration in some tangible way, even if we don't hear about it in the news.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  42. The real credit goes to.... by heroine · · Score: 1

    the share holders, AdSense users, & Google fans who actually made this possible. We bought the stock, clicked the clicks, read the ads, handed over our personal information to put this executive in orbit.

  43. offtopic - your sig by neumayr · · Score: 1

    You are aware that capitalism relates to communism like a (centrally) planned economy relates to democracy?
    I.e. not at all really?

    --
    Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
  44. Nice. He won't even have to learn Russian by melted · · Score: 1

    Nice. He won't even have to learn Russian. I heard that's a requirement on the ISS - to know at least a few basic phrases. And seeing that he holds an advanced degree, he won't have any trouble doing the actual work, which is another requirement. And he's not very heavy.

    1. Re:Nice. He won't even have to learn Russian by LukeLuke · · Score: 1

      Sergey Brin *is* Russian. So I don't expect any communication problem on the ISS...

    2. Re:Nice. He won't even have to learn Russian by melted · · Score: 1

      That sort of was my point. Although he probably considers himself Jewish.

    3. Re:Nice. He won't even have to learn Russian by Illbay · · Score: 1

      I thought no one was heavy in free fall.

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  45. Migod! he beat Branson! by aqk · · Score: 1

    Richard, o Richard! Where are you?
    OK... so it ain't Mars. (yet)
    But at least it's a start!

    Brin takes my bait!

    Richard! You gonna let him do this to you? And me?


  46. More like buying an indulgence by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Theory of indulgences: somebody somewhere is doing good, you've got money, why don't you buy a bit of excess "good" with your money. (The excess "good" was Jesus' "Treasury of Merit", on the theory that since he was basically infinitely good you couldn't tap him out just by drawing out a finite amount to expiate your sin of choice.)

    Theory of carbon offsets: somebody somewhere is doing good, you've got money, why don't you buy a bit of excess "good" with your money.

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion