Slashdot Mirror


China Launches Antitrust Probe Vs. Microsoft

snydeq writes "China has launched an investigation into whether Microsoft unfairly dominates its software market, according to a state media report. A working committee of China's State Intellectual Property Office is investigating whether Microsoft engaged in discriminatory pricing and will also look at Microsoft's practice of bundling other software programs within its Windows operating system, according to the report. The probe is part of a greater sweep of operating systems and other software developed by multinational companies that cost much more in China than in the U.S. 'On the one hand, global software firms, taking advantage of their monopoly position, set unreasonably high prices for genuine software while on the other hand, they criticise Chinese for poor copyright awareness. This is abnormal,' a source said."

68 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. Wha? by wamerocity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think you can call it a monopoly if all the companies software in your country is pirated.

    --
    "Thank you for using Stop-n-Drop, America's favorite suicide booth since 2008"
    1. Re:Wha? by MoonlightSeraphim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe what they are trying to say is that. "We pirate your software because your prices are so effen high" and now they are using this action as an excuse for MS to fsck off and justify what they did in front of the world ... that is if they even care.

    2. Re:Wha? by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, given that said company wants the country to do something about it, then whether the way they set and enforce prices is legal in that country is certainly a relevant question. If Microsoft is calling upon China to enforce its intellectual property laws, it can hardly complain if China agrees, but also insists on enforcing its anti-trust laws.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Wha? by Hassman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's funny. Isn't that why people pirate music? People here usually think that is a valid excuse / reason. Attn: DOJ, time to sue the RIAA!

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    4. Re:Wha? by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your (Microsoft) software is so good and so expensive
      I know. The timing of this investigation shows the Chinese are reeling from how good Microsoft's software is, now that Vista's out.
    5. Re:Wha? by megaditto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Chinese plan is different from the US plans, how, exactly? American plan: America should be on top.
      Chinese plan: America should not be on top.

      I think most Americans can see the difference.
      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    6. Re:Wha? by megaditto · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, you are wrong. I wish people would stop calling China "communist," since it is not. Their economic system is a free-market capitalism, with elements of fascism (the original definition - "authoritarian union between the government and big businesses" - not the Gowin/deathcamp definition).

      Their political system is dictatorship, since they are governed by unelected representatives. Hence, the correct description for China would be capitalist dictatorship.

      The reason they don't like Microsoft (or Google) is because the profits go to USA instead of to their government-endorsed corporations like China Telecom, Nuesoft, Baidu, Kingsoft, etc. And we are not talking peanuts here either: last year Microsoft alone paid about US$ 7,000,000,000 in taxes, 70+% of which came from foreign sales.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    7. Re:Wha? by Erikderzweite · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think you can call it a monopoly if all the companies software in your country is pirated. Actually, you can, given the fact that piracy is known Microsoft's tactics to capture vast amounts of market share. They just sit there and watch their share grow without spending a penny. They come later and put pressure on government and commercial organizations to make pay for their products.

      Establishing the monopoly by selling the product very cheap and then increasing the prices drastically is called dumping.
      Dumping is illegal elsewhere, but Microsoft does exactly the same thing and is able to act as a victim instead of being prosecuted.
    8. Re:Wha? by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

      you are wrong. I wish people would stop calling China "communist"
       
      Actually, the gp said China was run by the communist party, which is 100% correct. His error is in thinking that any given communist party has the opposite agenda as a monopoly. On the contrary, communist parties are notorious for ruling as monopolies. Meanwhile, you are correct about the self-designated "communists" but that's another matter.

    9. Re:Wha? by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > is a government intrusion into a foreign company.

      Well... doing business somewhere tends to put you on the hook for obeying
      the laws of wherever that somewhere is. This could be murder, spitting on
      the sidewalk, or shady business practices.

      Try violating the laws of my state while doing business here and see how far that gets you...

      China is a sovereign nation with it's own laws. Imagine that?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:Wha? by jc42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish people would stop calling China "communist," since it is not.

      Look at it this way: China is Communist in the same sense that America is Christian.

      The leaders of both nations use the name, but they pretty much violate all the principles behind the name.

      Of course, they're not the only country for which this is true.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  2. How about an antitrust probe of the government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Next I hope is an antitrust probe of the Chinese government in business.

  3. Abnormal? by Xelios · · Score: 2, Funny

    "set unreasonably high prices for genuine software while on the other hand, they criticise Chinese for poor copyright awareness. This is abnormal"

    Actually, that sounds pretty normal to me.

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
  4. Par for the course by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't read too much into the story. All it means is one more high party official is looking to get his share of payments to the top officials in China. Once a few million $ are safely handed over, the probe will be frozen, to be thawed only during the negotiations of the next payment.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Par for the course by cduffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My distinct impression was that most of the corruption in the Chinese government was closer to the local level. Do you have any solid information to the contrary?

    2. Re:Par for the course by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Most != ALL

      Local corruption is blatant but you negotiate with the corrupt party directly openly discussing the quids for the pro quos. Higher you go, complex it gets. Often you deal with intermediaries, and you are not sure if they really represent the official they claim to represent, what is given and what is expected gets lost in translation.

      And of course, I don't have any evidence. That is par for the course in slashdot. Announcements like this is a typical way to authenticate the official bribe taker. The bribee would have already contacted the other side, hinted that an announcement is coming to show that he in the loop. The comminique would include subtle pointers to show that this is not a low level typist who is trying to make a fast buck. Like a escape clause or way out suggested by the potential briber. Now that the bribee has been authenticated the negotiations can proceed. Usually if it has escalated to press release level, it means the stakes have been raised and they are playing hard ball.

      And I don't have any evidence. That is par for the course in slashdot.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  5. The Microsoft Lottery by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other words, China is jumping on the bandwagon of countries that is playing the "Sue Microsoft Lottery" to get some extra cash. I mean, I don't like Microsoft's products, particularly their operating systems, because I think they've completely lost touch with what a computer is supposed to do, but when it comes down to it, it's our fault, not Microsoft's, that their junk software is so ingrained in the entire computing industry. We are the ones who vote with our dollars, and so, if you don't like Microsoft, or their software doesn't get the job done for you, then don't pay them your money. But don't wine and complain about them either. And certainly don't play the Microsoft lottery. That's ridiculous.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    1. Re:The Microsoft Lottery by BlueParrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have an alternative interpretation.

      If you don't like the rules in the country you try to do business in, then don't do business there, and don't whine when their courts fine you for breaking them. Or perhaps this issue is a little bit more complex than a one sentence argument?

    2. Re:The Microsoft Lottery by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You clearly dont have a clue about anti-competitive practices of Microsoft and how monopolies & cartels stop market forces working, meaning that "We are the ones who vote with our dollars, and so, if you don't like Microsoft, or their software doesn't get the job done for you, then don't pay them your money." doesn't really apply when there is no other option.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    3. Re:The Microsoft Lottery by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2

      In other words, China is jumping on the bandwagon of countries that is playing the "Sue Microsoft Lottery" to get some extra cash.
      And I say, good for them. Microsoft has a decades-long history of lying, cheating, stealing, and generally screwing over the rest of the world in order to rake megabucks into their war chest. Therefore I have absolutely no sympathy when someone else screws them. If they want to play dirty then let the rest of the world play dirty against them. I hope the whole world has their chance to sue Microsoft for no good reason.
      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    4. Re:The Microsoft Lottery by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is lost.

      If they show that they can sell Windows for a profit at $20 a copy in China, it's the beginning of the end for charging $300 a copy elsewhere. The fact is that an extra copy at $1 is profitable for them.

      So they want to sell all the $300 copies, then all the $200 copies, then all the ... $20 copies. To maximize their profits. So they have to manage perceptions. Folks are already balking at their quality/prices.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:The Microsoft Lottery by Hassman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But when the country is China? Come on. China! Like ANYONE or ANY company could get a fair trial there. There are no human rights, what makes you think that large non-govt. corporations will have any?

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    6. Re:The Microsoft Lottery by BlueParrot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you have understood my point perfectly, thou you didn't attribute it to me. Claiming "the solution" is as simple as the parent of my post did is naive at best. It doesn't matter if you are arguing in favor of anti trust laws or against them, pretending that the issue is merely a matter of "if you don't like it, don't take part in it" is naive at best. This applies just as well to customers at the mercy of a supplier as it applies to companies that are at the mercy of the local laws. My point was simply that if you are going to expect customers to grin and bear it without complaining, then companies should expect the same treatment from the government. As any sane person would be able to rapidly deduce, this is not really a practical way to do things, and thus the "if you don't like it don't use it" argument is nonsense. There is no reason why customers should "just not use it" if they are unhappy with a product, the same way there is no reason why a company should "just not do business there" if they dislike the local laws. The important thing is to realize that you either accept both of these claims or neither. What Microsoft is doing is claiming they should be allowed to use whatever shady business practices they want, while simultaneously arguing that governments have some moral obligation to not interfere. They seem to have this idea that they are entitled to stronger legal protections than the customers that buy their software.

    7. Re:The Microsoft Lottery by supervillainsf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, they do and it looks pretty good. See http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/02/1236237

  6. More communist lies by sheepofblue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No they criticize China because you are a bunch of pirating communist scum. As to price manipulation being a bad thing... from a communist country that has practiced both price controls and currency manipulation. Not to mention the closed market.... This is just a chance for China to shake MS down.

    1. Re:More communist lies by stormguard2099 · · Score: 4, Funny

      and maybe you'll start to see why people pirate. because there's no year of the linux desktop on the chinese calendar?
      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
  7. Re:What? by flyingfsck · · Score: 4, Informative

    China isn't any more communist than for example the UK, Canada or Australia.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  8. Antitrust over the 1 copy of Windows? by fprintf · · Score: 5, Funny

    So there is an anti-trust investigation over the one legitimate copy of Windows in China?

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
  9. Not First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news Microsoft is seeking an injunction against the FOSS community for unfair competition practices. "It is entirely unfair that they offer their software at such unreasonable prices. The pricing policy of not charging users for the applications they use severely impacts our market penetration.", a Microsoft Sales Representative said.

    1. Re:Not First Post by zapakh · · Score: 3, Informative

      In other news Microsoft is seeking an injunction against the FOSS community for unfair competition practices. This is an old sentiment. From the Halloween Document of the eponymous date in 1998:

      Linux distributors, such as RedHat, Caldera, and others, are expressly willing to fund full time developers who release all their work to the OSS community. By simultaneously funding these efforts, Red Hat and Caldera are implicitly colluding and believe they'll make more short term revenue by growing the Linux market rather than directly competing with each other.
  10. Re:What? by wattrlz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except for the part where they proclaim to be.

  11. Re:What? by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What use would Communist China have for anti-Trust laws

    China is being heavily leant upon by the US and its stooges to do something about their prevailing culture of piracy - you know, the great DVD markets of Hong Kong and Shanghai where every film is available a month before it reaches the cinema, all that stuff. It's all to do with international trade agreements; China gets to make more money selling abroad if they stop ripping off Hollywood and Silicon Valley.

    Hitherto China has been happily ignoring Microsoft's monopoly by simply pirating everything. If they're going to go legit then they're going to make damn sure they don't end up paying through the nose for it, so they're raising the same monopoly issue that the US and the EU have done. After all, if China is going to play fair, then so must Microsoft.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  12. In Other News... by TheBoll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... car makers bundling radios, gps, air bags and brakes within vehicles. More at 11.

  13. Re:What? by Robert1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're totally right. They aren't communist. What they are is fascist.

    "Anti-individualistic, the fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only insofar as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal will of man as a historic entity.... The fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value.... Fascism is therefore opposed to that form of democracy which equates a nation to the majority, lowering it to the level of the largest number...."

    Best description of China I ever read. That's straight from Mussolini's "The Doctrine of Fascism."

    On a related note anyone read the article on how Chinese police jailed parents who tried to go back to the faulty death-traps - I mean schools - their government had built. The police were also instructed to keep foreign press away from the schools and to not let anyone take photos. A pretty good example of how the most important thing is the state above all - including it seems the needless deaths of children.

  14. Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once again, China is just copying other countries. I bet their probe will be half the cost, too.

  15. Step 3 of 5 to economic collapse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just another step in China's eventual bludgeoning of the American economy. First you openned the door to trade with them. Now they outproduce you, and now they seek to sue your comapnies for wrong dealings while undercutting your prices and pirating the hell out of your goods. A lot of good people saw this coming, and now we just sit back and watch the sad dance play out to its bitter end.
    US trades with China.
    China outproduces USA on material items.
    USA moves to Intellectual Property.
    China ignores IP laws except where it suits them to make money.
    US economy collapses
    China is new global superpower.

    1. Re:Step 3 of 5 to economic collapse. by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True that. We survived WWII and came out on top because of our ridiculous manufacturing power and natural resources. For years we were helping the world rebuild. Then we decided we were too good for that crap and started outsourcing... Well - what'd we expect? China beat us at our own game. There are 4 times as many Chinese people, the government controls *everything*, and they don't give a crap about trashing the environment in the process of becoming a superpower. How do you compete with that? Oh, I know! IP (imaginary property)... that'll work - or not.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:Step 3 of 5 to economic collapse. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful
      My, the ignorance is breathtaking. Wishful thinking, at best.

      China is *hugely* inefficient, which is mostly masked by their huge growth. One thing that you have to remember is that the Chinese economy has *never* gone down in living memory. It's all up, up, up since Mao died and the national nightmare ended. This results in things like people opening businesses with no idea what they're doing, and the business succeeds anyway due to runaway demand. I see small shops open and close all the time, and it's the same story - no plan, no strategy, no marketing. It's just 'I'll open the doors and people will flood in.' The Chinese are geniunely shocked when they don't, and can't figure out what they did wrong. Really. Massive inefficiency is a hallmark of a prolonged boom (more annoying facts again - don't worry, I won't include any math) and China has been a boom (14%+ growth) for 30 years.

      The Chinese don't invent new things, which is going to really start hurting in a few years when all their low-cost manufacturing isn't low-cost any more. I see it every day, a lot of people really don't know how to solve problems except for copying someone else, even to the point of investing huge efforts into it. Just think of how much better off China would be if they had developed their own indigenous computer systems instead of just pirating Windows. And no, I have yet to see a single installation of this "Red Flag" linux that someone always spouts off about. China does in fact have IPR laws, and they do work, but you have to actually follow them. Speaking of laws, there is a new anti-monopoly law in effect this year, and it's going to be used by the government as a club to bash foreign enterprises. Of course, Chinese monopolies are safe. Remember, cheating foreigners is patriotic.

      Anyway, that's just my personal experience. Feel free to keep wishing hard for America to fall and China to rise. For further reading, for those of you who made it this far, check here (true today as when it was written) and Danwei and China Law Blog. Sorry to inject facts into the fantasy exercise - I realize it's a downer.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Step 3 of 5 to economic collapse. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Informative
      See? Copying. No innovation, no new ideas, no paradigm-shattering venture. Just a clone of XP, just as accurate as they can get it. And that you called it "my country's linux" is very very revealing. Do Americans call Redhat "their country's linux"? Germans call SuSE theirs? (Novell whatever) Rabid nationalism is going to play a huge part in the future, too. Foreigners are to blame for all of China's problems.

      QQ sucks raging donkey balls. I'm not surprised they constantly monkey with the protocol. When all you do is rip off others, you get really good at it, and you know how to avoid getting ripped off yourself. I would call this blatant hypocrisy, but then hypocrisy is a Western concept that has no equivalent in China. It's always been "the leader commands this" and instead of wanting to make everyone equal, Chinese just want to become the leader so that they can be hypocrites, too. Fundamental cultural difference.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Step 3 of 5 to economic collapse. by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to wonder when China sues Boeing for trade secrets. Lot's of short-sighted profiteering. Boeing will have to buy parts soon from China and compete with aerospace technology that they helped develop.

      I'm not a Microsoft fan -- but shouldn't China at least pretend to pay for all the copies they stole BEFORE they complain that Microsoft is a monopoly?

      It's like someone who stole my car calling me up and complaining that I didn't pay the tag license on it so they'd like some money for they penalty they had to pay at Motor Vehicles.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  16. "China's State Intellectual Property Office" by damburger · · Score: 3, Funny

    That just gave me the best chuckle I've had all day

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  17. Princess Bride by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

    China To Microsoft: "You're trying to have a monopoly on what we've rightfully stolen"

  18. Re:What? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China isn't any more communist than for example the UK, Canada or Australia. There's a school of thought that says that German Nazism in WWII and Russian Communism were essentially two identical versions of the same system which just claimed to be different. Of course Hitler and Stalin had different hate groups, but the actual systems they built were in practice very similar.

    So it's quite possible for a Communist country like China to change their official ideology to Han Chinese nationalism and corporate state/slave labour capitalism and still be just as far from the UK, Canada or Australia.

    So don't be fooled that they given up on 'Communism'. The PRC was never very socialist anyway, most European democracies went much farther down that path.
    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  19. How about a very different possibility? by Enlarged+to+Show+Tex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps this is a prelude to the Chinese government looking to do something better with American dollars than have them sitting in US government debt. If the Party were looking to buy out Microsoft, they could really have the rest of the world bent over a barrel, enjoying a tremendous amount of control over anyone that uses MS software.

    Not only that, it finally gives the BSA the power it's looking for - let's hear it for the Chinese military fighting the BSA's battles to defend Microsoft's owners and their IP...

  20. oxymoron by pak9rabid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    China's State Intellectual Property Office Now there's an oxymoron if I've seen one
  21. Re:What? by immcintosh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I claim to be the King of Prussia. Doesn't make it so, anymore than China's claims make it genuinely communist.

  22. Misleading comparison by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 3, Informative

    cost much more in China than in the U.S. What? Prices are much lower in China, since few there can afford the prices charged in the US (consider the cheap version of XP designed for poorer markets). What they mean is that the prices are higher relative to the mean income, which is a completely different statement.
  23. Re:Take a guess by JCSoRocks · · Score: 3, Funny

    I heard about the chair throwing, but shooting people? Balmer has gone too far!

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  24. Mod me as Troll if you will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But just like with the EU, this is will be nothing more than an attempt to extort money from successful American corporations. I know /. hates MS, but any sincere customer centric resolution to anti-trust *outside* of the corpration's home country would be done diplomatically with that countries government.

  25. Re:What? by abigor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Agreed 100%, and it is an absolute farce that they were awarded the Summer Olympic Games. Tens of thousands of people were displaced in order to build facilities and erase "unsightly" slums.

    I'm interested in seeing what the Tibetans get up to during the Games though - my guess is shenanigans will ensue, with the predictably heavy-handed military response. These Games could (hopefully will) end up being the biggest clusterfuck in the history of the Olympics.

  26. Re:What? by Hassman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Very true. The far crazy right isn't that different from the far crazy left when you truly look at it.

    This no value added comment brought to you by one bored guy.

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  27. Re:What? by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Funny

    I salute your use of alliteration in illustrating your point, my liege.

    --
    I hate printers.
  28. Re:What? by nschubach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You see, that's where I get really foggy on this whole MS anti-trust issue. I'm pretty sure it's considered "unfair practice" to sell your product to one area (State?) for less or more than another at base cost. (making one market pay more to cover the cost of underselling your product in another market ... ahem $3 per license Windows in Africa(?)) Shipping and taxes would influence the end price. This is what confuses me about how Microsoft does business and how it's still considered legal. The cost of Windows should only be influenced by taxes since digital transfers really cost nothing. (I guess you could add in the shipping cost of CDs though...)

    Isn't it global anti-trust to sell a product for less in one country than you do another? Is there such a thing? Who would bring down the hammer on such things?

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  29. Re:What? by UdoKeir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Agreed 100%, and it is an absolute farce that they were awarded the Summer Olympic Games.

    I can't believe the IOC even considered China. It's like hosting the games in Nazi Germany and having Hitler preside over the event.

    Oh wait...

  30. Re:What? by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Isn't it global anti-trust to sell a product for less in one country than you do another?

    Ordinarily, no, I don't think so. There's a natural limiting factor to this kind of thing, because if you sell your product much more cheaply in a poor market than in a rich one, then people will make good money buying up stock in the poor countries, shipping it to the rich countries, and selling it on at a profit while still undercutting your official price there.

    The problem comes when the product has a near-zero marginal cost to produce, and near-zero weight. It costs Microsoft almost nothing to stamp out ten thousand Windows disks and sell them in east Asia for a dollar each; if that's what it takes to compete in that market, a dollar per copy is better than nothing. But similarly, it costs me almost nothing to buy up ten thousand Windows disks and ship them to England, there to be sold in a street market; I can undercut their official price by a huge margin, and still turn a healthy profit.

    Thus Microsoft play silly buggers with the EULA, claiming that their product is licensed not sold, and that it's illegal to use in England the copy they sold in China. And Hollywood play silly buggers with region coding as well, to make sure Europeans don't buy DVDs from America of films that aren't yet in our cinemas, and to make sure neither of us buys DVDs from China priced super-cheap to compete with the pirate market. Is that legal? Don't know, but it's sure as hell not right. If globalisation and free trade benefit the corporations, who'll outsource your job at the drop of a hat, it should work for us too: I want to outsource my DVD buying, thank you very much.

    One thing I'm pretty sure of is that this is not legal within the EU. You can't sell a product cheaply in Slovenia and dearly in Germany, and then complain when the Germans buy in Slovenia. Apple ran afoul of that a little while ago with their iTunes pricing structure, though I'm not sure how that turned out.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  31. Re:HA! HA Ha HA ha ha! by hany · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft products don't force you to use more Microsoft products, it's just generally more efficient if you do.

    Well, I tend to disagree.

    Imagine you are responsible for the whole IT infrastructure of some company. The size of the company does not matter. Imagine you choose to deploy say Microsoft Office 2003 or (if you are more oriented or pushed towards smaller costs and/or increased "freedom") even OpenOffice.org .

    Now try to imagine a reaction of a CEO of given company after:

    1. some potential client of the company sends you a document created in Microsoft Office 2007
    2. your coworkers (sales, engineering, ...) failed to open the document or failed to open it properly thus creating some problem
    3. thanks to that problem client takes the business elsewhere and your company looses revenue
    4. you tell to CEO: "we did not lost income, we are just slighly less efficient"

    To add more spice, imagine that client was a big one and potential income (and thus real loses) are quite big.

    :)

    All that thanks to inability or whatever of Microsoft to use and follow open standards or at least some decent backward compatibility and our quite small ability to push them toward that (thanks in quite big proportion to what some people call "dominant position in the OS market for PC" or, more importantly "dominant position in the office document format market for document exchange" which stems from the firts one), which would ussualy make the above example non issue.

    --
    hany
  32. Re:What? by TheNarrator · · Score: 4, Interesting
    China's economic ideology is different from the west. Let me explain how:

    U.S
    * Banker makes loan to whoever they damn well please.
    * Loan doesn't get re-paid
    * Other bank takes over banks assets and screws depositors over 100k.
    China:
    * Banker makes loan to favored state owned company or other entity.
    * Loan doesn't get re-paid.
    * Government recapitalizes bank.

    U.S
    * Banker makes a bunch of questionable bad loans
    * Retires with golden parachute package
    China
    * Banker makes a bunch of questionable bad loans
    * Banker is executed by government

    U.S
    * Bankers en masse make loans to fund housing/stock bubble
    * Government runs to see how they can loosen regulations to help the banks make exponentially more money and profit
    * Bubble bursts, banks are bailed out by government discount window loans, TAF, TSLF,etc

    China
    * Bankers en masse make loans to fund housing/stock bubble
    * About 1 year after it gets going government raises real estate transfer tax or stock trading taxes and bank reserve requirements to purpousefully punish the speculators.
    * Bankers who make ridiculous corrupt loans are executed. Some banks who didn't get swept up in the bubble keep operating as usual

    Long story short. In China, unlike in America, the politicians actually have far more control of the economic activity in their country than the bankers do.

  33. Re:What? by thewils · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's because the the IOC like the secrecy of the Chinese Government better than any democracy. The worst games for the IOC were Lillehammer where everything was in the open - including the bribes paid to IOC officials to host the games.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  34. Boy... by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...if this isn't the hammer calling the sickle black.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  35. Re:What? by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is very little difference between fascism and communism.

    Both ideologies claim that society is greater than the individual. Both ideologies condemn all actions that don't benefit society as a whole. Both ideologies support environmentalism.

    The difference? Communism sees society as encompassing all humanity, while fascism sees each state as its own society. Fascism is prone to nationalist posturing, while communism isn't.

    Both fascism and communism oppose free-market capitalism. Fascism refers to an ideology called "corporatism", but that has nothing to do with corporations in the modern sense; the "corporations" in corporatism are basically trade guilds. Corporatism is about both putting society under the control of a collective, and tying such collectives into the state. It fits in with the whole "society as a whole" model, with each function of society overseen by its own collective, and all the collectives are part of a larger collective (i.e. the state).

    China isn't really fascist; they allow multinational corporations to do business there, which real fascists would condemn. If China was fascist, they wouldn't let even local companies practice unfettered capitalism the way they do. A fascist state wouldn't let Chinese companies pollute as much as they do, nor would they let the companies do things like put lead paint into toys.

    Now, I'm not defending fascism in any way. I'm a staunch individualist, and I despise both fascism and communism. My point is that China isn't really any more fascist than they are communist. Well, they do more than their share of hyper-nationalist posturing, but that's about it. China is simply a totalitarian state that tolerates capitalism. The free market is the one exception to China's totalitarian control over their people.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  36. Re:What? by Daishiman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, you pay more because you don't have large institutions negotiating the price on drugs on larga scale (such as countries with nationalized health care), and because your insurance companies rape you for them, as their interests are aligned with those of the insurers. That, and the fact that the FDA functions in a completely innefficient manner.

    Do remember that a lot of big pharma is based on Europe. Take Novartis for example.

  37. Re:Duck by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Plus they do not allow any of their other eight or so "political parties" to have any power and those 8 are only permitted to have any function whatsoever under the authority of the Communist Party.

    Wouldn't that mean that they aren't communist and are a dictatorship ? Because in a communist government, there are no classes. So lets see we have A) Classes, B) Unequal distribution of wealth C) some people are really poor, others are filthy rich, and D) one party/person has total control. Seems like a dictatorship to me. And communism != dictatorship. They may be called "communists" but only in the way that the USA is called "free", in name alone.
    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  38. A Real and Big Change! by Tungbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The PRC was never very socialist anyway, most European democracies went much farther down that path"

    Really?

    Did they organize all farmers into Colletives? Did their government take over virtually all manufacturing enterprises (i.e. state own enterprise) ? Did their Communist Party install representatives in all enterprises to enforce doctrinal purity?

    There has been tremendous change in people's thinking and the organization of productive activies within the last 10 years - since Teng Xiao Peng redirected China toward a more pragmatic path.

    Listen to people who've visited China and don't rely on academic abstractions. US people have a bipolar attitude toward China. When they spout cliches toward one another, nothing is learnt and they will not gain a realistic picture of China as potential partner or competitor.

  39. Original Definition of Fascism by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    National Socialism

    as opposed to universal socialism known as communism.

    So when the government controls business, i.e. "nationalizes" or "socializes" it, that is fascism. At least in the original definition.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Original Definition of Fascism by Capsaicin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      National Socialism

      ... was, in power, as socialistic as the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea is democratic. The original principles of the NSDAP could perhaps fit your description, but after Hitler took over the party any socialist trends were suppressed (you've heard of the Night of the Long Knives?). To quote my Grandmother (my translation) "THEY, stole our revolution." 'They' being BigBusiness(TM) and the Hitler (as opposed to Roehm) faction of the NSDAP.

      So when the government controls business, i.e. "nationalizes" or "socializes" it, that is fascism. At least in the original definition.

      This did not happen either in Fascist Italy, nor in Nazi Germany. In Italy Mussolini was basically a prisoner of large Industrial and Agrarian Interests. In Germany, of course, Hitler wasn't so easily manipulated, however Big Busisness was perhaps the only institution of German society that wasn't subjected to Gleichsschaltung.

      As far as an original definition, it depends on whose original definition. The Italian Fascists originally definied themselves as a pro-war (ie. vs Germany in WWI) breakaway of the Italian Socialist Party amalgamated with left-Nationalist and Futurist elements. But they were swiftly coopted by two forces. 1) Funding from pro-war Industrialists, 2) the rapid and massive expansion of a membership base which joined the party for the sole reason of fighting the Socialsts. When Mussolini wanted to call off the war with the PSI he was even forced for a time to resign from the Party. As it became clear the Facsists were to be a puppet for business interests many of the orginal founders (including the Futurist Marinetti, the original instigator of violent attacks on Socialist party members) left. Mussolini, seduced by power, stayed on, the ulimate puppet dictator.

      Because of this "fascism" is often used by educated people to indicate a kind of government which is seen to govern in the interest of (esp. large) business, but lacking the politcal freedoms usually associated with a market based economy (ie. the "liberal-democratic state" 'Liberal' here referring to free-markets, 'democratic' to representative government). Slightly less educated people focus purely on the authoritarian nature and draw up bogus lists like "10 indicators of a fascist state" and the like. Importantly there was also the 'Totalitarianism' Cold-War propaganda meme, which tried to paint fascism as the flip side of the coin to communism.

      For myself (being more than merely 'educated' :P ) I prefer a stricter historical definition, which sees 'fascism' as an inter-bellum political phenomenon spanning a limited number of European countries and which arose as a response to the perceived threat of imminent socialist takeover. I disagree with the characterisation of China as 'fascist' on this account.

      I'm afraid your naive "original definition" of fascism, cannot be sustained by anyone with even a passing familiarity with the historical realities involved.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  40. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm warming to this executing bankers concept; can
    I join the Chinese Communist party?

  41. Don't like it? Don't buy it. by dindi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That should stand on all software boxes.
    If they bundle whatever with windows, it is their business, and the whole EU suing is a ridicule.

    Am I a MS fanboy? Not. I do not use Windows (I have one machine with it that I turn on once a month or less for testing software).

    Up to2 weeks ago, the only MS product I used was an xbox 360, which naturally died, and was my last ever MS product I purchased. (I love my new PS3 though, so thanks MS to open my eyes).

    Yes, for servers it is Linux and BSD, and MAC on desktop.

    So No. I do not like, or protect MS, but they should price their product as they like, and they should bundle it with whatever they want.

    How comes no one says : hey you have MSN messenger in xbox, and so you are damaging google and AOL( AIM), and ICQ.......

    Everyone should have the right to say to a customer : "I hate you, and now your price is 100, even though your neighbour's price is 40."

    It is like I sue BMW for having an mp3 player bundled with my car, which is built in, and is a bit problematic to remove.

    Stupid world, stupid people. Then again, if you do not like it, just buy something else.

    Oh... yes I switched to MAC after Vista came out. One week of usage, and I saw that this was the end of me and MS.

    just my 2c .... you can of course go out, buy it (even if you know it sucks) then complain and sue ....

  42. Re:What? by Z34107 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most banks in America are FDIC insured. Post-Great Depression, can you name an instance where banks loaning money too generously resulted in "screw[ing] depositors over 100k?" Does this happen often? And does this happen because banks are pressued to make loans to "the little guy," whatever the current definition of that term is?

    How many bank executives can you name that retired with a "golden parachute package" after failing at banking? Were they forced to retire, perhaps by the board of directors? Does that not sound like a clear case of "the system works?"

    "Bankers en masse make loans to fund housing/stock bubble"... You realize that the housing bubble screws banks out of any money related to mortages? Y'know, how this "housing bubble" you say those evil bankers made involves them being stuck with a devalued house and a bad loan? I can see how they had to scheme hard for that deal - it must go all the way to the highest levels of our government!

    Continue living in ignorance, and tell me where you cash your paychecks and keep your savings. I'll be happy to call you a hypocrite.

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW