Slashdot Mirror


Hotmail Full Version Incompatible With Firefox 3

An anonymous reader notes that Hotmail's full version doesn't work with Firefox 3. Users get the following message when they try to log in: You are temporarily on the classic version of Windows Live Hotmail due to an error encountered during login. Before trying again, please clear your cache and cookies. (Clearing cache and cookies doesn't fix it.) At least 8 other bug reports have been duped to this one. The fault apparently lies with the Hotmail site, not Mozilla — maintainer Dave Garrett assigned the bug to Tech Evangelism, explaining: "I'll... move this over to TE, as my guess is this [is] the site's fault (just bad user agent sniffing?)."

258 comments

  1. The cake was a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    FP.

    1. Re:The cake was a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why is this modded offtopic? It's funny, IE team sends them a cake and this guy says the cake was a lie.

    2. Re:The cake was a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      IE team != Hotmail team

    3. Re:The cake was a lie. by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 5, Funny

      MS is MS, they are the collective, resistance is futile.

    4. Re:The cake was a lie. by shasosa · · Score: 0, Troll

      Excuse me Active and very smart guys here, But can anybody here describe the simple logical basic of these sentences : 1. "Hotmail* Full Version Incompatible With Firefox* 3" 2. "MS is MS, they are the collective, resistance is futile" are you serious? really to describe and report a bug in using some systems together , shall we refer "the Incompatible" to wich one? "the newer" or "the older"?! please read this fake topic even as a joke! : "Ferrari CEO in rome said that:"the Earth is incompatible by our new Models""! what do u think about this man or woman?!!! ok! ferrari is a good car, even ferrari is the best but the earth is older than ferrari, even you say ferrari is Elvis!!! do you think that MS must predict the Arch of new FireFox even before release it and changed it's long time available service-HotMail- Methodology based on that. so i think the correct form to report this problem in a human manner is : "Firefox 3 Incompatible With Hotmail Full Version ". and about the number 2 , I Can just say "What? come on the smart!"

    5. Re:The cake was a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think my brain just exploded. Shasosa, try that again only use proper formatting and terminology which resembles coherent thought.


      Yes I know I'm responding to a troll, thus the Anonymous Cowerd approach.

    6. Re:The cake was a lie. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      If I recall, someone dug up an old picture of the IE cake, because that happened several years ago and some chump on digg just re-submitted it.

      Unless they've now sent 2 cakes - either way it was done several years ago for FFox 1.5? or 1.0, I can't recall precisely.

    7. Re:The cake was a lie. by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      do you think that MS must predict the Arch of new FireFox even before release it and changed it's long time available service-HotMail- Methodology based on that In a way, yes. MS has access to the standards and if Hotmail was written with standards in mind, this shouldn't really be too much of a problem. Also, Firefox 3 has been around for a while in beta and RC releases so they should have done testing to make sure it works.
    8. Re:The cake was a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it's an excellent reference to the Steam Orange Box Game "Portal".

    9. Re:The cake was a lie. by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Meh... GMail has made it obsolete anyway. POP3, IMAP, HTTP, whatever you want to use.

    10. Re:The cake was a lie. by Zemran · · Score: 1

      How would anyone dumb enough to be using Hotmail full version know what Firefox 3 is ???

      Gmail = best,
      Yahoo = hmmm, OK
      Hotmail = is it working today?

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    11. Re:The cake was a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If war is the answer, we need new questions.

      War isn't the answer, it's the question. Yes is the answer.

    12. Re:The cake was a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      War isn't the answer, it's the question. Yes is the answer.

      ... And apocalypse is the result.
    13. Re:The cake was a lie. by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      I'm using Firefox 3, have been doing so since betas, and I use Hotmail.

      Why? Because it's an address I've had for.. 10 years or so and I don't want to go to the hassle of updating my address with everyone.

      Do I use it for my 'main' correspondence? No, that's my personal email hosted on my own server. Do I use it to sign up for anything I want to and not worry about spam? Yup, and I would guess about 99% of spam is filtered these days as I get bugger all in my inbox.

      I use it out of convenience, I program for a living, I am not dumb, but you are an arrogant dick who jumps to conclusions about others if they don't agree with what _you_ think.

      Bravo sir.

    14. Re:The cake was a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found a decent solution to this problem. You can download an Add-On to firefox called IE Tab which opens an IE Tab within firefox so you can open a tab of Hotmail and have access to Hotmail full version.

    15. Re:The cake was a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the phrase "the cake is a lie" is a reference to a joke in a video game.

  2. Hotmail incompatible with me.... by KozmoKramer · · Score: 1

    Film at eleven.

    --
    My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my Father! Prepare to die!
    1. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by laserbeak43 · · Score: 4, Informative

      From my experience, The new hotmail has compatability issues with IE7!! LOL

    2. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by jeff419 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, I think M$ does this to force people to use IE to check their hotmail. Not like that doesn't fit their MO

    3. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by strabes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Solution: switch to a decent email service.

      --
      Its = possessive. It's = "it is"
    4. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by introspekt.i · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the bigger question for the film is:

      "Why are FireFox users using Hotmail?"

      I guess you could be a legacy user from way back when..buuuuuuuut...eventually you have to stop using Geocities.

    5. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Why are FireFox users using Hotmail?"
      Not everyone reads Slashdot. Most people who use Hotmail don't necessarily know or care that it is a Microsoft service, or think everything in the computing world was designed by Microsoft. I recently overheard a discussion in the library about Tim Berners Lee and how he was the guy who invented "the Internet" (He really invented the web, which is not the same thing as almost all of us here know, but the better illustration of my point is coming.) What did his friend say?: "I though Bill Gates invented the internet." I was too busy trying to keep from puking to point out that Gates not only did not invent the Internet, but actually originally said the Internet was just a fad.
      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Everyone knows that Al Gore invented the internet. He also has AlGorithm named after him, so he is a programmer too.

    7. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by introspekt.i · · Score: 0, Troll

      I thought Al Gore invented the internet.

      Lolz for cliches (without accent marks).

    8. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by introspekt.i · · Score: 1

      You beat me to the punch. ROAR.

    9. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by WiFiBro · · Score: 1, Troll

      Are you still quoting that distortion of Al's words?

    10. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do you care what site it is? The simple fact is that every web browser should work with every web site. Period. Would your opinion be different if this was for Yahoo Mail or Gmail?

    11. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess you could be a legacy user from way back when... Yeah, except that even way back when, hotmail was lame.
    12. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by medeii · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some of us signed up with Hotmail before Microsoft acquired it, or haven't felt inconvenienced enough to switch. I only use it for site registrations anyway, I've got my own domain for my 'real' email.

      --
      got standards? --- http://www.w3.org/
    13. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      I use it when I sign up for things I'm not sure I can trust not to spam my main address and check on it once a month or so.

    14. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by jcgf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I guess you could be a legacy user from way back when.

      Been there since 1996. It had everything I loved at the time, it was fast free and BSD. It didn't even attempt to start your chat client when you logged in to check your mail!

      It all went downhill after MS bought them. The first thing that happened was they decided to replace the existing and working infrastructure with MS servers running IIS and of course the hardware requirements went up and reliability went down. There are rumors that they haven't been able to fully complete the process to this day and that somewhere at hotmail some BSD machines are still running, but I'm skeptical of that.

      And here I sit, like the husband who stays with his unfaithful wife for the kids. Except this is just a mail server rather than a wife and there are no kids involved, so I guess that's not a very good analogy, but God damn it, hotmail will die before I give up that email address.... or they start charging $ for it.

      If I ever won enough money to buy the domain, I would start my own mail service and put a graphic on the main page depicting Beastie pitchforking Ballmer with a caption that says "I fear that there are no chairs here, biatch!"

    15. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      School account is run through hotmail.

    16. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by dbcad7 · · Score: 1
      Alright.. my way back story is that not only did I use hotmail before MS took em over, but after they took em over, me and my family members (who at the time were ICQ users) checked out out MSN Messenger which had the hotmail tie-in.. and long story short we have all been Messenger/Hotmail ever since.. And it's just became too much trouble to get everyone to switch to a different IM client. (although I use aMSN linux client it's still MSN network)

      I'm sure there are many other groups of people who are stuck with AIM or some other IM network for the same reasons I am stuck with Hotmail.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    17. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by LiquidDeath · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. My first thought was "their fault for using hotmail in the the 1st place."

    18. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by medeii · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotmail

      Acquired by Microsoft in 1997.

      --
      got standards? --- http://www.w3.org/
    19. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by witherstaff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a developer I keep a hotmail account around to test that emails from the site go through without triggering their spam filters.

      However I don't trust their spam filters to work. I keep flagging EVERY single message from MSN as spam and I still keep getting them.

    20. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      "Why are FireFox users using Hotmail?"

      When I needed a free email service, the only other one I could find was Google mail, which required a phone number (I didn'thave a phone at the time). Hence, Hotmail.

    21. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by pbhj · · Score: 1

      ...eventually you have to stop using Geocities. Ha!

      I've had my hotmail account since what about 1996, GeoCities too. Geocities was my first shot at web pages on the WWW (previously only on intranet). Curiously the most recent permutations of those pages still exist! Apparently I moved to CSS in 2001.

      Can't imagine who looks at those pages now, but Yahoo is paying for the server. The stats package moved from NedStat to someone I never even heard of, wonder if I can still find a login?

      I've just had a snoop around GeoCities and can date the early content to 1996 at least (teasing my flatmate about liking the Spice Girls!).

    22. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by SnEptUne · · Score: 1

      Phone number? How strange.

    23. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I was with hotmail before Microsoft came in. It's the only free provider I ever used, now I only use email from my own domains so that I am never locked into a provider.

      This logo brings back memories
      http://danscomp.net/hotmail_logo.gif

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    24. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by digital_rich · · Score: 1

      I opened my Hotmail account before Microsoft bought them. Why should I stop using the service? It's free and very reliable. The live version is slow as shit anyhow, I tried it for a week and went back to classic.

    25. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      pass the popcorn.

      I gave up on hotmail years ago after they deleted my 3 year old account for not using it for 30 days.

    26. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Your main address wouldn't happen to be @gmail would it?

      I'm sure spambots harvest this site and /.'s way of masking e-mail's is pretty ineffective against all but the most simple of bots.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    27. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      they need to prove you're a person they can verify. With Hotmail or Yahoo, you need a "real" email address to follow back to, typically your ISPs default email. Google is making it available to ANYBODY not just those with an already existing internet account.

    28. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by SnEptUne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got my gmail account by invitation, and I don't believe it ever asked for my phone number. But who knows, it may be different now.

    29. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between general spam that is usually blocked and the specific sites that might send me spam and require an Email address to register.
      For example, I didn't know whether Facebook will send me spam when I registered so I used my Hotmail account, after several months I changed it to my main account.

    30. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by clampolo · · Score: 1

      every web browser should work with every web site. Period.

      MS doesn't have a monopoly on browsers any more. If they want to scare away everyone using firefox, then let them shoot themselves in the foot. There are easy alternatives to any of the handful of sites that don't properly support firefox.

    31. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      yes, every site should be accessible with every browser.
      and I cannot access my yahoo mail site with FF3!
      I tried hotmail, but its not working.
      Strangely..I tried addons site addons.mozilla.org and guess what! it doesn't open with FF3, but IE successfully opens this site!

    32. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got it the other way around. It's every web site should work with every browser. Almost all browsers obey the HTML/CSS/ECMA specifications. It's the web developers who don't.

    33. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful my ass.

      Saying "every web browser should work with every web site" implies it's the browser's responsibility to make sure all sites render fine.

      Browsers have one responsibility - to correctly follow the W3C recommendations/specifications/etc.

      If a web developer then codes to some weird standard.. too bad...

    34. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It dont working with Opera ither.. i was contact the hotmail support for 7 month ago with this problem to and i used FF2 and i need to write my password to times every time i logg on to my mail

      The support answer that they now this problem and should fix the problem soon as they could!

      But the funny is.. i have a "@live.se" acount and that one work with no problem.

      Lars/Sweden

    35. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      The classic Hotmail seems to work well enough in FF.
      I had tried whatever the Web2.0 version is called a while ago, and the interface screamed "gmail wannabee with gratuitous differences that make it inferior".
      Perhaps it has improved, but I have little motive to switch, as I just use the Hotmail account for a junk bin.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    36. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by kv9 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      that would explain why Vista users are so butthurt. oh, and *whoosh*.

    37. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Curtman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny, but true. My wife seems to be unable to log in to Hotmail using IE7, and FF2 & 3 had no problems up until now.

    38. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I used to have a Hotmail account before Microsoft took over and it was reliable then. Then M$ took over and and switched from Sparcs to NT and you never knew if it was going to work or not. It went downhill and as I also had a Yahoo account I started switching stuff to that. After working abroad for a couple of months I came back and found that my Hotmail account had been cancelled. I had only been away for a couple of months, not 3 but the Yahoo account was still working so I just forgot about Hotmail. It was good in the day but that day past.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    39. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      MS doesn't have a monopoly on browsers any more. If they want to scare away everyone using firefox, then let them shoot themselves in the foot. There are easy alternatives to any of the handful of sites that don't properly support firefox.

      If you buy into that conspiracy theory, yes. But it's much more likely that it's a simple mistake on the part of either Firefox or one of Hotmail's web developers. I've seen nothing whatsoever to convince me that this is done on purpose.

    40. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      So, let's say my site consists of a "BuildNiceWebSite" tag that should automatically engineer a profitable online service.

      Renders as a blank page or an error. Blame the web browser?!
      Yah, this is getting somewhere...

      What the hell are you talking about?

    41. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a simple bot, you insensitive clod!

    42. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Thankyou... same boat exactly.

    43. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Vaticus · · Score: 1

      You too??! I have noticed over the last year that hotmail 'requires' me to put my password in twice. whenever I login using firefox (any version) the first login attempt *always* fails. And I know I input it correctly! anyone else experience this?

      --
      John 3:16. Know it.
      Drink Yourself Healthy: MonaVie
    44. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that Al Gore invented the internet. He also has AlGorithm named after him, so he is a programmer too.
      Are you here all week?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    45. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      I had a Hotmail account before they were bought by M$. I still have that account because of plain laziness: I don't feel like researching which sites I used that account with in order to migrate to a new service.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    46. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by rubah · · Score: 1

      I guess I should stop checking my hotmail, but I guess it'd get annoying if adium had a perpetual 'New Email!' message for my MSN.

    47. Re:Hotmail incompatible with me.... by kv9 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      *waves to butthurt Vista using mods on crack*

  3. User agent switcher by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does using to add-on to look like IE change anything? That would be pretty revealing.

    1. Re:User agent switcher by jeiler · · Score: 4, Informative

      Doesn't work. (FireFox 3, User Agent Switcher).

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    2. Re:User agent switcher by Vectronic · · Score: 5, Informative

      Tried as well, no go... even masking as FireFox/1.5 doesn't work, even though it says in mail.live.com that FireFox 1.5 is compatible.

      As a side note, it doesn't work in Opera 9.51 either, I didn't notice since I prefer the classic version anyways...

      It does however work if you set the site preferences as Mask As Internet Explorer (in Opera) although it seems to run really poorly, masking as FireFox goes to Classic.

    3. Re:User agent switcher by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

      It works perfectly under 9.51. I just loaded it like usual. I didn't have to do "mask". It just loaded.

      http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/6519/operahotmailhn9.png

      I don't know what opera your using but I just updated opera last night.

    4. Re:User agent switcher by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      Mine refuses...

      This is the classic version of Windows Live Hotmail
      This version works better with your browser. The full version of Windows Live Hotmail runs on Internet Explorer 6.0 and higher (make sure you check the system requirements before you install it). The full version also works on Firefox 1.5. And the option to switch between Classic and Full is gone from the Options, etc... and my moms a whore...so what...
    5. Re:User agent switcher by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

      Mine refuses...

      This is the classic version of Windows Live Hotmail This version works better with your browser. The full version of Windows Live Hotmail runs on Internet Explorer 6.0 and higher (make sure you check the system requirements before you install it). The full version also works on Firefox 1.5. And the option to switch between Classic and Full is gone from the Options, etc... and my moms a whore...so what... I am just wondering what you are trying to say and how this is a reply to my post. Opera works perfectly with hotmail and it is still much faster in opera than IE.
    6. Re:User agent switcher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Changing the user agent likely wouldn't stop it from recognizing a given browser. Most browsers support certain features that others don't. For example, javascript could look for the existance of ActiveX to find IE, document.all or document.frames for IE, conditional comments for IE, window.opera for Opera, etc. A quick view-source of this page on identifying browsers through CSS and Javascript will show some of the many ways to identify browsers.

    7. Re:User agent switcher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Firefox--no second capital F. God, I hate that mistake (even more than 'GMail' instead of 'Gmail').

    8. Re:User agent switcher by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

      It works fine for me in Opera 9.51--I have it set to mask as Firefox. Also, it doesn't run slow for me--it seems to just work fine. Also--finally Yahoo mail works for me now! (albeit slow on that one)

    9. Re:User agent switcher by seyyah · · Score: 1

      Tried as well, no go... even masking as FireFox/1.5 doesn't work, even though it says in mail.live.com that FireFox 1.5 is compatible.
      Folks, you seem to forget that switching your user agent to Firfefox 1.5 or to IE6 doesn't actually turn your browser into Firefox 1.5 or IE6.
    10. Re:User agent switcher by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      Never said it did, only that if Firefox 1.5 is compatible (according to message on mail.live.com), that changing the User Agent to Firefox/1.5 should be accepted by the site at least to the point where it tries (if the browser isn't actually capable) to show the site as intended for that web browser, which is what the 'User Agent' is intended for.

      I know that Opera, and Firefox are both capable of running it, and oddly IE7 is the slowest of the three, and the site should only be looking for the User Agent and OS, having so much difficulty by-passing it is just more credit to how suspect the Hotmail/LiveMail site actually is, especially considering the the main "perpetrator" of the use of "User Agent" was Microsoft in the first place, and they seem to be figuring out a new way to steal from, or block out other browsers.

    11. Re:User agent switcher by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Not only does it not work but on my computer (Xp x64) Firefox 3 crashes on MSN.com every single time. Now I'm certain formatting bugs shouldn't crash a browser.

  4. Change the User Agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There are add-ons for Mozilla that allow you to change the user-agent.

    (Have you tried sending IE7 as the user-agent?)

    1. Re:Change the User Agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I tried the IE7 user-agent and it still didn't work

  5. sniff sniff.. smells afoul by aXi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Seen this before certain banks using microsoft's web libraries, and suddenly firefox not being able to enter your banking page. Setting the browser's id as IE and os as windows and suddenly it works flawlessly. So Id guess it smells afoul.

    1. Re:sniff sniff.. smells afoul by aXi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I mean setting user agent to IE/windows helped.. However later they added some extra code, and even blocked that. The only way I could bank then, was by downloading the login page and editing it to remove the IE/Windows detection bit.. And guess what ? I could enter and use the rest of the site no problems whatsoever..

    2. Re:sniff sniff.. smells afoul by Zibri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Great that you solved it, even so; in a geeky way. However you should have called them and demanded they'd support firefox and linux and yadda yadda or threaten to switch bank. Just as people with hotmail trouble should do this to MSN. In case they don't listen: switch mail provider. Gmail still supports firefox.

    3. Re:sniff sniff.. smells afoul by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

      Maybe "spoof IE/Windows" should be a Firefox 3 feature...

    4. Re:sniff sniff.. smells afoul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However you should have called them and demanded they'd support firefox and linux and yadda yadda or threaten to switch bank.

      This complaint wouldn't even make it past customer service, let alone to a middle manager that would make the decision to support Firefox. Also, many banks now are massive corporations that don't really care if you threaten to switch to another company.
    5. Re:sniff sniff.. smells afoul by Kyokushi · · Score: 1

      Only on /. would people switch banks rather than switch browsers. Wow.

    6. Re:sniff sniff.. smells afoul by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      I've switched banks twice in the last year.

      The last time I changed my browser was when it was still Firefox 1.5

      Guess which one has more momentum?

      Also keep in mind that a switch to IE would require an entire operating system overhaul.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  6. I'm not at all surprised by CaptainPatent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IE comes with MSN as the default page and has links to tons of Microsoft products and services whereas Firefox leans away from most Microsoft-based sites. I'm sure these bugs will be fixed eventually... but I'm also pretty sure Microsoft wasn't too worried about launching Hotmail without Firefox support.

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    1. Re:I'm not at all surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thanks CaptainObvious.

    2. Re:I'm not at all surprised by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Firefox is basically funded by google. You know how the default search engine is google it is because google donates and promotes firefox. Not to mention the firefox "homepage" is google. Firefox received about 66 million dollars in 2006.

      http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2007/10/22/beyond-sustainability/

      Which is fine because they publicly state that. Almost all of the money they make, besides the occasional donation is from google. The mozilla foundation is funded by google.

      http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/documents/mozilla-2006-financial-faq.html

      Now that microsoft is competing head to head against google in the online arena this is not surprising.

      A larger firefox market share translates into a higher market share for google as firefox users are directed towards google.

    3. Re:I'm not at all surprised by onion2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure these bugs will be fixed eventually... but I'm also pretty sure Microsoft wasn't too worried about launching Hotmail without Firefox support.

      How long they take to fix it depends on whether they feel people are more likely to change their browser to fix a problem accessing their email, or change to a different email provider. While it's a great deal easier to change to a compatible browser it's not a foregone conclusion that people will necessarily take that route, especially if they're trying Firefox because they're dissatisfied with IE - if they're already trying to defect from the MSFT camp then a problem with Hotmail on FF3 will drive them further away.
    4. Re:I'm not at all surprised by astrosmash · · Score: 1

      but I'm also pretty sure Microsoft wasn't too worried about launching Hotmail without Firefox support.

      Actually, Microsoft is worried about all of its internet properties right now. The last thing they is yet another reason for someone to consider migrating away to a competing service.

      --
      ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    5. Re:I'm not at all surprised by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      ...I'm also pretty sure Microsoft wasn't too worried about launching Hotmail without Firefox support.

      That pretty much says it all about how much MS fears the law. What's one more potentially criminal antitrust abuse? The courts are so slow and punishments so weak, why would they even bother worrying about breaking the law?

    6. Re:I'm not at all surprised by dpilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One word: Tying

      (IANAL, but I can recognize a duck when I see it waddle and hear it quack.)

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    7. Re:I'm not at all surprised by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not surprising? Last I checked, Google is the #1 search engine, but you could still access it 100% with IE.

      This is like if GM was the primary sponsor for Six Flags amusement parks, and the parking attendants direct you to park at the far end of the parking lot because you drive a Toyota, but they don't explicitly say that they do so, and even though there's no technical reason why your car can't park in the more convenient spots.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    8. Re:I'm not at all surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is like if .

      Please. Just stop.

    9. Re:I'm not at all surprised by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

      Not surprising? Last I checked, Google is the #1 search engine, but you could still access it 100% with IE.

      This is like if GM was the primary sponsor for Six Flags amusement parks, and the parking attendants direct you to park at the far end of the parking lot because you drive a Toyota, but they don't explicitly say that they do so, and even though there's no technical reason why your car can't park in the more convenient spots.

      - RG>

      Than again microsoft's slogan isn't "Don't be evil" like google's is :P
    10. Re:I'm not at all surprised by firefly4f4 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the default search engine on the top right defaults to Google, but if you actually type an unknown address in the address bar it seems to default to Yahoo's search engine.

      I haven't figured out how to switch that (the title bar search) one over to google yet, either. Then again, I haven't looked very hear either.

    11. Re:I'm not at all surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still a silly business tactic, though. If the browser's *already* steering the user in Google's direction, and if the user then makes a *conscious choice* to use YOUR services, see YOUR ads and earn YOU money, shouldn't you be thankful for that instead of punishing them for it?

      It's like a salesperson refusing to serve a customer because a salesperson from a competitor's trying to get that customer's attention, nevermind the fact that the customer isn't actually interested in that competitor and is doing his best to ignore them.

    12. Re:I'm not at all surprised by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

      Still a silly business tactic, though. If the browser's *already* steering the user in Google's direction, and if the user then makes a *conscious choice* to use YOUR services, see YOUR ads and earn YOU money, shouldn't you be thankful for that instead of punishing them for it?

      It's like a salesperson refusing to serve a customer because a salesperson from a competitor's trying to get that customer's attention, nevermind the fact that the customer isn't actually interested in that competitor and is doing his best to ignore them.

      Don't really see why this was modded down. I completely agree.

      Obviously even if people arent using the microsoft browser they are deciding to use Microsoft's hotmail which makes them a contributing customer of Microsoft. Why is microsoft turning people away just because they don't use IE. Not to mention that people on linux or apple don't have IE. I mean if people using linux or apple decide to use Microsoft, which would be surprising considering the disdain for Microsoft that both of those camps have than Microsoft should be like oh' damn this OSS guys are using our online services, we are still getting something out of them.

  7. FF3 fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to comments in the bug report it works just fine in IE7 & FF2. Nothing to see here I guess.

  8. I have been using the "Open in IE Tab"... by jeaster · · Score: 1

    ...feature to get around this. I haven't poked about too much, but is there a way to 'hard code' that into the bookmark? That is, just specify in that Hotmail bookmark it should always open in an IE tab? Funny, the day after I noticed this problem, we got an intern at work who will be designing a web page for our department. When I was asked if I had any preferences for the web site, I replied "Don't force me to use IE to view it." Several other internal websites at our company do this, to my consternation.

    1. Re:I have been using the "Open in IE Tab"... by mtempsch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Under Tools -> IE Tab Options, Sites Filter tab - add the site, wildcarded as needed, for instance like http://foo.com/*

    2. Re:I have been using the "Open in IE Tab"... by KaMiKa-Z77 · · Score: 4, Informative

      is there a way to 'hard code' that into the bookmark? That is, just specify in that Hotmail bookmark it should always open in an IE tab? Yes, there is. If you go to IE Tab's preferences, there is a "Site Filter" tab. I usually add three rules to it so they always open in IE Tab:
      • http://*.hotmail.com/*
      • http://*.live.com/*
      • https://*.live.com/*
      Sucks, I know, but I'd rather do this than wait for Microsoft to fix their websites to work with FF.
      --
      Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous? - Calvin
    3. Re:I have been using the "Open in IE Tab"... by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      I tried this , doesn't work at all, weird.

      -
      Fake sig of a proud Linux user.

    4. Re:I have been using the "Open in IE Tab"... by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      It's helpful but it doesn't help much if you don't use Windows.

    5. Re:I have been using the "Open in IE Tab"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay, thats a good solution for Linux users!

    6. Re:I have been using the "Open in IE Tab"... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      It might be if IEtab works with IEs4Linux, though i haven't used that, so i'm unsure.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    7. Re:I have been using the "Open in IE Tab"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just how many Linux users, that use Firefox, that use hotmail do you think there are?

    8. Re:I have been using the "Open in IE Tab"... by miro+f · · Score: 1

      actually I'm on linux and I have a legacy hotmail account from way back that I use for site registrations.

      But then again, for the 10 seconds I need to check my email for the registration code, I couldn't care less whether it was "Live" or "Classic" mode...

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    9. Re:I have been using the "Open in IE Tab"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0?

  9. Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you use Safari, eventually the site saves your info to the cache - even if you ask for it not to save your username or password. Once your info is in Safari's cache, loading hotmail.com to try to log in gets you into an infinite loop bouncing between a couple of addresses. You have to stop the loading, go empty the cache of everything from live.com, and reload hotmail.com. Perhaps some of the fault is Apple's, but I've never had that problem with any other website while using Safari.

    It's probably just Microsoft being Microsoft.

    1. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by edalytical · · Score: 1

      This happens with my university's PeopleSoft and WebCT garbage.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    2. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happens on GMail as well in Firefox.

    3. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by $random_var · · Score: 2, Funny

      WebCT was put on earth by aliens who are set to destroy us by slowly driving us insane. What other explanation is there?

    4. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by edalytical · · Score: 1

      Sounds reasonable and probably very effective...

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    5. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      If you ever manage to login (hint: get rid of those hotmail, passport, live cookies), it will suggest you to use "Internet Explorer" for full site. On OS X!
      At least in Turkish version, it happens to a friend.

    6. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using the debug/developer menu to change user agent to firefox or ie works too. No need to empy cache

    7. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by QBasicer · · Score: 1

      WebCT's replacement, Blackboard, is orders of magnitude worse than WebCT. If you click the logo in Blackboard, it opens a new window with a new login screen. It also won't let you open new windows in tabs because you can't be signed in more than once. It's also very unstable and quite unintuitive.

      I want WebCT *back*.

      --
      x86, oh yes, I'm pro.
    8. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      It also has javascript blocking *NIX file paths unless the useragent contains "mac". It worked before and might be fixed now, though. I don't see why they don't check that a file was actually received, you can enter a path to a non-existent file and it will report a successful upload. My university also has passwords sent in base64 for some reason, but that might be just an issue with them.
      Although I don't see the other issues you mention. IIRC, I've always been able to open up pages in a new tab without issue. Clicking the logo takes me to my university's homepage, and clicking "MyBB" returns me to the main page. This is version 7.

    9. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your school is sane, they'll move to Sakai.

    10. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      The problem is with Safari -- I have huge problems not only with MS sites, but Yahoo ones as well. Safari's cookie code is seriously fux0red...

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    11. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by jaygridley · · Score: 1

      It's probably just Microsoft being Microsoft.

      It *is* Microsoft being Microsoft. Since when has any Microsoft site worked identically in a non-IE browser to how it works in IE? Take Exchange 2003. Outlook Web Access does not work the same in Firefox as it does in IE. (Can't speak for Exchange 2007 as I've only had limited experience with it, and in a non-production setting at that.)
    12. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by el_mancebo · · Score: 0

      This is solved, if you enter from this link: http://home.live.com/?mkt=es-es ...so perhaps, more M$ faults.

    13. Re:Not so friendly to non-MS browsers. by QuietObserver · · Score: 1
      Why would they do that?

      It would be efficient and it would make sense.

  10. Konqueror issues too by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Even the free version wont work in konqueror ( or at least hasn't for me for some time now )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Konqueror issues too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I first tried it in konq 2 years ago or so, I just could't even log in.

  11. Come on Hotmail! by drspliff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With a large dev team, lots of server admins, lots of marketing and a massive user base - you mean they don't test at all with other browsers while their in beta?

    The only way I could see this happening is if theres an internal policy to use _only_ IE for browsing (unlikely), or if developers were not allowed to.

    1. Re:Come on Hotmail! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The only way I could see this happening is if theres an internal policy to use _only_ IE for browsing (unlikely), or if developers were not allowed to.
      You must be new here.
    2. Re:Come on Hotmail! by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      With a large dev team, lots of server admins, lots of marketing and a massive user base - you mean they don't test at all with other browsers while their in beta?

      Wait, you think this is accidental?

      hahahahaha

    3. Re:Come on Hotmail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't overplay the joke. There's a huge sticker in your forehead saying "socially inept"

    4. Re:Come on Hotmail! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      People thinking it is accidental or modding you flamebait also thinks MS really wants to give .NET functionality to Linux via Mono project and Novell deal.
      Yes, everyone on earth tried how their page looks with Firefox 3 but MS didn't. Lets believe that.

    5. Re:Come on Hotmail! by drspliff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was just trying to push some arguments that there was no way this could happen unless Microsoft specifically had policies in place to not test with latest browsers.

      The developers there are nice people if you ever meet them, and the incompetence is unlikely to be on their behalf.

    6. Re:Come on Hotmail! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm saying. If there's any problem, it probably comes from the management and/or marketing department(s).

    7. Re:Come on Hotmail! by distilledprodigy · · Score: 2

      Well, they also haven't been in beta since start-up. Unlike our GMAIL-forever-in-beta-friends.

    8. Re:Come on Hotmail! by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      The developers there are nice people if you ever meet them, and the incompetence is unlikely to be on their behalf.

      But they're insufferable bastards if you don't meet them. Or they aren't. They're Schroedinger's Developers!
      --

      Question everything

    9. Re:Come on Hotmail! by domanite · · Score: 1

      Sometimes stuff does slip through the cracks - if it does turn out to be a Hotmail site issue, then I agree we should have caught it. Firefox is a fully supported browser for live sites, at the same level of support as IE. If you want to help keep us honest about that - we're hiring.

    10. Re:Come on Hotmail! by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      You are right, it shouldn't be such problem to check your commercial (doesn't hotmail have commercial version too?) email system with those five browser what you have? IE, Firefox, Safari (Webkit), Konqueror (KHTML) and Opera....

      Mayby it's just so that Microsoft does not have enough money to buy machines what would run those... wait... all runs on normal PC.. so mayby it's just that they cant install GNU/Linux for test machines... wait... all exept Konqueror works on Windows. So mayby it's just so the UAC is warning about the browser install and they are afraid to install those because they can include malware, what would allow crackers to get inside of Microsoft intranet.

    11. Re:Come on Hotmail! by pxc · · Score: 1

      So you're saying the Hotmail developers are dishonest?

      Man, whose side are you on here!?

    12. Re:Come on Hotmail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These bugs are 'by design'.

      So ofc they test it with FF etc. They test to make sure the site is BROKEN...

  12. That's odd...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hotmail is sure compatible with Spam.

    1. Re:That's odd...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but that's not even remotely true. As a user of both mail.live.com (hotmail) and Gmail, both get no spam to speak of in my inboxes. I use both of them as my internet persona's and neither has any spam. I guess the SPAM blocking was implemented after the last time you used it? And no, I am not going to post both addresses so that you can TEST the spam filters; I'm just pointing out that in my subjective real use of both, neither get any spam at all.

    2. Re:That's odd...... by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

      So the people sending spam AREN'T using Firefox 3, thank you for bearing with us through our tests, we hope you didn't think we were intentionally blocking you guys.

      ~ A Microsoft Employee

    3. Re:That's odd...... by duguk · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you'll find Hotmail has more of a habit of losing non-spam messages.

      Hotmail has another weird bug with firefox - some accounts (mostly @msn.com) have to log in twice. Here's a long forum post about it, here's a pretty bug report, and here's an easy fix.

  13. In run into similar symptoms with Konqueror by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Same behavior in Konqueror(3.5.9). Well, actually, the default Konqueror UA isn't recognized as compatible with the full version interface; but spoofing either an IE or an FF UA changes that. With the spoof in place, the page exhibits the same behavior as described with FF3

    So, this problem isn't caused by straight discrimination based on UA string, since spoofing IE had no effect. Something about the website is clearly wonky, though I can't say whether or not KHTML is to blame.

  14. This isn't particularly new by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This may not exactly be on the topic, but I've noticed every Microsoft run website that I try to access with Firefox gives me trouble, even with previous versions of Firefox. The Xbox live site never recognizes passwords the first time when they're inputted with Firefox. I tried accessing the same sites with Internet Explorer and lowe and behold the passwords work properly every time. I try not to get into that mindset that the Microsoft people are actually petty enough to pull stunts like that, but from my own experience and reading stories like this it starts to get difficult.

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
    1. Re:This isn't particularly new by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Weird, the MSDN sites (even the subscription download ones) work perfectly fine for me in Firefox.

    2. Re:This isn't particularly new by Darkk · · Score: 1

      Same here with FF2 and FF3. Works fine for me on those sites.

    3. Re:This isn't particularly new by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 1

      They also work fine for me. But I always have to do my login twice because the first time it always says I put in the incorrect password

      --
      I have nothing compelling to say
    4. Re:This isn't particularly new by vertinox · · Score: 4, Informative

      This may not exactly be on the topic, but I've noticed every Microsoft run website that I try to access with Firefox gives me trouble, even with previous versions of Firefox.

      Its not flamebait.

      Support.microsoft.com and office.microsoft.com have quirks with pages loading completely that make it painful enough to use IE instead.

      Its not like I have to visit those sites that often though.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    5. Re:This isn't particularly new by duguk · · Score: 1

      If its an @msn.com address, particually with Hotmail, try and the associated bug report. I think it might be related.

  15. It works in Opera :-) by David_Bloom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The full version works fine in Opera 9.5...now who says Opera's not a compatible enough browser? ;-)

    --

    Karma: Excellent (fuck, even in the future moderation doesn't work!)
    1. Re:It works in Opera :-) by natenovs · · Score: 1

      yeh. when i switched to opera, i no longer needed the IETab extension i relied upon in firefox. i dont care what the mozilla team says, FF has some serious web site compat issues

    2. Re:It works in Opera :-) by TheSeer2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shush. Stop getting in the way of the MS bashing.

    3. Re:It works in Opera :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, all proprietary software is "crap", even if it's just some random desktop application.

      Also, a lot of people have Hotmail accounts, so obviously they care.

      How old are you? 15?

    4. Re:It works in Opera :-) by Vexorian · · Score: 0

      May I say who cares about running friking 'full hotmail'? The people that still use hotmail don't really care about getting the full widgets or whatever stunt MS invented here, I'd say they are more interested in MSN.

      It is a web browser, not a random app, you use it every day, and even though opera could appear to be a decent alternative to firefox 3.0, it remains not good enough, plus you add the fact that it is proprietary, using it over firefox truly is non-sense. So with firefox3 you got a better quality browser, that is FOSS, while with opera you get what? full hotmail? Sorry, but I pass.

      I could be 15 or 23, would you care? I'd say that your attachment on age is quite immature, my conclussion is that you probably are a 40 years old that's still behaving as a teenager trying to use age to make a point.

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    5. Re:It works in Opera :-) by Ptraci · · Score: 1

      My father. I was planning to update his laptop with FF3 when he comes back from his annual trip to Alaska, but he's been using Hotmail for his email for quite a while and it would be a real hassle to get him to change it. He's 80 years old and doesn't like to change things.

    6. Re:It works in Opera :-) by HappySmileMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope, IE has the issues, and Opera accomodates that crap.

    7. Re:It works in Opera :-) by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well I bet there is a memo at Microsoft like "Don't mess with Opera" after the MSN scandal and rumored $millions loss after settlement.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/02/06/msn_deliberately_breaks_operas_browser/

    8. Re:It works in Opera :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea full version works fine for me opera 9.5 running on gentoo linux

    9. Re:It works in Opera :-) by pbhj · · Score: 1

      My father. I was planning to update his laptop with FF3 when he comes back from his annual trip to Alaska, but he's been using Hotmail for his email for quite a while and it would be a real hassle to get him to change it. He's 80 years old and doesn't like to change things.

      That's fine then because the "classic" Hotmail still works fine it's the new and improved (changed) version that doesn't work with FF3.

      Install away.

    10. Re:It works in Opera :-) by kjart · · Score: 1

      The full version alsoo works fine (and has for a long time) in FF2. In fact, there was an article like this that came out around the time the new Hotmail site was released regarding FF2 availability. I fully expect support of FF3 to be added within in a few weeks.

    11. Re:It works in Opera :-) by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      You are not allowing speaking truth by facts. It's not about bashing Microsoft, it's about truth...

      If I bash Microsoft, I say it's middle class software company what has no future...

  16. Sensational, or Novell? by ilikepi314 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As much as I hate anecdotal "evidence" for things, I can say that I just cleared my junk mail from a full Windows Live mail account (it was Hotmail until they forced me to move it over) just before I came to slashdot. In Firefox 3. No problems. I've never seen that message.

    That being said, I also have SUSE, and it occurred to me perhaps there is some special deal going on there to allow it to work fine. But if not, I can't see any good reason to blame Mozilla or Microsoft; the bug was filed with Firefox 3 still in beta, perhaps it was an un-updated extension or the like interfering?

    1. Re:Sensational, or Novell? by duguk · · Score: 2, Informative

      look carefully, its in the center of the page; if the site doesn't load it redirects back to the old version with a message, in a yellow box on the main hotmail page. its easy to miss - i did too.

    2. Re:Sensational, or Novell? by roster238 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      "I can't see any good reason to blame Mozilla or Microsoft;"

      Apparently you are new to /. There is always a reason to blame Microsoft, George Bush, or Fox News. Please do not try to cloud the issue with facts it only enrages the proletariat.

      --
      I swear I didn't know it was loaded...
    3. Re:Sensational, or Novell? by ilikepi314 · · Score: 1

      thanks for pointing that out! sure enough, it is there and easy to miss. I was in classic mode the whole time.

      this made me curious though, so I went to my windows machine and opened up IE. It loaded the full version and... it almost looks exactly the same! I thought I had tried it once before, no wonder I never noticed the transition to classic mode! I don't see any practical difference. Maybe I just turned off the bling last time I used it though.

      As an aside, I had to actually turn down the IE cookie protection from "high" in order for it to work. Makes me really proud of their security efforts. Glad hotmail is essentially my spam account these days.

    4. Re:Sensational, or Novell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win XP here and FF3 since beta and never had that problem... What doesn't work is previewing on slashdot most of the time.

  17. Curious demographic by pembo13 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I am somewhat curious about the type of person that uses Firefox 3 but has a Hotmail (note not Passport) account that they actually check.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:Curious demographic by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      I am somewhat curious about the type of person that uses Firefox 3 but has a Hotmail (note not Passport) account that they actually check. I believe that population would fall somewhere between size 0 and size N where N is the number of users that had firefox installed on their system by their open source savvy friend.

      Plus or minus a few for the "I only use it for passport, but then use it as a throwaway email for some sites" crowd or the "I only use my ISP email address" crowd.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    2. Re:Curious demographic by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Well I have a Hotmail account, I just don't check it, and there seems to be no way to delete it. And you don't need a Hotmail account to have a Passport account.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:Curious demographic by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      yes, but for many who started with their account back in the day, it became their passport account.

      Out of curiosity, was there a point in that either way?

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    4. Re:Curious demographic by no1home · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I don't use Hotmail as my main account (haven't for quite a while), I still use it. And Firefox. No, nobody installed it for me. I am the go-to guy for tech and science (etc, etc, etc.) And I don't have any trouble getting into Hotmail (full) at all. :)

      --
      I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

      Persecutors will be violated!
    5. Re:Curious demographic by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Well I have a Hotmail account, I just don't check it, and there seems to be no way to
      > delete it.

      Can't you change the address to anonymous@example.com and the password to Yaewoh4i? That would seem to have the same effect.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:Curious demographic by chooks · · Score: 1

      I am somewhat curious about the type of person that uses Firefox 3 but has a Hotmail (note not Passport) account that they actually check.

      I do. I've used Hotmail since before MS bought them (I think they ran off BSD in those days...netcraft may have even confirmed it!) and I just never bothered to switch over to something else.

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    7. Re:Curious demographic by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Damn you senor counterexample =)

      Ok so add no1home-ish users to N.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    8. Re:Curious demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internet Cafes, Libraries other public places. You name it...

    9. Re:Curious demographic by Pazy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do for one, I created it when I first got on the net and have never had a problem with it so never needed to change. And since most of my friends use MSN to chat online I need an address for that anyway. I see no conflict of any kind, hotmail works and does its job as do my non-M$ browsers.

    10. Re:Curious demographic by j_sp_r · · Score: 1

      Curious, I got 3 passport accounts and no hotmail.

    11. Re:Curious demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use messenger all the time anyway, and both my messenger clients (aMSN and Live Messenger) have hotmail inbox checking, so I use it for noncritical stuff.

      My "official" mail is my gmail box.

  18. get with the times by Cyko_01 · · Score: 0

    Hotmail was sooo 2 years ago. Gmail is where it's at

    1. Re:get with the times by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Hotmail was two years ago? What decade is this? Someone bring me some coffee!

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  19. Sounds familiar by bwian · · Score: 1

    http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/08/1355246&from=rss
    "Hotmail Doesn't Work With Linux Firefox 2.0" - Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:35 AM
    "... The writer concludes that the webmail interface has been artificially limited by basic user-agent sniffing. The solution is simple enough: spoofing the User Agent that Firefox report"

    I wonder if it works with IE8 beta ... it is supposed to be standards compliant by default.

  20. hotmail? by hansoloaf · · Score: 1

    what is this hotmail you speak of?

  21. And what did you expect? by Mensa+Babe · · Score: 0

    I have predicted it on the day when Gmail introduced Firefox to the Google Pack, only to get laughed at by the Slashdot crowd. In this case it is sad to have been right but let's face it - we had it coming. And for those who are posting messages about how Micro$oft can't make a correct website - do you think that they have missed the campaign? I wish. The truth is that they are some of the most knowledgeable folks out there, even if on the evil side of our battle. Sadly the only solution is to do what we have done in the same situation with Open Office having problems with Office generating incorrect documents. We had to cripple Open Office internal file importation algorithms to the point of having tons of slow spaghetti code (take a look at the CVS sometimes) but what was the other alternative? We could have only excluded ourselves from the main stream of de facto standards. Now the Firefox team stands before the same dilemma. Let's just hope that they will solve this problem wisely and elegantly. They need our support now, for they will not get it from Redmond.

    --
    Karma: Positive (probably because of superiour intellect)
    1. Re:And what did you expect? by maxume · · Score: 1

      It'll take Microsoft about 5 days to fix it.

      Part of being a giant, evil mega-corporation is successfully choosing when to be pragmatic.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  22. Hotmail is dying by newr00tic · · Score: 0

    And if Hotmail is dying, so is *BSD.

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  23. HTTPRequest broken by zakeria · · Score: 1

    even ebay is broken with check status etc...

  24. How is this a problem? by strabes · · Score: 1

    Does anyone actually use hotmail anymore? If so, does anyone that knows enough to use firefox still use hotmail?

    --
    Its = possessive. It's = "it is"
  25. Seriously, Hotmail? by TheFairElf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    People still use Hotmail? Compared to other services (Gmail, Yahoo) hotmail is stuck in the dark ages.

  26. This tactic has worked in the past... by Rinkhals · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why on earth would microsoft abandon it now?

    --
    "I'm a snake if we disagree"-Jethro Tull, Bungle in the Jungle
  27. has problems with by thc4k · · Score: 1

    This is only news to IE users, and there probably aren't much around here. Almost every website under *.microsoft.* or *.google.* has problems with either opera or firefox or both.

    1. Re: has problems with by fragino · · Score: 1

      I use the full version of Hotmail in Firefox3. It works fine except that the email list and read pane feature doesn't work. When I click on an email I lose the list. It's annoying and I hope they fix it soon. Since Firefox is the one that changed, I blame Firefox although I still use it. YES I USE AND LIKE HOTMAIL. I also have a Yahoo and a Gmail account when they first started up. I prefer the layout of Hotmail. I use what I like and am comfortable with. Yes there are some of us Hotmail users out here left. I've been using the internet since Mosaic. I like compatibility because I got tired of having to write up a script to configure memory every time I bought a new game. Up to this point the only computer that I used and didn't build are the two laptops that I owned. I had a Compuserve account and Wordstar was my first word processor.

  28. Microsoft! The incompatible company! by timtiminator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In 80's and 90's everyone was like "get a compatible" meaning get a PC with DOS or Windows. Now it seems like Microsoft is the incompatible company! Examples: Internet Explorer not standards compliant, Vista not compatible with many business applications that ran well on XP, MS Office not supporting ODF... Does this mean that Microsoft is going down the same path as Commodore and OS/2?

  29. Is Hotmail Incompatible with Firefox 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or is Firefox 3 incompatible with Hotmail?

  30. Bad QA at Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hotmail is one of the biggest e-mail site out there - even if the problem is with the site, the FF QA should have detected and reported it.

  31. Who cares by rduke15 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Who cares about hotmail anyway? Isn't that the obnoxious service which adds advertisements to all the mails sent by their users? (And most users not being aware that they are sending spam at the bottom of the mails they write.)

    Well, in fact Yahoo does the same thing. Strange that the MS/Yahoo deal didn't work out. As far as treating their email service users, they seem to behave the same.

    1. Re:Who cares by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yahoo lets Safari 3, Opera 9.5, Firefox 2 (3 has documented issue) users to use their (New) Yahoo Mail and (Beta) My Yahoo. They are way complex and beyond anything those MSCE monkeys could code BTW. My Yahoo beta is essentially a full feature RSS reader masked as a webpage.

      I don't see any comparison between Yahoo and Hotmail really. It could only serve to get idea about what would happen if MS really acquired Yahoo.

  32. Firefox 3 Javascript by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The fault apparently lies with the Hotmail site, not Mozilla -- maintainer Dave Garrett assigned the bug to Tech Evangelism, explaining: "I'll... move this over to TE, as my guess is this [is] the site's fault (just bad user agent sniffing?)

    1) Changing or spoofing agent string doesn't help. Even pretending to be IE, the .js files associated still fail in FF3 WITH THE SAME ERROR.

    2) If you look at the page source you can tell that Hotmail is identifying FireFox properly and loading the corresponding javascript, etc specific to FireFox.

    So why is the Firefox team assigning this to 'Agent String' or 'Tech Evangelism' again?

    1. Re:Firefox 3 Javascript by jimicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So why is the Firefox team assigning this to 'Agent String' or 'Tech Evangelism' again?

      I haven't RTFA but at a guess I'd say it's likely that Firefox is being fed broken js/HTML by Hotmail.
    2. Re:Firefox 3 Javascript by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Because they can't dare to mess with Microsoft giant like a little Norwegian company did?

      Opera sued them big time for messing around with their application along with releasing a dedicated "Bork edition" release which is a legend already.

    3. Re:Firefox 3 Javascript by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Firefox is being fed broken js/HTML by Hotmail

      Possible, but if you change the user agent, and Hotmail thinks your browser is IE7 or IE8 or FF2 it still breaks...

      If it was just bad FF .js/HTML then changing the user agent would fix the problem, and it don't.

      (Also remember IE8 runs in standards default mode, breaking with IE legacy, so code for it would be pretty pure and shouldn't break on FF3.)

    4. Re:Firefox 3 Javascript by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because they can't dare to mess with Microsoft giant like a little Norwegian company did?

      Opera sued them big time for messing around with their application along with releasing a dedicated "Bork edition" release which is a legend already

      1) Stuff like this is why you look at the served HTML.

      2) You do realize that the 'margin' setting on the MSN style sheets that caused the problem with Opera was either a stupid MSN programmer doing something NOT MSN, or was a very simple accident, since the margin number it received was from a 'calculation'.

      MSN is NOT Microsoft, you would be surprised how separate the businesses operate, and isolating Opera users with a messed up page would NOT benefit MSN.

      Some interesting MSN info:
      The MSN datacenter managers and site programmers are borderline retarded having worked with them directly, I would bet on it being an accident and wouldn't be surprised if there aren't tons of coding errors that hit all browsers independantly.

      The MSN managers and programmers are the reason Microsoft 'Live' exists, and why MSN groups and other MSN features are all in competition with Live and being replaced by Live services from Microsoft's other divisions OUTSIDE of MSN. MSN is a held over tie to a time when MSN was a folder based compuserve type service and tried to adopt to being a portal site.

      Notice that everything from Windows Messenger to even search moved from the MSN teams and was replaced. All Microsoft products shove live.com as the default home page, not MSN.com.

      If you ever want to see a day in insanity, go hang out with the MSN datacenter people. I feel sorry for sites like Slate.com, etc that have to work through their operations.

      I worked with another 'partner' like Slate and dealing with the MSN people scared the fek out of myself and my team. We even had to fix programming for them and send them instructions for their servers because an 'ok' manager at MSN said his people didn't know how to do something really simple and asked if we would do it for him on the side. Scary...

    5. Re:Firefox 3 Javascript by duguk · · Score: 1

      If it was just bad FF .js/HTML then changing the user agent would fix the problem, and it don't.

      Um, not if IE is using non-standard js, that isn't supported in Firefox. I think that's kinda the problem. Hotmail's code for Firefox doesn't work because MS broke it, and the IE js isn't compliant.
    6. Re:Firefox 3 Javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee...it couldn't actually be a problem with Firefox...it's GOTTA be that evil MS. Heh. Way to look at all the possibilities; congratualtions.

    7. Re:Firefox 3 Javascript by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, not if IE is using non-standard js, that isn't supported in Firefox. I think that's kinda the problem. Hotmail's code for Firefox doesn't work because MS broke it, and the IE js isn't compliant.

      What are you suggesting here? That Microsoft went out of their way to find some exact combination of Javascript functions that:
      1) Works in IE
      2) Works in FF2
      3) But doesn't work in FF3
      4) Was installed before any FF3 betas were around (since this has been reported for every version of FF3.)

      Seriously? Do you think that's even technically possible? Hell, do you think the combination of points 2 and 3 is even technically possible?

      It's a billion times more likely that this problem is caused by a obscure error in FF3 that didn't exist in FF2.

    8. Re:Firefox 3 Javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The combination of points 2 and 3 may not be technically possible. This is a moot point, however, since FF2 no longer works with the full version of hotmail either. I know it did before Firefox 3 came out, though...

    9. Re:Firefox 3 Javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Gates and company have been known to purposely rig their own products to break others' before. Google or Wiki for the history of DR-DOS, for example, if you think I'm lying.

      Why should we trust them not to do so now?

  33. Antitrust by KasperMeerts · · Score: 1

    Nobody wants to do that of course, but can't they technically be trialed for this?
    Willfully excluding a competitors product is not so nice. [/naive]

    I guess Microsoft is still Microsoft. Will they ever change?

    --
    As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
  34. They're not the only ones by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

    Secureserver.com (Godaddy's email service) has started rejecting logins if you're using Opera.

    I don't mind a warning, but for God's sake let me just take my chances, would you?  Now I have to switch to Firefox to check mail--fucking retarded.

    Hey, I've got an idea--instead of serving custom pages by sniffing user agents, why not make a single set of code that works everywhere?  I mean, I know it's horrible to contemplate--but I'm really not interested in your fancy Ajax interface or toys that try to second guess everything I do--I just want to check my fucking mail.  And now I can't even do that, 'cuz yer so fancy.

  35. Outlook Web Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been pulling the same thing with Outlook Web Access for years.

    1. Re:Outlook Web Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you should be glad they are doing that, because otherwise it wouldn't work at all in Firefox.

    2. Re:Outlook Web Access by Kalriath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You do realise that Outlook Web Access actually does rely on some IE only stuff right? Specifically, it uses a non-standard HTTP verb (SUBSCRIBE), they still haven't moved from using the old XMLHTTP ActiveX control to the new XMLHttpRequest (you can probably forgive them for being slow on the uptake there - they probably can't believe it ever took off - nothing Microsoft invents takes off!), and I imagine some of the Javascript is quite funky too (the "You have new e-mail" popup appears OVER other programs).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  36. Account management broken as well. by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    The account management page doesn't work either, the sections just sit on loading forever (why do they use scripting for this anyway?). Thus giving no way to, say, change your password.
    Billing still works. Still no way to remove a credit card without adding another, though.

  37. What really surprised me... by KeepQuiet · · Score: 1

    What really surprised me is that people are still using hotmail?!?!

  38. Time to dust off and update the old memes. by Alpha+Whisky · · Score: 1

    Instead of "Dos ain't done until Lotus won't run." how about "Hotmail ain't done until Firefox won't run."

    --
    it's = it is

    its = belonging to it

  39. Oh, of course it's MICROSOFT's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The fault apparently lies with the Hotmail site, not Mozilla "

    Gee, do you think this might have been a different angle in a slashdot summary if Gmail had broken with new version of IE and Microsoft had made the user agent incompatible w/Gmail?

  40. Response from Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I filed a tech support request on hotmail, the following is the email I got back from microsoft.

    Dear Joel,

    Your message was forwarded to us at Windows Live Hotmail Technical Support. This is Kris and I gather that you are having issue that Windows Live Hotmail will not load in the full version when you are accessing your *****@hotmail.com account through Firefox 3 as your browser. I understand the importance of having this addressed immediately.

    Joel, I would like to inform you that Windows Live Hotmail does not currently have the feature that will allowed you to use the full version of Windows Live Hotmail when using Firefox 3 as your browser. What I can do for you now is to personally submit this item to the Windows Live Hotmail Product Development Team as a feature request for evaluation, as I see the usefulness of this capability.

    We appreciate your continued support as we strive to provide you with the highest quality service available. Thank you for using Windows Live Hotmail.

    Sincerely,

    Kris

    Windows Live Hotmail Technical Support

    --- Original Message ---
    From : *****@hotmail.com
    Sent : Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:12:37 AM UTC
    To : LV_ID.WNLV.NA.US.EN.MSF.SEA.TS.T01.RTG.00.EM
    Subject : Windows Live ID:I have a different proble:Other

    Service:
        Windows Live ID

    What type of problem do you have?
    I have a different problem or question [I have a different problem or question]

    Other [Other]

    Full name:
          Joel *****

    The e-mail address for us to send a response:
          *****@hotmail.com

    Primary e-mail address/member ID associated with the account you are inquiring about:
          *****@hotmail.com

    Be specific when describing your problem. The details that you include enable us to promptly send you the most likely solution to your issue.
          The full version of live mail won't load in Firefox 3. The classic version loads instead with an error message.

    The full version of live mail worked with Firefox 2.

    Frequency of the issue:
          Always present [Always present]

    Who is your ISP?

    Have you recently installed any new software (if you enter yes please add more comments in the text box above)?

          Yes [Yes]

    Which operating system are you using?Windows XP: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008052906 Firefox/3.0

    Which browser are you using: Firefox3.0

    Location: en-us - English (United States)

    Type of Support: E-mail Support

    Browser Default Language: en-us,en;q=0.5

  41. I've seen several browser problems with hotmail by KernelMuncher · · Score: 0

    I've had a hotmail account since forever and still keep it because so many people know my address. Over the years I've seen numerous browser problems with hotmail. So I'm not surprised about the latest FF issues. Quite frankly I'm glad Microsoft is being such a pain about these things. By being difficult they push people away from their products. Even lazy bastards like me who should have switched to Gmail years ago. So please, Bill, keep designing your software to be so petulant. It helps to make your company more irrelevant with every passing day . . .

  42. Gmail v2 doesn't allow Opera 9.5 by rodgerdb · · Score: 0

    What else is new? Gmail v2 doesn't seem to work with Opera 9.5 either unless you tell it to bypass the browser check: http://mail.google.com/mail/?nocheckbrowser Seems kinda silly that these giant providers can't get with the program.

  43. Well... by thegnu · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you still quoting that distortion of Al's words?

    In Soviet Russia, Al Gore quotes YOU!

    And the Internet invented AL GORE!

    And you reply to ME!

    And I downmod YOU!

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
    1. Re:Well... by WiFiBro · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Lol you lost a modpoint then by replying :P.

    2. Re:Well... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      And you reply to ME!

      And I downmod YOU!

      Well I, for one, am glad that the communists didn't win.

      Oh god! I just replied to you! This is where it starts!

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    3. Re:Well... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      In soviet Russia, the moderation system doesn't understand YOU!

      (Well, that guy over there, but who wants to ruin a perfectly good cliche?)

      --
      It's been a long time.
  44. To those who can't sign in with Firefox or Opera by ya+really · · Score: 1
  45. OMFG!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some websites are incompatible with some web browsers!!!11! It's the end of the fucking world! Somebody alert the president! This is unheard of!

  46. too much fuzz aboout hotmail by indi0144 · · Score: 0

    I have two hotmail accounts, I need them so I can use the messenger accounts for specific purposes. But I rarely log into hotmail to check the litle mail I get there, I have them setup to redirect any new mail to a gmail account. BTW a hotmail account is perfect to give away when you don't trust the site who ask your email. Also when you create newsletters you can't simply don't test if they render properly in hotmail, a lot of people use hotmail. Is not personal preferences some times.. all in all .. yes hotmail sucks, It have to sucks more so users(tm) find that gmail is way better and change. I've find that if you do a little tutorial about gmail for them, they change happily. Just tell the that if they use gmail they can receive/write their mail in their desktops with outlook or thunderbird and without login into any website, that trills them. Just stop complaining and do a little more for "educate" average people.

  47. igoogle borked too? by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

    My iGoogle layout broke the day I upgraded to FF3 also, so I assume it's the culprit. It's still usable so I haven't dug too deep for a solution, being lazy and all.

  48. Workaround by Titoxd · · Score: 1

    True. That said, if you are stuck in the infinite loop, though, you don't have to go clear your cache to be able to log in. You can just go to the main MSN portal, and since that site recognizes that you're still logged in, it will show you a "sign out" link instead. Just log out, and go back to the Hotmail site, and will let you log in again. Not ideal, but better than clearing caches.

    HTH

    1. Re:Workaround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had that work, but it wasn't completely consistent for me and I found myself doing the cache clearing again. I definitely check hotmail a lot less than before and, considering it's not my main address anymore, that's probably a good thing. (I can get into nervous-habit checking of sites sometimes.)

  49. IE-only website testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of companies that only test their websites with the Internet Explorer browser. They're everywhere, and part of the problem is that IE has so many proprietary controls or shortcuts in their renditions of JavaScript and CSS that are adopted by developers due to the business pressing developers to roll out their web applications sooner. Many businesses fail to address the increasing use of alternative browsers (especially Firefox) and subsequently fail to adhere to ISO standards in their development. Sounds like Hotmail has fallen into that rut (though this is not necessarily new news).

    What can we as developers and/or users do to push the envelope toward cross-browser compatibility?

  50. Confused by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    What's this Hotmail thing, a gay male "connecting service"?

    1. Re:Confused by DamonHD · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, you'll be thinking of hotmale.com.

      Boy, I wish I'd registered that way back when, to make my megabucks!

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
  51. Is this a great idea with banking? by jesterzog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    However later they added some extra code, and even blocked that. The only way I could bank then, was by downloading the login page and editing it to remove the IE/Windows detection bit.. And guess what ? I could enter and use the rest of the site no problems whatsoever..

    Not to excuse them for having a crappy site, but do you know for sure that you weren't breaking their terms of service by doing this? With most sites I wouldn't care, but in the case of Internet Banking I might be tempted to just find an alternative bank that did agree to support my browser.

    For all you know, the reason they were trying to block Firefox might have been because they knew of a bug that would mis-interpret your banking instructions. (eg. If you told it to pay someone on 6/7/2008, it might be sent by the browser as 7/6/2008.)

    If you'd knowingly worked around their efforts to block your browser from using their banking interface, and then they'd lost your money, you might not have much of a legal standing to fall back on.

    1. Re:Is this a great idea with banking? by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about bypassing artificial restrictions like this for the sake of accessibility. This sort of strategy is going to blow up in these company's faces when a blind user gets upset enough about being forced to use IE over their preferred browser. These are the sort of poor CYA decisions made by management: Since we can't thoroughly test our site on all browsers we'll lock out all but the one we want to support to minimize our hassles.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  52. hotmail is still around? by dziban303 · · Score: 1

    Who still uses hotmail, anyway?

  53. Re:Microsoft! The incompatible company! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody gives a fuck about standards compliance. I haven't met a single non-geek that could give a shit about ODF.

    So while Microsoft continues to generate billions of dollars, you can continue to rant.

  54. Dear Hotmail Web Developer: by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0

    YouAreTheWeakestLinkGoodbye.

  55. not the only bug by thbsp · · Score: 1

    if their response to other bugs is any indication then it looks like firefox users are going to be using the basic version of hotmail for some time to come. i've been marking all the windows live service emails as phishing attempts for years but they still keep coming...

  56. I can explain it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    easy one this...

    Micro$oft = Monopoly.

    if (!MicrosoftProduct) {
            giveUserLessFeaturesForNoTechnicalReason(); // This Function got us in court due to anti-trust laws- USE WITH CAUTION. and try to hide the fact with some cryptic error.
    {

  57. Gmail Full Version Incompatible With IE 7 by spaceturtle · · Score: 1
    Uh, yeah, about that, the latest (full) version of GMail is incompatible with IE7, so my sister switched to Firefox.

    (Although I also added the ?ui=1 trick in case she really had to use IE for some reason)

  58. I am able to use full version from FF3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is talking about the released FF3 last June 17th?

    funny that i am able to login to hotmail and to use the full version without any problems.

    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008052906 Firefox/3.0

  59. Salesforce by aragod · · Score: 1

    At work we found some odd Salesforce incompatibilities with FF3 too. Annoying to have to open IE for one damn button....

  60. Google's counter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    G O O G L E

    _________________ [Search]

    ??? Svenska Italiano ??? ???

    This site would work better with Mozilla Firefox. Click >here to install.

  61. Another Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I installed F3, tried to login into my web email account only to have to browser somehow cause the login process to continuously reject the login. I immediately uninstalled F3.

  62. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  63. Not the first... by espinha · · Score: 1

    Do not forget: GMail doesn't work with Opera either... at least not with the full capabilities working.

  64. Some bugs in Firefox 3 remain unfixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some bugs in Firefox 3 that remain unfixed. One involves peculiar errors parsing some HTML; a few pages I visit are mangled in 3, fine in 2. Then, there is the Carpet Bomb vulnerability.

    Of course, it's impossible to release a perfect product, but the Firefox team comes very close to it! I hope they'll fix these things soon, so I can see the update on the release version.

  65. not to mention qmail by nobaloney · · Score: 1

    The original pre-MS hotmail also used qmail.

  66. who is still using hotmail by Sadsfae · · Score: 1

    besides spammers?

    There are so many other free web-based mail alternatives out there that do not close your acct for inactivity, have proper methods of spam control, and work properly with web standards.

    --
    Have a squat over at the hobo house.
  67. Here... save by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

    You can clean that up a bit... one site filter:

    *.(hotmail|live).com*

    --
    Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
  68. I'm Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you wear a tin foil hat too?

  69. Chepe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here a Settings Configuration solution:
    http://chepe-town.myminicity.es