Slashdot Mirror


China Claims Score In Weather Manipulation

hackingbear writes "Despite prior skepticism over effectiveness, China claims successful application of weather intervention to ensure a stunning Olympic opening ceremony, according to a report by the official Xinhua News Agency: 'We fired a total of 1,104 rain dispersal rockets from 21 sites in the city between 4 p.m. and 11:39 p.m. on Friday, which successfully intercepted a stretch of rain belt from moving towards the stadium,' said Guo Hu, head of the Beijing Municipal Meteorological Bureau (BMB). While there wasn't a single drop of rain over the National Stadium — also known as the Bird's Nest — during the opening ceremony from 8:00pm-12:00am on August 8, the weather services said that Baoding City of Hebei Province, to the southwest of Beijing, received the biggest rainfall of 100 millimeters Friday night, and Beijing's Fangshan District recorded a rainfall of 25 millimeters."

147 comments

  1. On tomorrow's agenda... by Jophiel04 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Would be finding those darn smog dispersal rockets.

    Olympic cyclists had a hard time coping with the combined effects of the humidity, temperature, and smog laden air and visibility of the flame cauldron was barely a mile.
    http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/trackandfield/columns/story?columnist=caple_jim&id=3475952

    1. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by Jophiel04 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by Dan541 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The smog in China could be a tourist attraction itself. I have shown people photos just so they can see the smog engulfing the city skyline.

      No where in the world have I seen smog like China, it is a unique sight.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    3. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by tristian_was_here · · Score: 1

      They had to fire them rockets otherwise the rain would of melted the entire stadium.

    4. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "No where in the world have I seen smog like China, it is a unique sight."

      It's dramatic but unfortunately it's not unique. Half a century ago the west were suffering pea-souper's of our own. Here in Melbourne Australia we have smog from bushfires during most summers, the summer of 06-07 was exceptionally bad with most of December looking like a bad day in Bejing.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by ozbird · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's not smog, that's smoke from the rain dispersal rockets (which clearly weren't used for the women's road race.)

    6. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They hardly used the technology for the Women's Road Race which ran through torrential rain and even flooding problems.

    7. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by johndmartiniii · · Score: 2, Informative

      We have the same in Cairo in November from the rice-straw fires in the delta. The air is just black/gray in the morning and hangs. It is probably the reason for something that they expats collectively refer to as Cairo Lung.

      --
      If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
    8. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      Apparently they were testing the reaction of the spectators on the idea of Olympic water cycling. ;)

      But respect for those women for cycling so long and so fast on such thin tires during the kind of weather they encountered.

      Although there sadly were some accidents. :(

    9. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... only November? (Visiting Cairo on a vacation trip in the middle/end of October)

    10. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some history books say that such smog was the case in LA right up until the late 1970's or so. (I'm sure there's still old photos around showing how a thermal inversion turned the city skyline into a nasty looking heavy brownish-yellow haze.) It was pretty much the entire reason why emissions standards (and the tougher CA emissions standards) were invented. China has the manufacturing down on methods they've borrowed from the Western world, but apparently they neglected to observe the lessons learned in the West regarding the problems of industrialization. (All the pollution and shit that goes with it.) At least they don't have to start from scratch, just need to get off their asses and copy current emissions controls and standards from the West. Sure, it may make manufacturing and transportation more expensive and restrictive, but in turn the payoff is that people can be more productive if they're not hacking and coughing from lungfuls of soot or whatever.

    11. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Women in wet shirts? Hello? :)

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    12. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is a case of cutting off your nose to spite your face.

      Rain, in Beijing, as in many other cities, performs two roles: (1) provides water to everything on the ground and (2) "washes" the air.

      So, by making the opening ceremony 'rain free', they've all but guaranteed the rest of the event to have lower air quality. How do I know this?

      I've lived in Beijing during this time of year *and* the air on morning/day after a rain event is _always_ much nicer than it was the day before.

      So why is it so humid in Beijing? The prevailing wind direction from most weather patterns that affect the city is onshore (wind blows from the sea to the land.) During summer this brings lots of hot moist air from out over the ocean, over the land until it meets the mountains that border Beijing, trapping it. About once every 2 weeks they get a westerly wind pattern and all that crap gets blown out to see - clear skies usually last less than 48 hours.

      I'm sure the only people who are surprised about the condition of the air in Beijing are the IOC folks that haven't spent any real time in the city and lapped up whatever the Chinese told them. The Chinese people won't be, anyone who has been to Beijing won't be, athletes maybe (because they've been duped by the IOC.)

      So the buildup of bad air continues and one is left to wonder if the Chinese authorities will insist on playing God (and make things continually worse) for the entire event or will let nature look after itself.

    13. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardly even remotely similar, being from Melbourne and now living in Beijing, believe me.

      My mother lived in the south-eastern suburbs, we could see the actual light from the bushfires over her back fence and yes, it was smokey and horrible.

      Beijing however is in a _permanent_ state of disgusting smoggy freakishness, just from sheer pollution. It is not in the least bit similar and ANY day in Beijing is far, far worse than anything I've ever seen on Melbourne, bushfires or not.

      Ridiculous comparison.

    14. Re:On tomorrow's agenda... by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

      Well, the air is terrible all the time, but November/December is the worst because of the rice straw. In October you should be alright. Enjoy your vacation. There are some amazing things here.

      --
      If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
  2. The most controlled Olympics ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not only is the weather being controlled but so are the people. For the first time ever the Olympic road cycling course was deserted. The silence freaked out quite a few of the riders, who are used to Tour de France conditions, where the spectators go berserk.

    1. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by dwater · · Score: 3, Informative

      I watched it on tv too, and wasn't surprised that, on some parts of the course, there were no people there - I've been there, and it's quite a difficult place to get to even when the roads are open...of course, the roads would be closed for the races.

      I wonder what the locals do....

      --
      Max.
    2. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      locals? I don't think you'll find many locals left in Beijing near the Olympic stadium. From the news that gets out it seamed like a robocop style Olympic village build.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    3. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by gringer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sure, they're there. Just look behind their big walls:

      http://omoikane.minstrum.net/one-world.jpg

      --
      Ask me about repetitive DNA
    4. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by dwater · · Score: 5, Interesting

      1) the event wasn't near the olympic stadium....it was from Beijing city up to the great wall.
      2) the people who were claimed to 'live' where the stadia were built were most likely migrants that were squatting there illegally - it is very common in BJ.
      3) there *are* locals living right near the main stadium - there are blocks of flats right next to the village occupied by locals. The flats are very similar to the one I lived in until a couple of months ago.
      4) Do you *really* believe what you're shown/told on the news? If living in China has taught me one thing, it's to question what you're told. I thought that I knew this before I went there...but now I am back in 'the west', I find the amount of (apparent) BS on the news (particularly the BBC) quite disgusting - it seems they go knowing what to look for and if they find it, they don't look for reasonable (or even unreasonable, but culturally different) explanations...they just go 'ooh, look at the aweful Chinese; aren't they bad'. It's pathetic, sometimes (seems to be getting better now the games are actually running though).

      All, my opinion though...and I seem to be in a minority in this respect on /., so I guess I'll be moderated troll or flamebait, because that's how people will respond....which isn't my fault.

      --
      Max.
    5. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they just don't give a damn about cycling and they might be smarter then the people I have seen in front of my house when I still lived in Antwerp, Belgium, when the Tour de France passed there. Setting up camp and car in the morning, waiting for the tour to pass. Shout for about 30 seconds as they pass. Pack up and go to the next place for the next day.

      I know if I would be interested, I would watch it on TV.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by jjackalb · · Score: 1

      I tried getting to the finishing loop. No luck. Many roads were and still are closed and the drivers have a hard enough time understanding what you want to do even when the roads are open.

    7. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by jjackalb · · Score: 1

      I'm an avid cycling fan and I agree with you. The sad part is that here in Beijing the local population turned out in force to watch the race. After the peloton rolled by, most of them stayed in place as if expecting there to be something more -- there wasn't of course. Its really too bad the road cycling course didn't at least make a few loops in the city to make it a little more worthwhile to watch. Getting to the wall to watch the loops was impossible -- at least for me.

    8. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Or they realized that the women's road race would probably get better ratings with the rain...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by DeadDecoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That picture looks more like an anti-China pr piece, than anything else. If you look closely at the image, the wall isn't very long, tall or comprehensive as the photographer is able to get a picture of the disparity on foot. Sure, it's conveniently placed to hide the more impoverished parts of the town, but I don't think it's unreasonable that they want to present their best face to the world. If they were super totalitarian, they might have just relocated that person, preventing said image from being created.

    10. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Media manipulation is a global phenomenon. Just about every country has their own agenda with it. For example in China, the media is controlled to protect the CCP and maintain control of the populous through mis-information. In the USA however, the media is all about the cultural "shock value". The more shock, the higher your ratings become for profit.

      If anyone thinks there is a shred of honor left in any of the media conglomerates would be sorely mistaken. It's about bending, shaping, and molding the premise which to base the news on to achieve the predefined objective.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    11. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by dwater · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > in China, the media is controlled to protect the CCP and maintain control of the populous through mis-information

      That's not my experience. It's more like they know to avoid certain topics. I was told that it's very different to how it used to be too - it's now all kind of unwritten, unlike a decade or so ago when it was a much more direct level of control.

      ...but, yes, media should be questioned and distrusted at all times, IMO - they just don't put the effort in to find the real history behind what they find. They're just lazy now - want quite results.

      I recall a recent BBC story where they were searching for Chinese arms in Dafur. I mean, they weren't looking for arms from anywhere else. Eventually, after much effort, they found a couple of lorries (trucks), and they called that a success. Pathetic.

      To be fair, they did 'discover' that the Chinese had sold them fighter jets before the embargo, which they said was understandable, but that the Chinese were still training them.

      I find myself with many questions: 1) is that all? 2) did they 'sell' the training with the jets and so it's also prior to the embargo, 3) what about all the other weapons that the Sudanese were using?

      I am not the most well educated person, especially when it comes to politics and such like, but if *I'm* coming up with these questions, surely they must too; but they weren't addressed, so I ended up writing the report off as biased.

      I find it happens a lot these days. They come to a 'conclusion' before all the (obvious) questions are answered.

      --
      Max.
    12. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      What do the people of China want though? It seems like they want a democracy and maybe we should start thinking about what that means.

    13. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Sadly it's not anti-China, it's the current reality of the Chinese government to it's own citizens. Any place where they haven't removed a neighborhood for complete development yet(read re-commercialization gets a wall). That is, one vision of their world imposed. The old world view is obsolete along with the citizens who are below the poverty line; Thus an eyesore and must be purged to further the idea that they've done a great job of cleaning everything up.

      These types of people are an embarrassment to the eyes of the government and should just go away.

      This is happening in many area's of Beijing, they're not relocating they're leaving the people to fend for themselves. And these are people who've lived in the same area for 3-5 or more generations, and are in many cases CCP hardliners.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    14. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "I am not the most well educated person, especially when it comes to politics and such like, but if *I'm* coming up with these questions, surely they must too; but they weren't addressed, so I ended up writing the report off as biased."

      Perhaps you should start by asking why a BBC journalist would risk his life for such a "pathetic" story.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    15. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by -benjy · · Score: 1

      Media manipulation is a global phenomenon. Just about every country has their own agenda with it.

      "Of course the government and the media lie. The key is that in a democracy, the lies are different."

              -Roughly paraphrased from memory. I believe it came from a Steve Jackson game.
           

    16. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by dwater · · Score: 1

      I think I did. It is for money and/or some desire to point the finger; evidence of bias within the bbc.

      I mean, I could understand trying to find out where the sudanese get their arms from, but they explicitly went in with the objective of finding evidence to blame the chinese. They found very little evidence of anything, and yet still found that conclusive. It seemed clearly biased to me. I mean, almost everything is made in china these days, even trucks/lorries. Where do the rest of their weapons come from?

      --
      Max.
    17. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "It seemed clearly biased to me"

      I did not see the show so I can't really give an opinion as to how biased the show you saw was. Since you haven't provided a link I don't even know if it was a BBC reporter, or just a independent doco broadcast by the BBC (a big difference there). Yes the BBC is biased against China's arms sales, it is also biased against UK arms sales, in fact I'd say the BBC is very biased against arms sales. Since the BBC is meant to report NEWS in the public interest then I think that bias is "good bias", arms dealers of course think of it as "bad bias" and nationalists think of it as "anti-(insert nation) bias".

      "It is for money and/or some desire to point the finger; evidence of bias within the bbc.

      Money from whom - the hippies? Let's assume your are correct and that the show you saw was totally biased against China for some reason. What you are now doing is letting your own bias see this one "anti-China" program as proof that the BBC is biased against China, but how do you explain the acticles in my links? What I am trying to say is that nobody can escape bias, you, me, the pope, nobody! However, there are some easy things you can do to check just what that bias is and how strong it is ( as I did with the BBC )....

      1. Transparency: I am biased against China in respect to Tibet specifically because they will not let the BBC or any other media walk around and talk to people (same in Sudan). Please don't take offence to that, I was biased against my own govt. when they wouldn't let the media look around immigration detention centers.

      2. Critical thinking: Is a skill. If you practice you will be able to spot some (but never all) of your own bias and maybe those of others. The beauty of an open web is you can jump around and get different views from different outlets on both sides of any fence allowing you to speak directly to a brain-washed westener such as myself.

      BTW: Google news is an excellent source of different media from around the world. I have found China's news outlets much more informative than US papers when it comes to Isreal and the Palestinians. It's not because of what the US papers say, it's what they don't say. Same deal with China's press where Tibet and Sudan are involved.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    18. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > in China, the media is controlled to protect the CCP and maintain control of the populous through mis-information

      That's not my experience. It's more like they know to avoid certain topics. I was told that it's very different to how it used to be too - it's now all kind of unwritten, unlike a decade or so ago when it was a much more direct level of control.

      True it's not like it used to be but there are still, even just as an example, regular meetings (With mandatory attendance of course) between the CCP and a group of the top media outlets to discuss "direction", including more modern web/online media firms, etc...

    19. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by dwater · · Score: 1

      > Since you haven't provided a link

      I'm pretty sure it was this one : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/7493934.stm

      Reading the comments, it seems I am not alone in seeing the bias in it, and the lack of *conclusive* investigation.

      Actually, it seemed to me that they did investigate how the Chinese trucks and aircraft ended up there and that they were sold and delivered prior to the arms embargo, so that's to their credit. However, they still concluded that China were somehow to blame for all the atrocities rather than the Sudanese - just look at the title of the film "China's secret war.".

      They also clearly (to me at least) stated that they went in to only look for Chinese arms - not to look to see who is supplying arms, so, like I said, I have to wonder who is supplying the rest of them.

      If they had just gone in to see where the Sudanese were getting their arms, then I might come to the same conclusion as you - ie that they are simply biased against arms trade - but that isn't the case with this particular show. Perhaps it is some subset of the BBC that is biased in this way - I guess that's the natue of some shows such as panorama since they're just trying to shock people.

      Your point on transparency has some merit, I guess. Though there's no reason why they should let reporters into the region since said reporters have a history of reporting in a biased manner. This is what has become obvious to me since I left China. They just apply their own interpretation to what they see and don't bother to entertain the idea that there might be some history that might explain what is happening or that it might be just a little more complicated than they think.

      They also didn't let media around in SiChuan during the earthquake. The fact is, it causes problems. There are many reasons, some of them are even good reasons. Sure, it's reason to be suspicious, but I wouldn't necessarily draw any solid conclusion.

      I would be interested in a series by the BBC about the atrocities perpetrated by the British, and all the problems their (our, since I'm British) empire-building has caused - which is part of the history of the Tibet problem too, btw, though much more complicated than just that.

      I agree that what you call 'critical thinking' is a skill, and it's actually quite interesting. I can't help but come to the conclusion that we can never come to a conclusion about anything. The closest I can come to being certain is being there myself when whatever happens happens, but even then it is easy to misinterpret.

      I had been brought up in the west with the opinion that the Tian'anmen Square events were some sort of 'massacre', and yet, when I try to find evidence of mass shootings, all I can find is evidence to the contrary. Even the film clips I found were more about violence by the demonstrators rather than the 'armed' forces (eg the BBC clips showing demonstrators burning soldiers alive). Other reports were of the army laying down their weapons and demonstrators taking them. It doesn't take a stretch of the imagination to see that it could be either side that opens fire first and so start a gun fight - which wouldn't be the same as the order coming down 'from on high' to massacre them all, or whatever. This has made me less sure of what I've been told. It seems another example of the media and 'the west' in general jumping to conclusions simply because the country has a communist government.

      Yes, I don't trust the Chinese governemnt either, especially at the local level where the corruption is closer to home - though I don't really have any experience of anything there, so perhaps that is *my* anti-Chinese gov. bias in play. ...but I now seriously question anything that the media, including (esp) the BBC, tell me. I'm not sure I did question them so obviously before - I think it's me that has changed, but I'm not sure about that; perhaps the BBC has changed (for the w

      --
      Max.
    20. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "would be interested in a series by the BBC about the atrocities perpetrated by the British"

      I found about 24 relevant articles and broadcasts using the BBC search function. How can I belive you when you say "they haven't anticipated obvious questions", have you bothered to search the rest of the BBC or are we still judging the entire organisation from one show?

      "I had been brought up in the west with the opinion that the Tian'anmen Square events were some sort of 'massacre', and yet, when I try to find evidence of mass shootings, all I can find is evidence to the contrary."

      I watched it unfold on T.V. as an adult. You won't find video of the mass shootings because they didn't have 'mass shootings', they drove tanks into the crowd. I'm also old enough to remeber watching news of US state troopers shooting at anti-war protesters, try finding that on the web.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    21. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      It seems like they want a democracy

      It does? According to whom?

    22. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by dwater · · Score: 1

      > How can I belive you when you say "they haven't anticipated obvious questions", have you bothered to search the rest of the BBC or are we still judging the entire organisation from one show?

      Well, I *am* talking specifically about this show since it's the most recently obvious example, but it is just one data point since I have watched plenty of BBC shows. I've not seen any shows about British atrocities that I can recall. Perhaps it's just my memory - or perhaps they've done them at times when I don't have access to their shows - I'm rarely in the UK these days. Perhaps I should restrict my judgement to just Panorama, but I notice other comments on the BBC news in general where they just don't seem to ask the obvious questions.

      > they drove tanks into the crowd

      Well, that's the first I've heard of *that* - certainly no video. The BBC reporters were talking of the army opening fire on the crown - it was Kate Adie (sp?), IIRC. I would certainly be interesting in hearing more about that. I'll search for some of that, of course, but if you have any recommendations, don't be shy.

      --
      Max.
    23. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly it's not anti-China, it's the current reality of the Chinese government to it's own citizens.

      What makes it anti-China is the fact that the same things happened in Atlanta, but it wasn't publicized in the US. Some people in the US don't even know they build the Atlanta Olympics buy bulldozing 72 acres and displacing the poorest people in the city.

    24. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I sat on my couch and watched tanks drive over barricades and into people, they were obviuosly killed. I don't have the video because it happened 20yrs ago, all I can say was that I did not watch it on BBC since I am Australian and we didn't get BBC here until cable TV was introduced in the 90's.

      The wikipedia entry also mentions tanks...Around four or five the following morning, June 4, Charlie Cole reports to have seen tanks smashing into the square, crushing vehicles and people with their tank treads. By 5:40 a.m. June 4, the Square had been cleared.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    25. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by dwater · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks for the data point. Of course, I don't know you from Adam, but it's something to make me look for more info or at least consider another angle to the whole thing.

      I don't really remember the time. I can't even recall where I was ... 1989 ... I was 23, so not young by any means. I wish I could remember, though it would be in the middle of the night in the time zone I was in...

      If you find any video online, be sure to share :) I'll have a look, of course, when I get a moment...

      --
      Max.
    26. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by dwater · · Score: 1

      Well, I've not found any significant evidence of what you describe. Your account is the most explicit about the tanks killing demonstrators. Nothing much in the Wikipedia, but notably this which suggests things weren't as one-sided as is suggested by the media in general :

      "Leaders of the protest inside the square, where some had attempted to erect flimsy barricades ahead of the APCs, were said to have "implored" the students not to use weapons (such as molotov cocktails) against the oncoming soldiers."

      The BBC account references just has them driving over people, but doesn't say if said people were alive or not - note that this was *after* the shooting. The article I do see is this one :

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4313282.stm

      which give an account where the PLA action seems almost reasonable, again with the demonstrators being far from blameless :

      "At the top of the square just in front of the Forbidden City, an APC got separated from its column, and in its panic to get out of the crowd area, ran over several demonstrators. This, in turn, caused the crowd to grow violent.

      They disabled the APC, tore its crew from the vehicle, killed them, and torched the vehicle. All this was done in plain view of several PLA platoons about 150 metres away at the edge of the square. Standing beside the burning APC, I looked down the avenue and in the orange glow of the lights of the square I could see the PLA lock and load their AK-47s. "

      The reporter does talk as though the shooting was a more directed attack than I had imagined. I had suspected that it was the protesters that had started the shooting - or at least that it was possible in all the confusion.

      In any case, I still am unable to conclude that it is a one-sided 'massacre' as is typically suggested. I started to suspect it wasn't as I had been lead to believe after watching the BBC video[1] where protesters burn soldiers alive in their vehicle.

      The only video I've seen is of the tanks trying desperately to avoid a protester who insisted on standing in front of it.

      Can you remember what news network it was you saw drive into the crowd. I'd be very interested in seeing it so I can come to my own conclusion.

      Thanks,

      Max.

      [1] this was part of the '50 years of news' dvd that I picked up while in Beijing. Unfortunately, I wasn't allowed to take that DVD out of China since it wouldn't be allowed into other coutries (due it being fake, probably). How ironic is *that*? Unfortunately, I can't watch it again to refresh my memory.

      --
      Max.
    27. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "In any case, I still am unable to conclude that it is a one-sided 'massacre' as is typically suggested. I started to suspect it wasn't as I had been lead to believe after watching the BBC video[1] where protesters burn soldiers alive in their vehicle."

      Neither side has a monopoly on the truth and both sides must take the blame for the actions of their members. The video I saw of the tanks/APC's was probably from the ABC, ABC is Australia's version of the BBC and in my experience a trustworthy news source.

      From my distant vantage point I see similarities between China's society now and that of the west 50yrs ago. In the west the fight was called the "civil rights movement", western governments of all stripes used overt censorship, secret police and soldiers in an attempt to crush the movement. The movement itself also employed violence and rioting against the government.

      I hope the Chinese can settle their differences without the violence and social upheaval, but somehow I doubt it.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    28. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by dwater · · Score: 1

      > The video I saw of the tanks/APC's was probably from the ABC ..but what you saw was supposedly live, right? Difficult to beat live video, I think. I'll have to look it up.

      About 'sides'...I don't expect the news orgs to be 'a side' as such and so I expect them to report the events. As I read more and more on it, their reports *do* seem more un-biased than I imagine. However, I have still the impression of the "Tian'anmen massacre" - basically the government just killed a load of peaceful protesters. I wonder how I got that impression when it is clearly nowhere as near as one-sided as that.

      In fact, the more I read, the more I wonder if the protesters hadn't indeed been infiltrated with foreigners that were trying to cause trouble. It seems entirely possible to me.

      Someone recently pointed me at an opinion on the Tibet issue, which I found interesting, and more in line with my emerging opinion in general :

      How people can think these issues are as black and white as they seem to, I don't know. They're clearly much more complicated than some people make out.

      --
      Max.
    29. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I do agree that western media routinely portray the incident as a one sided massacare but I also think that the BBC have done more than most to dispell that myth. I'm glad you are open minded enough to give them a second look.

      I also would recommend an organisation called "reporters without borders". My only real opinion on Tibet is that I would like China to allow the BBC and others reasonable access to the area.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    30. Re:The most controlled Olympics ever? by dwater · · Score: 1

      > but I also think that the BBC have done more than most to dispell that myth

      Well, I'm not so sure. Reading their reports, things seem much more unbiased, but when you hear the general commentary on the subject, over the years, I don't think so - but perhaps that's just that their reporters (who weren't actually there at the time/etc) have had the same 'whatever' (general media coverage, I guess) that caused me to have the opinion that it was a one-sided massacre.

      I guess I would also like China to allow press access to, well, anywhere really, but I also see that it is up to them - I don't see it as some kind of 'right'. I think they're stupid to not allow access, actually, since it's not in their interest - though I can understand why, since western media will undoubtedly 'jump to conclusions' and seemingly automatically discount the government's position (rightly or wrongly). Things are definitely getting better though, and, contrary to what some people say, the Olympics *is* helping in that respect. I seriously think things will get better as foreign reporters start to understand China (and gov.) better, and China changes into a place that is easier for foreigners to understand. Over the last week, I've seen several shows on Chinese culture and this can only be good, I think (I especially love ones about cooking, since I miss the food there a lot - Chinese food in Finland is, generally, pretty poor [as it is in England]).

      --
      Max.
  3. Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Tom90deg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's very hard to prove a negative. You could also claim that a squig of nutmeg around your neck will prevent alien abductions.

    The tests of various rain-making programs have been more or less a wash. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't, or to look at it a diffrent way, sometimes it rains and sometimes it does not. I'll believe it when they can A) stop rain on demand, or B) start rain on demand. If you can't do either, sell your snake oil somewhere else.

    1. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could also claim that a squig of nutmeg around your neck will prevent alien abductions.

      Well, it's worked for me so far.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by denzacar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll believe it when they can A) stop rain on demand, or B) start rain on demand.

      A) They did stop rain on demand.
      B) There is quite a difference between dispersing clouds that are already there and creating clouds out of nothing.
      And any system that be able to effectively deliver water on demand would probably be far more expensive than digging a ditch and letting water flow through it.
      Unless you are thinking of something like this at 5:00.
      That might work... with some changes to the laws of physics.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    3. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Joebert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's stop and think about what makes up a rain cloud for a moment.
      It's essentually just a bunch of water vapor suspended in the air with some dust particles.

      Eventually the air becomes soo saturated that the water vapors combine and become too heavy to say airborne, turning into rain.

      One thing I've noticed living here in Florida for 20+ years where it's quite moist is that it seems to rain on almost every holiday where there's
      a) Masses of people BBQ-ing
      b) Masses of people setting off fireworks

      Both of these activities fill the air with excess dust particles, which eventually crowd the area where water vapor accumulates quicker than happens naturally & causes the rain to fall. I think it happens like that here in Florida because of the relative humidity. I believe the same thing would happen in for instance, Seattle where it's very wet.

      Given the Chinese are using rockets, I think there's a very good chance they actually can control the weather, to a point. It's kinda like detonating land mines before troops get to them, except in this case it's all about making the rain fall before it gets to the place an event is being held.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    4. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      And hey, if you get bored you can always swallow some of the nutmeg and THINK that the aliens are kidnapping you.

    5. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by jamesh · · Score: 5, Informative

      The tests of various rain-making programs have been more or less a wash. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't

      We've been doing cloud seeding since the 60's or so here in Australia. It works under a fairly specific set of circumstances. You need clouds that are 'bursting at the seams' and are going to drop their rain at some point in the very near future. Given such clouds, you drop silver iodide into them and you'll increase the chance of the rain event happening now rather than a bit later, and probably increase the volume of rain too.

      You'll never get rain out of air that just doesn't have enough moisture in it to begin with though.

      And you can't stop it raining somewhere, except by coaxing the clouds into making their rain somewhere else first, which is what I think China did (or what I think China think they did :)

    6. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Heian-794 · · Score: 4, Informative

      This guy supposedly did it a century ago:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Hatfield

      Supposedly Hatfield noticed that it would frequently rain on battlefields somewhat after the fighting had died down. Extrapolating from this, he considered that perhaps something in the explosions was affecting clouds overhead.

      Unfortunately, his chemical formula died with him, but it's an inspiring story if he really did come up with this idea himself and actually put into practice.

    7. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's impossible to prove a negative, prooving these rockets lower rainfall isn't. They could get some strong circumstantial evidence for the efficacy of their meteorological interventions by showing a correlation with below average rainfall where they've applied the rockets. Who'd believe them though? There's 'the truth' (shakes head) and 'The Truth' (nods vigorously).This is China we're talking about here.

    8. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I wear a medical bracelet. Err... It is a bit personal but it isn't for anything major, I wear it because I don't want them to give me narcotics. (Yeah, I have a history of abuse.)

      Anyhow, I also have a daughter. This is not verbatim probably but should be close enough...

      Daddy, why do you wear that bracelet?
      So I don't get trampled by elephants at the circus.
      Daddy! Of course you won't.
      How do you know? ...
      See? It has worked so far.

      Kids are great.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    9. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by value_added · · Score: 5, Funny

      Given such clouds, you drop silver iodide into them and you'll increase the chance of the rain event happening now rather than a bit later, and probably increase the volume of rain too.

      I'm wondering, from a purely technical point of view, whether this technique would be appropriate for the smug clouds known to exist over parts of Los Angeles. And if so, would you get rain, or an increase in the smugness index?

    10. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by syousef · · Score: 1

      sell your snake oil somewhere else

      The free to air TV network that has the rights to broadcast the Olympics in Aus are selling a $4000 commemorative jacket in a frame.

      Anyway fuck the Olympics. It has become a moneymaking scam, nothing more. The difference between the top 10 places in some sports is seconds (for events that last hours). It's no fun to watch anyway when they're so close to the limit of human ability that it's so damn close.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    11. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      A rain event ??? Well, I hope I can get tickets to that :)

      (GCRIP).

    12. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand what you're saying, but it's not exactly correct.

      It's hard to prove the negative of something that almost never occurs. Similarly, it's hard to prove the positive of something that almost always occurs.

      The point being, it's hard to show direct correlation when the desired outcome is the one that occurs "naturally".

      In this case, they're claiming they prevented rain. If it rained everywhere around them (and weather reports indicate it did), but not on the area they attempted to prevent rain; then the likelihood of direct correlation is higher. By comparison, if they claimed they prevented rain, and it *did not* rain anywhere else; we would doubt their claim.

      See what I mean?

      As a side note, I suspect it's easier to prevent rain than to cause it (which is what you're talking about). To prevent rain, you just need high pressure to prevent rainclouds overhead. Causing rain is a different matter, you need to create proper moisture and temperature conditions in the atmosphere.

    13. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by dwater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's more than that in this case.

      I've seen more tv programmes (inc news) about Chinese culture in the last week (controversial and not) than most of my life. This has to have a positive effect on the west understanding China generally.

      --
      Max.
    14. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      There are only so many ways you can 'understand' a government that relies on using fear & violence against its own people. As for Chinese culture, well its sort of cute in a historical sense but when the government can declare Maoism is 70% right (the last 30% seams to contain a lot of corruption, oppression and capitalism) you have to wonder how much of the culture remains untainted. Is it a cultural tradition to not talk about the 4th of June or to have only one child?

      I have a 'Chinese' friend going on about how proud of china he his, if he thinks its so great maybe he should go live there a while. It seams to me that the rich kids living in west have got a fairly good dose of 'patriotism' that's rendered them blind to human rights abuses.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    15. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One thing I've noticed living here in Florida for 20+ years where it's quite moist is that it seems to rain on almost every holiday where there's
      a) Masses of people BBQ-ing
      b) Masses of people setting off fireworks

      Whilst it sounds plausible, the smoke from these would tend to hang close to the ground, or at most, within a few hundred feet of the ground. Not up where the clouds are. Put another way, if you stuck your nose up around the clouds and took a sniff, you wouldn't smell smoke.

      That it rains when people want to BBQ and set off fireworks is probably due to an entirely non-scientific effect: Murphy's Law.

    16. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by wickerprints · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering, from a purely technical point of view, whether this technique would be appropriate for the smug clouds known to exist over parts of Los Angeles. And if so, would you get rain, or an increase in the smugness index?

      I don't know if you live in Los Angeles, but in case you haven't noticed, people here are pretty damn smug enough as it is.

    17. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Migity · · Score: 1

      I usually use two squigs...but I think cinnamon works better.

    18. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      This guy has your guy beat by 600 years. He used ceremonial fires that were built on the mountain tops.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    19. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In 1902 the same thing was being down reasonably close to the middle of Australia. One of the vertical cannons used (Stiger Vortex Gun) now sits at the front of a Boy Scout hall. This was inspired by similar guns used in Italy in 1901 to prevent hail.

      Apparently even now it is very difficult to say whether seeding any paticular cloud will work or not and if it does whether it would have rained anyway. There are a lot of variables so I'm not sure if "mysterious lost secrets from a dead master" are really going to help. Rain is always going to come eventually so clever confidence tricksters can always win.

    20. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iminplaya, I would like to buy your squig of nutmeg

    21. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You would have to disperse clouds of mustard gas over Los Angeles to have any hope of an effect on the Smug clouds. Odds are, even that would result only in the proliferation of color-coordinated NBC suits.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just to put myself firmly in the crackpot camp, there was heavy chemtrail activity the day when the California fires began due to widespread heat lightning, in turn blamed on high temperatures and extremely low humidity. The idea of cloud seeding is to make the moisture fall out of the sky.

      There's long-time evidence that cloud seeding works, and that "more is more" (as opposed to "less is more".) So there's no particular reason why you shouldn't believe that the seeding worked. On the other hand, now they're having flooding. Correlation does not imply causation, but tampering with chaotic systems is generally considered to have unforeseen consequences - which is why we call them 'chaotic'. They're confusing because they're complicated.

      Remember, the most complicated computer systems in the world are used for what? Nuclear blast simulation, computational fluid dynamics/carbon fiber modeling/stealth/other highly repetitive modeling tasks, and climate modeling. About which I know next to nothing except that it keeps some very fast computers very busy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      The few times I've been to Flordia, I've noticed that it tends to rain just about everyday around 5PM.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    24. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool
        So now we've also proved Aliens have a nut allergy.

    25. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by noidentity · · Score: 1

      One thing I've noticed living here in Florida for 20+ years where it's quite moist is that it seems to rain on almost every holiday where there's

      a) Masses of people BBQ-ing
      b) Masses of people setting off fireworks

      Both of these activities fill the air with excess dust particles, which eventually crowd the area where water vapor accumulates quicker than happens naturally & causes the rain to fall.

      Sounds more like Murphy's Law. It's a holiday and people out enjoying themselves, therefore it will rain.

    26. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Garse+Janacek · · Score: 1

      You could also claim that a squig of nutmeg around your neck will prevent alien abductions.

      That's not really how the math works out. The problem with nutmeg vs. aliens is that there is no observed correlation, that is, the observed frequency of abductions is the same with or without the nutmeg (I'll approximate this frequency as zero). Same with a tiger-repelling rock, etc.

      With the weather example, the observation is that the weather was as desired, i.e., a 0% chance of bad weather over a very small sample size. Nevertheless, 0% is a lot lower than the average chance of bad weather when no weather-control attempts were made, so there is an observed correlation, albeit with a rather large margin of error. But from a statistics/uncertainty point of view, this still conveys positive information (i.e. all else being equal, it increases the expected probability that the claim is true), whereas the nutmeg example conveys no additional information at all.

      Real confirmation would require additional tests using the same method, to achieve a satisfactory degree of certainty. But it's actually very easy to prove a negative: just do the same thing 10 times in a row, and see if it always works. Or, if you're skeptical, 20 times. Or however many times a statistician tells you to. This is the same method that is used in practically any medical research, so unless you think it's very hard to prove that vaccines prevent polio, this situation is no different.

      Also, as another reply pointed out, this isn't a "rain-making" program, and the theory behind keeping existing rain clouds out of a particular area is very different (and possibly on sounder footing) than making clouds appear when they weren't already there.

      --

      I am the man with no sig!

    27. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      How do you measure what the "chance of rain" was? Just because you roll a six doesn't mean your "chance of two" was 0%.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    28. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Joebert · · Score: 1

      You just have bad luck.
      I was born here in 1981. :)

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    29. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by sjames · · Score: 1

      The best way to limit rain in Beijing would be to order everyone in the neighboring cities to wash their cars and have a picnic.

    30. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seattle is not very wet in the summertime (dry season) compared to most places' wet seasons. In fact, Seattle only gets ~3 feet of rain a year because it is partially in the Olympic rain shadow.

    31. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but LA better reduce its smug levels fast, lest it suffers the fate of San Francisco.

    32. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a good pinch of nutmeg down your throat will make you believe you've been abducted by an alien.

    33. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can make a cloud in a certain state rain on demand. We can also make a cloud currently raining down rain harder. Rain happens when a certain concentration of vapor condenses on either the right combination of dust, or changes temperature or pressure in the right way. Vapor condenses and rain is the result. (this an a general, and loosely scientific description, please don't waste time shooting holes in it).

      dispersing the right chemicals in a cloud, one that is in the right state and relatively close to becoming a rain cloud, can push it over the edge and start the rain process. However, once this state is reached, stopping it is a whole different science, which basically would require dramatically changing the pressure or temp of the cloud, or dispersing it's volume.

      The rain clouds approaching the city, on a moving front line, were easy targets for rain making. They were able to make them dump their water before they got over Beijing. The rain clouds dropping water on the bikers, those mostly formed OVER the city, in part likely due to the conditions created by altering the front line the day before. Those clouds were not in a position to be targeted to rain out prematurely to save the riders. China hoped they might move away before they reached critical mass, but they did not.

      The cool thing, since we DO know how to make a clound rain, or rain harder, is that we now have the technology to be able to "steer" a hurricane. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1566898/Scientists-a-step-closer-to-steering-hurricanes.html. We haven't quite figured out all the rules yet, but we're close. The idea is basically to cause one part of the hurricane to rain harder, or to heat part of the hurricane by introducing black dust particles to the top, causing cyclic changes and slowing the building processes of the storm, and creating a pressure difference that pulls the hurricane in a different direction.

    34. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by PawNtheSandman · · Score: 1

      Actually, Hawaii gets the most rain fall per year out of any state in the U.S..

    35. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by neurovish · · Score: 1

      ...or, people tend to set off fireworks and bbq in the summer. If it is summer, and you are in Florida, then it is going to rain.

    36. Re:Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence by glwtta · · Score: 0

      It's essentually just a bunch of water vapor suspended in the air with some dust particles.

      In the interest of pedantry: it's actually water droplets (extremely small water droplets, at that); water vapor is invisible.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  4. China... by denzacar · · Score: 0

    ...will grow larger.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nationalism will bring us victory!

    2. Re:China... by kvezach · · Score: 4, Funny

      Warning: Weather control device activated!

    3. Re:China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has been generous!

    4. Re:China... by WoRLoKKeD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quick! Prism tank rush!

      --
      Immolation is the sincerest form of flattery.
    5. Re:China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll suck their bank accounts dry!

    6. Re:China... by donnielrt · · Score: 1

      Quick! Prism tank rush!

      Actually, it's too late - the device has already been activated.

      More like, sell, sell, sell!

  5. Must have forgot to fire them today by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just watched the womens road race where they could have swapped bikes for canoes, the rowing is cancelled and several other events have been postponed because of rain.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Must have forgot to fire them today by jjackalb · · Score: 1

      There was an absolute deluge around 4:30pm local time in Beijing. Thankfully they were handing out ponchos left and right at the events to help deal with the weather. I feel sorry for the outside events -- the inside events were hard enough to get to and from.

  6. Confucius say by Provocateur · · Score: 4, Funny

    He who controls the weather, reigns supreme

    Thanks, I'll be here all week!

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:Confucius say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's time to replace Soviet Russia jokes with Communist China.

    2. Re:Confucius say by martyb · · Score: 1

      Quoth the parent:

      Confucius say:
      He who controls the weather, reigns supreme

      He who controls the weather, rains supreme

      Fixed that for ya. :)

    3. Re:Confucius say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Communist China, the weather controls YOU!!

    4. Re:Confucius say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dealing with the consequences of weather -- particularly flooding -- has been a part of Chinese culture back to legendary times.

      The mythical emperors of the past are remembered for their flood control projects. When Chinese miners came to the US west, the earned the hatred of American miners by extracting gold from abandoned claims. Part of this was that building efficient, small scale hydraulic projects was second nature to a Chinese farm boy.

      Attempting to actually control the weather doesn't seem quite so quixotic in a country which has struggled for thousands of years to survive and prosper in the face of alternately too much and too little rain.

    5. Re:Confucius say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, you don't have to explain things here, this isn't digg :-)

  7. This weather machine is a tad anti-climactic ... by The+Sith+Lord · · Score: 1

    ...
    It just doesn't have the "super villian-y" vein we expect from a super power ...

  8. good thing for those million made homeless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by their forced relocation to rebuild the city for the olympics. No rain to deal with.

  9. In Soviet Russia by Frankie70 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia, the weather manipulates you.

  10. Wait, this is not right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was convinced it was the allies who had that tech.

  11. oblig by AlexCGilliland · · Score: 0

    I have a rock which keeps tigers away

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the purple monkey dishwasher
  12. Re:This weather machine is a tad anti-climactic .. by archont · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they should just stick with the nukes. The weather machine belongs to the allies.

  13. THERE IS NO SMOG., by Inominate · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's just mist. It'd just evaporation and humidity. Stupid American propagandists.

    1. Re:THERE IS NO SMOG., by Albanach · · Score: 1

      Moderators who marked this flamebait; look up, there's a joke passing over...

  14. In other news... by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 2, Funny

    The polar bear repellant has kept the streets of Beijing free of polar bear activity.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  15. Ob. Simpsons by ElMiguel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or, to put it in a more Slashdot-friendly way:

    Homer Simpson: Not a bear in sight. The Bear Patrol must be working like a charm.

    Lisa Simpson: That's specious reasoning, Dad.

    Homer: Thank you, dear.

    Lisa: By your logic I could claim that this rock keeps tigers away.

    Homer: Oh, how does it work?

    Lisa: It doesn't work.

    Homer: Uh-huh.

    Lisa: It's just a stupid rock.

    Homer: Uh-huh.

    Lisa: But I don't see any tigers around, do you?

    [Homer thinks of this, then pulls out some money]

    Homer: Lisa, I want to buy your rock.

    [Lisa refuses at first, then takes the exchange]

  16. International implications? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The system in use does not prevent rain, it just makes it fall elsewhere. Assuming for a moment that the system will get better, and perhaps we will be able to control other aspects of the weather like wind or temperature, I can see weather control becoming an international issue in the future.

    One country could blow smog away over another, or prevent it from entering their airspace. What if two neighbouring countries have different ideas, or one decides to wreck the other econnomy (deliberately or otherwise) by preventing rainfall over their neighbour, perhaps by "stealing" it for themselves?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:International implications? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      It would be useful for countries with high demands and large watersheds to intercept water, and the motivation need not be malevolent.

      In the choice between ones own people and others, it is logical to care for own-side first.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:International implications? by Kagura · · Score: 1

      There have already been legal suits between states in the US over alteration of river flows.

  17. John Stewart said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How do you know when a country has become a superpower? When the have superpowers"

  18. Who'll stop the rain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, worked real well... It's currently pouring with rain here in Beijing and has been for most of the afternoon. I guess they just stopped it for the opening ceremony and didn't bother about the rest of the events. Hah, yeah right.

  19. Having lived in Beijing, I can tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xinhua says a lot of things.

  20. global warming, everyone panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By creating clouds in one place they are cooling the air there, which granted 2% more clouds globally would reverse any effects of global warming, but meh.

    When you have cold air in one place and warmer air in another it will move, pulling warm air towards the poles and cooler polar air towards the equator to be warmed. This can affect climate on a global scale providing large enough regions are being done.

    As the warmer equatorial air is forced towards the poles, it will melt the ice, as the cooler polar air is moved towards the equator it will warm from more direct sunlight. Storms will form, the earth will die.

    Ok maybe I dont write for the MSM but I could with tripe like this! bonus: my captcha is concoct

  21. We do this routinely in North America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  22. Waste by NJVil · · Score: 0, Troll

    From NPR: $100 million A low estimate for the cost of the opening ceremony. That's about $476,000 per minute and almost $8,000 per second and more than twice the cost of the 2004 Athens opening ceremony.

    There are many places in the world thirsting for precipitation of any sort and the Chinese are firing rockets to stop rain just so that the opening ceremony of their PR stunt can be free of dampness. I guess that they wanted to guarantee their hundreds of millions in pyrotechnics weren't ruined. Of course, the firing of rockets does nothing to help with global climate issues.

    Meanwhile droughts and floods ravage other areas of China. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DEED7113BF93BA15753C1A96E948260

    1. Re:Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo Fucking Hoo. Outer Crapistan has a drought, so nobody better spend any money on having a good time.

    2. Re:Waste by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should move to the places that are thirsting for precipitation so that you can cry them a river.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Waste by icegreentea · · Score: 1

      All they're doing is cloud seeding. It makes clouds drop their precipitation earlier than normal. So they try to make as many clouds as possible drop their rain around Beijing, not on Beijing. Same amount of rain/water falling to earth.

      As for cost of their opening ceremony. It's their money. They spend it how they want.

    4. Re:Waste by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It may be a lot, but it's also like half a yuan per Chinese.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  23. Rain control tunnel vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It rained during the US women's beach volleyball game against Japan. Where were your anti-Rain missles then? (I guess it didn't rain *that* much)

    I can see what this will eventually turn into, a story on StumbleUpon. "In the 2008 Olympic games China deployed thousands of anti-Rain missle launchers and converted AA guns to stop weather clouds. In 2012 Olympics, Great Britain built a roof over their buildings.

    1. Re:Rain control tunnel vision by Tom90deg · · Score: 1

      You could make the argument that China only said that it would not rain during the opening ceremonies. Which is like me saying that I can control rain, since it will not rain next Tuesday from 5-8 p.m.

      Can I control the weather? Tune in next week to find out!

  24. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if all of their nice weather is the cause for all of the freak thunderstorms over North America lately...

  25. 1988 called... by znerk · · Score: 2, Funny

    They want their article back.

    The article you linked to contains the following dateline: "Published: October 28, 1988"

    Way to keep up with current events.

    --
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
  26. Good news: China ran out of rockets! by kanweg · · Score: 1

    I saw the women's bicycle race this morning. They got soaked for over 3 hours in heavy rain.

    Bert

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. another person who claimed weather control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wilhelm Reich did many experiments on weather control many years ago and, hard as it is to believe, most of the time his "cloud-buster" actually worked.

  29. Re:This weather machine is a tad anti-climactic .. by Frnknstn · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This weather machine is a tad anti-climatic"

    There, fixed that for ya.

    --
    If it's in you sig, it's in your post.
  30. Re:WTF your quoted article is from 1988 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you going to find some news article in 1888 about China and say China is still being ruled by some imperial court?

  31. Beijing as seen by a meteorologist by ctwxman · · Score: 3, Informative
    I am a meteorologist. I'm not going to dispute this particular Chinese claim, but I think it needs to be taken in context because the Chinese have not been above stretching the facts when it serves them.

    The weather and air quality have been fairly close to the worrisome scenario painted months ago. I've been checking meteorological observations every day, finding the dew point at Beijing's airport in the mid and upper 70s on a regular basis and visibility of 1-2 miles common (It is currently under 1 mile, but there is rain falling).

    Back in February I wrote on my blog of the potential Olympic weather: "So, when the deputy chief engineer of the Beijing Meteorological Bureau says, "Even if the rare extreme weather hits Beijing in August, people will not feel muggy. High humidity will not accompany the hot weather in August because their climax periods are different, " I'd hide the silverware and other valuables."

    Current Beijing observations are here.

    Dew points (the real number you should look at when you think humidity) have been consistently in the 70s--often the upper 70s. That's like walking around with a warm, damp cloth wrapped around your body. Much of yesterday had Beijing more humid than Miami.

    I would feel better about what the Chinese say if dissenting voices were allowed to speak about the air!

    There is an independent group from Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants in England who have been monitoring the air and issuing their own forecasts which have been much more pessimistic than the official government version. Now that forecast is gone! From Telegraph.co.uk: British scientists monitoring air quality in Beijing have been ordered to close down their website after their readings clashed with official statistics showing the city was meeting its pollution targets.

  32. Rains affect on air quality. by wfstanle · · Score: 1

    Did I get this right? They wanted to prevent rainfall in Beijing? In recent weeks, after every rainfall the air quality actually improved. You would think they would want some rainfall just before the games to improve the air quality.

  33. A win either way by edcheevy · · Score: 1

    If their seeding plan had failed, they still would have called it a success because it rained in Beijing and washed away some of the smog. They had nothing to lose!

  34. You KNOW that the worst part is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Bush and his neo-cons are over there seeing how to make this happen in America.

  35. If this really could have worked, then.... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    they would have been doing this like mad in sychuicans(sp) region after the earthquakes/rain. As it was, that area was SLAMMED with rain afterwards.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:If this really could have worked, then.... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting..... They don't care about their own people.

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  36. Men's Vollyball by sjames · · Score: 1

    There's a heap of "not rain" falling on the Men's Vollyball. One of the cameras got struck by lightning.

    That's the thing about weather control. There are techniques known that given enough effort can apparently alter the weather. The problem is that they're expensive, rather unreliable, and sometimes alter the weather for the worse.

    If the techniques do become more reliable, I predict that it'll be like forest management. If you prevent all fires for a time, you create the conditions needed for a truly devastating and uncontrollable "superfire".

  37. So What?..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    People have been seeding clouds for DECADES. This is as newsworthy as saying "China Seeds Clouds".

    *yawn*

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  38. Oh, but they do by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    They ARE afraid of them. Right now, the Chinese gov is a VERY small group of ppl. The military is being changed right now from suppressing ppl, to being able to take on USA for Taiwan. Individuals, they do not care about. Groups of ppl terrify them.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  39. Don't Mess With Mother Nature by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Wholesale messing with atmospherics without the barest understanding of the consequences is asking for trouble. Kicking a chaotic system hard enough to change its state has the power to shift it into a new groove. A new groove of weather that doesn't help humans survive as we have in the old one.

    The Atlantis myth encodes a deep human taboo against messing with the weather as the highest, and most dangerous, exercise in vanity. China is doing an abysmal job protecting the atmosphere from all its other unbridled industrial activity. This latest stunt could really be daring nature to show us a real storm, or just take a hint and stop raining at all for some time. Or some other unpredicted change we can't handle.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  40. Well.. by T3Tech · · Score: 1

    I for one, welcome our new communist, weather-controlling overlords!

    Wait.. On second thought...

    --
    Of course I didn't RTFA... why would I do that? You really are new here aren't you? Don't let my UID fool you.
  41. The Broccoli Must Die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Broccoli Must Die

  42. funnay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0