Slashdot Mirror


Dolphin Inspired Mini-sub

What do you get the millionaire in your life who has everything? How about the Seabreacher mini-sub. Described as a dolphin-inspired cross between a jet ski and a submarine, the Seabreacher has a top speed of 45mph above the waves and 20mph below them. The two-man £30,000 craft is 15' long and its design makes it self-righting. Strangely, this doesn't come with a laser package.

181 comments

  1. Ergonomic? by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 4, Funny

    The words: "Ouch, my spine." come to mind, though the follow up of "Don't worry, it doesn't hurt any more" are probably more worrying.

    --
    I'm gonna need a spec.
    1. Re:Ergonomic? by Grashnak · · Score: 2, Funny

      As I always say, "That looks like it hurt... but only for a second."

      --
      Life needs more saving throws.
    2. Re:Ergonomic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like more info on flipper and photo's or video. Where do I look. harkat@hotmail.com

  2. Friggin Laser Beams? by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought dolphins came with explosive charges?

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    1. Re:Friggin Laser Beams? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's sharks. Didn't you see the documentary? Their brains and sexual organs are made of M-80s.

    2. Re:Friggin Laser Beams? by zotz · · Score: 0

      "Strangely, this doesn't come with a laser package."

      "I thought dolphins came with explosive charges?"

      I don't know about either of these...

      The sharks inspired model comes with lasers, this one would need to come with a laser defense system. (System to defend against lasers, not necessarily defense system consisting of lasers folks.)

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    3. Re:Friggin Laser Beams? by perlchild · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is also the ex-military dolphin version that comes with a full on drug-addict and unreasonable computer-hacking ability. (The novella was much better than the film, nuff said).

    4. Re:Friggin Laser Beams? by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 1

      "Strangely, this doesn't come with a laser package."

      "I thought dolphins came with explosive charges?"

      I don't know about either of these...

      Oh, what a cute dolphin ..... BOOM!

      --
      Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
    5. Re:Friggin Laser Beams? by laejoh · · Score: 0

      Indeed, ''Johnny Mnemonic'' by William Gibson from the collection Burning Chrome.

      Hey, I can reuse this comment in the Google thread about Chrome :)

  3. sea bass? by piggywig · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm waiting for the budget 'sea bass' version to come out. I think £30,000 is a bit steep for me.

    1. Re:sea bass? by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

      A lot of people think that.. and then they are off to buy a house and/or car.

      But seriously, obviously it's a lot of money. But if I ever get my own island off the coast of Dubai, count me in.

    2. Re:sea bass? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Personally, if I had the time to justify an expense like this, I'd get SCUBA certified and buy one of those underwater scooter things. I'd have money left over to take some pretty awesome diving trips too.

      Come to think of it, it's probably good for divers that these things are and will remain rare.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:sea bass? by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Are they ill-tempered?

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    4. Re:sea bass? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Strangely, this doesn't come with a laser package.

      Well, duh. It's shaped like a dolphin,not a frickin' shark.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:sea bass? by mR.bRiGhTsId3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or, you could just lock a whiz-kid in a room until he designs you your own made out of PCV and duct tape, just like SeaQuest's Stinger

    6. Re:sea bass? by walterwalter · · Score: 1

      Be nice to Lucas, he's misunderstood. However this does raise a good point in that this article needs to be tagged "Seaquest DSV."

    7. Re:sea bass? by strelitsa · · Score: 1

      Dream Scenario: Lucas Wallenczech (sp?) and Wesley Crusher in a steel cage match. When the smoke clears, there's nothing left but a scorched SCUBA regulator and a wrecked baryon particle detector.

      --
      No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
    8. Re:sea bass? by mR.bRiGhTsId3 · · Score: 1

      Wolenczak I believe.

    9. Re:sea bass? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      You forgot Jar Jar ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  4. Duh... by purpleque · · Score: 1

    It might have had a lasers package if it's design was inspired by a shark...

  5. engine by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems odd that they don't use an electric motor to avoid the problem of having to get air into the engine.

    1. Re:engine by kobaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      or nuclear

      --

      The goal of computer science is to build something that will last at least until we've finished building it.
    2. Re:engine by raynet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Gasoline is much lighter than the equivalent amount of batteries.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    3. Re:engine by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those crazy whales and dolphins, what will they be doing next?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:engine by sznupi · · Score: 1

      If they'd do that they would soon run out of rich idi^H^H^Hclients for new versions, right after current owners decide it's exciting to dive close to crush depth.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    5. Re:engine by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      Apparently you missed the "45 MPH", which is faster than an average speedboat can go. I'll bet someone could water-ski behind this thing. Most electric scooters max out around 25-35MPH, and something like this would require even more power.

    6. Re:engine by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 1

      Gasoline is much lighter than the equivalent amount of batteries.

      Yah, but the heavy batteries really help during the "drive" phase.

    7. Re:engine by Brad1138 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Couldn't they use an air tank to supply air to the motor? Maybe you could stay down for 10 minutes or so.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    8. Re:engine by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Well, it's based on a dolphin, presumably it has a blowhole.

    9. Re:engine by slashgrim · · Score: 1

      Yah, but the heavy batteries really help during the "drive" phase.

      Yeah, but they really, really help in the "drown" phase.

    10. Re:engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this thing in the past.... I think I saw somewhere that it is based on an adapted Sea Doo engine.... so that it is like an underwater Jet Ski.... a Sea Doo seems like a good machine to salvage the engine and start working on your design... the rest now is dealing with the problem that those kind of engines impose.

    11. Re:engine by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not really. They also avoid the problem of having to get air into the *occupants*. It's a sealed, atmospheric pressure submersible (but it is not a submarine in the traditional sense, those are actually more analogous to blimps than airplanes, and the watercraft is more like an airplane.). So they have to either have a tricky method of maintaining that pressure during a dive (doable, but adds cost) or just keep underwater jaunts brief and exchange the air frequently, avoiding the need for rebreathers, active pumps, carried oxygen, and the like.

      And if the jaunts are brief, just power the engine the same way.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    12. Re:engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because batteries that would allow the craft to travel any kind of distance with an equivalent power rating (215 hp) would be way to heavy

    13. Re:engine by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      And they really, really, really help during the "electrocute" phase.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  6. I want one by martinQblank · · Score: 1

    That looks like fun...

    1. Re:I want one by stjobe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, if you want a real submersible instead of a 20-seconds-below-snorkle-depth, try DeepFlight: http://www.deepflight.com/

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    2. Re:I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And these do in fact have frickin' lasers on the Super Falcon Wings (check the last page of the PDF spec sheet)!

  7. Ah slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are beginning to accept that idle is here to stay

  8. What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would happen to this submarine went underwater for too long, resulting in a lack of oxygen to the engine? As you no longer have any power, you can't empty water from the snorkel, preventing the engine from being restarted. I would hope that it floats on top of the water by default (instead of sinking) and therefore the occupant can escape via the top hatch quite easily. The problem would just be getting the thing back to shore to empty the snorkel and possibly drain water from the cabin as necessary?

    1. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by Smeagel · · Score: 2, Informative
      FTFA:

      "It can do 20mph below the water. If you go below snorkel depth you run out of air for the engine and you stay under for 20 seconds before the craft will automatically surface. But with the snorkel system in use you can stay under for longer."

    2. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by TheP4st · · Score: 1

      FTA:
      "It can do 20mph below the water. If you go below snorkel depth you run out of air for the engine and you stay under for 20 seconds before the craft will automatically surface. But with the snorkel system in use you can stay under for longer."

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    3. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      My guess, reading between the lines and looking at the picture, is that the entire vessel is buoyant, and only stays submerged by moving forward and using its control surfaces to counteract its buoyancy. That would make this thing a "submarine" in the same way that a snorkeler is a "marine mammal": perhaps technically defensibly so, but not really what people mean. In any case, if that is true, then when the engine stalls, the vessel will simply float to the surface.

      That's how I'd design something like this.

      Making a "real" submarine takes a lot of engineering expertise. You can cheat any number of ways to make something sort of like a submarine. You can make a "wet" submarine, and avoid having to deal with a pressure hull. Unfortunately, that experience lacks something of the Captain Nemo drawing room atmosphere (namely the "atmospheric" part). Making a bouyant submarine that stays submerged using its control surfaces means you don't worry about ballast systems, and have a system that is intrinsically safer than one that requires pumping air and water around. But it means you can't go to deep, and you can't stop and admire the scenery.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you won't die if something breaks down. I guess there are trade offs with everything.

    5. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      There is a glitch...

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      ...in the matrix

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      You lose oxygen for that bag of meat you stinky humans call a body.

      So stay out of the water. I like having power.

      [Whu? Plug my ear piece back in. Why?]

      Small user problem. Be Right Back.

    8. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case anyone's interested, there has been a reputable marine engineer working on advanced designs with this concept for over a decade...

      www.deepflight.com

      World renowned engineer, Graham Hawkes, created the Deep Flight series of winged submersibles. The first winged submersible was unveiled by Hawkes Ocean Technologies (H.O.T) in the late 1990's.

      Prior to beginning the Deep Flight project, Graham Hawkes designed the Deep Rover submersibles which were featured in James Cameronâ(TM)s 3D IMAX film, âoeAliens of the Deep.â Previously, Graham designed a significant percentage of the manned and unmanned vehicles used by science and industry, including the WASP and MANTIS Atmospheric Diving Suits, and many of the Remotely Operated Vehicles originally built by Deep Ocean Engineering.
      HOT is currently designing and building submersibles and other deep sea technologies for private clients.

      The Company's design and engineering office is located in the San Francisco Bay Area.

    9. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      No, it's a safety feature. They want to sell them as recreational watercraft. The 20 second limit and positive buoyancy ensures that flaky vacationers won't accidentally descend below crush depth, or run out of cabin oxygen.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    10. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add thrust vectoring and counteract the buoyancy more directly - by directing thrust vertically.

      Safe *and* allows you to have a poke around. :)

    11. Re:What happens when the engine loses oxygen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that standard, a plane is only a land-vehicle with pretensions to flight, because it can only stay aloft by moving forward and using it's control surfaces to counteract gravity.

      Yes, this isn't a traditional submarine, it's more akin to upside-down flying...

      I WANT!

  9. And it can dive for 20 seconds ! by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How exciting...

    Much closer to a jet ski than to a sub... Another expensive and useless toy.
    Those guys supposedly make proper mini subs (or real ones, although apparently nobody has taken them up on it).

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
    1. Re:And it can dive for 20 seconds ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome. I can have my very own Sealab! If only I can get a new one after it blows up...

    2. Re:And it can dive for 20 seconds ! by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Exciting is right.

      I've had idiots at the lake almost hit me because they didn't see me on an 11ft long BRIGHT RED waverunner sitting on top of the water. Running something like this thing mostly submerged is just asking to be killed.

    3. Re:And it can dive for 20 seconds ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, if you can afford the $5 million-US price tag.

  10. Air for the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the snorkel provides air for the engine... what about the two people in the seats? Ahh... engine exhaust has some oxygen in it right?

  11. Nothing like this. by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What do you get the millionaire in your life who has everything?

    Nothing like this. They would play with it a couple of times and then, I don't know.

    It just so happens I have a couple of millionaires (self made) in my family. They're not into these very expensive luxury toys. They don't spend money on shit - especially over priced shit: cars, boats, Rolex Watches , etc...

    One of them is really into bicycling and he does buy high quality equipment - used.

    The other, she does spurge on here horses, but she actually competes in her retirement.

    These types of toys are for the high salaried folks who still end up living paycheck to paycheck because they're spending all of their money on crap like this (doctors, lawyers, corporate business execs, star athletes etc...). "The Millionaire Next Door" explains much better. And yeah, those family members of mine, at lest one, are right out of that book.

    1. Re:Nothing like this. by Splab · · Score: 1

      You sound like it is a bad thing to use your money.

      If I had a million bucks I would sure as hell make sure I had the most fun possible with the money.

    2. Re:Nothing like this. by apt142 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When I first saw this, I thought to myself, you know who would really want this?

      Drug Runners!

      IThey already go through a lot of trouble to make cheap subs to get around customs. Well, this couldn't be too much more expensive and it's reusable and safe. And if they got picked up on radar... Well, they could brush up on dolphin mating calls.

    3. Re:Nothing like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like it is a bad thing to use your money.

      If I had a million bucks I would sure as hell make sure I had the most fun possible with the money.

      That, my friend, is EXACTLY why those GP's relatives are millionaires and you are not. Satisfying one's spending needs is relatively cheap. In fact, there is many "helpful" hands to join in (for an interest) and you won't even feel like you don't have money, or that you are being ripped off in the process.

      Only those who find more joy in collecting money then in spending money will ever become "filthy rich" (hairs and lottery winners excluded). Oh, irony ...

    4. Re:Nothing like this. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      We'll just feed viagra and MDMA to the dolpins near the coast.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:Nothing like this. by zoefff · · Score: 1

      Millionairs can only become so by NOT spending at least a million in whatever currency.

    6. Re:Nothing like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand.

      It's not a bad thing to use money, that's what it's there for! In the end, it serves no other purpose. But before we GET to the end, people who are legitimately rich do a whole heap of other stuff with it- they use it to get more money.

      For example, say you have $60,000 Australian dollars. Roughly the cost of one of these subs- roughly. Now, you could go and just buy the sub, sure- or you can use that $60,000 as a deposit and buy a unit/apartment. Since you generally need about 10%, let's say you borrow $300,000 and buy an apartment of that value.

      Let's say you wait five years, paying off the interest on your loan only. In that time, your loan remains $300,000- but the value of your property has increased to, let's say $390,000. You sell it, reclaim your deposit, and that's $150,000 from your original $60,000 investment. Because, remember, the value of your property increases over time, whereas the value of your loan overall remains static (drops due to inflation/devaluing of currency, increases due to interest repayments). You pay your taxes, etc, let's say it goes down to $120,000

      You take half the return ($60,000) and buy yourself your minisub. You have your minisub, you have your $60,000; it's five years later and while your mates back in 2008 have a crappy, beat up minisub, yours is shiny and new (and depreciating rapidly, I might add).

      The point is not to "not use" money, but to use it intelligently- to maximise your fun.

    7. Re:Nothing like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally.

      In a stroke of astonishing good fortune, I made ~20 million when my company had its IPO. Let me tell you, I went right out and bought a couple of XBoxes. Because I had so much money, I didn't feel like I needed to play anything splitscreen.

    8. Re:Nothing like this. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      A million dollars isn't what it used to be. It's easy to be a "millionaire," but for most people who get there, it takes many years - often decades. Frittering away 6% of your net worth on something like this doesn't really seem like a good expenditure. Now, if you happen to have a 7 or 8 figure annual salary and the likelihood of that continuing for the foreseeable future, this might come in handy when you visit your house on the island your own in the carribean.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    9. Re:Nothing like this. by scipiodog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Surely, that's not the only porpoise this could be used for.....

      --
      http://clightnirish.wordpress.com/
    10. Re:Nothing like this. by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 1

      Then in short order, you wouldn't have a million bucks, and a lot of used toys for sale.

    11. Re:Nothing like this. by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Hairs are rich? And to think, all these years I've been walking out of my barber's shop leaving the cuts on the floor.

      --
      I hate printers.
    12. Re:Nothing like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The other, she does spurge on here horses"

      Eww, gross.

    13. Re:Nothing like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you are counting on getting one of your rich relatives to kick down for your interest only loan payments, I think you forgot to subtract them from your net gains. Assuming 5% interest I believe that drops you down to a mere $15,000 net profit on the deal, which at 25% of your original $60k is not bad, but that still doesn't take into account possible property taxes and the insurance you need to hold as part of your home loan as well as maintenance costs etc, that will actually put you into a net loss on the investment. The only way your scenario works is if you assume that you would be paying a monthly rent that would equal the monthly cost of mortgage payments plus ownership costs. And this is all counting on the speculation that property values in that area will not drop over that time, which is a big risk in the vast majority of places.

    14. Re:Nothing like this. by slashgrim · · Score: 1

      If I had a million bucks I would sure as hell make sure I had the most fun possible with the money.

      Maybe that's why you don't have a million bucks.

    15. Re:Nothing like this. by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      In that situation, you should choose a back-ended loan instead of a front loaded one (think ARM here in the States). You'd pay minimal interest if you got out in 5 years.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    16. Re:Nothing like this. by Splab · · Score: 1

      And you know what, I have quite a lot of fun living my life - Am I rich? No, I earn decent amount of money, I can buy all the stuff I want.

      Money doesn't make me happy, friends and my true love makes me happy.

      Go see if your cash will give you a hug when you are feeling down.

    17. Re:Nothing like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      My family is all self-made millionaires. And yeah, every person in "The Millionaire Next Door" is a member of my family, except for one of them.

      My millionaire family members are so cool, but they don't even like this stuff. They like used bicycles instead. Used bicycles are way cooler than robot dolphins.

      My sister likes horses, just like Catherine the Great. Sometimes after she has been riding her horses, she comes out of the barn all sweaty and naked.

      I am not a millionaire, I just sit around on the internet telling other people what my millionaire family likes to buy. I will be a millionaire someday for telling millionaires how to spend their money.

    18. Re:Nothing like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't take it with you when you die. May as well spend it.

    19. Re:Nothing like this. by rtechie · · Score: 1

      The other, she does spurge on here horses, but she actually competes in her retirement.

      Pet horses are the very definition of "expensive toys". I have a pretty good idea what stabling, vet, etc. costs and she spends a lot more on horses than her cars. Probably as much as her house(s).

      I'm sure you could hold "competitions" for these dolphin things too. Horseriding competitions are an even bigger waste of time and money than pet horses.

      "The Millionaire Next Door" explains much better.

      The term "millionaire" dates back to the time when if you had a million dollars in ASSETS you were considered obscenely rich. Nowadays that's the cost of one nice house. I don't think 20-30% of American homeowners are obscenely rich.

      If you have a few million in assets in the USA you're solidly middle class. If you have an ANNUAL INCOME of a million dollars or more, you're a millionaire.

      And people with annual incomes of over 1 million do piss away money on stuff like this, largely for their kids.

    20. Re:Nothing like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. I couldn't have explained it better myself. My friends and family always ask my why I drive a pickup truck instead of a Ferrari. I became rich because I was smart with my money. It's not a light switch you can just flick in your head one day and just start throwing money around.

    21. Re:Nothing like this. by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      If you so smart, how come you ain't rich?

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    22. Re:Nothing like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, summary is misleading. This isn't for millionaires, this is for multi-millionaires. I happen to know a few (self-made, natch), and they are definitely into expensive toys.

  12. Stupid, Pathetic Idle Rich by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 0, Troll

    As if we didn't have enough problems in this world without the idle rich finding new and innovative ways to waste time and money. Here's the only question that should matter: at the end of your life are you going to wish you spent more time riding in a dolphin? I doubt it.

    1. Re:Stupid, Pathetic Idle Rich by Megaport · · Score: 1

      As if we didn't have enough problems in this world without the idle rich finding new and innovative ways to waste time and money.

      Dude, I just used my 20mbps home internet over my Wifi on my XPS laptop to reply to you while I was surfing the web for the first time with the new Chrome browser, and I didn't even read TFA in the post. Umm wait, what was my point?

      --M

      --
      # grep slashdot access.log | grep html | sort | uniq | wc -l 2604
    2. Re:Stupid, Pathetic Idle Rich by proind · · Score: 1

      are you kidding me ? riding a dolphin is what life is all about.

      --
      When Geiger counters are outlawed, only mutants will have Geiger counters
    3. Re:Stupid, Pathetic Idle Rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To answer your question: Hell yeah!

    4. Re:Stupid, Pathetic Idle Rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Putin's Russia, Dolphin rides you!

      'Oh, why did he have to say that? That's just nasty!'

    5. Re:Stupid, Pathetic Idle Rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm wait, what was my point?

      That you use Windows as your OS?

  13. seaquest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reminds me of seaquest!

    1. Re:seaquest by asdir · · Score: 1

      Yep, thought so too. Anyone thinking Lucas Wolenczak or Darwin here?

  14. Air by jep77 · · Score: 1

    Air is provided for the engine through a snorkel... and what about air for the people up front? Ahhh... exhaust gasses might work...

  15. Dolphin Inspired Mini-sub by hellop2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh please oh please oh please... I promise I will clean my room and go to bed on time every day!

    --
    How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  16. More Details by yogibaer · · Score: 1

    Fun toy, with lots of power (Must be great for racing with real dolphins :-) More details: http://innespace.com/current%20projects.html http://www.seabreacher.com/ (With movie...)

  17. Hmm.. by jcr · · Score: 1

    Not much of a sub, it sounds like. TFA doesn't mention anything about how deep it can go.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Hmm.. by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

      "TFA doesn't mention anything about how deep it can go."

      Well, if it can go max 20mph underwater and can only last 20 sec "below snorkel depth" before the engine cuts out and it starts to float back up, it can't have a dive depth over 600 ft. Actually, I'm sure it's much less than that because you probably can't go 20 mph straight down, working against the craft's buoyancy.

      And BTW, why don't my <quote> and <p> tags work the same way anymore?

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    2. Re:Hmm.. by bubbl07 · · Score: 1

      TFA doesn't mention anything about how deep it can go.

      That's what she said.

    3. Re:Hmm.. by NorthWestFLNative · · Score: 1
      And you can't go 20 mph straight up unless you want to get some type of DCI either.

      Seriously though if it's keeping water out it either has to be pressurized (doubtful if it's using a snorkel for air) or just watertight. If it's watertight it's probably only down to a fairly shallow depth, if it gets too deep the water pressure is going to start pushing water in through the "watertight" seals. Assuming a watertight seal (and not a pressurized vehicle) and given that the pressure at 10m (33 ft) is twice the atmospheric pressure at sea level, I'd be willing to guess that the max depth isn't much more than that (if not less).

    4. Re:Hmm.. by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

      doubtful if it's using a snorkel for air

      TFA says it uses a snorkel for air

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
  18. Eh? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Millionaire? This thing cost less than most modern Bass boats, decently equipped pontoons, and less than half what a common cruiser will run you. More than your average Seadoo PWC, but most people who buy them get at least two if not three or four (depending on wealth and the number of kids they have).

    Then again, perhaps the millionaire aspect comes into play when it comes time to find someone to repair the craft, as anyone who spends a few hours on the water every week will tell you, anything boat/pwc related has a tendency to demonstrate it's willingness to break down in the worst possible ways at the worst possible times. It's almost as powerful enough of a force, I am beginning to suspect Murphy has a whole set of laws being enforced upon anyone who takes up marine recreation. Anyway, even the millionaires I've met who are into marine craft already know all this and still try to shop for designs which have been around for a few years and closer to the "proven technology" badge instead of pissing away money on completely new designs bound to have many flaws-- that's why they are millionaires and not scratching lottery tickets.

    I'd also not really want to run that thing in most US waterways. More than once, I've cracked gel coats on thick fiberglass hulls ramming into surface debris at speeds below 50mph. The last thing I would want is to be sitting behind some plastic windshield and have a pointy chunk of tree collide with it at any speed. Not to mention the stump mazes just a few feet under many managed waterways. It'd be cool in some place like the Bahamas, though.

    1. Re:Eh? by Huntr · · Score: 1

      That's a really good point. Millionaires don't buy $50k Tritons and Rangers. I've seen plenty of guys with a glitter boat and a 350 Super Duty parked in the driveway in front of a trailer, i.e. a mobile home.

    2. Re:Eh? by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Funny

      Boat: A hole in the water into which one throws money.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    3. Re:Eh? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      These types are all about investments. For all who aren't familiar with new boats, a $50k bass boat will be worth about $20k in a couple of years. Even if you buy it and lock it in a garage the whole time.

      I recall looking at Tritons once, which were proudly displayed outside. Brand new boats. Simply sitting on display for a couple of weeks on nice weather days already caused most to have slightly degraded vibrancy in the gel coats.

    4. Re:Eh? by Zzesers92 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Two happiest days in a boat owners life... the day he buys a boat and the day he sells it.

    5. Re:Eh? by dcraid · · Score: 1

      BOAT stands for Break Out Another Thousand.

    6. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also phrased as the question:

      Q: What do you call a hole in the water where all your money goes?

      A: a boat

    7. Re:Eh? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      I just bought two old Jeep Wranglers to rehab from the frame up. Someone I met who brought me into a Jeep club said Jeep stands for Just Empty Every Pocket. Ahhhh, money sucking hobbys for the win.

  19. Professor Calculus plagiated by mmu_man · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Tintin had this decades ago!
    http://www.sur-la-toile.com/images/articles/ben_1113361162.jpg ;)
    Once again Herge was visionary :)

    1. Re:Professor Calculus plagiated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did Robbedoes en Kwabbernoot (don't know what they were called in French): http://www.puikjes.net/Robbedoes&Kwabbernoot/Robbedoes9.htm

    2. Re:Professor Calculus plagiated by oever · · Score: 1

      No, he used a shark shaped sub (before the invention of the laser).

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    3. Re:Professor Calculus plagiated by bidule · · Score: 1

      Spirou & Fantasio

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    4. Re:Professor Calculus plagiated by mmu_man · · Score: 1

      Right, still very much alike in design.

      He's called Professeur Tournesol in french btw :)

  20. I see you have experience... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...on a waverunner.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  21. Old design.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The model is just a copy of Herge's Tintin Adventures comic book series...

  22. SeaQuest by JKSN17 · · Score: 0

    Looking at the image, immediately reminded me of an episode of SeaQuest. I think it was called the "Stinger."

  23. Why useless? by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure its for recreation but you could travel in it and you wouldn't get as wet as a jetski which seem to be pretty popular even though they're little more than a leisure vehicle. And unless that mini sub can do 20mph under the water (year right) it won't anything like as much of a buzz as this machine.

    1. Re:Why useless? by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The mini sub may only do 2 knots underwater but does dive to 300m with a 6 hour capacity which makes it an actual submarine. In my eyes it's much more exciting than something that just goes around on the surface.

      The dolphin thing, while possibly technically interesting, remains a leisure surface craft. It's also probably quite a bit cheaper.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:Why useless? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      I can't see a mini sub being anything other than a leisure craft either. Its not like you can mount a trident missile on the back or torpedo shipping with it.

    3. Re:Why useless? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      What about research or education? Inspecting bridges? Salvage operations? There are other useful purposes for a submarine besides killing people.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  24. Stupid, Pathetic Idle Rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Here's the only question that should matter: at the end of your life are you going to wish you spent more time riding in a dolphin? "

    That's a fetish I haven't tried.

  25. Thats just your family by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Go find out what russian oligarchs spend their money on.

  26. your family is boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It just so happens I have a couple of millionaires (self made) in my family. They're not into these very expensive luxury toys. They don't spend money on shit - especially over priced shit: cars, boats, Rolex Watches , etc...

    They sound like a boring family. I picture them sitting around (when they're not busy not buying anything fun), engaging each other in a game of "who can be the most curmudgeonly?".

    I bet you beat those millionaires out every time at that game.

  27. Better model would've been a shark by Centurix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least I could install the frickin' laser myself.

    --
    Task Mangler
  28. Military Applications? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    The SEALs are always looking for new ways of infiltrating by sea. I wonder if a suped up version of this wouldn't be able to make a fast approach but also mimic the motion of a dolphin (or whale) enough to throw off a countries' various defenses. A two-person sub should be able to carry one SEAL and his gear, without having to worry about the freezing water temp, dive weights, oxygen tanks, etc. And, of course, they would have to mount fricken lasers.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  29. Eh? by Smivs · · Score: 3, Funny

    My boring mate thinks this is a dull-fing...he can't see any porpoise to it at all!

  30. Wrong quote reference... by psiberia · · Score: 0

    It was "sharks with friking laser beams attached to their heads"...

  31. Tintin by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1
    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  32. Seen it! by McFortner · · Score: 1

    So what's so new and revolutionary about this? The Wesley (Lucas Wolenczak) on seaQuest DSV made one just like this. Old news....

    --
    Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
  33. Neat by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    This has been seen on Discovery channel repeats for at least two years. Still cool though.

    1. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try 10 years

  34. 007? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Maybe this will show up in the next James Bond movie?

  35. So long by barocco · · Score: 1

    So long and thanks for all the fish...

  36. frickin lasers by Windows_NT · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dr. Evil: You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads! Now evidently my cycloptic colleague informs me that that cannot be done. Ah, would you remind me what I pay you people for, honestly? Throw me a bone here! What do we have? Number Two: Sea Bass. Dr. Evil: [pause] Right. Number Two: They're mutated sea bass. Dr. Evil: Are they ill tempered? Number Two: Absolutely. Dr. Evil: Oh well, that's a start.

    --
    Go go Gadget Nailgun!
  37. Reminds me of SeaQuest by LavaIce · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the show SeaQuest on SciFi. The only thing that's really different is that the mini-subs they had were much faster and the initial ones were single seaters. It's closer to the one that they competition to Lucas has than the one he was making however.

    1. Re:Reminds me of SeaQuest by Swampcritter · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Reminds me of SeaQuest by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      you mean Flipper Trek?

      good times, I'm re-watching the whole series on netflix instant

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    3. Re:Reminds me of SeaQuest by LavaIce · · Score: 1

      Yes the one Lucas made was called the Stinger. I'm talking about the one that Tucker made, I forget the name. This was the episode: http://www.tv.com/seaquest-dsv/the-stinger/episode/33397/summary.html?tag=ep_list;ep_title;16

  38. Please... by MistrBlank · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I signed up... can I please have a method for turning off entire sections of Slashdot.

    1. Re:Please... by Smivs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Go to 'Help and Preferences' at the top left of the main page, then where it says 'Your preferences' (right hand side), go to 'Sections'. There you can set what sections you want displayed and what priority you want them to have. The first option (crossed through circle) will remove a section completely. Hope this helps, Smivs.

  39. We speak differently out at sea. by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    The Seabreacher has a top speed of 39.1 knots above the waves and 17.4 knots below them. There fixed that for ya.

  40. Old news even by Slashdot standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been reading about these guys for ten years now and they've been working on it and promoting it a hell of a lot longer than that. As zaporware goes this thing has Duke Nuke Em Forever beat all to hell. They've had a bunch of working prototypes but never quite seem to release a commercial one. A little like Moller. It sounds impressive but they don't appear to have the resources to actually turn it into a commercial product. They're really good at getting press and keeping the name out there but I doubt you'll be seeing them for sale any time soon.

  41. Why aren't we all millionaries? by hoofinasia · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because we can all think of how to spend a million, but the rich ones only think of how to make a million.

  42. Group of Dolphin Subs... by samcan · · Score: 3, Funny

    But can you make a Beowulf cluster?

  43. That thing is OLD! by PottedMeat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I saw this thing in a Hammacher Schlemmer catalog like 10 years ago! Surely there is more impressive tech to cover, even in Idle, than this.

    PM

  44. Quote.. by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    We're gonna need a bigger dolphin.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  45. Submarine my ass by Deadstick · · Score: 1
    This thing is no more a "submarine" than the ones at Disneyland. It's just a boat that can get itself partially underwater (the snorkel has to remain exposed) by maneuvering with its fins. It is always positively buoyant -- no ballast tanks -- and if it loses speed it simply bobs to the surface.

    rj

  46. Welcome to the Nineties! by meist3r · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is so old the dolphin has died of arthritis: http://fast-world.com/index.php/Interesting/Dolphin-Submarine.html

    Why not show a few newer pictures: http://www.bionicdolphin.com/cms/

    http://www.gizmag.com/go/4095/

    Jeez, compared to the news this part of Slashdot is even more outrageous.

  47. Average "speedboat"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently you missed the "45 MPH", which is faster than an average speedboat can go.

    You must not know jack about boats. The average "speedboat" can go MUCH faster than 45 mph.

    My boat is not a speedboat, not even close to being one. It's a lowly Glastron 17' with very small underpowered 125hp 4 cylinder engine, and appropriately classified as a "family runabout". It's cruise speed in smooth water is 44MPH which is typical of boast in its category. My friend's Baja is a true speedboat and will easily go over 75 mph, and has twin V-8 engines.

  48. Modern Marvels by Viper007Bond · · Score: 1

    This was actually on an episode of Modern Marvels (or similiar) quite a while back (some multi-subject episode). Very interesting to see how it worked (a lot like a jet ski) and how it handled.

  49. And I have seen that before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  50. 1 or 2 decades old? by olddotter · · Score: 0

    I remember seeing this on "Real People" or "60 Minutes" or some similar show in the 1980's or 1990's. Along with the story that a guy from the mid-east wanted to buy the prototype for six figures cash in a briefcase. They didn't sell for fear it would be used for terrorism.

  51. I call ... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Bullshit
    How come in the photo there are no ripples from where it has breached?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  52. Thankfully... by Microsift · · Score: 1

    ...it also lacks opposable thumbs.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  53. Seems Odd That You Don't Know Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're joking, right? How many 200HP (150KW) electric motors are there that could fit in such a machine? How many battery packs could power such motors? How much would these battery packs weigh? How long would the charge on these battery packs last?

    The fact is that no other available power plant but a two stroke gasoline engine and 5 gallons of gas could provide that much power and that endurance for such little weight and volume.

    There's also the issue of getting air to the operator though, granted it is more easily solved.

  54. They so stole this: by necrodeep · · Score: 1

    From the SeaQuest episode: Stinger
    I guess maybe that show did make a single contribution to mankind........

    Nah...

  55. Discovery channel had this sub already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the Discovery Channel clip on the episode they did on August of last year on this Dolphin sub.
    http://watch.discoverychannel.ca/daily-planet/august-2007/daily-planet-aug-15-2007/#clip7714
    Old news here it would seem.

  56. Beyond 2000? by fitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember something like this shown on "Beyond 2000", back in the late 1990s.

  57. Seabreacher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about "Stinger" or "Gazelle"?

    1. Re:Seabreacher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm calling it the contraption.

  58. Making out? by Bryansix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you look at the photo closely I think you can see the couple in the craft actually making out.

  59. Just keep an eye out for tuna fishing nets! by Render76 · · Score: 1

    Just keep an eye out for tuna fishing nets or six-pack rings.

  60. Better watch out, though by PhetusPolice · · Score: 1

    Dolphins can use the same ploy against *US*!
    Be wary, and think twice about the strangers you see, for a dolphin can be "surfing" on land with its new man-mobile.
    Yes, dolphins, too, have an upper class who indulges on this kind of thing.

  61. Welcome to 2006 by Resident+Netizen · · Score: 0

    http://www.gizmag.com/go/6542/

    This is news?
    It's novel, but it's not new.

    --
    My other sig is a Porsche!
    1. Re:Welcome to 2006 by M-RES · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking... I'm sure I saw this on TV a couple of years ago. You can dive underwater which allows you to do the 'dolphin jump' tricks, but can't stay submerged for long, because the cockpit only has a limited air supply. You can also barrel-roll this baby, which looks cool.

  62. Poorly thought out by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2, Funny

    Assuming he doesn't secretly build a PVC and duct tape weaponized exosuit and escape, kicking your ass in the process.

    And in case you think it can't be done:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1f4zrYzDz8

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  63. U.S. Navy "Killer dolphins" by jamrock · · Score: 1

    I thought dolphins came with explosive charges?

    Nope; they're armed with hollow needles and CO2 bottles, and with toxic dart guns.

    Rumors have persisted since the mid-seventies that the U.S. Navy used dolphins to kill enemy divers during the Vietnam war. Allegedly, when an approaching diver was detected by a patrolling dolphin, it would swim back to an equipment barge where it would arm itself with a large hollow needle and compressed CO2 bottle, both integrated into a cup which fitted snugly over the dolphin's beak. Then it would simply impale the unfortunate bastard in the torso and watch him float to the surface with his stomach hanging out of his mouth. Apparently, someone got the idea from the CO2 harpoons divers used to protect themselves from sharks.

    Supposedly the project was shelved because the age-old military problem of IFF (Identification Friend or Foe) was insurmountable. Simply put, the dolphins were unable to distinguish between friendly and enemy divers and killed a number of U.S. Navy personnel.

    The modern spin on this is the allegation that these dolphins are now controlled with "electrodes planted under the skin" and are armed with anaesthetic dartguns, the idea being to capture the enemy alive for interrogation. It was even reported that the Navy lost some of these dolphins from a training facility near Lake Pontchartrain during Hurricane Katrina.

  64. Testing against other mini-subs? by modeforge · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this cute little sub fares against the Orca, Great White, and Giant Squid mini-subs?

  65. OLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This device is about 3-4 years old maybe more . I remember seeing this on tv a while back i dont understand why its in slashdot.

  66. Taken from a show... by blackdragon07 · · Score: 1

    I believe they took the idea from Sea Quest.

  67. Not inspired by the _Miami_ Dolphins hopefully.... by PapaBoojum · · Score: 1

    ...otherwise it would sink to the bottom and stay there.

  68. It's all fun and games by JTsyo · · Score: 1

    until an actual dolphin tries to mate with you. Then you'll just have to break it's poor heart.

  69. Words to Live By by MonolithicX · · Score: 1

    If it floats, fucks, or flies, rent don't buy. My guess this thing does all three depending on at what angle the first unsuspecting swimmer is struck by it.

  70. so how long will it be... by CdBee · · Score: 1

    ... before some rich joker decides to have a look at the underside of a USN Carrier Battle Group - and gets depth-charged?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  71. Never mind the air, what about the flotsam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be realy great to smack a crack into the lid as you surface into an outstanding leap from the water as would any dolphin, but with less the survey-abilities of eccolocation you'll land top-most into a floating bit of solid debris. Even better, is this thing probably compensates its slightly positive buoyancy to a bilge chamber or two. Just we wait until the proper testing comes in, when someone dives into the deep with a defective depth gauge and lost their positive buoyancy. Say about 180 feet into the blue the dome will crack and these people wouldn't need to worry about their air. These mutants will adapts, and lead our mole Howser right to Quatto, and our mole will kill the Underground Resistance. Copen-Hagen will be the victorious Mayor known to end the war, and he'll make a bundle selling these people their air. F*cking magnificent idea, and you get to f*ck his wife every night!

  72. What does this comment mean, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been lookin at it for such a long time and can't figure it out. I don't see any porpoise in the subject topic. Maybe the dolphins chased them all away? What's that little thing to the right of the subject you wrote? Is that...is that suposed to mean it is Funny by whose standard of being funny? Was given a score of 5 marks for Funny?

    Shutup.

  73. Being a "millionaire" isn't rich antmore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice that today, a millionaire just means you move from the job that made you a millionaire to a job that was more antiquated? I see many people with a million or two go back to cattle ranching, and spend money on the matter after the fact that all the strains of cattle have all been GMO'd and cross-bread away from their disease immunity-resilient original breeds. Some go to rocketry, where they are smacked-down by a jerk 2,000 miles away in FAA. Some try their hand at brewing wine or wiskey, and find the BATFE(ces) smacks more pain and anguish on them to break less than even. Some go into international motor and boat touring, but find that to be far too financylu depleting because they are still not sound and must hire someone else to handle their UCC liens or follow them around to heal their contracted diseases from porting in strange country. Some just give up; after working like a slave for 30 years through ever market condition that did more to re-adjust their money to be worth less the longer you hold on spendin it, they find they actually have no reason to live: they just sit down, can't find a reason to live, and die from a strane disease inducted from an immune system effected by depression.

    The smarter ones gain control of a standing army; this so they can commit their slavery as above, and anyone that redresses them for grievances will either agree to vacate or disappear to another country.

    Millionaires and the like are evidence of unjust weights and measures. Someone with a large amount of property is someone who redeemed their currency when compensated that moment. Ussury is a crime. Who is heir to a million dollars that did not earn it?

  74. seaQuest DSV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wan't this concept on seaQuest back in 1994 or something?

  75. You just insulted the whole working class. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you get the millionaire in your life who has everything?

    Nothing like this. They would play with it a couple of times and then, I don't know.

    It just so happens I have a couple of millionaires (self made) in my family. They're not into these very expensive luxury toys. They don't spend money on shit - especially over priced shit: cars, boats, Rolex Watches , etc...

    One of them is really into bicycling and he does buy high quality equipment - used.

    The other, she does spurge on here horses, but she actually competes in her retirement.

    These types of toys are for the high salaried folks who still end up living paycheck to paycheck because they're spending all of their money on crap like this (doctors, lawyers, corporate business execs, star athletes etc...). "The Millionaire Next Door" explains much better. And yeah, those family members of mine, at lest one, are right out of that book.

    Do you realize just how big an ass you sound like?

    First, you remind us that millionaires can afford to buy expensive toys and not even use them. Then you fault sub-millionaires for buying pricey toys within their budgets. Then, horses are practical - if you compete?

    Are you fucking serious? I think you intended to remind us that rich folk can be modest and practical too. You fail to realize how much pride the common man has for the very few nice things he might own. A name band set of tools might be the nicest thing some men ever own. Surely, to you it would just be a waste of money and the reason for the man's lack of wealth. Replace tool set with car,boat, plane, jewelry, etc...

    These types of toys are for the high salaried folks who still end up living paycheck to paycheck because they're spending all of their money on crap like this

    Right there... that's where you stepped over the line. My own father works for the Air National Guard, and has no other source of income. He built with his own time and money an experimental light sport aircraft that cost him a little more than what one of these boats cost. He is still living well within his means, and I cant even explain to you how happy he is flying that thing.

    Calling something a useless toy because a rich man can afford to throw it away insults the poor man that saved up to buy it and take a LOT of pride in it. For damned sure, I can think of a few people in my life that would be just as, if not more proud of simply owning a Rolex watch than your family is of their horses. If I was a millionaire, you bet your ass I would buy nice stuff. I would also appreciate it in more ways than you're capable of knowing.

  76. Video by dbrower · · Score: 1

    There's demo video at youtube. It looks to me like a cross between a jetski and a hydrofoil, with control surfaces. In either case, I'm sort of surprised the pilotes are not wearing beefy life preservers. Probably helmets would be a good idea as well. And I'm not keen on the idea of tooling around with the canopy open as seen in the video, because the low gunwales looks like an accidental swamping about to happen with an accidental twitch of the controls. If you can avoid baking in the greenhouse, it looks like fun. -dB

    --
    "It if was easy to do, we'd find someone cheaper than you to do it."
  77. This is better for the environment... by jules3882 · · Score: 1

    Check this one out. Definitely not as fast, but better for the environment: www.subhumanproject.com www.lunocet.com

  78. Dollars? by narcberry · · Score: 1

    An american company builds a watercraft designed by a californian and sold in the states via a quote from one of 2 sales reps with american numbers... Why is the price in franks?

    --
    Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.