Slashdot Mirror


David Foster Wallace an Apparent Suicide

snydeq passes along the news that David Foster Wallace was found dead Friday at his home in Claremont, California. Wallace's wife found her husband had hanged himself when she returned home at 9:30 PM Friday. The novelist, essayist, and humorist, best known for his 1996 novel Infinite Jest, was 46. Wallace had been awarded a MacArthur Foundation "genius grant" in 1997.

232 comments

  1. Netcraft confirms it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - David Foster Wallace was found dead in his Claremont home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the American community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to Society and true American patriotism. Truly an American icon.

    1. Re:Netcraft confirms it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those modding up, this is a copy of a Stephen King troll.

    2. Re:Netcraft confirms it by Pi+Is+A+Rational · · Score: 1

      i lol'd.

    3. Re:Netcraft confirms it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, Captain Obvious. Our nation salutes you!

    4. Re:Netcraft confirms it by FuzzyFox · · Score: 1

      Maybe you'd care to explain the joke, for those of us who have no idea what you're talking about.

      --
      splunge (n) -- A good idea.. but it could be lousy... and I'm not being indecisive!
    5. Re:Netcraft confirms it by Tekzel · · Score: 1

      I second that, I have no idea what a "Stephen King troll" is. I guess I don't keep up with the fun and games on the interwebs nearly enough these days.

    6. Re:Netcraft confirms it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure everyone in the American community will miss him

      Who the hell are you, dear pompous ass, to speak for "everyone in the American community"? I never heard of the guy -- that doesn't make me a moral defective. Nor does my failure to miss him.

      Hey, did you hear the one about the cosmetic surgeon who hung himself?

  2. NAFTA by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've referred to NAFTA as "The Sin of O.N.A.N." ever since reading Infinite Jest.

    I'm sorry to hear of his passing.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:NAFTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm sure you're a hit at parties.

  3. Very Very sad by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It is a great loss. He will be missed.

    1. Re:Very Very sad by Szechuan+Vanilla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you had, or knew anyone who had, an affective disorder that led to suicidal ideation or attempts, you wouldn't say that. Unless you actually are the ignorant, cold, and heartless ass your note reveals.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Very Very sad by newr00tic · · Score: 0, Informative

      damn, you're a fucking idiot.

      --
      A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
    3. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would someone miss someone egoistic and ungrateful that he commits suicide not caring about anyone else but himself in his wasteful pity?

      As to "egotistical", I was under the impression that people who commit suicide generally have such a low self image that they believe the world is better off without them. Sort of the opposite of egotistical.

      As to "ungrateful", if someone is so unhappy that they want to die, then the things to feel grateful for are going to be outweighed by some other really bad stuff.

      I'm not saying that people who are suicidal wouldn't benefit from help, just that your characterization of the thought process of people who are suicidal is, in most cases, substantially inaccurate.

    4. Re:Very Very sad by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apparently you never had anyone close to you commit suicide and therefor cannot understand why I consider people who take suicide willingly complete egoistic and ungrateful morons.

      Those who commit suicide because they are mentally ill (schizofrenic, and such) and do not know right from wrong are excluded from this definition as they cannot possible be blamed for this utterly stupid and ultimate egoistic act.

      Okay Troll I'll bite.

      As a survivor of having a close relative commit suicide I can easily say that by the time they commit the act they are already mentally ill.

      In my experience it takes at least some serious mental instability to even consider suicide as an option.

      Quick frankly you should be ashamed of yourself for holding the viewpoint you do. They failed and broke but know this - the people around them failed as well and many of us, myself included, will carry that failure to our graves with us.

      And if I could find the bridge you live under I would drag you out into the sunlight with the rest of us and stake you out in it until you realize how important it is to help those around you.

      'Scuse me now while I go shower to remove your nasty trollish smell from my presence.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    5. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You're a fucking idiot. When someone close to you commit suicide without any real reason other than they think to much about them self and don't ask for help then you can call me an idiot.

      When you come home an realize someone you care about committed this act without letting you help, without letting you understand except that stupid letter that has no value. Then you can come here can call me an idiot. And I doubt you will, you will most probably not know what to do and ask yourself WHY did they not ask for help, why did they not confide in you, is it your fault. You will feel bad that you did not know, guilty that they had to deal with whatever they felt was that unbearable that they committed suicide.

      Some people consider them weak and they are because they cannot handle that life sucks sometimes and they have not the strength to wait it out and do something about it. They just want out of their misery leaving everyone else who cares about them in even worse state instead of together overcome it.

      There is rarely (if anytime) any good reason for anyone to commit suicide. The only time when someone should commit suicide is when they are like Bush, Stalin, Hitler, Sharon, Pol Pot and other mass murders.

    6. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not a "survivor" if you were never in any danger. Claiming to be disgraces the memories of those who died tragically.

    7. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those who commit suicide are to blame for their actions unless someone forced them to do so. If you feel pity the deceased but not those left behind then you are the inhumane one.

    8. Re:Very Very sad by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are judging the motives of suicides based on your own culture and ideals. Culturally and societally, there are reasons and causes for suicide that have nothing to do with mental instability historically and presently.

      Personally, I view the act as an act of desperation, escape or destruction that can never be undone or repaired and should be avoided until absolutely all other options are explored and tested. There are times when I feel suicide may be appropriate, for example, in the case of the terminally ill. (My mother died of "natural causes" brought on by a degenerative nervous disorder and prayed for death and my own salvation for more than a year of unceasing misery before she finally died, choking to death in her sleep... presumably in her sleep... odds are good that she actually awoke while choking and dies of suffocation which I understand is actually rather painful.)

      Suicide is a subject I have given a great deal of though and observation to. I find that suicides are too often unsuccessful, especially among women, and the chances of survival are too great. For this reason alone, suicide should be considered a very bad idea -- people just don't die the way they do in the movies. Hanging, for example, is a pretty horrible way to go -- you don't just magically die... and that death is ridiculously messy and disgusting.

      There are a variety of other issues to concern one's self over and yes, some of them are rooted in family, society and culture. But generally speaking, people grow up within their own cultural ideals and beliefs. It is inappropriate to judge one culture, society or even an individual based specifically on your own ideals and beliefs. In it's own way, it is a form of prejudice as bad as any other.

    9. Re:Very Very sad by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      You're not a "survivor" if you were never in any danger. Claiming to be disgraces the memories of those who died tragically.

      Fuck you troll.

      Ask more people than just the person in the mirror if they are "survivors" of someone close to them committing suicide and the answer is always the same - yes.

      That death leaves something inside of you that is serious to deal with and I disgrace no one my claiming the title of survivor.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    10. Re:Very Very sad by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      I was responding to the subject at hand which was a troll claiming that suicide and mental illness were not as synonymous as they are.

      You are however correct in that I forgot about many other types of suicide such as for fatal illnesses and honor related suicides. However as far as I'm concerned both should be rare events.

      Regardless the article is concerning a singular suicide and that's the subject I used to frame the discussion in my mind.

      My apologies to all for feeding the trolls. I just have seriously strong feelings concerning this subject.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    11. Re:Very Very sad by BLAG-blast · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those who commit suicide are to blame for their actions

      Blame? Whatever, we're not short on people, everybody should be allowed to kill them self. Only religious nut cases (i.e. the mis-informed) believe otherwise.

      If you feel pity (for?) the deceased...

      I'm so jealous, what could be easier?

      Look dude, it's not your fault, you don't have to fight it so hard. They made their choice, you must let go, get on with your live, go and make your choices. You don't have to feel guilt for their death, you don't have project that guilt on to the deceased.

      I see your pain, feel pity for you. I feel pity for you because you feel you deserve pity, and well that's kind of sad. I feel pity, because you feel so guilty about the death of your wife (this was your wife, right?), that you continue to blame her for your suffering longer after her last breath.

      You must accept the the decision she made, not feel guilt, not feel a need to blame her. I get the feeling you lover her a lot, even if you're not the best husband in world.

      Forgive you're wife, then forgive yourself. There is no point in wasting two lives over one death. Take care.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    12. Re:Very Very sad by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Generally "survivor" is used to mean a situation in which ones death could easily have been foreseen. For instance. "I'm a survivor of the Iraq War" or "I'm a survivor of a horrible car accident", "I survived cancer" etc. People generally don't use survivor like this: "I'm a survivor of driving to work", "I survivor of my dad's heart attack", etc. I agree it's fucking pathetic to think you survived someone else's suicide. Talk about ego.

      People who talk like would probably like to commit suicide but know that they'd fail at that like everything else in their lives.

      You disgrace everyone who has actually survived something that was a serious risk to their life.

      If you seriously think you are a survivor of this suicide, go to the nearest VA hospital and have a chat with those guys about surviving. Odds are you'll end up getting the shit beat out of you by people with no legs.

    13. Re:Very Very sad by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      It doesn't take mental instability to consider suicide. Stress of all sorts can encourage thoughts of suicide: some of them, such as the stress from terminal, painful, debilitating illness, are quite reasonable to consider suicide. Even the stress of the loss of loved ones can make suicide attractive, although that can usually be helped more easily.

    14. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent was modded FUNNY? The trolls are moderating now?

    15. Re:Very Very sad by Malevolyn · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess there's not enough bridges being trip-tropped tonight.

      --
      Your ad here.
    16. Re:Very Very sad by jd · · Score: 1

      There have been a few suicides (and a few involuntary commitments - no, not me) in my family, so I feel vaguely qualified to comment. Yes, by far the majority of suicides are by the mentally ill. There are probably a fair few due to extreme adversity, but those tend to be a minority of cases, and one could argue that those are due to a mental illness in the social structure itself. You see the "high profile" suicides, but only because they're high profile and not because of some self-gratification. Some are burned out and mentally destroyed by society's demands, others are celebrities because their mental illness grants them the genius as well as the means of destruction. Some religions and philosophies decry suicides, but usually it is defects in the support system they denounce, not the individual. Some sects and denominations twist it to blame the victim, but that's insanity in itself.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    17. Re:Very Very sad by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      You do realize you have just made the most egocentric, self-centered argument ever don't you?

      "HOW DARE THEY KILL THEMSELVES!!! WHAT ABOUT MEEEEEEEEEE?!?!?!?!?!?!?!???"

      This is of course not getting into the fact that people who kill themselves more often than not believe that the world is honestly a better place without them.

      You make it sound like they just up and off themselves with a random thought like they popped in for tea and decided to throw some arsenic in just for the extra kick one morning.

      People who attempt to kill themselves tend to take their choices quite seriously.

    18. Re:Very Very sad by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      You appear to have some serious issues with blame.
      Based on your comment...

      If your friend kills him/herself your first response is to first blame yourself, then to make them wrong for it and hate and attack their character posthumously?

      Dude, that's pretty fucked up.

      Here's the thing you seem to be missing...
      It's their life, and their choice.

      It doesn't mean anything about you, or the quality of your relationship.

      Get over yourself and quit being an arrogant little twerp.

    19. Re:Very Very sad by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      How can you not define stress as a form of mental instability? It causes all sorts of changes in behavior, thinking, emotional reactions, physical changes can be highly dramatic...stress is too generic of a term, i really can run the gamut...and being stressed is not the natural state of a person.

      Stress is indeed a form of instability, that's kind of what the word means.

    20. Re:Very Very sad by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I lost some good friends to suicide and I myself tried to kill myself when my mental illness and stress in my life became too much for me to take anymore. Part of that was trolls on IWETHEY, Kuro5hin, etc telling me to go kill myself or the "shotgun mouthwash now!" comments. I even had coworkers and managers telling me to kill myself. This sort of abuse happens to mentally ill people, and in some mental states we actually do it or try to kill ourselves.

      Once or twice I had to fake my suicide online via an alt.suicide.holiday to get my suicidal thoughts out of my head. People still give me a hard time for that as well.

      Friends of mine that killed themselves had anonymous people calling them on the phone at 3am waking them up, and the very same thing happened to me and my family. For those doing that sort of thing please quit. I do not want to kill myself.

      I just got over panic attacks due to a big storm in my area that knocked out power, phones, and caused some flooding. I am not in the mood for people to start calling mentally ill people as egomaniacs, or selfish. We are not sociopaths, as sociopaths feel no pain, most of us mentally ill people kill ourselves because we are in great pain and don't want to suffer anymore. If you've never been suicidal in your life, kindly shut the F up about those of us who have been suicidal or had friends and family that killed themselves.

      It never ends, ever since 2002 I've been on disability because of this stuff, and people still won't leave me alone. They still want me to kill myself and I changed my phone numbers and email addresses and I still get harassed. Kindly quit, I refuse to kill myself because some anonymous trolls decided to troll me in real life and at my work and at my home and even dragged my friends and family members into it.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    21. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no. You're completely wrong and an ass besides. Feel free to define survivor however you like, but the mental health community will still recognize that mental illness is often a family illness and that suicide leaves behind many victims.

    22. Re:Very Very sad by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I really am. I have mental illnesses and the pain and suffering gets to be too much. Sometimes an alter ego comes out and takes over because my pain is too much to bare that a space pirate ninja from 4096AD takes over so he can deal with the pain and suffering.

      I hit the doughnut hole and they won't cover my psyche medicine any more, but I see my doctor this week and maybe I can get samples so I won't be out. They refuse to give me samples until I see my doctor and the pharmacy wants $200 for a month and I am broke.

      I had to travel back in time and stop myself from killing myselves or self and get me to a hospital, and this is really really hard to choose to live and the blood pressure is stroke level trying to cope with all of this.

      People don't kill yourselves, decide to live, find a way not to die. I'm looking for one. Stop making fun of mentally ill people and harassing them and calling them names for being mentally ill. Anyone suicidal or wanting to kill themselves are mentally ill. You don't understand how crazy a person can get before they decide to kill themselves. No sane person would kill themselves.

      I would never have been suicidal if people didn't harass me for being mentally ill in every aspect of my life. It is a sore subject and it is brought out countless times, and every single time it is discussed I get into more pain and suffering.

      But I've been to Hell already, and came back, I'd much rather go to Heaven this time. I fight evil and the devil and I am fighting to live and trying to get well and get back to being a human being again that doesn't suffer as much. I don't want to put my family and friends what they have gone through when others killed themselves.

      I'll be alright, don't worry about me. Just a bad cycle of my schizoaffective disorder. I'll go to sleep eventually and wake up feeling better and I won't be this again in the morning. I'll be something else and the pain and suffering let me know I am still alive.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    23. Re:Very Very sad by GaryPatterson · · Score: 3, Informative

      The word "survivor" has different contexts, and you're using it in a popular but not exlusive one.

      "Person X is survived by their wife and children," is used simply to mean that when person X died, their wife and children lived on. It doesn't mean they all faced some danger together.

      It only means that people lived on.

      In fact, dictionary.com has "to remain alive after the death of someone," as the first definition.

      It's correct to say that the family of a suicide are survivors.

    24. Re:Very Very sad by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      Do not criticise a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes....I suggest that you should try committing suicide before you criticise others for doing the same~!

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    25. Re:Very Very sad by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      Generally "survivor" is used to mean a situation in which ones death could easily have been foreseen. For instance. "I'm a survivor of the Iraq War" or "I'm a survivor of a horrible car accident", "I survived cancer" etc. People generally don't use survivor like this: "I'm a survivor of driving to work", "I survivor of my dad's heart attack", etc

      How about this: "I survived Heaven's Gate and all I got was this lousy purple t-shirt!"

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    26. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this guy. Killing yourself is the most selfish of acts. And by its very nature, anyone who does it deserves it.

    27. Re:Very Very sad by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Brings to mind a rather memorable mass suicide, where a large number of gentleman remained upon a sinking ship so that the women and children could use the too few lifeboats and survive. Ones wonders whether that would happen any more in today's modern society or would they all behave like a pack of panicked wild animals attempting to survive for every possible moment.

      It brings to mind the question, if a guilty conscious and the associated negative karma greatly increase the fear of death and distorts one's attitude towards it ie. those that really fear death and have good reason for doing so. For those who seem to be intrinsically aware of their positive life balance, death seems to hold far less fear.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    28. Re:Very Very sad by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Very nice way to work Bush in there.

      I'd add Saddam Hussein; he's as much scum as any of them, and if he'd offed himself earlier we would have taken our mass murder somewhere which, oh I don't know, had a nonzero probability of hiding ObL.

      And to hell with your assumption that a suicide is weak, and that they should have done nothing instead of something. Maybe the suckage of their life was a hell of a lot worse than you could possibly imagine, and they knew that. Why should they have taken inaction instead of action, just to save you some heartache?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    29. Re:Very Very sad by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      Go fuck yourself.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    30. Re:Very Very sad by erroneus · · Score: 1

      In other words, "If you haven't done anything wrong, you have nothing to fear." Right?

    31. Re:Very Very sad by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is a common turn of phrase to say that friends and family members "survive" the deceased no matter how they died.

      Read an obituary sometime, I'm sure you'll find something like "Bob is survived by his wife and three children."

      But if you'd rather bash some guy over his choice of words than actually know what you're talking about, then go right on ahead and ignore commonly used alternative definitions.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    32. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why would someone miss someone egoistic and ungrateful that he commits suicide not caring about anyone else but himself in his wasteful pity?"

      I don't honor suicides I despise them. They leave their friends and family without them and leave a mess to clean up. They do not deserve respect.

    33. Re:Very Very sad by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      No, stress means pressures applied to something, usually expressed as a ratio of force to area. Instability is what you get when the stress is excessive, or the structure flawed: the normal stresses are what provide guidance to our paths, and even give us the traction with the world to interact with it.

      To say that 'stress is indeed a form of instability' is to ignore the existence of normal, day-to-day stress.

    34. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go kill yourself.

    35. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... I remember you from K5. Please stay alive, OK? Not everyone wants you dead.

    36. Re:Very Very sad by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Brings to mind a rather memorable mass suicide, where a large number of gentleman remained upon a sinking ship so that the women and children could use the too few lifeboats and survive. Ones wonders whether that would happen any more in today's modern society or would they all behave like a pack of panicked wild animals attempting to survive for every possible moment.

      Suicide = taking your own life.

      What you described = sacrificing your life to save another.

      Tiny difference?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    37. Re:Very Very sad by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, so it is actually a sacrifice bomber, quick get in contact with the repuglicans they have got it all wrong ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    38. Re:Very Very sad by archen · · Score: 1

      For this reason alone, suicide should be considered a very bad idea -- people just don't die the way they do in the movies.

      That's sort of a self-fulfilling prophesy in our society though. No one ever goes into details on what is the "best" way to go about committing suicide, so people tend to randomly improvise. Obviously no one is going to hand out pamphlets on the most successful ways to kill yourself (being as that would be seen as encouraging suicide), so in the end the methods most people employ are what they see in the movies or hear has worked for others. Having reached a "low point" in my own life I did some research online of the best way to kill yourself. Despite the fact that this is the internet, and there are emo kids on every corner, such information isn't as readily available as you would think.

    39. Re:Very Very sad by erroneus · · Score: 1

      No, but some basic appreciation for anatomy would be helpful... if I were to do myself in, I would be successful and it would be painless, and no, I'm not going to put any how-to instructions on the net either. (Though I would suggest that if there were a people-sized wood chipper operating nearby, diving in head-first would be the least painful and most guaranteed method since the brain would be the first thing to go and the chances of survival are so close to zero that the number may as well be negative.)

      I do find it amusing that people lack the basic understanding that one of two things or both need to happen -- stop the heart, stop the brain.

    40. Re:Very Very sad by mopower70 · · Score: 1
      Very well put. Except for this:

      ... the people around them failed as well and many of us, myself included, will carry that failure to our graves with us.

      This is a dangerous thought pattern. You can not change or prevent a determined suicide. You can not take responsibility for the actions of others not matter how sick or desperate they are. You are not that strong, and you are not that powerful. Taking that misconception to your grave means you have failed yourself.

    41. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the dead bury their dead, but while one has life one must live and be happy!

      Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace

    42. Re:Very Very sad by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      They failed and broke but know this - the people around them failed as well and many of us, myself included, will carry that failure to our graves with us

      I know a few survivors or suicides and they all sound like you. Amy's one, the fellow she spent eight years with hanged himself two years ago this November. She's been living in a bottle of Canadian Superior ever since, convinced that she was at fault. yet he would have committed suicide even if he had never met her, I'm sure of this. As you say, suicide is the end result of many mental illnesses.

      You're both wrong - IT IS NOT YOUR FAULT. Your relative would have committed suicide whether or not you had ever been born. Please stop beating yourself up, even if you have to get help to do so.

      I thought of suicide one time - my doctor had just taken me off Paxil and I was in the middle of having the bank take my house away after my wife had left me and my two teenaged daughters. Knowlege of what it owuld do to my children and parents was the only thing that kept me alive. If I had gone through with it, it would have been my fault and mine alone (well, the doctor taking me off the drug might have shared some blame).

      Suicide is the most selfish act anyone can perform. I'm terribly sorry for the horrible pain your relative caused, but man, it is NOT your fault. Please see a mental health professional yourself. One helped me greatly after my divorce.

    43. Re:Very Very sad by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      > The only time when someone should commit suicide is when they are like Bush

      Wow, you almost had me thinking you weren't a complete idiot. Then you had to say that.

      Speaking as someone who's dealt with suicidal ideation and years of therapy, in many ways the person who commits suicide does so precisely to avoid being a burden on others who care about him. This is why there are no "pleas for help" or such. Yes, it can be construed by some as being selfish, but then there are cases where severe depression or other mental illness has them convinced they are worthless people who only do harm to others.

      Now kindly go DIAF.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    44. Re:Very Very sad by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      I've come to believe severe depression that results in suicide is not actually a mental disorder in the literal sense. It is natural selection in its cruelest form.

      Most attempted suicides (read as: cries for help) are committed by women. Most actual, completed suicides, by a vast margin, are committed by men. I've come to believe depression--feelings of worthlessness, failure, extreme lethargy, withdrawal from social contact, etc.--is a biological subroutine that kicks in to remove "weak" men and women from the gene pool. Note that depression can strike a person of any race, gender, social status, economic class, etc. We are all capable of depression, even severe depression. I think it's because we're all wired with it, in case we can't cope emotionally with whatever adversity life hands us.

      Society has its own agendas and ways of appraising it, treating it and trying to stop it. And ultimately many of us, with help of psychotropics, therapy, or just good friends and loving family are strong enough to fight suicidal ideation with the knowledge that things can get better, or an appreciation of the people around us who would be permanently and grievously hurt. But not everybody. Those who succumb to it are probably just doing what their genetic programming is insisting that they do: take themselves permanently out of the pack, leaving more resources for the stronger.

      It just sucks that people like David Foster Wallace couldn't find any more reasons to keep going, not even his wife. Depression is a bitch, folks.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    45. Re:Very Very sad by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Thank you, you must be one of my fans. I will stay alive, I see my doctor tomorrow to get my meds changed.

      Everything will be much better then, and then the voices and hallucinations and delusions will all go away. :)

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    46. Re:Very Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      suicidal ideation

      Oh, shit -- spare us the current psycho-obfuscation. It's as bad as the last one -- "contemplating suicide".

      What's the point -- to raise suicidal thoughts to the politically correct plane of "contemplation"? I seriously doubt anyone planning a suicide is in a state of "contemplation".

      Likewise, substituting the lofty-appearing term "ideation" for its synonym "thought" adds nothing to the discussion.

      Captcha: excrete

    47. Re:Very Very sad by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Gee I got rated as funny. Which is about as funny as schizoaffective disorder can get. That is why Orion Blastar is well known as an Internet Comedian instead of a Troll. It is Dadaism much like andy Kaufman used.

      I really am mentally ill, but I use humor as a drug to treat my illness.

      Thank you people, I'll be here all week. I'm booked up solid now.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  4. RIP David Foster Wallace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had the opportunity to meet David at a book signing. He was an incredibly gracious and friendly individual who will be missed by many in the literary field as well as everywhere else.

  5. With great genius comes great madness by AngrySup · · Score: 1

    'Nuff Said.

    1. Re:With great genius comes great madness by eebra82 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As opposed to "with idiocy comes no madness"? It's there regardless of how clever you are.

    2. Re:With great genius comes great madness by lysergic.acid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it's well documented that great artists, writers, and people with other forms genius have a much higher incidence of mental disorders than the normal population.

      generally speaking, creative/artistic individuals have a greater disposition for bipolarism. conversely, the children of mathematically gifted parents are more likely to develop autism or Asperger syndrome. that's why there's such a higher concentration of kids with Asperger syndrome in Silicon Valley.

    3. Re:With great genius comes great madness by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Is it madness that pushes us to end it all, or sanity in being able to see what it all really is...

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    4. Re:With great genius comes great madness by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a myth. For instance, Shakespeare was by most accounts a gregarious, sane and happy fellow.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    5. Re:With great genius comes great madness by retchdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, the parents in Silicon Valley tend to be wealthy enough to get their kids diagnosed with Asperger's, and medicated/trained into being "better" students... just a thought.

      I'm suspicious of how well documented this link really is; let alone, that any evidence is totally observational. Of course the randomized study would be grossly immoral, even if it were possible.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    6. Re:With great genius comes great madness by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "'Nuff Said."

      I doubt this person was mad, depressed perhaps, or overwhelmed by sadness. But insults are the retreat of the ignorant against men they don't know and who's thoughts they don't or cannot understand.

    7. Re:With great genius comes great madness by Tpl2000 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a rephrasing is in order? With great madness comes great genius?

      --
      Epic. Just epic.
    8. Re:With great genius comes great madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's well documented, please give us some references. It sounds like a (sub)urban myth to me - but I'm prepared to be proved wrong!

    9. Re:With great genius comes great madness by jefu · · Score: 1
      Both, I suspect.

      There seem to me to be rational and completely reasonable reasons to commit suicide. The prospect of a life that is only painful to oneself and others, complete hopelessness, serious illness... But at the same time, suicide seems so far from our base animal behavior that it must also incorporate some kind of thinking that goes far, far against the norm.

      Whichever is the case, I can only add my regrets that Wallace is gone.

    10. Re:With great genius comes great madness by MrHanky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "most accounts?" There's hardly any information about the person William Shakespeare.

    11. Re:With great genius comes great madness by lysergic.acid · · Score: 3, Informative

      here's a list from Wikipedia that cites several sources. here is an article discussing the relationship between Autism/Asperger and genius. here is an article on Psychology Today that discusses a growing movement within academic circles that views autism and similar disorders as just part of the spectrum of neurodiversity that our society is comprised of. and if you do a search for "Geek Syndrome" you can find a Wired article that i believe may have been on Slashdot a few years ago. i also recall reading something a few years ago on PubMed that discussed the correlation between genius and mental disorder.

      another interesting paper i read on PubMed also discussed the evolutionary advantage of Bipolarism. basically, the author(s) argued that while Bipolarism/Manic-Depression may present an evolutionary disadvantage to the individual, the genes have been perpetuated because it fosters altruistic actions which coincide with kin selection.

      all of this makes a certain amount of sense to me. i've always felt that bipolarism endows an individual with greater capacity for emotional experience. this can be a beneficial trait to artists/musicians since good artwork is defined by its ability to evoke strong emotions, and, likewise, good artwork is often inspired by emotional trauma in the artist's life. but greater emotional depth can also enable one to better empathize with others, which could potentially lead to altruistic behavior.

    12. Re:With great genius comes great madness by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Heh. A walk through San Francisco disproves that.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    13. Re:With great genius comes great madness by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1, Interesting

      if the high incidence of Asperger/Autism in Silicon Valley is strictly due to it being a more affluent neighborhood, then wouldn't similar increases in Autism be observed in other more affluent neighborhoods? and why Asperger/Autism in particular, and not other mental disorders like ADHD, bipolarism, anxiety disorders, etc.? Asperger Syndrome isn't called the "Geek Syndrome" for nothing.

      and i think it should be noted that observational evidence is different from anecdotal evidence. any kind of hard science is going to rely on observational data, which, unlike anecdotal evidence, isn't skewed by subjective bias or small sample size.

      i would encourage you to do some research into autism/Asperger and bipolar/manic-depression/suicide yourself. if you check on PubMed you can find a lot of relevant studies on this topic. this article may also be of interest.

    14. Re:With great genius comes great madness by retchdog · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was "strictly" due to that. There are many other possible explanations; the most tragic would be that ground-water contamination from industrial pollutants (the very industry which drew the bright parents there) is to blame; your explanation is not quite as bad, but still kind of sad. These may all be true to some degree, or none of them.

      And lo and behold! Try googling "autism income diagnosis" and "adhd income diagnosis" for many citations that diagnosis is in fact positive correlated with income.

      (Now you could say of course, that maybe these disorders are associated with "genius", which is then associated with income. Maybe. But from my experiences, you'll need some evidence to show me.)

      Observational data can easily be skewed by subjective bias, although it is better than anecdotes, usually. Unfortunately, any case where you don't unambiguously state in advance what your study units and sampling methodology are going to be, and then adhere fanatically to them is going to be much closer to "formalized anecdotes" than science, I'm afraid.

      I think people believe a lot of things which have not been borne out by the data. If we're going to understand and do something about these things, we can't romanticize. Although in and of itself that article was kind of meh, it had some good cites, and I followed the cite of Nancy Andreasen to wikipedia. I am tentatively impressed by her work and accolades, and will look at her paper "Creativity and mental illness: prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives" (Am J Psych. 1987. 144:1288-92) shortly. Thanks.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    15. Re:With great genius comes great madness by Chysn · · Score: 1

      > There's hardly any information about the person
      > William Shakespeare.

      That's just totally wrong.

      --
      --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
      -- See?
    16. Re:With great genius comes great madness by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Well that's just great. Their online articles only go back to 1988. Never mind.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    17. Re:With great genius comes great madness by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      i believe ADHD is on the rise largely because it's being diagnosed more (and possibly over-diagnosed). and there may be a correlation between income and ADHD diagnosis. but i did in fact do a search for "autism income diagnosis" as you suggested, and i could find no studies which support such a link.

      of course, short of identifying the exact genes that trigger autism/Asperger and bipolarism, it's going to difficult to prove a direct causal link between these disorders and exceptional mental abilities. and i agree that social/cultural factors complicate the issue. but i believe the circumstantial data shows a strong correlation.

      if it were really just an urban legend, i don't think there would be so many academic papers and books discussing the relationship between the two. i wish i could provide you with more conclusive studies, but most of the academic literature that i'm finding with titles like "Asperger's disorder and mathematicians of genius" or "Autistic Genius?" require paid subscriptions to an academic database. but if you do a search for "neurodiversity" or "autistic spectrum" i think you may find a lot of useful info.

    18. Re:With great genius comes great madness by Trogre · · Score: 1

      ummm... no.

      Aspergers isn't exactly hard to diagnose.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    19. Re:With great genius comes great madness by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      >> There's hardly any information about the person >> William Shakespeare. >That's just totally wrong It's true, there is hardly any information about the person William Shakespeare. Oh, I'm not talking about the playwright, I'm talking about the other William Shakespeare: he worked as a baker in London in the 1660s. I defy you to find more information about him!

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    20. Re:With great genius comes great madness by retchdog · · Score: 1

      I was referring to this http://www.autismspot.com/news/Survey-finds-minority-low-income-students-less-likely-receive-Autism-diagnosis unfortunately I couldn't get it to resolve to anything more substantial without registering.

      I looked up that "Mathematicians of Genius" paper; it was a speculative retrospective analysis of whether various genius mathematicians fit the Asperger's guidelines. Many of them did, and despite the totally subjective nature of this, I'm willing to buy it for the moment. I don't doubt that Asperger's is associated with mathematical thinking; but is it really associated with greatness?

      I don't know - it's just disturbing to me, to have genius and accomplishment closely linked to what is really an illness. I still suspect that Asperger's only correlates with having the "strange motivation" necessary to pursue deep intellectual activity, with the actual ability closer to more traditional measures like g. And what should we do as society, with useful people who draw such satisfaction and fulfillment from such narrow understanding?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    21. Re:With great genius comes great madness by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt that Asperger's is associated with mathematical thinking; but is it really associated with greatness?

      i wouldn't go so far as to say that Asperger is linked to greatness, but i think it does cause a proclivity for analytical thinking and mathematics. you often hear of autistic savants who can count the number of leaves in a tree at a single glance, or can calculate the day of the week that any date past or future falls upon, or other similar feats. this cannot be a coincidence.

      it's just disturbing to me, to have genius and accomplishment closely linked to what is really an illness.

      personally, i look at it as a continuous spectrum. we have the DSM IV criteria for autism/Asperger syndrome, but as with bipolarism, the diagnostic criteria are somewhat subjective. there's no clear cut-off between high functioning autism and Asperger syndrome. likewise, there's no clear cut off between mild Asperger syndrome and someone who's just geeky and socially awkward.

      the same genes that cause mathematical talent/genius seem to also cause autism, so it may be a genetic trait that is beneficial in moderate amounts, but if inherited from both parents leads to an increased probability of autistic disorder. likewise, while the genes that cause manic-depression increases one's artistic/creative talent, if they are expressed in excess it would render an individual incapable of functioning in a normal capacity.

      i think the key thing here is to not treat it as something like hepatitis or down syndrome. with the proper care and considerations, most high functioning autism/Asperger syndrome sufferers can still lead a relatively normal life--one which their unique neurological disposition actually enriches rather than detracts from. in fact, some of the most influential figures in our cultural history were likely mildly autistic.

    22. Re:With great genius comes great madness by BountyX · · Score: 1

      I concur, I was in a gifted class where everyone in the class passed the standford binnet with a score over 135. The average score was 145. The common misconception is that geniuses are geeks. Wrong. Most gifted individuals (based on my subjective experience) did not fit the geek profile. In fact, as gifted individuals we were simply just really good at EVERYTHING we did. All of us were top in sports, music, academics (every subject), and socially manipulative (in evil and good ways). Anything new we learned, we quickly became proficient in (such as rapidly learning new languages). Genius just means an ability to learn faster and progress faster than the average. Furthermore, people with aspergers are psuedo "intelligent" at best. They appear intelligent because they engage in repetitive behaviors and obsessions. This is the opposite of intelligence (learning fast). Society incorrectly associates such obsessions with intelligence due to an incorrect assumption that geeks are intelligent. Geeks suffer from the same obsessive behaviors. Perhaps the words relation to the mental disorder exploits its own ambiguity.

      --
      Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
    23. Re:With great genius comes great madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      here [autism.com] is an article discussing the relationship between Autism/Asperger and genius.

      I have never seen any research connecting Autism with high intelligence.

      While there is nothing preventing an autistic person from having high aptitude in many areas, I have never seen anything even remotely thorough that would suggest that there is a strong correlation.

      I've seen an awful lot of claims of it being the case, however. Generally, I can't help but wonder if those can be attributed to the ego of autistic people or their friends and family who want to say "see, we're better off this way".

      Social issues, however, may contribute a person with autism or aspergers to spend vastly more time working on and/or obsessing about an issue, which may lead to their having a greater understanding of the issue, but there's nothing precluding a non-autistic person from doing the same thing, except a greater capacity for social normalcy.

      I don't think I buy your argument about bipolar disorder either. There is a certain allowance for "error" within animals and humans. There is absolutely NO evolutionary advantage to poor eyesight, except a general lack of necessity.

      I would argue the same for long-term emotional stability.

    24. Re:With great genius comes great madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...

      all of this makes a certain amount of sense to me. i've always felt that bipolarism endows an individual with greater capacity for emotional experience.

      Your ideas of "emotional experience" are far removed from the experiences of those with bipolar disprder.

      this can be a beneficial trait to artists/musicians since good artwork is defined by its ability to evoke strong emotions, and, likewise, good artwork is often inspired by emotional trauma in the artist's life.

      You obviously have never interacted with a person with severe bipolar disorder. It is not equivalent to "emotional trauma" in those who do not suffer from it.

      but greater emotional depth can also enable one to better empathize with others, which could potentially lead to altruistic behavior.

      Your ignorance of bipolar disorder (and the behaviour of those afflicted by it) is overwhelming.

    25. Re:With great genius comes great madness by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      Asperger's is a 'behavioral trait' moreso than a 'behavioral disorder'. It's not that there's anything wrong with people with Asperger's, but there are a number of characteristics that tend to go side-by-side. Some can get bad enough to be considered a 'disorder' in that they have negative effects on people's well-being.

      Research so far indicates that there are a modest number of genes involved in increased intelligence which we have started selecting for in modern society. The upside being increased intelligence and focus, the downside being that some of these genes have side effects like clumsiness or anti-social behavior.

      Mix too many of these genes in one individual and you get Autism.

      Hence there is not "one" autism gene - it can come from any of many combinations of the genes that contribute to Asperger's characteristics.

    26. Re:With great genius comes great madness by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      actually, i have been diagnosed with clinical depression, and for a while i did require medication (fluoxetine, lexapro, etc.) but i've been doing just fine without any of those meds for the past 3-4 years. perhaps you shouldn't be so quick to jump to conclusions about someone you've never met.

      if your experiences run contrary to my statements then i'm very interested in hearing them. i can only base my claims off of my own personal experience, and i recognize that my experiences may not be true for others.

    27. Re:With great genius comes great madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He apppears to have been well-liked by his peers, sober, hard-working, and a bit aloof. A little like Bach. The antithesis of the Romantic genius.

    28. Re:With great genius comes great madness by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      "Higher incidence" doesn't mean "necessary". Do you think Einstein's brain was like yours?

      A creative genius isn't going to have a normal mind; he's not going to be at the top of the bell curve. He is going to be different.

      Different <> crazy. A creative genius can be mad, but there's no correlation.

    29. Re:With great genius comes great madness by yali · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, David Foster Wallace wrote the book Everything & More about the work of mathematician Georg Cantor, who suffered from mental illness late in life. Around the same time as Wallace's book was published, another book came out trying to argue that Cantor's mathematical genius stemmed from his illness. In an interview, Wallace called it "dreck, the very worst kind of appeal to a flabby, unconsidered pop version of what you just now called the 'mad genius' syndrome." Wallace goes on:

      ...The fact is that it's all but certain that Cantor was bipolar, that his professional insecurities and travails aggravated the illness but didn't cause it, that most of his worst episodes and hospitalizations occurred when he was older and his best work was long behind him. Etc., etc.--some of the unsexy truth gets talked about in [Everything & More].

      People like the "mad genius" meme, but it paints an overly simple picture of things. It might be the case (and empirically, the jury is still out) that some of the same predispositions that put people at risk of mental illness in some circumstances can contribute positively to intellectual functioning in others. But that is most definitely NOT the same as saying "with great genius comes great madness." If anything, the madness comes along and puts a sad end to the genius, rather than enhancing it.

    30. Re:With great genius comes great madness by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Apparently there's a "spectrum" from "neurotypical" to "flailing-about autism", with Asperger's somewhere toward the neurotypical side. Since Asperger's is hard even to define, please tell me exactly how that can be anything but hard to diagnose.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  6. From the Harvey Mudd student list by Goobergunch · · Score: 3, Informative

    Professor David Foster Wallace of Pomona College's English Department died tragically on Friday. Professor Wallace was a well-known writer and gifted creative writing instructor. Pomona College has planned two events to remember Professor Wallace's life. The first will be tomorrow (Monday) evening at 6:45 - a candlelight memorial in the Peter Stanley academic quad. The second - an informal opportunity to share thoughts - will be Wednesday, September 17 at 4pm in Smith Campus Center 201.

    1. Re:From the Harvey Mudd student list by Chaset · · Score: 1

      Ah, interesting. When I saw Claremont, I was wondering whether this man had anything to do with the Colleges. No mod points, unfortunately.

      --
      -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
  7. Infinite Jest one of the best books... by CandideEC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Infinite Jest was an amazing book. Foster Wallace was an incredible writer. Very interesting and depressing. Time to read the jest again - ..

  8. Actual quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness." -- Aristotle

    1. Re:Actual quote by Missing_dc · · Score: 1

      "No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness." -- Aristotle

      I try to refrain from responding to ACs, but this one needs clarification in my mind:

      It is madness if it remains within your perception of reality, and Genius if it exceeds them, forcing you to re-evaluate your place/stance.

      --
      How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
  9. And with it, finally by gelfling · · Score: 1

    The death of deconstruction and semiotics. Which is either terribly arch or exactly what it itself would have predicted.

  10. Re:am I the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who read that as Stamford Wallace dead. I cheered. If you transform Spammers into non-humans, it is easy to cheer their demise.
    Until I realised it was some guy I have never heard of. American Icon, true patriot? Maybe with his passing, you USians will need less of that.

    He wrote a book that mostly makes fun of our dedication to corporatism and neo patriotism and all the things that have been wrong with our country in the past generation.

    When they say 'true patriot' they mean the real one. Not a fox news patriot which are the worst kind.

  11. A brief personal narrative (in the style of . . .) by yourpusher · · Score: 4, Informative

    (crossposted from Blacknell.net)

    Sad.1 David Foster Wallace2, along with perhaps only William Gibson, had a reader in me for everything he wrote. So dedicated was I to his Infinite Jest that I carried it in planes, trains, and autobuses over three continents.3 If you've never read any of his work, maybe you could start with this brilliant 2005 essay on political talk radio.4

    1And I say sad in some weirdly personal sense that comes from both finding his writing deeply compelling in itself, and identifying his work with a period of time in my life which is not missed, but stands out as significant in recollection.

    2David Foster Wallace (or DFW, as he is popularly known among fans) also provided (albeit completely unknowingly) some of the reason that Blacknell.net exists today. The blog that inspired me to start my own was written by an alumnus of the law school I had just started in. He, in turn, had been motivated to write online (in a format once known as an "online journal") while he read Infinite Jest (nb. This same author once had an essay published in the same collection as DFW). An early autobiography of this online journal community is available here (it is amusing to consider how much energy was expended on the subject of diary v. journal, only to have blog become the accepted appellation).

    3 A massive tome of a book with 1200 pages of writing to be relished and consumed (in addition to being read) I took two years to complete it, taking it to Panama, Venezuela, and Britain. I've since reread it (in sections, while it wasn't lent out).

    4Even though it isn't entirely representative.

    (Ah, for want of a superscript tag . . .)

  12. Re:good ridence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  13. omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a humorist? there is nothing funny about suicide..

  14. This sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it sucks(1) that he(2) died.(3)(4) We (5) need more (6) like him.(7)(8)

    (1)Here, literally, I'm, of course, speaking metaphorically. I don't mean it literally sucked (like, say, the 500 dollar an hour prostitute sucked the republican hypocrites shriveled cock), but rather figuratively sucked (like, say, the republican hypocrites bill to put you in jail for the same prostitution related behavior). Incidentally, by "it", I can't tell if I mean the whole universe or his dying or if those might not be one and the same.

    (2)David Foster Wallace, a brave writer who broke open peoples heads. Understood grammar structures and larger similar consciousness effect on conventions he altering did have.

    (3) Due to concern for his family, I won't mention the obvious fact that a cover up of his botched murder is already underway by the CIA agents who killed him to stop him from publishing his new book, which would of liberated minds beyond the power of the narrow imaginations of the CIA to control.

    (4) Did you ever notice how we always are sad people are dead, even though that obviously shows no empathy. Look, first of all, it's not like there was a David Foster Wallace. Any ego is an illusory construct, his was no exception. There may have been a self referential feedback pattern that thought it was David Foster Wallace, but that no more makes there a David Foster Wallace then David Foster Wallace thinking he is a blue potato makes him a blue potato.

    Second of all, if he really wanted to die, and was in that much pain, who are we to judge. Can you imagine being David Foster Wallace and having to deal with idiots like you people all day, every day? Maybe we should be glad such a great mind is finally liberated from the pain of dealing with stupid dumb fucks like us (well, OK, just most of you) every day.

    Third of all, if this was maybe an epic fail at autoerotic asphyxiation, as some scurrilous, borderline slanderous, and definitely inappropriately timed comments wryly have hinted at, we shouldn't think it's sad. The same perverted streak is probably what caused Grandpa Wallace to poke Grandma Wallace in the ass while she was butchering a pig. Without that perverted streak, the drop of cum his dad's dna was in would have never dripped out his grandmas dirty ass, and we would have never had him in the first place. It's misplaced to hate an aspect of nature that is responsible for the creation of things we like.

    (5) I mean, again, you stupid fucks, who don't know how to use your brains.

    (6) If certain theories about reincarnation are true, maybe DFW stepped out when he did because, at the magical, metalogical realms he walked in, he saw it as an optimal time to reincarnate to the best effect.

    (7) In the sense of writing and thinking like he did.

    (8) If we want more people that brilliant, we need to do a better job making the world not suck. People of the internet, it's not good enough to sit around reading about tech and science fiction while smoking pot and jacking off. If you don't use your brain right while your are reading science fiction, smoking pot, and jacking off to the same perverted porn that lead your parents to the sex act that made you, you might as well be in a church on your knees praying to a God that doesn't exist, or in a university fighting for biosurvival tickets, with which to do ridiculous rituals that have as much to do with truth as catholicism in many cases, with memetically sophisticated domesticated primates who fight over their ideas long after they have been rendered obsolete, or raising your kids to be as dogmatic as you are, for all the good it will do yourself, your world, and the nothingness you arise in and return to. What does it say about us and where we are headed in the 21st century that someone as brilliant as DFW wouldn't stick around and experience it? Can we do better than this?

  15. Re:good ridence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Henceforth, the part of David Foster Wallace will be played by Moe Szyslak.

  16. Let me be the first to say... by rhizome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!

    If you don't want to leap into "Infinite Jest," start with "Girl With Curious Hair."

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  17. a little personal irony by cathector · · Score: 1

    it's strange,
    i was feeling a bit blue just a couple days ago, and was considering rereading IJ to cheer me up: it's a book which always puts things in perspective and makes me laugh, and i especially appreciate that it makes *me* feel smart and witty, as if DFW were loaning me a portion of his verve and charm for a while.

    IJ is in my opinion the best novel in the english language,
    and DFW's suicide at such a young age is a huge loss to literature.

    my thoughts go out to his family, friends, students, and fans.

    1. Re:a little personal irony by jasonjacks0n · · Score: 1

      IJ is in my opinion the best novel in the english language,
      and DFW's suicide at such a young age is a huge loss to literature.

      I agree; IJ has meant a lot to me each time I've read it, although it especially blew my mind the first time. It's an amazing masterpiece.

      I'm in my 30s, and this is the first "celebrity death" I've ever really been sad and upset about. Even Vonnegut's passing didn't affect me like this.. :-/

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:a little personal irony by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      A tremendous loss. It seemed like David Foster Wallace could write brilliantly about everything (and with his famous tendency for digressions, footnotes, and endnotes, did his best to actually write about everything). Brilliant nonfiction essays, hilarious short stories, and of course, mindwarping novels. Infinite Jest contains multitudes- it's a novel about tennis and addiction and entertainment and American hegemony and Quebec separatism and commercialism and physical deformity and a thousand other things. The novel is worth reading for the description of the game of Eschaton alone. Infinite Jest was a major undertaking to read- I cannot imagine what it was to write it- but richly rewarding.

      R.I.P, DFW.

      Where be your gibes now? your gambols? your songs? your flashes of merriment, that were wont to set the table on a roar?

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  18. I prefer to think of it as tortured soul syndrome by VTEngineer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most great artists please many, but inside are miserable. God's greatest gifts make the receiver miserable, but give pleasure to many. Kind of fascinating to me. Almost like their internal misery is the source of their genius.

  19. Footnotes by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

    The description of footnotes in Infinite Jest reminds me of Wilson by David Mamet. Would Wilson be considered "in the style" of Infinite Jest?

  20. Re:Good! by yourpusher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yet unlike you, he had the balls to sign his name to whatever he wrote.

    Fuck off.

  21. Just goes to prove.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hemp rope makes a lousy necktie especially when you tie it to the ceiling. Sorry, no sleep, 12 Red Bulls and three quad lattes later your sense of humor is heavily influenced by the caffeine related brain damage.

  22. Whoa dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you just blew my fuckin' mind.

    /toke

  23. Re:Good! by strelitsa · · Score: 0, Troll

    In which telephone book can I find the name "yourpusher"?

    You're not exactly showing a lot of bravery yourself, you cowardly little chickenshit punk. Identify yourself so I can beat your ass like you deserve - DO IT NOW!

    --
    No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
  24. Glamorizing suicide by Chairboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    All the coverage of this cowardly act seems to really implicitly glamorize suicide. When people kill themselves, they hurt families, loved ones, etc. Then there's all this fawning news coverage of the suicide... oh come on.

    He took the cowards way out. No diagnosis of terminal cancer, his death doesn't somehow cleverly result in saving someone from some terrible fate, there's no apparent real reason for doing it other than just giving up.

    Fine, your life is the only real currency you have any anyone should be entitled to make that one decision about when and where they go. But for the news to make such a big deal out of it is a disservice to all the writers whos passing went unannounced and sends a terribly mixed message to society about how we value folks more for their death than their life.

    1. Re:Glamorizing suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who says we don't value folks more for their death than their life? If anything, this points out a serious problem; it doesn't cause it. (For the record, Wallace was quite well appreciated for a guy who had only one big-name novel which was written only a little more than a decade ago; most writers don't even get what he got.)

      As for him being a coward, who are you to say that? You clearly don't know his life well enough to judge him. His reason is simply not apparent to you; until you have all the facts, you can't say it was unreasonable.

      And yes, families members get hurt. But some problems are harder to heal from than loss. If he was suffering from something that gave him excruciating pain and could not be cured, then the families' temporary pain over their loss could be justified.

      You might not agree on that, given that you seem to be using the classic utilitarian argument, but since you can't measure anyone's suffering, that argument falls flat. Thus, it is just as possible that his suffering "measures" higher than his survivors' suffering than vice versa.

    2. Re:Glamorizing suicide by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

      I take it you don't know that there are diseases and brain chemical imbalances that can cause pain which is of such a level that death is preferable.

      It's easy to blame the dead, point fingers at them and heap scorn upon their bodies.

      Fact is, you're not him, I'm not him, neither was anyone else. We don't know why, and will never know why.

      Feeling sadness, I think, is a more appropriate reacting than slinging insults at the dead.

    3. Re:Glamorizing suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a real child. Or at least, someone who's life has been relatively easy and painless.

      Everyone dies, get over it. A person's life is their own. Maybe he was in pain, or maybe he was just tired. What the hell do you know of his life, and who are you to judge?

      Cowards way out? I salute him for having more courage than I do. Life is suffering, more or less, and it is only the fear of the afterlife, or lack of one, that keeps many of us here.

    4. Re:Glamorizing suicide by yali · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would draw a clear and bright line between what you say about David Foster Wallace ("he took the coward's way out") and others' reactions ("fawning news coverage"). The second point, I totally agree with you on. The first, I vehemently disagree.

      We don't know why DFW committed suicide, and we might neverk now. But in the vast majority of cases, "cowardice" isn't even a relevant concept. Depression -- real, deep depression -- is not just about being in a crappy mood. Real depression (and other kinds of serious mental illness) messes you up so deeply that up seems like down and you cannot make rational sense out of yourself or the world. To call someone a "coward" implies that were faced with a choice and, with faculties intact, made a weak decision. Like I said, not a relevant concept for suicide.

      And for the exact same reason, all the tributes making this into some sort of penetrating existential act of a man who saw the world too clearly... please! DFW was a brilliant thinker and writer, but his death is a tragedy and a loss. It is not an artistic act.

    5. Re:Glamorizing suicide by bogjobber · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why would having terminal cancer change anything? I hate to break it to you, but we're all going to die. Everyone has terminal cancer. If that's going to convince you to commit suicide you might as well get it out of the way now.

      You have no idea what his life was like, or what sort of distress caused him to do this. Maybe he was mentally ill, something terrible had just happened to him, and he just became overwhelmed. It happens.

      So take you condescending attitude and fuck off. DFW contributed a great deal to our society, and he was obviously a person with great personal anguish. There's a slight, minuscule inkling of truth to what you are saying, but calling him a coward does nothing but make you look like the dick you are. We all know suicide is a pointless affair, that's why we're all still here.

    6. Re:Glamorizing suicide by thelexx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My uncle committed suicide a few weeks ago. All I'm going to relate is the position of his church implied by the words of the presiding priest. He used a quote (that I can't remember the attribution of) which went along the lines of, "When someone does this, it is no different than if they were set upon and murdered in the woods." My take on it was that the person had been overcome by some outside force. We don't have a problem who are physically overcome; we reserve our derision for people who are overcome mentally. Not very fair in light of the truth I learned in martial arts, which is that there is ALWAYS someone faster, stronger, or better trained than you. No matter how much we care to think nothing can overcome our will and clear thinking, it seems manifestly untrue in light of events like this.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    7. Re:Glamorizing suicide by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Cowardice? Do you think committing suicide is easy? It takes real courage and hard determination, although that doesn't mean it's commendable.

    8. Re:Glamorizing suicide by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Oh, no. Practice and the law of averages have caught up with many cowardly, poorly implemented suicide attempts of real wimps. Alocholism, and its cousin drunken driving, have been the means of many successful suicide attempts. So has arguing with somebody with a gun.

      Glorifying suicide as 'courageous' leads to suicide bombers.

    9. Re:Glamorizing suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cowardice? Do you think committing suicide is easy?

      Suicide IS easy. Comedy is hard.

    10. Re:Glamorizing suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To call someone a "coward" implies that were faced with a choice and, with faculties intact, made a weak decision.

      Im pretty sure he could find help if he wanted to. There are allot of help for depressed people. But for whatever reason he decided the coward way out.

    11. Re:Glamorizing suicide by zOper · · Score: 1

      It's difficult to seek help when you're ashamed of your feelings. And honestly, people like you make things worst. Nobody is an "egoistic coward" for feeling sucidial. It is just natural to keep searching for happiness and ways to relieve your pain. It doesn't mean that the solutions you're considering are the best, but it doesn't mean you're a coward either.

      The danger of culpabilizing a suicidal person is that it is probably the main reason why people kill themselves without telling a word to anybody. When something gets really difficult to admit, you tend to keep it for yourself. And one day, it is going to be too late: you feel the urge to relieve the pain now, on the spot: you've had enough for far too long. And this urge is so strong that you won't think of all the possible consequences: this is what we call a suicide crisis.

      Don't be a part of the problem: help to prevent suicide. Please.

    12. Re:Glamorizing suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comedy is hard.

      Rigor mortis jokes already? Geez, you guys...

    13. Re:Glamorizing suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some cancers cause slow lingering extremely painful deaths. Being faced with immediate pain is much more of a reason than just knowing someday probably decades away you may die.

    14. Re:Glamorizing suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... reserve our derision for people who are overcome mentally. Not very fair in light of the truth I learned in martial arts, which is that there is ALWAYS someone faster, stronger, or better trained than you.

      Including... yourself? Apparently suicide is like meeting yourself in a dark alley, and despite your ninja training, getting your ass kicked by your own superior kung-fu. Emotionally speaking. Impressive...

    15. Re:Glamorizing suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Depression -- real, deep depression -- is not just about being in a crappy mood. Real depression (and other kinds of serious mental illness) messes you up so deeply that up seems like down and you cannot make rational sense out of yourself or the world.

      I suffered from acute clinical depression for around 2 years. (It apparently runs in the family.) And it most definitely is not a "mood". There are profound changes in brain chemistry after a couple of months of it, and by the time how best to die becomes every third thought, you're hardly yourself anymore. The fact that profoundly depressed people get by physically -- work, eat, drive (particularly drive) -- is a grim testament to how autonomic we are. How can we drive when we can barely see what's right in front of our eyes? A mystery. If Wallace committed suicide due to depression, I feel sorry for his family. (One of my family members followed up on what I'd once wished for.) There's a trail of grief for the family of suicides that won't abate for around 2 years. (The regularity of the toll of grief is another odd testament to how autonomic we are. Grief takes from 6 months to 2 years to abate. It just does.)

      If anyone reading this is also depressed, please see someone professionally. Even if you don't "believe" in psychiatry. Talk to a sympathetic professional. Take the damned medicines briefly. Learn newer more rational ways to think and behave. Keep your guard up. And good luck.

    16. Re:Glamorizing suicide by ROU+Nuisance+Value · · Score: 1

      Thank you for such a reasonable, rational, humane response.

    17. Re:Glamorizing suicide by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      It's actually more like meeting yourself in a dark alley, except there is no fight left. Only a winner and a loser. The "winner" is the one who kills the other; then both die.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  25. He also wrote an excellent popular math book! by retchdog · · Score: 5, Informative

    No slashdot discussion of DFW is completely without mentioning Everything and More. In addition to his fiction, he wrote an excellent non-fiction book about the history of mathematical infinity. Unlike most popular math books, it was interesting and not condescending. He clearly taught himself a good amount of Analysis in order to write so well on the subject. If any slashdotter wants to see what made this guy great, you'd do well to start there. Not only is it excellent writing, it's technically coherent and you'll likely learn something.

    Appropriate here may be what he had to say about the popular story of Georg Cantor going insane trying to understand infinity (specifically the distinction between the infinity of integers, and the "larger" infinity of the real line):

    "To lament Cantor's failure to describe infinity, is like feeling sorry that St. George lost to the Dragon. It is both wrong and insulting." (paraphrased)

    Of course no one is lamenting DFW's failures per se, but I can't imagine many accomplished postmodern writers caring to get the grip on modern mathematics that DFW did. He didn't go for the low-hanging fruit, this guy.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    1. Re:He also wrote an excellent popular math book! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to mention the subtitle: A Compact History of Infinity, probably the best math double-entendre I've ever heard/read.

    2. Re:He also wrote an excellent popular math book! by ortholattice · · Score: 3, Informative

      Appropriate here may be what he had to say about the popular story of Georg Cantor going insane trying to understand infinity (specifically the distinction between the infinity of integers, and the "larger" infinity of the real line)

      Actually, the problem wasn't the distinction between these two infinities (he successfully and famously proved that with his diagonal argument) but rather whether there are any infinities in-between the infinity of the integers (aleph-0) and the infinity of the real line (the continuum, c). Specifically, he tried unsuccessfully to prove that the next higher infinity after aleph-0, called aleph-1, was equal to c.

      As it turns out, this problem is unsolvable unless we assume it as an additional axiom of ZFC (Zermelo-Fraenkel with Choice) set theory, called the continuum hypothesis (CH), which states aleph-1=c. Goedel showed that is was OK to add CH to set theory without causing a contradiction (i.e. CH is consistent with the rest of ZFC set theory). That CH is independent, i.e. unprovable from the other axioms, was finally shown by Paul Cohen in 1963. He did this with a brilliant new technique he invented called "forcing", which became a stepping stone for a whole slew of amazing new discoveries about the "universe" of mind-bogglingly huge infinities that we mere mortals can barely even begin to grasp.

    3. Re:He also wrote an excellent popular math book! by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      It's in fact the subtitle that made me buy the book! I only made it halfway though, I expected a faster pace to get to the real "meat" of infinity. I might give it another chance now.

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    4. Re:He also wrote an excellent popular math book! by crazybilly · · Score: 1

      I just finished Everything. Fine DFW work--a little bit headspinning, but funny and thought-provoking. I've got to say, this is a sad day for all.

  26. I might as well break the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just read some sad news in the New York Post - writer David Foster Wallace was found dead in his Claremont home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure a small minority of people in the Slashdot community will miss him - even though I didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture, which, as we all know, is destroying this country. Truly an American icon.

  27. Low self image& better world by denzacar · · Score: 1

    You can't believe that the world would be better off with you dead - without giving yourself greater importance than EVERYTHING else in the world.
    You are SO bad for the ENTIRE UNIVERSE that your death will cause a sigh of relief across the all of the existence.

    Hell yeah suicidal people are egotistic!
    They just express it differently than usually expected.

    As for grateful... How about for being alive?
    Yes. Its a pain and a constant struggle but sure beats the alternative.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Low self image& better world by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Its a pain and a constant struggle but sure beats the alternative.

      How do you know that? The only people who can say for certain that that is the case are dead people--and they ain't talkin'.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    2. Re:Low self image& better world by GaryPatterson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're arguing from a rational perspective here, but I don't believe people kill themselves while in a rational frame of mind. Instead it's an emotional choice, brought about either by events and an inability to deal with them, or a disorder that creates the belief that suicide is the only option.

      Cool, rational debate isn't a feature of suicides.

    3. Re:Low self image& better world by Thiez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > You can't believe that the world would be better off with you dead - without giving yourself greater importance than EVERYTHING else in the world.
      You are SO bad for the ENTIRE UNIVERSE that your death will cause a sigh of relief across the all of the existence.

      Huh? Just because you think the universe is better off without you doesn't mean you think you are the worst thing in existance. I think the universe would be better off without, lets say, hay fever. Does that in any way imply that I think hay fever is the worst and/or most important thing in the world? No, and such a conclusion would make no sense at all. But if I think the world would be better off without me, then that suddenly means I give myself greater importance than everything else?

      > As for grateful... How about for being alive?
      Yes. Its a pain and a constant struggle but sure beats the alternative.

      Grateful for being alive? Why? And to whom should we be grateful?
      Suppose you think your life sucks. If you are dead, you do not experience anything at all, so I guess being dead qualifies as 'neutral'. Surely if you really dislike your life and see no way to change this, then surely the rational thing is to die since that would be an improvement (it ends your suffering forever).

  28. Depression ? by EEPROMS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Depression is a horrible thing and it hits many without notice and can be a horrible experience. Many of you will look at this death as weakness but the reality is some of the greatest and strongest people alive (and dead) have suffered with the demon that is depression for years often with no help and in complete ignorance by those around the sufferer.

    1. Re:Depression ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. Depression is a "weakness" as much as diabetes or cancer is.

    2. Re:Depression ? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      The One who gives the disease, provides the cure.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    3. Re:Depression ? by Temkin · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough... Depression and Diabetes appear to have some as yet undetermined link. If you're diabetic, you have a high probability of being depressed.

    4. Re:Depression ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Depression is a "weakness" as much as diabetes or cancer is.

      That is to say, quite a lot of weakness.

  29. Charlie Rose interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never heard of the guy. But this seems to be interesting.

    http://www.charlierose.com/shows/1997/03/27/2/an-interview-with-david-foster-wallace

  30. Is it too early... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ... to start thinking about the casting for the "Infinite Jest - the movie"?

    I mean... Angelina and Brad are not getting any younger...

     

     
    P.S. Yes. I am joking. Dark humor and stuff like that.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Is it too early... by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 1

      Truth be told, Angelina would make a pretty good P.G.O.A.T.

      I'm not sure what role Brad would play though. Maybe Himself? That could work, especially after his work in 12 Monkeys.

      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
    2. Re:Is it too early... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was born in a facility run by a corporation.
      The book was published by a corporation.
      The movive will be made by a corporation.
      He'll be buried by a corporation.

      Feel the irony.

  31. Re:am I the only one by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

    Yessir, never let your ignorance get in the way of a good USA bashing. If you'd taken the time to read up on Wallace (by clicking on the convenient link provided in the summary) you would have found out that he was exactly the opposite of what you surmised from your misreading of a satirical troll.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  32. Re:Good! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're not exactly showing a lot of bravery yourself, you cowardly little chickenshit punk. Identify yourself so I can beat your ass like you deserve - DO IT NOW!

    Wow, I can find out who yourpusher is within two clicks of his comment. As opposed to 'strelitsa'... who is only known to us as "technical writer, rouge, dab hand with soldering iron".

    This is, what, the pot calling the china black?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  33. I asked them... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    "Wouldn't you like to be alive?"

    The silence of their approval was deafening.
    I still can't hear very well with my right ear because of that.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  34. Re:I prefer to think of it as tortured soul syndro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Almost like", nothing. I'm no genius, but I was a pretty decent writer when I was depressed. I managed to ride it out instead of offing myself, and actually got better--but I just haven't been able to hang a complete story together since.

  35. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bravo my good man!

  36. Suicidal Hanging? by LoudMusic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to kill yourself, fine, go right ahead. Your life, end it if you wish.

    But why in the world would anyone commit suicide by hanging? There are plenty of other options to choose from. Especially when most suicidal hangings are done WRONG and end up taking loads more time to die than they had intended.

    Don't do it. It's stupid. Pick something else.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:Suicidal Hanging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. And why would he do it where his wife would find him?! How incredibly traumatizing an experience finding him hanging there must have been for her.

      Would have been better to get a handgun and then gone to the parking lot outside of the police station and shot himself there. That way a cop would find him rather than some innocent passer by.

    2. Re:Suicidal Hanging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Slip knot suspension is a little better than hanging, but both are better than suffocation, cutting, drowning in the tub, or overdosing because, with a strong rope and enough height, suspension or hanging better protect you from unconscious survival reflexes (whether it's tearing the bag open, not being able to cut under the veins, climbing out, or vomiting--all while unconscious). Carbon monoxide poising is on par with hanging because it is easy to not go far enough with both of those methods. The only better methods are jumping, shooting, or one of two hard-to-purchase cocktails. Hanging isn't that poor of an option considering none of the methods are foolproof, and that not everyone wants or can use on of the three better options.

    3. Re:Suicidal Hanging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah. I completely agree. I tried that last weekend, and it didn't work. But neither did a shotgun to the temple the weekend before that or jumping off the golden gate bridge the week before that. This weekend I drove a wooden stake through my own heart and woke up feeling quite refreshed.

      Are you suggesting that I should just listen to some loud music instead? And if so, which kind works best? Country music seemed to work well in Mars Attacks, so I'll try that next weekend.

    4. Re:Suicidal Hanging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why in the world would anyone commit suicide by hanging? There are plenty of other options to choose from.

      Ideally, pick a means of suicide that leaves your organs in working order, after signing up to be an organ donor. If you don't want the use of your eyes, kidneys, liver, bone marrow, etc, there might be other people who do.

    5. Re:Suicidal Hanging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because he wasn't in a sane state of mind; it should evident by his suicide.

      How many people go about researching the quickest way to die before killing themselves?

      Not many.

    6. Re:Suicidal Hanging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Some people think about it their whole lives...maybe even daily.

    7. Re:Suicidal Hanging? by drjuggler · · Score: 1

      If you've read his books it's clear that DFW knew many methods to "de-map" oneself. The centerpiece of Infinite Jest was a mad genius who exploded his own head in a microwave by cutting through the door with a hacksaw and stuffing the gap between the door and his neck with tinfoil. Maybe that's one the author considered. What concerns me is that this man clearly knew--had WRITTEN ABOUT--spiritual despair in the American intelligentsia and could not avoid succumbing to it. From his point of view, was this inevitable? Did he lose a battle with his predisposition (clinical depression) or rather with his creative philosophy (post-ironic doom)? I sort of suspect that the man finally outsmarted himself and it was the former using the latter as self-deception.

    8. Re:Suicidal Hanging? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >But why in the world would anyone commit suicide by hanging?

      Because its an impulsive act for most and there's always rope around. Guns and the proper mixtures of poison? Not so much.

      Youre asking why people dont think rationally when killing themselves. Think about that for a moment.

  37. Mod parent up! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    This short post by an AC is an excellent point.

    1. Re:Mod parent up! by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed. Depression is usually completely misunderstood by those with no experience of it, either direct or by loved one. Worse are the people who know someone is depressed and then tell them to "just snap out of it" or who pile on extra stress in other ways - it's like kicking the crutches out from someone with broken legs.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  38. It's too bad by BlastOff · · Score: 1

    I don't care why he did it. I don't care if he was depressed. I don't care if people think he was weak. All I know is that he was one of the greatest writers I ever had the pleasure of reading. It's a tragedy that he's gone. That's all. Just a god damn tragedy.

  39. Consider the Lobster by bogjobber · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you like David Foster Wallace or would like to get a good idea of his style without diving headfirst into a novel, check out Consider the Lobster and Other Essays. It has the full range of his work, from literary criticism to a hilarious essay describing his trip to a porn convention and various rambling thoughts on pornography's relationship with "regular" society and art. There's some really great stuff in that.

    RIP DFW.

  40. Re:Good! by yourpusher · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the Internet. See those little underlined words? They're called hyperlinks. You can click on them for more information!

  41. Glamorizing apparent suicide by cryptoluddite · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All the coverage of this cowardly act seems to really implicitly glamorize suicide.

    Apparent suicide. A writer that questioned the patriotism of those who take away rights in the name of security and criticized McCain found dead. Somehow I think Jonathan Swift would have apparently committed suicide as well, if he were to have lived now.

    I'm just saying that it seems like a lot of people are committing apparent suicide these days. This guy, the 'dc madame', the anthrax guy come to mind. Suppose there's a drug that pharmaceutical companies discovered doing normal drug research that makes people very suicidal and was kept secret by the man -- how would you know then even with no evidence of foul play if these people actually committed suicide under their own free will?

    Seems to me the only fair thing to do is celebrate the departed's accomplishments regardless of how their death happened.

    1. Re:Glamorizing apparent suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a conspiracy nut are'nt you? This current government is to incompetent to do anything right so I doubt they would get away with something like this. I know I underestimate them and what people can do if they have the right initiative but the current bunch really asks to be underestimated. But they seem to do it the texan way shooting people in the face and then ask if there is anyone else who does not want to get in line for a buttfuck. Or say really stupid things that makes no sense and anyone who questions them is made look a fool (emperors new groove) and then refered to the stupid answer.

    2. Re:Glamorizing apparent suicide by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying that it seems like a lot of people are committing apparent suicide these days.

      I'm reminded of a short story by Stephen King, Everything's Eventual.

    3. Re:Glamorizing apparent suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a conspiracy nut are'nt you?

      Not at all. But I am not going to exclude explanations that are within reason just because they are not easy or pretty. A drug that can induce suicidal behavior is completely believable. I did not say such a drug is known or that it was used, only that it would convenient and there is a pattern.

      This current government is to incompetent to do anything right so I doubt they would get away with something like this.

      Just the executive branch is 4+ million individuals. Many of them may be incompetent (certainly most of the top level or two is), but some are outstanding. How many people would need to be complicit... two? five? ten? Not many people in any case.

  42. Sometimes the finest minds resort to it. by RiffRafff · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "No More Games. No More Bombs. No More Walking. No More Fun. No More Swimming. 67. That is 17 years past 50. 17 more than I needed or wanted. Boring. I am always bitchy. No Fun--for anybody. 67. You are getting Greedy. Act your old age. Relax--This won't hurt" -- Hunter S. Thompson, suicide note.

    --
    "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    1. Re:Sometimes the finest minds resort to it. by east+coast · · Score: 1

      It's not a question of the act but rather the motivation. I agree with Hunter's motive. I don't know jack about DFW.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  43. since this is becoming a forum on suicide by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the rules are simple:

    1. sound of mind, unsound of body: suicide is ok. euthanasia is morally sound for the terminally ill

    2. unsound of mind, sound of body: suicide is not ok. if you are mentally ill, that casts a question mark over your decision making abilities. as such, a decision to end your life when you are not mentally sound is not a decision anyone else should respect, simply because it is not free will which is guiding the decision

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:since this is becoming a forum on suicide by quenda · · Score: 1

      What if you have an incurable mental affliction, are rarely happy, and feel consistently over a sustained period that you would rather die.
          Should that not then be respected as much as for "unsound of body" reasons?

    2. Re:since this is becoming a forum on suicide by Unordained · · Score: 1

      Have you read Catch 22? I like how you've taken what some would consider a symptom of insanity -- the desire to commit suicide -- and turned it into a proof of insanity: the idea that all who commit suicide are obviously, by the very act, insane. My free will ends where your sympathy and imagination end? Hell no.

      We are more than logical thinking machines; all of our decisions, even the ones we think most obvious and logical, are filtered through a squishy chemical mess of a thing we call a brain. When we second-guess someone's decision, we need to realize we don't have all the information: we don't have a copy of all those emotions, those chemical biases, those secondary concerns and stresses and memories and expectations and beliefs and habits and lessons-learned. All you can say is "I would not make that choice for myself, where I am today." Well, good for you. But I doubt he wants your pity, your judgment, or your diagnosis.

      As to those whining about how suicides hurt family members -- yeah. So does any sudden death. Or a slow death, for that matter. So does your decision not to take out the trash when you should. So does your obsession with playing Magic the Gathering. So does your inability to comprehend your teen daughter's lesbian tendencies. So does the fact that you like to think there's an extra 2 gallons at the end of your gas tank that mysteriously never comes to the rescue in the middle of nowhere.

      We are constantly affecting the ones we love, all the time, in everything we do -- but that doesn't mean that it's their decision to make, whether we should live or die. The last thing someone needs in a situation like this is to be told that, on top of everything that's already built up to cause them to feel this is necessary, oh, by the way, you're also hurting your family, and you're a bad person for it.

      You want to know what's really selfish and immature? That kind of whining. Complaining that someone killed themselves, and hurt you in so doing. Boo-f'ing-hoo. You want pain? You want suffering? Try figuring out what caused them to kill themselves, and see what you could have done to prevent it. Those suffering from depression need love, not bitching and moaning. Go give someone a big hug.

  44. Re:Good! by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 1

    [...]

    who is only known to us as "technical writer, rouge, dab hand with soldering iron".

    This is, what, the pot calling the china black?

    Ah, but we know that he is, indeed, red and not black.

    Duh.

  45. RIP DFW by rubberglove · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They can kill you, but the legalities of eating you are quite a bit dicier.

    This is a great loss. Just the other day, I finished reading 'Consider the Lobster', and I thought every one of those essays was interesting, funny, informative and insightful.

    I hope it's not selfish to say that I'm sad that now there will never be a new 'Infinite Jest'.

  46. This is weirding me out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just bought Infinite Jest a couple weeks ago, after reading a few blurbs about it. Never heard of it or the author before that.

  47. Re:A brief personal narrative (in the style of . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    (it is amusing to consider how much energy was expended on the subject of diary v. journal, only to have blog become the accepted appellation).

    I'm sure, especially when you know that the words diary and journal come from the same root.

    It reminds me of the satisfaction I once got (during a deposition) at a glimpse of the silliness of legal language. When asked how fast a car was going at the time of an accident, I said, "I guess about fifteen miles an hour." I got this horrified look and an admonition that this was serious business and I was not allowed merely to "guess".

    So I asked what I was allowed to say. The answer: "I estimate ...."

    Oh fun, especially when you know that the source of the word "estimate" is the Latin "aestimare", which, of course, means "to guess".

    Lawyers -- paahhh.

  48. its logically impossible to respect by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the idea is to respect free will

    but if your decision making process is under the effect of a disease OF your decision making organ, then you aren't making decisions based on your free will

    therefore, the decision to commit suicide by someone mentally ill cannot be respected, if you respect free will

    in fact, all suicides who have been stopped or unsuccessful have reached a point later in their life where they were glad they didn't succeed

    its amazing what modern psychopharmacology is capable of. its not a permanent state, whatever your mental illness

    suicide by the sound of body, but unsound of mind, can never be respected, in logical accord with the idea of respecting free will

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:its logically impossible to respect by quenda · · Score: 1

      in fact, all suicides who have been stopped or unsuccessful have reached a point later in their life where they were glad they didn't succeed

      What a ridiculous over-gerneralisation. If their reasons were sound, then either they get it right the second time, or it's too late an they have to die naturally and horribly. Maybe like this poor lady - too weak to take the Nembutal, and vomiting up excrement.

  49. Re:should you mingle with the 'fluff' people? by masterzora · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I realize feeding the trolls is a bad idea, but as a Mudder myself, I'd hate for the casual reader to get the wrong idea about us from the AC. Mudd is a liberal arts school with a strong humanities & social science emphasis in addition to all of the thermionic emissions and np completeness stuff. If you want to call English and religious studies (the latter of which I'm concentrating in) 'fluff', then, yeah, Mudd is about 'fluff'.

    --
    Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
  50. A brief eulogy by SpencerNobleman · · Score: 1

    It (1) is sad news (2) (3) he (4) died (5). We (6) need more people (7) like him (8). (1) sad news. (2) I don't understand why it's sad news. As I see it, there are three possibilities. First, such an enlightened being maybe just noticed that he could reincarnate to the best effect by cutting his time here short. In such a case, it's not sad news. In the meta-logical world that he walked in, he just made a logical choice and will be back at us, fundamentally unchanged, in a fundamentally new form. The next 40 or 50 years must be great if he hopped off the elevator now to get a start being in his or her new prime by then. Second, look at it from his point of view. Can you imagine being him and having to deal with stupid fucks like us every day? If we had empathy for him, we should be glad he is freed from his misery, especially the misery of being a couple hundred years ahead of his time. Third, if, like some very scurrilous, completely inappropriate, unfactual and baseless, based on nothing but speculation, comments, poorly timed and in bad taste, on slashdot, have suggested, this might conceivably be an epic fail at autoerotic asphyxiation, then isn't it also true that the same genetic propensity towards perversion may have been what caused grandpa Wallace to plug grandma Wallace in her ass while she was butchering a pig, causing pa Wallace to be born and thus Infinite Jest to get written, so, it doesn't make sense to be sad about a consequence of something like that, which led to so many good things including the birth of the person. (3) Is it sad when the sun sets? Why the heavy taboo around death? (4) He, ostensibly, refers to Wallace, who, being a human, like any other (until recently?), is actually nothing but a self referential feedback loop that temporarily deceives itself into thinking it exists, as Wallace himself no doubt understands, which actually has no discrete boundary with the environment it hilariously confuses itself about thinking it is separate from, and might more accurately be thought of as a single brilliant thought (a eureka) in a larger cognitive process. (5) Wallace is one of those guys for whom death doesn't really represent a shift in consciousness. In the east, they have gurus. We get sci-fi writers. (6) Us stupid fucks. (7) Understood grammar effects and structures of larger logical altering of people on consciousness parallel in altering the style of who in synchronic analogy and linked multiple of interpretation same the data of. (8) David Foster Wallace.

  51. This made me cry.... by HeavyDevelopment · · Score: 1

    David Foster Wallace was one of the few great contempory American writers. His talent will be missed.

    --
    Badges!?! We don't need no stinking badges!
  52. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Death by hanging is what people in jail attempt because it's all that can be linked to themselves while they are held in the cell against their will. Is that what he was thinking his last moments, that all he can find was an innocent rope because his jailer/wife would suspect him of anything other than the standard cleaning solvents in the average grocery list?

    That's exactly what the cops are trying to prevent. You see, that's why the cops hung him in his own house so there wouldn't be a traceable firearm or anything further than an abrasion of struggle concealed and overlay by the hanging. And if you all thought this was funny, then let me tell you: nobody actually dies alone; someone else is the reason why you are dead; their inductance of opinion, if not suggestion or physical force, brings you up to that one point that you consider your own value to be that of what everyone you've argued towards and their unproductive and compeltly unscientific attention to return cursing rather than an uninterested or neutral stance. Death by hanging? What are you people thinking? It's the easiest way to kill someone without evidence of a firearm or any other implement. I can't tell you how many home-invasion robberies occur here in southern California, where certain turn-coat thieves will wear all kinds of disguises to build confidence. By day, they are police men and women, and by night they are wearing painter's gear head to booties to contain any evidence. Death by hanging leaves no evidence behind, because it looks like the rope itself killed him without any assistance!

    He wasn't killed uninentionally, he wasn't slayed for another's gain, he was murdered because his beliefs were that much more annoying. Just look at the man's record.

  53. Been "suicidal" for 3+ decades. Really, it's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simply that one's "heart" has been murdered, and one "follows" one's murdered heart into silent death.

    Why be abused more for no reason?

    What could one gain?

    If one's will-to-live was beaten by "boundary violation"
    ( which doesn't require that someone "get off", btw,
    only that "authority" molest one's validity
    deeply enough that one's human formation is sabotaged ), as a child,
    and one is waging continuous up-hill battle to finish one's childhood self/other formation, and
    one is waging continuous up-hill battle against depression,
    AND working at functioning in a world that doesn't give a fsck about any real worth
    ( quarterly cash's more important! ),
    and those who don't have to work to *exist* insist we are gutless cowards,
    why on earth bother?

    Once we get rid of ourselves, you ( not parent-poster,
    but the shits who haven't enough honesty to hold heart-worth to be
    worth more than Status or Cash or Authority-On-Others )
    will have less to complain about,
    so therefore it'll be a "better" world with us ripped out, right?

    We're tired of waging multiple-front wars,
    and having "normal" insist there is something wrong with us AS HUMAN BEINGS,
    because our *condition* isn't the same as you.

    Missing limb people in the same boat?
    From your reactions, normals, the answer is Yes.

    There isn't anything wrong with us as human beings:
    there is something wrong with how much we have to work to even live,
    and that's something wrong with the condition ON us,
    not wrong with US.

  54. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have considered suicide many times on a purley rational level. This is not a joke, I seriously sit around and think about this stuff. Here are some of my motives for rationally killing myself:

    1. Curiosity. What happens when you die? Is there life after death? Is there a supernatural expirience to death? Can I find a mechanism to kill myself temporarily then revive before brain damage and still find the above answers? Will my subjective expiriences of death counter those of other near death expiriences?

    2. Politics. If I am extremely old and ill, should I go on a death mission (example, assissinate George W. Bush, whoops thats a echelon2 dictionary word) before I die, for a precieved good for society? Basically martarydom.

    3. Finances. Find a way to get insurance to cover sucidal death (as a mental illness), then kill your self when your really old anyways so your grand kids can have additional money from the insurance agency.

    4. Illness. Why deal with the pain? Best works when combined with number 3 and 2.

    5. Art/Fame. I often considered how suicide could be used as an artwork to codify works in history.

    6. Fun. Trying something you always wanted to do, but knew it would result in death. For example, playing paint ball in iraq while dressed as the al queda (damn another echelon keyword).

    7. Revenge. I dont have anything against anyone I personally know, but revenge could also be a rationalized form of suicide. I.E. setting somone you didnt like up to make the crime scene look like a murder, when it was actually a suicide. Could be political. I.E. Creating a false scnario where it appears that a cop killed you with unjustified force to influence publics opinion on security and management of police forces.

    The conclusion of my rationalisations? Makeveli's The Price answered it best, faking your death would just as easily work for all these scanrios other than physical ailments.

    While sucide can be commited for rational reasons in special cases, a truly rationalized thought process should also include the possibilty of a fake suicide.

    1. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've considered suicide a few times for what I believe are rational reasons. When you lose what you want most in life you can't help but question whether you should keep on living. Regardless, I would rather die by my own hand than in some uncontrolled situation so I'm sure I'll kill myself eventually, but in the meantime I'm planning on getting really old first.

  55. please read my top post by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    there you will find that i condone euthanasia

    suicide due to mental illness is not the same thing

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  56. It is typical rationalization... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a culture where mental illness or instability are taboo subjects and the condition is stigmatized, "normal" people work to distance their self-image from these characteristics. They also project this "normalcy" onto everything in their lives.

    People who consider themselves "normal" will brand any of their mental states as normal and healthy. This applies to everyone, including many who are clearly diagnosable (according to trained, objective observers) but who are in denial of their disability.

    As a survivor and caretaker of mentally ill family, I have developed a very different view. I see the gradual slide into illness that happens all around me in society. Luckily, most people merely dip their toes into madness and then return to the sunlight. A relative few slip over the edge and are lost. And most frightening are those who are able to cross in and out at will (sociopaths and the like).

    I also think that EVERYONE who commits violent acts against himself or others is clearly ill at the time. But society cannot tolerate such a view, because it makes ethics too confusing. What are we doing with prisons if everyone was ill? How do we reconcile the many forms of high-functioning disease and the wide range of rehabilitative potentials?

  57. mind versus body by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    is a valid conceptual demarcation

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  58. I guess living is... by Bemopolis · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...a supposedly fun thing he'll never do again.

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  59. Re:should you mingle with the 'fluff' people? by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

    Judging from the content of your post, I'd say you probably didn't waste too much time worrying about passing this "english" of which you speak.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  60. Re:Selfish bastard by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

    And one less of you would make it even better. It's odd that someone like you--with the empathy of a mollusk--would even pretend to care that he committed a selfish act.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  61. Re:good ridence by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, now we know. Karl Rove reads Slashdot.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  62. Suicide depends on pain by syousef · · Score: 1

    As a survivor of having a close relative commit suicide I can easily say that by the time they commit the act they are already mentally ill.

    If someone were to slowly torture you, turning one piece of your body to mush after the next in the most painful agonizing way - I'm talking medieval torture - crushing bones, destroying internal organs slowly, cutting, stabbing, burning - pain that didn't leave you so you could sleep or eat or function - so that you knew you were going to die but that it were going to take a long time, and so that you knew all the best life had to offer was long over, wouldn't you consider suicide? There are diseases - cancers, degenerative diseases etc. that are very much like that. It always doesn't take mental illness - extreme pain is enough. Now also consider that some people are in similar degrees of emmotional pain.

    You can of course redefine wanting to take your life as a mental illness, but to say mental illness is a pre-requisite speaks volumes for your limited experience and imagination.

    I only hope you and I are never in that kind of pain. Suicide shouldn't be glorified (ala Heath Ledger) - that's destructive. However to show no pity for a soul in such pain that they're willing to take their life is also destructive.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  63. Re:Good! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Duh

    Thanks, that adds to the conversation.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  64. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    note: not an Anonymous Coward but can't remember my login - last slashdot post was so long ago.

    What people's aren't talking about or considering publicly--before diving into the ins and outs of suicide--is the possibility that it may be a case of erotic asphyxiation. Which might help explain DFW's lack of depressive symptoms or "tells."

    I don't believe this has been ruled a suicide yet, has it? primary news sources are still referring to it as "apparent suicide."

    Whatever happened, it's tragic -- a terrible, terrible loss.

  65. Not a Bad Option Re:Suicidal Hanging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the mess left behind by guns, along with the likelihood of screwing up with either guns, knives or drugs, if you want to be sure, hanging is actually a pretty descent way to terminate one's life.

    Even if the actual death takes several minutes, the individual is most likely unconscious.

    Even if you don't go for a long drop, several kids have successfully (if unintentionally) killed themselves with bathroom cloth towel machines by simply being patient.

    Blacking out from oxygen loss to the brain doesn't generally seem to be as terrifying as suffocation/strangulation. (ie: cutting off the blood supply versus the air supply) and it's also much faster. However, achieving blood choke with a noose may be a challenge.

    The last typical option that I skipped in the above is CO (carbon monoxide poisoning). This can be problematic as you need a vehicle, and privacy. It can also be dangerous to the discoverer if they wander into the area where you've contained the CO. ie: if you have a spouse/kids and you don't want them to be physically harmed or die when they find you.

  66. Everything And More by tubegeek · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed that, when his publications are summarized in obituaries, "Everything And More" is never even mentioned? Math haters in charge of the lit section? For the record, it's an interesting, nonfiction book about the historical development of the concept of infinity in mathematics. David Foster Wallace will certainly be missed. A terrible loss.

  67. Big brains cause depression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big brains cause depression. How can anyone who looks at the world with any insight be anything but depressed and angry? If you don't feel for the people of this planet, you're *much* sicker than us depressed "geniuses".
    (If you don't get that, just consider that fact that we let people starve to death while we have a surplus of food.)

    I'm a "genius" (top 1% of LSAT, without studying) and I'll tell you, it's hard. I've battled with drug addiction for most of my life, because they make the pain go away ... for a while. Sometimes, even a little bit of relief is worth it. And no, I won't go see a shrink because I've actually studied psychology and I understand that they don't know wtf they're doing. I'd rather smoke a bit of pot than take something stupid like Adavan.

    We try a lot of things to take away the pain. Optimism and activism ... but it makes no difference. We try to just duck our heads in the sand and focus on the mundane, things like jobs and family, but the world always raises its ugly head. Then we get to the drugs... nice ... some real relief for a change ... until they stop working. Then you stare down the barrel of your pistol for a while and worry about how bad this is going to hurt your loved ones... which is the only reason I'm still here today.

    David Forest Wallace, I hope you found some peace.

    Waiting for death,

    Jon H. (sorry, I'm too paranoid to ever use an account)

    PS: Pot's the best. It gives just a bit of relief and you don't have to deal with stuff like alcoholism or any of the side effects of the psych meds.

  68. What about compassion? by LionMage · · Score: 1

    a decision to end your life when you are not mentally sound is not a decision anyone else should respect

    That's all well and good, but nowhere do I see you say anything about having compassion or understanding. Perhaps you've never struggled with mental illness. For those of us who have, it's not so easy to condemn David Foster Wallace for what he did.

    Obviously, his suicide is regrettable, both for its impact on his survivors, and for the loss of what he could have done had he lived on. I don't think anyone would argue that it's "OK" when someone commits suicide when they're mentally ill. But don't be so quick to lash out at the deceased and condemn them. Mental illness is a perverse thing and it robs its sufferers of much of their mental faculties. Making any kind of rational decision under those circumstances can be nigh impossible.

    I'm not sure I buy your claim that free will didn't enter into the picture. The question of free will in the case of the mentally ill is a tough nut to crack, and I don't pretend to have the answers -- but I also don't think anyone else does either, regardless of their claims of certitude.

    So, yeah, I've "been there" before. It's easy for me now to look back on those events (which I can thankfully count on one hand) and say, "Wow, what the hell was I thinking?" And the truth is, in the middle of those suicidal times, my thought process seemed rational, albeit tinged with depression. I distinctly remember that peculiar feeling of hopelessness. Had it not been for the intervention of dear friends (and in a couple instances, authority figures), I never would have gotten through those situations. I survived, and I got help. I feel sad that some people, even well respected people (and here I'm thinking of folks like DFW and Pushpinder Singh), apparently didn't get the help they needed.

  69. compassion? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    isn't true compassion about helping the suicide choose life over death?

    if the temperature in a boiler goes over 200 degrees and the boiler becomes broken, it might be useful to discard the boiler at that point. right?

    well, what if the thermometer itself is broken? how can you make a valid decision when the tools you use to make that decision are warped?

    such as it is with mental illness: there is no free will involved. decisions are being made under duress

    would you respect the decision of a man to kill himself when there is a guy standing by his side hammering his head with a shovel?

    so why do you respect the decision of a man to kill himself when he depressed? schizoid? same duress, same lack of free will involved

    especially since there are psychoactive compounds nowadays rthat can make that guy with a shovel dissipate

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  70. Or don't... by lessthan · · Score: 1

    There is a difference between having depression and killing yourself. There is help available and there are people you can talk to. Do you really think his pain justified the pain that his wife felt, and will continue to feel, after finding her husband hanging from the ceiling? Or how about all his fans? You may think they are inconsequential, but a whole lot of people admired him and his writing. How would you feel if your favorite author offed himself? That person may be "at peace," but he hurt a lot of people to get there. Suicide is the act of a very selfish person.

    --
    Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    1. Re:Or don't... by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      Your response amounts to "just tough it out" - it is an ignorant attitude and is part of the problem. You clearly don't understand depression and I'm not even going to try to educate you on it.

      There are people who when faced with an unpleasant situation will commit suicide rather than deal with it. That isn't what happens with someone with depression. A person with clinical depression who becomes suicidal usually does not see any other choice but death.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    2. Re:Or don't... by lessthan · · Score: 1

      He should have sought help. I'm sorry, you are entirely correct. I don't understand depression. I really have a hard time understanding "no choice." There is always a choice. Even if his depression gave him "no choice," killing himself where his wife could find him was despicable. His state of mind should not excuse him.

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    3. Re:Or don't... by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      He should have sought help.

      How do you know he didn't? Did you know that about 20% of people suffering chronic depression are not helped by either therapy or anti-depressant drugs?

      I'm sorry, you are entirely correct. I don't understand depression.

      If only you had stopped there you would have been fine.

      His state of mind should not excuse him.

      Of cooooourse not - why would a mind not working properly be an excuse for not thinking properly? While we're at it why don't we tell all those people who have lost their eyesight to just see anyway? Sheeeesh - you and people like you are a good part of the reason why people with depression don't seek help. Look instead of spouting off about things you admit you don't understand why don't you go do some reading about the topic?

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    4. Re:Or don't... by lessthan · · Score: 1

      Even a blind person knows that the sky is blue. That might not mean much to him, but the knowledge is there, allowing associations. Sky is blue, person with blue eyes has sky-colored eyes. Are you telling me that his depression pushed him so far he could make an association between his corpse and his wife coming home? I guess I better do some reading.

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    5. Re:Or don't... by lessthan · · Score: 1

      ...so far he couldn't make an association...

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    6. Re:Or don't... by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      I guess I better do some reading.

      I think that would be an excellent idea.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  71. DFW on Federer by palemantle · · Score: 1

    Here's a brilliantly written piece (IMHO) by DFW on Roger Federer. I'd never heard of the man till I came across this article a couple of years ago.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/20/sports/playmagazine/20federer.html