Slashdot Mirror


Becoming a Famous Programmer

An anonymous reader writes "GrokCode analyzes more than 200 famous programmers to determine what types of projects made them famous. Inventing a programming language, game, or OS ranked among the top projects likely to lead to fame. Most programmers became famous through their work on only one project. The article also shows that among famous programmers, the ratio of males to females is much larger than among normal programmers."

347 comments

  1. Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1, Funny

    The article also shows that among famous programmers, the ratio of males to females is much larger than among normal programmers.

    Which is sad, because I just realized that I can't think of any famous female programmers off the top of my head. Of course, the regular ratio isn't terribly different...

    1. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by dmbasso · · Score: 5, Informative

      How can you forget Ada Lovelace?

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    2. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Renegade+Lisp · · Score: 5, Funny

      How can you forget Ada Lovelace?

      Yeah, if it weren't for her, computing the ratio would always exit with division-by-zero. We owe her much.

    3. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any live ones?

    4. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Dani Bunten is the only one that I can think of. Though to be honest, she was a man when she did the work that made her famous.

    5. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by will_die · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about:
      Danielle Berry
      Audrey Tang
      Rebecca Heineman
      If they do not prove that women can be great programmers then what else does?

      Actually the only ones that came to me were Admineral Hooper and Roberta Williams.

    6. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Informative

      How can you forget Ada Lovelace?

      Yeah, if it weren't for her, computing the ratio would always exit with division-by-zero. We owe her much.

      My god, you people have no education in the history of computing. There are more. Right off the bat I think of Grace Hopper. She was the first to develop a compiler, for the UNIVAC system, and pioneered the entire notion of compiled high level languages in an age when everyone was basically still thinking in terms of programming the bare metal with 1's and 0's.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    7. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if it weren't for her, computing the ratio would always exit with division-by-zero. We owe her much.

      Oh, please. That is absurd to the point of being sexist. Are you saying that Babbage's machines would never have been designed if it wasn't for her? Yes, she was in a remarkable position for a women by the standards of the day, but she was at most a transcriber, and perhaps might have added some original material.

      Of course, it's also absurd to argue that Babbage himself was as important as you raise Ada to be, as though we wouldn't have computers at all if it wasn't for him.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    8. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well they certainly prove something about famous programmers...

    9. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Oops, I misread your quote. I thought you were saying that computing itself would be a divide by zero without her. Now I see you were making a joke. Carry on and ignore my post. :)

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    10. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Two of the three of those were men when they were great programmers...Don't know if that was your point.

    11. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Overrated. didn't do nearly as much as she was given credit for. Babbage just had a soft spot for the girl.

      Try Grace Hopper. One of the UNIVAC programmers who I believe did a lot of early work on compilers.

    12. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Dona Bailey, the creator of centipede.

    13. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

      My mistake, all 3. How did this get modded informative?

    14. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 0, Redundant

      >Right off the bat I think of Grace Hopper.
      About time too. I'm amazed so many posts went up before someone namechecked her.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    15. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Renegade+Lisp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oops, I misread your quote. I thought you were saying that computing itself would be a divide by zero without her. Now I see you were making a joke. Carry on and ignore my post. :)

      Read the spec halfway through and hack away. You have proven yourself to be a real programmer. Salute!

    16. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you needed any further convincing of the fact that Computer Science is a sausagefest, here it is.

      Even most of the famous women programmers had/did have penises.

    17. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Wasn't she also the one who came up with the term "bug"? *rtfa* Ah, yes.

      Wow. And an admiral, to boot.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    18. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by adrianwn · · Score: 5, Funny

      So her name is "Grace Hopper", and she made the term "computer bug" popular (see her entry in Wikipedia)? This can't be a coincidence...

    19. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Dona Bailey, the creator of centipede.

      Oh! Should have read GP's links more thorough.
      In the light of what The_Dancing_Panda has discovered, Dona Baily probably fits GGP/the actual topic more than GP's links.

      I can't think of any famous female programmers off the top of my head

    20. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And please don't forget Sophie Wilson.

    21. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by papasui · · Score: 3, Informative

      LOL how the fuck did this get modded informative. For everyone that doesn't get it all of those are transexuals.

    22. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Pants75 · · Score: 1

      Brilliant. ;-)

    23. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, the OP and the person who created the "breakdown" are idiots. These people have had gender reassignment surgery and women. You do not have GRS and become "transexual".

      Every person listed under "Transexuals" should be under the "Women". Most transsexual women would be offended by anything else, and quite rightly so.

    24. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by gstoddart · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Which is sad, because I just realized that I can't think of any famous female programmers off the top of my head. Of course, the regular ratio isn't terribly different...

      Admiral Grace Hopper comes to mind.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    25. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 5, Funny

      How can you forget Ada Lovelace?

      That's true. I forgot because after being forced to program in Ada, I permanently purged Ada and anything Ada related from my memory.

    26. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by papasui · · Score: 3, Funny

      Stay right there, I just called you a Wahbulance. It'll be right over.

    27. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      She's mentioned in the arti -- oh, right. Slashdot.

    28. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

      Actually, Ada is included in the list.

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    29. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by nicolas_pen · · Score: 5, Informative

      How about Frances E. Allen ?
      First female IBM Fellow and first woman to win the Turing Award, yet no one seems to have mentioned her. I think she qualifies!

      Also, there's a wikipedia article about women in computing, which I didn't see linked here.

    30. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So her name is "Grace Hopper", and she made the term "computer bug" popular (see her entry in Wikipedia)? This can't be a coincidence...

      While we're hunting for wild name occurrences, if you combine her maiden and married initials, she's a GBMH, which is only a typo away from GmbH. Which considering her Navy valor in WWII she *also* helped establish. Amazing Grace indeed!

    31. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The scary thing is both of them were hired to prove that programming was so easy "that even a woman could do it".

      What I find more scary is all the best women coders I know have a very strong liking and deep understand of perl.

    32. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    33. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Zironic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you missed the fact that the post you're quoting was a joke.

    34. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: Audrey Tang:

      Be sure to check out the below audio interview -- nice digitally-adjusted voice, for absolutely *no justified reason*...

      http://www.perlcast.com/audio/Perlcast_Interview_024_tang.mp3

      On the other hand, there is a different Audrey Tang, also asian, who is a true 2-X-chromo geek.

    35. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Oh, please. That is absurd to the point of being sexist.

      If I suspected feminism lacked a sense of humor, I now know that to be the case. Oh, and Summer Glau, is that you?

      --
      I hate printers.
    36. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by try_anything · · Score: 1

      I think most people who become famous have that possibility in the back of their head the whole time, and it guides their decisions. C'mon, girls, toss your upbringing aside and work on those egomaniacal fantasies!

    37. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by beerbear · · Score: 2, Informative

      Barbara Liskov? You know, of Liskov Substitution Principle fame?

      --
      Hold my beer and watch this!
    38. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by electrictroy · · Score: 2, Troll

      There are not many famous women engineers either. I suspect women simply don't have as much interest in "gadgets" as we men do. Likewise we men don't have much interest in shopping sprees for the latest clothing & shoe styles.

      BACK TO LIST:

      Where are the programmers from Atari, Commodore, and Activision? They *definitely* deserve to be there since they created the first arcade game (Pong), first home videogames (Atari 2600 cartridges), and first third-party development company (David Crane, Larry Kaplan, Alan Miller, Bob Whitehead) because they DEMANDED that programmers receive credit on their creations, rather than be treated like anonymous laborers.

      (deep breath)

      Perhaps I'm just an old curmudgeon, but it annoys me how these lists so often "forget" the contributions to computer industry that occurred during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s. It's almost as if the authors of these lists think nothing existed prior to 1990 except Apple, Gates, Microsoft, and Jobs.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    39. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I have a terrible memory for p0rnstarlets

    40. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by ghbpiper · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Admiral Grace Hopper (Invented COBOL)

    41. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      You've been watching far too many Disney/Pixar videos, I think.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    42. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by digitig · · Score: 1

      First recorded use of the term "bug" (in the sense of a program fault), but from the context the term must have already existed. So we actually don't know who came up with the term.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    43. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How can you forget Ada Lovelace?

      Yeah, if it weren't for her, computing the ratio would always exit with division-by-zero. We owe her much.

      Because I keep confusing her with her cousin Linda.

    44. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does no one recall the brilliant Paula Bean

    45. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by KGIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In reading your post I was sort of struck with an odd thought so, well, I'll share.

      There really aren't that many famous programmers. There aren't any at all other than perhaps Bill Gates and Steve Jobs and they may not be considered programmers by the masses. They are famous to you, to me, and to the /. crowd but we're such a minority in the grand scheme of things that they are only famous to a very small subset of the population.

      If you ask anyone who George W. Bush is they will know. They will know who Paris Hilton is. They will probably know Madonna, Brad Pitt, and more. If we go outside of our social circle they are unlikely to know anyone on that list.

      Mirriam-Webster defines fame as widely known. The second definition is honored for achievement but being on Wikipedia isn't really an honor I don't think. Gates and Hoare were knighted, I suppose they might be considered famous but, then again, who other than us knows who Hoare is?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    46. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      You misspelt "brillant"...

    47. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Right off the bat I think of Grace Hopper. She was the first to develop a compiler, for the UNIVAC system, and pioneered the entire notion of compiled high level languages in an age when everyone was basically still thinking in terms of programming the bare metal with 1's and 0's.

      Whether she was the absolute first is disputable. However, she was the first popularizer of the idea of "readable" languages. In her time, she was sometimes accused of "dumbing down" or "de-fanging" programming. A lot of this may have been "the boys" defending their turf using various anti-female innuendos about allegedly coddling people.
           

    48. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Abasher · · Score: 1

      AKA: Woosh!

    49. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not have GRS and become "transexual".

      No, you become "confused"...

      Every person listed under "Transexuals" should be under the "Men".

    50. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by mweather · · Score: 2, Informative

      hey *definitely* deserve to be there since they created the first arcade game (Pong), first home videogames (Atari 2600 cartridges)

      Pong wasn't the first arcade game (Galaxy Game was, or Computer Space if you're only counting commercial releases), and the Atari 2600 not only wasn't the first home console (the Magnavox Odyssey was), it wasn't Atari's first home console (Pong was).

    51. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by spockman · · Score: 1

      COBOL and Grace Hopper http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper . She basically invented the first compiler for COBOL.

    52. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Sophie Wilson

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Wilson

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    53. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Saint+Gerbil · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can technically count Danielle Berry.

    54. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Saint+Gerbil · · Score: 1

      Woosh! Yes realised it my self that bit too late.

    55. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      who other than us knows who Hoare is?

      Your mom, right? Everyone knows that.

      (Come on, it was right there, someone had to go for it)

      --
      It's been a long time.
    56. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. I learned something new. By definition an arcade game is one that collects money (just like the pinball machines it shares space with), so Galaxy Game would not qualify. Computer Space would be first in 1971.

      And you're right, the Odyssey was the first home console. Those programmers should be included in the list too, if they created anything memorable. After all, the creator of Pac-Man is in the list... the guys who created Asteroids and Space Invaders and other famous 70s-era games ought to be in the list too.

      Along with Activision founders David Crane, Larry Kaplan, Alan Miller, Bob Whitehead who demanded name recognition for their work.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    57. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you forget Ada Lovelace?

      Yeah, if it weren't for her, computing the ratio would always exit with division-by-zero. We owe her much.

      My god, you people have no education in the history of computing. There are more. Right off the bat I think of Grace Hopper. She was the first to develop a compiler, for the UNIVAC system, and pioneered the entire notion of compiled high level languages in an age when everyone was basically still thinking in terms of programming the bare metal with 1's and 0's.

      Yeah, and she headed the design of the of COBOL programming language.

    58. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by jadavis · · Score: 1

      First female IBM Fellow and first woman to win the Turing Award, yet no one seems to have mentioned her. I think she qualifies!

      Your description suggests that she's famous for being a woman programmer, not famous for being a programmer.

      You should focus on her accomplishments, like her work with optimizing compilers.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    59. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      P.S.

      Where the heck is Sid Meier? He created some of the best Commodore and PC games of the 1980s and 90s: F-15 Strike Eagle, Stealth Fighter, Silent Service, Red Storm Rising, Pirates, Civilization..... just to name a few.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    60. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Hey Earl, is that you?

    61. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by mweather · · Score: 1

      Galaxy Game did collect money, actually. It just wasn't a mass produced commercial product.

    62. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      Just proves that moderators don't click links when moderating.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    63. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

      I must be the only one that remebered the best:
      Angelina Jolie AKA 'Acid Burn', 1995 Hackers.
      The best and the hottest! :P

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    64. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Mirriam-Webster defines fame as widely known. The second definition is honored for achievement but being on Wikipedia isn't really an honor I don't think. Gates and Hoare were knighted, I suppose they might be considered famous but, then again, who other than us knows who Hoare is?

      You have to consider context (and stop quoting dictionaries - that's strictly grade school). If someone is widely know in the programming community, then they're famous. They aren't a celebrity, but they're famous within a subculture.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    65. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like one of them regretted the change...

      "Being my 'real self' could have included having a penis and including more femininity in whatever forms made sense. I didn't know that until too late and now I have to make the best of the life I've stumbled into. I just wish I would have tried more options before I jumped off the precipice." - Danielle Bunten Berry

    66. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      No, she's the first one to find a literal bug (insect) in the computer. Bug as an error in a problem was in use as far back as newton.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    67. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They may be offended but the fact remains they aren't women. Hence the reason they won't be giving birth any time soon.

    68. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by KGIII · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My guess is you have a rather inflated sense of self-worth but that's just a guess. This is /. - we like citations. Thus referencing a dictionary is a Good Thing®. Even if we take context into consideration (we shouldn't, a definition is clearly not something you just change because it suits your own needs though certainly languages should grow) the list consists of a bunch of products that are/were famous and a small percentage of people who's names even those of us in the community actually know. These people aren't famous for the most part. The only ones who are famous are the two that I listed though I might have missed one or two more but I double checked and am not seeing any who's names would stand out with even (made up on the spot) 20% of the population.

      To use the age old car analogy...

      We know Henry Ford. We know Shelby, Benz, and a few more.

      We also know the Mustang, Corvette, and even the Accord. Very few people can actually name the person who designed the bodies for those vehicles.

      The vehicles are famous. The designers are not.

      So, no... I don't see it as "grade school" to cite the reasons that I used to reach my conclusions. Your ego may make it so that you don't like my conclusions but attempting to alter the definition to suit your own desires doesn't change the definition.

      Sorry, in advance, for the bad analogy but it was all I could think of at the moment.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    69. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is part of a broader spectrum of ignorance. There are easily 20 times as many people who know who Paris Hilton is than who Buckminster Fuller was. Ask somebody what else the Lear who built Learjets invented first. What did Tesla do that actually got built and worked? What branch of the US government did Learned Hand work for? Who was Armand Hammer? Milton Canniff? Leon Trotsky? Ludwig Mies van der Rohe? George Adamski? Alvin York? All of these died less than a century ago, which should make it a bit easier.
            Ask people to name 3 famous physicists, without starting with Einstein. Name 3 famous architects, without including Frank Lloyd Wright. Name 3 famous individuals from the Renaissance, without Michaelangelo and DaVinci (I have to exclude two there, but only because of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles). If Henry Ford founded Ford motors, who founded General Motors?

       

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    70. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I don't see it as "grade school" to cite the reasons that I used to reach my conclusions.

      It's grade school because it's tired and dull (that's why Skinner does it so much on The Simpsons) and also because it isn't by any means authoritative. The bar for getting a definition in the dictionary is pretty low.

      My guess is you have a rather inflated sense of self-worth but that's just a guess.

      I add the idea of context to frame the scope of someone's fame and I'm the one with an ego? Whatever.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    71. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by theverylastperson · · Score: 1

      Can we count Selena Sol? Even though she turned out to be a he. Seriously, Selena Sol was long thought to be a woman and rose to fame as such. http://www.selenasol.com/selena/

      --
      ed duval the very last person
    72. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      What did Tesla do that actually got built and worked?

      How about the first working Alternating Current distribution system?

    73. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok. steve jobs is not a programmer. idiot.

    74. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Apathy451 · · Score: 1

      Neither will women who have had a hysterectomy, but it makes them no less a woman.
      The only thing you can argue is what chromosomes are possessed, but dictionary definition aside, there's more to being a woman than having two X chromosomes. The social definition is arguably as or more important than the textbook definition. In a world where people desire brevity, how do you simplify "a born male who sexually, emotionally, and intellectually identifies (him|her)self as a woman" without acting like a 14 year old?

    75. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that definition, any woman who's had a hysterectomy isn't a woman. Be careful about this argument. There are lots of ways to define maleness and femaleness, some are reproductive, some are morphological, and some are social or legal.

      Also, you're not considering ectopic pregnancies (pregnancies without wombs) or uterus transplants, both of which scientists have been experimenting with recently. Transexual reproduction is just around the corner, and in both directions too. MTF and FTM.

    76. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by ZorroXXX · · Score: 1

      Actually he spelled it perfectly.

      --
      When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
    77. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh...

    78. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We owe her nothing more than the description of Babbage's Analytical Engine.

      The overwhelming probability is that Ada did little more than translate Menebrea's decription. She was clearly a legend in her own mind, but to call her the first programmer is an insult to Babbage and to real programmer's.

      See Doron Swade's The Difference Engine.

    79. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Emb3rz · · Score: 1

      This is /. - we like citations.

      [citation needed]

    80. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by mrjb · · Score: 1

      And Paula Bean?

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    81. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      In hind sight I am sorry for my verbiage and attitude. I'm not sure if you meant it but to call something "grade school" was seen as patronizing to me and, frankly, I'd expect better. Even if it was an attempt to patronize my response was actually a bit rougher than I would have liked and, for that, I offer a sincere apology.

      That does not mean that I agree with you, I still do not. Having re-visited the idea, your response, and my further response I'm quite content to stand on the opinion that I have and I suspect that your opinion is not going to change either.

      Even if your intent was to patronize or belittle in your first response or not (it may simply be the way you speak/type), my response was, if nothing else, grade school because of the attitude used while writing it. Well, alright, maybe middle school but still what I'd hope would be beneath me most of the time.

      As a side note, it would be great when teachers, physicists, scientists, programmers, and engineers were famous. Unfortunately the riches go to lawyers, venture capitalists, and the press goes to the wealthy and pop culture stars.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    82. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Whether she was the absolute first is disputable.

      The guys who pioneered programming languages as versus hand coded assembly were the guys in IBM who wrote an efficient FORTRAN compiler. They once and for all killed the notion that hand coded assembly language was the only way to get efficient code. At least John Backus got mention though none of his team did.

      I notice that Herman Hollerith (inventor of the punch card) was absent too.

      I might as well finish off the list of omissions. Andrew Morton (#2 penguin), David Miller (Linux networking), and Al Viro (VFS). Maybe Greg KH (Linux device drivers) too.

      And one applications guy: I think Ken'ichi Handa (Mule - MUlti Lingual extensions to Emacs) belongs on the list.

    83. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      m2f?

    84. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by access.name · · Score: 1

      Care to post your sources?

    85. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by ZorroXXX · · Score: 1

      Whoosh...

      I did get the joke. However my approach to when somebody obviously didn't get it (like my parent post) is to be constructive and share. While I cannot tell if you had a childish "haha, what a looser that didn't get it" motivation for writing your post, I have a hard time interpreting it as something other than a product of win/loose mentality. You and people you interact with will be better off if you go for win/win.

      --
      When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
    86. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Ask somebody what else the Lear who built Learjets invented first

      Car radio. Later, he invented the stereo 8 track tape player. Almost as interesting is what Bill Lear named his daughter. Personally, I wouldn't name my daughter Shanda Lear, if for no other reason than it might encourage her to marry the first guy that seemed adequate just to get rid of the name.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    87. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      There really aren't that many famous programmers. There aren't any at all other than perhaps Bill Gates and Steve Jobs and they may not be considered programmers by the masses.

      Steve Jobs is a salesman, not a programmer. His contribution to the original Apple computer consisted of marketing, goading Steve Wozniak on, and helping solder components when they were up against a delivery deadline.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    88. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could it be no one gives a damn? Yes.

    89. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      The scary thing is both of them were hired to prove that programming was so easy "that even a woman could do it".

      No, Grace Hopper was hired because she had a PhD in mathematics and understood how electronic computers worked. There was sexism in the 20th century, but was nothing compared to the 19th.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    90. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Right off the bat I think of Grace Hopper. She was the first to develop a compiler, for the UNIVAC system

      Whether she was the absolute first is disputable.

      If it's disputable, put up or shut up. Name a compiler that predates the A-0 compiler for the UNIVAC I in 1951. You can't, because there isn't one. She developed the first compiler for a programmable electronic computer. This is documented. This is fact.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    91. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maya's head programmer is a woman, ive forgotten her name tho.... so i guess that means she's not famous.

    92. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I waited many hours before posting this.

      This is one of the rare times I'd be willing to post AC but I never have and never will.

      I wanted to tell you that my mother recently died. ...

      Yeah...

      I realize you may have no empathy, you may not have seen my many posts that have referenced it over the past couple of months, and I opted to not post earlier because the words I would have had would have been unimportant.

      What was funny to you was, well, unfunny to me. A few months ago I'd have laughed probably. The clue stick is occasionally quite heavy. I have been hit with it.

      So, well, I have had time to think instead of just typing back. I realize that you were attempting to be amusing. I can only say one thing, if it applies, "Put down the slashdot and call your mother." Just call, tell her that you love her.

      I don't know what this will mean to you but... Well... This is an email that I sent to a buddy of mine who is very close.

      I hope you never have to face this but, well, you probably will. I have this
      to say as it may help (or may not) when that time comes.

      There is no such thing as closure, I hope. I don't think that there can be,
      I don't want there to be.

      My mother hasn't gone to a "better place." A better place would be here with
      me - right now.

      *sighs*

      Call your mother as soon as you can. I'm fortunate as the last words I said
      to her were the night before when Sabrina and I used the spare bedroom to
      sleep. I said, "I love you, good night."

      We didn't have a funeral, we had a celebration of her life.

      The pain doesn't go away, it just hides for a while. When it comes back it
      is just as strong.

      Love? Love is doing CPR on your mother and keeping going when she pukes in
      your mouth while dead. Puke beside her, don't stop. Remember, that even if
      you're certified, if she's been dead for an hour or more (probably) than no
      matter how adept at CPR you are you will not be to blame.

      It brings the family closer. I haven't had time to test this but for this
      time we were all very close so my guess is that we need to keep it close
      after that and that this might help us have the motivation to do so.

      Cherish your friends. They'll be the ones that hold you when you cry.

      Cry, cry your eyes out. Things don't go back to normal, they go to something
      different.

      My mother was in a lot of pain (unable to sit, stand, or lay down for more
      than 15 minutes even with narcotics). Her death eased her paid. Grab what
      you can and hold onto it if it makes you feel better for a while.

      The tears don't stop, they just go away while you think of other things. Let
      them go away at some point (I cried for a few minutes as I wrote that last
      sentence) but the reality is that life must go on.

      Sobriety sucks but sometimes you've got to do so when the time comes.

      It is okay to have the feelings - no matter how irrational. I was, for the
      first couple of days, pissed that people would have the audacity to mow
      their lawns as opposed to weeping and mourning the death of my mother.
      (That's pretty irrational but it is okay.)

      Cremation is good. I have a small urn with my mother's ashes. There were
      plenty of them so that a bunch of people were able to spread giant spoons of
      them and all of the kids and grandkids got them if they wanted.

      In talking with other people I learned that sometimes death makes people
      stupid. We, our family, was lucky. No one fought over who gets what but I
      guess that can happen. If that doesn't happen in your family than you're
      doing great. In mine, it was great. Take what your father/mother gives you
      because they do know best in this instance. I didn't think I wanted anything
      but things that I was given were so heartwarming and appropriate that I
      cried each and every time (and am now just thinking about them).

      Telling your children is the hardest thing. Be grateful if you don't ha

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    93. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by pbhj · · Score: 1

      You, the OP and the person who created the "breakdown" are idiots. These people have had gender reassignment surgery and [have become?] women. You do not have GRS and become "transexual".

      Assuming I read your mis-write correctly:

      If I comb my hair and think that I now look attractive, that doesn't mean I'm not still ugly. Nor does it mean everyone has to call me "handsome".

      A male who has "GRS" to appear to be a woman, is still male. They just now appear to be a woman. Men that wish to pass themselves off as women are called "transexual". The term is being correctly applied. Being offended, because a person was born different to how someone wishes them to be, does not mean that others have to play along.

    94. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Ricin · · Score: 1

      My condolences. I felt that I needed to reply. I was touched by your post and I feel sad for you.

      Just remember that while the pain never goes away (and it shouldn't) it will get less over time (and it should). Don't feel guilty for carrying on and cherish the memories, pass on the values she taught you. Don't idolize someone because they're dead, they were just them as you are just you with all their faults and blessings. There's no death without life and no life without death. people don't realize that most of the time. They don't want to. They are even taught not to.

      I lost my brother at a young age after years of illness. It certainly molded me. And if there's anything, any word that comes up first it is this: empathy. It may make you feel weak at times but it most certainly makes you a better person. And sadly, in our instant gratification society most people, including myself, only learn that after a great personal loss. But goddamned, hold on to that. It's probably the greatest gift your mom ever gave you.

      All the best,

      Dan

    95. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If no one has mentioned her, then why should she be considered famous?

    96. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      put up or shut up.

      Dude, lay off the caffeine. If you disagree, just say so.

       

    97. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      Grace Hopper, a.k.a. Grandma Cobol

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    98. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The Cogwheel Brain by Doran Swade. Quite a hefty tome to prove my point, but a decent read anyway. There's also this article, which doesn't really do a lot to back up the argument.

      Swade actually talks considerably about Ada Lovelace and the argument is pretty compelling.

    99. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lovelace's writings are usually done a thorough disservice by being introduced as merely early conceptualisations of programming. But her papers bring to mind both the dreams of mechanised reason in Leibniz's Combinatorica and the computer algebra systems of the last few decades. Lovelace was not so much a "good programmer" as a "good scholar of the theory of programming" - her legacy was to increase what could be programmed, rather than what is programmed.

      And that makes her way more interesting, especially since the average programmer today works with a far more primitive, procedural toolset than she contemplated. Procedural programming per se is merely giving a set of unambiguous instructions, and that's been done since prima asserted micromanaging leadership over secunda (think prehistoric PHB). Naming Ada after Ada is an insult to Ada.

    100. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by hanzdamanz · · Score: 1

      Speaking of the Turing Award, why isn't Alan Turing on the list of famous programmers?
      I realise that it is up for debate whatever he was a programmer by modern standards, but there simply weren't any good computers to program on in his days. However, he (probably) wrote the first computer Chess-program in 1948, for a computer that didn't even excist at the time.
      He deserves to be on the list, IMHO.

    101. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Ah but you'll see. I posted it for you, not for me. So, good luck with that.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    102. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by TheLink · · Score: 1
      --
    103. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a question out of the blue.. have you named all of the women in programming yet?

    104. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Oh! For me? Thank you so much!

      Hey, it's unlikely you live in the country I do, could you give me detailed instructions on how to do my taxes in your country?

      I just want to devour all I can from the "KGill's masturbation is for my own good" trough.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    105. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      You're the one we need the "Wahbulance" for. "Oh noes, they're transsexuals!"

      What is this, primary school?

    106. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      You're right that no one should give a damn - why should it matter to qualify them with "transsexual"? But evidently some people do seem to care.

      For some reason I expected a bit more tolerance on Slashdot, but evidently it's like being in the playground...

    107. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      If I comb my hair and think that I now look attractive, that doesn't mean I'm not still ugly.

      Wait, you're saying if that someone's appearance changes so that they're attractive, they're still ugly? What sort of definition is that?

      Sure, no one has to acknowledge a particular gender. If I was creating a chart of Slashdot users, I could put you in the male or female category, as I choose. But at the same time, I can't complain if others dispute that choice.

      And indeed, this works both ways - if someone categorises transwomen as women (or transmen as men, come to that), there's no point whining about it just because you disagree.

      Honestly, what is this - a list of 200 programmers, and people have to make fun because one of them happens to be transsexual?

    108. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Neat. I'd seen a few of her movies but didn't even know her name. I had no idea that she'd helped to invent that.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    109. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      Neither will women who have had a hysterectomy, but it makes them no less a woman. The only thing you can argue is what chromosomes are possessed, but dictionary definition aside, there's more to being a woman than having two X chromosomes. The social definition is arguably as or more important than the textbook definition.

      That makes no sense..

      If you are XX you are female, if you are XY you are male. It is that simple, personally I don't particultarly care if people have GRS or not, or for that matter if they believe themselves to be the opposite gender due to a chemical inbalance in their brains.

      If we did it your way, we would have to wait until a child grows up and then ask it "Do you feel more male or more female?" before we could assign them a gender.

      In a world where people desire brevity, how do you simplify "a born male who sexually, emotionally, and intellectually identifies (him|her)self as a woman" without acting like a 14 year old?

      Confused???

      Just because a man has a urge to have his dick cut off, he dosen't not magically become a women.

      It is also entirely possible that those that have GRS don't really care what I think.

    110. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      sed 's/he dosen't not magically/he dosen't magically/'

    111. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by pbhj · · Score: 1

      If I comb my hair and think that I now look attractive, that doesn't mean I'm not still ugly.

      Wait, you're saying if that someone's appearance changes so that they're attractive, they're still ugly? What sort of definition is that?

      Nope, what I'm saying is that even if I think I'm something else that doesn't make it so. Some people think they are immortal, or an animal, or another person ... it does not make it true.

      Aside from chromosomal abnormalities the question of whether someone is a male or female human is a simple test irrespective of gender specific phenotypes (ie what there genitals look like). Allowing for such abnormalities I've never heard of a human changing from male to female or vice-versa (ie changing their chromosomal make up).

      If the question were one about whether someone is male or female who does have a chromosomal issue, like a non-functional SRY gene on their Y-chromosome (male as XY, but otherwise more biologically similar to a female) then the question becomes ambiguous (and I'm open for such people to choose one or the other; like those with CAIS being termed female, which seems right to me). But I don't consider this to cast ambiguity on those without chromosomal anomalies.

      there's no point whining about it just because you disagree

      It is biology that disagrees.

      people have to make fun because one of them happens to be transsexual?

      I'm not making fun of transexuals. I assume you're referring to other posts.

    112. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I notice that Herman Hollerith (inventor of the punch card) was absent too.

      But that's more of a mechanical invention, which should be mentioned with computer inventors.
             

    113. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Right. At the Niagara Falls powerplant, there are still plaques on some generators and such, that list the relevant patent holders. It's amazing to see some with twenty or so names, mostly 1 or 2 patents per name, and then Tesla's name with a string of numbers after it that stretches for paragraphs, (and probably ends with 'continued on next machine...'). But, most people don't know who he was, and a lot who could vaguely identify him as an inventor still think of him more as Rotwang in Fritz lang's Metropolis than as THE person who made things such as the New York power grid possible.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    114. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      This is /. - we like citations.

      [citation needed]

      Citation.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    115. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh noes, they're transsexuals!"?! GP didn't say that, you said that. May I remind you...

      Oh noes, they're "transsexuals"! We should be calling them "women"! I am outraged!!1! (loosely paraphrased)

    116. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Mechanical or not, it still computed. He is as deserving as Babbage and Lovelace.

    117. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      somebody obviously didn't get it (like my parent post)

      Say again? #25194341 was a joke. Obviously he "got it" (unless he really thought "brilliant" is spelled with only one i, which I doubt).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    118. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      A woman that has a hysterectomy is still a woman will functioning female breasts or are we now talking about a woman with a hysterectomy that also lost her breasts in a comical incident with a meat grinder?

      A woman who has a hysterectomy is still a woman with a vagina and not an orific that is potentially made out of bits of penis and goes into an anal cavity.

      Finally a woman who has had a hysterectomy is one who doesn't need pills to make her a woman.

      I have nothing against people that want to make the choice to do that to themselves and I'm more than polite enough not to call them a man to their face but the fact remains no matter how you skin a cat, it's still a cat.

    119. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What is "computed"? I am not complaining about recognition so much as the category.

    120. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I should have posted a link the first time. Sorry.

      http://www.columbia.edu/acis/history/hollerith.html

      Hollerith's contributions to modern computing are... "incalculable" :-) He did not stop at his original 1890 tabulating machine and sorter, but produced many other innovative new models. He also invented the first automatic card-feed mechanism, the first key punch, and took what was perhaps the first step towards programming by introducing a wiring panel in his 1906 Type I Tabulator, allowing it to do different jobs without having to be rebuilt! (The 1890 Tabulator was hardwired to operate only on 1890 Census cards.) These inventions were the foundation of the modern information processing industry.

    121. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      I apologize. I overreacted. Forget I said anything. I went way past the line of decency in trying to get across a basically reasonable point.

      My reaction was just caused by the fact that it's a generic joke on a site without any sense of community, so this incredibly personal massive post just isn't appropriate in response. There's no community here so any pathos will be fleeting.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    122. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Apathy451 · · Score: 1

      A woman that has a hysterectomy is still a woman will functioning female breasts or are we now talking about a woman with a hysterectomy that also lost her breasts in a comical incident with a meat grinder?

      The GP suggested women are only women because they can give birth - I offered a counter example. Moreso, some women have small breasts and can't lactate. Where do these women fall? Or what of women who have has a double mastectomy and hysterectomy combo due to, for example, cancer? No longer women to you?

      A woman who has a hysterectomy is still a woman with a vagina and not an orific that is potentially made out of bits of penis and goes into an anal cavity.

      So by your definition, a woman who has GRS and rids herself of her vagina is no longer a woman? Can't have it one way and not the other...

      Finally a woman who has had a hysterectomy is one who doesn't need pills to make her a woman.

      So now hormones make the woman? Women who have had an oophorectomy take some of the same hormone pills that are used post-GRS. So these women are no longer women then?

      Again, the only deciding factor on sex is our chromosomal makeup. As shown by you, other posters, and even me, there are societal definitions, as well as personal definitions, at work here. It's not as simple as projecting these quick-thought, shallow definitions onto everyone else -- from either side of the argument.

      Personally? There are (wo)?men who are fit the classic definition of (wo)?men, effeminate men, masculine women, (wo)?men who sexually identify as the other biological sex, (wo?)men who are sexually attracted to their own sex, etc. I've known a biological woman who sexually identified as a gay man, i.e. she was biologically a woman (and still had the female bits), was attracted to men who were the classic definition of men, and was undergoing hormone therapy to be more like a male, physically. He also preferred the pronoun "he" when used to describe him. I don't think it's as simple anymore as saying, "Oh, that's a guy/girl."

    123. Re:Can you think of any famous female programmers? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Well, the plug-board is borderline IMO. I'd still group him under computer hardware rather than software (programming). If your opinion differs, then let it be.

  2. It's the... by skam240 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The article also shows that among famous programmers, the ratio of males to females is much larger than among normal programmers."

    Obviously it's the extra typing appendage that makes all the difference. It's a well known fact that famous programmers, like myself, type with their keyboards on their lap.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:It's the... by clickety6 · · Score: 5, Funny

      clever dick!

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    2. Re:It's the... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Mod parent funny .... had me laughing in my cubicle.

    3. Re:It's the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up! hahahaha

    4. Re:It's the... by drolli · · Score: 1

      fear of becoming the sexual fansaty of millions of geeks. Every woman intelligent enough to become a famous programmer will figure out that the combination of "is woman" maybe "looks geeky" and "has created a new programming language" will result in beeing stared at on geek conventions. Imagine one hundred socially incompetent geeks trying stupid pick up lines on you.....

    5. Re:It's the... by Scott+Kevill · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that famous programmers are strongly-typed?

      --
      GameRanger - multiplayer gaming service for PC and Mac games
    6. Re:It's the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but "For natural comfort [male bloggers] naturally sit with their legs further apart." -- Yossi Vardi http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/yossi_vardi_fights_local_warming.html

    7. Re:It's the... by Syonax · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mary Tsingou is an example of a woman who should have been famous for her programming, but she didn't get the credit for her work.

      A pdf of the Physics Today article about her and what she did: http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/thierry.dauxois/PAPERS/pt61_55.2008.pdf

  3. Rule #1, get a good publicist by petes_PoV · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Looking at the actual list, most of the people cited weren't the sole originators of a work, merely the figurehead. In fact I haven't heard of most of them - or their "products", so to call them famous is greatly exaggerating their actual obscurity.

    For example, there's one guy credited with Microsoft Word. Now I'd bet my pension that he hasn't written every version single-handed. Likewise Larry Ellison as the creator of Oracle - no. There are thousands of people who create each version of Oracle, not simply one guy.

    This list is too simplistic to have any value, and time spent analysing it is largely wasted.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Rule #1, get a good publicist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at the actual list, most of the people cited weren't the sole originators of a work, merely the figurehead. [...] Larry Ellison as the creator of Oracle - no. There are thousands of people who create each version of Oracle, not simply one guy.

      It's true that Oracle has many programmers, but does it have many programmers with fame comparable to Larry Ellinson?

      Still, my personal opinion is that this type of page effectively illustrates why 'deletionism' and 'notablilty' exist at Wikipedia - not that I would delete the entire page, but at the moment it represents an extremely broad interpretation of both "famous" and "programmer". Chris Lattner might be a great guy, but he doesn't exactly have the name recognition of Linus Torvalds, Bill Gates or Donald Knuth.

    2. Re:Rule #1, get a good publicist by Otter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Likewise Larry Ellison as the creator of Oracle - no. There are thousands of people who create each version of Oracle, not simply one guy.

      C'mon. Oracle was created by Ellison and two other guys, not by the person who fixed some bugs in 2004. The distinction between the two is the entire freaking point.

    3. Re:Rule #1, get a good publicist by thogard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since I known 30+ people in the list I would have to say you are very wrong. While I don't know the author of Word, it would not surprise me if the 1st few versions weren't 90% the work of one person and I've used word on a unix based 3b2.

    4. Re:Rule #1, get a good publicist by daenris · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you noticed, but that link (Famous Programmers) actually just redirects to the article List of Programmers. The description given is that "This is a list of programmers notable for their contributions to software, either as original author or architect, or for later additions." So they're not actually trying to call them famous, that's just an unfortunate redirect from a former page, and potentially a bad name choice for an old article which has been fixed.

    5. Re:Rule #1, get a good publicist by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Oracle was created by Ellison and two other guys, not by the person who fixed some bugs in 2004.

      Which leads to the fundamental theorem of attribution: Programmer fame is directly correlated to the number of names attributed to the project. Ergo, Larry Ellison wrote Oracle!

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    6. Re:Rule #1, get a good publicist by lazlo · · Score: 1

      What's really interesting to me about the wikipedia list is how many red links there are. So, apparently, there are a fairly large number of programmers who are famous enough to be listed on wikipedia's list of famous programmers, but not famous enough to actually have a wikipedia article about them. That seems an odd sort of limbo to be in...

      --
      Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?
    7. Re:Rule #1, get a good publicist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fixed some bugs in 2004, you insensitive clod!

  4. How many famous female programmers can you name? by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > The article also shows that among famous programmers, the ratio of
    > males to females is much larger than among normal programmers

    You know, I never thought about this before, but off the top of my head I'm having a hard time thinking of *any* famous female programmers, unless you count Audrey Tang (who isn't technically female, in the strictest biological sense, and wasn't even making pretensions of being female in any sense at all when he became a famous programmer) or Mitchell Baker, who, although she's famous in conjunction with a programming project, is not, as far as I'm aware, actually a programmer herself. I'm sure I'm probably missing someone, perhaps even someone really obvious, but, honestly, I'm racking my brain here, and I'm coming up blank. I know of several female programmers, but none of them are especially famous outside a specific application space. There are a couple who are well-known in the interactive fiction community, for instance, but nobody who doesn't follow IF knows about them. There's a female programmer or three who's fairly well-known in the Perl community, but nobody who doesn't use Perl has ever heard of them.

    Wait, I've been thinking of *current* famous programmers. Wasn't one of the very early third-generation programming languages designed by a woman? I can't remember which language, though...

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  5. Re:So... by paradxum · · Score: 1

    you were rated troll.... must be too soon.

  6. Infamous programmers by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay so this is great a list of some very very smart guys that most of us will never directly work with. What we really need is the list of the top 1000 infamous programmers. The guys who destroy projects and create the biggest turd burger frameworks in existence. These are the people who you bitch and moan about in a bar at a conference somewhere and hear the words "you gave Hank X a job? But the guy is a complete idiot" from a few chairs down, a couple of hours later you have the Hank X depreciation society formed and it turns out that this gormless numpty has been screwing up projects since the day he was born.

    A nice anonymous list somewhere that needs to include posted code to verify the stupidity level with a least 3 people from a project voting for the muppetry level.

    Now that would be great so we could find out just how rubbish a person the HR person has hired and the PHB has approved.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Infamous programmers by Loibisch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here is not a comprehensive list of those programmers, but at least a comprehensive list of their collective works:
      http://thedailywtf.com/

    2. Re:Infamous programmers by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      include posted code to verify the stupidity level

      But the people who really kill projects aren't those who write the code. They're the ones who prevaricate about designs, choose inappropriate languages, tools and development schemes. The people who build-in limitations as they don't have the skill (or vision) to appreciate the implications of what they're designing or make things so hopelessly complicated - in the name of flexibility - that no super-coder could ever implement the design.

      Bad code can be rewritten, but lousy design is here forever

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    3. Re:Infamous programmers by jimicus · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure that such a list wouldn't attract even the remotest bit of litigation in a country like the US.

    4. Re:Infamous programmers by Migala77 · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Infamous programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad code can be rewritten, but lousy design is here forever

      And that is Worse Than Failure!

    6. Re:Infamous programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people have complained to me, that my code is too complex. (it sounds like what you're saying) Can you explain to me why other programmers generally avoid my code, despite tons of effort and ingenuity? Is "the simplest way" a golden rule, even if the code accomplishes the job elegantly?

      Here's some broad examples I was proud of at the time, that got bad reactions from some (if not all) other programmers:

      Creating subclasses of (or a simple interface for) VB controls with an additonal string property, which contains a database, table and field name to make generic read/write routines possible (taking into account nested controls within groupboxes, etc.). Special data is also handled by field name, with a select case (instead of all textboxes are text, all radiobuttons are boolean, etc).

      Constructing a union in C/C++ which contains an unsigned char array, and a struct of the same size as the array which subdivides it into named bits and bytes. *This blew some peoples minds when they came across it; they coded around it rather than using it. It's part of a microcontroller program for communicating with a wireless module ~ which requires a configuration of 256 named-bits that are listed in its datasheet. This made it easy to configure, clearer than y=(x[4] & 0x0A), and easy to send to the wireless module. Other people's reactions were the opposite of what mine would've been, back when I was the one learning to program (fascination).

      Excessive use of macros and inline assembly, to achieve blazing speed on microcontrollers. (the one instance that comes to mind was heavily commented code, albeit damn ugly anyway) I typically code for performance from the start of most projects, even when it's not appropriate, because that's how I keep learning and avoid recoding later.

      I once spent a month creating a programming environment within a basic application, which could dynamically compile code during runtime. It had some features of C like preprocessor directives #include, #define, #undef, #if/#endif etc. The end result being an application that's rewritable while it's running... It'd grab code for pieces of the application and interface from a database, then run it ~ it was like proprietary insecure Java (but the programming environment itself was built into the application). The insecure nature of being able to run code from a database was a downside, but the app was only used by system admins - not average users.
      (I felt a great disturbance in the force, when I unveiled this; it was as though a million voices cried out in terror, and then fell silent...)

    7. Re:Infamous programmers by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``Bad code can be rewritten, but lousy design is here forever''

      Maybe the constraint that "design is here forever" causes a lot of problems.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  7. Who are the famous programmers? by neonprimetime · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well here's an actual list

    1. Re:Who are the famous programmers? by mdm42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you had RTFA you'd have seen that the Wikipedia article is exactly where they drew the list from in the first place.

      And for that you get +5 Informative?

      --
      New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
    2. Re:Who are the famous programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that wiki article shoulda been linked in the /. summary

    3. Re:Who are the famous programmers? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interestingly, the wikipedia article only mentions Kernighan for AWK and ditroff. It doesn't even mention that other language that he's known for.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    4. Re:Who are the famous programmers? by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, the wikipedia article only mentions Kernighan for AWK and ditroff. It doesn't even mention that other language that he's known for.

      What? Did he invent B?

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  8. Who are the people *you* think of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Damn, I just moderated so rather then post non-anon, I'll just post anon.

    I think of that Carmack guy, who wrote Doom and Quake. I think of Billy G, who isn't famous for writing code exactly (or at least not only because of that).

    Richard Stallman and Linus "rare Finnish/Swedish name" both come to mind.

    I'm having trouble thinking of the name of the SAMBA dude, and what are the names of the two Google founders?

    And that's about it. I've run out of ideas.

    apathy maybe.

    1. Re:Who are the people *you* think of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Your moderations will still be lost even if you post anonymous ya doofus.

    2. Re:Who are the people *you* think of? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates, of course -- a programmer from the start.
      Hans Reiser. He didn't make the list, but IMO ReiserFS should have put him on the list before he gained lasting infamy.
      Linus Torvalds
      Brian Kernighan & Dennis M. Ritchie
      Bill Atkinson
      Ada Lovelace
      Grace Hopper
      Steve Wozniak (though I think of him more as an engineer)

      Some of the other names I think of as famous, but not so much as programmers -- Wirth, Backus, and Dijkstra I think of as computer scientists, for instance.

    3. Re:Who are the people *you* think of? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on Reiser - even before he killed his wife his name was well known in the programming world. I certainly would have recognized his name before someone like Les Earnest (creator of the finger program).

      Then there are others that were considered gods as programmers before becoming even more famous as Designers - Sid Meier or Peter Molyneux anyone? I can name others that are a bit more obscure but incredibly influential during a time like Silas Warner (creator of Castle Wolfenstein, the game that defined the stealth genre and one of the first computer games to include digitized voices) and Bill Budge (probably most famous for Pinball Construction Set, but his Apple ][ work was well known).

      As for Woz, he was (is?) both a great programmer and engineer - he wrote the boot loader for the Apple machines, Integer BASIC (one of my favorite Woz quotes - "Regrets about my own life? Yes, I wish I would have put floating point in Basic, but I wanted to get it done quick"), Apple DOS (with Randy Wigginton), SWEET 16 (virtual 16 bit OS), software Breakout, and certainly more from his jobs at companies like HP.

    4. Re:Who are the people *you* think of? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      OK, Aside from RMS and Linus; I think of Carmack also, as well as John Abrash who co-wrote the games with him. From back in the day, anybody remember Bill Budge? EA, back in the day, gave its game developers the same sort of status that record labels gave musicians and his name sticks out in my mind. Of course, there's anybody behind a language as the summary stated: Larry Wall, Guido van Rossum, etc. Then there's Miguel ummm... I forget the last name... Icaza, or something like that, who worked on the Linux desktop.

      OK, that's all I can think of off the top of my head, before having breakfast.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    5. Re:Who are the people *you* think of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed a week or so ago that this might not actually be the case, just checking to make sure. I just modded you overrated and thanks to me you're at Score:0, Informative. If this works, I'll be a genius!

    6. Re:Who are the people *you* think of? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I'm having trouble thinking of the name of the SAMBA dude

      Jeremy Allison and he has his own Wikipedia page.

    7. Re:Who are the people *you* think of? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      SWEET 16

      The Sweet 16 interpreter remains the most amazing piece of code I have ever seen. It emulates a full featured 16 bit processor and is written in just over a page (256 bytes) of code. Absolutely no wasted space and reasonably fast. I doubt one programmer in a million could take those specs make it work and fit it in the space budget.

      It's a true work of art.

  9. Make money by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Making boatloads of money will make you (in)famous. And that is not even listed in that pie chart.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  10. Incomplete List, sigh :- by rel48 · · Score: 1

    Missing from Wikipedia are at least a few pioneers who made significant contributions: Nan Shu - author of the first Fortran compiler (Watson Research Center c. 1954); John Kemeny & Tom Kurtz - creators of BASIC (Beginners Allpurpose Symbolic Instruction Code) at Dartmouth College c. 1964

    1. Re:Incomplete List, sigh :- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      author of the first Fortran compiler[..]
      creators of BASIC

      a few pioneers who made significant contributions

      I don't think that word means what you think it means.

  11. Fame != influential by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just because people know of them doesn't mean they really contributed to software development. One on the list that comes to mind is John Romero. My understanding is that he was primarily a level designer with Doom and Quake, and that he did some rudimentary coding, like menus and the like, whereas the real cutting edge stuff was of course all attributed to Carmack.

    I bet everyone at Slashdot knows who John Romero is, but I bet few at Slashdot know of him because of anything he has coded.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Fame != influential by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      I bet everyone at Slashdot knows who John Romero is, but I bet few at Slashdot know of him because of anything he has coded.

      Of course not. He was the guy in that play. "O Romero, Romero, wherefore art thou Romero?"

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    2. Re:Fame != influential by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Quite so. Eric Raymond is much more well known as a writer, Larry Ellison and Bill Gates are really famous because they were successful businessmen. Even for all his work on GCC and Emacs, Richard Stallman is probably best known for the FSF.

    3. Re:Fame != influential by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      He made me his bitch.

    4. Re:Fame != influential by TeamSPAM · · Score: 1

      I thought we all knew who Romero was because he dated Stevie Case.

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    5. Re:Fame != influential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet everyone at Slashdot knows who John Romero is, but I bet few at Slashdot know of him because of anything he has coded.

      You're right, most people probably recognize him as the head on a pike at the end of Doom II.

  12. Poor visualization by haluness · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What a horrific visualization - first it's a pie chart and on top of that why put in a background to obscure the colors? Someone went overboard with their charting software

  13. 'Famous' is subjective here to say the least by Otis_INF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (Disclaimer: I don't give a **** if I'm on the list or not ;))

    Perhaps the right question isn't 'how to become a famous programmer' but first let's focus on what a famous programmer is? The concept of being famous is that a lot of people know you.

    Let me see some hands, who knows "David Bradley" and can name what he accomplished? No-one? Why is this person then branded as 'famous' ? Sure, he wrote a handler which is in almost every Bios, but aren't there millions of routines out there used by even more million people? I mean: the guy / girl who wrote the event handler for the 'Google Search' button has his/her piece of code executed a couple of million times a day as well... The people who know who wrote that routine is probably as big as the group of people who know the name "David Bradley" and associate that name with cntrl-alt-del.

    So this 'famous programmer' list is IMHO more of a list of some editor who liked to have his (her?) personal favorites in a single list on Wikipedia.

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  14. Article is missing a beard length pie chart by VampireByte · · Score: 4, Funny

    Growing a beard seems to be important to becoming a famous programmer.

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

    1. Re:Article is missing a beard length pie chart by Rashdot · · Score: 1

      That would explain the lack of women on the list.

      --
      This is not the sig you're looking for.
  15. My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just moderated, so posting anonymously. Dijkstra - 'nuff said. Peter Norton - made the PC accessible to small company programmers. Woz - invented the accessible home computer!! Dan Bricklin - spreadsheets.

  16. Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Men would always be over represented in any group that has a mean significantly different from the whole society. Women are clustered around the mean with lower variation.

    There are more male criminals, murderers than female. The reasons are based on simply reproductive success rate differential between males and females. No matter how successful a woman is, she is very very unlikely to bear more than 10 children. A very successful man could easily leave behind dozens and in some cases hundreds of children. Two thirds of men who have ever live do not have any living descendants toady. Essentially men take more risks and bet it all and two thirds of them lost it all in the genetic race. Thus all living males today come from a lineage of high risk takers. That results in greater variation in every measure, be it with positive connotations or negative. More variation in height, weight, muscle mass, BMI and most importantly risk tolerance.

    It is entirely possible that women might even have a higher mean when it comes to intellectual labor than men. But since men have more variation you will find more men in the outliers. If one is in the top 200 of any field, that person is an outlier.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thus all living males today come from a lineage of high risk takers.

      Since women have fathers, I think you could say the same about them.

    2. Re:Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I'm a little skeptical of the 2/3 claim, but otherwise well-stated. I posted a similar statement in similar sub-topics in the past and was essentially ignored. I'm glad somebody eventually found a way to get this info through.

    3. Re:Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      No woman has a Y Chromosome. All the genes in the Y are exclusively descended from males for the last 400 million years.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    4. Re:Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you assume a successful man only leaves male children and a successful woman only bears female ones?

    5. Re:Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Here is a readable version of of this (pdf) paper.

      The number of women in the ancestral population that have living descendants today is twice that of men. (So my paraphrasing is wrong. I cant say two thirds of men did not leave any living descendants. Just only half as many men as women left living descendants) Most anthropologists and scientists shy away from describing the difference in standard deviation and mean between men and women. There is a history of politicians and non-scientists with vested interests misinterpreting the research to their benefit.

      For example a very well respected scientist/authors like Jared Diamond, who published studies comparing the testicle sizes between different races early in his career is largely silent about it in his more popular books, Guns..., Collapse, The Third Chimpanzee, why sex is fun .

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by manicfish · · Score: 1

      The Y chromosome deliberately has as few genes as possible to make it a very small target for the competing X chromosome (the X chromosome having the upper hand). It doesn't count for much. The X chromosome is phenotypically much more relevant, since males do not have a backup X.

    7. Re:Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by simplerThanPossible · · Score: 1

      More variation: more geniuses and more... idiots.

      Consider: if you hear about a Darwin Award winner, is there any doubt whatsoever in your mind that it is a guy?

    8. Re:Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a simplistic understanding of gender. There are XXY karyotypes, and XY intersex variants that don't express the Y chromosome, resulting in a person physically indistinguishable from female, but with mixed genetics. Also, there are mosaic individuals who have some cells XY and some cells XX. Biology can get pretty convoluted in this area, and real life itn't as simple as high-school biology would have us believe.

    9. Re:Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Even among elephant seals where 80% of the males in each generation don't get to reproduce have 50/50 sex ratio at birth. And the ratio remains close to 50/50 even today for H sapiens. But it is undeniable some men had far more children than others. It is a zero sum game. It means other men left behind no children. QED

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    10. Re:Men would always be overrepresented in all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After years of programming many slashdotters still have to improve a bit ou^H^Htheir reproductive success rates.

      Improving BMI could help.

  17. The real way by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sure you can design a great OS, Game, Programming Language or even _File System_... but if you really want to be famous just brutally murder a loved one.

    1. Re:The real way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the word you're looking for in infamous, which is the polar opposite of famous.

  18. Protip: by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 1

    Killing your wife? Not actually a project.

    Well, okay, yeah, I mean, it takes some planning and the execution is, well, an execution, but it's not very open-source.

    --
    ~ C.
    1. Re:Protip: by phision · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seems like killing your wife is a feature of the software you write: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_file_systems&oldid=220529437#Features

  19. Famous female programmers by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is Emily Short really famous? I knew of her but only because I follow Interactive Fiction.

    And I'm sorry, just because Roberta Williams was part of a husband and wife team doesn't mean she counts as half a person. If you were counting _projects_ that might be valid, but then you'd have to divide all the other programmer's projects up too.

    1. Re:Famous female programmers by Hatta · · Score: 1

      How much programming did Roberta Williams actually do? I always thought she did the game design, and Ken did the programming. But I don't know for sure. Has anyone written a good history of Sierra Online? I would most definitely buy such a book.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Famous female programmers by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      "Hackers" by Steven Levy has a section on Sierra Online. I read the book back in the 80s and don't remember how informative that section was.

  20. da da da... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    I thought it was common knowledge that men and women had very similar means in almost all intelegence fields, but men had a flatter distribution curve than women (so at the top and bottom there are far more men than women).

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    1. Re:da da da... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 3, Funny

      similar means in almost all intelegence fields

      Dude...

    2. Re:da da da... by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

      Bang! You're right and there is not much more to it. Unfortunate and a tragedy for women - if they maximize their efforts, the highest reachable seems to be a rule of middle management. But perhaps more tragic for the men at the other side of the curve, for they are the most used and abused, and no one fighting for them, because men don't need that, right?

    3. Re:da da da... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      it's /. they take your posting card if you spell everything right. Actually I forgot I wasn't on firefox, where I clearly benefit from spell checking on the fly.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:da da da... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      "because men don't need that, right?"

      Most won't admit to it.

      If a man had the compulsion to wash his hands often, he'd try to find out what's the "best" soap to use, what's the "best" method, he might even join/start a group of likeminded people, have long debates on methods and soaps, brag about how many times he can wash a day etc.

      If a woman had the compulsion to to wash her hands often, she'd either keep it secret, or look for professional help.

      I might be exaggerating a bit, but just look at the various things men do. Sports, hobbies, etc.

      Sure some of it may actually turn out to have _some_ use, but really...

      There is selection against women being prone to extremes. Being prone to doing extreme stuff is not very conducive for successfully carrying a baby to term.

      As for women being stuck in middle management, if you want to be a CEO start your own company. Worked for many of those male CEOs out there.

      If you want to be a programmer, just get a PC and install a Linux distro or something. How much does a PC for programming cost? A lot less than many handbag or shoe collections.

      Nowadays the external barriers are insignificant for women in the developed world.

      Thing to keep in mind is, in many fields you do not have to be "Top 200" to be reasonably successful (at least from the POV of earning a decent living). Just avoid "Star" fields like sports, film, music. And some fields are harder to outsource than others. So far many women seem to be picking fields that are harder to outsource. Programming can be outsourced to Elbonia or wherever, whereas Nursing can't ;).

      --
  21. Elaine Roberts by torstenvl · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only the greatest hacker of our time, duh.

    http://xkcd.com/342/

    1. Re:Elaine Roberts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Help I'm Trapped In a Driver's License Factory Elaine Roberts.

  22. Men bigger risk takers? by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the thing is that men are wired to be bigger risk takers and society rewards people who take big risks. Of course, with men, for every guy that hits it big, there's a dozen, if not a hundred, that completely flounder.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Men bigger risk takers? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and society rewards people who take big risks

      True but incomplete. Society rewards people who take big risks and succeed. Those that take risks and don't succeed get a Darwin-award or a bankruptcy.

      (source: homeless guy living near the subway station)

    2. Re:Men bigger risk takers? by tjstork · · Score: 3, Funny

      True but incomplete. Society rewards people who take big risks and succeed. Those that take risks and don't succeed get a Darwin-award or a bankruptcy.

      Unless you own a bank! :-)

      --
      This is my sig.
    3. Re:Men bigger risk takers? by russotto · · Score: 1

      True but incomplete. Society rewards people who take big risks and succeed. Those that take risks and don't succeed get a Darwin-award or a bankruptcy.

      That's not what Alan Fishman says.

    4. Re:Men bigger risk takers? by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      That's why the human birth rate for males is higher than that of females. We males tend to win more darwin awards so humans evolved to make more males to even out the ratio. :)

  23. Why bother with those strategies by sleeponthemic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Steps to Fame:

    1. Get into game development position
    2. Inject Goatse timebomb
    3. PROFIT!
    4. NO WAIT!. NO PROFIT.
    5. SOME FAME

    --
    I record my sleeptalking
    1. Re:Why bother with those strategies by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      You are so nominated for the Evil-Bastard-Awards of 2009.

    2. Re:Why bother with those strategies by Kugrian · · Score: 1

      The Gaping Coffee scandal!

    3. Re:Why bother with those strategies by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      If your timebomb has no wait, you're doing it wrong...

  24. Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by GogglesPisano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not like "Transsexual" is an endpoint - it seems more like a transition path.

    Wouldn't it make more sense to simply add one point (or one-half, if you will) to both the Male and Female genders?

    1. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      Probably because there is a 5:1 ratio of women to transsexuals?

    2. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Vanders · · Score: 1

      I am glad I'm not the only one to be annoyed by that, but it frankly doesn't surprise me.

      You're right: the people listed should be either "Male" or "Female" for the purposes of this breakdown. "Transsexual" is utterly meaningless.

    3. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Here, let me pull these ratio numbers out of my ass..."

    4. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wouldn't it make more sense to simply add one point (or one-half, if you will) to both the Male and Female genders?

      Except that would make the numbers (and definitely of gender) utterly meaningless if people could simply choose what to call themselves. The premise of the whole point is that there are fewer famous biological females. Who cares what psychological issues they're carrying around? Genetic gender is the only reasonable definition to use.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

      except there are far more then just the XX and XY chromosomes that people are familiar with. Which category would you place: XXY? XO? X_? XY female? and the about half dozen I always forget?

      about 1 in 1000 babies have some kind of intersex condition, the vast majority are surgically altered to have female sex organs and are never told (most parents are never told or consulted... simply told their baby needs "immediate surgery").

      sex is what is between your legs, gender is what is between your ears... and unless you are going to try telling all the women here that they are nothing more then a walking vagina you have to admit there is more to a woman then their ability to spit out babies.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    6. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      sex is what is between your legs, gender is what is between your ears

      Actually, "sex" and "gender" are exactly the same thing, and include what's between your legs and your entire body, including your brain, based on your genetics. But to your point, give me a way to measure the gender of that part of your brain that determines programming ability and its propensity to become famous, and we can apply that into the statistics. Until then, we have to use the easiest way we have to measure physical gender, and that's external appearance.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    7. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

      you may want to do some research into gender theory, your ideas are about 120 years out of date. Not only are sex and gender different from a biological and sociological point of view, they are also differentiated in many laws. At best your post is ignorant, at worst it is a weak attempt at a flame against trans and intersex users of this site.

      and external appearance is even a worse measure of gender then genetics... at what point does a "large clitoris" become a "small penis"? a "shallow vagina" becomes a "deep scrotal indentation"? I realize it is a lot to take in, but people are not binary... we don't come in a this or that arrangement... there are a lot of steps in between one and the other.

      unless you are extremely anti-social, you have likely met many people in your life who are not XX-female or XY-male. As I said, about 1 in 1000 have a physical indication of non-standard chromosomes, as many as twice as many may have it and not know it (based on when the Olympics conducted genetic testing, falsely accusing many women with AIS with cheating). In fact, there is not an unreasonable chance that you yourself may have a non-obvious intersex condition and not even know it... so until you are willing to submit yourself to a kyrotype test to prove your genetics, i kindly suggest that you do not speak about things you do not have all the data on.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    8. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, "sex" and "gender" are exactly the same thing

      Actually, they're not.

      Until then, we have to use the easiest way we have to measure physical gender, and that's external appearance.

      Well it's nice to see that at least you agree that the people currently listed under "Transexual" should be listed under "Women". Very progressive of you. Well done.

    9. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      you may want to do some research into gender theory, your ideas are about 120 years out of date. Not only are sex and gender different from a biological and sociological point of view, they are also differentiated in many laws. At best your post is ignorant, at worst it is a weak attempt at a flame against trans and intersex users of this site.

      Sheesh. Apparently you're one of those people who will do their best to take offense without regard to what someone actually *says*. Did I, or did I not, acknowledge a range of gender? I believe I did, which is not exactly news.

      As for recognizing a difference between sex and gender, dictionary.com has a pretty good way to describe this:

      First:

      gender1 /dndr/
      -noun
      1. Grammar. [snipped]
      2. sex: the feminine gender.
      3. [snipped]

      And the usage note:

      Usage Note: Traditionally, gender has been used primarily to refer to the grammatical categories of "masculine," "feminine," and "neuter," but in recent years the word has become well established in its use to refer to sex-based categories, as in phrases such as gender gap and the politics of gender. This usage is supported by the practice of many anthropologists, who reserve sex for reference to biological categories, while using gender to refer to social or cultural categories. According to this rule, one would say The effectiveness of the medication appears to depend on the sex (not gender) of the patient, but In peasant societies, gender (not sex) roles are likely to be more clearly defined. This distinction is useful in principle, but it is by no means widely observed, and considerable variation in usage occurs at all levels.

      So, again, until you can give me a clear scientific test to determine the gender of specifically the attribute we're interested in (in this case, Famous Programmers), we have to do our best and peg someone as male or female.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    10. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Until then, we have to use the easiest way we have to measure physical gender, and that's external appearance. [...] Well it's nice to see that at least you agree that the people currently listed under "Transexual" should be listed under "Women". Very progressive of you. Well done.

      External appearance at birth, not external appearance after they've chopped things up.

      Sorry, but I believe in science. I believe in measurements. And people are notoriously unreliable at self analysis.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    11. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

      If you want to know if a person's gender is male or female or other, you could... I don't know... ask them.

      Gender (not sex) is basically how one "feels" male or female or both or neither... you can't explain it any more then you can explain what it "feels" like to be hungry. If you have always lived with ample food in arms reach you may never have felt hunger and never noticed that you could feel different, if you have never noticed a difference between your mental-gender and physical-sex then you likely have never noticed the two can be different.

      There have been studies that have shown a limited correlation between the size and shape of some brain structures in transwomen being similar to cisgendered females. However I will be the first to point out that those studies were HORRIBLY flawed, biased, sexist and just plain jumped to a lot of conclusions. The sad fact is, the "test" you ask for may very well exist, however there currently have been no large scale studies on transpeople that can be even remotely called credible... it simply is not a very popular segment of science... you get a lot of people who assume they know everything and simply tailor the data to suit (EG: Blanchard/Bailey/Zucker/Lawerence).

      but as you said, gender is a sociological term, relating to how one fits in with other people.... unless you are flashing your bits to others on a regular basis they do not play a huge role in your day to day interactions... neither do the results of your genetic test. I would like to turn your last point around on you if I may... can you prove to me, scientifically, that your mental gender is what you say it is? Not your sex, as we have agreed that sex is biological not sociological, and not genetic, as we have agreed that chromosomes do not always match up with how one feels their gender to be...

      PS: nice ad hom in your first line... I took offense because, *GASP*, it was offensive. If you do not wish to be called on your cis-sexist behavior, don't behave in a cis-sexist manner.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    12. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      If you want to know if a person's gender is male or female or other, you could... I don't know... ask them.

      Absolutely not. The worst way to define sex and gender is to ask people. People are notoriously unreliable at self-analysis, as I said in another post.

      Gender (not sex) is basically how one "feels" male or female or both or neither... you can't explain it any more then you can explain what it "feels" like to be hungry.

      Feel free to "feel" anyway you want. But I'm not interested in how you feel for purposes of statistical studies, I'm interested in a scientific measurement of reality. To use your hunger analogy, it's perfectly possible for someone to feel psychologically hungry even though their body is not actually giving them real physical signals. "A state of hunger" is defined as the body needing nourishment, and we also have a related concept, which is "hungry". The first one is a measurable and quantifiable, the second is not.

      can you prove to me, scientifically, that your mental gender is what you say it is? Not your sex, as we have agreed that sex is biological not sociological, and not genetic, as we have agreed that chromosomes do not always match up with how one feels their gender to be...

      Of course I can't, as we've already established the fact that we don't have the technology to test for that, and we may never have it. I don't know what your point is.

      I took offense because, *GASP*, it was offensive. If you do not wish to be called on your cis-sexist behavior, don't behave in a cis-sexist manner.

      No, you took offense because you chose to interpret it as offensive. That has nothing to do with whether it was objectively offensive, especially since it was not. My intent is more important than your interpretation.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    13. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      External appearance at birth

      Ohhhh, O.K. Don't move those goalposts too far now, they're probably heavy. Oh but hang on, where do you place intersex people and hermaphrodites?

      Sorry, but I believe in science.

      Then I'm glad to inform you that science confirms it: you're dead wrong. Sex, gender and genetics are different things. Sex is defined by the genitalia, gender is self-defined and genetics don't fall into neat XX and XY boxes. Try using a medical text for your definitions instead of a dictionary. That shouldn't be too hard for someone who "believes in science" after all.

      Enjoy your trolling now.

    14. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Onoz! Teh world will fall apart if people were trans! Aaargh!

    15. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you should have spent five minutes with Google before shooting your mouth off about something you're obviously clueless about. Putting aside the sheer stupidity of claiming that subjective states such as hunger or gender dysphoria don't exist because you can't directly observe them, it just isn't true that you're speaking of a subjective state with no independently observable correlates:

      Male-to-Female Transsexuals Have Female Neuron Numbers in a Limbic Nucleus

    16. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you took offense because you chose to interpret it as offensive.
      Excellent! I can say racist things now and tell people that they "chose to be offended"!

    17. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Putting aside the sheer stupidity of claiming that subjective states such as hunger or gender dysphoria don't exist because you can't directly observe them,

      Hint: I didn't say that. And I didn't say the other (related) thing you accuse me of.

      That's what I love about these psycho-subjects, people who are sensitive to it read whatever they want to read, and it doesn't really matter what I actually *write*.

      See also: genetic homosexuality and the attraction mechanism.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    18. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you just dismissed the identities lived experiences of hundreds of thousands of people because you, for reasons that are rather unclear, wish to insist that chromosomes trump all else regardless of evidence. If a person has an unusual gender identity for their karyotype, that is prima facie evidence that at least some elements of this person's neurology, the ones which influence subjectively perceived gender identity, did not develop in a very typical way for their chromosomes, and there is no particular reason to expect other sexually dimorphic elements to have developed in the chromosomally-typical way.

      Really, if you're trying to look at statistics on gender differences further out from the mean than one or two standard deviations (and if you're looking at the most famous rather than average programmers, that's what you're doing), the last thing you should be doing is approaching it with this sort of simplistic binary thinking; it seems clear that transgender people are significantly overrepresented (i'd guess a factor of ten at least over prevalence in the general population) among the upper extremes of ability in this field, and this is an interesting phenomenon well within the scope of a study on gender differences in programming ability, and one that would be totally ignored by just proclaiming chromosomes the only variable of interest ex recto. The study the article linked to is insensitive by virtue of labelling its categories 'transsexuals' and 'women' rather than 'transgender women' and 'cisgender women', and by failing to inquire about trans men in the programming field, but at least it noticed an interesting and relevant phenomenon which your preferred model of gender would ignore.

      See also: genetic homosexuality and the attraction mechanism.

      What does that have to do with anything? Gender identity and sexual orientation really don't have very much to do with each other, but bigots regularly conflate the two. I'm beginning to get a very clear and ugly picture of your views on the subject.

    19. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Troll

      See also: genetic homosexuality and the attraction mechanism. [...] What does that have to do with anything? Gender identity and sexual orientation really don't have very much to do with each other, but bigots regularly conflate the two. I'm beginning to get a very clear and ugly picture of your views on the subject.

      Okay, here is *exactly* what I'm talking about! Maybe you'll learn something here. To quote myself:

      That's what I love about these psycho-subjects, people who are sensitive to it read whatever they want to read, and it doesn't really matter what I actually *write*.

      So you automatically take a moonshot to your "very clear and ugly picture". But nowhere did I make the link that you're accusing me of. That's your wacky assumption. I gave you an example of another *subject* that is regularly misinterpreted by people who are sensitive to the subject, and no matter what you write, they'll flake and form and filter you into their worldview -- which is normally a paranoid tinfoil hat "clear and ugly picture."

      I think it's actually because your whole identity is tied up in these issues, and any deviation from your worldview (or rather, even any deviation of *PHRASING* from your worldview) is automatically assumed to be a personal attack on your identity. I hope you see the irony here.

      If not, let me give you a hint: we are saying EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    20. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If not, let me give you a hint: we are saying EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

      No you're not. You figured it'd be an easy troll, got bogged down in the scientific and medical stuff which you were poorly equipped to understand let alone argue, and made school-boy errors by flat out contradicting yourself in at least two posts.

      The quality of Slashdot trolls is frankly shocking these days. You're rubbish at it.

    21. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

      If not, let me give you a hint: we are saying EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

      good to know you can admit that you are wrong, that is a good first step... next is to accept what you did and apologize for for it. You may not find what you said insulting, just as you may not find "fag", "dike", or "tranny" to be offensive, but to those who deal with this hatred day after day, they are... you do not have the moral authority to dictate to others what is or is not offensive.

      and since quoting oneself is in season, I will repeat the following: If you do not wish to be called on your cis-sexist behavior, don't act in a cis-sexist manner (that means first finding out what cis-sexist means, then educating yourself so you don't do it again)... if on the other hand you don't feel like it, be prepared to be called on your bigotry.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    22. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Except that would make the numbers (and definitely of gender) utterly meaningless if people could simply choose what to call themselves.

      No one's claiming that.

      The premise of the whole point is that there are fewer famous biological females.

      Is it though? I don't think it's clear that the difference must be due to genetic differences, as opposed to nurture or other social factors.

      (FWIW, I can still see some point in highlighting a person as being transsexual, as it helps identify possibile differences. For example, the person might have done their famous work before transitioning, or it may be a factor that they were brought up as a particular gender - e.g., boys are more likely to be encouraged to use computers than girls - even though they have now transitioned. OTOH, there's hardly enough data to draw any conclusions - only a handful of women, and with only one of the trans. It doesn't seem worth the bother and complication to mark her out separately.)

      Genetic gender is the only reasonable definition to use.

      Except this is not straightforward either, due to conditions such as intersex.

      Has everyone one of the people on that list had a genetic test? I doubt it.

    23. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      good to know you can admit that you are wrong, that is a good first step

      If you makes you feel good to declare unilateral victory, be my guest! I love making people happy.

      You may not find what you said insulting, just as you may not find "fag", "dike", or "tranny" to be offensive, but to those who deal with this hatred day after day, they are...

      On the other hand, I'm actually curious what I've actually said (my words, please, not yours) that you interpret as offensive.

      you do not have the moral authority to dictate to others what is or is not offensive.

      That is true, or really a truism, since obviously I can't control how others choose to interpret what I say. But you're making a fundamental mistake. It's one thing to find a word offensive (e.g., 'tranny'), then we can have a reasonable debate about whether common usage recognizes it as an offensive word. It's another thing to find a concept offensive, as (at least, I think at this point) you're doing.

      Intent is *always* the most important thing, not your interpretation. If a mentally handicapped person called you a 'tranny' in a friendly way and didn't know any better, would you take offense? Hopefully not, because there was no intent to offend. On the other hand, if I called you a [whatever politically correct term you prefer these days] in a snide, insultful way, then my intent was to offend, even though I used the word you like.

      Nearly everything can be taken with offense by someone somewhere. At some point, tiptoeing around trying not offend anyone is just stupid -- they have to take some responsibility to understand what others are saying. I'm reminded of that guy who was fired for using the word "niggardly" around some African Americans.

      Now, in Real Life, out of politeness, it's normal and expected to be sensitive about certain subject with various people (e.g., don't make suicide jokes with someone who just lost a family member to it). But in forum conversation, I'm not going to avoid reasonable discussion because someone might take offense to it. There's no offense intended -- it's your responsibility to not to be offended.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    24. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

      you want a list? let's start shall we?

      "The premise of the whole point is that there are fewer famous biological females." because a famous cisgendered female is far more impressive then a famous transgendered one? I don't know what's worse, that you consider transwomen to be less then cisgendered women, or that you consider being biologically female to be such a hindrance in one's ability to code.

      you stated many times that you require a scientific test to prove someone's gender, you were then told (and agreed) that no such test exists, yet you still ask for proof. Rather then accept this you go on to tell countless people that their feelings, life experience and whole existence is invalid because it can not be tested.

      you continuously move the goalposts... first you say "Until then, we have to use the easiest way we have to measure physical gender, and that's external appearance.", but then you concede that gender is a sociological term, not a physical one. You then go on to specify that only genitals at birth mater. While you may think with your bits, most people do not, and your point that they somehow influence one's thought processes is blatant sexism. A girl does not think like a girl because she does or does not have a wang, she thinks that way because of the way her mind is.

      appeal to authority issues right up at the top. you can quote websites all day, I can do the same.

      "genetic homosexuality and the attraction mechanism", red herring, bad science, anti-GLBT bigotry.

      constantly demanding that transpeople prove to you that they are who they say they are. this is extremely offensive.

      Saying that transpeople's opionion of themselves and how they identify is "unreliable"... even a 5 min google check would have told you that a persons gender is extremely constant throughout their whole lives, even if they do not accept it or express it until later in life.

      complete and utter ignorance on the topic of gender theory, womans studies, biology, sociology and several other sciences... what's worse is when presented with evidence by several people you do not attempt to increase your store of knowledge, but rather discount it out of hand as a "psudo-subject".

      you admit you do not have the moral authority to tell anyone what is offensive or not, yet not a few posts previously you were telling us that you were not "intending to be offensive" and that we should therefore not be offended. Which is it? Are you telling us what we should find offensive, or are you not? Heck in this very post you tell us "it's your responsibility to not to be offended." Pick a side and stick with it.

      to your next point about intent: yes, I would find a mentally handicapped person called you a 'tranny' in a friendly way and didn't know any better offensive, IF they refused to learn to do otherwise (assuming they had the ability to consciously choose not to). This is exactly what you are doing... you are repeatedly insulting not only transfolk, but women and GLB people, however when you are called on it you refuse to learn and discount our anger as being "sensitive" and not "reading what you write"... we read what you wrote, it was offensive, accept that and move on.

      we fully understand what you are saying... once a penis, always a penis, and that cisgendered women getting famous in this field are far more special then transgendered women getting famous because they are either: less likely to overcome the fact that they are biologically female and become good programmers... or that they are more important then transgendered women.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    25. Re:Why a separate "Transsexuals" Category? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      *sigh* I grow weary of battling with your determination to filter everything I say through your own bigoted, paranoid lenses. Since all of your points are pretty much the same, I'll just deal with your first paragraph.

      "The premise of the whole point is that there are fewer famous biological females." because a famous cisgendered female is far more impressive then a famous transgendered one?

      Good god, where did I use the word "impressive"? Did you miss the point in this article? It's that there are fewer female famous programmers. This is simply factual. The original point I made is that, for purposes of trying to find out what's going on with this, one has to make some sort of determination of sex. It's the biology here that's interesting, not how one chooses to identify oneself.

      In fact, you'll note that the three famous transsexuals mentioned originally identified as male.

      I don't know what's worse, that you consider transwomen to be less then cisgendered women, or that you consider being biologically female to be such a hindrance in one's ability to code.

      And again, you pull that TOTALLY out of thin air. Nowhere did I make either point. It is simply factual that there are fewer famous woman programmers. It could be that this is sociological, or it could be simply due to the fact that women are, on the average, different from men, on the average.

      All the rest of your post is pretty much the same thing. Take something I said, or never said, and accuse me of some issue that you angrily hold against society.

      Anyway, as I said, I grow weary of debating this with someone who won't (or, more likely, can't) debate honestly and objectively. You're determined to see me as the Satanic Patron Saint of Gender. So, please, be my guest... have some righteous hatred and anger on me. I hope it helps you to have a happy day.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  25. I met a couple by JoeCommodore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think fame is overrated, the two I met I marked them as famous for programs they wrote in the 80s, not their current work. One was Brad Templeton, to me famous for Time Trek and Power/Power 64 utility for the Commodore PET & 64, though now he is probably best known for his work in the EFF. The second, Kermit Woodal, who wrote a while back a SIDplayer program for the Commodore 64, I met him at an Amiga conference, from my impression he is still best remembered for that SIDplayer program, which does not always help him in his current projects.

    So I think becoming famous in the tech field can have a similar trap like it is to actors, through your fame, you may become typecast into some sort of programming role.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:I met a couple by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I met a lot of famous people when I worked at Disney, and I completely agree with you. I understand why people would want to be rich (who wouldn't?) but I have no idea why anybody would want to be famous.

      Some of them, like the late Buddy Hackett, are really nice guys who you would never know was a rich famous person. But a lot of them are utter assholes who are in love with themselves and don't give a rat's ass about anybody else.

      I met Eddie Money the day before he became famous, when his name was still Duane Mahoney. I was stationed with his girlfriend's brother. He played his demo tape for us ("Baby hold on to me") and we drank Budweiser and partied. Really nice guy, if a bit conceited.

      I nearly wrecked my car six months later when I heard it on the radio.

    2. Re:I met a couple by martinw89 · · Score: 1

      ...you may become typecast into some sort of programming role.


              student my_job = "studying";
              (programming_role) my_job;
              printf("%s\n", my_job);

      Nope, it didn't seem to work.

    3. Re:I met a couple by KGIII · · Score: 1

      The only famous one on the list that I have met would be Bill Gates. We had a very short chat, he seemed rather quiet/shy, more so than I would have expected given how frequently he's in the public eye. He seemed genuinely nice and was far more down-to-Earth (if such can be gathered in just a few minutes of chatting) than I would have expected as well.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:I met a couple by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I think fame is overrated

      So is being a nobody :-) Anyhow, we all have different goals and dreams. I'm not gonna bash anybody for wanting to be famous badly or wanting to avoid fame badly. To each their own.
         

    5. Re:I met a couple by MajGeek · · Score: 1

      I had the chance to hear Admiral Hopper speak at the Naval Academy (1990, '91, somewhere in there). I had no clue who she was or why everyone was being so deferential to this old lady. After her talk (which blew my mind -- I don't remember exactly, but I think it had something to do with the new paradigm of computers networking together and how it was going to change the world), I was invited with a group of others to meet her for a short panel. I declined, I don't remember why, but I'm sure it was something terribly important at the time.

      Then I went and looked her up and cursed myself for being so damned stupid. Her story was inspiring.

      Ah well. At least they named a ship after her.

  26. "Normal programmers"? by heritage727 · · Score: 1

    I am unfamiliar with this concept. Please explain.

  27. Step 1: Be a programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step2: Kill your wife

  28. Fewer female programmers could have been better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks to miss hopper, I still have problems sleeping at night, I sometimes wake up screaming, thinking back about my COBOL classes in college.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper

  29. Really? by visible.frylock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article also shows that among famous programmers, the ratio of males to females is much larger than among normal programmers.

    Really? Seriously?

    Is it still necessary to add the obligatory We Are Not Sexist bit to everything? In other news the ratio of males to females is higher among soldiers, firefighters, police officers, coal miners, and convicted felons.

    Haven't we been over the sexist arguments to death by now? Is there ever going to come a time when we can talk about people without mentioning their gender, ethnicity, skin color, whatever? When we take it as a given that the median man/woman, black/white, Asian/Hispanic are equally as smart/dumb, and we don't have to hide behind PC language?

    --
    Billy Brown rides on. Yolanda Green bypasses Gary White.
    1. Re:Really? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      No. There is a vocal minority in almost every group who will not stop until they feel that they are in control. It is no longer okay to be a white, straight, male, with a religion, a firearm, and an SUV. They preach equality but the real goal is superiority.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically you think minorities have it better than majorities? Go live in Africa, then. You'll have it made.

    3. Re:Really? by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between sexist or racist and people that in general feel superior because of the group they are part of, and general objective observation of the differences without assigning it as an instrument to higher yourself or put others down.

      Plain fact is nature nor evolution has a concept of equality of gender and races. What works in dna-regeneration, works. Plain fact is there are differences, and that you can't dream it away. Most is determined by chance, gender and climate. If you take IQ for example, it's common knowledge that men have a curve with a flatter distribution, and Asians the highest iq on average, and cold is better (you're forced to be inventive). If it makes you feel better, differences are small and decreasing because of better education. And on an individual level, it's an open game. But there are inherent differences, whether you like it in your cultivated view, or not.

    4. Re:Really? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I know you were attempting to be snarky but, yeah... I have enough saved so that I could easily go live in Africa and have it made. By the way? I'm not white. I was commenting on the state of affairs here in the United States of America as I see them.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Really? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I was thinking and I felt my earlier answer wasn't complete.

      No, I don't think that gays, lesbians, religious people, atheists, women, minorities, and such have it easy.

      Warning - the below is NOT politically correct...

      ****************

      I don't think that they have it easy. I think that we've reached the point where there are laws that ensure that they have equal rights. Equal rights does not mean superior rights.

      This is NOT a challenge I recommend you take.

      Go out this weekend and get drunk.

      This weekend you're going to find a man and punch him in the face.

      Come back and let us know what the total of your fine was.

      The following weekend go out and punch a woman in the face.

      I'll see you in three or more months. Come back and tell us that was equal.

      No, no no... I am not advocating punching women in the face. To further the study, go to your local NOW meeting. Complain about the disparity of treatments in the courts. I dare you. Find ONE woman in that group who stands up and says the judge's choice was the wrong one and that you should have been punished equally regardless of the gender of your victim.

      Ask them what they think about a guy who is killed by his wife because he abused her. Ask them what they think about a guy who yells at a wife who cheats on him. (I've dared to do that one, don't... Just don't...)

      Make it varied if you want. Go punch a gay guy in the mouth and then punch an "obviously" straight person.

      Rights protecting a minority group are wrong. Rights apply to all humans. There *should not* be a woman's rights movement. There should not be a gay rights movement. There should not be a black rights movement. They should all have those rights afforded to them by grace of birth. No more, no less. There is racism, sexism, and hate in this world. They don't need rights to support them, they need the laws that were in place (for the most part and certainly in recent years) already to be enforced.

      I want to touch on the subject of gay marriage. Hello? This is one case where they can make a law that says all people who were able to perform marriages legally are now able to perform civil unions. All people, regardless of style, number, or gender can form a civil union. From here on out we'll consider the term "Marriage" as a trademark of the various religious groups who have a claim on it for more than the past fifty years and we'll grant an exemption for them. In other words, a fundie can still have their marriage and a heterosexual couple can still opt for a civil union. By legal definition they will be no more and no less than equal. Any laws covering marriage will also be forced to cover civil unions. Those who can find a tax exempt church (so as to go according to the law) that will perform the ceremony and call it marriage can certainly call it a marriage and any marriage performed to date will still be termed a marriage regardless of gender.

      I mean, WTF, who do we think we are? I don't care if you want to be married to three women and a goat. LET them and let's stop pushing our morals onto people. 18 is a magic number where girls become smart enough to decide who to sleep with? I sure as hell hope not 'cause otherwise I'd have to be having illegal sex 'cause all the women would be too smart to sleep with me. A bunch of people live together and want to raise a family in that environment and can do so effectively? No? That's bigamy? Err... So? I'm not unhappy with the bigamy, I'm friggen JEALOUS.

      Meh...

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      African countries tell the vocal minority to go fuck themselves. Or sometimes they just kill them. America is too civilized to do that.

    7. Re:Really? by visible.frylock · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking about how to reply to this. You're right of course. I guess the best answer I can come up with is that small differences (in IQ, for example) really don't seem to make much difference in the grand scheme. Japanese, for example, seem to be just as susceptible to human nature as anyone. IQ is not wisdom.

      But these small things really weren't what I was trying to get at. In any event, the postulate of equality under the law trumps any differences, or at least it should.

      --
      Billy Brown rides on. Yolanda Green bypasses Gary White.
  30. Fame by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

    Yes, there's a fine measure of your success as a human being.

    Programmers spend far too much time in front of a computer and far too little time in the real world, having real relationships and fixing real problems.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:Fame by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Programmers spend far too much time in front of a computer and far too little time in the real world, having real relationships and fixing real problems.

      So, it's not a "real problem" when someone's life is destroyed by poorly-written software? All right, then.

      To be blunt, you're the one not living in the real world if you think that problems involving computing aren't "real problems".

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    2. Re:Fame by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Programmers spend far too much time in front of a computer and far too little time in the real world, having real relationships and fixing real problems.

      Let me guess, you're one of the people who call it "playing on the computer"?

      Maybe even one of the people who think that technology is the problem and having some vision of a fantastical world of old where people enjoyed a leisurely way of life with little or no worries?

      If any of this is true I'm really surprised that you bother with slashdot.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    3. Re:Fame by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I don't think that I'm a rarity when I say that I have a wife, children, an ex-wife, a disparate group of friends and family that I socialize with on a regular basis, frequent various societal functions, and most generally don't write code for no reason at all but actually code typically because there is a real-world problem.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  31. It's an arbitrary list by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would bet that 95% of Slashdot readers never heard of Alain Colmerauer, for example.

    And the Bard's Tale author is included, but even though the game is well known, he (now she) is not. And there are many, many other well-known games with great programmers behind them who are not on the list.

  32. I for one by MortenMW · · Score: 0

    I for one, welcome our new transexual, programming overlords.

  33. Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by bboxman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This might sound a bit like flame bait -- but I am speaking from the experience of nearly a decade of software/algorithm development. I've known good programmers, great programmers, and bad programmers. Women just don't (usually) fall into that great category.

    This may stem from many factors. For instance, women may not be drawn to computer programming as a hobby as men. Thinking of those that I classify as great -- the vast majority of them knew how to program well before they ever attended any formal setting.

    I've known solid female programmers. But I can't come up with one whom I'd trust to write 10,000 lines of code in a week to come up with a working prototype -- Aren't that many men in that category, but there are a few.

    1. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by Card+Zero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe you that your post was not intended to be flamebait, but I must say it was very frustrating for me (a female programmer) to read. I agree that there are many factors that contribute toward the scarcity of women in programming. But the implication of your post, or perhaps just your title, sends a message that I shouldn't bother trying, because "I'm just not good at it." I don't think this was your intention, but I'd like to point it out as an issue that most, if not all, female programmers are forced to address at least once in our careers.

      One of the most commonly cited reasons for the lack of women pursuing computer-related professions or hobbies (e.g. video games) is that they aren't encouraged--indeed, some say they are actively discouraged--to do so. Has it ever been said of you that you'd likely never be among the best programmers because you are a man? If so, how did it affect the development of your career goals?

      I don't think it's correct to view the computing world as a bunch of men gathered behind locked doors and discussing ways to keep the girls out of their clubhouse, either. But there are certainly prevailing assumptions about the capabilities of wo/men in general that force a lot of women to seriously question why we'd want to work in an environment that doesn't value them as highly as men, simply because we're women and they're men.

      Another example would be a different post in this thread speculating that men were better programmers because they were "wired" to be bigger risk takers (huh?). These arguments, while silly (and probably not ill-intended), still send a message to women that we'll have a harder-than-normal time succeeding in the industry. It's not surprising that many of us choose to try something else instead!

    2. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I believe you that your post was not intended to be flamebait, but I must say it was very frustrating for me (a female programmer) to read.

      Someone relates their experience and you talk about your feeling? You're doing it wrong!

      But the implication of your post, or perhaps just your title, sends a message that I shouldn't bother trying, because "I'm just not good at it." I don't think this was your intention, but I'd like to point it out as an issue that most, if not all, female programmers are forced to address at least once in our careers.

      Can you meet the test he set? I could (maybe), but I haven't had to.

      One of the most commonly cited reasons for the lack of women pursuing computer-related professions or hobbies (e.g. video games) is that they aren't encouraged--indeed, some say they are actively discouraged--to do so.

      If you're so weak willed that you can't deal with people discouraging you from your chosen path, then you won't last too long in it. I was the problem child - my family thought I'd be dead or in jail by 18, so I didn't get much encouragement or support, but look where I ended up - slaving away over hot code.

      Another example would be a different post in this thread speculating that men were better programmers because they were "wired" to be bigger risk takers (huh?). These arguments, while silly (and probably not ill-intended), still send a message to women that we'll have a harder-than-normal time succeeding in the industry. It's not surprising that many of us choose to try something else instead!

      Why is the argument silly? Men used to hunt, while women gathered food and tended to the young. Over 100,000 years or so, this can lead to differences in psychology (which have been confirmed, btw). Who knows, maybe you will have a harder time at it - what you're doing here won't help; you're basically yelling at the guys in charge (such as that exists) to stop being mean instead of stepping up.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by Card+Zero · · Score: 1

      Why is the argument silly? Men used to hunt, while women gathered food and tended to the young. Over 100,000 years or so, this can lead to differences in psychology (which have been confirmed, btw). Who knows, maybe you will have a harder time at it - what you're doing here won't help; you're basically yelling at the guys in charge (such as that exists) to stop being mean instead of stepping up.

      I'm pretty sure I wasn't yelling at anyone to do anything. And while I wouldn't argue your statement about traditional gender roles 100,000 years ago, we're talking about programming, which isn't exactly a "risky" activity or one that requires use of obvious physiological differences between men and women (like muscle density or childbearing hips). In fact, from your "psychological development from prehistoric social roles heavily influences aptitude in industries that have only been around for a few generations" theory, the argument could be made that women are inherently better programmers because of the 100,000 years they spent developing algorithms to test which plants were safe (note the element of risk here as well) to eat. But that probably sounds just as silly to you, eh?

      Putting aside for one moment speculations as to the cause of the scarcity of women in programming, let me ask you this: Do you think that the programming industry would benefit from having a greater percentage of female programmers?

    4. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      In fact, from your "psychological development from prehistoric social roles heavily influences aptitude in industries that have only been around for a few generations" theory

      Who cares how long the industry has existed? The artifacts of our entire ancestry do influence our present behavior.

      the argument could be made that women are inherently better programmers because of the 100,000 years they spent developing algorithms to test which plants were safe (note the element of risk here as well) to eat. But that probably sounds just as silly to you, eh?

      It does - I would expect that most people who gather plants learned how from their parents and seniors, and they generally didn't have to deal with new plants after the first generation.

      let me ask you this: Do you think that the programming industry would benefit from having a greater percentage of female programmers?

      No. But it wouldn't be hurt either.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    5. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by shish · · Score: 1

      Another example would be a different post in this thread speculating that men were better programmers because they were "wired" to be bigger risk takers (huh?)

      Not "men are better", but "men are more extreme, so they tend to end up right at the top (see this list) and right at the bottom (see The Daily WTF)"

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    6. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by access.name · · Score: 1

      I'm a female programmer, and I can write 10.000 lines of code in a week to produce a working prototype. Can you think of any other test you would like to perform to see if i'm a great, good or bad programmer? How do you think the fact that I have a vagina instead of a penis will affect the results?

    7. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by bboxman · · Score: 1

      Your genital parts shouldn't affect the results one iota. A good programmer is evident by examination of the design, code, time to market, and results... No actual need for human interaction.

      I'm relating my own personal experience. Haven't run into a female someone who I'd classify as great (though I'm sure there are some) -- ran into plenty I'd classify as good; but there is a distinction between the two.

    8. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by access.name · · Score: 1

      So, what can we do to see if I fit in the "great" category? Are you willing to run a series of experiments? I mean it! What amount of tests would let you satisfied, so you never again think that women are just worse than men?

    9. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by access.name · · Score: 1

      I believe you that your post was not intended to be flamebait, but I must say it was very frustrating for me (a female programmer) to read.

      Someone relates their experience and you talk about your feeling? You're doing it wrong!

      why?

      But the implication of your post, or perhaps just your title, sends a message that I shouldn't bother trying, because "I'm just not good at it." I don't think this was your intention, but I'd like to point it out as an issue that most, if not all, female programmers are forced to address at least once in our careers.

      Can you meet the test he set? I could (maybe), but I haven't had to.

      I could too.

      One of the most commonly cited reasons for the lack of women pursuing computer-related professions or hobbies (e.g. video games) is that they aren't encouraged--indeed, some say they are actively discouraged--to do so.

      If you're so weak willed that you can't deal with people discouraging you from your chosen path, then you won't last too long in it. I was the problem child - my family thought I'd be dead or in jail by 18, so I didn't get much encouragement or support, but look where I ended up - slaving away over hot code.

      what would you think then, if the entire culture you are surrounded by affirmed you are worse than your colleagues because of X reason, being X you hair color, eye color, gender, food preference or whatever? Would you feel it is correct, after all all the X persons you met are bad programmers too? Or would you argument that the assumption that you are a worse programmer because of X is a fallacy?

      Another example would be a different post in this thread speculating that men were better programmers because they were "wired" to be bigger risk takers (huh?). These arguments, while silly (and probably not ill-intended), still send a message to women that we'll have a harder-than-normal time succeeding in the industry. It's not surprising that many of us choose to try something else instead!

      Why is the argument silly? Men used to hunt, while women gathered food and tended to the young. Over 100,000 years or so, this can lead to differences in psychology (which have been confirmed, btw). Who knows, maybe you will have a harder time at it - what you're doing here won't help; you're basically yelling at the guys in charge (such as that exists) to stop being mean instead of stepping up.

      If women gathered food and tended to the young, wouldn't that make them better at sedentary activities involving the brain? After all, the males were sweating in the jungle running after prey with bows and arrows, no time for thought exercises. I'm willing to step up, I want to know if I'm a worse programmer because of being a female, I really do, if that ever is proven to me I will quit my career and start any other business, why stay in CS and forever be cursed to be mediocre? I want to be good and recognized at what I do! It seems there is little chance of that happening in the CS field.

    10. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      why?

      Because that's just telling people to stop talking about something that makes them uncomfortable. It's polite, but it won't change anything.

      what would you think then, if the entire culture you are surrounded by affirmed you are worse than your colleagues because of X reason, being X you hair color, eye color, gender, food preference or whatever?

      Ignore them. Seriously, do you actually believe that crap? It's fresh from the 1950s ward and june hallucination. Anyway, I had quite a bit of people convinced I wasn't going anywhere and I got past that. I wager that most women who actually make it through high school (which is a pit if you actually can think) will have an easy time of it.

      Oh, and women shouldn't complain about taking verbal abuse from men unless it's more than they give each other. Trying to break into the field and at the same time make it safe and cozy smacks of the sort of people who move to the country and complain that farms smell bad.

      If women gathered food and tended to the young, wouldn't that make them better at sedentary activities involving the brain?

      Dunno, how smart are sheep? Think about your examples.

      After all, the males were sweating in the jungle running after prey with bows and arrows, no time for thought exercises.

      Why sweat when a bit of strategy removes the need? Really, now, warfare is one of the prime drivers for thought and technology.

      I'm willing to step up, I want to know if I'm a worse programmer because of being a female, I really do, if that ever is proven to me I will quit my career and start any other business, why stay in CS and forever be cursed to be mediocre?

      Statistically, the answer is maybe, but it doesn't take much to rise above the average. If you're worried that you'll never be Carmack, join the crowd.

      I want to be good and recognized at what I do!

      So do good things and be recognized.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:Sorry gals, women just ain't that great at it. by bboxman · · Score: 1

      Lets say we run this series of tests -- and you come out as the greatest programmer alive; This wouldn't change my mind. It takes more than one, two, or three exceptions to break a pattern.

  34. To be a great programmer by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    #1 Always do research, analysis, and design before you start coding. If not, do it later so you know how to fix and debug your program.

    #2 You do quality work.

    #3 You give the users what they want and the managers what they want. Customer satisfaction is the key. Everyone effected by the program needs to be happy and that is hard to do sometimes.

    #4 You learn from your mistakes and failures and you try to invent new ways to do things.

    #5 You keep trying even if you fail, you read books you look at articles and forums on the Internet, you search knowledge bases and online documentation.

    #6 If you cannot meet a schedule, you tell the customers that you will add in features later and you are running out of time and need more time but will try to get a quick release now with fewer features and try to get it stable first, and then add more features later.

    #7 You make a gold release where you fix most of the bugs and don't add in extra features until you can get the program stable first. You can add in features later, but the user really wants a program that does not crash too often and needs to save his/her work if there is a crash, so you write crashproof error trapping that saves the session so it can be restored after a crash.

    #8 Invent new ways of doing things.

    #9 License technology and code if you cannot invent new things. Open source projects might have what you need, but you need to pay off the open source programmers for their work first, and then get a fork of their code and use it in your project as they agree to release it from the open source license to your license. That includes open source libraries if the license requires commercial code to buy a license to use in non-open source code. If not license commercial code and libraries instead.

    #10 If all else fails, design a standard that the program or operating system should go by and hope someone else or another company or group can code to that standard. Then license their work and pay them off.

    #11 If you are not using legacy software you can license them to retro computing companies who can use your old version for retro computing hobbyists in exchange for 10% of the profits from sales of the retro program or operating system. It is called OEMing the retro software like Serenity making OS/2 into eComStation or the AROS project turning AmigaOS 3.1 into a new open source OS. You can make money that way as well, always another group or company that will continue on legacy software and retro computing.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  35. Carmack? Torvalds? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Granted, not all of Quake was written by John Carmack, but he is credited with quite a lot he's done by himself. He's got a shadowing trick named after himself, after all -- Carmack's Reverse.

    So, given something like Word or Oracle, it's plausible that the first version, or even the first prototype, was written by exactly one guy. Take Linus Torvalds -- say what you will, but the original Linux was entirely his, complete with 386 support and a multithreaded filesystem (already giving it an edge over Minix).

    Oh, and I doubt any actual paid publicists were used. Seriously, how would that actually work, and how would you justify the expense? I'm sure you were joking, but actually think about this -- for better or worse, these people are famous through word of mouth, among their peers. I'm guessing most have done something worth mentioning to earn that fame.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Carmack? Torvalds? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``say what you will, but the original Linux was entirely his, complete with 386 support and a multithreaded filesystem (already giving it an edge over Minix).''

      *blink* Multithreaded filesystem?? What do you mean?

      Also, as far as giving it an edge over Minix goes, allow me to point out that Minix is a full, Unix-like operating system, whereas Linux is a kernel. I have written kernels all by myself. If I am to write a full, Unix-like operating system, I sure hope I won't have to do it all alone!

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:Carmack? Torvalds? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      *blink* Multithreaded filesystem?? What do you mean?

      Just what I said. Here, further reading:

      http://www.dina.kvl.dk/~abraham/Linus_vs_Tanenbaum.html

      If I had to guess, I would say that a single-threaded filesystem is maybe a step up from Win98, if that. If you remember, reading from a floppy on Win98 would bring the entire system to a crawl, as any disk IO would make the rest of the OS block until it was done.

      I didn't use Minix at the time, but I would guess it was like that, at least for the filesystem itself, if not for the entire OS -- in that, if the filesystem was blocked doing disk IO, all attempts to talk to the filesystem would also be blocked.

      Minix is a full, Unix-like operating system, whereas Linux is a kernel.

      Really? I was under the impression that it used GNU tools to fill in the rest of the system, just like Linux.

      In fact, it's also credited to just one person -- Andy Tanenbaum.

      I could be wrong, though. If so, that would be another point against Minix -- Linux was able to leverage existing, portable tools. Minix was not yet POSIX-compliant at the time, making portability between Minix and anything else a bit harder.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:Carmack? Torvalds? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``> Minix is a full, Unix-like operating system, whereas Linux is a kernel.

      Really? I was under the impression that it used GNU tools to fill in the rest of the system, just like Linux.''

      I could be wrong, but I think that used not to be the case. For example, where many free Unix-like systems use gcc as their compiler, Minix has traditionally used ack - the Amsterdam Compiler Kit, developed by Andrew Tanenbaum and Ceriel Jacobs. I think Minix 3 does use GNU tools, but, again, I could be wrong.

      As for being credited to one person, that may be the case, but I don't think Andy wrote _everything_ by himself. In the version of Minix I used (2.0.something), Ceriel Jacobs is also listed as the author of some things. I know for sure that Minix 3 is developed by others besides Andy.

      ``I could be wrong, though. If so, that would be another point against Minix -- Linux was able to leverage existing, portable tools. Minix was not yet POSIX-compliant at the time, making portability between Minix and anything else a bit harder.''

      IIRC (but, again, I could be wrong - this is not stuff I think about every day), Linus originally used Minix as a development platform for Linux. So that's your "portable tools", then, I guess. :-D Also, the version of Minix 2 I used claimed to be POSIX-compliant, but you should take that with a grain of salt - I think it mostly meant "we've implemented all the required parts, but left out everything else, and taken full advantage of any leeway offered by the spec". As for portability, it is my understanding that Minix originally started out as a clone of Unix Version 6, so I would expect there to be compatibility on that level. At any rate, portability between any two unices was pretty rocky at the time.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    4. Re:Carmack? Torvalds? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Linus originally used Minix as a development platform for Linux.

      Right... What's your point?

      I don't mean to be confrontational there, but I actually don't get it. Linus used Minix to bootstrap Linux development. What does that prove?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  36. "Transexual" programmer??? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    Let me guess, (s)he invented "she-mail".

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:"Transexual" programmer??? by WatcherXP · · Score: 1

      Dani (Danielle) Bunton

      (S)he only made the best multiplayer game EVER!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danielle_Bunten_Berry

      --
      09-f9-11-02-9* (G^GCA_++{>. RV>>>>+++ NO CARRIER
    2. Re:"Transexual" programmer??? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a creative way to increase the female list count; if you don't mind sharp tools down there.
       

  37. Sophie Wilson ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sophie Wilson ?

  38. Discrimination alive and well in... by linzeal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, its more likely discrimination and not only the kind you are thinking about in the workplace. When a venture capitalist walks into a programming shop with his MBA that has taught him to stereotype people as much as possible to fit them into market segments the last thing he wants to see is a female programmer telling him how she is going to change the world. He wants more of the same and a woman doesn't fit into his understanding so he will balk, I have seen them do it repetitively to female engineers to the point of sending junior male colleagues to meet with these folks. VC is a man's game still and they do not like looking across the table at a woman who is more intelligent, has more education and is actually doing something with it while all he does is carry around sacks of money.

    1. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      When a venture capitalist walks into a programming shop with his MBA that has taught him to stereotype people as much as possible to fit them into market segments the last thing he wants to see is a female programmer telling him how she is going to change the world.

      While a pile o' poo-poo. This is wrong on multiple levels.

      First, how much V.C. money did Torvalds take? RMS? ESR? Pike? Ritchie? Kernighan? Hell, how about Gates? Generally speaking, legendary programmers become legendary by *programming*, not by "being made" by some VC.

      Second, you fundamentally misunderstand the role of VC people. They do not create people, they finance people that already created. Either they already have a business that has become successful and they want to take the next step, or they've already had a considerable track record and have enough credibility to get money. In neither of these scenarios does being a woman matter. VCs want to make money. They'd give a monkey ten million if that monkey already had a track record of making money (and they often have, come to think of it).

      Or to put it another way, would Meg Whitman or Carly Fiorina (regardless of what you think of them) have any trouble walking into a VC firm with their big idea and getting some big money? Not at all. Of course, they're not technical people, but the point is that VCs want a return on investment with as little risk as possible.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by myrdred · · Score: 1

      And how does this stop female programmers from becoming famous by making some awesome OSS software?

    3. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS, ESR and Gates are definetly not famous because of their achievements in programming.

    4. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      RMS, ESR and Gates are definetly not famous because of their achievements in programming.

      ESR, I will grant, though he has written some useful tools. RMS, on the other hand, first became famous because of EMACS and GCC. He became *more* famous later on for his "other" activities, but he was originally a programmer. Bill Gates was certainly famous early on because of programming -- he personally wrote the Microsoft BASIC interpreter that was ported to many personal computers of the time (e.g., the TRS-80). That's what made Microsoft their original money. People think Gates has always been some satanic businessman, but no, he was originally a programmer and a very good one, too. [MS/Basic fun fact: it had a built-in editor based on 'vi' that I only realized was 'vi' much later on.]

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      MBA that has taught him to stereotype people as much as possible to fit them into market segments

      That must be an elective class or something. Taking the MBA classes myself I never had that lesson? Actually they teach to try to diverse as much as possible. As having greater diversity increases general team work across the organization and prevents cliques from forming to be so coherient allowing a more open exchange of of information. This open exchange of information helps prevent the old tride and true ways from continuing when the situation has changed and what worked 20 years ago no longer applies.

      Most of this Bad Behavior that slashdot talks about is actually discoraged in MBA Programs. The problem is not the MBA but the individual who decided not to incorprate his teachings into his work.

      If you feel there is sexual discrimation going on there are legal recourses that you can do against the company and the manager.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by pla · · Score: 1

      When a venture capitalist walks into a programming shop with his MBA that has taught him to stereotype people as much as possible to fit them into market segments the last thing he wants to see is a female programmer telling him how she is going to change the world

      Spoken like a true Politically-Correct zombie... Insisting we have a male-heavy list due to discrimination, despite the fact that the dominant categories of paths-to-CS-godhood mentioned in TFA tend to involve either academic funding (with a strong bias in favor of females in domains they tend to shy away from) or "lone-gunman" style projects which require little to no external funding.


      Sorry, Ms Steinem, but put bluntly, men code better than women simply because men problem-solve better than women, and coding boils down to little more than solving big problems by breaking them down into trivial ones. The fact that we see a higher ratio of males among "Famous Programmers" than in the CS world in general nicely illustrates that fact, contrasted against the background of universities desperate to get women in engineering majors (if not for which, you wouldn't see so many women in the general CS population either).


      Which, incidentally, does not mean women can't make excellent coders - TFA mentions several. But sometimes, lopsided numbers actually reflect reality rather than prejudice.

    7. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asked my boss recently how come there were no chicks in our department. I asked because the whole place is a sausage fest. Its kind of hard to meet girls when you don't go anywhere other than work. I figured it would be nice (although I have a feeling it would severely decrease my productivity).

      Anyways, he said that few girls that he hired in the past had very good credentials, however they did not performed as well.

      Now, obviously, he may just had bad luck and he ran into few girls that were not up to par with some of the other guys that got hired there. Or perhaps it is because not as many girls go into CS majors thus the # of gifted girls for the field is lower.

      Either way, I think that male are better suited for CS/EE type of fields. I say this because I've yet to meet a girl who would rather stay at work after hours and try to write a pong game using FPGA than go out to the bar with friends.

      Don't get me wrong, I know some girls that stay after at work, but they just play games or they chat with their friends online. The only reason why they stay at work is because the hardware is better there.

    8. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Uhm, what color is the sky in your world? The overwhelming majority of these famous programmers never had to ask VC people for money. Either they wrote open source code in their spare time, or they worked for a big company, or had scientific grants, or had a partner that did that type of stuff(e.g. Jobs for Woz)

      Seeing discrimination in everything is almost as silly as being discriminatory yourself.

    9. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by access.name · · Score: 1

      First you say "men code better than women simply because men problem-solve better than women" and then you say "which does not mean women can't make excellent coders". So, Which is it? I'm a female programmer and I'm willing to get tested and compared to any male programmer to see if there is any intrinsic difference attributable only to my gender.

      If there is no difference caused only by gender, then there sure exists another cause for the low numbers of women in the field. I don't know what that could be, but an inherent "lesser skill" should be proved first before being used as a valid fact, don't you think?

    10. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by access.name · · Score: 1

      So, when hired for a job position, is it part of the job description to be single and available to date the coworkers? I don't think so. Women and girls should be hired because of their technical skills, the same way the males are hired. But having to choose between two junior programmers equally qualified, one male, the other female, who do you think will be chosen because of prejudices, stereotypes, and just a notion of who will "fit in" the best?

      I'm sure a lot of fresh-out-of-college girls are never given the same opportunities as the males in the same position. And the majority of society just do not believe in females as being capable and equal in this field. Your post is a clear example. Me, I'm beginning to doubt my own capabilities, am I worse than the male programmers? How could I test myself to see? This insecurity is a heavy load in my everyday work life. My motivation (to stay after hours to program a pong in FPGA, for example) suffers because of it too. Why do that, if I'm just an inferior female? I will never get recognition anyway!

      What do we have to do to prove ourselves once and for all?

      Your boss could have bad performance results with male employees too, but I'm sure he didn't group them mentally as "the males", deciding not to hire males anymore. He did that to females though. That is something that happens in the entire culture at all levels.

    11. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by smellotron · · Score: 1

      It's quite reasonable from a pure-logic point of view for the GP to say both "men are better problem solvers" and "women who are good problem solvers exist" without contradicting himself. The truthiness (or not) of his statement is essentially independent from any sort of test that you could take.

      Consider this analogy: Men are taller than women. This is true, on average. However, the average does not apply to a special case: it takes about 2 seconds on a busy street to find a tall woman or a short man (both of whom deviate from the average).

    12. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by pla · · Score: 1

      First you say "men code better than women simply because men problem-solve better than women" and then you say "which does not mean women can't make excellent coders". So, Which is it?

      I can also say (and doubt you or anyone else would disagree) that "men can bench-press more than women (on average)", but have no doubt that the top women weight lifters could put me to shame by comparison.

      I'll apologize for not qualifying my generalization as such (I considered it an obvious generalization, but accept my omission), but as a generalization, I stand by what I said.



      I'm a female programmer and I'm willing to get tested and compared to any male programmer to see if there is any intrinsic difference attributable only to my gender.

      And you may well have the skill to out-code 99% of the field. I'll even accept that, conceivably, you (or any individual, of either gender) could possibly outcode everyone else on the planet. But that still doesn't change the generalization.

    13. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by access.name · · Score: 1

      It's quite reasonable from a pure-logic point of view for the GP to say both "men are better problem solvers" and "women who are good problem solvers exist" without contradicting himself. The truthiness (or not) of his statement is essentially independent from any sort of test that you could take. Consider this analogy: Men are taller than women. This is true, on average. However, the average does not apply to a special case: it takes about 2 seconds on a busy street to find a tall woman or a short man (both of whom deviate from the average).

      Ok, I can see that the logic is correct. But following your analogy, my question is: Are men really taller than women? Why do males affirm that? How can that be proven or disproven?

    14. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by access.name · · Score: 1

      I can also say (and doubt you or anyone else would disagree) that "men can bench-press more than women (on average)", but have no doubt that the top women weight lifters could put me to shame by comparison. I'll apologize for not qualifying my generalization as such (I considered it an obvious generalization, but accept my omission), but as a generalization, I stand by what I said.

      But why? What data do you use to make that generalization? (I mean the "men are better programmers than women" generalization).

      I make the following statement: "men are no better programmers than women, they are equal" and I stand by what I say too. Who is right? Who is wrong? How can we get to a conclusion without a scientific test?

      At least I hope that my comments open a little your mind and the mind of other readers, and that no one takes me as "an exception to the rule" but just a normal woman that can program as well as any male, like any woman could do. (Sorry for any english mistakes, english is not my native language)

    15. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, spelling wasn't a requirement in your MBA program. The word is tried.

    16. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by smellotron · · Score: 1
      Here's a little table of adult heights around the world. It's pretty easy to measure height. But as to measuring intelligence or problem-solving skills? I know of no such test. I've seen some experiments where other attributes were measured, giving some more specific differences. The results were something like this:
      • Men are better at spatial awareness (depth perception and local navigation
      • Women are better at attention to detail (identifying objects in a scene a la Kim's Game and correctly interpreting mood from facial expressions

      Sorry, I don't have a source for that... it was on Discovery Channel years ago. In any case, it's silly to try to measure something as vague as "problem-solving ability"; it's equally silly to assume that men and women are identical on the inside. The middle ground keeps moving as social research continues.

    17. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Men's and women's brains are different.

      Men consistently out-test women in spatial tasks and pattern matching (IIRC). Women consistently out-test men in language and a bunch of other useless stuff ;-) Which skills are most needed by programmers?

      The difference between the average numbers for both groups is MUCH MUCH less then the standard deviation. Even though women are worse on average, using that as any sort of guide for individuals is foolish. You can expect that women that wind up in a 'sausage fest' field are genuinely interested. Men are just as likely to be chasing four years pasts starting salary number as to have a real interest. Women who actually work as programmers might be better then men who actually work as programmers due to selection bias even though women in general are worse. YMMV

      Men also consistently show a higher standard deviation then women on intelligence tests. We have more geniuses and more morons. Any field the requires near genius level abilities can be expected to over represent men.

      Interestingly women keep up with men in math achievement tests until puberty. Then the women fall flat. Ether estrogen is an anti-math hormone or girls figure out that they can get boys to do the hard work for them about the time they grow tits (I favor the latter theory).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't deny there's probably sexual discrimination going on, but I think your mechanism is wrong. How many of these programmers took VC money?

      Finger, APL, LaTeX, Brainfuck, Logo, Dijkstra's algorithm, gdb? I'm not seeing a lot of money flowing here. This is about fame, not riches.

      (Er, unless you mean Viet Cong. 'Nam was definitely a "man's game".)

    19. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say this because I've yet to meet a girl who would rather stay at work after hours and try to write a pong game using FPGA than go out to the bar with friends.

      Sounds like Jeri Ellsworth.

      The previous place I worked, we had something like 25% female programmers. Some of them quite good too (not all of the male programmers were equally good either).

    20. Re:Discrimination alive and well in... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      How can we get to a conclusion without a scientific test?

      Well, we could always look at the ~200 greatest programmers and ... oh wait. Never mind.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  39. Famous? You keep using that word... by clickety6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Famous?

    You keep using that word.

    I do not think it means what you think it means.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  40. Re:How many famous female programmers can you name by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

    Wasn't one of the very early third-generation programming languages designed by a woman? I can't remember which language, though...
    COBOL, Admiral Grace Hopper.

  41. error margin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Acording to the description of the article, the sample was 200 progrmammers. In the article, 0.45% are transexuals, i.e. 0.9 subjects. I guess this includes the margin of error?

  42. Bardolf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm missing rate how many famous programmers are/were killers/murderers ;-)

    1. Re:Bardolf by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      I'm missing rate how many famous programmers are/were killers/murderers ;-)

      Well, at the time of the article's posting, Hans Reiser wasn't on the Wikipedia page that they used as a source. Now he is. Most likely, the article will go back and forth until it gets locked one way or the other.

      If you simply must cite a Wikipedia article, especially one that deals with something as relative as "fame", include a timestamp.

  43. 5 1/2 women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    222 famous programmers
    2.48% % women
    -----
    5.50 are women. I wonder if that is how they got the 1 person who is transsexual?

    1. Re:5 1/2 women by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      No, the 0.5 was because they counted a husband/wife team as 0.5 in both the "men" and "women" categories.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  44. The Mule by syntek · · Score: 1

    0.45% of famous programmers are transsexuals. Which 1% would be 2 out of 200 and .50% would be 1. So part of 1 programmer who is famous is transsexual. Also I find it funny that it's Danielle Bunten Barry and she is known for the M.U.L.E. multiplayer video game written in 1983. A Mule being a sterile species (most of the time.)

  45. Relational languages by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    If somebody is looking for a way to introduce a new programming language, the niche of relational languages is comparatively open. While there are thousands of "regular" languages, there are only a handful of known competitors to SQL. (I've proposed one myself, by the way, called SMEQL.) SQL has grown a bit long in the tooth and is due for competition.

  46. What it doesn't answer by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    is whether becoming a famous programmer will get you laid.

  47. Re:How many famous female programmers can you name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >You know, I never thought about this before, but off the top of my head I'm having a hard time thinking of *any* famous female programmers...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radia_Perlman

  48. Horrible by T.E.D. · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TFA spends a lot of time talking about how few women there are on the list, without digging any deeper than that. I find that verging on morally reprehensible.

    Looking into it myself, I see he used the list here as his starting basis, with only a few changes. The problem I have with that list is that it includes oodles of people who I've never heard of. Since I've been a professional software developer for 20 years, and an ameteur for 10 years before that, I think in my case "people with names I recognize" is a good filter for famous. Also lots of people are named who became famous more for starting companies than for their own programming. For example, Bill Gates and Paul Allen did write a Basic interpreter once upon a time, but its running Microsoft they are famous for. Talking about way less women starting software companies should be an entirely different discussion.

    I think I can make a much shorter and better list. YMMV of course:

    • Alfred Aho
    • Marc Andreessen (mosly famous for his company, but I know his name from the Mosaic days
    • John Backus
    • Tim Berners-Lee
    • Dan/Dani Buten (as mentioned previously, male when I first heard of him, transgendered later)
    • John Carmack
    • Vint Cerf
    • Alan Cox
    • Ward Christensen (I was a big BBSer back in the day)
    • Ward Cunningham
    • Edsger Dijkstra
    • James Gosling
    • C. A. R. Hoare
    • Grace Hopper
    • Miguel de Icaza
    • Brian Kernighan
    • Donald Knuth
    • Ada Lovelace
    • Bertrand Meyer
    • Jeff Minter
    • John Ousterhout
    • Eric Raymond
    • Dennis Ritchie
    • John Romero
    • Guido van Rossum
    • Richard Stallman (debateable, as FSF, not emacs, is probably why I know his name)
    • Bjarne Stroustrup
    • Andrew Tanenbaum
    • Ken Thompson
    • Linus Torvalds
    • Larry Wall
    • Roberta Williams (TFA Author only counts her as 1/2. WTF?)
    • Ken Williams
    • Niklaus Wirth
    • Phil Zimmerman

    Just to avoid the argument thread, if there was a name on the list that I didn't include, its either because I didn't recognize the name without reading the description, or because I know them for their business activites (or in one case, for his *hardware* development), not their software development.
    With my pared-down list, that's now 3.5 out of 35, or %10 female. There would probably be more if I made up the list entirely myself, but its tough for one person to judge "fame" all by himself.

    Still this is much closer to what has been the actual historical percentage of participation of women in the industry, (and remember, "fame" would be a lagging indicator). So I don't think they are really fareing that badly in the fame department. Its getting them into the industry we are really having trouble with.

    1. Re:Horrible by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      So you came up with a different list than the wikipedia entry, and somehow yours is more authoritative? Also, is it any less morally reprehensible to comment on the surprisingly large number of female programmers on your list without digging deeper?

      So let me do some digging into your list, or your methodology. You took Bill Gates and Paul Allen off, because they're famous for their business rather than their programming. Maybe so, but Bill at least _was_ arguably famous as a programmer before Microsoft made him a household name. (MS-Basic was the de-facto standard on many platforms.) Also, based on that criterion, I'd yank Eric Raymond off the list--is he really that well known for fetchmail, or for being an open-source gun-nut self-important greaseball zealot?

      Also, Bill Joy is off of your list, which I find odd. Bill is not just known for writing vi (yes, and Java), but is more tightly associated with this project than almost anyone on the list. K&R=C. R&T=Unix. Linus Torvalds=Linux. Bill Joy=vi. For everyone else, the connection is somewhat more vague, even if they're recognised. (OK, maybe Phil Zimmerman=pgp is a tight connection, but how many people who recognise Don Knuth's name instantly tie him to TeX? Not more than half, I'll bet.)

      None of which addresses women in computing of course, but does point out that I can claim that your list is every bit as questionable as the Wikipedia one. (Both of which are missing Jay Miner and Kathleen O'Brian, incidentally.)

      I think the real mistake here is to seriously consider an article that plays fast-and-loose with statistics applied to an arbitrary and unvetted list.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Horrible by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      So you came up with a different list than the wikipedia entry, and somehow yours is more authoritative?

      My list isn't entirely different, its a subset. I wasn't trying to come up with a new list, just make the one he used better. I don't believe I tried to sell it as "authoratative" either. That's what YMMV is there for. You could probably do exactly what I did and come up with a similar but different subset. Your list would almost certianly be better than the original too.

      The reasons I gave for leaving people off actually apply to everyone you mentioned. For example, I only know Bill Joy's name because of Sun. Perhaps you are different, but I suspect some of the names I know you don't, and the effect would even out.

      A special note about Jay Miner: it actually did pain me to not throw him on there. He's on my personal heroes list right under Alan Turing (how in the Hell is he not on that page?) However, then it wouldn't have been a subset. As you correctly pointed out, I'm not exactly proving anything by just throwing up a list made up entirely out of my own head. Perhaps the correct way to solve that problem is to add what we consider the "missing names" to the original wiki page, no?

    3. Re:Horrible by dkf · · Score: 1

      Alan Turing (how in the Hell is he not on that page?)

      Turing was not a programmer. If the list had been of famous computer scientists (or possibly even mathematicians) then he'd have been in there for sure.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    4. Re:Horrible by grokcode · · Score: 1

      TFA spends a lot of time talking about how few women there are on the list, without digging any deeper than that. I find that verging on morally reprehensible.

      Actually, only a third of the article talks about the men vs. women thing. And it certainly wasn't my intention to do anything morally reprehensible.

      Looking into it myself, I see he used the list here as his starting basis, with only a few changes. The problem I have with that list is that it includes oodles of people who I've never heard of. Since I've been a professional software developer for 20 years, and an ameteur for 10 years before that, I think in my case "people with names I recognize" is a good filter for famous.

      I won't argue that using Wikipedia's list is the best possible source for famous programmers, but it was the best I could come up with at the time. If someone comes up with a better, quantifiable way to decide who is famous I would be happy to use it when / if I write a follow-up article.

      Theoretically, you can't get a Wikipedia page without being "notable" and having your name mentioned in print media. This is definitely a condition for being a "famous programmer", although certainly not a sufficient one.

      And I would argue that "people with names recognized by X," where X is any single person, is a bit silly to use a filter. Perhaps taking a bunch of programmers, asking them who is famous, and then choosing people on multiple lists is a better criteria, but this is essentially what the Wikipedia page does anyway. I will be the first to admit that Wikipedia is a dubious resource, but it does at least have the advantage that the end result is the opinion of many people.

      As a side note there have already been comments on the article from people who want to add themselves to the Wikipedia list, and the Wikipedia page has had around 40 edits since it was slashdoted. I believe the version used for the article was this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_programmers&oldid=223902373

    5. Re:Horrible by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Turing was not a programmer. If the list had been of famous computer scientists (or possibly even mathematicians) then he'd have been in there for sure.

      That's arguably true in a very narrow sense. However, he invented the modern concept of an algorithm, and showed how to implement them with simple machines. Most of us would call implementing an algorithm on machines "programming". However, these were always theoretical implementations. You could argue it either way I suppose, but if Ada Lovelace belongs on there, Alan Turing does as well.

  49. The Wikipedia list is badly flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't even list Steven Falken.

  50. Slashdot by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

    Where is posting on slashdot in the list of activities that lead to fame?

    --
    Stop! Dremel time!
  51. the word "computer" once meant female programmer by peter303 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was reading in Physics Today about a 19th century female astronmer at one of the New England observator who used to be a "computer" or clerk than measured telescopic photo plates. She discovered an asteroid, devrived a version of the Hersprung-Ressuel star evolution table, etc. Other "computers" derived the books of algorithms, ballistic trajectories, etc. These were used well into World War II and the early day of vacuum-tube computers. Then they wired the computer gates like telephone operators to implement calculations. Richard Feynman talks about a room of female computer clerks who tediously executed a finite differnce calculation to predict atom bomb effects.

  52. IANAFP by tedhiltonhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    And now we have a new disclaimer: IANAFP

  53. The best way to become a programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After many minutes of intense Research, I have found the Equation of being a great programmer. (also, to use this list, you must pay me, for it is patented!)

    1) Live at Parents House

    2) Have at least one pet named 'Zelda'

    3) Drink losts of Mountain Dew / Coffee

    4) Dont have a girlfriend (of course everyone knows that programmers dont, but I figured I would include this one)

    5) ????

    6) Subscribe to Slashdot

    7) Only eat food that comes in cellophane bags (i.e. Doritos)

    8) Play lots of WoW

    9) Dont play with yourself (no distractions)

    10) Learn VBS

    finally) PROFIT!

    This worked for me, and many others.

    Now it might take a few days, and even more bags of Doritos, But That dude from grandma's Boy WILL call and ask you to help on the next Eternal Death Slayer!

  54. Chicks caint code! If one coulds, she be a he !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It just caint be that a chick be a coder. Theys not smart enuf. Take a walk on da wild side is da only ways !!

  55. "Famous" not "Good" Programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody wants to be a 'Icon', not a hero

  56. Slow news day? by micromuncher · · Score: 1

    C'mon. Seriously. Great programmers know they are. They don't need to be on a wiki page. Besides fame doesnt equate to great. Putting together a list, if you don't mind the hypocrisy of the following list, is just pandering to
    1) narcicists
    2) sophists
    3) egotists
    4) braggarts
    5) snake oil salesmen
    6) shameless self promoters
    7) groupies

    Or does fame mean infamy, in which case I can see why a few of those names are on the list.

    "Fame does not make one great." (In Yoda voice.)

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
    1. Re:Slow news day? by trouser · · Score: 1

      "Great fame does not one make." (In Yoda voice.)

      --
      Now wash your hands.
  57. Well, this IS slashdot... by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

    Haven't we been over the sexist arguments to death by now

    Because mentioning sexism, drm, or evolution automatically gets your article 800+ comments.

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  58. Hans Reiser comes to mind by swschrad · · Score: 1

    potentially reduced the number of female programmers by one. ended up with a divide-by-zero-brains error and is chained in the sandbox.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  59. For those people who haven't heard of Ada before, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm certain you're all wondering "is that the girl that had sex with that dog, and did all those hardcore oldy sex movies?"

    Survey says...dog knot in the ass!

  60. Simple by Timedout · · Score: 1

    So... The easy way to be a famous programmer is to be a woman?

  61. Grace Hopper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't get much more famous than this... at least for programming.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper

  62. Bob Long by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    I'd like to cite the late Bob Long, one of the heroes of the second-generation computing world and an old friend of mine, a true utter geek and the guy who introduced me to computers at SDS back in the late 60's. Bob was a radio/hardware engineer who moved into computers. Among the things that made him famous (rather locally, I think -- we all knew of him in Los Angeles) was (0) the first infinite-precision arithmetic program that ran on a discrete-transistor machine (SDS 930) which ran in base 2 to base 32 without rounding errors, (1) the LGP-30 programmer who discovered you could save an instruction by throwing two digits at the Flexowriter simultaneously because they would add in the mechanical type box, (2) that if you put an AM radio and moved it to "5.4" and put it on top of the M register in a 930 you could hear the progress of your Fortran compile ("ah yes, it's sorting its symbol table now. I could write a better sort than that" (he subsequently did, and patched the compiler)), (3) who calculated - by hand - 9E81 so he could check his arithmetic program, and did it three times to check his calcs, and (4) that the mean distance a 1953 Buick Roadmaster can travel is 2.5 miles, tumbling, when launched off the steam catapult of the USN Carrier "Onslow" into the wind on an up wave. This post is without new line whitespace in his honour. Ok, maybe he wasn't famous. But I'm hoping he is, a little, now -- I'd be hard pressed to fill in all the [citation needed]'s if I tried to post him in Wikipedia.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  63. How about the ratio of blacks to whites? by access.name · · Score: 1

    Let the sexist distinction die, please. I'm a normal woman (not an exception to the rule) and I'm a programmer as good as any male programmer.

    Female programmers are as capable as male programmers.

    If you think differently, please evaluate why you think that way. Most likely, it's a stereotype you have in your head. That stereotype in thousands of heads (both male and female) is what caused the fewer number of women in the CS/IT field.

    1. Re:How about the ratio of blacks to whites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a normal woman (not an exception to the rule) and I'm a programmer as good as any male programmer.

      If you're so fucking amazing, why aren't you on the list?

      I'll tell you why: despite your ridiculous claim that you're "as good as any male programmer" (which includes all the famous male programmers on the list, BTW, and "normal" women – and "normal" men for that matter – don't make that grade), you're not really that great.

      You're not great until you accomplish something. Go accomplish something, make a name for yourself, and then we can talk about how great you are. Nobody's stopping you.

  64. A Bug becomes a Rolls Royce with a hood and trunk? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I've got a Rolls-Royce to sell you for only $50,000.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  65. HeShe or It. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Even Garrison figured this out.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  66. Most significant inventions by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

    But, most people don't know who he was, and a lot who could vaguely identify him as an inventor still think of him more as Rotwang in Fritz lang's Metropolis than as THE person who made things such as the New York power grid possible.

    Unfortunately, Tesla was his own worst enemy. He gave control over his patents to Westinghouse who proceeded to screw him leaving him to eventually die in poverty.

    Out of significant inventions that have changed human history, the only two that even come close to delivering electricity over a long distance are Guttenberg and the printing press and Hammurabi who invented modern society.

    Truly it is sad that he is relatively unknown. Everybody knows Edison invented the light bulb, few know where the light comes from.