Slashdot Mirror


Virtual Fence Could Modernize the Old West

Hugh Pickens writes "For more than a century, ranchers in the West have kept cattle in place with fences of barbed wire, split wood and, more recently, electrified wires. Now, animal science researchers with the Department of Agriculture are working on a system that will allow cowboys to herd their cattle remotely via radio by singing commands and whispering into their ears and tracking movements by satellite and computer. A video of Dean Anderson, a researcher at the USDA's Jornada Experimental Range at Las Cruces, NM., shows how he has built radios that attach to an animal's head that allow a person at the other end to issue a range of commands — gentle singing, sharp commands, or a buzz like a bee or snake — to get the cattle to move where one wants them to. Anderson says it would cost $900 today to put a radio device on one head of cattle, but he says costs will fall and the entire herd wouldn't have to be outfitted, just the 'leaders.' Much of the research has focused on how cattlemen can identify which cattle in their herds are the ones that the others follow."

216 comments

  1. Re-adapted Tech by slifox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "working on a system that will allow cowboys to herd their cattle remotely via radio by singing commands and whispering into their ears and tracking movements by satellite and computer"

    Looks like they're finally re-adapting that technology once reserved only for our most esteemed government leaders ;)

    The animal trials usually come before the human trials -- but I don't know if I'd consider any of our current heads of state still "human" ...

    1. Re:Re-adapted Tech by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      Congressmen==cattle. That's cute.

      Even when you whisper in their ear, they don't listen. I heard my Congressman say he had 80-to-1 calls telling him to say "no" to the bailout. Well he listened the first time, but ignored the voters on the second time, and passed the bill with a yes vote.

      Considering the DOW just dropped ~500 points, back to 2003 levels, maybe the Congressman should have listened to his people. They knew the bailout wouldn't do diddly-squat.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    2. Re:Re-adapted Tech by hachete · · Score: 1

      that sound in your ear is your nurse telling you the joke has gone way over your head.

      also, who modded the op insightful? He's clearly referring to Bush ...

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    3. Re:Re-adapted Tech by AigariusDebian · · Score: 1

      Nah, to be applicable to humans it needs ... MORE COWBELL!

  2. This sounds laughably impractical by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used to work with cattle on my uncle's farm when I was a kid. They are dumb animals. They do dumb things. Anytime you try to move them, they do all kinds of stupid shit. I've seen them get "trapped" in fencing, in ditches, even in bushes and trees. So, here we have a system, which costs $900 for every cow it's put on (and that "just put it on the leaders" line sounds like wishful thinking to me). If it has some sort of mechanical malfunction or loses signal in some mountain pass, you could lose a lot of cattle. If you move the cattle and some of them get trapped in a ditch/underbursh/etc., you could lose a lot of cattle (since no actual person will be there to see it and help them). And if the cows simply ignore or get confused by the signal you're sending them, you could lose a lot of cattle. And every cow lost is a lot of money lost.

    Basically, this seems to me like a very high tech, expensive way to so something that's much more effectively and economically done the old-fashioned way. Ranch-hands are relatively cheap, smart, and effective. And handful of good cowboys can move a surprisingly large herd.

    This new system, by contrast, sounds unreliable, dumb, and VERY expensive. When you're talking huge herds, $900 a head is a LOT of money. Even $900 a "leader" is a LOT of money. Certainly, its tracking function would be useful to keep an eye on the herd (but I think they already have those sorts of systems already). But the idea that you can move cattle remotely with the push of a button, with no actual cowboys on hand, seems to me like the dream of someone who has never actually worked with the smelly, stupid things.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by magarity · · Score: 5, Funny

      You've taken it way too seriously - in reality, the whole 'cattle herd' thing is an allegory for political parties. Read it again and it'll make sense this time.

    2. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I used to work with cattle on my uncle's farm when I was a kid. They are dumb animals. They do dumb things."

      You don't watch South Park do you? If you did, you'd know they are the smartest animals on the planet!

    3. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, as someone forced to labor around these animals, I second your dubiousness. I have stared into the void that is the eye of a bovine creature and the void also stared back.

      From trying to help one get untangled from a barbed wire fence to watching one fry itself on an electrified fence to watching one stare confoundedly as a vehicle killed it at 55 mph to ... did I mention you can't lead them down a set of stairs?

      Well, now stealing the cattle is not only going to be easier but there's going to be bonus cattle where not only do you get the $800-$1000 a head but you also get a $900 device!

      --
      My work here is dung.
    4. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by elrous0 · · Score: 0

      Apparently, the aliens are so threatened by cattle that they kill and mutilate them. They must not see us as nearly that much of a threat. We just get anal probes.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Perhaps. But you sound like a whole lot of people whose jobs have since been replaced by automation.

      Seriously.

      For example, it was once said that vinyl-cutting CAD/CAM systems would never replace the journeyman sign painter (yes, signs used to be painted by hand!). You could NEVER do all the stuff that a guy with a brush and some paint could do.

      Yet, today, you pretty much can. There are very few people left who actually know how to layout and paint a sign by hand like an old pro. Most sign companies don't even have a hand lettering person on staff anymore.

      This might be in its infancy, but it is possible -- even likely -- that one day, something along these lines might actually be made to work well enough to replace experienced ranch hands.

      If a rancher can even eliminate the need for 1 or 2 ranch hands with this technology, in the long-run, he'll save himself a bundle of money.

    6. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if all the breeding that was done to get the best cuts of meat didn't bother to check if the offspring were dumber than their predecessors.

    7. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not saying it's impossible for a system to one day replace cowboys, just that *this* almost certainly isn't that system. Some things are not only hard to automate, but largely impractical (which is why farmers still hire humans for such tasks as fruit-picking, harvesting lettuce, etc. even though it should be theoretically possible to automate the process).

      And if you think ranch-hands make a huge "bundle of money" compared to what it would cost to outfit and maintain a herd full of transmitters at $900 a head, you are WAY out of touch with how much ranch-hands make.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      My uncle use to say that that the dumber the cow, the more milk it produced.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      There are very few people left who actually know how to layout and paint a sign by hand like an old pro.

      Lots of Brazilians disagree :-) Last time I was in Brazil for my work, the whole city was full of hand-painted signs. It was actually very nice to see, and often done very professionally.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    10. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Great...so now..instead of cattle rustlers, you're gonna have cattle hackers???

      Man..that is seriously going to fuck with good western movies from now on. How do you string up the rustler/hacker when the bad guy is in Russia, and you're in TX somewhere?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And if you think ranch-hands make a huge "bundle of money" compared to what it would cost to outfit and maintain a herd full of transmitters at $900 a head, you are WAY out of touch with how much ranch-hands make.

      Notice I said "in the long run". At first, a rancher might start with outfitting the 'leaders' amd try the tech out. Or they might try it on some small herd on a contained plot of land, or something like that. I don't know much about ranching, honestly. But what I am saying is that that's kind of how things got started in the sign industry -- the CAD/CAM systems that came out at first really couldn't replace a sign painter. And they were expensive. It cost the annual salary of like 3-4 journeyman sign painters just to buy one machine.

      But as the tech got better and economies of scale kicked in, you can by a machine complete with software that can power a small sign shop run by a single person for about a couple of grand. Less if you buy used.

      So they'd start out with little projects here and there, and slowly but surely everything got automated more and more and more. To the point that these days, there are no more sign painters.

      Sign painters figured they'd never get replaced by automation because they had a skill, and there was no way to automate that.

      But I'm telling you, even if it isn't *this* tech, a radio-powered *something*, probably combined with other tech, will likely be used to herd cattle around someday.

      So people going around emphatically denying that this profession or that profession is 'safe' from automation are most likely wrong, in the grand scheme of things.

    12. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Talderas · · Score: 1

      There's a fundamental difference between painting a sign and herding cattle. One deals with an inanimate object, the other deals a stupid living creature.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    13. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While your reasoning seems sound, it fails in real life. I have worked in the telcomms industry for some time and have personally witnessed the use of pagers in waterproof wrappings, taped to a collar around a couple of cows, for the express purpose of telling them when it is milking time. Inside of 2 weeks the cows were reliably answering the pager call. Given the right motivation, even dumb cows can be convinced to do the 'right thing' most of the time. Using some technology to reduce the amount of manpower required to convince them is nothing but good.

      Pagers, BTW, would not cost $900 per cow, and empirical evidence suggests that only the lead cows really need the pager around their necks.

    14. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by socsoc · · Score: 1

      You have an interesting point, but having precision in sign making via CAD/CAM isn't really the same as introducing technology devices to herd leaders.

      Cattle don't require that level of precision and my limited experience at friends' ranches has shown me that they truly are dumb animals.
      My favorite question was "Why do you have fences around that sinkhole?" "Cause they'll walk into it and fall to their death"
      No wonder painted cattle guards on roads work...

    15. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      The difference is one was dealing with paint (inanimate substance) one is dealing with cows (dumb animals), anything dealing with inanimate objects is relatively easy and cheap to automate, anything dealing with animate objects (or irregular objects) is difficult and expensive to automate

      Farm hands, fruit pickers, etc. are cheap, the machine that can do their job is unreliable and expensive - come back when the machine is cheaper and as reliable as a farm hand and I will get my AI computer to hire the robotic cowboy ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    16. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I own a small herd of goats and compete in herding trials with my border collie. One man and a good dog or two can move stock very effectively.

      As for this tech. replacing fencing, I don't think just effecting leaders will stop a other individuals from crossing over to the "greener grass". Even sheep known for tight flocking, would spread out if no pressure is being applied to the whole herd.

      The basically sounds like "GPS based invisible fence". I don't think you can extrapolate that most stock can learn like a dog.

    17. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Swizec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only professions safe from automation are programming and different kinds of designing. At least until we get creative computers, but that's not very likely in the foreseeable future.

    18. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by ijakings · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like all hacker movies, invent some tech that would make absolutely no sense even if it were possible throw in alot of buzzwords about TCP encryption and some stuff your just making up.

      Sounds like a winner to me.

    19. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by RMH101 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, those we outsource instead.

    20. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Of course. Dumb cows can never remember if they've been milked or not, so they just keep on producing milk, just in case.

    21. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      I think we're going about this all wrong. We're trying to mechanize nature.

      What we should be doing is making the cows' nature more convenient, rather than trying to control it.

      We should genetically modify cows so that they don't have legs or organs. They should just be growing pieces of meat that don't move. Then we should fill up skyscrapers with them!

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    22. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen them get "trapped" in fencing, in ditches, even in bushes and trees.

      How does a cow climb on to a tree and get stuck there. You sure, you're not mixing up your ,"cat", story with the ,"cow", story?

    23. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by camelrider · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't see a lot of cattle since I moved to Alaska, but years ago I grew up among a lot of them. Dairy cattle fifty years ago surely didn't need a pager to tell them when to come in to be milked! They were there without fail twice a day, most of them even entering the barn and poking their heads into their accustomed stantion.

      If an individual didn't show up on time, you'd better go find what's the matter with her.

    24. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Replace "cattle" with "tour group" and it also makes more sense.

      I look forward to idea of cattle out roaming the pastures while having smooth jazz broadcast to them.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    25. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by JustOK · · Score: 1

      How does a cow climb on to a tree and get stuck there. You sure, you're not mixing up your ,"cat", story with the ,"cow", story?

      It was the cow that tried to jump over the moon. The landing was a bit off.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    26. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... did I mention you can't lead them down a set of stairs?

      Wait...so the cows...they're Daleks?

    27. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have stared into the void that is the eye of a bovine creature and the void also stared back.

      That sounds like my last trip to McDonalds. It's bovines serving bovines to bovines. Bovines all the way down.

    28. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by mysticgoat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please re-read the the posts you are responding to and pay attention to the content.

      Persons with expertise on the ground in handling cattle are saying that moving the herd is only one component of the job, and one of the less difficult components, at that. Protecting the animals from external threats and from their internal inabilities to cope with common environmental traps are economic necessities.

      Until there is a remote way of intervening when a cow worth several hundred dollars gets itself crosswise to a barbed wire fence, being able to remotely direct the herd offers no benefits. These parts of the job will require a sophisticated all terrain robot capable of identifying a cow in trouble, immobilizing the large animal without hurting it, cutting and repairing barbed wire, delivering an antitetanus jab, and so on. And then you might as well save a bunch of money on the cowhead radio receivers by just putting a loudspeaker system in the robot.

      Yeah, at some point technology might replace the cowboy and his horse, but radiohead cows are not going to do it. And robotics has a long ways to go before a person who knows how to safely immobilize a ton of living hamburger with a few feet of rope is in danger of losing his job.

      To put this in perspective: a little before Fulton figured out how to make a steam engine small enough to fit inside a boat, there were some persons that history has forgotten who were experimenting with steam powered bicycles. Radiohead cows sound an awful lot like steam powered bicycles. The developers might be shooting their arrows more or less in the right direction, but unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any actual target anywhere near where their arrows are going.

    29. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 4, Funny

      did I mention you can't lead them down a set of stairs?

      If I had a dime for every time I hid a cow in my bedroom...

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    30. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Dumb animals. You said it right there. Think about it. If we can heard a bunch of supposedly intelligent human beings just by putting up those 'Tense-A-Barrier' things, we can't be that far off from hearding dumb animals. ;)

    31. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Talderas · · Score: 1

      In a tree doesn't mean up in a tree, a cow could try passing between two trees that are a bit too close together for it to fit through and it gets stuck.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    32. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Or make the cows smarter? No, nix that. They'd start to fight back as soon as they saw a hamburger.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    33. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      We already have radio control for the mass flocks of humans, coupled with buzzing bee sounds, 'singing', and harshly spoken orders.
       
      I take it you've never watched Thoth on 'America's Got Talent'?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    34. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Fishead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think part of the problem isn't just the dumb cow (we had a hobby farm when I was a kid), it is the rugged terrain.

      If you REALLY wanted to automate your cattle herding process, a good first step would be to flatten your land. Take out all those dangerous canyons, trees, fallen logs, boulders, and gopher holes. If your acreage is in Saskatchewan, most of the work is done for you if it is in the Peace River BC area, a bit more work. Here you might want to employ an army of robots with shovels and dynamite.

      I say just hire a couple mexicans. Trying to automate everything is stupid. And yes, I am an automation technician presently building an automated mouse trap in my basement.

    35. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Hey if they're stupid enough they might even be happy to be eaten.

      Is there anything unethical or immoral about eating a cow that wants to be eaten?

      --
    36. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just as a note, the dairyman that I had to deal with wanted to mod the pager for louder beeps and longer battery life. He had enough cows to overwhelm his milking barn and took them in turns from different fields. The pagers made a huge difference for him. We did the mods - encased it in a 'waterproof' project case, ran battery and speaker connections external from the pager, and all was good. He got about 1 month battery life and effective management of the cows at milking time. I extended my trip to watch the cows come in for milking several times. One of the many odd stories I've collected over the years.

    37. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...But the idea that you can move cattle remotely with the push of a button, with no actual cowboys on hand, seems to me like the dream of someone who has never actually worked with the smelly, stupid things.

      The real economics question is can you move them with fewer cowboys on hand not none? And...is the "fewer" enough to make it economically viable? It may not be a better way to move cattle but if someday it is a cheaper (TCO-style....so counting lost cattle) way it will eventually get used.

    38. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      And technology makes the cows smarter... how?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    39. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by ari_j · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The thing is that full-time ranch hands are not needed at most normal-size ranches. Where I grew up, it worked more like this. You need to round up your cattle about twice a year (branding and slaughter). This can be accomplished with four to ten people, depending on the terrain and size of your pastures. You also have to actually do the branding (which includes neutering, dehorning, etc.), once a year. You have several neighboring ranches, all of which also need to do round-up about twice a year and branding one time a year. Their days don't have to coincide with yours. So what you do is help each other out, exchanging labor for labor.

      I don't see this technology being remotely economically viable for quite some time. That doesn't mean I am opposed to people developing it on their own dime, though.

    40. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by invckb · · Score: 1

      There is already technology available to replace ranch hands. Trained up cattle dogs go for up to $5k each. A crew of good dogs can replace 2-3 hands in gathering cattle.

      In my area, gathering cattle is done with day labor ($100/hand+horse/day). Cattle are gathered 2-3 times a year. The price of the system is going to have to come down a lot to compete.

    41. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Except we can be put off by notices that say "keep off the grass" (mostly), cattle would ignore tensa-barriers, they would last five minutes and be largely ignored ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    42. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by kat_skan · · Score: 1

      You do realize cattle can be sold, right?

    43. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by kat_skan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Personally I think it's worth sacrificing that old trope in exchange for the possibility that any mall anywhere in America could spontaneously be invaded by radio-controlled cows.

    44. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by darkcatalyst · · Score: 1

      ... did I mention you can't lead them down a set of stairs?

      Oh, you can lead them down a set of stairs. All you need is a pickup truck with a winch.

      --
      This is what entropy is for.
    45. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Not *up* a tree, of course. But they would get stuck between trees, in groves of trees, in branches, etc. I found a calf one time who had his head caught between a fork in a large, low-hanging branch. It could have just lifted its head and walked away, instead it just stood there like an idiot until I can over and pulled the branch down.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    46. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      for the possibility that any mall anywhere in America could spontaneously be invaded by radio-controlled cows.

      Possibility?

      I see that every day, ...here at Walmart.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    47. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is the modern cow has been bred strictly for size,which just boosts the stupid by a factor of ten. As for cows themselves they really didn't use to be THAT stupid. When I was a kid I use to help my neighbor check on and feed his small herd of milkers along with his bull,and when I'd hope the fence along with my friends who had never come with me they would freeze and look like they were going to shit themselves. When I would ask what was wrong they say "Bull....BIG Bull....BIG horned Bull!" and I would of course try to keep from laughing at them. I'd go "Hey Petey,who's a big ole feller? Who wants his ears scratched?" and old Pete would come a trotting along and start mooing wanting his ears scratched.He and the whole herd were just like big oversized dogs.

      So you see,they didn't always used to be so damned stupid,the stupid is strictly a man made add on. Just like all the dogs they breed for looks are much stupider than your garden variety mutt,so have cows become giant morons. Sadly I read recently that nearly all the "old stock" breeds are nearly extinct thanks to western overbred cattle being brought in to maximize meat production. I just hope their is an animal equivalent to the seed bank otherwise one good new cattle disease could wipe them off the face of the earth.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    48. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      ... farmers still hire humans for such tasks as ... harvesting lettuce ...

      I swear the recent e. coli outbreaks from tainted lettuce and spinach are from the distinct lack of toilet paper in the fields.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    49. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by wtfispcloadletter · · Score: 1

      I used to work with cattle on my uncle's farm when I was a kid. They are dumb animals. They do dumb things. Anytime you try to move them, they do all kinds of stupid shit. I've seen them get "trapped" in fencing, in ditches, even in bushes and trees.

      I grew up around cows and many other animals. They are not dumb animals. Read the book Animals in Translation where the author talks specifically about why cattle behave as they do.

      I agree though, the system is stupid and can't compete with what a few good cowboys can do.

    50. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

      so .. was that a fat joke?

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    51. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Alright... First off, about all I know about cattle is that they taste good. So don't think for a moment that I'm going to say anything terribly intelligent about handling cattle in general. But I think you need to take a decent look at some of what is being discussed here...

      Until there is a remote way of intervening when a cow worth several hundred dollars gets itself crosswise to a barbed wire fence, being able to remotely direct the herd offers no benefits. These parts of the job will require a sophisticated all terrain robot capable of identifying a cow in trouble, immobilizing the large animal without hurting it, cutting and repairing barbed wire, delivering an antitetanus jab, and so on. And then you might as well save a bunch of money on the cowhead radio receivers by just putting a loudspeaker system in the robot.

      You did see the part where they're calling this a "virtual fence", right? So you would theoretically be keeping the cows where they belong not with barbed wire fence but with this radiohead thing. So there would, in theory, not be a whole lot of barbed wire for them to get tangled up in.

      Of course this does absolutely nothing about the natural hazards that folks have mentioned - things like gopher holes and bushes and whatever - but that would be taken care of in the next step of the process.

      See, this radiohead thing won't be the end of it. Nobody is going to say "OK, we've got remote controlled cows, we're all done now." This isn't about remote controlled cows. This is about a steady march towards automation in just about every money-making venture.

      Sure, humans are still involved in picking some fruit and vegetables... But machines are involved in harvesting a lot of it too. And research is being done to automate those fruits and veggies that are still picked by hand.

      So this radiohead thing maybe isn't a silver bullet, but it's a step along the path of automation... And the next step may be to grab some industrial earth movers and completely flatten your land so you've got nothing for the cattle to trip over... And the next step might be some kind of genetically modified supergrass that strangles out all the bushes and trees in the area and creates a giant green lawn for your cattle to graze on... Maybe you can engineer that grass so that it's toxic to gophers too, so you don't have gopher holes for the cattle to step in... And then, when that's all working correctly you replace the one guy watching a computer screen and directing the cattle with a computer program that keeps them in-line all the way up to the slaughterhouse.

      Sure, that kind of automation may never actually happen. And if it does, it may be dozens of years down the road. But that's the ultimate goal. Not just to get rid of one or two cowboys or make one or two jobs marginally easier.

    52. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      And yes, I am an automation technician presently building an automated mouse trap in my basement.

      Huh? I'm no expert, so maybe you are using jargon that simply resembles my layman's speech, but aren't ALL mousetraps automated (unless you want to call a cat a mousetrap)? I mean, when I think non-automated, I'm thinking a box propped up on a stick with a string tied to it...

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    53. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

      Yup. Sad.

    54. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If I had a dime for every time I hid a cow in my bedroom...

      Dude, I don't want to hear about problems with your dates. This is slashdot: we rarely get the best-looking gals.

         

    55. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dean Anderson insists he doesn't want to put cowboys out of business. But he would like to see them get more indoor work.

      By definition cowboys don't want to work indoors. Not surprising that a government employee of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is so out of touch with the industry to which he is supposed to support.

    56. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      While your reasoning seems sound, it fails in real life.

      While your anecdote is amusing, it fails in real life. The topic under discussion is controlling beef cattle on the open range, not summoning milk cattle to a fixed point.

    57. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you know the species to target to prevent the Daleks from ever evolving -- somewhere in the universe is a breed of cows that will gain sentience and technology along their path of migration to Skaro but will still avoid stairs at all costs to the structure of a building. That is, until they develop vectored thrust hover capability.

    58. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had enough cows to overwhelm his milking barn and took them in turns from different fields.

      That must have been a while back. Cows aren't allowed to free roam anymore, since it wastes food energy. Movement is now restricted as much as possible. The dairy farmers in my family hate it, but say it's the only way to stay competitive (aka make a profit). It was factory farm or quit farming. They seriously considered quitting.

    59. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      that gives me an idea for my next invention.. stupid living paint! Then what?
      I've got it - inanimate cows!

    60. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by thepotoo · · Score: 1

      invaded by radio-controlled cows

      I think that's one of the Soviet's units in Red Alert 3.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    61. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Deagol · · Score: 4, Interesting
      As someone who's owned family milk cows, I say you're being a tad harsh. Our cows were not only personable, but exhibited downright devious behavior. They learn quickly. They'll follow verbal commands. They recognize specific people and respond to their preferences to those people. Granted, they were both Jersey cows, which have a reputation for being a bit more clever than the average Holstein (and I would assume the typical Angus or Hereford that I see being run around my neck of the Utah open range).

      Sure, cows are big clumsy animals, both by nature and due to breeding. But they're certainly not totally devoid of presence and thought, as you seem to imply. I didn't just labor near these animals, but I hand milked them daily. People who have hand-milked animals like cows and goats know there is a bond formed between them and the animal. They know full well that they could kill you in an instant, yet they recognize the give-and-take relationship they're part of.

      As for the stairs... cows have little to no depth perception. That's why you can paint cattle guards across a road and it'll be as effective as a real cattle guard. They're not dumb, but self-serving. You of all people should know this. Bovines are known to be more sure-footed than horses, which are skittish creatures bordering on neurotic. They simply won't put their feet down where they're uncertain of the consequences (except when they're in a panic). That's why oxen are preferred as beasts of burden over horses, at least in countries where people aren't too proud to have cattle perform such work.

      Still, I think that this idea is rather dumb. People who range cattle here in the West aren't making a killing as it is, and devices like these solve a problem that doesn't exist, in a very expensive way. Cheap radio beacons for tracking down cattle that have been ranging in the wooded mountains for the summer? Maybe. Probably not. But remote controlling cattle is something only a foolish marketing drone would come up with.

    62. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      I'm here all week. Try the veal.

    63. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Then what?
      I've got it - inanimate cows!

      Sorry, prior art

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    64. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by ptelligence · · Score: 1

      I can see it now. Cowboys huddled around a computer screen somewhere in the middle of Wyoming, not sure what to make of its message...All your herd are belong to us.

    65. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >so .. was that a fat joke?

      It appears to be... along with an admission that he works at Wal-mart.

    66. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Basically, this seems to me like a very high tech, expensive way to so something that's much more effectively and economically done the old-fashioned way.

      Word for word, this sounds exactly like the situation with electronic voting machines. One more example and we'll need a new entry for the jargon file. I choose 'Benderize' -- after a robot that mostly sits around, drinks beer, and "Has never made anyone's life easier, and you know it".

    67. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      Cattle are rocket scientists when compared to sheep.

      I think a system that shows the position of a herd of cattle would be awesome though (prevent cross border cattle theft).

    68. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Reziac · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      "That is what cowboys have been doing since the 19th century. For generations, cowboys have used commands such as "gee" and "haw" to tell
      their cattle to move right or left."

      I see the problem. They've confused "cattle" with "herding dogs".

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    69. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      toxic to gophers too

      Bad idea. Let the gopher holes happen. I'm sure you can "close them off".

    70. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by dbIII · · Score: 1
      If you are not that far away then it's just a large number of virtual cattle dogs.

      Journalists like to paint pictures of people sitting at home sipping martinis and doing their job with a few clicks of the keyboard, however I doubt the people developing this are under that illusion.

    71. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Domestic cattle are stupid and can get themselves into pretty awful situations. Imagine it's about to rain. You try to move the herd to somewhere ir's safe, but lo-and-behold, you can whistle / buzz/ or order the herd to go to safety, and they will head immediately over a muddy bank and into the creek where they will promptly be stuck.
      Just reading this article revived a horrible memory of as an 9 year old girl having to untangle a 15 hand horse from grounded harbed wire without wire clippers. If he'd panicked he could have killed or crippled me. Cattle are worse. They go from zero to panic in a heartbeat--and they stay there.
      However, I bet this system would work a peach with dogs.

    72. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

      Given the right motivation, even dumb cows can be convinced to do the 'right thing' most of the time. Using some technology to reduce the amount of manpower required to convince them is nothing but good.

      The sad thing is that I forgot you were talking about cows and thought you were talking about the average person.

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    73. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Now THAT is funny!

    74. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I think the dumber animal here is the one who thinks they know more than people who have actually done research on the idea. Do you have any evidence at all that this is a dumb idea for those supposedly dumb animals other than some anecdotal observations you made as a kid?

      Also, this system may be expensive, but is maintaining miles of fencing a quick and easy task?

    75. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      No. A joke about the stupid masses.
      I did not know that in America, even the cows were fat. ;)

      Oh, and I can't work at Walmart, because I only know it from the stories of others. I've never seen one myself.
      My joke/argument is meant for every consume temple, not any specific one.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    76. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This actually happened to me once.

      I was trying to bring an elderly thin cow from the main calving pasture to a small pasture for old cows and heifers where I put out far better feed.

      She resisted, not wanting to leave the herd. She started walking along the edge of a very very steep hill on a narrow path which had snow/ice pack on it. There was a tree with branches whose limbs grew right next to the hillside.

      She slipped and fell, sliding down to end up in the hook of two major branches, about ten feet off the ground.

      My dad was dumbfounded when I came back to the house to get the chainsaw to cut down the tree to free the old cow. He just sat in the pickup watching me and never said a word.

      After she was back on the ground, the old cow was much more cooperative than before.

    77. Re:This sounds laughably impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

      I live in a farm in Scotland (I'm a farmer's son), and that is exactly what I thought when I read the Article. It's utter Bull (pardon the pun). Cattle are dumb, but they are also dumb enough to walk in the direction of a scary noise by accident. I also have a funny feeling they would quite easily knock the kit off by simply rubbing against a tree or the like.

      So in conclusion, it's a pile of overpriced bloatware shit. Let's all move on people (pardon the pun #2).

  3. Rustlin' by halcyon1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So what happens when a posse of rustlers comes along with a roll of tin foil?

    1. Re:Rustlin' by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      So what happens when a posse of rustlers comes along with a roll of tin foil?

      Screw hustling the cows, at $900 a pop for the radios, why not just take *them*?

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    2. Re:Rustlin' by Idiomatick · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are right, we should be mounting laser cannons on them.

    3. Re:Rustlin' by JaBob · · Score: 1

      I want to see when some high school kid breaks into some system on a large ranch, then proceeds to send all the cows to their school or whatever they want to disrupt. If this happens, is that enough to get the FBI involved, just because it's electronic? How could someone (other than the group trying to sell this to ranchers) think this is a good thing? Do they seriously think it will have the capabilities to replace a proper border collie?

    4. Re:Rustlin' by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The last thing we need is land sharks.

    5. Re:Rustlin' by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      The price of a full grown steer is far higher than that.

      I look forward to hacker cattle rustlers or even worse, armies of hijacked cows terrorizing the west. I hope the Dept of Homeland In^H^HSecurity is looking into the likely scenario of a terrorist taking over our cattle!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Rustlin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun fact: in C&C Red Alert 2, if you put a cow inside an IVF it will get a super-strong laser cannon. :)

    7. Re:Rustlin' by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      You're not going to get the e-fence's retail price from your fence^h^h^h^hpawn broker. Plus, cow parts are easier to move (due to their much larger market) than cow chips.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  4. A first step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "For more than a century, politicians in the West have kept sheeple in place with fences of barbed wire, split wood and, more recently, American Idol. Now Sheeple researchers with the Department of Homeland Security, are working on a system that will allow politicans to herd their sheeple remotely via radio by singing commands and whispering into their ears and tracking movements by satellite and computer. A video of Richard Dean Anderson, a researcher at [Secret Base], shows how he has built radios that attach to a sheeple's head (called bluetooth headsets) that allow a person at the other end to issue a range of commands -- gentle singing, sharp commands, or a buzz like a bee or snake -- to get the sheeple to move where one wants them to. Anderson says it would cost $900 today to put a radio device on one person, but he says costs will fall and the entire population wouldn't have to be outfitted, just the "troublemakers." Much of the research has focused on how DHS can identify which sheeple in their herds are the ones that the others follow."

    I'm upping my tin foil.

  5. Does this work on congressmen/senators? by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We need something like this for our congresscritters so we can whisper commands into their ears..you know, like "Don't vote for the bailout".

    1. Re:Does this work on congressmen/senators? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      ;) I suspect you have the thinking backwards. They want these so that they can put them around the necks of the citizens to keep us controlled and herded at a lesser cost.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Does this work on congressmen/senators? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Dianne Feinstein got 90000 calls against the bailout and she still voted for the bailout. Those weren't whispers.

      It only works if you make sure you punish them by not voting them back in.

      --
    3. Re:Does this work on congressmen/senators? by caseih · · Score: 1

      Just because large masses of stupid people urge something doesn't mean it's necessarily a good thing. And polls indicate that the American people were equally split on the issue, not overwhelmingly opposed to it, as you intimate. It is a fallacy to suggest that 90,000 phone calls is representative of her constituency. Most folks in favor of the rescue plan probably never said anything because the situation logically demanded the rescue; they knew Feinstein would vote for it.

      I take it you'd have been in favor of letting American tax payers lose 700 billion in assets straight away rather than spending the money to rescue the economy and making back the same 700 billion (just barely if we're lucky) over the next few years. Letting the tax payers just suck it all up big losses would have been very unfair, and incredibly damaging in the long term. I'd be in favor of just letting all the companies collapse--if the people who ended up with all the losses where the folks who opposed the rescue plan. That would serve them right. But that isn't what would happen. Instead, many honest, hard-working Americans who were paying back their loans would lose the most because they were being dragged down by all the bad loans. Better to nationalize some lending institutions. We know from other economies that such a move does in fact work.

      I'd have opposed the rescue plan too, except that Warren Buffet, who's one of the smartest financial men in America, and one of the most conservative, said it was not only a good idea, but essential. I give his opinion more weight than 90,000 folks who barely comprehend the system. Of course it's a shame that the rescue plan was not able to really clamp down on the companies and CEOs and restore regulation and stop this ridiculous habit we have of lending money we don't have at the ratios we have been allowing (4:1, if you can believe that). Congress will do that in the coming years, hopefully.

    4. Re:Does this work on congressmen/senators? by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

      I'd have opposed the rescue plan too, except that Warren Buffet, who's one of the smartest financial men in America, and one of the most conservative, said it was not only a good idea, but essential. I give his opinion more weight than 90,000 folks who barely comprehend the system.

      Warren Buffet also has a heck of a lot more money in the stock market than you do. Maybe he said it's essential because it benefits him. (Or maybe he's honest - I don't know.)

      What I really want is for the people who made all the shady deals to be the ones who lose their money. If we taxpayers always bail them out, why wouldn't they continue to game the system?

    5. Re:Does this work on congressmen/senators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we already do ... they're called lobbyists

    6. Re:Does this work on congressmen/senators? by caseih · · Score: 1

      Buffet has enough cash to weather the storm with or without the rescue plan. In fact, in an attempt to bolster confidence in lending institutions recently announced a multi-billion dollar investment in one of the troubled firms.

      Your comment about dishonest people losing their money is the crux of the whole issue. Sadly the majority of folks who now bear the financial results of the actions of dishonest investors are the honest folks. That's why the rescue plan is essential. Sadly it does benefit the dishonest as well as the honest. We can and should enact laws (regulation!) to prevent gaming of the system. Of course we used to have those laws and regulations, but both republican and democratic presidencies in years past removed them, saying that the market would regulate itself.

  6. Sure could make rustling some cattle alot easier. by StJohnsWort · · Score: 1

    Just hack in and send them where you want. Yippie Ki Yay...

  7. Makes sense by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that my representative needs the occasional cooing in his ear to stop him from throwing a fit and puking all over himself.

    1. Re:Makes sense by EchaniDrgn · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that my representative needs the occasional cooing in his ear to stop him from throwing a fit and puking all over himself.

      I thought Ted Kennedy was a Senator.

  8. Suddenly by Technopaladin · · Score: 5, Funny

    All these Bluetooth wearing peoples existence becomes clear...they were the prototype for Cattle management. Truly the work has flipped upside down. I would love to see Rattlesnake, Bee, growling pumped into those things while people cruised around.

  9. Agreed, Tag Story "wormtongue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... except ... for cattle.

  10. Rawhide by eclectro · · Score: 1

    I call dibbs on the patent that interfaces to the cows to allow internet operation.

    Keep movin', movin', movin',
    Though they're disapprovin',
    Keep them doggies movin' Rawhide!

    Move 'em on, head 'em up,
    Head 'em up, move 'em out,
    Move 'em on, head 'em out Rawhide!

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  11. Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the plan assumes that the "leaders" are statically chosen by the heard.

    It might negatively impact "that's the cow I want to follow around!" feelings when your leader starts hearing voices in it's head and jumping at snakes that aren't there.

  12. Be prepared... by StripedCow · · Score: 1

    to see a flash-mob of cows on your lawn anytime soon...

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  13. Take me to your leaders by snspdaarf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got a laugh from "Much of the research has focused on how cattlemen can identify which cattle in their herds are the ones that the others follow." I have also worked around cows in the family beef operation, and all one has to do to identify the "leaders" is watch the cows.

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  14. "Old West" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they're inventing a time machine to travel back to the Old West? Wouldn't it be easier just to try this in the modern West?

  15. Intelligence of cows by Ed+Avis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How much bovine stupidity can be attributed to human preferences? Have we bred cattle to make them more stupid? I'm sure wild bison and buffaloes are a lot sharper. I expect it's our fault; when did you last send back a steak in a restaurant because it wasn't intelligent enough?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Intelligence of cows by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure wild bison and buffaloes are a lot sharper.

      Citation desperately needed.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    2. Re:Intelligence of cows by superbondbond · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm not so sure wild bison were any smarter. Read about the historic buffalo jumps that the native Americans used in hunting...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_jump

    3. Re:Intelligence of cows by Arthur+B. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't even think they were bred for stupidity, it's just that they were bred with no preference for stupidity or intelligence, it's irrelevant to reproductive success. The rest is just natural genetic drift.

      I'm looking at you, humanity.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    4. Re:Intelligence of cows by AhtirTano · · Score: 1

      So what do you suggest? Tear down the fences, expose them to the dangers of the real world off the ranch, and let natural selection raise their intelligence again? I'm not sure ranchers would be able to afford the kind of loss that would take; and we probably wouldn't be able to afford the steak anymore either.

    5. Re:Intelligence of cows by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You need a citation to back up the claim that he is sure?

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    6. Re:Intelligence of cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and what good does it do for intelligent cows if you eat them all before they can reproduce anyway?

    7. Re:Intelligence of cows by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure wild bison were any smarter. Read about the historic buffalo jumps that the native Americans used in hunting...

      What? Never been stuck in traffic before?

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    8. Re:Intelligence of cows by Noexit · · Score: 1

      Native Americans used to slaughter wild bison by herding them off of cliffs. I think that counts as "dumb".

      --

      Never argue with a man carrying a water buffalo

    9. Re:Intelligence of cows by ari_j · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, we breed them to be docile. Extreme docility and stupidity seem to go hand in hand. I would venture that 100% of the delta-stupidity of a cow beyond that of a similar wild animal (perhaps a bison or a wild boar) can be attributed to human preferences.

    10. Re:Intelligence of cows by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

      We are just attempting to prevent the inevitable Cattle Uprising

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
    11. Re:Intelligence of cows by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There was a time when intelligence of human children and more so of their parents weighed heavily in humans reaching reproductive age. Then we became civilized enough and technologically assisted enough that it makes very little difference.

      Of course, being mostly geeks, we probably don't want to go back to when keen natural eyesight, strong muscles, fast nerves, muscle coordination, and agreeable stomachs also weighed heavily in survival.

    12. Re:Intelligence of cows by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i'm not sure what that's supposed to prove. if you panic a large crowd of people by say, threatening their life, you could herd them towards a cliff too. such tactics have been used in many historic battles to corner enemy troops. it's probably one of the more obvious tactics for using terrain to your advantage.

      when a large group of individuals/herd of bison/whatever are running from danger, they tend to move as a single mass. this may be an evolutionarily learned trait since in the wild, if a predator is chasing a herd, the animal that is separated from the heard is singled out. aside from protection in numbers, this strategy also allows the mature animals to form a protective wall around the more vulnerable young, so this is a good defense usually.

      but large groups of panicked animals, and this includes humans, can be easily herded by a smaller group of coordinated attackers. and once you have a stampede effect where individuals are bunched together, then the individuals at the back are simply following the stampede and cannot see what's ahead, and by the time the individuals at the front can see that there's a cliff they can't stop and simply get pushed over the cliff by the individuals behind them.

    13. Re:Intelligence of cows by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      keep your britches on. no one's trying to take away your steak. he was simply making an observation.

    14. Re:Intelligence of cows by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Speak for yourself, weakling :P All kidding aside, there's no reason a geek shouldn't at least be moderately fit. It's as easy as parking far out in the parking lot instead of right next to the door, and ordering a nice sandwich with veggies and such on it instead of pizza.

      Athleticism isn't purely genetic... it takes practice and work, just like every other skill.

    15. Re:Intelligence of cows by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amen.

      Remember the old quote (I think it's from Arnold himself): Being in shape is 60% nutrition, 30% exercise and 10% genetics.

      You forgot to mention soda. It's the #1 reason for geeks (and everybody else) to be fat and unhealthy.

    16. Re:Intelligence of cows by alienmole · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't eat steak. If you're going to eat meat, you may as well make it intelligent meat. As Professor Farnsworth said when eating dolphin, "Pass me the speech center of the brain!"

    17. Re:Intelligence of cows by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I'm no pool of lard or swizzle stick. I was in football and wrestling in high school. Yet I still don't want to compete for scarce resources with the type of guys who play college football, let alone pro sports. I'm content to stay moderately healthy and keep an office job.

    18. Re:Intelligence of cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you eat them all before they can reproduce

      I'm not a cattle farmer, but I don't think they do that. At least, not all of them.

    19. Re:Intelligence of cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about crippled legs because of genetics?

      What about nasal deviation because of genetics?

      What about psychological issues because of genetics?

      Plus, you blaming soda is totally misguided for anyone not living in America - we have soda sweetened with sugar from sugar beet instead of HFCS.

      Now, HFCS soda is bad, but the real-sugar soda calorie level is not enough to make you fat in any reasonable quantities for a normal human to drink (as in, up to 3L) as long as you eat correctly otherwise and reduce your carbohydrate intake accordingly.

      Nevermind Splenda.

    20. Re:Intelligence of cows by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "I expect it's our fault; when did you last send back a steak in a restaurant because it wasn't intelligent enough?"

      We don't do that with women either.
      Ah, the Law of Unintended Consequences.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    21. Re:Intelligence of cows by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I expect it's our fault; when did you last send back a steak in a restaurant because it wasn't intelligent enough?

      More importantly, you don't want to get in the situation where people are sending back steaks because they're too intelligent (see also: THHGTTG, book 2).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    22. Re:Intelligence of cows by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      There's a bit more to it, but nothing particularly difficult for a geek. There are really only two things to do:

      A diet. Doesn't really matter which, as long as you can stick to it, mostly -- so pick something delicious and relatively cheap. Preferably high-protein...

      Excercise. Worth mentioning that this guy is a geek. And I agree with the philosophy that it's far more important to just do it, than how much you do.

      There are all kinds of tricks to this -- for example, I rarely drink coffee (tea instead), and when I do, it's black. I've almost completely given up my Mountain Dew habit. And, as you said, park farther away, or just walk/bike if you can.

      I almost wouldn't call it a skill. It's just a habit.

      Also: I have an agreeable stomach, and I imagine plenty of games play action games, which means we've got fast nerves.

      No, I'm much more of a geek than GP -- I don't want to go back to that time, because they didn't have the Internet or laptops.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    23. Re:Intelligence of cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my experience it is similar in horses...

      Of the six we had while I was growing up, the one that threw riders and goofed around too much to be considered a "kid-friendly ride" was also the only one that figured out how to unlatch and open gates, break the ice on the water in winter, etc.

      If it wasn't for that horse the others would have died of thirst staring into a water tank with 1 inch of ice on top. And the others never learned no matter how many times they watched it done.

    24. Re:Intelligence of cows by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      3L of coke = 1320 kCal. You claim this has no effect on obesity ? You must be joking.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
  16. Military applications by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Imagine a big, pissed-off herd taking Bombay or any other city in India. Who would dare to stop them?

  17. They're called lobbyists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted, the current generation of the technology is primarily analog, and is phenomenally expensive to operate. And, regrettably, the notion that mass-producing them would REDUCE cost has proven wildly inaccurate. But we've got top people on it, and I'm sure we'll work all the kinks out soon.

  18. Screw Halo 3... by PinkyDead · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wanna play World of Warcow.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    1. Re:Screw Halo 3... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Just play a Tauren character.

    2. Re:Screw Halo 3... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Forget that, I'm much rather play Mario Cow

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Screw Halo 3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no cow level.

    4. Re:Screw Halo 3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      battle cattle for the win! lawl

    5. Re:Screw Halo 3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanna play World of Warcow.

      But d00d, you won't get a major level 40+ C0W without several weeks of cud-grinding to get those Golden Horns of Pr0ng, and you don't really get good drops until you make Bull.

  19. Anderson said he got the idea by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    from observing the modern American political process

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  20. Mooooo by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 3, Funny

    Moooo!
    - Please, come back to the stable!
    Moooo!
    - OK, you force me to use brute force!
    Moooo ... bzzzzzz ... MOOOOOO!
    - I told you!

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  21. Oh Oh YES by MajorDick · · Score: 1

    I can see it now, herds of High on Mushroom teenagers running around the fields with the gear on their heads.

    Wouldnt you ?

    This is JUST BEGGING for a New Beavis and Butthead episode......

    1. Re:Oh Oh YES by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Actually I was hoping for a return of Gary Larson.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Oh Oh YES by Atheose · · Score: 1

      This is JUST BEGGING for a new Southpark episode......

      There, fixed it for you. This isn't 1998 dude.

  22. Wooo USDA-ARS; I work for them! as in right now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I just visited that ARS site back in May (for an IT conference)... btw I work for USDA-ARS (the people doing this work); just at a different location (not in NM).

    Oh and for the record, make sure the bus drivers don't do 90mph in the desert (actually on the Jornada Test Range) and break any oil pans this time!

  23. Cats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can imagine inside each cow's head: "We get signal. Main screen turn on."

  24. Oh hey by kjzk · · Score: 0

    How long till they start doing this to us? In the name of preventing terrorism of course...

  25. Maybe we can do something like this for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Republicans!

  26. Cattle will follow the leader... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    Much of the research has focused on how cattlemen can identify which cattle in their herds are the ones that the others follow."
    .

    Cattle will follow the lead cow who takes them where they want to go. Therein is the flaw to the plan. If the identified leader follows the commands of the cowboys and goes where the other cattle do not want to go, will the other cattle then continue to follow that leader?

  27. Secret Cow Level by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Your in luck, there is in fact a World of Warcow level hidden in Diablo 2.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  28. Just what they've always wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to be able to say, "Hold on, I'm getting a call on my cow phone!"

  29. And then by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    The cowboy controllers can be outsourced to India.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  30. Honk and Dog by toddhisattva · · Score: 1

    Ten-cent RFID ear tags make sense.

    Training cattle to respond to a multitude of radio commands is laughable.

    But they can learn at least one useful trick. If you honk your horn every time you bring fresh hay, they learn that sound means "food."

    So we already have a cow tractor beam.

    The pressor beam is your dog.

    I've got to wonder, has our litigious society made field trips impossible? So much "research" is done by people who have never been outside.

  31. what happens when the network goes down? by buttle2000 · · Score: 0
    Here in Spain there is an area that is experimenting with a crop irrigation system that works via cell phones.

    If these kind of things work and get widely accepted, farmers will eventually lose their traditional how-to.

    My worry is about what will happen the day the network goes down. In th event of a local or global catastrophy , networks and electricity grid may just be some of the first services to go.

    That may lead to a scary situation where not even the milenium old skills like agrigulture and animal husbandry are commonly known.

    1. Re:what happens when the network goes down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good news is that in the event of a global catastrophe, farmers probably won't have to produce as much food. With lower population, etc.

    2. Re:what happens when the network goes down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may lead to a scary situation where not even the milenium old skills like agrigulture and animal husbandry are commonly known.

      I could make a joke on millenium old skills like spelling and ??? are commonly "known", but I'll leave that to /. imagination ;^)

  32. Singing? by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Singing? I can see it now: iTunes for cows! Or worse,
    ""Are you losing cows due to dropped calls to your bovine herd? Download your cattle's favorite ringtones from the Mozy Network! Mozy: Less deadspots than the other cattle network!"

  33. And it's such a clean environment... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    ...conducive to well functioning electronic equipment.

    Anyone else smell (other than the cows) a technical maintenance nightmare?

    Although if you can get them going in a conga line or spell out words, it might be worth it. Make a good halftime show.

  34. Just a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    before we see farm-hand out-sourcing to India.

  35. Sirens of Titan by sagaciousb · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of how they controlled the martian soldiers in the Sirens of Titan. Soon, maybe we'll be controlled by ice cream truck noises, buzzing bee sounds, and kitty-in-distress samples. It's really just easier to not eat meat.

  36. Where's the iCow adapter for the iPod? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Laugh now, but when your iTunes music store has a "cattle herding tunes" section on it, where you can download rattlesnake sounds and cowboy whispers, it'll be a goldmine with the farming community!

  37. wow by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

    McGuyver made a machine that can control cattle out of 3 gum wrappers a DIVX player and a old WebTV box?

    oh thats RICHARD Dean Anderson?

    nevermind then.

  38. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we'll have *sshole cattle walking around with bluetooth headsets talking loudly to themselves and annoying the rest of the herd. Of course, on the upside, now when I see some suit wandering into Starbucks I'll be able to imagine him heading soon to the slaughterhouse.

  39. Mad Cow Syndrome by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

    Just think of the impact to the tenderness of the meat: them cows 'll be lookin' left 'n right all day, all stressed-out, trying to figure out where them bees or snakes' be hiding at!

  40. Meet the Meat by camperdave · · Score: 1

    They could be engineered to want to be eaten.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  41. No! by Camaro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work with cattle for a living, both my own and helping neighbors. I see it over and over. There are definitely leaders in a herd but there are also cattle that will not follow unless you get behind them and get them moving in the right direction. Maybe there's a slow one who stepped in a hole yesterday. Maybe the calf has picked that moment to get a snack and the mother stops for it to suck. Or it's the nervous cow that heads for the hills at the first sign of a roundup. Hell, there's even leader cows who decide to go different directions. Cattle like routine and if they don't usually go a certain direction they don't really feel like going there. Many times I've had a herd approach an open gate and stop. After a few minutes of trying to get them to go through they scatter. But often the first place they head when I start trying to round them up is where they go to drink water because it's what they do every day.

    1. Re:No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your experience of cows is similar to my own.

      One does notice certain leader cows. They strive to be the leader and will walk fast or even run to maintain their position as the leader. A leader cow who knows the time of year and the type of roundup (spring roundup, fall roundup, winter pasture) is actually pretty helpful. Until they miscue and lead the entire herd astray. LOL.

      You do notice the organized social resistance of cows to human control. There are times when it is nothing more than a sheer battle of wills, assuming they don't go nuts and try to run you and your horse down or just break down fences or scatter in twenty directions.

      The earlier comments on the thread about cattle constantly getting tangled in barbed wire and deadends sounds silly to me. They must have some really stupid stupid cows. I've handled many thousands over the years and have only dealt with one single cow who tangled on an open barbed wire gate that was laying on the ground and a handful of calves who got themselves tangled and exhausted. You actually have a far greater hazard for calves falling into sinkholes caused by erosion or by getting their heads caught in old junk somehow.

    2. Re:No! by Camaro · · Score: 1

      Your reply mentioning a battle of wills and calves in wire reminded me of the trouble I've had with bulls. One year we had a Hereford bull run ahead of the herd to try and cut them off while we tried to roundup. No way was he going to let us take his girls! We finally gave up and rounded up a different herd. And twice in the past two years we've had a bull try to go over a fence to visit the neighbors' herd only to get stuck halfway because he couldn't get his back legs over. The first time I think he spent a couple of days there before I found him. The second I knew they'd been hanging around the fence so I was checking every day.

      In a week our two I'll be rounding up to get rid of a couple of cows with murderous intentions...and that's a whole different challenge!

  42. $900?? by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    Shit, at $900, just give them cell phones on a collar, FFS. Staple some blue tooth earpieces onto their ears and you're golden. I doubt the receivers they're using are any less likely to give them brain cancer.

    1. Re:$900?? by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

      Then your cows will learn howto call out, and be pranking you at 3 oclock in the morning ..
      "MOOO!, Where my damn food at, MOOO!!"

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
  43. Slippery slope? by yenne · · Score: 1

    Wonder how long it will take until we progress from cowbot to Lobot.

  44. Virtual fence ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Isn't that a guy who buys and sells stolen property in Second Life?

  45. Not so appealing by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    Most if not all ranchers would prefer to get out and about and not live indoors. That is one of the attractions of the lifestyle. Sure, knowing where your cattle -are- would be a good thing, but you are going to want to check on them, and the water tanks, and salt blocks, and their health in person.

  46. In unrelated news: by archont · · Score: 1

    2 killed, 14 injured in Baghdad after a suicide bovine attack. Feargus Urquhart has denied involveme

    1. Re:In unrelated news: by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Yes, never trust a mutant, two headed Brahma in the wasteland!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  47. docility by zogger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are bred for docility and for large and fast weight gain and huge milk production. Docility is number one though, you can't do squat with a really wild cow (total range cows excluded, they are all mostly wild) I have an eastern perspective on this, and a small herd that are traditional barbed wire fenced in. I have one now, pretty wild and suspicious, takes me forever to lure it into the barn/corral in order to deal with it, like de worming, etc.. The rest, tame enough, come when they are called-literally, I just yell at them to come on in. I make a point every new calf to go up to them and rub them a lot and get them to smell me and be around me for the first week, momma willing of course, most put up with it because we get along OK, and it works, they get and stay at least half tame-to me anyway, not to anyone else around here. Dairy cows I have worked with, about as tame as puppies, most of them anyway, because they are handled daily and want to be milked, they line up for it. As to smarts a big variable there, I've seen some pretty sharp ones then some walking vegetables, the majority are in between. Lot of folks around the world still use oxen for working, singly or in teams, they tame up and are smart enough to be reliable enough for that sort of thing. I was going to do that myself, but haven't had a good set of bull twins yet.

  48. If they use WiFi... by thered2001 · · Score: 1

    ...there go the rest of our IPv4 addresses! I can just imagine it: the Java Cow Interface library v0.1. Let the cowboys control their cattle via laptops in the field. myCow = moo.create(). "Warning: cow at address 64.04.207.2 refuses to enter pasture!"

    --

    If your only tool is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail.

  49. There's one in WoW too by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Why bother with that, when there's a cow level in WoW too. It's called Mulgore ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  50. Uh, even easier... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    How about a GPS-enabled shock collar? Or maybe a GPS- and flux gate magnetometer-enabled ear shocker that'll not only know when they've strayed out of bounds but will know which ear to zap to get them pointed in the right direction!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  51. Replacing Fences, not Cowboys by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised these things are $900 - compare them with the "invisible fence" dog collars, which are about $100/receiver (plus the wiring in the ground, which is the more expensive par.) These may be a bit fancier, and while you want the batteries to last longer, you can put much heavier batteries on a cow than a dog.

    It sounds to me like what they're really able to do is make open-range grazing more possible - the West was mostly unfenced until farmers started winning out and forcing ranchers to keep their cows fenced in. (That didn't mean there weren't corrals or whatever.) If this kind of technology works out, not only does it mean that farmers will have alternatives to maintaining fences, but also that wild animals will have less fencing to deal with, which will help them do whatever migration they need to.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  52. So that's why! by IdeaMan · · Score: 1

    I always wondered why the President had the football near him at all times.

    --
    They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
  53. African cattle breeds by billstewart · · Score: 1

    A few months ago there was an article in the NYTimes about the decline in various African cattle breeds as they're getting replaced by Holsteins and other First-World agribusiness cattle. The African cows were big-horned ornery creatures that are adapted for their environments; the Holsteins are weaker, more disease-prone, don't get along as well on the local vegetation - but produce about 10 times as much milk, which means that a small farmer can produce enough surplus income to send his kids to school, so the old breeds are getting replaced, in spite of the extra costs for things like medication. There are essentially no wild cattle these days; they've been domesticated for a long time, so if farmers stop using a given breed, it's pretty much lost to the gene pool.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  54. HEY! Already thought of this! by CCTalbert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So funny, a friend and I were bouncing emails back and forth over the use of small GPS chips after seeing an article on GPS enabled pet collars. The Desire to Profit was in mind... we envisioned a cool web site with all sorts of interesting images of cattle being manipulated by cool technology,etc. Anyway, my joke/rant from 2003:

    The Digital Ranch(tm)

    "Wireless Ranch(tm)"... (Web site and hardware in development, pricing to be announced)

    So, you have your herd of cattle, bison, horses, sheep, whatever- you implant one "Ranchhand(tm)" chip in each, and then you can monitor all your ranch assets via your computer. Each chip monitors all of the animals vital statistics, as well as it's location, and reports them to you via wireless networking. So you can pull up a real-time display of your herd at any time, pick out individual animals and check on their health, see where they've been, set watch points on health and be notified if anything goes out of bounds. Of course, all this ties into "Ranch Database(tm)" that you use to track the health and progress of each animal through it's life cycle.

    Each animal can also be fitted with the optional "Drover(tm)" module, which provides audible signals to the animal (backed up with a mild to severe electric shock) to modify the animals behavior. As the animal approaches the perimeter of the area you have defined as available to it, it receives a pleasant "chirp" warning it not to proceed, followed by a mild shock if it doesn't comply. Fences and the cost of their maintenance become a thing of the past! When it's time to move the herd to another pasture, to the barn, etc., the "Wireless Ranch" software module will send the appropriate signals to gather your assets together and herd them to where they need to be. Individual animals can be separated and directed as needed for grooming, health maintenance, harvesting, etc.

    Feeding chores become more efficient with the "Smart-Trough(tm)". Using the "Drover(tm)" module, animals can be guided to specific feeding receptacles, so supplements and medications can be automatically dispensed to specific animals. Using the optional pressure mat at each feeding trough allows you to automatically weigh each animal. With the "Ranch Vet(tm)" health monitoring software the need for supplements and medications can be automatically assessed and dispensed!

    Docile healthy animals, with less effort than ever before- the "Wireless Ranch(tm)" is your ticket to a more efficient and profitable ranch than ever before!

  55. How Much Does A Cowboy Cost? by ryanisflyboy · · Score: 1

    I've spent some time around cowboys while they were working. I respect what they do. They have a very difficult and demanding job. However, they didn't seem the kind of people who were well paid. The rancher, yes, but not the cowpuncher. What is the anual cost of a cowboy, his materials, and transportation (not just the horse, but the trucks and other gear they need).

    1. Re:How Much Does A Cowboy Cost? by plover · · Score: 1

      And how often do those ranch hands not show up because they're sick, or hungover, or whatever? How much do those hands cost the rancher because they're inexperienced and do the wrong thing? How often do hands get injured on the job and sue for damages? And you never have to pay unemployment insurance if you leave a radio collar on the shelf for a year.

      On the other side, how much do you pay for maintenance contracts for radio collars, and how reliable are they? How expensive is it if your herd wanders off because of a technology failure? How expensive are the redundancies? How does a rancher know when his gadgets are failing?

      The only real question is if the machinery can perform the task adequately. Notice I did not try to compare them to a human, just asking "can they actually do the task required"?

      The answer is that an automaton is almost always cheaper in the long run than a human. The more you train a human, the better or faster they'll perform a task -- within certain limits -- but then they'll cost you more, and the expense is perpetual. Machinery, on the other hand, costs you dearly up front but is practically free over the long term. It's even more cost effective when you consider that it doesn't need training -- plug it in and it goes.

      --
      John
    2. Re:How Much Does A Cowboy Cost? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      The answer is that an automaton is almost always cheaper in the long run than a human.

      Actually, no, that isn't true. Automation is only cheaper, and in fact only acceptable, in those tightly controlled situations where an activity can be done without judgment. Such as the way we set up factories. Which is not a surprise since the whole concept of factories vs craftsmen is based on designing things so that the greatest amount of work can be done with the minimal amount of judgment.

      Working with animals always involves constant re-assessments and judgments about factors that we know how to process, but that we know in the same way we know how to balance on a moving bicycle: we can do it, but we can't explain it, and we can't put it into words that would allow us to automate the procedures.

      A ranch hand knows what the cow in front of him is thinking and knows what the horse under him is thinking, and uses a lot of near instantaneous judgment to control the situation. This is more similar to the knowledge and judgment a wolf has about his pack mates and his prey during the hunt than to the kind of stuff we know how to codify in language and use in designing automated systems.

    3. Re:How Much Does A Cowboy Cost? by plover · · Score: 1

      Rather than looking individually at each problem, consider it from a strategic point of view, or one in statistics: maybe 99% of the herd cooperates 100% of the time. The idea is to find a way to automate or at least control the outliers, and the rest of the work is done.

      Or if the ranchers can control the animals' behavior 99% of the time through automation, maybe they're willing to accept the risk of not having full control. What are the chances that some cow will step on a rattlesnake and cause a stampede that can't be stopped by radio collars? If it happens only once every 10 years, it might be worth it.

      Or what if the collars let fewer hands do the work?

      I know that at the root of what you're saying is "animals have their own self-motivations". And sure, a good cowboy will understand what motivates a cow (a fence, a rattlesnake, a bull, a calf, etc.) and will use that knowledge to their advantage. They will know that cows can get spooked and how to calm them, how to herd them, how to corral them, etc. I'm not arguing that a trained hand knows these things well. What I'm saying is that there's a reason we have the phrase "herd mentality", and that is that cow behavior is essentially statistical in nature. Figure out how to usually drive the herd, how to control the beasts and you can use it "most of the time". Maybe you reduce costs. Maybe four cowboys are too expensive. Or maybe the tech isn't mature enough. Depends on some rancher's willingness to take a risk on these collars.

      --
      John
    4. Re:How Much Does A Cowboy Cost? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Losing one cow out of herd of 100 is unacceptable to cattle ranchers. Perhaps these radioheads should be put on sheep instead: the statistical model being offered in PP sounds a lot like the way I've heard cattle people describe sheep ranching. That's where you guess how many sheep the pasture can carry, then you increase that by eight percent or so to feed the coyotes, and increase that by a few more percent because sheep are basically too stupid to live even in perfect conditions. At least this how a cattleman once explained the Western American style of sheep ranching to me. He said it is done without dogs or shepherds, and ideally human contact with the flock is limited to driving by in a fourwheeler every so often while drinking Budweiser and looking for coyotes to shoot at.

      OTOH, the common wisdom among sheep ranchers is that a homesteader with yen for steak on the hoof will raise pigs and goats for a couple of years until the pastures are cleaned of native vegetation, then raise sheep until they've paid off their debts, then finally switch to raising cattle until they are bankrupt. YMMV.

      Back to the point: tending the 99.5% of the cattle that are in the herd takes very little time or effort. The cowboy is there to intervene on behalf of the half of one percent who just can't get it right. And who often enough represent the difference between the ranch breaking even or losing money.

      Guiding cows from place to place just isn't a significant part of the cowboy problem space. The radiohead approach is like trying to optimize a report generator that uses a slow bubble sort by spending money on a fast hard drive. It might be a good solution for some problems, but it is the wrong solution for this particular application.

  56. The segway of farming? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see maddox write a follow up to his article on the segway in regards to this "new method of herding.

    Barbed wire is working fine. It uses abundant resources, and does not require a special chemical composition to continue doing its job. (i've run into century old barbed wire in forests which have since been designated protected wilderness)

    We don't need poltergeist machines to whisper things in cow's ears.

    We CERTAINLY don't want to make the simple control of livestock dependent on a 100% uptime on an electronic device.

    Finally, we don't need to be consuming even more electricity when we're having numerous national campaigns, even by right-wing officials, trying to solve the nation-wide energy crisis.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  57. BovineBot Shenanigans.... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    So.....a DDOS attack would be, maybe, commands given to guide said herd of cattle onto the nearby stretch of Interstate 5 in the middle of the night?

  58. I dunno... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Humans don't seem to mind in the same situation.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  59. Automated milking... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    The difference is one was dealing with paint (inanimate substance) one is dealing with cows (dumb animals), anything dealing with inanimate objects is relatively easy and cheap to automate, anything dealing with animate objects (or irregular objects) is difficult and expensive to automate

    Wasn't it not that long ago that we had a article here about automated milking machines, and no longer having to get up early in the morning to milk the herd?

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  60. Cattle are indeed dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a third generation farmer, worked with cattle for 25 years. I'm now an IT guy, but that's a different story.

    Different cattle situations vary. In the US West, cattle live on vast expanses of thousands and thousands of acres. This land is pretty crappy, takes lots of acres to provide grass for a herd. These cattle are routinely moved over longer distances. This is the traditional cowboy scenario. While pickup trucks and 4-wheelers are a godsend, there are still places where a man and a horse will always rule. A good horse knows how to work cattle almost as well as a man.

    Dairy cattle are different. They have smaller pastures (perhaps supplemented with hay), and are used to going into the barn every night. When they are lactating, a full udder is uncomfortable. While their little pea brains won't directly associate the milking machines with "oh, what a relief it is", they are ultimate creatures of habit. When it's suppertime, they are ready to go. Handling dairy cattle already is very sophisticated. RFID tags can keep a lifelong an daily history. As they stick their heads in to eat, the feeding program can note recent health issues, and custom mix this meal's feed to be exactly what is best for this cow now.

    Beef cattle (what I did) are different yet. I did it in the USA Midwest. We would breed cows/heifers, feed their calves out, and sell the calves. Beef cattle that are pastured get moved around from one pasture to the other, to give the grass a chance to grow back. There are no long cattle drives like the West. Others do confinement feeding, where the cattle stay a lot more enclosed. This introduces more problems with manure management, health, etc.

    Like everyone here with experience has noted, cattle are inherently dumb. "Wild" cattle/bison may be more aggressive with predators, but that is a survival tactic that is learnable.

    There are leaders, but an essential part of moving cattle is "driving" them, getting behind them and keeping stragglers going. One dumbass cow can start veering off for some/any reason, and half of them can peel off and follow, just because that's what they do. A good stock dog can be worth it's weight in gold, and sometimes is.

    For big cattle drives in the West where they are going for days? I could see robocow being a help. Cattle do learn words (or, more accurately phoneme combinations) and tone. You will always need humans to move them.

  61. Get off my lawn... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Get off my lawn, whippersnapper!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  62. Can't lead cows by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

    As a fellow former farm labourer I completely agree with you. This is a waste of time and money and a few cowboys can do the job better and cheaper.

    This quote from the summary says it all:

    Much of the research has focused on how cattlemen can identify which cattle in their herds are the ones that the others follow.

    I imagine this line of research was a failure because cows don't follow any leader for any good reason. They see one cow moving and think, "she move, I move too" and that's about it.

    You can't lead cows. Unless you have blackstrap molasses in your pockets. Then you'd better run like hell.

    1. Re:Can't lead cows by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They see one cow moving and think, "she move, I move too" and that's about it.

      When I read the bit in the article about identifiying the leaders, my first thought was "Well duh, it's the ones at the front!" So I was right?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Can't lead cows by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      It doesn't mean they move in the same direction, or that the leader one time is the leader again next time. It's pretty much random, like watching people applaud at a kids' Christmas concert. One person starts clapping at random, then a split-second later everyone's clapping despite the fact that no one enjoyed hearing "Here comes Santa Claus" being butchered by the inexperienced clarinet section.

  63. sounds like... by Bai+jie · · Score: 1

    a bunch of bull to me.

  64. head vs. other end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    > radios that attach to an animal's head that allow a person at the other end...

    hmm, where's this person supposed to be, say again?

    1. Re:head vs. other end by plover · · Score: 1

      > radios that attach to an animal's head that allow a person at the other end...

      hmm, where's this person supposed to be, say again?

      At the south end of a north-facing cow, naturally.

      --
      John
  65. Bad move, just ask the Native Americans! by rts008 · · Score: 1

    I don't think the Indians will go for this. The last time we played Cowboys and Indians....

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  66. Did they model this device ... by quax · · Score: 1

    ... after the radio control that this other ranch head has implanted? This 'leader' of the free world?

  67. And it is easy to find the leaders... by pikester · · Score: 1

    Just find the ones that face north first:
    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/26/1514226

  68. It's about the money by ancientt · · Score: 1

    Both of my grandfathers raised beef cattle and my father still does. Normally my father (and his father before him) would drive into a pasture where they wanted to gather the cattle, honk the horn for a few minutes and then lay a line of feed. The cattle come to the sound of a horn where they're counted as they line up and eat. This makes it easy to tell if any have been left behind by the herd (injured or strayed) or have left the herd to give birth. I've seen much the same thing from my other grandfather, but there was a long stretch of time when his pickup horn didn't work and he would literally call them in with his voice.

    These days my parents don't enjoy the rough lifestyle as much as they did when I was growing up. In those days we would gather the herds with horses, herding them into the pen. These days, they feed the cattle in the corrals a few times over weeks leading up to times when we need to pen them, and on the days when we need them penned, they close the gate after all the cattle trot into the pens.

    The price tag on this bit of equipment sounds pretty high, but consider that you can get a phone now that has more processing power than most government computers twenty years ago for about $100 (or $20 used.) Lets say that that price: $100, is our regularly adoptable technology rate, and assume prices are adjusted to today's values. Consider that these should have a lifetime of about five years, which takes the price to $20/yr. Then assume that you put one of these on every fifth cow, which takes the average price down to $4/yr/cow.

    I suspect this tech is more geek motivated than rancher motivated and over complex due to it. A very simplistic device will have one low tone and a varying pitch between two others, plus a built in compass and tracking utility. You program your hand held master to send pulses rising in tone as the cattle turn toward the desired location, increasing in beep frequency as they move toward the goal and switching to a low hum when they reach the desired point.

    With the device described, you program in a location near the herd the first couple times and feed them there. After a while, you feed further away so that they get used to following the audible cues. The stop signal comes into play so that you can gather several smaller groups together by having them wait at a location before continuing to the final goal. The rancher will need a couple months to get the herd trained the first time, then just a few reminders throughout the season to keep the training established. Since most ranchers feed regularly anyway, this would not be an undue cost or difficulty. After five years or so, you would have a well trained herd of cattle at a cost of $5/cow annually (factoring in a mild service and battery upkeep fee.) I think that most ranchers would go for that cost, and many would get by with far fewer than one in five cattle needing the tracking device.

    --
    B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
    1. Re:It's about the money by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Like the original poster, you seem confused on the difference between cattle on the range and cattle in a pasture. Sure are a lot of people who claim to know cattle, but who make such elementary mistakes, in this subthread.

    2. Re:It's about the money by ancientt · · Score: 1

      I guess you could be right, after all, while I'm from the area of some of the biggest ranches in the US, they do have fences around them, making them "pastures" rather than "on the range." Ranch hands on the King ranch, the Wagoneer, and Four Sixes refer to pastures, and sometimes use exactly the same techniques I described, but I guess they only "claim to know cattle."

      You'd be hard pressed to find cattle anywhere in the US intentionally running free where there is no fence, but those very few cattle must be what this is about. All those ranchers, the ones responsible for practically all of the beef cattle raised in the country, are completely outside the scope of this discussion.

      I've noticed that sarcasm tends to be mistaken for sincerity, so let me be clear: You're an idiot for correcting me when you don't know what you're talking about. If you think that the electronics described don't apply to cattle who are in fenced areas, you're an even bigger idiot.

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
  69. e-stampede by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    "Git along, little [*static*]"

  70. Can I get one of these... by SirKron · · Score: 1

    for my wife that goes off within 500 yards of a shopping mall?

  71. WTF! Really? by caller9 · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm glad the research money is going to good use. I doubt anyone will blink at attaching a $900 piece of hardware to a $700 cow. Since this will replace a fence that requires very very very little maintenance with a system that requires constant attention and talking to cattle.

    This has to be the most retarded invention I've ever heard of. What brought about the demand for this device? People who want to be cowboys but don't like the whole cattle/outdoors/cowboy part of things?

    I'm sure the several people he hires to replace the batteries will completely mitigate the need for people familiar with herding and handling cattle...wait...no it won't.

    I mean WTF?! Really?

  72. There is no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no cow level