Slashdot Mirror


UK UFO Sightings Declassified, Still No Intergalactic Relations

schwit1 is just one of the massive flood of readers (and publications) writing to tell us about the recently declassified UK Ministry of Defense account of a supposed UFO sighting. Included are nineteen sightings between 1986 and 1992, with the most notable being a sighting in 1991 with a US Air Force pilot's first-hand account. Not that this lends an air of credibility to anything, just more papers with more words. "Almost 200 such files will be made available by the MoD over the next four years. [...] UFO expert and journalism lecturer at Sheffield Hallam University, Dr David Clarke, said the documents would shed new light on relatively little-known sightings. He said some conspiracy theorists would already have decided that the release of the papers was a 'whitewash.' He added: 'Because the subject is bedevilled by charlatans and lunatics, it is career suicide to have your name associated with UFOs, which is a real pity. The National Archives are doing a fantastic job here. Everyone brings their own interpretation. Now you can look at the actual primary material — the stuff coming into the MoD every day — and make your own mind up.'"

100 of 319 comments (clear)

  1. And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The U.S. government weren't trying to cover up aliens at places like Roswell, they were covering up their secret spy aircraft. Why do you think most of these "UFO cover-ups" involved strange craft spotted near isolated air force bases at the height of the Cold War? Project Blue Book wasn't about little green men, it was about making sure no one had gotten a good look at their latest prototype stealth planes and also checking to see if any hillbillies might have actually spotted any Soviet spy planes in the area.

    No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But what will I do with my tinfoil hat collection?

    2. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

      yeah, but, it's more PC to say, "Aliens stuck a probe up my ass!" than saying "I stuck a probe up my ass because I LIKE IT!"

      I'll still blame the aliens thank you very much!

    3. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by CorporateSuit · · Score: 5, Funny

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

      I think you underestimate the driving power of finding inlets of pornography.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    4. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

      Joyriding teenagers at faster than light travel certainly might think it worth their while.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Considering that most of the people whose asses they probe are smelly rednecks with beer guts and only a few teeth, I would question their taste. You travel 100's of light years, only to forgo probing Natalie Portman for some trailer park skank?!?! Aliens are indeed strange.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      My girlfriend stuck her tongue in my ass and it felt very alien. I did like it though...

    7. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      The U.S. government weren't trying to cover up aliens at places like Roswell, they were covering up their secret [craft].

      This may be true, but it also means the govt's creditability is zilch.
           

    8. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Rule 34. Even aliens have it.

    9. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Saffaya · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well then, you will have to explain why you can see flying saucers on medieval paintings, or exactly what the belgian F-16 were chasing above their territory, and which went through the sound barrier over urban areas without producing any supersonic bang.

      I have seen on television the videos of the F-16's radar when in pursuit of those. The commentary didn't mention any numbers, but as I recognized a familiar layout from my FALCON (ATARI ST) days, I did check the illuminated target speed indicator. It went from 400K to 700K in a matter of seconds.
      It is publicly known the intruder lost the F-16 in pursuit behind like leaves in the wind.

      Belgium is a small country and is maybe one of the few to have a fighter air force but no official, government-run public relation service in charge of explaining that everything people see is either a meteor or a piece of rocket burning on reentry.

    10. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which medieval paintings are those? And are you seriously citing your knowledge of radar screens based on an Atari game?

    11. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    12. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by MechaBlue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why is the possibility of of earth being observed by alien xenobiologists and xenoanthropologists always immediately dismissed? It certainly falls within the realm of possible when compared against our current understanding of physics.

      Astronomers are regularly finding extrasolar planets and are, in some cases, able to determine the atmospheric composition.

      Biology is slowly moving toward transgenic creatures, cloning, and cyborgs.

      Physics and nanotechnology continually revealing new information about how the universe works. Some of this information is finding practical uses in controlling information and energy.

      In the past 100 years, computers have gone from laughably simple to being capable of modeling the climate of an entire planet. It's still innacurate and slow but it's getting faster and better.

      If it were possible right now, we'd have all kinds of people exploring the galaxy. Within the next 1,000 years, it will be possible to find planets that have a high chance of sustaining higher life forms and deliver some kind of observers to those planets for further study.

      What would prevent there from being one or more alien races from undertaking a similar mission of exploration? Why would Earth automatically be disqualified as a target of such a mission?

    13. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you think the parent is insightful read this ...

      During the 1942 Battle of Los Angeles the military instituted a mandatory black out of the entire city of LA & fired 1400+ Anti-Aircraft rounds at a single, quoting the military, "unidentified aircraft." This lasted for more than an hour. Despite numerous confirmed hits the craft remained airborne and eventually flew off without ever being identified. (Read the 1942 LA times article).

      In 1948 green fireballs were seen over the south-western skies of the US near nuclear weapons research sites. Famous meteoriticist Dr. Lincoln La Paz declared they weren't normal meteors. In 1949 the USAF started Project Twinkle under the direction of Dr. Anythony Mirachi.

      The study concluded in a now declassified report that cinetheodolites had tracked 4 objects traveling at an "altitude of ~150K ft" (~28.5 miles!), were "30 ft. in diameter", & traveling at an "undeterminable, yet high speed." Mirachi went on to later criticize a Time magazine article that claimed there was no proof to support the existence of UFOs.

      Mirachi wrote, "There was too much evidence in favor of saucers to say they could have all been balloons. 'I was conducting the main investigation. The government had to depend on me or my branch for information.' He said he didn't see how the Navy could say there had been no concrete evidence of the phenomena." (see here for more details)

      Also in 1948 Dr. J. Allen Hynek, a self-proclaimed skeptic, joined Project Blue Book as a scientific adviser. By 1969 when Blue Book was shutdown Hynek did an about face. He wrote several books, particularly, "The Hynek UFO Report" which repeatedly stated that the attitude of Blue Book was, "it can't be therefore it isn't."

      He also gave an interview, available on YouTube, where he said, "I was there at Blue Book and I know the job they had. They were told not to excite the public, don't rock the boat, & I saw it [with] my own eyes. ... The cases that were very difficult to explain they would jump handsprings to keep the media away from that." He later went on to found the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS).

      July 13 - 29th of 1952, over the skies of Washington DC, numerous UFOs were seen by observers on the ground, in the air, & tracked on radar. The situation escalated & General Samford, the Director of Intelligence of the USAF, held an emergency press conference. When asked by a reporters what people were seeing he suggested the lights on the ground may have looked like they were in the air because inversions act like an "air lens" & bend light rays. He added that something similar could have "tricked" radar in to thinking it was tracking aerial targets. (http://ufologie.net/htm/usa1952.htm)

      In 1969 an Air Force scientific report titled "Quantitative Aspects of Mirages" (Menkello, F.G. Report No. 6112, USAF, Environmental Technical Applications Center) made it clear inversion strong enough to create the visual effect described during the 1952 press-conference could not exist in earth's atmosphere.

      1956 at Bentwater/Lakenheath an object was sighted by several military officers on the ground while simultaneously tracked on radar at 2 different stations. The object moved at ~4000 mph and was monitored for several hours during which two planes were scrambled.

      When the 1st DeHavilland Venom locked on to the object the UFO shot to the rear of the plane. The pilot tried evasive maneuvers, couldn't break free & eventually had to return to base to refuel.

      The 2nd plane encountered mechanical difficulties as it flew within range of the object. The US sponsored Condon Report had this to say, "

    14. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by olclops · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd recommend reading the book by the Air Force's first head of project blue book, Edward J. Ruppelt, before you make such general claims. It's available free online, here, and it's a refreshingly candid look at the sighting reports from the early 50's. He makes it very clear that he had access to all the pentagon experts and that a surprising percentage of cases were clearly not anything we had made. After reading this book, I have stopped mocking true UFO believers. Their case really isn't as shoddy as it seems.

    15. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Gat0r30y · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obligatory Calvin and Hobbes quote: Sometimes I think the surest sign intelligent life exists in the universe is that none of it has come here.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    16. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

      It went from 400K to 700K in a matter of seconds.

      700K isn't really that warm for a jet engine (~425 C), what's impressive is that it had been running so cool - 400K is only ~25 degrees above boiling! It is impressive that the Belgians incorporate that kind of data into their radar systems, though.

      They probably just kicked on the afterburner.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    17. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      flying saucers on medieval paintings

      You mean circles?

      F-16 were chasing above their territory, and which went through the sound barrier over urban areas without producing any supersonic bang.

      A mirage, a light anomaly, a meteor, another aircraft seen at a skewed distance, a hoax by the pilots, a falling satellite---and about 1,000 other possible explanations that are all much more reasonable than intergalactic alien visitors traveling almost incomprehensibility vast intergalactic distances only to buzz our aircrafts and probe our hillbillies.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    18. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Jonny_eh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not impossible that we're being secretly monitored by aliens that don't want to be seen, yet are seen by drunks and paranoidians anyways. It's just that rational thinking people are skeptical. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence, and all that.

    19. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Jim+Hall · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... are you seriously citing your knowledge of radar screens based on an Atari game?

      Laugh now, but when the revolution comes, I am the one who will fly the TIE fighters to save humanity. I have countless hours of simulation time to prove it. :-)

      Similar training has also taught me the best way to win a firefight (like let's say, Iraq or Vietnam or WW2 Germany) is to bunny hop diagonally, then make a rocket-jump to higher ground! Seriously, the guvmint needs to apply this to our armed forces training now!

    20. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Get ready for the staged alien invasion slated for 2012, of course.

    21. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, it's possible. It's also possible that unicorns are real, and are just really good at hiding.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    22. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Jonny_eh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that honestly witnessing such an event would be such an extraordinary thing, it just follows that a multitude of copy-cats would chime in with fake reports after hearing about it.

      What about a third, more reasonable, explanation for UFO reports? People see things in the sky they don't understand. i.e. it's something natural, not an alien, yet because they think it's an alien, it becomes an extraordinary experience.

      Every case that has enough data, ends up having a mundane explanation.

    23. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Jonny_eh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about the possibility that sightings were of natural phenomena? i.e. not made by the pentagon, or humans?

      What about lights in the skies created by civilians?

      Don't commit the false dichotomy fallacy of assuming there are two options, and if one is false, the other is automatically true. There can be other options!

    24. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are also dragons in medieval paintings. "You will have to explain why" they don't exist or else, obviously, we must accept that dragons are real. It's well known that the fire of a dragon's breath goes "from 400K to 700K in a matter of seconds," so we can safely say this is confirmed by ironclad modern empirical evidence!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    25. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I consider myself kind of a "UFO skeptic", yet not willing to accept that ALL of it is bogus either.

      You're not a very good skeptic, are you? Find something else to consider yourself.

    26. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The U.S. Air Force in 1947 (at that time still party of the Army) had just begun the first two of many programs (Project Mogul and Project Moby Dick) that would involve floating high altitude balloons over the Soviet Union to listen to and photograph military and industrial facilities (remember, this was before satellites and high altitude reconnaissance aircraft like the U-2), mostly to keep an eye on Soviet atomic aspirations. If the Soviets caught wind of this, so soon after WWII, it would have caused a major international incident and ratcheted up Cold war tensions (which were already high enough in the face of the establishment of the iron curtain). So when one of these things went down in Roswell, you bet your ass they wanted to shut people up about it.

      Little did they realize that their efforts to shut people up about what they saw would ultimately provide the perfect cover (leading people to assume they were covering up aliens rather than the secret spy programs they were REALLY covering up).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    27. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Why is the possibility of of earth being observed by alien xenobiologists and xenoanthropologists always immediately dismissed? It certainly falls within the realm of possible when compared against our current understanding of physics."

      I am perfectly willing to believe in alien observers - just give me proof that isn't easily explained by something else that is far more simple. Look up Occam's Razor.

      Of course, if William of Ockham was actually an alien planted to mislead the human community for generations, that would be a different story.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    28. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by UID30 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I present as evidence ... Meat

      --
      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte
    29. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by afabbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well then, you will have to explain why you can see flying saucers on medieval paintings,

      Of course, you can also see the earth opening up and demons dragging people down to hell in medieval paintings.

      Hell, in ancient Egyptian art, there are humans with falcon heads. If that doesn't smash theories of evolution all to hell...

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    30. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by TheGeniusIsOut · · Score: 3, Informative

      It went from 400K to 700K in a matter of seconds.

      700K isn't really that warm for a jet engine (~425 C), what's impressive is that it had been running so cool - 400K is only ~25 degrees above boiling! It is impressive that the Belgians incorporate that kind of data into their radar systems, though.

      They probably just kicked on the afterburner.

      I'm pretty sure they were referring to velocity, not temperature, since it was in reference to the "illuminated target speed indicator" and 300Km/s over 10 seconds is over 3,000 g.

      --
      Ignorance is Bliss -- And the Opposite is True -- Genius is Madness
    31. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by afabbro · · Score: 5, Informative

      Regarding medieval paintings, I think this is the kind of idiocy being referred to.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    32. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by timholman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it were possible right now, we'd have all kinds of people exploring the galaxy. Within the next 1,000 years, it will be possible to find planets that have a high chance of sustaining higher life forms and deliver some kind of observers to those planets for further study.

      What would prevent there from being one or more alien races from undertaking a similar mission of exploration? Why would Earth automatically be disqualified as a target of such a mission?

      Sure, it is certainly possible that we're being observed by an alien race. What makes no sense, however, is why they would be doing it the way the UFO believers think they're doing it, i.e. visiting us in spaceships and kidnapping random people for study.

      UFO believers constantly weave their own preconceptions of how aliens "ought" to look and behave into their delusions. Just read the history of UFO abductions over the past 50 years, and notice how the stories and descriptions constantly evolve to match the technology and culture of the day. For example, the "abduction" of Betty and Barney Hill reads like a bad 50's sci-fi movie nowadays - which is almost certainly what inspired it.

      Consider that an alien race would be literally centuries ahead of us in science and technology. If they've found an economical way to travel between the stars, then they would have an understanding of physics far beyond our own. The computing power at their disposal would be incomprehensibly greater than ours. They would have techniques for surveillance at their disposal that we could barely comprehend. My point is this: if aliens are actually monitoring us, we'd literally never know it.

      Think of it this way: suppose you wanted to constantly monitor a tribe of chimpanzees. Within 20 or 30 years we'll probably be using small robotic probes to do just that. The probes will look like rocks, or insects, or a hundred other objects that will be indistinguishable from the normal environment of the chimps. The chimps will have no clue they're being watched. We'll even be able to obtain tissue and blood samples using robotic insects. Now extend those ideas by a few centuries of technological progress and you'll start to have a glimmering of how aliens would be observing humanity.

      The whole idea of aliens flying around in spaceships, randomly kidnapping people, and subjecting them to bizarre physical examinations is laughable. It defies logic and reason. However, in the context of human psychology and sexual fantasies, the origin of such stories becomes perfectly clear.

    33. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Plekto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. I've read hundreds of doomsday and off the wall ideas over the years, but this one is by far one of the most entertaining conspiracy theories that I've heard. Truly tinfoil-hat time.

      That said, it's pretty clear that there are some incidents that look to be legitimate mixed in with all of the various piles of other junk. What they are, though... that's a whole other discussion. It's far more likely that they are actually the results of various secret programs. Doubly so since most "sightings" take place near military bases.

      And even *if* they were aliens and they did exist, it's still not going to fix our economy, make gas cost $2 a gallon, or even take out the trash. Life goes on, and there's a zillion things to deal with and fix that are more important.

    34. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's an unidentified object. Just because you don't know what it is doesn't mean it's an alien spacecraft.

      Just because it can't be explained, doesn't mean it's an alien spacecraft.

      When someone produces some real evidence instead of 'I don't know what this is, so it must be an alien spacecraft', I'll pay more attention.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    35. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and about 1,000 other possible explanations that are all much more reasonable than intergalactic alien visitors traveling almost incomprehensibility vast intergalactic distances only to buzz our aircrafts and probe our hillbillies.

      Just because the distance is incomprehensible to us, doesn't mean that it is to other alien races. To an ant in Africa, people flying 10,000 miles to study them would be incomprehensible (and yes, I know that ants have no idea what distance is, but it's an example).

    36. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are also dragons in medieval paintings. "You will have to explain why" they don't exist

      They evolved from fish. Their swim bladders gained an electrolysis gland which separated water they drank in to hydrogen and oxygen. They exhaled the oxygen, which caused spontaneous combustion on anything they breathed it on, and kept the hydrogen in their flight bladder to provide lift. Obviously, when they died, the hydrogen would combust, igniting the rest of the body and leaving no remnants in the fossil record.

      Next conspiracy please.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    37. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by bogjobber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody is saying that it's outside the realm of possibility, it's just that there's no proof. People mock UFO believers because their "evidence" consists of crazy government conspiracies and small dots of light appearing on film taken on terrible video equipment, all of which is explained simply and logically (with evidence) by other hypotheses.

      There are several groups that take an objective, scientific approach to the search for extraterrestrial life (NASA, SETI, etc.). Those institutions are well-regarded by the community. It's just the crazy people that are mocked.

    38. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just read the history of UFO abductions over the past 50 years, and notice how the stories and descriptions constantly evolve to match the technology and culture of the day. For example, the "abduction" of Betty and Barney Hill reads like a bad 50's sci-fi movie nowadays - which is almost certainly what inspired it.

      When I was a kid in the 70s, I was a bit of a UFO buff. I read accounts of all sort of aliens being sighted - tall ones, short ones, green ones, grey ones, ones clothed in shiny silver, naked ones...

      Then, after Close Encounters of the Third Kind came out, everybody started seeing Greys. No one sees tall green aliens in shiny suits anymore.

      (It's kind of sad, really...poor guys kicked to the curb by Spielberg's FX.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    39. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why publicize it was just a "weather balloon", yet go to all the apparent trouble to guard it from public view, quickly whisking it away under military guard?

      Because it wasn't just a "weather balloon". It was a balloon sent up to monitor Russian nuclear tests. In the late 40's, that's super-duper top-secret stuff - heck, I can almost imagine that they deliberately covered that program up with stories of a flying saucer crash!

      And there wasn't a whole lot of trouble taken to guard it from public view. A farmer found a bunch of shiny junk, it got picked up, the local paper ran a story about it, some joker at the Roswell Army Air Field conflated it with recent stories about "flying discs" and issued a press release. Thirty years later, reports of "rubber strips, tinfoil, a rather tough paper and sticks" somehow became wreckage of an alien spacecraft.

      The "Witness to Rosell" book published in 2007 lists over 600 people who claim, in some fashion, that it was really some type of UFO that was collected. That's a significant number of people.....

      You can find millions of Americans who claim, in some fashion, that a big bearded guy in the sky created the whole universe just a few thousand years ago, including a garden where he put a man made out of clay who is the ancestor of all of humanity. That's a significant number of people. But numbers don't make a belief sensible.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    40. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Plekto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. We're so clever that we couldn't learn anything from aliens?

      (looks around) Given the general lack of intelligence that Humanity seems to be demonstrating, I seriously don't think anything that they would teach us would sink in.

    41. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Liquidrage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The world would be no more interesting. It would be the world you've always known, complete with struggles and accomplishments, and highs and lows.

      Plato's cave is really a mathematical proof.

    42. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Xest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "1. that there is something unidentified in our airspace. Project Twinkle definitively proves this."

      Yes, roughly as well as the Bible proves god exists.

      The crux of the problem is this, whilst we have UFO sightings world wide the sheer number reported from the US is entirely disproportionate- especially abduction reports.

      The number of reports from the rest of the world simply don't match up to those from the US, statistically it just doesn't make sense unless someone can suggest a valid reason why visitors from another world would be interest mainly in Americans?

      We have people who say they've seen UFOs but we still have no photos that aren't either extremely poor quality or been exposed as hoaxes. This means the reality is we still have no more evidence for UFO visits than we do for the existence of god and the UFO is consistently, as in all your examples provided only as something unprovable "Oh it moved too fast for us to catch", how convenient.

      There's also plenty of room for plausible explanations in many cases too, how can people be so sure Russians don't have aircraft as high tech as proposed by the aurora project, it's not like the Russians are somehow less capable of keeping secrets, with their oppresive regime quite the contrary.

      Even in this newly released report a pretty obvious answer is sitting right in front of us. The incident happened in 1991, the object was brown. What was flying to/from the UK in 1991? British Tornado and Jaguar aircraft to and from Iraq from the first gulf war. The MoD confirmed it wasn't a balloon, a missile, a rocket and nothing more- why in war time would they confirm the flight path of their military jets?

      If we get some evidence that's a little more concrete then great, but whilst UFOs remain as provable as the existence of god in the context given then it really can't be given any more merit than religious belief.

    43. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by TheTapani · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their case really isn't as shoddy as it seems.

      The case of existence is open and shut.

      Every serious investigation on the UFO phenomenon has concluded that they are real (US, Soviet, British, Feench, Mexican, Brazilian miliaries for instance). That is not the issue anymore.

      The issue is to understand what we are seeing. Remember, UFO is not the same as ET. There is no single explanation that could explain the vastly different type of reports. One of the difficulties is that there is no clear border what reports to accept. The cases get continuously more and more wicked and logic defying.

      To give three examples of cases along the scale:
      Easy to accept case (probably an unknown natural phenomenon): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hessdalen_light
      Classic case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_Tehran_UFO_incident
      "Wicked" case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_the_sun

  2. Don't be silly. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you really think the MoD (or the CIA, NSA, etc.) are going to provide us with the real deal? Of course it's a whitewa.....NO, NO NOT THE ANAL PROBE AGAIN!!!

    1. Re:Don't be silly. by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mr. Goatse didn't cooperate, and look what happened to him.

    2. Re:Don't be silly. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you really think the MoD (or the CIA, NSA, etc.) are going to provide us with the real deal? Of course it's a whitewa.....NO, NO NOT THE ANAL PROBE AGAIN!!!

      Dammit! Another brownout!

      --
      This guy's the limit!
  3. Cause & Effect by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it is career suicide to have your name associated with UFOs

    Not career suicide, just a hilariously pointless hobby like squirrel eating ... or Warcraft.

    Something that's always bothered me about Alien sightings and 'abductions' is that the sightings really didn't kick off until 1897 which coincides closely with the release of the War of the Worlds. And, interestingly enough, alien abductions didn't really take off until the 1960s when movies about abductions had been in circulation since the 50s (as any devout MST3K fan knows).

    Aside from a few odd reportings (and maybe a few religions) the above holds true.

    We are human beings, we have awesome imaginations and a multitude of chemicals that effect them. I don't know what it's like to be coked out in an opium den or suffering from carbon monoxide poisoning but I think a lot of UFO stuff is pretty much a direct result of the human psyche, not extraterrestrials.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Cause & Effect by geogob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not career suicide, just a hilariously pointless hobby like squirrel eating ... or Warcraft.

      A career suicide indeed it is. We have had a good example here, in Canada. A scientist for the Defence Research and Development Canada, a DND department responsible for military research projects in Canada, lost his job a few years back.

      During his free time, that scientist worked on the active SETI project. He was always meticulous about keeping is work separate from his hobby, but Radio-Canada was not. During a prime time interview, they captioned his name with the title "scientist for the Canadian defense" or something like that.

      From what I heard, his career as a military scientist was promptly ended following that media "incident".

    2. Re:Cause & Effect by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Something that's always bothered me about Alien sightings and 'abductions' is that the sightings really didn't kick off until 1897

      That's wrong. They were happening before 1897, but instead of "aliens" they were blamed on "angels" "demons" or simply "the gods".

      There are highly detailed accounts of "otherworldly" abductions going back to the Sumerians, who sort of invented language. That's a pretty long time ago.

      I'm not saying that there have ever been real "otherworldly" abductions alien or otherwise, but to say that they started in 1897 is just plain wrong.

      It's amazing that it's taken as obvious that there's no such thing as UFOs (which as many as 80% of Americans believe in) but you'll get modded as flamebait if you suggest that there's no such thing as God (in which about the same number of Americans believe).

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Cause & Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Sumerians invented the first writing that we know of, not language. Language almost certainly came thousands of years earlier. Aside from that you're correct.

    4. Re:Cause & Effect by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Something that's always bothered me about Alien sightings and 'abductions' is that the sightings really didn't kick off until 1897 [wikipedia.org] which coincides closely with the release of the War of the Worlds [wikipedia.org]. And, interestingly enough, alien abductions didn't really take off until the 1960s [wikipedia.org] when movies about abductions had been in circulation [thetriangle.org] since the 50s (as any devout MST3K fan knows).

      Let's not mention the historic accounts of people meeting "gods" and going away with them, ezekiel's wheels within wheels, vimana's, the presence of UFO's in renaissance paintings, etc etc.

      This is called a cargo cult, and similar cults centered around aircraft have been encountered among previously undiscovered tribes in central south america.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    5. Re:Cause & Effect by timholman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We are human beings, we have awesome imaginations and a multitude of chemicals that effect them. I don't know what it's like to be coked out in an opium den or suffering from carbon monoxide poisoning but I think a lot of UFO stuff is pretty much a direct result of the human psyche, not extraterrestrials.

      The older you get, the more you realize just how fallible human perception and memory truly are, and how amazingly easy it is to fall prey to self-delusion. That pretty much describes every UFO believer I've ever met.

      What is actually very fascinating is to learn about (and sometime experience!) the psychological manifestations that have been attributed to alien visitation. True story: several years ago, my mother called me on the phone to tell me that she had experienced an episode of sleep paralysis. She had the classic symptoms: an inability to move coupled with hallucinations of someone (or something) being in the bedroom with her. She didn't know what had happened to her until I told her about the phenomenon, and how throughout history people had attributed sleep paralysis episodes to supernatural or extraterrestrial visitation.

      What was truly bizarre is that I experienced my own episode of sleep paralysis just a few nights later. I awoke in a panic, unable to move and absolutely certain that something was in the room with me. After about 30 seconds I broke out of it and jumped out of bed. Even though I intellectually knew what had happened to me, I didn't go back to sleep until I had checked the house for intruders. The feeling of another presence in the room with me was that strong.

      I knew what had happened to me by the next morning: my mother's description of her experience, coupled with the power of suggestion, had induced a similar experience in my own mind. Since then, neither my mother or I have suffered a second episode. It was a very sobering reminder to me that even rigorous education and scientific training are not always proof against the psychological tricks of one's own brain.

    6. Re:Cause & Effect by Macrat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jesus was an alien pregnancy experiment?

    7. Re:Cause & Effect by bogjobber · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I really recommend Carl Sagan's book The Demon-Haunted World. A decent amount of the book is focused on this phenomenon, with several scientific explanations for why people have abduction dreams. There are the obvious ones (a traumatic event that damages your mind, unconsciously covering up abuse, plain old lying) but the mind is capable of some crazy things.

      What many abduction believers are conscious of, but don't really take into account, is that normal people hallucinate all the time. Most people do it every day, although not very vividly. It can be triggered by anything, but it is especially common when you are waking or doing something monotonous and repetitive (such as driving while tired). Everything from tiny daydreams to full out trips are possible if your brain is in a certain state.

      Some people can have vivid hallucinations quite regularly without drugs or anything unusual in their body. When that happens their mind goes to extraordinary things (no one hallucinates about doing their laundry). Little kids see monsters. If you watch sci-fi movies, maybe you'll see aliens. If you spend your time at a hellfire and brimstone church maybe you'll see demons. How many times have you woken up from a dream and it took you a long time to realize that you were awake?

      The scientific method is the only way to examine these things in a neutral way. There's nothing wrong with believing that there might be UFO's. But until there is proof you can't claim that anything extraordinary like that exists. Right now there isn't even crappy evidence, let alone enough to prove something that incredible.

    8. Re:Cause & Effect by gnick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's amazing that it's taken as obvious that there's no such thing as UFOs

      They do exist - I can testify to it personally. I see maybe 2-3 very strange flying things in the sky around Los Alamos, NM per year. Definitely not planes/helicopters and their shape & flight patterns make balloons a strange guess.

      They're flying objects that, at least for me and most (possibly all) of the town, they're unidentified. Now, whether or not they're extraterrestrial as opposed to some weird LANL experiment or hobby object is up for debate. (Los Alamos is full of nerdy hobbyists - LANL/hobbyist seem about equally likely.)

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    9. Re:Cause & Effect by Internalist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [...] the Sumerians, who sort of invented language.

      The mind boggles. The likely timespan between the evolution of spoken language (meaning something with at least some syntax and probably phonology) and written language (which is what the Sumerians are typically credited with) is on the order of 1E4 years. And yes, IAALinguist.

      More on-topic, I've personally witnessed a documented unidentified aerial phenomenon, also witnessed by hundreds of others, including police, firefighters, journalists (yeah, yeah). I'm talking about the November 9, 1990 sighting in Montreal. I was in Grade 10 at the time, walking downtown with two friends. One of them noticed the lights over Place Bonaventure, and we all determined that something at least "unusual" was afoot, and stood there looking at it for almost a half-hour. It was pretty neat.

      I'd love to get my hands on a copy of the official RCMP report on the incident, which concluded with no plausible explanation for the phenomenon.

      --
      Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing. -- Wernher von Braun
    10. Re:Cause & Effect by tftp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given that I don't believe in existence of god[s] ... no, I don't. This, however, does not prevent me from using the Bible as one of oldest sets of stories, be they fictional or true. IMO, most people don't have much imagination, and it would be hard for an ancient man to invent "a man on a flying throne" without some sort of an input (mushrooms wouldn't be enough - the idea of a flying machine has to be in his brain already.)

      It is also interesting that Indian equivalent of the Bible also features UFOs (vimanas, see Wikipedia.)

    11. Re:Cause & Effect by timholman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but this just doesn't seem very scientific. You obviously experienced something, but you've instantly correlated it to internal factors without any other supporting evidence? Do you frequently succumb to suggestion in this manner, or was this the first time? Have you experienced something due to suggestion since? What, other than your "rigorous education and scientific training" led you to this conclusion?

      I submit that you probably lack the necessary information to support the conclusion that "psychological tricks of one's own brain" were at play here.

      Well, I applied Occam's Razor to what happened. I had two possible explanations:

      (1) Aliens or supernatural beings visited my mother, then visited me. Maybe they were working their way through my family tree?

      (2) My mother's vivid recounting of her experience made a deep impression on me. She was really very concerned about what had happened to her and was more than a little frightened. She really didn't completely calm down until I explained the phenomenon of sleep paralysis to her. I spent a lot of time over the next couple of days thinking about what had happened to her, and reading more about sleep paralysis - and then, boom, I have an episode myself. So yes, I think the power of suggestion was clearly at work.

      Either my mind was playing tricks on me, or aliens (or maybe devils) visited me in my bedroom. So which explanation sounds more plausible to you?

    12. Re:Cause & Effect by inviolet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Some people can have vivid hallucinations quite regularly without drugs or anything unusual in their body. When that happens their mind goes to extraordinary things (no one hallucinates about doing their laundry). Little kids see monsters. If you watch sci-fi movies, maybe you'll see aliens. If you spend your time at a hellfire and brimstone church maybe you'll see demons. How many times have you woken up from a dream and it took you a long time to realize that you were awake?

      Yes... and what's more, there is a documented psychological disorder in which people cannot tell the difference between past imaginings versus past events. I forget the name of the disorder now, but it is serious business and common enough to be responsible for all of the abduction stories and a great many criminal accusations. Let this be yet another compelling reason to never ever convict a person based on the testimony of a single witness.

      Treatment for the disorder is palliative, at least for now. People who have the disorder are taught to frame their mental picture with a colored border so that later on, when they recall the memory, they'll see the border and know it wasn't real.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    13. Re:Cause & Effect by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've always wondered (and I honestly don't know, I'm not old enough) if the moon landing hoaxers were inspired by the movie "Capricorn One." The movie was released in 1978 about a mission to Mars which is faked from a desolate sound stage after NASA learns that the life support system on the capsule would break down halfway there.

      Can anybody older than I, and with a good memory, tell me if the moon landing hoax people were around before this movie came out? Or if they're a result of the movie, similar to the UFO phenom.

    14. Re:Cause & Effect by Spatial · · Score: 2, Informative

      Confabulation?

    15. Re:Cause & Effect by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about this particular scientist, though I do know that in some of the more secret 3 letter agencies (and various other slightly longer acronyms) that I worked for in Australia, we had a few black and white rules and regulations on the subject. It always amused me that one of those rules made it 'forbidden' to actually talk / write / comment about UFO's. I often wondered what evolution took place that would actually get those policies enacted in the first place. Was it some twisted idiot like myself messing around, or was it for slightly more serious reasons? I guess I'll never know.

      That said, I used to bring the subject up pretty much as a matter of routine in some very amusing places. At least they were amusing to me. Before I was employed by government, one of the psychs at the interview asked me why I wanted to have a job in this particular category. I told him straight up: "I want to find out if UFO's exist" - he giggled like a school girl and assumed I was making a joke, scribbled some notes, and I got the job.

      For a short while I got mixed up with a few contacts at DSTO, South Australia (Adelaide) who had access to a couple of bits of interesting gear (of the human manufactured kind) - in a briefing about it all one time, the perfect opportunity arose for another of my socially inappropriate remarks and I blurted out "So, you also take crashed UFO's there too?"

      The answer was interesting, not quite what I was expecting, but lets just say, even at those levels there is "No Conspiracy"

      I'm as anti-censorship as they come, but some things probably do need to be kept quiet lest you piss off someone that can actually hurt you.

      Lets put it this way:
      Through your binoculars you see test platforms and foreign planes flying around area 51, rednecks see UFO's, through our telescopes we see more, or perhaps more frequently, a lot less of much the same thing over various parts of our red dirt. We have our own supply of locally produced rednecks too.

    16. Re:Cause & Effect by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You see strange things really close to a military base where they work on experimental aircraft? Color me shocked.

      I'm a skeptic with most things - even UFOs - but I believe in the possibility very much. I really don't think the conditions for life are so stringent that we are the only sentient beings anywhere in the entire universe, much less the entire galaxy. That's arrogant and ignorant when you consider the full scope of outer space.

      It is very likely that those are just experimental U.S. aircraft, but I admit it's likely that it could be extraterrestrials as well. I mean, wouldn't you want to know the military capabilities of a planet before you went and said hello? That could also explain all of the pilots coming across things - maybe they were testing our fighter jocks. Or, ya know, just fuckin' with us and having a larf.

    17. Re:Cause & Effect by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I applied Occam's Razor to what happened. I had two possible explanations:

      Why only two?

      Perhaps the fact that this happened to your mother shortly before it happened to you is merely coincidence. Perhaps you inherited a neurological trait from her, once that has nothing to do with the power of suggestion. Perhaps what happened to you was not the same phenomenon at all, and you merely had a "hysterical" belief about such events based on what happened to her. Perhaps this same thing had happened to you before but you just ignored it, forgot about it, but this time paid more attention to it because of her report.

      Nothing personal, but we outside observers also have the possibility that you're lying or delusional - or your mother was lying or delusional.

      Perhaps you were not actually visited by aliens, but just targeted by their telepathic rays from Sirius. Or maybe just telepathic emanations from your neighbor. Perhaps it was neither aliens nor demons, but simply voodoo. Or government mind control experiments.

      As a practical matter, if Almighty Goddess herself came down with a sealed envelope holding The Truth of The Matter and invited me to bet on what it said, yeah, I'd put my money on sleep paralysis influenced by the "power of suggestion". But to say there were only two possible explanations is to overly simplify.

      Always remember that through any finite set of data points, an infinite number of curves can be drawn.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  4. Choice of words by Dr.+Grabow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "charlatans and lunatics" - what an exquisitely perfect choice of words ...

  5. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nonsense. There are no aliens here, just good old natives of Earth. You really need to just sit down and relax for a few hours. On an unrelated note, where do you live and is anyone else there with you?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. I beg to disagree by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

    To counter your wildly irresponsible statements, I offer proof.

  7. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by Emperor+Zombie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Foolish Earth meat-creature, there are no aliens here! Just thinking about this ridiculous idea makes my vocal tubes swell with mirth! Ho ho!

    --
    I'm so excited I just made water in my pantaloons!
  8. UFO != alien apacecraft by Itninja · · Score: 5, Informative

    Say it with me folks.... UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object. Of course UFO's exist! If a flaming dead cat is dropped from an airplane at night, and no one can identify it, it's a UFO. Anything that cannot readily be identified, and that flies, is a UFO. Now, whether some of these UFOs are alien spacecraft is an entirely different matter. Of course, once a UFO is identified as an alien spacecraft, it would then cease to be a UFO at all.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am pretty sure that a flaming dead cat dropped from an airplane at night would be considered a Unidentified "Falling" Object. Flaming dead cats do not fly.

    2. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by khallow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems highly unlikely that first contact from another galaxy would involve anything remotely humanoid.

      Like we'd have a clue one way or another. As I see it, there has been from the begining of multicelled life on Earth, strong selection pressure for limbs. And the biped has independently evolved at least twice (dinosaurs and primates). My take is that any planet with sufficiently advanced and varied life on it is going to have something bipedal. It might not be intelligent or even what we'd consider animal though.

    3. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by dbcad7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know that for sure.. sounds like testing is necessary.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  9. New Scientist by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm from Earth, but I'm a cyborg. No, really, I am. You will be assimilated.

    Anyway, back on topic. I just had New Scientest open, and they are running the same story:

    One pilot said he was seconds away from firing 24 rockets at the object, which moved erratically and gave a radar reading like "a flying aircraft carrier".

    It spent periods motionless in the sky before reaching estimated speeds of more than 12,000 kilometres per hour, said pilot Milton Torres, who is now 77 and living in Miami, Florida.

    After the alert, an unnamed man told Torres he must never talk about the incident and he duly kept silent for more than 30 years. His story was among dozens of UFO sightings in defence ministry files released at the National Archives in London (see UK releases classified UFO files).

    The files blame other UFO sightings on weather balloons, clouds or normal aircraft.

    UFO expert David Clarke said the sighting may have been part of a secret US project to create phantom aircraft on radar screens to test Soviet air defences. "Perhaps what this pilot had seen was some kind of experiment in electronic warfare," he said. "Something very unusual happened."

    <snip>

    The documents contain no official explanation for the incident, which came at a time of heightened tension between the West and the Soviet Union. Planes were on constant stand-by at British bases for a possible Soviet attack.

    "I shall never forget it," Torres told the Times. "On that night I was ordered to open fire even before I had taken off. That had never happened before."

  10. Re:Why not by thermian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh please... "The Egyptian papyrus described a fleet of flying saucers darting through the sky?"

    Seriously....

    The Egyptians said NO SUCH THING, that is by way of being utter nonsense.
    There have been lots of fascinating reports of strange events and objects in the sky in ancient time, most notably by the chinese. These are interesting because they reveal that early civilizations felt such things were worth recording, but most of the time information is scant, sufficient only to allow us to speculate as to causes, such as meteors or ball lightening.

    They are not, in any way at all, indicating that there were people sitting around pondering alien spaceships in the ancient world. Ever...

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
  11. The US has a good UFO detection system by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    Interestingly, the US has had, for several decades, a system which can detect UFOs - GEODSS, the Ground Based-Electro-Optical Deep Space Surveillance System. Each GEODSS site (there are three currently active, plus a mobile unit) has a pair of 40-inch telescopes. These were the first fully computerized telescopes, working since the 1980s. The telescopes scan the sky every night. They can detect moving bright objects as streaks, but there's more capability than that. They have a star atlas, and know what should be in each image, so anything that shouldn't be there is detected. If a known star is missing, that's interesting too; it may indicate a dark object. There are two telescopes, so for low-orbit objects, they can get parallax. Multiple sites can be coupled together to get parallax on more distant objects. They can even use one telescope with a laser to illuminate satellites while taking a picture with the other. This is how the USAF finds new satellites, near-earth asteroids, and nonmetallic space junk. The system was recnelty upgraded to use CCD imagers (it used to be tube camera based) and to use better alignment algorithms, so it's now both more sensitive and more accurate.

    This is all tied to NORAD in Colorado Springs. GEODSS knows what an incoming ICBM trajectory looks like, and if it ever sees one, NORAD gets notified, without any action from the GEODSS site operators.

    GEODSS is a real, live, functional UFO detection system that's been running for decades. If anything big enough to be interesting was anywhere near the planet for more than a few hours, it would be noticed. Even the target didn't reflect radar or light, it could be detected because it would occasionally occult a star.

    1. Re:The US has a good UFO detection system by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If anything big enough to be interesting was anywhere near the planet for more than a few hours, it would be noticed.

      And it would probably get written into a classified report, filed away for twenty or thirty years, then released to the public, yes?

    2. Re:The US has a good UFO detection system by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Damnit! That system is a word-for-word description of my old idea for detecting stealth/stealthy aircraft- I came up with it in low-observables/composites class a few years back.

      GEODSS is unsuitable for detecting low-flying aircraft. The field of view with big telescopes is too small. Sites have to be installed in high-altitude locations with good seeing. It's for looking at targets much further out. There are smaller electro-optical trackers for anti-aircraft use.

      The most useful approach for detecting stealthed aircraft is bistatic radar, a subject which tends not to be discussed much in the open literature. Ordinary "monostatic" radar has the transmitter and the receiver in the same location. Stealthed aircraft are designed to have a very small radar reflection of the incoming beam back in the direction from which it came. That's why the weird aircraft geometries. But only to a limited extent do they absorb radar beam energy. Much of it is reflected off in other directions. Bistatic radars, where the transmitter(s) and receivers(s) are in different locations, can pick up those reflections. There are some clever ideas in this space. But I digress.

  12. UFO sightings in Scotland... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... seem to be centred around Bonnybridge. Now, without wanting to sound like a UFO skeptic (I'm not) I do find myself wondering if "strange lights in the east" might have something to do with the flare stacks at the oil refinery in Grangemouth, the very bright strobes on a nearby pair of *immense* electricity pylons (couple of hundred metres tall) and a very tall power station chimney with strobes. Couple all that up with a bit of low cloud and you get some very odd effects. I used to drive through this area every day - at night in the winter you got some really odd glare off the clouds.

  13. Such a great distractor ! by speedlaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    UFO..... Maybe a secret hypersonic craft, since the SR 71 is retired, and there in "no" current replacement ? A cover up for soviet hypersonics ? Can't admit they have one and we don't. Consider that it is a great big deal to get here. I agree with the poster that your "abducted" people story is not rational. Kidnap a few humans if you need them, breed, and sequence the DNA, or just clone your own if you need to at this level of supposed technology. No one is coming here to bugger Bubba. Of course, if anyone had alien tech, it would be a huge leg up, aka the Terminator or Star Trek's Timeship stories. The fact that no one has just come out with a clean endless power source or radical new weapon is proof that no one has any significant alien artifacts.. -or at least ones we can figure out.

  14. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by Sancho · · Score: 2, Informative
  15. Being British,what are flying American acronyms... by D4C5CE · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...good for, when you've got genuine castles with even more genuine ghosts, and then again Nessie if Scottish summer gets all too boring?

    If anything, Her Majesty's extraterrestrials, keen to avoid any interference with the Royal Air Force (or, heaven forfend, the Home Secretary's wrath), stay orderly well grounded, and are kept busy making corn circles to lure Japanese tourists or those from insubordinate colonies to the fields of Devon!

  16. Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are literally tens-of-millions (if not hundreds of millions) more cameras in the hands of the residents of the planet earth than there were even 15 years ago. Cameras in phones, cameras in purses, cameras in trunks of cars, cameras in PDAs, the list goes on. Most of the cameras also shoot video.

    As a consequence we have many more pictures of police misconduct and celebrity's privates than we ever have in the past, but we have no noticeable increases in the numbers of good UFO pictures (or good sasquatch pics for that matter).

    If the number of UFOs are constant, and there are many more cameras, why aren't we seeing many more pictures flooding the intertubes?

    1. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cameras in phones, cameras in purses, cameras in trunks of cars, cameras in PDAs, the list goes on. Most of the cameras also shoot video.

      I have a Motorola flip phone made in the past few years and its camera (1.6 megapixel) is complete crap. I've actually tried taking a picture of a low-flying airplane at dusk, and it's all a blur.

      Have a look at this one. It's taken in broad daylight, a slow-moving target, nearly overhead, with an actual 5 megapixel camera. It's point-and-shoot, but was fully extended with its 5X optical zoom. It's really hard to get more than a few pixels out of an object flying only about 5000-7000 ft.

      Yeah, if I had my SLR with a good long, big lens and good low-light film, or a $1000-ish DSLR, I could probably take some good pictures like you describe. Fortunately, Moore's Law should put those kinds of sensors in cell phones within a decade, then maybe we'll see something like you describe.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  17. Weird things in the sky by FriendSite.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's obviously a lot of skepticism on this site.. however a few years ago I was having a bbq and, before you ask no one had started drinking or smoking anything, but a couple of us saw these silver globes traveling EXTREMELY fast around the clear sky, they (and there was about 8 of them) sped over the horizon and then shot upwards twirling around each other. DEFINITELY not a bird, plane.. photos are: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3251/2959668832_e5abe840d1_b.jpg http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3208/2959668228_778ac7d3d9_o.jpg After seeing these, I'm convinced we're not alone..

  18. Comon UFOs in the 1950s by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Informative

    Where F-94s and F-86Ds.
    The ADC would practice night intercepts on airliners. Those two aircraft where some of the first to have afterburners. The pilots would often light the burner and pull up. Then shut down the burner.
    Strange light making unusual maneuvers then is gone...

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  19. Re:Why not by thermian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That first link is indeed a bit dodgy, but if you look a bit around you find more articles on the web with references in them that show older sightings than from the 19th century.

    I don't doubt there are. However, its not early sightings of strange things in the sky I take issue with. Rather its the insertion of spurious conclusions without proof, and worse, the hailing of these rather childish idea's as confirmed and reliable sightings.

    I do in fact believe wholeheartedly in the existence of extraterrestrial life. However I do so as a scientist. Therefore I recognize my belief in this regard is totally without proof, and I freely admit this. It is more a hope then a belief in this respect, and one I expect only my descendants will answer.

    I don't however believe in alien visitation on Earth, in fact I disregard such claims completely. Those who do believe such things lack even the most basic grasp of the inconceivable distances involved and the velocities that would be required for such a journey.

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
  20. Party balloons by mangu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I once saw something exactly like you describe and your pictures show. I got my telescope and saw an aluminum foil balloon. It was much smaller and nearer than it seemed before I recognized it. It's really funny, how something that seemed like a huge metallic spacecraft flying extremely fast miles away was suddenly diminished to a small child's toy floating at a hundred yards distance.

    1. Re:Party balloons by GrahamCox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Similar thing happened to me once. I am very much a UFO skeptic (at least skeptical of the 'alien' explanation anyway), but one day I was driving along around dusk and saw what looked like a classic UFO in the sky - cigar shaped, silvery, glowing. It was hovering rather than moving at high speed but its position did change slowly. As I was moving myself and the object held its nominal position, it could only be something large at a distance. I could only get glimpses due to terrain, but I *HAD* to know what it was...

      It took a while before I could turn off the motorway I was on, and then figure out how to get closer to it. It was hard because I didn't have clear sight of it, but luckily it didn't suddenly zoom away as I half expected it to! Eventually I got it - I turned into a gateway to find... a large illuminated blimp attending some sort of sports event.

  21. Re:Why not by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They are not, in any way at all, indicating that there were people sitting around pondering alien spaceships in the ancient world. Ever...

    It would be hard to expect an ancient people to say, "we saw an aerodynamic craft of strange configuration approach at mach 12, capable of extreme delta-V acceleration, flying in formation with a mothership and several smaller ships, each with thrust powered by some sort of engine producing multi-spectral visible radiation," but we might hear things like:

    Ezekiel:

    4. And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the midst of the fire.

    16. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.

    17. When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned not when they went.

    18. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; and their rings were full of eyes round about them four.

    19. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went by them: and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up.

    20. Whithersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted up over against them: for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.

    27. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about.

    28. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD. And when I saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one that spake.

    2 Kings 2:

    11. And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them both asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.

    Isaiah 66:

    15. For, behold, the LORD will come with fire, and with his chariots like a whirlwind, to render his anger with fury, and his rebuke with flames of fire.

    Jeremiah 4:

    13. Behold, he shall come up as clouds, and his chariots shall be as a whirlwind: his horses are swifter than eagles. Woe unto us! for we are spoiled.

    Zechariah 6:

    1. And I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came four chariots out from between two mountains; and the mountains were mountains of brass.

    One might consider something like this a modern re-imagining of Ezekiel's wheels.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  22. Better question: "Why do you think we don't?" by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the number of UFOs are constant, and there are many more cameras, why aren't we seeing many more pictures flooding the intertubes?

    You must look in order to see. --This is always the case when it comes to subjects which do not bear the stamp of, "Official Truth".

    There are actually quite a lot of phone camera UFO pictures. Videos, too. --Many tend to be poorly shot and of low resolution, but that's to be expected given that the objects are photographed with crappy cameras at great distances by untrained people. I expect as resolutions on phone cameras get more powerful, we'll also get better images.

    -FL

  23. Think again by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    with the most notable being a sighting in 1991 with a US Air Force pilot's first-hand account. Not that this lends an air of credibility to anything, just more papers with more words.

    Sorry, having an Air Force captain (pilot) describe seeing this *does* lend an air of credibility. The Air Force doesn't let Jim from the trailer park fly their planes.

  24. Actually it makes sense by voss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rectal thermometers are standard in hospitals and rectal probes would be safer for the patient and the alien scientist than oral ones.

    Second if youre doing scientific experiments on a primitive population your not going to raid the population center youll grab somone on an outlying settlement. Plus you would figure the rednecks would have interesting diseases to study.

    1. Re:Actually it makes sense by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      or they would wait for us to mature as a species (i.e. grow out of our current selfish greed-driven, xenophobic, belligerent ways) and then make open contact with us.

      That is if you assume all life evolves the same way and undergoes the same probable events to come to a common endresult.

      Imagine a square world, the entire conceptualization ability of creatures living on a square world would differ so greatly they might be unable to grasp our sphere shaped one and the implications with al the results.

      Their biology, mathematics and all that would differ: they wouldn't have radiants, they wouldn't use degrees but will have a more firm understanding and derrived knowledge about squares. They won't really know Pi as they might have a hard time conceptualizing circles or spheres.

      Events creating our culture, would have a entire different timeline as well; they might not have the same symbols, ideals, social constructs, "moralities", art or any of that.

      Now, imagine then, to come to a planet, and observe a society, which takes its own references and mental constructs for granted, but for the onlooker, its alien. It's horribly abstract to grasp, and quasi impossible to trace back all those habits and structures which have evolved over the years.

      The same way you find a "redneck" a "lower form of human", they might consider it otherwise.
      Take this thought-experiment; in a place where space is scarce, he who lives in the open might be considered elite. In the same way, you might end up with a preconcept of creatures who are codependant and the ones being independant are considered king. What you find "disgusting" or "lower value" about a redneck is just cultural and is based on your frame of reference, conditioning and what you consider "wealth" or "health". To a species, alien to our, these nuances might be completely lost. Maybe they greet kings by anal probing them, as they can afford to be gay and do not require to fornicate to maintain their reproduction as they can afford some alternative means which might be considered more fashionable or they communicate through anal glands and feel frustrated humans are retartedly hysterical and fart (=screaming) uncontrollably when they try to engage into conversation.

      I think it's an impossible task to conceptualize the unknown with all its probabilities.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    2. Re:Actually it makes sense by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I suppose it could be aliens expending vast amounts of energy and traveling across distances that the human mind can't even easily comprehend just to do cursory exams of human biology. But may I also suggest the more radical idea that it's just a bunch of ignorant yahoos mistaking a rape nightmare for an anal probe and interpreting simple sleep paralysis as being held down by aliens?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  25. What about Edgar Mitchell then? by meist3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree to the assumption that we can't possibly be the only sentient species in the universe and given there were a few million years to evolve why shouldn't have something come up with better ways of generating energy? Not every species is as retarded as ours...

  26. A Moderation Haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The insightful mod
    Although very useful sometimes
    Should not be used now.

    1. Re:A Moderation Haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      When writing haiku
      Use seventeen syllables
      I counted eighteen

  27. We have reached the limits of what rectal probing by bussdriver · · Score: 3, Funny

    On earth the highest order creatures use rectal "probing" more than the lower creatures. It only stands to reason that more advanced creatures would have an even greater interest on rectal probing than us humans.

  28. Re:Cause & Effect - D.M.T. by six025 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is also worth reading "DMT - The Spirit Molecule" by Dr. Rick Strassman.

    Dimethyltryptamine is the most powerful hallucinogenic known to man, and the book concerns the study of the effects DMT has on the human mind. During the experiements he discovers that the "alien abduction experience" can be recreated "at will" by administering relatively high doses of DMT.

    DMT occurs naturally in the human brain and is regulated by the pineal gland - we are all taking a dose of the schedule one drug right now.

    From this we can determine that perhaps the "alien abduction experience" is built in to us at some level, and that those who experience it have somehow triggered a flood of DMT.

    Peace,
    Andy.