Slashdot Mirror


Finding Better Tech Broadcasts?

BearGrylls writes "As a young lad and aspiring technologist I have found shows like Revision3's 'The Broken' and 'Systm' to be entertaining, informative, and, most importantly, thorough. As time has gone on revision3 has kept some of the tech-related shows, but dumbed them down to appeal to a larger audience. This annoyed me, but I've continued to be a loyal viewer of their tech shows anyway. However, I suspect this trend to continue and my disappointment to grow. Where can I find tech shows that dive deep into projects and discussions instead of simply skimming the surface?"

205 comments

  1. Re: by dukeofurl01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've never had a first post before.

    I haven't found any TV shows I like about Tech in a long time, but I like Make magazine.

  2. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Way to blow it

  3. Educational TV by mac1235 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The show isn't just getting dumber, you're also getting smarter.

    1. Re:Educational TV by theaveng · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's more to it than that. The OP's opinion: "dumbed them down to appeal to a larger audience" describes cable television (or any mass media) perfectly. As time goes on, the requirement for more-and-more viewers, requires lowering the intelligence to where even Jimmy-Joe Bob can understand.

      I remember when TLC was called the Learning Channel and actually had intelligent programming. Now it's more akin to the "Tender Loving Care" channel about babies, weddings, and other stuff that doesn't require thinking. Discover Channel has also been dumbed down. Ditto Animal Planet. Ditto A&E.

      The History Channel is the only basic cable channel that still teaches something useful. The rest don't require anything more than 5th grade education.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    2. Re:Educational TV by arotenbe · · Score: 4, Funny

      The History Channel is the only basic cable channel that still teaches something useful.

      The History Channel... is that the one with all the shows about bible codes and UFOs?

      --
      Tomato wedge sperm darts that are Republican.
    3. Re:Educational TV by j85ason · · Score: 4, Funny

      The History Channel is the only basic cable channel that still teaches something useful.

      The History Channel... is that the one with all the shows about bible codes and UFOs?

      They also have programming about Nazis.

    4. Re:Educational TV by citizenr · · Score: 1

      They also have programming about Nazis.

      Nazi ghost hunters maybe

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    5. Re:Educational TV by denttford · · Score: 1

      Possibly the former; likely the latter. But -

      when have these shows ever been for the bright? I remember watching one or two of these shows a few years back and it seemed like skriptkiddie 101 for stoner wiggers.

      --

      Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
    6. Re:Educational TV by arotenbe · · Score: 4, Funny

      They also have programming about Nazis.

      That was one heck of a fast Godwin.

      --
      Tomato wedge sperm darts that are Republican.
    7. Re:Educational TV by theaveng · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sci-Fi Channel - yet another channel that was dumbed down. I remember when they had "talk shows" that visited conventions to meet the fans, discussed new technologies that were emerging, and interviewed authors about their latest books. Now the channel fills its primetime slots with "Scared Stupid", "Dishonest Seances", and other hokey nonsense.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    8. Re:Educational TV by theaveng · · Score: 1

      >>>They also have programming about Nazis.

      Yeah but they've toned-down those shows. The Hitler Channel..... er, I mean the History Channel is now showing more programs about the Romans, the Barbarians, or the Middle Ages. Their documentary about the 300 Spartans was more-entertaining (and informative) than the actual movie.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    9. Re:Educational TV by Darundal · · Score: 1

      I thought the H stood for Hitler.

    10. Re:Educational TV by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, History Channel is always at the top of my list of channels that went way downhill. They do still have the veneer of informative programming, but will have things like straight-faced interviews with one of the authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail. They love doing segments on wacky crap nobody takes seriously, and paint their quack subjects like some underdog determined to shine the light of truth.

      They should call it the conspiracy channel.

    11. Re:Educational TV by e-Flex · · Score: 1

      Do I smell market economy?

    12. Re:Educational TV by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      May I get borderline trollish ? Hell yeah, I have karma to burn...
      TV broadcasts are for dump/passive people. Smart, tech-savvy users search pro-actively on Internet the informations they need or want. The bandwidth per people of TV broadcast is so low that they can not afford to make shows solely for specialists that would make them compete with Internet.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    13. Re:Educational TV by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I remember when TLC was called the Learning Channel and actually had intelligent programming. Now it's more akin to the "Tender Loving Care" channel

      I refer to it as "The Ladies Channel".

    14. Re:Educational TV by RulerOf · · Score: 2, Funny

      They should call it the conspiracy channel.

      If a new network sprung up with the same budget as the History channel and had that name, I'm afraid to think of how many people would take it seriously.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    15. Re:Educational TV by theaveng · · Score: 1

      History Channel is a lot better than it used to be. People used to call it "the Hitler Channel" because it was constantly replaying old WW2 film. It became BORING.

      Fortunately over the last five years the channel has expanded its programming to Ancient Civilizations and Middle Ages. It's one of the few channels that has actually improved its coverage of its central topic.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    16. Re:Educational TV by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Yep. Giving people what they want, which is "easy" to understand programming. I guess if you want intelligent shows you have to watch that other channel government socialism sponsors. Um, darn, I forget what it's called.

      It shows lots of things that less than 1/4% of America tunes-in to watch (even fewer than the number watching CW). Let me think. Oh yeah, PBS.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    17. Re:Educational TV by yttrstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That happened to me with Slashdot many years ago. I noticed one day while I was sitting on my cube reading the comments for some post about network security...and I realized that the comments were generally completely factually incorrect, the theories being handed up were generally weak, and the article itself was pitted with subjectivity and blurred facts.

      I thought Slashdot was changing then too, but it wasn't. It turns out that while I wasn't paying attention, I'd become more experienced in the ways of such things than the average Slashdot poster.

      Or editor for that matter.

    18. Re:Educational TV by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Even PBS is garbage these days. Have you seen Wired Science? Or Nova: ScienceNOW? It's pretty bad when the best science show on PBS are 5-10 year old reruns of Scientific American Frontiers.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    19. Re:Educational TV by norton112200 · · Score: 2

      Screensavers: dumbed down so much it ceased to exist.

    20. Re:Educational TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am invoking Godwin's Law and shutting this thread down right now... Good job. That was quick.

    21. Re:Educational TV by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Hey Scare Tactics is a can be a great show, its much better now that they advertise it as a comedy.

      I agree with you on all of the Ghost Hunters and the other crap shows.

    22. Re:Educational TV by xappax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at least they have real ads now from their corpglomerate sponsors (aka owners). All that "supported by viewers like you" crap was so tiresome.

    23. Re:Educational TV by xappax · · Score: 1

      The student bests the master. And thus the cycle begins anew. You are ready, young grasshopper, to face your ancient foe: those lamers in your CS101 class who think they're so smart because they know about "ports" and "mac addresses".

      Go, now! Leave your mod points, they are of no use to you any more. From now on your moderations will be made in blood. The blood of inferior nerds.

    24. Re:Educational TV by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      right, like having ufologists, ghost hunters/paranormal investigators, cryptozoologists, and other assorted loonies on as "experts." no wonder America is getting dumber by the minute...

      compare the History Channel to real educational TV networks like the National Geographic Channel and the BBC, and you'll see what a complete joke History/Discovery channel are. they produce intentionally sensationalized programs on topics like Big Foot or the Chupacabra, which only have "believers" speaking on the show about their half-baked theories, shamelessly neglecting any skeptical perspectives. i can't even bare to watch History Channel programs anymore because they are usually so full of factual or logical errors.

      frankly, the History Channel's programs are insulting to one's intelligence (they even mix corporate PR with historic documentaries). if you want to watch interesting educational programs with some semblance of journalistic integrity, try National Geographic's Is it Real series. after watching IIR cover topics like UFO abduction, the Bermuda Triangle, the lost city of Atlantis, etc. you will see how bunk and scientifically sloppy/lazy the History Channel is. NGC actually makes an effort to report the truth and debunk false claims, whereas History Channel simply perpetuates misconceptions and fallacious arguments.

      the only way i can imagine History Channel being entertaining is if you personally enjoy being deluded and are ignorant of logical fallacies. i can't see anyone of even moderate intelligence actually enjoying the kind of junkfood-media that is aired on the History Channel or Discovery Channel (Mythbusters is the one exception).

    25. Re:Educational TV by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1
      "They also have programming about Nazis."

      I've been referring to it as "The Hitlery Channel" for years...

      (Always remember: People are Lazy. Thinking is work.)

    26. Re:Educational TV by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      PBS actually has some decent programs, like NOVA Now (and other NOVA shows). but the BBC is a much better example of public broadcasting done right. they produce, arguably, the best documentary and news programs of any network.

      personally, i lost all respect for American public broadcasting when KPBS (they're the San Diego member station of PBS run by UCSD) aired a program arguing that Separation of Church and State is wrong, and that the establishment clause was actually trying to give theists free reign to do whatever they want.

      thinking that a TV program has to either be incredibly stupid or incredibly boring is a false dichotomy. the National Geographic Channel regularly airs entertaining shows that are intelligent and educational. the rest of mainstream media is just dumbing down our society creating a race to the bottom scenario. networks that have journalistic standards like BBS, NGC, CBC, and NOVA are still popular in other countries that don't have a reactionary anti-intellectual culture.

    27. Re:Educational TV by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I like "Modern Marvels".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    28. Re:Educational TV by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's not trollish... smart people tend to read. It's a cycle... there's not much "smart" TV, so people pick up a magazine or book or browse the internet - which reduces the potential viewership for "smart" TV. Rinse, repeat.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    29. Re:Educational TV by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      NOVA ScienceNOW is alright. they're aimed at younger audiences to stimulate interest in the sciences in kids. i think that's a worthwhile goal. but i agree that PBS is pretty bad. i once even saw a KPBS documentary program denouncing the Separation of Church and State as "unconstitutional."

      however, the BBC, CBC, and the National Geographic Channel still provide decent quality programming. though i'm a little afraid that NGC is becoming more like the Discovery/History Channel. but so far they haven't tried to pass any Big Foot "researchers" off as sound scientific authorities. and even though they cover crazy theories and urban legends (even inviting the loonies to speak on the programs), they usually do a good job of debunking the fallacies behind such beliefs.

    30. Re:Educational TV by theaveng · · Score: 1

      And why is a comedy on the Science (and fantasy)-Fiction Channel? It doesn't belong there. It fits under neither genre.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    31. Re:Educational TV by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      which is why we shouldn't be giving the largely consolidated TV & radio networks control of so much of the radio spectrum. if we used those spectrum blocks to roll out municipal WiFi/WiMax, we could have a nationwide wireless broadband infrastructure in place by 2012 (just in time for the world to end =P).

      but seriously, why dedicate so much bandwidth potential to closed proprietary communications networks controlled by a handful of media corporations. the internet is a generalized open communication network; it can be used to broadcast video stream, audio/voice streams, text, and any other form of data. best of all, it's open so that anyone can publish their own content. this democratization of media distribution changes the cultural hegemons of our society from corporate media (our current gatekeepers of information) to the individual.

      this lets the public choose what they watch/listen to/read rather than being force-fed by FOX/CNN/NBC/Clear Channel/etc.

    32. Re:Educational TV by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Also "300 Spartans" was a good documentary. Ditto "Lost Civilizations". And "Underground Cities" which covers the past, mostly the middle ages. "The Barbarians" was a 10-part documentary about the fall of Rome and eventual formation of modern Europe. From time-to-time they also show great movies or miniseries like "Holocaust".

      There's a lot more good stuff on History Channel than bad.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    33. Re:Educational TV by theaveng · · Score: 0

      >>>BBC is a much better example of public broadcasting done right.

      At $300 a year?

      Pass. I prefer my television to be free. No matter how poor you are, if you live in the U.S., all you need to do is erect an antenna and there it is. Free television.

      What these "educational" channels need to do is stop measuring themselves by the ratings/number of viewers. They need to stop paying Nielsen and instead focus on providing good product.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    34. Re:Educational TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget wrestling.

    35. Re:Educational TV by Doggabone · · Score: 1

      remember when TLC was called the Learning Channel and actually had intelligent programming.

      "Connections" with James Burke is the program that got me to pony up for cable. Until then, I was using a guitar string jammed in the coax connector, as an antenna.

    36. Re:Educational TV by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      the PBS is still partially tax-funded despite their corporate sponsors and constant donation-drives.

      and luckily many Brits show a more progressive attitude than you do, otherwise we wouldn't have amazing programs like BBC's awe-inspiring Planet Earth series, James Burke's wittily narrated & innovative Connections series, all of the pioneering wildlife documentaries presented by broadcasting legends like David Attenborough, and the sharp unapologetic social & political commentary by intellectual firebrands like Richard Dawkins.

      these days the BBC seems like the lone beacon of light in the unilluminated sea of ignorance that is the mainstream media. but of course most Americans would gladly see all public services/resources/infrastructure dismantled if they could pay a few bucks less in taxes.

    37. Re:Educational TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just that show, but all of TechTV. But I heard it lingered on in Canada for a little while longer.

      What I find ironic is that the death-knell came from G4TV, which is so dumbed down that I found it to be unwatchable. (And that's in comparison to Spike, USA, UPN, and other such channels.) Yet the channel still exists. (And not only that, but it still occupies two slots. One being the former TechTV's.) Why?

    38. Re:Educational TV by GCP · · Score: 1

      Market economy? Yes, indeed. Now that millions of folks like me use tech like TiVo to skip the ads, ad revenues are dropping, they need to reach wider (and less tech savvy) audiences to compensate, and presto: we have what they warned we would have. So we move on to more intelligent programming, meaning "what are the smart podcasts on the Internet?", TV viewership drops, Internet use booms, ad revenues on the Internet boom, Google booms, we all get ad blockers for our browsers and complain that our favorite websites are getting dumber (because I deserve high-quality, smart programming for free!), rinse and repeat....

      We keep evolving ad resistance, starving ad-sponsored programming, and the environment keeps trying to evolve better ads.

      Fortunately, there's vastly more room in the state space on the Internet than the hundred or so slots on TV, and much lower cost of entry, so we'll probably get a lot of good stuff, but we can't count on its stability. We're still pretty early in the process of evolving business models in this environment.

      --
      "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
    39. Re:Educational TV by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      What's funny is if I recall, half the reason Rose and friends started Revision 3 was because stuff like Tech TV got dumbed down and killed off.

      How soon the rebels become the establishment.

    40. Re:Educational TV by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who has done both. Paid the license fee in the UK, and experienced the wonder of "free" TV here, I'd take the license free and the BBC ANY DAY OF THE WEEK over what passes for free here.

    41. Re:Educational TV by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Screensavers going down was a fucking tragedy. I remember when they first broadcast in Canada, I saw the very first episode they aired here and thought "Finally! A TV show for ME!"

      You knew things were turning to shit when they cut the shows length to 60 minutes (because 90 minute shows don't work was the argument) and started having celebrity interviews. Writing was clearly on the wall from then on.

      I still miss TSS. These days the only tech show I watch regularly is Tekzilla, which I like, but I find it endlessly frustrating as the show is too short, and too focused on questions. I like it when they get someone on with new games, or did their recent uber gaming PC etc... Basically when the show is more "The Screensavers" and less "Call For Help".

      And since it's kind of related, if you're a gamer, I recommend Sessler's Soapbox as a great podcast. Adam Sessler, if you read this, you sir, ROCK!

      Only other remotely tech related podcasts/shows I watch regularly are Geekbrief and Webbalert. And then I tend to have interesting fantasies about what would happen if you put those two in a romantically lit room with some alcohol and baby lotion...

    42. Re:Educational TV by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Yeah, definitely not a troll. Five years ago I couldn't have imagined not having cable TV. Since then I've spent 3 of the last five years TV-less. I don't miss it at all. No asinine commercials. Reality shows. Bullshit news reporting. Reruns... The money is being spent elsewhere and really, for what I paid I can pick up a couple of DVD's, and spend more time watching them then I spent watching TV when I had it.

    43. Re:Educational TV by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then IMO you have a responsibility to CORRECT those wrong assertions. Not all of them, but at least one or two, or else nobody else is going to learn.

      Just a thought.

    44. Re:Educational TV by try_anything · · Score: 1

      Which way do you want it? Paid for by advertising, or paid for by you? If it's paid for by advertising, then not only will they go for the biggest possible audience, they will try to attract an audience that works for their advertisers. That is, they will narrowly pitch each show to an advertising segment (say, explosions for the 18-35yo male) instead of to an interest segment.

      Hopefully the economic and regulatory climate will make it possible for us to buy well-produced television content or at least buy cable channels a la carte. That way a group of people who share an interest could attract attention from TV producers simply by having money and desiring to buy content, instead of needing to be a known target for an identifiable segment of advertising.

      As for public/philanthropic funding, I don't understand why the BBC and PBS consistently produce a trickle of worthwhile television, so I'm somewhat suspicious of that model, but I'll continue to support them given their track record, even if they produce a lot of bland drivel along with the good stuff.

    45. Re:Educational TV by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You can't "bare" [sic] to watch History Channel programs anymore?

      It sounds like you need to subscribe to the English Language channel.

    46. Re:Educational TV by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I presume you mean Connections 2, since the original aired on PBS.

      (IMHO, Connections 2 was MUCH more disjointed and less well thought out than the original Connections, and Connections 3 even more so.. Even so, I missed some episodes and intend on renting it on DVD some day.)

    47. Re:Educational TV by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Well, I do think it's somewhat trollish. I have avoided "asinine commercials" for a very long time with VCRs and now with Tivos. I like some reality shows(*). Some are dumb, some are entertaining. I avoid reruns the same way I avoid commercials. I also like various dramas, a few sitcoms, and various documentaries. (Slashdot readers should watch "The Big Bang Theory". Though I laugh a lot at it, I think the cliched main storyline is unfortunate.. It is still very funny.)

      (*) I can't find a reference to it in a quick search, but I remember reading that some famous author (I had thought Isaac Asimov) had written an article for TV Guide saying that their favorite show was "Three's Company", with the rationale that everyone can just turn off their brain once in a while and laugh. If someone can find a citation, please post it.

    48. Re:Educational TV by NovaHorizon · · Score: 1

      Hay! I wil like to poant owt that my IQ is B graid (ful 84 infakt!) and I havn't nevr red wen not neaded..

    49. Re:Educational TV by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I don't get why you capitalize acronyms and proper nouns, but leave capitals off the beginning of sentences. Those are the most important capitals for reading.

    50. Re:Educational TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP's opinion: "dumbed them down to appeal to a larger audience" describes cable television (or any mass media) perfectly.

      Sadly, this statement applies to Slashdot as well. The articles have become less technical as the user base has grown, and that user base seems far less interested in doing "nerd" things with computers than they are in getting free entertainment.

    51. Re:Educational TV by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, "Yet Another Giant Snake Movie" or my personal favorite, when they pasted the "who wants to be a superhero" winner into "Crappy Snake Film III: Michael Shanks phones it in!"

      Is it too much to ask, for twice every decade or so, for some channel to air a nice, cheap, Gamra marathon instead of making an abysmal only-air-once cookie-cutter monster flick.

      Oh, well. At least they'd never resort to airing fake wrestling soap opera like USA and Spike.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    52. Re:Educational TV by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      I agree about Discovery...I think it used to have more science programming but they shifted that to what is now the Science channel. Science Channel still has some decent shows, as well as the occasional really good documentary, but certainly not all of it is high-quality. "Beyond Tomorrow" and the other future-predicting shows are usually pretty annoying.* Supposedly they were running Cosmos, dunno what happened to that as I don't see it on there anymore.

      Sometimes History International looks good but it's most of the same crap. There's just something really gut-wrenching about seeing a documentary on quackery that makes it seem legitimate with that "objectivity" smell. People are saying the ancient civ stuff is good though, so I may have to give HC another look.

      * pretty sure one time they showed somebody's homebrew touchscreen + earth map UI and said it was the future of computers. laaame.

  4. I have seen the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I too have noticed the same shallowing in the broader area of tech reporting generally.

    I have however noticed that the written word seems to be more resilient and retains depth (in places) longer than other media.

    1. Re:I have seen the same by Smivs · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's not just Tech. TV in general is dumbing down, which is odd considering the general population is supposed to be ever better-educated. Not only is it dumbing down, but certainly here in the UK it's getting sloppy too, particularly in areas like basic grammer. Stadiums instead of stadia is one common (and annoying) example.
      There does seem to be a trend towards the lowest common denominator which I, for one, would like to see reversed.

    2. Re:I have seen the same by funkatron · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not only is it dumbing down, but certainly here in the UK it's getting sloppy too, particularly in areas like basic grammer. Stadiums instead of stadia is one common (and annoying) example.

      Surely the choice between a Latin (I'm guessing) plural and an English one is just a choice to use a particular writing style. I bet you don't like split infinitives either.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    3. Re:I have seen the same by Smivs · · Score: 1

      Not just writing styles but spoken English as well. I hope I'm not too pedantic, but surely the correct use of the correct word is essential to ensure correct understanding. Yes we could 'Wiki' language so that what the majority believes is 'right' is right but this road leads to a chaos where, eventually, mis-understanding will become the norm. As for split infinitives, I'm quite happy to boldly go there!

    4. Re:I have seen the same by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Surely the choice between a Latin (I'm guessing) plural and an English one is just a choice to use a particular writing style. I bet you don't like split infinitives either.

      Greek. Although the spirit of your reply is correct; the same applies to words such as "virus": the Anglicized plural "viruses" is acceptable, even though in the original Latin there is no plural form (it's a mass noun).

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    5. Re:I have seen the same by nospam007 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "Not only is it dumbing down, but certainly here in the UK it's getting sloppy too, particularly in areas like basic grammer."

      Yeah, basic 'grammer' really sucks, not to mention 'ortografee'.

    6. Re:I have seen the same by paintswithcolour · · Score: 1

      I get your point and partially agree, but I don't think you're given example is great for this. Most people, however wrong, would probably write 'stadiums' now. This is more a cultural shift towards a greater standardisation of language than a move against it; people just following the logical rules that most of the time do apply. You're not going to get failures of communication by messing with the plurals of a few seldom used words, but by introducing shiny new ones.

    7. Re:I have seen the same by funkatron · · Score: 1

      Many aspects of English are fairly wiki-like. For example many dictionaries are compiled by looking at which words are used often in print or other media, so the dictionary definition is usually quite close to how the word is actually being used.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    8. Re:I have seen the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed. They should be using kilometres instead of stadia.

    9. Re:I have seen the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not only is it dumbing down, but certainly here in the UK it's getting sloppy too, particularly in areas like basic grammer"

      Don't throw stones when living in your glass World. GrammAr.. Yeesh.

      To top it all off you seem to think our education is improving, when it's been shown how averages are being used to make it appear that way. The government is dumbing us down for their herding intentions, obviously they're doing a great job judging by your own posts.

    10. Re:I have seen the same by Paua+Fritter · · Score: 1

      +V RIDICVLVS

    11. Re:I have seen the same by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I think is happening is that news and factual reporting is a deeper fracture between a "TV" and an "internet" audience.

      The internet now provides news in incredible depth. If you read bloggers who really know their subject, you'll get far more depth than TV ever gave you, and often more depth than most newspapers. You ever heard a TV economics reporter explaining the Laffer Curve or Basquiat's Broken Window Fallacy? You just never get that stuff. When the political parties were arguing about post office closures, not one journalism did the digging that showed that it was basically an issue of EU subsidies (that the government couldn't fund Post Offices).

      On the other hand, TV news is incredibly dumb now. A story like Kerry Katona being made bankrupt never made the news when I was a kid. It was almost entirely hard news.

      If people want to know why there's a real lack of hard science on TV, it's for this reason. Because the science audience is gone. They're watching video clips on YouTube or reading papers about science. Science coverage on TV is more "technology" now (which actually just means gadget reporting).

    12. Re:I have seen the same by Smivs · · Score: 1

      I did say "SUPPOSED to be getting to be ever better-educated." I agree with you that this may not be the case, and indeed all the evidence suggests that the general standard of education is still fairly poor. Just look at my spelling!
      As for the Government's herding intentions, I thought politicians nearly always 'herded' (ie gathered in parties), whether the populus was dumbed down or not.

    13. Re:I have seen the same by Smivs · · Score: 1

      Mod this up as 'insightful'. You are SO right, and this probably explains why I spend ten times more time on Slashdot than watching the telly. Thank God/Allah/Flying Spaghetti Monster for the internet!

    14. Re:I have seen the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stadia? Are you for real? No-one says stadia. It's not even correct to do so. English nouns (such as stadium) pluralize with an s on the end. Back to 6th grade for you!

    15. Re:I have seen the same by Smivs · · Score: 1

      Indeed. They should be using kilometres instead of stadia.

      Or Libraries of Congress?

    16. Re:I have seen the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are being too pedantic. English usage is not defined by dictionaries. Dictionaries are defined by English usage. No confusion or mis-understanding arises from using "stadium" instead of "stadia". You're just being elitist.

      If you accept split infinitives I don't see why you don't accept regularization of plural noun formation.

    17. Re:I have seen the same by Smivs · · Score: 1

      Stadia, stadiums...I'm beginning to wish I'd never mentioned it.

    18. Re:I have seen the same by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Informative

      No-one says stadia.

      I present myself as a counterexample.

      It's not even correct to do so.

      The Oxford English Dictionary and American Heritage Dictionary offer both "stadiums" and "stadia" as plurals for "stadium". Webster offers only "stadia".

      English nouns (such as stadium) pluralize with an s on the end.

      There are no simple criterions for determining how English nouns pluralise, whatever they may teach childs where you live. Yet somehow, in spite of the many "crisises" of which we hear so much in the mediums, the English language has survived. It seems to have more lifes than a cat.

    19. Re:I have seen the same by dwarfking · · Score: 1

      If you read bloggers who really know their subject,

      So then the question is, how do you know which bloggers really do know their subjects? Anyone with a computer and an internet connection can start a blog. Is there any type of peer-reviewed rating system for blogs to help find those knowledgeable sorts?

    20. Re:I have seen the same by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      What's worse than stadiums is something like "Pleaded" or "funnest". I mean, really!

    21. Re:I have seen the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The split infinitive threw me on that, "ever better-educated" just seemed unreasonable ;-)

      "Nearly always..", I guess people generally only start conversations with you in a lift - to save having to spend too much time figuring out what you're actually trying to say :)

      Herded more in the sense of turning us in to fenced in animals. See the increasing strictness (or perhaps nearly ever increasing strictness *sic*) of our laws on all sides of the oceans, the lowering of the education level/bar, with the fear mongering that if we leave the safety of the herd we'll be eaten by wild tigers (terrorists).

      The biggest shame in all of this as a community is we'll just sit here nitpicking on each others spellings, trying to outsmart everyone, or just joke about it (thus devaluing the fact of what's happening). Eventually it'll just be like idiocracy.

      Off topic, but it needed saying.. and it needs to keep being said until we as 'the people' do something about it and stop letting the top 100 rich evils of the World from controlling us.

    22. Re:I have seen the same by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Mostly by opinion and counter-opinion. If a blogger is full of crap, you'll see other bloggers using facts to tear their pieces apart.

      Also engage your brain and think about what you're reading. We've long been given the belief that newspapers and TV are very high quality news gatherers, but I've read so much in blogs that shows that's not the case, that those media forms just prefer a sensational headline to well-checked content.

    23. Re:I have seen the same by Bandman · · Score: 1

      The problem with Libraries of Congress is that it's not a static measurement. You've got to have Libraries of Congress adjusted for inflation

    24. Re:I have seen the same by maxume · · Score: 1

      Your attitude is very French.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    25. Re:I have seen the same by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't knock the wiki. If you don't like it, write your own encyclopediums.

    26. Re:I have seen the same by who's+got+my+nicknam · · Score: 1

      Yes, YouTube. You can get all kinds of great informative, and intellectually stimulating tech info there. I particularly like this one. Seriously though, YouTube is a great resource. I am a big fan of the Periodic Table of Videos series, which is informative and funny.

      --
      "Apparatus dignosco occultus, satis non supernus."
    27. Re:I have seen the same by xappax · · Score: 1

      Language is consensus-based. There's no decision to make about whether we "wiki" language or not - language is a wiki, that's the nature of culture and people. Every speaker is a self-empowered editor and interpreter of language, and they're inevitably going to modify it to suit them.

      Doesn't mean you can't complain about it, but it's sort of like complaining about how "times change". Well, yeah. That's what they do.

      But fortunately, the point of speaking is still to be understood, so it's very unlikely that people will modify/destroy their understanding of language to the point that they cannot communicate - that would defeat the whole point. Even people who normally write in loltxtmsg-speak are capable of more standard communication when it's needed. So they're not really changing English, just forking a new pidgin to use instead when it's useful. Language is expanding to cover new meanings and purposes, and all you can do is complain that it's different!

    28. Re:I have seen the same by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      "Stadiums" is perfectly acceptable unless you are talking about the Greek measurement for length. I don't think I've ever heard anyone say "sports stadia".

      From Merriam Webster
      From Oxford

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    29. Re:I have seen the same by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You are right. I never realized how wacky English was until I had a kid.

      Most of the things my 2-year-old says are logically correct but not the accepted use of English. She figured out the whole tense thing really quickly, but still uses it incorrectly: "I throwed the ball," or "I falled down." Threw and fell are definitely not logical. Some comedian does a whole skit on this.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    30. Re:I have seen the same by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      I watched one of the Google Tech Talks about Bigtable. Mindblowing stuff, but you'll never get it on TV.

    31. Re:I have seen the same by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      So then the question is, how do you know which bloggers really do know their subjects?

      You have to use your noggin'. Unfortunate for people without one, but there you go...

      Generally, if you find yourself reading a particular opinion/fact on only one type of site - well, it's probably horse shit. For instance, if you read an article about how 9/11 was an inside job, but can only find corroborating information on conspiracy sites... it's horse shit.

      If you disagree with that last statement, then you fail teh internets.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    32. Re:I have seen the same by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you were on some bo-bo "Websters" site. M-W.com (i.e. the "real Websters") accepts both forms.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    33. Re:I have seen the same by dwarfking · · Score: 1

      So, if there is a subject in which I am not familiar, but want to learn, then I have to first locate and review multiple blogs on the subject and then determine which is probably accurate by the number of others that agree or disagree?

      I suppose it might be better to first read about a subject in a peer reviewed publication so I have the background, then find the bloggers that semi match the publications. Of course that could lead to me dismissing someone with an opposing view point that might have a valid case.

      Is anyone aware of a site or sites that host peer reviewed content where the identities of the reviewers is public so you can check into their credentials?

    34. Re:I have seen the same by who's+got+my+nicknam · · Score: 1

      And don't forget TED. More great stuff than you can shake a stick at!

      --
      "Apparatus dignosco occultus, satis non supernus."
    35. Re:I have seen the same by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The first place I go when looking for a new subject is Wikipedia. It usually gives you some background - just hold your nose if it is an even remotely controversial subject. Reading the "wrong viewpoint" won't hurt you :)

      The next thing that I'll typically do is look down at the references in the Wikipedia article and use those for my next step. But at some point you have to step back and do your own research as a sanity check.

      Again, it depends on the subject.

      Oh, and there is a Directory of Open Access Journals for more heavy research. And Peter Suber runs a blog concerned with opening up peer-reviewed research.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    36. Re:I have seen the same by Henneshoe · · Score: 1

      Thank you for linking to that insightful video. As an electrical engineer, I feel it is one of the best explanations of a cathode ray tube that I have seen in some time.

    37. Re:I have seen the same by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      The fact you spelled grammar wrong amuses me given what you were ranting against. However, I am not replying to point that out. That's merely an observation.

      A friend and I were discussing this the other day. He is horrified by how many people he knows that watch reality shows, X Factor, Pop Idol etc... He asked if I did. He was greatly relieved when I said I didn't.

      I think part of the problem is less and less people have the time to watch anything truly engaging, intelligent or demanding, which is why HBO's "The Wire", despite being one of the greatest television shows ever made, had such poor ratings. (That, and probably a fair degree of casual racism because of it's primarily African American cast.)

    38. Re:I have seen the same by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Fewer people, not less people.

      (I only point it out because you pointed out a spelling mistake.)

    39. Re:I have seen the same by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Touché, sir. Touché.

    40. Re:I have seen the same by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Isn't stadia plural for the distance measurement, rather than for the discrete arena count?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  5. Revision 3 has new, better shows! by mldkfa · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have also found them to dumb down the old shows. But they just added Hak5 to their lineup. This show is great for advanced users. They really get technical with all things network, hacking, games, .... I also found the audio pod casts from Leo Leport to be good.

    1. Re:Revision 3 has new, better shows! by ozamosi · · Score: 1

      Great for advanced users?

      I only watched one episode, but it consisted of them talking about "pwning n00bs", and interviewing someone who was supposedly "seriously 31337" about some shareware app of his, before talking about counter strike for a few minutes. They also mentioned some game on Steam, which they commented on by saying - and this is a direct quote - "of course, everybody uses it already".

      I'm not saying it was bad - I would have loved this show when i was 13-15. But... Seriously?

    2. Re:Revision 3 has new, better shows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That show has gone down the drain. They've added a "babe" who reads the ads (infallible decline indicator for a tech show), there are many more outright ads, plus more of the segments feel like product placements rather than tech content.

      Babe:
      "Netflix is awesome!"
      "Darren, I need to tell you about OpenDNS."

      Ouch, they've diggified Hak.5.

    3. Re:Revision 3 has new, better shows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hak5 sucks balls!

    4. Re:Revision 3 has new, better shows! by BearGrylls · · Score: 1

      To me Hak5 is no better than any other. It shows some good concepts but it has all been done before. They are not showing original content and personally I think the production level needs a lot of work.

    5. Re:Revision 3 has new, better shows! by solid_liq · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I personally came to the conclusion that Hak5 was the most dumbed-down braindead show of all Revision3's shows. At least, of the ones I'd even consider watching.

  6. TechTV by Smitty025 · · Score: 1

    Not that this helps you, but I still miss TechTV :(

    1. Re:TechTV by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Amen! TechTV still had a lot of potential when it was murdered by gamers.

    2. Re:TechTV by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I miss Turkey TV. I'm sure that helps even less.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:TechTV by idanity · · Score: 1

      i was on that show... it was so stealth, i drove right by the studio, and yet, inside, was very complicated ... that was a good show.

      --
      happy trials
  7. On TV? No. by iamapizza · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You won't find any. That's why these shows are on TV - for people who don't want to bother reading specs and details.

    --
    Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
    1. Re:On TV? No. by iamapizza · · Score: 0

      Way to blow it, me. I meant to say: That's why they're *SHOWS*.

      Great, now the impact of the statement has been compromised. Just pretend it impacted you and you've been stunned into realization.

      --
      Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
    2. Re:On TV? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe any of the Revision3 shows mentioned above are on TV. Aren't they all Internet shows?

    3. Re:On TV? No. by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      That can't be true at all, it'd be like saying stargate is pure make believe and not the fine set of documentaries that it is. Next you'll be saying HEROS isn't real either. What's the world coming to! People don't even believe photographs any more!

    4. Re:On TV? No. by rugatero · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oddly, I thought your point was clearer the first time!

      As it happens I do quite enjoy The Gadget Show (UK) - although it doesn't always go into as much detail as I would like, and suffers from an occasional bout of "oooh... shiney!".

      --
      This comment is for entertainment purposes only. Any similarity to real insight or information is purely coincidental.
    5. Re:On TV? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was a great series shown in the UK for a while, called "Planet Mechanics". They built, from scratch or any simple materials they could lay their hands on, a high pressure water turbine for off grid electricity, a working wind turbine generator, a compressed air powered moped, a farm slurry digester to make methane for fuel, all kinds of stuff.

    6. Re:On TV? No. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      That's the problem for me. All "technology" coverage on TV seems to fall into "Oooh.... shiny". I've never heard anyone on TV discuss things like closed vs open formats (which is a valid discussion about the long term use of what you buy).

      But TV has lost science and I doubt that it's ever getting it back now. People who really want to know about science get it all from the net now.

    7. Re:On TV? No. by Inda · · Score: 1

      One of the guys on the gadget show is a real 1st class geek who collects all manner of things including his favourite mini-robots. He has mentioned open and closed formats in the past. He is not frightened to say "your music will only work on one machine".

      Great show. I think the main problem with it is that they need to make it a 'fun' show and fit it all into the 1 hour slot.

      I suspect one of the british release groups has capped the new series - worth a look.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    8. Re:On TV? No. by mgblst · · Score: 1

      The gadget show is a disgrace, produced for the pretender geeks. People who don't really know about technology, but like to pretend they do. They know a little bit more than the average joe, but act like they understand it all. They show would be amusing if the presenters weren't so inept.

  8. No content in Tech TV by elendrum · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have never found any of the tech shows to discuss Tech for the most part. I wanted to her about the core level stuff, life what languages was best for what types of developments. What trends where in the works and how to best use them. How to make the most of product XYZ and not just O hey we installed it and it made nice pretty charts. I wanted to know how best to secure my networks and what products did what and what was the best approach and how to make product xyz do it. But, all I got was "Hey this is a neat new toy yall all need to go out and buy XYZ. Today show was sponsored buy the people who make XYZ, go buy it!" I want more than a bunch of commercials and cute girls pointing to the shinny new boxes.

    1. Re:No content in Tech TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you need to go back to school. I'd correct your initial posting but it's too long and boring, must be idiots who mark you informative. Either that or you just created several accounts to help boost your very low self esteem.

  9. GDGT.com by davidpfarrell · · Score: 5, Informative

    I listen to TWIT (This Week In Tech) regularly, mainly for Leo Laporte and any guest who isn't Dvorak. I don't find Leo to be particularly techy, but he's quite entertaining and controls the flow of the show well.

    They mention Rev3 alot and also a new site called GDGT (GaDGeT) which is supposedly good - I must admit I haven't found time to check it out yet.

    Okay no excuses, subsribing to an RSS feed is dead simple, so I'm going go ahead and subscribe to GDGT and check it out. - Oh and IO9 while I'm at it.

    --
    Cube On! (http://stores.ebay.com/PuzzleProz)
    1. Re:GDGT.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They're kids' programs covering Apple products (they're fanboys) and minor industry chit-chat. The poster wants real tech programming, not adverts for the latest Apple gizmo.

      Where can I find tech shows that dive deep into projects and discussions instead of simply skimming the surface?

    2. Re:GDGT.com by memetic+field · · Score: 1

      I like TWIT but I am looking for a replacement as Leo's rambling advertisements get longer and more numerous - I was OK with one Audible ad that was well-integrated into the conversation, but three advertisements per show are just too many for me.

    3. Re:GDGT.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to like TWiT a lot (I was even signed up with a monthly donation), but about a year ago, I decided to stop listening. The cause for my distaste with it was the frequent addition of Jason Calacanis to the panel. Whenever he came on, he dominated the discussion for the whole episode and inevitably steered the conversation to things like social networking, and building a network of followers. He would get the other panelists rambling on and on about how much they loved Twitter and whatever else was popular that week, bragging about how many followers they had.

      I liked This Week in Tech, I hated This Week in Social Networking.

    4. Re:GDGT.com by QuantumHobbit · · Score: 1

      I've been a Leo Laporte fan since Tech Tv, but I do have to agree with you on that. Twit is more about Leo and Dvorak chatting for an hour than anything substantial. SecurityNow is much better if limited in its focus and somewhat repetitive. Joel Spolsky's Stack Overflow podcast might be a better choice but I've only listened to 2 episodes and they seem a bit unfocused.

    5. Re:GDGT.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't really impressed with GDGT all that much.

  10. Matter of time by Manuel+M · · Score: 0

    My thought is that even if there exists what you are searching for, it's only a matter of time until it is dumbed down too.

    Good intentions last a while only; after that, money rules. To put it simply: "if there is more demand over there, what the heck are we doing here? Let's go there already!".

  11. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There really aren't any anymore. Nothing even close really. Maybe This Week in Tech, but I've never been a fan so I don't know in depth they get these days.

  12. Twitlive.tv or Twit.tv with Leo Laporte by nofadz · · Score: 1

    Leo built a one-man studio with five cameras and a NewTek Tricaster.. He streams live weekday afternoons in decent quality and does a good job keeping up with tech, explaining any new gadgets he comes across in-depth. That's at www.twitlive.tv or www.twit.tv for the recordings of what he's doing. Also crankygeeks.com with John C. Dvorak for a weekly round table discussion of tech news.

    1. Re:Twitlive.tv or Twit.tv with Leo Laporte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't stand all the commercials that Leo has. He interrupts conversations as they just takes off to talk about VISA or Audible. In my opinion that is not how you host a show professionally, it should be more seamless.

  13. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Way to blow it

    Indeed, with a UID that low he should know it's "Frist Psot!!1!!!111111!!!!"

  14. try FLOSS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a podcast with Randal L. Schwartz, and some other chap who's name escapes me. Very good talk about SW development, and some good speakers. They had somebody from KDE who was very good last week

    Bob

    1. Re:try FLOSS... by teridon · · Score: 1

      That sounded great until I found that "some other chap" is Leo Laporte. I'll give it try anyway.

      --
      I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:try FLOSS... by redxxx · · Score: 1

      Links are helpful.

  15. How about cnet? by kilkenny · · Score: 1

    I listen to Cnet's Buzz Out Loud podcast to keep up with technology news. They also have a section with Video podcasts over at cnet...
    --
    traceurl.com

  16. Re: by thePig · · Score: 1

    Moderately offtopic - But which are the best tech magazines which one can subscribe to?
    I checked out Make after you mentioned it and it seems to be a very good one. One I can think of myself is IEEE Spectrum . Are there others?

    --
    rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
  17. Google's Tech Talks by NoTheory · · Score: 2, Informative

    The internet is just jam packed with info. Just go sign up for Google's tech talk RSS feed on youtube, that's just a small corner of mostly tech, most of the time (and the occasional diversion into human rights or harry potter as a philosophically christian themed narrative :P ).

    --
    There are lives at stake here!
    1. Re:Google's Tech Talks by TobascoKid · · Score: 2, Informative

      I stopped watching Google Tech Talks after they moved form Google Video to YouTube. Back on GV, I could download a fairly high quality AVI that I could easily play on my TV. Now that they're on YouTube, downloading isn't quite as easy and the video quality is nowhere near as good.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    2. Re:Google's Tech Talks by gavinjolly · · Score: 1

      Install Greasemonkey in Firefox then add the Youtube download script. This adds a "Download this video" link to the bottom of videos on the Youtube site. The videos are good quality/size also. I have used this heaps

      --

      The weathers here - Wish you were beautiful

    3. Re:Google's Tech Talks by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

      You can make an RSS feed out of any youtube channel, as described here:

      http://www.youtube.com/rssls

      I did this with my channel and put into Miro. I could then play it with both my media extender and Xbox 360. I didn't have to re-encode it or anything.

      --
      "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  18. hak.5? by tulcod · · Score: 1

    hak.5 was one of the shows i followed. whether or not their topics are described in-depth depends on your definitions, i stopped watching it because i found them not to provide any in-depth information. however, they do show you how to set everything up and do stuff, so it's certainly not a useless surface show.

    1. Re:hak.5? by thetr0n · · Score: 1

      You should try again!

      It's improved this season with rev3. Hak5 don't have to worry about distribution and production problems that they previously been plaguing them. So darren is more focused on producing a TV show and not everything

  19. # FUDging reported in several states already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    probably not worthy of a 'stuff that matters' story, except for the use of machines in the process.

  20. System is more indept than most tv shows: GREAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I regret how much about any tvshow gears towards the show factor, in stead of indepth tech.

    Just watching Systm: great show!!!
    Will assimilate their stuff into mine. Will rock.

  21. ASK SLASHDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Like many slashdot readers/linux users, I'm a big fan of Barack Obama. And like many slashdot readers/linux users, I enjoy anal stimulation. Has anyone else combined the two? I tried it last week, accidentally, and the feeling was incredible! Just think about Barack Obama as you slide a finger into your asshole. It's really amazing!

    In a couple weeks, I'm going to drop trou and finger my asshole when I vote for him. I'm creaming my jeans just thinking about it!

  22. Hak5 by RobinH · · Score: 1

    So far I've found Hak5 interesting (also from Revision3). It's definitely unpolished (I find it charming), but it does introduce you to some interesting topics I wouldn't normally have noted. Of course, nothing's going to go into 100% detail, but at least it's a starting point.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  23. What about TechTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, wait...

  24. Wrong media by elfguy · · Score: 1

    Video shows cost a lot to produce, especially if you want them with high production quality. They have to get a certain amount of viewers to survive. You may have to stay with another medium to get your very technical, niche content, such as text or perhaps audio.

  25. Hackermedia by droops · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://hackermedia.org/ is a site that aggregates awesome tech shows. If anyone sees anything that I am missing please email me. While I am pimping out projects I work on, http://hackerpublicradio.org/ is a great show that is done by the community, not any set hosts.

    1. Re:Hackermedia by VoltageX · · Score: 1

      +1 for BinRev (www.binrev.com/radio)
      Although that's not TV, the archives are worth skimming. Same goes for Radio Phreak America.

      --
      "Anonymous could not immediately be reached for further comment." - International Business Times
  26. Definitely Hak5 by devolutionist · · Score: 1

    http://www.hak5.org/ They like to open stuff up and see how it works. Also they have good interviews - not only do they ask intelligent and relevant questions, but they pick good people to interview in the first place - many of whom nobody would ever consider putting in front of a camera.

  27. TWiTNetwork by rlp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Leo Laporte's TWiT (named after the flagship show "This Week in Tech") network at twit.tv. It includes downloadable audio casts and streaming video. I listen to it on my daily commute. Two good ones are FLOSS Weekly with Randall Schwartz and Security Now with Steve Gibson. I was just listening to FLOSS weekly today -- they had a KDE developer on discussing the latest developments.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:TWiTNetwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but it's not really in depth. I didn't walk away feeling like i learned something, it was just an interview. Sorry, but TWiT isn't an a place where we'll learn something. Between Audible commercials, all I hear is Leo's Apple fanboi crap and Paul Thurott's anti-apple fanboy crap. It's just like the real world, only with an army of freaks following them.

      When did Leo Laporte become the god of all things geek? These people follow him (some are there all day) like he's a messiah. God I hate the internet

    2. Re:TWiTNetwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TWiT - I've listened a few times, but found the content to be more about the personalities and naming friends of the show. Whatever MS, Yahoo, and Google announce gets covered too. But that is "this week in tech", I guess.

      SecurityNow - For the uninitiated, this seems like a really boring podcast. It can be. However, if you are just starting out, you can listen from the beginning and get a good overview of how the internet works. It is tailored for security concerns, so have your tinfoil hat read. Occassionally, Steve makes more of tiny issues than they turn out to be. At the time, he was dead on correct concerning WiFi security. Basically, there is no good-enough security in wireless anymore. WPA has been cracked.

      CNET TV - I get this on my TiVo now. I watch more because they might cover something interesting ... I'm usually wrong. They seem to be pumping whatever is new in cell phones and large screen TVs. My 8 year old 50" rear-projection HDTV still rocks and my 2 year old $19 cell phone does what a cell phone should. I'm clearly NOT their demographic, a cheap techie. They've never covered my Nokia N800, which I LOVE!

      DL.TV - Probably the best of the TV shows. Occassionally they get into gaming WAY to much - I don't game at all. Some of their guests are pretty, but less than knowledgeable. Robert loves hidef TV just a little toooo much.

      Hak5 - I'll have to check this out. The other Rev3 stuff was a waste of my time, if not mildly entertaining.

      To be fair, I'm a computering architecture consultant. I know networking, software arch, storage, security, and most hardware better than many of the "experts" the vendors send out. I'm not going to overclock **any** system that I have, period. Stability is the most important metric to me. Sadly, the types of shows that I'd watch couldn't get sponsors. Topics:
        - how to replace Microsoft Exchange for your Enterprise
        - how to replace MS-Active Directory for your Enterprise
        - Lowering your per desktop client costs with OSS

      I just saw FLOSS Weekly ... I'll be listening to that!

    3. Re:TWiTNetwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FLOSS weekly is mainly there to stroke Leo's ego and try to convince the world he's not an Apple Fanboy. He's currently trying to tackle Squeak and he 'collects libraries'...

      I can't stand most of the TWiT shows honestly.

  28. Open university. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    The open university do a few good ones here in the uk (like the Atom series) and the history of maths
    shown on the bbc.

    They don't go into 'serious' depth and the history of maths didn't actually cover much of the maths details but it did cover the the theroies and the history quite well.

    You may be able to find them on a torrent site. (and if your really lucky you may be able to find some of those late night open university broadcasts).

    There not really strictly tech but they do cover the science tech is based on.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  29. Expand your horizons by sp332 · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you're looking for in-depth tech, you can't beat the video archives of technical conferences. Sure, there are some boring presentations, but you can usually tell the boring ones in the first few minutes and go try another. My favorite site is the Chaos Communication Congress, which has everything from presentations from the Mifare hackers, to technical improvements to nmap, to geek culture presentations. Great stuff in there.

    Citizen Engineer only has one episode out so far, and looks like it's going to be mostly hardhacking, but it's definitely not dumbed-down.

    On the other hand, if you're looking for a serious discussion on the future of tech with a stronger grip on reality than Popular Science, try MIT's LabCast videos, with footage of working prototypes.

    1. Re:Expand your horizons by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can find serious tech, from the realm of computing at least, in the ACM conference proceedings which can include video of tutorials and paper presentations at conferences, e.g. the SIGGRAPH conference proceedings DVD. Check out http://www.acm.org/

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  30. Eight shows and podcasts you may enjoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You may enjoy these shows:

    The Packet Sniffers
    http://www.packetsniffers.org

    HackTV
    http://www.hacktv.org/

    M0difyd
    http://www.pracdev.org/m0diphyd/

    Infonomicon TV
    http://nomicon.info/infotv.php

    Irongeek
    http://www.irongeek.com/

    Hacker Media
    http://hackermedia.org/

    Hacker Public Radio (Daily tech audio podcast)
    http://www.hackerpublicradio.org/

    Today With A Techie (Audio podcast - stopped at 300 episodes)
    http://www.twatech.org/

  31. Why not DIY? by Phreakiture · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the spirit of open source, if something is making you itch, you have the opportunity to scratch it.

    I used to host a tech-oriented radio show on a local community radio station. I also syndicated the show using radio4all.net.

    Television is a little harder to do, but thanks to sites like YouTube, it is possible to do on the cheap, because Google will absorb the bandwidth costs if your show is a success (and reap the ad revenue).

    You can also do what Kevin Rose did in the early days of the Broken: Encourage your show to be distributed far and wide by whatever means are available.

    Granted, none of these are likely to produce a result with as much production value as Revision3 shows (there's nothing like geeking out in HD), but it can get you started.

    . . . if you want to go that route. If not, that's okay, too

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  32. PaulDotCom Security Weekly by ajensen · · Score: 1

    If you have an interest in information security, I recommend the PaulDotCom Security Weekly podcast. Paul and Larry do an excellent job of covering the news and giving in-depth tutorials for useful security tools.

  33. NPR Science Friday by jddj · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not always tech, but it's never dumbed-down. 2 hours a week. Podcast available.

  34. Learn to read by John+Hasler · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    n/t

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Learn to read by maxume · · Score: 1

      tldr

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  35. I don't think so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Informative? Please.

    gdgt is not even up and running yet, and Leo Laporte is a complete buffoon, as is all of TWIT.

  36. Microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't putting reflective objects in the oceans, to bounce sunlight back into space, cause the sun's energy to pass through the atmosphere TWICE, heating the air MORE than if it only travels through ONCE?
    Other than that, I guess cooling the oceans would help, as they could then absorb more of the ambient earth heat, or the excess heat in the air caused by reflecting the sunlight through it again...
    Oh, and yes, I am being facetious...

  37. Re: by Bandman · · Score: 1

    I asked about trade magazines and got a few responses, and I'm always looking for more reading material, so I'm interested in hearing responses too.

    And for the record, I like Lightwave, Dr Dobbs, Network World, Storage Magazine, and I'll be writing soon for Simple Talk Exchange, so you should subscribe to that, too ;-)

  38. Forget your television. by Poodleboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want to learn about something complex and nuanced, then your television is the wrong place to look. It has been argued by sociologists like Neil Postman in his book Amusing Ourselves to Death, and even by admen themselves, like Jerry Mander in his Four Arguments for The Elimination of Television, that the medium of television is a poor conduit for complex ideas.

    Even the networks which have not arguably been "dumbed down," like the History Channel mentioned here, are a pretty poor provider of accurate detail, although they are certainly entertaining. For example, the "Engineering an Empire" program covering they Byzantines suggested that the Emperor Justinian was a brilliant leader, whereas in fact he was not a visionary at all, but an easily manipulated tool whose military victories in Europe, vaunted by the program, were provided by his general Belisarius (cf. Lord Mahon's The Life of Belisarius).

    Personally, I recommend books for the fundamentals and periodicals from the IEEE or ACM for the leading edge. Television is only good for a broad overview of the current buzz, not for diving deep into anything.

  39. A venue, or the length of a venue? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Stadiums instead of stadia is one common (and annoying) example.

    Did you mean the plural of "stadium", a unit of length just shy of 200 m, or the plural of "stadium", a venue for concerts and sporting events? I always thought the former was "stadia" and the latter was "stadiums".

  40. Not just TV shows... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

    Everything.

    Did you ever read the late, lamented Dr. Dobbs Journal?

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  41. Sploitcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sploitcast.com/

    SLOITCAST doesn't update as regularly as I'd like them to, but it does have a nice back catalog of discussions for you to peruse.

  42. NNR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a podcast I listen to fairly regularly that is pretty good.

    http://www.nerdnewsradio.com/

  43. I'll Recommend Some Podcasts by Telephone+Sanitizer · · Score: 1

    For tech and science news and commentary, I listen to (and in one case, watch) these tech-oriented podcasts, available via iTunes...

    In Our Time with Melvyn Bragg

    Make Podcast (video)

    The Naked Scientists (Good, intelligent reporting and discussion. The hosts each have professional academic specialties and speak from their respective areas of expertise. Nice children's segments in this show.)

    NOVA Science Now

    Krulwich on Science (A classic British attempt to make science as deep and boring as possible. Luv it!)

    NPR Science Friday

    NPR Technology

    The Science Show

    Tech Talk Radio ('Gotta say: They're supposed to be experts, but they aren't and their mistakes are so damned funny sometimes... That's where this show gets entertaining.)

  44. Re: by AmaDaden · · Score: 1

    FLOSS weekly and Security Now. They are both shows that Leo LaPorte of This Week in Tech does. They all can be found here http://www.twit.tv/. FLOSS is one open source project per episode. Security Now is about computer security; current events, how stuff works and anything else that relates.

  45. What about Social Engineering? by jakeblue · · Score: 1

    You should check out Revision3's Scam School. You can learn some basic social engineering skills, all while earning free beer!

  46. Re:I'll Recommend Some Podcasts - Correction by Telephone+Sanitizer · · Score: 1

    Oops! I have to correct my previous post.

    The comment about "A classic British attempt to make science as deep and boring as possible. Luv it!" was actually supposed to go after "Melvyn Bragg."

    Krulwich on Science is another NPR broadcast. Not very British at all.

  47. Re: by kaosfury · · Score: 1

    Security Now is a VERY entry level security show. He spends far too much time going over how things work (which is not supposed to be the focus of the show) and stammering. The stammering annoys me more than the explanations. Pauldotcom.com has a weekly security podcast that goes into more detail about security vulnerabilities, penetration testing, and programs that are useful for finding network and security issues.

    --
    "Trust that little voice in your head that says 'Wouldn't it be interesting if...' and then do it." - Duane Michals
  48. Re: by AmaDaden · · Score: 1

    I can see that. SN is user security focused. It gives high level looks at current issues and does a lot of viewer feedback stuff. Personally, security is not my main area of study. For me talking about how DNS works, what the difference is between a TCP packet and a UDP packet, and discussing whats good security policy is far deeper then I know so I still learn a lot from the show.

    This brings me to a good point. If you want deep you need to find something on JUST the one topic. SN is user level security. The show you gave looks like it's the how it works of security. SN is more general in topic and audience causing it to lack depth. Depth comes at the price of a smaller audience. I think that podcasts are actually a good place to look for deep shows. They are cheep and fairly simple to make so it's easy for someone in the industry to sit down and make one in their spare time.

  49. MIT World by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    Not "dumbed down" in the least: http://mitworld.mit.edu/video_index.php

    For tech, their Innovation/Invention category... However whether you judge it entertaining depends on how much you enjoy detailed lectures and an appeal to intellectual audiences.

  50. Oh man... by Derrikex · · Score: 1

    then you're really not going to like my tech show: joe six-pack checks his myspace.

  51. Re: by kaosfury · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Network and security administration is my job, so SN usually either bores me or annoys me. I still subscribe to it so I can watch for a topic that has not crossed Security Weekly yet, then I research it further. Usually SN is behind SW though.

    You also raised a good point that looking through podcasts should be one way of finding shows for what you are interested in. Their are thousands of them out there.

    --
    "Trust that little voice in your head that says 'Wouldn't it be interesting if...' and then do it." - Duane Michals
  52. Re: by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

    Floss Weekly seconded. Love it

  53. Linux Reality by timdogg · · Score: 1

    For those who are interested in learning a thing or two about running Linux I would recommend the late Linux Reality podcast (RIP). The target audience is new to intermediate Linux users. There were 100 episodes in total and I found them to give a pretty good overview of Linux -- from introducing the various Linux distros to teaching you basic to intermediate commands and going over how to install and configure services (e.g. Samba).

  54. @Discovery.ca by Animekiksazz · · Score: 1

    I remember when I was a teenager I'd watch @discovery.ca on the Discovery channel. And it was always full of science and cool stuff. But it also was full of information and I found it facinating.

    Then they were bought by CTV and the format changed and the show as renamed Daily Planet. Gill Deacon left and was replaced with a blonde, who was then replaced with someone slightly less dumb. I still watch the show from time to time, but only when I'm bored. Where as with the previous format which always felt like it had real science and understanding, I'd watch for my enjoyment every chance I got.

    Now I don't watch any TV science shows... but thanks to CBC I still get my weekly science, via Quirks and Quarks' podcast.

    Another complaint which I wont go into... TLC... wtf happened.

  55. Show Suggestion - Sites Collide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to toot my own horn or pat myself on the back but.......

    www.sitescollide.com

    I have a podcast about trechnology you may want to try out. I get quite a few hackers and security researchers on the show. I am planning to launch another season soon.

    I'd appreciate feedback. Enjoy!

  56. More Hacker oriented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some older but still relevant content, check out Binary Revolution Radio and Radio Freek America. Hacker Public Radio is another, more current option.

  57. talktech.tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One I like a lot is TalkTech : talktech.tv . She interview founders and executives from Silicon Valley startups on their tech, business models, backgrounds, etc. Good stuff, especially for anyone with entrepreneurial ambitions.

  58. There's no TV shows! by ghostbar38 · · Score: 0

    Normally the information you will find in websites is way a lot better that what you find in a show... Shows are more oriented to normal people, no to people who want to get into things for real...

    --
    ghostbar page.
  59. bsod by calef13 · · Score: 1

    BSoD is a brilliant and innovative tech tv show, showing off loads of projects, and anyone can submit segments www.bsodtv.org

  60. Re: by jimpop · · Score: 1

    What is this UID thing you speak of? :-)

  61. Geekbrief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://geekbrief.mevio.com/ is more of a gadget review, with a very hot host.

  62. UCTV by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I get UCTV on my Dish Network satellite and its tech programming is excellent. Plenty to fill a DVR. Schedule here.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  63. on the verge by idanity · · Score: 1

    a co worker is doing online casting now for a show. he asked me for ideas, and basically its ratings that make/ break the shows. the more in depth, the less listeners there will be. so its gotta be both dumbed down yet directed towards a mystery- find yourself show. hence, i will start w/a local linux users group to start the basics of powerful pc's. i bring my laptop to all lug meetings, and sometimes im the only one who actually is running linux. other times, im in a room w/unix guru's who help me out. but on quality shows, there are more every day. they pop up, and disapear sometimes overnight, right now, ive been watching youtube for some very refined help... plus, you tube is commercial free..i wouldn't have it any other way.

    --
    happy trials
  64. Linux Action Show! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the Linux Action Show!!!!! That podcast is amazing and funny. Plus they have the best fake announcer voices in podcasting. They arnt afraid to be cynical or harsh on topics that deserve it.

  65. PBS Nova by whitelines · · Score: 1

    Nova, and you can watch the episodes online: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/

    Check out the episode on the secret space program... ..imagine what they're doing now.

    --
    /* TBD */
  66. Security Now, MacBreak Tech, Security Bites, etc. by the+JoshMeister · · Score: 1

    There are several TWiT podcasts, and some of them only partially meet the criteria of the person who submitted the question. Let's review the criteria: "entertaining, informative, and, most importantly, thorough," not dumbed down, "dive deep into projects and discussions instead of simply skimming the surface."

    The two TWiT podcasts that meet all the criteria that come immediately to mind are Security Now and the (unfortunately now defunct) MacBreak Tech. Security Now is very technical and educational, and it doesn't dumb things down, but instead it manages to explain very technical topics in ways that make them easy to comprehend. It's mostly about computer and information security (naturally) but it also gets into networking and other related topics as well. MacBreak Tech was mainly focused on Macs as the name implies, but I learned a lot of things from the podcast that don't just apply to Macs specifically. I think all the old episodes are still available, so browse through the titles and descriptions and download anything that looks remotely interesting.

    Other TWiT podcasts that the asker might enjoy: This Week in Law and FLOSS Weekly. This Week in Law gets in depth about the legal aspects of computer technology and the computer industry. FLOSS Weekly is all about Free (Libre) Open Source Software and consists largely of interviews with lead developers of major open source software projects.

    Another decent computer security podcast is Security Bites from CNET. Security Bites is not nearly as in-depth as Security Now as the episodes are very short and more focused, but the show is worth listening to as well.

    If you don't mind the shameless self-promotion, I'm one of the hosts of MacMod Live, which deals with Mac modding and peripherally-related topics. MacMod Live doesn't always get super technical, but MacMod.com has a lot of interesting stuff too if you're interested in computer modding.

    All of the above are audio shows (sorry if you're looking for video content specifically). Occasionally we do videos on MacMod Live, and those get posted in the same podcast feed as our audio shows.

  67. Re: by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, someone with a properly low uid will come along eventually. 5 digits just doesn't cut it anymore.

  68. Re: by Paxton · · Score: 1

    Nothing important.

  69. Re: by Paxton · · Score: 1

    I like Leo's stuff, but Security Now spends way too much time hawking SG's Spinrite. Too much ego...

  70. British sources are good by virginiajim · · Score: 1

    I listen to the following podcasts that cover technical subjects and are the best I've found. The Naked Scientists provide the best overall coverage in hour-long sessions. Leoville's Futures in Biotech is very good in this cutting-edge field, but offers a limited number of entries. Perhaps more donations would enable the producer to do more. Microbeworld offers one-minute bites. Some of the leoville material that covers his radio call-in program last 2 hrs. Except for the FIB, all of his stuff is electronics-related (computers--Mac and Windows --, computer security, cell phones, digital cameras, and home theater). Some casts involve panels and guests. I've not included several more he does relating to food and children. Time compression software or other enhanced playback options are helpful with it as well as the other items if your time is limited.The Lancet offers several categories of current medical info. Podnuts is a computer repair discussion. Ziepod on Vista Home Premium works well to download all new episodes once a week. http://leoville.tv/podcasts/twit.xml http://feeds.feedburner.com/microbeworld http://www.theworld.org/rss/tech.xml http://leoville.tv/podcasts/kfi.xml http://leoville.tv/podcasts/fib.xml http://www.thenakedscientists.com/naked_scientists_podcast.xml http://www.cbc.ca/podcasting/includes/quirksaio.xml http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/worldservice/docarchive/rss.xml http://leoville.tv/podcasts/leo.xml http://podcast.thelancet.com/laneur.xml http://podcast.thelancet.com/lancet.xml http://podcast.thelancet.com/laninf.xml http://feeds.feedburner.com/podnutz http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/worldservice/mh/rss.xml

  71. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another show that's new to Revision3 worth mentioning is Hak5.org. It's a weekly show focusing on security from an offensive standpoint.