Slashdot Mirror


China Defines Internet Addiction

narramissic writes "Three years after the first clinic dedicated to Internet addiction opened in Beijing, Chinese doctors have now officially defined it as an ailment. Those afflicted with this ailment spend six or more hours a day online and exhibit at least one of the following symptoms: difficulty sleeping or concentrating, yearning to be online, irritation, and mental or physical distress. Do you meet the criteria? You're in good company: About 10 percent of China's 253 million Internet users exhibit some form of addiction to the medium, and 70 percent of those people are young men, an official Xinhua News Agency report said."

201 comments

  1. First psot by burtosis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean I am addicted?

    1. Re:First psot by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      ... how did this get modded off topic? Not only is it really the first post, but he actually makes a humorous reference to the story...

      Anyway, I'm online 8 hours a day at work, but I wouldn't consider myself addicted in any way (although it's different when it's your job since you're generally doing work related stuff and not just sitting around playing WoW or whatever.) I don't fit the other criteria though and I have seen people who do. There definitely exists a possibility of becoming addicted to the internet but I don't see it becoming an issue for everyone. I've gone months with no internet access at all, as long as I've had a cell phone to stay in touch with people I really had no desire to go online. I know people who are the complete opposite though, they can't function if you take away their PC.

    2. Re:First psot by isBandGeek() · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think so. And I think I'm addicted to H2O... I just keep coming back for more. I have problems trying to concentrate or sleep without it, and am quite distressed without it.

    3. Re:First psot by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      What about if I am at work, and they ask me to go and work on my web development, can I sue them for wrongful misconduct leading me to become an addict? Or is it because it has to do with work that it is ok???
      So if it is for work, its ok? So can someone pay me to smoke the ganja all day long?
      Then I wont be an addict right....wait I don't understand.... :P

    4. Re:First psot by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1
      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  2. What did that say? by Dripdry · · Score: 4, Funny

    I read that as "China Defends Internet Addiction".
    I hear they also have a problem with youth in asia, but I've been assured that the government has the problem well in hand.

    --
    -
    1. Re:What did that say? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a disease! Just like teh gay!

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    2. Re:What did that say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I finally get it....
      I'm Chinese...That explains everything

    3. Re:What did that say? by Lordnerdzrool · · Score: 2, Funny

      Their government did a good job dealing with that whole freedom of speech outbreak a while back too. Our government should learn from th

  3. Just One More Way for Them to Stop You by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    About 10 percent of China's 253 million Internet users exhibit some form of addiction to the medium, and 70 percent of those people are young men, an official Xinhua News Agency report said.

    News Anchor: And in today's news, an unnamed Chinese dissident has been treated in Beijing for <sinister sounding voice>internet addiction</sinister sounding voice>. After monitoring his internet usage and anti-government e-mails through his ISP, the government was able to find the man and get him the help he needs at a special government run institution at a remote location for his own good. Let's hope he has a swift recovery ...

    --
    My work here is dung.
  4. Wow work related injury here I come by Coraon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I totally hope they have this in North America, I could totally go on workman's comp as my job requires me to be online all the time.

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
    1. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      six or more hours a day online and exhibit at least one of the following symptoms: difficulty sleeping or concentrating, yearning to be online, irritation, and mental or physical distress.

      I guess they'd be irritated and in physical distress after 6 or more hours on the internet, unless they were surfing with their laptop in the washroom ...

      As for "work-related injury" - no problem. You get fired, lose your internet access, problem solved.

    2. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by shinmai · · Score: 1

      I would've guessed it'd be illegal to fire someone just because they suffered an injury at work.. I'd hope that America would have at least the same standard employee-protection laws as us Europeans.

    3. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Grimbleton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, they can't fire you over your injury.

      But, hey, these last few weeks your productivity has been rather low, and, well, you don't mesh well with our corporate climate. We're going to have to let you go.

    4. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Internet addiction" is no more or less real than "Television addiction." Both have the same cure - TURN THE DAMN THING OFF!

      Ditto for "XBox addiction", "Playstation addiction", "Wii addiction", "Gamers addiction", "SMS addiction". Turn it off. Can't turn it off? No problem - it's currently a self-correcting situation, since you'll end up not being able to afford your habit.

      It's like people who weigh 600 pounds and say "I can't help it - it's glandular." No, it's not. It's from shoveling food into your face regardless of the consequences. Same thing with smokers. They go from "I can quit any time" to "I can't stop." We don't excuse drunk drivers because they decided to have one to many, we should do the same for other "lifestyle addictions."

      I'm all for helping people who help themselves, not those who want to hide behind the "addiction" label as an excuse to do nothing. Look at how many lardos say they need gastric bypass surgery to lose weight ... while scoffing down their 3rd box of Twinkies and washing it down with their 4th gallon of soda pop. Here's a thought - make it illegal for anyone who's obese to buy or possess junk food. Ditto for the enablers - you know, the parents who also weigh 500 pounds and insist on shoveling sh*t down their kids' throats.

      As for the "internet addicts", who gives a frak? They're antisocial slobs anyways. In times past, they would have been hooked on TV, or crack, to fill their hollow lives.

      Sounds mean? Well, you know something - life can be mean. If you want to spend all your life glued to the internet, don't be surprised if nobody wants to hang around you in real life. You made your choice to be ultra-booooring. Just don't as me to help subsidize it.

    5. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by machine321 · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod!

    6. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by shiba_mac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same thing with smokers. They go from "I can quit any time" to "I can't stop."

      Smoke 20 a day for six months. Then try to stop. Maybe you'll be able to, but you won't think it's easy anymore.

    7. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, way to completely miss the point on what addiction means.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    8. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      calm down Dennis Leary!

    9. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same thing with smokers. They go from "I can quit any time" to "I can't stop."

      Smoke 20 a day for six months. Then try to stop. Maybe you'll be able to, but you won't think it's easy anymore.

      Never said it would be easy for someone - just that there is NO excuse, and that it is up to the individual to stop, not hide behind the "I'm addicted" excuse as a "justification" to DO NOTHING ABOUT IT.

      How many people do we know ho complain every day about their MARRIAGE, but DO NOTHING ABOUT IT? They stay in a loveless relationship, rather than either trying to improve it, or leaving.

      How many people do we know ho complain every day about their JOB, but DO NOTHING ABOUT IT? They don't look for another job, they don't send out resumes, they don't try to improve their current job by making the work environment better ... just bitch bitch bitch and it's always everyone else's fault.

      How many people do we know ho complain every day about their LACK OF A SOCIAL LIFE, but DO NOTHING ABOUT IT? You suggest they go volunteer at verious places, and they go "that won't owrk!" You tell them to stop spending their free time at home on the stupid internet, but they say "that's all I have." You invite them to a party, and they say "I don't want to go" or "I'm too busy" - doing what? Sitting at home doing sweet-fra- all

      How many people do we know ho complain every day about their DEBTS SPIRALLING OUT OF CONTOL, but DO NOTHING ABOUT IT? They get a loan consolidation, then end up a few years later with twice as many debts ...

      How many people do we know ho complain every day about their WEIGHT, but DO NOTHING ABOUT IT? They just keep shoveling it in like its' their last meal. To paraphrase Woodstock -

      "It's 1, 2, 3, helpings, then ask for more.
      I'm fat and I don't give a damn,
      next up - 10 fish in a pan;

      and it's 5, 6, 7, open up the pearly gates,
      I'm just a fat slob and we know why
      I'm gonna just up and die!"

      It's a question of what people want. Do they want a better life bad enough to change their behaviour:? No? They don't want to make the sacrifice, do the dieting, go through withdrawal, whatever ... then they're just getting what, deep down, they really want. Whether it's internet addiction over a normal social life, or oral gratification instead of a healthier body, these are choices they make with every mouse click, every potato chip, every cigarette. If they don't care about themselves, why should anyone else?

      It's always "I'll change ... maybe tomorrow. Next week. New Years." Never "It starts NOW!" Always one more cigarette, one more bag of Cheetos, one more hour on the web. Deep down, they know there's no reason, just excuses.

    10. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you should agree with what the Chinese government is doing then. They are simply providing a voluntarily way for people to get away from the internet so they can help themselves.

    11. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, way to completely miss the point on what addiction means.

      Hey, way to completely miss the point on what personal responsibility means.

      A prime example is all the fat people who I see at the supermarket with shopping carts overflowing with junk. Are you going to argue that the boxes of crap just jumped magically off the shelves? Or that they had no choice in their purchases? Do we add "Junk fod shopping addiction" to the "pigging out addiction"? I don't think so. There is NOTHING stopping them from asking for or paying someone to help them - either by doing their shopping for them (they even sell fridges with a lock and an alarm, you know ...), or just abandoning the shopping cart before they get to the cash. Oh, right - we have to add "compulsive pay-for-inedible-crap addiction" to the list. There are plenty of points in the cycle where it can be broken - but they CHOOSE not to, just as others CHOOSE to.

      Same with "internet addiction." If you've been sitting at the computer so long that your rectum has prolapsed (and ys, there are people who have done that), your ASSHOLE is telling you something - TURN IT THE FRAK OFF!

      Same as people who wear Depends so they don't lose "their" slot machine - they made a conscious decision BEFORE they entered the casino.

      The simple fact is that sometimes people have to hit rock bottom before they can accept that they need help, and they they'll also have to be a part of the solution, instead of just looking for excuses.

    12. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smokers and overeaters would fix themselves up if they hadn't choked to death on your sanctimony first.

    13. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, way to completely miss the point on what addiction means.

      Hey, way to completely miss his point on who ultimately gets stuck footing the bill for treating shit like this.

      Of course, if you voted for Obama, this probably doesn't bother you as much as it should.

      Now go forth and work hard, millions of "addicts" representing the parasite-class are depending on your hard-earned dollars.

    14. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      So you should agree with what the Chinese government is doing then. They are simply providing a voluntarily way for people to get away from the internet so they can help themselves.

      What - RTFA? Are you crazy?

      Seriously, instead of calling them "boot camps", they could have at least called them "reboot camps".

      As to whether I agree with what China is doing or not- that's immaterial to at least one of my points, which is that personal responsibility has to enter into it before the person is "so far gone". It's a "lifestyle disease", same as smoking, same as over-eating, same as TV, same as pr0n.

    15. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason we hate drunk drivers more than people with "gamers addiction" is that (unless they have an Xbox in their glove and are playing it while driving) their video game habits aren't putting your life in danger.

      People with SMS addictions are just as hated because they do it while they drive STOP IT!! I'd rather you were drunk and watching the road than texting and paying no attention to anything at all.

    16. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Smokers and overeaters would fix themselves up if they hadn't choked to death on your sanctimony first.

      Great. Problem solved.

      And no, it's not being sanctimonious - it's being realistic. You can't change someone - they have to want it badly enough themselves. We can do our part by occasionally reminding obese smokers that they're smelly, gross, fat, disgusting tubs of lard. (okay, that covers a lot of sysadmins and slashdotters, so I'm getting my asbestos undies :-)

      What would you propose? Glorifying the ultra-fat, same as we used to glorify the anorexic in fashion magazines, or smoking on TV and in the movies? Frak that! If you weigh 500 pounds, you're obese. I'd say "get over yourself", but that would be a physical impossibility.

    17. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by KoD7085 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have one question, have you ever been addicted and had to quit? Because, it doesn't sound like it; and the way you put your opinion seems overly simplified. As "easy" as it is to quit, there's a lot more to it than just stopping. I can personally say it's a tough road, that some people can't handle mentally. Then you have the case, with some drugs, of the body building a dependency on the drug. It becomes not only mental, but physical. If they don't get their fix they can have severe reactions. I'll agree that the person has to truly want to change for it to work; however, it's not something to take lightly (which is the tone I got from your post). Everything we do is a choice. We all must face the good and the bad. Those that choose to find the jagged path back to good have a better understanding of the hell some people go through. It may be sympathy on my part; however, it's a lot easier to help other people when you care more than to just say "Quit" and realize there's more to it than that.

    18. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Plesae ... I never said it was "easy" to quit anything. However, there is an element of personal responsibility. For example, after major surgery and more than a month on a morphine drip, a few days after I was discharged, as soon as I realized I was looking forward to my 4x-a-day dilaudid, I stopped taking it. Immediately. By the next day, all the drugs that had accumulated in my body simultaneously released - while I was driving to the pharmacy for other supplies.

      I felt AWESOME. No pain. No common sense, either. But for a couple of hours, I could WALK! It would be months before I could say that again. I *NEVER* want to feel that good again. Feeling *that good* scared the crap out of me.

      I could have just "gone with the flow", rationalized it, excused it ... but I *CHOSE* not to. Better crippling pain for a month or two more. My body might have wanted it, but *I* didn't.

      Look, we ALL make bad choices. No exceptions. And we pay for them. That's part of learning. Same as this whole "internet addiction" thing. Anything that interferes with your life to the point that it takes over your life better be worth it. Playing games online isn't. Living vicariously in second life isn't. But for many people, obviously, only hard-won experience is the answer.

    19. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a huge difference between a bad habit & an addiction.

      The difference is chemical, physical dependency.

      Part of the problem is the US government using Orwellian Newspeak tactics to confuse the issue. Notice they use the term "Habit-forming" instead of "Addictive" when referring to many kinds of drugs.

      EVERYTHING can be habit-forming, but only addictive things can truly form a physical addiction. The term "Mental addiction" is a smokescreen, it is just another way of saying "bad habit".

      The internet might be habit-forming for people, just like jogging, going to church, or being healthy can be habit-forming.

      It is in no way addictive in any real sense of the word, and any person who becomes severely 'addicted' to the internet has mental problem already, the internet is just their fixation of choice.

    20. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people do you know who cant spell?

      Well, I think they are all a##holes who are neglecting their lexical responsibility!

      *Smirks*

    21. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We don't excuse drunk drivers because they decided to have one to many, we should do the same for other "lifestyle addictions."

      We don't excuse drunk driving because it can lead to physical harm or death of another person. Being addicted to food or the internet currently only harms yourself. Your point is a logical fallacy.

      What's amusing is how harshly you condemn people with problems and yet it seems as though you have stress management issues. I guess that means no mercy for those people that can't manage stress...

    22. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *NEVER* want to feel that good again. Feeling *that good* scared the crap out of me.

      Do you mean you don't want to feel that good again due to a drug, or at all? Because not wanting to feel that good from ANYTHING, be it love, or your job, or your hobbies, seems kind of strange. I mean, I can understand that you would be afraid that the element that made you feel good would take over your life and make you shirk all other responsibilities, but what if it was the entire gestalt of your life made you feel that good? I can't imagine that anyone would shun that kind of experience, or way of life.

    23. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      *notes email address*

      *figured there had to be something weird here*

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    24. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you say the same thing for a heroin addict?

      Or someone who was addicted to morphine when they had a debilitating injury?

      That's not something you can 'just stop'

      Withdrawal isn't just uncomfortable. It completely incapacitates you and can KILL you if proper precautions aren't taken when attempting to quit.

      Not everyone qualifies for a free methadone program and not everyone has 600 dollars to get themselves on suboxone.

      Don't go comparing internet addiction to crack. Keep your mouth shut because you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

    25. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      We don't excuse drunk drivers because they decided to have one to many, we should do the same for other "lifestyle addictions."

      We don't excuse drunk driving because it can lead to physical harm or death of another person. Being addicted to food or the internet currently only harms yourself. Your point is a logical fallacy.

      Bullshit. Overweight people contribute to global warming and higher food prices

      That does affect me, and the whole planet.

      What's amusing is how harshly you condemn people with problems and yet it seems as though you have stress management issues. I guess that means no mercy for those people that can't manage stress...

      You need to re-read what I wrote. As far as I'm concerned, until the individual takes some responsibility for their own actions, there's NOTHING that we should bother doing for them - we just become enablers. For example, lying to the morbidly obese instead of telling them point-blank "No second helping for you" isn't helping them. At the same time, not having a second helping in front of them is a gesture that they can appreciate, rather than just beating on them.

      The key point is that everyone is looking for a bail-out from responsibility for their own actions and decisions. Just look at GM - for decades, making the wrong kind of cars, and they now want a bailout, instead of letting them go broke and rewarding more responsible manufacturers with a slice of their market. Or the Wall Street bailout, which did nothing to help people whose mortgages are under water. Or the people who let greed and stupidity get the better of their judgment, and committed fraud by taking out "liar loans". If you lied on your mortgage application "because everyone else is doing it" you should go to jail, just like any other crook. No bailout for YOU!

      We're punishing the responsible people by making them pay to bail out every irresponsible individual. When you reward irresponsibility and punish responsibility, as was the situation in the US since the beginning of the decade, don't be surprised when a large portion of your country engages in fraud. And don't be surprised when there's push-back wrt moral hazards.

      Internet addiction? Grow the frak up.

    26. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      It was clearly an unnaturally high "high" - so much so that the warning bells went off immediately. Unsustainable, and as such, dangerous. I know the limitations of my wetware ...

      I'll stick with the occasional rum and coke, thank you :-)

    27. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by mrdarreng · · Score: 1

      How many people do we know ho complain every day about their

      It's generally a good idea to spell check something before you copy and paste it.

    28. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Or someone who was addicted to morphine when they had a debilitating injury?

      That's not something you can 'just stop'

      Yes, I would. Been there, done that. Took me 6 months before I could even sit for 5 minutes and write one lousy paragraph of code, and another 6 months before I could walk properly, but after 6 weeks on a morphine pump and a week on dilaudid, I decided I valued lucidity over feeling good.

    29. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      on freeway. jst hd srs accident. pramedics cutting me out ov car. ow my spine.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    30. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      You've still completely missed the point. Yes, personal responsibility is a must. That does not mean that there aren't going to be some people who get addicted to certain substances or activities. Your pick-yourself-up-by-your-own-bootstraps approach is admirable, but it simply will never, ever work in many cases. Now, you can go on moralizing all you want but the fact remains that there is such a thing as addiction whether or not people try to take personal responsibility or not.

      Apparently you've had the good fortune to never have been addicted to anything. Good for you. But try to keep in mind that there are lots and lots of people out there who are addicted to things because they had the misfortune of not being born perfect--unlike certain Slashdotters--and far from being blase about it they are actually quite unhappy about it. And it takes a lot of work and many attempts to kick an addiction. Just ask any smoker.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    31. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Atario · · Score: 1

      Uh-huh. And what do we do about people who are "addicted" to ALL CAPS? And repeating the same point a hundred different ways in a row? And judging and berating others? And harboring a superiority complex?

      On another note, you seem to have a particularly deep well of vitriol (maybe even hate) reserved for the obese. Permit me to remind you that, unlike all those other things whose status as addictions you mock, eating is something which you cannot simply quit "cold turkey".

      Finally: these various addictions are not the only things that make people tend not want to hang around you. There's also being a shrill, unsympathetic asshole.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    32. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by lloydchristmas759 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes but what are YOU doing about it ? NOTHING!

      --
      I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.
    33. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by jandersen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... DO NOTHING ABOUT IT ...

      Unfortunately it is not quite as simple as "doing something about it"; it's like saying "everybody complains about America's addiction to oil, but they DO NOTHING ABOUT IT". As you probably know, you can do a lot about things and still not have any success.

      When you are trying to beat addiction it feels like you are fighting against your whole body and all your instincts; which is why that old "Just say no" campaing was so cringelingly stupid and totally missed the point. You can decide all you want that now you are going to stop smoking/shooting heroin/overeating or whatever, but when the craving hit you, it's amazing how obvious it suddenly seems that you don't actually need or want to stop,

    34. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more with you. It's so true ppl tend to hide behind their addiction as an excuse for their failures and stupid doings. It's very difficult to change someone unless they want to.

      I had a bad habit which always hampered by professional growth and no matter how much I was told to improve myself I wouldn't unless I fell flat face down and told myself no it's gonna work this way and changed.

      Often bugging ppl and forcing em to change ....all it does is to make them more resistant to bring about that change in their life.

    35. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

      Yeah, of course, the cure is easy - just turn it off. Just like when you're an alcoholic, all you need to do is stop drinking, or just how smokers just need to stop smoking, or how crystal meth addicts just need to stop using crystal meth.

      After all, it's that easy, right?

      In fact, it's similar to other illnesses, diseases and conditions, too. Are you an autist? Why, just speak up for once and go outside and be social, man! Everyone else does it, so why can't you! Got the flu? Why, just get rid of those viruses! Got a broken leg? Just make the bone heal! Everyone else's bones are fine, too, so why can't yours be!

    36. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by knutkracker · · Score: 1

      Sounds like learned helplessness

    37. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      ... but when the craving hit you, it's amazing how obvious it suddenly seems that you don't actually need or want to stop,

      No, what's obvious is that you decide to satisfy your craving. That's a conscious decision, just like buying tons of junk food, or cigarettes, or dope. You choose the immediate satisfaction over long-term satisfaction. Your choice. The fat person who loads up their shopping cart with junk is making choices with every item they pick up off the shelf. A second choice when they get to the check-out, to actually KEEP it instead of saying to themselves "I don't need this sh*t."

      There's nothing preventing someone who thinks they have "internet addiction" to hook their computer up to a timer - when the hour is up, the power gets shut off. Or, with a laptop, to put the recharger in another room, away from where they use the laptop - when the batteries go dead, so does their addiction.

      There are ALWAYS alternatives. Just as with your oil example, people CAN do things to reduce their gas consumption. They CHOOSE not to. They CHOOSE not to move closer to work, drive a smaller car, carpool, take the bus, walk to the corner store, etc. Nobody forced them to buy a hummer, or a mustang,a 4x4, an SUV, or any other gas guzzler.

      Just like nobody forces the fatties to go to an all-you-can-eat. It's a CHOICE they make, well before they walk into the restaurant and hoover up a weeks' worth of calories. When you're so fat that you can't even reach around to wipe your ass, that should tell you something ...

    38. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      How many people do we know ho complain every day about their LACK OF A SOCIAL LIFE, but DO NOTHING ABOUT IT? You suggest they go volunteer at verious places, and they go "that won't owrk!" You tell them to stop spending their free time at home on the stupid internet, but they say "that's all I have." You invite them to a party, and they say "I don't want to go" or "I'm too busy" - doing what? Sitting at home doing sweet-fra- all

      True, but when you go volunteer or go to a party and you get there and feel completely out of place and have nothing to talk about you end up feeling worst then you did before you go there. This happens to me EVERY TIME. I feel out of place and alone because I dont go out socially much and I dont go out socially much because I feel out of place and alone when I do.

      It goes back to "I need experience to get a job but to get experience I need to have had a job."

      It's just a fucking feedback loop that I have not been able to escape ever since I realized I was stuck in it 6 years ago and frankly I dont see an escape EVER.

    39. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      It's not moralizing. Your stance fails the logic test.

      You yourself say:

      You've still completely missed the point. Yes, personal responsibility is a must.

      Personal responsibility means not giving in to the urge to pig out to the point of bursting | gamble your rent money and kids' food | watch TV or the Internet to the exclusion of all else | smoke until you cough up a lung or two | whatever.

      Nobody said you have to do it by yourself ... but I've seen so many people who say they WANT to change their behaviour, but that's all it is 0 a "want." They don't actually want to change badly enough, or they would at least make a frakking effort. They keep saying "I want to", but they don't change their daily routine one iota, and wonder why, a year or a decade later, they're still whining about "wanting to change" and "how hard it is."

      Hint - when you want something badly enough, you'll actually DO something about it. If you WANT to lose weight, you'll buy healthier foods instead of crap, you'll think twice before getting a second portion - and then say "I don't want it ... my stomache might, but *I* don't". You'll stop going to the all-you-can-eat buffets.

      Ditto for "InnerToobs Addiction." If you want your life back badly enough, you'll fill the hours that you wasted online with other activities, like walking the dog, playing with your kids, chatting up your spouse, having friends over for a game of Risk or Pictionary *(oh, silly me - if you're an internet addict, you don't HAVE any 3-D friends any more).

      The fact is, a lot of people are lazy shits. They don't want to change their routines, because that is too much like "work." Easier to sit around stuffing their faces with "comfort food", surf the net until their bladder is ready to burst, feed coins to the one-armed bandits while shitting themselves (they wear Depends so they won't lose "their" machine, or they get a second coin cup and piss in it), but ask them to change their routine, go and volunteer to walk dogs at the local pound, or help out at the hospital, or even take a trip to the library and read a frakking book ... that would require a decision to change their habits.

      If you're not ready to substitute a good habit for a bad one, then don't be surprised if your bad habits run your life. There's a name for someone who does the same thing over and over again, but expects that "this time it will be different."

      and far from being blase about it they are actually quite unhappy about it

      Not unhappy enough to actually change their habits. Too much like "work." The case you cite - smokers - is a good example. Look at the justifications of people who refuse to quit - "It's the only pleasure I have left - cough cough retch hack hack" - They didn't get to that situation in one day. Plenty of warning signs that they CHOSE to ignore.

      Anyone who says they weren't warned is a liar. Let them take the first step, by admitting they they have been lying to themselves. Until then, it's a waste of time.

    40. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      More bullshit, I see ...

      Permit me to remind you that, unlike all those other things whose status as addictions you mock, eating is something which you cannot simply quit "cold turkey".

      You've obviously never done a hunger strike. I did one for 10 days back in my "protest years", so, yes, yu can simply quit cold turkey.

      The ONLY sure way to lose weight is to STOP PUTTING FOOD IN YOUR FRAKKING MOUTH!

      Exercise won't do it. The number of calories that go in has to be fewer than the number of calories that go out.

      I see so many people who are 50 to 100 pounds overweight - they say they want to lose weight, but every weekend, they hit the all-you-can-eat brunch. At home, they have seconds. And thirds. And desserts - plural. And when their clothes don't fit, instead of taking that as a sign that they should eat less, they just buy bigger clothes, until Omar the Tent Maker is their tailor of choice. Of course, by then, it's "oh well, it's too late to change now."

      Obesity is a prime example of a natural activity gone amok. Cut out the high fructose soda pop? God forbid!!! Stop buying Pizza Pockets and eating at McDonalds? That's unreasonable!!!

      I had a friend in grade school who was always chubby. Finally, in the first year of high school, he decided that he would stop eating more than one meal a day - and he lost the weight. It started with a choice - to DO something different.

      Have a banana or an apple instead of a bag of ships. Water instead of a "sports drink". A salad instead of spaghetti. Smaller portions. Fewer portions. No seconds. Desserts only a couple of times a week, instead of at every meal. A hot breakfast instead of that crap they call "breakfast cereal", massive does of carbs that still leave you hungry an hour later.

      But people choose not to change their eating habits. They CHOOSE to buy a bag of Fritos instead of a head of lettuce. And they feed the same crap to their kids, so that they'll have more time to watch TV.

    41. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Again, I never said it was easy. The fact is, people DO decide to quit their self-destructive behaviors, and they DO succeed. But until they make that decision, they're just lying to themselves.

      This applies to the obese, the smoker, the gambler, the crack addict, etc.

      They have to WANT to quit more than they want the feedback from indulging their habit. When you don't want to quit, quiting is impossible, When you DO want to quit, it suddenly becomes possible. Funny how you choose to ignore that - which makes you, not me, the idiot.

      Got the flu? Why, just get rid of those viruses! Got a broken leg? Just make the bone heal! Everyone else's bones are fine, too, so why can't yours be!

      Comparing bad lifestyle choices to autism or a broken leg is a sign of desperation. People are fat because they eat too much - they want the sugar rush more than they want a healthy body. People smoke because they want the immediate "hit" from nicotine more than they want the long-term reduced risk of cancer. People gamble because they want the "thrill' of losing more than they want the money to pay their bills.

      When they get to the point that they want a healthy body more than they want to stuff their faces or smoke out their lunds, they'll change. When they want to have a real life more than they want a virtual one, they'll get up from the ocmputer.

    42. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      Let's be honest... not all addictions are bad. I think some people have got that idea in their head, but last I checked: being addicted to air or water isn't bad.

      Like being 'addicted' to the internet is not entirely bad either. Simply quitting as you suggest, means what else do they do with their lives? Socialize as you suggested? But... isn't that what you do on the internet?

      This goes on to the debate of: if you're online all the time, you 'have no life'. No, last I checked, defining whether someone has a life means you are living, breathing, with a pulse, communicating. That's what you're still doing online. When you stop interacting with the world, your life ceases to lose meaning.

      BTW I would suggest YOU take a break from your internet addiction...You seem to be responding to almost every post made. Or maybe you can accept the fact that you are addicted, but who cares except YOU?

      I too was once chubby, and I was made fun of all my life, until 1 day. I stopped eating as much. I ate once a day, and eventually I lost a lot of weight. Did this stop people from making fun of me? No, 'omg I can see your cheekbones! you're so frail' etc. etc. Eventually I realized I don't care what I weigh, people will either accept you, or they won't. Then I gained all my weight back. Now I have hit a point where I gained too much and have gone back to eating once a day (nice way to save money if you ask me), but by choice (because I really am not hungry all the time anyways, for some reason eating a big lunch makes me full all day, and I never really ate breakfast all that much). I haven't lost any weight, I may have actually gained some. But... for some reason... I don't care, the ones who truly love you should still accept you regardless. One way to tell if a person cares about their weight? Check to see if they have a scale, I haven't owned one for about 2 years+ now.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    43. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by srussia · · Score: 1

      How many people do we know ho complain every day about their

      It's generally a good idea to spell check something before you copy and paste it.

      I've added "ho" to my spell-check dictionary, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    44. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Sounds like learned helplessness

      You got that right!

      An individual's attributional style or explanatory style was the key to understanding why people responded differently to adverse events (Peterson & Seligman, 1984). Although a group of people may experience the same or similar negative events, how each person privately interprets or explains the event will affect the likelihood of acquiring learned helplessness and subsequent depression (Abraham, Seligman & Teasdale, 1978).

      The pessimistic explanatory style--which sees negative events as permanent ("it will never change"), personal ("it's my fault"), and pervasive ("I can't do anything correctly")--are most likely to suffer from learned helplessness and depression (Peterson, Maier, & Seligman 1993). Cognitive behavioral therapy, heavily endorsed by Seligman, can help people to learn more realistic explanatory styles, and can help ease depression.

      In other words, if you want to keep hiding behind the "gee, I can't do anything about it - I'm addicted", you'll keep stuffing your pie-hole with junk, keep smoking your lungs out, keep gambling your money away, etc. When you decide "I've had enough of this shit!" and MEAN it, you'll change things.

      A "disease model" isn't called for. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - for example, holding people's feet to the fire over the choices they've made and continue to make, and forcing them to think through the sequence of events, and where they CAN change things but REFUSE to, works. You don't even need to see a shrink. For example, with the fatties (since people seem to think I have some sort of hatred for fat people because I think there's no excuse for being so fat you can't even wipe your own ass) - some of the choices they make that they can change:

      1. Before shopping, make a list. Review it. For each item, ask yourself "What are the consequences of buying this? Is it going to make me fatter? Is it junk that I shouldn't even feed to a dog?"
      2. When shopping, don't just pick things up to replace what you bought in the past. Look at each item, and ask yourself - "Do I REALLY REALLY want this? If I buy this, what will happen when I eat it? Will it contrbute to my health, or just keep me fat?"
      3. When at the checkout - review your list and, for each item that you "cheated on" - that wasn't on your list, but that you picked up anyway - acknowledge that you ARE cheating, and say to yourself "I *do* have a choice - I can buy this, or I can put it back. Waht's it going to be?"
      4. When going out, don't just head for the all-you-can-eat. If going in a group, discuss the choice with everyone else. Tell them "We need to lose weight. We can either start going somewhere else, have a good meal, and not regret it, or we can pig out like usual, and see the same fat slobs in the mirror a year from now."
      5. When serving, say to yourself 'I can choose to put a small or a large portion on the plate. It's my choice, and I'm the one who will face the consequences. Do I *really* want to keep eating larger portions, or do I take a stand here, and try to get by on less?"
      6. When eating, remind yourself that you can actually CHEW your food instead of shoveling it in. "I can eat slowly, and actually enjoy this meal, and my stomach will have time to signal "hey, there's food in here now", or I can eat like a hog getting slopped, barely taste my food, and not realize I have enough calories to last until the next meal until my stomach is STUFFED. Which is it going to be?"

      In all the above - it is up to the individual to realize that they actually have control of what they do, and have a choice to make. Not just for one meal or one day, but forever. They can either empower themselves, or go "I'm addicted." The choice is theirs. The good news is that, once they start acting on the realization that there are a lot of different "pinch points" that they can leverage to change their behavior, it gets easier. They "learn" to take control of their lives.

    45. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by one_in_a_milli0n · · Score: 0

      Sounds mean? Well, you know something - life can be mean.

      Life is not mean. People are. And yes, you have no clue about addiction. As somebody not affected by it, you stand erect on your pedestal talking people down. Anything that makes you happy, I guess...

    46. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      How many people do we know ho complain every day about their LACK OF A SOCIAL LIFE, but DO NOTHING ABOUT IT? You suggest they go volunteer at verious places, and they go "that won't owrk!" You tell them to stop spending their free time at home on the stupid internet, but they say "that's all I have." You invite them to a party, and they say "I don't want to go" or "I'm too busy" - doing what? Sitting at home doing sweet-fra- all

      True, but when you go volunteer or go to a party and you get there and feel completely out of place and have nothing to talk about you end up feeling worst then you did before you go there. This happens to me EVERY TIME. I feel out of place and alone because I dont go out socially much and I dont go out socially much because I feel out of place and alone when I do.

      It goes back to "I need experience to get a job but to get experience I need to have had a job."

      It's just a fucking feedback loop that I have not been able to escape ever since I realized I was stuck in it 6 years ago and frankly I dont see an escape EVER.

      Have a seat, grasshopper. I've beed discussing this at work with someone in the identical situation.

      First, those feelings of being "out of place" are normal, and they CAN change.

      Socializing, like any other skill, can be learned. However, it takes time - a LOT of time. Realize that and make an open-ended commitment to learning how to get along in groups. This way, you avoid the first pitfall, which is thinking that "it isn't happening fast enough, so I'm failing."

      To be interesting to others, you need to be able not just to listen, but to relate to what they're talking about. The 5 big talk items are sex, politics, religion, money, and family. You can cover all 5 of those by being observant, and by keeping up on the news. People like a good listener, so even atheists should remember the old saw "God gave you 2 ears and only one mouth for a reason."

      Expect to get the brush-off frequently, knowing that each refusal brings you one step closer to success. As one saleman said "I make one sale for every 10 visits. When a potential customer says NO, I think to myself 'great - one down, 9 more to go and I'm good!' Each refusal is just one more NO in my quota towards that YES".

      Related to the above, don't try too hard. People pick up on that "flop sweat" smell of desperation. If you approach each situation with a "whether it works out or not, I'm good!" attitude, people will pick up on that as well. Say it often enough, in enough negative situations, and you'll find that at some point it becomes true ... and then you end up with fewer negative situations.

      Don't try to overcome things by being loud, but don't be too quiet either. If you have a suggestion that might help, offer it. Ditto with encouragement, if it's genuine and not sucking up.

      Get a dog. Seriously, get a dog. Even if it's only temporarily fostering a dog (in which case, the pound will probably cover the food and any vet bills). A dog not only forces you to go out, but you'd be surprised at how many people who don't own dogs will talk to you. This will get you in the habit of being at ease talking to total strangers, so that when you're in a group of strangers, you're not nervous joining a group of 4 or 5, introducing yourself, and taking part in the conversation.

      As you said, you need experience in groups of strangers to be at ease in groups of strangers, so that you can become friends. Dogs work. They give you that experience, on a twice-daily basis. Plus, it's good exercise. And it gives you something to talk about.

      Look for opportunities. Hallowe'en parties are great for that. Nobody knows you, who you are, what you look like - and nobudy gives a crap. Just get a good costume, circulate, compliment people on their get-up, ask them what they think about so-and-so's outfit (point to any random party-goer) and you're good.

    47. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by theaveng · · Score: 1

      >>>eating is something which you cannot simply quit "cold turkey".

      Sure you can. When I want to lose weight, I fast for two or three days. It works wonders in reducing my waistline. (And then of course you have to go back to eating moderately, not pig out.)

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    48. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by one_in_a_milli0n · · Score: 0

      More bullshit, I see ...

      Permit me to remind you that, unlike all those other things whose status as addictions you mock, eating is something which you cannot simply quit "cold turkey".

      You've obviously never done a hunger strike. I did one for 10 days back in my "protest years", so, yes, yu can simply quit cold turkey.

      Please protest with your stomach against widespread obesity and go on for...dunno...the next three months or so. I dare you!

    49. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my experience with women:

      "The pessimistic explanatory style--which sees negative events as permanent (it will never change), personal (it's my fault), and pervasive (I can't do anything correctly)." Also add: "no woman will ever like me so I might as well stop trying".

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    50. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by theaveng · · Score: 1

      >>>frankly I dont see an escape EVER.

      Get a part time job at a store. That forces you to socialize and that's how you gain experience. It's what worked for me in overcoming my social awkwardness (i.e. shyness).

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    51. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      BTW I would suggest YOU take a break from your internet addiction...You seem to be responding to almost every post made. Or maybe you can accept the fact that you are addicted, but who cares except YOU?

      I'm just having some fun while fixing code for a friend during my week off. He took on a job that he ended up having to give up on, and I'm helping him out by redoing it from scratch, so why not troll slashdot from another computer at the same time :-)

      I could have told him that I have better things to do on my week off, but he's a friend, and if it means being glued to a computer for a few days, so what? I still find time to go out, go to a party or two, visit people, walk the dogs, etc. If I can help him out at the same time, I should. It's hnot like I don't have a few more weeks off owed to me, so I can afford to be generous.

      I too was once chubby, and I was made fun of all my life, until 1 day. I stopped eating as much. I ate once a day, and eventually I lost a lot of weight. Did this stop people from making fun of me? No, 'omg I can see your cheekbones! you're so frail' etc. etc. Eventually I realized I don't care what I weigh, people will either accept you, or they won't. Then I gained all my weight back. Now I have hit a point where I gained too much and have gone back to eating once a day (nice way to save money if you ask me), but by choice (because I really am not hungry all the time anyways, for some reason eating a big lunch makes me full all day, and I never really ate breakfast all that much). I haven't lost any weight, I may have actually gained some. But... for some reason... I don't care, the ones who truly love you should still accept you regardless. One way to tell if a person cares about their weight? Check to see if they have a scale, I haven't owned one for about 2 years+ now.

      I don't make fun of my friends who are overweight (well, not much, we all make fun of each other because we ARE friends, and we all know that, push ocmes to shove, nothing will change that :-) You might want to shift that one meal a day to breakfast - it turns out that, consuming the same amount of calories at the start of the day, you put on less fat. The absolute worst time to eat - right before bed.

      A waist is a terrible thing to mind. We all know that. Our sedentary lifestyle doesn't help. The processed crap that runs through the aisles is hard to avoid. The HFCS that disrupts metabolisms seems to be everywhere. It's not fair. However, ignoring the health issues isn't going to help. The average North American is fat, and needs to lose weight. A LOT of weight. Not so that others will like them better, but so that they will live longer, and have a better quality of life.

      One thing that people are surprised at is that, like your tactic of skipping breakfast, eating healthy is also cheaper. It can be a LOT cheaper. Sure, you don't get the sugar high from the junk, but you also don't get the crash afterwards, and after a while, the "incredible munchies" disappear. However, without a big public push similar to the one that was done against smokinng, we're not going to see much change.

      I just don't buy into the "addiction" bit - especially for "internet addiction."

    52. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by robogymnast · · Score: 1

      People don't do anything because it requires them stepping out of their comfort zone, which, sadly, is terrifying enough for many to simply complain and exhibit a self-inflicted learned helplessness.

      For me, rock climbing was the activity that helped me expand my comfort zone. After you've been forced to push yourself onward in the face of fear and taken several long falls (and boy do they feel looooong when you are plummeting through the air) you tend to realize that maybe taking a risk in your social life or your career isn't such a scary thing after all.

      --
      unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; find ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; fsck ; umount ; sleep
    53. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Atario · · Score: 1

      I'm still having real trouble seeing why you have such vitriolic, holier-than-thou rants, written at great length, reserved for the overweight. Did a fat guy kill your dog last week, or what?

      You've obviously never done a hunger strike. I did one for 10 days back in my "protest years", so, yes, yu can simply quit cold turkey.

      You obviously don't know what the hell "cold turkey" means. If you quit, say, smoking, cold turkey, it means you stop smoking. Permanently. It doesn't mean you stop for 10 days and start again, but less. Duh?

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    54. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I'm still having real trouble seeing why you have such vitriolic, holier-than-thou rants, written at great length, reserved for the overweight. Did a fat guy kill your dog last week, or what?

      No, but I think that parents who let their kids eat crap because they don't want to take the time to actually BE parents, should be taken out to the woodshed and given a good whipping. Or a kick in the head. Or any other form of physical punishment that it takes to make them get off their own fat asses and start supervising their kids rather than watching TV. This applies to both parents, btw.

      How frakking stupid do you have to be to say you didn't realize that a 7-year-old weighting 420 pounds is a problem? Or this? This?

      Tis isn't a weight problem ... it's a stupidity problem. And btw, lard-arsed parents telling their kids to diet is hypocritical. They should be setting the example.

      The same goes for smoking, or any other "lifestyle disease." Parents telling their kids not to smoke because it's unhealthy, but they keep right on lighting up - that's a formula for failure.

      Plenty of people can go into their kitchen without eating everything in sight. Heck, since you brought up dogs, even my dogs don't empty their food bowls. They eat when they're hungry, not just because there's food available.

    55. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      Good advice, however I already have a full time job as an engineer (aka cubical rat).

    56. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your news letter. Seriously.

      I understand what your saying but just like writing a term paper in college, the first paragraph is always the hardest. Frankly I'm dead tired when I get home from work and barely have the mental power to play WoW, let alone throw myself into stressful social situations. I just look around at everyone I have ever known and none of them seem like they ever had a proublem with people, like I missed some critical step in my social development (it could be that I went to school with the same people for 1st to 8th grade, a class of maybe 30).

      I try, I really do. Every Friday my local paper has a list of events going on within 50 miles of me and I look for ones that are interesting. However, the fact that I live in Mayonnaise-on-white-bread-Utah means most of the events are religion focused.

      Thanks, I'll keep what you said in mind. However, I base all future predictions on past events and if moving half way across the USA did not change anything, it's hard to see anything changing now.

    57. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Took the words right from my keyboard...

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    58. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      How about me? I'm as much an internet and books addict as you could get. I barely study these days. And you know why? BECAUSE I'M FREAKING LONELY! When have I refused an invitation to a party? I haven't received any! And the only thing I do outside my room is mix alcohol with pills, so I'm definitely not to busy whatever it is. I'd accept anything, anything at all! But all I ever get after approaching someone before/during/after school can be summed up as "GTFO!". So, what do I do now? Get a personality transplant? TELL ME!

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    59. Re:Wow work related injury here I come by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      There probably will be one, one day. Thing is, its ONE DAY, not TODAY. And getting turned down more than once a month makes me reach either for the bottle, or the kitchen knife, so still single here. :-/

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  5. I'm addicted by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    Ok, so I know we're all biased here, but let me be the first to say that, "I'm addicted to the internet".

    I think they're on to something however I don't think people should be forced into camps over it. I'm not hurting anyone with my addiction including myself.

    1. Re:I'm addicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, you sound irritated. You should be locked up.

    2. Re:I'm addicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not hurting anyone with my addiction including myself.

      ever heard of global warming you insensitive clod!?

  6. Yes by davidwr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How to tell if you are addicted to Slashdot:

    You your recent posting history has more posts than days.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Yes by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      So if I only have 8 days out of 24 posts does that mean I'm addicted?

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    2. Re:Yes by theaveng · · Score: 1

      I post around 30 posts every day.* I suppose that makes me an addict, however I disagree with China. Instead I agree with U.S. and EU psychologists who maintain internet addiction is merely a consequence of *already existing* conditions such as obsessive compulsiveness, or loneliness, or poor impulse control.

      The fact that these "flaws" manifest themselves on a computer is no different than if they manifested themselves while reading a book & neglecting sleep, or while constantly talking on the phone, or while compulsively cleaning your hands every hour. The flaw is in the person, not the device he or she is using.

      *
      * It's work boredom not addiction. At home I don't bother with slashdot at all.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    3. Re:yes by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      I'm to the point that I would like to EMP all of my electronics. However, my job requires me to be on a computer all day and even without useable ones at home I dont think I could resist getting another one.

  7. I can quit any time.. by shinmai · · Score: 1

    but seriously, I actually do meet most of the criteria, but I don't think I'm an "addict".

    This is simply because my supposed "addiction" causes no harm to me, or the people around me. I use the Internet, mostly just www, but other stuff too, for work, studying and social interaction with far-away relatives.

    I do know people who just waste away their lives online, but even most of them still manage to do their work just fine, and lead rewarding social lives.

    1. Re:I can quit any time.. by rhyder128k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget that there is a huge mental health industry with a vested interest in creating (oops, I mean "identifying") new classes of illness that they will have to paid to treat.

      I suspect that what's happening is that they are identifying something that has become a pillar of an individual's life-style and then claiming that this constitutes an "addiction" because the person suffers anxiety when the thing is taken away. A person with a normal social life would start to exhibit anxiety and yearning if socially isolated. How often do we hear someone who is trapped at home due to short term illness say something like "I need to get out, I'm going mad stuck here"? That person must be addicted to going down the pub or addicted to work.

      I probably fit the Slashdot stereotype of being fairly dependent on Internet access. I had to go without Internet access for a couple of days recently and I found it frustrating not to have it. By the time I got onto the ISP customer support, I was sufficiently perturbed to be firm with them. However, I haven't watched live broadcast TV in over ten years. Instead, I watch things off-air from my video/DVD collection in addition to downloaded content. I suspect that most of the population of the UK would find it difficult to go any length of time without access to a TV with an aerial. Same goes for lots of them in regard to access to a mobile phone with text messaging. Actually, amongst poorer people in the UK, treatment for "pointless mobile phone use complex" probably would save them some money if nothing else.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    2. Re:I can quit any time.. by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      See, there's the problem, You start out with just www, but http is the gateway protocol (well, figuratively) and soon you'll be into news and ftp and god help us all if you sink deep enough to get to gopher because it's a long road back from that, son.

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
  8. Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by polyomninym · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think someone made this point a long time ago in a comment: If you were as oppressed in your daily life as the Chinese, you might spend a lot of your time where you can be "free" in some form of context, social, MMO, whatever. It's not always about escape, there is also immersion and just plain wanting interaction. We all know that anything can become physically addictive, and whether or not some term is coined for those things or not, it's simply human nature at work.

    1. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by Sinbios · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Bullshit. Speaking as an ex-average Chinese, the average Chinese doesn't feel oppressed at all. Government control of everything is and always has been the norm, even before the communists. In fact, nationalism is so ingrained in the culture that the people often feel the government is justified in doing most of the things Western audiences get their panties in a knot over.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    2. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by polyomninym · · Score: 1

      I accept your call of bullshit. So you never felt oppressed there? Don't you think it is unjust for the government anywhere to limit your leisure activities, in this case not drug-related or pr0n-related. Secondly, do you think these 20 something year olds really represent the average status quo in China? I respect your insight, but why are you not still there if it's not so bad? Had to ask.

    3. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by Sinbios · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I personally have never felt oppressed, and my parents have never complained about the government. In fact, they love it so much they could usually rationalize any negative press about the government away. Trusting the government to do the right thing was a way of life; for most people it was the only way they knew and they lived happily by it. Of course, the media usually projects the government in a rather positive light, but hey, it keeps the people happy. The only thing I dislike the Chinese government for is the education system, where nationalism and reverence of communist heroes were ingrained at an early age.

      From TFA, the Chinese government is not limiting anyone's leisure activities, rather Chinese doctors have formally defined Internet addiction. This is likely a product of the cultural sentiment of abhorring excess in any form and living life by a framework of rules (three square meals a day, eight hours of sleep, etc.), which prolonged hours surfing the web obviously tends to disrupt. Another factor is since the Internet is a rather new development in China, most users are teens and 20-to-30-somethings. People beyond this age group tend to be very traditional, and tend to look down on all the shiny new technology stuff that they don't get (isn't this a problem in the West too? Maybe to a lesser degree.) I know my mother always bugs me when I'm watching too much TV/on the computer too much/reading too many books (I used to average about ten a week back in high school, so I guess that qualifies as excess for her), and it certainly doesn't have anything to do with the government.

      I don't quite understand your question regarding the status quo.

      My family left China because my father thought he could have better opportunities in America, and later Canada. How wrong he was. He's back in China now, and won't stop going on how about how his old buddies have all struck it rich during the rapid economic development, and how he could have been a lot better off it he stayed behind. Personally I think I've become a more well-rounded person than if I had stayed in China, but I wouldn't mind living or working there once I complete my degree, especially since fluency in English could apparently command quite a premium.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    4. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by polyomninym · · Score: 1

      Nice work. Thank you for the good insight. Very interesting to read, I may have learned something (gasp) :) I guess I was getting off topic. Thanks again. Cheers!

    5. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Government control of everything is and always has been the norm, even before the communists.

      You weren't around before the Communists. All of those people are dead now.

      Before the Communists, China was very loosely managed by the Ching Dynasty. Tibet, Manchuria, and numerous other territories were essentially independent. This is not to say that China has had a tradition of liberty and free expression. Far from it.

      But that's no reason to defend the PRC as being somehow "normal". Most of the Chinese I know are from Hong Kong and Taiwan and they definitely feel oppressed by the PRC.

    6. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even have the slightest idea of the life of an average Chinese? It's sickening to read post like this.

    7. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      Before the Communists was the Guomindang, which was pretty much composed of a bunch of warring warlords. Life wasn't exactly easy. Before the Guomindang were, as you say, the Qing (who were Manchurian, by the way), and they were weak and corrupt to the core, the very reason it was overthrown. Ans so it went all the way back to the Seven Kingdoms; with a few exceptions, almost every dynasty in China's history met its demise due to the oppression of the people, leading to the rising thereof (if you are interested in more details, I suggest giving äSää"åfå - I believe the English version is called Tales from Five Thousand Years of Chinese History - a good read. It's publicly available online and a very easy read on the highlights of China's history from the creation myths to the twilight of the Qing dynasty). Compared to those days, the current regime is easy street.

      I think the current administration understands that its foundations were built on the dissent of the people (the very reason Mao, a peasant out of dirthole, was able to gain power was by promising his fellow peasants a better life), and if the people grew dissatisfied with them, they'll be out of business in a very short time. And that's the fundamental reason for all the censorship - they have to be seen as the benevolent protectors of the people. Culturally, China is simply not ready for a political atmosphere like in the West where people openly criticize the government, precisely because of the history of uprisings, including some very recent ones. The sentiment that "if things get real bad, we'll just kick them out, just like all the imperial guys before them" is still very strong (which is an interesting contrast to America, where people still pretend they can overthrow the government, but the government's attitude is the exact opposite :P) is still strong. And before anyone stages the "but the government is better equipped!" defense, I must point out that there are a lot of people in China, and this has been the deciding advantage against many better-armed opponents, e.g. in the Sino-Japanese war and the Korean war. The Chinese government just can't afford to be seen as the bad guys.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    8. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      Oops, looks like Slashdot doesn't like Chinese character entry. For those interested, the book's title is "Shang Xia Wu Qian Nian".

      I also want to add a tidbit to address your last point. Who's to say that the PRC is not "normal"? Normal by whose standards? As far as the average citizen is concerned, their life is perfectly normal, and not many of them give a damn about what Westerners think is normal.

      As for your friends from Hong Kong and Taiwan, how exactly were they oppressed by the PRC government? Taiwan is a separate country created by the remnants of the Guomindang, and Hong Kong still retains its own government and economy under the "One Country, Two Systems" policy. Neither entity has been governed by the PRC, so how would those people you mention have been oppressed?

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    9. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

      Wow, looks who's teaching Chinese history to the Chinese...

      Just as the other poster said, before the communists, there's Guomindang - they lost the civil war and had to move to Taiwan. And Guomingdang lost the civil war not because they're "too good" - it's because they're corrupt. Of course, we all know by now that the other alternative is just as bad (worse if you compare it to modern-day Taiwan), but the idea of communism was really attractive to the peasants back then.

      Before the civil war and WWII and WWI... China was split and invaded by a number of foreign powers, most notably the Japanese but many "civilized" western countries were included as well... And those invaders were surely much more brutal than either the Guomindang or the CCP. Ever wondered why Hong Kong was still a territory of Britain until 1997? That's the reason. If you want a reason why nationalism is so prevailing in China, that part of the Chinese history is a good reason for that.

      "China was very loosely managed by the China Dynasty"... That is so wrong I don't even know how to counter you. But to start, China was ruled by the Manchus from Manchuria in the Ching Dynasty! The Manchus founded it! And if you can call that "independent" you may as well call the CCP an "independent party" as well - as if there's a bigger ruling party. Chinese laws were much more brutal than modern day China in those days. You think capital punishment is evil? You think the Aztec sacrificial ceremony is beyond evil? Look to ancient China kid, we have Slow Slicing - guaranteed to give you three days of excruciating pain before your eventual death. Cruelty and sickness with style, almost an art. Draw and quarter is only for the uncivilized you know.

      But there's still something even better than that - I don't know the English term for that but if I directly translate it to English it is "kill nine races" - it means if you've committed some really heinous crime, like, speaking up against your emperor, than not only will you be killed (probably with slow slicing or some other totally sick method that will make the Aztecs look like school kids), your parents, your relatives and your friends will also be killed. And you call that "very loosely managed"? Where have you been living in? Some cave managed by the Taliban?

    10. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

      Typo in my post: Ching Dynasty, or even better, Qing.

    11. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Speaking as an ex-average Chinese, the average Chinese doesn't feel oppressed at all. Government control of everything is and always has been the norm, even before the communists. In fact, nationalism is so ingrained in the culture that the people often feel the government is justified in doing most of the things Western audiences get their panties in a knot over.

      Sounds like the mentality of the average chinese in Beijing. Meanwhile, citizens in Shanghai feel quite the opposite. More to the point, they really don't like each other much in comparison to the rest of the provinces. So I've been told anyways...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      I respect your insight, but why are you not still there if it's not so bad? Had to ask.

      It's better in the USA. That's why so many people of all nationalities come here. Don't let them fool you with their bullshit. I joke about emigrating sometimes when something like FISA passes, but I wouldn't leave the USA. The proof is in the fact that I haven't left. Life is better here and anyone who lives here and doesn't have plans to leave either agrees, is in jail, or is lying, especially if they originate from another country.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    13. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by ztcamper · · Score: 1

      I was born in USSR and I have to tell you... I can not decide if Chinese brainwashing techniques are far superior or you are just shamelessly spreading propaganda.

    14. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Relative to the current iron-clad control of the PRC, the Ching dynasty WAS loosely controlled. Rebellions were constant due to the unpopularity of the Manchu dynaasty who were seen as "foreigners" by the majority Han Chinese (trivia: The Han have ruled China for less than 500 years of it's history.)

      The "death of a thousand cuts" is probably fictional. You simply can't keep someone alive for 3 days cutting chinks off them with no medical attention. The article you cited confirms that "Slow slicing" probably only took 15 minutes. And this was a rare punishment reserved for traitors.

      The fact they meted out some brutal punishments simply puts them in the same category as the Europeans, Africans, etc. The Czars were pretty oppressive too. That doesn't mean that Western democracy won't "work" in Russia.

      The Aztecs were WAY worse. The full-time job of 1 in 5 Aztecs was the processing of human flesh for consumption. Repeat, CONSUMPTION. That means 20% of the Aztec population, thousands of people, day in and day out were torturing, murdering, and ultimately EATING thousands of people. And these people committed no crimes whatsoever. They were either military prisoners of war or civilian slaves. No society, before or since, had practiced cannibalism on the scale of the Aztecs. If you you look at the timeline the Aztecs slaughtered and consumed WAY more people than the Nazis killed in concentration camps.

      And remember the Romans slaughtered thousands of people in incredibly barbaric ways for mere entertainment. At least the Aztecs were motivated by religion, deranged though it may be.

      BTW, Using "Q" for "Ch" is a crazy idea cooked up by the PRC. The correct Wade-Giles would be Ching or Ch'ing.

    15. Re:Addicted to being human, wanting freedom by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Oops, looks like Slashdot doesn't like Chinese character entry. For those interested, the book's title is "Shang Xia Wu Qian Nian".

      Yeah; slashdot only allows Latin1; none of those funny eastern characters allowed. Anyway, I did a bit of googling for the book, found lots of sites willing to sell me a copy, but I didn't find any trace of an online copy. Any idea how I might find it?

      It'd be fun if there were a version that had the original next to the English translation, but I suppose that'd be too much to hope for.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  9. Even better than opium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The internet: it's way cheaper than opium, and way more effective at controlling the masses!

    1. Re:Even better than opium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not good at controlling masses. See forums and 4chan.

  10. Looks like they have defined IT jobs as an ailment by D4C5CE · · Score: 4, Funny

    difficulty sleeping or concentrating, yearning to be online, irritation, and mental or physical distress

    Each of which is all too easily inflicted at the hands of a PHB (cluelessly imposing impossible deadlines), without one single minute of WoW involved...

  11. Get a real addiction ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    difficulty sleeping or concentrating, yearning to be online, irritation, and mental or physical distress.

    Get a real addiction--I sucked dick for bandwidth!

    1. Re:Get a real addiction ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The paraphrase is "I used to suck dick for bandwidth!"

      Bob Saget doesn't get much love on Slashdot, so it's the least you can do to get it right.

  12. Internet Addicts Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I'm Jason, and I'm an addict. I have been an addict for many years now, I don't even keep track anymore. My days consist of sitting in a comfortable office chair staring at two 17" wide screen monitors, carelessly "surfing" (as us addicts call it) the internet. I need help.

    *steps down from the e-podium, and sits back in his chair next to a smelly, neck bearded nix user*

  13. Step 2 by Mordac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Step 1 is admit your addiction... yup, i'm addicted.

    Well if step 2 is submit to a higher authority.

    Well, I have submitted to the power of Google.

    Now leave me alone, I got me some good internet.

  14. Addiction by mfh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously conflicted here. Addiction should never encompass anything that the bulk of society uses every day. I would imagine that the fundamental definition for any addiction should include a majority of negative repercussion, or at least that the addiction would cause the person's ultimate doom.

    Look at alcoholism. Approximately 2% of alcoholics get Korsakoff's Syndrome, which ultimately destroys the person's sense of reality while Thiamine B6 is absent from the 3rd & 4th ventricle of the brain long enough for damage to erode/reconfigure brain cells. There is no parallel result in internet addiction, apart from mood swings and perhaps suicide attempts, but these are all mostly related to social mishaps online. Internet abuse does not cause anything like Korsakoff's.

    Drug addiction, seems to all fit.

    Alas, where a parallel could exist would be with sex addiction, although one could argue that the STD's cause your doom.

    About the only thing Internet Addiction could cause is An Hero Syndrome (NSFW).

    Medically, there could be serious degenerative disorders as a result of being fixated in one place for long periods of time, or perhaps dietary issues from eating and drinking the worst possible food in order to have more time online, but again that's all a bit of a stretch.

    If I had to guess, I would say that the term Internet Addiction is a misnomer. This is more aptly that people who struggle to get back online crave attention because their own lives are sparse or deficient in areas of socialization, so they feel powerful online and therefore need it.

    I think there is a long way to go on this subject and China's efforts, while interesting, are not quite there yet.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Addiction by mfh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thiamine is B1, I fudged that one up. FYI.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    2. Re:Addiction by internerdj · · Score: 1

      Medically, there could be serious degenerative disorders as a result of being fixated in one place for long periods of time, or perhaps dietary issues from eating and drinking the worst possible food in order to have more time online, but again that's all a bit of a stretch.
      It never seemed to bother my college roommate. He only really got up from DAOC for work. Since he worked at a pizza joint he could always bring back the worst possible food. He even slept on a pile of clothes in front of his computer.

    3. Re:Addiction by Bazouel · · Score: 1

      "[...] absent from the 3rd & 4th ventricle of the brain [...]"

      Confusing brain with heart, are you ?

      --
      Intelligence shared is intelligence squared.
    4. Re:Addiction by mfh · · Score: 1

      Confusing brain with heart, are you ?

      No, not at all. Third Ventricle of the Human Brain. Fourth Ventricle of the Human Brain.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    5. Re:Addiction by Bazouel · · Score: 1

      Ah well, I will go to bed less stupid tonight :p

      --
      Intelligence shared is intelligence squared.
  15. Just One More Way for Them to Misinterpret... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or:

    News Anchor: It's boring being in China, with a lot of old codgers running everything who believe in freedom only for themselves. That's why people spend so much time on the internet, the window to the outside world.

  16. Not addicted by Daimanta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Internet is simply ingrained into my life. Imagine a world without coffee. I wouldn't care much because I don't have a taste for it but I bet that millions will cry out in terror and will suddenly be silenced(faiting by lack of cafeine in their bloodstream :) ). Now imagine a world without the internet. I can't. I could. Around 10 years ago we got 33k dailup to get access to "this curious thing called the internet". We used it more and more untill one day we got a bill of 120+ eur and we knew it was time to switch to cable. Every since that moment I and the internet have been connected. If I want to look up an address or zipcode I go the right site and tada, zipcode and address. If I want to look up a term I go to Wikipedia, type the word in and tada, I've got the meaning and some deeper information about the subject. I check my mail every day to see if I have recieved any messages from people and institutions all over the world. If I want to know about technological development I visit tweakers.net or slashdot. I discuss on internetforums in many different countries and have developed my skills in some foreign languages that way.

    I am not the only one. The whole world is addicted to the internet. Sending data is now something you do with a few clicks and a few lines of text. You can send huge amounts of data from Vladivostok to Bogota in a matter of seconds. People all around the world can check videomessages people leave on youtube.

    Now imagine that somebody "turns off the central switch". I can only fear what would happen. Stock markets would probably go bananas because they are not being fed regular data. The most important letter exchange format in the world(e-mail) would cease to be and sending messages to eachother would become a matter of days not seconds. Distributed projects would die and it would cease to be effective. And that's only the things I can think of. Imagine the extra effects.

    We are all addicted to the internet whether we use it or not. That's the paradox.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Not addicted by Knara · · Score: 2, Funny

      I personally have no idea how office workers lived with themselves before the Internet existed. Sitting 8 hours in a cube pushing paper around was a way of life for millions of people for around a century. I would have to do a job that involved "outside" stimulus were it not for the Interbutts (not to mention having a totally different job).

    2. Re:Not addicted by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.

      "Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied."

      Alternative interpretation for you there.

    3. Re:Not addicted by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Many in the world are "addicted" to having electric power, lights at night, air conditioning/heat, social contact, etc.

  17. Where there is an addiction ... by mi · · Score: 1

    Where there is an addiction, there needs to be treatment. Mandatory, if need be — for the betterment of the society, of course.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  18. Regulation and Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reeducate the lot of them I say. What better excuse is needed for regulating and controlling Internet users?

  19. Redefining healthy by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yesterday they announced that taking cholesterol drugs when healthy is a good thing. I told my wife that no one is healthy anymore; we are all simply waiting for a chronic disease to strike.

    Today 10% of China's population is declared "sick". So now we don't have to wait for a disease to strike us - we already are diseased, but the doctors haven't told us what we have yet.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  20. Crackberry by oGMo · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if my blackberry is constantly connected to the internet and it's on 24/7, I guess that means

    ...

    ...

    I'm ... what were we talking about? I was checking my mail.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  21. And I thought 'Videogame Addiction' was bad... by Zathain+Sicarius · · Score: 0

    Seriously what the heck? How can you be addicted to a form of communication? I dont agree with an attempt to make Videogame Addictions a real diagnosis either, but atleast that holds a tiny bit of water compared to this bull...

    Pardon me, I have to sniff my router for a bit. Apparently I'll relapse if I don't.

  22. It's no big deal by SteveHencye · · Score: 1

    I cannot understand why China has to make such a big deal about these types of things. Can you imagine how many people in the US are addicted to the internet? *raises hand* Why must they take control over the internet? The internet is a place to be free with no rules, where you can go anywhere and do anything. They need to calm down in my opinion.

    --
    -Steve "The Geek" Hencye
  23. Guitar by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Take the guitar away from my brother, and he'll show every one of those symptoms. Does that mean he's addicted to guitar? Or does it mean that internet addiction is bullshit?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Guitar by smart.id · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the country of China had absolutely nothing to do with this -- it was a bunch of doctors at one clinic. Hasn't anyone heard of science by consensus?

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
  24. Korea by Haoie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem is just as bad, if not far worse there. The prolific MMO play-rate [plus localised social networking] doesn't help either.

    But somehow, I don't see Korea classifying it as an illness anytime soon.

    --
    If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
  25. I think a seperation needs to be made by ParanoiaBOTS · · Score: 1

    I think there needs to be a distinction between an addiction and a problem. I think its fine to be addicted to something, as long as it is not a problem. We all have our "addictions" but as long as we function as contributing members of society I say leave the addiction alone. It's when that addiction becomes a problem we have...well...a problem.

  26. I'm addicted by ben2umbc · · Score: 1

    I'm already addicted to Weed, television, and Rachel Ray, I might as well be addicted to the entire internet too.

  27. Bad term? by Alarindris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IMHO, an addiction should have some physical counterpart. If it's strictly mental, it's just a bad habit.

    For example, an alcoholic will get the DT's if they don't drink. A heroin addict will convulse and sweat if they don't get their fix. A cigarette smoker will get headaches, tremors, and an increased appetite without their smokes. I should also mention that alcoholics and some other drug users, when quitting cold turkey, can actually die from withdrawal.

    Take away and addicts internet and what, they read the paper or watch TV instead? That's not an addiction, sorry. Take the internet away from an 'internet addict' for a week and they will have found other things to do. A drug addict will still be thinking about his drugs... for months and even years.

    I should mention I smoke cigarettes, I'm a recovering alcoholic and have had various drug addictions when I was younger and stupider. I use the internet all the time and even play WoW, but it's hardly an addiction and don't see any possible way it could be classified as such unless there are marked differences in brain chemistry or something like that.

    1. Re:Bad term? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Brain chemicals are brain chemicals. How you create the need for them to be activated is not relevant.

      Yours is chemical. Someone else's is through constant ego-reward.

      As for withdrawal, removal from a constant source of attention and validation will lead to a condition known as "grieving," which has distinct symptoms and can be physically painful as well as psychologically traumatic.

      Some people may be genetically susceptible to these situations.

      Never underestimate your brain's capability to do things to you that you do not intend and can not control.

    2. Re:Bad term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >unless there are marked differences in brain chemistry

      How is that determined? I mean, do you check brain chemistry with a dipstick?

    3. Re:Bad term? by Alarindris · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate your brain's capability to do things to you that you do not intend and can not control.

      God grant my brain the serenity to accept the things it cannot change; courage to change the things it can; and wisdom to know the difference.

      hehe

      On a more serious note, I can see the argument for internet addiction, perhaps I'm conflating my real life experiences a bit. I have a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that trolling forums or browsing the internet could destroy your life and the people who are close to you.

    4. Re:Bad term? by Alarindris · · Score: 2, Informative

      From wikipedia:

      Acute effects

      Acute (or recreational) drug use causes the release and prolonged action of dopamine and serotonin within the reward circuit. Different types of drugs produce these effects by different methods. Dopamine (DA) appears to harbor the largest effect and its action is characterized. DA binds to the D1 receptor, triggering a signaling cascade within the cell. cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) phosphorylates cAMP response element binding protein (CREB), a transcription factor, which induces the synthesis of certain genes including C-Fos.[4]

      Reward circuit

      When examining the biological basis of drug addition, one must first understand the pathways in which drugs act and how drugs can alter those pathways. The reward circuit, also referred to as the mesolimbic system, is characterized by the interaction of several areas of the brain.

      * The ventral tegmental area (VTA) consists of dopaminergic neurons which respond to glutamate. These cells respond when stimuli indicative of a reward are present. The VTA supports learning and sensitization development and releases dopamine (DA) into the forebrain.[5] These neurons also project and release DA into the nucleus accubems[6], through the mesolimbic pathway. Virtually all drugs causing drug addiction increase the dopamine release in the mesolimbic pathway,[7] in addition to their specific effects.

      * The nucleus accumbens (NAcc) consists mainly of medium-spiny projection neurons (MSNs), which are GABA neurons.[8] The NAcc is associated with acquiring and eliciting conditioned behaviors and involved in the increased sensitivity to drugs as addiction progresses.[5]

      * The prefrontal cortex, more specifically the anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices,[4] is important for the integration of information which contributes to whether a behavior will be elicited. It appears to be the area in which motivation originates and the salience of stimuli are determined.[9] '

      * The basolateral amygdala projects into the NAcc and is thought to be important for motivation as well.[9]

      * More evidence is pointing towards the role of the hippocampus in drug addiction because of its importance in learning and memory. Much of this evidence stems from investigations manipulating cells in the hippocampus alters dopamine levels in NAcc and firing rates of VTA dopaminergic cells.[6]

    5. Re:Bad term? by Aerynvala · · Score: 1

      Yes, this. Exactly. When my hard drive failed and I was off-line for 2 weeks I went through a grieving process. I don't game, but I do interact with friends online every night. And suddenly I no longer had that. I couldn't even type down things to share later. I don't want to go through that again.

      --
      http://transformativeworks.org/
    6. Re:Bad term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It IS a bad term. The terms to distinguish are "Physical dependance" and "Addiction".
      Addiction is commonly defined as the continuation of a behavior despite harmful consequences.(Whether it's drugs or internet)
      Physical dependance is the state in the usage of a substance that leads to withdrawl symptoms(these are physical) with cessation of use.

      Now substance addiction exhibit both physical dependance and addiction, but in the case of internet addiction, you don't have physical dependance. However that doesn't mean it can't be as destructive.

      I think the problem with addiction to certainly behavior patterns such as over-eating or over-gaming...etc, comes from a pathological over-reliance of a single behavioral source for pleasure. Playing WoW gives you pleasure, therefore you do more of it. Eventually a positive feedback pattern forms over time. However, if there are other things in your life that can fire up your dopaminergic neurons, it won't get out of hand.(Because you still like to hang out with family/friends, still enjoys a movie or a book, or have fun playing basketball or Catan.) It's the people who don't have other sources of pleasure in life, that becomes pathologically dependent on that one source that gives them joy, who becomes addicted.

      Another thought, Perhaps the prevalence of such "Internet addictions" is really just the unmasking of the increasing number of people who are at risk for clinical depression. Thoughts?

    7. Re:Bad term? by Bazouel · · Score: 1

      Gambling is a recognized addiction and yet, it does not have physical repercussions AFAIK. A person with an addiction will just move the next when the current one is cured, unless the root cause is found and dealt with. This may or may not apply to you...

      --
      Intelligence shared is intelligence squared.
    8. Re:Bad term? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      *looks around* What people? *looks in the mirror* What life?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  28. You're Posting this on Slashdot? by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

    If you're reading this comment, then yes, you are addicted to the Internet.

    Double points if you respond to it so that you can argue with me.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  29. The COMPLETE 12 Step for Chinese Internet Addicts by BulletMagnet · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll run your comment off right off the rail

    1. We admitted we were powerless over the Internet (even the filtered one in China) - that our lives had become unmanageable (Communism is good).

    2. Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves (already defined as Google) could restore us to sanity.

    3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God (Eric Schmidt) as we understood Him.

    4. Made a searching and fearless moral database inventory of ourselves.

    5. Admitted to God...er Eric, aka EES, to ourselves and to another human being (Probably in the IT Department) the exact nature of our wrongs.

    6. Were entirely ready to have EES remove all these defects of using another browser other then Chrome.

    7. Humbly asked EES to remove our IE8 Beta installs.

    8. Made a list of all persons we had pwnd, and became willing to make amends to them all (China's really working on this list too, really, honest).

    9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, buy supplying them with stolen credit card numbers and boxed copies of the English show "The IT Crowd" except when to do so would injure them or others, or if they already own it.

    10. Continued to rewrite our personal inventory database and when we were wrong promptly debug it.

    11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with EES as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out that we will no longer "Do Any Evil" .

    12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to other Chinese Internet Addicts and to practice these principles in all our affairs on our brand new Android equipped devices.

    (disclaimer: I'm in REAL 12 step program - if you are too and don't see the humor in this, tough shit)

  30. What if you spend the same time in front of the TV by JoeSchmoe007 · · Score: 1

    Is that an addiction too?

  31. What about: Nothing To Do Once Online?? [n/t] by Jizzbug · · Score: 0

    What about: Nothing To Do Once Online??

    --

    -=/\- Jizzbug -/\=-
  32. Haha! by blair1q · · Score: 2, Funny

    6 hours a day?

    L4|\/|3rz.

    Thanks to virtualization, I spent 6 hours on the Internet in just the past 40 minutes!

    1. Re:Haha! by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Thanks to virtualization, I spent 6 hours on the Internet in just the past 40 minutes!

      Obligatory.

  33. So the 30%... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    30% of them are female... what are their emails?

  34. They forgot pizza and coke!!! by syousef · · Score: 1

    As far as I'm concerned, if you don't spend your time coding or connected to a MMORPG, and living on pizza and coke you're not net addicted!!!

    On a more serious note I find it interesting that they don't distinguish between work and play. An addict is online because he or she wants to be, and will not take the opportunity to do other things. A worker may jump at the chance to get away from the computer (provided that doesn't mean they have a hell of a job trying to catch up when they get back).

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  35. As a Replacement for Romantic Love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of these "symptoms" can be found in those who have fallen in love: "difficulty sleeping or concentrating, yearning to be [with the loved one]" etc.

    Given the high ratio of young men to young women in China, this could be seen as a transferrence of affection by men who can never hope to have a girlfriend or wife.

    The Internet seems a rather benign place to transfer these interests, as long as China's "Great Firewall" keeps them from exposure to incorrect thoughts.

  36. Good job parroting a popular sentiment. by booyabazooka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By what methodology do you judge which addictions are valid? The cure to "crack addiction" is STOP SMOKING CRACK, but saying it in capital letters doesn't make it easy.

    You make a good point that not *all* addictions are true "addictions", but it's a point we already know. The question is - how to determine which are, and to what extent? It isn't helpful to try to oversimplify a potentially complex question in psychology.

    1. Re:Good job parroting a popular sentiment. by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You make a good point that not *all* addictions are true "addictions", but it's a point we already know.

      All addictions are psychological addictions so anything that makes you feel good ends up rewiring your brain (this is why you constantly think about what you are addicted to, your brain is looking for ways to feel good again) - and hence your brain rebels against you when you try to quit (it literally becomes a civil war inside your head). So its not really a matter of what are "real" addictions - they are all real because you make them real - even if to the outside observer there looks to be no addictive component.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    2. Re:Good job parroting a popular sentiment. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm concerned, if free will exists, then there are no psychological addictions, just people who refuse to take responsibility for bad choices. If, on the other hand, free will doesn't exist, then the question is pointless, since we're all just automata, and both our comments are predestined, and so are our opinions.

      I'll opt for the existence of free will, since that is the only context under which any exchange of opinion makes sense. It's not hard to figure out - people do things because they get something out of it. In addictive behaviour, the "something" is an immediate fix, and damn the long-term consequences.

      We've seen this everywhere, including with the people who went out and took isane mortgages so they could get their "piece of the American dream right now", and who gives a frak about the terms of the loan ... there's no "housing addiction." But there are a LOT of greedy, short-sighted people - and they don't want to face the consequences of their bad decisions.

      Same with "internet addiction." Same with "TV addiction". Same with any other addiction with a social or psychological component.

      You can't help an addict until *THEY* WANT TO CHANGE. It's their decision. By deciding not to do anything to change their lives at this point, they have exercised their free will.

    3. Re:Good job parroting a popular sentiment. by descalco · · Score: 3, Interesting
      With any due respect, I am driven to point out the abuse of the term "literally" in the above post. Unless the left hemisphere and right hemisphere are launching action potentials at each other across the corpus callosum and exacting violence upon each other, nothing is "literally" becoming a civil war inside of anyone's head.

      Furthermore, all habits involve rewiring of neural circuitry. Some drug habits induce a physiological dependence, which is not to imply that psychological dependence is not physiological, but rather than psychological dependence does not involve the body going into a sort of shock. Take a person off of heroin cold turkey, and there is the possibility of death.

      Regardless of the type of addiction, every addiction is a function of the lack of volition. It can be theorized that this is the result of a weakened cingulate gyrus which has been posited as a potential "seat of volition" within the brain.

      Regardless of the neuro-correlates, we are responsible for our decisions. And if we fail at being responsible, we are responsible for making ourselves responsible for our decisions.

      Furthermore, it is important to take context into consideration when identifying a pathology. Social structures exist that may in themselves be responsible for pathological behaviors, and in some cases, pathological behaviors may not be pathological but entirely adaptive. This does not change the diagnosis of a disorder (which is based entirely on symptomatology and has nothing to do with etiology), but it does bear significance.

      That is all

      /uselessopinion .Sean

    4. Re:Good job parroting a popular sentiment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free will is a ridiculous piece of philosophical bullshit that has absolutely no relevance to the argument.

      Did you ever stop to think that maybe being addicted *means* that you don't want to change?

    5. Re:Good job parroting a popular sentiment. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Free will is a ridiculous piece of philosophical bullshit that has absolutely no relevance to the argument.

      Did you ever stop to think that maybe being addicted *means* that you don't want to change? (ephasis added)

      Free will is entirely relevant. People act on their "wants". They want that crack rock. They want that extra 3 helpings of fries. They want that next smoke. They want to be on the net all day. They want to sit on their asses watching TV from suppertime to bedtime. If they didn't want it, they'd be doing something else instead.

      Nobody is forcing "internet addicts" to go against their wishes - quite the contrary - it's what they want to do. The problem isn't the phoney addiction - it's the low level of self-actualization and the refusal to accept responsibility for their own decisions. Same as the stupid bail-outs for greedy people who bought too much house because they ... got greedy, and checked both their brains and their moral compass at the door.

      The fatty who decides to drink that extra gallon of pop has chosen instant gratification as opposed to the pain of self-denial. It's a choice. They took the easy way out, then cray that they're "addicted to food." Give it up. Ditto for "internet addicts." When they finally get pissed off at how much of their life they've wasted, they'll either make the hard choice - or they'll decide "wtf, it's too late now, the damage is done" and keep feeding their "addiction of choice", whether it's the internet, food, smoking, porn, gambling, or sex with furries.

    6. Re:Good job parroting a popular sentiment. by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      The way you form thoughts and opinions in your brain is very much like decisions by consensus (although its a shouting match between various drives too). It is essentially distributed decision making. There is no seat of volition in your brain - there is no "you" (one proof of this is people with strokes often undergo a change of personality as the dead parts of their brain no longer contribute to the persona). When you become addicted and go cold turkey you essentially have a conflict between two drives so intense that ends up with collateral damage (the various symptoms of withdrawal) which to me invokes rather strong parallels with civil war. It certainly felt that way to me.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    7. Re:Good job parroting a popular sentiment. by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As far as I'm concerned, if free will exists, then there are no psychological addictions, just people who refuse to take responsibility for bad choices. If, on the other hand, free will doesn't exist, then the question is pointless, since we're all just automata, and both our comments are predestined, and so are our opinions.

      Fallacy of the excluded middle. What if free will doesn't always exist? What if there was a disease of the mind that impaired or eliminated freedom of choice? We could call that disease something like, oh, 'addiction', and then we might think about how it ought to be treated.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:Good job parroting a popular sentiment. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      In this case, there is no "excluded middle". They exercise their free choice when they fill their shopping cards with crap instead of spending less for a smaller amount of healthy food. They're not automata. Ditto for the smoker who goes and buys yet another pack of cigarettes. This takes a conscious decision. They're not on autopilot. Just like they could decide NOT to buy them. They don't because they CHOOSE not to have to face the symptoms of withdrawal. They won't face their fears.

      We need to stop lying to ourselves and trying to justify people smoking, or being fat, or "hooked on the net.' What next - people "addicted" to spousal abuse? We know bullies "get off" mentally when they beat up on other people, so we can make the same "disease model" fet, and "justify" wife-beating, paedophilia, and serial killers. Frak that! Bad lifestyle choices are not "diseases" to be "cured",

  37. Re:Looks like they have defined IT jobs as an ailm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first, I read that as GHB... medicine for what ails 'ya?

  38. Those Are Symptoms, Not the Disease by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those are symptoms of people who aren't high-functioning addicts.

    Any addiction is defined by one simple criterion: can the person exercise self control over the behavior?

    The question can become existential: what if they don't want to quit? If they're high-functioning, they might never have call to exercise self control. In which case what's the difference whether they're addicts or not? The only question then is whether something might change requiring their quitting, and they might not be able to, which could be a problem.

    Besides, everyone is "addicted" to food. Few complain about the addiction, except people who can't afford to eat, who have some other compulsion/obsession that conflicts with eating, or who have a compounded problem of eating too much. But we all live with our basic addiction to food, which isn't really a problem, and is even celebrated. Why should any other addiction matter, if there are no bad symptoms?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  39. I think I'd better go and do .... by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    ...the shopping before the thought police turn up and haul me off to boot camp in the forest, because I have a 24/7 on Cable connection to the Internet.

  40. Leave it to bored government researchers... by NumenMaster · · Score: 1

    Leave it to the Government of China to classify the desire to read information not published by their own news outlets a disorder. On a separate note, it is commonly held that young men often think of sex, usually every few minutes. I can't wait to see what they'll classify that as.

    --
    Where's my sock? There it is...
  41. O.K. by Chicken_Kickers · · Score: 1

    "Internet addiction" is no more or less real than "Television addiction." Both have the same cure - TURN THE DAMN THING OFF!

    O.k. I will listen to you and turn off my Inte

  42. I have ALL these, but NONE of the negatives by unity100 · · Score: 1

    how about that ? the clinic any whomever did that research in china should shove their results up their asses in my opinion.

    what they define are stuff normally found in any average home in the modern world in people that are watching daily tv broadcasting after a long day's work. so our modern life is also an ailment too ?

    give me a break.

    1. Re:I have ALL these, but NONE of the negatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the article? They're trying to treat people whom exhibit dependency symptoms similiar to substance abusers.

    2. Re:I have ALL these, but NONE of the negatives by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1
      s/abusers/users/g

      using any substance other than tobacco or alcohol for recreational reasons is abuse only in the mind of a journalist and/or purist.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  43. Addictions are an escape route by unity100 · · Score: 1

    to escape the realities of life. people who see that there is little hope in future, or too much effort, too little gain, try to escape the reality.

    its natural. its an instinctive reaction. computers, games, internet is the best addiction in that regard, because they are not directly lethal to the biology, or psychology. just, excessive tiredom, or distancing from the physical social life existing around the person.

    chinese society should ask itself, what is wrong with their modern way of life, and try to remedy it.

    1. Re:Addictions are an escape route by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      You just described my life.

  44. Statistics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "About 10 percent of China's 253 million Internet users exhibit some form of addiction to the medium, and 70 percent of those people are young men."

    This means that .1*253000000*.3=7590000 women on the internet, as a lower bound.

    Clearly these statistics cannot be trusted.

  45. Since I am a doctor by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    I suppose I can now declare and define a new and dangerous addiction - Air addiction.

          My research has shown that people deprived of air for as little as 30 seconds will present "difficulty sleeping or concentrating, yearning to breathe, irritation, and mental or physical distress." Do YOU meet these criteria?

          Yawn. The problem isn't the internet, caffeine, nicotine, heroin, crack, meth, etc. The problem is the underlying psychology of the individual. People who become "addicts" aren't victims of the substance/behavior. Rather the behavior is a manifestation of serious psychological problems like depression, anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, etc. There's a REASON they're seeking that dopamine.

          Perhaps the Chinese will soon announce a melamine-laced cure. Or maybe powdered rhinoceros horns will be involved somehow in the treatment.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  46. Why Godaddy.com was blocked by China without tear by jack+fopston+ · · Score: 1

    Some twitter users reported Godaddy.com can be accessed again in China from last night on. It's not surprising thinking of Sourceforge and Wikipedia's sufferings back and forth. For more information click here...

  47. very convinient for the chinese gov. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I'm sure lots of people in China do surf a lot. Hardly suprising when its probably the only way they can get access to actual news rather than heavily biassed and censored proaganda.

    If I was cynical I'd say this is simply just a made-up study for the chinese government to justify further censorship or even a total ban on internet access to all people of china except presumably, government officials.

  48. Outsourced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be America which came up with these laughably absurd concepts, guess that outsourced that as well.

  49. Then you don't really know Chinese life by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    Trusting the government to do the right thing was a way of life; for most people it was the only way they knew and they lived happily by it. Of course, the media usually projects the government in a rather positive light, but hey, it keeps the people happy. The only thing I dislike the Chinese government for is the education system, where nationalism and reverence of communist heroes were ingrained at an early age.

    That shows you have never really lived in the country for more than a few weeks. In China, people all just ignore whatever government said and find ways to bypass whatever rules the government tries. They don't worry about "rights" because they just ignore rules (even as simple as traffic laws) whenever there is a fringe benefit. And if you get in trouble, find some connection in government to bail you out. That's why there are so many tainted products.

    1. Re:Then you don't really know Chinese life by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      Born and raised in the PRC, baby. First ten years of my life, and two years back there more recently. Perhaps you could enlighten us on your own experiences with the country?

      Anyway, I agree with your statement; many people would exploit anything to benefit themselves. But that doesn't invalidate my point that the citizen for the most part are content with the current government.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    2. Re:Then you don't really know Chinese life by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Born and raised in the PRC, baby. First ten years of my life, and two years back there more recently.

      People tend to have rather nostalgic and idealized notions of the land of their birth/youth. It's usually irrational. Anyway, I'm guessing that you hail from a very modern and urbanized part of China, where the differences with the western world would not be as stark (The building in the west being smaller for example.)

      Perhaps you could enlighten us on your own experiences with the country?

      Perhaps you could enlighten us with your own experiences of life in the Chinese rural provinces?

      People forget that China's industrial boom, colossal as it is, has not actually affected most of the country or the population. 800 million people have been left behind over the course of the boom. The wealth and indeed to some extent freedoms enjoyed by the urban populations have most certainly not been extended to the vast majority of Chinese citizens. These people are not even allowed to live and work where they want to, essentially needed a chit from local officials to so much as rent an apartment. If that's not oppression, I don't know what is.

      So please remember that China is a colossal country, and while you may have experienced little or no oppression in your own small and modernized corner, that does not mean that your experience is universal. When people in the west complain about lack of human rights and freedoms, it is largely the rights of the poor majority which they are referring to.

      Now, your experience shows that life is getting better in China, and to be fair, there has been much improvement in the quality of life for many. But there has been little or no improvement in the political and other freedoms in China. Freedoms that people should enjoy, regardless of any ethos of consent. It is true that the communist party of China is in a difficult position, but even still they have made inexcusably little effort to give Chinese people the rights they should enjoy. They might be afraid of another July 4th, but if they don't release pressure by granting rights, then they will end up with another whether they like it or not.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  50. Addicted? by Digital+End · · Score: 1

    12+ hours a day here. I've been online for more then 6 hours just doing homework today, so screw their definition of addiction.

    If the world gives me a good reason to use a different medium for my entertainment or education I'll listen, however the internet is both my work and my play. And I'm quite happy that way.

    --
    Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    1. Re:Addicted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many hours is just one critera. RTFA

  51. Bullshit by gd23ka · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But not surprising for it to be coming from China. I can only imagine life to be
    so completely without thrills in that place, it's a small wonder people try at
    least to escape mentally. And that's probably the real beef the commies have
    with the internet, it not only imports a whole lot of critical thought into the
    country but it also takes away from the communist party mindshare.

    1. Re:Bullshit by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      Glad you didn't like it.

  52. If we could just harness that anger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    hook ya up to a turbine or something.

  53. It's not addiction; it's our future by Espressoman · · Score: 1

    For people not connected to the technological world, heavy use of electronic devices might appear to be some kind of addiction. I feel sorry for those people, because when the singularity comes, they will be unfortunate casualties. Games are merely an alternate reality in which people can live quite happily as long as it's sustainable. Once we're connected to the 'net through myriads of implanted devices to have those devices disabled would be devastating.

  54. Yeah right... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    ... the same doctors who diagnose people with things like "clabbered bile", and "an imbalance in the Chi", and other mysterious disorders, which equally mysteriously can all be cured by poking people with needles.

    Man, what a scam. I could probably make more money than either a Chiropractor or a Naturopath!

  55. Yeah, sure it is by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that the "cure" for this "addictive ailment" will involve some sort of "re-education", too. Fucking bastards.

  56. Ah, if only our minds were so straightforward... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doing what you know is "best for you" can be damn hard when suddenly, due to stress, self-loathing, fear, crushing boredom, etc., *the bottom drops out of your ability to care*. At some rational level the person "knows" they ought not do x, yet there is this other voice of, "Aww, who gives a crap anyway" and they go on with their behavior.

    Yes, sometimes one can ignore that voice and bulldog forward into avoiding the behavior and doing the right thing. Sometimes one can't. What makes or breaks it has everything to do with conditions: genetics, upbringing, weather, finances, employment, friends, daylight, blood sugar level, cortisol level, judgments about the future and likelihoods of future payoffs, presence of useful distractors, etc. Some of this is finally being studied scientifically instead of just applying some clunky folk psychological simplification to it. Stay tuned.

  57. First Addicted Post! by Hordeking · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice how this seems to be more of a problem in the Orient than anywhere else? I don't usually hear about Punk-rocking Discotheque Germans or Rednecks ever dying from playing games for 10 days straight...

    --
    Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
  58. So I am sick? by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

    I need internet for socialising with my friends, watching news, listening to radio, watch TV and play games. Oh my god I am addicted! Oh my god I am ill!

    Fucktards^2

    --
    Here be signatures
  59. Reminds me... by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reminds me of the "test" if you need the Guardian's religion in Ultima 7. No matter how you answered the questions, there would be something wrong with you. E.g., if your mother and a small child are drowning, and you can save only one, who do you save? If you chose the child, you obviously are nuts, if you didn't choose the child you obviously are nuts.

    Well, ok, maybe this one isn't in the same way, but it's broad enough to make a large chunk of the population "sick" even if they don't have a computer at all.

    E.g., difficulty concentrating? Well, after working some 12 hours a day in a sweatshop, I would imagine that a lot of Chinese are rather too tired to really concentrate on much. Trouble sleeping? Well, too many worries will do the same to you. Etc.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Reminds me... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      You need to read a little more closely here.

      Those afflicted with this ailment spend six or more hours a day online and exhibit at least one of the following symptoms: difficulty sleeping or concentrating, yearning to be online, irritation, and mental or physical distress.

      I seriously doubt some one working 12 hour days in a sweatshop is going to spend 6 hours a day on a computer.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  60. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's face it. By "internet addiction" they mean "porn addiction."

  61. crap by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    All sys-admins must be addicted. I mean I'm online 6+ hours a day and under "mental distress".

  62. Re: Addicted by el+momia · · Score: 1

    Oh I'm hooked Chinese doctors please help me!! And if you can bring a couple of young chinese girls to blow job my addiction off.

  63. I have to agree here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internet = knowledge, work, entertainment. Best drug EVER. Just remember one thing. Internet is NOT a series of tubes. I know cos I tried to make the beer come out and got electrocuted.

  64. Internet Addiction = Infomania by mahadiga · · Score: 1
    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
  65. Re:Ah, if only our minds were so straightforward.. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    At some rational level the person "knows" they ought not do x, yet there is this other voice of, "Aww, who gives a crap anyway" and they go on with their behavior.

    If they don't give a crap, then why should I, or anyone else? Their life is their responsibility. If they want to shirk their responsibility, then they have only themselves to blame for the consequences.

    If someone says "I really need to get a job", and does nothing about it for years on end except make excuses for why today is not a good time to start looking, eventually, you'll conclude that person doesn't REALLY want a job. So why can't the same reasoning be applied to the obese who, at some level, "want" to lose weight, but aren't willing to do the hard work that goes with actually making it happen? Ditto for smokers, gamblers, and internet addicts. They don't want it badly enough to actually make the changes they know they need to make. They're still in their "comfot zone."

  66. Behind the GFoC? by jimbudncl · · Score: 1

    Imagine those "addicts" on an uncensored Internet... it would be like handing a heroin addict 95% pure product.... wait a minute...

    Hey China! Disable your firewall for a day and you'll solve the problem!!

    (instead of 10% addicts they'll have 10% jelly-brained zombies ;)

  67. yes by unity100 · · Score: 1

    you have to change your circumstances. make drastic decisions and implement them.

  68. MOD tomhudson (43916) DOWN, PLZKTHX by Atario · · Score: 1

    Bloody hell. I shoulda noticed sooner. Obvious troll is obvious. Not that it helped me.

    Note to self: pay attention to users' homepages and email addresses, at the very least. Particularly when they say "troll" right to your face.

    All mods please note: MOD DOWN ALL tomhudson POSTS, INCLUDING ALL ANCESTORS OF THIS MESSAGE. Thanks.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  69. Attack the messenger when you can't beat the msg. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    So, you can't argue against what I say, so you would rather kill the messenger ... that's really lame. Even trollish.

    Not all trolling is done with the sole intent of making people look stupid - some of it is designed to get people to think through their illogical positions. This whole "internet addiction" bullshit is one example.

    Try this thought experiment: Lock an "internet addict" in a room with a pc and a connection to the world. Tell them that they have 2 choices - they can eat, or they can forfeit today's calorie for unlimited surfing for the day. Repeat. Tell them that if they eat, then surf, they lose both choices the next day - they will go hungry AND have no internet. Watch how quickly they lose their "addiction" and learn to HATE the internet.

  70. Re:Attack the messenger when you can't beat the ms by theaveng · · Score: 1

    Here's another experiment: Take-away the computer and give them a wall of books instead.

    Pretty soon you'll have a book junkie who can't stop reading. The flaw is in the person (obsessive compulsive and/or lonely and/or bored), not in the tool being used.

    --
    FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
  71. Mmmmhmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm addicted to gaming, not the Internet, you fucking Chinese morons! What does being online have to do with gaming? Not necessarily anything. A happy addict > a miserable non-addict. Simple. Hey, let's spend millions on a study so we can make other people's flaws official! Sounds like THEY are the flawed ones, and in need of a self-esteem boost!

  72. Re:Attack the messenger when you can't beat the ms by Atario · · Score: 1

    I have a better experiment. Prove to all of us that you are not an Internet addict: never post again.

    That will teach us!

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  73. Re:Attack the messenger when you can't beat the ms by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    I have a better experiment. Prove to all of us that you are not an Internet addict: never post again.

    That wouldn't prove anything, since the internet is more than just slashdot - but then again, since I don't believe in "internet addiction" any more than I believe in "sex addiction", I wouldn't have anything to prove anyway. By the way - "physician, heal thyself" - if you feel that's a good way to prove it, why not try to prove me wrong by taking your own advice. It would be one data point in your favour.

  74. No threat, because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... in Korea only old people use it.

  75. Re:Looks like they have defined IT jobs as an ailm by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

    Ah, apparently I'm not alone...

    --
    I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.