Slashdot Mirror


Monty Python Banks On the Long Tail Via YouTube

JTRipper writes "Monty Python seems to have done the right thing. Instead of issuing take down notices of their videos on YouTube, they are doing it better themselves with their own YouTube channel. They are putting all their clips (including snips from their movies) up in a decent resolution, with the only caveat being a link to buying the movies and TV episodes from Amazon."

222 comments

  1. Well, Not ALL of Them Really by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    They are putting all their clips (including snips from their movies) up in a decent resolution ...

    Um, that's kind of misleading. There are 24 clips as of this posting. That's not to say there isn't more to come but the channel description clearly states:

    What's more, we're taking our most viewed clips and uploading brand new HQ versions.

    Their announcement video shows more video clips than they have up right now (man with a recorder up his nose from And Now for Something Completely Different, etc) so hopefully there's more to come. I'm a bit disappointed the general populace doesn't watch The Flying Circus more often ... it's a shame every time I see a banana at a corporate function I have the urge to hand it to someone while instructing them to "come at me with that banana like you really mean it!" And they just continue to treat me like I'm insane.

    And where's The Crimson Permanent Assurance (opening feature to The Meaning of Life)?! That single skit was probably more expensive than all other Python works combined--and a gold mine for office humor to send to your coworkers!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by (ana!)a · · Score: 5, Funny

      They probably haven't finished downloading all the torrents

      --
      IANWYTIA (I Am Not Who You Think I Am)
    2. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now really, was it necessary to quote that entire post when you added your nine words? Did it significantly enhance the quality of your own post? I contend that it did not, and that you and the community as a whole would benefit from you never doing that again.

    3. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Um, that's kind of misleading. There are 24 clips as of this posting

      That's because they only put up the good ones.

      (Don't worry, Mr. Karma, I'll do this one anonymously)

    4. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yes

    5. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are putting all their clips (including snips from their movies) up in a decent resolution ...

      Um, that's kind of misleading. There are 24 clips as of this posting.

      How so? Saying "They are" can describe something they are in the process of doing.

      What's more, we're taking our most viewed clips and uploading brand new HQ versions.

      Their announcement video shows more video clips than they have up right now (man with a recorder up his nose from And Now for Something Completely Different, etc) so hopefully there's more to come.

      Again... "What's more" implies that the 24 clips are in addition to what they have planned. Just because it's not everything immediately doesn't mean that the summary is incorrect. This seems to happen all the time on Slashdot. An announcement of some work in progress or planned item is made and then people slag off on it for not being 100% complete from the get-go.

    6. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by owlnation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Um, that's kind of misleading.

      Did you come here for an argument?

    7. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by duguk · · Score: 5, Funny

      The use of the tag "suddenoutbreakofcommonsense" just seems so inappropriate when discussing Monty Python. :)

    8. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've told you once.

    9. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Mantrid · · Score: 1

      It's not strange it just means most people have been there done that in college and have moved on.

    10. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, you didn't!

    11. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by zxnos · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm a bit disappointed the general populace doesn't watch The Flying Circus more often ...

      no offense, but the general populace (at least in the states) doesn't like or 'get' python. you either love it or hate it - which isnt an even split. more people probably like the stooges. i cannot fathom why people like that show. (see how that works?)

      it's a shame every time I see a banana at a corporate function I have the urge to hand it to someone while instructing them to "come at me with that banana like you really mean it!"

      that is a bit of a shame... i like python as well, but hearing people do bits all the time is a bit annoying. particularly when it gets into a 'who can make the most obscure python reference' infinite loop.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    12. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Suddenoutbreakofsomethingcompletelydifferent"

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    13. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean you either hate it (Americans) or you love it (the rest of the known universe)? :P

    14. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by X0563511 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think this is what you meant:

      They are putting all their clips (including snips from their movies) up in a decent resolution ...

      Um, that's kind of misleading. There are 24 clips as of this posting. That's not to say there isn't more to come but the channel description clearly states:

      What's more, we're taking our most viewed clips and uploading brand new HQ versions.

      Their announcement video shows more video clips than they have up right now (man with a recorder up his nose from And Now for Something Completely Different, etc) so hopefully there's more to come. I'm a bit disappointed the general populace doesn't watch The Flying Circus more often ... it's a shame every time I see a banana at a corporate function I have the urge to hand it to someone while instructing them to "come at me with that banana like you really mean it!" And they just continue to treat me like I'm insane.

      And where's The Crimson Permanent Assurance (opening feature to The Meaning of Life)?! That single skit was probably more expensive than all other Python works combined--and a gold mine for office humor to send to your coworkers!

      At least it's a step in the right direction!

      Now really, was it necessary to quote that entire post when you added your nine words? Did it significantly enhance the quality of your own post? I contend that it did not, and that you and the community as a whole would benefit from you never doing that again.

      Yes

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    15. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Nerdposeur · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I tagged it "herecomethequotes."

    16. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Suddenoutbreakofsong"!

    17. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by treeves · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm American and I love it. Like some other people I know.
      Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    18. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      ...... and I told you twice, But ya never listen to my advice You don't try very hard to please me, With what you know it should be easy Well, this could be the last time This could be the last time Maybe the last time, I don't know. Oh no. Oh no

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    19. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by pngmangi42 · · Score: 1

      You often see bananas at corporate functions?

      --
      I tried to walk into Target, but I missed. --Mitch Hedburg
    20. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      I must say, I was somehow expecting a rickroll...

      And that line is put because of the silly anoyingly presumably argumentable and debatable feature-wannabee that is the time limit on slashdot comments. IF THE TIME LIMIT RAISES COMMENTS INTERESTS, THEN CAPSLOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL. I'm cool. Another random sentence because 5 minutes is like very long.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    21. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by theeddie55 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You must be new here. Of course it's necessary to quote the entire post, what sort of person's going to click the link to read it.

    22. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by gentgeen · · Score: 5, Funny

      At least it's a silly step in the right direction! There, fixed it for you.

    23. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      no offense, but the general populace (at least in the states) doesn't like or 'get' python.

      Actually, they just think they don't like or get it.

      Saturday Night Live was an attempt to be a US version. Not a rip-off, but the same sort of really out there humor that sometimes results in convulsive laughter and sometimes just goes on too long if it doesn't work. Lorne Michaels often talks about the influence Python had on the show.

      Also, the creators of Cheers have also cited the Python humor as being an influence. I don't really see it myself, but then I didn't create the show.

    24. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Kagura · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At least it's a step in the right direction!

      If we want to talk about steps in the right direction, how about Hulu.com? You sit through something like 60 seconds of commercials per episode of whatever you want to watch, but otherwise everything is perfectly free. The service is designed very well and is well implemented. As far as "new business models" go, I think the people in charge of this site really know what they're doing.

      I'm happy enough with the service that I gladly advertise it for them. I regularly watch Colbert Report episodes one or two days after they air there.

    25. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by operagost · · Score: 1

      No. Stupid git.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    26. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, that's kind of misleading.

      Did you come here for an argument?

      I've told you before

    27. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 4, Informative

      I sit through a darkened page that says essentially:
      "You can only use this service in the US. You are not in the US, so bugger off."

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    28. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Middle management?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    29. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Kagura · · Score: 5, Funny
      > go n

      You sit in a darkened page that says essentially: "You can only use this service in the US. You are not in the US, so bugger off."

      What do you do?

      > look
      It's too dark to look.

      > listen
      You hear panting.

      > Run Away
      Run where?

      > run e
      Your path is blocked by something. You are eaten by a grue.

      > God dammit
      You can't go down. You are dead.

    30. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Akral · · Score: 1

      I sit through a darkened page that says essentially: "You can only use this service in the US. You are not in the US, so bugger off."

      It works for me. And I am in Eastern Europe, you cannot confuse my IP. :)

      --
      Don't worry, be happy!
    31. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by deroby · · Score: 1

      that's weird, most certainly doesn't work for me (Belgium)... and I've tested on different providers =)

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
    32. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Like the Iranian's with the Bomb!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    33. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

      > Also, the creators of Cheers have also cited the Python humor as being an influence.

      I don't see it either. Cheers always struck me as wallpaper sitcom.

    34. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by alecwood · · Score: 1
      I think it's a bit of a myth about Americans not getting Python, like them not understanding the concept of irony.

      Sure some Americans don't get it, like some Brits don't, some Irish don't, some Islamic Extremists don't......................

      All the Americans I know do get it, but then most of them are the kind of people with whom one chats on the internet so perhaps it's not a representative sample of the populations as a whole

      --
      Real happiness lies in the completion of work using your own brains and skills.
    35. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

      HEY! We picked Obama so we're okay again.

    36. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I am a fellow hulu fan. I suspect once they have a critical mass of viewers they will ramp up the ads. I will be saddened when it happens, but I think it will devolve to overlay ads, many commercial breaks, and longer ones once most tv shows are viewed online.

      I think it is really cool that I can watch my favorite shows legally and in a timely manner, supporting the creators. I hope they don't cripple it too much in order to protect their other distribution channels.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    37. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

      I tried to tag it "suddenoutbreakofcommonnonsense" but it seems to be interpreted as "suddentoutbreakofcommonsense"! I am really upset now.

      I also tagged it "humour" rather than "humor", and it worked.

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    38. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You forgot to taunt him the first time!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    39. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by AceJohnny · · Score: 1

      IF THE TIME LIMIT RAISES COMMENTS INTERESTS

      Quite, child. Time limit is to mitigate automated posting by would-be astroturfers (I don't see what other use a spammer would have of slashdot).

      --
      Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
    40. Re:Well, Not ALL of Them Really by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      * Automoderation is working fine for this.
      * spammers don't care about having to wait 5 minutes, legitimate users do.
      * Couldn't a karma above 10 disable this nagging feature ?

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  2. hmm, by davidangel · · Score: 0, Funny

    It could grip it by the husk.

  3. These people are fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thank you Graham, John, Terry, Eric, Mike, and the other Terry that isn't the first one!

  4. No problem by Drakin020 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had no problem getting a few ads to watch something online. Much like Hulu's service. If they want to start something like this, go for it! This is how it should be done.

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    1. Re:No problem by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Hulu has the distinct issue of refusing non-US based connections. A little VPN here or a little proxy there and their detection can be bypassed trivially, yet they insist on denying access to a worldwide captive audience. Their advertisers are missing out on a huge amount of exposure for no good reason.

      So, with that out of the way, can you let the rest of the world know how exactly the ads are shown on Hulu?

    2. Re:No problem by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Afaict most of the major media producers carve up thier licensing by region and then sell each regions license to the highest bidder.

      That means a site wanting to show them online would most likely have to make seperate arrangements for each region they wanted to show them in.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  5. That's not a caveat by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's just a link to amazon.

    A caveat would be a warning or proviso indicating terms of use, like that you have to pay them $1 million if you don't buy the video from Amazon.

    1. Re:That's not a caveat by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      you have to pay them $1 million if you don't buy the video

      I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition!

    2. Re:That's not a caveat by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!!

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  6. And now, for something completely different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  7. Let it begin by iamapizza · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    NI!!!

    --
    Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
    1. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    2. Re:Let it begin by HiVizDiver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let it begin

      I'm as big a Python fan as the next, but let it not.

    3. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Niiiiiii!

    4. Re:Let it begin by Sobrique · · Score: 1
      Personally I prefer Perl.

      (Or fish slapping, whatever)

    5. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a big Python fan and so's my wife.

    6. Re:Let it begin by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      Is she a goer, know what I mean?

  8. It's good to see some people are getting it... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All your old business models are dead... it's time to find a better way and stop treating potential customers as the enemy.

    (I have the entire flying circus on DVD bought and paid for... what a wonderful waste of time.)

    1. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny

      All your old business models are dead

      Nah, they're just resting.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      All your old business models are dead

      Nah, they're just resting.

      Oh bugger!

    3. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by Shade+of+Pyrrhus · · Score: 1

      I think they can go on...

    4. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, they're just resting.

      Look, matey, I know a dead business model when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now

    5. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by AioKits · · Score: 1

      So... The only reason I'm seeing them now before my eyes is that they have, in fact, been nailed there?

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    6. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No no it's not dead, it's, it's changin'! Remarkable business model, the MPAA, idn'it, ay? Beautiful Portfolio!

    7. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      It's pining for the coins.

    8. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, some are getting it. For example, Tokio Hotel have been updating their youtube channel weekly for a year with concert footage and behind the scenes material. Now they are selling a DVD with those episode, extra footage, and band commentary. I have mine pre-ordered.

    9. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by bograt · · Score: 1

      (I have the entire flying circus on DVD bought and paid for... what a wonderful waste of time.)

      I believe you meant to say "what a senseless waste of human life."

    10. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      Did you come in here for an argument?
      Sorry, but this is the room where you get hit on the head with a mallet.

    11. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by bograt · · Score: 1

      Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type really makes me puke, you vacuous, coffee-nosed, maloderous, pervert!!!

    12. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by bograt · · Score: 1

      [full disclosure: I just copy-pasted that quote from here. I'm pretty sure that should be "toffee-nosed", not "coffee-nosed".]

    13. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they're...they're, ah...probably pining for the fjords

    14. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by The+Notorious+ASP · · Score: 1

      They'll be stone dead in a moment.

    15. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by Pollardito · · Score: 5, Funny

      Listen: strange men sitting at desks uploading clips to youtube is no basis for a system of content distribution

    16. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no. It's just pining for the fjords...

    17. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Look, this business model wouldn't "voom" if you put four million volts through it! Oh dear...

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    18. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your old business models are belong to us?
      sorry, I couldnt resist

    19. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by perlchild · · Score: 1

      It's an ex-business model.

    20. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by davegravy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...yet another rip-off of Philogelos

    21. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by msormune · · Score: 1

      Uh, so first you declare the old business models dead, and then say you DID buy the DVD?

      Did the old business models just drop dead, after you bought it? :)

    22. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by dgr73 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Look, matey, I know a dead business model when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now

      MPAA: I'm not dead yet!

    23. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Monty Pythons Complete Waste of Time.

      I's time for a HiRes-Version of it. (at least PAL-Resolution) :-)

      --
      bickerdyke
    24. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by wanderingknight · · Score: 1

      Yes you are!

    25. Re:It's good to see some people are getting it... by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      Look, matey, I know a dead business model when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now

      MPAA: I'm not dead yet!

      Shut up, you're not fooling anyone.

  9. Well, I didn't expect this. by Eg0Death · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nooooobody expects the Monty Python clips on Youtube! Our chief weapons are . . .

    --
    Why is this thus? What is the reason for this thusness?
    1. Re:Well, I didn't expect this. by pragma_x · · Score: 1

      Python A: Humor, common sense, and a strong affinity for silly things.
      Python B: And Cake!
      Python A: Oh yes, and cake.

    2. Re:Well, I didn't expect this. by duckInferno · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd quite like to sit down and watch these.
      Biggles! Fetch... THE COMFY CHAIR!

      dastardly music

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    3. Re:Well, I didn't expect this. by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Seriously. What are people doing writing slashdot comments when there are tubes to be you'd?

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  10. Obligatory by CdBee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you suggesting that cononuts migrate to online services??????

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Obligatory by dieth · · Score: 1

      Not at all. They could be carried.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not at all. They could be carried.

      What? A swallow carrying a coconut?

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:Obligatory by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      He could grip it by the husk.

  11. But at what cost? by kramulous · · Score: 1

    A shrubbery!

    --
    .
    1. Re:But at what cost? by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      That's the easy part. I'd like to see you perform their next request: cut down a tree... with a herring!

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    2. Re:But at what cost? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're getting this completely wrong.

      1. A shrubbery
      2. Another shrubbery, placed to make a bi-level effect with a path ("A path! A path!")
      3. Cut down the tallest tree in the forest with a HERRING!
      4. ???
      5. Profit!
      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  12. explanations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who is Monty Python and why should I care? Is it a band? From what I can tell they're just a bunch of fat Australians who need shaves.

    1. Re:explanations? by duckInferno · · Score: 5, Informative

      A british comedy skit show from the 60's and 70's that was very controversial and revolutionary in its comedic delivery for the time. Considered by many to be one of the best comedy shows of all time.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Python

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    2. Re:explanations? by xav_jones · · Score: 1

      Haha. Your powers of observation are astounding. As is your ability to ask the question here instead of Google.

    3. Re:explanations? by 0racle · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're not Australians you numbskull, they're South African.

      God damn, the nerve of some people.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:explanations? by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      Whoosh....

    5. Re:explanations? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      From what I can tell they're just a bunch of fat Australians who need shaves.

      Ah, but at least among those Australians you will find NOOOOOOOOO POOFTERS.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    6. Re:explanations? by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      If the parent was making a joke, it is either so lame as to have passed as common ignorance, or so epic as to have completely whooshed by me, even after giving it a second look.

      Of course, I'm just banking on it being a troll :P

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    7. Re:explanations? by RockWolf · · Score: 1

      Their name is Bruce, you insensitive clod!

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
    8. Re:explanations? by compro01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, I'm just banking on it being a troll :P

      One man's -1 troll is another man's +5 funny.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  13. Who ordered this? by elashish14 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder who had the power to make this decision since most artists sell their work to a label/studio. According to Wikipedia for example, The Holy Grain is currently produced by Fox and EMI in the UK and Cinema 5 in the US (who I've never heard of). But the others seem to have other distributors. It's strange that they would upload portions from the entire collection when it seems that different parts are owned by different companies....

    But it's welcome news. Maybe it will set a precedent for others to do the same.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    1. Re:Who ordered this? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Mr. Reaper did.
      I think he was talking about his hedging business or something.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    2. Re:Who ordered this? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      I think you will find thats Mr Death, here about the reaping. Bloddy Americans! (-:

    3. Re:Who ordered this? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      We always say stuff like "Now let me just say this!" and "Let me tell you something"!

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    4. Re:Who ordered this? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Your'e dead now so shut up!

    5. Re:Who ordered this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Film and TV publication rights belong to other companies- but the content itself probably was retained by the Python Crew collectively.

    6. Re:Who ordered this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, they actually went to court to win back ownership of the intellectual property (at least in the US). As far as the UK goes, I imagine the BBC, being public television, has a similarly enlightened view to Australia's ABC (whose current programming is all available online for free). The movies were all made by the Python's own production company, so I would imagine they would own the rights there too.

    7. Re:Who ordered this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least for the series Monty Python holds the copyright and all the original tapes too. They got them after the ABC fiasco. You can read about it in the biography "The Pythons

  14. It figures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..the jokers at MPAA and RIAA don't get the joke while the funny ones do ;)

  15. And now, by Armakuni · · Score: 1

    the penguin on top of your YouTube will explode.

    --
    That's not Picasso, that's Kandinsky!
  16. Outside convent with half naked women... by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sir Lancelot: We were in the nick of time. You were in great peril.
    Sir Galahad: I don't think I was.
    Sir Lancelot: Yes, you were. You were in terrible peril.
    Sir Galahad: Look, let me go back in there and face the peril.
    Sir Lancelot: No, it's too perilous.
    Sir Galahad: Look, it's my duty as a knight to sample as much peril as I can.
    Sir Lancelot: No, we've got to find the Holy Grail. Come on.
    Sir Galahad: Oh, let me have just a little bit of peril?
    Sir Lancelot: No. It's unhealthy.
    Sir Galahad: I bet you're gay.
    Sir Lancelot: Am not.

    1. Re:Outside convent with half naked women... by mathx314 · · Score: 1

      His! Name! Is!
      Lancelot!
      And in tight pants a lot
      He likes to dance a lot
      You know you do!

      I do?

      So just say "Thanks" a lot
      And try romance -- it's hot!
      Let's find out who's really you!

      His name is Lancelot
      He visits France a lot
      He likes to dance a lot and dream
      No one would ever know
      That this outrageous pro
      Bats for the other team!

    2. Re:Outside convent with half naked women... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What is the world coming to when a random quote from Monty Python, with no relation to the story (other than being Monty Python), gains a +5 funny?
      http://xkcd.com/16/
      You should be ashamed.

  17. they get it! by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    Good to see that they've finally figured out how to port carrier pigeon technology to swallows.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:they get it! by againjj · · Score: 1

      An African or European swallow?

  18. Long Tail? by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

    Can anyone explain the summary title to me? I don't understand what any of this has to do with the "long tail" as I've heard it explained. I mean, it might apply to youtube ... if youtube were selling it's videos.

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    1. Re:Long Tail? by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The "Long Tail" is a retail concept. Normally, business make 80% of their profit/sales off 20% of the items that they sell. Which is why "Big" retails are well stocked with the latest Hollywood film, but not that obscure DVD with British humor. The Internet is supposed to change this. Because adding an additional piece to inventor does not take up an additional retail "space" a store can offer unlimited holdings. So one would expect that fewer sales of the "Big" hits and more sales of the more odd titles. It's is a nice theory, but it not true. 80% of Amazon's sales come from just 20% of their inventory. I mean, sure, they have a much larger inventory then most stores, but they don't expect the long tail. The numbers are bigger but the ratio stays the same. I have always wondered if Apple's Itunes has escaped into the long tail.

    2. Re:Long Tail? by geobeck · · Score: 5, Funny

      I mean, sure, they have a much larger inventory then most stores, but they don't expect the long tail.

      No one expects the...

      Oh, bugger.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    3. Re:Long Tail? by againjj · · Score: 1

      The tail refers to the increased sales of less popular products. If you have one seller selling the most popular n products, and another that sells all products, then the difference of total sales between the two can be larger than the total sales of the first. The reason it applies here is that Amazon can sell Monty Python (which, sadly to say, is not appreciated by all) while the average seller does not. Basically, Internet sellers can use the long tail effect to their advantage by having larger inventories at minimal cost.

      The effect of this is that more products in the tail are available, and therefore more get sold. This paper shows that while traditionally the top 20% of most popular products capture 80% of the market, on the net it captures only 73%.

    4. Re:Long Tail? by Daemonic · · Score: 1

      It's is a nice theory, but it not true. 80% of Amazon's sales come from just 20% of their inventory.

      I think the point of the long tail is that because of the non-geographic wider reach of the Internet, the obscure titles are now worth stocking. A major retailer like Amazon is always going to make the big bucks on the obvious stuff - the wider audience means even more people buying "Sex and the City", but at least it's now worth them offering the oddities.

      More importantly, a small "Mom and Pop" (as you yanks would say) outfit can suddenly become profitable by offering really weird stuff, because somewhere out there across the world are just enough like minded weirdos to make it work.

    5. Re:Long Tail? by soliptic · · Score: 1

      Which is why "Big" retails are well stocked with the latest Hollywood film, but not that obscure DVD with British humor.

      Your explanation of the Long Tail concept is on point, but I struggle to accept Monty Python counts as "obscure" and would not normally be stocked outside of long tail stores?

  19. And now for something completely different by duckInferno · · Score: 4, Funny

    A man with twenty-four Monty Python clips!

    'es watching youtube

    Oh.. uh... a man with three legs!

    'es run away

    ... oh come off it!

    --
    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  20. So let me understand this. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    the people who wrote, produced and own the rights to something are putting THEIR work up for other people to view and are providing a link for other people to purchase the work they wrote, produced and own the rights to.

    This is compared to telling people who didn't write, produce or own the rights to a work to stop posting said work which they didn't write, produce or own the rights to for others to view.

    Yes, I can see the similarities.~*

    * Testing out the new sarcasm tage

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  21. Seems like a better model to me by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was a huge fan of the way id released their games back in the day, first episode is long and free, the next two will cost you something. Now with Monty Python, the last show went in the can years ago and they're not likely to produce anything new. But for newer shows, I think the PBS model would work. Give the content away for free but let the fans who really like it become direct patrons to support the arts. Let's face it, stamping out piracy is pretty much impossible and not every pirated copy is really a lost sale to begin with. Better to support the culture of patronage and count on the real fans to help you turn a profit.

    One thing the networks are struggling to contend with right now is gaining an accurate measure of just how popular a show is. We know about Faux's surprise when Family Guy was canceled for poor ratings and the DVD set went on to become the #2 selling show ever. This sort of performance gap is continuing with geriatric-targeting CBS having great Nielsens while shows skewing towards younger demographics seem to be under-performing but this does not reflect the interest on p2p sites. ITunes only depicts a portion of the overall success online. And DVD sales aren't figured until long after the current season is over.

    I'll be happy when the middle-men are completely done away with and first-run shows are produced with no need for networks. We're already seeing quirky comedies doing well on Youtube but those are extremely low-budget. It'll take some bucks to put together something like Firefly on a fan-funded basis.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Seems like a better model to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The PBS model doesn't really even work for PBS. When I worked at WGBH in Boston, I got to see the budget numbers - about 90% of the budget comes from the corporate sponsors. Those commitments are arranged and planned for years in advance.

      The remainder of the budget comes from "viewers like you," and since it's impossible to predict those donation amounts in advance, it goes only into a discretionary spending fund. Every project plan has a few "would be nice" items in case there's enough in that discretionary fund to build them by the time the project is being produced.

    2. Re:Seems like a better model to me by IWood · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I'll be happy when the middle-men are completely done away with and first-run shows are produced with no need for networks. We're already seeing quirky comedies doing well on Youtube but those are extremely low-budget. It'll take some bucks to put together something like Firefly on a fan-funded basis.

      The hammer is my penis.

    3. Re:Seems like a better model to me by genner · · Score: 1

      . It'll take some bucks to put together something like Firefly on a fan-funded basis.

      And there's the problem...expensive shows like that will never happen on a fan-funded basis.

    4. Re:Seems like a better model to me by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      And there's the problem...expensive shows like that will never happen on a fan-funded basis.

      Conventionally speaking, you would be correct. But IT is allowing for a lot of business models that wouldn't have been possible with conventional financing techniques. I'm not saying it will be easy or happen tomorrow but I think that the internet will allow communications and financing that completely outstrip the conventional way of doing things. Politics is changing dramatically. The majority of Obama's funding came from small-time donors. Individually, their donations don't account for crap. Collectively, they outstrip the best efforts of the old school fundraisers. Also case in point, local races can blow up on the national scale and gain fundraising attention that simply would not have been possible in the past. That Republican who accused her Democratic opponent of being an atheist and taking godless money, she ended up earning her opponent a ridiculous amount of netbucks once the story hit the blogs.

      I speculated about this stuff in papers for my entrepreneurship class in college. I figured it'd be years before this sort of stuff started happening in the real world. It has been years but it is happening. It'll be more years until we see stuff like a fan-funded Firefly but it'll happen.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    5. Re:Seems like a better model to me by genner · · Score: 1

      The majority of Obama's funding came from small-time donors.

      Buahaha.....yes he declined declined public financing but he had plenty of large donors.

    6. Re:Seems like a better model to me by john83 · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this off topic has clearly never seen Dr Horrible's Singalong Blog.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    7. Re:Seems like a better model to me by IWood · · Score: 1

      Is there an "Outside my limited knowledge of Joss Whedon's oeuvre" mod? That'd be cool. Or maybe I need a blow to the head, I'm never sure.

  22. Oh you Barstewards by thewils · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why did you have to tell me that. Bang goes the rest of the week...

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  23. The State by qoncept · · Score: 1

    If only MTV would do this with The State.. Along with creating a DVD they could link to to buy. You know, so, even if I had to pay, I could watch the funniest show ever.

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:The State by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      You know, so, even if I had to pay, I could watch the funniest show ever.

      No kidding. That's my favorite show of all time. Reno 911 is pretty damned funny too though.

      MTV has been working on a DVD for The State for years, but it's hung up on copyright problems with all the music that's in it. Same thing for WKRP in Cincinnati.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  24. What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track free by timothy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate laugh tracks.

    No, scratch that -- I am annoyed by laugh tracks. Partly because I'm used to them, and when I notice a laugh-track it's often too late.

    Please, Pythons -- your sketches are funny (on albums) without the degrading use of laugh tracks. Do you still have the masters from which to make better video clips, without them?

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  25. Yes, it is! by Alsier · · Score: 0

    Is this the where I come for an argument?

    1. Re:Yes, it is! by jacquesm · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, I'm pretty sure this is abuse...

    2. Re:Yes, it is! by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ...Stupid git

      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
    3. Re:Yes, it is! by againjj · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ... you want room 12A, just along the corridor.

  26. A terrible decision by xav_jones · · Score: 5, Funny

    YouTube will be inundated with spam.

    1. Re:A terrible decision by owlnation · · Score: 1

      Spam's off.

    2. Re:A terrible decision by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's spam, egg, sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:A terrible decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the link.

      Still I haven't seen this bit on the official Monty Python channel yet.

  27. Oblig XKCD by AdamTrace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Going WAY back on this one...

    http://xkcd.com/16/

    1. Re:Oblig XKCD by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for this. I'm surprised it took this long to have it posted.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:Oblig XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was just about to link to this. Way too many out-of-context quotes on this page.

  28. Better way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they should tax all foreigners living abroad.

  29. Re:What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track fre by skwang · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'm no expert, but many of their Flying Circus episodes were filmed in front of studio audiences. In addition, there was a laugh track that was inserted in post-production.

    I'm afraid you'll have to do with the laughter.

  30. All I see on YouTube these days is... by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    "We're sorry, this video is no longer available."

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:All I see on YouTube these days is... by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      hit refresh a couple times and it usually comes up...
      dunno why though.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  31. Re:dead model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, its just pining for the fjords.

  32. Caveat? by JPortal · · Score: 1

    "with the only caveat being a link to buying the movies and TV episodes from Amazon"

    Am I the only one who views this as a service, not a caveat? Link = resource.

    1. Re:Caveat? by zxnos · · Score: 0

      i think you are forced to click the amazon link and by an episode or something...

      --
      always mosh clockwise
  33. Re:What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track fre by mcgrew · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I hate laugh tracks.

    You must understand that these shows were produced almost four decades ago, when producing a comedy without at least a live audience was not only unheard of, but unthinkable.

    That said, I always hated laugh tracks too, even back when Monty Python was new (and I was young); particularly LOUD laugh tracks. Monty Python doesn't seem to be a particular offender here. But if it's funny it doesn't need a laugh track; there isn't any laugh track to my stupid slashdot comments but I regularly have people telling me I owe them a new keyboard.

    Lack of a laugh track is one reason I like My Name Is Earl so much. That show is hilarious (Patty the Daytime Hooker with her hand caught in a soda machine: "I'm not trying to steal a soda, I have a client who's into dead people").

    I was telling a guy at Felber's (a bar here) who hardly watches any TV about it.

    "What's it called?" he asked.

    "My Name Is Earl."

    "I thought your name was Steve?"

  34. Re:What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track fre by Tetsujin · · Score: 3, Funny

    "What's it called?" he asked.

    "My Name Is Earl."

    "I thought your name was Steve?"

    "THIRD BASE!"

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  35. They 'get it' - but today's audience does not. by Animaether · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to wit: "with the only caveat being a link to buying the movies and TV episodes from Amazon."
    caveat? -caveat-? Holy crap. The people behind the actual stuff can't put a f'ing "BUY THIS NOW" link with their videos without being chastised for it now?

    The "me me me" generation needs to move along and die - the sooner the better.

    I've always said (search my comments - I'm sure I've ranted on this topic here before) that the content owners should have a two-part strategy..
    1. yes, by all means, send DMCA takedown notices of clear rips (if for no other reason than that I am tired of the leading title sequences for clips saying "video made by GangFunksta!!!!" in bright yellow on blue put together in windows movie maker, followed by the actual video overlaid by "made with unregistered hypercam" in the corners all over, and the sound too quiet to hear without setting the volume to 11)
    ( Note that I say 'clear rips'; somebody playing some stupid song in the background of their kid dancing shouldn't get a DMCA takedown. Somebody putting up a still image with the artist name and title of the song with the music in good quality -should- be DMCAd left right and center. )

    2. Make an official and -good- quality version available themselves. Doesn't even need to be high quality or HD - leave that for sales if you want, but just set up good quality versions, add links to other productions of yours, add links to amazon, to swag, insert special promo codes - whatever you think would bring you more customers instead of driving them away (and to those crappy rips).. heck, put in an actual ad at the end of the video.

    1. Re:They 'get it' - but today's audience does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree with you completely, but I think the use of the word 'caveat' was due only to Slashdot having barely-literate editors who receive piss-poor submissions.

    2. Re:They 'get it' - but today's audience does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just think how much they pay to get music videos and advertising on tv. And they can do this on youtube for a larger audience for free.

    3. Re:They 'get it' - but today's audience does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, by all means, send DMCA takedown notices of clear rips (if for no other reason than that I am tired of the leading title sequences for clips saying "video made by GangFunksta!!!!" in bright yellow on blue put together in windows movie maker, followed by the actual video overlaid by "made with unregistered hypercam" in the corners all over, and the sound too quiet to hear without setting the volume to 11)

      If you're tired of them, does it mean that you're watching them even if you know they are not legit?

    4. Re:They 'get it' - but today's audience does not. by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      I think it's more in the fact that the meaning of caveat in modern language is not the literal latin meaning and by no means was misused or used to chastise anyone by the OP.

      Caveat in this day an age means something is not a "no strings attached" deal not "Beware of these scumbags that are trying to trick you".

    5. Re:They 'get it' - but today's audience does not. by Animaether · · Score: 1

      Even in your proposed meaning of ".. but note that there are strings attached", I have to say that's a preposterous statement. Oh noes! A LINK! To a site where you have to -pay- for the content! Well that's just unacceptable! *rips the flv and re-uploads with an account.. WITHOUT THE EVIL LINK.

      yeeeeeeeesh.

      Honestly, the link didn't even deserve mentioning and certainly not in a negative light.

    6. Re:They 'get it' - but today's audience does not. by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      Let's see...

      "They are putting all their clips (including snips from their movies) up in a decent resolution, with the only caveat being a link to buying the movies and TV episodes from Amazon."

      "Oh noes! A LINK! To a site where you have to -pay- for the content! Well that's just unacceptable! *rips the flv and re-uploads with an account.. WITHOUT THE EVIL LINK."

      I think you're are being a bit ridicluous.

  36. Re:What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track fre by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I'm sure with the right amount of effort, it could be removed.
    Laugh tracks are annoying because there are exactly the same. Actual laughter tends to varies.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  37. Argument clinic by bonniot · · Score: 1

    No, you haven't!

    1. Re:Argument clinic by NibbleG · · Score: 3, Funny

      OH, oh I'm sorry, but this is abuse. You want room 12A, Just along the corridor.

    2. Re:Argument clinic by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Stupid git!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    3. Re:Argument clinic by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      The Japanese have a man who can bend a leg right back over his head with every step

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    4. Re:Argument clinic by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      The Japanese have a man who can bend a leg right back over his head with every step

      Then who's the guy that can do a forward aerial half turn with every alternate step?

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  38. Instant Record Collection by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Monty_Python_Instant_Record_Collection

    Next they should release the instant video collection that fills your hard drive with a collection of dummy video files that makes it look like you have a large collection.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Instant Record Collection by Kagura · · Score: 1

      There's been a new breakthrough in home-video marketing. Instant cassettes! They're out in stores before the movie is finished. ;)

    2. Re:Instant Record Collection by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Go past this, past this part. In fact, never play this again.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  39. I didn't expect.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monty Python to use the 'comfy chair' technique!

    and associated quotes....

  40. And so there was great rejoyce by gotem · · Score: 1

    yaaaaaaay!

  41. Life of Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going to throw in here the finest bit of meta-humour I've come across.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykN-00i7VVs

  42. south park by qw0ntum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the best model that any show has come up with is South Park's. Every episode from every season posted online, full, without commercials. The newest episodes are posted the week after they air.

    This policy has encouraged me to watch South Park. And what do you know: I even watch it on TV sometimes. +1 viewership by enlightened understanding of digital distribution.

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    1. Re:south park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The South Park episodes online DO have commercials, albeit only one at a time. Also, the newest episodes are posted the DAY after they air, are available for some days, then disabled for a week, then enabled again.

      So really, go and watch yesterday's episode, today.

    2. Re:south park by anomnomnomymous · · Score: 1

      I don't know what site you're talking about, but the official site has three (short) commercials in each episode:
      Then again, it might be region-related.

      --
      When you shoot a mime, do you use a silencer?
    3. Re:south park by qw0ntum · · Score: 1

      Shrug, all I know is that when I watch it at my US university, there are no commercials. That would definitely be less awesome if there were.

      --
      'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    4. Re:south park by Kagura · · Score: 1

      there are no commercials. That would definitely be less awesome if there were.

      I gladly sit through Hulu.com commercials. The service that they provide essentially for free (about 60-90 seconds of your time per 30 minute episode) is well-enough implemented that I'm more than happy to watch their commercials. The people in charge of their site really, really know what they're doing.

    5. Re:south park by shma · · Score: 1

      Of course, you can still watch south park without any commercials for free at South Park Zone and new episodes are put up the night the show airs (although I find they load much faster if you wait an extra day).

      --
      I came here for a good argument
    6. Re:south park by funkatron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately the only episode on the official South Park site is called Sorry England and the animation is worse than usual.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
  43. Re:dead model by markana · · Score: 5, Funny

    The way Detroit is going, soon they'll be pining for the Fords...

  44. Re:What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track fre by duckInferno · · Score: 1

    If you've watched any of MP's sketches then you'll know that they don't use laugh tracks. You'll notice that many of the jokes bomb with the live audience.

    --
    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  45. Re:What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track fre by St.+Alfonzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually I believe that Python was produced at a time when the BBC was opposed to using any canned laugh track. The exterior shots laugh track were presumably recorded while playing back the tape to the audience as a prelude to the interior, live filming.

  46. Success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monty Python is a success. Offering free stuff to encourage people to buy the DVDs and CDs and stuff. I feel like actually looking for them at the stores now.

  47. Re:What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track fre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M*A*S*H tried a program without a laugh track and the network went nuts, so it was produced with a track. But never in the OR

  48. Censored? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Have any of the new DVD releases undone BBC or American censorship? I refer specifically to the Prince and the canc^H^H^H^HGANGRENE spot, and the All-England Summarize Proust competition ("What are your hobbies outside summarizing?" "Well, it's golf, strangling animals, and masturbation.")

  49. Re:What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track fre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jokes are funnier when you're told they're supposed to be funny.

  50. The nightmare continues. by quag7 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh GOD, it will never end now. Entire new generations will be quoting this stuff over and over until we all gouge our eyeballs out with sporks. Monty Python, the Led Zeppelin IV of humor, will continue to be the millstone around all of our necks.

    Seriously I love Python, I guess. I think I do. I forget. I think after the 50,000th time of having to sit through Holy Grail, I could no longer tell how I once felt.

    I'm going to cry.

    Thank you Python, thank you - it's wow, I'm inspired like I am by the Top 500 Classic Rock Songs of All Time they do around Labor Day each year because like Layla or Hotel California, I just gotta hear the Parrot sketch ONE MORE TIME because it is so funny, it's like, oh, saying a Rosary or something, you don't really get the whole gestalt of the experience until the 9000th Hail Mary.

    Someday when we are all extinct aliens will be digging through our garbage and they will record one thing in their logs: "We left after exploring only .0000000000000000005% of Internet content because we couldn't take the 'Knights Who Say Ni!' references *ANYMORE*."

    Oh god, kill me now. I suppose I should look on the bright side (err, yeah). I've got at best another 40 years left or so on this planet.

    1. Re:The nightmare continues. by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's people like you what cause unrest.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:The nightmare continues. by quag7 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to send you to a vivisectionist.

  51. Shoulda been public domain anyway by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Under the original terms of US copyright law (14 years with optional 14 year renewal if author is still alive, and zero copyright protection for foreign works), most monty python material would already be in the public domain in the USA.

    Just something to think about...

    1. Re:Shoulda been public domain anyway by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      Zero copyright protection for foreign works? You mean in the USA it would have been public domain the instant it was released? Glad that law was changed.

    2. Re:Shoulda been public domain anyway by againjj · · Score: 1

      At the time, it meant a huge flood of works into a market that was not originating many works. All countries go through this -- China will not (really) enforce laws on IP until such time as they start originating IP in large amounts. It provides a way for developing countries to get up to speed faster (and yes, the US was a developing country at that time).

    3. Re:Shoulda been public domain anyway by isorox · · Score: 1

      Zero copyright protection for foreign works? You mean in the USA it would have been public domain the instant it was released? Glad that law was changed.

      Not really, if the US doesn't respect copyright from other countries, there's no reason for those countries to respect the US'

  52. niceee, bookmarked by zm4201 · · Score: 1

    perfect, hopefully they just keep adding videos though as there are only 24 videos right now. and it'll all be easily accessible all in one page and if they keep up with what their offering we wont need to search for certain clips :)

    1. Re:niceee, bookmarked by conureman · · Score: 1

      I've been compelled to change my browser's home page.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  53. so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh good that'll save me the trouble of downloading them from torrents. Youtube's censorship is a joke.

  54. Re:dead model by gavinjolly · · Score: 1

    Well played Master

    --

    The weathers here - Wish you were beautiful

  55. Surely it belongs to the BBC? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    And as property of the BBC it is property of licence payers who provided the money for the clips.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Surely it belongs to the BBC? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Surely it belongs to the BBC

      No. Most of the stuff the BBC puts out is not BBC copyright -- even things produced in house

      Heroes doesn't belong to the BBC. Eastenders does, but the music played on the radio in the background of the pub isn't.

      And as property of the BBC it is property of licence payers who provided the money for the clips.

      You may wish that were the case, but it's not, any more than things made by ITV are property of the advertisers

    2. Re:Surely it belongs to the BBC? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      MP was a BBC production like Eastenders, not bought-in like Heroes, paid for by the BBC licence payers. The BBC is a public corporation owned in trust for the British people by the Board of BBC governors, not like ITV which is owned by its shareholders.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  56. AR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JTRipper: http://entertainment.slashdot.org/entertainment/08/11/19/201255.shtml
    JTRipper: I is famous :)
    AR: no

  57. This world by CdBee · · Score: 1

    Are you implying that coconuts migrate????

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:This world by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

      Not at all. They could be carried.

      It could grip it by the husk!

  58. Re:What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track fre by Kagura · · Score: 1

    You say "Who's on first" one more time, I'll break your arm! ;)

  59. Obligatory..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Ekke Ekke Ekke Ekke Ptang Zoo Boing (unintelligible muttering)"

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  60. Re:What I'd like to see of Python: laugh-track fre by Triv · · Score: 1

    Ever seen an episode of Mash without the laugh track? The DVDs give you the option. I recommend it - it gives the show an entirely unexpected level of depth.

  61. I look forward to the dupe of this next week. by erroneous · · Score: 1

    "Good evening. Tonight on Slashdot, we examine the phenomenon of déjà vu. That strange feeling we sometimes get that we've read something before, that what is posted now has already been posted. Tonight on Slashdot we examine the phenomenon of déjà vu, that strange feeling we sometimes get that we've ... "

    --
    erroneous: look me up in a dictionary
  62. Still + music = infringement? by tepples · · Score: 1

    ( Note that I say 'clear rips'; somebody playing some stupid song in the background of their kid dancing shouldn't get a DMCA takedown. Somebody putting up a still image with the artist name and title of the song with the music in good quality -should- be DMCAd left right and center. )

    Does this include videos including clear rips of 20- to 30-second snippets of several songs intended to prove a point about these songs?

    1. Re:Still + music = infringement? by Animaether · · Score: 1

      I'd say "no", but I'm not a lawyer. These types of questions/answers often spiral down into extremely hairy (legal) details.

      What if it isn't 30, but 60 seconds?
      What if it is 30 seconds at a time of the same song?
      What if it is the full song, but the titles are used to explain something about the song - would it still be an original and non-derivative work?
      What if it is the full song, but the titles poke fun at the song - would that qualify as parody?
      What if it is the full song with the original video, but it is posted with the comment that it is for display in educational institutions only? Would that qualify for the educational exemption status, and any breach of that by viewers (non-educational purposes) be a breach of the terms of the video poster only - thus giving no legal relief to the copyright holder as it is strictly a dispute by the poster of the video and the viewer and the poster may have no interest in enforcing the terms?

      Again - find a lawyer.

      But the fun thing about the DMCA is that you're sitting on roses with *any* video you might post. It is up to the copyright holder to:
      1. find your video in the first place
      2. perform a legal analysis of the video
      3. if found to be in breach - write up the DMCA takedown and send to YouTube/Google/Whoever

      At which point YOU can:
      4a. remove the video
      5a. re-upload the exact same video under a different name / from a different account.

      The entire procedure then continues with:
      6a. goto 1

      OR:
      4b. disagree with the DMCA claims and have YouTube/Google/Whoever re-instate the video

      At which point the copyright holder can:
      5b.a once again file the claim and proceed with legal action against you*
      or
      5b.b decide your arguments for disagreeing with the DMCA claims are sound and solid (or too expensive to research), and drop the matter.

      That's my understanding of it anyway - again, I'm not a lawyer.

  63. hmmm. how is it when by nimbius · · Score: 1

    microsoft does something like this (ala joining the fray) its 'embrace extend extinguish' however when monty python (also a commercial franchise) does it, we're looking at a good thing?

    im a big enough fan to go out and buy the DVD box set. they're worth it.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  64. Help me find a sketch, please by RichiH · · Score: 1

    I am looking for a specific sketch. It might or might not have been called "French Art Film". It shows a woman in a white dress, standing and sitting around a landfill. From lots of angles. Often. They have a close-up of a chair, standing on heaps of trash. Again, the woman. More perspectives. Then a soldier in a Vietnam chopper, firing his machine gun. End of sketch.

    I have been looking for this one for more than a decade and I could not find it. If you would help me, I would be a *happy camper* and finally able to *enjoy the sauce*.

    1. Re:Help me find a sketch, please by danzona · · Score: 1

      I am looking for a specific sketch. It might or might not have been called "French Art Film".

      My Google-Fu is strong. It is called "French Subtitled Film" and is on YouTube, but not in the Monty Python section (yet).

    2. Re:Help me find a sketch, please by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Though I shouldn't have asked. Of course, it is not near as funny as I remembered. What did you google for?

    3. Re:Help me find a sketch, please by danzona · · Score: 1

      What did you google for?

      I started with:
      "monty python" list of skits
      The first hit was a website with a list of 59 Monty Python Skits and links to them on YouTube (all of which have been taken down).

      One of the sketches listed was "French Sketch" so I Googled with:
      "monty python" "french sketch"
      The third hit was the sketch on YouTube

  65. Good for 'em by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    Well naow, 'at's a bit uv aw roight!

    Toad

  66. Long history of this by Shagg · · Score: 1

    Monty Python has been pretty friendly to their fans using/viewing their material for a long time. I was a regular on the alt.fan.monty-python USENET newsgroup back in the early 90s, and used to host an ftp site with lots of scripts from the movies/shows. They gave their blessing and said they had no problem with it as long as we also put something up about where to buy copies of the "official" books with the scripts if people wanted them.

    I also ran a ewtoo talker http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talker (kind of like the old telnet MUD, but more social based instead of combat based) that had a strong Monty Python based theme. Not only were they completely fine with that, they also offered to host it on their official pythonline website. A lot of other MUDs at the time were being sued over trademarks/copyrights.

    They pretty much looked at it as free advertising and encouraged people to trade scripts/etc, as long as you weren't profiting from it.

    --
    Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.