Slashdot Mirror


Steve Jobs Takes Leave of Absence From Apple

An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt from Network World: "A number of sites are reporting that Apple's CEO Steve Jobs is taking a leave of absence till June at least. Speculation over Jobs' possibly failing health has run rampant in the past few weeks. Prior to the recent MacWorld show, Jobs said he had a hormone deficiency that had caused him to dramatically lose weight. In a memo today Jobs told workers his health issues are more complex than he thought." Reader Bastian227 adds a link to this letter from Steve Jobs on Apple's website, which also says that Tim Cook will be responsible for daily operations, though Jobs will remain involved with major strategic decisions.

429 comments

  1. June... by jcr · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's usually when WWDC happens. I think he's planning on doing that keynote.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:June... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      I think he's planning on doing that keynote.

      On what basis?

      On a different note, this is a sad day for those owning AAPL shares - expect them to plunge even further than they have over the past year.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:June... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      That's a big chunk of work to schedule yourself to return to. But he could probably do a recap and introduce Bertrand Serlet to do the Mac stuff, then Scott Forstall to do the iPhone stuff.

    3. Re:June... by johnsonav · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On a different note, this is a sad day for those owning AAPL shares - expect them to plunge even further than they have over the past year.

      Well, if you didn't see this coming a mile off, you probably shouldn't be in the market at all.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    4. Re:June... by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's usually when WWDC happens. I think he's planning on doing that keynote.

      -jcr

      I don't think so. WWDC was June 9-13 last year, and Jobs' announcement specifically says "until the end of June." There will be tons of cool stuff to show off at WWDC this year, and it doesn't make sense to bet on Jobs' health improving enough to be able to do the keynote, especially if he won't be involved with operations beforehand.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:June... by jcr · · Score: 1

      That's a big chunk of work to schedule yourself to return to.

      It doesn't all have to be done at the last minute, and he does know what Apple's plans and projections are already.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:June... by jcr · · Score: 1

      WWDC doesn't always happen at the same time, and it was even postponed after announcement in 2003 to include the G5 introduction. It could easily be late June or early July.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:June... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      AAPL is down in after-hour trading.

    8. Re:June... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Please people think of the iSheep...

    9. Re:June... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I couldn't find a list of WWDC dates, but I remember thinking WWDC 08 was unusually early. I'm pretty sure I remember going to one in July, and most of them being in mid to late June.

    10. Re:June... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, someone has to buy the shares everyone is selling.

    11. Re:June... by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Well, if you didn't see this coming a mile off, you probably shouldn't be in the market at all.

      No shit, but to what degree was this priced in already? Sure we'll see a kneejerk tomorrow, but Apple is already trading at a historically very low PE. And this is in the noise relative to the general consumer spending fears.

      However, earnings are next week, so it's easy to imagine that this announcement was carefully timed so that it could be immediately offset by a stronger-than-expected Christmas Q.

    12. Re:June... by Gerzel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think so.

      Don't count Apple out just because Jobs is gone. He isn't the ONLY person working at Apple and he certainly isn't the once and future designer.

      Sure they might not do as well but they still have Ipods, Itunes, Imacs and a lot of Fanboys and Girls.

      And say what you will Apple does make some good, if expensive hardware and software.

      Jobs may be more than just a figurehead but he is hardly all the company has going for it.

    13. Re:June... by Gerzel · · Score: 4, Funny

      The iDroids dream of them.

    14. Re:June... by bdbolton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On a different note, this is a sad day for those owning AAPL shares - expect them to plunge even further than they have over the past year.

      Ohh and I don't know it might also be a sad day for his family. Let's get some perspective here. He has serious health issues and people seem to care more about the stock prices.

    15. Re:June... by jocknerd · · Score: 1

      I'll start a rumor. He's going into secret training and Carl Weathers will be his trainer. He'll emerge faster and buff. For those of you too young to know what I'm talking about, think Rocky III.

    16. Re:June... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      On a different note, this is a sad day for those owning AAPL shares - expect them to plunge even further than they have over the past year.

      You mean quite unlike the rest of the stock market?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    17. Re:June... by johnsonav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No shit, but to what degree was this priced in already?

      I think the market had already priced in about 80% of this news. Unless there is other, unforeseen fallout from this announcement, we're pretty close to where the stock should be. For the last year it has been a question of "when", not "if". Actually, this may be the the jump-start the stock needs; big money has been reluctant to invest in Apple until the uncertainty of Job's condition is cleared up. He should have done this six months ago.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    18. Re:June... by Gerzel · · Score: 2, Informative

      To those who marked me troll.

      It is a reference to the book "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep"!

    19. Re:June... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean quite unlike the rest of the stock market?

      Compare Apple's stock price to the NASDAQ composite.

      You'll notice that AAPL consisently out-performed the rest of the market.... up until six months or so ago, since then Apple has lost more value than most other tech stocks.

      To answer your question/statement: yes the rest of the stock market has plunged, but AAPL has plunged more.

    20. Re:June... by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well news like this an easy chance for investors to sell short for a bit of profit taking. So will be seeing ups and down as the another 10% gets priced in.

      --
      "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
    21. Re:June... by Tacvek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which is better known by the Movie title, an post-movie release book re-release title of: Blade Runner.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    22. Re:June... by Meski · · Score: 1

      Which is better known by the Movie title, an post-movie release book re-release title of: Blade Runner.

      An? Oh, forget it, the whole sentence was confusing, probably the pee was silent.

      One of those odd connections between a book and a movie. The plot was different, the title was different... But i liked them both, as opposed to the movie iRobot.

    23. Re:June... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your post is better known as: Karmawhoring, how to post common knowledge and get enough karma points to post at +5 forever.

    24. Re:June... by iamacat · · Score: 1

      How about people whose families have trouble paying for health care because their investment tanked? Most people now need money for essentials, not luxuries. So you shouldn't automatically judge them for caring about stock prices. At least Steve Jobs is getting good healthcare, when he chooses to use it instead of trying to cure cancer by drinking herbal tee. The same can not be always said about someone's grandpa with heart disease.

    25. Re:June... by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, you can't spell out your cool obscure reference to an awesome book just because someone modded you troll, that ruins it. You just have to trust in the idea that there are cool people on /. who will get your hip shit and mod you up just to stick it to the less nerdy mods. You'll just have to live with the mod-kipple, for some day all moderations will be filled with kipple, and we'll be consumed by it.

    26. Re:June... by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

      Apple still has a "spare" Steve available... though he's currently only a part-time employee and probably has no interest in becoming CEO.

      But maybe he (Woz) can deliver keynotes? The fanbase will love him.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    27. Re:June... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the most retarded thing I read today.

    28. Re:June... by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      think Rocky III

      I really don't want to, but thanks!

    29. Re:June... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [ATTENTION MODS]

      If you didn't recognize either of these two references to "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?", it would be in everyone's best interest for you to go dump your mod points on some thread about religion.

    30. Re:June... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      And from the start of the year, Apple again outperformed NASDAQ. But yeah, WMF, stick to the few months that "prove your point".

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    31. Re:June... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Apple still has a "spare" Steve available... though he's currently only a part-time employee and probably has no interest in becoming CEO.

      But maybe he (Woz) can deliver keynotes? The fanbase will love him.

      Woz doesn't even work for Apple anymore. The keynote address needs to come from someone who's involved in day-to-day operations at the company, otherwise they could just hire some actor to do it and you'd wind up with essentially a live on-stage TV commercial.

      Jobs isn't good at this because he's a good presenter, he's good at this because he's an integral part of the company's operations. He truly represents the company. Nobody on the outside can do that.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    32. Re:June... by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      While fairly common knowledge, far from everybody is familiar with it. Even many people who have seen the movie are unaware of the book, and especially the book's original title.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  2. Get well, Steve by Rayban · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Love 'em or hate 'em, he's changed a lot in the tech sector. His presence will be missed.

    --
    æeee!
    1. Re:Get well, Steve by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Love 'em or hate 'em, he's changed a lot in the tech sector. His presence will be missed.

      He's not dead yet!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Get well, Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Love 'em or hate 'em, he's changed a lot in the tech sector. His presence will be missed.

      He's not dead yet!

      He doesn't want to go on the cart.

    3. Re:Get well, Steve by Rayban · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's why it's "Get well", not "RIP".

      --
      æeee!
    4. Re:Get well, Steve by wildsurf · · Score: 3, Funny

      He doesn't want to go on the cart.

      The Apple cart?

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    5. Re:Get well, Steve by Shikaku · · Score: 0

      "RIP" would mean he's Jesus.

    6. Re:Get well, Steve by mjwx · · Score: 1

      He's not dead yet!

      E's just pinnin for the iFjords

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Get well, Steve by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      He's not dead yet!

      We know, we know, you don't have to remind us...we know...

    8. Re:Get well, Steve by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      Yes. I wish him well.
      Being a CEO of a large company is hard work so I getting some rest from daily duties of running such a big organization is needed once in a while. This is not Paris Hilton and I think we need lay off so he can have a personal life.
      Also this will allow Steve Jobs to see how he groomed the leadership at Apple, so like me, like to retire without worrying about the company's continuity.

    9. Re:Get well, Steve by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      It will never be "RIP" - the rebirth of the iGod has oft been foretold.

      Off-topic: can anybody imagine Steve Jobs with long hair and a serious beard? I can't.

    10. Re:Get well, Steve by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

      No, the iCart. It revolutionizes plague-victim disposal a trendy brushed-metal look and user-friendly interface.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    11. Re:Get well, Steve by linhares · · Score: 1

      can anybody imagine Steve Jobs with long hair and a serious beard? I can't.

      You don't need to imagine that at all.

    12. Re:Get well, Steve by torstenvl · · Score: 1

      Oh my GOD, dude, I laughed so hard at that. Thank you!

    13. Re:Get well, Steve by Rinisari · · Score: 1

      I think he'll go for a walk.

    14. Re:Get well, Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to http://www.archive.org/ and see state of Apple/ Macintosh back in the day right before he came as unofficial CEO. See Macworld etc. and Usenet (via Deja/Google Usenet)

      I mean, if he could fix that disaster, anything could be possible. I wasn't following Mac that time and when you browse the sites one after another and see them in concentrated way, you will be more impressed.

    15. Re:Get well, Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just pulling a stunt to promote the up and coming iCoffin. *blink blink*

    16. Re:Get well, Steve by Hao+Wu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Love 'em or hate 'em, he's changed a lot in the tech sector. His presence will be missed.

      I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    17. Re:Get well, Steve by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Supposedly his tomb is already finished. Rumor has it that on the day he dies, they'll mummify him in a giant (but stylish) monument and entomb him with his employees, his possessions, and thousands of wild-eyed Apple fanboys.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    18. Re:Get well, Steve by claytonjr · · Score: 1

      He's not dead yet!

      Thats because Netcraft hasn't confirmed it.

    19. Re:Get well, Steve by CrazeeCracker · · Score: 1

      The iCart, as it were.

      --
      Of course I didn't RTFA.
    20. Re:Get well, Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iCart of course.

  3. He shall return as iSteve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    He had to lose weight and do hormone therapy before all of the bionic implants could go in...

    1. Re:He shall return as iSteve by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When he first came back to Apple in 1998, he was known as the iCEO, because for awhile it was thought that he would only be interim CEO until they could find a replacement.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:He shall return as iSteve by jrothwell97 · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...so Apple will have a cyborg in charge, like MS had the Borg in charge until not so long ago? It's true. Apple IS the new Microsoft.

      --
      Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    3. Re:He shall return as iSteve by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Funny

      and the "i" in iCEO is not a letter but actually a tiny picture of Steve.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    4. Re:He shall return as iSteve by thomawesome · · Score: 1

      Yes, and Google is going to start working on turning their CEO into an android.

    5. Re:He shall return as iSteve by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

      This will leave only Linus, who will, by 2015, have turned into a Cyberman.

      --
      Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    6. Re:He shall return as iSteve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, it was 1:1 scale.

    7. Re:He shall return as iSteve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Theo de Raadt will still be made of 200 proof flames.
      RMS, on the other hand, will have died and released his body under the GPLv4 license. Eventually all life on Earth will use portions from RMS' body and victory will be his.

  4. Sell quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the market says "sell sell sell!"
    watching the stock price collapse is almost funny if it wasnt so sad
    .

    1. Re:Sell quick by johnsonav · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the market says "sell sell sell!"

      Makes me glad I'm long Apple put options. Ahh, schadenfreude.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    2. Re:Sell quick by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bought AAPL at $50 a few years ago, it's the only individual stock besides AMD (which I got burned on in the late 1990s) I have ever purchased. For a while there AAPL was touching $200 and my wife and I said that our stock in AAPL is going to pay for our daughter's college education someday.

      With the way that AAPL has been going lately, I think she's going to have to go to a community college :/

    3. Re:Sell quick by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, well adversity does help things along - reading the millionaire next door, people who had to work for their success did much better than those who didn't. Of course, Bill Gates and Paul Allen went to the Lakeside School, so there you go.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Sell quick by Cally · · Score: 1

      I dunno, doesn't look so bad to me (and that's AAPL vs the NASDAQ over the last year; the latest 24h doesn't look so bad either.) Though Google != Bloomberg or Reuters, so those are old prices by now.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    5. Re:Sell quick by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      They got a bit of a head start at Lakeside vs some kid in the inner city with no access to computer technology, but they Gates and Allen did work for their success too. They could have easily been swept under the rug during the first years. Wasn't one of the themes of millionaire next door also that people who invest in stock as a way to get rich aren't actually working for success and so deserve not much at all being that they assume the smallest risk unlike the entrepreneurs behind the companies investors buy stock in? Maybe I'm thinking about Netscape Time.

    6. Re:Sell quick by unitron · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you spent "x" buying Apple at $50 you should have sold half of it when it hit $100. Then you would have still had "x" dollars worth of Apple and "x" dollars with which to diversify into other stocks. Even after Apple's share price takes a big hit tomorrow, it'll probably still be above $50.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    7. Re:Sell quick by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not that I recall - the major theme that I recall is that millionaires tend to be the winners of a high risk bet - entrepreneurism. They're also people of normal taste and lifestyle, with a large difference between what they bring in and what they spend.

      My original point was that, on average, people don't value what they're given, just what they have to work for.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:Sell quick by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm already heavily diversified. The amount I have in 401K is many times larger than the amount I have in AAPL. And AAPL has done much, much better for me over the last four years than my 401K has done. I kinda wish I'd put it all in AAPL to be honest :/

      I could spend time researching and trying to figure out what would be a good stock to complement AAPL in a diversification scheme, and sell off half of my AAPL when it gets back up to $100 (which it will, I have no doubt) as you have suggested. But that just seems like too much *work* when the only company I can really say for certain that I have a sincere belief in the future of is AAPL. I'll just keep it all in AAPL. I'm still confident that when my daughter is ready to go to college in 16 years, AAPL will have done quite well for me.

    9. Re:Sell quick by samkass · · Score: 1

      This was announced right after the end of trading today, so no chart is going to account for it yet. When trading on Apple resumed it immediately lost 10% of it's value or about 7 billion dollars of market cap. It's back up to -6% which is about tied for its 52-week low. No one can argue that this news is good for Apple-- it's about as bad as it gets.

      On the other hand, Apple's still raking in lots of cash and can survive on momentum alone for a long time. They still have all the teams that put together the current product line in place and will probably come out with a generation or two of Steve-like products on pure momentum. So even if the worst happens and he never returns to Apple, they've got a lot of time for someone to rise up and take the reigns before things get critical.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    10. Re:Sell quick by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      WTF... why didn't you divest at 200 a share?

      Buy and hold is a medium term thing. You hold mutual funds for long term.... individual stocks you hold for medium term at the longest.

    11. Re:Sell quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What is gained too lightly is esteemed too little. its an old saw but very true.

    12. Re:Sell quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least someone with a Community College degree would have known when to sell. Looks like you need to start attending night classes at your local community college.

    13. Re:Sell quick by defi · · Score: 1

      A 300% return in a couple years and you didn't take it. Thats why the average investor gets burned by wall street, they never take profits..

    14. Re:Sell quick by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What is gained too lightly is esteemed too little. its an old saw but very true.

      Or the corollary - "What is gained at great expense is valued too highly."
      Which is the reason frats haze pledges.

    15. Re:Sell quick by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      IMHO, if you haven't sold out already, ride out the storm...[i.e. hold]
      I don't have the real thing, but I do play stock-simulation games for fun and some practice at the market.

      LOL, my econ professor referred to the stock market as "gambling for rich people" (paraphrased) a couple classes ago.

      IANASB...

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    16. Re:Sell quick by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      And what exactly should I have put it in? I am still confident that Apple is the best investment. You're saying I should have sold my Apple and bought something that I didn't expect to do as well? You're saying that because Apple went up 300% in that time period, that it would not do very well going forward?

      I think you should only sell a stock and buy another if you think the other stock has a better chance of performing well than the one you already own. I feel that Apple is a good stock to own and I can't think of another that I have more confidence in. I will hold my Apple stock until my opinion changes.

    17. Re:Sell quick by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      Divest ... and buy what? A stock I had less confidence in?

      Is that how you do your investing? "OK, stock A has doubled since I bought it, I'd better sell it. Hm, I think I'll buy stock B. I don't expect it to do as well as stock A going forward, but I don't want to lose my earnings on stock A. Oops, except I already think I'm more likely to lose those earnings by putting the money into stock B. Whatever shall I do?!?"

    18. Re:Sell quick by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Hindsight is 20/20. You can't always look at the stock market as a "should have." What happened in the past isn't worth kicking yourself over, so long as IF you made mistakes you learn from them.

      Looking back I SHOULD have put all of the money I was making at my entry level IT job into AAPL stock, instead of only a small portion. But I didn't, because that's a risk I wasn't willing to take. That's not a mistake.

      I SHOULD have sold AAPL when it was worth more than double what it is now. I sold when I was up ONLY ~300%. Should I be kicking myself for making ONLY 300% in a couple years on my investment? Not unless I don't like making money.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    19. Re:Sell quick by defi · · Score: 1

      well I'm not a professional investor but I would think selling it, and then sitting on the sidelines for awhile waiting for it to take a dip is one option. If it continued to go up you could always have re-bought it, missing out on a little bit of profit. I guess my point is that just like when people say "you haven't lost money till you sell" the same holds true in reverse. "You haven't made money until you sell". Heres another one I like "bulls and bears get rich, pigs get slaughtered". Think about that for awhile..

    20. Re:Sell quick by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Selling apple and investing in something like Coca Cola or IBM would have been pretty safe bets which have been more or less flat since 1998, and from 1980-1997 flat as well

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    21. Re:Sell quick by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > You're saying that because Apple went up 300% in that time period, that it would not do very well going forward?

      Exactly. Dig into the numbers like sales/share, profit/share, P/E Ratio, debt ratios, etc. When a stock gets 'hot' and everybody wants in the price will do a moonshot. That's basic supply & demand at work. As it shoots up, odds are it will go up far faster than the company is actually growing. When it hits crazy valuations based on those hard performance numbers you sell a large chunk to those idjits buysing stocks based on some shouting head on MSNBC. If you can't find another good prospect that hasn't become popular (thus overpriced) sit on the cash or buy some short term bonds.

      Odds are the ferets in the day trading pits will soon find another stock to fall madly in love with and the price will fall back to earth. It still might be pretty high but it will return to some semblance of a relationship with current business or at least the near term prospects. Then you can buy some more if you still have the cash sitting on the sidelines. Buying a stock today based on what some pundit says they will be selling/earning ten years out is dumb once enough idiots have priced the stock up to valuations that only make sense if that prediction is true. No more upside (already priced to perfection) and almost unlimited downside. Dumb.

      I have rode AAPL up twice in the past. Did RedHat once. I got out when they went crazy. No way they were going to be moving enough cash anytime soon to justify some of the prices they were trading at. Got back into RH recently at about $8 while the whole market was tanking. Starting to sniff around AAPL again but it ain't low enough for a vulture like me quite yet.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    22. Re:Sell quick by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 3, Informative

      I could spend time researching and trying to figure out what would be a good stock to complement AAPL

      try: Food (Even in a severe depression we still have to eat)

      the only company I can really say for certain that I have a sincere belief in the future of is AAPL.

      • The first thing I feel compelled to say about that is: I hope no "innocent" bystanders, like "kids" for example, are intended beneficiaries of your investment outcome.
      • I would say there's a 50-50 chance that Apple's business model will either change, against the corporate will AND fundamentally, or it, and the company won't even exist in 20 years time.

      if you're concerned with longevity and business models, Consider:

      • IBM
        • Founded in 1888, 90 years before Apple (they know a few things about weathering market disruptions)
      • 3M
        • 107 years old in 2009.
        • One of the most innovative companies, from anywhere, ever. Everyone knows the "15% Rule" where scientists at 3M are allowed to spend 15% of their time on any project they wish. Forget Google for a moment. 3M formulated that 'rule' as the Depression was really ripping this country to shreds, in 1931-32.
        • They set up an internal venture capital fund (the Genesis Grants) that financed scientist/inventor ideas that had been turned down by management already. (Think about that for a moment).
        • Long ago they required that each division of the company HAD TO derive 25% of its net income from products it had invented within the last 5 years. In '93 (when they were actually "in trouble" with valuations and the Market) that was changed to 30%. (For want of a more polite term, that took some major league balls, right there)
        • They got diverted from these principles in the 90s, but brought in an outsider (from GE, itself no slouch when it comes to staying power, and 3M "innovated" again, in that this was the first outsider to take the helm in 3M's history) and returned to those early "rules" and spends 7% of total sales, annually on R&D.
        • I call that Institutionalized Innovation. Management and Economics people call it a textbook example of a Winner.

      There are many others. Do not get lulled into laissez-faire attitudes toward investment. You have to diversify outside of 'sexy' industry groups. When everyone heads for the exits the fundamentally sound companies get hammered, right along with the 'pretenders' and it is sad, brutal and devastating for a lot of people when that happens.

      If I sound harsh, I'm sorry, but life and some of its lessons are far harsher than anything I could come up with. And no matter who you are, I don't like seeing people get hurt. I watched some very intelligent people as their retirement nest eggs got decimated, several times. It is not something I would wish on anyone.

    23. Re:Sell quick by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Makes me glad I'm long Apple put options. Ahh, schadenfreude.

      Back in the day I used to make money selling puts on AAPL just before MacWorlds.

      Might work here.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    24. Re:Sell quick by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      A sincere thank you for taking the time to write all of that, solely for my benefit. I really do appreciate it.

      And a clarification: it's not that I think Apple is the only company that is going to do well over the next 10 - 20 years. It's just that Apple is the only technology company that I can think of that I feel truly excited about. I fully admit that I have not done much market research, and your points about IBM and 3M are very well taken, and convincing. If I have more money to invest, I will definitely look into those.

      What I'm trying to say is, the criteria I have for making my own decisions about what stocks are worthwhile are based on a personal subjective opinion about which companies are in a strong position to innovate and increase their market share as well as create new markets for themselves. The top of that list for me, for companies bigger than start-ups, is Apple. I don't want to get into all of the reasons that I feel this way (the biggest one is that they have successfully wed a kick-ass Unix operating system with an innovative graphical desktop, which I think is something that should have happened 15 years ago and I'm glad that Apple has finally been the one to do it), because obviously arguments about the technical value of any particular technology can go on forever. My point is that I know more about some companies and less about others, certainly not enough about any of them to feel that I am a super well informed investor, but that in the little bit that I do know, Apple is the company that I have been most impressed by and have the most faith in. So I'm putting my money there.

      It's only $5,000 in the end anyway. My 401K is (or WAS, a year or two ago) 20x that, and that's all in very large index funds, so it's not like a significant part of my retirement is based on pretending like I know what I'm doing. I know that I'm not the most competent or well-informed investor. But I've been very happy with the performance of AAPL in any case, it's done nearly as well as Google over the same time period that I've owned the Apple stock, and I don't know how one can realistically expect to do much better.

    25. Re:Sell quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't see how your greed is Apple's problem. YOu should have sold when you had a 400% return.

      In any case, Community College was probably the best she could have hoped for anyway.

    26. Re:Sell quick by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      take the profit? Put it in bonds until you find something that looks good? etc.

      If you seriously think that hanging onto a single stock for a long period of time is the best way to make money in the market, then you should put your cash in a CD and leave it there.

    27. Re:Sell quick by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      A sincere thank you for taking the time to write all of that, solely for my benefit. I really do appreciate it.

      First, you are sincerely welcome. And secondly, your message points up a valid point that I also recommend to people and that is: Invest in what you understand. What one "knows" in other words. Everyone who works has some instinct about what they encounter as to what works and what doesn't. A really "plain" example might be an auto worker who puts part of his 401k in a specific parts supplier, etc.

      When China was really heating up, and guys were buying into shoe factories in the middle of nowhere, that employed almost zero accountability, I looked for American and European companies that were "participating" in the expansion in China, as far as building things and infrastructure-related moves. We did pretty well that way, and when guys I knew were moaning about this or that "unknown" entity being taken over by the People's Army, or having more holes in their finances than yen, I always felt, "Well, what did you expect?"

      Go with what you know. That should be rule #1, and thanks for reminding me of that.

      People who sell stocks and bonds on the retail level are notorious for pulling out the charts and throwing together what sounds, even to someone who understands the hackneyed terminology, like "gobbledy-gook." And, in that situation, the worst thing we can do (I've done it myself) is to "go along" with the "story" that doesn't actually make clear sense to us. Many of us have an inclination to say we understand something when it's still "fuzzy." But doing so when we're being "pitched" by a salesman is the worst possible time for this. (And again, this has happened to me, and I was straight A's in math, all the way up, somewhat well-read and "traveled", so I wasn't a complete idiot, but ... I felt like one later, believe me).

      I think it was Peter Lynch who first brought that idea to my attention; the notion of "go with what you know" and "get out there and kick the tires." Even if someone read the 3M piece, and was impressed with "the story" I always suggest that individuals contact the person at a company whose function is "Investor Relations." Those people are generally pretty conservative, and they avoid "hard sell" tactics, as a rule.

      Also, you mentioned larger "Index Funds" and I'm definitely a proponent of them. They are not so much a "get rich quick" scheme, but they do conform to strategies related to "slow and steady wins the race." There are total market funds out there, as well as the usual S&P 500 and S&P 100 funds. But there are also large funds that "mirror" the Russell 2000 (that include smaller exchange-listed firms) and "sector" funds. So, while the bulk of an index-based account might lean heavily towards broader market measures, the presence of a sector or "small-cap" fund can often provide a serious run-up in paper values when a Market turns upward.

      And of course, Index Options are a smart move when one is holding primarily index funds, because they can act as "insurance" to maintain 'real' value when paper losses occur, and are also so leveraged that a total loss on an index option, when the underlying Index is held, is always accompanied by a larger move upward in terms of the underlying Index, itself. They can act as insurance, to keep one's net worth steady in turbulent times (for the Market, as a whole).

  5. WSJ on possible health reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/01/05/steve-jobss-health-what-the-pancreas-has-to-do-with-weight-loss/

  6. Rest well deserved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He's busted his hump over the last few years. He deserves some time off to focus on himself and his family.

  7. i feel sorry for the guy but... by timmarhy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    .. next we are going to have a post telling us steve's stool isn't a healthy colour. seriously people, post something news worthy for once.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:i feel sorry for the guy but... by exley · · Score: 1

      Actually, it comes in a variety of colors!

      iStool: Shit different(TM).

  8. Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It is a sad day.

    6 Months = Chemo

    Here's to a long life for Mr. Jobs.

    1. Re:Cancer by thejynxed · · Score: 1, Informative

      Honestly...if he's already been treated for pancreatic cancer, his chances of living much past this year are grim....

      As of 1996-2001:

      * 7 percent of pancreas cancer cases are diagnosed while the cancer is still confined to the primary site (localized stage)

      * 26 percent of pancreas cancer cases are diagnosed after the cancer has spread to regional lymph nodes or directly beyond the primary site

      * 52 percent of pancreatic cancer cases are diagnosed after the cancer has already metastasized (distant stage)

      * 14 percent of pancreatic cancer cases had staging information that was unknown.

        The corresponding five-year relative pancreatic cancer survival rates were:

      * 16.4 percent for localized
      * 7.0 percent for regional
      * 1.8 percent for distant
      * 4.3 percent for unstaged.

      Info is only a few minor percentage points different now, according to the American Cancer Society.

      I am sorry to say it folks, but he's either had a re-occurrence or it had already spread to his lymph nodes before he was treated the first time around. Seeing as 2004 was when he got treated, 2009 is the 5-year mark. 5% survival rate at five years isn't too great. The rapid weight loss is very common with this particular form of cancer. Patrick Swayze is going through the same thing.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    2. Re:Cancer by SashaMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your data is not relevant, and Jobs and Patrick Swayze are going throgh very different things. Jobs had/has a neuroendocrine tumor, which is much more survivable than the much more common adenocarcinoma that Swayze has, which has a 5% 5-year survival rate. Jobs basically has a completely different type of cancer than you usually think of when you hear the term pancreatic cancer.

    3. Re:Cancer by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but he said "folks" which automatically makes his post a trusted authority.

    4. Re:Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what's more sad is the fact that this was an internal email to his Employees.

      It annoys me that some employee(s) would have then decided to submit a very personal email to public sites. If Steve wanted the world to know, he would have sent out a public email.

    5. Re:Cancer by brendank310 · · Score: 1

      True, but Steve Jobs wasn't in Roadhouse. That drops his odds significantly.

    6. Re:Cancer by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      What are the chances of taking a totally dead big company with no future products in hand and make it the Apple of today? :)

      Browsing the Web archive, I have seen people seriously saying "Apple can't go chapter 11 since they can't afford it."

    7. Re:Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:Cancer by LordVader717 · · Score: 1
  9. I'm buying calls in the morning. by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I expect another record earnings report for Q1, so I'm grabbing as many February $95 calls as I can afford.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  10. Wonder what affect it will have on stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    having the keynote delivered by a head in a jar?

    1. Re:Wonder what affect it will have on stock by eln · · Score: 1

      As long as we can have the jar sitting on top of a black turtleneck, maybe with the turtleneck part sort of fitting around the bottom of the jar, we should be okay.

  11. Hmm. by Toonol · · Score: 0, Troll

    SELL SELL SELL!!!

    And best wishes for Mr. Job's health in the future.

    But, SELL SELL SELL!

    1. Re:Hmm. by iluvcapra · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And I'll BUY BUY BUY tomorrow... do you seriously think anything has fundamentally changed in Apple's business? It still remains to be seen.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    2. Re:Hmm. by johnsonav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      do you seriously think anything has fundamentally changed in Apple's business?

      Stock price doesn't have anything to do with the actual fundamentals of a company, only how those fundamentals are perceived. Like it or not, Job's absence may have an effect on stock price, even if the company is run exactly the same as it would have, were he still at the helm. Perception is reality; at least in the market.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    3. Re:Hmm. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      And I'll BUY BUY BUY tomorrow... do you seriously think anything has fundamentally changed in Apple's business? It still remains to be seen.

      The reality distortion field has been compromised!

      What else do you think has been keeping the viruses at bay? Technology? NO! It was Steves' own convictions which overwhelmed the surrounding paradigm, but no more...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we actually have data from the last time Jobs left Apple. It wasn't pretty. I'm actually surprised that Apple lasted long enough for them to rehire Jobs because they were selling seriously overpriced crap.

    5. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I will SELL SELL SELL more tomorrow if you are BUYING, BUYING, BUYING.

    6. Re:Hmm. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does in the long term. Yeah, if you're day trading you care a lot about the latest Steve-news. If you're investing then you care much more about those actual fundamentals of the company.

    7. Re:Hmm. by jkoke · · Score: 1

      Immediate stock price is affected by perception, but the fundamentals drive the price over the long term. Think about this. Say Steve Jobs dies in a few months -- Apple stock tanks in the short term, but three months later, they release better than expected earnings, Macs, iPods and iPhones are still selling at a record pace. The stock will shoot up like it's the second coming. That's not to say that if SJ is gone, Apple might eventually lose market share and the stock price settle, but this immediate drop is not an indicator of anything.

    8. Re:Hmm. by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Interesting that the majority of replies agree with me, but the post was still moderated -1, troll. I think that the way slashdot moderation works, if a comment ever drops to -1, it drops off most people's view... so it sticks at that level.

    9. Re:Hmm. by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Perception is reality; at least in the market.

      Sorta, but there's a pretty good chance, as others have pointed out, that Apple will probably have a very good earnings report in the next few months. You can trade on the news, but the signal to noise ratio on this bit of information is very low. It doesn't give you a good leading indication of where Apple's business is actually going. It's not predictive in the way that something more disruptive, like iPhone sales crashing.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    10. Re:Hmm. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I'd wait a week or two. If the stock dip after 9/11 taught me anything, it's that irrational sell-offs take a little while to turn around. (it was ~2 months btw for that one, but I'm not sure how that scales to a single company.)

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  12. Soo... by denzacar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Would it be safe to say that there is a Jobs opening at Apple?

    Or would that be Steve closing?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Soo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      During his time off, he will be known as Steve Hobbies.

  13. One more thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is all just part of the build-up for what will be the most astounding corporate marketing stunt of all time: the death and resurrection of Steve Jobs.

    1. Re:One more thing... by Phoenix+Rising · · Score: 1

      If I have to buy the entire collector's comic series in order to find out which of the four Steve Jobs' is the "real" one, I'm switching to Windows!

      --
      Let us live so that when we come to die, even the undertaker will be sorry -- Mark Twain
    2. Re:One more thing... by unitron · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is all just part of the build-up for what will be the most astounding corporate marketing stunt of all time: the death and resurrection of Steve Jobs.

      So the next product announcement will be for ... the iCorpse?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:One more thing... by ozamosi · · Score: 1

      Would that be their new iResurrect product I've been reading about?

    4. Re:One more thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh thank god, I shall live to see the second coming of Jobs. Praise Jesu... I mean Steve

    5. Re:One more thing... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, the iNail is coming out this easter?

    6. Re:One more thing... by zobier · · Score: 1

      That's sooo 0's.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  14. Nah. by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If he was going for six months of chemo, he wouldn't be talking about returning in six months. More like a year. I think he's taking the leave between now and the next major event, which would be WWDC.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  15. NETCRAFT CONFIRMS IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs is dying

    you heard it here first, well, 2nd right after Netcraft

    best wishes in the next life, Steve!!

  16. On the upside... by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Apple now has the thinnest, lightest CEO on the market.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:On the upside... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is just sick... freaking hilarious... but sick. Mod up. I mean down, I mean up. I feel so guilty.

    2. Re:On the upside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Posting AC for obvious reasons:

      http://xkcd.com/527/

    3. Re:On the upside... by Sancho · · Score: 4, Informative

      Meh. XKCD did it first.
      http://xkcd.com/527/

    4. Re:On the upside... by momerath2003 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Give credit where credit is due:
      http://xkcd.com/527/

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    5. Re:On the upside... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Its from xkcd

    6. Re:On the upside... by linhares · · Score: 1

      ... Apple now has the thinnest, lightest CEO on the market.

      Yeah, right. But the battery is up to no good, and can't even be exchanged.

    7. Re:On the upside... by uranus65 · · Score: 1

      Why not bring in Woz for a while ... as ballast?

    8. Re:On the upside... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      lol, and of course the evil hat guy had to say that.. I love the attention to detail in that comic. :D

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  17. Nothing To See Here, Move Along by gustar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even with the prospect of Jobs having of an extended absence from the day-to-day at Apple I think we will see the company continue to do fine, or at least continue on their existing business path.

    While leadership is a key element of business success, so is having a well balanced team of professionals driving your development/innovation teams.

    I have to image Apple has this balance in their organization.

    1. Re:Nothing To See Here, Move Along by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Even with the prospect of Jobs having of an extended absence from the day-to-day at Apple I think we will see the company continue to do fine, or at least continue on their existing business path.

      As long as there is not a cadre of MBA's ready to come in and cut costs. Really, how many companies who have sold a premium product have we seen destroyed by excessive cost cutting, resulting in the premium nature of the products being lost, further resulting in the premium price of the products (and hence profits) being lost?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Nothing To See Here, Move Along by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but I wish someone would do whatever you just said to your sentence.

  18. Re:LOL, No... by Rayban · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He still built up a ton of excitement around all of the Apple products. MP3 players were drab and virtually useless before the iPod - a few years later everyone had one.

    Apple products have influenced design across the hardware and software landscape (for the better IMHO).

    Without the iPhone, there just wouldn't be any exciting phones out right now. It changed the playing field and helped bring us the G1 and Palm Pre.

    --
    æeee!
  19. Life after Steve by geekmux · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Jobs said he had a hormone deficiency that had caused him to dramatically lose weight..."

    In related news...

    Shareholders show that a Common Sense Deficiency(CSD) causes them to dramatically lose faith in Apple whenever the mere thought of their beloved Steve leaving in any way, shape, or form is mentioned...

    1. Re:Life after Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While other employees are perfectly capable of emulating Steve's design sense, management techniques and perfectionism, he is, unfortunately, the only one who can maintain the Reality Distortion Field.

      Just wait til he dies and everyone suddenly realizes there is no iPod, just a shiny piece of plastic that vaguely reminds you of your favorite music.

    2. Re:Life after Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... wait, you're saying that when the Reality Distortion Field (RDF) starts to fail due to Jobs's failing health, there's a common sense deficiency?

    3. Re:Life after Steve by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Just have faith that there is a doppelganger Steve held in reserve (a la Kagemusha) who can maintain the pretense of his superficial personality quirks while the bees at Apple keep on producing product in demand.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    4. Re:Life after Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, last time he left Apple it almost got extinct, so they should be worried...

    5. Re:Life after Steve by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I really thought all these big companies, finance guys had a better thinking/logic than our average "OMG Steve is dying!!!!" Web 2.0 guy.

      Of course, when a financial news legend like CNBC has become a news outlet for semi-trolling mac blogs or nameless sources, it will happen. What happened to fact checking etc.?

      It is like, 32.000 employees of Apple are there to make coffee to Steve Jobs while he writes OS X 10.6 and iLife 10 (X?) on XCode and design a new product on AutoCAD :)

    6. Re:Life after Steve by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Well, last time he left Apple it almost got extinct, so they should be worried...

      Cripes, with all the Jedi-like wizardry surrounding Master Jobs, the next damn product they should be developing is iYoda. Maybe then the company will stand a chance in hell when/if Steve leaves suddenly. A new young leader we apparently need...

    7. Re:Life after Steve by Raffaello · · Score: 1

      Noah Wylie is already being prepped for the role.

  20. Short Sell AAPL by teshuvah · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Man, I would love to short sell about $20,000 worth of AAPL tomorrow.

    1. Re:Short Sell AAPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late. The stock is already trading, post announcement, around $79.75, in the after markets.

    2. Re:Short Sell AAPL by OnlineAlias · · Score: 1

      Tell you what, I'll let you short my real ones tomorrow after my having shorting them today. I could use the extra cabbage.

      That's the thing about the stock market, by the time you think you know something, it's already too late...

      After Hours: 79.61 -5.72 (-6.70%)

    3. Re:Short Sell AAPL by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Already too late, and usually an excellent time to do exactly the opposite of what you thought you should do.

    4. Re:Short Sell AAPL by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      You know, when you sell them, you sell them to someone buying them. Think a second about why that guy/institution buys that stock of yours.

  21. Good thing Pixar bought Apple by Bemopolis · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now they can get ready to slide Stevie boy in the company freezer next to Walt.

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    1. Re:Good thing Pixar bought Apple by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

      Does this mean we'll have a sequel to Los Disneys : Las Apples?

      --
      Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    2. Re:Good thing Pixar bought Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that that's an urban legend, right? Walt Disney is totally dead and buried. They just "Disney-ized" his death for the kids, hence the wild tale of cryogenics.

  22. Re:What? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 0

    AIDS = Apple is doomed, surely.

  23. Re:LOL, No... by Xocet_00 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And, yeah, 'teh iPhone'. Millions of emo Starbucks drinking retards posting their unboxing vids on youtube and looking for every single possible way they can somehow work their phone into their conversations to try to make it clear just how 'special' they are.

    Fuck. This is totally why I hide my iPhone from view when I'm on the bus or in public in general. It was the best, cheapest option (seriously) for me to get an effective browsing/email client on the road (BBs are crazily expensive and the iPhone 3G was having a launch sale) but I'm deeply embarassed to be seen with it.

    It's a great device. It does what I need it to do. I'm happy I own it. I just wish nobody else knew that I own it.

  24. Good luck, Mr. Jobs by AlpineR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish him well. As someone who had to retire at age 33 to fight cancer, I know how discouraging it is to have your body spoil what your brain wants to do. But I also found that giving up the full-time job really did improve my health and led to greater productivity in my remaining activities.

    1. Re:Good luck, Mr. Jobs by bryan1945 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hope you beat it, or already have. Had to watch my uncle waste away. Good luck to you and your family.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  25. The best luck for him by cuby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He was already missed before even leaving, as recent speculation testifies.

    --
    Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
  26. Re:LOL, No... by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Funny

    Inverse snob.

  27. Python by GFree678 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oblig.:

    The Dead Collector: Bring out yer dead.

    [a man puts a body on the cart]

    Large Man with Dead Body: Here's one.
    The Dead Collector: That'll be ninepence.
    Steve Jobs: I'm not dead.
    The Dead Collector: What?
    Large Man with Dead Body: Nothing. There's your ninepence.
    Steve Jobs: I'm not dead.
    The Dead Collector: 'Ere, he says he's not dead.
    Large Man with Dead Body: Yes he is.
    Steve Jobs: I'm not.
    The Dead Collector: He isn't.
    Large Man with Dead Body: Well, he will be soon, he's very ill.
    Steve Jobs: I'm getting better.
    Large Man with Dead Body: No you're not, you'll be stone dead in a moment.
    The Dead Collector: Well, I can't take him like that. It's against regulations.
    Steve Jobs: I don't want to go on the cart.
    Large Man with Dead Body: Oh, don't be such a baby.
    The Dead Collector: I can't take him.
    Steve Jobs: I feel fine.
    Large Man with Dead Body: Oh, do me a favor.
    The Dead Collector: I can't.
    Large Man with Dead Body: Well, can you hang around for a couple of minutes? He won't be long.
    The Dead Collector: I promised I'd be at the Robinsons'. They've lost nine today.
    Large Man with Dead Body: Well, when's your next round?
    The Dead Collector: Thursday.
    Steve Jobs: I think I'll go for a walk.
    Large Man with Dead Body: You're not fooling anyone, you know. Isn't there anything you could do?
    Steve Jobs: I feel happy. I feel happy.

    [the Dead Collector glances up and down the street furtively, then silences Jobs with his a whack of his club]

    Large Man with Dead Body: Ah, thank you very much.
    The Dead Collector: Not at all. See you on Thursday.
    Large Man with Dead Body: Right. ...

    Too soon?

    1. Re:Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, I think the problem is that you're extremely late with that joke, and the circumstances don't actually add enough to it to justify including the entire sketch.

    2. Re:Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh oh! Now do John McCain...

  28. Re:Pancreatic Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Learn to discriminate your pancreatic cancers. Adenocarcinoma has a 5% survival rate. Steve had a islet cell neuroendocrine tumor, which has a 50 to 75% 5 year survival.

  29. Seems like a good idea by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems like a good idea for Steve to take some time. It gives him a chance to see how well Cook handles the shop when no major new products are shipping and seems to indicate that he is at least semi-comfortable that he's got the right management to oversee day-to-day operations, and gives them a chance to fine-tune anything should he want to retire or passes away pre-maturely. As die-hard as he is, I can't imagine him doing the keynotes if he is too frail (physically) to "wow" the crowd.

    Since the major aesthetic overhall in the iMac, MBP and MB lines in the past year or two, and OS X 10.6 shaping up to be a smaller update (aesthetically and technically) to 10.5 than the 10.4->10.5 jump was; it doesn't appear that there is going to be much "new business" from now to then. Maybe some hardware line updates to faster chips, and some 10.5.x updates; but nothing major. I'd imagine 10.6 won't even ship until summer; just in time for the WWDC in June.

    --
    Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
    1. Re:Seems like a good idea by wish+bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Steve may be a mirco-managing megalomanic, but he also has some REALLY good people working at Apple who don't receive wider recognition (much).

      For all we know, all those annoying things about Apple (eg - lack of headless iMac, lack of Firewire on Macbooks, crappy iLife feature refreshes...) might go away with Steve's absence too.

      Those guys working under Steve might be getting their chance to shine.

      --
      lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
    2. Re:Seems like a good idea by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      There's something to be said for this.

      Way back when, Steve envisioned Macintosh as an all-in-one device. And, believe it or not, sales were well below what Apple projected them to be. After Steve left and Sculley brought in Gassée, that's when you started seeing Macs where mere mortals could upgrade the memory, Macs with slots, external displays, etc. And that's when Mac sales took off.

      So, maybe it is time for Steve to go away again and for someone to come along who'll listen when customers say, "We'd love to buy this..."

    3. Re:Seems like a good idea by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Trying to find another someone else who can run Apple in the same way as Steve Jobs might not be an easy task, but as long the person who will eventually replace him understands the keys to Apple's new found success then maybe that will be enough. For me what I see from Apple:
        - constant innovation
        - pushing the boundaries
        - quality industrial design and engineering
        - simplicity of use, especially when it comes to complex tasks
        - beauty in design, without being tacky
        - getting the technology right
        - getting employees to give their best
        - don't get smug - getting smug was what hurt Apple when Windows 95 came out

      Sure I can't expect a perfect track record, but as long as these items are part of the check list and being attained most of the time, then that's all that matters.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  30. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's a great device. It does what I need it to do. I'm happy I own it. I just wish nobody else knew that I own it."

    Get over yourself. It's a phone. Do you really worry about what other people so much that you are embarrassed that your phone is shiny and white?

  31. I meant, good thing Disney bought Pixar by Bemopolis · · Score: 3, Funny

    I should stop drinking at work.

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  32. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could try my approach, and just not give a crap what other people think of your choice of cellular telephones.

    But I guess the lack of drama rules that option out, huh.

  33. Re:What? by EkriirkE · · Score: 0

    whoosh

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  34. xkcd comic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://xkcd.com/527/

  35. Re:LOL, No... by Xocet_00 · · Score: 0

    No, I'm embarrassed that it's shiny and black.

    Seriously though, no, I'm not hugely concerned. That said, the iPhone is, at least in my area, associated with a particularly type of person (i.e. the type who works it into conversation for no reason other than to brag). I'd rather not be thought of that way. Excuse me.

  36. Re:What? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    Well, now you have. A tag is as a reliable rumor as anything else.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  37. What's changed? by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And I'll BUY BUY BUY tomorrow... do you seriously think anything has fundamentally changed in Apple's business? It still remains to be seen.

    Well, yeah, something fundamental has changed. Steve Jobs won't be there. Look at Apple's history. That makes all the difference in the world.

    When the guy does die... whenever that is... it's going to be earth shattering in the tech sector, and you'll never see anything like it in this business again. Jobs is the Elvis of the computing business. When he goes, you'll see people weeping on TV. Silly or not, that's the way it will be. And the endless speculation for months (and years) will be "Can Apple survive without Steve Jobs?".

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:What's changed? by jalefkowit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Steve Jobs won't be there. Look at Apple's history. That makes all the difference in the world.

      Jobs has had more than a decade with which to root out the nonperformers at Apple and replace them with performers. Performers can carry on in the boss' absence. Nonperformers cannot.

      If over all that time he did nothing to replace the people who couldn't run Apple with people who could, he's not as good a CEO as we all thought.

    2. Re:What's changed? by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Good" leadership requires an absence of other leadership. Trust me, there is no one else at that company right now who can do Steve's job. He would have gotten rid of them long ago. The fact that the company is running so well, after completely reinventing it's business, tells the story. Another person like Steve would have torn the company apart.

      They will turn the company over to a big-name, high-priced CEO and the company will live or die based on the ability of the board to select the right person (random chance).

    3. Re:What's changed? by linhares · · Score: 1

      They will turn the company over to a big-name, high-priced CEO and the company will live or die based on the ability of the board to select the right person (random chance).

      Yeah; bring on the pepsi cola guys!!!!

    4. Re:What's changed? by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Jobs is the Elvis of the computing business.

      Yes. And when Jobs passes away, Apple will die too, just like rock 'n' roll died with Elvis.

      Oh wait.

  38. Wow... by Idiomatick · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm going to make a /. post next time Michael Morhaime (head of Blizzard) is hung over. Honestly, what other CEOs get this cult level of worship?

    1. Re:Wow... by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm going to make a /. post next time Michael Morhaime (head of Blizzard) is hung over. Honestly, what other CEOs get this cult level of worship?

      What other CEOs have personally made noticeable changes to the world?

      Jobs was indirectly responsible for the IBM PC, which is what "PC compatible" computers were imitations of. IBM created the PC in response to the threat they felt from Apple.

      Jobs was responsible for bringing a lot of the ideas from Xerox PARC to a mainstream market, something Xerox couldn't have done. Most people don't realize that Apple pioneered the "noun, then verb" paradigm we're all familiar with in GUIs (select an icon, then choose something to do with it); Xerox's GUI required the user to select an action first, before selecting the item upon which to perform it. This makes sense if you're used to a command line, but it's less intuitive to the masses.

      After leaving Apple, Jobs created NeXT, which was the source of much of what became Mac OS X. Microsoft has been incorporating a lot of Apple's ideas into Vista and Windows 7.

      Jobs bought Pixar from George Lucas, and was at the helm during the creation of the first feature film ever to be entirely computer animated. Jobs now sits on the board of directors of Disney and owns 7% of the company. RenderMan has become an industry standard.

      This isn't worship; Jobs has been genuinely influential in a lot of areas. The fact that you (correctly) felt the need to add "(head of Blizzard)" after Morhaime's name is why he doesn't get this kind of attention. Sure, Blizzard has had a significant impact on computer gaming... but what else has he done?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Wow... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Hes not dead yet jim.
      Anyways i was more reffering to http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/07/1511242 http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/06/1840225 http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/05/1429210 http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/01/210226
       
      Talking about Job's last keynote and retirement. Seems excessive to have 4 topics on this in 14 days. Maybe it is just /. reposts.

    3. Re:Wow... by Xest · · Score: 1

      "What other CEOs have personally made noticeable changes to the world?"

      Warren Buffet, Larry Page, Fred Smith, Lakshmi Mittal, George David, Richard Fuld, Jeffrey Immelt, Henning Kagermann, Alan Lafley, James Sinegal, Michael Dell, Satoru Iwata, Rupert Murdoch, Steven Reinemund, Larry Fink, Peter Rose, Terry Leahy, Eric Schmidt, Charlie Ergen, Bill Gates...

      Need I go on?

      "This isn't worship"

      You indirectly suggested Steve Jobs is the only CEO who has personally made noticable changes to the world. It's hard to imagine how that could be anything other than worship.

      No doubt, Jobs has done an amazing Job, but he's certainly not unique. Some of the names above changed it for the good, some for the worse, but Jobs sits at neither end of the scale. Whilst he may not be as evil as Murdoch he's also not been the philanthropist with his fortunes that Bill Gates has either. If you go beyond CEOs he's even less of a rarity- what about Tim Berners-Lee, what about countless political leaders and the like for example?

      I know it's nice for some Apple fans to take things a little to the extreme and suggest Jobs really is Jesus, but seriously? Do you really believe Jobs is so special he's changed the world more so then many other CEOs or people?

      I'd have more respect for the guy if him and Apple were a little more philathropic.

      Job's achievements should be recognised for what they are- impressive achievements as a leader in the technology industry, but to blow it up to be more than that, to suggest that he stands out as entirely unique in the scale of his achievements or that he's even necessarily a nice man is ignorant of the facts.

    4. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that your doorbell I just heard?

      I believe Steve is coming round with his strap-on member to give you your regular seeing to - so please assume the position.

    5. Re:Wow... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually the early days of Apple are rather revisionistic. While Apple cannot be denied to have influenced the IBM PC somewhat, I personally do not think Apple has invented the personal computer which became the IBM PC, Apple was sort of third behind Commodore and Radio Shack also in the timeline (I do not mention the Altair here which was just an important footnote in history albeit being the first)

      It is rather clear that IBM took a serious lesson from the early Commodores and TRS models... more than it did from Apple!

    6. Re:Wow... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      You indirectly suggested Steve Jobs is the only CEO who has personally made noticable changes to the world. It's hard to imagine how that could be anything other than worship.

      Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that Jobs is the only one, merely that he is one of them.

      I know it's nice for some Apple fans to take things a little to the extreme and suggest Jobs really is Jesus, but seriously? Do you really believe Jobs is so special he's changed the world more so then many other CEOs or people?

      More than any other CEOs or people, no, of course not. More than many CEOs, yes, absolutely - that's the point I was trying to make.

      I'd have more respect for the guy if him and Apple were a little more philathropic.

      That would be nice. Hopefully he'll start shifting in that direction.

      Job's achievements should be recognised for what they are- impressive achievements as a leader in the technology industry, but to blow it up to be more than that, to suggest that he stands out as entirely unique in the scale of his achievements or that he's even necessarily a nice man is ignorant of the facts.

      Again, I didn't mean to imply that he's unique in this respect, only that he should indeed be recognized for his achievements. My point was merely that Jobs taking a 6-month leave of absence for health reasons is significant and notable, which is why we're discussing it here. The CEO of Blizzard getting a hangover is not.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    7. Re:Wow... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Actually the early days of Apple are rather revisionistic. While Apple cannot be denied to have influenced the IBM PC somewhat, I personally do not think Apple has invented the personal computer which became the IBM PC, Apple was sort of third behind Commodore and Radio Shack also in the timeline (I do not mention the Altair here which was just an important footnote in history albeit being the first)

      It is rather clear that IBM took a serious lesson from the early Commodores and TRS models... more than it did from Apple!

      Wikipedia does seem to back you up; they also credit the Atari 400 and 800. I wonder where I got the idea that it was mostly Apple that IBM was afraid of.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    8. Re:Wow... by overunderunderdone · · Score: 1

      Ironically I think looking at your list you've actually inspired a more Jobs fanboi attitude than I personally had before. I don't think anyone else on that list has had quite the wide range of influence and/or long duration of influence as Jobs. A few on the list have influence only because they of their business acumen and success in competing well in established markets. Michael Dell for instance has very little influence of interest to me (or most nerds) because it has nothing to do with how computers work, or what they're used for, he's just sold a bunch of them. His few innovations have to do with inventory management & retailing. Important but rather boring work: assembling other peoples technologies into a box for sale, and if we're better at managing inventory we can sell them for less than the next guy selling identical boxes... woohoo!!! THAT'S the guy I want to read about on Slashdot.

      Job's influence is more interesting because it isn't from primarily from his business success but from being the first one to identify new technologies as important and viable. To be the first one to do new things in a big enough way to have a wide impact. Other people may have invented or done the early pioneering of any/all of the innovations we associate with Apple or Jobs but in each case it was Jobs who was the first to take those innovations and introduce them to the broader word. The PC, the GUI, the MP3 player, Computer animated films, etc. That plus a colorful personality and an enormous ego that ensures a lot of drama in the process and sure, he merits the constant attention he gets on slashdot.

      Warren Buffet, Murdoch etc. are as influential in their way as Jobs is but you might have noticed a slight bias on this site towards news about computers and technology as opposed to major market newspaper circulation numbers or stock valuations. Others on the list are known for new, innovative, influential technologies we're all interested in. Though not many have been doing so repeatedly for over 30 years. Tim Berners Lee for instance had one huge breakthrough innovation that changed the world. It's Individually more impressive than anything Steve Jobs ever personally did because it was his sole invention whereas Jobs just identifies such inventions and markets them to the world. On the other hand Jobs has had his more modest involvement in more such innovations. Berners Lee gets his fair amount of mention here but Jobs gets more press because he's still doing stuff that influences the technologies we're using. Berners Lee, not quite as much or as colorfully. (As an interesting aside Berners Lee used Objective-C on a NeXT machine to write the first web server & client... Not to in any way credit Steve Jobs but funny to note in such a conversation)

    9. Re:Wow... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      The documentation pirates of silicon valley which got many things wrong timewise :-)

  39. Cancer sucks by groovyPost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll bet there will be no returning for Jobs. Sad news but a lesson to all. A company should never be about "A" person. None of us are eternal.

    1. Re:Cancer sucks by jalefkowit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A company should never be about "A" person. None of us are eternal.

      Story goes that Charles de Gaulle, who was often referred to as France's "indispensable man" due to his huge influence in setting that nation's course after the Nazi conquest, was asked what he thought of that title.

      His response: "The graveyards are full of indispensable men."

    2. Re:Cancer sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A company should never be about "A" person. None of us are eternal.

      None of us *is* eternal. (You'll thank me in a later life).

    3. Re:Cancer sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The board should be Razed for the POOR POOR handling of this. It could not have been handled in a worse fashion (IMO). What were they thinking?

      Bill has some spare time now..... I wonder if he's interested. (JOKING!! - I promise!!!!)

    4. Re:Cancer sucks by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      As a cancer survivor who was told I had 3-5 years to live 6 years ago (and am doing fine) - you never know.

    5. Re:Cancer sucks by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Sure, mankind will continue. Apple Computer, on the other hand... we shall see.

    6. Re:Cancer sucks by mindwanderer · · Score: 1

      I heard they're working on a device called the iBrain.

      --
      :wq
    7. Re:Cancer sucks by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      As a cancer survivor who was told I had 3-5 years to live 6 years ago (and am doing fine) - you never know.

      I want to say, "Congratulations" and believe me, I mean it.

      15 years ago, after 6 weeks in ICU and a couple more months upstairs, I was told I would either lose my right leg, never walk unassisted if I saved it, and had 0 chance of ever regaining any kidney function whatsoever.

      Upon release I walked out of the hospital, with kidneys that were at 100% healthy function, and a year later a complete physical said that all of my internal organs were in the condition of a very healthy man, 15 years my junior.

      A positive attitude isn't just a "good idea" it is crucial. In 5 weeks my chemo comes to and end (necessitated as a result of blood transfusions in the same Hospital where I was supposedly losing my leg and had forever-dead kidneys). A 48 week treatment. The actual virus that necessitated it? Undetectable using state-of-the-art blood assay tests, since week #4.

      I did not "beat" any of this, unassisted. That's a fact. After 8 weeks inside, and having shrinks try to convince me to "accept" the inevitability of every other day dialysis, I got a phone call from a dear friend in Ontario. He told me: "Your kidneys are going to be fine, and you aren't losing your leg, you'll walk out of there, soon." When I heard that, I cried, which was odd, because I was being fed intravenously and lacked even enough moisture to lubricate my eyeballs. Upon hanging up I had an urge to urinate, and did, a tablespoon or two, for the first time in 8 weeks and 3 days.

      The doctors were too lame to tell me it was a miracle, or to admit they were dead wrong, in person. I didn't really care about that, anyway. I advise people, if you have a friend or person in a hospital, get in touch with your feelings, and make a call. Because you never know what's possible, and the doctors, because they think "they know" have even less of an idea.

    8. Re:Cancer sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks so much for sharing this.

  40. Anonymous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt from Network World

    Oh come on, coondoggie, don't be so modest!

  41. Get Well Soon by Gricey · · Score: 2

    Regardless of the trolling and fanboyism, I for one would like to wish him well and hope he gets better in due time. Enjoy your rest, Steve, and get well soon!

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.
  42. Re:What? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Look, this is Jobs, so it's not AIDS, it's iAIDS. If he's got cancer, it will be iCancer or iMalignancy. I'm really quite worried that he might have iSyphillis or iLeukemia. Get better soon, iJobs!

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  43. Then you're a FOOL FOOL FOOL by GuloGulo · · Score: 1

    And not the kind from Motley Fool either.

    "AAPL
    85.33 -2.38 (-2.71%) Jan 14 4:00pm ET
    Open: 86.24
    High: 87.25
    Low: 84.67
                              Volume: 37,805,239
    Avg Vol: 31,669,000
    Mkt Cap: 75.90B

    After Hours: 80.00 -5.33 (-6.25%) Jan 14 6:24pm ET"

    The after hours drop is said to be directly attributed to Jobs health, according to pundits.

    I am not a pundit, but I agree with their assessment.

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
    1. Re:Then you're a FOOL FOOL FOOL by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      How does that make him a fool? Looks like he's going to get a nice 6-10% discount on the Apple stock he buys tomorrow.

      Personally, I'll probably give it a week to see how bad a hit it takes, THEN buy.

    2. Re:Then you're a FOOL FOOL FOOL by GuloGulo · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I'll probably give it a week to see how bad a hit it takes, THEN buy."

      He said he'd be buying ,tomorrow.

      Perhaps if you consider EXACTLY what was said, you'd realize you're making my point.

      And I agree with you, I wouldn't buy TOMORROW, I'd wait a few days.

      --
      "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
    3. Re:Then you're a FOOL FOOL FOOL by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Buying tomorrow he stands a good chance of making a nice profit. Historically Steve health scares cause a one or two day 10% dip in Apple's stock price, then a recovery. I'm probably going to lose out by waiting a week.

      He's got the guts to make a slightly riskier investment, but he's not doing anything foolish. Foolish would be selling tomorrow.

    4. Re:Then you're a FOOL FOOL FOOL by GuloGulo · · Score: 1

      "Buying tomorrow he stands a good chance of giving away a nice piece of profit"

      FYP.

      "He's got the guts to make a slightly riskier investment, but he's not doing anything foolish"

      It's not going to rebound immediately, so yes he is.

      And honestly, I don't care what you think about it, I'm right and I know it.

      --
      "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
    5. Re:Then you're a FOOL FOOL FOOL by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      The after hours drop is said to be directly attributed to Jobs health

      Let me point something out. How the market opens tomorrow is based far more on overnight S&P 500 futures activity in Asia (while we're sleeping, or up all night coding, in the US). And "after hours" trading is almost always revolving around lower volume, in other words "thin" trading, so the result is much larger volatility in the bid/ask spread and the pricing. If Wall Street opens with a hefty order imbalance for Apple (more 'sell' offers than 'buy' bids) that might be a bit spooky. But "after hours"? These aren't the players, at all.

      Anybody tempted to make market offers to sell Apple, based on 'after hours' activity, needs to get a grip.

    6. Re:Then you're a FOOL FOOL FOOL by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      And honestly, I don't care what you think about it, I'm right and I know it.

      Is your power to predict the future fueled by your arrogance? Cause if so, I'm listening to you from now on.

    7. Re:Then you're a FOOL FOOL FOOL by GuloGulo · · Score: 1

      "And honestly, I don't care what you think about it"

      Learn to read before you post.

      You'll save yourself time and embarrasment.

      --
      "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
  44. Simple Advice by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    For Mr. Jobs, the advice is simple. An Apple a day is what you need to keep the doctor away.

    Then who is going to take care of him?

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    1. Re:Simple Advice by iocat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Isn't Steve Jobs vegan? Maybe he should try eating a steak or some fries. I still remember when my anemic, scrawny, vegetarian girlfriend left the doctor and came home crying becuase the doctor told her "You need to start eating animal protein, you're anemic and you're not paying enough attention to your diet to maintain a vegetarian lifestyle." He also told her to put salt on all her food to increase her blood pressure, and advised her to eat red meat if she could.

      Man, how I wanted to go that salt-and-red-meat-perscribing doctor! Anyway now she eats hamburgers. Everyone won.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    2. Re:Simple Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still remember when my anemic, scrawny, vegetarian girlfriend left the doctor and came home crying becuase the doctor told her "You need to start eating animal protein, you're anemic and you're not paying enough attention to your diet to maintain a vegetarian lifestyle."

      Instead of eating animal protein, couldn't she have just taken the doctor's advice and just pay more attention to her diet?

    3. Re:Simple Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, fries are vegan you stupid bitch. and that doctor is a moron for suggesting animal protein but i can already see you made up your mind as to what works. just another stupid american thinking big macs are real food.

    4. Re:Simple Advice by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      couldn't she have just taken the doctor's advice and just pay more attention to her diet?

      Of course, but that would have taken brains and some effort, which she and her boyfriend, by the sound of it, were lacking. If she wants her risk factor for several cancers (besides the obvious colon and gastrointestinal types) including breast and uterine to rise by a factor of 4-5, Burger King can have her.

    5. Re:Simple Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, boil my fries in liquid bacon you twat.

    6. Re:Simple Advice by swb · · Score: 1

      Maybe she should have sucked a little more cock.

  45. Re:LOL, No... by donstenk · · Score: 1

    I sympathize with you, it's hard for a nerd to own fashion statement.

    There are older phones on the market (Nokia's with Opera for example) that would probably suit you better and save you money. But you couldn't resist, could you? And now all you can do is play it down; the ultimate snob.

    --
    Dennis Onstenk
  46. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without the iPhone, there just wouldn't be any exciting phones out right now. It changed the playing field and helped bring us the G1 and Palm Pre.

    Does time flow backwards for Apple fanboys whenever it's convenient? Quoth Wikipedia:

    Apple announced the iPhone on January 9, 2007.

    In July 2005, Google acquired Android, Inc., a small startup company based in Palo Alto, CA.

  47. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike you, perhaps?

  48. A "hormone imbalance?" O rly! by David+Gerard · · Score: 0

    Apple chief executive Steve Jobs, 53, announced Monday he was being treated for a "hormone imbalance" but would remain head of the company.

    "I found myself unable to give the Macworld keynote," said Jobs, "but my truly spectacular rack will be well worth the hormonal rages. It's like six months of PMS, though my engineers will tell you thereâ(TM)s hardly a difference."

    The keynote, presented by Pamela Anderson and Jenna Jameson, introduced the new iKini and iFront lingerie range, in signature translucent white, with eight gigabytes of music storage and 3G phone connectivity. "Left one for signal strength, right one for network."

    Jobs noted that his decision not to give the Macworld keynote had set off a "flurry of rumors about my health, with some even publishing stories of me on my deathbed." To restore investor confidence, he has been fitted with a full set of cybernetic implants providing full live data on his bodily functions, broadcast in sideband data on the Disney Channel and downloadable daily on iTunes.

    Bill Gates pooh-poohed the iFront range, offering his new Zunewear "Carrot" Macho Dude-Pants, which would make you look better "every day of the year" (except December 31st) and "show off your Ballmers like never before. DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! I'M A PEE-CEEEE!"

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:A "hormone imbalance?" O rly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an incredibly lame troll from a lowid.

    2. Re:A "hormone imbalance?" O rly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These "essays" you write on the story du jour and then paste to Slashdot are becoming tiresome. Why don't you find another, more constructive way to publicize your blog?

  49. afterhours by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Apple dipped 10% in afterhours. But now it's back up from that to just -6%.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:afterhours by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 0, Redundant

      so if the market that AAPL is traded in is closed.... how is there after hours trading? O_o

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    2. Re:afterhours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that was a rhetorical question, otherwise, you know the drill.

    3. Re:afterhours by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      The market has after hours trading.

  50. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and helped bring us the G1 and Palm Pre.

    Thanks for nothing, Steve.

  51. Scotty!... by simaolation · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...We need MORE POWER to the REALITY DISTORTION FIELD, now!

  52. Re:LOL, No... by arkhan_jg · · Score: 0

    mp3 players might have been drab before the iPod, but they were certainly far from useless. I had two different sd-card based mp3 players years before the iPod launched, and they both worked perfectly well for playing mp3s I ripped from my CD collection.

    I think penny-arcade said it best when the iPod first launched.

    as for the iPhone... has it got cut and paste yet? Can I use it with a carrier of my choice without having to break the DRM, or avoid pay through the nose for the data plan? Can I download and install my own apps? Or is it just a pretty, expensive, show-off chunk of easily scratched plastic?

    There were plenty of great phones out before the iPhone, and there'll be plenty after it - just look at the stuff you can get outside the US.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  53. As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by GuloGulo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On a different note, this is a sad day for those owning AAPL shares - expect them to plunge even further than they have over the past year.

    No.

    If the company is sound, this will be a short term drop follwed by a recovery. If you own shares, and think AAPL is sound without Jobs, then selling makes no sense. Instead, you should be buying the discounted shares in anticipation of a recovery, which is what strong companies do.

    On the other hand, if you think AAPL is not strong without Jobs, then WTF were you doing buying AAPL in the first place?

    In short, you are making the same mistake all amateurs make.

    And no, I'm not a pro, but this point has been emphasized enough, and proven accurate enough, that I take it as correct.

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
    1. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Arthur+B. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also AAPL is good to own in a recession.

      Imagine the total demand for computers shrink 10%.
      If you're Dell, you car a lot.
      If you're Apple, you can still double your sales, you simply grow in market share.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    2. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except for that minor detail that you sell a premium good that people can afford less and less.

    3. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am in the market and write trading systems, and could not have said it better myself.

      The thing about Steve Jobs and these sorts of leaders is when to let go. Lou Gerstner brought back IBM from the dead. Then he let go. IBM is still alive and kicking.

      Nokia's past CEO made Nokia what it was and then he let go. Nokia is still alive and kicking.

      Microsoft is an example of how one half let's go and the other half does not. I am actually much more pessimistic with Microsoft than Apple.

      In the past Apple lacked execution. They had great ideas, but poor execution. Now Apple has execution, and it is NOT STEVE JOBS that did the execution. Think about it, how well did Apple execute with Steve Jobs previously? Or how about Next? NOT AT ALL! What was different this time is that Steve Jobs built a team...

      Ideas are a dime a dozen. The ability to execute on the idea is what makes the difference... And that Apple can do...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    4. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by cpm80 · · Score: 1

      People aren't spending money unless they have to (check the government's December retail sales report if you don't believe me). When people are forced to buy a new computer do you think they'll buy a $700 Dell or a $1400 Apple when both have the exact same hardware specifications? Sure the Apple looks prettier and the OS is superior to Windows, but for $700 more? In difficult financial times the value isn't there for most people. As a result I see Apple's recent market share gains retreating rapidly as the recession lingers.

    5. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      apple computers are more luxury items then PCs. in todays economy unless you are completely screwed you really do need to have an internet connection and a computer. a cheap PC will win out every time if someone is watching their budget.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the other hand, if you think AAPL is not strong without Jobs,

      Well, I am a whiney apple fanboy, so of course I believed Apple's statements saying Jobs was in good health & thought he'd be running the company for years to come....

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    7. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew you'd show up with some vapid repsonse as soon as you were shown to be wrong.

      God you're a loser.

    8. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by arminw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...In difficult financial times the value isn't there for most people....

      Apple isn't targeting their products at people in dire financial straits, but to people who still have money. They have never sold stuff to the bottom end of the market, especially commodity items such as computers. That is why they are doing better than the other PC makers. Also, more and more people are beginning to understand that the purchase price of a computer is only a relatively small part of the total cost over the life of one. Having to dork with Windows, buy anti-malware software and being stuck with an 8 year old OS is certainly not lost on people. A smart marketing message by Apple, taking advantage of the MS VISTA debacle is also part of the equation. A Mac OS10.5 Leopard OS runs acceptably well on our old G4 Mac Mini. Getting VISTA to run on PC of equivalent age & specs is an exercise in frustration if the older software even works at all.

      That old G4, connected to a 47" LCD TV makes a fine, networked media device for movies and music.

      In the car business, Honda is an example. Their cars generally cost more to buy, but they also sell for a lot more used than some Ford or Chevy. This true of used Macs as well. Check that out on ebay if you wish.

      --
      All theory is gray
    9. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      I knew you'd show up with some vapid repsonse as soon as you were shown to be wrong.

      Shown to be wrong? I've already been proved right. Apple stocks are down 6% in after hours trading.

      You just have no sense of humour do you?

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    10. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by the_macman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really. I've found the old PPCs lack the ability to run any modern media center software. The new de facto standard for OS X is Plex and it's intel only. I'm still trying to figure out what to do with mt old G4 Dual 1ghz MDD.

    11. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Is there still an updated world community grid or folding@home client for PPC? Toss in an ATI graphics card or two and you've got a good number crunching machine. Alternately it's a good grandma computer.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    12. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by geekboy642 · · Score: 0

      I was going to comment "lolfrontrow", but a quick Google search to make sure of that revealed...Apple's a platform elitist! Only iMacs are allowed to run Front Row. And, best of all, after a clever coder cracked the controls, they sent a cease-and-desist! Jerks.
      Thankfully, there's at least two proprietary and one open-source media centers that will run on your elderly machines. Check out equinox's MediaCenter, snarb.tk's XHub, and the open-source MythTV, which runs on anything better than an 800MHZ G4.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    13. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is true, but intriguingly, Apple also sells iPhones and iPod Touches, which many people can use as substitute computers. A friend of mine got iPod Touch for his birthday and pecks out his documents with the Notes application and emails them around, instead of using a computer.

      iPhones are cheaper than any computers, even netbooks, and are not significantly different in price from other smartphones.

      Apple has a pretty big iPhone developer community now, and they are compensated pretty well through the App Store. What do those nice folks who made $100,000 do with their well-deserved gains? Buy 17" MacBook Pros, of course. Tax deductible and all that. And as lovely as a well-designed sports car, just a lot cheaper.

      The one huge advantage Apple has is that people love their products, so they will scrimp and save and suffer to buy them. For this reason, I expect them to gain market share, especially in tough times. The enthusiasts still buy, while the pragmatists stop buying. Thus, the total market shrinks but Apple's market share is likely to increase.

      D

    14. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If we think about the team here, Jony Ive can design the computers, Phil Schiller can market them and Tim Cook can make sure the financials come out all right.

      I think we will all miss Steve but Apple itself will do just fine.

      I wish Steve joy in relaxation - he has had one of the busiest lives I could ever think of - and a speedy recovery and return to the helm.

      D

    15. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Um, what? I ran Front Row just fine on my Macbook, now my Macbook Pro just fine. Minis, too.

      The only thing that's out is the Mac Pro tower.

    16. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I have Apple stock bought in 1997 (at about $4/share) and 2007 (at about $130), and I'm holding it all.

    17. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That old G4, connected to a 47" LCD TV makes a fine, networked media device for movies and music.

      Sweet! Can it handle H.264 1080P ?

    18. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by daveime · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You can gold-plate a turd, but it's still turd.

      iPhones are cheaper than any computers

      My Nokia E90 is a hell of a lot cheaper than an iPhone, and it's a damn sight closer to a computer. Can the iPod connect in SSH2 to a server on the other side of the world ? Damn, until the 2nd edition, the iPhone had trouble even making a phone call. It should have been called the iNoPhone.

      It's shiny crap for Starbucks wannabes, and let's face it, if you're prepared to pay 10 bucks for a frothy coffee, then you'll buy ANYTHING.

    19. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can the iPod connect in SSH2 to a server on the other side of the world ?

      Yes, there are 8 ssh clients currently available in the app store.

    20. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      As the CP below points out, most macs can run front row. I even have the hacked version of it running fine on my old G4 mini.

    21. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by daveime · · Score: 0

      Wonderful, could it do it 3 years ago ?

      No, that's right, the iPhone is a "recent" revolution in tech. Not like dusty old Nokia.

    22. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Retric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can the iPod connect in SSH2 to a server on the other side of the world ?

      Yes. You can SSH from the iPod touch. There are SSH clients for the iPhone for ~3$ in the app store. You can also SSH to the iPhone / iPod, but that's a separate issue.

    23. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plex is not a "de facto" standard. It is a branch of XBMC, which has a better OS X port in the main tree.

    24. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by RudeIota · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did Nokia have a multitouch screen 3 years ago? Did they have an app store? Does the N90 have a video accelerator? Does it have this.. that.. blah blah?

      Do you have a point? It's pretty easy to spin you argument around.

      As far as being 'expensive', $199 -- hell, $99 -- with a contract too much for you? I didn't realize the N90 was a free phone... Of course it isn't, even though its from 2005, refurbished and used, it's selling north of $200... STILL. The Nokia N90 MSRP was $799.

      --
      Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    25. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Funny

      A sports car? Seriously? Look man, the MacBook won't get the "transform into a vehicle" feature for at least another 20 years, and then it would probably be a lame ass Vespa or something like that.

      Then again, I'd rather not ride the XP version and crash...

    26. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true at all, I run a Mac Pro at work and it definitely has Front Row. It doesn't have the remote, but I don't need that with my bluetooth cellphone.

    27. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by dangitman · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you're Dell, you car a lot.

      Do we have to bring car analogies into everything?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    28. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by pacificleo · · Score: 0

      No Fanboy ...But N95 lets you use your own Goddamn File System

      --
      somethings are best left unsaid , I am one of those things
    29. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by pacificleo · · Score: 0
      "Let's face it, if you're prepared to pay 10 bucks for a frothy coffee, then you'll buy ANYTHING."

      You nailed it .
      ever wonder where steve called while demoing iPhone for the first time . StarBucks ...

      --
      somethings are best left unsaid , I am one of those things
    30. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by daveime · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There are SSH clients for the Nokia, that are .. get this ... FREE.

      A previous poster extolled the benefit that iPhone has an "AppStore" ... I can't see how paying through the nose for software for a device you already paid through the nose for is a "benefit".

      Still enjoy your lock in. You deserve it.

    31. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by anagama · · Score: 1

      I picked up a used iTouch. After jailbreaking, ssh works great.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    32. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2

      iPhones are cheaper than any computers, even netbooks, and are not significantly different in price from other smartphones.

      Whoa, whoa! Stop right there! My Asus EEE PC 701 4G cost a whopping 289.90€ including shipping. (Strange that the price didn't go down since I bought it spring 2008) I can now also get it "Free" with a wireless broadband connection (capped at 5G/month): 24 months x 25€ = 600€.

      An iPhone? Ha! iPhone for 0€, but a contract for 24 months at 35€ = 840€ and the data plan is just 2G/month!!!! Alas, I don't find a link to the unlocked version of the iPhone, but last time I saw one in a shop it was in the 700€ range.

      Sure, that's the national provider and they're in general a bit more expensive, but I don't expect the competition to do much better in price.

      In conclusion: netbooks are much less expensive than an iPhone. Yes, they have downsides: larger, hotspot-dependent (unless you take such a wireless package), no funky interface... However, that's about it. The more recent netbooks are between 300€ - 400€ and spec much much better than my "early-adopter" Asus.... However, in price that still beats the iPhone.

    33. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by elbobo · · Score: 1

      Still enjoy your lock in. You deserve it.

      Wow. You're a prick. And an ignorant one at that.

      There's free ssh clients in the app store. I've got a couple. They work fine.

      There's no concern about lock in either. All iPhones are unlockable, both for apps (jailbreaking the phone) and network.

      Sounds to me like you've got a bee in your bonnet. Sad.

    34. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by dwater · · Score: 1

      Never mind 'funny'. Someone please explain what it was he meant?

      Has the US turned 'car' into a verb now?

      --
      Max.
    35. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by dwater · · Score: 1

      I think the phone in question is the E90 - not the N90.

      I guess it's easy to get confused when you have more than one phone to choose from.

      --
      Max.
    36. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If the company is sound, this will be a short term drop follwed by a recovery. If you own shares, and think AAPL is sound without Jobs, then selling makes no sense. Instead, you should be buying the discounted shares in anticipation of a recovery, which is what strong companies do.

      The problem with Apple, is that the stock price is sustained by hype. Hype for cool new products. Fortunately or unfortunately for Apple, the hype is mostly generated by Steve Jobs. If he goes, the price of the company is going to drop and it won't recover unless Apple can somehow reinstate the hype.

      Aside from Jobs I suspect that the economic climate and the market oversaturation / stagnation of phones, computers, mp3 players isn't going to help the company any. Apple products have generally commanded a premium for their styling and their perceived quality over competitors, but the reality is that advantage has disappeared. Every market they compete in has many, many comparable alternatives and more often than not they are cheaper too. Even markets which are still opening up such as digital movies have many alternatives. Apple screwed up bigtime with the underpowered Apple TV and I doubt they will be able to recover sufficiently to dominate movies the way they enjoyed with music.

    37. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by elbobo · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, let me get this straight ... the only way to either unlock your phone with regards to apps or network is to do something strictly against the Terms of Service, thus invalidating your warranty.

      Nope. You're still wrong. Network unlocks are available from the networks themselves in most countries.

      Oh, and maybe you brick the thing in the process.

      Again wrong. The jailbreak and unlock processes are practically single click now, and there's next to no risk of bricking. And if you do somehow manage to brick it you can always do a restore through iTunes, even getting your stored data back in the process.

      Personally I like to use devices I have paid for in the way I choose to, not the way Steve Jobs TELLS me to ... and *I'm* the prick ?

      Yep, you're still the prick and you still have a bee in your bonnet. You're no more locked in with an iPhone than you are with any other phone. You've got issues son, and I suggest you go cry them out in private. Your whinging and wining in public is embarrassing.

    38. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      add an 'e', as in "If you are DELL, you care a lot"

    39. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by elbobo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Pathetic.

    40. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by daveime · · Score: 0

      Nonetheless, true. And apparently my orignal comment is +5 insightful. Must have hit a nerve, eh ?

    41. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by dwater · · Score: 1

      Aahhh. Thank you!

      --
      Max.
    42. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by elbobo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      A nerve with fellow crying babies like yourself.

    43. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by daveime · · Score: 1

      Okay, first a prick, and now a cry baby.

      To anyone reading the thread as a whole, I think that vast majority will form the reverse conclusion.

      Unable to come up with any pertinent arguments, resorting to the use of maybes, mostlys, and finally degrading into childish name calling, all you've proved is that the ability to post on slashdot is not directly proportional to the maturity of the poster.

      Thank you, and goodnight. You bore me.

    44. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by elbobo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Look, I'm not even reading your arguments. I stop reading each of your messages one or two sentences in.

      I've seen you and your kind around for decades (as long as I've been in this industry). Hell, you're not even unique to this industry. You're a reasonably universal phenomenon.

      Fascinating to study in psychology and sociology, but pointless to actually debate with. What's driving you is not rationality. Passion and negativity, for sure, but not rational.

      If I were to engage your arguments I'd be missing the point. And if I were to try and help you out of your fugue I'd be giving you free medical service. Sorry buddy, I'm off the clock.

    45. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by daveime · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What rationale drives you to continually post replies to me when you can't even be bothered to read the entirety of my post, Asshole. There, happy now, language you can possibly relate to ?

    46. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by elbobo · · Score: 1

      Because it amuses me, toying with emotional failures like yourself.

      There's so much misguided hate and passion going on, it's entertaining to watch. You're the flipside to the Apple fanboy, but so much darker and more disturbing.

      See, the extremes of the Apple fanboys, while sad and pathetic, at least have some basis in reality. Apple really are making the cream of tech products at the moment.

      But the anti-fanboy crowd, like yourself, you're a dark and disturbing thing. It's bitter contrarianism in the face of a reasonably undeniable reality, and at such a passionate level that hints at much darker personal issues beneath the surface. It's like watching a moving drama about family abuse or alcoholism or something.

    47. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by PhiberOptix · · Score: 1

      so does a jailbroken iphone + mobile terminal

    48. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Just for the record -- I've never paid anything close to 10 bucks for a frothy coffee at Starbucks.

      Other than that, yeah, the iPhone is shiny crap for wannabes.

    49. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 1

      You too are now grounded, gimme those smart phones right now and go to your room!

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    50. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      Fail.

      Front Row is part of the OS and works with any Mac. It's running perfectly fine on my 1st gen MacBook. In fact it's running VERY well and has been significantly updated since I first got my MacBook. So much so that I'm thinking about buying a MacMini when they do a product refresh on the line to replace my 5 year old shuttle that has media duty next to my TV.

    51. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      After coming from an HTC Apache (xv6700) on Verizon to an iPhone, I can say that I've gotten far more things to work far easier on the iPhone. Syncing makes much more sense (though I don't get why they do not have Bluetooth syncing support when every Apple computer has Bluetooth). I've already got a media remote software that works with my setup (iTunes). The Apache was just as crippled by Verizon if not more so than the iPhone is by AT&T. In fact I'd argue that at least Apple, the maker of the phone, has such tight control even in the AT&T environment, that at the least every user of an iPhone gets what Apple wants them to get instead of what AT&T wants them to get. I definitely was not getting the phone that HTC developed because of Verizon provisioning and Windows crappiness.

      The only thing my iPhone doesn't do that my Apache did is Stereo Bluetooth over A2DP. But that's not anything to brag about considering the quality of media player on the Windows Mobile device sucked and I can plug any pair of headphones (including my high quality Sennheisers) into the iPhone. I needed an adapter for the smaller plug in the HTC-Apache.

      "It just works" is still a VERY valid statement for Apple. And I haven't paid a DIME to the App store or unlocked my phone and gotten more functionality and more fun out of my iPhone in less than a month of ownership than I did for 3 years with a comparable device from Verizon.

    52. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by pacificleo · · Score: 0

      But that's illegal too

      --
      somethings are best left unsaid , I am one of those things
    53. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem, it was a tough one to crack.

    54. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by egyptiankarim · · Score: 1

      Whoa, whoa, whoa... Let's just calm this the hell down for a second.

      Vespas rock! :)

      --
      Eek!
    55. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      Sure. Install Fedora 10, and yum install boinc.

      --

      You are not the customer.

    56. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to the apple store in an open-air mall near Cleveland last night around 8pm. It was literally the only retail store I saw that had customers.

    57. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by EXTomar · · Score: 1

      Would you be happy if we "cdr Dell" instead?

    58. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shown to be wrong? I've already been proved right."

      You'd said it'd be a sad day for apple shareholders, the drop isn't what you were wrong about, read the fucking posts.

      You were wrong, and it's really fucking pathetic that you can't admit it when it's right in front of you.

      You really are one sad pathetic can't-admit-when-you're-wrong douchebag, who can't even admit he's wrong when it's been proven by a half dozen people right in fron of his face.

    59. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...Can it handle H.264 1080P...

      The desktop and the iTunes Visualizer display at 1080x1920, but I have no video material at full 1080 quality. I don't know if a blu-ray player in a fire-wire-enclosure would work. Normal DVD's played straight or converted to H.264 look very nice though. The appear to be at least as good as from the Toshiba up-converting DVD player. The 8MP pictures from my Olympus SLR look very sharp however, using iPhoto.

      --
      All theory is gray
    60. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      It's a bit of a stretch calling Apple products "luxery goods". "Premium mass-market" would be more appropriate here.
      They may be more expensive than other PCs, but the reason why Mac sales have been able to grow in recent years is that they are still affordable enough for the mass market and middle class people who are confident with their economic situation. In recent times, there have been a lot less of those people, so I see Apple products as particularly vulnerable.

    61. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      iPhones are cheaper than any computers, even netbooks, and are not significantly different in price from other smartphones.

      What the? Do I have to remind you that you spend almost two-thousand dollars over the space of two years to use an iPhone? Even compared to premium offerings, there's no way an iPhone makes more sense financially than a PC.
      And yes, they are a poor replacement. Let's not kid ourselves.

    62. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...so I see Apple products as particularly vulnerable....

      Maybe, but apparently a lot less vulnerable than the makers of bottom of the barrel computers. The people in that bottom category will try to limp along with the stuff they already have until they see evidence of an economic turn around. Also, buying a new PC with VISTA is a step DOWN, rather than an upgrade. The new bottom tier computer with VISTA doesn't work any better than the older ones with XP, but possibly worse.

      --
      All theory is gray
    63. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out what to do with mt old G4 Dual 1ghz MDD.

      My G4 mini still works for everyday web browsing/email/etc., plus it's set up as a print server and Subversion repository. It backs up my VPS across the Internet, so I have a local backup of my email and websites. Photos get dumped into it from my camera, and are then backed up (along with the music on my network) when I sync my iPod to it. My iPhone also syncs to it, grabbing podcasts, video (transcoded on one of my other computers from DVD or a MythTV recording), and subsets of music and photos.

      OTOH, the MythTV frontend doesn't work too well on it for even non-HD playback. HD? Forget it!

      Whether old hardware is still useful depends on your expectations for it. I know what the mini can handle reasonably well, and what it can't. If the mini can't handle a task, there's a homebrew Core 2 Quad box next to it that can.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    64. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Can the [iPhone] connect in SSH2 to a server on the other side of the world?

      Yes. Better yet, jailbreak it, install screen and OpenSSH on it, and use that to tunnel VNC traffic over SSH so you can also access desktops across town...or "on the other side of the world," if necessary.

      Does your E90 have a web browser that doesn't suck like most phone-based browsers? My Treo 650 certainly didn't.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    65. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I thought about this for a while and realized that your country of origin has a lot to do with this.

      Here in the USA, the iPhone costs US$200 with a two year AT&T contract extension. The monthly cost is about $20 a month more than a regular cellphone. So overall I would say I'm paying less than what I would pay for an Asus + a cellphone.

      Here, the data plan is unlimited. I mooch off of a friend's AT&T family plan because I use almost no minutes - my phone use is almost 100% data but there are some times when voice calls are vital. My bill's about $35 a month for the phone and the lowest text message plan. Google says that's about 26.75 euros.

      And of course if you don't want an iPhone you can always buy a $229 iPod Touch.

      So I stand by my message as being correct in the USA but I will admit that if charges in the US were similar to those where you live, I might well think twice.

      D

    66. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem the computer makers have right now is competing with their old products. In that sense, I see Apple having a problem with the fact that most of their users are now using newer machines thanks to the Intel switchover. I don't know any Mac users that don't have at least one Intel Mac by now, whereas a good portion of of the PC users I know are using PCs that are over 3 years old. I've always figured that Apple's sales would slow down once people were done replacing their PPC machines with Intel ones, now it could be worse if they can't convince those who have the first generations of the Intel Macs (2-3 years old) to get the latest and shiniest.

    67. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Here in the USA, the iPhone costs US$200 with a two year AT&T contract extension. The monthly cost is about $20 a month more than a regular cellphone.

      Ehm, 200$ + ( 24 * 20$ ) = 680$

      You still pay more than a netbook... A netbook is 300$ to 400$, retail, even in the US.

      I know as a fact, that what I mentioned in my original post is true for at least Belgium, France and Germany. Most likely all over Europe.

      Heck, since made the calculation for you, it's even true in the US.

    68. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      But if you want Internet access anywhere you go, even where there are no open WiFi sites, you pretty much have to pay that much no matter what device you're using.

      D

    69. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Yes, true... However, your original claim was that an iPhone is cheaper than a netbook. The thing is netbooks are complete computers and can be used without a network connection (I know, in this time and age, people won't believe me if I say that) They do come with an office suite, some games, and stuff like that...

      That an iPhone is the cheaper option when you want Internet on the go (provided by your cellphone company), I am ready to believe. However, the iPhone is useless without it. To have an iPhone to be competitive you may not have a fixed broadband connection. That's when you really save. If you have one for your other computer(s), you are not saving money. You're spending on luxury, namely Wireless Internet broadband.

      Do note that your need a computer to activate your iPhone. How are you going to do that if you don't have a computer (remember, you were saying that people would use an iPhone as a replacement for a computer. This means they do not have a computer anymore, just an iPhone). Perhaps they do it in-store for you, but I don't know.

      All in all, the iPhone is a great idea if and only if it's the only device you're going to use and your whole (and only) Internet experience relies on the wireless Internet service provided by your telecom company.

      In all other cases, the netbook is the better option, even if then you don't have Internet on the go. I have a netbook, I don't need Internet on the Go. At home, my access point does the job and on the road there are plenty of open and/or commercial hotspots. Getting a wireless data plan is next to insane in my case. I'm not going to give up my DSL for (slower) wireless "broadband".

      Now, the iPod Touch.... That's more competitive to an netbook in pure usage (pricewise and featurewise). The only problem that remains is freedom. You do whatever you want on a netbook, you don't on an iPhone/iPod Touch. Don't start about jailbreaking and stuff like that, I talk about what technically you're allowed to do. Not some hack... As others have pointed out, paying for your applications in this day and age has become strange for me. It's just a question of finding the appropriate package in my repository, and off I go. I do, however, admit that this is mainly caused by the fact that I'm a computer professional. Normal people don't "react" like that.

    70. Re:As always, amatuers like you fail at stocks by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....is competing with their old products....

      add to that the fact that a newer PC saddled with VISTA isn't that much of a step up, if not even a step backward, to the older system with XP. With new Apple systems shipping with OS10.5 there is a definite, rather substantial step up from the 3 year ago predecessors with OS10.4. Also, since all Macs have a substantially higher resale value than any other PC brands, the cash outlay an existing Mac user needs for a shiny new model is less. Beside better faster hardware, Mac up-graders also get newer software. With OSX succeeding releases always work FASTER on the same old hardware, whereas with Windows, the same older hardware gets really constipated and sluggish when trying to run new bloatware from MS. So Apple's sales outlook isn't nearly as dismal as the other computer makers. The past Christmas selling season numbers reflect this fact also.

      --
      All theory is gray
  54. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd bet you wish you and your Zune could command the same sort of customer loyalty and industry sector influence with the same small market percentages that Apple does.

    You don't have to like the man or the company, but at least give them their due.

    That's what bugs me the most about computers and Tech; the people here are just so unremittingly childish. Glad I'm getting out.

  55. Not a good time to buy. by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, you have to buy for him to be able to sell. Someone a lot smarter than you will buy from you later after Steve dies and the stock loses 9/10 of it's (nominal) value, but only if it looks like there's leadership that can allow the company continue for long enough for investors to realize they overestimated Steve's role in the company. Say 2 years from now?

    Rich people think about the day after tomorrow. Now is not a good time to buy. This stock has nowhere to go but down until at least a few months after Steve is no longer with us. Even then, it will only be worth something if they pull off a successful transition.

    1. Re:Not a good time to buy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would one only buy if it looked like Apple would have good leadership?

      Sculley's reign during the late 80s consisted of milking the Macintosh. Not building for the future mind you, but it was still a good time to own AAPL stock.

      I think a complete idiot would be capable of squeezing a few more years of profitability out of the iPod/iPhone/iTunes.

      Although your scenario would be better from the investor's point of view. It still shouldn't be that bad a gamble.

  56. Re:LOL, No... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

    It's a great device. It does what I need it to do. I'm happy I own it. I just wish nobody else knew that I own it.

    So the people who own the phone because it's trendy are just being silly, allowing their thoughts and actions to be influenced by what other people think....and yet you're deeply embarrassed to own one, and hide it when you can. Hmmm.

  57. Re:LOL, No... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let me get this straight: you let the opinions of the type of people who post semiliterate anonymous screeds on Slashdot dictate when, where, and how you use a useful piece of equipment? Wow.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  58. Do not go Gentle Into That Good Night by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Dylan Thomas

    Do not go gentle into that good night,
    Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
    Because their words had forked no lightning they
    Do not go gentle into that good night.

    Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
    Their frail deeds might have danced in a green
    bay Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
    Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
    And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
    Do not go gentle into that good night.

    Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
    Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    And you, my father, there on the sad height,
    Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
    Do not go gentle into that good night.
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Do not go Gentle Into That Good Night by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      "That's a lot of cows."

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

  59. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  60. Must be nice.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    to be able to up and take a 6 month leave of absence. Of course, his salary is only $1.00, so he's only looking at a 50 cent pay cut if he doesn't get "paid," but I'm betting his "bonuses" and stock options will all remain in full effect.

  61. Urgent Memo From Devil to G.Reaper: Pull Back NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wrong Steve you idiot! I said the one whose company makes personal computing a living hell, not the cool dude whose company gave us the MAC and the iPod!!

  62. four daughters by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Two are still minors. He will spend some time with them.

    1. Re:four daughters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is disgusting, disrespectful, and NOT FUNNY.

  63. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He still built up a ton of excrement around all of the Apple products.

    Fixed that for you

  64. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Absolute poppycock.

    "Drab and useless"...I sure hope you're not actually referring to your iPod as a fashion accessory...

    My Creative Zen 30GB (many years old) is still, to this day, absolutely useful as an mp3 player.

  65. In related news: apple stocks fell nearly 7% by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 2, Informative
  66. Re:Pancreatic Cancer by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

    This post brought to you in part by the word "House" and the letters M & D.

    --

    kurzweil_freak

    5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

    Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

  67. All part of their plan by fallenmink · · Score: 1

    This is just Apple's plan to get rid of him....again.

  68. Re:LOL, No... by defaria · · Score: 1, Troll
    I'm kind of sick of this

    MP3 players were drab and virtually useless before the iPod

    bullshit. Perhaps you saw MP3 players ad drab and useless before the iPod but I can assure you the millions of other people sure did not. And get this news, millions of people still don't use iPods nor iPhones because their MP3 players or smartphones of choice are still vastly superior to the iThings that Apple puts out. Apple makes a nice product but it's for the sheep of the world who blindly follow Apple and limit their demands to only that which Apple says they should have!

  69. Re:RIP Apple by Fred_A · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Woohoo ! No more chair throwing !

    No wait, it's the Apple guy, so no more (crap, what did he throw again ?) I'm pretty sure it was plates. Or something flat. iPods ? MacBooks ? Statements ? Pies ?
    Damn I can't place it.

    Anyway it probably won't be missed. Wait. I remember now. He didn't throw it at people. He threw it at that huge screen. No not at the screen. At something flat. Journalists ? Mac buyers ? It'll come back eventually.

    Anyway we really need this guy back. The chairs are like *really* piling up. No, not the chairs. The flat things. Anyway we've got lots of them around here. Get him back. He's the only one who can get the journalists to get the damn things off of us. Won't somebody think of *argh cough cough*

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  70. Re:Shoulda eaten more meat, Steve-o! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even healthy living can kill you I guess.

    Eat more bacon, you won't live long. but at least you can have some bacon.

  71. Re:LOL, No... by rfuilrez · · Score: 1

    Acquiring a software company, and designing a phone concept are 2 totally different things. That would be like me saying I preclude the modern fuel injected engine, because I acquired a company that makes pistons before engines had fuel injection...

    Just because they purchased a software company, has nothing to do with the hardware, or the final product.

  72. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know exactly what you mean. I bought my first Mac to run Office, Photoshop, Flash, and a full-scale *AMP stack all at once, all on one machine. (This was years ago, when WINE and its relatives were far less useful.)

    I seriously couldn't care less if the case looked like a five-year-old milk crate, or how "shiny" the GUI looks. I use it because it's a solid *nix box that also runs the desktop apps my boss wants me to use.

    There are few things more annoying than rabid Apple fanbois. Rabid Apple haters who claim that *any* Apple owner *must* be a fanboi are one of those things.

  73. Buy buy buy by Fished · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm going to buck the trend, and say "buy buy buy". Let me put it this way: on the one hand, Steve Jobs is seriously ill, and may be out of the picture. On the other hand:
    1. Apple has got the best operating system available, stable, and for the moment feature complete.
    2. The iPhone has a nice lead over the competition. The BB Storm seems to be in the process of failing to be an iPhone killer, and while its too soon to say on the Palm Pre, I do notice that they are now selling iPhone's at Walmart. That says something important about demand.
    3. iTunes store just made a major step forward that gave them feature parity with their competition, at a time when they're still ahead in market share.
    4. Apple's brand still has a lot of "shiny gloss to it
    5. Jobs going might be a *good* thing, because it might open up the path for Apple to offer OSX to other manufacturers. In the short term, this is admittedly risky, since it could cannabilize hardware sales. But, if done right... software is awesome to sell, because the marginal cost approaches zero. And let's not forget that there are a number of other products (iLife, iWork, Final Cut, ProTools, etc.) that could benefit from OSX being more widely deployed.

    I just don't see that Jobs going changes the fundamentals of the company all that much. I think Apple at the current price is a great buy, and if it tanks tomorrow, it is a great buy. Time to take some money out of bonds :)

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:Buy buy buy by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > 1. Apple has got the best operating system available, stable, and for the moment feature complete.

      I'll agree on that point. For a mass market the various Linux distros aren't playing in Apple's league. Vista is a punch line and Windows 7 is likely to be and be seen as Vista SE.

      > 2. The iPhone has a nice lead over the competition.

      Yes, but without Steve to pour the Flavoraid where will the next version come from? Cell phones have a short shelf life and the biggest feature of the i* products is Steve pitching them.

      > 3. iTunes store just made a major step forward that gave them feature parity with their competition...

      Yes, because they were forced into it. Make no mistake, Apple depended on the DRM to lock customers into an eternal stream of future iPods which keeps people using iTunes and even sells Macs. Without the locks you can buy anybody's player.

      > 4. Apple's brand still has a lot of "shiny gloss to it

      No. Steve's brand has a lot of gloss. Which is why we are having this thread in the first place. Even billg@microsoft.com didn't have that kind of star power. As Bill has backed away from Microsoft the stock has just sat there. Of course that is what it has been doing since the .bomb, just sitting there. Apple without Steve isn't much more than a design house.

      > 5. Jobs going might be a *good* thing,...

      No. So long as Steve draws breath the things you hope for will never be permitted.

      > I just don't see that Jobs going changes the fundamentals of the company all that much.

      Everyone else disagrees with you. Apple was swirling the toilet bowl when Steve came back and the assumption is that without His reality distortion field it wouldn't be three years before the Apple Death Watch started again.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:Buy buy buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeeeaaahhh... except, I went to an Apple store a day ago to purchase a laptop for my step-sister. Never having owned or widely used a Mac myself, I was in for a shock. The cheapest computer available was $1,000: those little mini-Mac boxes that don't even come with a screen or a keyboard or nothing, just hard-drive pods basically. 1 gig of RAM, yada, yada. The cheapest -laptop- was about $1600. We balked and walked out. Looking up a new Dell laptop I was able to find a decent one with a few hundred dollars in post-christmas discounts applied for $700, a full $1,000 less than the low-end Apple model. 4 gigabytes of RAM, 250 gig HDD, and with office and the extras it evens out to $1,000. After this experience I am having trouble understanding how Apple stays in business, much less prospers. More than likely their viability as a company is tied to sales of the Ipod, Itunes music, and now the Iphone. Problem comes when Apple runs out of markets to create cool things in. The low-hanging fruit is absolutely gone. Where do they go from here? Portable gaming? There's been rumblings about that. If Apple tries to take on Nintendo and create a game-system, that will be a fight worth watching. But my sense is that Nintendo will blow them out of the water. The portable-gaming seas are littered with the shredded corporate-charters of companies who tried to take on Nintendo in the portable market. You won't be able to turn the Iphone into a game system, it's can't compete with Nintendo's dedicated hardware, it ain't happenin'. And if Apple tries to create dedicated portable gaming hardware... that will be a laugh, because Apple always makes expensive hardware to make a hardware profit, which is -not- how you make it in the gaming industry. Apple has zero developer relationships and is not going to make their own games certainly. You cannot try to sell and make a large profit on the hardware of a portable gaming system, or even a console (*cough*sonyPS3*cough*) and expect to survive in that market for long. What else is left after gaming? Hell, gaming could even bring down the company if they try and fail to take on Nintendo. And imagine if they try to do that without Steve Jobs at the helm, yikes.

    3. Re:Buy buy buy by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

      You might want a disclaimer on that post so slashdot doesn't get sued to get your name, so you can in turn be sued by someone taking your advice.

      But seriously - Apple has some serious issues to overcome.

      Here is why - the iPhone, while a remarkable product needs to be revised. The hardware uses too much juice giving it a useable daily life of about 12 hours while traveling. There are a number of new phones that feature swapable batteries, and other manufacturers will likely improve their life to be competitive. i.e. Android, Pre, Storm

      Pre is showing users that they can have a slick multi application OS. A little bit of historical irony as PalmOS was originally a single application OS as well. Steve tried to tell us that running more than one app was not a feature. Personally, I feel this an incorrect philosophy, not to mention that 40 years of computing history tells us this is not how we want computers to work.

      The first generation Storm will likely be revised to be more competitve as well.

      The basic features of the iPhone need continued work - for example something as simple as searching through mail is not possible, this makes travelling on e-documents difficult, unless you made your reservations a day in advance. This is a basic feature that almost all competitors have a better solution for. It is hard to comprehend that this has not been fixed sometime in the last two years.

      The "newness" of the iPhone is starting to fade, with your Walmart example proving this is the case. Which takes us to the next thought...

      Apple needs a new "thing", but what is it? Steve's name was on the patent application for the iPhone. Is Tim going to step up and innovate the next big idea, is he going to be putting his name on the next patent?

      Ultimately this is the problem, uncertainty. If Apple does not continue to drive innovation around the iPhone or a new big idea they will flounder.

    4. Re:Buy buy buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't look very hard. The cheapest Mac laptop around Christmas was the $899 MacBook.

      Instead of just bullshitting us, why don't you just admit you hate Macs.

    5. Re:Buy buy buy by alienw · · Score: 1

      Yes, because they were forced into it. Make no mistake, Apple depended on the DRM to lock customers into an eternal stream of future iPods which keeps people using iTunes and even sells Macs. Without the locks you can buy anybody's player.

      Um, what? Last I checked, nobody even came close to the iPod in terms of overall quality, software integration, and industrial design. That's what sells players, not iTunes DRM. The Zune is fugly and has crap software and crap usability. Same goes for Sandisk. It's like comparing a Porsche to a Kia.

    6. Re:Buy buy buy by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      All of this may be true (though much is simple opinion); for the sake of argument, let's assume it is. It's still a risky business to buy Apple stock right now.

      The reality in investing is that you're not directly investing in the (perceived) knowledge that the company is going to do well -- you're investing in the perception of other investors that the company is going to do well. And by "do well," I mean "make the investors a profit." This is true of professionals and big-business funds as much as for individuals.

      For the people who spend a lot of time and effort investigating stocks they may agree that Apple is a strong company. However, that doesn't matter one lick if enough people take the "what I saw on TV" approach and only see that Apple tanked when Jobs left and is now stronger than ever before since hes come back, and then panic and sell their stocks.

      In fact, major investors should probably join in if that's what they perceive is going to happen -- you sell now, make some money, watch it tank tomorrow and then buy. (I actually think there is a way to do that without all the work--somehow with options--but I'm not a stock market guy and, really, it's also not relevant to my point.) You end up with essentially the same shares you had today but you pocket some cash in the interim. And if you really do believe it's a strong fundamental company, it should go back up a bit after the panic subsides.

      If you have any belief it's going to tank tomorrow, wait until tomorrow to invest (where "tomorrow" is "some point in the future when you think it's the bottom"). You're playing more against other investors than with/against the company you're investing in and we've seen some sizable down-turns whenever a rumor about Jobs' health surfaces--and this appears to be more than a rumor. Assuming investors are basically interested in the company's fundamentals is generally a good assumption, but you're still going to get whacked around quite a bit. Anticipating the mood swings can be as valuable as anything else.

    7. Re:Buy buy buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point 5, though I don't believe it for a moment, would be a sign that any Apple stockholder should find a sucker to unload the stock on before the value goes to zero. Seriously, people, the licensing thing has already been tried.

  74. Re:Pancreatic Cancer by tonywong · · Score: 1

    So instead of having a virtually guaranteed death sentence, Steve has a one-in-four to one-in-two chance of dying within 5 years? Still not very good odds.

  75. Information on options by KingAlanI · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those unaware...

    A put option is a guarantee for the holder of the put option to be able to sell something at a specified price.

    So, even if the price goes down, he still gets to cash in on the sell price offered by the put option.
    He could even buy new stock at the now-lowered price, and sell it at the option price.

    Call options are similarly advantageous when the stock is going up.

    Long means he owns a positive amount of them. (as opposed to owing someone else AAPL put options)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  76. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the fact that they have over 10% of the US laptop sales by volume not make them above niche?

    Err.... does the fact that they sold and sell truck load of both the iPod and iPhone not count as more than a tech note?

    I work in the City and almost all the traders, quants and IT guys have iPhones even if they have a blackberry and most of them use it for Bloomberg updates rather than youTube.

    Did the aggressive outsourcing of manufacturing, emphasis on UI and creation of retail stores not count as changing the industry?

  77. Re:Pancreatic Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the survivability rate of my MacBook, so far the back light is flickering, the dvd drive is broken, and on my second battery. I give it closer to 50% to survive the full 5 years.

  78. Nonperformers -- MobileMe & Predicting Death by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    There are still non-performers at Apple. MobileMe is screwing the pooch and has been since the dot-mac days. Also, who the hell are the bozos vetting iPhone apps?

    A far as Steve's Health goes, economists and epidemiologists can predict when you are going to die with something like an 85% certainty. Basically, almost everyone experiences a 7X increase in health care costs, and then is dead in two years. Things don't look so good for Steve. This is too bad, because he's done a lot for the computing world.

  79. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry for Jobs but Apple's declining stock price should be a lesson for those who lionized his management style.

    I am happy to see abusive, controlling and dictatorial behavior shown up to be bad due to the problem that every dictator encounters: the lack of a successor.

  80. Really bad hyperthyroidism by Trillan · · Score: 0

    I think it's hyperthyroidism. It not only matches the symptoms, but it also matches his statements and explains why he didn't know he needed a chunk of tine off until this week. He's probably on a therapy to burn out his thyroid entirely now.

  81. Re:LOL, No... by joshbosh · · Score: 1

    > MP3 players were drab and virtually useless before the iPod

    This was modded +5 Insightful?!

  82. Capital allocation by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    Your mistake was not to do explicit capital allocation in your portfolio to that Apple stock. Basically, you should have explicitly planned to keep your Apple stake within a certain size; either an absolute size ("I will hold no more than $10,000 on AAPL at any one time") or as a percentage of your portfolio ("I will hold no more than 5% of my portfolio on AAPL"). Then, when the stock skyrocketed, you should have sold shares to account for the excess value of your holding relative to your planned cap.

    Anyway, AAPL closed at 85.33 today. If you paid $50 for it, that's a 70% total return. Looking at the stock prices chart, AAPL was around that level at the following times: Sep. 2005 and Jul. 2006. In the former case, that's about a 17.41% annualized return; in the latter, it's about 23.84%. You haven't done badly in any sense. Just do make sure that you set a good rule for when to sell, and follow it strictly and mechanically.

  83. Re:LOL, No... by arminw · · Score: 1

    ...Or is it just a pretty, expensive, show-off chunk of easily scratched plastic....

    Of course that is all it is but they are selling like hot-cakes and Apple is laughing all the way to the bank, even in a recession. Same is true of those "expensive' Macs many here on /. are moaning about.

    --
    All theory is gray
  84. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think penny-arcade said it best when the iPod first launched.

    Nineteen months afterwards, but who's counting?

  85. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets not forget (telling the stupid investors) that Steve Jobs didn't fire up AutoCAD and designed iPod himself. Another guy designed it. Just like, he doesn't sit at home staring to XCode and mess with 10.6 kernel sources now.

    He is a very important figure but important figures are also known to pave the future of their creations.

    BTW the real overlooked revolution happened in smart phone scene is the opening up the Symbian. Symbian is the hidden giant among smart phones and thanks to iPhone panic, lots of interesting things happen. Even acquisition of Trolltech, the maker of Qt and making Qt practically free is connected to iPhone. So iPhone even effects future of Linux Desktop and app availability. If Developers pick it for Windows development, they would really get "lets try the Linux market,maybe we could sell couple of stuff" idea.

  86. Amateurs? by alcmaeon · · Score: 1

    Frankly, in a choice between buying stock in a company with good numbers like Citibank or Enron and buying a stock in a company with Warren Buffet at the helm, like Berkshire-Hathaway, I would take Warren Buffet.

    But that's just me.

  87. Re:Shoulda eaten more meat, Steve-o! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose his frequent use of off-list pharmaceuticals and other fun-seeking drugs during his youth would have had anything to do with his poor health. While 60 isn't old, it seems like a lot of people his age who "lived too hard" are now suffering the consequences through odd early/uneven aging, hormonal issues, cancer, auto-immune diseases, and other odd things we've not seen before.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  88. Somewhat of a coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's somewhat of a coincidence because jobs will take a leave of absence in America for six months, too.

  89. Re:LOL, No... by dave562 · · Score: 1

    I'll give you a hint. It wasn't the Microsoft shills.

  90. Maybe the hormone theory _was_ true? by smchris · · Score: 1

    Have a friend going for a second try on parathyroid (and now maybe thyroid) tumor surgery next week. It is my understanding the tumor is non-malignant but the tissue is literally indistinguishable by eye from healthy tissue and needs a marker. They have to figure out a 3D "eyeball" of it with a radiation counter after they slit the throat open. First try, they just didn't feel they had the parameters so they closed up and they're going in again.

  91. you bullshit by Uberbah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm kind of sick of facts

    Fixed that for you. Facts:

    1. Apple was the first to use a micro hard drive.
    2. Everything else was either a tiny flash memory player (64 megs) or used a heavy desktop drive.
    3. Apple used 400 Mbps Firewire when everyone else used 11 Mbps USB 1.1.
    4. They had a good hardware/software interface.

    As to point #4, I remember a nice Penny Arcade strip from way back (which unfortunately I can't find right now) where Jonathan asks Tycho how well Musicmatch staked up against iTunes. It went something like this:

    Tycho: Imagine iTunes as a fresh orange, glistening with morning dew...

    Johnathan: Okay...."
    Tycho: And Musicmatch is a bag filled with dog poop.
    Johnathan: Yuck! Dog poop isn't even food!
    Tycho: Exactly.

    1. Re:you bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, the name is "Gabe." I know it's his character's last name, but I never see him referred to as "Jonathan."

    2. Re:you bullshit by Draek · · Score: 1

      1. Apple was the first to use a micro hard drive.

      And how does that automagically mean that everything else was "virtually useless"? flash-based MP3 players have sold pretty well before, during and after the original iPod.

      2. Everything else was either a tiny flash memory player (64 megs) or used a heavy desktop drive.

      See above. Plus, given the low bitrates of your average MP3 at the time, it was easy to fit up to two albums in a 128 MB player, and considering that tapes could only hold one I wouldn't call that "virtually useless".

      3. Apple used 400 Mbps Firewire when everyone else used 11 Mbps USB 1.1.

      Percentage of people at the time of the original iPod's introduction that had firewire connectors on their PCs? percentage of people at the time of the original iPod's introduction which found 11 Mbps to be "so slow it's virtually useless"?

      4. They had a good hardware/software interface.

      Completely subjective.

      In short, you've stated the advantages the iPod had over the competition around the time it was first introduced. You have, however, most definitely not proven that all the other MP3 players were "virtually useless" as you alleged and the GP disputed.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    3. Re:you bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's real funny alright. How about the Penny Arcade comic that talks about how Apple has purposefully made the new generation of iPod's and iPhones incompatible with any software other than iTunes, whereas previously the devices worked well under Linux and other platforms? Or the fact that DRM is used in Mac OS X to ensure that it can't run on any other PC's than their overpriced Intels, that one was a laugh too.

      Oh, right. PA didn't do comics on those because that would be honest, and like you, Macwhores aren't prone to honest discourse when it comes to their beloved, do-no-wrong company.

      Fact #5:

      5) With enough money in their pockets, Apple is no better than Microsoft.

  92. Re:LOL, No... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    This was modded +5 Insightful?!

    It was because it was. See my response to defaria downthread.

  93. Re:LOL, No... by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Informative

    mp3 players might have been drab before the iPod, but they were certainly far from useless.

    Are you forgetting that Apple was the first to use a 5 gig micro hard drive? Everything else was either tiny flash memory (64-256 megs) or heavy desktop hard drives. And Apple used 400 Mpbs Firewire when everything else used 11 Mpbs USB 1.1.

    You can argue the iPod was priced high, or that it's nothing special now. You can't argue that it wasn't revolutionary when it came out.

  94. hahaha....hahha..hahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no really, you're hilarious.

  95. Re:Pancreatic Cancer by mkaushik · · Score: 1

    Learn to discriminate your pancreatic cancers. Adenocarcinoma has a 5% survival rate. Steve had a islet cell neuroendocrine tumor, which has a 50 to 75% 5 year survival.

    Unfortunately, someone has to make up the other 25%.

  96. Re:Pancreatic Cancer by colonslash · · Score: 1

    I've seen these numbers, but I don't see how they are relevant. What are the survival rates for billionaires? Surely Steve can buy some more life.

    Steve Jobs - Net Worth: US $5.4 Billion (2008 Forbes)

    According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs

  97. Two words: Keith Richards by NeoBeans · · Score: 0

    If "living hard" had guaranteed consequences, he wouldn't be playing gigs...

  98. Re:LOL, No... by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple makes a nice product but it's for the sheep of the world who blindly follow Apple and limit their demands to only that which Apple says they should have!

    I dunno about that one. I hate apple, but I have an ipod classic ever since my Neuros II went tits-up. It matched on all my criteria.

    1. Plays MP3s: Check.
    2. Can use standard 1/8" stereo headphones: Check
    3. Works in Mass Storage mode OR works with linux: Check
    4. Costs less than $2/GB: Check.
    5. Wasn't from Creative. (Too many bad experiences with Nomads to buy another one)

    Honestly, it was the only hard drive-based player (#4) that met #3. And I looked. Boy did I look.

  99. Re:LOL, No... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bullshit, before the iphone was a twinkle in Steve's eye we had Palm and WindowsMobile doing a lot of things you cant do today with an iphone. Tethering, copy and paste, downloading any app you like, *gasp* running software you wrote, choosing whatever wireless company you want to go with, outlook syncing, voip, etc.

    Useless mp3 players? Perhaps useless as a fashion accessory, but I had an mp3 player before the ipod was even released. Worked fine, thanks for asking.

  100. Re:LOL, No... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Of course that is all it is but they are selling like hot-cakes

    Yes we must all judge things by popularity. Good idea! The best phone: the iphone. The best artistic endeavor in human history: the reality show. The best food: McDonalds. The best country: india.

    I think you can see where Im going with this.

  101. Re:Pancreatic Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but don't forget homeostasis during cell endocrine compression. This has been shown to lead to trichinosis of the stomach wall (35-40% of clinical cases) and could explain current absorption status. Of course, I haven't seen his lipid stats, so one can't be sure for certain.

    (By the way, I have no idea about what the above means because I just made it up. Sounds cool though, right? I always wanted to make an authoritative sounding diagnosis like that. Maybe I should send it to a media outlet to see if they bite.)

  102. Re:LOL, No... by DarkVader · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I suppose informative would be a better tag.

  103. Re:Two words: Keith Richards by Skrapion · · Score: 3, Informative

    Smoking doesn't guarantee lung cancer either. That doesn't mean it's unrelated.

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  104. Re:Shoulda eaten more meat, Steve-o! by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

    As a comic once said: "Health food doesn't make you live longer, it just makes it seem longer."

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
  105. Re:Shoulda eaten more meat, Steve-o! by Meski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't suppose his frequent use of off-list pharmaceuticals and other fun-seeking drugs during his youth would have had anything to do with his poor health. While 60 isn't old, it seems like a lot of people his age who "lived too hard" are now suffering the consequences through odd early/uneven aging, hormonal issues, cancer, auto-immune diseases, and other odd things we've not seen before.

    Always pisses me off when people use the argument of "'blah' diseases that we've never seen before" - all we've done is improved diagnostics so we can tell "what" is killing you, and in some cases, "why" you got it.

  106. Re:LOL, No... by joshbosh · · Score: 1

    He didn't substantiate his assertion, so it wasn't informative. Let me guess. Are you a theist?

  107. Re:LOL, No... by joshbosh · · Score: 1

    > It was because it was. See my response to defaria downthread.

    I don't think your response to defaria contained sufficient empirical evidence to adequately support the assertion that MP3 players were "virtually useless before the iPod." But at least you provided some evidence, unlike Rayban, so thanks for contributing.

  108. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then you haven't visited 4chan's /g/ board lately. that's specifically what they're doing right now.

  109. Re:LOL, No... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    There are older phones on the market (Nokia's with Opera for example) that would probably suit you better and save you money

    I have used an iPhone, and Nokias and various flavors of mobile Opera.

    You have got to be fucking kidding.

    The Palm is the first device I've seen where the browser seems as reasonable to use.

    You just don't want to admit a device that some consider fashionable can also be extremely utilitarian.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  110. Amazing Timing by deanston · · Score: 1

    If it were truly serious, Apple Board would not be doing their fiduciary duty to keep it a secret. What I'm amazed at is the interesting timing, which has been one of Jobs' key strengths since his return to Apple. With the economy in a lull and no serious threat from rival companies, and major products for the year already planned and in works - if there is a good time to step aside to take a break and also evaluate his succession team's performance while alive - this is it. Don't count out Apple's penchant for drama and marketing, using Jobs return mid-year to boost other product announcements and take the wind out of the sail of every other tech company again. What does Arnie say as the Terminator...?

  111. Re:LOL, No... by bonch · · Score: 1

    I think you can see where Im going with this.

    Tired counterculturalism that rejects anything that's popular, even though there are plenty of popular things that are good?

  112. Re:LOL, No... by anagama · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My first mp3 player, which is still kicking around in drawer or a closeted box, was a Creative Nomad II MG. $250 for 64 mb and $100 for a 128 mb mmc card -- $350 total. For that, I got a player with controls that were so awkwardly placed on the sides that even after a year of steady use, I had to actually look at it to change songs -- it was ridiculously easy to delete songs instead of skip them. The screen was extra small too.

    Several years later I picked up a refurbed ipod for half the price with 15 gb of storage and controls I could use without looking at them. I recently got an 80 gb model, refurb, for half the price of my Creative, and the controls are even better than my old 15 gb model -- as long as I'm not searching through my library, I can control it "eyes-free" effortlessly and without thinking about it. Now, I'm sure most players don't have controls as dreadful as my Creative, but the fact the ipod is easy to use is not some kind of reality distortion event. The ipod is objectively better designed because I can adjust the volume and skip songs without looking at it. With the Nomad, anytime you pressed a button without looking I risked random outcomes up to and including song deletion. Reality distortion would be thinking that the Nomad was better than an ipod.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  113. FREE Vicodin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paging House

    We need you here in Cupertino. Our CEO has a bad case of somethin fierce. Please, please, please hep us, hep us now, House.

    Wacked out doctors eyes only

    http://images.celebritymoviearchive.com/members/thumbs/l/LisaEdelstein@House-2-CMA.jpg

  114. Re:LOL, No... by Xest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "MP3 players were drab and virtually useless before the iPod - a few years later everyone had one."

    I've never understood why people make comments like this. The iPod was a step backwards in terms of features and such, I'm not even convinced iTunes is any easier to use than the icon I could just drag and drop my MP3s into in Windows either. The iPod was actually quite a late arrival in the MP3 market, many forget that MP3s were already becoming somewhat mainstream (we already had support in some car sound systems for example). It's certainly fair to credit the iPod as the product that took the mainstream, but not necessarily the product that acted as a catalyst for mainstream- the fact you could store thousands of tracks in the space of half a portable CD player and not need to carry media around was already a good enough catalyst. People would've bought players regardless, but it was the style and prestige factor of the iPod that got it most of those sales, as well of course as it being in the right place at the right time- arriving just as the MP3 market was already taking off.

    I don't disagree that Jobs and his marketing team were excellent at creating hype and shifting units, but I'm still not convinced it's because the products are necessarily ground breaking, or even that high quality (battery problems, easily scratched screens etc.?).

    Apple under Steve has been good at what designer clothes companies are good at, building a brand that people want because they feel it gives them that extra bit of prestige. People will take Armani jeans over some bog standard jeans if they have the opportunity, the bog standard ones may even wear better and be more durable, but for many, the name matters most.

    I agree with you more on the iPhone though, certainly it seems to have pushed other companies into gear in some respects, but I think it's worked both ways in a way. Apple came along with a phone with not too many features but with a really nice looking UI and a much more tightly integrated experience. This has pushed other companies to follow, but on the same note, Apple has been pushed to follow the likes of Nokia with 3G, GPS and so on also when it became clear the iPhone was losing customers because of lack of said features so it has been a two way street. The underlying point though is that yes, without Apple, existing phone manufacturers wouldn't have had that much needed push.

  115. Re:Shoulda eaten more meat, Steve-o! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "can", "I guess"?
    Any living will kill you, unavoidably.

  116. He is in luck by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    I heard that the Messiah is taking office soon.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  117. I reckon he's got a glucagonoma by pyjamashark · · Score: 1
  118. Re:Shoulda eaten more meat, Steve-o! by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of George Carlin's old line: "Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time."

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  119. You know. You are one of the lucky ones. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Statistics is a bitch.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  120. The iPhone has a nice lead over the competition? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Probe it keemosabee.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  121. hey listen to this by GregNorc · · Score: 1

    I am Steve's pancreas. I get cancer, I kill Steve.

  122. Since when is a warranty worth anything? by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Just a point... have you ever returned your CFL lightbulbs for warranty replacement? Umm... and did you make sure to follow the postal regulations for shipping hazardous materials?

    Did you make sure to get the Circuit City Extended Warranty for your Christmas gifts?

    Did you make sure to check whether Circuit City was even there this month?

    So unlocking the iPhone invalidates a bunch of nonsense that is only worth whatever the company wants it to be worth, later, minus whatever penalty they want to apply to you, to "discourage frivoulous complaints"...

    And you still have a problem with invalidating a warranty?

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  123. hormone imbalance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it sounded dubious when i first heard it.
    Either he has got another neuroendocrine tumor or his thyroid is completely whacked out.

    Anyway, here is a hopeless plug... go to
    >www.thecyberdoctor.com

    And post a diagnosis for in the case of the 53 year old ceo with a hormone imbalance :P

  124. Apple...Welcome back to John Sculley by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 1

    One thing I haven't seen anywhere is who will be taking over Steve's responsibility for the next 5-6 months that he is out.

    Perhaps John Sculley will be getting a call...not!

    --
    "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
  125. Re:Shoulda eaten more meat, Steve-o! by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

    While 60 isn't old, it seems like a lot of people his age who "lived too hard" are now suffering the consequences through odd early/uneven aging, hormonal issues, cancer, auto-immune diseases, and other odd things we've not seen before.

    As a minor counterpoint, we also couldn't detect these things reliably until relatively recently, so it's hard to say if these "odd things" are something new, or simply something we're just figuring out.

  126. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it wasn't.

    Apple had been using firewire on all of their external devices. This gave them pretty good bandwidth and they were pushing for it to replace USB.

    Compaq actually made a player using a 2.5" hard drive with a 4.8Gb capacity in 1999 (apple used a toshiba brand 1.8" in 2001) Look up the PJB-100 or Personal Jukebox. Bulkier but hard drives improved over the next two years too.

    What Apple did what put it in a nice case with a shiny interface. Nothing else was all that revolutionary

  127. What? [Get over it] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NB: This post may contain USA-centric content.

    Ever since Lawrence v. Texas, AIDS has lost its stigma because the behavior of the demographic associated with its primary mode of transmission has been decriminalized. However, it has long since been destigmatized by those who drive the culture. What if Mr. Jobs indeed has HIV and the virus mutates so as to defeat available treatments and he succumbs to the complications thereof? With his wealth and status (documents shall having been altered and/or destroyed), we will never know for sure, so I would side with the argument of "presumed so until proven otherwise to a criminal standard".

    If it were ever made public that he had an alternate sexuality, what is the big deal? It would only make sense and thus bolster the suspicion that Apple products and creative people share something in common.

    No court can ever criminalize one's right to be disgusted when evil is called "good" and good is called "evil".

  128. what the letter said .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "One thing I haven't seen anywhere is who will be taking over Steve's responsibility for the next 5-6 months that he is out"

    "I have asked Tim Cook to be responsible for Apple's day to day operations"

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  129. Re:Shoulda eaten more meat, Steve-o! by BigFoot48 · · Score: 1

    He's 53.

  130. He's not dead yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least, not as we know it.

  131. Re:LOL, No... by Uberbah · · Score: 2

    Translation: you're a Kool Aid drinking anti-Apple fanboy, a breed vastly more common than the Apple fanboy. Apple could cure cancer and legalize pot, and you'd still find something to bitch about.

  132. Re:LOL, No... by pacificleo · · Score: 0

    ya sure ... and you are a apple fanboy who , whenever steve jobs farts ,thinks that its second coming of Jesus . Get a Life . And if apple can cure cancer than I suggest they do it soon .i am sure they have at least one beta tester Ready . So tell me are they announcing it on next WWDC ?

    --
    somethings are best left unsaid , I am one of those things
  133. Re:LOL, No... by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

    Without the iPhone, there just wouldn't be any exciting phones out right now.

    I find my N95 to be more exciting than an iPhone. Having a truly open platform (self-signing free programmes is annoying though) is a lot better than being locked to an app store.

    --
    Nick
  134. Re:LOL, No... by kisrael · · Score: 1

    I agree that maybe MP3s would have gained traction on their own, but i think for both original iPods and the iPhone, you're greatly underestimating the power of interface; the loveliness of the clickwheel, all the major paradigm shifts and tiny little gracenotes of the iPhone... it's not just about "looking great". Not just style, not just prestige, not just hype.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  135. Steve Jobs is dying of AIDS by hessian · · Score: 1

    Last week, when Steve Jobs announced that his recent weight loss was due to "a hormone imbalance," I got calls from reporters and others (which, I must admit, I ducked) asking me if that was the medical problem he had confessed to when he and I had had our infamous phone call last summer -- the one where he called me a slime bucket and denied that he had a recurrence of cancer. The answer is no, it wasn't. It was something else -- which of course I still can't disclose because the conversation was off the record.

    http://executivesuite.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/its-time-for-apple-to-come-clean/?hp

    This has caused at least one reputable news source to report that Steve Jobs is dying of AIDS.

  136. Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring back the Woz. Result.

  137. Re:LOL, No... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    >Of course that is all it is but they are selling like hot-cakes

    Yes we must all judge things by popularity. Good idea! The best phone: the iphone. The best artistic endeavor in human history: the reality show. The best food: McDonalds. The best country: india.

    I think you can see where Im going with this.

    Yeah, you are saying all the people telling us the iPhone is not the market leader by far are trying to sell us shitty phones.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  138. Shareholder Lawsuit? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Since that 'my health is perfectly fine' letter is increasingly looking like BS, he better hope he doesn't get sued for making a material misrepresentation to the shareholders.

  139. Re:LOL, No... by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

    You can argue the iPod was priced high, or that it's nothing special now. You can't argue that it wasn't revolutionary when it came out.

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

  140. Re:Shoulda eaten or, possibly, less gluten by awtbfb · · Score: 1

    For about 1 in 130 people in the US, eating gluten can lead to rapid weight loss and malabsorption of food (like Steve). If you're a vegetarian, this is a bit of a pain due to the prevalence of gluten in fake meat products.

    I doubt this is what Steve has, but Celiac disease is often a suspect after mysterious weight loss. The reason I don't think he has it is because diagnosis does not usually include time off from work.

    It is not uncommon for people to discover they have it late in life due to ambiguous/absent symptoms and general lack of awareness among doctors. Ironically, diagnosis is pretty straightforward. A simple blood test followed by an endoscope, if necessary. Treatment is very simple - don't eat gluten.

  141. Hmm, you should have kept your trap shut by GuloGulo · · Score: 1

    " - Apple Inc. (NASDAQ)

    81.70 -3.63 (-4.25%) Jan 15 12:58pm ET
    Open: 80.50
    High: 82.59
    Low: 80.05
                              Volume: 39,310,466
    Avg Vol: 31,577,000
    Mkt Cap: 72.67B"

    Hmm, Looks like I was EXACTLY RIGHT.

    Where's the snide comment now boy?

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
  142. I win, you lose by GuloGulo · · Score: 1

    " - Apple Inc. (NASDAQ)

    81.70 -3.63 (-4.25%) Jan 15 12:58pm ET
    Open: 80.50
    High: 82.59
    Low: 80.05
                                                        Volume: 39,310,466
    Avg Vol: 31,577,000
    Mkt Cap: 72.67B"

    I'll revisit this at closing, and I'll still be right.

    People like you never think someone else might be better at this than you, but I am and now you know it.

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
  143. Re:Shoulda eaten or, possibly, less gluten by 93,000 · · Score: 1

    I thought the same thing as well. I have celiac disease, as do my mother and sister. It takes an average of 11 years of being misdiagnosed before they hit upon celiac as the cause of health problems (can't cite -- sorry), however this is hopefully changing as awareness grows.

    Some people do have 'refractory sprue', where the the damage done to the intestine from ingesting gluten doesn't heal. This is rare, but can be a huge problem. If this was his case, I can see it necessitating time off. (Joe C from Kid Rock's band had these types of complications if I'm not mistaken. I do know his cause of death is listed as complications from celiac disease, so I'd guess that's the case).

    However if he has run of the mill celiac, it would be a pretty minor deal -- at least for someone with the cash for a personal chef, someone to shop for him, etc.

  144. Re:LOL, No... by arminw · · Score: 1

    ...Yes we must all judge things by popularity...

    If you were running a business like Apple is, rather than a charity, you would be interested in selling as many widgets and making as fat a profit on each as possible. So yes, in THIS case at least, even you as a business person, would judge your success by how many people were willing to fork over a nice chunk of change to you.

    --
    All theory is gray
  145. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And let me get this straight - you paid to read this bullshit? I can see that little subscriber's ASCII anus next to your name so I know you've been fucked. Wow. You're pretty arrogant for a pseudo-intellectual nerd that complains about the anonymous postings on Slashdot while simultaneously forking over cash to read them. Some would call that fucking stupid. You wouldn't, of course, because you think you're above everyone here (which you're not). What you really are is some creepy-ass, over-the-hill goth freak, sorry to say. And you'll stay a miserable freak until the end of your sorry life.

    Go ahead, come up with some witty retort that I won't read. I have better things to do with my time than waste more than a post belittling your pathetic ass.

  146. What will his pay be for the time off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he does not get paid, I wonder what his prorated salary will be? $.50?

  147. Re:LOL, No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is moderated by it's members. It has a karma system, those with high karma may moderate the posts of others, those with low karma can't moderate and in extreme cases, are limited in how often they can post.

    Say you had a group of members with an agenda. This group could moderate the post they agree with up, ensuring that the poster would have positive karma, giving him the ability to moderate. They could also moderate posters they disagree with down, denying them mod privileges. This is most obvious in the Apple and the Politics sections. I'm not saying that every pro Apple or pro Liberal moderation is unwarranted, but the are enough highly moderated posts that are undeserving that it is obvious that the moderation system is being abused.

  148. On the downside... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    ... Apple now has the thinnest, lightest CEO on the market.

    Unfortunately, due to a design decision, you'll have to replace him every so often because you can't replace just the battery.

  149. Re:LOL, No... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    >Everything else was either tiny flash memory (64-256 megs) or heavy desktop hard drives

    Err, no. When I opened by old Archos Jukebox mp3 player I found a 2.5" laptop hard drive. Not a 3.5 desktop drive. I dont think Ive ever seen one with a desktop drive.

    The first generation ipod had a 1.8" drive, which is a laptop drive, but a little smaller than the 2.5". So its not "OMG BIG DESKTOP DRIVE vs MICRODRIVE" its really 2.5" vs 1.8". At least until Apple moved to the Hitachi Microdrive, but that wasnt for a few years. Its not fair to compare a device from 1999 to one in 2004. Also, considering how many ipod mini's I went through which all had bad drives, perhaps the microdrive wasnt such a good idea. The move to flash, which ironically was what original mp3 players used, was a smart move.

  150. Re:Shoulda eaten more meat, Steve-o! by OutOnARock · · Score: 1



    Please try and quote George correctly....

    (from the same news cast as the Hippy Dippy Weather Man, you know, we're expecting a Canadian low, which is not to be confused with a Mexican high!!!!)
    (in the voice of a newscaster)

    ....this just in......saliva causes stomache cancer......

    ...but only when swallowed in small amounts over a long period of time....

  151. Re:LOL, No... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Err, no. When I opened by old Archos Jukebox mp3 player I found a 2.5" laptop hard drive.

    A valid nit. The Archos did indeed come out before the iPod, and used a 2.5" hard drive. However, it was two and a half times as big and weighed almost twice as much as the first iPod. It was also hobbled by USB 1.1 and Musicmatch, which was nicely described in a Penny Arcade strip (that I unfortunately can't find but do remember):

    Tycho: Imagine iTunes as a fresh orange, glistening with morning dew...
    Johnathan: Okay....
    Tycho: And Musicmatch is a bag filled with dog poop.
    Johnathan: Yuck! Dog poop isn't even food!
    Tycho: Exactly.

  152. HAHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Were you frothing at the mouth while you wrote that? Feel the urge to throw a few chairs around?