Slashdot Mirror


Jumping To Ubuntu At Work For Non-Linux Geeks

twigles writes "I'm a network engineer, meaning I spend my days dealing with things like selective route advertisements, peering, and traffic engineering; I'm not a Linux admin or developer. About 6 months ago I finally got fed up enough with my experience on Windows XP to jump ship to Ubuntu 8.04, despite not having much Linux experience, particularly on the desktop. Read my ramblings for an engineer's take on taking what can be a pretty intimidating plunge for us Linux noobcakes."

181 comments

  1. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No offense but this isn't very enlightening or insightful.

    1. Re:Yawn by pnevin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speak for yourself. I just learned that someone's apparently still listening to The Prodigy.

    2. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it's about Unbuntoo man - UNBUNTOO!!!!

  2. Traffic Engineer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Repeat after me, you are not an engineer.

    Until you go through the same hell in college that degreed mechanical/electrical/aero/civil engineers go through in college and have a chance to obtain a PE, you are not an engineer.

    1. Re:Traffic Engineer? by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's also quite madly irresponsible, if he's advocating non-techie people switching to Linux in work without the support of a sympathetic admin. Sounds like a sure way to lose that promotion.

    2. Re:Traffic Engineer? by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Nice proper use of an uncommon definition of "rent", AC.

    3. Re:Traffic Engineer? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me, you are not an engineer.

      Until you go through the same hell in college that degreed mechanical/electrical/aero/civil engineers go through in college and have a chance to obtain a PE, you are not an engineer.

      Repeat after me, you are not an engineer.

      Unless you work on / maintain an engine, you are not an engineer. Or.... perhaps that word has changed a bit over the years. First to include the structural & eletrical fields, then to include anything where you methodically apply technical knowledge & repeatable natural laws to solve a problem.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:Traffic Engineer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience in process control and industrial automation, many of those degreed professionals, including many of those with the awe-inspiring title of Professional Engineer, should not be called engineers either.

      It is one of the chief frustrations of my job (I am a programmer for process control systems, PLCs etc) to have to deal with these PEs who couldn't engineer a way out of a paper sack.

      On the other hand, although my work is highly technical, including custom hardware design and software work in assembly languages etc, I am not an engineer either, it is more of an academic pursuit than real engineering.

      Besides which, traffic engineer sounds like the cop who gets stuck directing cars when the stop-light breaks down...

    5. Re:Traffic Engineer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engineering = the practical application of science. A traffic engineer applies queueing theory. Get off your high horse.

    6. Re:Traffic Engineer? by RobinH · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work in the same industry as you. IAAPE. I am "degreed" and I have a license, however it's not required for PLC programming, process control work, or even the general electrical design (though this should be done by an electrical engineer).

      Since the entire system must meet the electrical code and pass an electrical inspection anyway, the only time we are required to get an engineer involved with an electrical control system is for the safety subsystem. In this case we need to get the safety system design approved by a licensed engineer, and they must inspect the implementation and sign off on it. In this jurisdiction they have to submit a "pre-start review" (aka a PSR) before we can let an operator touch the machine. Note that the safety design has to take more than just electrical design into account - it must take all sources of energy (mechanical, chemical, etc.).

      Say what you want about "engineers", but "professional engineer" refers to your legal status as a professional, and therefore the fact that you have demonstrated an understanding of the legal and ethical obligations of that title. Contrary to popular opinion, it doesn't mean "you can be sued" (anyone can be sued; try practicing engineering without a license for a while and see how long it takes). What it means is that there are a specific set of work that can only be undertaken by a licensed professional, and the licensing procedure ensures that you are very well informed about your legal and ethical responsibilities, and the consequences if you fail. This is both to protect the public, and the image (and trust) of the profession in the public's eye.

      So, as long as someone doesn't refer to themselves as a professional engineer when they're not, they don't practice engineering without a license, and they don't misrepresent their education on a resume (you can only get an engineering degree at a university - if you're an engineering technologist, that's fine), then I really don't care.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    7. Re:Traffic Engineer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work on rocket engines.

      Thank you very much.

    8. Re:Traffic Engineer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Until you go through the same hell in college"

      No need even to put the bar so high.

      "I spend my days dealing with things like selective route advertisements, peering, and traffic engineering [...] I only have three semesters of computer science [...] don't really have time to sift through forum posts for someone's custom Perl script that made something work, it just needs to work."

      He's a damn network operator.

      "In the methodical tradition of engineering, I'd like to evaluate Ubuntu's performance as a Windows substitute"

      And he's stupid too. How long has been engineering tradition mixing apples to oranges?

      "To replace SecureCRT I chose SSH Menu along with the stock OpenSSH client. This keeps track of my connections, allowing me to avoid having to memorize IP addresses of jump off boxes, and it also remembers my window sizes. "

      Oh, my god, so damn ignorant. He has not the slightest idea what he's talking about. Besides, Konqueror does everything SecureCRT does and much, much more. With ease.

      "If you really like Putty, it's available in Ubuntu."

      Simply insane.

      "I've found that most of the pain in switching comes from having to tinker a little to get the Linux equivalent of your Windows program working."

      Your problem is twofold: on one side thinking that you can speak Danish to a Chinese, so to say. Don't try to bring your prefigured ideas from Windows to Linux (neither do it the other way around); they are simply two different beasts so focus on the way to do things on the given platform instead. On the other hand you are too full of "I'm a network ENGINEER" when you are not much more than a mildly savvy user: don't take yourself too seriously. No, you don't know half you think you know.

      "The downside you won't easily escape is that many sites are built expressly for Windows."

      Not even that. I only have to visit two sites that require Internet Explorer and the last version of Wine will run IE 6 OK. Just download, double click and there you go.

  3. Noobcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hereby nominate noobcakes for "word of the year"

  4. A Flock Of Seagulls? by auric_dude · · Score: 3, Informative

    Submit an article. Get people to view your hair style. Profit ??

    1. Re:A Flock Of Seagulls? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      "Service Temporarily Unavailable" doesn't look like a hair style to me.

    2. Re:A Flock Of Seagulls? by Squeeonline · · Score: 1, Informative

      ...Learning how to use the br tags?

      Priceless.

      for everything else, there's Mastercard.

  5. WTF? by mangu · · Score: 1

    FTFA:

    my company had installed so many things on my laptop that it crashed or locked often, and booting took more than 20 minutes. There was no way around this while still on the domain, and if you run Windows here, you have to be on the domain

    One of my goals was to have everything be as easy as Windows.

    So, what he's looking for is how to make a boot in Ubuntu take more than 20 minutes?

    1. Re:WTF? by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      he said "as easy as windows", not "as fast as windows". 20 minute boot time isn't easy nor difficult, just slow and frustrating.

    2. Re:WTF? by kerashi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      My Windows box only takes 15 minutes, with all the crap that runs at startup! Still, a PC with an Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 may boot faster than most.

    3. Re:WTF? by azgard · · Score: 1

      Maybe he thought that Windows took booting "easy".

    4. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are doing something very, very wrong. Perhaps you need to run a registry cleaner and stop installing unneeded crap on your machine. My work laptop has had the same install of XP on it for about 2 years. It boots in about 2.5 minutes. Not a speed demon by any stretch, but 15 minutes? WTF?

    5. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Windows box only takes 15 minutes

      What is it with so many Slashdot readers being so completely inept at administering Windows?

    6. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much work for minuscule gain? Probably it's just that most people just cant be arsed.

    7. Re:WTF? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Dude. You are doing something wrong if it takes your box 15 minutes to boot Windows XP (or Vista). My XP load, which runs in a 32-bit VM under VirtualBox on a 2.0 GHz AMD Athlon X2 64. takes only 1 minute and 15 seconds to boot.

      Seriously.

    8. Re:WTF? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      And in my experience, which is anecdotal, I admit, although noticed by a colleague, also, is that Windows runs better and faster in a VM than on bare metal, provided enough memory is available.

      So your VM that takes 1:15 to boot, might very well take an extra 15-20 seconds if the same install options and extra software were installed on hardware.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  6. No SFTP? by dvice_null · · Score: 3, Informative

    From TFA: "Also, there's no SCP or SFTP feature that I can find comparable to SecureCRT."

    I don't know what SecureCRT is like, but you can use the file manager as SFTP client and bookmark pages if you want to. Or you can install Filezilla (the new version can handle SFTP also). Not sure what version comes with Ubuntu 8.04.

    1. Re:No SFTP? by kerashi · · Score: 1

      From my reading, it's not a matter of having no options that can handle it, but a matter of having them all in one single easy to use client with a large feature set.

      Unfortunately, SecureCRT is proprietary. So no go on a Linux version, and just a quick search doesn't turn up much in the way of alternatives. One thing it DID turn up was SecPanel, which is a GUI for SSH and SCP. I doubt it has quite the feature set, and I haven't tried it, but it might be worth looking into.

    2. Re:No SFTP? by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 1

      I think both scp and sftp are installed with the openssh package. Command line tools of course.

      And in the menu 'Places' there is an item 'Connect to Server...' that launches Nautilus using the sftp, ftp, webDav, smb protocols. You might have to install openssh for that too, I'm not sure.

    3. Re:No SFTP? by cr_nucleus · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "Also, there's no SCP or SFTP feature that I can find comparable to SecureCRT."

      WTF ?? Nautilus does handle mounting file system over ssh. It's just as simple as connecting to a samba share.
      It's event better than secureCRT since it's completely integrated.

    4. Re:No SFTP? by quippe · · Score: 1

      I think it's not nautilus itself; should be a new interesting library, gvfs, which replaced the infamous gnome-vfs and provides nice features as managing mounts via dbus, give a new solid base to the file dialog and provide an unified way to configure mime handlers

    5. Re:No SFTP? by bartonlp · · Score: 1

      There is a sshfs module that lets you mount a remote file system just like you mount anything else. It is secure and fast. Google sshfs for more information.

    6. Re:No SFTP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA: "Also, there's no SCP or SFTP feature that I can find comparable to SecureCRT."

      I don't know what SecureCRT is like, but you can use the file manager as SFTP client and bookmark pages if you want to. Or you can install Filezilla (the new version can handle SFTP also). Not sure what version comes with Ubuntu 8.04.

      We use SecureCRT, all this is Putty in a Non-free package with some bells.

      I choose to use putty instead.

      Since I find the extras in SecureCRT get in my way.

      All the functions of putty can be done from the command line in linux anyway.

    7. Re:No SFTP? by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Or you can be a real programmer, and use the command line.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    8. Re:No SFTP? by Matt+Perry · · Score: 2, Informative

      SecureCRT uses tabs in a window for each session you have open. You can open a new tab with a "sftp>" prompt and enter sftp commands, although I think that using filezilla or a file manager like you mention is much easier.

      The best part about SecureCRT is that you can install the lrzsz package on your Linux boxes and then use sz and rz commands in the remote session to send and receive files to/from your local computer. No need to mess around with scp, sftp, or opening other windows or tabs. It's very nice, and far easier and faster to use than other methods.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    9. Re:No SFTP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is a wider problem in Linux with some things like SSH and Package management. They are so well integrated that users dont find them. Coming from Windows users think that they need a separate application for everything, and search it from the internet or something.

    10. Re:No SFTP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Filezilla has supported sftp since dirt.

    11. Re:No SFTP? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      SecureCRT uses tabs in a window for each session you have open. You can open a new tab with a "sftp>" prompt and enter sftp commands

      Or you can just use a tabbed terminal, like Gnome-Terminal, Konsole, or pretty much any other, and create a session which just runs the 'sftp' command. If you don't like having to enter a password, use ssh keys.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    12. Re:No SFTP? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that you can't drag a file directly from nautilus into a non gnome aware application like thunderbird.

      I really wish gnome would write a workaround for that. My wife uses thunderbird for her email and stores her files on ssh accessible severs.

    13. Re:No SFTP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem is that you can't drag a file directly from nautilus into a non gnome aware application like thunderbird.

      I really wish gnome would write a workaround for that. My wife uses thunderbird for her email and stores her files on ssh accessible severs.

      If there some reason Evolution is not a viable option?

    14. Re:No SFTP? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that you can't drag a file directly from nautilus into a non gnome aware application like thunderbird.

      I really wish gnome would write a workaround for that. My wife uses thunderbird for her email and stores her files on ssh accessible severs.

      If there some reason Evolution is not a viable option?

      Massive scaling problems when you have multi gigabyte folders of messages. Evolution maintains its own index files and they don't always work.

  7. For password management try using KeePassX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    For password management try using KeePassX http://www.keepassx.org/
    It's free and cross platform.

  8. Linux will not "get there" until this happens by bogaboga · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From the submission:

    My experience in switching from Windows XP to Ubuntu 8.04 has not been all positive, but overall I'm incredibly glad I did it. I used to hate my entire computing experience, now I just hate my email client. My coworkers say things like, "wow, it took Notepad over 10 seconds to load," and I chuckle. It's tempting to interpret this to mean Windows would be a better choice in an environment not bogged down by constant security scanning and filtering, and to some degree that's accurate. However I've found that most of the pain in switching comes from having to tinker a little to get the Linux equivalent of your Windows program working.

    Remember the author had time to try to make things work. How many folks have time to tinker with text config files or a system help mechanism that is incomplete at best? I wish Linux fan boys can put their bigotry aside and listen for once.

    For Linux to become main stream the following must happen.

    Support for relevant applications, out of the box - not via a separate repository that must be enabled. (Key word, - relevant)

    A single API for applications so that "Linux" is one platform, not many that must be supported for many versions. Without this, all efforts to make Linux the mainstream are thinned, customers get confused which leads to less adoption.

    A single desktop, so that Linux is one desktop, not several. Otherwise the other efforts, such as the help desk, marketing and research all multiply their efforts making everything impractical.

    I am sure those waiting for this to happen will love KDE 4.2 which will be released in 2 days. Trust me, it's a different animal all together. Things actually work and work well in the coming release. The earlier releases were a total disaster.

    1. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by kerashi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are a few reasons I don't use Linux on my main box right now, and this hits the biggest of them.

      Anyone who has ever tried to install a program not in the repository will know what a pain it can be. Getting stuck in dependency hell is still a very real problem, and while repositories help they are no substitute to fixing the problem.

      In Windows, if you get an installer you have a reasonable expectation of being able to run it. Sometimes you hit dependencies, but not often, and they're generally the same for most programs.

      Another big thing is having different package managers. What to do when a developer distributes a .rpm but not a .deb, or the other way around?

      And I won't even start bitching about the 3D Graphics support...

      Still, Windows isn't perfect, and Linux is far better in many ways. Having a software repository is awesome, and saves a lot of time searching for programs. However, until these problems are addressed, many developers will continue to develop only for Windows.

      (I do use Linux on a regular basis, and find it does an awesome job for many things. Just not everything)

    2. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A single desktop, so that Linux is one desktop, not several. Otherwise the other efforts, such as the help desk, marketing and research all multiply their efforts making everything impractical.

      Many GNU/Linux users like the possibility to choose your own desktop (window manager). The possibility to choose is a feature and advantage of FOSS and who doesn't like it, simply shouldn't use it :-)

      If KDE or Gnome was the only window manager in GNU/Linux, how would be possible to make a lightweight distribution for older computers?

      I don't think GNU/Linux will become main stream neither it's users really want it. //Dan KrÃtký

    3. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please remember one thing, Linux is not trying to be Windows.

      I wish people would stop trying to lead and or label it that way.

    4. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who has ever tried to install a program not in the repository will know what a pain it can be. Getting stuck in dependency hell is still a very real problem, and while repositories help they are no substitute to fixing the problem.

      So how often do you install windows applications that aren't compiled, linked and packaged for that OS distribution? See how moronic the argument is?

      Usually on a linux/bsd distro, you at least have the option of compiling / linking yourself.

    5. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by downix · · Score: 1

      Let us analyze the following:

      >Support for relevant applications, out of the box - not via a separate repository that must be enabled. (Key word, - relevant)

      Then you become dependent on a single source for what applications are available. By allowing, and enabling multiple repositories means that you can offer more choice, and choice is good. Imagine a world with only Coke products. No Coffee, no Tea, no 12 year aged Scotch Whisky, just Coke. Do you complain that you need to go to a seperate grocery store to some products?

      >A single API for applications so that "Linux" is one platform, not many that must be supported for many versions. Without this, >all efforts to make Linux the mainstream are thinned, customers get confused which leads to less adoption.

      A single API is a security exploit waiting to happen. And how would customers get confused, as they don't, in general, program.

      >A single desktop, so that Linux is one desktop, not several. Otherwise the other efforts, such as the help desk, marketing and >research all multiply their efforts making everything impractical.

      Absolutely incorrect. I work for a very large, public company, which does sell Linux based products. We manage to handle the differences between the various desktops quickly and easily, even those among us in the support department that do not use Linux.

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    6. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by karnal · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't people think Linux is trying to be Windows? They're both Operating Systems for PCs; they both give you access to web browsing, creating documents, enjoying multimedia files and generally getting work done.

      They may not be targeting the same mindshare for the desktop, but they're both capable of doing the same thing. In that regard, I'd bet most people would compare the two as similar if they had the chance.

      --
      Karnal
    7. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, while I'm an experienced Linux user I have not done any tweaking using text files or anything like that on my Ubuntu system. That is part of the reason why I use Ubuntu. I want to get stuff done, not tweak crap. In fact, I have to do less tweaking to an Ubuntu install than Windows so I don't really get where you're coming from.

      As for packages, well out of the box Ubuntu has a frickin crap-ton of packages compared to Windows. On Ubuntu I pull up the package manager GUI and click install while on Windows I would have to go out searching to find it, then hope it installs, etc. Sure, if you need something not in the stock repositories it's going to take more work but not any more than it would be for the same program in Windows. Usually when you do have to do more work to get something you're working with something that isn't even available on Windows so now you're talking about something completely different.

      I see you're a KDE user, maybe that's why you think you need to tweak a whole bunch of crap on Linux to make it nice.

    8. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What to do when a developer distributes a .rpm but not a .deb, or the other way around?

      Use Alien.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    9. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The GGP wants it to be Windows...

      "Single API...", Out of the box support for "relevant" applications (whatever "relevant" is supposed to mean), etc.

    10. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 2

      There are a few reason I don't use Windows on my main box right now, and this hits the biggest of them.

      Anyone who has ever tried to install a program in windows knows how much of a pain it can be. They don't have a centralized repository for you to download the package.

      On Linux, if you get an installation CD you have a reasonable expectation of connecting to he repository for that distro and getting a wealth of software available from the click of a button. Sometimes you find a package that isn't in the repo, but not often, and they'll generally install with a './configure && make && make install'

      Another big difference is the way libraries are linked. What do you do if one vendor ships *.dll's under Program Files and another vendor ships the a different version of the same libraries under their subdirectory. Then you have two programs shipping the same code with double the memory. It's no wonder downloads of windows installers take so long.

      And I won't even start bitching about installation wizzards...

    11. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or, compile yourself and install via checkinstall. I'd think if you were halfways aware of how to administrate a Linux system, you already know how to compile a tarball. Checkinstall builds the package, .deb or .rpm, and installs it for you. Then, you can add the package to your local repository.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    12. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...

      Anyone who has ever tried to install a program not in the repository will know what a pain it can be. Getting stuck in dependency hell is still a very real problem, and while repositories help they are no substitute to fixing the problem.

      In Windows, if you get an installer you have a reasonable expectation of being able to run it. Sometimes you hit dependencies, but not often, and they're generally the same for most programs.

      ...

      Instead, what you get with Windows is programs
      a) forcing their way into unnecessarily running at startup.
      b) forcing their way as the default for any file types they handle.
      c) contacting the internet for who knows what purpose.
      d) interfering with other installed programs, including the O/S itself.
      e) ".dll Hell" I've had far more problems with this than "dependency hell". In fact, I've never suffered from "dependency hell" in 5 years of using Linux as my primary O/S.
      f) DRM

      Not to mention that Windows itself can affect all the above issues whenever you update.

    13. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by s4m7 · · Score: 1

      You're doing it wrong, son.

      1) search for special case repositories, they're out there for darn near everything.
      2) if they're not there, use checkinstall (for debs based distros anyway) to build a package which will then correctly install dependencies for you. (this is almost never necessary)
      3) proprietary apps with binary isntallers for linux work 99.9% of the time.
      4) alien converts debs packages to rpms and vice-versa
      5) you shouldn't bitch about 3D graphics support because any decent card will work on any modern linux distro.. heck Ubuntu prompts you to install the proprietary drivers and automatically reconfiures x for you. it doesn't get any easier.

      I don't know what distro you're using or what crazy apps you're trying to install, but seriously it's nowhere near as bad as you make it sound.

      --
      This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    14. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by kerashi · · Score: 1

      It may not be that bad, but it still can be somewhat annoying. My whole point is that, having used both Linux and Windows, my experience on both is mixed (though with Vista it's more "pissed beyond belief that I wasted my time on that pile of shit" than mixed). There's really no mythical OS that does everything perfect and right. Unless you believe the Mac fanboys.

    15. Re:Linux will not "get there" until this happens by s4m7 · · Score: 1

      There's really no mythical OS that does everything perfect and right.

      Well of course not, and I wouldn't claim that Linux is "there" in that sense. Since nothing is, it seems not to be a huge loss in that category.

      It may not be that bad, but it still can be somewhat annoying.

      I agree, and so can working on any other platform. I find that Linux works for me in almost all situations. Sure there are still a few places where it's weak, but it isn't even as bad as it was 2 years ago in the sense of having to configure things from the CLI, compile drivers, etc. It's getting a lot closer and if you don't expect it to be like windows, chances are it will work out fine.

      --
      This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
  9. Password Program: KeepPassX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hello sir,

    I think i read that KeepPassX can be used in Linux and Windows,
    using the same repository.

    Check it out!

    Cheers

  10. Re:Not again by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the guy's main point was "give it a try, you might just like it". It didn't sound in any way like he was trying to make you a convert, it was more for someone like him who as come to not exactly enjoy their windows experience due to all the bloat of modern day security apps business tend to require.

  11. Re:Not again by El+Lobo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sure, but that is an OPINION, (a politically correct one in this place), but... an ARTICLE??? An article should be informative, interesting, or fun... not a biased or anecdotal opinion. That are what the comments are for.

    --
    It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
  12. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be new here. In a few days you will be posting your 1337 H4x0R adventures in 00B00NT00 and showing the world your ugliness.
    You might want to install a so called CYGWIN(Yes, like all free software it is named after a swearword/mental/physical disability) to get you started on the UNIX gulag mentality.

  13. How would you replace Visio? by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    I ain't a fan of Linux but even I can do more than this dufus.

    The only things he told us that he ran on virtualized Windows were Microsoft Visio and the password manager. With a viable alternative to Visio, he might not have been tempted to set up virtualized Windows in the first place. What would you have used to replace Visio?

    1. Re:How would you replace Visio? by kerashi · · Score: 1

      A quick search on OSAlt.com turns up kivio, Dia, OOo Draw, and ArgoUML. While they probably don't have the feature set of Visio, there are alternatives.

    2. Re:How would you replace Visio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Did you read the bit where it's a "de facto" industry standard?

      From another comms person's view, without visio you will struggle

    3. Re:How would you replace Visio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      OOo Draw is like creating stick figures, its not even remotely a replacement for visio, any more than MS Paint is a replacement for visio.

      When a network engineer is asking for a replacement for visio they are looking for a program that will use visio templates provided by hardware vendors for the specific devices. Those templates are not just a picture of the device but include some amount of manipulation; such as a cisco 12000 chassis and seperate blade templates to load up the chassis EXACTLY the way its setup in your network.

      I hate MS with a purple passion and hate the windows community equally. But I do concurr that a template compatible replacement for visio does not exist.

    4. Re:How would you replace Visio? by markdavis · · Score: 2, Informative

      >OOo Draw is like creating stick figures, its not even remotely a replacement for visio, any more than MS Paint is a replacement for visio.

      Obviously you have not *really* USED OOo Draw's flowcart and diagramming features before; it is certainly no "Visio" but:

      1) It is object oriented, and vector based
      2) Objects can be labeled, grouped, scaled, etc
      3) Objects can be connected with various connector types
      4) Objects can be moved while retaining connections to other objects
      5) Template objects can be created and used
      6) Controlling styles can be used across objects

      So comparing OOo Draw to MS-Paint is *far* more insulting than comparing MS-Visio to OOo Draw.

    5. Re:How would you replace Visio? by tepples · · Score: 0

      [In OpenOffice.org Draw,] Template objects can be created and used

      But can OOo Draw use template objects created for Visio by hardware vendors? Or do you expect hardware vendors to re-create all template objects for OOo Draw (not bloody likely at this point)?

    6. Re:How would you replace Visio? by markdavis · · Score: 3, Informative

      As far as I am aware, no, you cannot directly use Visio objects in OpenOffice. However, there are lots of objects available if you don't want to draw them yourself. For example:

      http://openoffice.blogs.com/openoffice/2006/10/custom_openoffi.html
      http://lautman.net/mark/coo/index.html

      Or, you can convert many Visio VSS files into objects that *can* be read by other programs, such as OpenOffice. For example:

      http://www.gnome.ru/fileformats/stencils.html

      Will hardware vendors release their objects/stencils in something non-proprietary? As you said- not likely for now. But that doesn't mean OpenOffice Draw isn't perfectly capable of creating nice diagrams. In fact, people tend to grossly underestimate what can be done in OpenOffice Draw; mostly because many of the powerful features aren't immediately obvious and/or it is positioned more as a vector drawing program and not a diagramming program.

    7. Re:How would you replace Visio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inkscape can do all the common Visio things and can be made to work with it if the Visio output is saved in .wmf or .emf instead of the proprietary .vsd format.

    8. Re:How would you replace Visio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Dia, I've also looked at Gaphor. But I'm kind of a fan of packet tracer for networks, it's always nice to test things out.

    9. Re:How would you replace Visio? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Depends what you truly need Visio for. For most things I want to graph, I use GraphViz, often Dot, or I just grab a whiteboard.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    10. Re:How would you replace Visio? by spinkham · · Score: 1

      Inkscape is a vector editor, and doesn't support automatic layout when you move items around. At least that I know of, if you can tell me how, you'll make me very happy. That said, I use Inkscape for making presentation graphics in Linux, but it's not really a Visio replacement.

      Reddit had a thread on this topic a few months ago, which you can find here: AskReddit: What is the best Visio replacement?

      Some of the better suggestions were:

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
  14. Who is this guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a network engineer, meaning I configure routers, switches, firewalls, and the occasional Unix/Linux box. I don't write code or script, though I have a little experience in both of those areas.

    Not only is he a nobody he offers little unique insight, this guy is suffering from "newbs enlightment fever". Why is this blogosphere pollution here?

    1. Re:Who is this guy? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not only is he a nobody he offers little unique insight

      GASP! Wow, I never thought about it. You're ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, Mr. Anonymous Coward!

    2. Re:Who is this guy? by quadrox · · Score: 1

      Just because someone is a hypocrite doesn't mean they aren't right. Just thought I'd throw that out there...

    3. Re:Who is this guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be poking fun at people hiding behind pseudonyms Peter Parker.

    4. Re:Who is this guy? by rokknroll · · Score: 1

      and indeed, mr AC, who are you? Everybody *is* Somebody....

      --
      billy pilgrim *has* become unstuck in time!
    5. Re:Who is this guy? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I can bring this out now that you give me the chance.

      A pseudonym like the ones that Slashdot gives us are an alter ego, a persona which we build our reputation upon (that's what karma points are for). Subscribers can see the WHOLE HISTORY of a user's comments, you can see how the user thinks, what bothers him/her, etc., and know him a lot. And yes, make one mistake and all that reputation goes down the drain (like mine did a few months ago).

      So, no, a pseudonym is NOT equivalent to being anonymous. Without pseudonyms we couldn't communicate and exchange ideas.

      So, when I speak, I speak for myself. And fellow users, even if they don't know my real identity, know who I am by what I write.

    6. Re:Who is this guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgive me for paying no attention to the authorship line and instead scrutinizing your comments on their merits.

      Without pseudonyms we couldn't communicate and exchange ideas.

      Really? Would you like to rethink this?

  15. For printable documents... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Just export as PDF.

    This is something that I still don't get: Why do businesses require all printable documents to be written in a WRITABLE format? Oh, right. Word doesn't have one by default. Why Innovate when you got 100% of the market?

    1. Re:For printable documents... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      MS was going to include PDF save capability in Office 2007, but Adobe threatened antitrust action so MS made the PDF and XPS save capability a separate installation.

      http://my-tech-tips.blogspot.com/2006/11/adobe-threatens-microsoft-over-office.html

      http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2006/06/05/216271/microsoft-drops-pdf-option-after-adobe-threat.htm

      So blame Adobe for this lack of ability, its certainly not Microsofts fault...

    2. Re:For printable documents... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      This is something that I still don't get: Why do businesses require all printable documents to be written in a WRITABLE format?

      All formats are writable.

  16. What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A network engineer running IM software, music players and Amazons MP3 whatever on his admin box?

    Sounds to me like switching to linux is but a minor problem here.

  17. Re:If you don't like a story, please don't post. by JickL · · Score: 1

    Great attitude you got there! At least the AC seems to have bothered to RTFA.

  18. What's wrong with Dia by xeoron · · Score: 1

    Why did he not replace Visio with Dia?

    1. Re:What's wrong with Dia by Jantastic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why did he not replace Visio with Dia?

      Because he was running late for his appointment at the hairdresser

      --
      ...a fact which for the sake of a quiet life most people tend to ignore ~H2G2
    2. Re:What's wrong with Dia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Dia is fine if he is creating a non-shared, vanilla, block diagram illustration. If he needs to work with existing Visio diagrams already on the main file server, or use templates provided by vendors like HP and Cisco, he doesn't have a recourse.

    3. Re:What's wrong with Dia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I tried to seriously use Dia once.

      I had designed and implemented a web service, and the IT department wanted a diagram showing how it all worked. Being a Linux guy, using Ubuntu for my daily work, naturally I reached for Dia and tried to use it.

      I found it was horrible. Years previously, I had used Visio once to do a similar diagram, and it was easy; I figured it would be equally easy in Dia. But it wasn't. I don't remember all the details, so I can't offer any specifics right now, but overall I was stunned by how unusable it was.

      I wound up writing a text-based flow description that read like a flowchart, and the documentation guy in the IT department said it was good enough that he could use Visio to make the diagram. And that was the last time I tried to use Dia. This was about six months ago.

      Firefox is way better than IE. I'd much rather use Evolution than Outlook. My Ubuntu desktop is smoother and prettier and nicer than a Windows desktop. I'm no Windows fanboi... but Dia does not cut it as a replacement for Visio.

      I saw in other comments that the vector drawing features in OpenOffice.org are pretty good. I hope so; I never want to use Dia again unless it is seriously improved, but I also don't want to use Visio, because I'd rather work in Linux.

  19. required Linux tools .. by viralMeme · · Score: 1

    A pretty impressive set of tools, now you only left out this one

    --

    click on reply, nothing happens, fire up textpad and type in what you were going to say, before you forget, back to slashdot as the page has finally loaded .. :)

  20. Linux not Ubuntu by markdavis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Here we go again with another example of the word "Ubuntu" being used in the title instead of "Linux", which would be more appropriate. In general, the subject of the article (more of a blog) is about using Linux instead of MS-Windows. It is not specifically about using Ubuntu.

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=344745&cid=21176921
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1095787&cid=26502007

    If MS-Windows were (generically) a car, and Linux were a motorcycle, it would be like titling an article "Jumping from driving a car to a Kawasaki". This trend can be extremely annoying to fellow Linux users that don't use Ubuntu, and somewhat of an insult to the thousands of people who contribute time and money to non-Ubuntu distros and even Linux and Linux-related FOSS projects in general. There is nothing wrong with using, liking, or even promoting Ubuntu; but give credit where credit is due. Distros are all about 99% the same, the real difference that matters is MS-Windows vs. Linux vs. MacOS....

    1. Re:Linux not Ubuntu by jerep · · Score: 1

      It's Linux/GNU you insensitive clod!

      But seriously, I think he meant Ubuntu as in the general name for the entire system; linux is only the kernel, GNU are only a core set of the tools, and Ubuntu is the glue that holds it together.

      As for all distros being 99% the same: try using both Slackware and Ubuntu and we'll talk about it again. That would be like saying winME, XP and Vista are all 99% the same.

      And don't even get me started on LFS (linux from scratch) :)

    2. Re:Linux not Ubuntu by jerep · · Score: 1

      Apparently my morning coffee didn't kick in yet, it's GNU/Linux, not the other way around !

    3. Re:Linux not Ubuntu by markdavis · · Score: 1

      OK, I probably shouldn't have said "all distros", perhaps "most distros" or "the major distros". Having used Fedora, SuSe, Mandriva, Debian, and Ubuntu; I can pretty confidently say all THOSE are nearly 99% the same, especially after installation.

    4. Re:Linux not Ubuntu by VampireByte · · Score: 1

      Good save, RMS was about to post a comment correcting your error.

      --

      Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

    5. Re:Linux not Ubuntu by weazzle · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the comparison you would prefer is: "Jumping from driving a Ford to a vehicle with a Kawasaki engine".

    6. Re:Linux not Ubuntu by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Not really. Although I thought about that before posting. Don't you hate car analogies? :) We always seem to revert to them, since it is something people can relate to... they just don't always fit quite right.

    7. Re:Linux not Ubuntu by quadrox · · Score: 1

      As someone who has been switching distros like their underwear (i.e. regularly) because they each sucked, I beg to differ. Even now, SUSE Linux remains unusable to me due to their arcane menu and configuration systems. I far prefer ubuntus simplicitly - even though it is lacking in configurability in some areas, but that is nothing I can't do myself in the command line. (It sounds like a contradiction, I know. But this is how it appears to me)

      For sheer "get-stuff-done" I still think ubuntu is King. But I must admit that I have not checked any other distro for more than a year, simply because I am satisfied with ubuntu.

    8. Re:Linux not Ubuntu by quadrox · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I reply to myself, but I am ill right now and find it hard to think properly.

      Anyway, what I mean is that the last time I compared distros, ubuntu was the only one that tried not to get in the way. Ubuntu does not provide you a path to ALL the things you might want to do or configure, but instead it focuses on the most important core tasks and makes it straight-forward to do them.

      SUSE/KDE try to give the user EVERYTHING they might ever want in the name of configurability, but they don't do it well. The 5 features I do want to configure drown in the sea of other useless junk that is also enabled or has some obscure default setting.

      I find it far easier to start with an almost clean slate and add-in those five things myself instead of filtering out all the junk I don't need. Even if that means I have to install gnome-do myself, it ensures that I get exactly what I want.

    9. Re:Linux not Ubuntu by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The last suse installation I tried installed three web browsers by default and gave them their own submenu. For most people that is too much choice.

    10. Re:Linux not Ubuntu by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      I bounced around from distro to distro for a while, too. Used Mandrake for a while because Red Hat was terrible, Debian's installation confused me (this was quite a while ago, mind you) and wanted some sort of "floppy calibration" test thing that I still don't understand (and haven't seen since) before it would happily install.

      Switched to Debian when Mandrake began to suck (after version 8) and Debian had gotten mildly more user-friendly.

      Then Gentoo, after a brief but annoying flirtation with Fedora and Suse. Gentoo was a gigantic pain in the ass, but it was still less of a pain in the ass than the other distros I'd used. That's how bad the others were.

      I tried Ubuntu in its second release, and knew that they were on to something, but it wasn't quite all there yet. Their third release won me over and I haven't looked back. It is different from its most similar competitors (Red Hat/Fedora and Suse)--specifically, it's less fucked up under the hood and has much more user-friendly admin tools, which integrate well with the rest of the UI rather than looking like something tacked on. Ubuntu has a tendency toward sensible defaults that I believe it inherits from Debian, but doesn't stop you from doing other things. Its stock set of programs makes more sense than any other I've seen.

      Its Debian roots serve it well, but I never have to worry about downloading the source for a program and then needing to use a non-official repository or compile a newer GTK (or some other library) to compile it because the one I've got is so ancient, as can occasionally happen even in testing and unstable Debian (or at least it used to be a problem--I haven't used Debian at all in nearly two years, admittedly). It keeps me up-to-date but still feels more-or-less like Debian beneath the surface.

      It's easy enough for a n00b but flexible and powerful enough for power-users and Linux geeks (at least, those of us who have had our share of mucking around in /etc to achieve basic functionality and have no desire to continue doing that). None of the other "user friendly" distros have impressed me so much.

  21. Dump the VM by gbr · · Score: 1

    Visio runs just fine under Codeweavers CrossOver Office. I run Visio 2003 that way, and it just works.

  22. Re:Not again by RedK · · Score: 1

    I thought nerds were usually open minded and wanted to try new stuff ?

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  23. You got it wrong by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Let me put it this way. Linux should put [all] resources on one desktop environment which should result into a wonderful desktop while leaving the possibility of using another should there be need. What's wrong with that?

    1. Re:You got it wrong by skeeto · · Score: 1

      I think you completely misunderstand how all this software gets developed. There isn't some big company that makes all the software you find in a single distribution.

    2. Re:You got it wrong by bogaboga · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Now, if that is the problem, then why do we spend resources on all there desktop environments which have given us lots of choice but at the same time, robbed us of "hands" to make an impact where it matters most?

      It that is the problem, then let's solve it. Fixing the API or making it at least predictable would be a good first step. This approach appears to work for Apple...that is a software is made to work for OSX and indeed it does. But for Linux, more questions about the distro have to be answered.

      In addition, different library versions within the "Linux" (read distro) ecosystem make it difficult to create software that will run across the board. I don't know why this concept is so difficult to understand. Why?

    3. Re:You got it wrong by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      If everyone puts all resources towards one desktop, how can there be another one to use "should there be a need."

      Really, when we follow that reasoning, you should just choose the desktop every person on the Earth will use. All Hail Emperor Bogaboga!!!!

      BTW, you're a complete idiot.

    4. Re:You got it wrong by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Statically link your binaries or create a startup script to include the necessary (and included) libraries. It's done all the time. Lots of proprietary software that's distributed on Linux is packaged this way. It's no different, really, than OS X's disk image method.

      Do you even understand the system you denigrate?

    5. Re:You got it wrong by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      Did you see "[all]" ? If I were to mark your script, I would call you a complete idiot.

    6. Re:You got it wrong by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Quoting from your original post:

      A single desktop, so that Linux is one desktop, not several. Otherwise the other efforts, such as the help desk, marketing and research all multiply their efforts making everything impractical.

      You then go on to say in a later post:

      Let me put it this way. Linux should put [all] resources on one desktop environment which should result into a wonderful desktop while leaving the possibility of using another should there be need.

      You want a single desktop. How, then, can one leave "the possibility of using another should there be need?" People see a need now, so they use different ones now and they help develop these.

      p.s. You're writing in English, not pseudo-code. Use brackets correctly.

    7. Re:You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      before calling people idiots i would rethink what you wrote.
      it is a strength of linux that the desktop
      is modularized, configurable and replaceable.

      it is also a strength that multiple 'desktops' are being developed.

    8. Re:You got it wrong by Draek · · Score: 1

      Let me put it this way. Linux should put [all] resources on one desktop environment which should result into a wonderful desktop while leaving the possibility of using another should there be need. What's wrong with that?

      "The mythical man-month", for starters, the issue of the philosophy underlying The One And Only DE (simplicity, flexibility, aesthetics, which one takes priority over the other two?) for another, and then there's the fact that if another desktop enviroment is at all developed, then it's not "all" resources and we're back where we originally were.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    9. Re:You got it wrong by jonasj · · Score: 1

      Of course he saw the word all. But what are those brackets supposed to mean? The stuff you are writing doesn't make any sense! I'm close to considering you a troll, but I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here... explain yourself!

      --
      You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
  24. GO BACK TO COLLEGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Network Admins are like Dental Assistants and other occupations advertised by Sally Struthers.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RKQRVn4NAs

  25. Re:Not again by In+hydraulis · · Score: 1

    Let everyone use whatever tool they want.

    Your sig:

    It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!

    You, sir, are a hypocrite.

  26. Re:Password Program: KeepPassX, Password Gorilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Password Gorilla is compatible with Password Safe databases and works on both Windows and Linux.

  27. My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by DanWS6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two main problems that I'm trying to overcome:

    Exchange support. Evolution just doesn't cut it. It won't load my global address list and it doesn't seem to handle the "location" field for meeting invites. That means when I get an invite or try to send one I have no clue where our meeting will be.

    CVS. I really like TortoiseCVS and can't find an equivalent that is as easy to use. I guess it's not a big deal, I could go back to using the cli, but what can I say, I am lazy. :)

    Everything else has been good so far.

    1. Re:My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      I never tried invitations, but you can try http://www.claws-mail.org/faq/index.php/Connecting_to_MS_Exchange

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    2. Re:My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by DanWS6 · · Score: 1

      Thanks I'll check it out. My latest attempts were install outlook 2007 through the latest version of wine. That's been an effort in futility as well. I can get it installed, but then when I run the account setup wizard the pages are all blank. I managed to snag one of those free serial numbers for Codeweavers CrossOver when they were giving them out back in October, maybe I'll give that a shot.

    3. Re:My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Instead of finding a good CVS client, you should focus on finding a good VCS instead of CVS.

    4. Re:My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by TheNarrator · · Score: 3, Informative

      We almost got roped into exchange at my job but I made them go with Zimbra. Zimbra acts like Exchange and windows users can't really tell the difference when using outlook. Now the windows people are happy and the Linux people are happy.

      I think if we got an Exchange server it would have eventually sucked the whole company's IT infrastructure into Microsoft proprietary only. If there's one thing you can do at a new startup to save money it's to avoid MS Exchange and go with Zimbra. That's because once the camel's nose is under the tent the whole IT infrastructure gets sucked into the MS black hole and you're paying the yearly Microsoft tax on every component of your IT infrastructure. Zimbra helps limit the bottom line damage that the obligatory windows licenses create.

    5. Re:My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always run Office 2007 under VMware, with Unity mode turned on.

    6. Re:My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by DanWS6 · · Score: 1

      I've considered that too, that will be the last resort. Currently Ubuntu is installed inside a image on my ntfs drive (didn't want to deal with IT yelling at me for screwing with the partitions).

    7. Re:My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      CVS. I really like TortoiseCVS and can't find an equivalent that is as easy to use. I guess it's not a big deal, I could go back to using the cli, but what can I say, I am lazy. :)

      How about tkcvs?

    8. Re:My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late. If you haven't already downloaded, your serial expired after a month. If you've already downloaded, then you're good, but if not, you're SOL.

    9. Re:My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by ianare · · Score: 1

      I use SVN and had used the nautilus SVN scripts which let you do basic SVN commands (update, commit, add, etc) before moving over to netbeans for all my development, which has built in CVS and SVN support. In any case, there are some nautilus CVS scripts which could be helpfull to you.

    10. Re:My troubles switching to Ubuntu at Work by tedrampart · · Score: 1

      could be an issue with a missing font. I installed steam a couple of years ago in wine, and until I installed some sort of truetype font it would recognize, all the pages were blank. I remember it took some digging and wasn't too obvious of a solution on the wineHQ site.
      I haven't tried wine since then since I've never needed it. so I could be way off in my guess work.

  28. What a loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy probably makes less money than the guy who cleans the toilets.

    Who cares what this loser's silly "problem" is. I don't hear the toilet cleaner guy in a state of angst over switching to Formula 409 after relying on Fantastik for all these years.

    Suck it up, bucko. And get a life.

  29. What about Linux users moving to Windows? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been a Linux user since 1993, when I was a student at university. Until 1998, I ran Linux as my primary OS, but kept a Windows partition on my home system to run some games. And since 2002 I've been fortunate enough to run Linux full-time at work. It has been a great experience so far. I didn't have any issues exchanging documents with others at work, and certainly my previous bosses didn't mind. But times change, I suppose.

    I've been asked to move back to Windows, at least for work. The difference between Windows (XP) and Linux (Fedora 9) has been shocking, to say the least. Since you often see blogs or tech articles (like the parent post) when long-time Windows users experiment with Linux for the first time, I thought it might be equally interesting for this long-time Linux user to blog about my first experience running Windows in over 6 or 7 years:

    Linux in Exile

    The short list of things I have run into in my first week of running Windows:

    • hardware support is definitely not plug-and-play (had troubles getting a simple laptop mini-dock to get recognized, same with the external display.)
    • programs look and act differently from each other (no common themes, inconsistent behavior, etc.)
    • MS Office (2007) makes it hard for me to write the documents I need to create for work.
    • Font rendering is poor.

    I haven't written yet about program look-and-feel; I'll do that soon. But I have noticed that MS Office acts differently from Notepad, from Media Player, and from the Windows local file browser.

    Also, ctrl-backspace is implemented differently just about everywhere - in some cases, it backspaces to the start of the word or field (what I expect) and elsewhere it only backspaces once, and in other cases it inserts a ctrl-backspace character!

    1. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by Daengbo · · Score: 1
    2. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by cj1127 · · Score: 1

      But I have noticed that MS Office acts differently from Notepad

      DEAR GOD!

    3. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't written yet about program look-and-feel; I'll do that soon. But I have noticed that MS Office acts differently from Notepad, from Media Player, and from the Windows local file browser.

      Ars Technica mentioned this a while ago, about every windows application looks different from one another. There's an excellent screenshot here:

      Windows Theme Confusion

      Showing about 10 different applications from Windows Explorer and IE through Visual Studio, Word, and Notepad and their inconsistant themes.

    4. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by Mspangler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "MS Office (2007) makes it hard for me to write the documents I need to create for work."

      Office 2007 makes it hard for EVERYONE to write the documents they need to create for work. It's very egalitarian in that way.

      Everything except 'paste values' in Excel is one extra click away from where-ever you are than was the case in Excel 2003, because you have to click on the menu to get the correct ribbon, then drill down into the tiny little arrow to get the dialog that has what you want.

      I actually do most of my word processing in Wordpad, as it lets me write without helpfully formatting everything the Ballmer Way. Then paste the text into the official company memo template, resave, and done.

      Fortunately I have no need to use Powerpoint. For this boon I hold my employer in great regard.

    5. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to use both as well, I recommend turning on ClearType fonts for the font rendering and why not use OpenOffice?

    6. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 1

      Middle-click to paste: Because I'm pasting from stuff all the time, I can normally hold two states, the Ctrl-C one and the highlighted one. That means, for example, if I want to paste the name of an article and the link to it, I can normally highlight one, copy, then highlight the other, move over to my blog or wherever and paste both in without switching back. There are a million other uses for this stuff. Highlighting and middle-clicking is just easier, anyway. Speaking of easy ...

      God this is the most frustrating thing in the history of using computers.

    7. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      I have to use both as well, I recommend turning on ClearType fonts for the font rendering and why not use OpenOffice?

      I'll probably get flamed for this but ClearType sucks. Native linux font rendering is so much better, especially with light text on a dark background. Cairo now has the ability to use cleartype-like rendering the the output is awful compared to native rendering. It looks ok with black text on a white background but as soon as you reverse the color scheme the light text becomes a multicolored mess. You can clearly see the the red, green, and blue subpixels. The native Linux algorithm does a much better job in these situations. This isn't just a cairo issue either. You can see the same issues with IE on a webpage that uses light text against a dark background.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    8. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Font rendering is poor [in Windows]

      Strange, I find the exact opposite. I've been fighting with fonts forever on Linux: they are what I call 'horribly out of focus' (but developers call them 'aliased'), and their sizes make no sense (I've been trying to get the same look on both OSes for months for two user interfaces I develop).

      ctrl-backspace

      On some other progs it's also used to 'redo' after an 'undo'.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    9. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      See a link, highlight it. It's now in the buffer. Got to Firefox, highlight whatever is in the address bar with the intent of pasting your links. Ooops, it's now in the buffer. Go back to square one. This copy/paste behavior drives me insane.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    10. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 1

      Only because you're used to doing that in windows. A linux user would:

      1. See link, highlight it.
      2. Switch to firefox
      2a. Optionally ctl-T
      3. middle click the window.

    11. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I know that, but it just doesn't work this way (you open a new tab, I just wanted to reuse one). It's the same deal when copy-pasting code: you see some code you want to use after looking for it, you highlight it, you go to where you want to put it, you highlight the code you want to replace... Ooops. Argh !

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    12. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's stopping you from using the CLIPBOARD buffer? The only difference is that in X you're offered an the PRIMARY buffer on top of the one you're already used to. That doesn't mean you have to use it.

      There are also all sorts of ways to get around the problem you're talking about: alt-tab and ctrl-L is approximately a thousand times faster than coordinating more mouse clicks anyway. Plus you've got drag and drop, which works sanely in most applications with the exception of the terminal.

    13. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by rusl · · Score: 1

      Wow, I never knew about the middle button. That is cool, thanks! I just use the Ctrl+C+V. Also I use Glipper in Gnome. It is a bit buggy (Just when the desktop starts up) and there are other free clipboard managers out there but I have never had any serious problems. It keeps the last 50 (or whatever I set) cut and pastes for me. It also would work with stuff you just select but I turned that feature off because it annoyed me. I like the idea of having that as one system and the middle button as a 2nd system. Cool - thanks!

      The hard part for me is the Ctrl+Shift+V in the terminal. I use that so often that I get confused if I'm in the terminal or the firefox and then press Shift in the wrong place and have to do it twice because I did it wrong the first time.

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    14. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by msormune · · Score: 1

      Why is not possible to use the same software to write the documents you need? After all, no one's resisting you from using open source software in Windows?

      Also, are you saying programs in X don't have a different look and feel from each other? Like Gnome and KDE applications?

      Is the hardware MORE plug-and-play than in Linux?

    15. Re:What about Linux users moving to Windows? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      Also, are you saying programs in X don't have a different look and feel from each other? Like Gnome and KDE applications?

      Sure, GNOME and KDE apps look different - but under Fedora, where GNOME was installed by default, all my apps were GNOME. So Firefox, Openoffice, Terminal, the text editor, ... all looked identical.

      Yet under Windows, apps all look different - they use different themes - even "first-party" apps from Microsoft. Office looks different from IE or Firefox, different from Media Player (our phone system emails me my voicemails as WAV files), ... it's all different. Nothing feels the same.

      Another example is keyboard handling. When I used Fedora, every application handled, say, ctrl-backspace the same - it backspaced over the last word. But under Windows, this is different depending on which app you're in. For some apps, ctrl-backspace works "correctly" and backs up over the last word. Other apps insert a ctrl-backspace character. Other apps just back up one character. Another app just skips back to the start of the line, deleting nothing. And one other app doesn't recognize ctrl-backspace at all (does nothing.) Again, behavior differs even in first-party (Microsoft) apps.

      So I'd say that Linux (certainly, Fedora ... the one I used) is waaaaaaaaay more consistent than Windows.

      Is the hardware MORE plug-and-play than in Linux?

      I haven't used any weird hardware, but I do find it interesting that Windows didn't recognize the laptop's mini-dock until after it was rebooted. Yet I know (from using it under Linux) that the mini-dock just presents the optical drive as a USB optical drive, and reproduces ports for audio, USB, video, etc. And Linux recognized it right away, even the first time, without having to reboot.

      In that instance, Windows was definitely LESS plug-and-play than Linux.

  30. Humor in Slashdot by troll8901 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You didn't hear the Whooooooosh!! flying past you?

    I suggest buying these two products:

    • Humor for Humans 3.1
    • Common Sense for Humans 1.4

    The open source equivalences require you to build our own databases (by reading lots and lots of Slashdot), which takes too long. These two proprietary products allows you to gain Humor and Common Sense capabilities instantly.

  31. How about web-based apps? by f1vlad · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Outlook Web Access (if recent built on server side) works actually very well on IE7+. It has some resemblance to hotmail.com, or maybe hotmail resembles OWA. Unfortunately it scks deluxe on any other browser :(

    When it comes to other things you mentioned, why not use some of the web-based alternatives?

    1. PDF Reader -- Google docs/gmail offers a fantastic PDF reader.
    2. Visio could very likely be completely replaced by one of the following -- glinkr.net, bubbl.us, gliffy.com.
    3. MS Office/OpenOffice probably too can be replaced by either thinkfree.com or docs.google.com
    --
    o_O
    1. Re:How about web-based apps? by s4m7 · · Score: 1

      there's nothing wrong with evince (ubuntu PDF reader) and the fact that he couldn't figure out to uncheck "View>Dual" in there shows how much time he spent on the problem.

      Evince is tons faster than Adobe Reader and the rendering is spot-on.

      --
      This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
  32. Sshfs is your friend. by Kjellander · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's so much easier to just mount the remote dir with fuse, that to use any client.

    sudo apt-get install sshfs
    sshfs user@host:dir/ dest/

    And you're done. Use the normal file handler after that.

    Don't want to type in passwords? Use ssh-keygen and ssh-add. Don't wanna type in the mount line? Just put them all in a bash script and mount them all first time you log in. Or get the old ones with 'history | grep sshfs' and tun it by typing in the number in front of the command after an exclamation mark, like so: '!679'

    1. Re:Sshfs is your friend. by atrus · · Score: 1

      Depending on what applications you're use, and if you have gnome's FUSE VFS thing running, you can bonk the URL into Nautilus, and its transparent.

      I don't use Gnome or KDE however.

    2. Re:Sshfs is your friend. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Or get the old ones with 'history | grep sshfs' and tun it by typing in the number in front of the command after an exclamation mark, like so: '!679'

      You have one of those new-fangled keyboards without ^R, I see.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  33. I think he forgot about wine ... by RoCKeTKaT · · Score: 1

    He seems to know know about the existence of wine, or at least he didn't mention it. Too bad.

  34. zmodem by coryking · · Score: 1

    zModem support is the *best* feature of SecureCRT. Much easier then the alternatives. While I've switched to PuTTY, I sure miss it.

  35. I switched in Decemeber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had a position change at my current job which results in a lot less .Net programming and more infrastructure management and planning.

    First thing I did was dump XP for Ubuntu 8.10. I love it. Everything on my Dell Latitude D620 just worked. I have dual monitor support from nVidia with just a driver download. I've got OpenVPN and wireless and sound and all working with almost no hacking.

    The only times I use Windows are when I need to manipulate Active Directory or SQL Server, then I use an XP instance in Virtual Box. Oh, and the stupid Exchange calendaring.

    Otherwise, I have no issues using Ubuntu daily. The update mechanism works well, it's secure, and I've had zero issues. I've tried Linux several times in the last 10 years, and I can finally say it is ready for 'mom' use.

  36. Suggested alternatives by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind, this is a list of things which I believe to be viable alternatives, not necessarily good ones, and not necessarily better. Just things you might not have known about, or considered.

    Mostly, just in case people read TFA, try one of his suggestions, and find themselves thinking "this sucks!" Well, Linux is all about choice -- and here is some choice:

    Vanilla SSH is good, but...

    To replace SecureCRT I chose SSH Menu along with the stock OpenSSH client. This keeps track of my connections, allowing me to avoid having to memorize IP addresses of jump off boxes, and it also remembers my window sizes.

    For the IP addresses, I would suggest a host file and possibly some aliases, if you have a few you connect to often enough to have, for example, 'ssh root@chromium' is too long, so you type something like shcr instead. (I don't actually do that (I type too fast to care), but I've seen others do it.)

    Or just use a smarter terminal -- one which can remember window sizes and commands to run as part of a "session".

    Also, there's no SCP or SFTP feature that I can find comparable to SecureCRT. This isn't too much of a problem as I don't SCP that many files, but it's still annoying having to type in hostnames or IP addresses.

    See above -- not ssh-specific. Any command you type frequently enough, you could just make a menu entry.

    Or, if you're a GUI person, fish is nice, too -- just bookmark fish://user@host/wherever in Konqueror.

    I'm using OpenOffice (OO) 2.4.1, and it works fine.

    Good enough.

    If it's not fine, alternatives to try are KOffice, or the GNOME office stuff (AbiWord, Gnumeric, etc). Google Docs, of course, works flawlessly in Firefox regardless of platform.

    Ok, Microsoft is probably never going to port this application to Linux. So I used VirtualBox, a free alternative to VMWare, and installed XP.

    Not a horrible solution, if you actually need Visio. But there are numerous alternatives that try to do the same thing. I usually go for something more automatic, like GraphViz (with dot).

    Since I use Adblock, sometimes I have to use Opera when I want to see how a page is supposed to look.

    Or Konqueror... Or you can turn off Adblock for a single page.

    This is a sore spot. I work in an Exchange environment...

    When I did, I just used Thunderbird with IMAP. These days, I'd use KMail/Kontact with IMAP. I guess it depends how much you need.

    The problem is Evolution kind of sucks too

    I'll suggest Kontact.

    Another easy win here. Pidgin comes pre-installed.

    Cool. If you need webcam support, there's Kopete, but it has its own weirdness. Pidgin likely Just Works.

    Nothing big here, I just use Gnome-RDP.

    Similarly, krdc is nice, mostly because it's a multi-backend client. Paste in a URI-like specification, and it'll do RDP, VNC, whatever.

    Ubuntu comes with a stock PDF reader pre-installed, and it works. However it's pretty plain, and at one point I changed it to view two pages at once and since haven't figured out how to put it back.

    KPDF was good. Okular is excellent. And for the record, to change the above in Okular is view->view mode.

    So I downloaded the Adobe Linux client and it works great.

    apt-get install acroread. Yep, works great. I only use it when I have to, though.

    So I use PasswordSafe. Unfortunately the Linux version sucks.

    There's got to be something else out there. I know that, at one point, I was using Google Browser Sync -- maybe there's a service like that, still?

    I just switched over to Amarok though, and I love it - it has smart playlists, and even a pause button! I kept Rythymb

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Suggested alternatives by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

      I know that, at one point, I was using Google Browser Sync -- maybe there's a service like that, still?

      Foxmarks.

  37. gnome speaks sftp by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1

    On ubuntu you really don't need an ftp or sftp client because gnome applications already speak those networking protocols.

    Just open up nautilus, and give the networking path instead of the file system path. sftp://my_username@myserver.com/my/path

    Using gedit or other gnome programs you can even open up the files remotely without manually copying them to the local disk.

    This also makes setting up an smb server unnecessary since as long as you have ssh access you can access the whole remote filesystem through nautilus.

  38. alien does not work by sentientbrendan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never heard of anyone ever getting it to work with a real world program.

    The problem is that different linux distros are *not* binary compatible with each other. Some of the core libraries like glibc are compatible, but most binaries link a ton of other stuff. You might as well try installing windows programs or osx programs.

    Alien cannot fix ABI incompatibilities.

    >What to do when a developer distributes a
    >.rpm but not a .deb, or the other way around?

    Install from source.

    On the other hand proprietary developers have a different system for installing their software. They use a minimal set of shared libraries like glibc and the x libraries that don't change their ABI often, then they statically compile everything else.

    They also typically provide a shell script based installer instead of an rpm. Those that provide rpm's typically also provide a fairly generic deb.

    It's a bitch getting inter distro compatible binaries on linux, so unless the developer put the initial work in, don't expect to be able to force it to run on your distro.

    1. Re:alien does not work by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice.org is just about the largest program in a normal desktop install, and using alien to convert the RPMs into DEBs was the standard way to install it (out of repo) on Debian for years.

      No, because of shared libs, it's not 100%, but (as you mention) devs who want compatibility can plan for that.

    2. Re:alien does not work by rusl · · Score: 1

      What? I've never had a problem using alien to convert and rpm to deb!? What planet are you from and what packages are you using? I don't even have any examples of packages I have converted that I recall because it has always been so easy and painless I never gave it a 2nd thought... Actually, come to think of it, an example off the top of my head that I do remember now is the LVM GUI for Redhat. I'm on Ubuntu and they don't make a deb if I remember correctly. I can't tell you the exact name but it's the only one so it would be easy to Google. I've used it many other times but that's the only obviously rpm that I can think of and I remember the process because LVM was a learning process.

      Ah, now I see your sig. Linuxhaters. No wonder you are talking nonsense. I went to that site (a long time ago) hoping to find something funny or insightful but it is just bitter and not very accurate. There's lots of room to poke at Linux -no doubt- but that ideological site doesn't do it constructively, just whining.

      On the other hand I use Ubuntu so pretty much everything has an Ubuntu version because it is so popular I imagine if you used a less popular distro you would have more problems than I have had... But Alien is part of the simplicity of using the popular distro - yes it works.

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
  39. exchange supports imap by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1

    and I've had good luck with it in thunderbird.

    However, I don't think there's linux program that handles exchange calendaring well. There's a plugin for thunderbird, but it doesn't work very well.

    My advice is to use outlook web access for calendaring if you don't have a windows box on hand... although honestly I just keep my corporate laptop with winxp next to my linux workstation for when I need the calendar.

    If you get sick of switching back and forth between windows, a good option is to use rdesktop:
    http://www.rdesktop.org/

    to log into your windows machine and keep a window open with outlook. Alternatively, there's always vmware, although it's a bit pricey and sucks up ram.

  40. I think what surprises me most ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that it is 2009 and someone who claims to be a network engineer (one that deals with routers and switches) is still trying to use Windows. I've been running a pretty large network and have not touched Windows since the late 90's. I've been using Solaris and Linux as my desktop for years, only one member of my team still has Windows installed and that is booted only when we need to check a VPN package or something. Seriously, when trying to admin a network, Windows only gets in the way and causes problems. Sure, other people will give answers about IT policy and having to fit in with the rest of the IT infrastructure, but the networking group *is* the infrastructure and is pretty much above the law when their requirements come into question.

  41. Re:Not again by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

    It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!

    You, sir, are a hypocrite.

    No, just neither an Apple or Linux fanboy. Most likely chants 'There is but one OS and Richmond is its vendor' at any and all board meetings.

    Hey, nobody ever got fired for specifying Microsoft.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  42. Re:Not again by Hucko · · Score: 2, Funny

    But the curses are piling up...

    --
    Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  43. Is it me, or are articles like this now trendy? by Major+General+Ist · · Score: 1

    It seems like I'm seeing a new article about a Windows guy trying Linux every couple days or so. I don't find this guy's article particularly stimulating, but I like the message. Windows guys are liking Linux enough to spread the word any way they can. Here's another Windows IT guy blogging as he tries Linux. I'm interested to see his final verdict: Vista Vitals

  44. Titles by srobert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've got some special insight into this argument since I've been on both sides of it.
      I've been through all of the hell that you described above and gotten my BS in Mechanical Engineering from an accredited university. I've now worked as a Civil Engineer for several years, and have recently taken the PE exam. (I'll be retaking it soon. My score was one point too low).
      Before I got my degree, I was working my way through college part-time as ...an engineer. (Note what I'm doing with Capitalization here). Specifically, I was a stationary engineer and a member of the International Union of Operating engineers. I served a four year apprenticeship in order to be a journeyman stationary engineer. There can be a certain amount of "hell" associated with that process too (that most academics would underestimate).
      The title is traditionally applied in two different (and probably more) senses. The first, Engineer, is given to a range of professions requiring a high degree of mathematical, scientific, and a well-rounded academic education, that is (supposed to be) typical of at least a four-year college degree. The second sense, engineer, is to refer to members of a range of vocational trades that branched out of heavy equipment operations, (especially steam-powered equipment) in the nineteenth century. Both of these traditional uses of the term have well-established precedent.
      Today the academic Engineers would like to restrict the use of the term to distinguish themselves from the vocational engineers. But the latter naturally object to the loss of the respected title. My take on this is that vocational side underestimates the expectations that the most recent use of the term Engineer evokes. I would continue to have considerable respect for current members of my former trade, if they were to use the titles of "technician" and "operator" instead. But I suspect that many of my current colleagues, i.e. Engineers, don't adequately appreciate the difficulties encountered in acquiring a skilled trade and don't have much respect such titles or vocations.

    1. Re:Titles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your opinion doesn't count for much because civil engineers aren't real engineers anyway.

    2. Re:Titles by smithmc · · Score: 1

      The title is traditionally applied in two different (and probably more) senses. The first, Engineer, is given to a range of professions requiring a high degree of mathematical, scientific, and a well-rounded academic education, that is (supposed to be) typical of at least a four-year college degree. The second sense, engineer, is to refer to members of a range of vocational trades that branched out of heavy equipment operations, (especially steam-powered equipment) in the nineteenth century. Both of these traditional uses of the term have well-established precedent.

      Here's another: my alma mater offered (not sure if they still do, don't think so) an Engineer's Degree. It was a professional-level degree, intended to be parallel to a law or medical degree - three years full-time beyond a B.S., just short of a Ph.D. Getting it didn't mean you were licensed, but you certainly had more education than the rank-and-file B.S. going out into the workplace.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  45. A few hints to his Ubuntu "problems" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice Reading albeit a few misconceptions in using Ubuntu may come from the fact that he's try to use it exactly like Windows. I thought of writing it as a e-mail but ended up posting it on /.
    So don't wonder I address "you"

    A few hints:
    > SSH Client
    > To replace SecureCRT I chose SSH Menu along with the stock OpenSSH client.

    Do you mean "connection to server" under "places"? Where you simply mount a remote directory via sshfs/webdav/younameit and then just use it like any other folder? Not a rhetoric question, this is the only point in your article I am not understanding what you wanted to say.

    Btw. SSH Tunnels are managable with the package gSTM. You might try adding the medibuntu source for that. I didn't found it on my workstation (no medibuntu sources) but it is on my laptop (with medibuntu sources), but I didn't look it up before posting.

    SSH _multiplexing_, working in parallel: Try the package "clusterssh" :) You can't do that with Putty!?

    > Visio
    Most Ubuntu users go with Dia. But that might not be an option if you already have a lot of Visio files, or receive them regularly.

    > Browser
    > [..] Since I use Adblock, sometimes I have to use Opera
    > when I want to see how a page is supposed to look.

    It's possible to use firefox with and without plugins easily.
    Try using another profile without/with less plugins. You can even make a second icon which starts firefox with the option "--no-remote". That avoids simply opening another window of an already active profile and offers you to select whatever profile you like.
    The only prerequisite is that you don't automatically start with the last profile. (.mozilla/firefox/profiles.ini, in "General" section set "StartWithLastProfile=0")
    This way you can start as many differently configured firefoxes as you like.
    ("NoScript" is a good candidate to be disable in a "just-works" profile for secure, known sites.)

    > PDF Reader
    > [..] it's pretty plain, and at one point I changed it to view two
    > pages at once and since haven't figured out how to put it back. [..]

    "Evince" is badly configured by default -- at a first look I was totally disappointed by it, too.
    But there is a solution to that:
    Right click on the toolbar and you can add the icons for "two-paged", "fullscreen", "rotate ..." etc.
    Honestly I still do printing via Acrobat Reader, e.g. it's far more easier to configure for printing multiple pages on one printout.

    > Music Player
    > (though the lack of a stop or pause button on a music player is pretty lame).

    You can pause it by pressing the play button once more -- as its "pressed down" state suggests :)
    As far as I know every new Gnome application follow this rule, e.g. press the "two-paged" button in "evince" again and it will go "single-page".

    Regards

  46. Use andLinux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Last Friday I stumbled over a project that seems to fit that requirement perfectly.

    I'll just cite the site's intro:
    andLinux is a complete Ubuntu Linux system running seamlessly in Windows 2000 based systems (2000, XP, 2003, Vista; 32-bit versions only). This project was started for Dynamism for the GP2X community, but its userbase far exceeds its original design. andLinux is free and will remain so, but donations are greatly needed.

    And some more:
    You will get:
            * a fully functional Linux system, however without the usual desktop (you've already got one from Windows)
            * a second panel (e.g. at the top of your Windows desktop) or a second start menu (in the system tray next to the clock), from which you can start Linux applications
            * Linux applications and Windows applications can be used simultaneously and you can cut and paste text between them
            * apt / Synaptic to install further applications
    You will NOT get:
            * another desktop
            * the bench of applications that usually ship with Linux distributions (you have to fetch whatever you want)
            * trouble with further drivers ;-)
    Limitations
            * Security warning: It is recommended to use andLinux only on single-user-PCs or in a trustworthy environment because the communication with the X-Server and the launcher is not secured, i.e., every user who can login to Windows can access andLinux.
            * andLinux is not suitable for high-performance realtime graphics such as required by most 3D games. Although some users managed to get openGL applications to work on recent hardware, you will most probably experience problems doing so.
            * If you have a multi-core CPU, you will only be able to use one of these cores for andLinux (due to technological limitations, as all andLinux processes are encapsulated in one Windows process).

    See http://www.andlinux.org/

    I haven't tested it yet but I think I will install it shortly.

    Cheers.

  47. Linux solution for Visio by stry_cat · · Score: 1

    Actually his writeup hits a point I've been struggling with for a while and one that is making me reconsider Linux as my desktop OS.

    Is there a diagram editor that works on Linux? I've tried Dia and it seems clunky and lacking. Is there anything out there with the functionality of Visio, but runs on Linux?

  48. Serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we supposed to take this freak seriously? Try looking like a man and then come back.

    1. Re:Serious by twigles · · Score: 1

      He didn't hear your mom complaining.

  49. just moved back to XP..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have just switched back to XP from ubuntu 8.10 due to numerous issues:

    laptop suspend and hibernate not reliable
    close lid, low battery, sleep then hibernate no go
    sound would just quit working
    multiple monitor and res switching, better in U8.10, but still not as transparent as under XP
    3D acceleration of hi-def video and googleearth touch and go
    no support for HP's apparently-windows-only 3G modems in Elitebook
    a silly bug with the logitech dinovo usb dongle that it would lock up on ubuntu boot, had to unplug and replug every time, meh.
    other silly productivity-killing bugs like cant paste an image into thunderbird new mail and cant have more than one vpn connection up at a time

    these issues became deal breakers for me, I had to switch back to XP to get the most out of my shiny new Elitebook. This boils down to HP (or whoever) not working as well with open source community making the hardware support seamless as they seem to do with M$. under XP, all the drivers are rock solid and mature. It all just works.

    I do miss some things about Ubuntu, the fully whizbang compiz desktop is quite a treat! Ubuntu 8.10 intrepid is the closest thing to be really useable on various laptops I tried it on. Maybe Version 9 will get us over the edge.

  50. Re:If you don't like a story, please don't post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, kdawson. Oh, wait...

  51. Developer having a go as well by wheelie77 · · Score: 1
    I have made the jump to Intrepid Ibex 8.10 a while ago. However, I am not able to completely convert because there are some apps that are still giving me trouble. In my job in need to use the following:
    • Visual Source Safe
    • PeopleTools 8.9
    • Exchange
    • Cognos
    • SVN
    • ssh and other stuff relating..

    Well I have most of this going either by using Codeweavers crossover or linux tools:

    • For the exchange stuff i am using Evolution which is not great but it is doing the job.
    • VSS does seem to run under crossover with no trouble at all
    • Cognos is running under ie6 on crossover because of the activeX requirements.
    • svn and ssh stuff seems to work better than it did under windows. Just being able to mount and ssh share is sweet ie. sshfs://username@server/dir and away you go. You can also bookmark these shares for quick access.

    The only thing i have not been able to convert over to linux is PeopleTools, which is getting looked at by the crossover guys atm. For now i have it running under Suns new implementation of VirtualBox which is running sweet as and has not crashed once ;) . I do admit that it is a "little" more effort to get things up and running, but I enjoy learning. So as long as this reigns true I will keep using Ubuntu.

  52. Linux use still under 1% - Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real reason Linux on a desktop is horrible is because there are about 100+ different distros, how the hell am I supposed to find what I want to use, sadly people complain about 5 different windows versions how would they feel with a lot more. I have used all the top distros that you can name for about a week each, plus installing software is a pain let alone finding what you want and then finding out it works but doesn't work as you want it to and you need to spend time to fix the problem.

    Heck I am an experienced computer user and I know I could get the hang of it but what the hells the point of switching to linux if only less the 1% of users use it then divide the one percent by the 100 different distros and how the hell am I going to make money supporting people on 100 different distros if I only know a 2 or three. People don't want a $1000 bill for my service, they might as well get a new cheap windows computer for half the price. Linux gurus get together and make a couples of kick ass os's because the way it is going there will be 10,000 different ones and still less then 1% after you combine them all together.

    Linux on servers now that is a different story.