Slashdot Mirror


Keeping in Contact With Family, From Afghanistan?

LiNKz writes "Within a short while I will be heading to Afghanistan and in the interest of keeping in communication with my wife and family I've been looking at different means of it, from VoIP to cellular services. I'm not sure how well connected or how stable of a connection the base I'm deploying to has, which means VoIP might simply not be an option. I have, however, noticed in my searches that Afghanistan has recently boomed with cellular coverage though that too seems to be difficult to ascertain. I'm curious if the Slashdot community has any information or experience regarding international cellular services offered in this country and the means of obtaining it."

176 comments

  1. Not an issue anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Internet access and calling centers are plentiful, at least on the US bases. This is really the *last* thing you need to be worried about.

    1. Re:Not an issue anymore by Crewdawg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would disagree slightly here. I am an IT Manager that has a dozen or so remote sites in Afghanistan and Iraq. I would not consider the internet and call centers plentiful. We are often forced to use VSAT to get any connection at all. When there is a military provided connection it is usually a SIPRNET or NIPRnet. Use of VoIP and personal communications on these networks is usually prohibited. We do have good luck with Skype and even Vonage when there is an internet connection, though it is often heavily delayed (think 800 - 1200ms delays).

    2. Re:Not an issue anymore by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you can't just hook up a VOIP device to niprnet and expect it to work - the firewalls are far too restrictive. Not to mention that it violates regs.

      Morale phones are generally provided. A cell phone is a possibility, but remember foreign call charges.

      In my experience, about all you can count on is snail mail, email, and rationed phone access.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Not an issue anymore by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine is currently serving in Iraq, he is a Marine. His friends all think My Space is a proper "email" service and he is forced to wait upward of ten minutes for a single page to load.

      For the author of the article, if you plan to do personal internet stuff go with what ever is indigenous like cell phones.

    4. Re:Not an issue anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't know if the Asker is leaving in uniform and will have access to anywhere near that level of support.

      If I weren't going out there on government orders and with their full support on the ground, I wouldn't even consider going without a satellite phone. Cell phone towers and the ISPs are often the first thing to go in a coup, and the country in question is anything but stable.

      I'd suggest grabbing a prepaid Thuraya phone, just-in-case. They're cheap ($0.90/minute?) and tiny, no larger than a ~1999 Nokia phone until you extend the antenna. It's also possible to get ISP service over the phone, in a pinch. Their site kinda sucks, but the service doesn't: http://www.thuraya.com/

      They can be useful in other situations, as well: http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=29876

      I'm not familiar with the alternatives (Thuraya's the only service I've seen set up storefronts in my current home of India), but your colleagues in country may be able to give more and better advice.

    5. Re:Not an issue anymore by Bangmaker · · Score: 1

      There is a free online video contact service a friend of mine used. I can't remember the name at the moment( I will post it when I find it out so keep looking for it). All you need is a webcam and microphone for both parties -- worth the cost to keep visual and audio communication.

    6. Re:Not an issue anymore by Judinous · · Score: 1

      A bit of an off-topic reply, but your post made me think of my own situation:

      I am a system administrator that has a handful of remote sites in South Texas. I would not consider the internet and call centers plentiful. We are often forced to use satellite or cellular networks to get any connection at all. When there is a cable provided connection it is usually at sub-dialup speeds. Use of VoIP on these networks is usually filtered. We do have good luck with Skype and even Vonage when there is an internet connection, though it is often heavily delayed (think 300 - 20000ms delays).

      It depresses me that this kind of bandwidth and latency is similar (if not better) than what I am able to get here in a US college town. The telecom industry in this country is so fucked up it blows my mind.

    7. Re:Not an issue anymore by tibman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I spent 6 months in a coalition log base that had zero internet, phones, pay, tv, or mail services. The only americans were my platoon, an ODA team, some rogue infantry major (a US liaison to another country), and a few commo guys. My platoon chipped in and bought a Satellite and a monthly plan from a local.. we had to pay in cash, however. Each plt member paid $100 the first month and $30 after that. We drove 2 hrs to the nearest FOB a few times a month. It had all the normal services so we could pickup mail for the logbase and get our monthly allowance from finance. I think the service plan we had gave us 12 unique IPs to play with. The service was good too(when there wasn't asshats leaving P2P stuff running all out). However, i recommend you stick to non-live communications as much as possible. Phonecalls make people cry and you just won't be as focused on the job with that kind of stuff to worry about (imo, of course. To each their own).

      It's a good idea that a senior NCO has control of the satellite so he can pull it down if he feels there is a good reason (sudden visit by a VIP, for example). The NCO can ensure everyone is running AV and NOT doing anything mission critical with the computer (watch Officers! anything official even memo's should be done on a non-network'd machine). Using a cheap (220v!) Router with assigned MACs is a good control mechanism. This is really only feasible with a small unit. You are responsible for lives and millions in equipment.. i feel there is no reason why you could not run a small network without oversight.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    8. Re:Not an issue anymore by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I was looking at SatPhones for a future camping trip (out in the boonies, no signal), and you can rent them from $25-$35 a week. A bit expensive, but it's easy to tell if you have signal. Can you see the sky? Yes? Then you have signal.

    9. Re:Not an issue anymore by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Judging by their coverage maps, Thuraya use geostationary satellites. That means latency will suck, hard. Iridium uses satellites in LEO, so the latency isn't quite as bad (though since they cut down on the number of ground stations the signal still goes a long way, so it's not as good as it used to be).

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    10. Re:Not an issue anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for the worthwhile post

    11. Re:Not an issue anymore by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I would really recommend you to move to somewhere else. Not too hot, not to cold, not too catastrophy, not too backwards. It can only get better. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  2. Ham radio by Gazoogleheimer · · Score: 0

    For a relatively reliable link, one could get a General class ham radio license and operate HF...although antenna and radio can get a wee bit expensive. Additionally, propagation conditions could be quite an issue.

    1. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      However, it's not clear that the Afghani government is ready to issue a reciprocal license to just anyone dropping in unexpectedly, since it doesn't appear that there's much activity from their own citizens these days.
      And, even if you were able to get over that hurdle, then there's the issue of who you'd be talking to - if your family members are also licensed hams (with a General class or higher license), fine. BUT, if they don't, you're probably out of lucky as I don't think there is a third-party agreement in place between the US and Afghanistan, and the US ham involved could lose his/her license by passing third-party traffic to/from a country that doesn't permit it.
      Your most reliable solution, albeit expensive, would be a commercial satellite telephone.

    2. Re:Ham radio by LVSlushdat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I worked at a MARS (Military Affiliate Radio Station) station in Vietnam back in the 70s, and have been a ham since then, and I can tell you you're gonna have major difficulty doing any kind of HF phone patches from that part of the world.. HF propagation from there to the US is pretty spotty at the best of times. I've lost contact with the MARS program, and would guess that with all the better communications options today for deployed military morale traffic, that old-style HF phone patches have gone the way of the dodo bird...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    3. Re:Ham radio by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 0

      And if everybody did that, you would be doing what you'll be doing as a well-equipped soldier in afghanistan from the "comfort of your own living room", without backup, and without logistics, and since hospitals are the first targets of these assholes, without medical care.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable truth

    4. Re:Ham radio by easyTree · · Score: 2

      If the guy wants to go sightseeing; who are you to suggest that he shouldn't? You're acting as though he's gonna go there and kill ppl ffs!

    5. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May you live forever SheildW0lf.

    6. Re:Ham radio by rohan972 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I forgot those dessert dwelling peasants attacked our freedom right? Give me a break.

      Yeah, what could they possibly do. It's not like they could fly planes into buildings packed with people or anything.

    7. Re:Ham radio by fred911 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, hanging even a 10mtr wip not to mention a g5rv is like .. Target time?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    8. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... Let's harass every country that could potentially do that.

      Oh wait. That's what we're working on.

    9. Re:Ham radio by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      No they can't, in fact half of them don't even speak English.

      Perhaps we should jail the entire United States over the Virginia tech massacre while we are at it.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    10. Re:Ham radio by rohan972 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah... Let's harass every country that could potentially do that.

      Not a great idea, how about just the groups who actually have done it. Like the 9/11 attacks were done by Al-Qaeda for example. You know, those guys hiding in Afghanistan.

    11. Re:Ham radio by rohan972 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No they can't, in fact half of them don't even speak English.

      Yeah, you're right, they can't. Except for the fact they did, but who cares about facts.

      Perhaps we should jail the entire United States over the Virginia tech massacre while we are at it.

      If that attack was a military/terrorist attack with political goals sponsored by an organisation as part of an ongoing campaign it would be appropriate to attack and destroy that organisation. If they were being sponsored and protected by a government it would be appropriate to take action against that government including, if necessary, military action. Neither Afghanistan nor any other country has had its entire population jailed, if you're going to use a straw man argument you could at least use one that isn't quite so stupid.

    12. Re:Ham radio by kgamiel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I recently acquired my (now deceased) grandparents home. He was a WWII veteran, radio man, who taught at the Coast Guard Academy and served in the Navy in communications. Until he died when I was 17, he had a 100' tower in his yard (many kid accidents caused by guy wires) and was a dedicated HAM, he hosted the repeater for the region. Among the many dusty certs on the wall of his small shop/office is a MARS cert. What a fantastic program and comradery. From what I can tell, that and like-minded groups of guys would hear the poster's question and move hell or high water to make it happen, that was their cause. Do we have such geeks today? I suspect we do and if so, we need to celebrate them with crusty-edged paper that bears their name and shows up on Slashdot decades later. If not....

    13. Re:Ham radio by reynolds_john · · Score: 1

      MARS was around when I was in Japan in 1988 in Iwakuni. Made life a lot better, since phone calls back then long distance could cost you your whole paycheck in the span of an hour or two.

    14. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 fucking idiocy. Just because they can fly planes doesn't mean they can launch a large scale attack that will require massive defense. I respect soldiers, I don't respect idiots who think if it wasn't from them being in Iraq we'd all be pissing ourselves.

    15. Re:Ham radio by gandhi_2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was stationed at Schofield Bks, Hawaii in the late 90's. There was a MARS site near Area X-Ray (ranges) that seemed to be in use. It's been about 10 years...but I imagine the mil hasn't given up on that stuff entirely.

    16. Re:Ham radio by HailSatan · · Score: 0

      Al-Qaeda did that? How on Earth did a database file named Al-Qaeda, that contained the names of all the horrible people the CIA gave money/weapons to in the 80s in Afghanistan, fly 2 planes into 2 buildings?

      I think some people may have done it, personally

    17. Re:Ham radio by HailSatan · · Score: 0

      Like the freedom to do whatever you want with your own body and mind when it harms no one else?

      You should ask Michael Phelps about how much he loves that freedom. God Bless America!

    18. Re:Ham radio by rohan972 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Al-Qaeda did that? How on Earth did a database file named Al-Qaeda, that contained the names of all the horrible people the CIA gave money/weapons to in the 80s in Afghanistan, fly 2 planes into 2 buildings?

      I think some people may have done it, personally

      As I said "You know, those guys hiding in Afghanistan." The "guys hiding in Afghanistan" being the "people" you mention, you idiot. Whether you think Al-Qaeda is the correct name to use to describe their organisation is irrelevant.

    19. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You bring us a Stinger missile and we will make you an imitation that would be difficult to tell apart from the original." You may need to revise your opinion of those "dessert dwelling peasants" capabilities. Sure, the article is about Pakistani tribesmen, but it is in the "lawless tribal belt along the country's western border with Afghanistan."

    20. Re:Ham radio by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Your level of ignorance astounds me, you really believe that an entire nation is at fault for the actions of a few?

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    21. Re:Ham radio by HailSatan · · Score: 0

      civil disobedience A political act involving disobeying governmental authority on grounds of moral objection, with the aim of promoting a just society.

    22. Re:Ham radio by Zappa · · Score: 1

      Although it sounds quite reasonable for basic communications, I have no idea, how easy access to HAM radio is granted in T6 now, my last information was that is was disallowed for "security reasons" by the mil two years ago.

      As you metioned, phone patches are not really state of the art for private communications. I'm sure you can be lucky, your country spent so much money in mil equipment, so hopefully also your private communication issues can be handled well...

      vy 73 es fb dx de oe6bkf

    23. Re:Ham radio by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Your level of ignorance astounds me, you really believe that an entire nation is at fault for the actions of a few?

      That's just stupid. Countries don't just tolerate other countries attacking them simply because not every single citizen was involved in the attack. Otherwise any country could launch attacks anywhere with impunity simply by maintaining a portion of innocent civilians.

      Never in history has every person in a country been responsible for military aggression. At the very least, babies and small children do not participate. That's no reason to let other countries attack you with no fear of retaliation. Your mentality is what allows terrorists to gain sympathy by using civilians as human shields. Then they play the victim card when they are rightly counter-attacked. You, sir, are part of the problem.

      War is a terrible thing, but it isn't the worst thing. Allowing your own people to be killed with impunity and being unwilling to fight back is worse. It is cowardice, even if you make some bleating excuse. Even Ghandi, as a pacifist, preferred violence to cowardice if those were the only choices.

    24. Re:Ham radio by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      The towel head nation did not attack you, a few of it's citizens did. Should innocent people in the United States be killed in an invasion by another country if a bunch of rednecks jump the boarder and kill a few people.

      "It is cowardice, even if you make some bleating excuse."

      and bombing some poor desert peasants who have no chance of fighting back isn't cowardly? These people hardly know who you are they often refer to western forces as "The Americas" to many of them you are just a militia that brings death and destruction.

      By your logic 9/11 victims where not innocent since America had been messing with Afghanistan long before 9//11 hence any victims would simply be casualties of war no different than the people American troops are fighting.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    25. Re:Ham radio by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      That's just stupid. Countries don't just tolerate other countries attacking them simply because not every single citizen was involved in the attack.

      of course not, but usually, you know, the government has to support the attacks generally? as opposed to having the group who purported the attacks simply being from that country

      I'm sorry, but I find the virginia tech massacre comparison of grandparent valid. If the government ordered for the military to hijack the planes and crash them, that would be a completely different story.

      Just because a country has a few nut jobs is not justification to go to 'war' with that country. Mind you, I completely support our troops out there (I'm not from the US) and if I'm lucky may get a chance to go there myself with the military.

      Even the party that started this 'war' in the end conceded it was illegal. Some of them still think it was the right thing to do. I wouldn't be so quick to say that the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocent people is justified because of a small group of rogue idiots.

      I'm not out to convince you either way, but I do think you should perhaps look at the other side of things sometimes, if a small group of american civilians bombed china, would it be appropriate for china to invade the US to stamp them out?

    26. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, most of them were Saudis, and it's mostly Saudi money. Go attack them instead.

    27. Re:Ham radio by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      The towel head nation did not attack you, a few of it's citizens did.

      On behalf of an organisation supported by the Taliban, the governing body of Afghanistan at the time.

      Should innocent people in the United States be killed in an invasion by another country if a bunch of rednecks jump the boarder and kill a few people.

      If the US government supported and protected said rednecks and the civilian casualties were an unavoidable in the process of killing those rednecks then those civilian casualties would be the responsibility of the US government. Back to reality, if US citizens made an unprovoked attack on Mexico or Canada, that government of that country would apply for extradition of those citizens and the US government would co-operate, round them up and extradite them for trial. The murders would provoke outrage across the US, not the celebrations that happened in many countries after 911.

      and bombing some poor desert peasants who have no chance of fighting back isn't cowardly?

      That would be the "poor desert peasants" that sent the Soviet military packing, right? In any case, they were protecting those who organised an attack on the US that deliberately killed several thousand non-combatants. Their ability to counter-attack isn't relevant. You don't get any immunity from military action just because you pick a target that has more military strength than you.

      By your logic 9/11 victims where not innocent since America had been messing with Afghanistan long before 9//11 hence any victims would simply be casualties of war no different than the people American troops are fighting.

      No, I never said innocent people weren't innocent, I said that is not reason enough to refuse to fight the actual aggressors. If they had been killed as part of collateral damage during a strike at a military base or similar situation, they would be civilian casualties of a military strike rather than victims of terrorism. They wouldn't be less innocent but the action of the attackers would be seen differently by most people. As for "America had been messing with Afghanistan long before 9//11" I can only presume you are referring to arming them in their fight against the Soviets, which would generally be considered the act of an ally, not an enemy, or perhaps all the foreign aid spending the US did in Afghanistan?

    28. Re:Ham radio by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      of course not, but usually, you know, the government has to support the attacks generally? as opposed to having the group who purported the attacks simply being from that country

      If you check it out I think you'll find that the Taliban was quite supportive of Al-Qaeda even if they didn't initiate the attacks. Supporting the organisation is equivalent to supporting their acts.

      I'm sorry, but I find the virginia tech massacre comparison of grandparent valid.

      and as I replied: "If that attack was a military/terrorist attack with political goals sponsored by an organisation as part of an ongoing campaign it would be appropriate to attack and destroy that organisation. If they were being sponsored and protected by a government it would be appropriate to take action against that government including, if necessary, military action." The virginian tech massacre was done by a lone man who would have been prosecuted had he lived. 911 was carried out by an organisation that the Taliban subsequently refused to act against. It is not a valid comparison.

      Just because a country has a few nut jobs is not justification to go to 'war' with that country.

      Unless of course those "few nut jobs" launch a major attack on your country and subsequently get protected by the government of that country as is the case in Afghanistan.

      Mind you, I completely support our troops out there (I'm not from the US) and if I'm lucky may get a chance to go there myself with the military.

      So it would seem that in this case you agree with me, unless you still think it is unjustified but want take part in it anyway.

      Even the party that started this 'war' in the end conceded it was illegal. Some of them still think it was the right thing to do.

      It is illegal, as far as I'm aware there has been no declaration of war by congress as required by the US constitution. The solution to that is to make a legal declaration of war, not allow your enemies to kill your people with impunity.

      I wouldn't be so quick to say that the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocent people is justified because of a small group of rogue idiots.

      We're coming after some idiots in your country [to Afghanistan]. Hand them over and we'll be gone. Otherwise get out of the way. Seriously though I'm not in favor of killing non-combatants at all. I just don't think that civilian casualties necessarily outweigh military objectives. Sometimes but not always and not in this case.

      I'm not out to convince you either way, but I do think you should perhaps look at the other side of things sometimes, if a small group of american civilians bombed china, would it be appropriate for china to invade the US to stamp them out?

      If the US government refused to extradite them, yes. Still might not be a good idea, but it would be justified.

    29. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but but but... the oils!

    30. Re:Ham radio by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      By your logic 9/11 victims where not innocent since America had been messing with Afghanistan long before 9//11 hence any victims would simply be casualties of war no different than the people American troops are fighting.

      They're not innocent. They're liars and thieves and exploiters of decent hard working human beings, and they should have suffered more before they died. They should have been waterboarded first.

      If they were innocent, free peoples around the world wouldn't have been staging mass protests for years about the evil shit they were doing.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    31. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. They were evil because some people said they were evil. It is wrong to be unpopular.

      And yes, that IS what you're saying, and yes, saying it DOES prove you to be the craven idiot you so rightly fear yourself to be. Because that's the only possible reason you would retreat into that kind of circular reasoning.

    32. Re:Ham radio by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "but I imagine the mil hasn't given up on that stuff entirely."

      It hasn't, and it's worth noting that amateur radio offers communication when more complex systems are disrupted such as during natural disasters.

      "The combined three service MARS programs (Army, Air Force, and Navy-Marine Corps) volunteer force of over 5,000 dedicated and skilled amateur radio operators is the backbone of the MARS program."

      http://www.netcom.army.mil/mars/

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    33. Re:Ham radio by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Oh. They were evil because some people said they were evil. It is wrong to be unpopular.

      And yes, that IS what you're saying, and yes, saying it DOES prove you to be the craven idiot you so rightly fear yourself to be. Because that's the only possible reason you would retreat into that kind of circular reasoning.


      Nice try. Except I wasn't using public opinion to justify the truth of my statement. I was demonstrating that there is CONSENSUS that my statement is true. And there is such consensus, and has been for a long time. Enough consensus to unite peoples from all races, all religions, all nationalities behind a common goal of opposing the evil that was being done.

      You must be just terrified.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    34. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a liar.

      You haven't demonstrated consensus of anything, and you never will. You've merely made vague allusions to protests and claimed them as proof of your claims. You literally said that the fact that some protests occurred showed that it was okay to kill thousands of people. Your claim rests entirely on the notion that it's okay to kill people who work in a big building because some other people didn't like some of the things that some of the people in that building were doing.

      As for consensus, there's a much bigger one that 9/11 was, in fact, a bad thing. Much of it comes from the exact same people providing you with your (entirely illusory) "consensus" regarding America. So even by your own childish logic, your argument is worthless.

      And I'm not terrified. I've long since come to terms with the fact that the world is complicated. You haven't, which is why you try to paint it as simple.

  3. Try something new: "voicebeep" by nitroamos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a cross between instant messaging and asynchronous voip.

    http://voicebeep.com/sayit

    1. Re:Try something new: "voicebeep" by metlin · · Score: 1

      Yo, I'm sure he could talk to Jon Katz.

      I'm sure there are a few Commodore 64s lying around that he could use.

  4. MWR provided internet and Voip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm currently deployed in Afghanistan at FOB Blessing and the broadband phones and internet that the MWR give us for free is actually really quite good considering where we're at. It's free and works perfectly, the only problem is the small amount of computers (8) and phones (3) available for this base with our numbers. Most of the other outposts have a MWR room with similar things in them, maybe less or more comps or phones..

    Not many people use the afghani cell phones or their blackberrys (apparently depending on the plan they work here albeit very expensive).

    hope this helps or reassures you!

    1. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by bmgoau · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you bring/use laptops? Is there a wireless access point or is that considered to much of a security threat?

    2. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      "and internet that the MWR give us for free is actually really quite good considering where we're at."

      I currently have a crappy (and expensive) 3G connection that keeps on disconnecting. So what you are basically saying is that Americans in a war zone have better access than me (living in a stable country)?
      Amazing.

    3. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by dollargonzo · · Score: 1

      For all our sakes, stop reading Slashdot at work!
       
      ..I kid, I kid

      --
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    4. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by v1 · · Score: 1

      what's wrong with skype or ichat?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by MrFreezeBU · · Score: 1

      I've had friends stationed at FOBs in Iraq over the last 4 years. They were able to bring their personal laptop along for the ride. As far as connectivity goes, I am not sure the options presented to them, but they were online in some capacity. On a flight to Vegas during a friends mid-deployment leave, he fired up the laptop, complete with sand from Iraq, much to the annoyance of the other passengers (you can only imagine what infantry guys find amusing)

    6. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by shiftless · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yo dude, hello from Camp Phoenix, Kabul! Never been to Blessing, but I've heard of it. IIRC, you fuckers are always getting lit up, or at least you used to when I went through the area a couple years back.

      To the OP, most larger bases have a SPAWAR system. That's a very good satellite system with a bunch of phones and computers available. You purchase minutes off the SPAWAR web site and make calls back to the states for $.04/min. You can also use Skype, as VOIP bandwidth is guaranteed. Laptops are generally not allowed on the system, but the network actually has very few (if any) restrictions. I download torrents all the time, for example, by running uTorrent off a thumb drive. The system is really slow during peak hours but in the middle of the night you can get some fantastic download speeds. I've hit 400k+ a sec before on torrents.

      Smaller bases (small FOBs) may only have DSN phone access. In that case, you just call back to a base in the states, have them transfer you to an outside line, and use your calling card to complete the call. Just as cheap as SPAWAR, though more hassle.

      At any rate, what it comes down to is, you will have no problems keeping in touch with family, even if you are stationed on the smallest, shittiest FOB in Afghanistan. So don't worry about it!

      P.S. be sure to bring a big external drive. You'll need it to hold the thousands of movies people will let you copy off their drives.

    7. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as may you

    8. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by shiftless · · Score: 1

      On a lot of the medium to large bases, guys will throw in money to purchase their own satellite systems, and they will sell access to people. It's generally expensive, but in many cases it is a great option for getting net access in your room. The "hadji" net access really blows. If you have net access in your room, then of course you can use your laptop, set up wireless access points, or do whatever. If you are using the MWR system (the free internet access, i.e. a computer lab) then you generally aren't allowed to plug in your laptop. Of course, it varies depending on where you're at. For more details on the net access situation, see my other posts.

    9. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your service, and stay safe out there.

    10. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greetings from Orgun-E. I didn't realize how many of us /.'rs are in Afghanistan. I agree with the phones in the mwr being the best bet. you can get local cell-phone service and call the states and all, but it costs alot and some bases don't allow it. and you may have to surrender it to your CoC during a commo blackout. as for net, usually someone will shell out some money for a sattelite and some switches and get the engineers to run some cables. It's expensive and slow as hell, but it's enought to email and message your family if nothing else.

    11. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by ccoder · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one reading this to be worried about security ?

      --
      "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" -- George Orwell
    12. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And... thank you for an accurate posting (no guessing, no fluff)... and the laughs.

    13. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a contractor developing stuff for some entities that must remain nameless, one of their biggest terrors is someones' porn collection hitting the system and people just generally using it as a file dump. Of course, they didn't bother bringing this up until about 3 days before we delivered, so I spent about 48 hours straight putting in a system of moderation and file removal (and testing) just to make sure you guys couldn't have fun with it, instead!

      I still end up laughing about it, but it's tempered a bit by pulling a pair of all nighters in succession. I started seeing shit halfway through the 2nd day; I know, I know, I'm a pansy-ass soft civvie, but seriously, shit was getting weird!

    14. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by socsoc · · Score: 1

      For more details on the net access situation, see my other posts.

      Or you could tell us?

    15. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Probably, since there wasn't anything in my post that could even remotely be considered classified or sensitive information.

    16. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by ccoder · · Score: 1

      OK, it was a rushed comment.  You are right.  But point and fact: others have carelessly used USB keys with classified information and lost them. This is a completely separate thing, having nothing to do with you storing movies on a HD (personal data).

      Sorry how it came off, and thanks for your efforts.

      --
      "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" -- George Orwell
    17. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I was stationed at Asadabad not to far south from Camp Blessing, I can confirm what this poster said. Most of the MWR rooms have computers with Skype, etc and ours had open ports on the switch specifically for people to bring in their laptops. Additionally, if you are going there with a PRT or something and can swing it with people you are going with, the base commanders wont have an issue with you getting a connection supplied locally.

    18. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Can you bring/use laptops? Is there a wireless access point or is that considered to much of a security threat?

      You can buy laptops from the PX shop on at least some US bases. My last laptop came from a PX in Kabul. If you can buy them on the base, i'd assume they'll let you use them there too.

    19. Re:MWR provided internet and Voip by strikethree · · Score: 1

      "P.S. be sure to bring a big external drive. You'll need it to hold the thousands of movies people will let you copy off their drives."

      Yes, yes, bringing a HUGE drive is a great idea. Several of them even... however, since I work in IA for you folks, could I possibly suggest that you have a virus scanner program on that drive? Honestly, viruses are a major problem as many of you in Afghanistan should know (FRAGO 11 ring a bell?).

      In summary, bring hard drives and bring anti virus software.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  5. Space, the easy way out by arogier · · Score: 1

    There's always the satellite phone option. Yes it is a bit pricey, but it should be a very reliable option given the terrain, etc that make such a mountainous country a less than ideal place for a cellular or traditional radio solution.

  6. There's an RFC for this by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Funny

    RFC1149 is the obvious approach one would take. Though there is some packet loss, the packets can be sufficiently large to transmit entire messages without fragmentation.

    1. Re:There's an RFC for this by rbrausse · · Score: 1

      but with this protocol any user should be aware of sniffing with machine guns...

      http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-361.html

    2. Re:There's an RFC for this by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Though there is some packet loss, the packets can be sufficiently large to transmit entire messages without fragmentation."

      High latency over Kandahar may be a concern, as avian carrier efficiency deteriorates when in defensive ("CYA") mode.

      http://www.javno.com/en/world/clanak.php?id=130563

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:There's an RFC for this by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Why do people always overlook the latency issues with this RFC?

  7. Regulations by breakzoidbeg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Communication Through un-official means may get you into some trouble, so be discrete no matter what option you choose so be careful. When the prime minister of Canada visited our base in kandahar they blacked out official communications and were really on top of unauthorized communications (no e-mail even). Keep your head down mate!

    1. Re:Regulations by LiNKz · · Score: 1

      Good to know, I've been concerned about that as well. I'm not entire sure of the regulations related to communication devices. In all, regardless of what I might want I won't set myself up for trouble, but I am interested in the possibilities.

      --
      Proceed with Format (Y/N)? Y
    2. Re:Regulations by MrFreezeBU · · Score: 2, Informative

      One thing to watch for, if someone deployed to the base is critically injured or killed, all unofficial communication channels are closed until the next-of-kin can be notified, for understandable reasons. I've been on the US side of one of these blackouts, and although unpleasant and nerve racking, I can understand the reasoning behind the decision.

  8. Hey, it's you! by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Funny

    Osama, is that you?

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:Hey, it's you! by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      The most funny thing about it is that if he had made a (maybe slightly offensive) joke about Bush, he'd got a +5 funny. Don't take me wrong, I don't like Bush either, but it's kinda strange that here on Slashdot, some people seem to look at Obama as if he was some kind of legendary savior and that insulting him is either racism, heresy, fascist talk or other bad form...

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    2. Re:Hey, it's you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get signal.

  9. Be sure not to do any phone sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless you like giving NSA employees jollies, don't be doing any phone sex from Afghanistan.

  10. Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    While you may have questionable internet, Skype is free and you can use it whenever you do find a internet connection. I set it up for a couple of friends and acquaintances while they served in Iraq and they were really happy with it, especially the video phone part of it.

  11. Video Skype by flyingfsck · · Score: 4, Informative

    Video Skype on a Linux Netbook is the easiest way to do it.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Video Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Iraq is anything like Sudan, there is affordable, extensive wireless coverage but the bandwidth is crap - Skype breaks up badly in remote areas. In Khartoum it's pretty good. We use MSN text chat with video. The video tends to be a bit laggy but you can at least see each other's faces. We were told that the mobile phone we bought here would work in Sudan but it didn't, needed to buy one locally with the correct frequencies. It's quite expensive. The UN provides phonecards which may be used on the UN network for subsidised personal calls. try this page for info http://wikitravel.org/en/Afghanistan#Mobile_phones

  12. VSAT and VoIP will work fine by Tolaris · · Score: 2, Informative

    My company provides VSAT service in the Middle East and Africa, including as far east as Afghanistan.

    VSAT latency is 600-1000 ms, and many VSAT Internet service providers prioritise voice-over-IP. We certainly do, although to a limited number of providers due to technical limitations.

    Given sufficient bandwidth, VoIP will do fine. Be sure to use a service that supports good audio compression, and turn it on. Use G.729 or G.723, and never G.711.

    On an iDirect VSAT network with cRTP enabled (RTP header compression), a G.729 call needs about 16 kbit each way. Good VSAT service in that area will have at least 64 kbit upload and 256 kbit download.

    1. Re:VSAT and VoIP will work fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good VSAT service in that area will have at least 64 kbit upload and 256 kbit download.

      At a k$ per hour, that's not too bad.

    2. Re:VSAT and VoIP will work fine by grcumb · · Score: 1

      My company provides VSAT service in the Middle East and Africa, including as far east as Afghanistan.

      I have a colleague working in Internet in Afghanistan. He tells me there are others investing directly in building out VSAT access there as well. See o3b Networks for details.

      His personal observation? It's interesting work and very very challenging in a place like Afghanistan, fighting your way through the red tape alone is a major achievement, then there are all the service delivery problems without any infrastructure.

      If you're there on a military assignment, it sounds like your best option - for now, at least - is to use whatever's available on the base. Outside of Kabul, it's bound to be better (or at least, more robust) than any commercial offering.

      Good luck. Keep your head down.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  13. T-Mobile International is the Ticket by lindec · · Score: 3, Informative

    My father has been deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan and other places around the world and he brings with him a T-Mobile Quad-band phone with the International Package. He got pretty good service in Afghanistan. You can check the rates here: https://www.t-mobile.com/International/RoamingOverview.aspx?tp=Inl_Tab_RoamWorldwide It looks like calls are about $4.99/minute there, so you probably won't want to chat for hours on end, but my family has used this method for several deployments and it works stellar. Thank you for your service.

    1. Re:T-Mobile International is the Ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://www.militel.net/default2.asp?ag=undefined

      Militel is a great method for keeping in contact. It's relatively low cost and you can use just about any Afgan phone. They even give you an 800 number so that people can call you from the states. My father just got back from a 13 month tour at FOB Lindsey and it worked out great for our whole family

    2. Re:T-Mobile International is the Ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And thank your father for his.

    3. Re:T-Mobile International is the Ticket by oldebloke · · Score: 1

      If the rate quoted is US$4.99/minute, that is ridiculously expensive. A look at the Prepaid SIM Cards available from Telestial.com and others shows that much cheaper rates are available from world, regional and local SIM Cards. Of course this depends on whether you have a sim-unlocked phone to use. Both AT&T and T-Mobile will do that for a reasonable or no fee for individual traveling overseas. BTW, I am not an employee of nor compensated by any firms mentined.

    4. Re:T-Mobile International is the Ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      his what?

    5. Re:T-Mobile International is the Ticket by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      It looks like calls are about $4.99/minute there

      Who in their right mind would pay $5/minute when drastically cheaper alternatives are so readily available, unless they were only in town on a 48-hour flyby? Just pop into your local chicken-and-tire shop and pick up a SIM card.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  14. A Little Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm currently in Afghanistan as well.

    SPAWAR provided phones at the MWR are cheap. Take a look at the link: http://oif.spawareurope.net/

    Also, Bently-Walker provides good satellite Internet out here. That's what I'm using right now.

  15. Iridium by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is price an object?

    If not, you can buy an iridium phone for around $1400. Plans are around $30/mo, and $1.45 a minute, Or you can do prepaid. They work everywhere, and are pretty portable. You can call the phone from the US for regular long distance charges using a pass-through number.

    1. Re:Iridium by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd second this. If purchasing one is out of the question, renting one is possible -- though for six months, it may be cost-prohibitive to rent. In addition, if you're worried about the cost, you may be able to recoup your expenses by selling access to other people who similarly want to keep in touch with folks at home. I rented an Iridium phone for a drive to the Arctic Ocean and was able to get people to pay $5 per minute for an opportunity to call home from the Arctic Ocean. The proceeds paid for the phone rental.

    2. Re:Iridium by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 1

      Inmarsat phones are also a good choice, they work perfectly anywhere but the poles
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inmarsat

      We sell second hand units for ~US$400 where I work. The call plans are also usually pre-paid - about $20 per month.

  16. Keeping in touch downrange by Sir.Cracked · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you're at an established base, net connectivity isn't an issue. The same connection that provides net connectivity does phones and other comm. This will be kept up as a matter of necessity.

    Bandwidth is crap, however. You won't be streaming music or movies. When I was at a rather small, forward base, what I did was telnet/ssh to a pre-setup stateside linux box with an ncurses (read, text based) AIM client installed on it. It's low bandwidth, and generally not filtered. Worst case, setup your stateside box to sit on port 80, which is NEVER entirely blocked.

    How useful this all is of course depends on how often you can get a laptop on the network. I was a comm guy, in fact, the comm guy responsible for local infrastructure, so, a drop to my tent was a given, and I brought my own laptop. Depending on your job, you'll get more or less time at a computer, I know most shops had at least one computer in their tent/structure. Since telnet is a standard tool, you don't have to install anything.

    Best of Luck!

    --
    Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?
    1. Re:Keeping in touch downrange by SpiceInvaders · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Worst case, setup your stateside box to sit on port 80, which is NEVER entirely blocked.

      May not be blocked from the far side but if you happen to have Verizon as your ISP, they have been blocking port 80 from getting to your stateside box for years, purportedly as an anti-spam mechanism. 443 goes through ok as does 8080. Good luck and stay safe.

    2. Re:Keeping in touch downrange by shiftless · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're at an established base, net connectivity isn't an issue. The same connection that provides net connectivity does phones and other comm. This will be kept up as a matter of necessity.

      Bandwidth is crap, however. You won't be streaming music or movies.

      I bet to differ. Most of the larger bases have a SPAWAR system, which is great. It's slow as shit during peak hours, but if you can get on in the early morning it flies. I have hit 400k+ sec on movie torrents. It is 6 AM right now and I am currently downloading three torrents at 120k/sec total.

    3. Re:Keeping in touch downrange by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      SSH really would be preferable to telnet if at all possible, even for innocuous personal data. The encryption/decryption all takes place at the end points so there is no extra bandwidth burden over using telnet. In fact, I cannot really think of a good reason NOT to use SSH when connecting to your Linux server back home over the public Internet.

    4. Re:Keeping in touch downrange by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Guess what:
      Its slow as ass BECAUSE somebody else in the network is hitting 400KB in a movie torrent at the same time...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:Keeping in touch downrange by Sir.Cracked · · Score: 1

      Really? I can. It's very simple, actually. Putty is non-standard software, and isn't generally included on computer builds. While pulling down Putty isn't difficult, it's also a violation of the rules to put it on there without authorization.

      Connecting with Telnet, using the standard client included with windows (which, admittedly, sucks), doesn't actually violate any rules. And violating military rules carries some rather different penalties than just ignoring your employer's computer use policy.

      --
      Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?
    6. Re:Keeping in touch downrange by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Do you find that a lot of spam is sent over port 80 instead of 25?

  17. Shortwave radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Uncle was stationed out in the Pacific doing atomic bomb tests in the 1950s and had weekly chats with his family in California via shortwave radio. Should still work today!

  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. There's internet... but by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

    I have a friend in Kabul, Afghanistan ... civil stuff, but works in military base. They have internet there, but 70mb daily, then they shut you down .. until tomorrow.

    At least you can use messangers... if the latency sucks, sorry.. don't know the details.

  20. Deprecated by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Actually, the RFC1149 protocol has been deprecated in favor of RFC4376, the lunch protocol.

  21. Piece of cake by b.foster · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Piece of cake by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      There are virtually no landlines in Afghanistan - and i think hooking a C64 up to use a GSM data connection could be tricky!

  22. text messaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would use text messaging personally. Coverage is not as much a concern, the messages queue and send/receive when you are in range. (As long as there's SOME coverage at any rate.) Plus, outside the US, voice tends to be rather pricey, if your relatives have a phone they probably text more anyway.

  23. video mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a web cam you can send video mail.

    Good luck.

  24. A few options. by ManicDeity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was deployed to Afghanistan last year and was able to call back home a few ways. Also it helped that I was signals intelligence.

    Skype-on Bagram or Kandajar this was very popular since you can get your own internet (crappy Indian internet at least) in your B-Hut. A USB skype is great for MWR computers, but you will have spyware and/or a virus on it after you use it. Also if you use this option bring a copy of limewire or some flavour of it and tell it to not connect to the internet. Both areas are giant LANs so you can get tons of movies and music. I bought a 500 gig HD there and filled it before I came home.

    Calling card- this is the simplest way on semi built up FOBs and main bases. Cheap, simple and effective. VoIP phones are everywhere in heavy duty areas. Just make sure you get a state side DSN that will transfer you out to POTS. Some airbases and guard bases in the states will transfer you for free to local numbers in the area you are calling, so make sure to ask your chain of command if anything exists like that for you.

    Cell phone-it is pretty expensive but it works. Shop around for minutes at different markets through out the country. Cell phone reception goes from decent near cities and main highways to "I haven't seen a bar on my phone for the last 400 miles."

    Make friends with somebody that has an iridium- About 2 months into my tour I was given a job that meant I had to travel to every corner of Afghanistan and back again. Before we left my first sergeant gave me an iridium and said to use it if SIPR/NIPR/DSN was unavailable. We soon figured out we could use it as much as we wanted so we pimped it out at remote FOBs. The guys were very thankful for that. Pretty much for 10 months we had our own personal satellite phone. There is bound to be a few others around the country in a similar situation.

    Good luck and I hope you don't have to go to Konar, Korengal or Musah Qaleh.

    1. Re:A few options. by EQ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Army 98? Good on you.

      98C are the smartest monkey-wrenches in MI.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
  25. I would try Cell first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cell phones are a pretty easy if slightly expensive depending on how often/long you call home. No waits at the MWR either. You need to check with your chain of command tho to make sure they are ok with personal cells. Many units forbid personal cell phones and you can recieve UCMJ action if caught with one.

  26. Is it safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To use a Cell Phone network in a country that is very likely infiltrated by your adversary and using it to place phone calls to your loved ones at home.
    You loose anonimity for you and your family and it can be used against you.

  27. my friend by mistahkurtz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is in iraq on his second deployment. before he left for the second time, he picked up a laptop, and now communicates with the family via skype, and keeps in touch with his buds via wow.

    iraq is iraq, and afghanistan is afghanistan, i can't really speak to what differences there may be from base to base let alone country to country, but i'd have to assume that there would be some similarities in infrastructure, availability, etc. expect your latency to be pretty high. my buddy's wow ping is usually around 2k. not sure how well skype works, but he hasn't asked about finding a replacement, and voice chat/vent for wow worked ok.

    good luck

    --
    not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
    1. Re:my friend by uberbrodt · · Score: 1

      I too, have a friend who is currently deployed (again) in Iraq. From what I understand, he's able to bring his own computer. However, sand is the enemy, and can destroy a computer fairly fast. His communication options are fairly good, as he can chat through aim fairly easily. But bandwidth probably won't be good (he ended up getting Vista, since he couldn't grab the necessary drivers and service packs for XP reliably). For phone calls, he ends up buying a phone off Iraqi merchants and calls international back home. So as long as he people you are trying to talk to will pick up for random numbers routed through Virginia, you should be fine. Not cheap, but works well as long as you're not standing next to any concrete barriers :-P I had another friend in Afghanistan a couple years back and he seemed to do alright by the phones that the army provides, but your mileage may vary.

    2. Re:my friend by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      In Kabul, it's dust that's the problem. Everything fills up with it very quickly.

  28. Re:Just end it all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    hackel, You're a fucking piece of shit

  29. ask hajji by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can get a cell on the local economy... shouldn't be too expensive. sometimes shitty service, and your commander (assuming you're military) may ban the use.

    and to all of the "go kill yourself" douche bags on here....

    soldiers don't decide the wars they fight. politicians who derive their power from the people they govern (at least in the US... most of the time) decide the which wars are fought.

     

  30. Junis by VojakSvejk · · Score: 1

    Find Junis. Use his Commodore 64...

  31. Military or Civilian? by pz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, the OP forgot to include one bit of important information: are they being deployed as part of military service, or as part of a civilian effort?

    While there are a few people on Slashdot who are or have been in the military (and I hope they speak up), I daresay the general Slashdot opinion will be worth about what the OP paid for it: squat. I haven't been in the service, but can imagine that there are a raft of security issues around communications back home and that they need to be done through approved channels.

    For civilian deployments, however, the story is entirely different. For this, there is lots of worthwhile advice. Here's my bit ...

    1. I've yet to be in a town, even in remote parts of eastern Europe and the eastern Mediterranean, where there isn't some sort of internet cafe. Connectivity is available. Some intenet cafes even have headsets for Skype.

    2. Cellular phone service is nearly ubiquitous. Seriously. You have to get very remote to not have some kind of mobile phone service. The US has terrible coverage compared to Europe and the Middle East. I've been on small, remote islands in the Aegean with 5 bars. And I've yet to find a country (including in the former Soviet bloc) where you can't get pay-as-you-go service that's heaploads cheaper than any US phone company's international roaming. Just make sure that your phone is (a) unlocked and (b) quad band GSM. Or buy one there.

    3. Everything in the Middle East is negotiable. Everything. Negotiation and bartering is part of the culture.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:Military or Civilian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the OP forgot to include one bit of important information: are they being deployed as part of military service, or as part of a civilian effort?

      While there are a few people on Slashdot who are or have been in the military (and I hope they speak up), I daresay the general Slashdot opinion will be worth about what the OP paid for it: squat. I haven't been in the service, but can imagine that there are a raft of security issues around communications back home and that they need to be done through approved channels.

      For civilian deployments, however, the story is entirely different. For this, there is lots of worthwhile advice. Here's my bit ...

      1. I've yet to be in a town, even in remote parts of eastern Europe and the eastern Mediterranean, where there isn't some sort of internet cafe. Connectivity is available. Some intenet cafes even have headsets for Skype.

      2. Cellular phone service is nearly ubiquitous. Seriously. You have to get very remote to not have some kind of mobile phone service. The US has terrible coverage compared to Europe and the Middle East. I've been on small, remote islands in the Aegean with 5 bars. And I've yet to find a country (including in the former Soviet bloc) where you can't get pay-as-you-go service that's heaploads cheaper than any US phone company's international roaming. Just make sure that your phone is (a) unlocked and (b) quad band GSM. Or buy one there.

      3. Everything in the Middle East is negotiable. Everything. Negotiation and bartering is part of the culture.

      Dude? I'm assuming he's American, would you stroll around Afghanistan, as an American, to find a local iCafe? I don't care how big your gun is! lol
      Besides, there are great options available on most bases, as some have said. I've set up a connection for one of the Canadian bases, so I know it to be true.

    2. Re:Military or Civilian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has terrible coverage compared to Europe and the Middle East. I've been on small, remote islands in the Aegean with 5 bars. And I've yet to find a country (including in the former Soviet bloc) where you can't get pay-as-you-go service that's heaploads cheaper than any US phone company's international roaming.

      I think Afghanistan is something of an exception here. Most European and Middle Eastern countries have been building GSM networks for over 12 years now, Afghanistan has had more like 7 years. It is also one of the poorest countries on earth and dramatically poorer and more warn torn than any of its neighbours.

    3. Re:Military or Civilian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry: Eastern Europe doesn't count as remote. You'll not find a town without Internet there because, well, it's in Europe!

      I've found Internet Cafes to be available in most Central Asian towns (Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, etc), although finding an Internet Cafe is no guarantee there will be Internet there this week.

      Related story: I once stepped into a Internet Cafe in West Africa with 10 computers, all switched off. I asked to use one, and the owner switched one on, and tried to dial up a connection. He then informed me that the entire city only had 6 telephone lines to the outside world, and they were all currently in use. Perhaps I should try tomorrow?

    4. Re:Military or Civilian? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Dude? I'm assuming he's American, would you stroll around Afghanistan, as an American, to find a local iCafe? I don't care how big your gun is!

      As a civilian, I am always amused by the military people who are convinced that I am putting myself in mortal danger every time I stroll out without body armor and 4 guys carrying giant guns.

      There's two ways to move around:

      You can take serious and overt physical security measures, attracting attention but dissuading casual aggressors.

      Or, you can blend in, get to know people in the neighbourhoods, and keep a low profile.

      The first approach has its merits, for example when you have large numbers of people, or people who aren't well acclimated to local culture and behaviours. But after long experience I'm highly skeptical that it's the safer of the two in situations where the second option is reasonably available.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    5. Re:Military or Civilian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being that I just came back from a military deployment in Iraq I can definitely say that communication is pretty straightforward. As has been mentioned, there are SPAWAR and MWR facilities all over the place (I spoke with a few guys that were bouncing around Afghanistan while I was stuck in Kuwait for a month about that being pretty much the same for their respective deployments) and I also happen to be Signal so it was never an issue for me. As far as security goes, you're naturally not telling Susie Rottencrotch where you keep things and for god sake don't think it's funny to give your friends grid coordinates to find on Google Earth. Aside from all that, if you are military and are not signal I'd suggest treating those guys like you treat supply and food-service. I did the mobile phone thing for a short time and it was extremely expensive as far as I was concerned so I wound up just keeping an active SPAWAR account. It cost me less than my cell in the states ever did and I was calling every other day at least for thirty minutes to an hour at a time. At any rate, the gist is that there is no shortage of varying avenues for communication back to the states, some of which being free and the others are relatively inexpensive with the exception of the mentioned cellular and Iridium phones. Good luck and try not to sleep near a C-RAM if you can help it.

    6. Re:Military or Civilian? by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Dude? I'm assuming he's American, would you stroll around Afghanistan, as an American, to find a local iCafe? I don't care how big your gun is! lol

      There are shitloads of Americans in Kabul who use internet cafes. Quite a few restaurants/cafes have free wireless internet.

  32. MagicJack by Deathlizard · · Score: 1, Troll

    I don't know the feasibility of using this over there, but if you have access to a computer you could look into a Magicjack.

    Basically, you plug the Magicjack into a USB jack and it acts like a Voip gateway for a phone. You can use a regular phone or a computer Speaker/Microphone to call. Since you can use a local number for your jack, if you family calls you it will not be long distance. It also supports Caller-ID and voicemail. combine with this phone, and you got a lightweight solution. Although that handset isn't looking too stellar review wise.

    It's not the cheapest solution though. Magicjack costs 39.95 for the unit which comes with 1 year of service. After that it's 19.95 a year. Also, the Military may frown on software being installed on their PC's. If you are bringing a notebook or Netbook you shouldn't have a problem though. Third, bandwidth could be an issue too, since it needs a minimum of 128 kb/s to function.

  33. Defense Switched Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was deployed to Iraq in '06/'07. When I was there, cell phones were a big no-no, and for good reason. Allowing unsecured communications is a BIG security risk. VOIP was also not an option because there was no way to connect my computer to the Internet and one cannot simply install unauthorized software on government computers.

    Your best bet is to use provided channels. We had phones though MWR (very cheap but limited to 30 min calls and with long waits), and the AT&T phone center (less wait time, no time limits, but more expensive). I found that using the military's DSN network was the best bet if you can get access to a phone. (I worked in the company office so it wasn't a problem for me.) Call a stateside switch board and they can give you an outside civilian line. From there you can use a regular phone card. If you find a switchboard near home you may be able simply to place a local call.

  34. Been There, Done That by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just got back last July. Most cities, major roads and Coalition bases have cell phone voice coverage. In my experience, data services were non-existent outside of Kabul. I primarily used prepaid cell service where I purchased cards to add minutes -- voice only. I made a few international calls on that cell but felt they cost too much for regular use (about $0.80 per minute to US). I used the coalition provided comms wherever possible. The only commercial ISPs I saw off a US base were in Kabul and the data rates were roughly from well below 56k modem to maybe 128k DSL. Hope this helps. Stay safe.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  35. Facebook! by filesiteguy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm trying to be a troll, however, I have a very good friend who is currently deployed in Kwohst and keeps us informed on a regular basis using facebook. We even chat as I'm waking up and he's going to sleep.

    1. Re:Facebook! by filesiteguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oops!

      That should have read - I'm *NOT* trying to be a troll...

  36. Wait and see.. by gen11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Probably best to wait and see when you get there. It's been over a year since I was there and NIPR was horrible and limited but enough to provide the basic connection. Then our camp had a satellite connected that about a hundred of us shared. It was slower than dialup and expensive with a high monthly rate and initial equipment charge of a 2-3k, if memory serves. Hopefully things have changed and you have fiber to the hubble by then. lol. Good luck and keep your head down!

  37. Make Friends! by BrianF81 · · Score: 1

    I can tell you that as someone who has experience deploying to both Iraq and Afghanistan, it is not all that hard to keep in contact with your friends and family back home. Now, granted, I was a commo guy in the Army, so i had access to phones/internet at practically any given time. But, if another soldier asked to use our phone or internet line I usually had no problem letting them do so. Unless they were a jerk. If that's the case, then they're on their own. But yeah, the VoIP phones that the Army uses, the MWR phones, and Skype all work very well out there. Couple pieces of advice: Make friends with your commo guys!! And, try to get the number to a couple Air Force base MWR call centers. The Army ones will cut you off after only about 15 mins, but the Air Force leaves you alone. Maybe that's changed though, I haven't been there in almost 2 years now, and don't plan going back. =P Good luck to ya man! Stay safe.

    1. Re:Make Friends! by hazem · · Score: 1

      Make friends with your commo guys!!

      Some things apparently never change. My grandfather was in the Navy after WWII and he said if you wanted to make life better for yourself, make good friends with the mailman and the cook.

      When I was, myself, in the Army, a good friend of mine got detailed to a Navy ship and making friends with the cook scored him all kinds of pastries and such.

  38. GlobalStar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As previously stated... iridium is an option. I currently use GlobalStar. The phone is pricey, but I only pay $30 for unlimited usage (if u get within a spot beam for the satellite).

  39. I think I can help you. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

    There is a hacker named Junis in the Kabul area can I hear he can help, got an old Commodore on dial-up through Pakistan that works sometimes. He got an awesome (tho low res) porn collection as well! Good Luck, and say Hi to Junis!

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  40. Cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed not a lot of people are talking about cellular options. Yeah, it's a rather underdeveloped country, and Internet means may not be feasible. But most if not all of the cellular network there is GSM, so depending on your carrier and plan, you might be able to get an international capable plan. I know that in my case, with Verizon (who uses CDMA) I would have to get a quad-band phone (around $300, supports both GSM and CDMA) as well as add international calling to my plan (another $4.99/mo), and the calls themselves would be quite expensive (about $2.29 a minute). But I feel your pain, I'm looking at deploying to Iraq later this year and I want very much to keep in touch with my beloved wife, more often than the military would generally permit me.

  41. I'm in Afghanistan by Premo_Maggot · · Score: 1

    You can get a Roshan cell phone, they're very afordable. They are available at Bagram Airfield at the West PX Complex and many merchants outside of BAF can get you phone cards. Some FOB/COP's depending on where you go may have spawar phone's at the MWR center that are cheap but I like the freedom of a cell phone. Also if you have a DSN and whoever you're trying to call has a phone number withing the area code limits of the base/post you can have the base/post operator transfer your call to them. Hope that helps, hooah!

    --
    Good karma sticks to me like velcro on a piece of plexiglass.
    Move along, citizen.
    1. Re:I'm in Afghanistan by LiNKz · · Score: 1

      Definitely helps, I wasn't sure how I would get one if I was over there already, now I know :)

      --
      Proceed with Format (Y/N)? Y
  42. blotto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got back from Afghanistan there are two main prepaid services over there great cell phone service, they are roshan and Afghan Wireless, Afghan Wireless is your best bet they even have internet over there phones about twice as fast as dial up, usually for about 500 units it is 5 bucks and gets you 10 minutes of calling can be a bit pricey but is good in the long run.

  43. Keeping in Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern, tri-band cellular telephones can be purchased at your Exchange at a good price (or pick one up before you leave home), with Rosham (spelling?) as your chip provider. The sat. footprint for the cell service is wall to wall and treetop tall.

  44. Roshan by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    I have, however, noticed in my searches that Afghanistan has recently boomed with cellular coverage

    Roshan is around 5 years old. Why not ask them?

    Check the map.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  45. Get on good terms with Milo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He will sort out any problems you might have - for a fee of course.

  46. dilemma by anonymShit · · Score: 1

    There's a dilemma here: if you feel that your country needs you, to fight and protect it, go there and be a real soldier not a kitty, needing to call mamma. Otherwise, as that private in Street fighter said: "go home and be a family man"!

    Besides, do you realise that you're fighting a fake war? Do you think Bin Laden blew the towers? Let me laugh at you, poor idiot. Do you think he's hiding in the mountains? hahaha, you poor manipulable idiot. If all intelligence activity in your country and in my beloved europe cannot stop the terrorists, then you'll never stop them. Invading a country doesn't have to do with terrorism at all, but with petrol(etc). If all of you, fucking americans, would study a little the history of other countries (yeah! they exist! you're not alone in the world!) you'd realise that terrorism is fought with guerrilla wars, with dirty tricks and a lot of intelligence, not by invading a country, and least of all manipulating the richness of that country and apropriating it. Irak: weapons of mass destruction (now your petrol is ours), Afghanistan (any oil conduct around here, mon amour?) , Iran is next (in the list of biggest oil world producers)(let's not invade it yet, we spent too much money in Irak, and -who knows?- we might yet advance a bit with renewable technologies).

    As a summary,
    I HOPE YOU DIE THERE, IDIOT
    A spanish bastard

    1. Re:dilemma by Banquo · · Score: 1

      You idiot,...our GOAL in the US is to get the middle east involved in a war that will cause some sort of nuclear event in the area, this way we can thin the global population of it's overcrowding uncivilized poor and re-distribute the resources between the powerfull and civilized. *sheesh* Learn to read between the lines for crying out loud. That's why we spread AIDS in Africa,..(Granted it WAS supposed to mutate into a fast acting form, but hey the human immune system is a wacky thing.)

      Also in the US we developed ways to make oil out of just about anything at this point (see changingworldtechnologies) so really it's all about power, population and power now.

      Also the lizard people are behind it all. (just google them and you'll see!)

  47. Magic Jack Recommendation by AcademyKP03 · · Score: 1

    I'm currently deployed in the Kandahar region of Afghanistan. I've had decent luck using MagicJack. It's basically a VOIP system. The internet connection is through a local Afghan company - usually get about 6K / second; which is just barely enough bandwidth for a conversation ... but it works. It's also nice that family and friends can call the local number (US phone #) and the phone rings in Afghanistan. Just my 2 cents.

  48. Forget your family - you're a solder by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    If you are going to Afghanistan and you are a Slashdot reader then it is quite likely that you are going to Afghanistan as a solder.

    If that is the case then you should say good by to your family or don't go at all. It is your choice. Your country doesn't depend on the status of Afghanistan for its freedom or economic security. Your family depends on you for its freedom or economic security. If you go to the other side of the world for some vague and undefined reason like duty or honor, then you are betraying your family.

    If you are going to be a solder in a strange and distant land then you should accept the fact that you are a solder. YOU are leaving your home for the purpose of killing people in the place that you are going to. You must reasonably expect that the people there are going to kill you for being there. Being concerned about your family only complicates the situation and makes it difficult for you to focus on what you are doing: which is killing the people in the place that you are going to.

    You can believe that the people who have dedicated their lives to killing you for being in their country have said good by to their families. They have told their families that they are going to fight the invader, they expect to be killed, and the family should consider him to be dead already.

    This is what solders have done since the beginning of time. You are no different. You should not pretend otherwise. Forget your family.

    If you are not a solder then there are only two reasons that you could be going to Afghanistan. One is to be a worker in non-governmental organization. You should stay home. The Afghan people don't need NGOs. The Afghan people generally try to kill NGO workers. Since you are not a solder, you have no legal or moral way to protect yourself from those are quite successfully killing the NGO workers in Afghanistan. Be an NGO worker in your own country.

    The only other possibility is that you are a drug dealer. Afghanistan is the world's largest supplier of heroin. You should stay home. The world, your country, and your family don't need any more heroin dealers. Go work at a McDonalds instead.

    1. Re:Forget your family - you're a solder by IDtheTarget · · Score: 1

      If you are going to Afghanistan and you are a Slashdot reader then it is quite likely that you are going to Afghanistan as a solder.

      If that is the case then you should say good by to your family or don't go at all. It is your choice. Your country doesn't depend on the status of Afghanistan for its freedom or economic security. Your family depends on you for its freedom or economic security. If you go to the other side of the world for some vague and undefined reason like duty or honor, then you are betraying your family.

      Umm...no.

      I've been a soldier for over 20 years, an officer in the Army, and just got back from a year in Iraq. While communicating with your family back home can distract you some from the mission (and yes, I've seen it happen with my troops), it has been my experience that those soldiers who call home regularly are much less likely to have marital problems or divorce when we get back home. A deployment is typically much harder on the families back home than it is on the deployed soldier, and checking in every day or two, even if only by email, can often not only ease the fear and stress on the family back home, but keep the relationship alive.

      Every soldier has difficulties re-adjusting to life back home after a deployment, but adding the stress and isolation of the lack of communication for a year to the mix is a sure-fire way to make the situation worse.

      Based on your post, I believe you may have some issues in this area. If you desire some assistance, or maybe just somebody to talk to, I'd be happy to help you find a confidential counselor who may be able to help.

  49. My experiences from Afghanistan by Fallon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Afghanistan has pretty good cell phone coverage and not horrible long distance rates. And like most of the rest of the world (not U.S.A) any GSM phone that utilizes the right bands (get a quad band world phone) will work there. A SIM card is like $5.00 and you just buy refill cards at whatever denomination you need. No contracts, no BS, just pay as you go.

    In Kabul our house had a 512kbs down 128kbs up satellite link that we split between 18 odd people... It only cost $30,000 a year and was about the cheapest satellite connection available. With that little bandwidth and that many people, VoIP worked decently during non-peak use hours, but not so well when everybody was on. Ping times and packet loss really sucked.

    About the time I was leaving a group of friends got a wireless connection, 802.11 something or WiMax I think from one of the cell phone companies. It was about as expensive per person & shared bandwidth as our satellite connection. Being terrestrial based rather than satellite, it had much better ping times.

    Most of the bigger military bases have some local ISP on the base providing service for reasonable ($10-60 or so a month) rates. Service is usually way over subscribed and supported by cat5 strung over the ground or what not.

    The military is pretty good about supporting the troops. If you have a DSN (Defense Switched Network) phone, which is most of the phones the military has over there, you can call a U.S. military base stateside and have them patch you through to a local number near the base, or a 1-800 number for a calling card.

  50. Cellular-Roshan by johndeerejedi · · Score: 1

    I know several people who use the Afghan cell networks, primarily Roshan. I think at least three are using their own personal cell phones, including an iPhone and a Blackberry. I don't remember the rates exactly, but it's reasonable considering the circumstances.

    I use Skype to video chat every night on a commercial satellite ISP sponsored here on base by AAFES. I pay $100 a month for the top tier upload and download speed, and I think it's barely adequate to push the video upstream. Again, it's worth it to me.

    Good luck, and stay safe.

  51. I asked the same question about Broadband.. by Banquo · · Score: 1

    I asked the same question about Broadband in Iraq for a friend who is stationed there who is all but 100% cutoff from the world (you have to be at a NICE base to get decent acess) if your in the a lot of the support units you get next to nothing.

    You'd have thought I was asking who wanted free herpes.

    Maybe I should have said it was me who was going to get greenlit.

  52. OPSEC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting ac here for opsec reasons:

    this is obviously your first deployment to "the Stan"

    first of all im Canadian so Kandahar is my experience. from what ive seen, you can buy pay as you go style cell phones and sim cards from any local market. your country may have restrictions on this but others don't so KAF might have what your looking for.

    second: don't and I SAY AGAIN don't bring your pers cell, using a pay as you go sim/cell is bad enough but calling home from a pers cell sends up red flags to TB/AQ. think of it like thousands of local call all over vs hundreds of international cells(phones) all of witch are potential targets for at the very least harassing phone calls.

    I've actually run into this sort of thing with our terps. They get stopped by a random taliban road block, see and international number on their phones, dial it and if and english voice answers the phone: bullet to the head.

    Last: most bigger bases and FOB's have ample phone time aloted to soldiers, and even if you are civi you can still buy phone cards from the PX or CANEX(Both sell to anybody). Go with this, but remember OPSEC at all times as TB/AQ can and do listen in. maybe not to every call but i never take chances.

    FYI, In Kandar I managed to talk to friends/family, update facebook, take car of banking and even a little ebay(you will get an APO for your base/FOB) for about $15US a week. All that with the last option(phone cards). I used my cell phone strictly for dealing with the locals.

    almost forgot: secure SATPHONES are an option if price is no object for you, but they are quite pricey. depending on your job you may be issued one but higher may not like you phoning family/friends on it.

  53. Globalstar! by Glumac · · Score: 0

    I'm going on a longer trip to the Oz outback - and after some serious investigation, I desiced on Globalstar (www.globalstar.com) for my connectivity. In Europe, you have the option of paying 50 EUR as a connection fee, and then NOTHING as a monthly fee. The call costs range from .80 euroCents to 1.75 EUR, which I find acceptable for urgent communication (and the occasional "I'm standing under Ayers Rock!" call). The Phone was 150 CDN on eBay. And yes, they have service in Afghanistan. As a note however, they're having satellite issues, so you don't always have connectivity... Take a look at: http://www.globalstareurope.com/en/content.php?cid=300

  54. Wow! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Solders are awesome in USia, if soldiers are as good those Taliban are lost...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  55. I'm a Signal Officer that just got back from Iraq by IDtheTarget · · Score: 1

    I haven't been to Afghanistan yet, but just got back from Iraq. Some things to consider:

    1. AT&T trailers, when available, are usually pretty expensive. However the Chaplains usually have AT&T cards to give away so that you can call home.
    2. I know that many FOB's in Iraq have civilian Internet available, and many do not. Ours did, but it was very expensive and had poor bandwidth. We purchased our own satellite system, but many FOBs (especially where AAFES is the Internet provider) won't allow you to have your own satellite system. This is so that the FOB commander can "pull one plug" if something happens and not have to worry about somebody emailing home about the incident. There's no real way to stop this, but it makes commanders feel better. If you are relatively sure about the FOB to which you're deploying, see if you can contact the signal folks at that FOB and see if there are any restrictions on personally-owned satellite Internet.
    3. We purchased a satellite and service from Macrosat. They had the best rates we could find, no data cap, and the service was phenomenal. They let us try various band plans for a couple of days each until we found the one that best met our needs. We had about 70 people on our link, which was the 3meg down and 512k up, and what with shift work and all it was sufficient. Not great, but sufficient. We ended up paying $200 each for the equipment, I think, and then $50/month each for the service. MAKE SURE THEY KNOW IT'S FOR AFGHANISTAN! We had one provider prior to Macrosat sell us a U.S.-only satellite system, and we had a hell of a time getting our money back.
    4. I purchased a Vonage router and plan, and put it in the commo shop for anybody to use. I chose a U.S. phone number that was local to most of our troops, and put a regular wireless phone (encrypted 5.8GHZ) on the router. Our family members were able to call us when emergencies arose and we were able to call home quite well. We had to cut down the call quality to ensure enough bandwidth, and there was plenty of lag during heavy Internet-usage times, but it went a long way to keeping the stress down. The cost after taxes and all was around $31 per month, and we could dial anywhere in the U.S., which was nice for the guys who got attached to us from other states.
    5. If you do go with MacroSat, or any other satellite Internet provider, you will probably want to get a satellite meter/finder. Check with your provider to ensure that you can get one that's compatible with your dish. It will save you HOURS of trying to get the danged dish pointed at the correct satellite. It's well worth the money.
    6. You will need to ensure that your troops are not doing peer-to-peer with a satellite Internet connection. This is because that upload pipe gets saturated FAST. We typed up a user agreement that stated that each user wouldn't use peer-to-peer and that we reserved the right to boot the user from the agreement if they violated it. Unfortunately sometimes the user doesn't realize that when they're downloading that movie, that it's using peer-to-peer software. My solution was to purchase a Linksys WRT54GL and replace the firmware with Tomato, which gave me the ability to:
      1. Assign one IP to each MAC to help ensure only subscribers got access
      2. Slow down peer-to-peer traffic (blocking the ports entirely just makes the port-agile software find a new port. Throttling the bandwidth on the port keeps the same port, but preserves the bandwidth for legitimate uses)
      3. See who was using peer-to-peer software, and work with them to disable or remove it.
    7. Please, PLEASE ensure that all of your troops understand that ANY personal communications are monitored by the enemy. At our FOB, we knew that Iran was monitoring our cellphone communications, and probably the scatter from some of our satellite comms as well. Saying "I love you" is okay. Giving out y