Slashdot Mirror


Drug Deletes Fearful Memories

Al writes "Technology Review has an article about a common drug that seems to 'delete' painful memories related to a fearful experience. Experiments carried out by neuro-scientists at Emory University show that propranolol, a drug commonly used to treat high blood pressure, can suppress the emotional part of a fearful memory. The results, published in Nature Neuroscience, suggest a new way to treat anxiety disorders. In recent years, scientists have discovered that the simple act of remembering a past experience requires that the memory be consolidated once again. And both animal research and some human studies have shown that during re consolidation, long-term memories — once thought to be fairly stable — can be more easily meddled with."

247 comments

  1. A boon to higher education by mbstone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now they can make money re-educating the same students they educated before! Think of the student loan debt!

    1. Re:A boon to higher education by lucif3r · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nice, now I can touch the stove again!

    2. Re:A boon to higher education by davester666 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I know this is in extremely poor taste, but...

      It's the new morning-after rape drug!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:A boon to higher education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is in extremely poor taste, but...

      Hey, as I remember it now, it tastes great! And, it's less filling!

    4. Re:A boon to higher education by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny

      You guys should not be joking about this. Deleting painful memories is an incredibly dangerous thing, as I can tell you from experience, and in the long run it will only make things worse than they were before. The reason why it's so dangerous is because... ah hell, I can't remember. But anyway, I'm pretty sure it's a bad idea.

    5. Re:A boon to higher education by hopkimi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nice, now I can get married again!

    6. Re:A boon to higher education by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll stick to the old methods, I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    7. Re:A boon to higher education by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      You guys should not be joking about this. Deleting painful memories is an incredibly dangerous thing, as I can tell you from experience, and in the long run it will only make things worse than they were before. The reason why it's so dangerous is because... ah hell, I can't remember. But anyway, I'm pretty sure it's a bad idea.

      Yeah, it's called liver damage.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    8. Re:A boon to higher education by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Now they can make money re-educating the same students they educated before! Think of the student loan debt!

      It's called "free trade"; just when you master something it's either automated or done overseas for 1/4 the cost.
             

    9. Re:A boon to higher education by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      "As you age, the second thing to go is your memory. I forget what the first thing is."

      I just saw that posted somewhere else, and I swear to god I forgot where it was.

      --
      What?
    10. Re:A boon to higher education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what was I going to say

    11. Re:A boon to higher education by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

      I'll stick to the old methods, I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy...

      A girl with psychic powers says "T-bone, what's your sign?"

      I blink and answer "neon"--I thought I'd blow her mind.

      --MarkusQ

    12. Re:A boon to higher education by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      If you had only said morning-after date-rape drug this would be 5: Funny.

      It's all about the rhythm, and remember kids, rape is horrible, but date-rape is hilarious.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    13. Re:A boon to higher education by masshuu · · Score: 0

      Only a gun and a bottle of wisky can cure that

      --
      O.o
    14. Re:A boon to higher education by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Which will cause you to completely and extensively relive them.

      Best... punishment... EVER. :D

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    15. Re:A boon to higher education by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Now they can make money re-educating the same students they educated before!"

      This assumes the students retain anything in the first place...

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    16. Re:A boon to higher education by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

    17. Re:A boon to higher education by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I don't even HAVE a little dog Toto!

    18. Re:A boon to higher education by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. I took this stuff for my high blood pressure and it made me forget every Julia Roberts movie my girlfriend had ever made me watch. It saved our relationship.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    19. Re:A boon to higher education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got the joke wrong. It's...

      "As you get older the second thing to go is your hearing and I forget what the first thing is."

      Jeez. Don't they teach you guys delivery and linguistics any more?

    20. Re:A boon to higher education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poppies!

    21. Re:A boon to higher education by ThinkTwicePostOnce · · Score: 1

      Henny ("Take my wife, please!) Youngman's _All Time Greatest One Liners_, available
      in paperback is all the education on delivering a joke you'll ever need.

      But seriously, I shouldn't make jokes about my wife. She's permanently connected
      to a life support machine -- the refrigerator!

      --Henny Youngman--

      --
      Hide all sigs: Click HELP+Prefs (top), VIEWING (last on right), DISABLE SIGS (3rd on left) and SAVE (hidden at bottom).
  2. PropranoLOL by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Any relation to propofol, a.k.a. milk of amnesia?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:PropranoLOL by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope, propofol (2,6-diisopropyl phenol) likely works by increasing the response to inhibitory neurotransmitters, and acts as an anesthetic. Propanolol is a non-selective beta-blocker, which blocks the beta-adrenergic receptors (receptors for epinephrine and norepinephrine). As the summary notes, the most common pharmaceutical use for this is to lower blood pressure, which it does by preventing the release of renin. Its effects on memory are completely coincidental to those on blood pressure.

      In the brain, a part of the brainstem known as the locus ceruleus is the site of norepinephrine synthesis, and it is activated by stress to send norepinephrine to the amygdalae, the brain's "emotional memory association" centers. It is in the amygdalae that memories are associated with emotions, with the ultimate result being that it is easier to form long term memories of experiences that associated with strong emotions. In blocking norepinephrine transmission to the amygdala, beta-blockers most likely are acting to uncouple the connection between a stressor and its associated memory, such that the brain no longer considers it important enough to keep in long term memory.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    2. Re:PropranoLOL by jayemcee · · Score: 1

      Inderal is great for stage fright; doctors and lawyers would take it before oral exams back in the day, not sure if it's still used this way...

    3. Re:PropranoLOL by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, most definitely- it's still an off-label use of the drug in the US, but people are certainly taking beta-blockers to treat performance anxiety, as well as to prevent nervous fine motor tics. At the most recent Summer Olympics, one of the medalists in pistol shooting had his medals taken away after testing positive for propranolol.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    4. Re:PropranoLOL by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Way to ruin a good joke with those lame facts, man.

    5. Re:PropranoLOL by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Was I making a joke? I don't remember.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    6. Re:PropranoLOL by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Mr. Burns: Smithers, get the amnesia ray.
      Smithers: You mean the revolver, sir?
      Mr. Burns: Yes, and be sure to wipe your mind clear when you're done as well.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  3. Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    propranolol

    So this will turn your fearful memories into hilarious ones?

    1. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the beta blockers are a funny bunch. Metoprolol, atenolol, timolol, sotalol. I'm wondering if there are any drugs ending in -rofl..

    2. Re:Drugs by Talderas · · Score: 2, Funny

      Propranolol.

      Lol your nightmares away.

      With propranolol you'll be LOLing so hard you'll be ROTFLYAO.

      Sides effects may include: dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, water retention, painful rectal itch, hallucination, dementia, psychosis, coma, death, and halitosis. Propranolol is not for everyone. Consult your doctor before use.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or more like a post-roofie.
      y'know... in case she wakes up...

    4. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My nightmares are from 4chan. I don't think I can LOL away the people responsible for that lolocaust.

    5. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only is propanoLOL generic, those of us in the industry with a sense of internet humor do emphasize the LOL.

      Everyone go get some generic propanolol ER. I could use the paycheck. /. won't check it self.

      Pharma IT.

  4. Bush/Cheney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So I can forget the past eight years?

    1. Re:Bush/Cheney by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      As I said, you might completely and extensively relive them.

      But maybe that is what you want... :D

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  5. Ahh... by XPeter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I can finally forget the day that ruined my life. It took me away from schoolwork, friends, family...it was horrible.

    Now I can finally forget the day I joined Slashdot.

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Ahh... by trum4n · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can do that when you've got a digit on the new kids.

    2. Re:Ahh... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can do that when you've got a digit on the new kids.

      Dammit, I'm gonna have to wait forever. Actually, only another 50 years or so, assuming arithmetic (I can dream can't I) growth...

      By then then the only lawn I'll me able to yell at the kids to get off of will be covering my grave...*sigh*...well, at least it's something.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    3. Re:Ahh... by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn!

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

  6. And this is a Good thing!? by sjvn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know one does learn to avoid making many mistakes in life--I really cant fly, fire is pretty but it does hurt--by pain.

    Besides just the idea of tampering with memory being a *bad* thing, the notion of fooling with one of the fundamental ways we learn strikes me as a really bad idea.

    Soma anyone?

    Steven

    1. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Damn it, Bones, you're a doctor. You know that pain and guilt can't be taken away with a wave of a magic wand. They're the things we carry with us, the things that make us who we are. If we lose them, we lose ourselves. I don't want my pain taken away! I need my pain!" --Captain James T. Kirk

    2. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by woolpert · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You speak as if our brain's software is without bugs. If you had seen the suffering and disablement that intense, often unreasonable, emotional pain can inflict on some people even years after the traumatic event, perhaps you would be less dismissive of an attempt to patch this particular bug.
      Expose X people to a horrific event and a high percentage of them will show the ability to get over it. There is that outlying group, however, who (despite honest effort and therapy) seem to have an overactive emotional memory system which prevents them from ever coming to terms with what happened.

    3. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by bipbop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're right, to an extent. Living without pain is very hard--some individuals born without the ability have hellish lives as a result. But sometimes, pain teaches us lessons that aren't so good, like "I should never touch anyone for the rest of my life," because touching is so strongly associated with pain. How people with this sort of thing varies from one individual to the next, but for someone with a deeply ingrained irrational fear based on some painful experience, maybe removing the memory could be a good thing.

      Another way of looking at it is this: if you are raped, and the idea of sex is permanently distorted in your mind by the memory, then this memory is a punishment for something that isn't your fault, haunting you and messing up your life to this day. Wouldn't it be a good thing to allow the *option* of removing this weight from one's shoulders?

    4. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by drolli · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm you can record you life on a carry-on camera you carry around. A knowbot indexes it for you and after you agree with the indexing you swallow this drug. After that use google desktop to search you memories.

    5. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny

      On the other hand, previous experiences suggest this might not be such a bad thing. It didn't actually do much damage last year when a secret biowarfare lab accidentally released the Mnemonivirus and we had a global Amnesia Plague. Remember that?

    6. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by jamesh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Besides just the idea of tampering with memory being a *bad* thing, the notion of fooling with one of the fundamental ways we learn strikes me as a really bad idea.

      Now suppose that you and your family were kidnapped from your home at gun point, and you had to watch while unspeakable things were done to them and to you.

      One thing you would 'learn' (and have a terrifying anxiety attack in response to) is that sitting around in your own home with your family is an unsafe thing to be doing, because something really bad happened one day when you were doing that. That response would be completely useless and would make your life an absolute misery.

      That's the sort of thing this drug could be useful in 'editing out'. 'editing out' the sort of 'that hurt me last time I did that so I won't do it again' memories is a stupid idea and I don't know why anyone would bring it up.

      The nature of most people on Slashdot appears to be to figure out a way that a certain product could be used badly, assume that that is the only way it could be used, and then post a whole lot of comments to that effect.

    7. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by kd5zex · · Score: 1, Troll

      Now suppose that you and your family were kidnapped from your home at gun point, and you had to watch while unspeakable things were done to them and to you.

      I think this would 'teach' someone to go buy their own gun.

    8. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Now if the could selectively get rid of good memories, that would be really useful. Do the same fun thing over and over again, for the very first time, cool. Watch the same sci fi series or movies for the first time over and over again, no more clichés, really cool ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wrong. No one just "get[s] over it." Every individual, based on their prior experiences will take a given situation and either adapt to it to the best of their abilities, perhaps by adding it to their experience or by "moving on" and ignoring it even though the effect is still with them at a subconscious level. And the really poorly off people break; they have something happen to them so traumatic that it shatters their emotions. While they are the most obvious "victims" of an event, if they can't find help with dealing with the problem, either through talking it out with someone, taking a step back from life and doing some reflecting on their life, or finding some other way to overcome their emotional burden, they will forever go through life not only with the scars from the event, but the inability to cope with other problems, regardless of their magnitude.

      You can't tamper with the learning process of gained experience because nature doesn't breed it out of the gene pool anymore. Modern medicine has, in my opinion, overcome the acceptable boundaries of emotional science without considering the long-term health effects of just throwing pills at people.

      Learning to adapt and overcome is far too important to let us forget. No matter the cost.

    10. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by woolpert · · Score: 1

      No one just "get[s] over it." Every individual, based on their prior experiences will take a given situation and either adapt to it to the best of their abilities, perhaps by adding it to their experience or by "moving on" and ignoring it even though the effect is still with them at a subconscious level.

      Tomato, Tomato. Potato, Potato.

      You can't tamper with the learning process of gained experience because nature doesn't breed it out of the gene pool anymore. Modern medicine has, in my opinion, overcome the acceptable boundaries of emotional science without considering the long-term health effects of just throwing pills at people.

      Learning to adapt and overcome is far too important to let us forget. No matter the cost.

      Either you're assuming there are not legitimate "bugs" in our software which prevents some from properly processing emotional trauma (And there is no evidence this "some" are even genetically inferior, or even different. The jury is still out over if this is a result of predisposition or the circumstances of the specific trauma.) OR you're proposing we "improve the race" by letting the weak fail. (So we let people suffer today in order to carry out your vision of evolution?)
      No thanks either way
      .

    11. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ever heard of phobias? PTSD? How does a person benefit from remembering their "mistakes" in those cases? Sometimes the mistake is remembering something when you don't need it.

    12. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by uniquegeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There would be a difference between using this on someone who encountered stressful things and had a hard time getting over it, versus someone who has PTSD or PTSD-e and is virtually incapacitated by the affliction.

      Having bad days and dealing with depression is one thing. Having recurring nightmares of terror and constantly reliving every bad encounter in your life is another.

    13. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The nature of most people on Slashdot appears to be to figure out a way that a certain product could be used badly

      The first thing I thought of when I first heard about the research on trauma-amnesia, despite all the articles talking about treating post traumatic stress, was "oh great, they'll be able to torture people and make them forget that it happened".

      It's a post-modern thing. All the wonders of the 50s that ended up biting us in the ass. We're cynics now... until they treat us with this stuff, so we can get back to loving the petrochemical industry, in blissful forgetfulness of all the cancers and deformed babies.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    14. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      There is that outlying group, however, who (despite honest effort and therapy) seem to have an overactive emotional memory system which prevents them from ever coming to terms with what happened.

      Some callous bastards would suggest that that is what we'd call natural selection...or at least it would be so called when it was shown that their inability to handle their trauma either prevents them from reproducing or decreases their parenting/nurturing abilities.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    15. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, the problem is, we don't know the consequences of these actions until it is too late.

      It reminds me of a story I read a long time ago. I swear it was called "The Purple Room" and it was written by Hitchcock or someone similar ("Eternal Sunshine of a Spotless Mind" was certainly inspired by it. I can't find any references to it. I must have some fact wrong).

      The story goes something like (please forgive me... it was almost 20 years ago when I read it): A man and a woman madly in love were on a ship which ended up capsizing and sinking. The man survives and is so torn by losing his love that he contemplates suicide. He comes up with an invention called "The Purple Room"... it shoots a purple laser right into the soul of the entrant and makes them forget their most painful memories. One day a woman enters the establishment... in a cloak, and he couldn't see her face. After coming out of the purple room, she takes her hood off and he sees it is his long lost love... but she has no recollection of him at all. Distraught, he goes into the purple room and forgets her too. Now neither of them remembers the best parts of their lives.

      While your intentions may be the best, the consequences are likely worse. You have no idea what else you are leaving behind until it is too late.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    16. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in an attempt to create a "quick fix" you are advocating the permission for people to bury their heads in the sand and let life pass them by because they got hurt and don't want to feel bad? Are you going to pay for their trip in the whaaaambulance with your own money or are you going to actually try to help them in a way that rehabilitates them and lets them go back to living?

      I think you ought to either drop the programming analogy or realize that there are no "bugs" in our "software." Humans can't "upgrade their firmware" to overcome "short-sighted design" or development. They either adapt at a conscious level or a subconscious level; the former has a much more obvious affect on their abilities, while the latter is harder to actualize, but can be just as potent.

      (So we let people suffer today in order to carry out your vision of evolution?)

      It sounds to me that you are letting people suffer through ignorance and allow them to experience the same things later, which they will then also need to be treated for. As well, I don't see chemically or genetically manipulating our memories as "evolution." I call that science. Do I think that emotionally damaged people deserve a second chance? Sure, but with the proper tools and in the proper environment, not through the use of a one-size-fits-all memory supplement (or otherwise) that doesn't solve the victimization problem of the event from reoccurring.

    17. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      The nature of most people on Slashdot appears to be to figure out a way that a certain product could be used badly, assume that that is the only way it could be used, and then post a whole lot of comments to that effect.

      History has shown us that the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. Government research on technology that can be used to enhance life is usually used first to destroy it - the atomic bomb being a good example. Other times, good technology is used for just general bad purpose when it comes into contact with the wrong hands from RFID to CCTV to AutoTune. Society has a way of perverting everything. It just so happens that Slashdotters are more aware of this fact than the general public and it has made Slashdotters, who are generally some of the most tech savvy population on the internet, into some of the most disillusioned, skeptical, and paranoid crusaders against the same technology. Perhaps this pill can erase our bad memories of how the technology we love is perverted more and more every day and then we won't be afraid to welcome this pill with open arms!

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    18. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by woolpert · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So in an attempt to create a "quick fix" you are advocating the permission for people to bury their heads in the sand and let life pass them by because they got hurt and don't want to feel bad?

      As I previously said, there is a group of people who, despite honest effort and therapy, do not recover from traumatic events. There is no support for a quick fix anywhere in my earlier comments. Stop attempting to straw-man this.

      I think you ought to either drop the programming analogy or realize that there are no "bugs" in our "software." Humans can't "upgrade their firmware" to overcome "short-sighted design" or development. They either adapt at a conscious level or a subconscious level; the former has a much more obvious affect on their abilities, while the latter is harder to actualize, but can be just as potent

      Bullshit. There are clearly innate and instinctual functions of our brain our higher processes wish they could override. We have an onion of a brain with layer upon layer of functionality, but also layer upon layer of cruft.
      Flinching when you know the person isn't going to hit you. Accelerated heartbeat when you know it is only a movie. Goosebumps when you know you have no hair to fluff. Even the annoying sensation of cold when you know you are able to maintain core temperature. All of these are examples of where, despite conscious will, our base programming still rules.

      It sounds to me that you are letting people suffer through ignorance and allow them to experience the same things later, which they will then also need to be treated for.

      You're assuming these people can learn. I'm arguing there is a class of case where normal brain function has been so disrupted by an overactive response to an emotional event that learning from the event is impossible. Despite your insistent wish to believe that isn't so.

      Do I think that emotionally damaged people deserve a second chance? Sure, but with the proper tools and in the proper environment, not through the use of a one-size-fits-all memory supplement (or otherwise)...

      Who says this is a one-size-fits-all solution? Not I. It appears to me that there is either a reading comprehension problem or a desire to straw-man again.

      ...that doesn't solve the victimization problem of the event from reoccurring.

      A non-functional personality can solve no problems. Either we do what we can to restore advanced functionality (and maybe this will prove an effective tool to do so) or we accept the person as a loss. Many really are just that far gone.

    19. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by wellingj · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the part where public schools and corporate health-care start prescribing it to people to help them adjust to a socio-political system that robs them of their individual rights.

    20. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean a pensieve?

    21. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Dodder · · Score: 1

      I didn't have to jump off a house and break my leg to know I couldn't fly and I didn't have stick my hand into a fire to figure out it burns. And if I had I don't think I would still need to have those memories now to know those things. And it would REALLY suck if every time I recalled those memories my body fully re-experienced the pain of those events. That would be pretty unnecessary. Of course it would definitely keep me from trying those things again, but pretty sure I could just figure that out with at the very least just the memory and not pain recurrence.

    22. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Dodder · · Score: 1

      On your side on this topic, but...

      I'd rather flinch even when I know someone isn't actually going to hit me than not flinch when someone is.
      Accelerated heartbeat when you know it is only a movie. Isn't that what makes it fun and exciting?
      Goosebumps when you know you have no hair to fluff. Ok, don't have much to refute on this, but pretty sure it served and may still serve some useful, if trivial, purpose. Goosebumps are no hair off my back. :)
      Even the annoying sensation of cold when you know you are able to maintain core temperature. Better than getting frostbite because you got distracted and forgot to consciously monitor your core temperature.

      My point is, I don't consider these "Bugs" in our software. I consider them for the most part critical vital responses to stimuli that have been hardwired into our brains because they have proven to fit the 90+% rule over the eons and it is far more efficient and beneficial to our survival and reproduction to respond immediately to them in this way. Same with our emotions.
      If someone hits you in the face you get mad and usually respond by striking them back. If it's your best friend and it was an accident you question these irrational "buggy" emotions. But your friend will almost never accidentally hit you in the face. 90+% of the time some aggressor is potentially trying to kill you and if you had to take the time every time to consciously decide if this is an action that requires reprisal or further defense and then consciously send the proper signals for your metabolism to speed up and your senses to heighten and clench fist, etc. The person with the "buggy", inefficient emotions would have already killed you or at least critically injured you. Thus its persistence in the gene pool.

      Now on the other side of the coin. If I burnt my hand on the stove when I was 3 and developed an acute fear of the stove as a result which prevented me from going near it as result of the intense emotional response this would be detrimental to my wellbeing. If I could remove the intense emotional response it would greatly benefit me. The downside? The article didn't say anything about removing the actual memory just the correlating emotional response to it. I think the memory should be enough to keep me from putting my hand on the stove again and I'm pretty confident that even without the memory as an adult I'd know better than to do so.

      Bottom line...

      Hardwired 90+% correct instant responses to potentially dangerous stimuli. Yay.
      Softer wired conscious ability to override these responses on a case by case basis after the fact as time permits. Yay.
      No instant hardwired response to dangerous stimuli and complete constant reliance on conscience decision making for all external events. Boo.
      Inability to override hardwired responses despite solid conscience evidence to do so. Boo.

      If I built two robots with the last two criteria the first one would consciously decide to bludgeon me to death for making it uncompetitive with reactional models. The second one would bludgeon me to death in a uncontrollable rage.

    23. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Dodder · · Score: 1

      Or as we like to say in the software business. "It's not a 'Bug' it's a 'Feature'."

    24. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      While your intentions may be the best, the consequences are likely worse. You have no idea what else you are leaving behind until it is too late.

      Like anything, you weigh it up, and you may not always get it right. If someone with PTSD is so miserable that they would rather be dead (and will blow their brains out if you turn your back on them) then I think it's time to start considering things that you otherwise wouldn't consider.

      The guy in your hitchcock story may well have killed himself years earlier if he hadn't invented his purple room, so has he really lost anything?

      I also think there is a world of difference between losing someone you love and the other sorts of things that give a person the sort of PTSD that I'm thinking of.

      It's a very very fine line, and you won't always get it right, but when you've tried all the 'proven' methods and nothing has worked, are you really doing the right thing by doing nothing else?

      Lobotomy was one of these sorts of radical solutions - before anyone else mentions it. In the end, most of the time it did way more harm than good - there are a few spectacular exceptions to this but they are rare. It's still used today though in various forms - to cure some forms of epilepsy they can remove _half_ of your brain, assuming you are still young enough for the other half to take over.

      The big problem with lobotomies (apart from the fact that they almost always didn't work) is that they became a "when all you have is a hammer, everything else looks like a nail" solution, and they'd do them when they really shouldn't have.

      Epilepsy and anti-psychotic medications both can have some really unpleasant side effects, but of course in those cases the side effects are considered less unpleasant than the condition itself.

      It's the same with this 'memory deleting drug', assuming it does what it says it does. At some point when the condition becomes bad enough, and when you've tried everything else (apart from the lobotomy :), you start thinking about giving this one a go.

      The big problem is where they start thinking about prescribing it like ritalin (a very useful drug when prescribed correctly - if you haven't tried it I found the effect much like caffeine, and I know you all love that :)

    25. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're right though, aren't we? Let's not kid ourselves, if an over-the-counter trauma eraser became available, people'd start taking it for everything from heart break to bad days at work.
      You can get this drug by prescription right now, and I'm sure if it turns out effective, it'll join painkillers as a middle class drug, especially popular among divorcees and people who've had deaths in the family.
      Hell, maybe feed your kids a couple when Bubbles or granny dies, so you can keep the Valium for yourself.

      (Just to be clear, I'm not dissing the research. Now we know, and knowing is half the battle, and all that. And if people want to use this to zombify themselves, hey, personal choice and all. Helping the people with real trauma takes priority. And best of all, they can work their drugged-down asses off in the salt mines for their pain-and-pleasure-feeling overlords.)

    26. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by dintech · · Score: 1

      Tomato, Tomato.

      Those both sound the same to me. :)

    27. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Now suppose that you and your family were kidnapped from your home at gun point, and you had to watch while unspeakable things were done to them and to you.

      One thing you would 'learn' (and have a terrifying anxiety attack in response to) is that sitting around in your own home with your family is an unsafe thing to be doing, because something really bad happened one day when you were doing that. That response would be completely useless and would make your life an absolute misery.

      And, having learned that, you'd keep the door and windows locked and a gun at hand at all times, thus being far safer against that sort of thing again.

      The reason people tend to be anxious is that the world really is an inherently brutal, nasty and downright evil place. People do get kidnapped at gunpoint from their homes, raped and shot. Sitting around in your own home with your family really is an unsafe thing to be doing, unless you're living in a fortress.

      Besides, while there might be therapeutic value for an invention like this, abusing it would be more profitable, so that'll be more widespread.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    28. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fire is pretty but it does hurt

      I just can't stop imagining Homer Simpson saying that.

      "Money can be exchanged for goods and services!"
      "Fire is pretty, but it does hurt!"
      "I call the large one Bitey!"

    29. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, if you combine it with Ambien ("The drug to calm the restless mind") then perhaps you can turn into a complete zombie. (I smell a movie here.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Yeah that was awesome. I finally got that stupid song out of my head.

    31. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am posting as AC because I am, in fact, someone who was raped. I feel like sex *is* permanently distorted in my mind. However, there are a couple of reasons I would not want to just pop a pill and make the pain go away. One reason is that I am very cautious about who I trust or get close to. This is not a bad thing--being too trusting and gullible in today's society is just asking for it.

      Secondly, it it something I have discussed with the few men I've had a relationship with since then. The current one is the only one who loves me enough to be willing to take things slowly and deal with the sometimes "irrational" emotions that come up. We trust each other, we talk to each other about anything we need to. He knows what I can and cannot do (yet), he is patient and is helping me to open up. I have already gotten to the point of being able to feel things and be comfortable with situations that I never dreamed I would again.

      I would not have found this man, or a love deeper than I knew was possible, if it were not for what happened to me. I will be affected by that event for the rest of my life, but at this point, I would not change any part of the past, because it has gotten me to where I am now. Not only in my relationship, but as a whole. I, for the first time in my life, actually like who I am.

      It sounds corny but it's absolutely true. I guess I am having to get through it the "old-fashioned" way, but... easier is not always better. Quicker is not always better. And no... an "apathy pill" is not always going to be better.

    32. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      The nature of most people on Slashdot appears to be to figure out a way that a certain product could be used badly, assume that that is the only way it could be used, and then post a whole lot of comments to that effect.

      That may be true, but is it bad? I see people all around me that simply accept what they are told. They are idiots. Being able to take a claim, analyze it, find faults, then weight them against the good is at the heart of a rational, logical decision. I would trade the current state of many minds (accept what you are told, don't question the govt/school/science/religion) for those who are over-zealous on finding the faults in whatever they are told.

      Now, GET BACK IN LINE!

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    33. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by kcdoodle · · Score: 1

      Yes, Bart, you just have to wait a few months.

      Scientists are almost ready with a pill that absorbs 98% of excess guilt.

      - Lisa Simpson

      --

      - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted
    34. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by drolli · · Score: 1

      Something like that.

      The pensieve is the "beta"-version for that...... I find it awkyard to use and it has a lack of access control....

    35. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by DeskLazer · · Score: 1

      actually, come to think of it, I can't recall that happening...

    36. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would be more then willing to take a drug that would remove the negative emotions I feel in social encounters (I'm talking about the real world ones, I get along with people on the internet just fine). If it were not for the negative connotations my brain associates with social interactions I might actually get out of the house for a reason other then going to work or buying food.

      I have to try really hard to remember a social encounter that did not leave me feeling like an outsider or someone unworthy of having friends. Still, my first reaction to a new social encounter is to try and disappear and save my self the pain of another social disaster.

    37. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by blueforce · · Score: 1

      Is that you Tom Cruise?

      --
      If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
    38. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      Not if it makes you such an mental wreck that you're incapable of coherent thought for long enough to go shopping.

    39. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Rynd · · Score: 1

      I would think that taking this pill after such an event would make it even more hellish. Imagine: you still remember all of those unspeakable things that were done to your family, but you don't feel bad about it.

    40. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I would think that taking this pill after such an event would make it even more hellish. Imagine: you still remember all of those unspeakable things that were done to your family, but you don't feel bad about it.

      I think maybe you don't understand what PTSD is. It certainly isn't just 'feeling bad' about something. It's waking every night in absolute terror or waking up fighting. It's having a panic attack every time something reminds you of what happened.

      And if you take the pill and then feel bad about not feeling bad about what happened anymore, i'm sure they can develop a pill for that too :p

    41. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by baubo · · Score: 1

      and no...an 'apathy pill' is not always going to be better"

      And there you have the problem with this new treatment in a nutshell. It will go, like antidepressants, from "here's a drug that we don't really understand how it works or exactly what conditions to prescribe it under, but it may help you if you have these specific symptoms" to "Oh! You feel bad! Poor thing...here take these!" (family or ER doctor scribbles prescription and thrusts a handful of samples at the patient)

      No thanks.

    42. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Oh... Sorry dude. Hope it improves. I was like that once. My own insecurities and ambitions had turned me into some misanthropic wunderkind, with no concept of compassion. Now, sadly I long for those days, when I didn't have the habit of becoming codependent and entwined with every social connection I attempt. It's even worse when I'm looking for a girlfriend. By the time I get around asking her anything, I'm already head-over-heals, and gaining speed straight down. And when I inevitably get cut-off, I don't dare look a girl that might interest me in the eye for weeks. I hope they come up with some sort of preventative version for people like you and me.

      Cheers!

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    43. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      And this drug won't actually erase the memory of the bad things happening, it would erase the emotional component of the memory. So you'll remember what happened, you just wouldn't remember how terrifying it was. But I'm sure it won't be a pleasant memory nonetheless.

    44. Re:And this is a Good thing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called pot. Just ingest before said activity.

  7. Hollywood Has Already Done This by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, it turns out that the test subjects are actually ghosts who are dreaming the future.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    1. Re:Hollywood Has Already Done This by Taikutusu · · Score: 1

      In before Eternal Sunshine...oh wait. Damn.

  8. will this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    make me forget my ex?

  9. Eternal Sunshine by sexybomber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Admittedly I didn't RTFA, but is this specific to just painful memories? I mean, I'd love to delete some memories I have, but I wouldn't want to run the risk of overwriting, say, my acceptance to law school, or memories of particularly good sex, for example. (Yes, strangely enough for a Slashdotter, I have had some.)

    How can the drug possibly discriminate between good and bad memories, or for that matter, any memories at all?

    1. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Caboosian · · Score: 0, Troll

      How can the drug possibly discriminate between good and bad memories, or for that matter, any memories at all?

      Easy, the drug is racist.

    2. Re:Eternal Sunshine by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The headline is somewhat misleading. The memory is not erased. Rather, the emotions associated it are dampened. As in, "I saw my mother hacked to pieces with a chainsaw. Meh."

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    3. Re:Eternal Sunshine by sexybomber · · Score: 1

      Easy, the drug is racist.

      Ahhhh, of course, of course, I should have realized that, considering it's white powder, contained in a white pill, packaged in white packaging.

    4. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't want to run the risk of overwriting... memories of particularly good sex, for example. (Yes, strangely enough for a Slashdotter, I have had some.)
      Would that be by yourself, or with a partner? And if the latter... what's it like?

    5. Re:Eternal Sunshine by patagoniantoothfish · · Score: 1

      Well, not exactly - unless you get to see your mother hacked to pieces repeatedly while on the drug. Maybe if chainsaw-mrderers were considerate enough to record the act so you could play it back in propranolol therapy.

    6. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for people with PTSD. Severe mental trauma. That sort of thing.

      As a psychotic disabled vet who has had no success with therapy, this sounds like a potentially wonderful thing; to wake up happy without medication... for me, man, that's the stuff dreams are made of, risks be DAMNED.

    7. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, I'd love to delete some memories I have...

      I see that you've already deleted the blog on your "homepage" link. Good start!

    8. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it does. I'll have to read the article first to see if they actually did decent controls.

      Their end result was if the folks were less startled by a sound (that they just introduced in place of a shock) when seeing the picture of a spider that they'd been attuned to fearing because of the accompanying shock.

      I've been on propranolol for a couple years. It dampens down my response to... everything... a bit. It depresses/mellows you. I'd expect the group to be less startled because of the drug, but not because of any effect of the drug on memory.

    9. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The dampening is a temporary one while you are on the drug. Come off of it, and things return as they were before. This is going to be worthless unless they intend to keep the PTSD folks on it the rest of their lives.

      I've been on it.

    10. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admittedly I didn't RTFA, but is this specific to just painful memories? I mean, I'd love to delete some memories I have, but I wouldn't want to run the risk of overwriting, say, my acceptance to law school, or memories of particularly good sex, for example...

      That's easy. Just be sure, while the drug is active in your system, not to think about any of the good...

      Uh Oh.

      At least they now have a cure for this problem:

      http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/1996-07-23/

    11. Re:Eternal Sunshine by RockWolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The dampening is a temporary one while you are on the drug. Come off of it, and things return as they were before. This is going to be worthless unless they intend to keep the PTSD folks on it the rest of their lives. I've been on it.

      On that note - as you point out, it only works when you're on it. Does that emotion-suppression while you're taking the drug allow a better success rate of more normal therapies, so it is possible to stop taking it and not undo the therapy? Or should I RTFA?

      /~Rockwolf

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
    12. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      or memories of particularly good sex, for example. (Yes, strangely enough for a Slashdotter, I have had some.)

      But did it involve a partner?
           

    13. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      The headline is somewhat misleading. The memory is not erased. Rather, the emotions associated it are dampened. As in, "I saw my mother hacked to pieces with a chainsaw. Meh."

      Which means this drug would severely decrease the chances of a real-life Dexter! Ban it!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    14. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I didn't RTFA either, but I have heard of the research previously. They ask the person to focus on the painful memory while they are given the drug. So, if you want to forget the bad thing, focus on it while they give you the drug.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    15. Re:Eternal Sunshine by muridae · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article suggested that the use of the drug for a single session of exposure therapy helped reduce the effects of anxiety on the next exposure when the drug was not in their system. It was a news article, not an academic paper, so probably not that accurate.

      Given how they guess that it works, I would say that therapy while taking the drug would be more effective. This appears to interfere with the emotional part of memories, but only those remembered when on the drug. Really, it sounds like what a few therapists had tried with LSD. If it works, it will probably get restricted or banned.

    16. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Manchot · · Score: 1

      Dear Ken,
      I'm in pieces. Why the cold shoulder?
      Love, Barbie.

    17. Re:Eternal Sunshine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad I'm out of mod points today. Sad that this was modded troll, hopefully the metamods will have more functional brain cells.

  10. Dupe? by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've seen this story before. I think.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this story before. I think.

      I KNOW I've seen this story before, I just don't seem to care.

    2. Re:Dupe? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I've seen this story before. I think.

      These are not the dupes you are looking for. -O.W.K.
         

  11. University of Amsterdam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The article states that the experiments where carried out at the University of Amsterdam, not Emory University.

    1. Re:University of Amsterdam by pieisgood · · Score: 1

      Later scientists were asked about their research but could only reply "man... we totally forgot about that shit, man. You like just blew our minds"

      --
      Eat sleep die
    2. Re:University of Amsterdam by multatuli · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's outside of the US, so can be ignored ;-)

  12. Hopefully I'll get some peace of mind after this by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 1
  13. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another thing to hear my tinfoilhat friends complaining about..

    "The government is magically putting it IN THE AIR!"

  14. How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long will it be until law enforcement or the military drugs an interviewee, thus having the evidence thrown out?

    1. Re:How long? by claybats · · Score: 1

      The military currently uses this drug to help soldiers with Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome. From what I have seen personally, it helps some, but it takes years.

  15. What if it deleted something really important.. by neiltrodden · · Score: 1

    ...but not something you'd notice straight away? Would you ever even miss it? Would your life be a bit more crap because you lost a fond memory to look back on and didn't even know it?

  16. side effects of propranolol by tyroneking · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "SIDE EFFECTS: Propranolol is generally well tolerated, and side effects are mild and transient. Rare side effects include abdominal cramps, diarrhea, constipation, fatigue, insomnia, nausea, depression, dreaming, memory loss, fever, impotence, lightheadedness, slow heart rate, low blood pressure, numbness, tingling, cold extremities, sore throat, and shortness of breath or wheezing. "

    Lot of patients who I've dealt with who took this drug suffered from impotence and had to be changed to alternative medication - wonder if in fact all that happened is that they forgot what do with it :)

    I vaguely remember being told by a gynae doc that Pethidine had some memory loss effects too

    The article linked above also goes on to say:
    "Kindt's team has already tested whether the propranolol effect lasts longer than three days--a key requirement for therapeutic use--but she declined to give the results because they have been submitted for publication."

    So continuous treatment might be required? Side effects of prop. can be worse than the memories maybe?

    Really, what's wrong with spending money on counselling instead?

    (IANAD - but IWAP)

    1. Re:side effects of propranolol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Wedded A Pediatrician?
      I Willingly Anal Probe?
      I Want A Pony?

      C'mon -- give us a clue!

    2. Re:side effects of propranolol by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't care... after the drug strips the emotional content of the memory of having suffering all of those side effects, it will just dont matter anymore.

    3. Re:side effects of propranolol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Worse side effects: I keep shitting my pants, but I don't know why!

    4. Re:side effects of propranolol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably used in combination with counseling, or at least it should be. While free of the fear, you get used to being not-terrified, both in general and specifically around whatever you were having trouble with. A few months later when you're off the medicine, you retain all those fresh memories of doing OK in the formerly-bad situation, and this helps counter the older nasty memories. To use a trivially simple example: if you were terrified of heights, but spent a year using a medicine that cancelled the fear and spent a lot of time climbing ladders, riding elevators, looking out skyscraped observation decks, flying, etc... theoretically you'd be able to handle heights after you were off the medicine.

      Also, for some, fear/stress/depression are feedback loops, and just breaking the loop for a few months can be immensely beneficial.

    5. Re:side effects of propranolol by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So continuous treatment might be required? Side effects of prop. can be worse than the memories maybe?

      Really, what's wrong with spending money on counselling instead?

      Sometimes counseling doesn't or won't work. 10+ years is enough for me to say that another 10 years won't work. And those side effects that you listed? I'd consider them minor, others might not, but that's their decision to make.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    6. Re:side effects of propranolol by Laser_iCE · · Score: 1

      but I waffled a pony?

    7. Re:side effects of propranolol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lot of patients who I've dealt with who took this drug suffered from impotence and had to be changed to alternative medication

      Why change medication? I'd expect that at least they didn't care that they'd become impotent...

    8. Re:side effects of propranolol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One side effect that shows potential for requiring another drug that the pharmaceutical industry can also profit on is that if this blocks the epinephrine receptors (mentioned in the thread somewhere), then allergic and anaphylactic responses are more likely. That means antihistamines and maybe Epi-pens, right?

          So the drug blocks the fear response part of the memory of when I had an allergic rxn to a bee sting, I decide "no fears, I'll pet the bee, it's furry" and when the little fella protects himself, I have a much more severe rxn.

      Furthermore, I expect that the blocking effect will go away after discontinuation of the drug, therefore, it means long-term income for the pharmeceutical company.

      Follow the money, folks!

  17. startle reponse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they've proved is that the drug inhibits startle response.

  18. I Don't Remember Anything From Saturday Night by CyberSlammer · · Score: 0

    I wish I could remember why my ass hurts.

  19. Scary philosophical thought by ShooterNeo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If everything that you think you are (your memories) gets gradually shifted and rewritten from day to day, who are we? Never minding the fact that it appears our conscious existence ends when we die, it's almost as if we die a tiny bit every day. While I think I remember who I was 10, 20 years ago, if these memories are faulty and always being revised, perhaps I am that person no longer.

            Some days, I look around and find it remarkable that I even exist. But, sadly, that appears to be a temporary state of being. Not only will I not exist in the future, it appears that I will not even be able to know I don't exist. And now, with these discoveries on memory, it appears that this gradual process of death happens even when we are still alive.

    1. Re:Scary philosophical thought by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
    2. Re:Scary philosophical thought by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Why do you think memories make up who you are? They're just things that happened. And how do you know you won't exist in the future? Last time I checked, the debate on what happens when you die was far from over.

    3. Re:Scary philosophical thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things that happened like learning how to speak and what your name is? Or are you telling me that if the world was filled with objects with Klingon names and you responded to the name "Cowboy Neal" you would be the same person? I think your confusion is that you are 30,000 years out of date on the debate on what happens after you die. What happens is that you rot, mate.

    4. Re:Scary philosophical thought by Icarus1919 · · Score: 1

      Look up the Ship of Theseus example.

    5. Re:Scary philosophical thought by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Things that happened like learning how to speak and what your name is? Or are you telling me that if the world was filled with objects with Klingon names and you responded to the name "Cowboy Neal" you would be the same person?

      Why would I think that? When you say person, are you more talking about personality or consciousness?

      I think your confusion is that you are 30,000 years out of date on the debate on what happens after you die. What happens is that you rot, mate.

      Your body sure does. And before I go any further, I'm not sure I even believe in the afterlife or reincarnation. But I'm also a scientist, so it would be stupid for me to assume what happens to my consciousness when I die.

    6. Re:Scary philosophical thought by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Not so much death as growth.
      We are not the same people as we were yesterday, but we continue to grow and evolve into better people with each day. If your memories were static, then there would be no potential for new insight, new interpretations or innovation of any kind.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    7. Re:Scary philosophical thought by hicksw · · Score: 1

      Nothing lasts, nothing is finished, and nothing is perfect.

      Google "Wabi-sabi". Depressing - maybe, but scary - no.

    8. Re:Scary philosophical thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when you fall asleep tonight and your consciousness evaporates, where does it go? When you wake up tomorrow is the "you" of today back, or just an analog, a copy?

    9. Re:Scary philosophical thought by illtud · · Score: 1

      Jean-Paul, c'est toi?

  20. ZOMG! by ranok · · Score: 0

    Dude, I think you smoked too much TROLL!

    --
    (>'.')>
  21. Buy your expensive drugs by psnyder · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll keep my alcohol. Years of private studies show loss of fear and suppression of bad memories.

    1. Re:Buy your expensive drugs by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll keep my alcohol. Years of private studies show loss of fear and suppression of bad memories.

      Yes, but it's like a DELETE statement without a WHERE clause.
         

    2. Re:Buy your expensive drugs by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Didn't Haruki Murakami once write that alcohol doesn't remove the pain, it just gives it a life of its own, away from ours?

  22. Can't we get this funded more quickly? by tjstork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Such a drug could be enormously helpful for soldiers suffering from PTSD.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Can't we get this funded more quickly? by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      A trial for that purpose is currently underway.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    2. Re:Can't we get this funded more quickly? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Such a drug could be enormously helpful for soldiers suffering from PTSD.

      or marriage ;-P
         

    3. Re:Can't we get this funded more quickly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maps.org has some interesting studies showing MDMA to be a very useful one-time therapeutic agent for treating PTSD.

    4. Re:Can't we get this funded more quickly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tetris sounds like a safer way to deal with that

    5. Re:Can't we get this funded more quickly? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      maps.org has some interesting studies showing MDMA to be a very useful one-time therapeutic agent for treating PTSD.

      Quoting parent for better visibility.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  23. PSYCH DRUGS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientology is gonna fucking ATE this!

    1. Re:PSYCH DRUGS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HATE ... I meant HATE

    2. Re:PSYCH DRUGS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way really. Either they have a crusade against it, or for it to use in their indoctrinations and REALLY make people forget their families care about them like all cults try to do.

    3. Re:PSYCH DRUGS! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It's working! You forgot the "H" already.

    4. Re:PSYCH DRUGS! by tepples · · Score: 1

      Scientology will especially hate this because it would appear to compete directly with Dianetics auditing as a way to erase engrams, the memories of psychological trauma that cause PTSD.

  24. As Roosevelt said, by blakedev · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself, and now we have a drug for it."

    --
    QamuIs Heg qaq law' lorvIs yInqaq puS
    1. Re:As Roosevelt said, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't often LOL at comments but this one did it for me. That ought to be in a bumper sticker.

  25. Torture by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    I guess using this technique you could torture someone, then make it "all better."

    Lovely.

    1. Re:Torture by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

      Well, for the many people who have been tortured, it would be nice to have a medical palliative, yes. Currently their lives may well be more or less destroyed.

      (insert Guantanimo/extraordinary-rendition slam here, etc.)

      --
      "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  26. Brave New World? by owlnation · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Soma -- Praise be to Ford.

  27. Since this is the epic lolz thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they delete all my fearful memories, I won't remember any of my visits to Slashdot. Fuck, I might not even remember this site exists.

    And here's another dangerous feedback loop for you:

    "Oh, what's this OS, haven't seen it before. 'Windows Vista', hmmm, looks good, like the shape of the box!"
    *puts DVD in drive. Boots machine*
    "Aaaaargh!"
    *Takes tablet*
    "Oh, what's this OS, haven't seen it before. 'Windows Vista' ...

    Maybe this drug is the secret behind the success of Windows 7. No-one can remember how awful it is!

    1. Re:Since this is the epic lolz thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's my +5 epic fail moderating option?

  28. Who we are by Dupple · · Score: 1

    is a result of experience both good and bad. You would be deleting yourself.

    --
    Watch those corners
  29. Can this drug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    delete the awful memory of the scientology ad I just saw on this site?

    1. Re:Can this drug... by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but if it can't, it can at least help you forget that you were ever in that cult in the first place!

    2. Re:Can this drug... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What cult? What's slashdot? What is this glowing screen thing in front of me? Hey look, buttons with letters! hl;akljsdf;kjasdf~';

  30. Ponies? by Elitist_Phoenix · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it works on bright pink colour schemes?

    --
    "I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google"
  31. Phillip K. Dick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phillip K. Dick has been done proud once again... sounds just like one of his novels.

  32. Mass treatment by Stiletto · · Score: 1

    Pipe it into the U.S. water supply, and maybe we can all forget the last eight painful years...

    1. Re:Mass treatment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gay..

    2. Re:Mass treatment by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Something on your mind there, sport?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  33. You can learn to forget. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Actually, you can teach yourself to forget once you develop a certain level of introspection.

    The key is in realizing that trying not to think about X will, in fact, cause you to think about X by reference. Combine that with the fact that one memory will trigger related memories (as if they were all connected by URLs or pointers or what have you... yes, I am a software geek) and you may start to see the solution.

    First, you need a 'null thought' to overwrite the bad memory with. This should be a thought that references only itself. A software diagram that showed a memory scheme where address 0 was filled with 0x00 so that it acted as a null pointer that pointed to itself was what gave me that idea. It's not unlike the sink state of a state machine.

    You might worry that it will develop links to the outside as you use it as a replacement. This is a reasonable worry, but solved via use. Most people can't remember how many times they've, say, breathed, because the memories are indistinct. There are simply too many of them. Forget enough and the null memory will be the same.

    After that, you need the introspection to know when you're about to think about the thought you want to replace, at which time you divert to the null thought. It won't quite work at first. But over time, the memory will lose power by virtue of not having been thought of as much. The further ingrained into your mind the memory is, the harder it will be to forget. If you erase it right away, it may die on the spot. If this is the most painful moment of your life that you've lived with for decades... you might not be able to fully get rid of it, but you may be able to think about it a lot less.

    Be smart about what you erase. Sometimes painful memories are a part of us. You don't have to erase everything. Just find a level you can live with and stay there. It's hard sometimes. And not every bad memory should be erased. Sometimes, you're better talking them out with someone you trust. Sharing your pain is another way to lessen it. That's a lot better than having some weird drug mess with your mind. And that goes double for illegal drugs.

  34. This is old news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This news came out in 2002.

    http://www.neuropsychiatryreviews.com/march02/ptsd.html

  35. russian perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Russia this thing is known for centuries, they call it "vodka".

    1. Re:russian perspective by kd5zex · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, memory erases you!

  36. Being prepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I get four years' supply?

  37. No one on the entire web has RTFA. by rayd75 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The drug in the study is a beta blocker. They are used heavily to treat high blood pressure, heart rhythm issues, and specific aspects of heart failure. The study indicates that they MAY be useful in helping to dampen the negative feelings associated with traumatic memories when combined with specifically designed therapy. There's no claim that they can actually cause a memory to be forgotten. It's not a potential lifestyle drug poised for widespread abuse. Most links I've seen to this article and others covering the study seem to suggest that simply popping one of these pills will make you forget an entire event at will. It's nowhere near that simple. If it were, I'd be a lot more laid-back than I actually am.

    1. Re:No one on the entire web has RTFA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, wtf? I used propranolol to block out tachycardia (related to anxiety). I can't see it being some mystical government drug to block out certain memories. It's no Diazepam either.

    2. Re:No one on the entire web has RTFA. by kjllmn · · Score: 1

      Neither have I (RTFA).

      Anyhow, suffering from a host of physical problems and having an abnormally low level of standing anxiety, I can testify that beta-blockers certainly do not eradicate your memories, but they may make you somewhat more "laid-back" - if you are in a abnormally non-calm state to begine with!

      I can't see this particular beta-blocker working any differently, or this posing any problem whatsoever of any kind. It's just quietly saving your life for you to live again.

  38. BAD idea by binpajama · · Score: 1

    Stan: Let's go watch the new Indiana Jones movie.

    Kyle: Yeah, dude. Totally!

    (in theater)

    Stan: What are they doing?

    Kyle: They're raping him! They're raping him!

    Butters: Let's get out of here.

    (two weeks later)

    Stan: Let's go watch the new Indiana Jones movie

    Kyle: Yeah dude. Totally!

  39. Could be used to justify torture by straponego · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After all, if you can't remember being tortured, and there's no permanent physical damage, where's the harm?

    Also, with this or roofie-type drugs, I wouldn't be surprised if some people were willing to pay to be tortured, as long as they couldn't remember it.

    Lastly, quit referencing Eternal Sunshine. Yeah, it was okay. The original PKD story, We Can Remember it For You Wholesale, was pretty good too. Of course, they never gave credit, just like Idiocracy never credited Kornbluth's Marching Morons, despite being a verbatim copy. Pretty sure Harlan Ellison had a similar story, but I... can't remember right now.

    Oh look, the coffee just hit.

    1. Re:Could be used to justify torture by WeatherServo9 · · Score: 1

      Lastly, quit referencing Eternal Sunshine. Yeah, it was okay. The original PKD story, We Can Remember it For You Wholesale, was pretty good too. Of course, they never gave credit,...

      Eternal Sunshine had nothing to do with We Can Remember it For You Wholesale; yeah, both stories involved memory but were completely different. Total Recall was loosely based on the PKD story, and did credit it.

    2. Re:Could be used to justify torture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why pay to be tortured if you can't remember it? That kind of defeats the whole reason to pay to be tortured....

  40. A cure for goatse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And they said some things couldn't be unseen.

  41. Too many LoLs by asdf4 · · Score: 1

    Its just propoganda from the lol machine (crazy scientists with a sense of humor, propranolol)

  42. Where was this drug ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... when 'Battlefield Earth' was released?

    Wait a minute. I think I posted the same quip the last time this story came out.......Oh No!!!!! Old jokes live on!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  43. Just fearful? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    can suppress the emotional part of a fearful memory

    What about supressing the emotional part of an intense, but not exactly fearful memory? There wasn't cure for love... till now?

    1. Re:Just fearful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about supressing the emotional part of an intense, but not exactly fearful memory? There wasn't cure for love... till now?

      Only if your idea of love is a highly stressful torture season.

  44. Let's call it... Gleemonex by telemnar · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Let's call it... Gleemonex by kd5zex · · Score: 1

      "Won't you take me to Funkytown"

  45. Same goal: moving on by letgo · · Score: 1

    'Delete' being misleading is correct. More often than not, we witness researchers 'mainstreaming' their research by promoting it to the general public - and using words to express it in a way that they mean, genuinely, but subtly is underrated.

    These are the type of advances that ARE beneficial towards psychiatric treatment. As some above have already said, we are not all built the same, neither do we learn the same. Outliers exist as a result of experience or mental deficiencies that make the value of a learning process disappear beneath the weight of its trauma.

    It is obvious that some who experience fear in excess on a daily basis will benefit from it, and it is obvious that some looking for the next cheap exit in terms of life's hurdles will abuse it. This is always the case. And at the end of the day, society's decision is based on this--the IMPORTANCE of this, that outweighs this debate that, I'm sure, has taken place time and time again--which is why these drugs go on to getting made: to give help to those who need it.

    The disclaimer is there. Just because society develops a way to change what fundamentally makes us human, doesn't mean we are incapable of making the decision of what is fundamentally right for us.

  46. What anal probe? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, UFO abductions alleged use something like this.

  47. The brain is not a file system by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    I wish people would stop using words like "delete". Evidence suggests that the brain simple doesn't work like that.

    1. Re:The brain is not a file system by Bwerf · · Score: 1

      Even file systems often don't work like that.

      --
      If noone rtfa, then what's the slashdot effect?
  48. Ugh, can the media stop with the scifi headlines? by margaret · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sick of these stupid "propranolol deletes memory" headlines. There was even an episode of boston legal or law & order perpetuating this nonsense a year or so ago. The drug does not "delete" a specific memory. The only people who can that are on star trek. The drug simply reduces the emotional significance of the memory, uncoupling it from the autonomic/fear response associated with it. A HUGE difference.

  49. Not nearly as potent as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is misleading. It does not alter or delete memories at all, it simply changes the person's response to a memory.

    Propranolol is also used by people who experience anxiety, because it inhibits the "fight or flight" response. Musicians routinely use it when performing to stop the shaking related to stage fright.

    what the research showed is that propranolol worked exactly as expected; the subjects were trained to become fearful of a spider picture, and those who took the drug had a calmer response when seeing it. That's it.

    As someone who takes propranolol daily, I found it alarming that the article would link selective memory loss to it, but then never really back up that point. Sloppy reporting.

  50. Thank the Lord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll finally be able to wipe the image of Goatse from my mind.

    1. Re:Thank the Lord... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I'll finally be able to wipe the image of Goatse from my mind.

      You know, this is something I've never quite understood. Goatse is, in the end, a man with a big ass mooning the camera. It's not shocking, it's not disgusting, it's not even particularly ugly. Far worse things get posted daily on Gurochan. So why is Goatse considered the archetypical shock site? Or is that the whole joke which just whooshed over my head?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Thank the Lord... by Rompicollo · · Score: 1

      But then you'll just be doomed to an endless cycle of horror. Since you'll have forgotten what was so bad about it, you'll click on it again. Then you'll have to take the treatment all over again. And the cycle will continue ad infinitum.

    3. Re:Thank the Lord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll finally be able to wipe the image of Goatse from my mind.

      Aauugghh!!! You restored the Goatse image to my mind, you insensitive clod!!!b

  51. Finally! by el3mentary · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can win at the game!

    --
    I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    1. Re:Finally! by Icegryphon · · Score: 0

      You can never win the game.
      yjl*g
      ouota
      usshm
      *ttee

    2. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What game?

  52. Badly B0rken by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    TFA is more than most hyping of background and implications of a minor advancement, written so as to appear TFA is the origin. But this time there are even falsehoods in the summary.

    The study tests a very physiologically based instinct and the effect if the drug to alter that response. Altering a physiological reaction is not the same as blocking part of a memory. Startle response is easily reduced in almost everyone by giving a startling or even sub-startling stimulus 1/2 second prior to the target. Nobody would dare argue that a stimulus prevents the effect of another simply because the body is unable to react to a second startle stimulus fast enough.

    Recent research does not show that memories must be reconsolidated. Memories are constructed heuristically from components stored by association with prior stimuli similar to the present stimulus. The fastest good enough result to provide adequate response is accepted. Virtually never is anything recalled entirely accurately. It is during this construction phase that alterations from the original can and do occur. Such memories can be "meddled with" after this phase, as it is being held in consciousness. It is not because this memory exists in a malleable form, but rather because the brain continually refreshes the memory with a new construction, usually more accurate with time as new information (correct or not) becomes incorporated.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Badly B0rken by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yep that's the important bit: "long-term memories -- once thought to be fairly stable -- can be more easily meddled with".

      We already know that memories are unreliable. Now here we have a way to make them even more unreliable.

      If you delete memories, it makes it easier to replace them with new fake ones (which is probably the intended usage).

      If you do things wrong, you can traumatize someone, over and over again. And they might think the new traumatic memories are real and sue the wrong person for the wrong thing.

      --
  53. problem solved! by Caue · · Score: 1

    now we only need a drug that makes us afraid of things we want to forget

  54. DRM? by Monkier · · Score: 1

    Could this be coupled with a movie/book/song - so after you've paid the small 1 time leasing fee, you are required to take a pill to forget the movie/book/song. Don't want any unlicensed memories 'stealing' from artists!

  55. Needless hype by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a topic that has popped up on Slashdot several times in the last year alone... a beta-blocker somehow altering mind function to improve concentration, increase cognitive abilities, recreational "doping" of the brain, etc...

    It seems far more likely, that this isn't actually "removing" anything from the brain in terms of bad thoughts, but instead is making the brain better able to cope with a bad experience by improving it's ability to reason it's way through it using common sense and logic.

    Likewise, it could also be argued that people who can't normally focus on a simple task at will often end up going off on wild tangents at random instead, and will ultimately go insane trying to consciously resolve whatever scenario pops up in their mind at any given moment, only to shift the workload over to resolve a completely separate scenario brought on by attempting to resolve the previous one. Since this accomplish nothing but large amounts repetitive thinking on the same overall theme, while generating no useful information or solutions, it's not surprising that someone locked in such a state would be depressed and believe themselves to be "traumatized".

    I suppose a beta-blocker might help a case like this, but it seems like this is simply restating the obvious to make whichever drug company did this study seem more "profitable" through sensationalism.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Needless hype by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      What you described is called ADHD. It's quite real, and I speak from personal experience.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    2. Re:Needless hype by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting it isn't real. I used to get failing grades in high school all the time until I was placed on a beta blocker as a preventative measure for a genetic condition I have. Finished out my junior and senior years as a straight A student.

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    3. Re:Needless hype by Thomas+Cruise · · Score: 1
      Rock on, dude!

      BTW, sorry for posting from a secondary account, I exceeded the 25 posts / 24 hours limit.

      --
      Linux is for those who hate windows, *BSD is for those who love UNIX, Plan 9 is for practical folks like me.
  56. Already out in MOVIE form... by careysb · · Score: 1

    "The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind"

  57. If I got this right... by internetcommie · · Score: 1

    Well, I did RTFA, and I understand it so that to get over the painful memories from my marriage, I have to take propranalol and marry the bastard again?
    Being relationship-averse suddenly doesn't seem like such a bad thing!

  58. Tags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't this have the 'backupeverything' tag?

  59. Meh, doesn't work for all anxiety causes by Beve+Jates · · Score: 1

    Fighting anxiety when it's for a specific reason sounds so easy. Man, I wish I had anxiety like that. Try fighting Generalized Anxiety. You can't tell what is causing it so there is nothing to fight. I know other anxiety disorders must be terrible but imagine the same thing except with no source. It feels like your body hates you. Torture for the mind. Horrible...

  60. Attribution Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /.:
    "Experiments carried out by neuro-scientists at Emory University..."

    Technology Review: "...a neuroscientist at Emory University, in Atlanta, who was NOT involved in the research."

    According to Nature Neuroscience, the researchers are all affiliated with the University of Amsterdam.

  61. dampening emotional response by hinux · · Score: 0
    "The findings add support for a new approach to treating anxiety disorders: chemically blocking the emotional component of a memory as it is being recalled."

    Reading the discussions here, some people seem to think that the drug actually erased the painful memories; which it doesn't.

    My understanding is that with the drug, you don't have the same panic/anxiety response that you would normally get while recalling painful memories. That would mean that you can reflect on the event that created those painful memories more objectively and be better able to deal with your situation, if you're having problem coping with it.

  62. the research was _not_ conducted at Emory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The research in this article was _not_ performed at the Emory University, but at the University of Amsterdam.

  63. C.I.A Manchurian candidate trials by guyonweb · · Score: 1

    I think you are all not seeing the big picture. man, marine taken up reported dead with all long term memory modified no name just a mindless killing machine.

  64. Surprise! Summary is wrong by thesaurus · · Score: 1

    This is from the University of Amsterdam, not Emory University. TFA: says Seth Norrholm, a neuroscientist at Emory University, in Atlanta, who was not involved in the research ... In the new experiment, researchers from the University of Amsterdam...

  65. Re:Ugh, can the media stop with the scifi headline by pcolaman · · Score: 1

    Nanoprobes would totally whoop Propranolol's ass...

  66. Radio Lab did a bit on this a while ago. by thefnjester · · Score: 1

    Radio Lab did a great bit about this a while ago. Check it out here: http://www.wnyc.org/shows/radiolab/episodes/2007/06/08/segments/71872

  67. Off-patent varieties by jonaskoelker · · Score: 5, Funny

    So this will turn your fearful memories into hilarious ones?

    Just wait when it goes off-patent. You'll see knock-offs like propanorofl, propanolmao, propanolulz and propanocheezburgar.

    1. Re:Off-patent varieties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Propanololomgwtfbbq sauce?

    2. Re:Off-patent varieties by DiamondMX · · Score: 1

      Must be taken with food.

  68. Rename the drug. by anethema · · Score: 1

    Everone knows what this drugs name should really be.

    Repressitol!

    -Millhouse

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  69. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the vista nightmares can end.

  70. thank god by arndawg · · Score: 1

    After watching 3 guys 1 hammer last night i really need this.

  71. How can they understand so little about psychology by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    There's a simple mechanism in all of us, protecting our brain from being overwhelmed by something that we can't grasp at that moment. (Eg. because it is too horrible.)
    It's called repression.

    A bit of it is normal, and everyone does it.

    But normally, you process it later, when you got the psychological hold and stability to fully face it.
    If this does not happen, you will start to live in a delusional world.

    Neurally, it is a simple over-association. You link things that are not linked in reality, because -- in simple terms -- the linking power was too strong and overflowed into other areas.

    So, "simply" getting into a state of emotional hold (eg. by having a therapist or a really close person be with you) where you feel safe, then facing your fears (because now you can), and really mentally "diving" into the core of them, will result in a re-linking to the original cause. You can easily help facing your fears, by strengthening the congruence between the original horrible moment and now. But it has to be controlled by your own gut feeling of what you fear. Not by what you think. This is, because in this case, we address a very old and primitive mechanism.

    When you re-linked the cause (= strengthened the original path of association) enough, you will notice all the situations where you repressed this thing, and where you lived in delusion.
    This can then be used as a tool to realign your associations with reality. (= weaken the wrong neural paths of association)
    I found the best way of doing this, is to use the method of the self-fulfilling prophecies. This means that if you think that something will happen this way, it strangely usually does. (In reality, it only is much more likely that it does, because you act in that direction. Of course you still can't do magic. ;)

    So if you get in a situation where you notice that you usually did have wrong associations with it (eg. you fear going to work, because you got beaten up in school and therefore feared going to school), you "sidestep" your fears, use your tool to see what the actual reality is, and then tell yourself that you expect it to happen like you think reality really is.
    Afterwards, you can then say "See, I told you it would not end horribly", reward yourself for it, and take the not-so-good days on the light side. (After all, it is what it is. No good or bad about it. An asshole at work still is only a system that works in a specific way, and that you can control is a specific way. But if he *really* is an asshole, of course you can think of him that way too. But don't let him play you. ;)

    And that is the complete essence of neuropsychology on the subject of healing fearful memories, and every other repression/delusion/psychoblocade and even psychosomatic problems. In a nutshell.

    Now if you do this, while balancing the difficulty of things to face with your own (then growing) abilities, you can really heal. Of course, it will not change from now to then. But I achieved to change things so massively in a matter of weeks, that I myself changed completely.

    So you do not need any "repress this even more" pills. Because it will break out somewhere else anyway. Sooner or later. And then it will be even harder to detect and re-associate.
    And you also do not have to have your memories deleted. You can face them and have no fear at all.
    Needless to say, that this will give you a big advantage over forgetting them.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  72. Don't try it! by Demoriel · · Score: 1

    You may end up using Windows again...

  73. Obligatory Trek quote by uncle+slacky · · Score: 1

    "Damn it Bones, you're a doctor. You know that pain and guilt can't be taken away with the wave of a magic wand. They're the things we carry with us, the things that make us who we are. If we lose them, we lose ourselves. I don't want my pain taken away! I need my pain!"

    --
    Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it.
  74. Actually we can delete memory by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

    Elecroshock therapy combined with several cocktails of druds will do the job very very well. Of course it might delete slightly more then a specific memory nothings perfect

  75. Fuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My doc used to give this to me for migraines..

  76. Propranolol doesn't erase memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it merely makes them bearable. If you were raped, normally you would be unable to even think about your memory of being raped without experiencing significant trauma. On the other hand, if you've been treated with propranolol as it is supposed to be used, you can then think about your rape experience and say, "Yes, I was raped. Ok, now what?"

  77. NOT Emory by splante · · Score: 1

    The article has a quote attributed to, "a neuroscientist at Emory University, in Atlanta, who was not involved in the research." Further down, it says the research took place at the University of Amsterdam.

  78. A Cure for Goatse by gtall · · Score: 1

    Eh, maybe it can remove the damage the goatse guy has done to some of us.

    Gerry

  79. What if... by Tdawgless · · Score: 1

    I have a phobia of forgetting things? :|

  80. Propanolol by deuist · · Score: 1

    Propanolol is a beta blocker used to treat everything from high blood pressure to tremors to fears about public speaking. While I'm interested in seeing where this research takes us, I'm a little concerned that deleting painful memories would be a bad thing because they teach us to avoid the behaviors that originally led to those mal events. For example, rape is terrible crime, but forgetting who your rapist is would be even worse.

  81. Re:How can they understand so little about psychol by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

    Quite simply, the method you describe does not work for everyone. Believing it does not make it so. The causes can be many.

    I think you're probably right about "it will break out somewhere else anyway". But the way it breaks out might still be preferable, for some people.