Slashdot Mirror


Major Cache of Fossils Unearthed In Los Angeles

aedmunde sends along news from the LA Times: "A nearly intact mammoth, dubbed Zed, is among the remarkable discoveries near the La Brea Tar Pits. It's the largest known deposit of Pleistocene ice age fossils... in what might seem to be the unlikeliest of places — under an old May Co. parking lot in L.A.'s tony Miracle Mile shopping district. ...huge chunks of soil from the site have been removed intact and now sit in large wooden crates on the back lot... The 23 crates range... from the size of a desk to that of a small delivery truck... There were, in fact, 16 separate deposits on the site, an amount that, by her estimate, would have taken 20 years to excavate conventionally. ... Carefully identifying the edges of each deposit, her team dug trenches around them and underneath, isolating the deposits on dirt pedestals. After wrapping heavy plastic around the deposits, workers built wooden crates similar to tree boxes and lifted them out individually with a heavy crane. The biggest one weighed 123,000 pounds."

215 comments

  1. DUH by timpdx · · Score: 1

    Well, it is right next to the La Brea tar pits, so, DUH. The building site is easily seen as you enter the new Renzo Piano-designed wing to LACMA

    1. Re:DUH by ThinkTwicePostOnce · · Score: 1

      The La Brea Tarpits.

      Now let me see.

      That would be North of the Rio Grande River, and
      South of the Sierra Nevada mountains, wouldn't it?

      --
      Hide all sigs: Click HELP+Prefs (top), VIEWING (last on right), DISABLE SIGS (3rd on left) and SAVE (hidden at bottom).
    2. Re:DUH by ConanG · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is no Rio Grande River. It's the Rio Grande. Rio means river in Spanish so it would be redundant to tack river at the end of the name. Also, it's the Sierra Nevada. Shouldn't add mountains at the end as sierra means mountain range. Redundant, once again.

    3. Re:DUH by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      You know what else is redundant? The La Brea Tar Pits. I am guessing you missed the sarcasm.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    4. Re:DUH by PDX · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just woke up from a dirt nap to find myself dangling in the air from a crane!
      What would only make this intolerable to my soul, would be to have steel rods rammed into me to prop me upright for all eternity.

    5. Re:DUH by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      That's because you forgot the sarcastimark: ~

  2. Not politically correct. by iYk6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are called, "old people", and yes, there are a lot of them in L.A.

    1. Re:Not politically correct. by Puffy+Director+Pants · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not any more. Anybody in Los Angeles that looks to old is sent to the "Valley" where they're happier and the rest of the city doesn't have to look at them, or risk them being seen on TV.

    2. Re:Not politically correct. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      I live in the Valley.....*sob*

    3. Re:Not politically correct. by chill · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then we're going to have to ask you to turn in your webcam.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    4. Re:Not politically correct. by Mr.+Conrad · · Score: 5, Funny

      They better have evidence to backup their claims, as they're going against conventional wisdom. Everyone knows that the largest deposit of fossils is in Naples, Florida.

    5. Re:Not politically correct. by RockWolf · · Score: 1

      Then we're going to have to ask you to turn in your webcam.

      Some people enjoy seeing old people on webcam, you insensitive clod! Especially if they're in North Korea.

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
    6. Re:Not politically correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I literally live across the street from the museum. I have been here over 3 years and although I do take occasional walks there and have shown friends the tar pits, I have not gone into the museum. I always thought, "been there done that"

      I had no idea that there was this big of a find right next door.

      Honestly, I thought the biggest claim to fame of the tar pits was that Tommy Lee Jones movie about a volcano erupting from the middle of the tar pits. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120461/

      Which I always thought was kinda cool.

      And last summer they did film part of the new Land of the Lost movie http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0457400/ there also but I never did run into any Sleestaks.

    7. Re:Not politically correct. by wipeMyButt · · Score: 1

      And given the high levels of silicone, collagen and other "unnatural" substances they are filled with, they are generally quite well preserved and offer great insight into world that was ancient Los Angeles.

    8. Re:Not politically correct. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      I'm only 154 in dog years.

    9. Re:Not politically correct. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It should make for a great exhibit on Pleistocene-era narcissists. "Kids, meet the mighty Mammoth Media Whore, which lived over 20,000 years ago--but claimed to be much younger."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Not politically correct. by jd · · Score: 1

      I thought the largest deposit of fossils was in Washington DC.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    11. Re:Not politically correct. by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      they're not all sent to the valley... some are sent to the desert

    12. Re:Not politically correct. by midol · · Score: 1

      "Major Cache of Fossils Unearthed In Los Angeles "

      what, not the RIAA????

    13. Re:Not politically correct. by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      The fossils in Naples are migratory. They come down from Ontario and Chicago in winter.

      --
      snig
  3. Wow by hiojay · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, that's a mammoth of a find.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lame.

    2. Re:Wow by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a lame mammoth of a find. ???

      Fixed it for you....

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame I don't live in that area. It would have been Pleistocene it.

    4. Re:Wow by jd · · Score: 1

      Correction: Wow, that's a find of a lame mammoth.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Wow by Ironica · · Score: 1

      He was missing a leg, right? That would tend to make him a lame mammoth...

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also had severe arthritis. The rib cage showed evidence of an old but severe injury that had healed, but I couldn't find any way to work that in.

  4. Who's Zed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Zed's dead baby, zed's dead.

    1. Re:Who's Zed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a fossil, obviously it is NOT alive but rather dead. Sometimes I really do wonder why every single captain-obvious on the internet has to join slashdot....

    2. Re:Who's Zed? by d3m0nCr4t · · Score: 2, Informative

      I take it you've never seen Pulp Fiction?

    3. Re:Who's Zed? by Nogg · · Score: 1

      I am Zed's excavated pelvis.

      --
      move.w #0,$dff180
    4. Re:Who's Zed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh!

    5. Re:Who's Zed? by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Let me fix that for you...

      I am Elvis's excavated pZed.
      only problem is i don't know what a pZed could be.... maybe a shoe or a belt....

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    6. Re:Who's Zed? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      If Superman and the Flash were to race around the world (on foot), and they passed on either side of 'Captain Obvious AC, the Whooosh! they made would not compare to the one Captain Obvious just experienced.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    7. Re:Who's Zed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that the crazy tear gas drinker from police academy?

      how sad...

    8. Re:Who's Zed? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      This was my first thought.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:Who's Zed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you've never seen Fight Club?

  5. Flintstone by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

    I'll be impressed if they find the fossilized remains of Fred Flintstone.

    1. Re:Flintstone by spineboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      They've found COMPLETE frozen wooly mammoths in the Artic tundra in Russia, complete with hair and all
      http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/03/0324_050324_mammoth.html
      So while this find is quite nice, it's by no means the best ever.

      --
      ..........FULL STOP.
    2. Re:Flintstone by kiwijapan · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So while this find is quite nice, it's by no means the best ever.

      Considering where it was found, I don't think the researchers will be complaining. The interesting point to this story though is the fact that the "nearly intact" (FTA: "he appears to be about 80% complete") mammoth was found in L.A., which is hardly frozen Artic tundra.

      Researchers from the George C. Page Museum at the La Brea tar pits have barely begun extracting the fossils from the sandy, tarry matrix of soil

      If it was the composition of the soil in which the body was buried that preserved it for so long, then perhaps similar finds could be made in other non-tundra climes.

    3. Re:Flintstone by wisty · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, the medieval Russians used to eat wholly mammoths during banquets, and mammoth ivory was an export to China.

    4. Re:Flintstone by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've only ever been able to manage a partial mammoth.

      Sorry, I'll get my skins.

    5. Re:Flintstone by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      But it is significantly different. The mammoths in Siberia are just chillin'. The mammoth in LA is truly stoned. The LA mammoth was more committed to the results of his actions.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    6. Re:Flintstone by geobeck · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it was the composition of the soil in which the body was buried that preserved it for so long, then perhaps similar finds could be made in other non-tundra climes.

      Uh-oh, maybe they'll have to declare all of northern Alberta a protected archaeological site...

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    7. Re:Flintstone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They've found COMPLETE frozen wooly mammoths in the Artic (sic)
      > tundra in Russia, complete with hair and all
      > http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/03/0324_05032
      > 4_mammoth.html [nationalgeographic.com]
      > So while this find is quite nice, it's by no means the best ever.

      This is an American find, so by definition it is the best ever.

    8. Re:Flintstone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine, eating nothing else but mammoth meat at a banquet - you'd think they could have served some appetizers or dessert with it.

    9. Re:Flintstone by tmosley · · Score: 1

      More importantly, did they find any frozen cavemen?

    10. Re:Flintstone by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      More importantly, did they find any frozen caveman lawyers

    11. Re:Flintstone by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Considering where it was found.

      Let's do that.
      Hmmm. A fossil near the La Brea Tar Pits. Who'da thunk?

    12. Re:Flintstone by jd · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find those are pygmy woolly mammoths, and that the fossil finds are of a much older subspecies.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    13. Re:Flintstone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's hope not; that could cause some headaches in the daily lives of northern Alberta's three human residents.

    14. Re:Flintstone by spineboy · · Score: 1

      Well, I personally haven't found any mammoths - pygmy or not, but thanks for being optimistic.

      --
      ..........FULL STOP.
    15. Re:Flintstone by jd · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're looking in the wrong aisle in the supermarket. Or maybe you need to let yourself be inspired by the story of Mary Anning, who had discovered two new species of dinosaur by age 20. There are well-known rich fossil beds in many countries, who knows what you might find.

      Hell, new species of insect are sometimes discovered by people visiting their local fossil store and buying a piece of amber. It's not as impressive as a mammoth, sure, but it's still spectacular. So, yes, although I wasn't thinking in those terms (which you know), I am highly optimistic that one of Slashdot's own (perhaps you) WILL make an important discovery in fossils.

      Anything Mary Anning could do, you can do. Sure, more species are known now, but more fossil beds are known now and you have far superior mobility and technology at your disposal.

      I shall expect a detailed report of the finding of Spineboyasaurus in, oh, shall we say the next couple of months?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  6. Not unlikely at all by heretic108 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The fossils were found under a parking lot.

    Obvious really - Thag and his wife Urga came back from the show to find their trusty mammoth leg-clamped for over-parking. They couldn't afford the unclamping fee, so had to walk home. The rest is history.

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
    1. Re:Not unlikely at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pre-history, actually.

      (I'll be here all night, try the veal)

    2. Re:Not unlikely at all by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      Some people really do deserve to get towed away by a troop of Velociraptors, especially those unevolved idiots who park in front of the mammoth stables. Some of us have to go hunting in the morning, you know.

    3. Re:Not unlikely at all by CraftyJack · · Score: 1

      Or, it was that drive-up place where you can get a side of bronto ribs delivered right to your car. People tend to just toss the bones aside afterward.

  7. Re:Clear your cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We also would have accepted jokes about how a mammoth is too big to fit in cache and you would probably get better performance by using -Os rather than -O3.

  8. doh! by djupedal · · Score: 5, Funny

    > "in what might seem to be the unlikeliest of places..."

    Hey, Marge! I found fossils in a known tar pit - who would have guessed.....!!

  9. Yes, at Leisure World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    talk amongst yerselves

  10. ObFuturama by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Leela and Fry are in the Planet Express ship, trapped deep in the La Brea tar pits! Seeking any means of escape from Certain Doom, Leela scans the endless depths of their petroleum prison...)

    [Leela looks at a scanner.]

                                                                              LEELA
                                                      It's some kind of hollow tube, devoid
                                                      of human life. The Los Angeles subway!
                                                      We can blast our way in and escape!

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    1. Re:ObFuturama by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      I am glad this commented showed up with "futura". Though, I expected the Stallone reference.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  11. As seen on Dirty Jobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    These guys were on Dirty Jobs, I think two weeks ago. (Maybe three.) They've been working on that single fossil for a LONG time. (With good reason - it's a freaking mammoth.)

  12. Confusing by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Funny

    from the size of a desk to that of a small delivery truck

    For those of you who prefer more conventional measurement units, that's between 0.35 and 2.5 volkswagens.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    1. Re:Confusing by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am so sick of every thread turning into some goddamn crusade for the metric system.

      Look, people, this was in the US, so we're simply going to use the imperial system (.08 to 0.6 Chrysler Imperials).

      --
      -Styopa
    2. Re:Confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the size of a desk to that of a small delivery truck

      For those of you who prefer more conventional measurement units, that's between 0.35 and 2.5 volkswagens.

      Sorry, what's that in Buicks, football fields, and Libraries of Congress?

    3. Re:Confusing by Inda · · Score: 0

      Browsing at +3, yours is the only post that mentions metric.

      56 tons, 56 metric tons, 56,000 kg.

      Funny though, 2nd result on Google for "123,000 pounds in metric tons" is this thread.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    4. Re:Confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am so sick of every thread turning into some goddamn crusade for the metric system.

      Look, people, this was in the US, so we're simply going to use the imperial system (.08 to 0.6 Chrysler Imperials).

      Nah, that would be 3/32 to 19/32 Chrysler Imperials

    5. Re:Confusing by rozthepimp · · Score: 1

      As far as the time period mentioned in the summary, 20 years (english units) ~ 20 metric years.

    6. Re:Confusing by Hellburner · · Score: 1

      Dammit...what is the conversion formula for Volkswagens to Library Of Congresses?

      Or am I confusing dry weight with volumetric measurement?

      Oh...drat...maybe Library Of Congresses only convert into teraGutenbergs?

    7. Re:Confusing by genner · · Score: 3, Funny

      I am so sick of every thread turning into some goddamn crusade for the metric system.

      Look, people, this was in the US, so we're simply going to use the imperial system (.08 to 0.6 Chrysler Imperials).

      My car gets 40 rods to the hog's head and that's the way I like it.

    8. Re:Confusing by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Per Road & Track, my '70 Impala Sport Coup's trunk is large enough to carry 14 suitcases or a dead horse. Would that mean an Impala has a 1/2 Mammoth cargo capacity?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    9. Re:Confusing by operagost · · Score: 1

      whoosh

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Confusing by Arterion · · Score: 1

      How many Libraries of Congress is that, if burned to standard capacity DVDs?

      Please talk in terms a techie can understand.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    11. Re:Confusing by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      How many LoC's can a mammoth hold? What about a mimmoth?

      Render unto Capt. D's the things which are Capt. D's?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    12. Re:Confusing by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      That's (rounded off) 0.0008 kilometres per litre or 0.002 miles per gallon. I think it's time you switched to a Prius, dude.

      Or maybe a bicycle.

      Hell, a fully loaded 747-400 gets better fuel economy, take your pick.

    13. Re:Confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My car gets about 504,000 rods per hogshead =)

  13. Fossils in LA: Susan Saradon??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Was Susan Saradon among those fossils unearthed?
    How about her son, Tim Robbins?

  14. Multiple redundancy by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just in case anybody cares, "La Brea" is Spanish for "the Tar," so "The La Brea Tar Pits" translates into "The The Tar Tar Pits."

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:Multiple redundancy by Killer+Orca · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just in case anybody cares, "La Brea" is Spanish for "the Tar," so "The La Brea Tar Pits" translates into "The The Tar Tar Pits."

      Don't you mean The Tar the Tar Pits?

    2. Re:Multiple redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No ÂÂ

    3. Re:Multiple redundancy by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mmmm, tartar pits..... picks up a fried fish finger

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    4. Re:Multiple redundancy by elthicko · · Score: 1

      That should be fried mammoth finger.

    5. Re:Multiple redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like /. can talk.

    6. Re:Multiple redundancy by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tar Tar Pits. He's going to be a character in the Clone Wars series.

      Search your feelings! You KNOW it to be true!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    7. Re:Multiple redundancy by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      No. Translate the words in the order you see them, and you get "The The Tar Tar Pits." What you're doing is moving things around to come out the way you want.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    8. Re:Multiple redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just in case anybody cares, "La Brea" is Spanish for "the Tar," so "The La Brea Tar Pits" translates into "The The Tar Tar Pits."

      Being that they haven't been cooked yet, what's wrong with calling them "Tar Tar"?

    9. Re:Multiple redundancy by hab136 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Just in case anybody cares, "La Brea" is Spanish for "the Tar," so "The La Brea Tar Pits" translates into "The The Tar Tar Pits."

      Is there somewhere in The La Brea Tar Pits where I can put my PIN number into an ATM machine?

    10. Re:Multiple redundancy by laejoh · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why there is the -z option, so that you can include gzip compression.

    11. Re:Multiple redundancy by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      Multiple redundancy = Tautology

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_(rhetoric)

    12. Re:Multiple redundancy by Anynomous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Your post was modded Redundant :)

      --
      I'm not a coward by any name.
    13. Re:Multiple redundancy by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Crazy Americans! What will they think of next? Perhaps some website named aitch tee tee pee colon slash slash slash dot dot com?

    14. Re:Multiple redundancy by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      No, The Jar Jar Binks

      --

      Your head a splode
    15. Re:Multiple redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do they have ATM machines there where i can use my PIN number?

    16. Re:Multiple redundancy by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Uh, that's exactly what he wrote.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    17. Re:Multiple redundancy by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Uh, that's exactly what he wrote.

      Are you honestly saying you can't see any difference between "The Tar the Tar Pits" and "The The Tar Tar Pits"?!?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    18. Re:Multiple redundancy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, tartar pits..... picks up a fried fish finger

      You can get them next to the fried chicken lips place.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Multiple redundancy by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

      Hey! I'm a Tartar, you insensitive clod and we don't eat fried anything!!

      We keep our mammoth steaks under our saddles for a week until they're tender and then eat them washed down with fermented mammoth milk while listening to the lamentations of their women.

    20. Re:Multiple redundancy by Erik+Greenwald · · Score: 1

      welcome to http colon slash slash slash dot dot org.

    21. Re:Multiple redundancy by operagost · · Score: 2

      I don't even care anymore, being accustomed to "Personal Identification Number Number", "Automated Teller Machine Machine", "Network Interface Card Card", "With With Juice", and "Grilled Roasted Meat Steak"*.

      Also, "The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim" translates to "The The Angels Angels of Anaheim".

      * Taco Bell used to advertise their "carne asada" taco as "grilled carne asada steak."

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    22. Re:Multiple redundancy by drew · · Score: 1

      OK, I know I haven't followed baseball in a long time, but I used to live right down the street from them. When did they stop being the "California Angels"? And how does any team end up with two cities in their name. That's just plain dumb.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    23. Re:Multiple redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just in case anybody cares, "La Brea" is Spanish for "the Tar," so "The La Brea Tar Pits" translates into "The The Tar Tar Pits."

      So does that mean some university dumped all their old Tape ARchives there?

    24. Re:Multiple redundancy by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      When I first saw it, Killer Orca's post did not appear at all. Now that I see it, of course, it makes a whole lot more sense.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    25. Re:Multiple redundancy by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      No, a tautology is the equivalent of the equation a = a such as in the comment, "That water is wet." A redundancy is saying the same thing more than once, or something that somebody else already said. Quite a difference, really.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    26. Re:Multiple redundancy by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      What they have there is automated ATM machines where you can use your personal PIN number to identify yourself.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    27. Re:Multiple redundancy by Arterion · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean The The Jar Jar Binks?

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    28. Re:Multiple redundancy by cthulhu11 · · Score: 0

      One would naturally back them up on DAT tape. (you see, DAT stands for Digital Audio Tape, so ... oh nevermind)

  15. 10 000 - 40 000 years old fossils? by Dionysus · · Score: 0, Troll

    Lies. All God fearing Americans know the Earth is only about 6000 years young

    --
    Je ne parle pas francais.
    1. Re:10 000 - 40 000 years old fossils? by schnikies79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Way to re-hash the same 'ole shit over, and over, and over. It wasn't funny a year ago, It's not funny now. Yes people think that way, everyone here knows that. You know what? The only ones I hear bringing it up every discussion I read is you guys making fun of it. The people that actually believe talk about it less.

      It's off-topic and it's annoying.

      --
      Gone!
    2. Re:10 000 - 40 000 years old fossils? by DavoMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually its a serious problem. That creationist stuff is a good reflection of social progress. f it keeps up, soon you will find the USA in the dark ages.

      --
      Whats the harm in yelling 'Computer, end program!'? You could be living in Star Trek! Go on.. give it a try.
    3. Re:10 000 - 40 000 years old fossils? by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

      Yes, but talking about it offtopic is not helping anyone. I agree with schnikies79 that the ones that bring it up are mostly people trying to make fun of it and it's not funny. Here comes the karma burning for 'trolling'.

      --
      ics
    4. Re:10 000 - 40 000 years old fossils? by ag0ny · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wrong. Making fun of religion and religious nuts is ALWAYS funny.

      Especially if it involves the Pope, Texas, and a midget or two.

    5. Re:10 000 - 40 000 years old fossils? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually its a serious problem. That creationist stuff is a good reflection of social progress. f it keeps up, soon you will find the USA in the dark ages.

      And then it won't be long until the USA starts a series of crusades against Muslim countries.

    6. Re:10 000 - 40 000 years old fossils? by geobeck · · Score: 1

      All God fearing Americans know the Earth is only about 6000 years young

      That just means He had them on ice for a while before he found a use for them. "These humans are going to be my most gullible creations evar! Let's see what they make of these! *snicker*"

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    7. Re:10 000 - 40 000 years old fossils? by genner · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Making fun of religion and religious nuts is ALWAYS funny.

      Especially if it involves the Pope, Texas, and a midget or two.

      You bigot.....they preffer to be called "Little People"

    8. Re:10 000 - 40 000 years old fossils? by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thanks, Captain Hyperbole. I'm sure that a small contingent of people who wish to believe something you don't will threaten our way of life. They must be exterminated! By the way, about as many people believed in creationism both before and after the Dark Ages, so I dare say that it is not a reasonable indicator of "social progress."

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  16. AND IT'S CALLED... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Beverly Hills!!!

    What I don't understand is why this is news.

  17. TAR PITS! by n6kuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Pico and Sepulveda...)
    (Pico and Sepulveda...)
    Doheney...
    Cahuenga...
    La Brea...
    TAR PITS!

    --
    If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    1. Re:TAR PITS! by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      zippy? someone let you out of your cage?

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    2. Re:TAR PITS! by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      Thanks man!
      You just gave me a flashback to when I used to listen to Dr. Demento every Sunday evening.
      Every now and then I used to be able to catch the Top 10 in syndication out here in the mid-atlantic area. But nothing is the same as 6-10 on a hot California Sunday night when I was 17-18 years old out bombing around in my '73 Nova listening to Dr. D.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
  18. Re:hmm by darinfp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't know about "flamebait", but this would make a great "ask Slashdot". Another 1200 comment thread would certainly drive up the ad revenue.

  19. This is a good thing? by Jflatnote · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And by quarrying the fossils in bulk sections, the geomorphic relationship is completely lost. Much, if not most of the scientifically valuable information that can be gained from a fossil site comes from the relationship of the fossils in situ to the stratigraphic setting, etc. While this may seem like news, it is just a report of the same business-as-usually destruction of valuable scientific information by paleontologists who should know better but who somehow do not know or do not care.

    1. Re:This is a good thing? by mbone · · Score: 1

      And by quarrying the fossils in bulk sections, the geomorphic relationship is completely lost.

      That is not what I got from the article - "huge chunks of soil from the site have been removed intact and now sit in large wooden crates on the museum's back lot" precisely because "researchers are perhaps even more excited about finding smaller fossils of tree trunks, turtles, snails, clams, millipedes, fish, gophers and even mats of oak leaves. In the early 1900s, the first excavators at La Brea threw out similar items in their haste to find prized animal bones, and crucial information about the period was lost."

      So while, yes, they are in a hurry, it seems to me that they are trying hard to preserve the context and stratigraphy and are fully aware of the benefit of such information.

    2. Re:This is a good thing? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      That's the thing though. They're trying hard to maintain the context and stratigraphy given the circumstances. Every single one of them would tell you that they'd much rather be working with the material in place in the ground rather than out of crates in the back lot.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:This is a good thing? by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that before removing the large chunks they made some sort of reference as to where the top of the chunk was in relation to the site as a whole.
      And since this was a site that had been excavated previously in order to create the parking lot in the first place, there was probably some context lost before the specimens were found.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    4. Re:This is a good thing? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > And by quarrying the fossils in bulk sections, the geomorphic relationship is completely
      > lost.

      I wouldn't have thought that there would be a whole lot of stratigraphy in a tar pit to begin with.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:This is a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't it always the case that some random high userID guy on /. knows more about something than the actual professionals doing the work in the field? Man, we must have a huge concentration of knowledge in this place or lots of management material.

    6. Re:This is a good thing? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      That's the thing though. They're trying hard to maintain the context and stratigraphy given the circumstances. Every single one of them would tell you that they'd much rather be working with the material in place in the ground rather than out of crates in the back lot.

      Have you seen the weather in SoCal lately? I'm not so sure the scientists would rather be under tarps and in slickers rather than in a comfy hangar or wherever...

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  20. Please mod parent up insighful Re:Multiple redunda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Needed that one (tough day/week/month whatever).

    Thanks! ^_^

  21. old dead things by DavoMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have they found the MPAA's business model yet?
    ziiing! ;)

    --
    Whats the harm in yelling 'Computer, end program!'? You could be living in Star Trek! Go on.. give it a try.
    1. Re:old dead things by jd · · Score: 1

      That was covered in a story some time back on the earliest evidence of microbial life.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  22. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'd still be a flamebaiting "Ask Slashdot" and would be full of more flamebait threads.

  23. Uh.... by Spasemunki · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm the only sixth grader in the room, but anyone else think they might want to rethink the lettering in that little sign in the picture?

    1. Re:Uh.... by biduxe · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm the only sixth grader in the room, but anyone else think they might want to rethink the lettering in that little sign in the picture?

      Come on the lettering is perfectly undertandable even for a sxth grader.

      As a side node That bone is really huge!

  24. For those asking for metric... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 5, Funny

    This story is tagged "metricplease", but they didn't have the metric system in the mesozoic era. Sheesh.

    1. Re:For those asking for metric... by tpheiska · · Score: 1

      I thought the imperial system is dated to be from about that age.

      --
      "wahts woring iwth my tyoping?"
    2. Re:For those asking for metric... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      This story is tagged "metricplease", but they didn't have the metric system in the mesozoic era. Sheesh.

      They almost did!

      In SE Asia they found a fossilized homo erectus, and in its hand it was holding a stone rod which was divided by carved grooves into ten equal sections, which were each then subdivided by smaller grooves into ten sections. Embedded in the specimen's skull was another rod, which was divided into twelve sections, with sixteen subdivisions.

      Thus we have evidence of the oldest known metric vs imperial argument, and its resolution. While anthropologists do not know the identity of the assailant who doomed the entire pleistocene to imperial measurements, it is assumed they were an early form of Yankee.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:For those asking for metric... by artson · · Score: 1

      File this under not good for trade.

      --
      In times of trouble, the smell of frying onions usually gives confidence and comfort.
    4. Re:For those asking for metric... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      When I first read this comment, it was at Score:4, Informative.

      I just shook my head.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    5. Re:For those asking for metric... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too, gave me a chuckle. :)

      Don't fear too much for humanity. It was probably the moderator doing the use-informative-because-funny-doesn't-give-karma thing. As if I give a flying fuck about karma (or like my bad jokes need to be encouraged) but hey whatever.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  25. Obviously not an American Mammoth by doublecuffs · · Score: 0

    I was wondering why they called it Zed and then I remembered - The United States is only a couple of hundred years old, so it couldn't have been American and that's why they called it Zed rather than Zee.

  26. Zed died prematurely by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    Mammoths normally lived to about 60, so Zed died prematurely.

    Well, you'd die prematurely too if you stepped into a pool of petrochemical quicksand.

  27. The pope? by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Especially if it involves the Pope, Texas, and a midget or two.

    I seriously don't see the link between the Pope and US puritan nuts. Or between the pope and the young-earth idiocy for that matter.

    If you look as far as back as St Augustine Of Hippo, he wrote in no uncertain terms that only an idiot would take the Genesis literally. "It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should hear a Christian speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are." That's pretty much a thorough flaming of that point of view. He got sanctified by the catholic church, btw.

    Plus, whatever bigotry the catholics might have had against science, were gone in the counter-reformation. (They had to try to stop losing ground to the protestants _somehow_.) The Society Of Jesus for example, is pretty much a scientific order sponsored by the Vatican. Those guys operate research labs and universities. And yes, they teach evolution and the big bang.

    Also let's remember that the Vatican, including the current pope, btw, has officially proclaimed Darwinism as correct. So you won't find _them_ arguing that dinosaur fossils were placed there to test your faith.

    Now I'm not saying the catholics are without fault. But ffs, blame them for their real faults, not for bullshit strawmen. Lumping them together with the young-earthers just shows massive ignorance. Blaming it on the pope is like blaming the fall of Byzantium on the emperor of China. That freaking stupid.

    It seems to me like some people aren't in it even for the science-vs-religion parts, but just because they're cretin trolls seeking to annoy someone, anyone for attention.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:The pope? by brightmal · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, I always thought of Creationism as the Raving Right's version of the Loony Left's Anthropogenic Global Warming. Both systems work if looked at through the eyes of a four year-old child. However, when looked at a bit more critically, Biblical Theology and Natural Philosophy both turn out to be a bit more complicated, and not quite so easily turned to political ends. Or condensed into media friendly sound-bites.

      --
      Islam Delenda Est
    2. Re:The pope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blaming it on the pope is like blaming the fall of Byzantium on the emperor of China. That freaking stupid.

      If the emperor of China had successfully contained and subjugated the Turks or their predecessors, then there would have never been any Ottomans to annex Constantinople.

      But as you say, this is stupid. Constantinople already fell to western crusaders who erected their own empire in the region. By the time the Turks were powerful enough to seriously threaten them, they were fragmented and greatly weakened. Had it not been the Turks it have been someone else.

    3. Re:The pope? by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's appropriate you mention the Reformation and Counter Reformation. One of Martin Luther's big peeves was the fact that the Church didn't want average people to read the bible, because it created too much dependence of the local priests, and was inevitably abused. The Church's stated reason was that the bible had to be interpreted by experts so that the laity didn't get confused by the Bible's complexity.

      Fast forward a few hundred years - Luther's spiritual descendants (some of them anyway) are doing EXACTLY what the Church said they would do.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:The pope? by Asic+Eng · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The "loony left" in this case includes noted left wingers like John McCain and Giuliani , chairmen of oil companies, just about every government of the first world, the vast majority of published climate scientists ...

    5. Re:The pope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Also let's remember that the Vatican, including the current pope, btw, has officially proclaimed Darwinism as correct.

      Actually they haven't been so stupid as that. They've said something to the effect that it's the most likely explanation according to current understanding. They've quite rightly avoided creating a new religious dogma out of it.

    6. Re:The pope? by operagost · · Score: 1
      That's funny, because he refuted the pagans' claims about the ancient origins of man by comparing them to the span of time recorded in scripture:

      Let us, then, omit the conjectures of men who know not what they say, when they speak of the nature and origin of the human race. For some hold the same opinion regarding men that they hold regarding the world itself, that they have always been... They are deceived, too, by those highly mendacious documents which profess to give the history of many thousand years, though, reckoning by the sacred writings, we find that not 6000 years have yet passed.

      - Augustine, Of the Falseness of the History Which Allots Many Thousand Years to the World's Past, The City of God, Book 12: Chapt. 10 [AD 419].

      This is right in the Wikipedia article you linked to. That being said, I agree with Augustine's insight that if our interpretation of scripture conflicts with our observations, that our interpretation may be flawed. Scripture itself calls us to reason and to analyze everything, keeping the good.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:The pope? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's the scripture that's flawed.

  28. 123,000 pounds in modern money? by fantomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's that in less historic money? ;-)

    interesting - do you guys over the pond use tons for big numbers or do you stick to pounds all the way up? Curious about the expression "123,000 pounds" - isn't that something like 100 tons or so? (he says plucking a figure out the air and being lazy ;-) )

    Here we'd say kg for small numbers, but once we'd got to a thousand we'd shift to (metric) tons, e.g. "over 123 tons" not "over 123,000 kg". Or is that domain specific? do some things get measured in pounds all the way up, but others you shift into talking about tons? What do you measure aircraft carriers etc in? millions of pounds?

    Great news though on the main topic, it will keep some university researchers happily employed for a good while!

    1. Re:123,000 pounds in modern money? by repvik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aircraft carriers are measured in ounces.

    2. Re:123,000 pounds in modern money? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      You'll probably not get any other serious replies, so here I go.

      At least in my experience, the use of the unit 'ton' is most often encountered when dealing with some sort of profession that deals in things by weight. The average citizen really has no benchmark as to how much a ton of anything is, so laypeople use pounds. Large trucks and cranes are rated in tons, and scrap iron dealers, lumberjacks, etc use tons, but you don't normally hear it in everyday conversation. Interestingly, our roadway load limit signs are in tons, unless the limit is low or would require a fraction of a ton, I assume.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:123,000 pounds in modern money? by Teun · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You got a point.

      But the explanation is rather mundane, lets take some hypothetical super tanker accident.

      The oil company will claim less than ten thousand tons of oil might have leaked away.
      The clean up company will report about fifty five thousand barrels of oil to collect and Green Peace will talk about a disaster involving over twelve million litres of crude oil polluting the environment.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:123,000 pounds in modern money? by fantomas · · Score: 1

      hahaha nice one :-) we of course measure them in grams or occasionally gills displacement.

    5. Re:123,000 pounds in modern money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      123,000 points sounds bigger than "over 60 tons.".

    6. Re:123,000 pounds in modern money? by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      The usage of tons vs. pounds is usually for effect. There are 2000 lbs in a ton, so 123,000 lbs would be 61.5 tons. But most people, unless they work in an industry that deals with very large weights of things, don't have any concept of a ton, and plus, adding "millions" or "thousands" to the end of a number makes it sound big and exciting.

      The following is not directed at fantomas, but at the other metric-heads in this thread...

      It's also interesting that you would bring up the metric ton (or tonne). This unit is descended from the centuries-old unit of tun, relating to the weight of a cask of wine. It was standardized as 1000 kg, because it's much less silly to say "ton" than to say "megagram", the official metric equivalent.

      I always found it amusing that Europeans who think metric is The One True Way seem to prefer using another totally made up unit (metric ton) instead of following the metric system (megagram) because it's easier, and that's the way they've always done it.

      All units are inherently arbitrary anyway, and there is no way you can ever get around conversion factors (1 ml of water weighs 1 g, but only at 25 C; at other temperatures, or with other substances, there is some conversion factor). The best units for any given situation are the ones that are the easiest to think in for that application, the ones that are easiest to estimate in. I maintain that Fahrenheit is best for weather because a cold day is 0 and a hot day is 100, whereas Celsius is best for lab work because 0 is freezing and 100 is boiling (for water), and Kelvin is best for physics because the 0 point is based on molecular motion. The meter is based on what, the speed of light? How often do we encounter such a thing in everyday life? That fact makes it just as arbitrary as the foot, or the yard. Besides, multiples of twelve are much easier to divide into meaningful, whole number fractions than multiples of ten, which is why the Arabians chose 12 and 60 as the basis for measuring time. I notice the metric-heads have no trouble calculating or estimating time in day-to-day life, even though it is not based on the One True Decimal System.

      Just because it's easy to multiply by 10 does not make the unit any more useful or meaningful for a given application. It's all still based on completely arbitrary standards we, as human measurers of our decidedly disorderly world, have put in place to make sense of things.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    7. Re:123,000 pounds in modern money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Posting as AC because I moderated on this thread.

      I'm a state certified weighmaster in California and one of my duties at work is operating a truck scale. Although the product we ship (bulk salt) is sold by the ton, the trucks are weighed in pounds.

    8. Re:123,000 pounds in modern money? by dwye · · Score: 1

      Besides, multiples of twelve are much easier to divide into meaningful, whole number fractions than multiples of ten, which is why the Arabians chose 12 and 60 as the basis for measuring time.

      Sumerians or Babylonians, not Arabs, and certainly not Arabians (the people on the peninsula of that name).

      And the meter was originally based on the circumference of the earth, before it was realized that the Earth-based value would never have the precision of the meter rod that was the next basis.

      And finally, the 0 (freezing) to 100 (boiling) system is Centigrade; the scale that Celsius devised had boiling at zero and freezing at 0, and so he should have been consigned to historical oblivion.

    9. Re:123,000 pounds in modern money? by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Yes, my mistake, it was the Babylonians/Sumerians.

      The meter has been based on many things, each as arbitrary as the last, including the circumference of the Earth, the length of a pendulum with a 1 second period, two different prototype bars (one of brass, one of platinum), the wavelength of a krypton-86 atomic emission, and the speed of light in a vacuum.

      And yes, Anders Celsius created a reversed scale which was promptly set straight upon his death. The term "centegrade," although used interchangeably by some people with Celsius, is considered obsolete by the Bureau of International Standards. The correct term is "degree Celsius," and has been since 1948.

      None of this changes how arbitrary all of these measurement units are, making a holy war about whether Imperial or Metric measurements are better all the more wearying.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  29. ... so by dominious · · Score: 0

    The 23 crates range... from the size of a desk to that of a small delivery truck...

    ...Is that... one person desk or two persons desk? ... ...?

    1. Re:... so by jd · · Score: 1

      It depends on whether the Mammoth is European or African and what its air velocity is when hurled by a coconut.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  30. Really?? No jokes about Susan Saradon?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When the Hell did it become trolling to make jokes at the expense of Susan Saradon?

  31. Zed should be renamed - by gluefish · · Score: 1

    Considering it was found under a County Museum parking lot, it should be named Steven Anthony.

    --
    I'd rather have a free bottle in front of me than a prefrontal lobotomy.
  32. Just down the street from the La Brea tar pits by mbone · · Score: 1

    I don't see why this is so surprising a location - it is just down the street (Wilshire) from the La Brea tar pits.

  33. Not fossils - bones! by benwiggy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was shown around the crates late last year. They are not fossils - they are bones that have been preserved by the tar. They have not undergone transformation in sedimentary rock.
    I also gave the tar a good poking with a stick. It's easy to see how large four-legged animals would get stuck in it.
    The museum also has a huge collection of sabre-tooth tigers - who thought all the stuck prey would be an easy catch....

    1. Re:Not fossils - bones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, they are indeed fossilized. My sister has worked in the active tar pit, and I've been there many times myself. I saw this find on the backlot several months back. Interestingly, they had a complete set of tusks coated in some protective material wrapped in paper and tape sitting out on the ground near the active pit. This find really has swamped them; their storage is pretty packed as it is. This find also means that their onsite pit work will progress very slowly until this stuff is all processed.

      This was interesting because finding full sets of tusks is quite a rare occurrence, and.... they were just sitting "exposed" outside, instead of in a crate or in a building somewhere. Though, they were behind a fence.

      Someone had also stolen one of the drawings they have in the informational area by the active pit =(

    2. Re:Not fossils - bones! by Toad-san · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point. NOT fossils. Chemically preserved.

      There are also questions about exactly what happened at those "tar pits". Ye Olde Idea of critters getting stuck in the tar (maybe beneath a watering hole), predators coming and getting stuck, etc. has been severely questioned. Mainly because of a real lack of complete skeletons, many bones found at the bottom of very narrowly necked holes, etc. And WAY too many predators (and very few birds, especially vulture types).

      Interesting place, but the entire concept needs some serious examination.

    3. Re:Not fossils - bones! by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      They also have a collection a humans who were either trying to drink the water floating on the tar (for those non-locals, reading this, the tar pits look like a small lake.) and thought they were smarter then the animals who tried and got stuck.

      BTW, a smart human who falls in should look at the ducks that are around. It is easy to swim to the edge because people will float on both water and tar. Lay flat on your back and you don't sink. But then I bet few of the native Americans living 10,000 years ago knew how to swim.

    4. Re:Not fossils - bones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also gave the tar a good poking with a stick.

      Ladies and gentlemen, I give you science at work.

    5. Re:Not fossils - bones! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      The museum also has a huge collection of sabre-tooth tigers - who thought all the stuck prey would be an easy catch....

      Stupid, stupid cat creatures!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:Not fossils - bones! by artson · · Score: 1

      "But then I bet few of the native Americans living 10,000 years ago knew how to swim."

      I'll bet that native Americans living 10,000 years ago were smarter and more capable than the author. After all, the penalty for not learning to swim was......... permanent.

      --
      In times of trouble, the smell of frying onions usually gives confidence and comfort.
  34. Simpson's Did It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simpson's did it

  35. Worldtrack manipulation by thespeech · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose anyone knows where the nearest Thousander math is located?

    1. Re:Worldtrack manipulation by Ironica · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In physical space, or Hemn space?

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  36. Hrm, this reads like a "new" find by BLKMGK · · Score: 3, Informative

    but the article says they took over 3 months to unearth them TWO YEARS ago. Kind of took a little excitement out of it to get nearly through the whole article to find out this all took place years ago. Would have been nice to have more pictures of the process and maybe an explanation as to how they found the edges of the deposits - ground penetrating radar maybe?

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    1. Re:Hrm, this reads like a "new" find by benwiggy · · Score: 2, Informative
      They moved the earth out of the building site two years ago. It's taken them two years to go through enough of it to make a worthwhile announcement.
      There's still loads of it left that they haven't got round to yet.

      Tsk. Kids today, they want their archaeologic research done at broadband speeds.

    2. Re:Hrm, this reads like a "new" find by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      So they had no idea what they had then and just excavated tons of dirt? Somehow I don't think so. It would seem they had some idea then what they had and an announcement of a find and innovative removal method would have been pretty cool to hear about. I stand by my initial comment - the Slashdot summary makes it sound as if this was just now found when in fact it's been ongoing research for over two years. Doesn't lessen the significance but it does tend to be less sensational when you're a little clearer on time frame.

      As for "kids" your UID betrays you. I ain't exactly new to this computer thing (lol).

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    3. Re:Hrm, this reads like a "new" find by benwiggy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, IANAA, but they knew there would be "stuff", given the location. Certainly, some prior analysis was done. But when I saw the crates in December, they were still excited about what they might find. They didn't say "we're looking forward to digging out the dire-wolves in crate 12".
      Various bones are often tightly packed together with bones from other creatures and other matter, so until you actually remove the matrix and separate the bones, you don't know what you've got. But obviously, when part of a mammoth skull starts to be revealed, then you'll spot it immediately.
      If a scientific paper was published, would you say "Old news. They've been working on it for years!"?

    4. Re:Hrm, this reads like a "new" find by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 3, Informative

      as to how they found the edges of the deposits - ground penetrating radar maybe?

      Much of the area around there is just plain out dirt. The tar is in large pockets. They likely dug out the dirt. The tarpits are now surouned by a nice grass covered park. The tar is only in places where crude oil bubbles up through small cracks

      The entire area at one time was an oil feild. It was such an obvious place to drill because the oil was visible at the surface. So it was drilled and pumped out in the eraly 20th century, mostly. There are a few operating wells around still.

    5. Re:Hrm, this reads like a "new" find by javajedi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lots more info here: http://excavatrix.blogspot.com/

  37. This couldn't happen in Scotland... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ..because as we all learned from Bugs Bunny, "Therrr'es no La Brrrea Tarrr Pits in Scotland!". And since their find is not Scottish, it must be CRAP!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  38. British Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A nearly intact mammoth, dubbed Zed,

    Translation for British /.ers:

    A nearly intact mammoth, dubbed Z,

  39. Not Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the last time people, creationism isn't science. Comparing creationism to science is beyond stupid. Creationism is a highly unlikely article of faith passed down through the generations, recently used as a wedge issue to get silly people to vote for Republicans. The scientific theories known informally as "global warming" represent actual science done by real scientists - and have recently been used as a wedge issue to get silly people to vote for Democrats.

    And lest we forget who the real villains are, keep in mind that creationists want to shove their superstition down your kid's throat in school, while environmentalists just want your car to perform better.

  40. Summary by sloomis · · Score: 1

    Man...is the...summary...for this...story...awesome

  41. Nearly intact? Bah! not a chance by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    What do you mean nearly intact? Them just bones. Not nearly as intact as The Encino Man

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  42. Re:hmm by rarel · · Score: 1

    Noah's Ark is a problem. We'll have to call it "Early Quantum State Phenomenon"... Only way to fit 5000 species of mammals on the same boat...

  43. Obl. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whose bone is this?
    -It's not a bone, baby, it's an os innominatum.
    Whos os innominatum is this?
    -It's Zed's.
    Who's Zed?
    -Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.

  44. whoosh? by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    Whoosh implies there was some sort of humor to get.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:whoosh? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      I thought the quote was quite apt, and its application humorous. But maybe that's because I was tripping the first time I saw Pulp Fiction.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    2. Re:whoosh? by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

      the whoosh was for the AC, not the pulp fiction quote. The pulp fiction quote was amusing and the first thing that popped into my head, too. The feigned ignorance by the AC afterwards was devoid of wit.

      --
      You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  45. uhm by vajorie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    CTRL + SHFT + DEL then check CACHE then hit ENTER

  46. Home Sweet Home by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

    Never a dull moment back home in L.A.

    --
    SARAVA!
    1. Re:Home Sweet Home by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      You're wrong. I mean, look at Zed, he's bored to death.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  47. OmG! by Endo13 · · Score: 1

    You killed Zeddy!!

    You bastards!

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  48. 10000 years from now by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Future archaeologists are going to be confused when they find all these dinosaurs buried in Hollywood. I predict that museums by then will have huge wax models of Will Smith riding a triceratops.

  49. I always thought of Creationism as the Raving Righ by Wizworm · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up, this is the most insightful post I've seen on slashdot in months. Thanks for the new Sig.

    --
    I always thought of Creationism as the Raving Right's version of the Loony Left's Anthropogenic Global Warming-brightmal
  50. oh Know by geekoid · · Score: 1, Redundant

    another one of gods tricks to try and make us believe the world is older then 6000 years so he can send us to hell~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  51. Award Winner by zaivala · · Score: 2, Funny

    This post has unanimously been awarded the English Language Institute's New Adjective Award, for "best use of 'tony' as an adjective."

  52. Re:Really?? No jokes about Susan Saradon?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nov. 4, 2008 (in the evening).

  53. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mammoth calls Rails a Ghetto...

    *crickets*

  54. Sarcasm misplaced by ConanG · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, La Brea is the name of the ranch the tar was found at and obviously named for. So 'La Brea Tar Pits' is short for 'Rancho La Brea Tar Pits'. It's not redundant in this case as it's referencing a proper noun.

    1. Re:Sarcasm misplaced by ThinkTwicePostOnce · · Score: 1

      Such moderating! Only the inaccurate information was boosted! Maybe the metamoders
      will see this, maybe they won't.

      Brea means tarpits. (I expect the tarpits predate the ranch.)

      Oh, and La means The.

      They don't come up much in conversation, but a few people I know always
      refer to them as "The The Tarpits Tarpits" when they speak. (Fortunately,
      as I said, they doesn't come up too often in conversation!)

      --
      Hide all sigs: Click HELP+Prefs (top), VIEWING (last on right), DISABLE SIGS (3rd on left) and SAVE (hidden at bottom).
    2. Re:Sarcasm misplaced by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      Its kinda like "slash slash slash dot dot org"

      --
      mod me funny
  55. See zed in person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was up in LA about a month ago and went to the la brea tar pits. Inside the museum they have an area where you can see the paleontologists at work. We went over christmas, so we didn't get to see them, but they left a big block of soil with Zed's tusk on display. If you went now you could probably see them preparing and cleaning the rest of Zed

  56. Obligatory by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Zed's dead baby, Zed's dead.

  57. Now THAT is interesting stuff! by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    a shame that wasn't also linked in the summary. Good pics and a sense of what is going on with the project. Seems they have a Flickr page and were filmed for Discovery's Dirty Jobs too - neat!

    Thanks for the very interesting link!

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org