Slashdot Mirror


In-Game Web Browser Round-Up

theodp writes "CNET takes a look at Web browsers you can run inside of the latest video games, offering mini-reviews of PlayXpert, Steam, Rogue, and Xfire. Why run these instead of your standard browser? Well, these browsers run lean and mean, play nice with full-screen apps, provide hot keys that can make them appear or disappear in an instant, and offer transparency so you can continue to play a game in full screen while chatting, reading e-mail or looking up cheat codes. So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?"

193 comments

  1. Thottbot by dintech · · Score: 0

    This would be useful for those playing World of Warcraft who need to look up things in Thottbot. I think I'd probably use it.

    1. Re:Thottbot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Use quest helper.

    2. Re:Thottbot by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're just looking for something to look up info there is no need for a browser in WoW.

      Install the Questhelper and lightheaded addons and you're all set.

      Questhelper points you to the quest locations and lightheaded parses all comments from wowhead on quests in a ingame addon.

      --
      Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
    3. Re:Thottbot by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're just looking for something to look up info there is no need for a browser in WoW.

      Install the Questhelper and lightheaded addons and you're all set.

      Questhelper points you to the quest locations and lightheaded parses all comments from wowhead on quests in a ingame addon.

      Questhelper has too large of a performance impact for me in my 3.8 GHz C2D with 4 gigs of ram. I'm glad you mention wowhead, which the GP should be using instead of thotbot. I think a good solution is cartographer and playing the game in windowed (but maximized) mode. In windowed mode, alt tabbing out is instant instead of incurring the 2 second delay of full screen. Of course, windowed mode incurs a performance penalty too, but it's less than QH and it can easily be turned off when not in need of constant reference material.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    4. Re:Thottbot by wisty · · Score: 1

      But does Questhelper let you browse online "art" collections during the boring bits?

    5. Re:Thottbot by Canazza · · Score: 1

      Problem with QuestHelper is that is causes all sorts of conflicts and problems, I've known alot of guildies who have to turn it off for raids because it interferes with things. One time someone couldn't move. Even when he logged out and back in again. He had to disable QH before then... freaky as hell tbh.
      WoW isn't that pissy about ALT+Tabbing either though, quite smooth transition from one to the other even when full screened so a Browser-add-on isn't really required.
      FPS games in general seem to have a harder time coping with ALT+TAB (particularly online games, Source-based ones being a prime example, Counter Strike being the biggest culprit of throwing minimised hissy fits)
      the only shooter i've known to work well while alt+tabbing has been S.T.A.L.K.E.R. and it's prequel which pauses and returns to the main screen when you alt tab (useful).

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    6. Re:Thottbot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I see an opportunity for a new plugin....

    7. Re:Thottbot by no1nose · · Score: 1

      EVE-Online is also alt-tab friendly. Both WoW and EVE got that right. I wish more games took that into consideration when playing in full-screen mode. For example, Entropia Universe will time-out and disconnect if you alt-tab for more than 30 seconds. However, if you leave the game up in full-screen mode it won't disconnect you until the idle timer is reached (about 5-10 minutes later).

    8. Re:Thottbot by DisKurzion · · Score: 3, Informative

      Questhelper has too large of a performance impact for me in my 3.8 GHz C2D with 4 gigs of ram.

      Sir...I call bullshit. I can run Questhelper fine on a crappy Compaq laptop running Vista on 1 GB of RAM.

      Although TourGuide (w/ the WoW-Pro guides) is better, and I use that now anyway.

    9. Re:Thottbot by ogl_codemonkey · · Score: 1

      Why? Compiz already lets me make any window I like (i.e. Firefox or WoW) translucent at the click of a button...

      The problem is clearly your inferior, hard-coded window manager.

    10. Re:Thottbot by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Questhelper has too large of a performance impact for me in my 3.8 GHz C2D with 4 gigs of ram.

      Sir...I call bullshit. I can run Questhelper fine on a crappy Compaq laptop running Vista on 1 GB of RAM.

      Although TourGuide (w/ the WoW-Pro guides) is better, and I use that now anyway.

      60 FPS pegged in Fjord vs. 60 dropping to about 20 every few minutes. Not only is that my experience, but it's shared by most people I know who have used QH and it's mentioned in a number of "essential mods" guides. Acceptable performance varies from person to person, and we don't share the same threshold.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  2. self-steering by polar+red · · Score: 1

    So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?

    I would rather have a car that steers itself

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    1. Re:self-steering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of those wishes is closer to reality than the other. I'll give you three guesses which.

    2. Re:self-steering by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that a full-screen browser display on the windshield of your car would be distracting enough to require the car to steer itself, I'm gonna go with the self-steering car as being the closest to reality. Not to mention the fact that there's places where such technology has already been successfully used, on existing highways. Never heard of a full-screen HUD-on-the-windshield web browser though.

      So, you were implying what exactly?

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  3. So.. the Video Game is the Computer? by pieterh · · Score: 1

    Kind of makes sense. A friend of mine was complaining that her son spent all his free time gaming, and I told her: "he's learning the user interface of the 21st century".

    So how long until video games start to offer virtual Linux consoles so I can compile and start an in-game web server to serve those in-game browsers?

    1. Re:So.. the Video Game is the Computer? by setagllib · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now that AIGLX lets you run any window as an OpenGL mesh and texture, it's not a stretch to map that into a surface in your game. But it would require some cooperation from the game itself, since it has to take a reasonable place in the OpenGL command pipeline unless you just want it hovering over everything.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
    2. Re:So.. the Video Game is the Computer? by Richy_T · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yep. With the way the economy is going, the user interface will be a rifle or shotgun.

    3. Re:So.. the Video Game is the Computer? by Canazza · · Score: 1

      oooh... another way to inject pop-ups into peoples lives :D

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    4. Re:So.. the Video Game is the Computer? by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      Yep. With the way the economy is going, the user interface will be a rifle or shotgun.

      As depicted by Doom as a tool for system administration

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  4. Tired of hitting Alt-F4? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    These new in-game browsers are great! I used to be annoyed that I'd have to hit Alt AND F4 to switch away from my game to check my stock prices, but now with these new in-game browsers I can simply hit Shift+F4 and browse at my leisure.

    This is a huge step forward in usability. I can't wait until Emacs includes a browser that can be toggled with an intuitive set of keystrokes.

    1. Re:Tired of hitting Alt-F4? by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 2, Funny

      What, didn't you know? C-c M-o M-browser and you're all set. You'll need a 64-bit quad-core machine to handle it though.

      --
      Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    2. Re:Tired of hitting Alt-F4? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      My computer takes two whole minutes to minimize and two more to maximize, so I really like xfire browser. It even has tabs, much sooner than IE :P

    3. Re:Tired of hitting Alt-F4? by shadowarmy75 · · Score: 1

      Plus my framerate usually takes a hit if I minimize and go back.

    4. Re:Tired of hitting Alt-F4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It already does--w3m mode.

  5. Oh good. Something else to do while driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?

    Hopefully never. People already have enough things to distract them while driving. Do they really need another one?

    1. Re:Oh good. Something else to do while driving by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      What, you don't think people will drive better if they can watch the latest porn from their favorite site on the way into work?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:Oh good. Something else to do while driving by jetsci · · Score: 3, Informative

      Its actually quite scary. I was on the bus this morning on my way to work when I look out the window at a women driving. She is completely beyond reality and roughly 2 car lengths from the nearest car, fumbling for gloves that she clearly needs right that moment, then lipstick.
      I was genuinely boggled when she pulled out a nail file and started working on her nails. All the while, oblivious to the cars around her.

      --
      Bored at work? Play Game!
    3. Re:Oh good. Something else to do while driving by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You think that's a gear stick what the guy in front of you is fingering every now and then?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Oh good. Something else to do while driving by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sup dawg, I heard you like to browse, so I put a browser in your car so you can browse while you drive.

      Did I do that right?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Oh good. Something else to do while driving by Endo13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yo dawg, I heard you like to browse, so I put a browser in your browser so you can browse while you browse.

      FTFY.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    6. Re:Oh good. Something else to do while driving by VinylRecords · · Score: 1

      I commute long distances upstate and in NYC very often by car, here's some of the oddities I've encountered on the road:

      - dozens of guys shaving with a portable electric razor while driving
      - people reading books when stopped at a red light...never heard of audio books you idiots?
      - people eating food...but with a plastic forks and knives out of containers at red lights
      - several cab drivers drinking beer while driving...
      - a guy swerving through traffic as his dog climbed under the pedals once...

      But nothing tops the guy I saw who was typing on a laptop going at least 70mph on the thruway...he had the laptop resting on his lap and he would switch between looking at the road and his monitor every nanosecond. It looked like the head shaking effect from the film Jacob's Ladder. Those must have been some important .txt files to risk near death.

  6. Steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't recall an experience with Steam's web-browser ever being "lean and mean."

    1. Re:Steam? by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      Just think of it this way: it is a locked down version of Internet Explorer.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    2. Re:Steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really "locked down"; the security holes are still there. Oh, and Steam server admins can cause webpages to open on your PC...

    3. Re:Steam? by HexOxide · · Score: 1

      This isn't entirely accurate. Base installations of source game servers don't easily allow for this, even if you have RCON. However if they've installed a third party server administration addon, such as Mani Admin for Counter-Strike Source, etc, where there is a command called ma_browse, which allows users to bring up websites in the MOTD window, admins with sufficient access can use the ma_cexec command to force players to bring up websites using the ma_browse command, but the majority of servers (I.E. the well run ones) do not give out this kind of functionality to most of their admins.

      Really, it's not a huge deal, and you barely ever see it happen, and I mean, what's to stop someone changing their server's MOTD to a simple HTML page with a bunch of gay porn pictures or something else most people find unpleasant to have forced upon them? Power has the potential to corrupt, the way I see it, it's not very different than if the admin were to slay people or set his health or give himself guns, or anything else.

      --
      Can I leave this box empty?
    4. Re:Steam? by Canazza · · Score: 1

      There is one server i've played on that has special commands. IE typing "Boobies" brings up ratemytits.com (or something)
      But this is a very locked down version of IE that doesn't actually run any JS (so you can't actually RATE their tits)

      other commands they use include 'cameltoe' and 'sheepy'

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    5. Re:Steam? by skyride · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? I run multiple TF2 game servers and I can assure that the in-game browser (even the in-game stats pop-up ones) are having your PC get the data and render it in IE. Theres is absolutely ZERO web data streamed from the game server. Also, even the MOTD data is taken locally. This is the MOTD on all my servers: http://www.epicbananaclan.co.uk/motd/motd.php Ive checked apaches logs and on map change, that page is accessed from a number of IP's, ive even checked that those IP's were also those of gamers playing.

    6. Re:Steam? by FourthAge · · Score: 1

      Isn't the point that the admin could use IE as a malware vector? For example, force the player's computer to open http://www.malware.com/ieexploit.html, which then uses one of the many IE bugs to install a trojan? This also applies to the MOTD feature. Because Mani is a server-side feature, you are forced to trust the admin not to do this.

      Even if you can trust the admin (and trusting him not to crack your computer is not the same as trusting him not to cheat), you can't necessarily be sure that the server is secure. It might be cracked; the cracker might replace the MOTD with a redirect to a malware site. This has happened to big advertising networks. Keylogging used to be about credit card numbers, now it's about WoW usernames and passwords. Steam users have never been more at risk. Arbitrary web page rendering is an extremely ill-considered feature.

      --
      The tao of democracy: the government you can vote for is not the real government.
    7. Re:Steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      make an empty motd file in your tf2 folder and set it read-only

  7. On windshields? by haeger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?

    I hope that we never see this. Not as long as there's a human steering the car. Do we really need yet ANOTHER distraction from driving? People are texting, putting on makeup, calling, eating, drinking, reading and doing too many other things than driving. Imho if a police should see you doing this they should sell your car and take your license since you're too stupid to figure out that 3000kg at 100km/h is a force to be respected.

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    1. Re:On windshields? by www.drk.com.ar · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are right. It sounds like a joke when, in the country where I live at least, there is a law against driving and using a cell phone at the same time.

      --
      _Leo_
    2. Re:On windshields? by travdaddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?

      I hope that we never see this. Not as long as there's a human steering the car. Do we really need yet ANOTHER distraction from driving? People are texting, putting on makeup, calling, eating, drinking, reading and doing too many other things than driving. Imho if a police should see you doing this they should sell your car and take your license since you're too stupid to figure out that 3000kg at 100km/h is a force to be respected.


      The funny thing is that people are far more likely to "pull over and chat" in an FPS (where they can respawn) than in a real car (where they can't).

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    3. Re:On windshields? by mfh · · Score: 1

      Do we really need yet ANOTHER distraction from driving?

      No.

      Also, if we involve windows with cars, predictable results will ensue.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    4. Re:On windshields? by masshuu · · Score: 0

      you're too stupid to figure out that 3000kg at 100km/h is a force to be respected.

      its in metric which means that every american can't understand it.

      perhaps posting in Imperial units will work

      --
      O.o
    5. Re:On windshields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It may be arrogance, or ignorance, but it's a matter of judgement on whether or not the area was safe and if you had the ability to do it.

      You're fine doing all those things, until one day you discover something you're not fine with, or some jackass pulls out in front of you and your reaction time is slower because you're distracted. Then it's all fun and games.

      Still, I guess some people never make it beyond toddlers. You've just gotta touch that hotplate before you figure out it's dangerous.

    6. Re:On windshields? by SirGarlon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When I was in college, I used to eat subs, eye drops in my eye, splash cold water on my face (long drives), take off a jacket, even pull off a pullover while driving. Once, I even had a plate of spaghetti on my lap.

      So what do you think would happen if a ball rolled out into the street in front of your car, followed by a laughing child?

      You were a complete asshole when you drove like that. I hope you've wised up, but it sounds like you still think your masterful driving expertise allows you to control things outside your card.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    7. Re:On windshields? by IdiotBoy · · Score: 1

      police should see you doing this they should sell your car and take your license since you're too stupid to figure out that 3000kg at 100km/h is a force to be respected.

      What are we to do the people who are "too stupid" to figure out that human liberty and property rights are a force to be respected?

    8. Re:On windshields? by houghi · · Score: 1

      If people do not go out of the way, they clearly did not respect it enough.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:On windshields? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?

      I hope that we never see this. Not as long as there's a human steering the car. Do we really need yet ANOTHER distraction from driving? People are texting, putting on makeup, calling, eating, drinking, reading and doing too many other things than driving. Imho if a police should see you doing this they should sell your car and take your license since you're too stupid to figure out that 3000kg at 100km/h is a force to be respected.

      Why not? As you've stated we wouldn't see any real difference. Those that would have wreaks by being distracted will find a way to have them. Do you want to prevent any new ideas just because some one might miss use it?

      I'd be happy with the windshield being used to display all that dash board car info, GPS nav crap, radio station stuff, or see better random ads while driving. Heck, if they could just have the windshield heat up enough so that it wouldn't be foggy in the morning or have morning frost stay on it for more than a minute, then I'd be happy. Cell phones have web browsers. I don't see why car windshields couldn't make use of them.

    10. Re:On windshields? by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      My right to not being run over trumps your right to drive a vehicle you're incapable of controlling.

      --
      I hate printers.
    11. Re:On windshields? by -Tango21- · · Score: 1

      Because real life is a single elimination scenario where you can't respawn.

    12. Re:On windshields? by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      The speed limit is set low in this country because we believe it is more important that a driver can parallel park that is that a driver know and obey the rules of the road. It's a trade off. I don't think people in the US would tolerate the German system of driver licensing and highway enforcement even if speed limits were done the same. They get to drive fast, we get to eat entire meals in the car, and drive in the rain without the headlights being on.

      On the other hand, I have been passed on the way to DFW by a driver reading the newspaper. The bumper sticker on his car read, "My other car is a 727." Now, that was frightening. I think it is better than people like that not get to drive at trans-warp speeds (and probably should not get to fly a plane, either).

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    13. Re:On windshields? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      So wait... Are you saying that it should be OK for you to drive however you want because it's your car? That the government fascists are imposing on you for dictating that you actually pay attention when in control of 2000 pounds of aluminum, steel, and plastic moving 60-70 miles per hour? I do believe that this might be the worst personal freedom argument I've seen.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    14. Re:On windshields? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So what do you think would happen if a ball rolled out into the street in front of your car, followed by a laughing child?

      I'd be wondering why a child was playing on the freeway in the middle of nowhere.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:On windshields? by IdiotBoy · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that it should be OK for you to drive however you want because it's your car?

      Yep. If you haven't harmed anyone, where is the crime?

    16. Re:On windshields? by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?
      3000kg at 100km/h is a force to be respected.

      3000kg * 28 m/s isn't a force, it's a momentum. ;)

      Now, when you hit something that makes you stop in .5 seconds...

      3000kg * -56 m/s^2 = -168000 N Now THAT'S a force to be respected. *G*

    17. Re:On windshields? by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are a cunt.

      I may have been trolled, but I've seen enough of this kind of shitty driving in real life--including the horrible consequences such as dead children who won't be having an open casket funeral--and enough 100% insane jerks trying to justify their terrible driving that I doubt it.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    18. Re:On windshields? by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      So because it's your car you could, say, drive on my lawn? On the sidewalks? Hint: it may be your car, but they aren't your roads. You might call them "your" roads, because your tax/toll money went toward them, but they're not your private property like your car is. They're a common good. So it's perfectly legitimate for the public to appoint a government that limits behavior on them. There's a more abstract common good, however, than just the physical road surface: it's the ability for people to get where they want quickly and safely. When you drive you make use of that good, just like I do (even though I usually do it on a bike or on foot), and similarly to what I do when I ride the trains and buses in my city. When people drive distracted, go much faster or slower than the average speed of traffic, cut too close when making maneuvers, and engage in many other behaviors that we usually deem illegal, they raise the rate of accidents on the road, increase their severity were they to occur, worsen surrounding traffic conditions, or some combination of these. And that is harm, whether simplistic libertarians can figure it out or not.

      Which is not to say that all traffic laws (or laws in general) are good. Some of them might be unfair to certain groups of people, some of them might suck for everyone. All laws should be subject to discussion and scrutiny. But this idea that government has no right to restrict how you drive your car because it's your car is completely bogus.

    19. Re:On windshields? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Freeways aren't always in the middle of nowhere. A freeway might have things near it like a MacDonalds with a playcenter, parks, etc. Also it doesn't have to be a child. There are wildlife you have to consider. Hitting a deer might be bad. Hitting a moose may be fatal.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    20. Re:On windshields? by discord5 · · Score: 1

      So what do you think would happen if a ball rolled out into the street in front of your car, followed by a laughing child?

      Spladder bonus

      To be honest, when I started to read that sentence I was thinking about meatballs with the spaghetti

      I'm sorry, I'm taking my tasteless jokes somewhere else now

    21. Re:On windshields? by houghi · · Score: 1

      It is Darwinism in process. in just a few generations, we will have kids who are able to be fast enough to jump away from the car just in time. (It's a joke, laugh.)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    22. Re:On windshields? by srollyson · · Score: 1

      I'd be wondering why a child was playing on the freeway in the middle of nowhere.

      How about: "what do you think would happen if a ball rolled out into the street in front of your car, followed by a laughing deer?" ;)

    23. Re:On windshields? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      What abone the blonde bimbo, doing the same thing as you with the eye drops, who slams her brakes on after spotting a squirrel. You don't notice her brake lights as you've eating a plate of spaghetti on your lap. You might have dropped the fork into the footwell.

      Actually, perhaps we should pray that this kind of thing happens more often. The blonde in the SUV takes minor scratches, maybe some glass in her face in some kind of poetic justice for her outrageous vanity. You, on the other hand, can be left in the state of spacial awareness you were in when searching for your eating tool around your feet.

      FYI, I beep my horn CONSTANTLY when I see people using their phone when driving. I pray that they crash, obviously without any other people getting hurt. It'd be one less idiot, like yourself, on the road.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    24. Re:On windshields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's 6613.9 lbs at 62.1371 mph for the non-metric types.

    25. Re:On windshields? by xorsyst · · Score: 1

      3000kg? What are you driving - a tank?

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
    26. Re:On windshields? by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      I'd be wondering why a child was playing on the freeway in the middle of nowhere.

      Only partly right. First you'd kill the child. Then you'd wonder why she was playing on the freeway. Then you'd blame the child for the "accident", because clearly from your point of view, she's the one at fault.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    27. Re:On windshields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would also be wondering why that child's father is beating your sorry ass into a bloody pulp. After that you would be wondering why you were being gang raped in a prison shower room.

    28. Re:On windshields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh! The on screen child detector would highlight the child and temporarily pause the on screen porn, direct a safe detour, and then automatically re-engage the porn. This is not science fiction. Object recognition technology is on the way there. See Vision4 .

    29. Re:On windshields? by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      I don't know about OP, but a laughing deer would definitely freak me out.

    30. Re:On windshields? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      The government has a responsibility to limit potential harm, not just direct harm. As sibling points out, driving while distracted significantly increases the risk that you will harm someone. No, you won't get in an accident every time you text while driving, but texting while driving significantly increases you risk of an accident. Since that accident will likely cause harm to someone else (either financial or medical), the government tries to limit the risky behavior. There is no similar law about texting while walking because you're not likely to kill anyone (except maybe yourself) by running into something on your walk. Your right to swing your arm ends at my face. Your right to take risks ends where those risks stand a good chance of getting me killed or injured.

      As a side note: WTF? I got modded troll? The guy just admitted that I interrupted his post correctly. How as that a troll?

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    31. Re:On windshields? by Spatial · · Score: 1

      What I'm wondering is why there's a 1,500Kg weight on top of the car...

    32. Re:On windshields? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Because real life is a single elimination scenario where you can't respawn.

      Sure you can. You've just got to believe in re-incarnation for that to work. You'd have to redo all of school. That's enough punishment/penalty for just about anything right there.

    33. Re:On windshields? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      This, quite frankly, is exactly the kind of behavior and attitude that causes the majority of traffic accidents in the US.

      Now, I'm not afraid to admit, I drive fast sometimes. But I always try to pay attention and be aware of my surroundings, whether I'm driving slow or fast. The few times I've been caught speeding it's been because I was too intent on watching my surroundings and didn't have my eyes glued to my speedometer (in fact, that's the main reason I hate speed limits - because watching the speedometer to make sure you're not speeding is way too distracting). Frankly, what we really need is a whole lot less emphasis on (mostly) irrelevant things like driving speed, and a lot more emphasis on things like paying attention (Is it safe to slam on your breaks for the dog that ran out in front of you, or is the guy behind you going to rear-end you if you do? Did you even KNOW there was a guy behind you??) and driving *with* the other drivers on the road (hint: driving 5 under the speed limit when everyone else is doing 10 over is more dangerous than if everyone were doing 20 over). I'll also be quick to admit there were times I wasn't paying attention and nearly caused an accident. Each one is a learning experience. I rarely listen to music or do much of anything besides drive on the road now, because it's just too distracting. Even at just 50MPH, things happen so fast that even just a couple seconds of inattention can result in someone's death.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    34. Re:On windshields? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      it's a matter of judgement on whether or not the area was safe and if you had the ability to do it.

      If I remember the statistics correctly, 80% of people think that they drive better than they actually do ("driving better" here specifically means reaction time and the general ability to evade accidents).

    35. Re:On windshields? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      American SUV (H3): 2223kg
      Cargo Load: 300kg
      Family of 5 Fat americans: 5*90kg *G*

    36. Re:On windshields? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I'll take my jacket off while driving. But if I don't do anything other than drive when I'm in a place where things can come from the side of the road without me seeing. But that's not every road. There are lots of high-traffic areas that are simply not accessible at all, or very rarely accessed by pedestrians. If you're eating and putting in eye drops while driving in Manhattan, I'd backhand you. Doing it while driving through the deserts in bumfuck, Utah without another car around for 50 miles? Not so much.

      You have to give appropriate attention while driving. Sometimes it's more, sometimes it's less. A good driver knows the difference.

    37. Re:On windshields? by jfeldredge · · Score: 1

      A few years ago, I was struck by a car while crossing a downtown intersection. The car was stopped at a traffic light, and I was crossing the street from the right (passenger) side of the car. The driver looked to his left, saw that no traffic was approaching, and pulled out into a right turn (legal in Tennessee) without checking whether anyone was in front of him. I didn't have time to jump out of the way, but instead had to topple onto the car's hood and bang on the hood to get the driver's attention. He carried me 20 feet or so before coming to a stop. Had I toppled backwards, he would have run over me, and would probably have simply wondered why the street was so bumpy. Fortunately, I just ended up with bruises on both shins from being struck by the front bumper. If you add a heads-up display on the windshield, many drivers will be paying even less attention to their surroundings than they do now.

    38. Re:On windshields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...FYI, I beep my horn CONSTANTLY when I see people using their phone when driving. I pray that they crash, obviously without any other people getting hurt. It'd be one less idiot, like yourself, on the road.

      Ahh, yes: the OFFENSIVE driver.

      To steal from Inigo Montoya: That word... I do not think the word they used in Driver's Ed is the word you think it was.

      Anyone that acts seeking to startle someone into a crash and maliciously prays for harm to a complete stranger seems to me to be ethically far worse than anyone that is merely inattentive and believes themselves invincible.

      So, either you're a troll whose lack of self-restraint boils over from the internet onto real life, or you're a sociopath. You choose.

    39. Re:On windshields? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Sociopath.

      Seriously, I'd rather cause death with malicious intent than through my own ignorant carelessness. At least then I could live with myself.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    40. Re:On windshields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He mentioned "long drives," so I presumed he was referring to highway driving. That's what I'm accustomed to, and I perform some of these same tasks. If a child is running after his ball on Interstate 95, there are some parental neglect issues in play.

    41. Re:On windshields? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Worse - a classic American vehicle. *ducks*

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  8. Real gamers by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

    have multiple monitors and multiple computers (though the latter is not always necessary). Having a browser come up and block whatever I'm doing is still annoying.

    Although in game excel or access would be nice for the OCD that keep a tracking of everything they're doing in game, long as I can save that file and open outside of the game.

    I remember in the old days when gaming meant keeping a journal (Ultima 3D) and drawing a map (Wolfenstein) as you went along. Now websites generally have most of the data, but sometimes, you need your own.

  9. Hmmm How about WOWos? by Phybertekie · · Score: 0

    Wowoffice, WOWtext,WOWSheet - I think u get the idea. A laptop that boots up into a Linux based gaming OS which can be used as a daily productivity suite.

    1. Re:Hmmm How about WOWos? by Missing_dc · · Score: 1

      Sign me up, I'd use it, I'd even reactivate my WoW account.

      --
      How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
  10. In game car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or how about an in-game car? If you like, hook it up to control your real car, and play Google Drive to Work. It uses Google Maps, and whatever cameras you have available. You can drive to work from your back seat using only your iPhone!

    1. Re:In game car by Daravon · · Score: 1

      A car in my car, so that I can drive while I drive?

      --
      I traded all my mod points for these magic beans.
  11. Eve's Browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Eve has its own browser, which works just dandy. And considering how much vital information about playing the game can only be found from 3rd party sources, it's less an add-on and more an essential element of the HUD.

    1. Re:Eve's Browser by JavaBear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Eve Online's IGB is a joke.
      What's worse is, the joke suck!

    2. Re:Eve's Browser by korTdev · · Score: 1

      eve online browser, while beeing very slow and buggy is still usefull because it can provides to web application a number of interesting data...

      Also, some allicances make usefull use of this by adding fleet links to apps so that people that just log dont have to beg for a fleet link.

      CCP should fix bugs, and optimise it.

    3. Re:Eve's Browser by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, EVE's IGB is not good.

      It's buggy, slow, featureless and barely make a passing nod at standards. Almost all web pages that need to be run in-game have to be specially rewritten just to render half decently. Can be a real pain; even most forums won't run properly in it, and the forums are where that game is really played...

    4. Re:Eve's Browser by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

      The fact that eve's IGB sucks so much and is still used is a testament to how much of a crucial feature it is. Actually the ingame-specific extentions to HTML it supports are a stroke of genius ( you have links that let you interact with the game, such as entering fleets or checking prices). So, as soon as you finish reading this, CCP emploee, stop goofing off on slashdot and go fix the IGB. And make me some drone bandwidth modules for my high slots while you're at it!

  12. Needs Adblock by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As with most geeks, no browser will get our full attention until it gets adblock.

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
    1. Re:Needs Adblock by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      At least the EVE in-game browser doesn't support JavaScript or Flash, and therefore most obnoxious advertisments won't be an issue. Images in HTML are fairly benign, and as long as they don't simply create table cell after table cell filled with "OMG U R WINNAR!!1" and "Get ringtones here!" images with no content in between, it won't be an issue.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  13. I don't like it. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All it does is encourage people to multi-task more. And that is not a good thing. Our brain isn't good at multi-tasking (in terms of focusing on different things), we end up doing each job half-assed. And have a big switch when we go from one to the other. It is like a drug though because we use so much extra brain power multi-tasking we feel like we are being more productive however you are better off doing job 1 then job 2 in order. With this happening more we are training our kids not to sit down and solve a problem but jump back and forth until until we fail at all of them.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:I don't like it. by zbharucha · · Score: 1

      This is how evolution works, mate. Multi-tasking humans with multiple brain cores is the next step!

    2. Re:I don't like it. by JustOK · · Score: 1

      so ADD and asperger's are just the next step on the evolutionary ladder that will ...ooooh a dog with a puffy tail!!!!

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:I don't like it. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All it does is encourage people to multi-task more. And that is not a good thing. Our brain isn't good at multi-tasking (in terms of focusing on different things), we end up doing each job half-assed.

      The more you multi-task, the better you get at it - at minimum, you get better at combining the tasks that you regularly combine.

      With this happening more we are training our kids not to sit down and solve a problem but jump back and forth until until we fail at all of them.

      Growing up with a slow modem and a multitasking computer (1200 bps BSR modem, Amiga 500) I definitely learned to multitask. I find that I am better at it than my parents. Perhaps it's a good thing. Besides, there will always be those among us who enter a nerdly fugue state and tune out the rest of existence. And isn't Autism on the rise? Perhaps humanity is segmenting :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I don't like it. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Or a great way to kill off the people. As the guy who can focus will rule the world while the rest die off from not being able to make a living.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:I don't like it. by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      All it does is encourage people to multi-task more. And that is not a good thing.

      It's a good thing if the people multi-tasking are my opponents. ;-)

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    6. Re:I don't like it. by twosmokes · · Score: 4, Funny

      Speak for yourself. I'm excellent at multi

      Item # Price
      15876 39.99
      15887 45.02
      16986 25.36
      12547 44.78
      13698 87.54
      15478 21.66
      11224 12.74
      1447 36.85

      Some of the above prices aren't matching what we were given by the vendor. Can you verify these for me by the end of the day?

      Thanks.

      tasking. You obviously haven't had enough experience with it. Keep practicing and you'll be able to do 3-4 things at the same time without any major problems.

    7. Re:I don't like it. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Mod parenty Funny / Insightful.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    8. Re:I don't like it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is insightful? i think i'm done with slashdot for the day

    9. Re:I don't like it. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Multitasking is not downloading a Program for 1 hour and doing something else while it is loading. (It is computer multitasking but not human multi-tasking). I remember when I installed Slackware My order for each module was well planned out I get the Core then Network first Install though then I boot into Slackware then Get the Games. Install the games module. Then I download the rest while I pay lasteroids.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:I don't like it. by popmaker · · Score: 1

      I remember when I installed Slackware My order for each module was well planned out I get the Core then Network first Install though then I boot into Slackware then Get the Games.

      You're multitasking right now, aren't you?

    11. Re:I don't like it. by Droideka-TheGuy · · Score: 1

      "All it does is encourage people to multi-task more. And that is not a good thing. Our brain isn't good at multi-tasking (in terms of focusing on different things), we end up doing each job half-assed." While I agree that it is a bad thing to do too many things at once, in our environment, it's extremely hard not to do so. Especially for someone like a college student, as I am, I mean, I normally end up having to work on calculus, physics, and programming (Not to mention my other classes) all at once. Learning to multi-task is *extremely* helpful to do this. Simple things like in-game browsers that make us better at doing two things at once without getting them confused actually does help in the long run. Think about a pilot, for example. They have to learn how to read their HUD, maneuver, check all of their system status(es), as well as remember how many times to blink to change screens on their helmet, along with whatever else they have to do. Multi-Tasking isn't always a bad thing.

    12. Re:I don't like it. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Multitasking is not downloading a Program for 1 hour and doing something else while it is loading.

      Making unfounded assumptions and blathering on is not posting an insightful comment, either.

      I remember when I installed Slackware My order for each module was well planned out

      I remember when I installed Slackware, I did it from a stack of floppies. Now we have both posted irrelevant anecdotes about Linux.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:I don't like it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should do just have ADD; I can multi-task and fail at none :P. My brain just works like that already. Oh yeah, but apparently, I'm a defect.

  14. Steam? by Crossmire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Steam seems to still use Internet Explorer for some things. I removed IE with nLite and can easily see where Steam tries to use it. TF2 also has major problems and it forces the game to minimise and presents a dialogue asking me if I want to download an html file, it then takes 20 seconds to get back into the game. I wish there was some way to stop TF2 from making any attempts to use a browser, but I haven't found one yet.

  15. Anyone gave security a thought? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Malware authors already found games as a new attack vector. Do we really have to give them an interface they're already very familiar with?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Anyone gave security a thought? by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      THIS

      A thousand times THIS!

      Totally with you. The world wide web is a terribly hostile place at this point. We've got so many tpyo squattres (that was deliberate), and legit but hacked web sites delivering malware/spyware, and so many idiots who really think some Nigerian interior minister is seeking their help that I predict EPIC FAILURE.

      That is all.

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
  16. I seldom alt-tab by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Usually I have all my chat windows etc open on second monitor where I can see them. Second old 17" LCD does the trick.

    --
    - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
    - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    1. Re:I seldom alt-tab by oracleguy01 · · Score: 1

      Yes you can see them but you can't change focus to them without the full screen game minimizing usually.

    2. Re:I seldom alt-tab by whoop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, these crazy kids making a minibrowser to look up some small piece of information for their quest, when they can just spend money instead on bigger video cards, extra monitors, until you want to control that extra monitor so now you need extra computers, keyboards, bigger desk, etc.

      Yeah, that is so much simpler than using a crappy little web browser in a game.

    3. Re:I seldom alt-tab by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

      I understand your sarcasm but I'm not making you to use 2nd monitor, I'm just sharing my experience. For me my 2nd monitor is essentially free, because it's about 5 years old and costs almost nothing now.

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
  17. Roadkill takes on a whole new meaning... by geekmux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?"

    Are you serious? We can't even keep people from crashing at 80MPH and killing innocent people because they're too busy texting on a 2x2" screen on a fucking cell phone, and you want to slap a full-blown YouTube/Facebook/Myspace portal on the windshield?

    I'll tell you how much longer. When we have a foolproof autopilot system for our cars.

    1. Re:Roadkill takes on a whole new meaning... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll tell you how much longer. When we have a foolproof autopilot system for our cars.

      There's no such thing, but rail is pretty good.

      We went the wrong way in this country when we let the auto companies dismantle the rail system (to the minimum level that would allow for their purposes.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Roadkill takes on a whole new meaning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is a tech website?

      Yeah we may not have the web on our windshield, but high end cars are adding driver aided support to cars. A heads up display on windshield is not a bad idea, how idiots may use it is another thing.

      Motion sensors, distances between vehicles, road condition information, all of this would be good information to have while driving on a HUD.

    3. Re:Roadkill takes on a whole new meaning... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Many cities are putting in a light rail system. The problem is that rail is great for moving large loads, not so much for getting someone to even within a mile or two of their destination. Gotta have something to cover that gap.

    4. Re:Roadkill takes on a whole new meaning... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Gotta have something to cover that gap.

      Guess your Chevrolegs are in the shop, huh? Maybe you could get yourself an electric scooter.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Another way by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    too bad linux games kinda aren't there, but I used to do this with quake4..

    Just run the game in its own X11 session. Then switch between them using and .

  19. DeathRace 2012 by Missing_dc · · Score: 4, Funny

    "So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?"

    just as soon as I mount those rockets, .50cal, smoke screen, oil slick, caltrop seeder, and armor on my truck.

    Oh, and I need to mod the controls to let me handle steering and acceleration/defense devices with a joystick and the aiming/offense with a mouse.

    --
    How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
  20. IRC? by jamesmcm · · Score: 1

    It'd be cool if more games added IRC clients like Uplink had. Just imagine having an IRC overlay on Fallout 3, where you can chat from the Pip-boy. It can damage immersion I suppose.

    1. Re:IRC? by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 3, Funny

      A/S/L?

    2. Re:IRC? by Inda · · Score: 1

      8, female, at school - why do you ask?

      Do people still do ASLs?

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:IRC? by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      Yes

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    4. Re:IRC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      23/Zombie/Megaton

  21. From TFS by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

    So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?

    NO, NO, NO, NO, NO!!! I will shoot the idiot that does this. It's already dangerous enough with people eating, putting on makeup, reading, sending text messages, watching movies, and rolling joints without adding web browsing. YOUR CAR IS FOR DRIVING ONLY!!! It's not an entertainment center and it's not your living room.

    1. Re:From TFS by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I take the time on my boring drive to work to cut my toenails.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  22. PlayXpert.... by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

    It looks pretty nice, especially the part about have multi-protocol IM support. Unfortunatly the reviewer forgot to add in that it isnt compatible with vista or 64 bit yet. Hopefully soon.

    "PLAYXPERT is built to work with XP and Vista for both 32 and 64 bit systems - however - the 'In-Game Overlay' system is not currently operational for Vista or 64bit systems. The Vista overlay system will be made available via the auto-updater in January 2009 and 64bit support will shortly follow. "

  23. I'd rather not by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, I find that trying Questhelper has pretty much killed all my interest in WoW.

    Now I do appreciate having Thottbot or such, for when I got lost or couldn't figure out the directions after trying for half an hour. But just following the cube makes me feel like a bot could do the same thing, and probably better. There is no need for any more complex thought above "click on that guy because Questhelper says so" or "head that way because Questhelper says so." There's nothing left to discover (technically QH discovered it already for you), nothing worth remembering (QH already tells you whether you need to go east or west, so no point in even trying to remember where the quest told you to go), you don't even need to look at the major landmarks (if it's behind that hill, QH will tell you so.)

    And you can tell. I know people who play exclusively by Questhelper (heck, mom does) and frankly, they don't seem to actually use any brainpower in playing the game. Often they won't even remember what they just did or where some major landmark is, because really there was no more thought involved than obediently doing what the bot told them to. They've run along some road a dozen times, but ask them to show you where it is, and you find that they couldn't find their own arse with a map and a compass, but without QH. Or you see them forgetting they had to use some unique item, and some whole group trying to take down some elite boss the hard way instead, because none of them bothered even reading the quest text and QH doesn't tell them, "dude, use the shreder".

    Now if that still keeps you entertained, good for you, and I'm not going to try to convince you otherwise. But it's just not for me. For me it makes the whole thing boring as heck, and takes away any kind of sense of achievement too.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:I'd rather not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've played the game way too long to care about the quests that I have to grind to get to my desired level. Questhelper is nice.

      An in-game browser would be sexy for things like looking up enchant/blacksmith/engineering/tailoring/jewelcrafting/inscription mats or reading up on gear, or assisting with strategies on boss fights as well as comparing pvp competitors with yourself or even playing with a new talent spec without having to actually drop your talents.

      There are also tons of quests out there that have no connection to a desired quest, but have to be completed before the new quest becomes available. Super annoying.

      If that's not enough reasons, I don't know what is. Give us the in game browser, with tabs. :D

    2. Re:I'd rather not by destroyer661 · · Score: 1

      Since when did WoW use any brain power for any of it? I'm lost...

      --
      #define true false // Have fun debugging!
    3. Re:I'd rather not by Tsujiku · · Score: 1

      If you want an in-game browser with tabs, Xfire has it (granted it's technically just displaying pages in an instance of IE, but whatever).

      --
      Paradox
    4. Re:I'd rather not by MaximumFrost · · Score: 1

      I'm another guy who just hates questhelper, though I've personally never used it. Why do I hate it? the reasons you stated above. When someone uses questhelper, they ignore just about _everything_ lorewise in the game. If you just want to do the XP grind and not care about the lore, go grind, don't be just following a bot to finish all the quests.

      I don't care for that addon and all it's clones, because it makes too many people not learn the areas and how to be cognitive when tricky quests come up.

      An ingame browser would be dandy, because it'd let me have the option of going back to full screen mode without having to worry about alt-tab issues as much, but something like questhelper? Don't use it, it breaks immersion in the game, and makes you a helpless twit.

    5. Re:I'd rather not by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, I find that trying Questhelper has pretty much killed all my interest in WoW.

      Really??

      *goes to download Questhelper*

      Dear Lord, please let this work...

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:I'd rather not by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      That's because quest helper is for vet players who have done 90% of the low-level content umpteen bazillion times and just want to get their alt leveled. And it's just not possible to remember every detail of every quest no matter how many times you do it. But at the same time, there's also no way they're going to be in any way new and interesting, so you just want to get them done as soon as possible. But imagining using it to level my first character, I agree with you 100%. I probably would never have hit 60. Course, now I'm bored with the game anyway. Haven't played for a number of weeks, and my sub runs out in a couple days (I think).

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    7. Re:I'd rather not by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Since when did WoW use any brain power for any of it? I'm lost...

      I'm not saying that WoW is some brain-gym kind of game. Far from it.

      But you still have to exercise at least _some_ (minimal) brain cells, e.g., to read the quest descriptions, use the map, and figure out stuff like "oh, it said go south at the crossroads" or "wait, these are not the kinds of satyrs the quest wanted." Not IQ-test grade by any means, but there's _some_ brain activity involved.

      With QH, I find that I hardly need any brain activity at all. You don't even need to read the name of the NPCs, ffs, because QH will already tell you if you need to kill any of those for your quests or not.

      Basically think this (bad) analogy: WoW without QH is like walking to the kitchen or toilet and back. Not exactly a work-out by any reckoning, but it might be just enough to not get a thrombosis. WoW with QH is like being in an electric-motor wheelchair all the time. You get buggerall use out of your own leg muscles, even if you spent the whole day running between the computer, the kitchen and the bathroom. Both don't qualify as sports, but the latter is even less activity than the former.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    8. Re:I'd rather not by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, too many do use it from their first character, though.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    9. Re:I'd rather not by EspressoFreak · · Score: 1

      questhelper isn't designed for first time wow player. even if it is, a first time wow player probably wouldn't know about add-ons until weeks or months into the game. plus, if you think QH killed the game for you, why did you bother looking for it and keeping it?

    10. Re:I'd rather not by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Hilarious. When you rate a players skill at the game it is usually in pvp or a raid setting. QH will effect none of your abilities to perform in this department. Lore... Wow lore is a joke, its a hodge podge of popular culture (i like this) with a bunch of stuff tacked on from warcraft 3. There really was no lore in war1 or 2... just some vague generic stories in the instruction manual. Pretty much all the chars were added in from war3. If you've played war3, you know the story.

      Moreover, not until northrend did you even really get lore mixed up with quests. Granted there would be one or two quest chains here or there that might be SLIGHTLY interesting, but if you want story, an MMO will NEVER be the place to go for that.

      It is also funny that if you read the quest text, there is a long block describing the quest, followed by a short sentence saying "go kill 3 murlocks north of town". Any brain dead idiot can read that and figure out where to go. Wow even gives you a map with an arrow to tell you right where you are.

      Hell, with tethered mobs, you don't even have to look where you are going. Half the time I run places , oh wait, fly over everything, but when I was questing, I just have the map up covering the whole screen and run that way. Mobs hit me but you just run away from them, no big deal. No need to care.

      I just find it hilarious people holding up their nose at the questhelper addon like leveling up and questing in wow is such a deeper, more challenging experience without questhelper.

      News flash, all the stuff that makes wow great is what makes it accessable and easy so that anybody can play it, see the content, and have fun. That is why I still play wow. While I enjoyed my first EQ1 trek from freeport to quenos, with my binder of eqatalas maps, you really only can experience that once and still enjoy it.

      Anyway for myself, I find no difference between using QH or spending 10 seconds to scan the quest text. It is pretty much the same thing.

    11. Re:I'd rather not by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "I've played the game way too long to care about the quests that I have to grind to get to my desired level.

      Then quit playing. It is obviously not fun for you anymore and something you regard as a chore. Remember, this is a game and games are supposed to be entertaining. (This is exactly why I don't play any MMORPG anymore. They are all like this to me.)

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    12. Re:I'd rather not by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      Totally disagree.

      I spent a whole year and three months levelling my first character to 70 all on my own, no guildies, no friends, just myself.

      Afterwards for my alts I used Questhelper. I had already done those quests and I did not feel like wandering around for hours trying to remember each location, mob and detail. Questhelper enabled me to level up those alts quickly.

      Besides, the best part of the game is the end-game raiding, and Questhelper has nothing to do with that.

    13. Re:I'd rather not by MaximumFrost · · Score: 1

      I probably should make myself clearer. Because of Questhelper, there are many people roaming around on my server who don't know what the hell they're doing, because instead of discovering on their own where to go, they followed the damn arrow. So they get up to level 80 and lo and behold, you have a warrior who doesn't know where half the instances are because he didn't explore anything while he was leveling, he let a box point him in a direction.

      I understand that a lot of stuff up to level 70 questing is mostly boring, hell, I confess to skipping a majority of the quest text myself, BUT flaunting the quest text _and_ flaunting proper exploration is what makes me hate questhelper.

      I really don't mind when experienced players use questhelper, although I still mock them, but when I see brand new players use it and somehow get to level 80 without knowing where important and pertinent stuff is(I'm talking level 72-80 content, not old expansion stuff) that is where I draw line.

    14. Re:I'd rather not by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      even if it is, a first time wow player probably wouldn't know about add-ons until weeks or months into the game.

      Somehow my parents heard about it from a guild-mate before either of them had even hit level 20.

      plus, if you think QH killed the game for you, why did you bother looking for it and keeping it?

      I had no way to know in advance that it would kill the game for me. I mean, if I knew the future... forget WoW, I'd contact Randi about it and get a cool million dollars ;)

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    15. Re:I'd rather not by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, which I agree is a sad state of affairs. When I started playing, no such mods existed. You could find most everything on thottbot already thanks to beta testers, but being told where something is and then finding it is a big big difference from having a bot holding your hand every step of the way. There's very few sections of Eastern Kingdoms and Kalimdor that I didn't become quite familiar with.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    16. Re:I'd rather not by DisKurzion · · Score: 1

      This stuff happened in WoW BEFORE QuestHelper even existed. People are idiots. It's part of playing an MMO.

    17. Re:I'd rather not by DisKurzion · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that.

      People with their first character don't even know how to turn with a mouse, let alone install addons.

    18. Re:I'd rather not by fractoid · · Score: 1

      You know the cool thing about MMO games? There's so many different things to do and different ways to play the game that however you do it, if you're having fun, you win.

      In your case, you assume that "the game" is questing and levelling. In my case, "the game" is running dungeons and raids, and PvPing. In my wife's case, "the game" is making money and levelling professions. All three are totally different playstyles, but we all have fun.

      Difference is, levelling your N'th alt to the level cap so you can take part in the bits of the game you find fun is not always, in itself, fun. It's annoying and boring to those of us who like living at the level cap, just like raiding or grinding gold or levelling professions or PvPing are annoying and boring to someone who mostly enjoys playing low level alts. Sometimes it's worth it to go through the boring bit in order to get to the bit that is "the game" to you.

      As for QuestHelper, it's great for speeding up your levelling if you just want to get your levelling grind over with. I've already got two 80s, two 70s, a 67 (who I'm levelling now), two 60s, and a bunch of lower alts. I don't really need to read the quest text or look up what drops what, but it's nice to see all the areas for the quests I have on me on the map so I can come up with an optimal route to get them all done fast.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    19. Re:I'd rather not by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      It's an understandable sentiment. I find that I enjoy WoW more (and games like Civ4) when I stop and smell the roses and stop rushing from place to place. The trick then, is to learn how to use QH only when I get stuck because the quest text is purposely or accidentally extra-obtuse.

      But at this point, I've seen 80-90% of the quests. I've gotten to 80, and the only time I pay close attention is if I'm on a quest chain that is involved and interesting. Or it happens to be one that I hadn't done yet on my myriad of alts.

      One of the nicer things about QH is when I'm questing with others who also have QH (the people that I quest with frequently). That makes it extremely nice, because we can coordinate our actions, and we're all on pretty much the same page without an excessive bit of typing about status. We'd much rather leave our brains free to talk about other stuff, or roleplay.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    20. Re:I'd rather not by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Totally orthogonal to the original topic, personally I'm a fan of voice chat for pretty much the same reason. It doesn't need sitting and typing, and an "ok, let's go across the bridge and do quest X" is 2-3 seconds worth of speech.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    21. Re:I'd rather not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just get sick of the whole "Bring insignificant item to insignificant person for insignificant reward" repeat times one million. That isn't fun, that is tedious work with a pretty bow on it.

    22. Re:I'd rather not by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure there can be such a thing as breaking immersion in a game where half your screen is icons, and the other half is floating text and exclamation marks, where the whole game is basically a theme park on rails, guiding you from one place to the next without any pretence at being a living, breathing world.

      The lore? Basic, bog-standard fantasy clichés mixed in with popular culture. I'm not sure you miss out on that by having an arrow on the map telling you where to go to kill 10 murlocs or whatever to complete the latest identikit quest.

      Let's look at two examples:
      1. I walk slowly over half of a boring zone to find some quest object. I spend five minutes running round and round in circles to find the cave/mob whatever that looks exactly like the other ten thousand caves in the game, all whilst dodging aggressive mobs that force you to fight but don't give any xp.

      2. Quest helper allows me to walk slowly over half of a boring zone direct to the quest destination, I return and complete the quest in half the time.

      In the second example, what lore or immersion have I missed out on exactly? Exploring the cookie-cutter forest zone that looks exactly like all the other forest zones in the game with a slight palette change? Holding 'w' with occasional direction changes to keep on track?

      It's not like most quests involve any problem solving or riddles, 99% are fedex quests or kill X number of Y, returning Z number of drops that only load on 10% of Y. The whole point of them is to slow the game down. The zones aren't exactly interesting to explore either. Once you've seen an acre or so of a forest zone, you've seen basically every forest zone in the game. There's little interaction with the scenery, and every five yards you get an aggro mob that's pretty much the same as all the thousands of others, with a different model and texture.

      Those five minute walks across the zone add up, and every month of walking up and down puts another $15 in Blizzard's pocket. If quest helper can reduce the amount of walking, then it improves the game without actually losing any enjoyment.

  24. I can imagine how this technology originated by Loosifur · · Score: 3, Funny

    Level pally...watch porn...level pally...watch porn...

    hmmm...

    EUREKA!

    --
    This unbiased moderation brought to you by the Porcine Aviation Group!
    1. Re:I can imagine how this technology originated by StoatBringer · · Score: 1

      Just combine the two by rolling a female blood-elf paladin. Problem solved!

      --
      Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
  25. Just another reason.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, lets just invest wildly in putting web browsers on windshields with no idea how safe it isn't!

    Somehow I doubt it. I get the impression that the car companies might just simulate this kind of thing before they put R&D money into building anything. Call me stupid, but that's what I think.

    Of course, it's usually cheaper to recycle software, so they'd probably try it with an existing setup, say with any of the browsers from this article in conjunction with a good driving simulator... of which there is only one. Perhaps we'll FINALLY get Gran Turismo on the PC. If you won't port it for the players, Polyphony Digital, will you port it for detroit? Please? For the players?

    /me runs out sobbing

  26. Two computers by xorsyst · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with having a second computer and either a second monitor or a KVM switch? Or a laptop? It really doesn't need to be anything fancy just to show a few web pages. You can basically get an entire suitable computer and (crt) monitor from freecycle these days.

    --
    Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
    1. Re:Two computers by Jumpin'+Jon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use my laptop and Synergy to achieve just that.

  27. Mac and Linux advantage by Foofoobar · · Score: 0, Troll

    I play Warcraft and use my browser with it all the time. Just open it in Windowed mode. What? you don't have that? Must just be Mac and Linux that have that then.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Mac and Linux advantage by MaximumFrost · · Score: 1

      There's no advantage here. WoW runs in windowed mode just fine in windows. Hell, that's the only way myself and a large part of my guild plays nowadays, just because it's easier to access other things during downtime between wipes.

    2. Re:Mac and Linux advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I play Warcraft and use my browser with it all the time. Just open it in Windowed mode. What? you don't have that? Must just be Mac and Linux that have that then.

      Windows can easily run wow in Windowed mode you silly fan boy.

    3. Re:Mac and Linux advantage by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      And since I listed two DIFFERENT operating systems, which one am I supposed to be a fanboy of? Hmmm? You seem a little confused as to the definition of fanboy junior. Why don't you finish third grade before you start throwing around terms you don't understand.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  28. What? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Steam (and probably the others too) just uses the drop-in ActiveX Internet Explorer component. It's not mean and it's definitely not lean.

    If they used Gecko or Webkit it would be a different matter.

    1. Re:What? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah it looks like they tested it using a site with Flash and then complained when the website performance was horrible. Even the Chrome team said they can't do anything about poor Flash performance (relatively speaking to the rest of Chrome).

    2. Re:What? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Considering the Steam overlay only originally allowed access to their pages, it's not really that bad. And why integrate Gecko or Webkit, when you're already Windows-only?

    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using IE for anything is definitely mean.

    4. Re:What? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Can't they give a hand to the Gnash team? Better yet, make a cross-compiler for ActionScript to JavaScript bytecode, offloading the media to JavaFX and SVG?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  29. But what would we call it...? by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    And maybe someday we will have games that run in resizable areas that take less than the full screen, so that one can run any arbitrary application (or even applications!) in the remaining space. Wow! Wouldn't that be something!

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    1. Re:But what would we call it...? by Samah · · Score: 1

      Windowed mode is slow. That is all.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  30. I love my in browser browser by TravisO · · Score: 1

    I love this new in-browser browser, now I can open a new window without having to be annoyed with that silly CTRL+T key combo, who can remember that anyway?

    Hey, does anybody want to hire me to invent the wheel?

  31. Do you have a death wish? by monkeySauce · · Score: 1

    So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?"

    Hopefully not before we get the option in our car to hit ESC and choose LOAD > This_Morning.sav after being in a fatal car accident.

  32. The killer app by Nerdposeur · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, I think the best thing to do with these in-game browsers is to play in-browser games.

    Hopefully, those games will include browsers, too, so we don't get bored.

    1. Re:The killer app by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      It's just a new version of the old adage: "All programs expand until they can read email", only now it's "browse the web".

      But I'd never considered the possible recursive nature of the adage until your post.

      Are there any in-browser web browsers?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:The killer app by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Yes. Or there were. Wiiminder was a site that you could go to through your Wii's Opera browser to add 'tabbed browsing'. However, I don't think it's up anymore.

    3. Re:The killer app by rkanodia · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yo dawg, I heard you like web browsers...

  33. EverQuest 2 - It's had this for a while by Erioll · · Score: 1

    For quite some time now you've been able to bring up FireFox inside of Everquest 2 (they have the files inside a sub-dir of the EQ2 directory, so it's a "private" copy of it, not accessing what you already have installed). They mainly did it because they were overhauling their in-game support page (reporting bugs, etc) to a normal web page instead of a one-off interface window specific to the game, but I guess somebody finally had a brain and said "hey, let's just let the players use this as a regular browser too" and so it happened.

    It's slightly limited, since you can't put your own extensions in (I'd kill for Adblock Plus), or access the options panels, etc, but generally it's fine, and I haven't noticed it killing performance, but I have a really good computer, so other experiences may vary.

    1. Re:EverQuest 2 - It's had this for a while by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it's all of Firefox they integrated, and not just Gecko (FF's renderer)? I know Second Life has an embedded version of Gecko they use for their help browser.

  34. and the reason for this is...? by mareviq · · Score: 1

    I can't say that I see the point of this. Usually games require the player to be involved in the process of playing the game, thus leaving little time for multi-tasking. Also, this spoils the point of games. When you watch a movie you don't want to read a newspaper at the same time, do you? (unless the movie is crap, but then why are you watching it?) There is only one game in existence that benefits from an in-game browser - EVE Online. And guess what? It's already there, and it's TRULY in-game, as in "integrated with the game's interface".

  35. Adding games to Steam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't tried it for WoW, but you can run non-Steam games through Steam by clicking "Add non-Steam game" on the games tab. That should let you access the Steam overlay in WoW.

    1. Re:Adding games to Steam by spyder913 · · Score: 1

      This can cause a large performance hit for some games/computers though. On my 2 YO computer, running UT3 with the steam overlay cost me ~25% of my FPS without it.

    2. Re:Adding games to Steam by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      running UT3 with the steam overlay cost me ~25% of my FPS without it.

      I'm pretty sure it's Epic's fault for you losing 25% of your First Person Shooter. Perhaps they should have made UT3 better.

      I'll see myself to the door, thanks.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
  36. Steam.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite Steam being one of the best content delivery systems i have ever used i would like to say this on behalf of every single developer:

    GOD DAMN IT VALVE STOP BREAKING OUR SHIT WITH EVERY SINGLE LITTLE FUCKING UPDATE. LOVE, ANONYMOUS COWARD (oh yeah.. making it so you can actually click on textboxes and type with the latest steam client beta and IE8 RC1 would be nice)

  37. What about EVE-Online's in-game browser? by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

    I wonder why they didn't test EVE's IGB (In-Game Browser).

    It sucks, but still...

  38. EVE Online includes a Time Machine by Jumpin'+Jon · · Score: 1

    The in-game browser in EVE is so basic, it transports you back to HTML 1.0.

  39. Reality check by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    "how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields" The average idiot on the highway already has to many distractions. Note that cell phone use is being made illegal in many areas, due to accidents attributed to cell phone use. Now, you want a web browser on windshields? Duhhh. An automobile is a means of transportation. Transport yourself, and when you get where you are going, you can browse, play games, listen to music, call a freind, whatever. Autos need to be stripped to bare bones essentials, so that the average American idiot doesn't WANT to live in his car, wasting energy and polluting the environment.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  40. Car implementation flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?

    I can see it now...

    "Javascript transparency exploit allows hijack of windscreen transparency settings"

    Oh wait, I can't see. Argh!

  41. Yo dawg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah...too easy.

  42. Run in a window. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just run the game windowed.

    Why does this article really even exist? This is nice for some games that can't run in a window, but almost all popular games can run in a window without any problems ( WoW, Quake, Counter Strike, etc ) and then you have access to not just some neutered web browser and chat client but your entire... operating system. Ta-da!

    Do that many people really not realize you can run games in a window? That's just sad :(

  43. Looking up cheat codes in the car. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    looking up cheat codes. So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?

    What's the cheat code for enabling infinite fuel in my car?

    Window up, window down, window up, window down, turn signal left, turn signal right, turn signal left, turn signal right, AC, emergency brake, ignition.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  44. EVE by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    What, no mention of EVE's godawful IGB? The one that barely supports fonts, images, and nothing else?

    I'm shocked.

    --

    Question everything

  45. A Windshield is the Best Idea for this? Not really by Droideka-TheGuy · · Score: 1

    "So how much longer before we see a variation of this on our real-world car windshields?" While a HUD on my windshield would be awesome, the fact that someone can hardly turn a radio dial without swerving off the road kind of says that this should never be done. It takes way too much hand-eye-coordination for the average person.

  46. pussies, use linux already. by nazsco · · Score: 1

    With linux, which has several decent window managers (not that childish thing you people has with windows and apple) you can do as you wish. I said, as you $&*^%@ wish!

    e.g.

    When i play starcraft, I left the IM window and IM notification icon override the full screen and be on top. so any time anyone IMs me, my IM hotkey will make the im window appear on top of the game. (the notification icon hides part of the population limit, but can be fixed if it really bothers you. and of course, the im window will be in the 800x600 resolution the game is using but i don't even think i need to mention that.)

    When i play*ed* world of warcraft, i left it full screen at virtual desk one, and a browser with toothbot on virtual desk two. a simple windowskey+f2 and voila, a browser! a terminal! a solitaire game! my music player! some star trek episode from the dvd!

    with wow i confess i had some problems dealing with hotkeys in game and out of game... but i managed to solve it *without* waiting for someone to do an app for me.

    But "linux is no good for games" :(

    with wine, it runs star craft, it runs warcraft 3, it runs world of warcraft.

    and at pretty good speed. and i last tested it on a duron 1.3ghz with 2gb ram with a value nvidia card (had to use some low settings for graphics because of the card)

    you bunch of pussies.

  47. If you're good at multi-tasking.. by tricky11 · · Score: 1

    If you're good at multi-tasking, you can be better with this. It is beneficial for those playing World of Warcraft and purchasing wow gold. I would probably use it to.