Slashdot Mirror


Kindle 2 Tear-Down Reveals Price of Components

adeelarshad82 writes "Amazon's wildly popular Kindle 2 got a good old fashioned tear-down from the folks at market research firm iSuppli. According to the organization, the Kindle 2's manufacturing cost is almost half as much as its retail price."

169 comments

  1. And you are surprised? by arizwebfoot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the Kindle 2's manufacturing cost is almost half as much as its retail price

    So . . . ?

    Is this supposed to be some new business model. I remember working at Monkey Wards and they would raise the prices 400% and then have a 1/2 off sale.

    It's the American way.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:And you are surprised? by ArcherB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, in fairness, Amazon could sell the units at a loss and make up the difference on digital book sales much like the console manufacturers do.

      But, I agree with you. If these units are selling, why lower the cost?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:And you are surprised? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's the Retail way.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    3. Re:And you are surprised? by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Funny. The company I worked for sells (yes, I quit and went back to school, but keep abreast of prices)R-22 for $58.00 a pound and R-410A for $64.50 a pound. They cost respectively approx. $180 per 30 pounds for R-22 and approx. $180 per 25 pounds for R-410A. For the mathematically challenged, that is a cost of $6.00 a pound for R-22 and $7.20 a pound for R-410A. I will let someone else figure the mark up for them.

    4. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the American way.

      Fixed that back for you.

    5. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Gasp*, they don't give it away free? Colour me shocked... ... Actually I wonder if they did give it away free, what effect that would have on ebook sales? *hmmm ponders*

    6. Re:And you are surprised? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Well, in fairness, Amazon could sell the units at a loss and make up the difference on digital book sales much like the console manufacturers do.

      Aside from the Xbox, who sells consoles at a loss?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:And you are surprised? by cromar · · Score: 1

      Nintendo says Wii is not sold at a loss (or so I hear). PS3 is sold at a loss.

    8. Re:And you are surprised? by tixxit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But, I agree with you. If these units are selling, why lower the cost?

      Valve had a 3000% increase in sales of Left 4 Dead by cutting the price in half. Why lower the cost if they are selling? So you can sell even more!

    9. Re:And you are surprised? by maxume · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you are selling your entire production run of a physical good, cutting the price in half just means that you take in half the revenue.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, in fairness, Amazon could sell the units at a loss and make up the difference on digital book sales much like the console manufacturers do.

      Aside from the Xbox, who sells consoles at a loss?

      This has been fairly standard practice since the PS1 days.

    11. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That requires you to have a higher price to begin with, though. The effect isn't made when you start something off with a low price, you only get those kinds of sales when you PUT IT ON SALE.

    12. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You do know that Kindle was sold-out for the longest time, since production couldn't keep up with demand?
      They have no need to increase the sales at this point.

      Also: there are very real dangers in lowering price for products; human mind tends to consider more expensive products as better, higher-quality things.
      Conversely, lowering price can dillute the brand.

      So there is very little point for Amazon to reduce the price significantly at this point.

    13. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Software is a non-rivaled good - it's not possible to "buy the last one". L4D is distributed primarily via Steam, so it's non-rivaled. The kindle is a physical object... it's a rivaled good.

      Your comparison fails.

    14. Re:And you are surprised? by Yeef · · Score: 1

      Keystoning is a pretty common thing in retail. I don't think this is really news.

      --
      I was once a horse.
    15. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      historically the wii is the first in around 4 generations not to be sold at a loss

    16. Re:And you are surprised? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait, you mean people try to sell physical products for more than it costs to make them so they can profit off of the sale?

      What a novel concept!

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    17. Re:And you are surprised? by binaryseraph · · Score: 1

      Well put. American's get too much flack for business practices. Fact is- everyone world wide is out to make a buck in the retail world. Cheers!

    18. Re:And you are surprised? by tixxit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. On the other hand, increased demand gives them more reason to up the production rate. The Kindle is also very expensive for what it DOES (not what it is). An e-reader really should be significantly cheaper then, say, a Netbook.

    19. Re:And you are surprised? by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      I don't think Nintendo consoles are ever sold at a loss.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    20. Re:And you are surprised? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Well, in fairness, Amazon could sell the units at a loss and make up the difference on digital book sales much like the console manufacturers do.

      Aside from the Xbox, who sells consoles at a loss?

      This has been fairly standard practice since the PS1 days.

      No, it's a recent phenomenon. The first was the Dreamcast, which catered, then the Xbox, which would've cratered if it was anyone other than MS bankrolling it.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    21. Re:And you are surprised? by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let me fix that one more time for you.

      It's the Ferengi way.

      Which proves the fix above you is correct, not yours, as according to Rule 284 of the Rules of Acquisition:

      Deep down, everyone's a Ferengi.
       

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    22. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no. Playstation and Playstation2 sold at a loss at introduction but they were sold at profit later in the life cycle.

    23. Re:And you are surprised? by mysidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But it means you can increase the size of your production run and make even more, potentially.

      Esp. after your customers get a hold of the device and start buying other products from you to use on the device, and you have an exponential ram up in revenue.

      You know.. like give away the razor, sell the blades.

      It's short sighted to set the price of entry as high as possible, when it reduces the size of continuous recurring revenue, that occurs when customers buy stuff to use on their Kindle, which at a bare minimum, they will do a little, to justify to themselves the cost of the device.

      Over the years as they use the device, all those book sales are pure profit, and can far exceed the value of the device...

      And none of that revenue would exist if they didn't buy the device because they thought it was too expensive, and instead got an iPod mini in order to listen to audio books.

    24. Re:And you are surprised? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "I remember working at Monkey Wards and they would raise the prices 400% and then have a 1/2 off sale."

      "Buy now, and only pay two flint spearheads instead of four!"

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    25. Re:And you are surprised? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Not really.

      The screen technology, already one of the most expensive parts of a netbook, is significantly more expensive in an e-book reader.

      E-ink is in no way similar to LCD technology, other than they both operate in a type of fluid to generate the pixels. How they do it is very different, and e-ink is much, much newer, and so more expensive. But the screens are getting better and the prices are falling, so it's a good thing. There is apparently even color coming some time soon. It's a good time to be a book lover. :)

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    26. Re:And you are surprised? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Why are you assuming that they set the price as high as possible?

      Depending on how elastic demand is, keeping the price at 2X (rather than cutting it to X) gives you more money with which to expand your production.

      Basically, without looking at Amazon's actual data, we are speculating about what sort of model makes the most sense (my comment above really only points out that they may be selling at the capacity that they can currently manufacture at).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    27. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you mean people try to sell physical products for more than it costs to make them so they can profit off of the sale?

      What a novel concept!

      You must be new here: Every wannabe here thinks that anyone that sells anything for more than a "fair" price is greedy. Of course, when asked to define "fair", the best they can come up with is "whatever I am willing to pay".

    28. Re:And you are surprised? by Zordak · · Score: 2, Funny

      The first was the Dreamcast, which catered

      Wow, I guess I'm just an old fogie. Back in my day, we had the SMS and then the Genesis, and neither of those were capable of serving food. They just played video games.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    29. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Valve had a 3000% increase in sales of Left 4 Dead by cutting the price in half. Why lower the cost if they are selling? So you can sell even more!

      Yeah, but with Software it doesn't cost more to produce/ship more units.

    30. Re:And you are surprised? by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "Valve had a 3000% increase in sales of Left 4 Dead by cutting the price in half. Why lower the cost if they are selling? So you can sell even more!"

      Each and every product has its own unique pricing curve. That's great for Valve, but you can't responsibly apply any assumptions to any given product.

      In general, keep in mind that even unit elasticity (where sales scale 1:1 with price) does not favor hardware products. In very simple terms... if your cost of sale of a product is $40 and you sell it for $100 (ie. $60 in profit), cutting the selling price in half would require a 6X price increase to make the same profit.

      I've dealt with Amazon on many occasions. They are often VERY good at what they do. They have a margin model that's unlike most other retailers and it's served them well. Pricing models and elasticity are concepts that they're very familiar with. Practically speaking, the chances are very low that $RANDOM_SLASHDOTTER knows better than them regarding Kindle pricing.

       

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    31. Re:And you are surprised? by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "if your cost of sale of a product is $40 and you sell it for $100 (ie. $60 in profit), cutting the selling price in half would require a 6X sales volume increase to make the same profit."

      Fixed that for myself.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    32. Re:And you are surprised? by tixxit · · Score: 1

      What comparison? If you lower prices, you will sell more, regardless if it is rival good. The only difference is your profit margin. That said, I was merely pointing out that lower prices makes you sell more. Just because you are selling units at one price point, does not mean lower your price will have adverse side-effects. You could sell enough more that you make up the profit differences. Rival or non-rival.

    33. Re:And you are surprised? by tixxit · · Score: 1

      Not really.

      You missed my point, since I fully agree with you. Yes, E-ink is in no way similar, which is exactly what I'm saying. For what it DOES, it costs too much. It lets you read books. I can do that for $8/book. $350 can buy me a lot of books. However, for what it is (E-Ink display and all), the price makes sense. Personally, I love the idea and love to read, but $350 is still too much for what it will let me do. Once the price of the tech comes down (what it is), I'll buy one in a heart beat.

    34. Re:And you are surprised? by tixxit · · Score: 1

      I fully know, and I also fully expect that amazon has people who are much better at economics then me decide the price. However, your example does kind of prove my examples point, since they, in face, sold 30x more copies ;)

    35. Re:And you are surprised? by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      Years ago I was in the shmata (clothing) business in Los Angeles. We made jeans but the markup is similar across the board: it's called twice keystone + 10 and it means the markup is 100%, then 10%, and then another 100% and then another 10%.

      In other words, let's take a pair of jeans that cost us $9 to make. 100% of that is another $9, so it's now at $18. 10% of that is $1.80; it's now $19.80.

      Now add another 100% of that; it's now $39.60. And then another 10% of that ($3.96) makes it $43.56.

      Round it up a bit, and that's how a $9 pair of jeans ends up selling for $45.00.

      And why there's still significant profit after the retailer marks it down 50% (to $22.50) in an end-of-the-season clearance.

      So now that you know, what next? Become a nudist?

    36. Re:And you are surprised? by Eivind · · Score: 1

      True. But digital goods typically have huge fixed costs and miniscule per-item costs.

      If your per-item cost is $1 and your selling-price is $59, then halving the price really does require double sales to give the same profit.

      Downloadable games (steam) have -very- low "per unit" costs.

    37. Re:And you are surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for Support, Bandwidth, Online Service availability, liability...

    38. Re:And you are surprised? by anvilmark · · Score: 1

      Amazon: "We're hemorrhaging money but we're selling LOTS of product!"

      Comparing a software product delivered electronically to a physical device that must be assembled, stored, shipped and maintained is an apples-oranges comparison.

      "Insightful"? "Funny" perhaps.

    39. Re:And you are surprised? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wow, I guess I'm just an old fogie. Back in my day, we had the SMS and then the Genesis, and neither of those were capable of serving food. They just played video games.

      Further proof that the Dreamcast was destroyed by conspiracy and not the market. I've been looking for a computer that could fetch me a beer since I was old enough to know what a beer was, and why I would want one. If it's a game console, so much the better.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    40. Re:And you are surprised? by mzs · · Score: 1

      If the rumors were true the N64 sold at a loss shortly after launch due to RAM price increase. Shorty after that the RAM prices dropped again. Other than that Nintendo never sold a console at a loss.

    41. Re:And you are surprised? by whoda · · Score: 1

      Physical goods that you have to manufacture and ship != Video games delivered online.

    42. Re:And you are surprised? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, it also comes with a lifetime of mobile internet.

    43. Re:And you are surprised? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      The Wii is the exception (sold with a profit). Ditto the Gamecube (it was sold at cost), but all the previous consoles like PS2, Xbox, N64, Dreamcast, PS1, Sega Genesis, and Super Nintendo were sold at a loss, because manufacturers can make their money off the software licenses.

      The same model is used for inkjet printers which you can buy cheap, but then you pay through-the-nose to get replacement ink packs (one every 100 pages). Contrast that with laser printers which cost high initially (~$150), but use ink that can print 5,000 pages and therefore save money over the long term.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    44. Re:And you are surprised? by tixxit · · Score: 1

      OK... Seriously, how can so many people miss the point. I could've used one of many examples where lower prices made a product sell more. I just chose one that was on Slashdot a few weeks back so that people would recognize it. Yeah, it is software, that does not change the fact that price and demand are intimately mixed. Lowering the price will attract more buyers. Yeah, you may not be able to produce 30x as many, but the 50% = 30x increase was obviously an extreme. Anyways, my point was a simple response to a question, "why lower prices if they are already selling units?" The obvious answer is so you can sell more. Perhaps there are technical or physical limitations preventing this, but this does not change the fact that lower prices means more units sold. I was not stating that they can afford to sell a product for half the price, and certainly did not say so in my post. However, assuming Amazon is making no profit is just as foolish as assuming they are making lots of profit. Also, assuming there is no room for cost cutting or price reduction is also absurd. We are also talking about a unit that will generate long-term repeat revenue in the form of books sold for the device (ie. the iPod approach). Selling at a loss is not necessarily a bad thing, if you will make up that loss and more in books sold... I do not pretend to be an economist, and I answered a simple question with a simple answer. It is only you guys reading more into it.

    45. Re:And you are surprised? by tixxit · · Score: 1

      No shit. However, lowering prices has been shown to increase sales. Certainly not always, but that was my point, plain and simple, not your strawman.

    46. Re:And you are surprised? by tixxit · · Score: 1

      Sorry, reread my previous point and realized I was being rude. Just got tired or reading, pretty much, the exact same reply 10x. The software example is an extreme case, which is why it proves the point so well. But, surely, the same reasoning can be applied to any product. Perhaps, in the end, some technical/physical/cost limitations make it infeasible, but you can always take a look at lowering the price as a way of increasing sales. And certainly, there is always a price point that will maximize revenue. However, we can not assume Amazon hit that point on the dot, and that there is no room for movement (up or down).

    47. Re:And you are surprised? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Well, ok - I was mostly talking about selling at a loss as a strategic choice.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    48. Re:And you are surprised? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I've been looking for a computer that could fetch me a beer

      Maybe use "sudo" next time?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    49. Re:And you are surprised? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

      Aside from the Xbox, who sells consoles at a loss?

      Xbox became profitable a long time ago. Are you perhaps thinking of Sony?

    50. Re:And you are surprised? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      The screen technology, already one of the most expensive parts of a netbook, is significantly more expensive in an e-book reader.

      And?

      For the last year or two, whenever I've been in line at Borders seen the display with their ebook reader (the Sony one I think) and I'd say "that's pretty cool!" Then I'd look at the price tag of about $325 and say "but not that cool."

      OTOH, I didn't have much hesitation in dropping $275 for my HP Mini, which, among all the other things it does, also has an ebook reader.

      That is the important point in the GP that you missed. if the E-Ink suppliers are pricing themselves out of the market, that's too bad for them. It's a cool technology, and if the devices were more equal functionally I'd probably pick the E-Ink device over the LCD device. As it is though, I'm not willing to pay ~25% more for a device that does a lot less.

      If it were under $200, I'd most likely end up buying at least one.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  2. And the other half... by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is R&D, marketing, distribution, and profit.

    Big deal.

    Why is this news again??

    1. Re:And the other half... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also remember that each Kindle has an unlimited cell modem plan built in. Those aren't cheap.

    2. Re:And the other half... by Burkin · · Score: 1

      Why is this news again??

      kdawson didn't have any Microsoft FUD articles to post today so timothy is picking up the slack.

    3. Re:And the other half... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      I notice that although this is being defended (and rightly so), there's not the amazingly defensive and outraged fanboy rampage that you get when you see articles like "iPhone components cost $120! ZOMG!"...

    4. Re:And the other half... by neonleonb · · Score: 1

      Also, free cellular internet. http://xkcd.com/548/

    5. Re:And the other half... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed: all you people out there scoffing should go out and take a couple of post-secondary business finance classes. Typically, with any widget in the most generic business model, the cost of goods and services (COGS) is roughly 50% of the final price, +/- a few points. You figure 40%-45% for overhead, which consists of indirect costs such as R&D, distribution, administration, marketing, legal, etc., and the rest is profit.

      Producing a product isn't free. Who knew?

    6. Re:And the other half... by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Is R&D, marketing, distribution, and profit.

      I'd bet good money that isn't how it is accounted. The rest is an upfront prepaid wireless contract. They will book zero profit on the device, great for tax purposes. The money comes from the fact it is for all intents and purposes locked[1] to Amazon content which has nice phat margins.

      Remember that the intended use is to buy all of the content over the wireless. To make that more desirable they even toss in some free wireless goodies. If the Kindle were just a typical e-book reader that loaded it's content via the USB port the battery life and weight specs would be much better. And it wouldn't need to waste so much space on the keyboard.

      [1] I know some twit will pipe up and say you CAN load other content onto a Kindle but Amazon went out of their way to discourage it and made buying their content oh so easy.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    7. Re:And the other half... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because profits are evil. don't you know that yet silly?

    8. Re:And the other half... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. That's the difference between the BOM, and the e-BOM.

    9. Re:And the other half... by rm999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every time there is a Slashdot article about a tear down with estimate hardware costs, tons of people point out that x% is an appropriate cost, etc. No one is saying otherwise; we can safely assume that Amazon understands the supply/demand curves, has researched the market, and plans on recouping its costs plus some profit - in other words, has priced the Kindle as optimally as it can. But this doesn't mean the tear-down exercise was pointless.

      In my opinion, there is plenty of interesting information encoded in what the hardware costs. For one thing, it makes estimating marginal cost much easier, which is useful from a business perspective (if you can estimate manufacturing costs and sales, you can get a good idea of Amazon's revenue and costs - this is important if you are interested in investing in AMZN. Another interesting aspect is the relative cost of individual components. The high relative cost of the screen makes it clear that Amazon greatly values that aspect of the Kindle. We can expect to see further innovation in e-book screens, as competition will pay attention to this. Consumers should also be interested in information about Amazon's costs. If/when competition ramps up, I would expect prices to fall because of their healthy profit margin. And personally, as an electronics geek, I'm fascinated in how these types of devices are put together.

    10. Re:And the other half... by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      The cell modem is likely subsidised by the prices of books more than the initial hardware sale. Plus, they're relatively tiny files.

    11. Re:And the other half... by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Call me a twit, but how do they discourge it? It shows up as a flash drive, you drop text files on it, tadah. The Ipod is more discouraging to put your own music on without itunes, unless you reflash it.

      And if you wanted to use the search/annotation features, it'd still need a keyboard, unless you wanted to add a battery sucking touch film.

      I would have bought one if they hadn't gotten rid of the SD slot.

    12. Re:And the other half... by smaddox · · Score: 1

      if you can estimate manufacturing costs and sales, you can get a good idea of Amazon's revenue and costs - this is important if you are interested in investing in AMZN

      Or you could.. you know.. just look up their revenue and costs.

    13. Re:And the other half... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      No one is saying otherwise; we can safely assume that Amazon understands the supply/demand curves, has researched the market, and plans on recouping its costs plus some profit - in other words, has priced the Kindle as optimally as it can.

      As far as I know all this marketing research and optimization of price points is like looking in a magic glass ball and having a crapshoot at a price point. If it's a hot product, something people really want or something that's hyped enough, some people will buy it no matter what. If you lower the price point however, more people will consider buying it. If they currently sold out of Kindle's they can try increasing production (with the cost that it brings) and hope the current price keeps buyers coming. If buyers stop coming, they lower the price so there's another run on the product to sell out the stock. If that exercise makes them more money than costs, they will most likely do it.

      Another thing you have to keep in mind is what the lower cost would bring as a side effect. Currently the product is fairly high priced (I won't buy it until it's at least 50% of it's current price). This keeps competitors at bay since the competitor would most likely want to make a product that's cheaper/better in order to pull customers away. However by keeping the price point this high, they might be trying to warn others: this is an expensive product to develop. As soon as the new product hits the market and gains traction, Amazon will drop the prices in order to out price the competitors which makes it harder for them to recoup development and production costs.

      And finally there is the monopoly part. Amazon basically has a monopoly on the e-book reader market. They can keep the price high, there is hardly any other product that offers the same and is well integrated with an online bookstore.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    14. Re:And the other half... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      well integrated with an online bookstore

      Mod parent up. This is the signal lesson of the iPod. You MUST have store integration.

    15. Re:And the other half... by rm999 · · Score: 1

      While a good start, no good investor depends solely on those numbers. For one thing, those numbers are way too high-level to get an understanding of what's going on inside the company.

      For example, if you believe in the next year book sales will go down, kindle sales will go up, movie sales sales will go up, and miscellaneous item sales will go up, you can estimate there sales over the next year if you know details about their costs and relative sales of each category. On the other hand, if you depend on financial statements, you'll have to wait a year, by which time other investors know what you do.

    16. Re:And the other half... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

      Why is this news again??

      Is this a trick question? It's something that is interesting that we didn't know a couple days ago and now we know--that's almost the definition of news.

  3. What is the cost to develop the software it runs? by jholder · · Score: 1

    I assume the rest of the cost is R&D, software dev costs, and a little profit. Sounds about right for any company that doesn't want to go under.

    --
    -- John
  4. Umm So? by logicnazi · · Score: 1

    It's not like Amazon somehow magically doesn't have any overhead, shipping or design costs for the Kindle. They also have inventory costs, returned item costs and all the other gunk associated with manufacturing and selling an item.

    Having merely a 50% of the cost (not including IP) for a still pioneering device like this seems totally reasonable.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

  5. How is this news? by stewbee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it a surprise to any one that the manufacturing costs are not as much as retail? The article mentions cost to build, ie materials alone, is $185.49. I did not see mention of SW development, so to think that the rest is profit is just silly.

    1. Re:How is this news? by Garse+Janacek · · Score: 1

      Is it a surprise to any one that the manufacturing costs are not as much as retail?

      Actually it's even worse than you're saying -- the analysis isn't about "manufacturing costs", it's about component costs (which is correctly described in the headline, and then incorrectly described immediately after in the summary). So, if you buy all the components, you've already spent half the cost before you start assembling them, testing them, shipping them, setting them up, packaging them, and shipping them again.

      The confusion is somewhat understandable since even the article itself says different things in different places. But reporters love to take the otherwise interesting reports from iSuppli and sensationalize them by implying that popular electronics devices are 50% profit or more (they've done the same thing for iPods and such)... but ultimately it's just lazy reporting.

      --

      I am the man with no sig!

  6. No kidding. by JCSoRocks · · Score: 4, Funny

    This. Just. In. There's a markup on retail goods! Also, the sky is generally blue and you need oxygen to live.

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  7. compared to an Iphone by EZ+Erik · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:compared to an Iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iAnything has a higher markup percentage.

  8. Half seems like a lot by stokessd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For a lot of retail electronics, 10% of retail price is about the price of the raw parts. One half of the retail prices seems like pretty thin margins.

    I was assuming that the kindle is much like a polaroid camera, or inkjet printer where the cost of the hardware is subsidized or sold at effectively no profit, and all the money is made in the consumables (the books).

    Sheldon

    1. Re:Half seems like a lot by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I didn't RTFA, but a lot of the early posts made it seem like they thought the parts should cost more. Quite the contrary, 50% - even if you include manufacturing costs - seems like a way to take a loss very easily. Most items have a 50% markup at the end stage of the chain, after all the devel, marketing, overhead, shipping, and production is included. Now, granted that the supply chain is short, and there will never (or nearly never) be a discount market for these, so the margin could be smaller and still make it. Still, with s/w development and support, this isn't going to make Bezos any richer from hardware sales.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Half seems like a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are forgetting the part where the Kindle comes with (limited) free cellular internet access for life.

    3. Re:Half seems like a lot by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Most items have a 50% markup at the end stage of the chain

      Remember, though, Amazon sells it direct on their web site, so it's a pretty short chain. If they sold through Best Buy, etc, they'd have to mark it up more to give the retailer, etc a profit, too.

    4. Re:Half seems like a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work, we estimate the cost to manufacture a volume produced product as parts cost + 15% (for lower volumes the amortized development cost pushes that up). On top of that, the factory adds 5% profit, and it is sold out to distributors at around 20% more than the cost of the parts. By the time it gets to consumers, the price is 3 times what the factory sells at. Amazon has cut out a lot of the middlemen, so double the parts cost is probably quite reasonable as a standard profit margin.

    5. Re:Half seems like a lot by nicklott · · Score: 1

      As someone with some experience in retail I can tell you that 50% margin would be considered extremely good for an electronic item at final retail. Normally the high street retailer will make 10-20% on these things and the internet discounters will be pushing 5%. There is just so much competition out there and people are very sensitive to price for electronics, however amazon has no competitors for the kindle, so they can pretty much charge what they want. (For comparison, clothing will normally make 50-80%, books 35%, though it depends greatly on the industry and niche)

    6. Re:Half seems like a lot by wwphx · · Score: 1

      There's more layers involved. If I make a widget that only costs me 10% of the retail price in materials, that doesn't mean I make 90% profit. I may not have the distribution might to sell it as broadly as I'd like, so I hire a distributor. I sell it to the distributor for 40% of retail price, he sells it to the retailers for 60% of MSRP. Everybody makes a profit.

      Obviously these are approximate numbers an vary wildly, but they are sufficiently representative.

      Amazon has a big advantage here. They are their own distributor and retailer, so they keep much more of the pie. But they still have their R&D costs, past and future, to cover, not to mention the bill they pay to Sprint to keep all of those Kindles connected to the mothership.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    7. Re:Half seems like a lot by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      Depends on maturity of market and competition. 50% margin isn't a lot for an early adoption / niche product. Do the math on how many inkjet printers and cameras there are, you'll see.

  9. Shocker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, you could do all the electronics, circuit board layout, PCB manufacturing, case manufacturing, and software/UI all by yourself, make a home-made Kindle2, and save a bundle! Show those crooks some what-for!

    1. Re:Shocker! by nizo · · Score: 1

      Even better, make the components yourself; ultimately all they are is silicon (beach sand!), metal, and plastic. Hell just recycle the trash you find on the beach when you pickup a few bucketfuls of that sweet silicon goodness and you should be able to make your own kindle for a few pennies!

    2. Re:Shocker! by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Back in the days of the C64 'me and the gang' looked at the cost of duplicating a commercial ROM cartridge copier plug-in board (for our own use - not to re-sell). I could do the the electronics, someone had the PCB making kit etc.. but when we added up all the raw costs, we were disappointed to find out it was cheaper to buy the item off the shelf!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    3. Re:Shocker! by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      Years ago I made the first Light Pen for the then popular TRS-80. We were selling them for $19.95. They had about $2.50 worth of parts (including the Bic Click pens we bought as advertising specialty pens, imprinted with our trademark, less the value of the refills we took out and sold separately) and we paid a $2.00 royalty to the inventor on each one we sold, paid about a quarter for the cassette tapes holding the software, and paid another quarter to the sheltered workshop which used handicapped labor to assemble them. We invested our own money in the software; gave away a minimal package and sold other software separately.

      One day a prospect called to ask us why he should pay $19.95 for a light pen that he could duplicate himself for about $15.00.

      I resisted the urge to laugh. But I didn't resist much else. I explained to him that the best reason to buy it for $19.95 was that we were soon going to raise the price to $24.95 (and we eventually did). I explained to him that we included software; he didn't seem to care; my guess was that he knew someone who had the pen, and would just take the software.

      Knowing I wasn't going to get the sale, but wanting to at least ruin the guy's day, I explained to him that if we had to pay $15 to make the pens we'd be selling them for $75, and in fact our cost was only about $5.00. As I recall, he didn't believe me, and hung up. I don't think he ever bought it, and that was fine with us.

  10. Also, don't forget the wireless service... by brainproxy · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not like Amazon somehow magically doesn't have any overhead, shipping or design costs for the Kindle. They also have inventory costs, returned item costs and all the other gunk associated with manufacturing and selling an item.

    Having merely a 50% of the cost (not including IP) for a still pioneering device like this seems totally reasonable.

    Lets not also forget that Amazon pays not only for the bandwidth to deliver all that content, but also pays for the Wireless data service for EVERY unit out there, perpetually.

    1. Re:Also, don't forget the wireless service... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      I bet the wireless coverage doesn't work on a per unit basis, it's either a set fee for amazon, % commission based on online sales, or based on data transferred for all the units.

      I don't think Amazon would enter into a deal where they would end up paying for units that are either dead or just thrown in the corner not being used.

    2. Re:Also, don't forget the wireless service... by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Would I be mistaken in thinking Amazon gets paid each time data gets transfered?
      It's hardly likely they are paying line rental in the deal.

    3. Re:Also, don't forget the wireless service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bet wrong. They pay a per unit cost for the service on a monthly basis for all actively provisioned devices.

    4. Re:Also, don't forget the wireless service... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Yes, you would. There is a built in web browser.

  11. So... by Xerolooper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they are selling it at a loss. A device like this is usually sold as a loss leader as they intend to make up the lost revenue in the sale of the consumables(in this case the ebooks).

    --
    "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Dear crackhead moderators,
      how the fuck did you reason when you thought this post should've been modded Insightful?

      Let me quote from the fucking summary:

      Kindle 2's manufacturing cost is almost half as much as its retail price

      For those of you who aren't fucking retarded, it means the markup is roughly one hundred per cent.

    2. Re:So... by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      For those of you who aren't fucking retarded, it means the markup is roughly one hundred per cent.

      Those of us that are "fucking retarded" apparently understand that manufacturing costs don't make up the entire cost to produce the product. The products don't design, develop, and market themselves now do they?

    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us based in THIS reality also realize that the R&D costs aren't all that great.
      By August of last year, Amazon had sold almost a quarter of a million units. Despite being out of stock for five out of the nine months.

      In other words, some 60000 units per month it was actually being sold.
      60k * $180 = $10.8M, which without a doubt covers the R&D for the first version.

      If you don't think $10M+ per month covers R&D, marketing and Jeff Bozo's coke deliveries, you're seriously delusional.

      Ars called the Kindle "Amazon's license to print money", and not for no good reason.

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're reading it backwards. Manufacturing cost is half as much as retail cost. They're making a profit on the device. I was kind of surprised by this, I assumed it would work like you say, but apparently not.

  12. Seems Like a Thin Margin by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    I took the point to be that manufacturing costs of 50% of retail are fairly high. I suppose that when you are looking at a razor/razor blade marketing model that works out, but it seems quite a bit higher than other electronic gadgets.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:Seems Like a Thin Margin by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      This is not full manufacturing cost, this is outside material only. They probably barely break even (considering that there is no multi-level distribution chain adding more mark-ups in every step.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    2. Re:Seems Like a Thin Margin by SterlingSylver · · Score: 1

      To give an idea of how things work in a different industry, your local grocery store (in the US) is marking up most of their goods from 35-70%. That's after the manufacturer's markup of a similar number. Which is of course after the farmer/copacker's markup of a similar number.

      Now yeah, your Walmarts are marking up goods 10-20%, but they're also making 50-100 points on the bureaus in the office aisle.

  13. Sanity Check by mpapet · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Where do they advertise to potential consumers?

    Who are their customers?

    By all appearances, they don't distribute it to other retailers. Most wouldn't carry it anyway.

    Since Amazon is the only one carrying it, how does anyone know how many are sold?

    I think the "news" actually is that they are trying to make a tiny bit of profit on a sale. Xboxes and the like are rumored to be break-even with profits coming from game titles sold.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  14. Even pawn shops aren't so selfless by Aphoxema · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "... manufacturing cost is almost half as much as its retail price."

    Wow, they're actually selling it pretty cheap then.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    1. Re:Even pawn shops aren't so selfless by jonesy16 · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking. In many retail businesses (clothing I know for sure), there is almost always a 100% markup over wholesale. Perform the same analysis on a Monster RCA cable and tell me what their margin is ...

    2. Re:Even pawn shops aren't so selfless by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Monster cables probably have a 90% margin, seeing as how a $50 cable costs $5 from monoprice.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  15. Are these "investigations" done by teenagers? by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    There's clearly a lot more to the cost of a product than the raw materials. Look at, oh, any video game or application software.

    1. Re:Are these "investigations" done by teenagers? by XPeter · · Score: 1

      I'm a teenager, you insensitive clod!

      --
      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
  16. Other costs? by mc1138 · · Score: 1

    What about costs that aren't inherent, such as defective units that have to be replaced for free, shipping costs on their end, R and D costs, that get transferred into cost, plus the fact that they have no real competitors to have a price war with. This isn't even including workers that will handle any of the various processes that the kindle touches from inception to shipping it out to consumers.

  17. Seems like a reasonable markup by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    OK, so the components cost X and the total, assembled, transported to user, advertised, with retail markup version costs twice X. Seems totally normal to me. It's not like clothing, where the cost after complete assembly is 1/10th the cost at retail sale.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  18. Sprint? by escay · · Score: 1

    you are getting a lifetime wireless connectivity with Sprint. I don't see this factored into their material cost. amazon (and analysts) have often stated that the cost of connectivity is overlooked when people complain about the Kindle being pricey.

  19. Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Link to the actual article

  20. Everything else goes to Sprint? :) by saikou · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that CDMA network is not free. So, add to price of components one or two years of pre-paid data access. Which is probably cheap, but not free.

  21. So cheap? by insane_membrane · · Score: 1

    Typical markup from manufacturer to retailer is 100%. From retailer to consumer is another 100-400%. At least this is true in the hi-fi stereo arena :)

  22. Rules of Acquisition applied to Kindle 2 by VulpesFoxnik · · Score: 1

    Rule 141:
    Only fools pay retail.

    Rule 142:
    Only fools sell wholesale.

    --
    RES PUBLICA NON DOMINETUR
  23. Really.. by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    when my friend worked for one of the major rental places they sold for over 300% cost and rented for far much more. In my industry we are easily double cost to our resellers whose prices are 150 to 250%. People always underestimate the true costs of running a business. For some reason too many think some things are just free. However it is the business behind the items that set much of the prices. All that time leading up to launch is accounted for as well as maintaining the business and aiming for other hopefully successful launches.

    Now in truly super volume sales, usually renewable, the costs are far tighter but its volume they are pushing.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Really.. by ausekilis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to work in a shop that sold music equipment. The cost to the business would be approximately 1/2 to 1/3 of MSRP, so even a 45% off "sale" would still net the shop some decent profit. Funny part was, there were slower moving items (like guitars/keyboards/drums) that had MSRP around 200% of cost, and faster moving items (like strings, sticks, cables) that had MSRP around 250-300% or higher.

      That's right, for a fast-moving item that cost us $1.50, MSRP would be $8, we'd advertise for $6. The best part? If I knew a customer and they were kind, they'd get them for more like $3. If the customer was a dick and asked for a discount, he'd get it for $5.50, oblivious that the dude in front of him paid half that.

      In the case of the Kindle, Amazon is (presumably) the manufacturer as well as the distributor, so the margins can be different. I couldn't tell you exactly what the cost to actually *make* a guitar might be with respect to the distributor's cost, though we can see they're still in business so they must have another markup somewhere.

    2. Re:Really.. by stewbee · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      I was quite terse in my previous post, since I was just looking at the costs to develop the hardware. There are other costs as well (as others have already pointed out in this post as well in your reply) that are associated in running the business. Someones gotta pay the utility bill for example, so of course you make for that in the mark up of the product that you are selling.

  24. Apparently... by brian0918 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Apparently, the folks at iSuppli subscribe to the socialist notion that the men of ideas are of no importance. Obviously, if you just take all the parts and throw them in a box, they'll magically form a Kindle.

    This reminds me of a story from a WSJ article from 1974, about the nationalization of plants in Chile, quote in Ayn Rand's Philosophy: Who Needs It:

    Among them was Dow Chemical Company, which owned a plastics plant in Chile. Bob G. Caldwell, Dow's director of operations for South America, came with a technical team to inspect the remains of their plant. "'What we found was unbelievable to us,' he recalls, 'The plant was still operable, but in another six months we wouldn't have had a plant at all. They never checked anything.' ....Worse yet, the highly inflammable chemicals handled at the plant were in imminent danger of blowing up. 'Safety went to pot,' Mr. Caldwell says. 'The fire-sprinkler system was disconnected and the valves taken away for some other use outside. Then they were smoking in the most dangerous areas. They told us, "You didn't have any fires while you were here before, so it must not be as dangerous as you said."'"

    1. Re:Apparently... by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      the socialist notion that the men of ideas are of no importanceFirst of all, stop reading Ayn Rand as it's obviously giving you very very strange ideas about socialism. Various implementations of socialism (i.e. highly authoritarian ones), sure - but that's true of

      Here's a fun fact for you:
      Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden are all very socialist countries. High taxes, high level of social security (free school, education, health care etc), and they're all very keen on getting people educated in college (i.e. making men of ideas). They see their future as one that has interlectual companies outperforming regular industry.

      In fact most of Europe would be seen as socialist by US standards. So lets compare university graduates in Europe to those of the US. I found this page while searching for "university graduates" per capita:

      Education and Skills:
      Percentage of Graduates in Science, Math, Computer Science, and Engineering

      Finland and Sweden rank 2nd and 4th on that list, Denmark and Norway are 14th and 15th and the US comes in at number 16 out of 17 countries compared.

      Now, if these four heavily socialist countries are still managing to produce more graduates in these fields (percentage wise from the graduate population) AND they believe that "men of ideas are of no importance", why are they wasting all that money on those educations? Keep in mind, a college degree from a Scandinavian university is probably more expensive (higher taxes), but the state pays the tuition. Some of these countries even give the students money while they're in school (actual payments, not student loans).

      Either they DO belive that "men of ideas are of no importance" but they're not socialist countries ... or you're completely and utterly mistaken about what makes a socialist a socialist.

    2. Re:Apparently... by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Well, aparently being openly socialist means the preview button changed its name to "Submit". Let's try it again with proper formatting:

      the socialist notion that the men of ideas are of no importance

      First of all, stop reading Ayn Rand as it's obviously giving you very very strange ideas about socialism. Various implementations of socialism (i.e. highly authoritarian ones), sure. But not socialism as an idea. No more than being an American makes you a fat, gun toting, inbred redneck who's never been outside the county he was born in, let alone country. It's true for some Americans, but it's not a general thing.

      Here's a fun fact for you:
      Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden are all very socialist countries. High taxes, high level of social security (free school, education, health care etc), and they're all very keen on getting people educated in college (i.e. making men of ideas). They see their future as one that has interlectual companies outperforming regular industry.

      In fact most of Europe would be seen as socialist by US standards. So lets compare university graduates in Europe to those of the US. I found this page while searching for "university graduates" per capita:

      Education and Skills:
      Percentage of Graduates in Science, Math, Computer Science, and Engineering

      Finland and Sweden rank 2nd and 4th on that list, Denmark and Norway are 14th and 15th and the US comes in at number 16 out of 17 countries compared.

      Now, if these four heavily socialist countries are still managing to produce more graduates in these fields (percentage wise from the graduate population) AND they believe that "men of ideas are of no importance", why are they wasting all that money on those educations? Keep in mind, a college degree from a Scandinavian university is probably more expensive (higher taxes), but the state pays the tuition. Some of these countries even give the students money while they're in school (actual payments, not student loans).

      Either they DO belive that "men of ideas are of no importance" but they're not socialist countries ... or you're completely and utterly mistaken about what makes a socialist a socialist.

    3. Re:Apparently... by trickyD1ck · · Score: 0

      "giving you very very strange ideas about socialism" as if 100 million lives lost on the XX century were not enough. with the right version of socialism they'll surey get it right. hold on tight!

    4. Re:Apparently... by GryMor · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I don't think Finland, Sweeden, Denmark and Norway have nationalized all their industries, so, they aren't socialist in the sense that GP was using the term.

      --
      Realities just a bunch of bits.
    5. Re:Apparently... by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      And the United States, a self-confessed democracy over its existence, managed to kill at minimum one out of 50 of its own citizens in a civil war, eradicate a substantial fraction of its native population, forcibly import a substantial number of people for servile labor, imprison a large number of citizens based on coincident heritage of one combatant party during a mid-century war (but ignoring those of coincident heritage of other combatants), and expend a significant amount of post-war energies persecuting those who made the mistake of agreeing with the governing philosophy of a nation we had made an erstwhile ally of that conflict. (For sake of brevity, I shall halt this litany before entering the 1960s, before I have to use phrases like "Ellsberg" or "warrantless wiretaps".)

      One might say that reflection on just these incidents might give one very strange ideas about democracy. Luckily you don't seem the type to suffer from inward analysis, being so busy judging other nations and all.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    6. Re:Apparently... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      First of all, stop reading Ayn Rand as it's obviously giving you very very strange ideas about socialism.

      Ad hominem. Try again.

      Various implementations of socialism (i.e. highly authoritarian ones), sure. But not socialism as an idea.

      The only variation is in the degree to which that fundamental notion is evaded or accepted.

      Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden are all very socialist countries. High taxes, high level of social security (free school, education, health care etc), and they're all very keen on getting people educated in college (i.e. making men of ideas). They see their future as one that has interlectual companies outperforming regular industry.

      Pay lip service to intellectuals is not the same as giving them the freedoms they need to achieve their goals and values. Neither their good intentions (wanting successful nationalized companies) nor their ends (actually having successful nationalized companies) justify the means (nationalization through the violation of individual rights).

      They do believe a man with ideas are important in only one sense - in the sense that they are able to leech off him.

    7. Re:Apparently... by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I could be wrong, but I don't think the US has clapped all of its workers in physical chains and forced them to work for no wages for their decadent overlords, so the US isn't a capitalist country in the sense that ol' Joe Stalin was using the word.

    8. Re:Apparently... by Eil · · Score: 1

      Hi.

      I saw that you posted the same comment in the gearlog article, but I don't have an account there. I have an account here, however, so I'd like to clarify the point upon which all your shouting seems to rest:

      Despite how you'd like to paint them, iSuppli is just a market research firm. They take things apart, document what's inside, and estimate the raw cost of the components. In particular, they made NO judgements about how much it cost Amazon's employees to engineer it, write the software, or market it. It's possible that they didn't even include many manufacturing costs (tooling the machinery, making the plastic moulds, etc). Even BusinessWeek's article was careful to point out that some costs, like royalty fees, were not figured into the research.

      YOU were the one that manufactured the idea of, "hey, these Kindle things are really only worth $185! Somebody's getting ripped off!" Only so you could (try) to tear it down in a fit of anti-socialist rage.

      Also, I'm still trying to figure out what a dilapidated chemical plant has to do with an internet story about an ebook reader.

    9. Re:Apparently... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      Ahh sure, the ever-objective folks at iSuppli certainly have no interest whatsoever in their work, and endeavor to choose it at random out of a hat.

    10. Re:Apparently... by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Pay lip service to intellectuals is not the same as giving them the freedoms they need to achieve their goals and values. Neither their good intentions (wanting successful nationalized companies) nor their ends (actually having successful nationalized companies) justify the means (nationalization through the violation of individual rights).

      They do believe a man with ideas are important in only one sense - in the sense that they are able to leech off him.

      If that's the case, then why does research show that people in those countries have a relative economic mobility equal to or greater than those in the United States? It would seem that the policies in the countries that the grandparent cited are affording their citizens more freedom to achieve their goals and values, if the data is any indication.

    11. Re:Apparently... by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      You're making a broad assumption that a graduate of a state-sponsored university is equivalent to a man of ideas, which isn't necessarily true even among the so-called elite schools. A central idea of socialism is that everyone is entitled to things like college educations, whether they are men of ideas or not. It doesn't surprise me that a socialist country produces more of something it gives away for free. It's meaningless. All it does is make it harder for the true men of ideas to stand out.

      What would surprise me is if the great ideas like the Internet that fueled innovation in recent decades had sprung out of socialist environments. It's not a coincidence that those things happened in the U.S. Even socialistic products like open source software flourish best here.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    12. Re:Apparently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it hilarious that - in order to defend "men of ideas" - you linked to an obviously illegal copy of an essay.

      Although really, the Kindle has no actual similarities to that essay, so I'm going to assume that you're just a bitter old man.

    13. Re:Apparently... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, then why does research show that people in those countries have a relative economic mobility equal to or greater than those in the United States? It would seem that the policies in the countries that the grandparent cited are affording their citizens more freedom to achieve their goals and values, if the data is any indication.

      Have you read Watership Down? Your comment reminds me of the rabbit farm, in which all the rabbits live happily and are well-fed, but occasionally have to give up one of their own to be slaughtered. The situations are equivalent in that the rights of certain individuals are being sacrificed to benefit everyone else. That the majority somehow fares better as a result is no justification for the means of their affluence. This is the sacrifice of the minority to the majority. For people to be truly free means that everyone has that freedom, not simply that the majority do.

    14. Re:Apparently... by Rycross · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about whether it was justified, but the data does seem to indicate your position that social capitalism removes opportunity isn't supported.

      I actually have a question: do you support taxes or tariffs for the purpose of providing the military, police, and courts? If so, how can you justify violating my property rights in order to protect your property? Assuming you have a society that regards things like health care and education as human rights, how can you justify the former and not the latter?

      Honest question. I'd like to hear your point of view.

    15. Re:Apparently... by ihavnoid · · Score: 1

      Although not mentioned on the article, I am damn sure that the guys on iSuppli will be thinking something like 'OMG how can they do business with such a high material cost?'. 50% looks tooooooo high to me, and I am damn sure that they are selling it for a loss.

      Believe me, iSuppli did many, many, and many work something like this before, and their purpose is to understand how those companies operate.

      It's no secret that material cost is only a tiny fraction of the retail price on this kind of high-tech business. Screaming socialism on this kind of article is completely laughable.

    16. Re:Apparently... by neolith · · Score: 1

      And the United States, a self-confessed democracy over its existence, managed to kill at minimum one out of 50 of its own citizens in a civil war, eradicate a substantial fraction of its native population, forcibly import a substantial number of people for servile labor, imprison a large number of citizens based on coincident heritage of one combatant party during a mid-century war (but ignoring those of coincident heritage of other combatants), and expend a significant amount of post-war energies persecuting those who made the mistake of agreeing with the governing philosophy of a nation we had made an erstwhile ally of that conflict.

      Goddamn what a great country! USA!!! USA!!! USA!!!

      --
      Like my comments? Try my podcast: http://www.baldmove.com
    17. Re:Apparently... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Socialism is providing basic services with public money. Communism is government (really community) ownership of property, including means of production (companies).

      Please don't confuse the two.

    18. Re:Apparently... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to say the US system, in which about 80% of the population is sacrificed so that upper management can receive their bonuses, is so much better?

      It is impossible to have any kind of society in which every single member believes that their rights are not somehow violated. That is simple human nature.

    19. Re:Apparently... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      He obviously has something against societies that provide basic means of living to their members. Jealousy seems an obvious motivation.

    20. Re:Apparently... by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      ... or you're completely and utterly mistaken about what makes a socialist a socialist.

      he's an american. *of course* he's completely and utterly mistaken about socialism. americans are brain-washed in school to believe that socialism is some perverse and more evil form of satanism hell bent on raping mom and her apple pies. and that brain-washing has been going on for so long now that it starts even before school as the parents for the last few generations were also brainwashed as children.

      most americans don't even know that their country had a strong and progressive socialist movement up until the 1940s that was responsible for legislating many of the basic rights that they now take for granted.

    21. Re:Apparently... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      I actually have a question: do you support taxes or tariffs for the purpose of providing the military, police, and courts?

      I support moving our current system towards that, however no, I do not support that as an end in itself. Taxes should be voluntary.

      Assuming you have a society that regards things like health care and education as human rights, how can you justify the former and not the latter?

      Those are not valid rights, for they require the violation of valid rights in order to be provided. There is a *need* for education and an *need* for healthcare, but not a *right* to either. The same goes for food, or any other material good.

    22. Re:Apparently... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to say the US system, in which about 80% of the population is sacrificed so that upper management can receive their bonuses, is so much better?

      Which "US system" is that? We haven't had laissez-faire capitalism, although we've come close in the past.

      It is impossible to have any kind of society in which every single member believes that their rights are not somehow violated.

      Bald assertion. What is this based on? If everyone understands the source of individual rights, and likewise understands what those rights are, people may claim their rights are violated (anyone can claim anything, of course), but they wouldn't be able to show it to be true in a court of law.

    23. Re:Apparently... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      I find it hilarious that - in order to defend "men of ideas" - you linked to an obviously illegal copy of an essay.

      Ahh, you're right, my apologies. I'm usually good about that too, but slipped up here. A few months ago I threw out my entire collection of copied CDs/DVDs - at least 300 in total. I'm still working to integrate it into everything I do.

  25. what else is new in the world? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is usually the way of things. Wanna hazard a guess as to how much food costs at your favorite restaurant? I can guarantee your $12 entree didn't cost even half that much for them at the wholesaler. But the gross on that ain't anywhere near the net. If you want to talk about a contemptible outrage, you're talking about BS like components getting marked up 4x at the big box retailers. Yeah, you get the printer for cost and the $2 data cable for $20.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:what else is new in the world? by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      My father was in the restaurant business. The markup was then, and still is today, on average between 400% and 500%. Really.

  26. Who cares one crap about iSuppli? by g0at · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, why does this company keep getting its name into headlines? Who gives a shit what they feel a bunch of components might cost? Come on, shills. This is a do-nothing company that pisses its pants for publicity, and places like the Mac rumors sites and Slashdot lap it up and parrot their squawkings.

    It requires no more than a grade-school education to understand that the price to design, manufature, market, support and service a product is greater than the sum of the wholesale cost of its physical components.

    Enough.

    Take this stupid company with their silly name out back, shoot it, and don't mention it again.

    1. Re:Who cares one crap about iSuppli? by MarkLR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's somewhat useful in that you can say "suppose the screen was 1/2 the current price?" and get an estimate on what that could do to the retail price of the whole unit.

      It also tells people don't expect an $100 or even $200 unit any without a change in the pricing model.

  27. Surprised compared to razors/razor blade model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would think like the game console model, you would cheaply sell the razor, knowing you were going to make your money on the sale of razor blades.

    Based on their numbers and this model, Kindle should be selling for $100 or less. I can't believe they are selling it for 100% markup. I guess suckers are born twice a minute on Kindle day.

  28. well that's me gobsmacked by BlindRobin · · Score: 1

    Alert, trendy techflash with marginal utility and lots of fashion statement has excessive mark-up because the makers know tonnes of punters with more cash than will fork over. Stuff that matters... right

    1. Re:well that's me gobsmacked by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      excessive mark-up

      You should try designing, manufacturing, marketing, selling to individuals through a retail web presence, supporting, and perpetually providing the bandwidth for something sometime, and then rethink your term "excessive."

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  29. Costs not covered by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Okay, so you have the raw material costs. What about:

    * Maintenance (patches, upgrades, etc.)
    * salaries - assembly, support, marketing, sales, quality assurance, and so forth
    * Surplus for future R&D
    * Surplus for warranty service
    * Patent royalties (software patents are evil)
    * affiliates' tiny slice of the pie

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  30. And your issue with the price is? by hkb · · Score: 1

    Welcome to R&D-Ain't-Free-Istan, where R&D ain't free and companies need to recup their costs. Wait a while, the price will drop.

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
  31. Cheap printers, expensive ink business model by sehlat · · Score: 1

    Or to use an older metaphor, the razor is cheap, but the blades, aaah, the blades...

    Amazon is clearly trying to sell the kindle for breakeven or lose-a-little and then more than make up any losses with ancillary sales of "kindle edition" ebooks. FYI, this strategy also seems to have worked pretty well for an obscure company, but I forget the name. It was Pear or Orange, or some kind of fruit, anyway.

    1. Re:Cheap printers, expensive ink business model by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Nope; Apple went the other way with the iPod etc. They're not making much money on iTunes sales, but it makes people want to buy more iPods and iPhones, which is where they make their money. Since these things aren't indestructible, and Apple keeps coming out with improvements, they've got a nice revenue stream.

      Either business model can work nicely, as Steve Jobs and any razor blade manufacturer will tell you. You do have to have something to profit on, which point some people seem to miss.

      However, Amazon may be making money on the Kindles, given that they control the distribution chain completely. Nintendo made money on each Wii sold. In both cases, I bet the big money is in the aftermarket (eBooks and games).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    2. Re:Cheap printers, expensive ink business model by sehlat · · Score: 1

      I sit corrected. Thank you.

      I would note, though, that it's likely to work better if you sell the hardware cheaply, because while Amazon charges about $10/ebook, each additional copy of the book costs them little more than pennies, and so provides a much better profit margin per sale.

    3. Re:Cheap printers, expensive ink business model by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      hile Amazon charges about $10/ebook, each additional copy of the book costs them little more than pennies
      Do you have a source for that claim?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  32. Don't Forget Actual Market Forces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suppliers sell products for as much as they can get. Even if the cost to bring the product to market is less than 0.01% (drug cartels), or more than 100% (sell stock at a loss). For whatever reason you may think justifies actual markup, the real reason is that they *can* charge that much.

  33. Re:xkcd by mlheur · · Score: 1

    The third frame of that comic should read ~on't Pani~

  34. meaning they have enough margin for direct sales by swschrad · · Score: 1

    but no retail sales. ideally at every level of the distribution chain, you would like to get at least 50% to be able to maintain and grow the business.

    if you're not keeping your margin, you are cutting either the future out, or starving the present.

    so the Kindle is good ROI and that's why Amazon likes it and is lining up all the product they can to read with it.

    if you sell a $30,000 product for $5000 less than the cost of making it, you are GM. this is not supposed to be a good thing.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  35. get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you didnt account for the other costs, legal, advertising, dev, etc. but even without these costs I would have to say so what? its a f'king free market u dont like it go move to china biatch

  36. Loss leader by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    It's a loss-leader. They sell it for a minimal (or zero) profit (don't forget manufacturing, R&D, support, etc.) and make money on the books they sell for it. They probably also make money on the publicity, when people realize how trendy Amazon are and buy even more books.

    There is an element of "halo product" about Kindle as well. It generates interest and hype far beyond what just selling a little box with a screen will create.

    Neither of these are new concepts.

    ...laura

  37. how much??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much do they pay to license the digital restrictions management features? Those DRM-pushers all have a hidden agenda, and I'm sure they don't work for free.

  38. Whispernet by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Some of the remaining price certainly has to go to pay for the Whispernet connection. Remember that there is a significant amount of free stuff you can d/l to your Kindle.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  39. Razors and blades by woboyle · · Score: 1

    This is not a new business model. Gillette pretty much wrote the book on the model - sell the razor at cost, and reap the profits in the blades forever after. If you buy a Kindle, guess where you are going to purchase your content? It sure isn't going to be B&N or Borders!

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  40. Guys... it's JUST A D**N parts list!!! by Mnemennth · · Score: 1
    Good lord, what the frakk are you nitwits on about?

    iSuppli's ENTIRE mandate is to dissect and catalog the COMPONENT PARTS VALUE of a completed product; nowhere in their breakdown do they assess development cost, or it's value as a product, or the "worthiness" of that relative value intrinsic in its parts against the purchase cost of the product.

    They get paid by people who buy their breakdowns for business purposes; whether it be to figure a way to make the product less expensively, or to get an idea how much it might cost to manufacture a similar product, or just for plain press-related intent.

    In truth, I'm surprised to see that it costs that much on a parts-only basis; typically tech products range in the 5%-25% range of cost to price ratio depending on the product's intended market; spending half the sale price on manufacturing such a product generally indicates you're getting a LOT of technology for your dollar.

    Of course in this case much of that tech revolves around making it easy for you to spend a lot MORE money on books that have a fixed one-time production cost; but hey - that's Amazon's business model. I simply cannot make myself pay HARDCOVER price for an e-Version of a book that has been released on paperback for over a year; there's a reason they still have competition.

    Don't be surprised when the geeks start hacking them; I'm sure someone is already eyeing that all day battery life and built-in Wireless Connection on someone else's account with interest...

    mnem *~~~Left blinker guy on the Information Superhighway~~~*

    1. Re:Guys... it's JUST A D**N parts list!!! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      What I wonder is how exactly they value the parts. I was under the impression that for large quantity prices were generally negotiated on a case by case basis.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  41. If you find this a wopping rip off email IR by jwkckid1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well here comes the $$ factor... Nearly 50% profit! Gee seems a bit greedy to me, and that's without the service access fees. I wonder, does this come with fries, or maybe a few free book choices at least? >:) Yes we can! >:) Maybe their pricing guru's were hired from recently laid off Wall Street traders/execs explains this whopping rip off... Or maybe the price reflects the Amazon executive bonus program? Whichever no sale here. I am not that big of a sucker...

    --
    Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
  42. This should be no surprise by DrXym · · Score: 1
    The average PDA and I daresay some phones have more computing power than a Kindle. I very much doubt the display adds much to the cost of the device.

    Its price might be forgivable if it weren't DRM'd up the wazoo, wasn't tied to a single provider and could display common non-DRM'd book formats. But it doesn't. Amazon are trying to have their cake and eat it too. The Sony Reader perfect either but even that's cheaper than a Kindle and has fairly reasonable format support too.

  43. What about everything else needed to produce them? by Tharsman · · Score: 1

    How much did they invest in R&D?

    Infrastructure setup?

    How much does it cost them to pay everyone involved in the process of producing one?

    You can say how much each part costs but all these other factors can't be determined by anyone that is not involved in the process. The production costs of any given product is NOT equal to the summed value of the parts. There are a lot of other involved costs a simple dissection wont reveal.

  44. And? by singingjim1 · · Score: 0
    I worked at Motorola during the pager heyday and we sold the 4 line text pager (Affectionately called The Brick) for over $200 and it cost us $60 to make at it's height of production. It's called a free market economy. Supply and demand and all that stuff. Whatever the market will bear, etc.

    Next story.

  45. JT Black would say "duh" by skathe · · Score: 1

    Manufacturing costs, including parts and materials, direct labor, indirect labor, plant/equipment depreciation, and energy are ALWAYS approximately half of the retail cost, on average. The most common model estimates it to be 40% of the retail price. The other half comes from Engineering costs (15%), R&D (5%), Administration, Sales and Marketing (25%) and an assumed built-in profit margin of 15%. Of course, this varies by industry (die-casting has a razor thin profit margin, only about 2%).

  46. What about free sprint wireless? by heyimdan · · Score: 1

    The tear-down talks about the wireless data module from Novatel Wireless costing $39.50. However, I didn't see it mentioning anywhere the cost Amazon.com has to pay Sprint in order to let each device have free wireless. I doubt Sprint is offering the service for free.