Slashdot Mirror


H1N1 Appears To Be Transmittable From Human To Pig

mpetch writes "In an interesting twist, it appears that H1N1 influenza can be transmitted from humans to swine. Apparently a Canadian pig farmer vacationed in Mexico, returned to Canada and infected about 10% of the swine on an Alberta farm. The swine subsequently developed flu symptoms."

132 comments

  1. Obligatory by schmidt349 · · Score: 5, Funny

    On top of everything else, now we have to worry about our police being knocked out by influenza!

    Great.

    1. Re:Obligatory by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 3, Informative

      From WHO: "There is no indication of virus adaptation through transfer from human to pigs at this time."
      http://www.who.int/csr/don/2009_05_03a/en/index.html

      US exports $5 billion+ pork each year. Mexico imports most of its pork from US/Canada. Other countries such as China know that the swine flu was much more likely to have incubated in the massive pig farms of US and Canada before transferring to humans, rather than the other way round as so called "news" like this try to make us believe.

      "China was also selective, banning only pork from Texas, California and Kansas, while the Philippines, South Korea, Thailand, Kazakhstan, Serbia, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates and Ecuador said theyâ(TM)re stopping all U.S. pork imports, according to Nefeterius Akeli McPherson of the U.S. trade representativeâ(TM)s office."
      China ban US pork

    2. Re:Obligatory by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even if your theory about the origin of this form of the virus is correct, you cannot get the flu from eating pork. These bans are simply sowing more ignorance.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:Obligatory by moonbender · · Score: 3, Funny

      Right, you need to look at the big pigture when considering these things.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This ban is not entirely useless. If you can transmit h1n1 in both directions (so swine to human and human to swine), then there are two species that can serve as pathways between two countries. Someone can be in the US, contract h1n1 from either swine or a human, then go to say china and infect more humans (or also infect pigs who then infect humans, but I'm assuming one is in more intimate contact with humans then pigs, generally).

      Another pathway is to have someone in the US catch h1n1 and that person happens to be a farmer. (This is what happened in Canada.) Then, say, China imports infected pigs (live ones) from the US. These pigs infect farmers who infect other humans and so on.

      So banning the importation of live swine stocks from affected areas makes sense. I agree with you that banning the import of dead meat makes little sense.

    5. Re:Obligatory by slack_prad · · Score: 1

      Only if it's cooked > 70 C. Would you take the risk and die? Think about an entire nation.

      What if parts of the dead animal meat did not reach 70 C when cooked?

      Sowing ignorance. Yeah.

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
    6. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case I would be more worried about trichinosis than the swine flu.

    7. Re:Obligatory by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

      Oh man! Someone mod that as +1 Funny!

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    8. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're really hamming it up...

    9. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The flu is a lung infection. I don't know anyone who eats raw lung.

  2. We need a new name, now by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 5, Funny

    9 out of 10 pigs suggest calling it "Human Flu."

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:We need a new name, now by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 2, Funny

      Poor young pig... Not only did he give her the human flu, the number he left was to some dry-cleaner's place. And I think they forgot to use protection. ;(

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    2. Re:We need a new name, now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but I'm not afraid of the flu. I think we should name it what Fox News suggested. The Black Plague 2.

    3. Re:We need a new name, now by causality · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but I'm not afraid of the flu. I think we should name it what Fox News suggested. The Black Plague 2.

      Yeah I love the way the major news networks hype this up. "This is what we want you to be afraid of today!" Anyone remember hoof-and-mouth disease? Mad cow? How about SARS? Bird flu? There's probably a few I'm forgetting. All terrible horrible epidemic plagues that were going to kill us all, or so you'd think from listening to the news. You want a population that's easy to control, you first have to make them afraid of something. Of course you could also choose to think that all of these things are accidents or coincidences...

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    4. Re:We need a new name, now by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, revenge is ours! Take that, swine!

      --
      I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
    5. Re:We need a new name, now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid of large news organizations. Where to do I turn so I can indulge in my fears?

    6. Re:We need a new name, now by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the closing line of Animal Farm, by Orwell:

      The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    7. Re:We need a new name, now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about human-swine flu?

    8. Re:We need a new name, now by murph · · Score: 5, Funny

      hamthrax

      --
      I don't care about your karma, I don't care about what's hip. --Weird Al
    9. Re:We need a new name, now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      portektion

    10. Re:We need a new name, now by plover · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid of large news organizations. Where to do I turn so I can indulge in my fears?

      Faux News, of course, aka the Fox Noise Channel. You'll get no better source of fear anywhere.

      --
      John
    11. Re:We need a new name, now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fine line is the point at which freedoms are given up in order to appease collective fears. But one can take a lot of actions that might be construed as either fearful or proactive, depending on who you talk to. Upon hearing of a potentially deadly virus (that may or may not spread quickly), is it best to:

      1. sit idle and do absolutely nothing out of the ordinary

      2. take some basic precaution, such as increasing intake of Vitamin D (which incidentally is extremely low in modern urban society, due to lack of sunlight exposure), making sure to wash your hands before eating or touching yourself, and perhaps stocking up on a bit more non-perishable food than usual

      3. wear masks everywhere you go (if you even dare leave the house), tune in to the news channel every hour, and hope/demand/pray that the fed or state governements do something about the situation

  3. Surprised? by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If H1N1 is able to infect humans... and it's able to infect swine... and it's transferable from swine to humans... why wouldn't it be transferable from human to swine? How is this news?

    1. Re:Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's news because it hasn't been seen in swine until now!

    2. Re:Surprised? by princessproton · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My understanding was that there was some amount of genetic reassortment that allowed the swine flu to be infectious to humans, and to transmit human to human. This altered virus is then somewhat different than the swine flu that typically infects swine, so I think that (in addition to not previously being documented) it is seen as interesting that the virus would jump back to the swine population after mutation. Of course, I may be completely wrong about this, and I encourage anyone better versed in virology to correct me.

      --
      I'm always positive; it's my nature.
    3. Re:Surprised? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apparently, it's news in the sense that we have now learned that Canadians kiss pigs.

    4. Re:Surprised? by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is any of this news?

      The normal, unswinely Influenza killed 190,000 people this year, just as every year and nobody gives a shit.

      The Swine one killed 1.

    5. Re:Surprised? by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Current reports indicate that this strain of H1N1 influenza contains genetic material from swine, avian, and human forms of the disease. That's probably why it can spread easily from humans to pigs; normally, a virus does not cross species unless there is frequent or prolonged close contact between the two, because making the leap depends on genetic mutation. In this case, the virus is already adapted to both hosts.

      To further clarify, the name "H1N1" refers only to a particular configuration of two proteins on the surface of the virus (H is hemagglutinin and N is neuraminidase). The configuration of these proteins determines how the immune system will react to a given strain of influenza (i.e. which antibodies will be able to recognize and attack it), which is the most useful information to have when it comes to treating the disease, but there are other factors that determine a given strain's properties.

      So the news here is not that H1N1 flu can jump from humans to pigs -- it can't, not necessarily -- the news is that this variety appears to be able to. And it's not that we didn't know this could be possible -- we've seen this kind of thing countless times, and in fact it's believed that all forms of influenza ultimately come from birds -- it's just that calling it "H1N1 flu" doesn't give us enough information to make those kinds of predictions about its virulence.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    6. Re:Surprised? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > If H1N1 is able to infect humans... and it's able to infect swine... and it's
      > transferable from swine to humans... why wouldn't it be transferable from human to
      > swine? How is this news?

      a) It was not known for sure before this that it could infect swine (and be transferred among them).

      b) It has never been known to be transmitted from swine to humans.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    7. Re:Surprised? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Come on, modders! Recognize satire when you see it. Lighten up.

    8. Re:Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it hasn't been seen in swine until now!

      And neither was the farmer, until someone filmed him performing Animal Husbandry!

    9. Re:Surprised? by CheShACat · · Score: 1

      > b) It has never been known to be transmitted from swine to humans.
      Actually, shortly after this article was printed, there was a case in Soviet Russia where...

    10. Re:Surprised? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Ha, ain't nuthing compared to what folks in Wyoming do with sheep. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  4. Noooooooo!! by zmollusc · · Score: 3, Funny

    OMG this will threaten stability and availability of teh bacons!

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    1. Re:Noooooooo!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My reaction as well. Won't somebody think of the bacon?!

    2. Re:Noooooooo!! by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      I often think of the bacon. Mmmmmm, bacon.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    3. Re:Noooooooo!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fear for my bacons. Lets enlist the wisest swine surgeons to save our bacons.

    4. Re:Noooooooo!! by sharpeye00 · · Score: 1

      Nah, we will still have turkey, Canadian, and Kevin Bacon to pick from. ;)

  5. pig travel by BigMike · · Score: 1

    Maybe that's why you don't see pigs on planes ...

    1. Re:pig travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least ones that are motherfuckers

    2. Re:pig travel by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Except when they need bailout money.

      --
      NO SIG
  6. Send him to washington DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And have him infect all the swine misleading our country. I'm tired of hearing about swine flu (the swine running this country are sick but not of the flu) or 11 Trillion dollars being given to other swine.

  7. What was he doing with those pigs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be cold and lonely in Alberta this time of year....

  8. is this how it started? by wjh31 · · Score: 1

    is there any chance that this is how it started, a sick mexican passed it on to his/her pigs, then we assumed it was some horrible new thing that had managed the pig-human jump? I am quite possibly talking out my arse since i am not a viroligist or whatever the appropriate field would be

    1. Re:is this how it started? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Influenza viruses go back and forth between humans, pigs, and birds, and they also mutate regularly. So, this didn't really "start" anywhere, it's a normal part of how the influenza virus lives.

    2. Re:is this how it started? by RDW · · Score: 1

      The reason it's thought to be swine influenza is that when its genome was examined and compared with other flu genomes:

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/FLU/SwineFlu.html

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/FLU/Database/select.cgi

      the various segments were most closely related to sequences previously (and recently) detected in pig viruses, though the particular strain had not been found before in any animal:

      http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/swineflu/biofacts/swinefluoverview.html

      It's actually quite possible, however, that pigs originally picked up a distant ancestor of the current strain from humans. Pig flu was first described in 1918, coinciding with the last human H1N1 pandemic, and when the virus was isolated from pigs in the 1930s, it was also found to have the H1N1 serotype.

  9. Well... you know what they say... by thomasdz · · Score: 5, Funny

    They always said there was no way that this could happen. They said that pigs would fly before this happened.
    Well... Swine Flew

    Thanks...I'll be here all week

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    1. Re:Well... you know what they say... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Thanks to Pink Floyd pigs flew over the English channel in 1976 already.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  10. finally! :) by meow27 · · Score: 1

    take that you swines! its payback time >:)

  11. Wikipedia page by Statecraftsman · · Score: 1

    Just when I thought the chart format was stabilizing we need 3 more columns!

  12. Name by AlastairLynn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I *still* think that Bacon Fever is a superior name. Just sayin'.

  13. Take THAT! by oldhack · · Score: 4, Funny

    You oinky vermins! You oinky, wonderous animal, you, delicious... ZOMG, what have we done?!

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  14. You hear that, George Orwell? by wooden+pickle · · Score: 1

    Time for a sequel to Animal Farm. At some point in the story, the paranoid pigs will order a culling of all humans.

  15. i hope they don't cull us by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    i hope they don't cull us to save the pig population.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:i hope they don't cull us by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way. If you survive the cull bacon prices will be waaayyyyy down. And ham will be cheep enough for every meal.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    2. Re:i hope they don't cull us by tftp · · Score: 1

      If you survive the cull bacon prices will be waaayyyyy down

      Yes, as long as bacon comes from a long pig ...

  16. Flamebait really mods? Flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who what where when why would someone mod the parent comment as flamebait? It's funny. It's a pun.

  17. Parmageddon or Aporkalypse by rja4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best I've heard so far is Parmageddon. Aporkalypse isn't too bad either.

    1. Re:Parmageddon or Aporkalypse by Kandenshi · · Score: 3, Funny

      My vote goes to hamthrax.

      Just wait until you get that pink powder through the mail...

    2. Re:Parmageddon or Aporkalypse by zx-15 · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Parmageddon or Aporkalypse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a real hamdemic, a snoutbreak of epig proporktions..

    4. Re:Parmageddon or Aporkalypse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hamageddon

    5. Re:Parmageddon or Aporkalypse by ULTRAJOE · · Score: 1

      don't hog all the good jokes, or the thread will get boaring

  18. This is what you want to see. by westlake · · Score: 1

    I don't know why anyone would find this at all surprising.

    The pigs are in confinement. The farmer has daily contact. It's an airborne disease.

    I'd be far more worried if the swine hadn't been infected.

    That implies a mutation. That the disease has taken root in the human population.

    1. Re:This is what you want to see. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I'd be far more worried if the swine hadn't been infected.

      While it is not too surprising that it can infect swine, it also would not have been too surprising if it couldn't. It's a human inluenza.

      > That implies a mutation.

      Flu mutates all the time.

      > That the disease has taken root in the human population.

      Flu took root in the human population a long, long, long time ago.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  19. And I thought... by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 3, Funny

    our politicians were immune.

  20. in soviet russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish it happend in russia, that would have matched :(

  21. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    (11)Avoid touching your genitals in an improper way. Conduct regular self-tests for vision loss.

  22. That's a lot of pig kissing by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 1

    Just saying.

  23. propagation of influenza by viralMeme · · Score: 2, Informative

    It appears to be different strains of flu virus crossing species and undergoing genetic reassortment. Where their is no direct infection route between species 'an intermediate host may be needed for genetic reassortment of human and avian viruses. Pigs are considered a logical candidate for this role because they can be infected by either avian or human viruses'.

    As to how it jumps species in the first place, one way is to drink raw avian blood as in Tit Canh. Then infect some tourist who gets on a plane and who coughs infected droplets into air that is recycled for a number of hours.

    1. Re:propagation of influenza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [quote]... raw avian blood as in Tit Canh [ehow.com]. Then infect ...[/quote]

      Finally... after some time, someone refered to breasts (tits) on slashdot

  24. pity by boxlight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    why do i feel more sorry for the pigs who catch it than the people?

    1. Re:pity by oldhack · · Score: 1

      cuz we don't normally eat people.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because pigs tastes better.

    3. Re:pity by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      cuz we don't normally eat people.

      speak for yourself. cannibalism is part of my zombie plan. i could explain but it would require lots of maps and graphs...

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    4. Re:pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly because they are doomed creatures that were bred in unnatural environments and destined to be painfully killed before their natural lifespan?

  25. Re:Flamebait really mods? Flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god for meta-moderation.

  26. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    (8)Enemas, enemas, enemas, enemas, enemas, enemas, enemas !!!!

    (9)Use soap and hand cleaners containing natural, organic tea tree oil. A powerful antibacterial without the chemicals. Kills viruses including swine flu, HIV, Avian Flu, Bubonic plague and dummies.

    (10)Feces. Urine is great (drink it!!) but feces are pure concentrated nutrition logs. Deep enema then pick out the pieces.

    (12)Avoid anything thought to be dairy but eat ice cream. I don't think it's dairy.

    (13)Eat lots of Pringles. I don't know if they're any good for you but they now come 100 to the can. It's just good fiscal sense.

    (14)Never clean your home and throw old newspapers coated in cat pee everywhere. The natural growth will naturally sanitize everything in the home naturally. Breathe deep, the odor is thrice as good as VapoRub.

    (15)Did I mention enemas? Give yourself enemas two at a time. Once to clean out the toxins from your body then another time to clean the toxins from the first enema. In fact, if you can, just shove a garden hose up your butt and turn on the water FULL BLAST! Don't take it out, ever, unless you want to die within 100 years or so.

  27. not surprising by ifeelswine · · Score: 1

    Pigs are unusual as they can be infected with influenza strains that usually infect three different species: pigs, birds and humans. pigs are like influenza adapters.

  28. Don't fuck pigs ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might give them the flu.

    1. Re:Don't fuck pigs ! by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Nah i think your thinking of swine syphilis, again!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    2. Re:Don't fuck pigs ! by g0at · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Nah i think your thinking of swine syphilis, again!"

      I think "your" thinking of "you're", again.

      -b

  29. fakin farmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet he was careless enough not wear mask when visited his swines. Ignorant pig.

  30. Get even by Smivs · · Score: 1

    Sneeze on a pig

  31. Serious answer to your question by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The H1N1 strain of type A influenza is the strain associated with the global influenza pandemic of 1918. In that year, not 190,000 but tens of millions of people died.

    Normally, the people who die from influenza are the very young or the very old. The shocking characteristic of the 1918 variety was that a great many of the people who succumbed to the disease were young and fit. They went from being healthy and happy to being dead in an alarmingly short period. Immunology had not advanced far enough at that time to for doctors to understand why this was happening, but today it is believed to have been the result of a phenomenon known as cytokine storm, which is a severe autoimmune reaction. In other words, the patients died because they were so fit and had healthy -- their immune systems, reacting to the sudden threat, went nuts and attacked their own bodies.

    Modern medicine could reduce the body count of such a flu dramatically, but if such a strain appeared again it would still be catastrophic. Treating viruses is still very difficult. There is still no cure for the common cold -- and, under normal circumstances, most people who get the flu just sit it out. Providing medicine for every patient in a true pandemic would be very costly and it's likely that there simply wouldn't be enough for everybody. It is also difficult to treat an autoimmune reaction in a patient that is already known to be suffering from a serious infection -- suppress the immune system and the virus wins. So don't assume that it would be easy to keep a new pandemic under control just because it's almost a century later.

    So the reason for all the hubbub is clear. Scientists want to be the Paul Reveres of a future pandemic: The British are coming, they're not already here. So to arms now -- not when they're in our homes. Governments can be very slow-moving when confronted with unforeseen things and they often need this kind of uproar from the medical community before prevention protocols can kick in.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Serious answer to your question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H1N1 strain of type A influenza is the strain associated with the global influenza pandemic of 1918.

      No, this strain of Influenza A is not associated with the 1918 pandemic.

      As others have pointed out, the H and N designations refer to the specific variants of two specific proteins that are exposed on the virus's surface. As such, they determine how the body's immune system will react to the whole virus itself.

      The proteins and genes which determine how virulent and how deadly the strain of virus is are the ones inside the virus. The strain of virus in the news these days does not contain the gene believed to have made the 1918 so deadly.

    2. Re:Serious answer to your question by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, the H and N designations refer to the specific variants of two specific proteins that are exposed on the virus's surface.

      Actually, it was I who pointed that out.

      The strain of virus in the news these days does not contain the gene believed to have made the 1918 so deadly.

      I hadn't read that scientists knew which gene(s) were responsible. As far my understanding, any knowledge we have about that strain is very limited, since virtually all known patients are dead. It is true, however, that the 1918 strain was also a variant of H1N1.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:Serious answer to your question by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There have been a couple of breaks in that area. IIRC, there were some preserved tissue samples, and about two years ago, they dug up someone who was buried in permafrost who died from it, so they have a pretty good idea what the 1918 flu looked like at this point. They also tested it on macaque monkeys and got a cytokine storm. (Source: BBC) Also, a few months ago, they took some antibodies from still-living survivors and injected the antibodies into mice. Scientists were surprised to find that the antibodies were still effective even after nearly a century. (Source: bio-medicine.org) The scientist described them as some of the most potent antibodies ever isolated.

      So yeah, they have a pretty good idea what the 1918 flu was, and the CDC says that this strain doesn't have the genes that made the 1918 strain particularly potent, at least for now. There's always a risk that it could acquire that gene from people or animals infected with H5N1, as that's presumably still running around somewhere, but I'd imagine the odds of that are about the same as the odds of the seasonal flu doing so. In short, this is probably a Shakespearean pandemic---full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. That said, I sure would like to know why there were so many fatalities in Mexico (and among young, presumably healthy adults at that). That's more than just a little disconcerting.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  32. Fortunately,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The pigs are fully covered under Canada's national health care, and are receiving medical attention at a Calgary hospital. Attorneys for the patients would not comment on their plans for a possible lawsuit against the farmer. Provincial authorities also remained tight-lipped over reports of bringing possible charges of bio-terrorism. "When you have an attack that leaves over 200 victims in it's wake, most of them unable to speak for themselves, then we've got a responsibility to act", said one official who wished to remain anonymous.

    Stay tuned to CBC News for further updates on this developing situation.

  33. Uh... by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

    The first thing that came to mind when reading this article was a resounding "No Shit."

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    1. Re:Uh... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And that reaction is why it should not be called swine flu.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read these two articles.
      http://cryptogon.com/?p=8350
      http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/12840743 (use the print view)
      If you don't want to read them, the keyword is 'Smithfield Foods'.

      No shit indeed!

  34. That's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Absolute last time I bang a pig.

  35. What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a vocal minority, i'm offended by the name H1N1 because it looks like it's pronounced hynie (the word for a little girl's private parts).

    Just thought i'd jump on the bandwagon :)

    1. Re:What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hynie (the word for a little girl's private parts).

      You perverted, idiotic pædophile. If that's too harsh, substitute the word 'uninformed.'

      [NSFW]
      That isn't what the word means. Hindquarter is a very relevant term.
      [/NSFW]

      Please, get psychiatric help before another young girl turns up missing.

  36. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by theNetImp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    (16) Bite my shiny metal ass.

  37. Re:Serious Matter: Close the Border with Mexico by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    But, but... I hate both Western and Country!

  38. I can feel it coming into my lungs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Baconnaise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have to go with my theory that the increase of publicity that John Stewart gives Baconnaise has a direct correlation with the increase of the Swine Flu.

  40. G'dang our VP is a moron. by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Informative

    As to how it jumps species in the first place, one way is to drink raw avian blood as in Tit Canh [ehow.com]. Then infect some tourist who gets on a plane and who coughs infected droplets into air that is recycled for a number of hours.

    Ok, we need to put a stop to this myth like thirty years ago.

    THE AIR ON PLANES ISN'T RECYCLED.

    Bottled oxygen and CO2 scrubbers are heavy and expensive, and completely unnecessary.* The plane is surrounded by a breathing medium that is perfectly adequate in every way except temperature and density. A problem which is solved by the same step: Compressed air is diverted from the engines before the fuel is mixed in. The compression is mostly adiabatic, so that raises the temperature, too.

    *A small amount of bottled oxygen is carried. But nowhere near enough for a whole trip. Just enough to descend to a breathable altitude and maybe land.

    The air cycles out pretty quickly, too. Since there are a lot of fat people on board, you need to handle more than one cubic foot per person per minute.

    And it leaks out through all the seams, not just the control valves. There's a good chance most of the air you exhale exits the plane mere inches from your face.

    And the air from the overhead blower is directly off the engine tap. It's 100% fresh outside air. If you're worried about mixing, just turn that sucker on and point it at your nose. (but wear a wet rag over your nose so you don't dry out.)

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  41. Canadian Bacon. by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

    So if it mutates and crosses back to humans should we call it the Canadian Bacon Flu ?

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  42. Oblig. Simpsons... by G-Man · · Score: 1
    Upon finding out Lisa is going vegetarian-

    Homer: Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute. Lisa honey, are you saying you're *never* going to eat any animal again? What about bacon?
    Lisa: No.
    Homer: Ham?
    Lisa: No.
    Homer: Pork chops?
    Lisa: Dad! Those all come from the same animal!
    Homer: Yeah, right Lisa. A wonderful, *magical* animal!

  43. 10% more attractive, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but the other 90% just weren't purty enough...

  44. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Complete and utter crap. The AC posted the same garbage in another thread. I'll repost my comments on the subject.

    Most of what you are saying is flat out wrong.... In the same (very bizarre) order as the parent:

    0. The presence of mercury in vaccines is a red herring. We're talking about 62.5 micrograms per dose. You get that much mercury from eating a typical portion of tuna. An average adult gets nearly that much every week from dental fillings alone. This theory for the cause of autism seems pretty implausible. Further, these days, vaccines intended for children are available in a thimerosal-free variant specifically for this purpose, making this argument against vaccines utterly moot.

    7. This is a clear case of correlation being confused with causation.... A pH level of 7.4 is considered normal in humans. So basically you are saying that most humans cannot get viruses or cancer. This is clearly not correct.... The normal range is 7.35 to 7.45. If you are outside that range, it is likely indicative of illness. Bringing your pH into that range doesn't kill viruses. Killing viruses brings it into that range.

    1. That is just freaking disgusting.

    2. Avoiding dairy is unnecessary unless you are lactose intolerant. I can certainly understand trying to avoid BGH, but there are BGH-free dairies that you can get your milk from. And in the grand scheme of things, it's really not that big a risk.

    3. No thoughts about the safety of drinking carbonated beverages (at least as far as the CO2 is concerned). I would note that fibromyalgia, as far as I can tell, is similar to dementia in that it is basically a catch-all diagnosis that means "We don't know what's wrong." Thus attributing it to any single cause seems dubious to me, but....

    4. Bleaching flour does reduce the health benefits, but not all white flour is bleached. Ultragrain(R), for example, is a white flour that is not bleached.

    Salt (at least salt that is safe for human consumption) is naturally clearish-white, including the sea salt you promote. Be afraid of any salt that is not white. As far as health goes, you should to be really careful using sea salt to ensure that you get enough iodine. It is not recommended as a substitute for table salt unless you either consume lots of citrus fruit or just enjoy goiter. :-)

    White sugar is just brown sugar with the molasses separated out. I'm not convinced that avoiding white sugar is a very good idea. AFAICT, the alternatives are all much worse for you. The things you need to avoid are high fructose corn syrup and any sugar substitutes (not just aspartane). Artificial sweeteners cause the human body to crave the calories that it is expecting, and when those calories don't follow, this causes you to consume more food than you otherwise would. This is why studies have shown diet drinks tend to cause weight gain in the long term, not weight loss. HFCS does the same thing, just to a lesser degree. You're much better off with cane sugar.

    5. I think my comments on #4 mostly covered this. Avoiding citric acid probably isn't necessary. It is relatively harmless. Avoiding other preservatives, though, yes. In particular, avoid sodium benzoate. When combined with citric acid, it releases benzene, which is really nasty stuff.

    6. I assume you mean oxalic acid. If so, you should not increase your consumption of those foods---at least not without cooking them to destroy the oxalic acid. In the long term, excessive consumption of oxalic acid can cause a number of nutritional deficiencies including osteoporosis.

    I also assume you mean nitrilosides, e.g. amygdalin. I would caution again that excessive consumption of these substances (particularly in the form of oral supplements) is toxic. Specifically, it releases cyanide when ingested....

    Also, the whole locavore thing has some advantages in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but it really isn't doing your body any favors health-wise. There are lots of

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  45. Re:Serious Matter: Close the Border with Mexico by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    The parent post does seem to be a troll, and I don't agree at all with the conclusion---halting trade is absolutely backwards---but ironically there is a kernel of truth in there. The health conditions in Mexico did play a significant role in creating this mess, and we have only ourselves to blame for that.

    The health of the poorest, most third-world country affects the health of everyone in the world. This is why we should have more trade with these countries and do everything we can to bring up the standards of living among the poor, homeless, etc. to tolerable levels. Allowing people to live in unsanitary conditions, allowing people to remain destitute, etc. is the best possible way to guarantee these sorts of outbreaks in the future. At least in the long run, our best hope of survival is in opening the borders more, not less. NAFTA was a start, but it really isn't enough.

    We as a society have to learn that our planet is not a bunch of countries. No man is an island. We are all connected in a giant worldwide ecosystem, and what happens to the poorest and the lowliest among us happens in part to all of us. The closed nature of the U.S./Mexico border is a significant cause of this crisis, not a solution, and instead of paranoid protectionist policies, we should be asking how we can help.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  46. So why did my bacon have to be cured!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Even if your theory about the origin of this form of the virus is correct, you cannot get the flu from eating pork. These bans are simply sowing more ignorance.

    Yeah, so tell me this smart guy: why did all my bacon have to be cured? What do you have to say to THAT!?

  47. No Quack by AlpineR · · Score: 1

    Well... Swine Flew

    No, the pig go. The dove fly:

    The pig go. Go is to the fountain. The pig put foot. Grunt. Foot in what? ketchup. The dove fly. Fly is in sky. The dove drop something. The something on the pig. The pig disgusting. The pig rattle. Rattle with dove. The dove angry. The pig leave. The dove produce. Produce is chicken wing. With wing bark. No Quack.

    I believe the above passage is a prediction of this epidemic by the nascent brain of Skynet.

  48. Recycled Aircraft Air by Acer500 · · Score: 1

    Ok, we need to put a stop to this myth like thirty years ago.

    THE AIR ON PLANES ISN'T RECYCLED.

    It seems your information is outdated. Once again, Google to the rescue:

    http://www.scientificjournals.com/sj/espr/Pdf/aId/2518

    Quoting:

    Today some 50% of commercial passen- ger aircraft use recirculated air for ventilation of the passenger cabin

    also here: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/travel/air/handbook/part3/section-3.html

    Newer airplanes recirculate part of the cabin air (up to 50%) to save fuel, in contrast with older planes, which use all fresh air ventilation.

    and a small article here:

    http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Health/story?id=1213901&page=1

    --
    There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    1. Re:Recycled Aircraft Air by rantingkitten · · Score: 3, Informative

      He's still right. What you're saying is basically akin to saying that the air in a car is "recycled" because it's not moving 100% of the air mass at all times. For a good duration of the time you spend in a car with closed windows, you're breathing in the same air you breathed out a moment ago. But it isn't airtight, and there are vents, so 100% of it gets cycled out eventually.

      When people speak of "recycled air" on an airplane they seem to think that aircraft are like submarines, completely airtight, and the only air is that which you had when you took off from the runway. This simply isn't the case -- it's all going to get cycled out and continuously refreshed. Of course a certain amount is getting recirculated, just as in a closed car, but sooner or later it's all fresh air. You're not landing with the same air molecules you had when you took off.

      In commercial aircraft (I don't know about small craft like Cessnas), there are one or more apertures, usually near the rear of the plane, which can open and close to variable diameters, and that's part of how cabin pressure is regulated. You pump more air into the cabin than you let out through the aperture, and the result is a higher air pressure than what's outside -- and that air is indeed being pumped in from the outside, through the engines (which are basically doing nothing but forcing air around at high velocity anyway).

      Incidentally this is also why shooting a gun in an aircraft and blowing a hole through the hull isn't the huge deal everyone thinks it is, resulting in decompression and a big crisis. If such a thing occured, the apertures would simply close a bit more to compensate for the drop in pressure, and all would be well -- at least as far as cabin pressure is concerned.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    2. Re:Recycled Aircraft Air by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      He's still right. What you're saying is basically akin to saying that the air in a car is "recycled" because it's not moving 100% of the air mass at all times. (snip)

      When people speak of "recycled air" on an airplane they seem to think that aircraft are like submarines, completely airtight, and the only air is that which you had when you took off from the runway.

      I guess either I misunderstood, or you did, but I wasn't thinking of "recycled air" in the submarine sense.

      The OP spoke about getting infected from recycled air. Zippthorne said it was a myth. My answer quotes two articles which address the fear of contagion, and they seem to take for granted that the possibility exists:

      All planes use HEPA (High Efficiency Particle Air) filters to remove dust, bacteria, and viruses
      As the proportion of recirculated air provided for ventilation is increased, energy savings can be experienced at the same time as health risks raised.

      of particular concern in this setting is the increased risk of disease transmission... if any of the passengers should happen to be ill with a disease which is communicable via air (HOLLAND, 1996; SEXTON, 1993.

      Recirculated air is usually filtered before being mixed with outside air for return to the passenger cabin. However, the efficiency of the filters used for this purpose varies with airline policy from 90% for 0.5 μm particles (European Union (EU) 9 classification) to 99.97% for 0.3 μm diameter particles (EU 13, or high efficiency particulate air â" HEPA â" filters))

      According to the quoted articles, the filters should help stop propagation of viruses due to recirculation (as long as they're HEPA compliant or better), but the threat exists (mostly thanks to being an enclosed space with lots of people, not due to the recirculation).

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  49. Canada the new Soviet Russia? by zen-theorist · · Score: 1

    In Canada, the swine get influenza from you!

  50. Re:Serious Matter: Close the Border with Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The health of the poorest, most third-world country affects the health of everyone in the world. This is why we should have more trade with these countries and do everything we can to bring up the standards of living among the poor, homeless, etc. to tolerable levels. Allowing people to live in unsanitary conditions, allowing people to remain destitute, etc. is the best possible way to guarantee these sorts of outbreaks in the future. At least in the long run, our best hope of survival is in opening the borders more, not less. NAFTA was a start, but it really isn't enough.

    This will never happen as long as corporations and money rule the world. Bringing other countries up to reasonable living conditions will increase the hourly wadge since a better living is also more expensive. This means producing an item will cost more for the corporations, less profit, and will also increase the cost to the consumer.

    So unless something major happens, asteroid hit, huge volcano erupts or maybe an alien attack we will exploit our third/second world slaves for a very long time to come.

  51. So if... by osoroco · · Score: 1

    bears come into the equation, will we be forced to call it manbearpig flu?

  52. HAha by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Sweet revenge at last....

  53. Re:Serious Matter: Close the Border with Mexico by alexborges · · Score: 1

    The most probable cause for this is CAFO farming in Mexico with even more lenient legislation than the ones you see in the US.

    Its not a matter of "poor sanitation" in Mexico. Its a matter of US big bussiness being completely irresponsible and a government, here in Mexico, that tends to say "YAY" to anything the US government says, including permiting CAFO farming here because "it creates jobs"... or so said the Bush people when they vouched that smithfield was a great company to be producing pork in Mexico.

    --
    NO SIG
  54. Egypt should... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... kill all humans then. It worked the other way around!

  55. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by treeves · · Score: 1

    I had thought it was benzoate + ascorbic acid that produced benzene, but I could see citric (another tricarboxylic, is it reducing?) acid might also.
    Someone please mod parent up informative.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  56. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by inflamed · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's funny. And subtle. But maybe a little too subtle for /. - this isn't a science community, it's a computer nerd community.

  57. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    You're right that it reacts with ascorbic acid. I've also read that it breaks down in the presence of citric acid, but IANAC, so I can't be 100% certain that this is correct. Either way, the ingredient to avoid is the sodium benzoate, not the citric acid. :-)

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  58. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by Raineer · · Score: 1

    Jesus christ it's Jenny McCarthy, get in the car!!!

  59. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

    And don't get anywhere near your car, gasoline can contain up to 1% benzene :). Actually, the idea of being able to reduce benzoic acid to benzene is nonsense, you get benzalcohol that route. You'd need to be able to decarboxylate.

    --
    I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
  60. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by treeves · · Score: 1
    Getting near, even inside, my car does not expose me to gasoline. And it's an old car. ;-) OTOH, foods and beverages often deliberately contain benzoates. Apparently, ascorbic acid, at least, can decarboxylate benzoate....

    FDA re-opens probe into benzene contamination of soft drinks By Chris Mercer, 15-Feb-2006

    US food safety authorities have re-opened an investigation closed 15 years ago into soft drinks contaminated with cancer-causing chemical benzene, following evidence the industry has failed to sort out the problem, BeverageDaily.com can reveal. A chemist at the Food And Drug Administration (FDA) said testing in recent weeks had revealed some soft drinks contaminated with benzene at levels above the legal limit for water set by the US and Europe. Benzene is listed as a poisonous chemical shown to increase the risk of leukaemia and other cancers.
    The FDA was originally alerted in 1990 to the problem of benzene in soft drinks triggered by the preservative sodium benzoate. It never made the findings public, but came to an arrangement with the US soft drinks association that the industry would "get the word out".
    But in recent months, internal documents and private tests have begun to surface, supported by claims from a former chemist for Cadbury Schweppes, who is now keen to blow the whistle on the health risk involved. He and a US lawyer commissioned new tests that have now prompted the FDA to re-open the case.
    These independent tests, performed by a laboratory in New York, found benzene levels in a couple of soft drinks two-and-a-half-times and five times above the World Health Organisation limit for drinking water (10 parts per billion).
    The FDA now confirms it has found a similar problem in its own follow-up testing. "There were a few isolated products that have elevated levels. We certainly want to make sure there is some reformulation," said an FDA chemist.
    The problem is caused by two common ingredients - sodium benzoate and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) - which can react together to cause benzene formation. It is considered completely separate from other outbreaks of benzene contamination due to faulty packaging in the 1990s.
    The two ingredients are still used together in a wide range of soft drinks across the world.
    The FDA was first alerted to the problem in December 1990 by Cadbury Schweppes and Australian drinks group Koala Springs, according to an internal FDA memo.
    This prompted FDA testing that led the US Department of Health and Human Services to report, again in an internal memo: "Benzene formation occurs at part per billion (ppb) levels in some food formulations containing sodium benzoate and ascorbic acid [vitamin C]."

    Yes, only ppb. Very small amounts.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  61. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    But it does undergo decarboxylation. It has been shown in multiple studies, including one by the FDA, that sodium benzoate does, in fact, turn into benzene when acidic products use it as a preservative. The amount of benzene depends on temperature and light (e.g. refrigerated cans would have lower levels than room temperature clear plastic bottles). Several soft drinks over the years have shown levels of benzene that were well outside even the most lax exposure limits for benzene in drinking water.

    If you want citations, just see the Wikipedia article on sodium benzoate or the more specific article benzene in soft drinks.

    Oh, and on the citric acid thing, according to that article, it isn't believed to cause it in significant amounts, but it can accelerate decarboxylation in the presence of ascorbic or erythorbic acid.

    And don't get anywhere near your car, gasoline can contain up to 1% benzene.

    Don't drink gasoline. Thanks for the tip. I'll keep that in mind. :-D

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  62. Re:Serious Matter: Close the Border with Mexico by niktemadur · · Score: 1

    Agreed. In my town, the state and municipal governments, eager to cut profitable deals with USA corporations,
    1) Green-lighted a huge sanitary landfill very close to the sea shore.
    2) Approved the construction of an industrial gas distribution center, smack in the middle of a wine valley that is gaining international recognition.

    However, the local population agrees that the natural beauty of the region would be put to much better use in long-term visions of tourism, and once you mess it up, it stays messed up. Projects of an industrial nature would not only be eyesores, but would also have adverse ecological impact in areas that could be put to much better use. I mean, sure, a new garbage dump may be necessary, but within striking distance of the beach? Gas trucks roaring in and out at all hours, within earshot of vineyards, B&Bs and restaurants?

    Fully aware of public consensus, willfully oblivious to any concept of "zoning", the government attempted to steamroll their agenda behind closed doors and with no public dialogue, triggering massive protests that effectively shut down both projects. In response, shocked about not getting his way and losing his under-the-table cut in the deals, our "honorable" state governor bitched and whined that the local population "seems to be against progress". Yeah, sure, pendejo, that's what it is.

    Since then, the landfill has remained in limbo, but the gas plant has been redirected away from the vineyards, to the north of town, a huge complex in what used to be a pristine stretch of coastline (sigh).

    Ever since the PAN has gained political power in large areas of Mexico, many of its' high-ranking officials seem to have become very, very wealthy, catering to Big Business investments of any type, with no filter and no vision, just a Rod Blagojevich, "what's in it for me", "this is fucking golden" attitude.

    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  63. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Russell Hoban's "Pilgermann" Muslims may not eat pork but they're not averse to fucking pigs.

  64. Re:Vaccines destroy your health. Go natural, not A by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    White sugar is just brown sugar with the molasses separated out.

    That used to be true, but now the opposite is true. Modern brown sugars are almost without exception fully refined white sugars with molasses added in after they have been refined.

  65. Learn about Swine Flu by SlashdotIsGreat · · Score: 1

    There is no need to fear swine flu if you follow precautions. I put together a fast fact sheet at http://www.doihaveswineflu.me/