Slashdot Mirror


Cola Consumption Can Lead To Muscle Problems

wjousts writes "As I'm sure many Slashdot readers live almost exclusively on cola drinks, a new warning from doctors: 'Doctors have issued a warning about excessive cola consumption after noticing an increase in the number of patients suffering from muscle problems, according to the June issue of IJCP, the International Journal of Clinical Practice. ... 'Evidence is increasing to suggest that excessive cola consumption can also lead to hypokalaemia, in which the blood potassium levels fall, causing an adverse effect on vital muscle functions.' And sorry, diet colas aren't any better."

420 comments

  1. Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I drink mountain dew instead.

    1. Re:Cool story bro by FredFredrickson · · Score: 5, Informative
      According to the article:

      It appears that hypokalaemia can be caused by excessive consumption of three of the most common ingredients in cola drinks â" glucose, fructose and caffeine.

      So first off, Yes, Diet makes a difference- lacking two of the ingredients. And Diet Caffeine free is just fine. Additionally, these three inrgedients are not cola exclusive. Coffee (from dunks with liquid sugar), Root Beer, and other drinks, I'm sure, could find yourself in the same dillema.

      I'm annoyed at this doomsday article (not just TFS, but TFA) which is totally shock value, and one paragraph of truth.

      But then again, I suppose I should get used to that.

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    2. Re:Cool story bro by wjousts · · Score: 5, Funny

      And Diet Caffeine free is just fine.

      I wouldn't be as bold as to suggest that anything about Diet Caffeine free coke is "fine".

    3. Re:Cool story bro by Knara · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Generalize much?

    4. Re:Cool story bro by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between regular cola and diet, I'll take option c: none of the above. Diet tastes like garbage and gives me an upset stomach.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    5. Re:Cool story bro by Jurily · · Score: 0, Troll

      Generalize much?

      If I say I do, will that make you stop thinking about all the chemi^Wexperience enhancing substances your body did not have to handle during creation/evolution you drink each day?

    6. Re:Cool story bro by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

          Actually, it's right.

          I'll preface this with... INAHN (I'm not a health nut), I'm just very aware of the bad things that I consume. I'm smoking a cigarette and drinking a tall glass of cold soda while I'm writing this. :)

          "natural" products, that aren't manufactured, but just bottled, are ok, but rather rare in most stores.

          "manufactured" products usually contain refined sugars, preservatives, artificial colors, etc, etc. The're all bad for you.

          The human body isn't designed to handle refined sugars very well. It does ok with raw sugar, but only in reasonable quantities. If they used raw sugar in the quantity that shows up in most sodas, it's bad for you. There was a recent study (and review of historical data) that showed the instances of diabetes were virtually nil compared to now. The major contributor? refined sugars.

          Caffeine free soda has more bad stuff in it, just not caffeine.

          Diet or sugar free sodas have artificial sweeteners that are cancer causing (among other things). Myself, I can't drink any diet soda. Even just a sip, and I'll have a migraine for the next 8 hours. I've been very unhappy during road trips, if/when I stop at a drive through and they hand me a diet soda instead of the regular one I ordered. One sip, and now I have 8 hours of driving where it feels my brain is going to explode.

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    7. Re:Cool story bro by averner · · Score: 2, Informative

      That depends on what you consider "fine". Artificial sweeteners have been shown to have a more obesity-causing effect in lab rats than sugar (due to their disruption of hunger, metabolism, etc), so diet drinks are probably not even "diet" drinks. I haven't heard of such an experiment performed on humans yet but I wouldn't take my chances.

      --
      Member of the 7 Digit UID Club
    8. Re:Cool story bro by retchdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Refined sugar is just as new to our bodies, on the evolutionary time scale, as high fructose corn syrup. Even the volumes associated with the modern concept of fruit juice are new: 12 oz. of orange juice is considered reasonable to drink, even though it's equivalent to eating six oranges in a few minutes. Lots more sugar, and much more frequently, than we had during what I'm sure was a pre-technological paradise. Oh yeah, even "natural" juices often have the vitamins stripped out and added back in after pasteurization. Little difference between orange juice and cola, really. If you like one over the other fine, but it's close to a wash nutritionally.

      There's nothing wrong with living your life by various rules of thumb, because it's impossible to get into all of the details in one lifetime. But insisting on the dogmatic conclusions of your heuristics, is sheer insanity.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    9. Re:Cool story bro by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Arsenic is natural. Tobacco is natural. Multivitamins are artificial.

    10. Re:Cool story bro by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 5, Funny

      caffeine free diet soda. for when you are low on artificial coloring.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    11. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the artificial sweteners will fuck you up even worse.

      The thing that's really causing mineral imbalances is the phosphoric acid used to carbonate.

    12. Re:Cool story bro by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh Jesus, Internet. Not this again. Can't we all agree that the science indicates aspartame is either harmless or barely measurably harmful, and certainly less harmful than the obesity one gets from consuming large amounts of sugar?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    13. Re:Cool story bro by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Diet or sugar free sodas have artificial sweeteners that are cancer causing (among other things).

      That's a myth. It's supported by the fact that most diet sodas used to contain saccharine, which is a sweetener that has been shown to cause cancer in laboratory rats if fed to them in sufficiently large quantities. As a result of these (possibly spurious) studies, most soft drink companies switched their artificial sweetener to aspartame ("Equal") many years ago (in the 1980s), which, as you can see by my link, has definitely not been shown by any studies to cause cancer (or lupus, or diabetes mellitus, or any other such nonsense). Virtually all of the evidence of aspartame causing ailments, including headaches, is entirely anecodotal and unsupported by scientific study.

    14. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you TASTED sugar free caffeine free Coke?

      Fucking vile stuff!

      Not to mention the aspartame in diet drinks...

    15. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    16. Re:Cool story bro by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

          Well, I know the migraines are easily reproducible for me. When I didn't know what the cause was, I was really confused. I'd drink whatever was put in front of me. Now, I don't drink diet sodas or tequila. Anything else is fair game. :)

          I did sample testing, but I've also accidentally fallen into blind tests. I've gone to friends house, and they've poured me a drink. I didn't know until my head hurt, so I'd ask "was that a diet drink?" Nothing else that I've ever consumed has ever given me a headache quickly. Alcohol does it too, but that's usually from over consumption, and the headache comes later. :) That's easily mitigated by the consumption of large quantities of fluids before the headache comes on.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    17. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No.

      Your assumption that "diet" soda helps with obesity is statistically false.

      And it tastes really bad.

      If "diet" does not really help with being fat, would you really choose aspartame over sugar.

      Swallowing tooth paste is possibly harmless too. I just wouldn't do it every day, just in case.

    18. Re:Cool story bro by sortius_nod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Arsenic is natural. Tobacco is natural. Multivitamins are artificial.

      Yes, No, No.

      Arsenic, yes, for sure, 100% natural.

      Tobacco, no, it's been modified by humans through selective breeding, exactly the same as other crops.

      Multivitamins are no different to having a diet that consists of fresh fruit, vegetables and meats. While not the best substitute for a decent diet, to say that vitamins aren't natural is just stupid.

    19. Re:Cool story bro by lgw · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the link "Fowler is quick to note that a study of this kind does not prove that diet soda causes obesity. More likely, she says, it shows that something linked to diet soda drinking is also linked to obesity." Correlation. Causation. Has Slashdot not gotten the hang of this yet?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...switched their artificial sweetener to aspartame ("Equal")...

      Virtually all of the evidence of aspartame causing ailments, including headaches, is entirely anecodotal and unsupported by scientific study.

      You mean Nutrasweet. Equal only refers to the granulated table sugar replacement form and would never be referenced as an ingredient.
      Also, many drink makers are using other sweeteners these days, or even blends to kill the aftertastes.

      There is plenty of evidence of aspartame sensistivity. The reason for so few studies in that practically everyone in the population has tried it at one time or another, and those who do have a sensitivity would never consider taking part in a trial of that poison.

    21. Re:Cool story bro by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll preface this with... INAHN (I'm not a health nut), I'm just very aware of the bad things that I consume. I'm smoking a cigarette and drinking a tall glass of cold soda while I'm writing this. :)

      It's a strange world where people say this as a way of convincing you to listen to them on health topics :)

    22. Re:Cool story bro by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Oddly enough, I would. As long as their testing regiment includes using the subjects in both the test and control groups during different periods of the study. Since I'm sure it would have to be double-blind, but I guarantee that I'll get headaches with it, and none without. That is unless they play rap music during the testing. Then I may have some bleeding from my ears. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    23. Re:Cool story bro by Quantumprof · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is pretty much one thing good about diet soda, and that is, it's something people with Diabetes (or who otherwise shouldn't have any sugar) can drink.

      The taste ranges from horrible to not particularly great, but if you drink it for a while you get used to it / tolerate it, and then it's not so bad.

      --
      Fnord.
    24. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Diet Caffeine free coke"

      That's like orgasm-free sex.

      That being said, diet coke is truly the most vile tasting of all diet colas. I'll drink ANY diet cola, EXCEPT diet coke (coke zero isn't nearly as bad). It takes like #2, only with bubbles.

      Funnily, bananas has always been my fav fruit. Coincidence? I wonder...

      -a cola (and coffee) addict

    25. Re:Cool story bro by SpeZek · · Score: 5, Informative

      Of course only drinking diet soda won't magically make fat people skinny, but it helps a lot. When you drink 2 or 3 cans of coke a day, that's 300-450 calories from nothing. That's a whole meal, really. Eliminating a whole meal a day certainly goes a long way to losing weight, without curtailing your cravings for the taste of cola.

    26. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "...More likely, she says, it shows that something linked to diet soda drinking is also linked to obesity." Correlation. Causation. Has Slashdot not gotten the hang of this yet?

      Correlation does not imply lack of causation either, particularly when there are very plausible explanations for possible causative effects, and when plenty of people have made that particular shift without any other major lifestyle changes and then experienced the theorised consequences.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    27. Re:Cool story bro by auLucifer · · Score: 2, Informative

      And it tastes really bad.

      God damn, not this shit again. How do you tell people what they think tastes good and tastes bad? It's all up to the individual. I can't stand the taste of beer, any beer and I've tried my fair share, yet that's an absolutely huge industry so surely there are just a lot of people out there that just have bad taste right?

      Your assumption that "diet" soda helps with obesity is statistically false

      Can you find an article that proves this point? I switched from real coke to Coke Zero and lost a few kg's in weeks, just because I cut the sugar out. I've come across a fair few people that experienced the same. These days I watch my diet pretty strictly, which is what you do when you start looking at promo work, and it does come down to moderation and calorie control but cutting out just under 200kcal per can of coke and having coke zero for the caffiene hit becomes quite the saving. 1lb of fat can be lost by cutting out 3000kcal so don't have 3cans of coke a day but try something diet and you'll save that per week.

      And yes, everyones body is different in how it burns but to say that people cutting the sugary shit out of their drinks is statistically false needs citing.

      --
      If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
    28. Re:Cool story bro by BKX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While that's perfectly logical and well-reasoned it flies in the face of actual real-world studies. Science now knows (for certain, using statistics and actual data) that drinking diet soda versus regular soda has no positive impact whatsoever on obesity rates. Source In fact, that article actually claims that diet soda drinkers are MORE likely than their regular soda drinking counterparts to be obese.

      Now, as the article points out, correlation isn't causation, but the taste of diet soda combined with no proof of its efficacy as a weight reducing substance means that I'll certainly never consider drinking it.

    29. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Little difference between orange juice and cola, really. If you like one over the other fine, but it's close to a wash nutritionally.

      Not true; for instance, orange juice contains potassium:
      see here

      ('...One eight-ounce glass of orange juice contains 450 milligrams of potassium, the same as an average banana....')

    30. Re:Cool story bro by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      I agree with you about processed foods generally being bad in large quantities, but don't forget that the brain consumes only glucose - the most refined sugar. straight glucose isn't bad for you as such, it just bypasses the body's refining methods, which is bad for some people, becasue for some bizarre reason, its the only method their body knows to control their blood sugar level.

      Most people who have a varied balanced diet can consume any types of sugar and manage it without issue.

    31. Re:Cool story bro by x2A · · Score: 1

      We live longer. Is all about balances.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    32. Re:Cool story bro by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      Additionally, these three inrgedients are not cola exclusive. Coffee ...

      Yeah when I read the "caffeine" (not to mention sucrose) bit it got me wondering, "hmm maybe drinking all this really strong coffee with two sugars is somehow connected to the increasing muscle pain I'm experiencing." So I had another drink of the double-shot flat white 2 sugars in front of me. You know you've got to get right back on your horse when you fall off.

      Damn pesky scientists making all these discoveries all the time. Someone oughta can their funding!

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    33. Re:Cool story bro by fooslacker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hint: if it's manufactured, it's bad for you.

      Sigh. This attitude is silly and I get tired of hearing the "if it's natural it's good for you crowd". Some manufactured things are bad some are good. There are manufactured medicines that save lives every day. And their are all manner of natural things that (e.g. urainium, hemlock, poison frogs, leprosy, lightning) that are bad for you. We should try to learn about ourselves and understand what is good and what is bad and why rather than simply generalizing and passing on a deceptive concept to those we talk with.

    34. Re:Cool story bro by x2A · · Score: 1

      Have you ever listened to a health nut?! *lol* that would explain it perfectly!

      hint: there's more to life than extending it! Ya gotta enjoy a little!

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    35. Re:Cool story bro by pherthyl · · Score: 3, Informative

      >> Little difference between orange juice and cola, really. If you like one over the other fine, but it's close to a wash nutritionally

      Not really. Cola is sugar water with nothing of nutritional value besides that. Orange juice (the real stuff) has a lot of vitamins and minerals in it that your body makes use of. Sugar content is also high, but that's not the only factor.

    36. Re:Cool story bro by x2A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "diet soda drinkers are MORE likely than their regular soda drinking counterparts to be obese"

      Cuz if you're not fat, why put yourself through diet? It's hardly rocket surgery.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    37. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I find it interesting that the country that produced Cyclamates banned Saccharine and the country that produced Saccharine banned Cyclamates, both claiming the other caused cancer when they fed rats obscene amounts of the stuff. Not that any of it is good for you but it's more often about economics and politics than it is about the health of the consumer.

    38. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that the experiment you are citing fed the lab rats the equivalent of several HUNDRED cans of diet sodas a day, right?

      I can tell you what happens before you die of cancer if you drink several hundred cans of ANY drink (including club soda) a day: You die from water poisoning.

      The studies found no attributable cases of cancer for lab rats with a more "moderate" aspartame intake the equivalent of several LITRES of soda a day.

      Now, if you're into drinking several litres (say 5+) of ANY drink a day, you're already pretty screwed, as you probably have diabetes. Yes, that includes water, because I'm not talking about the drinking causing the diabetes, I'm explaining that excessive liquid consumption is a symptom of diabetes.

      Also from the land of what-the-fuck: Pink insulation causes cancer. When it is stuffed into lab rats. Seriously, that's how they managed to give them cancer. They cut them open and stuffed them alive. What a surprise...

    39. Re:Cool story bro by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      Tobacco, no, it's been modified by humans through selective breeding, exactly the same as other crops.

      Yeah, but the rest have been modified by a radical selective-breeding revolutionist of the 19th century, named Darwin.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    40. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat people are more likely to be concerned about their weight, and thus to drink 'diet' drinks. News at 11.

    41. Re:Cool story bro by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Insightful

          You know, I've heard a lot of health nuts say a lot of things that they're spewing out of their cumulative asses. I frequently have the urge to light a cigarette, order a rare bloody steak, with a dark Irish beer, and a greasy side of something that'll disgust them.

          The fun part is, I'm not overweight. Other than smoking, I appear healthy to any passers by. :)

          I'm enjoying this ride right down to the end!

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    42. Re:Cool story bro by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What does selectively breeded have to do with it? Are breeded tomatoes bad for you or wild tobacco good for you?

    43. Re:Cool story bro by wjousts · · Score: 1

      While I mostly agree with you on artificial sweeters being "mostly harmless", there are some recent studies that have suggested that they are not as effective for dieting as first thought. The problem is that your gut has the same taste receptors as your tongue and is also "fooled" by artificial sweeters throwing your whole digestion out of whack. What ends up happening is that if you drink a diet soda with a meal, you end up absorbing more sugar from your meal that you would otherwise. Maybe still less than if you'd downed a regular soda, but more than if you drank a glass of water.

    44. Re:Cool story bro by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "produced"? Saccharin was first produced at Johns Hopkins University and Cyclamates was discovered at the University of Illinois and first produced by Abbott Laboratories.

    45. Re:Cool story bro by deraj123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You'll find that the GP made no mention of whether things were "good" or "bad" for you. He simply discusses whether or not certain substances are "natural".

    46. Re:Cool story bro by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All in the context of the GGGGP...

    47. Re:Cool story bro by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Relevant comic :)

    48. Re:Cool story bro by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Probably the notion that if you eat "blessed" food, you can have as much of it as you want and you don't have to exercise even if you work in a call center all day.

      Diet soda is like carbon credits. It's for weak-willed people who don't care as much about actually being effective as they do about appearing to try to be effective.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    49. Re:Cool story bro by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Not only are they not cola-exclusive, but "cola" drinks haven't contained any kola in a long, long time.

      --
      Property is theft.
    50. Re:Cool story bro by OrigamiMarie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Multivitamins are different from fresh fruit and veggies. The trouble is this: the vitamins we know about are not really the whole story. They are more like narrow-band tracers that we understand and can generally be used to locate a wider band of nutrients. The narrow band is helpful, but it is better for you to get the the wider range of neighbors. And the more we refine something (to make it into a pill or a supplement to dump into food or whatever), the more we strip away the nearby neighbors and get something that is purely the tracer nutrient.

      Plus, taking vitamins is a sort of crutch to keep you from noticing the good cravings and seeking out the food with the nutrient you need. If you can only get high-calorie, low-nutrient food, then yeah you should take the vitamins. But you are still missing some stuff, like fiber. And medical science is not perfect, it doesn't know everything you need. In a decade or two, it could be discovered that one or five really helpful nutrients had been historically overlooked, and people who were relying on the vitamin crutch were not getting the completeness they expected. Not really the vitamin manufacturers' fault, somewhat the doctors' fault, and quite your fault for not eating good food.

    51. Re:Cool story bro by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, many orange juices have sugar added. And many of the "low sugar" ones just add sugar substitutes! As though it wasn't sweet enough.

    52. Re:Cool story bro by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Oh Jesus, Internet. Not this again. Can't we all agree that the science indicates aspartame is either harmless or barely measurably harmful, and certainly less harmful than the obesity one gets from consuming large amounts of sugar?"

      Why not switch to something that is a bit healthier? Like Tea? What about green tea?

      I've pretty much done that...got rid of colas in my house....every once in awhile, for a treat I'll try to hunt down a MX coca cola...with real sugar. But that's just a treat every few months or so.

      I've been working hard to lose weight, and get healthy by working out, etc.

      I figured the less artificial chemicals consumed, I figure the better.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    53. Re:Cool story bro by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More broadly...cutting out excess carbs, especially from refined food really helps cut down on the weight, and insulin spikes...and so many other things that seem to kill us as humans.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    54. Re:Cool story bro by OrigamiMarie · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. There is another effect, one which was not widely publicized when it came out but saw enough of the light of day for me to hear about it. And no, it's not just aspartame that is at fault here.

      Sorry this will be a little long, but I promise it's good:
      So you feed your lab rats a fair number of their calories via yogurt (because it's easy to tamper with). They do reasonably well on this diet, and they don't overeat compared to their activity level -- they stay a reasonable weight. Now you leave half the rats on the regular yogurt diet, and switch the other half to part regular, and part yogurt that has artificial sweetener instead of sugar. You don't let them overeat for now. After a while, you switch group B back to only yogurt with real sugar in it. And their weight takes off! What happened?
      The trick is that animals have an innate sense of how many calories they are eating, partly based on how sweet the food is. But this sense is apparently not fixed, it is possible to mess with it. And break it. The rats who had taken on what tasted like lots of calories but turned out to be very few, had their calorie sensors broken because "sweet" was no longer an accurate way to measure. So now they happily eat way to much sweet without the normal internal limits, and balloon up.

      Same with humans, probably. Yeah, some people will get fat and get type 2 diabetes without the help, but folks who get fat and are told to get thin by any means "or else", well . . . they might switch to diet. And lose all possibility of self-limiting. As trimmer and trimmer people are told that they are too fat (doctors have been lowering the range of "normal" for a while now), more and more people will fall into the break-your-calorie-sensor trap that is artificial sweetening.

      I suspect that there will be a slight evolutionary trend toward people who think that artificial sweeteners taste nasty (yes, some components of ability to taste are genetic, and a bunch more come via the nurture route -- also usually from one's parents).

    55. Re:Cool story bro by n3ssaj · · Score: 1

      Swallowing tooth paste is possibly harmless too. I just wouldn't do it every day, just in case.

      Good instinct. I'd take aspartam over flouride any day..

      Don't Swallow Your Toothpaste
      http://www.fluoridealert.org/toothpaste.html

      And sure drinking diet helps with weight loss. When you drink 2L of coke a day like I did, it makes a whole world of change.
      I started drinking Cola Zero when it appeared some 2 years ago. It tastes a WHOLE LOT BETTER than Diet Coke by the way. After a month of drinking Zero instead of regular I realized that I lost about 6kg. After that, it was a rollercoaster ride. I started being aware of calorie intake and stopped eating other junk too, and then, about a year later, i lost like 35kg out of 105 (yeah i was fat@20yo mind you) looking best i ever did.

      So yeah, take it from me - drinking diet helps with loosing weight ..A LOT.

      And on topic, nowdays I don't drink nearly as much cola as i did 2-3 years ago, maby 2L a week insted of 2L per day, and certainly not because of some shock value articles on cola health issues.. just a change in lifestyle mostly, and I don't feel any better. Hell, what certainly feels good is a glass of cool Cola after a good meal or after a hard day at work.

      And from TA:

      The first, a 21 year-old woman, was consuming up to three litres of cola a day.

      It turned out she had been drinking up to seven litres of cola a day for the last 10 months.

      WOW, I'm impressed

    56. Re:Cool story bro by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Unmitigated bullshit.

      Sugar = chemical energy

      Artificial Sweetener = something else

      Them's the facts. You read too much hippy crap my friend.

    57. Re:Cool story bro by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      Glucose in soft drinks? Are there any soft drinks that actually use glucose rather than, or even in addition to fructose? If that's what TFA says, then I'm already calling BS.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    58. Re:Cool story bro by retchdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, OK. Or I can take a nearly-free multi-vitamin which is like eating my fill of every fruit and vegetable on the face of the planet, instantly, and with a net zero calories which I can spend later on the tastier cola (or to be frugal, water).

      Life is grand.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    59. Re:Cool story bro by w0mprat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Multivitamins are no different to having a diet that consists of fresh fruit, vegetables and meats. While not the best substitute for a decent diet, to say that vitamins aren't natural is just stupid.

      No. No. Yes to the the stupid bit.

      IAAAHN (i AM actually a health nut): There are a multitude of beneficial micro-nutrients, anti-oxidants and other compounds in fruits and vegetable, legumes and meats, that you simply don't these get through a popping a multi-vitamin, thus even a comprehensive vitamin and mineral supplement can never replace a good diet.

      Plants contain beneficial phytochemicals, flavinoids, anti-inflamiatory compounds, fatty-acids, amino acids, etc, etc. even the soluble fibre and insoluble roughage are highly beneficial to the essential life-supporting colony of bacteria that you are a host to. It's important not to ignore them either, your are a walking colony of your single-celled ancestors descendants, and guess what, a lot of them are along for the ride in your guts - there are 10 times as many cells in your body that are not you as human cells are more than 100 times larger than the bacteria in your gut.

      Put simply a full spectrum multi-vitamin would not replace vegetables without about 100-150 different compounds.

      Not eating your greens and eating too much processed foods seriously fraks with your internal biota, there's plenty of thought that suggests this is the cause or at least implicated in many modern ills.

      You won't develop deficiency and/or die if you don't have these compounds, you can live without them. However the human body has actually evolved ingesting all these fringe nutrients, it stands to reason this is why our health benefits from these compounds. Some would argue they might as well be considered essential based on the benefit to our longevity and physical function.

      Their really aren't any shortcuts to good health. Its a no-brainer that the key to good health is following the lifestyle that our bodies and minds evolved in. Exercise and wholefoods and time outdoors, you can't escape, ditch the cola and go for a jog.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    60. Re:Cool story bro by retchdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most of those vitamins are artificial ones and added back in after pasteurization.

      Drinking orange juice for its vitamin content, is literally paying a few thousand-percent markup on vitamin pills. Seriously. Just take a multi-vitamin (which costs practically nothing), and then drink whatever you want to drink.

      The "healthfulness" of juice is >99% marketing.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    61. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Root Beer isn't caffeinated.

    62. Re:Cool story bro by mog007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nutrasweet can actually be broken down by the body, and a teaspoon of it actually has one calorie more than a teaspoon of sugar.

      Artificial sweeteners aren't used because they aren't absorbed, they're used because they're so much sweeter than regular sugar, that you can use far less of them, and thus end up with far less calories.

    63. Re:Cool story bro by Wheat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, OK. Or I can take a nearly-free multi-vitamin which is like eating my fill of every fruit and vegetable on the face of the planet, instantly, and with a net zero calories which I can spend later on the tastier cola (or to be frugal, water).

      A multi-vitamin and a sugary drink (or water) is not even close to the equivalent to eating your fill of fruits and veggies. Yes, you will meet or exceed your bodies vitamin and mineral requirements, but you'll be completely lacking in phytonutrients, fiber, fatty acids and anti-oxidants. The human body requires a lot more than just vitamins, minerals and simple carbohydrates!

    64. Re:Cool story bro by johannesg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Arsenic is natural. Tobacco is natural. Multivitamins are artificial.

      Well then, why don't _you_ go on to only consume "natural" products, and be happy with your "natural" human lifespan of about 25 years, while the rest of us consume all these weird "manufactured" foods and enjoy our 80+ year lifespans...

    65. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is a study which shows the correlation with diet soda and weight gain.

      http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20050613/drink-more-diet-soda-gain-more-weight

      Yes, this does imply causation,

      But I know of no study that shows that switching to diet soda leads to weight loss.
      Do you know of any?

      Your single data point has little meaning.

    66. Re:Cool story bro by auLucifer · · Score: 1

      Having lost 40kg myself, but over longer (thanks to injuries), I always have to give props to people that lose a lot of weight as I know how damn hard it is. Was model quality in the teens then change in life style led me to being, well, a fat arse. I also started losing weight exactly the same too. The move to Coke Zero.

      So anyways, 'grats

      --
      If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
    67. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > but to say that people cutting the sugary shit out of their drinks is statistically false needs citing.

      And so does any claim that diet soda is effective way to control obesity.
      I know of no study that shows that switching from sugar soda to aspartame helps control obesity.

      http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20050613/drink-more-diet-soda-gain-more-weight
      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118523105635575469.html

    68. Re:Cool story bro by atraintocry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      no positive impact whatsoever on obesity rates.

      Statistics is that they don't necessarily apply to the individual, though. I lost 20 pounds recently, and while part of it was strict diet and exercise, part of it was cutting out crap like soda. But sometimes I want a soda, so I have diet soda. Technically I'm obese but my BMI is well on the way to merely overweight.

      I have an alternate hypothesis about the diet soda statistic. Based on my own experience, if someone trying to lose weight isn't drinking only water, they might be doing it wrong. You have to get used to eating healthy and drinking healthy. For a while it seems like your are eating/living bland, but you get used to it and a healthy diet tastes normal while really rich foods taste really rich.

      Maintaining weight is easy, and diet foods can be a help in that. But losing weight involves a lifestyle change that is torture at first but which gets easier with time. I used to drink a lot of sweetened stuff. Now it's mostly water, and I really enjoy drinking water all the time. Diet soda is like false hope. Anything in life worth having requires sacrifice, and giving someone soda that has no calories can be like telling them they don't have to sacrifice.

    69. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, sucralose gets excreted, passes right through your local water treatment plant, and ends up in the groundwater.

    70. Re:Cool story bro by modecx · · Score: 3, Funny

      God damn, not this shit again. How do you tell people what they think tastes good and tastes bad? It's all up to the individual. I can't stand the taste of beer, any beer and I've tried my fair share, yet that's an absolutely huge industry so surely there are just a lot of people out there that just have bad taste right?

      If you can taste the beer you're not drinking enough.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    71. Re:Cool story bro by syousef · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with living your life by various rules of thumb, because it's impossible to get into all of the details in one lifetime. But insisting on the dogmatic conclusions of your heuristics, is sheer insanity.

      Must be one of the side effects of drinking too much orange juice!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    72. Re:Cool story bro by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      Correlation does not imply lack of causation either

      Speaking in general terms, the burden of proof is on the person trying to prove causation. If all you have is correlation then that's all you have.

      and when plenty of people have made that particular shift without any other major lifestyle changes and then experienced the theorised consequences.

      Are you saying that you have evidence of people becoming obese after drinking diet soda, in a controlled experiment? Because AFAIK these studies look at populations, and basically compare the two variables: diet soda drinking and weight. All you can prove with a study like that is correlation. You cannot get into talking about causation until you do an experimental study with a control group.

      It really sounds like you're saying you have such data, and I'm going to have to call you out on that because that'd be shocking to me.

    73. Re:Cool story bro by SupremoMan · · Score: 0, Troll

      Then you are saying the diet soda does nothing for obese people. There we agree.

    74. Re:Cool story bro by auLucifer · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I do understand that my single anecdote doesn't even compare to research but to understand calories out vs calories in for being healthy shouldn't really be rocket science.

      The article definitely implies causation but the researcher seems to be more leaning towards correlation by a long way.

      "One possible part of the explanation is that people who see they are beginning to gain weight may be more likely to switch from regular to diet soda," Fowler suggests. "But despite their switching, their weight may continue to grow for other reasons. So diet soft-drink use is a marker for overweight and obesity."

      I'll take the researchers word over the way a shock article is written any day. I work in a health research institute so I think when they next run their 'diet' seminars I'll go along and ask if there are any definitive papers either way.

      --
      If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
    75. Re:Cool story bro by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

      Other things that help to cut down on the weight: not eating so fuckin much. I eat what ever the hell I want, I just don't eat as much as the next guy.

    76. Re:Cool story bro by auLucifer · · Score: 1

      "Excess carbs" is definitely key here. Some people survive on 30g/carbs a day keto diets (or Atkins) but everybody is different. Yes, again, more anecdotal but we all have our own experiences which we reflect on. For me to cut my carbs down I just don't function the same. I can't think straight and find it harder to function so I find the insightful key here is definitely the "excess" statement. Like everything in life though "All in moderation"

      --
      If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
    77. Re:Cool story bro by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Barq's is the only major brand of root beer that contains caffeine (there may be some obscure brands that do too, but I haven't personally found one yet).

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    78. Re:Cool story bro by Phroggy · · Score: 1
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    79. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Strawman/false dichotomy. He didn't say, "if it's natural, it's good for you".

      But I agree the truth would be better served by a little more precision: If it's manufactured to taste good to you while being cheap to produce, it's almost always bad for you in the long run.

      There is no such thing as a free lunch.

    80. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, OK. Or I can take a nearly-free multi-vitamin which is like eating my fill of every fruit and vegetable on the face of the planet, instantly, and with a net zero calories which I can spend later on the tastier cola (or to be frugal, water).

      Multivitamins contain little potassium. My centrum-equivalent has 80 mg or 2% of the RDA of Potassium. 100% of the RDA would be 4 GRAM PILL AT A MINIUMUM (actually, larger as you would not WANT to swallow pure potassium - trust me). I like vitamins and take them nearly every day. I'd rather have the will power, fortitude, habit, forsight, or whatever-you-call-it, to eat more healthy and rely less on supplements. But if you will depend on them, please educate yourself on the pros and cons.

    81. Re:Cool story bro by ergean · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by that? That after if I make my orange juice with my 5$ juice maker* I should a add a few vitamin pills?

      If I'm alone I use 3-4kg of oranges a week to make a 250ml glass of orange juice every day, best deal ever, it's cheaper then buying "100% natural juice" from the market.

      *something like this http://easyandhealthycooking.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/orange-juice-preparation.jpg?w=265&h=300

    82. Re:Cool story bro by slasho81 · · Score: 1

      The latest Piled Higher & Deeper comic is very relevant.

    83. Re:Cool story bro by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      Now go and study known effects for artificial sweetners. Still think it's a better choice?

    84. Re:Cool story bro by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      And no, all I drink is coffee. All day, every day. I have LOW blood sugar.

      Drink soda all day every day, and count down to diabetes. It's not the real "sugar". It's the high fructose corn syrup.

    85. Re:Cool story bro by Cimexus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd have to agree with this. I dropped my BMI from 24.6 to 19.8 in the last year, solely by:

      - Replacing my (considerable) soda intake with diet soda; and

      - A 30 minute run, 4 times a week.

      Not a huge effort really and the weight fell off fairly quickly. It's plateaued now though ... despite still keeping up my regime, it's flatlined at around BMI 19.7 - 20.0 depending how much I've eaten in the last few days. Which is fine since that's somewhat on the lower side of ideal (18.5 - 24.9).

      Now I am sure the running did an order of magnitude more than the diet soda. But it certainly helped. The amount of soda I drink means I'm saving at least 3000 kJ a day (which is basically a full meal's worth). But the soda alone wouldn't have done it.

      So yeah, you need a lifestyle change to lose weight. BUT the diet soda isn't entirely a placebo - that's real 'empty' calories that you used to consume, that you now aren't.

    86. Re:Cool story bro by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      The 3L/day I can relate to. I have days like that too (although it's almost always diet). Not every day though obviously.

      7L a day, every day, on the other hand - holy crap. The human body isn't supposed to have that much fluid intake in a day of ANY liquid (including water) is it? O.o I'm not even sure my stomach could cope with being filled constantly like that.

      She must have needed to go to the bathroom every half hour...

    87. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't actually say that it does nothing for obese people: it may be keeping them from being even more obese, it may be making them even more obese, or it may be doing nothing -- the facts in the webmd article are insufficient to choose among these three options.

      What it does conclude is that switching to diet drinks do not make an obese person un-obese.

      That is not an especially startling conclusion.

      What would be startling is if data that do support the conclusions following the rat pup comments at the end of the article were actually provided -- the implication here is that diet drinks would make an already overweight person obese, or an already obese person more obese. That is, the elimination of hundreds or thousands of kilojoules of energy from simple carbohydrate from sugared drinks would be made up for by even more kJ worth of energy from other intake in a statistical majority of cases.

      This startling conclusion simply is not supported within the article. Evidence supporting such a conclusion should be (pardon the pun) weighty.

      A more interesting line of investigation would be whether diet drinks reduce harm in people who are already on a trajectory through overweight to obesity, even if it does not arrest or reverse the fattening-up. For instance, do diet drink consumers exhibit differences in insulin metabolism or blood chemistry or markers of these types of disorders (kidney stones, for example)?

      In fact, these lines of investigation are regularly done, particularly in societies where the utility function is normalized because the health care system is paid for in taxes paid locally. These investigations tend make for much less interesting copy (particularly for a U.S. audience) than the webmd article.

      In fact, the same story gets a very different tone when read on the site of one such health agency that aggregates accessible stuff for an audience of English speakers:

      (UK National Health Service - Diet soda linked to higher diabetes risk).

    88. Re:Cool story bro by x2A · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Then you are saying the diet soda does nothing for obese people"

      You liar! Look, simply:

      Person A: I'm overweight, I know, I'll drink diet.
      Person B: I'm not overweight, I know, I won't drink diet.
      RESULT: people found drinking diet are those who are overweight.

      There is absolutely no claim there one way or another that it actually does help, makes things worse, or makes no difference. The *only* thing that's stated there that people who're overweight are more inclined to be drinking diet. Anything else you're reading into what I've said is purely a figment of your imagination. Why you'd conjure up such imaginings is certainly beyond me.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    89. Re:Cool story bro by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the wonderful world of state propaganda, my fellow comrade! You see our great and glorious leader Obama is planning a sin tax on sodas and therefor he has to have the puppet known as the media demonize them first, so as to make him a hero of the people when he makes them too expensive for the poor to have. Kinda like how P2P is the cause of all leaks of state secrets instead of moronic officials in the party putting Kazaa on a government laptop.

      So enjoy dear comrade. We live in a wondrous and glorious state where there are no abuses of power and every tax is for our own good. You and I are but children who cannot be trusted to make such descions for ourselves about what to consume, so our glorious leader and the state shall take such difficult decisions away from us. And the entire time their great communications arm, the main stream media, will cheer and tell us how great everything is! Isn't that nice comrade?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    90. Re:Cool story bro by kmac06 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That sounds like New Age BS to me. If we don't really know what all these useful vitamins and minerals are, why is it that specific deficiencies cause specific symptoms, can be chemically identified, and cured with administration of that specific deficiency? Oh yeah, it's because medical science knows what it's talking about.

    91. Re:Cool story bro by Terminus32 · · Score: 0

      Diet Soda is worse than normal Soda, as it contains the toxic chemical Aspartame.

      --
      http://nathanlindsell.blogspot.com/
    92. Re:Cool story bro by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      As far as I can remember the colouring in cola is caramel.

      Not that I subscribe to the 'artificial == bad' meme.

    93. Re:Cool story bro by SEAL · · Score: 1

      Little difference between orange juice and cola, really. If you like one over the other fine, but it's close to a wash nutritionally.

      If you don't mind swapping lots of vitamin C and potassium for caffeine and caramel color, then yeah it's a wash :P

    94. Re:Cool story bro by dugeen · · Score: 1

      I don't have preconceptions either way about aspartame, but Snopes isn't necessarily an impartial or well-informed source.

    95. Re:Cool story bro by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Can't we all agree that the science indicates aspartame is either harmless or barely measurably harmful, and certainly less harmful than the obesity one gets from consuming large amounts of sugar?

      Maybe. Unless you suffer from phylketonuria, of course. And all we know, of course, is that we haven't found out what harm it causes yet, strictly speaking; except for this:

      When we eat sweet tasting food, the body starts up certain processes as preparation to digesting carbohydrates; but, being a very clever machine, it also learns from experience, so when we eat artificial sweetener, we can end up unlearning the natural connection between sweet taste and calories. The consequence of this is that when we eat something that really does contain sugar, we don't feel full as quickly, and thus end up eat far more. So, in effect using artificial sweeteners may help set you up for obesity. The same presumably goes for fat substitutes and things like that new pill, Alli.

    96. Re:Cool story bro by xtracto · · Score: 1

      THAT was funny, Thank You!
      Oh god... you own me a new keyboard :(

      Have a nice day :)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    97. Re:Cool story bro by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      And it tastes really bad.

      God damn, not this shit again. How do you tell people what they think tastes good and tastes bad? It's all up to the individual. I can't stand the taste of beer, any beer and I've tried my fair share, yet that's an absolutely huge industry so surely there are just a lot of people out there that just have bad taste right?

      Yes, you have bad taste. Anyone who can stand the taste of artificial sweeteners is less perceptive than those who find the stuff absolutely loathsome. There is no evidence of bad taste that even comes close to that of a tolerance for artificial sweeteners. Hummel figurines, black velvet paintings, Pleather, vans with sunsets painted on the sides, avocado shag carpet and wearing polyester Quiana shirt knockoffs with gold chains are all less bad taste than preference for artificially sweetened drinks over water or plain iced tea.

      However, anyone who thinks diet soda tastes better than beer should be encouraged to drink the diet chemical poison, leaving more beer for those of us who aren't so perceptually impaired.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    98. Re:Cool story bro by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      Orangina uses glucose.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    99. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, tell that to my kidneys and the reactions I get from drinking only a single can of diet soda.

    100. Re:Cool story bro by toriver · · Score: 1

      "Artificial sweeteners(*) - for your artificial life!"

      (*) Not tested on humans, it was cheaper to bribe the regulators

    101. Re:Cool story bro by gunnarstahl · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this insightful...
      Saying that orange juice and cola are almost the same from the health point of view is unbelievable bullshit. Take a short look at the ingrediants of cola.
      - artificial sugars
      - phosphor acids
      - non-natural flavorings
      The only ingredient of these that you find in some of the cheap versions of orange juice is artificial sugar.

      Known facts (check wikipedia for sources) are that there are links between
      - cola and ostheoporosis due to the phosphor
      - cola and diabetes due to the sugar

      Check out these two links:
      http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3235539,00.html
      http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2006/08/25/benzene-beverages.html

      Both deal with links between cola and cancer. Google for increases in oesophagus cancer due to the increased consumate of cola.

      And you claim that the juice of oranges is equally health-destructive as cola? You must be kidding.

      I do have acid reflux and due to that I have to take pantozol (similar to nexium / purple pill). My physiological background is that I have an hiatus hernia. Used to drink 2-3 liter of cola (diet coke) every day. I had tried quitting drinking this stuff already, but without success. I was addicted. Like being addicted.

      And from time to time I've got pains in my oesphagus although I took my pills.

      Somewhere in march I read about the connections between cola and oesophagus cancer. Which hit me like a hammer. I instantly did quit drinking cola, which is now three month ago. Instead I drink pure water and coffee.
      With the result that I do not have to take the pantozol-pill every day anymore. I am down to taking it every second day. Which is a huge success for me.

      Yt,

      Gunnar

    102. Re:Cool story bro by RoundSparrow · · Score: 1

      Especially in the USA, we eat too damn much (calories). We market these calorie laden meals to ourselves, we eat way too fast (scarf scarf).

      I started to question the whole "3 meals a day" that is brainwashed by well meaning friends and family - to discover that it's probably made up social convention that is totally inappropriate for modern lifestyle [especially the typical slashdot geek ;)].

      I found the easiest diet is simple: Eat slow, put more effort into meals, and skip meals. This gem really caught my attention: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16529878 "The effect on health of alternate day calorie restriction: eating less and more than needed on alternate days prolongs life."

      So now I eat 3 or 4 meals total every 2 days - and put a lot more effort and time into those meals. I'm less hungry, more satisfied.

    103. Re:Cool story bro by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      aspartame is either harmless or barely measurably harmful

      It still tastes disgusting and makes your saliva also taste disgusting for some hours after consuming it.

      Mind you, HFCS isn't very palatable either.

    104. Re:Cool story bro by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      giving someone soda that has no calories can be like telling them they don't have to sacrifice.

      This, to me, is the essential problem with consumer culture ; the advertisers insistence that "You can have it all! At negligible personal cost!", hence products like Olestra, that lets you eat fatty food with no fat calories (at the cost of greasy anal leakage, niiiiice).

      For many of the things that are finest, the cost is part of what makes them worthwhile ; I love my prowess with code, partly because of how hard won it was (and partly because it's still gosh-darned cool to make a computer do exactly what you told it to). I love my home-baked bread, because I made it. And I love my daughter not just because she's my daughter, but for the person she is - and she wouldn't be that person without a lot of damn hard work by both her parents.

      Drinks? I stick to plain tea and coffee for stimulants, and water or watered fruit juice to quench my thirst. If I'm feeling expansive I'll dilute the juice with soda water. And I probably spend what I saved on soda on a good beer a few times a week.

    105. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you've got some messed-up idea of what "natural" means.

      Tobacco, no, it's been modified by humans through selective breeding, exactly the same as other crops.

      Do you seriously mean to suggest that no food crop or food animal since the advent of agriculture is "natural." Selective breeding is nothing more than keeping the seeds of plants that do well and mating your best chickens and eating the runts, which we've been doing for at least 5000 years.

      Multivitamins are no different to having a diet that consists of fresh fruit, vegetables and meats.

      See, it's things like this that make me despair of modern education. I don't even care whether the poster is trolling or honest, because there are people who honestly believe that you can identify 100 milligrams of compounds out of 500 grams of steak & potatoes as the things that "really" make food "good for you."

      Out here in the rational world, "natural" means unprocessed or minimally processed. Artificial processes include extensive refining, synthetic chemistry, and addition of substances that have been synthesized or refined. So, while 100 grams of orange contain about 50 mg of vitamin C, the refining process to extract the 0.05% of an orange that is vitamin C causes normal humans to consider "vitamin C" manufactured or artificial and "orange" natural.

      You may have missed the GP's point that things one might consider natural, as in unprocessed, like tobacco, can be "bad for you," while things that one considers artificial, as in highly refined extracts like multivitamins, can be "good for you." Hence, the current fad for "natural" foods is not in-and-of-itself beneficial, but plays strongly on public fear of "chemicals."

    106. Re:Cool story bro by duguk · · Score: 1

      Oh Jesus, Internet. Not this again. Can't we all agree that the science indicates aspartame is either harmless or barely measurably harmful, and certainly less harmful than the obesity one gets from consuming large amounts of sugar?

      [citation needed] Personally, I've had headaches and acid reflux/indigestion problems due to diet coke. Yes. This is anecdotal/personal experience. Best advice: don't drink either diet or normal soft drinks. I realise this'll probably be considered heresay on Slashdot.

    107. Re:Cool story bro by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The expansion in human lifespan is overwhelmingly due to a few things

        * Improved nutrition

      This is mostly because our enormously productive agriculture produces all the food we need, and a large variety of food. People do not routinely starve or have malnutrition in Western cultures.

        * Improved sanitation

      Washing with soap and good sewerage account for the most of this. People don't die in droves of cholera and a whole spectrum of other communicable diseases you get from bad water and dirty environments.

        * Vaccination

      'nuff said. The current counterculture of people who encourage people to avoid vaccination because of some ephemeral unproven idea that it causes autism makes me sick - these people are probably responsible for many more dead and maimed children than the entire world incidence of autism.

      Manufactured food seems likely to be the main contributor to the most fashionable Western plague of the 21st century ; obesity (and those conditions that follow from it). It's much harder to eat the same number of calories when it's composed of raw foodstuffs, unless you're eating whale blubber.

    108. Re:Cool story bro by rhsanborn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think GP was saying that, for example potassium supplements aren't worth anything. Or that multi-vitamins in general aren't worth anything. Rather that our multi-vitamins may be lacking in things we aren't aware of or don't think is important currently.

    109. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For a while it seems like your are eating/living bland, but you get used to it and a healthy diet tastes normal while really rich foods taste really rich."

      This is absolutely key. For the sake of my general health I radically cut back on sugary stuff, fizzy drinks, chocolate etc., and tried to eat rather better.

      The upshot is that things that were not sweet to me before, such as sultanas and raisins, bananas and the like, now have a very sweet taste, and coke, chocolate and sweets are back to being a treat.

      Everyone should do this. Eating less sugar makes chocolate vastly more rewarding when you do have some.

      I'm not sure I'd go as far as drinking only water, though; fruit juices, yoghurt drinks and the occasional diet soft drink (I prefer the taste of those made with sucralose) are all OK as long as you break the main habit.

    110. Re:Cool story bro by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I started to question the whole "3 meals a day" that is brainwashed by well meaning friends and family - to discover that it's probably made up social convention that is totally inappropriate for modern lifestyle [especially the typical slashdot geek ;)].

      I found the easiest diet is simple: Eat slow, put more effort into meals, and skip meals. This gem really caught my attention: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16529878 [nih.gov] "The effect on health of alternate day calorie restriction: eating less and more than needed on alternate days prolongs life.""

      While I have heard things good about the benefits of extreme caloric restriction, I"ve also read about and experienced the benefits of eating reasonable calories (coming from the right kind of foods), and spreading those meals out to 5-6 smaller meals a day rather than 2-3 big ones.

      I find by doing this, I really avoid any times of real hunger (the type where I lose it and gorge myself on something). I read that by eating a little all day long, you help to raise your basal metabolism since you have having to basically process food all day.

      And along with any diet modification, you gotta have exercise.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    111. Re:Cool story bro by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I used it only because the page includes links for sources that are impartial and well-informed. But, if you like, here's another one. If you Google it, I'm sure you can find tons more just like it. Which only further validates my statement. :)

    112. Re:Cool story bro by sorak · · Score: 1

      Don't forget shrooms, marijuana, and cocaine (if you chew the leaves)...

      I always find it hilarious when a jar full of pills says "All natural". I imagine a bunch of farmers in Vietnamese-style hats, shoveling dirt into a sieve and shaking it until only their precious fen-fen pills remain.

    113. Re:Cool story bro by sorak · · Score: 1

      Hold on. That seems pretty inconsistent. I can see claiming tobacco is not natural because it has been bred to have a much stronger nicotine count than what would have existed had man not intervened, but to turn around and say a vitamin is natural, despite the fact that it is a hell of a lot more concentrated and manipulated than tobacco, is inconsistent.

      Personally, I see the whole "all natural" thing as an example of the naturalistic fallacy. The fact that humans evolved in an environment containing certain items only proves that it is possible to do so. Remember, many life forms evolve defenses to prevent their consumption.

    114. Re:Cool story bro by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      OMG, you mention the brainwashing that you receive from friends and family, but I more
      so believe it is the whole system as a whole while growing up. You don't ask a brick layer about diamonds....if your nutritionist looks like they eat a cow a day, don't ask them their advice...however if you want something like a professional athlete, ask them!

      They eat 6 to 8 times a day, smaller meals, because this causes the metabolic rate to shoot up more often through out the day, plus eating the right things in sequence (combinations) makes for better digestion and also more consistent energy as your day progresses.

      I would never starve myself if I did not have to, and certainly not for dieting...the word diet means what you eat, not NOT WHAT YOU EAT...it's not about cutting back so much as knowing what is going in. You have to understand the concepts first, before applying them!

      Most that are obese are doing a disfavor and will get all the weight back if they cut too much on the food going in...they lose all the muscle, then when they go back to eating normally, they gain it back....the muscle that is....

      So when I hear you saying 3 to 4 meals a day, I would shoot you first before letting you poison anyone else with that false info.... more meals per day, snacking on vegetables, and asparagus,
      and proteins, less on the carbs. More water, less pop, no salt, no sauce or any kind. No butter,
      margarine, oils except the good one, olive oil. No sugars, except natural, like fresh orange juice...keep the juices to beg. of day, not before bed...stop eating carbs at 2 hours before going to bed...wake up during the night have a protein shake (when u go pee).

      The staple to any bodybuilder worth his salt is to understand his own body, as bodies are all diff. from one another, first and formost, then also understanding that sometimes you have to push further then you think you can stand. Learning about food does not mean become a bodybuilder, but seeing some of those "natural" freaks, as yes there are natural competitions too, which are tested etc... they do it all based on the food, and alot of workout too, but more so the food.

      The rippled 6 pack, with veins constricting through out, ....ask Bill Phillips, author of Body For Life, he'll tell you , the drugs and supplements are just to get big, but to get cut, its all about the food....nothing more "anabolic" then eating food!!!

      nuff said!

    115. Re:Cool story bro by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      That study doesn't necessarily indicate that diet soda causes obesity. I'm sure you know that. I'm willing to bet that the people who regularly drink diet soda, or any soda in general have a sweet tooth, and so while they may drink DIET soda, that bowl of ice cream, or piece of cake was almost certainly not diet. FWIW, I drink diet soda, but I also watch my calories. It makes a big difference.

    116. Re:Cool story bro by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      It depends on my mood, but I have also done the opposite of what your propose. In the past, I've eaten 5-6 meals a day but considerably smaller meals, so that I don't get to the point where I'm incredibly hungry right before sitting down to a meal. In any case, making an effort to make good food with raw ingredients ends up making better food, with more nutrients that isn't as calorie dense.

    117. Re:Cool story bro by wjousts · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try knowing what you are talking about before you comment. First result for "taste in the gut" gives you this:

      Taste receptors, the taste G-protein gustducin, and downstream signaling elements known to underlie the detection and transduction of bitter, sweet, and umami (monosodium glutamateâ"containing) compounds in taste buds of the tongue are present also in specific endocrine cells of the gut: the enteroendocrine K and L cells. Glucose in the gut activates sweet taste receptors and gustducin present in the intestineâ(TM)s enteroendocrine L cells, leading to secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) from these cells. GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) are incretin hormones, which augment insulin release from the beta cells of the pancreas. GLP-1, GIP, and other gut hormones released from the K and L cells affect insulin secretion, glucose homeostasis, nutrient absorption and other gut functions. Glucose transport into enterocytes via Na+,glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) and GLUT2 appears to be regulated by the gustducin- and sweet receptor-expressing enteroendocrine cells. In response to sugar ingestion, knockout mice lacking gustducin show deficits in the release of GLP-1 and insulin, in glucose homeostasis, and in upregulation of SGLT1. Apparently, the gut "tastes" sugars and sweeteners in much the same way as does the tongue and by using many of the same signaling elements. Taste receptors and other taste signaling elements in gut may be contributors to obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and other diet-related disorders. Gut-expressed taste elements are attractive targets for therapeutic intervention.

      The same sweetners that fool your sweet receptors on your tongue fool the sweet receptors in you gut messing with you insulin release amongst other things. We had a professor from OSU give a talk about it a few months ago.

      Heres another link from the Royal Society of Chemistry:

      A sugar-sensing receptor in the intestine could explain why drinking diet cola may hinder obese people who hope to lose weight1,2 and lead to new ways of treating obesity and diabetes.

      This explains why humans and animals fail to lose weight with low-calorie artificial sweeteners: they stimulate increased glucose absorption from carbohydrate breakdown in the gut,' said Soraya Shirazi-Beechey, who led the Liverpool team.

    118. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Previous studies have shown that this is caused by the phosphoric acid in cola:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphoric_acid

      So, yes, drink Mountain Dew instead, which uses citric acid.

    119. Re:Cool story bro by Curien · · Score: 1

      That wasn't a controlled study. "Correlation isn't causation" indeed, but in this case they aren't even in the same building.

      A more reasonable interpretation of the data is that, "Fat people try to lose weight (eg, by drinking diet soda), whereas non-fat people generally don't." But that's boring and obvious.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    120. Re:Cool story bro by Curien · · Score: 1

      Let me guess: you're an American.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    121. Re:Cool story bro by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      I started to question the whole "3 meals a day" that is brainwashed by well meaning friends and family

      Right. Because for decades and centuries, people ate three meals a day because they too were brainwashed by well meaning friends and families, not to mention that evil medical industry who only wants to take your money.

      Let me guess, you probably don't eat breakfast either despite the weight loss benefits.

      If your every other day of eating works for you, congrats. But trying to tie it to the "typical slashdot geek" because it's a stab at societal convention and how, miraculously, today's lifestyle is so much different than the past, is crap. The only thing that has changed is people's beliefs that they need to be answerable 24/7 because without the narcissistic urge to relate to everyone and anyone how busy they are, they'd realize they're simply making excuses for not eating right.

      Eating a balanced diet has ALWAYS been the correct way to maintain ones health. The fact that we ignore this simple mantra and have epiphanies when we 'discover' these miracle diets merely shows that in some cases, there's a reason for societal conventions.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    122. Re:Cool story bro by IlluminatedOne · · Score: 0

      Totally agree. My Dad lived on this stuff and esophageal cancer took him about 8 weeks after diagnosis. I can't draw a line back to diet soda, but I would find it hard to believe that it wasn't a contributing factor. Each can/bottle/glass is a chemical cocktail your body has to figure out how to deal with.

    123. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that you have evidence of people becoming obese after drinking diet soda, in a controlled experiment?

      A controlled, large-scale study? No, I don't know of one.

      A personal experiment, sure: I switched from drinking lots of regular cola to diet for several weeks when I started to get concerned about my weight, there were no other major lifestyle changes during the same period that seem likely to be relevant, and I certainly did experience the increased hunger and worsening weight problem that some claim are associated with the diet drinks. Moreover, when I switched back to drinking regular cola, the hunger/weight issues decreased to their previous levels. Of course, this only tells us that diet cola didn't work for me, but after hearing the same story from other people, I'm starting to think a proper scientific study should be done to put this one to bed once and for all.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    124. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The burden of proof is on the "diet" soda companies and supporters, who claim that artificial sweetener soda is less obesity-causing than sugar soda.

      Many people assume that the implicit claims of "diet" soda are true without any statistics (even a correlation).

    125. Re:Cool story bro by evol262 · · Score: 1

      The 25 year "average lifespan" is a massive canard, since it includes deaths from the (many) wars, death during childhood from diseases, etc. Back to ancient times, people were living to be quite old (Seneca, Pliny the Elder, Aristotle, Plato, etc).

      --
      "The more corrupt a society, the more numerous are its laws." -Tacticus
    126. Re:Cool story bro by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Right on. And until Monsanto corporation sponsors a study which shows that their product Aspartame is anything other than good for you we're going to go right on drinking it.

      Nobody ever died from trusting Monsanto, right?

    127. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arsenic is natural. Tobacco is natural. Multivitamins are artificial.

      Well then, why don't _you_ go on to only consume "natural" products, and be happy with your "natural" human lifespan of about 25 years, while the rest of us consume all these weird "manufactured" foods and enjoy our 80+ year lifespans...

      I suspect you missed the point he was making, that "natural" things aren't always good for you and "artificial" ones aren't always bad.

    128. Re:Cool story bro by lpevey · · Score: 1

      I frequently have the urge to light a cigarette, order a rare bloody steak, with a dark Irish beer, and a greasy side of something that'll disgust them.

      I am a health nut, and I would argue that all except the cigarette are good for you--assuming the grease in the greasy side is not monounsaturated, except maybe olive oil. Saturated fats and cholesterol have gotten a bad rap. The people I know who drink diet soda and eat fat-free this or that, and butter substitutes, protein bars made of soy, and other so-called healthy foods, are the ones who have a really hard time controlling their cravings and weight and just generally have a lot of unpleasant issues regarding food. I think their bodies are actually starving for real food, despite all the calories they are consuming. I know someone will point it out, so let me just go ahead and say that I know that correlation doesn't equal causation and that my anecdotes a clinical trial does not make. Still, the conclusion I draw is that the vast majority of so-called health food is anything but.

    129. Re:Cool story bro by russotto · · Score: 1

      While that's perfectly logical and well-reasoned it flies in the face of actual real-world studies. Science now knows (for certain, using statistics and actual data) that drinking diet soda versus regular soda has no positive impact whatsoever on obesity rates. Source In fact, that article actually claims that diet soda drinkers are MORE likely than their regular soda drinking counterparts to be obese.

      Biochemistry trumps statistical studies. Diet soda cannot (directly) cause weight gain. The study you posted is actually a textbook example of that mantra "correlation is not causation". And it shows why statistical surveys are no substitute for actual controlled studies.

    130. Re:Cool story bro by Iberian · · Score: 1

      I agree, when I was a kind I could eat all kinds of candy and feel fine. Now that I eat candy about once a quarter I can barely finish a pack of skittles. As a matter of fact I can't I have to give the rest to my two year old, who I know can eat a pack on his own. Thanks Grandma.

      Granted this is just me but I say try it. Once you get used to no salt or sugar or butter etc it actually becomes hard to eat those things.

    131. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Of the 622 study participants who were of normal weight at the beginning of the study, about a third became overweight or obese.

      For regular soft-drink drinkers, the risk of becoming overweight or obese was:

              * 26% for up to 1/2 can each day
              * 30.4% for 1/2 to one can each day
              * 32.8% for 1 to 2 cans each day
              * 47.2% for more than 2 cans each day.

      For diet soft-drink drinkers, the risk of becoming overweight or obese was:

              * 36.5% for up to 1/2 can each day
              * 37.5% for 1/2 to one can each day
              * 54.5% for 1 to 2 cans each day
              * 57.1% for more than 2 cans each day.

      For each can of diet soft drink consumed each day, a person's risk of obesity went up 41%.
      "

    132. Re:Cool story bro by ab0mb88 · · Score: 1

      but you'll be completely lacking in phytonutrients, fiber, fatty acids and anti-oxidants. The human body requires a lot more than just vitamins, minerals and simple carbohydrates!

      Don't worry, I am sure there is a pill for that too.

    133. Re:Cool story bro by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Probably, Glucose has more effect than Fructose. Glucose is a small sugar which passes straight across the blood brain barrier and IS a brain regulating chemical. Fructose is a larger sugar which has to first be metabolized into glucose to have brain effects. The difference is a blood sugar level chart that looks like rolling hills vrs one that can look like a wild roller coaster ride. Since Glucose is also used in the muscles, I'd expect it promotes equally rapid changes in how well muscles react to nervous impulses. Even if there's no other cause for muscle weakness, it's hard to actually build muscle or avoid injuries if individual fibers react very differently from one session to the next when being put under the same loads. Apparently, the original experiment was careful to use standardized modalities to test muscle condition, although the article doesn't really stress that.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    134. Re:Cool story bro by pherthyl · · Score: 1

      >> Most of those vitamins are artificial ones and added back in after pasteurization.

      Not in natural orange juice. The only ingredient is orange juice.

      >> Drinking orange juice for its vitamin content, is literally paying a few thousand-percent markup on vitamin pills.

      Drinking coke is like paying a few thousand percent markup on.. well, nothing. Sugar and water and cancer causing chemicals. Why not just drink some water and eat some charcoal for the same effect?

      The point of drinking orange juice is because it tastes good (so does coke). But with orange juice I get the added benefit of potassium, vitamin c, and some other good stuff, so I don't even have to take a multivitamin (there's no point if you eat healthy you know).

    135. Re:Cool story bro by Martin+Foster · · Score: 1

      Your forgetting the effect that drinking diet can have on someone. They feel that they can consume more of something else because they are being 'good' about what they drink.

      I recall an article on MacDonald's being lower calorie per meal then Subway because of the same thinking. First of all people would load up on condiments at Subway then get cookies and a real non-diet soda.

      When tallied together, it was better calorie wise to have a Big Mac combo with a diet coke. Reasoning being that since they knew what they were eating was bad, they would adjust accordingly. The reverse however does not seem to apply.

      Got this link from a quick Google search: http://www.diet-blog.com/archives/2007/09/04/subway_diners_eat_more_calories.php

    136. Re:Cool story bro by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Congrats on your 20 lbs friend. I've been battling weight issues for 10 years and finally, am at a very healthy place weight wise (17 years old, 245 lbs at 5'9...27 years old 150 lbs at 5'9). It took me a long long time to do it right, but really it's about portions and learning to listen to your body.

      We don't need nearly as much food as we become accustomed to having...

    137. Re:Cool story bro by x2A · · Score: 1

      "Your forgetting the effect that drinking diet can have on someone"

      No I'm not, as I said, I wasn't making *any statement at all* on the effectiveness of drinking diet, the difference in chemicals, calories, or psychological effects as I think there're far too many variables for me to make any informed comment on the issue with the level of experience and lack of research I have carried out on the matter, and I don't touch the stuff, diet or otherwise, coke's disgusting and just makes me thursty. My point was the *exact* thing I said it was, nothing more, nothing less, nothing between any lines to read into, AND, whether drinking diet does help 100% of the time, makes people fatter 100% of the time, or (more likely) somewhere in between (depending on a million other factors)... my point is completely unaffected and so still completely valid, because I only said anything about the cause, and cause must come first. What happens to people once they are already drinking it cannot be the cause of why people decide to drink it in the first place.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    138. Re:Cool story bro by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      "Then you are saying the diet soda does nothing for obese people"

      You liar! Look, simply:

      Person A: I'm overweight, I know, I'll drink diet.
      Person B: I'm not overweight, I know, I won't drink diet.
      RESULT: people found drinking diet are those who are overweight.

      Here Here! That is exactly what I thought...something about correlation & causation.

    139. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NERD RAAAAAGE!!!!!!!!!

      Seriously, relax a little. Stress kills. No need to worry about diet soda if you're going to be dead in a year from a heart attack or stroke induced by someone on the internet who misinterpreted your statement.

    140. Re:Cool story bro by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, and I certainly wouldn't say that "everything that is natural is good for you".

      However, there are foods that we have 10000 years' experience eating, and foods that we have 10 years' experience eating....
      I'm not saying that all "artificial" foods are bad, but some of them _surely_ are, and at this stage we don't know which.

    141. Re:Cool story bro by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      I dunno, sounds Irish to me (and I'm of Irish descent, we can smell our own). After all, they say that the reason they invented beer was to prevent the Irish from taking over the world.

    142. Re:Cool story bro by x2A · · Score: 1

      Huh... so you see an exclamation as stressed rage then? One can be calmly expressive ya know :-)

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    143. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of the 622 study participants who were of normal weight at the beginning of the study, about a third became overweight or obese.

      For regular soft-drink drinkers, the risk of becoming overweight or obese was:

              * 26% for up to 1/2 can each day
              * 30.4% for 1/2 to one can each day
              * 32.8% for 1 to 2 cans each day
              * 47.2% for more than 2 cans each day.

      For diet soft-drink drinkers, the risk of becoming overweight or obese was:

              * 36.5% for up to 1/2 can each day
              * 37.5% for 1/2 to one can each day
              * 54.5% for 1 to 2 cans each day
              * 57.1% for more than 2 cans each day.

      For each can of diet soft drink consumed each day, a person's risk of obesity went up 41%.

    144. Re:Cool story bro by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      Since this is posted in the context of a story that indicates that medical science didn't know everything about the consumption of caffeine and sugars, you should at least acknowledge the fact that the headline tomorrow might be "vitamin just found in ____ found to prevent ____." It seems like every day that we find a new benefit of a vitamin, so it doesn't seem unlikely that they might find a new benefit of some other substance that they then start labeling a vitamin. Didn't Folic Acid come out of nowhere less than a decade ago?

    145. Re:Cool story bro by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I don't know that anybody actually posted a link to the actual study, but were subjects randomly-assigned to the diet vs regular groups, or was there an element of self-selection?

      While there is clearly an interesting interaction between diet soda and obesity, the data you present do not in any way show what that relationship is. It could be that people who are genetically prone to becoming obsese are also prone to liking diet soda. It could be that diet soda causes weight gain. It could be that getting lots of calories from sugar somehow suppresses hunger and you eat less of other stuff. It could be that people who drink diet soda think they can get away with eating other things.

      In order to be valid you must control for the placebo effect. What happens if you give both groups the same thing but tell half of them that it is diet soda and the other half that it is regular? Better still - don't let anybody know what they're getting (which can be hard to do with food), and randomly assign individuals to the groups.

      It isn't a valid experiment unless there is a true control. It is surprisingly easy to mess things up that ruin a controlled experiment. When your test subjects are humans it is almost impossible to get it right. If it were, chances are we'd have cured cancer by now...

    146. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, kid. I'll bet you're a real physical specimen. Not only that, but you don't understand the first thing about nutrition.

    147. Re:Cool story bro by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Your argument (aside from the point about fiber) is all hogwash. I was curious about the term "phytonutrients" as that was a new one on me (although I was able to guess what it meant which I confirmed when I looked it up on wikipedia), so I did a little research and found out it's just a generic term for nutrients (aka vitamins) found in plants. Everything you list (except fiber, which can be had in dietary supplement form) can and is available in a multi-vitamin up to and including anti-oxidants. Further more recent research suggests those anti-oxidants everyone is raving over lately might actually have some adverse health effects.

      You're right though, the body does need more than just vitamins, minerals and simple carbohydrates, it also needs protein, so eat a steak with your soda and multi-vitamin.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    148. Re:Cool story bro by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      I'm diabetic you insensitive clod.

      Diet soda may be nothing more than flavored water, but that's kind of the point. Also Diet Coke Plus is flavored water with vitamins.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    149. Re:Cool story bro by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      And also just as likely the headline will read "vitamin just found in ____ fount to cause ____." Eat what you want, drink what you want, and keep it all in moderation. If you KNOW something is bad for you from personal experience (you're allergic, or it makes you ill in some way) then avoid it, but don't assume that because you have an adverse reaction to something that everyone else will or that that item is somehow universally "bad" for you (and likewise don't assume it's "good" either). Our bodies are governed by very very complex and individualistic chemical reactions, and no two peoples metabolisms are exactly the same. When it comes to nutrition there are very few universal rules (the most basic chemical reactions are pretty universal, so for instance it's a good idea to steer clear of arsenic as we like our Krebs Cycle running thank you very much), but for anything more complex than general categories don't assume something is universal (I for instance know people that have issues dealing with certain kinds of proteins in their diet, that most people have no problem with and generally enjoy).

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    150. Re:Cool story bro by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      BTW, for those that actually bothered to RTFA, you notice everyone involved was drinking ridiculous quantities of soda (most of the referenced individuals had consumed at least 4 liters per day). Every time I see one of these stories invariably it turns out the people involved are consuming quantities of something well beyond reason which people then turn around and try to turn into some sort of blanket statement that X is bad for you. The chemical reactions that occur inside of any living organism are a complex balancing act, but are to a certain extent very resilient (certain portions more than others), but too much of ANYTHING in the mix will cause problems, I don't care what it is.

      Look at the ratios of things in our natural diet and try to stick with that, not because there's something "magical", or "holy" about things found in "nature", but because it's a fairly good rule of thumb for the inputs our metabolisms are balanced to handle. As I said previously, everyone is different, no diet will work for everyone, so adjust as needed, but stop trying to preach that there's something special about "natural" foods, or that when you drink or eat quantities of something way beyond reason that that proves it's inherently bad for you.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    151. Re:Cool story bro by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      And interestingly enough some of them evolve systems to encourage their consumption where it's beneficial to do so (see for instance most fruits). One might argue that the tobacco that's been selectively bred is in fact a superior strain of tobacco that's developed a symbiotic relationship with humanity. We get tobacco to smoke, and in return the tobacco plant is spread far and wide and cared for to maturity. How much of the original species of tobacco still exists today, and how does it compare to the bred strains in terms of distribution? Darwin might argue that makes the bred versions a more fit species. One might also argue of course that the new tobacco is a overspecialized species at this point and too dependent on its symbiosis with humanity making it fragile, but only time will tell.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    152. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To say that that there is no scientific evidence that aspartame is detrimenatal to our health is simply not true. Read this article, the aspartame epidemic:
      http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/article/id992/pg1/index.html

    153. Re:Cool story bro by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      you would not WANT to swallow pure potassium

      For all you non-believers out there... the reaction you get when pure potassium contacts water is more violent than that of pure sodium.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    154. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you have a low tolerance to Caffeine, and not to Aspartame. Diet soda tends to have 10-20% more caffeine than regular.

      Caffeine is a stimulant, increases blood flow, heart rate, etc. Excess blood to your head your body didn't want can cause headaches.

      First you can cure that headache by restricting bloodflow to your head via various pressure points. (Research them yourself, there are 6 that work wonders)

      Second, Correlation does not equal causation. I gamble you can get the EXACT same reaction by doing Cocaine or meth, or popping 1-2 Caffeine pills.

      Not the Aspartame.

    155. Re:Cool story bro by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Without going into a pharmacological history, been there, done that, never had the same reaction from anything else.

          And... I've eaten caffeine pills like candy, taken long road trips powered by code red mountain dew, jolt cola, or whatever the most caffeinated cold drink I could find at the gas station was. Shot back three energy drinks, and although ending up with an upset stomach, no headaches.

          And when I make coffee, there's enough caffeine it so a hamster could power a city for about an hour (and then die of exhaustion). :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    156. Re:Cool story bro by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      What you describe is a process by which rats are starved for calories for a while, and afterward consume as many calories as they can get once food is abundant again. It doesn't necessarily say anything about artificial sweeteners, if I'm reading it correctly.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    157. Re:Cool story bro by SamuliZip · · Score: 1

      Arsenic is natural. Tobacco is natural. Multivitamins are artificial.

      Yes there are "natural" tobacco products with no artificial additives, but can you call this natural?
      And natural usually means bad, mmkay? Death by childbirth or tetanus or angry goat by the time you're 35. It might still be better than being deliberately poisoned though.

    158. Re:Cool story bro by modecx · · Score: 1

      It's even worse than that. I'm Irish, Czech and Russian, at least (in addition to other alcohol loving races, undoubtedly, I know there's some German in there too). It's like ultimate trifecta of alcoholism is coursing through my veins.

      By their powers combined, I am super drunk! Like a vampire that can walk in the day, I will use my very experienced liver to conquer the world!!! Eh, who am I kidding.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    159. Re:Cool story bro by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      Well, all I can say is 'cheers, brother'!

    160. Re:Cool story bro by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I do get hungry when I drink diet soda. I'm just super skeptical as a rule. I'd need to see it as part of a controlled study before I understood it to be an established effect that diet soda has. And again there is always the issue of correlation vs. causation. Who knows, maybe such a study exists, or maybe someday a causal relationship will be established.

    161. Re:Cool story bro by OrigamiMarie · · Score: 1

      Actually, I forget the details. They may not be particularly restricted during the artificial sweetener phase. I really should go locate that story again . . . okay this is kind of a lousy summary, but it's the study I'm thinking of: http://www.thedailygreen.com/healthy-eating/eat-safe/fake-sugar-study-44031708

    162. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the G*P:
      http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20050613/drink-more-diet-soda-gain-more-weight

      Yes, all of these are possible.
      Another possibility is that diet soda drinkers have overweight peers who influence them.

      But given that there is no study showing correlating "diet" soda with weight loss, I would say there is no reason to consider drinking this substance.

    163. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As no scientific study concludes that "diet" soda helps with weight loss,
      may I ask you to keep up the running and try one of the following:

      - switch back to sugar soda. Do you loose more or less?

      - switch to water. Is there more weight loss?

      Again, keep up the running, as that is the most significant part.

    164. Re:Cool story bro by retchdog · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you found what works for you.

      My reactions to orange juice and cola respectively, are completely the opposite of yours.

      Minute Maid brand OJ (the most processed) will actually make me vomit; Tropicana just makes me feel sick for half the day; and fresh-squeezed from good oranges is "safe" about half the time, otherwise it's like Tropicana.

      Cola doesn't do this. Still, I usually just drink water, and get my nutrition from actual food, which leans toward the healthy side. No point in drinking a few hundred calories.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    165. Re:Cool story bro by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Clearly (I thought) I was referring to "food industry" orange juice, not real orange juice. Good for you; I used to enjoy that when I had a tree in Florida.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    166. Re:Cool story bro by retchdog · · Score: 1

      In my case, I have steamed kale and a boiled potato along with the steak. Fie on the juice-drinkers; I get my nutrition from chewing actual food, and it's fabulous.

      Anti-oxidants: yeah, apparently oxidation is a pathway for the benefits of exercise (i.e. exercise weakens by oxidation your muscles, and the repair process is what is beneficial). I laughed when I read it. Yet another ridiculous fad debunked after, I'm sure, several million dollars in sales to the naive.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    167. Re:Cool story bro by retchdog · · Score: 1

      I eat plenty of vegetables, raw and cooked, in addition to a supplement. I am quite unconcerned.

      I guess my point is mostly that depending on juice for nutrition, for all the sugar you end up getting, maybe not the best idea. Better to eat real whole vegetables and drink cola, than to drink juice and eat processed crap.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    168. Re:Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That kind of abrasive attitude won't make you live to 80+.

    169. Re:Cool story bro by angster · · Score: 0

      Right. Because that 80-year+ life span has nothing to do with developments in water treatment, sewage removal, housing, refrigeration, or discoveries of bacteria and viruses, developments of antibiotics, vaccines, insulin, or any of the myriad drugs for the myriad diseases and conditions which have been discovered. Nor medical/surgical/dental procedures with ever more delicate and, increasingly, non-invasive instruments. And advances in understanding the human body and its nutritional needs and ways to meet those needs, pre-birth to old-age. Not to mention hospitals that are no longer the germ-soaked, infection-spreading ... hum, forget this one. I expect to continue consuming food as "natural" as I can get, mainly, and since I have already passed, by many years, the 25-year lifespan you have arbitrarily pulled out of your nether eye, I'll discount your opinions regarding diet. And to celebrate, I think I'll have a coke.

    170. Re:Cool story bro by angster · · Score: 0

      I don't know. I've sat and politely listened to comic book geeks until my eyes rolled up into my head, but if I ever need to know something about a comic book I ask one of them. Same with computer, film, science fiction, astronomy, even gardening, for gods' sakes. Talk to the ones who've done the most coding, watching, reading, researching. It's a good Starting Place.

    171. Re:Cool story bro by x2A · · Score: 1

      I disagree; balance tends to be pretty important in life, and obsessions are rarely if ever balanced. In the case of nutrition nuts, they can often and easily forget that there's more to food than pure nutrition, for example, taste and the general enjoyment of your meals. Obsessively focusing on either one of those things while neglecting the other I do not see as being A Good Thing. I'd rather take the advice of people who have struck the balances.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  2. Shit by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Define "excessive", please.

    1. Re:Shit by Cryogenic+Specter · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to the article, the people were drinking 3 to 7 LITERS a day. That is a lot.

    2. Re:Shit by xkenny13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      From TFA: The case studies looked at patients whose consumption ranged from two to nine litres of cola a day.

      I'm good. :-)

    3. Re:Shit by adisakp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      According to the article, the people were drinking 3 to 7 LITERS a day. That is a lot.

      If you drank 7 liters of pure water a day you would probably suffer from low potassium as a result of electrolytes being flushed our in your urine. The US-RDA for water is 2 liters of water (8 cups) per day.

      Not to mention, eating 2-3 bananas over the course of the day would probably correct the problem.

    4. Re:Shit by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The case studies looked at patients whose consumption ranged from two to nine litres of cola a day.

      OH NEVERMIND LOL JESUS WTF PEOPLE

    5. Re:Shit by nih · · Score: 0

      um ok.
      going beyond the usual, necessary, or proper limit or degree; characterized by excess: excessive

      --
      I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
    6. Re:Shit by wjousts · · Score: 1

      From the BBC article on the same study:

      They tell of the curious case of an Australian ostrich farmer who needed emergency care for lung paralysis after drinking 4-10 litres of cola a day.

      Another example included a pregnant woman who regularly consumed up to three litres a day for the last six years and complained of tiredness, appetite loss and persistent vomiting.

      A heart trace revealed she had an irregular heartbeat, probably caused by her low blood potassium levels.

      Once she stopped drinking so much cola, she made a full and uneventful recovery.

      So, yeah, excessive, even by my standards.

    7. Re:Shit by KingPin27 · · Score: 1

      WTF!!! WHO DRINKS 9 litres of frakking cola a day!

      --
      "i lost my dignity on a slippery wiener"
    8. Re:Shit by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      this reminds me of the guy that got cancer from microwave popcorn. because he ate like 3 or 4 bags a day, and with each bag, he would open it, place his face to it, and inhale the popcorn/butter fumes repeatedly.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    9. Re:Shit by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who drinks 9 liters of any liquid a day? No wonder other side effects were vomiting and diarrhea.

    10. Re:Shit by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Drinking 7 L of water a day would cause hypokalemia, but the hyponatremia (low sodium) would become a severe problem long before the reduced potassium.

      The interesting thing about the cola problem is that the hypokalemia is more severe than the hyponatremia, suggesting that there is an additional factor other than overhydration.

      Best guess is caffeine, as per the article. It's already well documented that high doses of caffeine cause hypokalemia, even when the caffeine is administered in pill form without abnormal amounts of water.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    11. Re:Shit by l00sr · · Score: 1

      Hand in your geek card immediately. Give it here.

    12. Re:Shit by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Could it just be that since cola typically contains some sodium, the hyponatremia doesn't occur, and all that's left is hypokalemia?

    13. Re:Shit by altinos.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pregnant for the last six years?

    14. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The US-RDA for water is 2 liters of water (8 cups) per day.

      [Citation needed]

      There is explicitly no RDA for water. The DRI or AI for water is between 2.7-3.7 liters per day, but "includes all water contained in food, beverages, and drinking water." Those references also note that "Thirst and consumption of beverages at meals are adequate to maintain hydration." -- I.e. no need to carry a bottle to constantly sip from as if you're trying to survive a desert hike, on top of every other beverage you're already drinking.

      The 64 oz / day myth was created by people who can't read both consecutive sentences from the 1945 Food & Nutrition Board study: "An ordinary standard for diverse persons is 1 milliliter for each calorie of food. Most of this quantity is contained in prepared foods." Well established. The most recent recommendation from the same board suggests approximately 3 liters of water, about-faces itself saying most (80%) is met through beverages, explicitly denotes caffeinated beverages as an acceptable source of hydration, and similarly reiterates that the "vast majority" of people meet their hydration need merely by responding to thirst - not by forcing themselves to drink water to hit a magic number.

    15. Re:Shit by Kumiorava · · Score: 1

      Was it the microwave, popcorn, butter, or the inhaling that caused the cancer? That reminds me of me, I shit every day and I don't have a colon cancer.

    16. Re:Shit by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      The US-RDA for water is 2 liters of water (8 cups) per day.

      That recommendation has no actual basis in medical science. At some point someone tried to track down where the 8 cups thing came from and they ended up at a dead end with no evidence for why it came about. It's just a meme that has been passed on through the medical establishment from sometime in the 20th century. You can get by just as well on 4-5 cups of water a day without impairing your kidney function.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    17. Re:Shit by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      I don't believe he had cancer but, rather, scarring of the lungs. The cause is the artificial butter flavoring that interacts unfavorably with lung tissue.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    18. Re:Shit by kilodelta · · Score: 2, Informative

      No kidding. Even at my heaviest consumption I went through less than a liter a day. Now I don't drink commercially produced soft drinks all that much, it's one maybe once in a very great while. I've gotten adept at making limeade, iced tea, etc. using real sugar instead of HFCS.

    19. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 litres of cola is like 3000 calories. Forget the muscle problems, 3000 calories of cola on top of whatever solid food they eat, they're going to be morbidly obese.

    20. Re:Shit by barzok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can get by just as well on 4-5 cups of water a day without impairing your kidney function.

      As long as your urine is clear or very pale, you're properly hydrated.

    21. Re:Shit by Virak · · Score: 1

      I, on the other hand, am holding a half-finished, two liter bottle of Coke in my hand at this very moment.

      And I don't really care. Who needs muscles anyway?

    22. Re:Shit by bagsc · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, eating 2-3 bananas over the course of the day would probably correct the problem.

      Not quite. 3 bananas might get you a gram of potassium. People should get about 5 grams a day from fruits and vegetables, but the average American gets about 2.5 grams a day. If you're hypokalemic, you need a professional to dose out your potassium. You might need 1 gram, you might need 10 grams, you might need it intravenously, and too much or too little may kill you, depending.

      However, if you're hypokalemic and don't want to deal with medical professionals, just:
      1) avoid any salty foods, and
      2) eat only normal foods that happen to have good potassium.

      I keep bananas, almonds, dried apricots, raisins, prunes, dates, etc on hand to snack on when I get hypokalemic symptoms.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    23. Re:Shit by kingcobra0128 · · Score: 0

      anything above one glass as the stuff is bad for you

    24. Re:Shit by ScottBob · · Score: 1

      It's called bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a.k.a. Popcorn Worker's Lung, and the chemical in the artificial butter responsible for it is diacetyl.

    25. Re:Shit by bagsc · · Score: 1

      TFA says "The case studies looked at patients whose consumption ranged from two to nine litres of cola a day."

      For those of you used to measuring in six packs, six 12 oz cans of cola is 2.1 liters.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    26. Re:Shit by ScottBob · · Score: 1
      Well, I, for one, can drink an entire case of beer over the course of a day. 24 cans x 12 oz/can = 288 ounces, or just over 8.5 liters. But then again, alcohol acts as a diuretic, causing more frequent urination, but more urination also causes depletion of electrolytes, which, along with metabolites of alcohol, causes a really nasty hangover...

      Now, who in their right mind would even attempt to drink an entire case of sodas, sweetened, diet or otherwise?

    27. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No shit they are morbidly obese. These are Americans we are talking about.

    28. Re:Shit by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      It's fine as a rule of thumb. Also, I've never heard anyone say to me that it definitely had to come from a bottle. Obviously there's water in food, and anything that can rightly be called a liquid should count.

      And none of this invalidates the actual statement, which was that too much water will flush out electrolytes.

    29. Re:Shit by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      So... you're saying a 2-4 of beer is bad for you?

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    30. Re:Shit by julesh · · Score: 1

      Define "excessive", please.

      And, while you're at it, please specify where the idea that "diet colas aren't any better" comes from, because it isn't in TFA and is explicitly contradicted by the bbc's article on the same study, which goes into more depth about the hypothesis being explored, which is that the combination of caffeine and sugars is responsible.

    31. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you figure that vegetable oil, ethanol (say 190-proof everclear), mineral oil (used on cutting boards and candymaking), ghee (served warm), and lecithin (an emulsifier typically sold in non-aqueous liquid solution) will all meet my daily hydration needs? And that's just off the top of my head of actual human-ingestible liquids that I've got in my kitchen right now. How about mercury? I've got that in my kitchen too.

    32. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you happen to consume a Rockstar Energy drink. Whatever is in it will turn urine a neon yellow for something like 24 hours.

    33. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps no RDA, but folks regularly die from drinking too much water. Usually it's around 3 gallons. But you'll see effects long before that.

      7 liters of water will produce some bad effects.

      10-12 liters of water can kill you.


      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_intoxication

    34. Re:Shit by barzok · · Score: 1

      Rockstar has a shitload of caffeine in it. Caffeine is a diuretic - it will dehydrate you.

  3. This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Evidence is increasing to suggest that excessive cola consumption can also lead to hypokalaemia, in which the blood potassium levels fall, causing an adverse effect on vital muscle functions.'

    Bananas contain lots of potassium.

    Solution is obvious: drink all the cola you want, just make sure to supplement with banana ice cream. Added advantage of calcium and magnesium in the ice cream (also necessary for proper muscle function).

    This post brought to you by Dole-omite and Benn & Gerry's.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Came here to say this.

      The problem is lack of potassium, not excess of cola.

      Solution: Go get some potassium.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Moblaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Too late. A certain extremely large software company has already patented the banana ice cream Coke float (as well as a number of variations involve diet and Pepsi applications) in order to provide its programmers a permanent competitive advantage.

    3. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From a physiological perspective, though, the problem is not a lack of potassium. That is a symptom. While it requires treatment, the underlying cause also should be treated

      The problem is probably comprised of two main factors: caffeine intoxication and fructose-related diarrhea.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by retchdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      2 liters of cola has about 220mg of caffeine. Twenty ounces of reasonably strong black coffee (e.g. starbucks) has a bit over 400mg, and many people drink a few cups a day.

      If the problem with cola were due to the caffeine, we'd have found the problem already in coffee drinkers who have already been studied to hell and back by people who'd just love to ban yet another enjoyable chemical.

      No, as mentioned above the "problem" is probably that the sheer volume of cola flushes out potassium, and maybe the sugar accelerates metabolism or something.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    5. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Bananas contain lots of potassium.

      According to this you need 4,700mg/day of potassium even without the effects of too much soda. At 422mg per banana, that's 11.14 bananas per day.

      Am I missing something? It seems you would have to eat a freaking huge amount of any of the listed foods to get your daily amount.

    6. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hypokalemia is a documented side effect of caffeine intoxication. We have discovered this same problem in coffee drinkers, if you read the literature, you'd see for yourself.

      Please note the "excessive" volumes referred to in TFA are on the order of 4+ (or up to 10+) L per day. That's like 2+ to 5+ pots of strong coffee a day in terms of caffeine content.

      This is probably exacerbated by the "flushing" of electrolytes via diarrhea caused by high-volume fructose consumption.

      Please. Know what you're talking about, or at least RTFA, before you try to make a counter-argument.

      Overhydration can cause hypokalemia via excess elimination as well, but that becomes a problem long after hyponatremia becomes a severe problem.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    7. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something? It seems you would have to eat a freaking huge amount of any of the listed foods to get your daily amount

      Well, the people TFA refers to are having fricking huge amounts of cola, why not fricking huge amounts of bananas? Switch from banana ice cream to a banana split sundae between each glass of cola.

      8 L of cola
      3 *large* glasses of cola per 2L bottle.
      So 12 glasses of cola.
      Which means 11 bananas if I skip the banana split after the last glass of cola.

      My calculations work fine, I'm sticking to my original plan, except I'm switching to banana splits instead of banana-flavored ice cream.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Bananas contain lots of potassium.

      There's about 422 mg potassium in a medium banana. The RDA is 3500 mg. There are a whole lot of foods with a whole lot more potassium than bananas.

      Not sure how bananas got the rep for being potassium-rich. I guess they've got more potassium than anything else in the nutrient department, but they're really not that high in potassium.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    9. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I usually don't bother with the /. article, and even my prestigious institutional affiliation doesn't give me access to the good articles on the subject (randomized trials, &c.) although the abstracts seem quite significant.

      How do life science people get anything done but negotiating access to research?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    10. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by maxume · · Score: 1

      Because they make a decent snack. I sure don't crave a tomato when I get done with a run.

      I guess french fries (which are around 50% higher in potassium by weight) would be the holy grail for people that drink several liters of soda on an ongoing basis.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Stop drinking carbonated sugar water, get outside and get that fat ASS of yours some exercise. Then move out of your mother's basement and actually talk to real, live girls IN PERSON instead of the 45-year-old fatass online pretending to be a girl, k?

    12. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by SpeZek · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine the meeting with the nutritionist?
      Cola Addict: Hey doc, so, did you get those results back?
      Nutritionist: Yeah, we're going to have to put you on a french-fry diet.
      Cola Addict: Sweet, now I can live at McDonalds!

    13. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I got that covered, been eating a small fry at lunch every day for years. Amazing how much nutrition is in a potato. I wonder how long you can live off them?

    14. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by maxume · · Score: 1

      I imagine quite a long time, though I think they are merely a good source of protein, so that might become a problem.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Bananas contain lots of potassium.

      Solution is obvious: drink all the cola you want, just make sure to supplement with banana ice cream. Added advantage of calcium and magnesium in the ice cream (also necessary for proper muscle function).

      Funny and insightful, calcium and magnesium help the uptake of potassium too. So with 7-10 litres of coke all you need is one full cow, a bunch of bananas and half of a VW engine block shredded in a blender for a balanced diet, mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    16. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drink 3 (12 cup) pots of strong coffee a day you insensitive clod! ......although I do love bananas.

    17. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bananas today are different than the ones from a few decades ago. The new ones aren't as high in potassium. Much of the early nutrition info came from studies during the great depression and was based on having reasonable meals a few times a week and going hungry at least once a week. Modern farming also has managed to strip some nutrients out of the end products and one example I read about showed that farmed iceberg lettuce now contains significantly less nutrients than it used to (even though it never had much).

    18. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. Know what you're talking about, or at least RTFA, before you try to make a counter-argument.

      You must be new here!

    19. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by sorak · · Score: 1

      The problem is probably comprised of two main factors: caffeine intoxication and fructose-related diarrhea.

      Hold on! houldn't the headline read "Caffeine Intoxicates. Fructose Causes Diarrhea"...In fact, leave off the fructose part. Nobody cares about that.

    20. Re:This stuff is b-a-n-a-n-a-s by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Bananas today are different than the ones from a few decades ago. The new ones aren't as high in potassium. Much of the early nutrition info came from studies during the great depression and was based on having reasonable meals a few times a week and going hungry at least once a week. Modern farming also has managed to strip some nutrients out of the end products and one example I read about showed that farmed iceberg lettuce now contains significantly less nutrients than it used to (even though it never had much).

      Interesting, especially since plantains (both raw and cooked) are way higher in potassium than sweet bananas. I expect they've not been hybridized as much, either.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  4. Dew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing I live on Mountain Dew...I would hate to have muscle problems!

  5. Knew it, somehow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah Ha! Now I know the reason why I never liked cola drinks. Sorry for the rest of you, that may have to give it up.

  6. Go figure by Cryogenic+Specter · · Score: 1

    I figured out that cola was bad for you when I heard of the school science experiment where you put old teeth (baby teeth or animal teeth) in cola for a couple of days and let them disintegrate!

    1. Re:Go figure by EdZ · · Score: 1

      If you're gargling your cola for several days before swallowing, then you'd have a problem. Thank goodness your stomach acids, much stronger than the Phosphoric acid in cola, do not cause any problems unless your stomach springs a leak.

    2. Re:Go figure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      I think Mythbusters disproved that one a few seasons ago. (also disproved dissolving a nail)

    3. Re:Go figure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I don't know, because I actually tried that and nothing happened.

    4. Re:Go figure by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I figured out that cola was bad for you when I heard of the school science experiment where you put old teeth (baby teeth or animal teeth) in cola for a couple of days and let them disintegrate!

      I figured out fresh fruit was bad for you when I heard of the school science experiment where you put some fruit on a dish, and a couple days later its covered in toxic molds.

      Unless you wander around with a mouthful of cola in your mouth for days at a time, your conclusion is about as absurd as mine is.

      Now I'm not arguing cola is good for you, but the experiment you are referring to is irrelevant. After all, the body normally contains far stronger acids than mere cola.

    5. Re:Go figure by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are plenty of other old wives tales telling how bad soda is for you, such as the suggetsion of using it for removing rusty lug nuts.
      Of course, plain old tap water can be substituted for soda in most of these old wives tales, and the result is the same.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    6. Re:Go figure by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      I tried that.

      They don't.

    7. Re:Go figure by mog007 · · Score: 1

      The Mythbusters debunked that myth.

      You heard of the experiment, perhaps you should have DONE it to confirm the results you were told. The teeth won't be pretty, but they won't disappear.

    8. Re:Go figure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False according to Snopes: http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/tooth.asp

  7. Licorice also causes excretion of potassium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So don't eat licorice along with your colas.

  8. Not gonna help you, bro by spun · · Score: 1

    FTFA:

    It appears that hypokalaemia can be caused by excessive consumption of three of the most common ingredients in cola drinks â" glucose, fructose and caffeine.

    The dew is even worse for you, bro. The article makes no mention of diet colas, which do not contain fructose or glucose, so I doubt they are as bad as sugar sodas.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the difference. Diet (sic!) drinks use aspartam as a substitute for sugar. Well, for anyone who has IQ higer than typical showel or brick, I must not to explain, that this chemical-ultratoxin kills faster than bullet.

      You must not to speak good.

    2. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by whiledo · · Score: 3, Funny

      chemical-ultratoxin kills faster than bullet

      That would explain the piles of dead bodies that I see stacked up next to every soda fountain and convenience store on a daily basis, what with it being faster than a bullet and all.

      Okay, I just can't help it - I really hope you are a non-native English speaker. Otherwise, I'm afraid I'm going to have to rewrite your post:

      What's the difference. Diet (sic!) drinks use aspartam (sic) as a substitute for sugar. Well, for anyone who has (sic) IQ higer (sic) than typical showel (sic) or (sic) brick, I must (sic) not to (sic) explain, (sic) that this chemical-ultratoxin kills faster than (sic) bullet.

      If you are a native English speaker, you have the IQ of a showel.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    3. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by retchdog · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, a very very slow bullet.

      I'm not sure what a "showel" is, but: There is no convincing evidence that moderate consumption of aspartame causes harm. The evidence was all from "accelerated failure studies", where they gave mice extreme doses and extrapolated back to normal consumption. Well, that's not bad for a first approximation, and diet drinks had a cancer warning label for a while. However, the studies were refuted early on and now time has borne out that the studies were incorrect. There's apparently a threshold effect, and under a certain dosage (which is quite high), it's perfectly safe.

      If you want to worry about something, worry about brominated vegetable oil, which is used in Mt. Dew and other citrus sodas to disperse the citrus oils uniformly in the drink. Or, if you really want to worry about something which actually has a non-negligible chance of killing/disabling you, look both ways before crossing the street and always wear your seatbelt; and (a distant second) don't smoke.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    4. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, obviously the above doesn't apply to people with phenylketonuria.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    5. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll have to rewrite your post:

      If you are a native English speaker, you have the IQ of a (sic) showel.

    6. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Ironica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, a very very slow bullet.

      I'm not sure what a "showel" is, but: There is no convincing evidence that moderate consumption of aspartame causes harm. The evidence was all from "accelerated failure studies", where they gave mice extreme doses and extrapolated back to normal consumption. Well, that's not bad for a first approximation, and diet drinks had a cancer warning label for a while. However, the studies were refuted early on and now time has borne out that the studies were incorrect. There's apparently a threshold effect, and under a certain dosage (which is quite high), it's perfectly safe.

      For very small values of "perfect."

      Artificial sweeteners may not be the certain cancer death they were once thought to be. However, there's still a few issues with them:

      * Asparatame breaks down into asparatase and methyl alcohol at higher temperatures, such as those used in baking, and during certain chemical processes, such as the digestive process. Methyl alcohol is toxic to humans.

      * Sucralose interacts badly with certain medications, including those taken by cancer patients to prevent recurrences.

      * ALL sweeteners, regardless of their source or chemical composition, trigger insulin production in the same way that sugar does. This is a reflexive response, where the body ramps up insulin production in response to the *taste* of sweet, not waiting until blood sugar actually goes up. This results in lower blood sugar levels in response to non-nutritive sweeteners, which induces hunger and sugar/carb cravings. This is why switching to diet soda from regular causes weight *gain* rather than loss in often-replicated studies.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    7. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes way more sense if you read it in a Russian accent. :p

    8. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is no convincing evidence that moderate consumption of aspartame causes harm.

      September 30, 1980-- The Public Board of Inquiry concludes NutraSweet should not be approved pending further investigations of brain tumors in animals. The board states it "has not been presented with proof of reasonable certainty that aspartame is safe for use as a food additive."

      January 1981-- Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, states in a sales meeting that he is going to make a big push to get aspartame approved within the year. Rumsfeld says he will use his political pull in Washington, rather than scientific means, to make sure it gets approved.

      January 21, 1981-- Ronald Reagan is sworn in as President of the United States. Reagan's transition team, which includes Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of G. D. Searle, hand picks Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes Jr. to be the new FDA Commissioner.

      March, 1981-- An FDA commissioner's panel is established to review issues raised by the Public Board of Inquiry.

      May 19, 1981-- Three of six in-house FDA scientists who were responsible for reviewing the brain tumor issues, Dr. Robert Condon, Dr. Satya Dubey, and Dr. Douglas Park, advise against approval of NutraSweet, stating on the record that the Searle tests are unreliable and not adequate to determine the safety of aspartame.

      July 15, 1981-- In one of his first official acts, Dr. Arthur Hayes Jr., the new FDA commissioner, overrules the Public Board of Inquiry, ignores the recommendations of his own internal FDA team and approves NutraSweet for dry products.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALL sweeteners, regardless of their source or chemical composition, trigger insulin production in the same way that sugar does.

      I've never heard of this, and can't find anything about it with a quick glance at Google. Citation?

    10. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Rip+Dick · · Score: 1

      Say nuclear wessels...

    11. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by lgw · · Score: 1

      You can *immediately* taste when Asparatame-sweetened soda has been stored at too high of a temperature - it tastes *rancid* (even for freaks like me who are used to the normal taste).

      A sweet taste triggers insulin production for a while, but your body is remarkably adaptive and eventually stops being fooled.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A sweet taste triggers insulin production for a while, but your body is remarkably adaptive and eventually stops being fooled.

      When your body stops reacting it's called diabetes.

    13. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by RunsWithMatches · · Score: 1

      ...Ahem, I think Mr. Whiledo was exercising much needed sarcasm with his 'IQ of a showel' comment and so I now feel compelled to call you an insensitive clod!

    14. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Almost 30 years later, epidemiological data shows A. a massive increase in brain tumers; B. nothing; or C. ?

      BTW: Absence of proof of safety is not proof of harm.

    15. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by machine321 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, his post made me sic.

    16. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're doing it wrong. Must havink to read it in ze Russian akksent, da?

    17. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      September 30, 1980-- The Public Board of Inquiry concludes NutraSweet should not be approved pending further investigations of brain tumors in animals. The board states it "has not been presented with proof of reasonable certainty that aspartame is safe for use as a food additive."

      Do you have any idea how much aspartame they force-fed those animals to provoke a (possible) carcinogenic response?

      Do you care?

    18. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      There will be no citation, because it's wrong.

      It assumes a nerve/conscious pathway to insulin creation that simply does not exist.

      The GP needs to go back to his phrenologist and consult an ephemeris to get his facts straight.

    19. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm not surprised that there was dirty dealings involved. It's part of how the world works.

      But it's been decades now. Every other dirty thing Rumsfeld has done, the truth has been uncovered within a year or two and is easily found by anyone who gives even half a shit.

      And yet, legions of scientists have found no problem with aspartame. Interesting. Even a stopped, greedy, clock...

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    20. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're phenylketonuric?

      Stevia is OK I guess. It helps my whey powder go down, but I wouldn't use it to sweeten things I want to enjoy eating...

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    21. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Damn, I just noticed that. I guess I get the "whoosh" award today.

    22. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, almost 30 years later, has the number of cancer cases related to aspartame increased? Is there even one (1) documented case of cancer caused by aspartame? Just curious.

    23. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Yup, to get the same effect, in human terms, you'd have to be able to knock back more or less 900 cans of your average carbonated diet beverage in a day. That's around 300 litres depending on which country you live in. (Some standardize on 330ml cans, while others are at 375ml)

      Before blogs and yahoo answers took over the world it used to be pretty easy to find reliable data on the subject.

    24. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by toriver · · Score: 1

      When your body stops reacting it's called diabetes.

      And even when it doesn't go that far, training your brain into associating less food with a given amount of "sweet taste" can make you eat more than you otherwise would have because nothing then triggers the "I am full" messages that make you stop eating before the last mouthful has reached the stomach. At least from the research I have seen on it.

    25. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bear with me because I'm remembering this from high school so I might not have the details exactly right.

      If I remember correctly, technically methanol itself is far less dangerous than the byproducts created when it is broken down in the liver - specifically, methanol breaks down into formaldehyde which is highly toxic and causes blindness.

    26. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      September 30, 1980-- The Public Board of Inquiry concludes NutraSweet should not be approved pending further investigations of brain tumors in animals. The board states it "has not been presented with proof of reasonable certainty that aspartame is safe for use as a food additive."

      Do you have any idea how much aspartame they force-fed those animals to provoke a (possible) carcinogenic response?

      Do you care?

      Do you have any idea how small a dose of aspartame it takes to make me sick for a week?
      Do you care?

      I know I'm hypersensitive, but poison is poison: when the canary bites it, you better get out of the pit.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    27. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by raw-sewage · · Score: 1

      * ALL sweeteners, regardless of their source or chemical composition, trigger insulin production in the same way that sugar does. This is a reflexive response, where the body ramps up insulin production in response to the *taste* of sweet, not waiting until blood sugar actually goes up. This results in lower blood sugar levels in response to non-nutritive sweeteners, which induces hunger and sugar/carb cravings. This is why switching to diet soda from regular causes weight *gain* rather than loss in often-replicated studies.

      Citation or reference? I'm not doubting you---I honestly want to read more about this phenomenon.

    28. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any idea what dihydrogen monoxide is?
      Do you care?
      It's lethal in small amounts if ingested incorrectly. Poison is poison.

    29. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Psych 110 (Fundamentals of Learning and Behavior) lecture, UCLA, circa 1994.

      Interestingly, I had noticed this effect anecdotally, and asked about it in Physiological Sciences 5 (Human Diet and Exercise), where the professors had never heard of it. It was known to those studying operant conditioning, however.

      Here's the first hit on Google Scholar for a search on [insulin artificial sweetener]. There have been human studies of this effect as well.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    30. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Ironica · · Score: 1

      See above for citations. There's a TON of literature about this, actually; I've done more thorough searches before when arguing about whether there were risks to stevia use as a sugar substitute... but on this forum, I think folks can find their way around Google themselves now that I've got the ball rolling.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    31. Re:Not gonna help you, bro by Ironica · · Score: 1

      See response to first request.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  9. This study sponsored by 7-Up - The Uncola! by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    Just mix 'em together and you're set.

    1. Re:This study sponsored by 7-Up - The Uncola! by Chabo · · Score: 5, Funny

      But if you mix cola and uncola, they annihilate each other, producing huge amounts of pure energy. Be careful!

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    2. Re:This study sponsored by 7-Up - The Uncola! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No,no! You are thinking of the new 7-UP, the ANTI-cola. My best friend's cousin, who works at one of their bottling plants up in Alaska, told him that once someone crossed the bottling streams and the explosion was registered as far away as Seattle!

    3. Re:This study sponsored by 7-Up - The Uncola! by pbhj · · Score: 1

      But if you mix cola and uncola, they annihilate each other, producing huge amounts of pure energy. Be careful!

      But if you mix cola and uncola, they annihilate each other, producing huge amounts of pure energy^W colons. Be careful!

    4. Re:This study sponsored by 7-Up - The Uncola! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for understanding and somehow figuring out how to put such an absolute truth in text form.

  10. Crap by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Funny

    I fear for Abby (NCIS).

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Crap by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Gibbs gives her one (large) cup every time he comes by, which is probably no more than once a day. Assuming a 32oz. cup, she's still under 2 liters.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    2. Re:Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't.
      She easily does 10+ liters.

    3. Re:Crap by Wisconsingod · · Score: 1

      Come one, get it right.

      First of all it's the 64oz (just under 2 litres) guzzler of "Caf-Pow", not some puny 32oz cup. And he only brings it when wants answers, not every time.

      Also, Caf-Pow is supposedly a high caffine drink with more caffine concentration than most soda's. That being said, and from TFA, caffine is one of the main culprets in this debate, that would put Abby at the bottom edge of the case study after only 1 serving.

      Geesh, get the facts straight

  11. Not just cola by lazybratsche · · Score: 1

    TFA states that it's a general problem with soft drinks, and the really serious cases involve patients that drink multiple liters every day. Not that there's any particular benefit to more reasonable consumption (say, 20 oz/day), even if it won't put you in the hospital.

    1. Re:Not just cola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The benefit, obviously, is the delicious, refreshing taste of NameBrand Cola.
      Or for urban hispanic youths, the crisp, refreshing taste of NameBrand Citrus Beverage.
      Soccer Moms and Minivan Dads can always depend on NameBrand Diet Black Cherry Vanilla Cream Soda for a new twist on an old favorite.
      Blacks know we got they back with the classic flavors they love in NameBrand Orange Soda and NameBrand Grape Soda.

  12. Cola specific? by EvilToiletPaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AFAIK hypoalkemia can be caused by fluid intake of any type in excess e.g. the mother who died recently on a radio program after drinking too much water. TFA doesn't state if cola affects it more than say water.

    I know cola has a lot more bad stuff in it but does is it a major catalyst of hypoalkemia?
    Looks like the reporter just wanted to make a sensational headline.

    1. Re:Cola specific? by piojo · · Score: 1

      I know cola has a lot more bad stuff in it but does is it a major catalyst of hypoalkemia?
        Looks like the reporter just wanted to make a sensational headline.

      On the other hand, how common is it to drink multiple liters of water per day? (Unless you're hiking the Grand Canyon.) If people are more likely to suffer this condition due to drinking soda, it seems fair to include "soda" in the headline.

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    2. Re:Cola specific? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      "Hold Your Wee for a Wii", they called it.
      Morons.

    3. Re:Cola specific? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the mother who died recently on a radio program after drinking too much water

      Methinks you need to get your sense of time fixed: that was over two years ago. That's not even recent in real time, let alone internet time.

    4. Re:Cola specific? by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's a geologist?

    5. Re:Cola specific? by bagsc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cola is significantly worse than water because:
      1) Simple sugars (glucose, fructose) significantly enhance electrolyte absorption and reabsorption. The later is important, because in your kidneys, this means more electrolytes excreted.
      2) Caffeine is a diuretic, and increases glomerular filtration rate, leading to more fluid and electrolyte excretion.
      3) Cola is very acidic (eg 2.6 pH). This strips out cations (sodium, potassium, calcium) and increased levels of anions (citrate, chloride, carbonate).

      The three of these working together simultaneously dramatically increases the amount of electrolytes removed from the body, and does so fairly quickly since they are absorbed quickly (due to the sugars).

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    6. Re:Cola specific? by bidule · · Score: 1

      iirc, the problem was not drinking too much water, but rather refusing to pee out the excess amount.

      Not that a paid attention to that occurence.

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    7. Re:Cola specific? by physman_wiu · · Score: 1

      That's OK. Just drink Brawndo!

      --
      Physics is imagination in a straight jacket. ~John Moffat
    8. Re:Cola specific? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      That woman died of hyponatremia, not hypokalemia. Hyponatremia kills several people per year, hypokalemia doesn't.

  13. Why post that on slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cola is not good for muscles. So? No nerd has to worry about it. No muscles, no problem.

    1. Re:Why post that on slashdot? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No nerd has to worry about it. No muscles, no problem.

      What about our Ctrl-Alt-Del finger muscles?
         

    2. Re:Why post that on slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      real nerds don't use Windows, dummy ;-P

    3. Re:Why post that on slashdot? by geekboy642 · · Score: 1

      Right, right. That poser. Everybody knows real geeks have to hit ctrl-alt-meta-super-F6 to save their documents.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
  14. right... the IJCP by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 1

    great just another thing we need, a warning on bad things we all like, like video games and eating too much candy...O, right.

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
  15. Very dramatic by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hypokalemia is very dramatic. Not. According to Wikipedia:

    Mild hypokalemia is often without symptoms, although it may cause a small elevation of blood pressure,[5] and can occasionally provoke cardiac arrhythmias. Moderate hypokalemia, with serum potassium concentrations of 2.5-3 mEq/L, may cause muscular weakness, myalgia, and muscle cramps (owing to disturbed function of the skeletal muscles), and constipation (from disturbed function of smooth muscles).

    In other words you might have cramps and the likes, and be constipated. And what's the no less dramatic cure to this terrible ailment? Oral potassium chloride supplements (Klor-Con, Sando-K, Slow-K) or just eating leafy green vegetables, tomatoes, citrus fruits, oranges or bananas.

    Really, thanks for that Slashdot. While we're at it, did you know that it is estimated that over 40% of the population has B12 deficiency, and that it can cause tiredness, decreased mental work capacity, decreased concentration and decreased memory, irritability and depression?

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Very dramatic by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      You glossed over the part where it "can occasionaly provoke cardiac arrhythmias." In case you didn't know, that means an irregular heartbeat. You can die from having an irregular heartbeat; people suffering from anorexia frequently die from cardiac arrhythmias (when they don't die from suicide).

    2. Re:Very dramatic by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Hypokalemia is very dramatic. Not. According to Wikipedia:

      My mom doesn't have much of a thyroid left as a result of a teenaged bout of Graves' disease. She has to manually control her calcium levels, and since Na+, K+ and Ca2+ are all interlinked, she has problems if her potassium levels get off, so she carries potassium supplements with her as well if her K+ levels drop too much.

      Hypokalemia sucks, let's just leave it at that.

    3. Re:Very dramatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While we're at it, did you know that it is estimated that over 40% of the population has B12 deficiency

      That is complete nonsense. I was diagnosed with a B-12 deficiency several years ago and I can guarantee you that 40% of the population does not have a B-12 deficiency. The real-world manifestation of a B-12 deficiency is closer to schizophrenia than what you/wikipedia listed. Tiredness, decreased mental work capacity, decreased concentration and decreased memory, irritability and depression in the general public are more likely to be caused by a lack of proper sleep.

    4. Re:Very dramatic by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Oh, a rare specimen of someone who knows better than Wikipedia. Maybe you should contribute your precious erudition to it then. By the way deficiency only means "less than you should have", that says nothing about the amplitude of things.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    5. Re:Very dramatic by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Right, and how many people died from Cola-induced hypokalemia? Hint: the answer is in another comment in this thread.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    6. Re:Very dramatic by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Hypokalemia and cardiac arrhythmias are two different conditions. One is not caused by the other. Just because nobody died from hypokalemia doesn't mean nobody died from cardiac arrhthmias. I don't know if anyone did or not, but you can't just ignore this issue of an irregular heartbeat.

    7. Re:Very dramatic by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I said Cola-induced.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    8. Re:Very dramatic by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Ah wait, I'm an idiot, arrythmias are caused by hypokalemia. For some reason I thought I had read that in the summary instead of your quotation. So I suppose your point stands, nobody died from this. It seems like they could though, an irregular heartbeat is a serious condition.

  16. water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's good, just fyi.

  17. What part of cola? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2, Informative

    So what ingredient of cola does this? Last I read most popular cola drinks like Coke and Pepsi are nothing more than sugar, water, cinnamon, vanilla and phosphoric acid. Most cola drinks do not even have kola nut ingredients in them.

    On thing is sure I stopped drinking the stuff regularly when I went to the dentist and had eleven cavities. Yes I brush twice a day and use the water pick. The trick is to rinse your mouth out after drinking very acidic and sugary drinks. As soon as you drink the acid begins to attack your enamel so after your done with a soda rinse your mouth out thoroughly with water. The few hours between drinking an acidic drink and brushing is more than enough time for acids to attack your teeth. This is what my dentist told me as he was drilling, not fun.

    1. Re:What part of cola? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Anecdotal as well, but my buddy went through several 24 packs per week, and over the course of a few years his teeth rotted out.

      Thanks to his Alaska Native heritage and therefore free medical care, he recently had what remained of his teeth pulled and was fitted for dentures. Now he can drink as much as he likes without rotting his teeth! Oy...

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:What part of cola? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Yeh I cut out my 1.5-2l a day coca cola habit after my dentist told me that my latest filling was required due to acid erosion from that. And now I'm sleeping better and feel happier as a handy and free side effect :-)

    3. Re:What part of cola? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what I was wondering...

      Since when is 'cola' an identifiable substance? Are they talking about artificial colors, artificial flavors, artificial sweeteners, natural sweeteners, caffeine, carbonation, preservatives? If so, which one, specifically?

      Will I get muscle weakness from Coke or Pepsi? Regular or Diet? Diet Coke or Coke Zero? Caffeinated or caffeine-free? What about Crystal Pepsi, maybe that's okay because it is without the artificial coloring.

      C'mon, get scientific, 's all I'm saying.

    4. Re:What part of cola? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is Slashdot, but would it kill you to RTFA to find the answer to your question?

  18. Oh shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been drinking around 2 liters a day for several months now. I feel like I want to beat wjousts, the author, into a pulp.

    But let's be honest, thank you. I'm going to switch to the good old tap water for a change.

    1. Re:Oh shit... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I'm going to switch to good old tap water for a change.

      No luck there either. Meds found in tap-water:

      http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-03-10-drugs-tap-water_N.htm
           

  19. I Thread The Needle by Dean+Edmonds · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I only drink caffiene-free diet sodas, so it looks like I'm safe.

    --

    -deane

  20. Bananas by Anenome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Might explain why I had a major hankering for bananas :P Eating as many as two or more per day. Bananas freakin' rock, the perfect fruit! Comes in it's own 'packaging', the flavor varies by ripeness (I like 'em a bit green), easily blended, no seeds to pick or spit out, and cheap and easily available.

    --
    "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
    1. Re:Bananas by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check it out and notice how far down on the list Bananas are for potassium content.

      One cup of tomato paste (granted, it's concentrated) has roughly 5 times the potassium content that a cup of banana does. A baked potato has just about double a banana, and a 1/2 filet of halibut has not quite double. More reasonable tomato sauces also double the potassium content of bananas. A nice meal of filet of halibut and baked potato is worth 4-6 bananas, depending on if you go for the full or just half filet.

      So, if you're going to drink 9 liters of cola per day, just be sure you also get the super-sized french fries when you go through the drive-through, that has about as much potassium as about 4 bananas!! (assuming 2 cups, which seems about right to me, probably on the low side)

      I don't want a large Farva! I want a liter-a-cola!

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:Bananas by Anenome · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ha, and bananas have a reputation for high potassium content. So much for that idea.

      Reminds me of the mistake that was made about spinach. They thought spinach had just ungodly amounts of iron, etc., turns out the original research on the issue had misplaced a decimal, giving spinach 10 times more iron content than it actually had. By then, Popeye was already a popular character and I doubt the meme has lost steam to this day.

      Luckily, I love spinach :P In fact, I love almost all vegetables. The only vegetable dish I'm not too fond of are extreme for other reasons: notably one particular Kimchee experience (I once had kimchee that was far too strong for me, despite loving spicy foods), and Natto (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natto). DON'T TRY NATTO! You've been warned. (But if you're curious, just imagine the sights, smell, and taste of eating someone else's puke and that just about perfectly captures the experience-- I am not kidding).

      "Popeye's creators chose spinach -- instead of, say, brussels sprouts or broccoli -- because of an 1870 German study that claimed spinach contained about as much iron as there is in red meat!
      In reality, this was nothing more than an accounting error. The scientists put the decimal point in the wrong place!
      The iron content of spinach is actually one-tenth of what was reported. The mistake was corrected in 1937. It was too late for Popeye, though. He'd already been getting strong on spinach for almost 10 years!" from (http://soundmedicine.iu.edu/segment.php4?seg=238)

      --
      "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
    3. Re:Bananas by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Well, like them while they last. Just like there was back in the Great Depression (inspiring the song "Yes, we have no bananas"), and again in the 1960s, there's a banana blight starting up, and the genetically identical Cavendish variety will probably be extinct within a few decades from Panama disease Race 4.

    4. Re:Bananas by Temposs · · Score: 1

      Just a note about the french fries, that the long distance transportation, freezing process, and frying process, will all leech out those nutrients you refer to, making is substantially less nutritional than you list.

      I know you were making a joke, but my point is a significant thing that not many people realize.

      --
      Knowledge is just opinion that you trust enough to act upon. -Orson Scott Card
    5. Re:Bananas by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Got any links to back that up? I'd be interested to know, because everything I've heard in the last few years says frozen preserves nutrients, i.e. if you don't freeze quickly vegetables lose their nutrients -very- quickly, whereas they maintain them longer when frozen. Obviously leaving fries frozen in the freezer for weeks will destroy much nutritional value, but short of that they should be great. And of course, I haven't heard everything, so I could easily be wrong.

      Also, deep frying is essentially flash-steaming, as long as you don't over-fry the potatoes they are steamed inside. There should be very little difference between their nutritional value and baked potatoes, other than fat. What makes a properly fried potato unhealthy is the fact that it is coated in oil when you are done, not necessarily anything about the process of cooking. Now, over-cook your fry and the steam loses pressure, allowing the oil to soak in deep. Those fries would be significantly worse for you than regular fries.

      Lastly, just so you don't confuse this post, the fries in my previous post were definitely a joke.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  21. Terrific news!!! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Pretty soon, the prices on cola will drop to the floor with this news. Then I can stock up!!

  22. Good thing I drink Mountain Dew... by shellster_dude · · Score: 5, Funny

    I only have to worry about a shrinking penis.

    http://www.snopes.com/medical/potables/mountaindew.asp

    1. Re:Good thing I drink Mountain Dew... by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      When i was young i used to believe mount. dew was nuclear waste and would make you get super powers, now i know the only thing it gives you is the ability to go a few days on no sleep and has the side effect to render you sterile

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
  23. I suggest water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Are you trying to suggest that aspartame (or whatever the newest artificial sweetener is) is healthy?

    The truth is:
      soda is bad for you and makes you fat.
      "diet" soda is bad for you and makes you fat (correlation). (it does not make you lose weight according to any study).
      "diet" soda uses various artificial sweeteners, of which the long term health consequences are not known.

  24. umm anybody notice the 2-10 liter part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how many people do you know that drink 2 liters of soda a day? that's 4 16.9 oz bottles. And that's just the lower limit of problem causing levels. 10 liters of soda a day ftw!

  25. News flash - this stuff will kill you by illumin8 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The amount that people drink in this study is just astounding. And really, how much common sense do these people have?

    The first, a 21 year-old woman, was consuming up to three litres of cola a day and complained of fatigue, appetite loss and persistent vomiting. An electrocardiagram also revealed she had a heart blockage, while blood tests showed she had low potassium levels.

    I'll give you hint sweetie. If you have persistent vomiting and you're drinking 3 liters a day of anything, stop drinking it and I bet your vomiting will go away!

    He also relates a puzzling case he saw in his own clinical practice, which was solved when the patient turned up at his office with a two-litre bottle of cola in the basket of his electric scooter. It turned out he routinely drank up to four litres a day. He refused to stop drinking cola, but halved his consumption and the muscle weakness he had been complaining of improved.

    Gee, you dumbshit. You're so fat you have to drive an electric scooter around with a basket to carry your 2 liter flagon of high fructose corn syrup, and you wonder why you have health problems?

    Man, I knew people were stupid, but not this stupid...

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    1. Re:News flash - this stuff will kill you by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Gee, you dumbshit. You're so fat you have to drive an electric scooter around with a basket to carry your 2 liter flagon of high fructose corn syrup, and you wonder why you have health problems?

      Who said he was fat? I had muscle weakness, and had to drive a scooter, but that doesn't necessarily mean he was fat. Making that assumption just makes an ass out of you and umption.

      Now, he probably WAS fat, 4 liters a day has got to be in the 2,000-3,000 calorie range, just from soda. His liver and kidneys have got to be shot, and he's certainly not getting any good exercise, but still, don't just assume. It's bad practice and hurts otherwise sensible arguments.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:News flash - this stuff will kill you by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Damn, I've really got to start previewing.

      -I- did not have muscle weakness, the GGP said the doctor's patient had muscle weakness and had to drive a scooter around.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    3. Re:News flash - this stuff will kill you by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The annoying thing, at least according to late night tv ads, is that that scooter may have been paid for by Medicare, under the premise, I assume, that "too fat to walk" is a legitimate disability...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  26. Naw, gotta be a trick by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    excessive cola consumption can also lead to hypokalaemia

    Let me get this strait: hyper cola-mania leads to "hypokalaemia"?
           

  27. What's Next? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Next they'll tell us that pizza, lack of sun, and too much pr0n leads to painful death.
         

    1. Re:What's Next? by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      As long as you enjoy every single moment of your agonizing death, who cares?

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  28. Correlation != Causation, for the love of Mohamed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times do I have to point out to these fucking retarded "scientists" that correlation is NOT the same as causation! Just because two things happen at the same time doesn't mean they are related. This soda study is exactly the kind of hoax bullshit study that makes you wonder what the fuck they teach in science class these days.

    once again, for the exceptionally slow:

    Correlation != Causation

    Get it through your thick skulls.

  29. Acids! Phosphoric acid and carbonic acid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Are not good for your teeth and bones, drinking tons will probably screw up your whole body's PH levels having all kinds of ill effects.

  30. Re:Correlation != Causation, for the love of Moham by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Correlation != Causation

    Good science tries to check this by looking for other correlations. Participants are often given long questionares with various life-style and food questions. Other factors that "stick out" are then investigated further. True, sometimes things slip through the cracks; no study is perfect.
         

  31. We're #1!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to go America! We're twice as good as "average"

    FTA:
    "In 2007 the worldwide annual consumption of soft drinks reached 552 billion litres, the equivalent of just under 83 litres per person per year, and this is projected to increase to 95 litres per person per year by 2012. However the figure has already reached an average of 212 litres per person per year in the United States."

  32. If by Root Beer you mean Barque's... by HiggsBison · · Score: 1

    Coffee (from dunks with liquid sugar), Root Beer, and other drinks, I'm sure, could find yourself in the same dillema.

    When it comes to Root Beer, I think only Barque's (A fine product of the Coca-Cola Company) insists on adding caffeine.

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  33. If death is "dramatic", then yes, it could be by fnj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Respect for the danger would be a good idea. Hypokalemia can cause arrhythmia. And hyperkalemia can also cause ... you guessed it, arrhythmia. And arrhythmia can cause death, with little warning. In fact, if your potassium level gets low enough or high enough, it is guaranteed that you will die from it, promptly. A single hypodermic syringe of non-diluted potassium chloride is practically guaranteed to send you to meet your maker within a couple of minutes.

    Lots of things can cause the level to get too low or too high. A reasonable consumption of soft drinks, alone, is highly unlikely to do you in, but it is playing with a chemical balance which is extremely critical to life. When you add this factor to a bunch of other potential factors, you best pay attention. And your suggested potassium supplements can be extremely dangerous. They are for cases where serious danger is already proved, and even then require close supervision. It is much too easy to throw the balance off in one direction or the other. The vegetables and fruits you suggest are safer, but even then you would need testing to establish the right balance.

    I am not a physician, but my grandfather was. Physiology is an interest of mine.

    1. Re:If death is "dramatic", then yes, it could be by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      Respect for the danger would be a good idea. Hypokalemia can cause arrhythmia. And hyperkalemia can also cause ... you guessed it, arrhythmia. And arrhythmia can cause death, with little warning.

      Yes...respect for the danger. Let's see, the scientific paper upon which the popular press drama is based, was a review of five individual case reports since 1994. That's right: in the whole of the medical literature, there are five reported cases of hypokalaemia linked to excessive consumption of cola. The outcome in all of those cases was "uneventful recovery," so the known risk of death due to cola-mediated caffeine intoxication is zero. There was exactly one case of "profound paralysis," with other symptoms being "mild weakness" and "mild arrhythmia." In the health-risk scale, the problem of hypokalaemia due to cola consumption is an order of magnitude smaller than the problem of lightning strikes (about 1 in 700,000 annually; 10% fatal).

  34. Other cola issues... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    I've also heard that cola can cause bone to deteriorate, due to the phosphoric acid many of them contain.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Other cola issues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if you inject it into the bone marrow or something. Otherwise, the hydrochloric acid in your belly would have done you in long before your first sip of soda.

  35. Nothing like volunteer lab rats by joeyblades · · Score: 1

    Holy Cow! The volumes that these people are drinking! 4 liters a day? 10 liters a day? Reminds me of studies with lab rats and artificial sweeteners. You pump too much of anything into your system... bad stuff will happen.

    Personally, my cola consumption is zero. I never touch the stuff.I prefer water and unsweetened tea... oh, and beer, of course!

  36. Where's the sunlight? by AnonymityCowardily · · Score: 1

    Lacking exercise results in lacking muscles. People who lack exercise lack non-drinking of cola. News at 11!

  37. dissolved my nails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *finger nail, zinc-plated nail, and a iron-oxide nail.

    Also dissolved a dry chicken bone, and removed the blood stain out of my carpet. Works bette than Oxy Clean(tm)!

    *ducks*

  38. I was going to type an awesome comment here.. by wellingtonsteve · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but the muscles in my fingers have given up..

    1. Re:I was going to type an awesome comment here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting seeing as you have no muscles in your fingers.

  39. Yes, what's all this about "Cola"? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    If it doesn't have Kola Nut, it's not a Kola, or a Cola. Do they mean to say "carbonated beverages"?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  40. Is that why I get aches? by antdude · · Score: 1

    I never had this problems years ago, but lately I get aches after drinking sodas (e.g., Mt. Dew, Coca Cola, Dr. Pepper, Hawiwan Punch, etc.). Or is it I am just getting old (over 30 years)?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Is that why I get aches? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      It's because you're getting old.

      It's the vast quantities of liquid that cause it (caffeen contributes but only to a small extent); as has already been noted, 4-9 liters of water per day will also cause hypokalomedia. With water though you will probably run into hyponatremia first.

      The sodium content of soda is likely what prevents this in the cola cases, so you could say drinking vast quantities of soda is SAFER than water!

      Though insulin spikes, liver failure, and kidney failure can't be good for you either.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:Is that why I get aches? by antdude · · Score: 1

      I just drink water and juices these days. I do pee a lot from water so I try to drink other things. :) Bah, age hit me. I did drink a little of Mt. Dew a couple days ago, and felt fine. Same for Dr. Pepper a few weeks ago (1/4th of a can).

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:Is that why I get aches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "so you could say drinking vast quantities of soda is SAFER than water!"

      My friend drank 3-4 litres every day a Coca Cola first few weeks he started use them.
      If I would say to you what happend to him, you would not believe me at all.

      Just forget those stuff and if used, just use them when you are actually a thirsty.

      Everyday using over 1 liter water is not good either if you do not actually sweat that out (heavy work etc).

      Human can survive 15 days without water in good conditions and in bad conditions like on desert, only about 3 days.

      Human only needs 0.3-1 liter of water a day what can be gained on food and other drinks and it depends about the workload what human does. Sitting on 21 Celsius office is lot different than sitting on 50 Celsius office a day.

    4. Re:Is that why I get aches? by AnonymityCowardily · · Score: 1

      Dude, 30 years is not freaking old.

  41. Caffeine and Cola by Gunslinger47 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The caffeine levels in Coke or Pepsi are very low compared to coffee; approximately 10%.

    Canada Health recommends no more than 400 mg of caffeine a day. To exceed this, you'd have to drink 12 L of Coke. On the other hand, only two extra large Double Doubles will bring you to that limit.

    18% of all Canadian aged 31 through 50 exceed this limit, and it's not from drinking cola. The typical Canadian coffee drinker aged 31 through 50 averages over 600 mg a day.[1]

  42. Cola != Soft Drinks by Annorax · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, the person that wrote the article really needs to stop using the term "cola" in place of "soft drink".

    Soft drinks come in many flavors including cola flavor.

    From my reading of the article, the soft drink can be any flavor and still be a problem if they contain any of the three ingredients listed (none of which include cola or cola flavor).

    Get it right!

    1. Re:Cola != Soft Drinks by lxs · · Score: 1

      I vote that they use the word "pop" or "sodapop". It makes the article more fun to read.

  43. what does it matter? by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 1

    Its not like slash doters use our mussels anyway.

    and if we do its to go get more soda.

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
  44. Cola, really? by dmomo · · Score: 1

    I wanted to read tfa, but I stopped after looking at all the techno mumbo-jumbo.

    So, What is "Cola" and what part of it is bad for you? Is it the Caffeine? The Sugar? The bubbles? I don't drink coke, but I drink seltzer... so.. I guess I'll just freak out anyway.

  45. Counterargument by scribblej · · Score: 1

    Bananas are the most useless food ever. Once you peel off the skin and throw away the bone, there's nothing to eat.

  46. Re:Correlation != Causation, for the love of Moham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez, people like you can be dense. Correlation != causation is not always true. Some things that are correlated because one thing causes the other. If you had bothered to read the fine article, you'd see that they presented plenty of evidence that drinking too much soda does cause the things problems they claim it does (well, more accurately, that removing the soda caused the problems to go away).

  47. A few related statistics by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    I thought my consumption was much higher than it should be, because on a stressful day when I'm working for a long time on a pet project, I sometimes get through five or six 330ml cans. My GF has been telling me off about this since forever.

    However, let's do a bit of maths here, using just the low end of the spectrum mentioned in these articles for illustration...

    One 330ml can of Coke contains approximately 140 Calories. That's 210 Calories for a 500ml bottle, and a staggering 840 Calories in a 2L bottle (or six cans, or four small bottles).

    A healthy daily Calorie intake for an average adult male with typical exercise levels and eating a reasonable diet is around 2,500 Calories. For an average adult female with similar criteria it's around 2,000 Calories. (For contrast, a typical front-line trooper in the army, performing a very physically demanding job, might consume about 4,000 Calories per day. An adult female professional dancer eating a careful diet to maintain health and fitness while losing weight to tone their figure might go down towards 1,200 Calories but would probably get told off for trying to go any lower.)

    Put that together, and drinking 2L of Coke per day is the equivalent of about 1/3 of the total daily Calorie allowance for an adult male. Drinking 3L is about half of the daily intake. Drinking 3L of Coke per day on top of an otherwise healthy and balanced diet is worth the equivalent of the energy expended in running about half a marathon. Doing that every day for a week is the energy equivalent of not losing a little over 2lb of fat every week, though of course nutrition isn't quite as simple as this!

    In short, drinking that much Coke is a serious problem even without the chemical imbalances it causes, that nasty bloaty feeling (if you can get past the nausea), the acid damage to teeth, and all that stuff. You'd have to be crazy to get to 3L in one day, and certifiably insane to drink it routinely, day after day.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  48. RTFA... what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, in general, doing almost anything in excess is bad. Everyone knows this. If you don't there is something wrong with you. Why bring it up?

  49. Could be worse by asm2750 · · Score: 1

    You could drink 3 or more rockstars a day and then have a stroke at the age of 23. I knew someone like that, thankfully he stopped drinking them afterwards.

  50. You Can Pry My Cola by timeOday · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...from my limp, pallid hands.

  51. oh noes by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gee, this is hardly surprising. Who'd have thought that over-indulgence of soft drinks (or 'adult' drinks like beer and liquor) would result in physical problems?

    With soda/cola/pop/whatever, you are consuming a supersaturate. There is a shitload of sugar in there, and its consumption will dehydrate you. And it's not all that good for the ol' pancreas, either.

    Diet sodas are also a problem, as they have aspartame in them. Aspartame is a mild neurotoxin. No, you won't get dehydrated and get muscle fatigue that way, but you sure as hell will cause problems down the line. Some people who are highly environmentally sensitive will have an allergic/asthmatic reaction to the stuff.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  52. Shocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a suprise. If you spend all day doing nothing but drinking tons of soda, you're muscles wont function properly! Sounds like a story for Rick Romero

  53. It IS dramatic. by bagsc · · Score: 1

    "Muscle weakness" is about as dramatic as it gets - when your heart stops beating, you have a problem. The arrythmia, muscular weakness, myalgia, muscle cramps mean your nervous system is losing control of your muscles, because potassium is a key neurotransmitter and necessary for muscle control.

    The best part is that when you are hypokalemic, those same neurotransmitters failing means you get confused and have no idea what is going on. So people typically "just don't feel good" without ever knowing whats going on. Then, they drink water and have a heart attack at age 20 and die.

    Sure, an EMT or nurse will pick up on it and give you IV fluids, but to the lay person, they don't know what is wrong, so they can't fix it.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  54. Not THAT old canard again... by aepervius · · Score: 2, Informative

    The main reason they did not approve was not due to REAL danger , it was due to the absence of proper documentation. The LD59 and LD90 of aspartam as so high that you would have way more problem before long before entering any danger zone. .

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Not THAT old canard again... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The main reason they did not approve was not due to REAL danger , it was due to the absence of proper documentation.

      The real reason it was approved was not due to real science, it was due to political connections.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  55. As a pharmaceutical scientist.... by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    I don't eat much "processed" foods. No colas, sodas, candy bars, cheezy puffs, etc... What I do eat are home cooked natural foods with locally grown herbs and spicies. Hell I make my own bread - no high fructose corn syrup in there. The important lesson here kids is start making food you can't find at the local grocer.

    I almost for got to mention - I look 15 years younger than most people my age.

  56. New advertising slogan by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    "I'll give you my ice-cold refreshing Coca-Cola when you take it from my cold, dead hands."

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
  57. My supervisor said... by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most geeks can not carry stuff > 50 pounds. No wonder why.

    The problem is, if you are in IT, you are expected to move machines around, and they ranged from 50 to 100 pounds.

    And that is also why in most of the time, most IT supervisor does NOT have an CS or IT degree. I have seen interviewers that only has a music degree.

    1. Re:My supervisor said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the job you're describing is a computer janitor.

  58. Nope by bagsc · · Score: 1

    Sodium in cola is pretty minimal. Compare:

    Pack of ramen: 890mg
    12 oz of V8: 885mg
    Small fries: 144mg
    100 grams of carrots: 69mg
    12 oz of Coke: 38mg

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:Nope by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but how much sodium is lost from 12 ounces of water? If it's less than 38 mg, then they would actually build up more sodium than they lost.

  59. Potassium and Hypocalcemia by sandman83 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just as the article states that the excessive drinking of cola drinks can cause problems with low potassium. What it doesn't tell you is that the phosphoric acid found in these drinks can also lead to being hypocalcemic. As the acid usually displaces the calcium that's found in the blood stream, and raises the phosphoric levels. The side affects of hypocalcemia can range from numbing/tingling of the extremities, tetany(seizing of the muscle), all the way to seizures and even death in most extreme cases. To those who have a rare condition called Hypoparathyroidism, it can become life threatening withing minutes of we call a "crash". We use the term "crash" to signify that the blood calcium to have suddenly dropped to low levels and start become symptomatic. When that happens and the person can't get bring the levels back up. The next course of action would to get the person to emergency room as fast as possible. The thing is anyone can become hypocalcemic at anytime. Especially when they are on really poor diet.

  60. Alternatives? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    I drink caffeine free diet soda because in the volumes of soda I was drinking I noticed weight gain issues and nervous system issues (from the caffeine). Recently I've been noticing other issues and I've suspected the soda and backed off drinking it with noticeable improvement in my health. I've also had some sort of muscle/nervous issue in the past couple years where I've had pain in my hands and sudden inability to grip or sudden releases of my grip - I wonder if that could also be related.

    But what else can I drink besides water (I don't drink alcohol, tea, or coffee either)? I checked my lemonade mix and it has fructose. Juice is high calorie. What doesn't have glucose, fructose, or caffeine?

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  61. The UK National Health Service comments on story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This same story caught the attention of the National Health Service, who published a a commentary here:

    http://www.nhs.uk/news/2009/05May/Pages/ColaSapsMuscleStrength.aspx

    This is probably more worth reading than the vast majority of the /. comments.

    Choice sentences from the end of the commentary:

    This suggests that some of the news coverage of this study may be unnecessarily alarmist.

    It should be emphasised that these individuals drank between three and 10 litres of cola a day for an extended period of time.

    Feel free to circulate the URL. I'm just an AC and UK taxpayer, rip me off. :^)

  62. Cola and Aspartame (98.6 ÂF (37.0 ÂC)) by VegetaFH1 · · Score: 1

    Excuse me but Cola has always been bad for you Infact ill tell you why, Cola, Coke, Diet-Coke and all those "Fizzy" drinks contain an ingredient known as Aspartame (Artificial Sweeteners) When Aspartame is heated to 86 degrees (F) is becomes more toxin then a fire-ants sting, with the human body temp being 98.6 ÂF (37.0 ÂC) you can count on side effects coming from these drinks containing Aspartame Muscle Retractions and Muscle Spasums are two examples of these side effects, it has also been known to cuase alot of headache's and/or migrains and can even cuase MS So folks, the next time you want to drink a "fizzy" drink, read the ingredients, if it lists Aspartame, then put it down and get something that wont actually kill you

  63. The Fear Culture by nomad-9 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Yet another symptoms of our Fear Culture. Different groups of people each competing for who is going to scare us the most. This might be the first time in the history of humanity that people are scared of almost... everything.

    Beware the soda drink epidemic that is paralyzing our muscles while the swine-flu pandemic threat is at level-5, terrorists are playing in your backyard, child abductors and serial killers are lurking right outside your home , the Iranian nuclear threat is coming to a theater near you, and global warming is killing the planet.

    Let us know if we left out anything, we will be more than happy to give you a reason to fear those too.

  64. Diet Coke is worse for you than normal Coke... by Terminus32 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    ...one word: ASPARTAME! And to think a whole generation of kids have had this toxic stuff put in their food & drinks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame I've decided to stick to drinking water & non-concentrated fresh fruit juices, a much better option if you care about your health.

    --
    http://nathanlindsell.blogspot.com/
  65. hypokalaemia by delvsional · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This condition is a result of low potassium. Just eat a freakin banana or two.

    --
    Oh Crap, I'm an optimist.....
  66. Summary is wrong - Diet coke IS better by Slartibartfass · · Score: 1

    TFA states that "It appears that hypokalaemia can be caused by excessive consumption of three of the most common ingredients in cola drinks â" glucose, fructose and caffeine." Glucose and Fructose are not contained in diet coke. I drink about 5-6l of diet coke per day and don't experience any prolems.

  67. Who needs cola? by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

    Who needs cola when there's water, beer and wine? They've been around for millennia.

    I can't find any uses for cola except to unclog sanitaries and mix with bad whiskey to make it drinkable.

    1. Re:Who needs cola? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      You can't bring a 6-pack to work, you fool.
      You need something to sustain you at work, and Coca-cola is the only one that is good to drink after a double-cheese burger.
      Outside of work, there's a great drink in new England: Flying Dog Pale Ale.
      Amazingly good. Better than Miller/Bud.
      A helpful waiter once recommended it to me in a New England Cafe...May he live long and prosper.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Who needs cola? by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Coca-cola is the only one that is good to drink after a double-cheese burger.

      Then I guess your problem is not only in the cola. I try to keep myself thin and healthy. A double cheese burger is my work lunch only once a year, or so.

      And most of the time I drink tap water. It's cheap and healthy.

    3. Re:Who needs cola? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      I weigh 57 Kgs. I eat like a hungry wolf. If it doesn't contain double-fat or double-cheese i don't eat it.
      My doctor says i have hyper-metabolism. Which means i can eat and eat and eat, but never be full [or never be fat].
      I checked my cholestrol, lipid and all the blood crap that killed my dad 17 years ago. Nope. All under control.
      Yet, i can eat through one pound of butter (Full fat and none of the Lite crap) in one meal WITHOUT any increase in any of vital monitors.
      I have checked with doctors in US (Connecticut), Australia (Sydney), and in India.
      All say the same thing: am one of the 1% of the population whose body metabolises the fat so fast that i gotta eat to remain healthy at 57 Kgs.
      And no, i DO NOT excercise periodically. Yet i can run one mile without sweating on a hot summer day. I can cycle my way to a mountain top without fainting (and without Gatorade).
      My wife hates me for this; Every time we go to a restaurant she has to be extra careful in watching calories and fat, while i usually ask for double the amount of butter or cheese or whatever contains trans-fat. I can live on McDonalds Fries exclusively (haven't tried, but have lived on Cheese pizza for some time).
      Some of beautiful gals at my ex-office, when we went out for lunch, were extremely jealous of me and wondered if my gene is hereditary.
      Once (two years ago) after watching one more scary documentary about strokes, i cleaned out my refrigerator of all fat. Bought and ate salads, drank tap water only and ate no-fat meals. I lasted for a week before i felt extremely tired, worn out and fell asleep while driving. (that was the only period my wife ate with me together in happiness)
      Drank Red Bull and other stuff to keep awake, but to no avail.
      My doctor was aghast when i went to see him: i had lost 3 Kgs in one week and i my red-blood cell count was very low.
      He scolded my wife for taking me off the fat menu (she got 'extremely' upset that we did not have any "action" for 2 weeks).
      Once i was back to pigging out on fats, i became OK slowly.
      And NO, am not lying. Because my CT doctor said: "Girls would kill for having your genes."
      heh heh heh.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    4. Re:Who needs cola? by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      My doctor says i have hyper-metabolism. Which means i can eat and eat and eat, but never be full [or never be fat]

      Lucky guy...

      she got 'extremely' upset that we did not have any "action" for 2 weeks

      VERY lucky guy! Sigh...

    5. Re:Who needs cola? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      VERY lucky guy! Sigh...

      Yeah, after 2 weeks, the fat made me stronger and long lasting.
      VERY Lucky...

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  68. No... ban those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was 4-5 years ago a heavy Coca-Cola, Fanta and Sprite user. Before that Pepsi Max.

    I drank about 3-6 liter a week.

    Then suddenly one day, I got stomach pains from Fanta. Coca-Cola had just changed the bottle of the Fanta and same time seems to have changed the mixture as well someway. Because the color was clearly different on the store shelfs where was old and new bottle next each other.

    So I changed to Coca-Cola and used it one year without problems. Then again, suddenly I started to get problems of urinating. I got feeling that I need to go bathroom to pass some water but never actually had anything.

    On that time I made choice to stop using all that stuff.

    And after few years on friend of my passed to me a Coca-Cola drink on the bar (I do not drink alcohol or coffee/tee and I have never drank those) and it was just 0.33cl bottle and I got same problem 5min after drinkin it.

    But, I have other problems now as well. My motor functions on my hand and leg muscles starts trembling if I take 0.33cl or more.
    You can not see it, but I can feel it how some muscles just twitch little bit and It does not feel nice when it takes about 3-4 hours as that.

    If those drinks would be invented now, they would never pass haleness authorities tests. Those are just poison for humans and we let our childrens to drink those every day.

    It is just too bad thing to even think that we can not turn those off because the companies who manufacture those, like Coca-Cola, are too powerfull and rich to keep their companies running.

    And what makes even worse (and funny in first time) is that most WHO recommences are paid by those companies, about how much a day you can enjoy of cola, ice-cream, chocolate etc.

    When you check out the sponsors of all studies about the daily sugar amount what is "good", you only find those big companies who manufactures all candies, sodas and other stuff.

    There is many other studies, what ain't paid by those companies and all the amounts what got enough for daily usage for adult human, was almost every situation a 1/10 of the same suggestions of what these companies has paid.

    And you can think it this way.
    On these days humans eat more healthy, they have removed fat almost totally. But same time we use more sugar, white flour, artificial fat from vegetable oil (vegetable fat does not exist anywhere on the world in that form. Totally artificial! It was designed on WWII on UK when there was not enough cattle to get real fat and people needed fat to bake. So scientics developed artificial fat from vegetable oil. Because oil could not be used on baking. And that does not include anything good for humans, just stress more human body than real fat what goes through the human body if not overused).

    Human race will eventually vanish itself by just these big companies.

    Oh, and have you seen the Supersize me Document? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1432315846377280008

    1. Re:No... ban those by angster · · Score: 0

      "Human race will eventually vanish itself by just these big companies." This is a truly great sentence.

  69. Try the new Banana Coke Zero ... by meist3r · · Score: 1

    now even more disgusting ... BUT YELLOW.

    1. Re:Try the new Banana Coke Zero ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it's called Diet Mountain Dew.

  70. How is this news? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Excessive use of anything will make you sick or kill you. You can even die from too much water.
    It's just that it is much quicker to happen with obvious crap like Cola, "Wonder Bread" (the only wonder is, that people survive it for so long), Margarine, etc.

    Oh, and now for the insightful part: If you consume smaller doses, if often does not prevent anything. It just makes it take longer, be more sneaky, and end up being called "age related diseases".
    Remember that, when you're 50, and start to develop those problems. ^^

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  71. American geek, eat less by skipping meals by RoundSparrow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who says we should eat 3 meals a day every day? How about: put more effort into selecting and preparing our meals, eat fewer meals! I find I'm way less hungry if I go longer without eating - as I'm not constantly 3 or 4 hours after the last big meal. The hunger sensation goes away if you get past it (a good analogy is the vibrations of breaking the "sound barrier" in a jet airplane, you throttle past it). In the USA, family and friends are so programmed to do the "3 meals a day" thing that practically nobody questions it.

    Discovery of this study changed my life. Now, some days I just eat one big meal, I focus more on enjoying that meal. If you have only one meal in a day: 2 hours to enjoy the meal, read while I'm eating or socialize with friends. I focus more on the quality of food, not quantity. Eating less frequently is a lifestyle change, not a diet!

    From: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16529878

    =======================

    "The effect on health of alternate day calorie restriction: eating less and more than needed on alternate days prolongs life."

    Restricting caloric intake to 60-70% of normal adult weight maintenance requirement prolongs lifespan 30-50% and confers near perfect health across a broad range of species. Every other day feeding produces similar effects in rodents, and profound beneficial physiologic changes have been demonstrated in the absence of weight loss in ob/ob mice. Since May 2003 we have experimented with alternate day calorie restriction, one day consuming 20-50% of estimated daily caloric requirement and the next day ad lib eating, and have observed health benefits starting in as little as two weeks, in insulin resistance, asthma, seasonal allergies, infectious diseases of viral, bacterial and fungal origin (viral URI, recurrent bacterial tonsillitis, chronic sinusitis, periodontal disease), autoimmune disorder (rheumatoid arthritis), osteoarthritis, symptoms due to CNS inflammatory lesions (Tourette's, Meniere's) cardiac arrhythmias (PVCs, atrial fibrillation), menopause related hot flashes. We hypothesize that other many conditions would be delayed, prevented or improved, including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, multiple sclerosis, brain injury due to thrombotic stroke atherosclerosis, NIDDM, congestive heart failure. Our hypothesis is supported by an article from 1957 in the Spanish medical literature which due to a translation error has been construed by several authors to be the only existing example of calorie restriction with good nutrition. We contend for reasons cited that there was no reduction in calories overall, but that the subjects were eating, on alternate days, either 900 calories or 2300 calories, averaging 1600, and that body weight was maintained. Thus they consumed either 56% or 144% of daily caloric requirement. The subjects were in a residence for old people, and all were in perfect health and over 65. Over three years, there were 6 deaths among 60 study subjects and 13 deaths among 60 ad lib-fed controls, non-significant difference. Study subjects were in hospital 123 days, controls 219, highly significant difference. We believe widespread use of this pattern of eating could impact influenza epidemics and other communicable diseases by improving resistance to infection. In addition to the health effects, this pattern of eating has proven to be a good method of weight control, and we are continuing to study the process in conjunction with the NIH.

  72. Needs more tartrazine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > caffeine free diet soda. for when you are low on artificial coloring.

    It's got electrolytes! They're what plants crave!

  73. I've Got Enough Problems by derspankster · · Score: 0

    Damn, now I have to worry about Diet Coke! Along with all the coffee, cigars and cigarettes I can't last another year.

  74. Cola- eww by mokumegane · · Score: 1

    I rarely drink anything like this. First off, there's a lot of sugar in it and too much sugar at once will either give me a migraine or put me to sleep. I can never drink one can of soda in one day because of that. Secondly, I don't like carbonation. It gets trapped in my stomach too often. Even if I get a soda to drink I have to de-carbonate it before I can drink it. Third, the caffeine puts me to sleep. If I want something that will put me to sleep, I'd rather drink hot chocolate. It at least tastes better. Most of the time, I drink water. Sometimes, I drink milk, homemade smoothies or a tea. When I have a craving or need to sleep easier, I drink hot chocolate made out of cocoa powder. I think the largest consumption of caffeine I have is green tea.

  75. The Plan by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

    1) Fuck the slashtards, eat what you want.
    2) Stop listening to people who want to tell you how to run your life.
    3) Slap anyone who believes anything that He-Who-Is-Always-Photographed-From-Below-Peering-Boldly-Into-The-Future says.

    Summary:
    Become Eric Cartman.
    Do it. Do it now.
    I command you to do it now.

  76. You can have my cola when... by mw13068 · · Score: 1

    You can have my cola when you pry it from my weak, atrophied hand!

  77. you can't trust the FDA: look at their funding by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    And yet, legions of scientists have found no problem with aspartame.

    In 2005 the prestigious Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center at the European Foundation for Oncology and Environmental Sciences published the results of their 3 year aspartame study on 1,800 rats, known as the Ramazzini Study. It was the most scrupulous and costly investigation of the chemical sweetener ever performed. Dr. Morando Soffritti led this groundbreaking research that revealed aspartame causes lymphomas and leukemia and is a âoemultipotential carcinogen.â

    And the FDA covers up data about aspartame.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  78. Relevant Anecdote by tholomyes · · Score: 1

    Just this weekend, I heard a story about a guy who worked some tech support position and wouldn't eat anything all day, but then would go and have two McDonald's value meals and scarf them down, and that was all he would eat, pretty much every day.

    He was a skinny guy with a high metabolism, but he woke up one morning and found that he couldn't move; his muscles wouldn't work. Slowly, very slowly, over the next couple of hours, he managed to reach his phone and call the ambulance. He apparently had a huge potassium deficiency and was lucky that his heart didn't stop.

    --
    When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
  79. how many liters? by gsmraxe · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    The case studies looked at patients whose consumption ranged from two to nine litres of cola a day.

    9 liters is enough soda to kill off 10,000 laboratory rats in one day isn't it?

    I gave up soda last year when I was diagnosed with an Autoimmune disease. I figured the less crap I pour into my system, the better I'll feel.

  80. What's considered cola? by trinarybit · · Score: 1

    Is cola being used in this article as a term for carbonated beverage with HFCS, caffeine and flavor, or actual cola like coca-cola? The last commenting doctor is from Ohio, where we call our bubbly "pop", and my 2L a day dew habit and I need to know!

  81. CASE STUDY by cynthiamonster · · Score: 1

    Take this finding with a grain of salt. It is a "case study" of very few people who already drink copious amounts of soda so probably live pretty damn unhealthy lives otherwise.

    Wait to panic and argue when there is a randomized control study about this.

  82. Have a Banana! by DanCentury · · Score: 1

    Have a cola and a banana, Squire! That will sort things out.

  83. Study based on pigs by spydum · · Score: 1

    People have much more troubling issues if they are consuming 2-9 LITERS of cola per day, which is what the study was based on. I'm sorry, but your pancreas is probably on FIRE trying to process that input.

  84. wait by GregNorc · · Score: 1

    So basically replacing water with a mixture of salt, sugar, and corn syrup will cause health problems?

    NO SHIT? REALLY? /sarcasm

    The dehydration effects of that much soda mixed with the effects of that much of a caloric overload (My conservative estimate pegs it at about 425 calories per liter for cola. So someone consuming seven liters a day would be consuming almost 3000 calories a day, and that's before we factor in food intake. (Keep in mind the average person needs between 2000 and 2200 calories to maintain body weight, anything more becomes fat.)

  85. Reminds me of when I had Chinese every day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hence products like Olestra, that lets you eat fatty food with no fat calories (at the cost of greasy anal leakage, niiiiice).

    Reminds me of when I used to work across the street from a Chinese restaurant. I like Chinese food and would get chicken chow mein every day, sometimes with chicken balls. The problem is that after a while I started shitting a greasy clear gel. I guess it was whatever oily stuff was coating the chow mein noodles. It only happened when I got lunch there consistently. People tell me I lost weight while I was working there, makes you wonder...

  86. Gah! by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Considering this comes from the International Journal of Clinical Practice it sounds awfully unscientific. Of course this could just be bad editing and a poor choice of headline.

    What is Coke? It is causing it? What in Coke is causing it is a better question, and likely the answer is sugar. 9 x 40g = 360g a DAY in ONLY cola. That's a third of a kilo, not including sugar you get from other sources. Go look at what 1kg of sugar looks like in the supermarket, and try and eat it in 3 days! In which case, Cola isn't the problem, it is sugary drinks in which there are plenty.

    For the Record:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation

    And my fav:
    http://xkcd.com/552/

    I find usually very smart people do not understand this very simple logical fact and make grandiose statements. They very well may be right, however their argument is wrong. Climate Change is one of my favorite examples of this. Flame on! (Sorry I couldn't resist!)

    Also think about Freakanomics.

    Perhaps there is also a statistical correlation between the people that would freaking drink 9 cans of coke in a day and those that smoke 20+ cigerates a day, or the fact that those people are more predetermined to be obese which may be causing it, or be more likely to eat other unhealthy foods, of which anyone factor may be the cause of.

    There are many possibilities and factors and we are talking about samples and statistics here in a study where these are not controlled environments.

  87. nutrients in ancient foods != industrial-farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nutrients in ancient foods != industrial-farming products.

    Was it Nat Geo that stated that oranges & tomatos were 1/5th the nutrient-completeness/level of the same fruit in the '50s?

    ( the ratio they stated I'm certain of, the source I'm sorta-certain of )

    When we replace the high-protein maize with high-sugar "sweet" maize/corn, and eat that INSTEAD, we aren't eating what we're evolved to.

    When we deplete all the nutrients from the soil, and just replace what we have to to produce salable product, we aren't eating what we're evolved to.

    When we destroy the soil-structure/ecology, replacing it with chemical-fertalizer & Round-Up & Round-Up Ready crops, we aren't even eating crops that are going to be producing, in a couple of decades ( because all the soil-ecology got broken, so the funguses needed by the roots in healthy gardens, ISN'T THERE anymore, etc )

    Ever heard of Colony Collapse Disorder?
    where the bees that fertilize our crops ( fruits & trees, mostly ), just suddenly die off, and if you can find any corpses, they're filled with fungus, viruses, bacteria, cancer, every damn thing imaginable, essentially having AIDS?

    That has some cause or other, probably the *complex* of causes, of our "industrial" gardening...

    Die-offs of non-viable species are natural, though, so our extinction will be Perfectly Natural, won't it?

    Natural isn't *inherently* better, but Nature ought be considered, HONESTLY, before replacing part of it and pretending/claiming that No Consequences Exist of the change...

    Cheers,

        Captain Obvious

  88. Excessive usage = Health Problems by prolene · · Score: 1

    This can be seen as: 1. Addiction. 2. Research upon effects of products when used excessively. 3. Label on all things: Excessive usage will lead to health problems.

  89. Who checks this stuff? by icarm089 · · Score: 1

    Urban legends and sundry anti-virus makers keep us alerted to hoaxes. What about viral health stories? Yes virginia, it's work checking "Behind the Headlines" at NHS Choices before spamming your friends with the latest miracle cure or coffee crisis. Here's the cola crisis analysis. http://www.nhs.uk/news/2009/05may/pages/colasapsmusclestrength.aspx. Their bottom line? Be more worried about the sugar effects on teeth and diabetes!

  90. Bananas and Coke by WindShadow · · Score: 1

    I live on bananas and Coke (cola, not nose candy) so my potasium should be fine.