Slashdot Mirror


Where To Buy A Machine With Linux Pre-Installed

The Berkeley LUG has a neat aggregation of many different places where you can acquire a desktop, laptop, or even netbook with Linux pre-installed. The list starts with a link to Dell's Linux offering, includes many independent vendors, and many updates from user comments, almost all of whom seem to be drinking the Ubuntu kool-aid. "Over the last couple of years, Linux has come a long way in terms of hardware support, and these days it is relatively rare that an installation of ubuntu/fedora will be lacking any drivers for your machine. However, installing any OS can still sometimes be a tedious task and one that scares the wits out of the average computer user. And, for the expert users out there, it's just more fun to buy a computer with Linux already on it and not have to pay the Microsoft tax."

229 comments

  1. Meh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought it was more fun to watch your computer compile your latest ebuild list...a preinstalled environment would remove the l33tness that so many linux users thrive for.

    1. Re:Meh? by Shikaku · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the point is more that the cost of the OS is going $0 to Microsoft more than anything. If you don't like the default OS, just install your own. It's free either way.

    2. Re:Meh? by Jurily · · Score: 1

      I thought it was more fun to watch your computer compile your latest ebuild list...a preinstalled environment would remove the l33tness that so many linux users thrive for.

      It would also come with all the drivers you need, properly configured X, hardware acceleration, and wifi. Ever had all of those on something you compiled, or did you get bored with it halfway through like I did every time?

    3. Re:Meh? by erick99 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the business model for all OS will eventually be to give away the OS and charge for Internet-based enhancements, add-ons, help, etc.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    4. Re:Meh? by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How do you figure that? Last time I checked you save exactly $0.00 dollars by getting the Ubuntu over the Vista, at least on the Dell XPS I last looked at. So in this case if there is any savings from not going MSFT then YOU aren't the one seeing it.

      As you can see here it is $1099 for EITHER Vista or Ubuntu. So why in hell would you WANT Ubuntu when you can get the Vista and then download the latest Ubuntu for $0.00 dollars and use the Vista License in a VM or to dual boot? While I am all for choice, this choice seems about as logical as saying "Hey Dell, you don't make enough money, here take that $50 you have to send Ballmer and put it in your pocket. On me pal.". Someone who is smart enough to run Linux as a day to day OS is smart enough to download and burn an .iso. Now when you get something for choosing Linux, like how the Asus would have a bigger drive? That I can see. This just seems stupid IMHO. Cue the Linux users labeling me troll because I dared to point out the Ubuntu deal is a ripoff at Dell.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Meh? by asdf7890 · · Score: 4, Informative

      How do you figure that? Last time I checked you save exactly $0.00 dollars by getting the Ubuntu over the Vista, at least on the Dell XPS I last looked at. So in this case if there is any savings from not going MSFT then YOU aren't the one seeing it.

      Correct. As well as getting Windows OEM licenses dirt cheap in bulk for their machine, Dall and manufacturers like them also get a kick-back for each bit of extra "trail" software (such as AV tools and such) they include. If you don't take Windows they can provide McUsless AntiEverything 2012, so they don't get the kick-back for that software for your machine, and if these kick-backs in total as much as the few $ they pay for each Windows license (i.e. laptop.cost+window.cost-crap1.cost-crap2.cost == laptop.cost-ubuntu.cost) that means your machines costs them the same to send to you what-ever OS you select.

      There is also the issue of extra returns for Linux machines if they make them cheaper. This actually happens, it isn't just FUD, though it doesn't happen for the reason that MS want you to believe (because Linux is defective) it is because the user has made a defective choice - they pick the cheaper option without doing any research then expect a refund because it won't play game-of-the-moment out of the box.

    6. Re:Meh? by sphantom · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe Dell pays Cononical a small kickback for every Linux PC they sell for support. This would explain why the two systems cost the same, though I tend to agree with you on principal that it would be nice to be able to get the Linux variant for cheaper.

      Also, last I checked, Microsoft's license terms don't allow you to run an OEM copy in a virtual instance (i.e. the license is tied to the hardware). If you want to run Vista in a virtual machine you'll need a retail boxed copy, or a volume license of some kind.

    7. Re:Meh? by jakykong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't agree with you, but you do have a point. You aren't spending less, but the problem with the microsoft tax isn't the money I spent. The problem is that the said money is going to microsoft.

      When I buy a computer from Dell, I figure they're going to make some profit either way. If they make more profit by selling Linux to me, then maybe it's encouragement to sell more Linux machines. In any event, that money going to dell doesn't bother me. That same money going to microsoft does.

      The other viewpoint here is that you shouldn't be paying that money because you aren't buying an operating system. This seems to be the one that you're taking. This being the case, there are other vendors where you don't buy the operating system (TFA mentions quite a few vendors -- check them out). Or you could build your own if you have the time to deal with it. It's a matter of taste, I imagine. Or budget.

      So, in short, you have a good point, but there are other arguments to be made as well. :)

    8. Re:Meh? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      That observation seems a bit silly. Yes, there ARE a number of ultra-leet who won't consider using an OS that they don't compile to their own custom needs. But, there are an even larger number of people who can't or won't go to that extreme.

      Face it - Joe Sixpack can download the binaries, install them, then do a relative minimal customization, and have a machine that does JUST WHAT HE NEEDS. And, that is precisely what the world at large needs to know. One doesn't have to be the ultimate geek to use Linux - instead one only needs to troubleshoot a handful of problems, most of the time, to find why the "defaults" don't work on THIS ONE machine.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    9. Re:Meh? by kaidadragonfly · · Score: 1

      Actually, Dell is horribly inconsistent. Sometimes the Ubuntu version is about $50 cheaper than the Windows one, sometimes it's been around $60 I think.

      I've never seen them charge more for Ubuntu than Windows, but on *some* models they charge less.

      I think it may mostly be on netbooks.

      Though, Dell also charges different amounts of money for the same configuration, depending on which "customize it" link you clicked on.

    10. Re:Meh? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      But they need to throw the consumer SOMETHING so they don't feel like they are getting boned! As someone who builds and sells PCs I know how important perception is. I make sure every customer that leaves my place with a PC in their hand has a smile on their face. And it isn't like with the buttloads of cash Dell saves by buying in huge bulk lots that they can't throw them something. Hell, what does Dell pay in bulk for RAM, or a HDD? I'm betting it is just a couple of bucks at most. Throw in a RAM stick, hell if they don't want to open the fricking case give them a damned flash drive!

      I don't know if it is greed, or they don't want to piss off Ballmer, or what. But if they actually want folks buying Ubuntu from them this ain't the way to go about it. Make the customer feel good about buying Linux from Dell. Throw in a RAM or HDD upgrade, hell just throw in a flash drive or a cheap webcam. But paying the exact same price for Ubuntu as you do Windows makes no sense and certainly isn't going to make the customer feel good, unless he has seriously drunk the Linux koolaid. But if he/she is hardcore Linux I doubt they would be happy with a Dell anyway. To me this is a classic case of the Chewbacca defense, as it makes no sense!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:Meh? by fluffman86 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I just ordered a Mini 9 from Dell. I checked the prices and sure enough I saved $40 by getting Ubuntu instead of XP.

      Funny thing is though, I called in the order to talk to a real person about different discounts (epp, sales, etc.), and she tried her *darnedest* to get me to *not* get that laptop! First she wanted to make sure I "had a *real* laptop" (yes, that's a quote!), then she asked what I would be using it for.

      ME: Oh, you know it's a netbook, so...the Internet.

      HER: Oh, you won't be typing papers at all or using Excel or anything? Because you need Windows to run MS Office

      ME: No...it's Ubuntu, it comes with OpenOffice, I don't need MS Office.

      HER: But you can't open word or excel without windows...

      ME: Yes, I can edit and create MS Office documents. Move along, please.

      Next, she urged me to upgrade the RAM.

      HER: And would you like to go ahead and get the 64GB hard drive [even though it's actually solid state] and 2 GB of RAM? This is a small laptop and is very hard to upgrade.

      ME: Actually, I've seen the videos online. It takes 2 screws and you just pop off a little lid and the extra ram or the new SSD just pops right in.

      Then, of course, she wanted to sell me the latest gizmos and gadgets they have. No, thanks. Finally, when the build is complete, I get the most hilarious thing EVER:

      HER: Ok, almost done here, one last question. Right now, we have a special on McAfee Antivirus and it's only $X/month and it will protect your system from...[I cut her off here]

      ME: Would you like to tell me A) how McAfee is going to run in Linux and B) what viruses I would be protected from? I'll go ahead and answer that: McAfee doesn't even run on Linux, so the question is moot. What's my total?

      I'm guessing that even if they sell McAfee and have to give a refund, they'll still charge people for that first month, or even if they give the refund on that, then McAfee gives dell a kickback for so many licenses sold.

    12. Re:Meh? by AceofSpades19 · · Score: 1

      There is also the issue of extra returns for Linux machines if they make them cheaper. This actually happens, it isn't just FUD, though it doesn't happen for the reason that MS want you to believe (because Linux is defective) it is because the user has made a defective choice - they pick the cheaper option without doing any research then expect a refund because it won't play game-of-the-moment out of the box.

      and not to mention, they(acer and asus to a lesser extent) put a linux distro that no one has ever heard of and has no documentation on their computers, obviously everyone is going to use a computer that no one knows how to do anything on

    13. Re:Meh? by el+americano · · Score: 1

      Currently, it's actually much cheaper to get a Windows XPS laptop, since they have an "up to 25% discount" offer, which is only available for the Windows versions. Does it make any sense that it costs more to discount one or the other?

      Some other observations:
      1) The Windows versions have better CPUs. The Ubuntu version's CPU cannot be upgraded. WTF?
      2) No 11n option on Linux. That's understandable.
      3) 1 yr warranty for Linux. 2 yrs for Windows.

      I'd buy the Ubuntu version with no savings, but I can't even get an equivalent deal. I'll just have to wait to get an M1330.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    14. Re:Meh? by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      and not to mention, they(acer and asus to a lesser extent) put a linux distro that no one has ever heard of and has no documentation on their computers, obviously everyone is going to use a computer that no one knows how to do anything on

      That is improving a bit with some netbooks (at least one from Toshiba, and some others that I forget) coming with Ubuntu so they are coming with a distribution that is well known and has at least some pre-existing support network.

      It is said that Acer went with Linpus mainly because of its relatively good support for various eastern languages at the time they were making the decision (I'm not sure how well other distributions match up on that factor in their more recent versions) so it may not have been an optimal choice for our part of the market to was for Acer's target audience on the whole. Another advantage Linpus has over UNR is the first-boot-to-useful-application-interaction time which is noticeably lower then I've been able to tweak UNR to manage - probably lower than UNR will every manage out of the box if only because Acer's custom Linpus setup doesn't have to scan for such a wide variety of hardware it might need to support.

    15. Re:Meh? by AceofSpades19 · · Score: 1

      What is the point of eastern language support and a faster boot time, if no one knows how to do anything with it though? I think the disadvantages of using linpus outweigh the advantages

    16. Re:Meh? by n4djs · · Score: 1

      I think that this probably has something to do with the terms of the arrangement that OEM's such as Dell have with Microsoft. It is my understanding that Microsoft is paid for each Windows capable machine sold, not per Windows installed machine sold. So effectively, you are paying for a Microsoft license when you pay for a Ubuntu load without receiving the software. I am surprised that this isn't illegal under antitrust law as a tying action. Perhaps it is because you don't have to buy the product - you just don't receive any price advantage by not doing so.
      Of course, this could no longer the arrangement between Microsoft and Dell. Anybody have a good feel for current practice?

    17. Re:Meh? by bfields · · Score: 1

      the Ubuntu deal is a ripoff at Dell.

      I don't get it. If I choose to buy the Ubuntu version, why am I being ripped off? From my point of view: I'm getting the OS I want (thus saving half a day installing and tweaking my own Ubuntu installation, as compared to buying the Windows version), at what looks to me like a reasonable price.

      If it turns out later that someone else finds a way to provide me a comparable product at less of a price--great, I'll consider the offer.

      As for guessing the value of the deal to Dell--forget it, I'm not interested. If they're making a huge profit at it, great, maybe they (and their competitors) will see that as an opportunity, and I'll get more offers like this next time.

      And I'm highly skeptical of armchair attempts to estimate Dell's costs--there's the cost of the Windows licenses, possible adware payments, costs of post-sales support for the two OS's, costs of pre-sale development (developing and testing the two OS install images, etc.), etc., etc., etc.

      As a customer, I'm just interested in what I get for my money. And the linked-to deal ($1099 for a 13" laptop, Ubuntu preloaded, 4G ram, Core 2 Duo P8600, 320GB (7200rpm) drive, etc.)--looks totally reasonable to me.

      I'm submitting this on a 1420n that came with Ubuntu preloaded, and I've been pretty happy with it.

    18. Re:Meh? by LinuxOverWindows · · Score: 1

      ya but must company's will still change you for the Windows install. The problem is Company's like Dell and Toshiba have contract with Microsoft so even if you want to install your own later you still had to pay for Windows

    19. Re:Meh? by LinuxOverWindows · · Score: 1

      Actually your right, what they should offer is a NO OS installed notebook, your buying the hardware any way so why bother with the OS install, just download and burn the ISO you want and spend all of the 30 min required to install it your self.

    20. Re:Meh? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --"customize it" --

      Don't do that pick the smallest hard drive, least memory, etc. Go get that custom stuff from newegg or somewhere like that. They make a killing off of memory and hard drives.

      Of course if you have to buy thousands I'm sure you can get them to discount that.

    21. Re:Meh? by westlake · · Score: 1

      There is also the issue of extra returns for Linux machines if they make them cheaper. This happens, it isn't just FUD, though it doesn't happen for the reason that MS want you to believe...it is because the user has made a defective choice - they pick the cheaper option without doing any research then expect a refund because it won't play game-of-the-moment out of the box.

      If that were true, we should be seeing the same number of returns for the low-end Windows system.

      The box that can't play the game of the moment either.

      When the buyer wants games - you give him games - or you drop out of that segment of the market.

      You haven't any legitimate cause for complaint about returns when you stock product no one wants and no keeps.

    22. Re:Meh? by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      If that were true, we should be seeing the same number of returns for the low-end Windows system.
      The box that can't play the game of the moment either.
      When the buyer wants games - you give him games - or you drop out of that segment of the market.

      There are two points there

      1. Perhaps games were not the right example to choose - they certainly are not the only example. What about someone who needs to view/edit MSOffice documents so full of VBA scripts that nothing but office will ever cooperate? What about little Johnny's favourite flash games being inaccessible because the sites hosting them have a brain-dead design that only works in IE or requires a later version of Flash than has been ported to Linux yet? Windows only personal finance applications?
      2. I also suspect (call me cyncal if you will) that a lot of the returns of this nature are only using incompatibility as an excuse. "You didn't tell me this would not work with Photoshop and I'm sure I mentioned that I wanted to use it for graphics work" hold at least a little more water than "I have buyer's remorse and wish to have a refund" or "I've seen something better/cheaper/both and would like a refund". Call me cynical if you will...
    23. Re:Meh? by forestwalkerjoe · · Score: 0

      Ever think for a second that some might want to pay DELL the 50 as incentive to getting them to sell more LINUX based machines? and are tired of the monopoly that lines Gates pockets? it might be 0 to 0 to you.. but if i am going to spend the money.. lets spend it some place that LIKE ME and not a place that could give a crap what i think. i get it.. since in my experince of linux.. i found a distro on net.. never did it before.. downloaded the ISO..burned and installed in duel boot my first day.. and pretty much never went back.. in the next year i had downloaded 11 versions of linux.. installed in multi boot all 11 and had a blast messing them all up.. and stayed in.. UBUNTU.. at home and SUSE at work. yeah.. i get it FREE toys.. but for stable able.. it's nice to see a company preinstalling some thing WE Want.. and getting paid to do it. RJ

  2. It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "And, for the expert users out there, it's just more fun to buy a computer with Linux already on it and not have to pay the Microsoft tax."

    Actually, for the experts, it's more fun to build the computer themselves and install whatever they feel like.

  3. Even if by TechForensics · · Score: 1, Informative

    And, for the expert users out there, it's just more fun to buy a computer with Linux already on it and not have to pay the Microsoft tax.

    I thought we paid that tax EVEN IF we bought a Linux laptop.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    1. Re:Even if by legirons · · Score: 1

      And, for the expert users out there, it's just more fun to buy a computer with Linux already on it and not have to pay the Microsoft tax.

      I thought we paid that tax EVEN IF we bought a Linux laptop.

      Well you could buy a macbook from EmperorLinux and only pay for the Mac OS X license to use Linux ;)

      or just get an Asus eee - for £156 there's not much room to hide the cost of an unused Windows license!

    2. Re:Even if by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I thought we paid that tax EVEN IF we bought a Linux laptop.

      The "Microsoft Tax" is one of those crazy ideas that clog the geek's mind -

      all it really means is that the OEM Windows install makes your laptop a viable mass market product that will outsell Linux by 100 to 1.

    3. Re:Even if by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      I thought we paid that tax EVEN IF we bought a Linux laptop.

      Not quite. You pay the Dell-don't-collect-on-the-bribes-to-include-extra-trial-software-on-your-machine-so-they-extract-those-$-from-you tax.

    4. Re:Even if by ukyoCE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why would a mass market laptop need to be available ONLY with windows pre-installed? The hardware can be mass market and 99/100 can be sold with Windows.

      But why should that imply whatsoever that I can't buy 1/100 of those mass-produced laptops with Linux pre-installed and a lower purchase price?

    5. Re:Even if by westlake · · Score: 1

      But why should that imply whatsoever that I can't buy 1/100 of those mass-produced laptops with Linux pre-installed and a lower purchase price?

      Apple sells an upscale urban lifestyle.

      Microsoft solid middle class value.

      Linux is much more difficult to explain and position.

      It doesn't help that you have to begin with a large black on yellow box like a road hazard sign: "This Computer Will Not Run Your Windows Programs."

      The Windows PC will - however - will run damn near everything FOSS.

      WalMart has been struggling with this problem for years and hasn't found a solution.

      Maintaining a dual inventory and support structure is expensive.

      Shelf space is precious.

      WalMart expects to see a good return from every square foot.

      It comes down to this: The Linux product is more expensive to bring to the point of sale than the cost of the OEM Windows license.

    6. Re:Even if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      posting to undo accidental moderation. Stupid AJAX.

    7. Re:Even if by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      The Microsoft Tax is where a PC/Laptop/Netbook is logically installed with Windows and Microsoft are paid, regardless of the operating system it is finally delivered with, so you end up paying for Windows regardless if you wanted it or not

      Microsoft have been taken to task over doing deals with manufacturers whereby they only give discounts if the manufacturer sells *all* their PC with Windows, this has been deemed illegal...

      But since most PC preinstalled with windows also come with other software and adverts for software and services that mostly pay for the bulk cost of Windows, you don't normally get a discount for not having a operating system, or having an alternative system, so the Microsoft Tax appears to still exist ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  4. Install Linux yourself by LinuxOverWindows · · Score: 0

    Why not just get a Linux CD and install yourself. Linux has also come along way with how it's installed, it use to be at it's best a curses based installer and now has come to live cd's.

    It's not what company will ship you a PC with linux installed just ask them to NOT install windows. It's easy to install Linux and one could do it Trust me.

    1. Re:Install Linux yourself by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not just get a Linux CD and install yourself. It's easy to install Linux and one could do it Trust me.

      Famous last words.

      You aren't going to be there if anything goes wrong.

       

    2. Re:Install Linux yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just get a Linux CD and install yourself. It's easy to install Linux and one could do it Trust me.

      Famous last words.

      You aren't going to be there if anything goes wrong.

      It is installing an OS. Not cooking nitro.

    3. Re:Install Linux yourself by Mansing · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You aren't going to be there if anything goes wrong.

      Neither is Microsoft nor the hardware vendors.

    4. Re:Install Linux yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except the hardware vendors have already tested and certified their various parts against the Windows OS so it will work. The hardware vendors also have support lines to help you. Good luck getting anything but snide comments about RTFM if you needed helping getting something working under a Linux distro you installed yourself.

    5. Re:Install Linux yourself by westlake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Neither is Microsoft nor the hardware vendors.

      I have been pricing refurbished 64 bit quad core Vista PCs from Dell and Tiger.

      It's a calculated risk, of course.

      But these systems come loaded. I can't imaging making any significant changes over the life of the hardware.

      So it works or it doesn't. If it doesn't, it goes back.

      I am not equipped or inclined to diagnose and repair a system level hardware problem or a system level software problem.

      I think - in this - I am representative of the mass consumer market.

    6. Re:Install Linux yourself by ion.simon.c · · Score: 2, Funny

      *points to forums.gentoo.org*

      They're nice and helpful over there. :)

    7. Re:Install Linux yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It really isn't that hard...

      Even if you want to retain your windows, all you have to do is defragment, partition, and install. Debian (and I'm assuming Ubuntu and others) will recognize windows and add it to menu.lst.

    8. Re:Install Linux yourself by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1

      If you can't install Linux using a live cd Graphical Installer then you really shouldn't even be on slashdot lol.

      Well. Sometimes. Normally, OS installs goes without a hitch (either flavor), but I've had both windows and linux installs fail horribly.

      My favorite failed windows was a machine (I still have it) which had a very obscure SATA disk (well, intel, standard chipset from ASUS ;) ) that windows could not grog out of the box. That was ok, because I had a CD with the driver. Unfortunately, windows could only install from a CD, not read a driver CD... or something like that. I asked a windows friend about how to do it, and he lost me about the slipstreaming process. I did try, but in the end, I just gave up. Yeah, so windows wasn't so important for me.

      Linux failed for me once because the CD drive (and old IDE affair) couldn't be read during the 2nd stage because the SATA controller driver lied and said it could control the IDE CD. The IDE driver worked, but was loaded later and politely let the SATA driver do it's thing. And yes, there was a boot parameter to fix it, but.. I just bought a SATA CD-drive. The old one was slow as molasses anyway.

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    9. Re:Install Linux yourself by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 1

      The Gentoo guys are quite often excellent and their wiki was great until the unfortunate incident...
      You weren't trying to make a joke were you?

      I totally agree with "Neither is Microsoft..." but even though it is a PITA to call manufacturers sometimes they really pull through and you wonder why you didn't call earlier.

    10. Re:Install Linux yourself by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Oh no, I was not trying to make a joke. I guess that a moderator had a different experience from mine? YMMV, I guess. I've been using Gentoo since 1.4. The installation guide is ffin' great, IMO.

      I'm still sad about the loss of the Gentoo Wiki. I really should help flesh out the new one...

    11. Re:Install Linux yourself by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      You have obviously never tried installing a different version of Windows onto a PC

      Try getting a manufacturer to support you installing XP on a machine supplied with Vista or a installing Vista on an machine supplied with XP, and you mostly hit a brick wall of "install the supplied operating system and drivers"

      The problem is not Linux, it is that they have not tested the system with any other operating system than the particular version(s) supplied with it ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    12. Re:Install Linux yourself by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --Neither is Microsoft nor the hardware vendors.--

      I've never seen them around for Windows either. Just make sure you can get Linux drivers for all of the hardware that you are purchasing. Notebooks may be tricky here. I might would buy one of those pre-loaded with Linux but not a desktop.

    13. Re:Install Linux yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you jest...

      This support thing you talked in context of vendors, how exactly do you get it? And I mean actual support, not "have you tried rebooting your windows" line of delya tactics?

      Just because they don't give snide comments does not, alas, mean they give you anything particularly useful. Unless you count hand-holding to be useful.

  5. Ubuntu kool-aid by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because, of course, not using Microsoft's Windows or Apple's Mac OS X isn't enough.

    You need to use an obscure Linux distro or else you'll still be a mindless sheep that other Linux users will laugh at.

    You're damned if you do, damned if you don't.

    I'll be at Milliways if anyone needs me.

    1. Re:Ubuntu kool-aid by belmolis · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's the point. Ubuntu is probably the best choice for people migrating from MS Windows. However, there are other markets. For example, I have used Unix in one form or another for 25 years. I do most of my work from the command line. I want more-or-less traditional configuration files and controls and I want to install all sorts of development tools. Ubuntu is not the ideal distribution for someone like me, and, I suspect, a lot of other people who read /. At the same time, I like the ability to buy a laptop with Linux installed so that I can be sure that the audio and wifi work properly. So for people like me, it is desirable to have options other than Ubuntu.

    2. Re:Ubuntu kool-aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aye, can't see what ScuttleMonkey is on about. Ctl-F 'ubuntu' in TFA, and read each in context. Perhaps SM can't write, and meant the vendors and not the commenters, but even then Ubuntu is simply the distro of 3 of the mere 5 vendors listed in the original post.

      Perhaps he means the koolaid in the Electric Koolaid Acid Test sense, and not Jim Jones, but it's still an odd remark. What's to be knee-jerk about? This is like the kids who write "Micro$oft". I think the lad is sucking the wrong end of the towel this morning.

    3. Re:Ubuntu kool-aid by cyphercell · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, I'm not going to be happy until I get full support for Linux From Scratch. I want it all to "just work". Uh, wait...

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    4. Re:Ubuntu kool-aid by scrib · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seconded.

      It's one thing to support your favorite distro, it's another thing to slur one with allusions to a cult. (Ironic, too...) How is that good for anyone?

      I got a taste for *nix in college in the early 90's, but joined the workforce writing software for Windows. I've installed, and deleted, many different distros over the years. Sure, I could use them, compile drivers, find hardware that was supported, but I knew that there was no way that anyone else in my family would make the leap.

      Recent developments in the Windows world have pushed me to investigate alternatives. I recently got my first Mac (a mini) and have been using Ubuntu as my primary desktop for a couple months. Ubuntu, like it or not, is the first distro I would even consider recommending to non-techie friends and family.

      Why? One big reason is the number of users. Any problems I come up against I can usually find answered with a google search. If a software writer has some pre-compiled versions or installation instructions, there's usually one for Ubuntu. Since I am my family's de facto computer support, it's important to have those resources available for a range of hardware and software configurations - not just my own.

      In my opinion, any Linux distro's popularity is a good thing and the more support the better.

      --
      Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    5. Re:Ubuntu kool-aid by isorox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ubuntu is not the ideal distribution for someone like me, and, I suspect, a lot of other people who read /.

      Hmm, I moved from redhat to debian when potato came out, partly based on slashdot (and linux newbie) raves about apt, so Ubuntu is natural when I want it to just work.

    6. Re:Ubuntu kool-aid by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...I moved from redhat to debian when potato came out, partly based on slashdot (and linux newbie) raves about apt, so Ubuntu is natural when I want it to just work.

      OK. And did you spit chips when you went to edit /etc/inittab and found it wasn't there? I'm not saying that RedHat/Debian/Ubuntu are good or bad, but expecting Ubuntu to "Just Work" can be a tall order if you're used to other Unices.

    7. Re:Ubuntu kool-aid by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he means the koolaid in the Electric Koolaid Acid Test sense, and not Jim Jones

      :)

      No, it's Jonestown. My guess is, like many geeks, he knows the phrase but doesn't know enough history to be able to connect it to a suicide cult. I thought it was in poor taste as well.

      And not really because of the cult thing, just because it's come to imply in tech lingo that the product is overrated. Frankly I don't think a Linux distro that takes a half hour to install and works immediately after can be overrated.

    8. Re:Ubuntu kool-aid by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      I happen to like red-colored sugar-water drinks.

    9. Re:Ubuntu kool-aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a big fan of brown kool-aid myself. Beside the Dave Chapelle joke wouldn't work quite the same.

      "I want brown drink mom!"

    10. Re:Ubuntu kool-aid by fishexe · · Score: 1

      And not really because of the cult thing, just because it's come to imply in tech lingo that the product is overrated.

      It also implies that people who buy into it are stupid. In this case, you must be stupid to think Ubuntu is good. Funny, I must be damn stupid 'cause I've installed about a dozen distros over the past decade and I prefer Ubuntu...now how could such an experienced techie fall for such an obvious scam?

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  6. Buy a server instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a server instead. These usually come with no operating system.

    For example

    1. Re:Buy a server instead by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Buy a server instead. These usually come with no operating system.

      For example

      Is that an example of no operating systems?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Buy a server instead by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Interesting

          Actually, this gets touchy sometimes.

          I prefer that my clients buy their own equipment. That way they know I didn't inflate the price, they are the customer of record, and I don't carry the risk of buying hardware the the client backing out. I've gotten stuck with a few pieces of equipment because the client "changed their minds". That really doesn't work well on stuff purchased through eBay, but even with many vendors I'd have to pay a restocking fee.

          We found a 3rd party vendor that was selling a Supermicro motherboard and chassis, assembled to spec with CPU, memory and drives. It's a nice machine. 8 core Opteron, 64Gb RAM, etc, etc. When the client put the order through, he asked "What operating system do you want?". I was already clear in that we were putting our preferred Linux distro on, but would be testing various RAID and filesystems, so he wasn't to have anything put on. They were very clear that the machine wouldn't support Linux. I went back to the spec, and checked on everything. There were no problem. They were insistent on selling him a Microsoft OS. They actually wrote it on the build sheet "Must use Microsoft OS". He was really concerned. Could this tech guy who's known all the answers so far know more than the vendor? Is he wasting a whole bunch of money on something that he can't use?

          When it got here, I opened it up and verified all the parts. Then I booted it up with my Slamd64 CD, and installed. Right out of the box, it worked perfectly. Every device was identified and the drivers loaded. No problems at all. I know he was much happier when he got the call "The machine works great. We're migrating to it now. It will be online by the end of the weekend."

          Had the customer not known any better, and we had given an option of Linux or Windows, he would have spent some good money on a Microsoft OS, because the vendor told him to.

          I know the vendors view. They can make extra money on it. Why would I want to slow a nice fast machine down with a heavy GUI, when I can strip Linux down to bare bones and run as fast as possible?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:Buy a server instead by nxtw · · Score: 1

      Yet, on Dell and HP's sites, it's easy to buy a server without any operating system. In fact, this seems to be the default on at least some of their servers.

      OS choices offered by Dell and/or HP include SLES, RHEL, Windows, XenServer, ESXi, and Solaris.

    4. Re:Buy a server instead by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      I think you have a problem communicating with your clients. I was thinking that as I read your 2nd sentence.

      Of course, you should be upfront with the charges for the equipment. If you don't charge extra for the equipment (and I don't think it's a problem if you do because you're going through the trouble of sourcing it), just say, "These folks offer this piece for $100". Let them know that it's off eBay and they can't return it. Let them know if it's store bought, there's a restocking fee that they're responsible for. If they change their mind, they'll be stuck with those charges.

      Tell them that you research equipment all the time and if they think they can find a better price, you're happy for them to buy it and you'll remember to start checking their place since they have a cheaper item than what you could find. I doubt they'll go through all that trouble.

      It's the same basic idea when they had the "it has to be run on Microsoft" bit.

      If they're hiring someone to do this, most of the time, the less questions you ask of them is better after you find out what they think they want. Make corrections since you're the paid professional. Why pay 5 grand for a super computer that'll turn off their lights when they'd be happier with a Clapper. You know what you're doing. Others can fake it and most clients won't know the difference.

      You need to figure out how much responsibility they want in the decision but don't overpressure them because you're the paid professional.

      In a bad car analogy, you're a mechanic. You call up and say the transmission is shot. It's a Ford, and you can rebuild a Ford tranny. Or they can pay extra and get a new Ford tranny. Of course, Ford also offers a heavy duty tranny. And Acme has a high end tranny that costs even more than the high end Ford tranny. And because you overshare, Slackme offers a low end tranny that's worse than the above.

      Some will ask you to drain and change the fluid and will bitch when that doesn't work. For some it's buy a new tranny. Some want rebuild one. Some want an OEM new tranny. Some want the Acme, some want the Slackme.

      Most want what works best for them (that's the important part). They don't know shit about transmissions so you have to find out what's best for them and let them know. Sure, there's a few cheapskates that want the fluid changed and will bitch to every last man on the earth that you ripped them off by changing the fluid then also charging them to rebuild the tranny because they're idiots about some things. Never forget the idiot factor but don't live by the idiot factor. Then there's others who are selling the car and have no problems with the Slackme transmission that'll blow up in 5,000 miles.

      You ask a few rough questions to figure out how much input they want. But for many clients, it's just fix it and they don't care about every detail.

      It's back to you're the trained professional. To me, it sounds like you misread your clients and offer too many options. It's a weird thing when you know all the details but if they knew the details, they wouldn't be calling you.

      But what do I know? I walked away from working with computers a few years ago.

    5. Re:Buy a server instead by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          On the equipment that I've been stuck with, it's usually been that they couldn't really afford it, but I (obviously) don't have access to their financials. We discussed the problem, what they needed. I came back to them with a price tag, and they agreed. Since I wasn't on their site when they agreed, I couldn't just collect a check in advance. When the equipment showed up and I was ready to deliver, they couldn't afford it. As it turns out, these are usually the companies that are usually a few weeks or months from closing the doors, but they put on a great act until the.

          For the recent customer who purchased the server, we discussed options. The server I suggested and gave him the link to purchase, it was only 16Gb, but I had discussed previous similar projects that I had worked with and since those already had 16Gb (and the price was right), he went for 64Gb. The confusion with the OS was all because of the vendor he was purchasing from.

          I've run into that too. I've bought a lot of servers over the years from different places. One place was very very insistent to put a MS OS on it, but since I wouldn't pay for it, it was the MS Server 2003 Demo. I may have the name wrong, but it's the one that dies in like 30 days after the install unless you pay for the full version. I only knew because I saw NTFS partitions, and one machine I turned on but was distracted and didn't get the boot CD in before it came up into Windows. In those cases, where I'm doing the ordering, and I'm very clear that I don't want any OS, they're just pushing MS products on me. I'd mention the vendor specifically, but I honestly don't remember.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:Buy a server instead by iris-n · · Score: 1

      Actually it's 1/sqrt(2) living cat + 1/sqrt(2) dead cat = 1 cat

      --
      entropy happens
    7. Re:Buy a server instead by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the reason we don't recommend to our clients that they do their own purchasing. If we purchase the hardware and configure it for them, we can take the responsibility for doing it wrong, and we also get to deal with the OEM on their behalf.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    8. Re:Buy a server instead by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's a pain when you are dealing with inexperienced sales guys. Of course in that situation you do know far more than the vendor.

    9. Re:Buy a server instead by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's time for a new third party vendor. I heard about Silicon Mechanics at OSCon; I don't know if they have what your clients need at prices they'll be happy with, but they'll never push Windows!

      (I have no experience with the company, they just sound good to me.)

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  7. Proximity to greatness! by siloko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have lived with three dudes over the past two years and they are all now running Ubuntu in one form or another having not even heard of any windows alternatives before. Simply seeing it work, being close to someone who can help when they come up against problems and experiencing the sheer breadth of free applications on offer is enough for many people to make the switch. Incidentally one of those guys didn't even own his own computer when I met him . . .

    1. Re:Proximity to greatness! by toetagger · · Score: 1

      My guess is its better if you wouldn't have said anything!

      The way you wrote this, you're giving Ubuntu a reputation that will make some people think twice before admitting that they also run Ubunut.

      And if you would say the same thing but with 3 girls, then no one would belief you.

      Doomed either way.

    2. Re:Proximity to greatness! by siloko · · Score: 1

      you're giving Ubuntu a reputation that will make some people think twice before admitting that they also run Ubunut

      errr, I'm not sure what criteria you use to assess an OS but ours obviously differ!

    3. Re:Proximity to greatness! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if you would say the same thing but with 3 girls, then no one would belief you.

      My girlfriend, my daughter, my niece and my mother all run Ubuntu.

      That joke is way past it's best before date... you might want to try some new material...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    4. Re:Proximity to greatness! by westlake · · Score: 1

      I have lived with three dudes over the past two years and they are all now running Ubuntu in one form or another having not even heard of any windows alternatives before

      Translation:

      I live in the college dorm.

      My bunk mates get 24 hour free technical support.

      They are refugees from the Land of The Lost who have never seen an add for the Mac.

    5. Re:Proximity to greatness! by Foodie · · Score: 0, Troll

      I have lived with three dudes over the past two years and they are all now running Ubuntu in one form or another having not even heard of any windows alternatives before

      Translation:

      I live in the college dorm.

      My bunk mates get 24 hour free technical support.

      Well, the other translation is too weird to imagine.

    6. Re:Proximity to greatness! by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend installed, ran, configured, and customized Ubuntu herself. She put Cairo-Dock and made it really nice looking and slick.

      She also likes that there's so much free software. And she knows how to use Wine if she ever needs to too.

    7. Re:Proximity to greatness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife, my girlfriend, my daughter, my nice and my mother all run Ubuntu!

    8. Re:Proximity to greatness! by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 0

      Does she have a younger sister?

      --
      Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
  8. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only if it's a desktop. You're not gonna build your own netbook and have it be of any respectable quality.

  9. Netbooks by Wowsers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought myself a Asus netbook with the Linux pre-install. It didn't last long and installed a different Linux distro which was not as childish and crippled as the pre-installed Linux version (not any Ubuntu flavour). Maybe there should be an option when buying machines for NO OS installed by default. It wouldn't prevent the manufacturer adding crapware for their Windows install CD's.

    It would be interesting to know which OS would be more frustrating to the average user to install. Every Linux install I've done, it installed everything a typical install does in one go and needed one reboot (setting up SuperUser and user accounts). The last time I installed WinXP on my desktop I lost the will to live after 35 reboots to install the OS and countless other drivers which insisted on full reboots.

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
    1. Re:Netbooks by Abreu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft would quickly oppose any attempt to sell computers with no OS... on the grounds that it would support piracy

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:Netbooks by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I have someone's machine here right now that needed a full reinstall. The machine took a power surge. The surge damaged the hard drive, memory, and sound card. Knowing the preinstalled version of Windows, it has so much crap it isn't even funny. I could spend hours cleaning those out, or put a nice clean install on.

          When I use a Windows machine (hey, it helps for gaming), it's always nice to have a clean install, versus the vendor provided crap, even if I have to go through couple dozen or so reboots. On the client's machine, even if I could have preserved the reinstall partition on the original drive, I would have gone through just as many reboots doing the Windows updates.

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:Netbooks by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Try nLite. Master your XP cd, plug it in and walk away.

      http://www.nliteos.com/

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    4. Re:Netbooks by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      I bought myself a Asus netbook with the Linux pre-install. It didn't last long and installed a different Linux distro which was not as childish and crippled as the pre-installed Linux version (not any Ubuntu flavour).

      That might be a little unfair to Linpus. Admittedly I replaced it with UNR in short order, but it is not without its advantages once you've visited the official update page that gives you a more recent version of Firefox (3.0.x upgrade from 2), OpenOffice, VLC, and so forth.

      The default install (once FF is updated) is perfectly fine for basic users, who do not need the flexibility you or I desire/require, and all the hardware definitely works out of the box. It also boots (and gets to the point of being able to use an application) a lot faster then I have been able to tweak UNR to (though this isn't much of an issue as mine very rarely shuts down fully - it sleeps most of the time instead which seems reliable)

      It is said that one of the reasons Acer picked Linpus instead of other alternatives such as Ubuntu was that it had better eastern language support at the time the decision was made, as it was originally created for those markets. The Asian market is/was a significant chunk of Acer's target market for the range.

    5. Re:Netbooks by westlake · · Score: 1

      Microsoft would quickly oppose any attempt to sell computers with no OS... on the grounds that it would support piracy

      WalMart won't stock your bare-bones PC because they can't sell your bare-bones PC - and they sure as hell don't want to accept it as a return.

      Bare-bones is strictly for the enthusiast and the IT pro.

    6. Re:Netbooks by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to know which OS would be more frustrating to the average user to install.

      Installing an OS is frustrating, full stop.

    7. Re:Netbooks by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      Software install and patching is where linux currently rules.
      At work we are approacing patch quarter, where we arrange the outage of over 170 servers while we bring their patch levels up-to-date. Needless to say most of these are Windows servers. However we have about 10 Linux servers for various other duties. They have been constantly patched with critical updates in the past 6 months. No patches installed have "required" a reboot. simply a restart of some affected services in some cases.
      At my desk I have one linux worktion I use to manage most of the switches and linux servers on the net, and a Windows workstation for Office and MS only management software. I can't remember the last time I rebooted the linux workstation. The Windows box is on the corporate "twice a month" patch and reboot cycle.
      (Side note, the Linux box has half the RAM of my windows desktop, but I prefer to use the linux machine for most general browsing as it is faster than the Windows box.)
      As to getting one with Linux Preinstalled, I personally have never bought a desktop already built, and my laptops have been provided by work, but all end up dual booting 8)
      On th ewhole I have found setting up Linux to be much easier than XP or Vista, espcially at home as instead of having to dig out the CD's and licence keys for proprietary OS's, and then having to phone up for activation, I just download the current version of whatever distro I am currnetly using, burn and boot. 40 minutes later I usually have the machine set up and ready to go.
      The one time I have had linux on machine from the supplier was an Acer Aspire One. The installed Linpus Lite OS was so crippled I just reinstalled Ubuntu over it. Apparently Dell's ubuntu install is busted too.

    8. Re:Netbooks by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to know which OS would be more frustrating to the average user to install.

      It's more intersting to note that most average users never have the need to install an OS.

      --
      Squirrel!
    9. Re:Netbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP said *ASUS* not *Acer* so they are dissing Xandros, not Linpus.

      Xandros for me had one really major flaw - slow slightly flackey wireless. UNR fixed that. I'd very strongly recommend UNR for eeePC users, the only drawback is on my atom based model 1000 I get a bit less battery life (eg about 4-5hrs rather than 5-6hrs).

    10. Re:Netbooks by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I don't see any reason why WalMart couldn't sell a bare-bones PC. They might even be able to sell two. Though I suppose it might be hard to base a profitable business model on the sale of two PCs.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:Netbooks by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Anyone capable of installing pirated Windows would be well aware that they can wipe any Linux machine for the same effort.

      Assuming the Linux machine and the No OS machine cost the same (and there's little reason why they shouldn't, really), selling Linux machines is the equivalent of selling No OS machines.

      Better really, in that at least you know it has compatibility with Linux and related OSs, which you wouldn't with a No OS.

  10. Another List for Laptop, PDAs and Mobile Phones by wehe · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is also a comprehensive and international list of vendors which provide laptops, notebooks, PDAs and mobile phones with Linux pre-installed. This list is accompanied by a survey of laptop and notebook manufacturers which provide Linux pre-installed, a survey of mobile phones with Linux pre-installed and an overview of media players with Linux pre-installed (these manufacturers are marked with an asterisk).

    1. Re:Another List for Laptop, PDAs and Mobile Phones by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Not comprehensive.

      It misses some major suppliers of pre-installed Linux boxes in Australia - e.g. Pioneer Computers and Kogan.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  11. Driver support by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you don't like the default OS, just install your own.

    But if you use the operating system that comes on the machine, it reassures you that the operating system will work OK with the hardware. I replaced Xandros with Ubuntu on my Eee PC 900, and I still have trouble with cloning the display and with audio after coming out of suspend.

    1. Re:Driver support by Jurily · · Score: 1

      But if you use the operating system that comes on the machine, it reassures you that the operating system will work OK with the hardware.

      Except when it comes with malware.

    2. Re:Driver support by nausea_malvarma · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try EEEbuntu. It's Ubuntu with a few eee-specific features, and a custom kernel. Should detect everything automatically. I've got it running on my 1000ha and I've never had a problem with it. Here's where you can grab it

    3. Re:Driver support by asdf7890 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Try EEEbuntu. It's Ubuntu with a few eee-specific features, and a custom kernel. Should detect everything automatically. I've got it running on my 1000ha and I've never had a problem with it. Here's where you can grab it

      IIRC eeebuntu hasn't been updated to with latest release version (it is still based on 8.10 rather than the newer 9.04). While the differences won't be massively massive and 8.10 will get security updates for a while yet, you are probably better off using the official "Ubuntu Netbook Remix" for new installs: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download-netbook

      I've been using it on my AA1 for the last few weeks and have found it to be excellent in terms of everything I've cared to test working out of the box, and the eee1000 seems to be well supported too according to the official list at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupport/Machines/Netbooks

      If you don't like the default UNR launcher interface, you can easily turn it off and use the standard desktop setup (or your custom preference if you have used Linux long enough to have developed one) instead (though you'll want to reconfigure the panels vertically, or remove them, due to the machines screen size and aspect ratio).

    4. Re:Driver support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like the default OS, just install your own.

      But if you use the operating system that comes on the machine, it reassures you that the operating system will work OK with the hardware. I replaced Xandros with Ubuntu on my Eee PC 900, and I still have trouble with cloning the display and with audio after coming out of suspend.

      Mandriva Free 2009 Spring supports all the Asus Eee Pc systems drivers. It has very good hardware detection. Mandriva has done this for a while. Mandriva is a far superior distro than Ubuntu. It just works and has good font handling etc. You can install multiple desktop managers and when swiching between them will find that apps are in he menus. It has better set of utiliies than Ubuntu. The current weakness of Mandriva is that it is Intel/Amd only alhough there has been a call for volunteers o help port it to ARM.

    5. Re:Driver support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The malware runs perfectly out-of-the-box. QED.

    6. Re:Driver support by nausea_malvarma · · Score: 1

      Say, Thanks for the advice :-)

    7. Re:Driver support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you use the operating system that comes on the machine, it reassures you that the operating system will work OK with the hardware.

      Not necessarily. My eeePC 1000 SSD model with the default Xandros install had slow and flaky wireless, and the sound support would crash after playing a few flash vieos. Replacing it with UNR fixed both these issues.

    8. Re:Driver support by PenisLands · · Score: 1

      Have you tried Debian?

  12. Any suggestions for Canadian laptop vendors? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

    It looks like Dell.ca isn't selling laptops anymore. For reasons (in no particular order) of patriotism, currency and hardware/warranty hassles, I'm interested in buying a laptop with working suspend-to-ram from a Canadian company...does anyone have any suggestions? (I know about the netbooks, but I'm wondering if there's anything else.)

    1. Re:Any suggestions for Canadian laptop vendors? by sherriw · · Score: 1

      I'm also interested in the answer to this...

    2. Re:Any suggestions for Canadian laptop vendors? by leoc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Years ago I bought a linux server from a company in Edmonton, and they seem to still be around. Their site is woefully out of date though.

      http://www.harddata.com/

      --
      STFU about slashdot bias.
    3. Re:Any suggestions for Canadian laptop vendors? by molesdad · · Score: 1
      --
      If the shoe fits, it's ugly.
    4. Re:Any suggestions for Canadian laptop vendors? by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Why do I always have to stop and ask myself "When did California get a TLD?"

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    5. Re:Any suggestions for Canadian laptop vendors? by Pissou+Anonyme · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try http://www.eurocom.com/ They sell Windozed laptops but you can buy one without an OS. Their base is in Ottawa. PA

    6. Re:Any suggestions for Canadian laptop vendors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever you buy, don't forget to install OpenBSD to complete the Canadian motif.

    7. Re:Any suggestions for Canadian laptop vendors? by SoddOffBaldrick · · Score: 1

      I noticed that a Canadian company was selling machines with Debian pre-installed when I was browsing the other day. http://debian.org/distrib/pre-installed

  13. Its Not a Tax You Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why do some people here like to still perpetuate the meme of a Microsoft tax.
    The fact is that the only real taxes are those levied by the government and nobody else. If you avoid this âoemicrosoft tax" nothing happens to you. If you do it against the government its called tax evasion and you can go to jail for it.

    Please, stop the FUD now. I thought were people were against it if its done by Microsoft, but you are doing the same thing here.

    1. Re:Its Not a Tax You Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do some people here like to still perpetuate the meme of a Microsoft tax.
      The fact is that the only real taxes are those levied by the government and nobody else. If you avoid this âoemicrosoft tax" nothing happens to you. If you do it against the government its called tax evasion and you can go to jail for it.

      Please, stop the FUD now. I thought were people were against it if its done by Microsoft, but you are doing the same thing here.

      It's a synecdoche, numbnuts.

    2. Re:Its Not a Tax You Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      All right, from now on I'll call it the "mandatory fee that you pay to microsoft when buying a computer regardless of your desire to use any microsoft product." Of course, these days it's not *strictly* true - you can buy a computer without the "mandatory fee that you pay to microsoft when buying a computer regardless of your desire to use any microsoft product"... just it's hard to do. Even many (most?) computers that you manage to buy without an OS or with some flavor of Linux pre-installed include the "mandatory fee that you pay to microsoft when buying a computer regardless of your desire to use any microsoft product." (I.E. Microsoft gets mad at vendors who try to sell PC's with no OS or Linux, on the basis that the users will probably pirate windows... and so many just include a windows license in the product price anyway).

      You know what? Fuck you - "mandatory fee that you pay to microsoft when buying a computer regardless of your desire to use any microsoft product" is way too long for ordinary use, we'll just agree to call it the "Microsoft Tax" because that's the closest analogy that fits in a reasonable amount of space.

    3. Re:Its Not a Tax You Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. how does that apply when im typing this from a apple macbook?

      Apple tax?

      Oh, and say hi to sixth grade for me.

    4. Re:Its Not a Tax You Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just DESTROYED YOU. Game, Set, Match. I win, you lose. This is what happens when little kids try to argue with the big boys.

      This, and then you call the other guy a douchebag.

      Priceless!

    5. Re:Its Not a Tax You Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, tax avoidance and tax evasion are vastly different things. Specifically, the first is legal and the second isn't.

    6. Re:Its Not a Tax You Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is anything made by apple a "computer"?

  14. Dell by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Informative

    So far I've bought 2 Ubuntu machines from Dell and they absolutely rock! I bought a Dell Latitude and a Mini 9. They were both rock solid, isn't too OEMified (i.e. no crapware preinstalled).

    I'm a huge Dell fan now, because they give me what I want!

    Rah rah rah, go Dell! ;)

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:Dell by TechForensics · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have a 10 amp power wang designed to drive any woman wild.

      Be careful you don't get a socket error.

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    2. Re:Dell by lolocaust · · Score: 2, Informative

      One thing you should watch out for is the really long delivery times for Dellbuntu systems, at least in my own experience. My brother bought an m1330 (with Vista) and it arrived in two weeks with no issues. I decided to buy my own but with Ubuntu pre-installed and I was given the same two weeks estimate. However for about two months I kept getting emails about unavailable stock and that the delivery estimate was moved back each time. This is despite the fact that the flashy stock checker said everything was fine when I customized the system. On top of this, I couldn't cancel or get a refund apparently because of the way the automated system works (what a load of bull).

      I got annoyed about a month in and just bought a Macbook for ~£30 less and better specs (everything was the same except the Macbook had an Nvidia 9400m instead of a 8400m). If I didn't have spare cash from my student loan I'd have been in a right mess because the m1330 didn't arrive until May 11th, about 3 weeks after my project deadline.

      Yes, I know my experience might have been bad, and others may vary, but this has put me off doing business with Dell for good, especially when my brother had no issues with his Vista machine, which tells me Dell isn't really serious about Ubuntu.

      To answer the submitter's question I've personally bought the 9" eeePC with Xandros preinstalled and installed Ubuntu on it with Adamm's kernel (which is as simple as adding a repo). I'm sure the larger eeePCs should be just the same.

      --
      Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
    3. Re:Dell by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      In my case, the Latitude took a couple of weeks but the Mini 9 took a whole month(!).

      It was worth it though and I customized my order fairly heavily.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  15. It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by hubert.lepicki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's more about getting "clean" laptop without any OS (or proprietary one) installed and hardware compatibility with free OSes.

    I'd love to see some vendor shipping laptops "Tested with Ubuntu, Fedora, NetBSD and OpenSolaris".

    From my experience (had 3 laptops with Linux pre-installed so far - 2 with Linpus and one with Xandros!), I always had to switch to something else than what came with laptop. With Acer laptops it was easy - hardware was fairly standard. Other thing was with early version of Eee PC, that had all sorts of problems with drivers for almost a year until I could install "stock" Debian on it.

    If I even got a laptop from Dell with Ubuntu, I would:
    - re-partition and encrypt hard drive
    - upgrade to something more recent than 8.04

    That means I don't need a laptop with Linux pre-installed, but one without Windows, with fairly standard hardware. I think most of you here would agree with me.

    1. Re:It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like you would bankrupt that company with all the testing going on.

      Pick one god damn distro and standardize on it.

      No offense, but people like you who speak out like everyone needs 20 different distros are just confusing vendors of where the market is at in Linux Desktop, hell whethere there is even a incentive for market in Linux Desktop.

    2. Re:It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >I'd love to see some vendor shipping laptops "Tested with Ubuntu, Fedora, NetBSD and OpenSolaris".

      I'd settle for full advance disclosure of chipset specs.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by Larryish · · Score: 1

      If your laptop uses an onboard Intel graphics chip, you may need to stick with 8.04 to get the best performance.

      http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359578

      http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1132722.html

    4. Re:It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by sherriw · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the case, you can always go to your local PC shop and have them custom build one for you. OEM isn't the only choice out there.

    5. Re:It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      With the first Eees, the problem was mainly that most distros didn't care to support it. I ran Mandriva 2008.1 on my 701 with absolutely no problems. My 1000HA runs Mandriva 2009. Mandriva were really the only Linux vendor at the time that saw netbooks as something worth including support for in the basic distro rather than trying to get OEM contracts for a customised distro with an "easy mode" UI.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    6. Re:It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by hubert.lepicki · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know that. Running 9.04 now with experimental drivers because I couldn't stand:

      - poor performance
      - system freezes (sic!)

    7. Re:It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by hubert.lepicki · · Score: 1

      Ok. They probably won't deliver me slick laptops...

    8. Re:It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OpenSolaris laptops, from Toshiba.

      http://www.opensolaris.com/toshibanotebook/

    9. Re:It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by Larryish · · Score: 1

      What experimental drivers are you using?

      I have 9.04 installed on a desktop machine with onboard Intel graphics and the performance is abysmal.

    10. Re:It's not about shipping Linux pre-installed by Hucko · · Score: 1

      huh? he named 2, and 2 unix systems. Plus if it is compatible with bsd, it is probably compatible with everything else. A benefit of BSD licensing. Not that hard.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  16. No mention of pogo linux? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Sure, they're mostly servers, but they do have Workstations. They'll even sell you Windows if you want it. http://pogolinux.com/

  17. Try outside the US by Godji · · Score: 1

    Heh, the US has it easy. Try finding anything preinstalled with Linux in Bulgaria.

    1. Re:Try outside the US by belmolis · · Score: 2, Funny

      I didn't know it was even possible to run Linux on a TRS-80. :)

    2. Re:Try outside the US by hubert.lepicki · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_computer_hardware_in_Soviet_Bloc_countries#Bulgarian_computers

      go learn about computing in Soviet block. I won't mention Polish "Odra" computer and it's top-of-the-art memory of that time.

      I never been to Bulgaria (want to go there), but I guess it can be possible to buy some cheap Acer laptops with Linux there from_a_shelf in cheap computer stores.

    3. Re:Try outside the US by belmolis · · Score: 1

      For those who don't read very carefully, ":)" means "I'm kidding". It's not a troll, it's a joke.

    4. Re:Try outside the US by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Lemme see. In Soviet Russia... system installs you?

  18. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by Omniscient+Lurker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I honestly tried to understand where in that blog it talks of making a netbook. i gave up. Note to EVERYONE: when linking to a blog (or elsewhere), link straight to the relevant post, not the front page.

  19. Microsoft tax is irrelevant by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    The $10/£10 you pay for MS is often trumped by the $30/£30 they add to the cost as it costs them more to support it, and that is ignoring the £20 that companies pay to preinstall crap on your PC). Don't worry about Microsoft getting rich off your £10, they don't care about the money from the home market, just the market share (which they loose if you uninstall it anyway).

    Decide if you want full floss (ati/intel/atheros) or are willing to use proprietary (ati/nvidea) to get better performance, then find the best PC you can get for your price. If your looking at desktops then do yourself a favour and build it, it is literally plug by colors now, as it cut the price in half.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    1. Re:Microsoft tax is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... just the market share (which they loose if you uninstall it anyway)."

      That's not true since on paper a system was sold with a Microsoft OS, so it's counted as one in the the Microsoft column. The reverse is also the same. If a system is sold with Linux and then later, heaven forbids, has Windows installed that share is STILL counted towards Linux.

    2. Re:Microsoft tax is irrelevant by ratboy666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft LOSES market share if you install something else over top?

      I would beg to differ -- all machines are still counted as Windows(tm) machines. This allows demonstration of the ABSOLUTE and CRUSHING numerical superiority of Windows.

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  20. Microsoft Tax, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it frequently a Microsoft Subsidy in order to make sure their product is sold first?

  21. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Deep linking when linking to an external website, is just good etiquette and stops me wasting time

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  22. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by nausea_malvarma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait wait wait. One person said "You're not gonna build your own netbook and have it be of any respectable quality" and you say "I beg to differ" and offer a link as a counter example. Any reasonable person would assume your link would contain someone who did make their own netbook, because you didn't specify otherwise, and it was in response to a question about homemade netbooks. Instead of lashing out at other users,consider the possibility that your post was vague and cryptic.

  23. Really, a printer? by Qubit · · Score: 1

    The article links to a local Ubuntu-friendly retailer ZaReason. Now I'm all about buying from local businesses, but given some of the text on their pages, I'm wondering if these guys got a little too "Berkeley," if you know what I mean:

    SD/MMC slot -- download photos, anything from your phone (if it holds an SD card), your printer... extreme usability

    Are they trying to tell me that I can "download a printer" or "download photos from my printer" ? I dunno about them, but usually photos come out of my printer, not the other way 'round.

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
    1. Re:Really, a printer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Lots of all-in-one printers have scanners and SD card slots, so you can scan a document to an SD card, and then transfer the SD card to your laptop's card slot.

  24. in the UK by legirons · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the UK, try: http://www.efficientpc.co.uk/

    don't bother with Dell - once you've found a machine that you want, there's no way they're going to put linux on it unless you request an offline quote that means you get no discounts and can't do easy comparisons between different configurations. Or unless you go through their "linux portal" that makes everything more expensive.

    Oh, and Dell will only sell you the most expensive possible version of the most expensive linux distribution unless you get one of their "toy" pink laptops from the 'home' section. (and who knows, they might give money to Microsoft on your behalf anyway)

    1. Re:in the UK by naich · · Score: 1

      I've bought network stuff from

      http://www.linuxemporium.co.uk/index.html

      in the past. I'd recommend them. They also do systems.

  25. I come from a Dark Star... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 5, Funny

    You need to use an obscure Linux distro or else you'll still be a mindless sheep that other Linux users will laugh at.

    I use DARKSTAR Linux, you insen... wait, I'm the insensitive clod, you sheep!

  26. Worse than installing Windows: doing it twice by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    [after installing XP] I lost the will to live after 35 reboots to install the OS

    Try doing that and watching it get Sasser'd twenty seconds after you plugged in the network cable :(

    1. Re:Worse than installing Windows: doing it twice by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      Not gonna happen post-SP2. That was over 4 years ago.

      --
      Squirrel!
    2. Re:Worse than installing Windows: doing it twice by bebemochi · · Score: 1

      Oh yes it does still happen. Because if your hard copy of XP is pre-SP2, you can no longer install SP2 from a downloaded .exe -- it won't let you. You *have* to connect to the internet to download it! Connect to the Internet with a pre-SP2 XP box!!

      Mine was infected about ten seconds after plugging in the Ethernet cable. WITH a firewall running -- that's how I knew it had been compromised (forget which firewall, because that was last year and I said "#*@* this, I'm installing Ubuntu" and haven't looked back).

    3. Re:Worse than installing Windows: doing it twice by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, you download the service pack stand-alone installer and put it on a flash drive...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  27. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got my Dell Insipiron with ubuntu pre-installed in the UK (amazon).

  28. freegeek by sugarmotor · · Score: 4, Informative

    freegeek ( http://www.freegeek.org/ ) recycles PC's and sells them if they have some left-over.

    Linux pre-installed.

    Have to check if there is one where you live.

    Stephan

    --
    http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
    1. Re:freegeek by cartavio · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:freegeek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard of them, but it looks like a pretty good system, 3 years warranty isn't too bad either.

    3. Re:freegeek by florina2 · · Score: 1

      I bought one of those as a gift for my cousin a few months ago. She's not a savvy computer user, so Ubuntu seemed to fit well with her. Every once in a while she calls me about a program she can't install. I tell her that it won't run in Ubuntu and I show her an alternative instead. So far she's been pleased.

    4. Re:freegeek by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      What they're doing seems praiseworthy and idealistic, but really, their prices aren't that different from what I've found at Good Will, garage sales, swap meets, and on eBay. For instance, I've found that I can generally get keyboards for a buck at garage sales. Low-capacity IDE drives go for $10 (including shipping) on eBay. Memory in sizes of 512 Mb and less is too cheap to worry about; the main hassle is just figuring out compatibility.

  29. Everex R.I.P.? - the search for the $200 linux box by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    I bought one of the first $200 Everex gPC boxes (reviewed here), and although their linux distro was awful at that time (it was a prerelease version), the hardware has worked fine. I put ubuntu on it, and it's a great machine.

    However, they seem to have recurring problems with production and/or distribution channels. They were originally selling them through Walmart; you'd order it via Walmart's web site, and it would be shipped to your local store for you to pick up. Now Walmart no longer has them. If you go to everex.com, they proudly tell you that their latest version, the gPC3, is available for $199. But of the two links they offer for buying it, neither actually works. One is to newegg, which lists it as a "Deactivated Item." The other is a link to a nonexistent page on everexstore.com.

    Unfortunately, this seems to be the recurring pattern. Fry's sold the $180-250 Great Quality machines, then stopped. Sears had the Mirus with Freespire (ugh) for $200, but now they only sell it with Windows. Now the gPC seems to be headed down the same road. It seems like lots of people get this great idea of selling a linux box for $200, but nobody seems to be able to sustain it as a business model. It probably doesn't help that they all put the world's lousiest linux distros on their machines, instead of just going with Ubuntu, which would be the sane, obvious choice these days.

  30. where to buy a machine with Linux pre-installed by rs232 · · Score: 1

    You could one from CAI, if you are in the non profit sector.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  31. List of Cities by sugarmotor · · Score: 2, Informative

    I forgot; there's a list of cities at

    http://www.freegeek.org/about/intergalactic

      * Free Geek Arkansas (Fayetteville, Arkansas)
      * Free Geek Central Florida (Orlando, Florida)
      * Free Geek Chicago (Chicago, Illinois)
      * Free Geek Columbus (Columbus, Ohio)
      * Free Geek Michiana (South Bend, Indiana area)
      * Free Geek Twin Cities (Minneapolis-Saint Paul, Minnesota)
      * Born Again Technologies (Murfreesboro, Tennessee)
      * Free Geek Vancouver (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada)
      * Free Geek Providence (Providence, Rhode Island)
      * The original Free Geek, often referred to as âoethe "Mothership". (Portland, Oregon)

    Stephan

    --
    http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
  32. Re:Everex R.I.P.? - the search for the $200 linux by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    Aha, after posting the above, I found out that Zareason sells the Everex gPC3. I wonder why the heck Everex's web page doesn't link to Zareason, and links instead to two nonfunctional retail channels??

  33. It's almost a good deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The problem with many Linux versions of desktops or laptops is that the Windows version is almost always a better deal. The computer you point at:

    Linux, $20 cheaper
    BUT
    Linux, 1/2 the hard drive (ie 4GB vs. 8GB)
    Linux, you don't get $30 off peripherals

    Up to recently they always found a way to make Linux a worse deal financially. I think they may have fixed that in the States but obviously not in Canada.

  34. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by oldspewey · · Score: 1

    Well then you're simply not willing to do the necessary work to understand people's references

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  35. Re:Everex R.I.P.? - the search for the $200 linux by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    D'oh, now I feel like a complete idiot, with two replies-to-self. Zareason doesn't actually have them in stock.

  36. Windows returns by symbolset · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it's time we bump the return rate on Windows machines by taking back our new laptops a few times. I'm tired of seeing this argument. As of right now my preferred recommendation for malware becomes "take it back to the store and exchange it for one that doesn't have that problem".

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Windows returns by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm with you there.

      I was just stating the case, not saying that I liked it!

  37. This insanity by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Is functionally equivalent to book publishers opposing the sale of blank paper.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  38. You Are Not The Target Market, Then by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    For example, I have used Unix in one form or another for 25 years. I do most of my work from the command line.

    ...and therefore you're probably quite willing and capable of installing whatever distro you like.

    As a techie, odds are, that the first thing you'll do with a new PC is zap the hard drive and re-install everything the way you want anyway.

    The only benefit to such people of getting a machine with Linux pre-installed is some assurance that maybe, just maybe, the supplier has the nous to only use components with reasonable Linux support.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  39. Places where I've seen linux preinstalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. In the local charity shop, on second hand computers they sell.
    2. ToysRus, on Asus EEE PC.
    3. Ebay

    Also, if you live in the UK, you may want to check out Aria and order your PC there- they actually charge less for a PC if they don't need to install an OS on it. I'm a happy recurring customer there and WILL check their site if I need any hardware at all.

  40. Linux as a windows wrapper by HW_Hack · · Score: 1

    As a linux user for 5yrs (and ex PC design engineer) - I really cannot see linux becoming the OS of choice of the masses (i.e. your dumb neighbor or the kooky lady in accounting). The Windows XP environment is what they know (more or less).

    They are not motivated or driven to learn a "new way" of doing things. As an IT guy I easily bounce between XP - OS X - and linux ... my normal friends are running XP and a few OS X.

    And both Apple and M$ learned that making wholesale GUI changes generally upsets the masses who just want to get shit done - no retraining.

    My take is someone needs to do a truly seam-less integration of XP / Windows 7 running as a virtual OS (ala parallels or virtual box) - where linux enhances security - monitors the data stream for viruses - and of course is there to be used a second OS (and of course to repair XP etc).

    Linux ... silently guarding average users from the crap M$ churns out. Now that would sell.

    And don't mention WINE -- I said integrated - seamless - invisible.

    --
    Its not the years, its the mileage .....
  41. Linux is not costless, it is Freedom enabling. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know no other way to put it in English (the free as in beer nonsense clarifies nothing frankly).

    In Spanish it is very simple: "Linux no es gratuito, es libre".

    My point is, when I buy Linux services I have full control over my data and support companies that roughly agree with my view of the world.

    When somebody buys Microsoft, they are making business with a company that is unethical to say the least (cue for cascade of Slashdot histories about this) and that can (and has) screwed users over access to their own data.

    The choice is clear, I made it 10 years ago. If Dell or others provide me with that choice, how they use their hard earned cash is frankly none of my business (well, not entirely, but in general that would be it).

    Often people reply to this that one should use the best tool for the job, failing to notice that ethical aspects are also important when deciding which tool is best.

    Most people will not allow a bad plumber, with a string of complaints anywhere near their shower or toilette, nevertheless give Microsoft carte blanche when it comes to the most important technology they may be using at home (and work).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Linux is not costless, it is Freedom enabling. by EvilBudMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      ---Most people will not allow a bad plumber, with a string of complaints anywhere near their shower or toilette,---

      My wife does. Guess who it is?

  42. Nah, it isn't. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Building and installing a computer are grunt tasks, that require lesser expertise.

    My time is expensive, I want a machine ready to go where I can do the real interesting bits.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Nah, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. It takes one hours.. TOPS. If you take longer, you suck at it.

    2. Re:Nah, it isn't. by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 0

      Mine would have taken less time, but I was too busy figuring out exactly how long one hours was.

      The grammar troll strikes again!

      --
      Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
  43. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by nausea_malvarma · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I believe you'll find appropriate counter arguments at this page.

    Link

    I refuse to explain how it is relevant, you spoonfed booby.

  44. System 76 by maryjanecapri · · Score: 1

    I am in the process of reviewing some of their hardware. Their laptops, desktops, and servers all come pre-installed with Ubuntu 9.04. Go to www.system76.com and check them out!

    --
    nature loves variety::society hates it get your variety at http://www.monkeypantz.net
  45. In the netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in Holland/Netherlands/Nederland, go to www.os4free.nl .

    I recently bought my computer there. It comes preinstalled with any taste of [K|X| ]ubuntu.

  46. Mod Parent Up by clarkn0va · · Score: 1

    I think it's time we bump the return rate on Windows machines by taking back our new laptops a few times. I'm tired of seeing this argument. As of right now my preferred recommendation for malware becomes "take it back to the store and exchange it for one that doesn't have that problem".

    Amen to that. If capitalists vote with their dollars, and the screwed-up market we live in makes the Windows+crapware model appear to be less expensive than the linux model, then we the market have an obligation to respond by pushing some of the real costs of owning the Crap 6.1 model back onto the distributors and manufacturers.

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
  47. Another link by KIAaze · · Score: 2, Informative
  48. BSD? by mcubed · · Score: 1

    But where can I buy a machine with Free|Net|Open BSD preinstalled? I don't wanna pay the Linux tax....!

    --
    "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
  49. But Is It Cheaper? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    But is it cheaper? There should be no Windows Tax (Per Processor License), but experience in the past has shown some of these machines to actually be more expensive then the Windows equivalent hardware from the same vendor.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  50. Dell "open source" laptop works for me by jtotheh · · Score: 1

    I bought a Dell XPS configured with Ubuntu and immediately put Fedora on it. It works really well. There was a hardware problem with the display and they arranged for a guy to come to my house and fix it. I have fought with drivers for laptops to run Linux many times and it is a PITA. ndiswrapper, etc etc. No need for any of that with this machine. Did I mention it works really well?

    On the Dell site look for "open source pcs" - it's not that prominent but you can find it.

  51. Can you really call that Windows? by pizzach · · Score: 1

    If you can call what they give you windows. If there was a standard vanilla MS Windows installer disk I might agree with you. But no, there is only the restore disk that wipes out your whole machine. If you want a vanilla install, you're still going to have to hash out that 200 or so dollars. Is that really money saved?

    --
    Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    1. Re:Can you really call that Windows? by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Normally I'd stay out of something like this. Obvious bias, etc. But out of curiosity, when was the last time you bought a Dell?

      They don't come with the Microsoft standard-issue hologrammed disc for Windows... they come with a blue-label disc. Said blue-label disc, however, installs a clean, vanilla image of MS Windows Vista (the XP disc is green). The only difference between the blue disc and the original hologrammed disc, aside from the holograms, is that the blue disc contains the version that's tied to the hardware and doesn't ask for your CoA.

      If you choose to install the crapware that comes pre-installed, they provide you discs to allow you to do that. If you choose not to, they've been kind enough to put all the drivers on another disc so you don't have to risk accidentally installing something you don't want. And yes, the blue discs can be used to repair an existing installation of Windows without wiping anything.

      No, you can't take your disc and use it to install Windows on another computer. You haven't paid for the retail version that'd let you do that. But it's not a "restore" disc that'll wipe out the entire machine, unless you tell it to, and even then, it won't bring it back to factory default, it'll bring it to vanilla Windows.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  52. connection to freegeek? by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

    What does that have to do with freegeek?

    Stephan

    --
    http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
  53. Re:Everex R.I.P.? - the search for the $200 linux by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

    It's not a sustainable business model because MS is bribing people.

    --
    $ make available
  54. LinuxCertified.com by elecmahm · · Score: 1

    LinuxCertified is a vendor that sells laptops (and computers, I think). I just bought one from them -- they sell Windows (you pay a little extra for it) or any major distro of Linux. (FC, Ubuntu, etc.)

    They guarantee that their installations of Linux will work with the hardware they use.

    The real attractive part, for me, was the price point. Since they have the laptops custom built, they aren't bound to the contracts that larger companies (Dell, Gateway, etc.) are. I spent $1485 (after shipping) for a T9300 (2.5 GHz with 6MB cache), 4GB RAM, 320GB 7200RPM hdd, 512MB NVidia card, and 15.4" WSXGA (1680x1050) display. Dell and even Lenovo/Thinkpad could not even get CLOSE to those specs at comparable prices. (If you're interested, the laptop I got was the LC2430S)

    Customer Service at LC was way better than Dell, too. (the benefit of dealing with a small company) :)

    I don't mean this to be an ad for LC or anything, I'm just really pleased with my experience with them so far.

  55. Europe, Europe do you copy? by GeneralSunTzu · · Score: 1

    I know European posters are a minority, but I wonder whether anybody has a better list than the hopelessly outdated TuxMobile one. Googling around has provided me with a couple of resellers in Germany, four in the UK and three in France. The French should have it easier, because there you can ask to take Win down and lower the price of the box (consumer protection legislation), if Sarkozy didn't change that already, to help his pals... Come on folks, any European vendors' list?

    --
    The Force actually is with me.
    1. Re:Europe, Europe do you copy? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Norhtec has a bunch of computers with Linux. Sure, a lot of them are miniature and low power, but there's always the Panda (SFF).

  56. Re:Everex R.I.P.? - the search for the $200 linux by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

    That's a pity, because those looked like cheap, just-enough-for-mom-and-dad machines, which at $200 is a great deal.

  57. If you buy parts, it's not a problem by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    There's an utterly glorious refurbished junk shop here in the centre of Melbourne, which throws out headless 3 Ghz ATX boxes for $200 AUD. However, the only way they can afford to perform such magic is without pre-installing Windows.

    When I last bought one, the guy who sold it to me warned me that there wasn't going to be an OS on it, to which I answered that it was going to have Linux on it anywayz, to which he said fine. (Although it will now most likely get FreeBSD)

    Getting machines without Windows is only a problem if you insist on buying them from Dell or other similarly evil places. I suppose the poor corporations don't really have much choice for what they want, but I've never bought a prebuilt computer from an OEM, and never will. Parts give me complete control, at every level...and that includes the operating system.

    With apologies to Michael Dell, but I've known for years that you are wholly 0wned by Microsoft; and I prefer freedom.

  58. Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is not where but when.

    2010 will be the year of Linux on the desktop!

  59. Linux Brick and Mortar Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a list of local Linux shops on webapps.ubuntu.com/marketplace/

    *disclaimer* I work at one of them, called caffe*nix. If you're in the Greater Toronto Area in Canada, we're a friendly neighbourhood Linux store.

    caffe*nix can be found here - www.caffenix.com

  60. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by rlanctot · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia's your friend. Minimal work is required not to suck at teh internets.

  61. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by rlanctot · · Score: 0, Troll

    The phrase RTFM springs to mind, for some reason. That the OP, and the several follow-up posters I responded to, didn't recognize the reference to, arguable, the premier case modder/builder out there isn't my problem. My time's as valuable as yours, if you don't feel like doing some digging, don't. You got the link, do what you will with it.

  62. What kind of power user leaves the built-in OS? by loufoque · · Score: 1

    What kind of power user leaves the built-in OS?
    It's usually a customized version of vista riddled with crapware.

  63. GGS-Data is a pretty good store in Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not sure how long it's been around but think (and correct me if I am wrong) it is one of those olden-days Amiga enthusiast stores turned Linux enthusiast. Anyways, they have a wide range of desktops and laptops and they all come with Ubuntu pre-installed and are fairly inexpensive to be located here in Sweden.

    I got myself a small AMD 4850e "QPack" HTPC system from them and it turned out to be a nice little box (I did however turn the PSU up-side-down compared to how it was originally mounted to have its fan help cooling the system better). This is my first box which I have not built from selected parts myself and I am pretty happy with it.

    http://www.ggsdata.se/

  64. pogolinux.com by SpeedyG5 · · Score: 1

    A lot of folks in our data center get them from pogolinux.com. I know they have various flavors of linux but I can't speak directly to service or support/ etc.

  65. preinstalled REAL Linux distros on netbooks by alizard · · Score: 1

    are a very good thing. Too many vendors are still using Linux to attempt to deliver a fixed-function 'websurf and office app only' netappliance experience that there is no known market for outside the imaginations of Yet Another Generation of Marketdroids. Personally, I see 'positive' reviews of Linux netbooks that start with "after I replaced the OEM OS with Ubuntu" as evidence of EPIC FAIL on the software side of OEM netbook vendors... people generally don't replace OSs which deliver satisfactory performance.

    Given driver support, an ordinary Linux install on a netbook is just like any other Linux install, open the install wizard, set a few things, find something else to do for quite a while, loading the OS files on a netbook SSD takes a long time.

    Unfortunately, if you like your hardware warranty, you can't do this on most netbooks. So I installed Kubuntu Jaunty to a flash card living in the card reader of my Eee PC900. Here's how I did it, part II of the article refers to customizing Ubuntu-Gnome-Intrepid using tweaks that aren't needed with Kubuntu Jaunty. This is probably not for n00bs, the first step is installing Sun Virtualbox on your desktop Linux box so you can install the OS to a flash card that shows up in Virtualbox as the only available HD if you've set it up correctly.

    Having a vendor willing to pre-install it and back it up via warranty saves quite a lot of time and work. It took me weeks to figure out how to make the alternative install to flash card work so I could write it up for publication.

  66. I've bought several machines from ASL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice hardware, good prices and some installation customization is possible.
    For me, it has saved the hassle of verifying all my hardware is linux compatible.

  67. Linux Brick and Mortar Store by cvishal · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a list of local Linux shops on webapps.ubuntu.com/marketplace/

    *disclaimer* I work at one of them, called caffe*nix. If you're in the Greater Toronto Area in Canada, we're a friendly neighbourhood Linux store.

    caffe*nix can be found here - www.caffenix.com

  68. Seriously, someone explain this to me... by fishexe · · Score: 1

    if you run gnu/Linux, and you want more people to run gnu/Linux or less people to run Windoze, for whatever reason, how does it benefit you to rip on a distro you don't care for, when you know damn well it works better than your favored distro for many people whose needs differ from your own? Doesn't that fragment and defeat the movement? If you cause fewer people to use Linux because the other distros are inaccessible and Ubuntu is for crazy Kool-aid drinkers, then there is less demand for new drivers for Linux (which benefit everybody), new commercial software for Linux, game development for Linux, wine development, etc., etc., etc....

    So there must be a really good, overriding reason, why less people using Linux is somehow GOOD for open source and Linux, as long as those people would have been using the "wrong" distro, and I'd really like to know what that reason is.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  69. Re:Everex R.I.P.? - the search for the $200 linux by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    It's not a sustainable business model because MS is bribing people.

    That's possible. I don't know. It's also possible that it's not a sustainable business model because too many people return the computers. Returns are very expensive to process, and the profit margin on a $200 desktop machine is razor-thin.

  70. The Tax by Mista2 · · Score: 1

    To me the MS tax is when you go to a public and open website to find they have used proprietary systems requiring proprietary client software that is not available on clients other than the one MS provides.

    For example - Office Live - requires the execution of windows binaries to install the Windows only client software for this cloud service. If you share documents with this, all of your intended audience will have had to pay their MS tax to view the content.

    MS Office Communicator - it has a web gateway, and claim to support Firefox and Safari on multiple platforms, but what you can't do is join meetings or make phone calls through the web client. You have to have installed the Windows only communicator client to fully use the software. Therefore all your employees using this form their homes will have to make sure they have paid their MS tax and have at least one windows device at home.

    Want to view content encrusted with Windows Media DRM - Have to run Windows MediaPlayer and have paid your MS tax.
    iTunes is nearly as bad, but at least you have the choice of Windows or OS X, but as Apple owes it's survival this century to MS, it's really just the MS tax again.

    The Apple Tax - It is still cheaper to buy a Macbook (even at NZ$1000 more than the closest PC competitor with the same disk CPU and RAM) than to pick up a PC and add AV software and firewall software, and renew that for the next 3-5 years. If you buy now you will only get Vista. Win7 is expected to be approx NZ$500 for a premium upgrade just for the OS. Office2010 likely to be at least NZ$300 or more. Apple Offer the "Box set" OS X 10.5.6, iLife09 and iWork09 for just NZ$419 upgrade from any previous OS X version. http://store.apple.com/nz/product/MB997Z/A?fnode=MTY1NDAzOA&mco=MzA3MTE3Ng
    It's still a tax though 8) Just less over the lifetime of the machine. 8)

  71. What about Dell Precision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at the Precision M2400n.

    Dell's own search misses them, but google "red hat dell precision" finds them.

    I would love to have one of these workstation-laptops, but them being unavailable in Canada is as much of a mystery to me as why they are so hard to find on Dell's website.

    This morning I had to get a mini 12 with Ubuntu instead.

  72. Dell sells Red Hat laptops too. by ipquickly · · Score: 1

    Dell Precision Open-Source Workstations with Linux: http://www.dell.com/content/products/features.aspx/precn_n?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd Please Dell, Bring these to Canada.

    1. Re:Dell sells Red Hat laptops too. by Chili-71 · · Score: 1

      Dell Precision Open-Source Workstations with Linux: http://www.dell.com/content/products/features.aspx/precn_n?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd Please Dell, Bring these to Canada.

      I just checked out this link and got a big laugh. If you follow one of the offerings you will see your choices for the Operating System. Mind you, these are all Linux O/S (or free DOS). But what O/S ICON did Dell place to the left? Not a penguin as one would expect, but the stupid Windows LOGO. Geez! How dumb can marketing people be. Uh, never mind, they're marketing people, that answer the question in and of itself.

  73. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by johnkzin · · Score: 1

    "Actually, for the experts, it's more fun to build the computer themselves and install whatever they feel like."

    Actually, for this expert, it's a lot less annoying to buy a computer with the pre-installed OS that I want, and not HAVE to play sysadmin both at home and at work. Thus the reason I only buy system with a flavor of unix pre-installed. (which tends to mean a Mac, or something that runs vendor-supported ubuntu)

  74. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fold? Its all about the crumple.

  75. Why not Linux an option for each and every lappy by URPradhan · · Score: 1

    Why not each and every Laptop vendors are offering Linux OS as an option to their each and every model restricting the users to use the crapy Windows Vista ? The consumer must have an option to select the OS for each model comes from the manufacturer. We have very limited model from Dell/HP which comes with Linux pre-installed, rather they MUST give an option for Linux for EACH AND EVERY model.

  76. Re:Everex R.I.P.? - the search for the $200 linux by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

    [Citation needed]

    --
    Squirrel!
  77. Not so easy in the UK by SaZZer · · Score: 1

    I recently purchased a new laptop for myself. I spent a good few weeks talking to lots of retailers - including Dell - about getting it without Windows pre-installed. Linux installed was preferable but no OS was also an option that I would accept. None of the suppliers that I talked to would do this at all until I came across Efficient PC, who not only did exactly what I wanted but sold me Kubuntu 9.04 on my laptop the day after it was available for download.

  78. No Ubuntu Linux from Dell in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell's German Ubuntu webpage is very funny. The only link they have on that page is a link to Windows PCs.

    http://www1.euro.dell.com/content/topics/topic.aspx/emea/segments/gen/client/de/ubuntu_landing?c=de&l=de&s=dhs

  79. Re:It's more fun to build it yourself (the machine by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    With Dell at least you can upgrade the memory and hard drives on those laptops your self and save some money sometimes.

  80. ZaReason is one of the best $299 - $700 range by lamapper · · Score: 1

    Full 3D support for a better 3D desktop experience with Compiz or Beryl for only $349; Limbo 3550 desktop.

    For only $299, get the Limbo 2550A desktop. They have laptops and more.

    For $699, get the Homebox 4.

    I met the entire family at SCALE 7x, held every February in Los Angeles (reasonably priced at $75 for the tradeshow, beats $600 to $1,400 which is the cost of most other tradeshows), they traveled from their home in Colorado to attend. Great people who stand behind their products. All their products come with a 1 year warranty.

    For 2010, the premier Open Source Community conference in the United States, will return to the Westin LAX Hotel. SCALE 8x will be February 19th-21st, 2010

    For netbooks, they are lite and weigh next to nothing, less than 2 lbs, which means very cheap shipping costs. So get the pre-installed with Linux netbooks from an online vendor. Use Pricegrabber, I can recommend NewEgg as a reputable vendor. Just be sure of the model you are ordering. The Asus Eee PC 901 has a webcam, the Asus Eee PC 901 Surf does NOT! So order the correct model and you will NOT have issues. You can read the reviews posted on the site to find a good vendor at a reasonable price.

    I have found replacement software products, most superior to Microsoft, for everything I was using over the last 20 years. If I had to use a MS-Operating-specific-application I would try first to run it in its own virtual machine or WINE. But the reality is there are alternatives for everything! And you will discover as most of us have, that the incompatibilities are because of Microsoft. Stupid things like not rendering the open document format standards correctly in Microsoft Word and dumb things like that. Fortunately for every issue that I have encountered I have been able to find help in the may Linux support forums online and resolve them. When I encounter these lame FUD issues it just makes Microsoft more loathsome to me. I use to like Microsoft, not any more, its been too many years of too many artificial and unnecessary hassles. They come across as even more juvenial when they deny the problem exists and you can repeat it. Years later you learn that they knew about the problem, but did not have a fix, so they just go into denial mode. No they lost my TRUST! When you start to discover the real issues, start to see through their FUD, you will want to use them less and less as many of us do. Today that is possible. And in this economy, we need to cut corners and save money every where that we can.

    Remember if you get a system with Linux preinstalled, it just works. You avoid all the proprietary driver crap and vendor LOCK IN shenanigans associated with other proprietary vendors. If WiFi is important to you, get it pre-installed and it will just work. Whatever you need, get it pre-installed from the vendor to avoid unnecessary hassles.

    With the Asus Eee netbook PC WiFi, Ethernet, Webcam, Sound, Video, USB plug and play, all just worked out of the box. It was fantastic! And when the Coreboot project officially releases, you will be able to buy a Linux system based on Coreboot compatible products which will make us not dependent on the BIOS vendors who are not always Linux friendly with comp

    --
    Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
  81. ion.simon.c: Learn to use it first, especially YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ion.simIAn.c - First: Prove what you claimed about being a professional programmer below

    AND??

    Tell us more about the Gigabyte IRAM being a piece of trash...

    (Because the IRAM works fine on Windows, but not Linux according to YOU @ least, so what is the "trash" here? Obviously the OS you use & its SATA access most likely)

    Based on your stupidity in your statement quoted below in regards to the Gigabyte IRAM? Well - I am leaning towards YOU not knowing what you're doing with the IRAM, or Linux, because the reasoning involved is VERY simple, yet YOU? You fail to grasp it...

    So answer the 2 questions below!

    First, by providing verifiable PROOF of your professional status as a programmer (which you asked me for & I provided volumes of it no less) & then about the Gigabyte IRAM:

    -----

    "I'm a programmer." - by ion.simon.c (1183967) on Saturday May 02, @11:17PM (#27803057)

    -----

    Really? Prove to us you are a professional programmer, ion.simIAn.c, won't you? After all, you CLAIMED that you are above, & demanded others do so as well, here:

    -----

    "You claim that you're a professional. Prove it" - by ion.simon.c (1183967) on Sunday May 03, @08:52PM (#27811101)

    -----

    I did so, & you no longer question that much... from here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1234703&cid=27981921

    HOWEVER, by way of comparison???

    I DO QUESTION YOUR ABILITIES TO RUN & UNDERSTAND LINUX period... why? This:

    -----

    "Heh. The i-RAM is a finicky chunk of trash." -by ion.simon.c (1183967) on Saturday December 13, @09:55AM (#26102285)

    -----

    So, since you said that? Well, back it up, vs. these 3 simple questions you now refuse to answer:

    -----

    1.) Does the IRAM run on Windows reliably? ANSWER = YES...

    2.) Does the IRAM run on Linux reliably?? ANSWER (per your sources no less) = NO...

    3.) Since the IRAM runs on Windows well, but not Linux, well... what is the "piece of trash" here (what is it YOU called the IRAM? A "finicky piece of trash"??)??? ANSWER (obviously) = LINUX...

    -----

    Funny - That 'piece of trash' (what you called the GIGABYTE IRAM SSD) works FINE on Windows... & yet, it does not on Linux!

    (Explain that, & it appears the "finicky piece of junk", IS LINUX, not Windows OR the IRAM... well, it's that or what I am STARTING to lean towards, & that is that YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING WITH ONE (or, Linux apparently either)).

    (And, just like the 3 questions I asked you there, and you RAN from them also? Again/once more - You're also STILL running from providing proof you are indeed, what you said you are - a professional programmer (not, no way, not with the tremendous amount of technical errors you make which I enumerated here above no less for ALL to see))

    Keep "dodging" these questions ion.SIMIAN.c - because anyone reading can make their decisions on "whom got the better of whom" by that alone, rotflmao (great showing here, ion.SIMIAN.c (NOT).

    Who are you trying to fool here?

    You "StRaNgeLy" (not, it's obvious WHY you do) keep avoiding the questions above, even though I PROVE you do see my "A/C" posts, here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1230601&cid=27949607 via 'baiting' you so easily (rotflmao on THAT one, boy - you surely are NOT intelligent), like you tried to get to go to some 10 yr. old post @ arstechnica so my IP could be tracked/logged by they I would have to say (no way, not THAT stupid here)...

    (ROTFLMAO... "too easy")

    APK

    P.S.=> Remember - you ASKED that I post this in your posts in your response to MEK_LoveBug, here ->

  82. in Finland by Neva · · Score: 1

    A list of mini-laptops with comparisons:
    http://www.mbnet.fi/tuoteseuranta/index.aspx?rrid=1

    Availability was scarce in verkkokauppa:
    http://www.verkkokauppa.com/?page=http://www.verkkokauppa.com/main.php?path=tietokoneet%2Fkannettavat&title=Tietokoneet+/+Kannettavat&search=1&cat1=Tietokoneet&cat2=Kannettavat&cat3=Linux

    Some sell Acer aspire one: http://hintaseuranta.fi/tuote.aspx/171402

    Here's Asus:
    http://hintaseuranta.fi/tuote.aspx/164709

    Lenovo T61 is pricier:
    http://hintaseuranta.fi/tuote.aspx/81991

    MSI wind:
    http://hintaseuranta.fi/tuote.aspx/79914

    You can check driver availability to about any laptop, even if it doesn't have linux preinstalled:
    http://www.linux-on-laptops.com/

    My personal choice would be Asus Eee PC 901. Enough CPU and SSD-drives which are more tolerant to shaking and movement, in addition of being fast.
    To play DVDs, an external drive would be needed:
    http://www.verkkokauppa.com/popups/prodinfo.php?id=2585 ..commenting in the order that the device is supposed to work with Linux.

    DVD-drive compatibility chart:
    http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/search_res.php?pattern=dvd

  83. WarrenIs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was waaay too many comments to read so i'm not sure if someone mentioned this yet, but i really disagree with dellbuntu's, i think its somewhat of a scam. i actually bought one when i was completely ignorant of video cards and how good they needed to be to play games.... i got lucky because they delayed my order so much that they had to tell me about a law forcing them to ask me if i still wanted it. i said i didnt because by the time they finally would have shipped it, and the week or so to get it delivered wasnt worth the wait. I went to best buy, assuming that i was just going to have to pay the "microsoft tax", but then i found this 14 in Asus X83VM with 4gb memory, 300gb hard drive, core 2duo 2.26g, and a 1gb NVIDIA GeForce 9600m gs graphics card.... for frggin 800 bucks. go to dell.com, i only saw 2 laptops (not minis) that came with ubuntu.. one couldnt be customized to be good enough to even be worth more than 600, and the other only could have a Core 2 Duo 2.16GHz (worse than mine) and the video card could be customized up only to a 128MB NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS (worse than mine), which made the price balloon up to close to 1,000.
    now of course, with the lack of gaming in ubuntu, the nvidia is definitely not necessary, which is why as much of an Ubuntu lover that i am, i'm very happy to dualboot and play me some pirated fallout 3
    but the point is that when matched up as close as possible, paying the microsoft tax ended up cheaper in my case, which is why i dell scammy, it just feels like, yea, theyre reducing the price, but its not because theres no windows, but because theres no need for a video card.... .and theyre not reducing it as much as they could.........

    please correct me if i'm wrong, this was just a feeling and an opinion... i actually want to know if i'm right, anyone else feel like somethings wrong here?