Slashdot Mirror


Free Wi-Fi For the Residents of Venice, Italy

pmontra writes "The City of Venice, Italy, started to offer free Wi-Fi to residents (Google translation from the Italian source) on July 3 2009. Tourists and other visitors will pay 5 Euros a day for the service starting from September. The hot spots are connected to a ten thousand kilometer (6,250 mile) fiber optic LAN the City started deploying in the '90s. The first day of free Internet access has been celebrated with a digital treasure hunt in the channels of the lagoon city."

153 comments

  1. Very cool. by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    I'll have to remember to take my laptop the next time I'm in Venice.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
    1. Re:Very cool. by Mr_Plattz · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll have to remember to take my laptop the next time I'm in Venice.

      I fail to see how that's a change fro mthe norm. As not only a slashdot member, but also someone who posts first. I assume you take your laptop _everywhere_ you go, not just to Italy.

    2. Re:Very cool. by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed. I've never had a first post. And yes, last time I was in Italy, I did have my laptop. It was a G3 iBook. Those were the days.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    3. Re:Very cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I fail to see how this affects non-italians.
      It is common knowledge that in italy the internet is translated to italian with a device not unlike the great firewall of china.

    4. Re:Very cool. by GreenTech11 · · Score: 1

      Wish it was active when I went over during Christmas, 5 Euro's a day isn't very expensive really, about the cost of a loaf of a bread in a canal side restaurant!

      --
      Laughter is the best medicine, except if you have a broken rib.
    5. Re:Very cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure we all visit Venice regularly, and were leaving laptops home because there wasn't wifi network available. I know I was. Finally we can bring our laptops!

    6. Re:Very cool. by Splab · · Score: 1

      Odd, I never bring my laptop anywhere if I can avoid it.

      I hate carrying around that thing - also I find them highly annoying at a meeting, much better with pen and paper.

    7. Re:Very cool. by Klistvud · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Remember to take your cash too. Next, they'll start charging non-residents for drinking water from public fountains. Or, for sitting on park benches.

      --
      Intellectual Property: an immaterial non-entity, most fiercely contended by those with no proper intellect to speak of.
    8. Re:Very cool. by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 1

      Second reply to reply to first post

      Whooooop!!

      --
      "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
    9. Re:Very cool. by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

      It's funny :) But to make sure that someone doesn't take you too seriously: internet in Italy is NOT translated in Italian (other than italian websites) ;-) This is actually good news for all, bad news for some hotels, for which I'm glad. I don't know about Venice but last year I was in Rome (and I've had similar experiences in other cities since I spend 2 months in Italy every year) and staying at a Marriott they charged 17 euros a day for internet access. That was on top of the 400 euros a day for the suite (200 euros for the cheapest room). Hopefully this will discourage hotel chains from charging an unreasonable amount for accessing the net. Funny enough, B&B can be very nice, have much cheaper rates and usually offer free wi-fi. Other than that it is important because in the States similar proposal have been struck down once again because "it would not be fair in the interest of providers"... Ah. the good old U.S. of A. ... always put the interest of corporations before those of the citizens (I live in the U.S.)

    10. Re:Very cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non sono Italiano mai capisco il Italiano. E facile imparare il Italiano
      e E una lingua molto bella. Inoltre, amo molto alle Italiane.

      PS: I didn't put the accents because of input problems here

    11. Re:Very cool. by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      mod parent down as troll!

    12. Re:Very cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where are u from? nothing gets translated... not everyone is America.

    13. Re:Very cool. by tcr · · Score: 1

      Man..... time to retire that Osborne 1...

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
    14. Re:Very cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was there , attendign the opening cerimony . Here's my personal concerns about Venice Muniwifi
      http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&hl=en&js=n&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdema.tv%2F2009%2F07%2F05%2Fcittadinanza-digitale-il-wifi-non-funziona-proprio-a-meraviglia-ma-va-bene-cosi%2F&sl=it&tl=en&history_state0=

      Cheers

      Anton

    15. Re:Very cool. by radub · · Score: 1
      I've been to Luxembourg once, and I encountered the same situation as you did: free wifi in the city, 1 euro per hour inside the hotel. But the free wifi was tuned in such manner that you couldn't catch the signal inside the hotel, even though I could see the antenna below my
      • open

      window on a lamp pole. I went off the hotel and tried again - worked like a charm. Then I read on city hall's website that they meant it to be used on the streets only, and not to compete with regular ISPs...

    16. Re:Very cool. by radub · · Score: 1

      Shit, I've used the wrong tab, wanted to use underline - how can I edit the above crap?

  2. Re:First! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fail.

  3. Why is this important to non-Italians by GeneralSunTzu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is important to non-Italians because: 1. it shows Americans that you can get something for free, much to their utter dismay, given the tenets of their society; 2. proves to non-Italians that local authorities do have a purpose in the general path of the Wheel; 3. provides to nerds and geeks of all over the world a reasonable pretext to visit Venice, one of the magic places on the planet That, for me, is enough.

    --
    The Force actually is with me.
    1. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by FlyingBishop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I think there are municipalities that offer free WiFi in an area roughly the size of Venice.

      Venice proper is basically a city that has been turned into a theme park. The article isn't entirely clear, but I don't think this extends to the cities surrounding the lagoon (where most of the work that isn't tourism gets done), which would be very significant.

    2. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by lxs · · Score: 1

      "Venice, one of the magic places on the planet "

      Well it was until it was overrun by millions of geeks.

    3. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      As someone who has visited Venice, I can tell you it's very commercial and full of tourist traps.

      100 Euros for a 30 min gondola ride, 400 Euros for a Venetian mask and don't even get me started on the Murrano glass.
      I felt like I was in a giant Hallmark store, full of useless over hyped and expensive stuff that only women can find "Oh so romantic".

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    4. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by Nuffsaid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As someone who actually lives in Venice, I can tell you that you are right about the tourist traps, but they are easily avoided if you look around instead of going windows shopping. The made-in-China stuff you can buy is far from romantic, but the sheer structure of the city, with its two entangled mobility networks (one for walkers, one for boats) still amazes me after 10 years living here. Now we have three entangled networks...
      Yesterday I had dinner with an old pal whose job in the last months has been installing the access points and congratulated him. He confirmed the amazing level of interest even among the elder population. Today, lots of people I know are checking signal strength in every hidden corner. Looks like the municipality (and my friend) did a great job, as the coverage seems rather complete.
      BTW, Venice is not a theme park. People still live and work here, enjoying a lifestyle like no other, mainly due to the absense of cars. I won't tell you "come visit us", but I can confirm you don't need a pretext like free connectivity.

      --
      Nuffsaid
      ________

      Don't know about his cat, but Schroedinger is definitely dead.
    5. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by Lennie · · Score: 0, Troll

      And I heared it stinks

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    6. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by Nuffsaid · · Score: 1

      You feel odors with hearing?
      Well, it sometimes do, with low tide and the wrong weather conditions. But it's all natural, organic, all-bio stinking stuff...

      --
      Nuffsaid
      ________

      Don't know about his cat, but Schroedinger is definitely dead.
    7. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by AmigaMMC · · Score: 4, Insightful
      >100 Euros for a 30 min gondola ride

      As opposed to $150 for a 10 minutes flight over the Hoover's Dam? You have the option not to do it.

      >400 Euros for a Venetian mask and don't even get me started on the Murrano glass.

      Hand made stuff, man. Not made in China.

      I visited Venice in the off-season, lots of good places to eat for cheap, cheap hotel and few tourists around. Your choice to go when everyone else goes. have you tried Yellowstone in August?

    8. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 E is cheap for a gondola ride. In my home state, gondola rides of roughly 30 minutes are $160. In the US. over 4,000 miles away from the city by the sea. In a crap town nobody's heard of. on fake gondolas (they're secretly electric...)

    9. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      1. it shows Americans that you can get something for free, much to their utter dismay, given the tenets of their society

      That's kind of a misleading statement, given the fact that you can find free wifi in pretty much any American city quite easily. I would go so far as to say that it's far easier to find free wifi in an American city than it is in a European city.

      But yeah, free here in the US is usually tied to marketing (free wifi in many restaurants/bars - but you have to eat/drink in the establishment to get it, etc).

      Unfortunately, free municipal wifi has been a huge failure here.

    10. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Hey, is there like separate tourist price and local price there? That is one expensive place.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    11. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by Jeian · · Score: 1

      it shows Americans that you can get something for free, much to their utter dismay, given the tenets of their society

      Actually, one of the biggest "WTF" moments I had when visiting Europe - Italy, actually - was when I had to pay to use the restroom/toilet/latrine/whatever-your-region-calls-it.

    12. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by The_Quinn · · Score: 1

      1. If Italians are forced to pay for the system with taxes, then it isn't free. Any more than the American postal or government-education systems are "free".

      2. wtf are you talking about

      3. Going to Venice to see government Wi-Fi doesn't exactly sound like a blast to me.

    13. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by HornWumpus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      He's full of shit (like the canals).

      People do work in Venice, but most can't afford to live there. They live on the mainland.

      People do live in Venice, generally very rich people.

      A friend of mine's family has roots in Venice generations deep.

      They all moved away over the last 25 years as it's tourist trap nature went to critical mass and it became more fashionable with the idle and pretentious rich.

      The GP should note the missing 'forth network', sewage pipes...sewage shares the canals with boat traffic.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by GeneralSunTzu · · Score: 1

      Buddy, we live in different worlds...
      1. "If Italians are forced to pay for the system with taxes..." standard defence. The difference is Europeans think, to different extents, that the state has to supply some services, not just jail pushers.
      2. Ever heard of Buddhism? Wikipedia is free...
      3. May I recommend reading some basic textbook on "humour, sense of"? I was poking fun at ourselves, geeks.
      Try to tell a geek he should see Venice and he'll shrug and get back to his on-line game or whatever.
      Tell him that there is the additional benefit of free WiFi, and maybe he'll come...
      And as to those mentioning tourist traps, oversold tourist spots and mixed complaints.
      Folks, there are people who get Venice and people who don't.
      Machu Picchu, the Hermitage, the Louvre, the Taj Mahal, the Forbidden City, are in the same situation.
      Italy is not better than elsewhere. It is different, though. If you don't agree, it's all right - am on my third zen book. I will not lose sleep over it.
      BTW, I write "him" because I never knew a geekette, in thirty-more years as an IT professional, much as I understand there are some over there (and even some real good ones, like Gina Trapani of Lifehacker.com fame; I don't even talk to people who do not know her...).

      --
      The Force actually is with me.
    15. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your pal work for Venis or Vitrociset, or was he the Tropos engineer who was here in the last two weeks?

    16. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You feel odors with hearing?
      Well, it sometimes do, with low tide and the wrong weather conditions. But it's all natural, organic, all-bio stinking stuff...

      You smell odors by feeling?

    17. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by The_Quinn · · Score: 1

      The difference is Europeans think, to different extents, that the state has to supply some services, not just jail pushers.

      Of course, some Europeans don't think that at all, they are just in the minority.

      I do agree that Europe, unlike America, has never held that an individual's life is his own, and that he does not exist as a servant to the needs or whims of others.

    18. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by GeneralSunTzu · · Score: 1

      The constitution of Upper Slashdottovia says
      in its Article 3:
      Thou shalt not feed the Troll (mythical creature from the Norse folklore OR contemporary being who hasn't got a life).
      Accordingly, I will not reply to such a blatant and inane baiting. Different does not mean enemy.

      --
      The Force actually is with me.
    19. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by The_Quinn · · Score: 1

      I'm not baiting, I sincerely believe that many Europeans do, in fact, hold that existing as a servant to the needs or whims or others is the good, while being concerned with your own life and interests is evil (or neutral).

    20. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by GeneralSunTzu · · Score: 1

      Then you might consider having a read of contemporary European philosophers: I do not recall a single contemporary one making this point.
      Should you wish to state that individualism is king in the US (and in the UK, the branch office), of course you're right.
      I used to teach my US students in Texas that the word "solidarity" appears by mistake in the Merriam-Webster...
      Maybe we're veering a bit OT, but I cannot resist advising to look up this guy on Wikipedia: "Geert Hofstede".
      He made a seminal study on culture characteristics and developed a number of conclusions, interesting if you do not take them as absolute truths.

      --
      The Force actually is with me.
    21. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by mgcarley · · Score: 0, Troll

      Helsinki has free Wifi in a lot of places as well as hot chicks (that aren't fat arsed American tourists). Stockholm and Oslo probably have it also. Oulu also has some kind of citywide Wifi or Wimax or something, I think - plus more hot chicks.

      Beat that!

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    22. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Outside of Venice is fantastic. If you're in for a non-tourist experience, stop in any of the small towns between Milan and Venice.

      Don't stop in Pisa unless you plan to stay, they hate tourists (most tourists stop, take that stupid photo of them "holding up" the leaning tower, then leave).

      The small towns between Bologna and Rimini are nice, too.

      Also any town on the A6 (turn off before Genoa, head towards Turin) - especially in the mountains. Few things are more romantic than eating in a local restaurant where it's just two people, a couple of locals and the owners family.

      I don't even remember some of the names of the towns, but I have the memories. These places are the TRUELY romantic places of Italy, and if you know even a few words in Italian, thats all the more impressive to the girl.

      I used to live in Nice (not Italy, but nearby), and the amount of people that called up asking "Do you speak English?" was pretty annoying. English is my native language, and I answered the phone in English, goddamnit, but I still speak at last SOME (badly pronounced) French to the people of the city.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    23. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they can find some way (keylogging, identity theft, botnets) to make it pay for itself.

      Physical pocket picking is old hat, and anyway the Roma immigrants are much better at it than the locals.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by The_Quinn · · Score: 1

      That's funny - and they could call it a "security tax".

    25. Re:Why is this important to non-Italians by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      400 Euros for a Venetian mask and don't even get me started on the Murrano glass.

      Hand made stuff, man. Not made in China.


      And now made handmade by the large Chinese migrant worker community, like many other "Italian" leather goods. It's a pretty big issue over there last time I was there.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  4. When does the spam begin? by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... oh wait.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:When does the spam begin? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Your sex organ sinking like your house? Cheap pill make your gondola floaty! Buy now!

  5. How long ... by Norsefire · · Score: 1

    ... until WiFi access is as ubiquitous as mobile-network access and people pay for usage much the same as for mobile phones.

    1. Re:How long ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... until WiFi access is as ubiquitous as mobile-network access and people pay for usage much the same as for mobile phones.

      Its a bit of a moot point because protocols change all the time and will no doubt converge in the medium term. If you pay a telco for a data service it won't really matter if the service is wifi or 3G in the future.

      My prediction for the next five years or so is that some businesses will stop wiring their offices for data at all. They will use the 3G cellular network with VPNs for secure communication.

    2. Re:How long ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It already is.

      I'm currently posting from a train without a WLAN. I'm using Mokkula, a wireless modem the size of an USB stick. It costs me 20 euros a month and the speed is 2 mb/s.

      There are cheaper models of it with lower speeds too and the area where this works is countrywide. (Granted, Finland is a country that is as big as a single state of USA)

    3. Re:How long ... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      That's expensive IMO. I pay £5 a month (about 6 euros)... it's capable of 7.2Mbps but you really only get about 6-6.5 at best in cities, and a lot lower out in the sticks.

      Damn thing is a godsend. Wifi is too expensive - expect to pay £10 per *hour* in the average hotel, and of course doesn't work when moving.
         

    4. Re:How long ... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Ah, insightful ... its good to know that neither you nor anyone moding your comments have any clue about network engineering.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:How long ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Ah, insightful ... its good to know that neither you nor anyone moding your comments have any clue about network engineering.

      Seriously. I work in a place which really does need a good hard wired LAN. It is over-engineered to hell by our IT contractor, mainly to help justify their existence. They use juniper firewalls in place of commodity switches for some reason.

      But most IT consumers don't do the software engineering we do. They move a few word documents around, exchange some emails. Google do email for domains for free now. They do word processing for free as well. Facebook does groupware better than lotus notes ever did.

      In house information services is going to collapse. Nobody needs desktop support for Android.

  6. It is interesting that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...when there is talk about "free" internet there are cheers by the crowds and when there are talk about free health care the opionons are much more polarized.

    Essentially it's the same thing, government and local authorities providing a "free" service. Of course it's not free, every citizen pays his share with taxes.

    FYI I'm totally positive the government arranging for the basic needs of the public, such as health care, eduction, roads, but have not yet taking a stance in the internet.

    Anyway, although i dont know much about italian internet i'm sure that if this becomes common practice it will affect companies that try to sell internet for living.

    1. Re:It is interesting that... by atraintocry · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well in this case it's going to be paid for by the tourists who don't know how to spoof a MAC, and the rest of us get free internet!

      Though to be fair I guess you could get free health care if you know how to spoof an SSN...

    2. Re:It is interesting that... by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's an interesting comparison:

      Paying for bottled water is popular without question in areas where people already pay for perfectly safe drinking water.

      Where free wi-fi is proposed, the debate is virtually always a matter of ethics, and not cost.

      Free health care? FUCK THAT!!! DON'T YOU DARE RAISE MY TAXES YOU PINKO COMMIES!!!

      ahem.. I mean, it often encounters far more resistance.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    3. Re:It is interesting that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they'll actually have to be worth the money you pay them. Perhaps with much faster speeds?

    4. Re:It is interesting that... by Bluesman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, let me be the first to say that nothing is truly "free," and this isn't "free" wireless; it's wireless that is paid for through hidden costs (taxes) that Venicians probably did not have a choice but to bear. Adding an intermediary between you and the service provider of nearly any industry can only mean higher costs, because for every intermediate step there's overhead.

      For something as relatively inexpensive as providing wireless access points, the penalty is innocuous for believing you can get something for nothing. Believe that about health care, and the penalty can be rather severe.

      Thus the difference in response.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    5. Re:It is interesting that... by Eevee · · Score: 1

      Adding an intermediary between you and the service provider of nearly any industry can only mean higher costs, because for every intermediate step there's overhead.

      Sort of like how you pay more for health coverage via your employer compared to getting it yourself? While there is overhead, there is also the ability to negotiate a better rate due to the collective value of a city's worth of people.

      (And, just to be an ass about it, there's a layer of overhead that the wifi vendor has internal to the company for dealing with individual customers that you're neglecting. The number of people required to handle a city's population worth of accouts has got to be greater than the city's overhead for staffing a unit to negotiate the wifi service.)

    6. Re:It is interesting that... by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 1

      Paying for bottled water is popular without question in areas where people already pay for perfectly safe drinking water.

      Duh, It's Got Electrolytes!

      --
      We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
    7. Re:It is interesting that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does tap water - otherwise you couldn't electrocute yourself by bathing together with a hair dryer.

      P.S. yes, I know that it is an idiocracy quote.

    8. Re:It is interesting that... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      Well it seems that it will be financed by the fees charged to the tourists. Assuming that works out, it's free to the residents. A municipality is in some ways similar to a company which is owned by the citizens. You make an investment (installing the infrastructure - paid by taxes) and get a return on that investment (tourists paying for wifi). The dividend in this case is free wireless internet access.

      Of course, instead of paying the dividend as internet access, they could have reduced taxes. So in that respect it's not free.

      However for a tourism-centered economy like Venice, it's important to remain attractive for visitors. It's in the interest of any cafe, restaurant or street (canal) vendor, that the attractive squares, bridges and public buildings are maintained. They need to invest in public infrastructure so that they can all benefit.

    9. Re:It is interesting that... by hoojus · · Score: 1

      See that's why Venice can do this. They don't have to waste taxes on the roads!

  7. Sounds nice by fearlezz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But what about privacy? Internet-cafe's are required to make a copy of your passport when you're using their internet. How much will you be spied on when using the wifi service? I guess all packets are stored "against terrorism/child pornography/critisism on berlusconi". Guess the only way to be safe is to setup a vpn and redirect everything over it.

    --
    .sig: No such file or directory
    1. Re:Sounds nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But what about privacy? Internet-cafe's are required to make a copy of your passport when you're using their internet.

      Where is that? Here in Finland they don't and I've never heard that it would have proved to be a problem (IE: Would have result in excessive illegal use or the right).

      The bars here have WLANs that are one of the three: Completely open, have passwords written on a blackboard on the wall or have passwords that you can ask from the staff (usually for free as long as you buy something).

      As for internet cafes, not only do they require nothing like that here but I've traveled quite a lot especially in southern Europe and never been even asked my first name in those places.

    2. Re:Sounds nice by THEbwana · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where is that?

      In Italy. See:
      http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/passport_requir.html
      for more info.

  8. sinking city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well they have to get something before their city sinks into the ocean.

    1. Re:sinking city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haven't you heard they are planing to dome the city so that it can still exist even if it drops 20 feet

  9. already free access to WLAN by napsy · · Score: 1

    Slovenian capitol city Ljubljana already has a grid of free WLAN hotpoints for everyone.

    1. Re:already free access to WLAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slovenian capitol city Ljubljana already has a grid of free WLAN hotpoints for everyone.

      So?

    2. Re:already free access to WLAN by tapanitarvainen · · Score: 1

      Slovenian capitol city Ljubljana already has a grid of free WLAN hotpoints for everyone.

      So does the Finnish town Oulu with its PanOulu network (since 2003 if memory serves). Somewhat unusually it is a joint operation of the university, the city and some private enterprises, who've found participation makes financial sense even though they can't charge users for it or even force advertisement banners on them.

  10. Super by tiger32kw · · Score: 1

    Jealous

  11. Wireless@SG by FeebleOldMan · · Score: 1

    Singapore has had free wireless coverage in major areas since 2006. I'm glad to see more cities following suit.

    1. Re:Wireless@SG by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Have to say I am sceptical of that. I spent a week in Changi Village (one of the localities in the article you linked to) a year ago. I didn't detect any wifi at all. I paid $12 SG per hour for wired internet, charged to work of course. In fact the only free wifi I know of in the region is in KL airport. But it is oversubscribed and very slow.

    2. Re:Wireless@SG by dnwq · · Score: 1

      The free coverage is limited to built-up public areas, not islandwide (which makes sense - this is a tropical city, who goes outside to work? Hide indoors under air conditioning!). So to find the free wifi you need to trek to the nearest McDonald's or such.

  12. With good reason by canonymous · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a public safety issue! The less wires the better for the next time the city floods.

    1. Re:With good reason by lxs · · Score: 1

      And when the Mexican flu hits, they don't have to leave their houses.

      This event will be chronicled in the Decametweet.

  13. Radical proposal?? by Alsee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've read a fair number of these 'City-X provides free internet' stories, and as far as I can tell they all have something in common... they all require everyone to to register their identity with the government and log on with a username-password.

    To my ears, thats like the government setting up a free water fountain in a park and requiring people to swipe a drivers license or other ID in order to unlock the water. In fact it sounds to me like they are SPENDING who-knows-how-much EXTRA money to buy and maintain the ID scanner and weld it to the water fountain.

    Is it jut me, or are there others out there thinking that free public water fountains (and free public public access WiFi points) should simply be open?

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Radical proposal?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      True. We have this service in most public parks of Rome too, but you need to sign in using a cellphone which is of course registered with your personal data, therefore anonimity is not possible. We have to thank for this nonsense the stupid anti-terrorism laws that our politicians enacted blindly following the example of other countries.

    2. Re:Radical proposal?? by worf_mo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, in Italy, thanks to one of the so called laws against terrorism (in this case L155/2005) whoever offers public access to Internet, be it via a wireless hotspot or an Internet cafe or any other means, must first register the customer's data by requesting a valid ID card (or passport, driver's license) and then collect and preserve usage data (but not content).

      Of course criminal organizations and terrorists are using the Internet, but so are millions of law-abiding citizens. And the same criminal organizations and terrorists have been using the telephone system for decades, but public pay phones do not require people to swipe an ID card. Yet.

       

    3. Re:Radical proposal?? by dkf · · Score: 1

      Is it jut me, or are there others out there thinking that free public water fountains (and free public access WiFi points) should simply be open?

      You're not required to use the free wifi; other mechanisms are still available. "Free" speech does not necessarily mean that it is zero cost, just unrestricted (especially with regard to the political domain). It also does not guarantee anonymity; free speech is public speech.

      To put it a different way: why would the citizens of Venice feel that they have to subsidize your porn access with their taxes?

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    4. Re:Radical proposal?? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      The concept of non-free wifi hotspots sounds as alien to me today as it sound the first day I encountered one.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:Radical proposal?? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      It's too bad that Internet service isn't more like cable, water, or electricity, where the usage of the service can only be monitored in gross terms, e.g. gallons or watt-hours. It could be, if everything was encrypted and there were plenty of proxies; then all the last-mile provider would see is large blocks of random data.

    6. Re:Radical proposal?? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You can police a water fountain by putting a police office next to it to deter or prevent crime occurring on/near the water fountain.

      Its far harder to effectively police roaming wifi. They have to have some way to tie the usage to a person otherwise it will just turn into a free for all much like EFNet 10 years ago.

      Requiring identification gives them SOMETHING to trace. So yes, it is that the goverment is trying to track you and what you are doing, thats kind of how it works when you have to provide some level of protection against crime.

      The solution:
      Don't use it, no tracking, no problem, its not like its a requirement, there are alternatives, all of those will also require you to register though, but since you don't seem to be bitching about registration in general, just when the government does it, then it shouldn't make your tin foil hat glow too much.

      Of course, the government has plenty of ways they can get get all the data from any 3rd party operating in your country as well already, this really just translates into someone (you) freaking out over something they've put very little (none) thought into.

      Public water fountains are monitored, even if you don't realize it. They are monitored by the the citizens in the general area at the time.

      Really, what you are concerned with is that someone might see you doing something you wouldn't want anyone else to know. Heres the neat part though, theres are REALLY REALLY good chance, no one gives a flying fuck that you go look at videos of people eating shit while they fuck horses.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    7. Re:Radical proposal?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Mountain View, CA. Uses Google. Granted, you need a Google ID to login, but no one says you have to give out real information.

  14. e-gondola broadband by tbj61898 · · Score: 0

    With WIFI area coverage all over the famous lagoon city it won't take long for services like "e-gondola", a new service dedicated to people all over the world, mostly lovers but also curious, for their chance to do a [not very] cheap trip under famous Venice bridges and channels... in total relax from their home, wherever they live.

    Someone want to invest in such a good idea? ;-)

    --
    nop, nop, nop #VBLANK
  15. War Sailing by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm just glad I don't have to do warsailing anymore. In the past I used to tell my boat rower to keep it steady long enough to break the WPA-PSK while wearing that ridiculous mask.

  16. NIce, BUT: by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    What is the bandwith? Is there a cap on the amount of data?

    Because, you know, bandwith on the backbone is not free.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:NIce, BUT: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that the reason you leave out the second d from bandwidth?

  17. Re:How long ... [WIMAX?] by tbj61898 · · Score: 0


    Metropolitan areas are very likely to be served by 802.11n and also WIMAX, which also benefits from greater area coverage ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX#Competing_technologies )... but I definitely agree with You.. no wires in the future!
    not even power line wires (not a news but, for reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_energy_transfer ).

    --
    nop, nop, nop #VBLANK
  18. It's not really free as in beer... by macraig · · Score: 1

    ... because the city residents have paid - and will be paying - for the infrastructure and the service through taxes or other levied fees. It's only "free" in the sense that there's no per-minute or per-hour charges; there's still a cost for it, and the city has to pay for it all somehow. That somehow is most likely higher municipal taxes, whether higher property tax or something else. I'm not saying that's a bad thing... far from it, if it's being done efficiently. This is collectivism at its best, hopefully. It's just not truly free.

    1. Re:It's not really free as in beer... by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      I bet their tax increase is a lot less than my broadband bill.

    2. Re:It's not really free as in beer... by squeeze69 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, if Cacciari (the major) is smart enough, Venice could get a really cheap contract through sponsors. It's a little bit known in the world and has some tourist now and then. :-)

    3. Re:It's not really free as in beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you use more bandwidth than the venetians, on average, use.

    4. Re:It's not really free as in beer... by macraig · · Score: 1

      If taking the profiteering out of it is done efficiently, then you're probably right. I said that. It's just not "free".

    5. Re:It's not really free as in beer... by macraig · · Score: 1

      That would certainly add another facet to the cliche "tourist trap", wouldn't it, if they're gouging visitors using wi-fi to pay for their own use of the system?

    6. Re:It's not really free as in beer... by squeeze69 · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you mean: tourists would see or know that a company is partner with Venice" as a tourist trap. I suppose tourists pay only to limit bandwidth consumption and to cover the global costs for infrastructure maintenance. ...and to make some more money too. :-)

  19. Not likely by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wireless is MILES behind wired in terms of speed and reliability. I mean have a look: The very latest and greatest short range wireless tech is N, which is actually still draft technically. If everything is right, you can get 100mbps of actual throughput (throughput on wireless networks is much lower than physical rate). However even that isn't as good as it sounds. That bandwidth is shared with everyone on the same access point. It is a single collision domain. Thus as the number of clients goes up, effective bandwidth goes down.

    Now compare that to wired networks. Gig Ethernet is standard these days. Hard to buy a NIC that isn't gig and gig switches are little more money than 100mbps switches. Also, each and every line on the switch has dedicated bandwidth, in both directions. You can do 1gbps up, 1gbps down at the same time, and so can everyone else. You don't grab bandwidth from each other.

    Of course for uplinks, there's faster stuff, 10gigE is not cheap, but not too bad for a company, and you can bond multiple wires together.

    So wireless isn't going to be taking over most businesses any time soon, unless they have really low bandwidth and latency needs.

    Also, all this is talking about WiFi, not 3G. 3G is slow as hell. Even new TIA-856 Rev. B, which isn't out yet only gets 4.9mbps peak per carrier and about 3 carriers per tower. So you are taking about trying to share cable modem speeds with a whole office on a contention based network. Ya THAT'LL be great.

    Sorry, but this kind of thing isn't going to happen until wireless is fast enough that it isn't noticeable slower than wired, and that it doesn't cost much more. While running cable is a pain, it isn't that much of a pain and you do it once and you are done for many years. I mean even if you laid Cat-3 cable back in 1990, you are still talking about speeds as good as N (better in real usage) and waaaay better than 3G. There's no usage fees either, like 3G. Your switch will happily move data for you all day without additional charge.

    Of course this doesn't even touch on all the security and configuration issues that you'd have.

    I just don't see the fully wireless office coming any time soon.

    1. Re:Not likely by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I just don't see the fully wireless office coming any time soon.

      It is already happening, and people are not noticing the slow speed because they are using neutered "NAS" devices instead of file servers (or quality NAS devices), so the slow wireless is not the bottleneck. As for getting out to the net, many businesses have a fairly slow or congested connection anyway so once again the slow wireless is not the bottleneck. The effects of building structure and/or the short range of antennas often mean that you have very few users per access point so the slow speed isn't really noticed much. It's convenient and the general public haven't noticed the speed problems yet so we'll see a few implementaions before some Forbes article comes out in a decade or so making your points above.

      Personally I like it an untrusted network for mobile staff and all those visiting clients, salesfolk, visitors from competing companies, relatives etc that insist they must connect onto your network to get their email.

    2. Re:Not likely by Melkman · · Score: 1

      I agree that wired networks will be used by the big majority of businesses for quite some time. An other big advantage of wired networks is that they "just work" with very little problems. And if there is a problem, finding the cause is easy and quick. Problems with wireless networks however are a pain.

    3. Re:Not likely by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I just don't see the fully wireless office coming any time soon.

      Not for big places but say you run a travel agency, or a little import operation. Many of your people need email but they can do that on their phones now. Maybe your receptionist has one of those netbooks you can buy from the phone company with 3G built in. If you don't need to transfer mass quantities of data, 3G might be enough.

      In years past we had an nntp server on the LAN at work for internal forums. Now that I can get to outside forums I just don't bother. For the younger generation its just going to seem natural to do normal business on facebook.

    4. Re:Not likely by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Also all wireless standard have been cracked. If I remember correctly you can send 1GB of wireless packets to Russia and they have a cluster of machines with lots of NVidia GPU's which will 'recover your key' for you in a week time for just a few 1000 dollars. On the fiber side of things you have very advanced systems that can even detect if a fiber has been cut or light deflected and resend. And fiber also can go up to 100 Gbit ethernet. I guess fiber might not be such an obvious choice your phone though, maybe cat5 or 6 might be more appropriate ? DECT is also usually not properly encrypted and easily broken if I'm not mistaken.

      Enough ranting on wireless

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    5. Re:Not likely by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      That I have trouble believing. WPA2 uses AES encryption which as far as I can tell is still completely secure. A break in AES would have implications far beyond wireless since it is used to encrypt SSH, financial transactions, government data, and so on. WEP is badly broken, of course, and you don't need anything more than a normal CPU to handle it. I could potentially believe TKIP has a break, though I find no information on this. However AES is the most tested cryptosystem in history, and thus far is secure.

      One could, of course, attempt to brute force the key, but so long as the key is of reasonable length (say 12 characters or longer) it isn't happening in a person's lifetime. That also only applies to networks using pre-shared keys, and short or common ones at that. An enterprise setup that uses a certificate is not vulnerable in this matter.

    6. Re:Not likely by Barny · · Score: 1

      I just don't see the fully wireless office coming any time soon.

      Sure it will, it will be as common as the paper-less office...

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    7. Re:Not likely by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I've been in plenty of offices that are 100% wireless, with a netgear in the corner serving their network. Not all companies are IT and need servers etc. and the average email/browsing/bespoke app stuff needs very little bandwidth to work well.

      As far as your 3G comments go... have you been asleep or are you just American? We have cities here delivering 15mbps over 3G and even from my office I can stream a solid 6mbps. The backhauls on some of these towers have *huge* amounts of bandwidth & the slowdowns you used to get are becoming a lot rarer.

    8. Re:Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of points: WPA2 is a crypto-system, AES is a cipher. Even without an attack on AES, the crypto system around it could be vulnerable. The attacks on WEP are mostly due to a bad cryptographic system not taking into account the known problems of the used cipher (RC4). AES is not synonymous with unbreakable.

      Brute forcing a key isn't the only choice. You can try dictionary attacks first. Even if that fails, a brute force attack is not entirely unreasonable: There are people, like you, who vastly overestimate the cryptographic strength of passwords: A 12 character passphrase randomly chosen from the available set (95 characters) is one of 95^12 possible passphrases, i.e. it provides only about 79 bits of entropy (log2(95^12)). A typical passphrase is chosen from a much smaller set (for example lowercase letters and numbers) and not completely random. That is not enough to withstand a brute force attack.

    9. Re:Not likely by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Your linksys router with a usb port and a westerndigital MyBook drive is not a NAS device, sorry.

      I can not possibly think of an NAS device other than something you would by at Best Buy that would perform slower than any form of wireless in use.

      Your final statement doesn't even make sense. You like wireless because its lack of security makes it ideal for allowing others to access your network? You do realize you can segment both wired and wireless networks, yes?

      I'm pretty sure from your post that you don't really have any idea what you're talking about, sorry.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    10. Re:Not likely by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You don't need to break AES specifically, just break the keying algorithm.

      Theres a LOT more to a secure system than JUST the encryption used.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re:Not likely by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Ok, so show me where there's a break in CCMP (the WPA2 implementation). I've looked, I can't find one. The only thing I've found so far is that using a GPU, or other massively parallel system, you can brute force keys in a PSK system. Ok, fine. However that relies on two things:

      1) The key must be simple. Only short keys can be broken in this manner. You can't do it on a 12+ character key, it takes too long. While a high end GPU is 30 times fater than a CPU or so at this, that doesn't help if your break time with a CPU is 100,000,000 years. Throw 1000 GPUs at it and you are still over 3 melennia to break the key, for example.

      2) The network must be using PSK. If it uses an enterprise setup using LEAP/PEAP none of this applies.

    12. Re:Not likely by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You are looking at this from a single user perspective and not thinking of contention. There are dozens of crappy RAID5 devices with a 300MHz or so processor that call themselves "NAS" devices - sadly they don't have a lot more processing power than a linksys + usb drive. Stick one of those in a small business with half a dozen people accessing it at once and even 10Mb/s cable would no longer be the bottleneck. Of course it's a bad idea, but it's becoming increasingly common and those are the sort of places where they think going 100% wireless is a good idea while the rest of us are filling in the last dark corners with gigabit networking.
      As for the second bit where you were so scathing and completely missed the context, there was a typo there and I missed a word - it should have read "Personally I like it AS an untrusted network". In other words outside of the trusted network on the same side of the gateway as the internet.

  20. Use 3G instead by quenda · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At 5 euro/day ?! Screw that.

    I'll take my 3G phone, which costs 50c/MB roaming on '3' in italy. Good enough for email, and looking up tourist info.
    I expect you can get a prepaid SIM in Italy that will cover the whole country for a lot less that 5 euro/day.
    And if you're in Venice, there are better things to do than reading slashdot all day in some wanky tourist cafe on Piazza San Marco. God, I hope it doesn't have a Starbucks now.

    1. Re:Use 3G instead by pmontra · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll take my 3G phone, which costs 50c/MB roaming on '3' in italy. Good enough for email, and looking up tourist info.

      I agree but there might be some reasons that can make the Wi-Fi service attractive to some people. One is that for your 3G contract to be competitive you have stay under a 10 MB cap. That won't let you upload your vacation pictures or download large attachments for business. Nothing that matters to you, probably, but it could matter to somebody else. Wi-Fi could also be an easier connection to setup: tourists will probably be able to register online from their home before leaving for Italy (Venice residents are registering online for the service now). That's seems a better option than looking for the right telephone shop in a foreign country and trying to communicate with personnel that maybe don't speak their language too well.

      God, I hope it doesn't have a Starbucks now.

      There are no Starbucks in Italy and probably there will never be. Starbucks' idea of coffee is too different from the average Italian's idea of coffee, an espresso quickly brewed and quickly consumed at the bar. Ironically, the original Starbucks was selling coffee beans and equipment and started selling coffee drinks only after a journey to Italy of its marketing manager in 1982.

    2. Re:Use 3G instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real reason is that if you are addicted to decent espresso, Starbuck's coffee simply SUCKS.
      It is good for "frappuccino", "mochaccino" etc. but that's, as you said, a different "coffee culture".
      Check out the beans the show (both Arabica and Robusta varieties) near the counter: small, irregular - good/average ones, not "top quality" ones.

    3. Re:Use 3G instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There are no Starbucks in Italy and probably there will never be. Starbucks' idea of coffee is too different from the average Italian's idea of coffee, an espresso quickly brewed and quickly consumed at the bar.

      The Portuguese idea of coffee is pretty much like the Italian's. "Coffee" here is synonymous with espresso, and nobody would dare serve you anything different. You can find a large espresso machine in virtually every place that serves food or drinks. You can even usually find them in beach bars and small food stands.

      People used to say exactly what you said, that Starbucks would never work in here and that it probably would never come to Portugal as it would be a lousy market for the types of drinks that they serve. And still, there are now 3 Starbucks stores in Lisbon. They're probably just feeling the terrain first given the locations they have chosen. One store stands in one of the most touristy areas of Lisbon, so even if the Portuguese don't like it, they can sell their coffee to other Europeans and Americans. The other 2 were set up at large shopping malls. They're basically empty during the week, but during weekends they fill up mostly with teens.

      I still believe that the future is not so bright for Starbucks in here. Their prices are high like in the rest of the world, and this is the country where people have good espresso available practically everywhere for 60 euro cents or even less.

    4. Re:Use 3G instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *ALL* 3G contracts in Italy are ripoffs. First X gigs or X hours are Y Euros, then from X+1 they cost Y*10 or even much more. A lot of people I know were ripped off thinking that if 100 hours a month are 20 Euros then 200 hours, would cost them 40 Euros. Someone tell me why the value of a gigabyte changes over time; I would accept for example if it cost more during daytime due to the higher load of the network, but surely not that way. These conditions are as usual buried into long contracts that nobody reads, but that doesn't change the fact that our telcos are fooling their customers in a dishonest way.

    5. Re:Use 3G instead by goatpunch · · Score: 1

      I was very amused when Hotel Tenuta di Ricavo in Chianti charged 'extra' for an espresso with breakfast, only filter coffee was included. Avoid Ricavo (and Chianti in general for that matter).

      Interestingly McDonalds adapted well to the Italian breakfast and coffee- we stopped in next to Fiumicino Airport in Rome and the espresso bar was 4 people deep, all knocking back shots and taking the odd pastry.

    6. Re:Use 3G instead by brasselv · · Score: 1

      There are no Starbucks in Italy and probably there will never be.

      I heard similar arguments about McDonalds some 20 years ago. Now they are everywhere in Italy.

      --
      "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    7. Re:Use 3G instead by pmontra · · Score: 1

      Argument granted, but McDonald's can compete on price with any Italian restaurant and Starbucks can't compete on price with Italian bars.

      However there are customers willing to pay for their products here in Italy and there are several customers groups advocating for SB stores in Italy (google for starbucks italia, maybe select pages in Italian language). On the other side I also have to point out this article of Financial Times of 2007, with a statement of Howard Schultz about not opening stores in Italy and to this analysis. The following discussion is interesting as it presents the differing views of Italian people on the subject intertwined with comments of people from other countries.

      Furthermore Italy's Autogrill is the licensee of the Starbucks brand for Italy at least since 2007 (and many others). However Autogrill has its own coffee shops so my suspect is that it's paying the license to keep a competitor out of the country.

    8. Re:Use 3G instead by brasselv · · Score: 1

      Interesting.
      Looks like Autogrill decided to licence as many brands as possible, and then "use" only the ones that make sense for them.
      They never used, for instance, the Sbarro or PizzaHut, and launched their own "Spizzico". With Burger King, though, they did just the opposite.
      I wonder how much they pay for a license that grants the right to keep it "sleeping".

      --
      "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
  21. In other news... by FranTaylor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Venice residents will soon begin renting their accounts to tourists for 3 euros/day.

  22. Vacation? by Nivlheim · · Score: 1

    Here I am, a tourist currently right smack in the middle of Venice. And not until I read it on Slashdot two days after the fact have I realized what the big stage on Piazza S. Marco was for.

    What do you mean 'talk to people'?

  23. Free? How wonderful! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 0, Troll

    1. it shows Americans that you can get something for free, much to their utter dismay, given the tenets of their society;

    Free? How wonderful! So the workers installing and maintaining the equipment will all donate their time! And all the equipment will be given to Venice for free also! And in the future, all the equipment needing replacement due to age or damage will also be free! And the Chinese and other Asian manufacturers will send all this equipment to Venice for free! They must really love Italy!

    It must be heaven there where Economics 101 doesn't apply, everything is free and no one has to pay for anything.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  24. Cool! But... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Personally, I think it's pretty neat... But I know a few people with electrosensitivity that have problems if they are around an emitted signal like that for any length of time. Driving past Internet cafés or coming by my house for a few minutes is no big deal, but if it were there 24/7, some people may not even be able to live there.
    I guess there should be some compromise--yes, people want there to be Internet everywhere, not just designated hot-spots, but there's this other side of the coin too.

    Before anybody calls BS, I was skeptical of RF sensitivity too, but I've looked into it and it seems to be real for some folks. Plus, I can hide my wireless router somewhere where you can't see the lights, and my friend can tell me whether it's on or not just from being in the house for a few minutes. It's actually kind of cool, except for the part where he gets a headache after about an hour if I don't turn it off. Weird.

    --
    10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
    20 DRINK COFFEE
    30 GOTO 10
    1. Re:Cool! But... by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For anyone feeling anecdotal, here is a healthy dose of BS calling:

      http://www.badscience.net/category/electrosensitivity/

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Cool! But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they are not electosensitive since they fail double blind tests.
      However they think they are and the suffering they experience
      is "real" even though it is self inflicted by their mind.

    3. Re:Cool! But... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      So one nutjob discredits loads of other folks? Sorry, I believe my good friend over this guy, plus I've seen him call it correctly 100% of the time as to whether I've got my wireless on. It's a game at this point, I've tried to trick him but he's spot on every time. I imagine some folks in Venice may experience the same thing, and I can see many being unhappy about this. Pity since it's quite useful for many others.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    4. Re:Cool! But... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that isn't what gp poster is saying.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Cool! But... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Calling Ben Goldacre a nutjob is ridiculous. He's a medical doctor. One that actually believes in science.

      You believing in your friend is mostly harmless (except you post publicly about it). Other failures to be sufficiently skeptical and realize the benefit of the enlightenment (you are literally willing yourself to live part of your life in the dark ages) lead to fucking evil bullshit like this:

      http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/

      Pure fucking evil. All because people refuse to set aside mysticism.

      Aside: when you turn off your router, how often does your friend also turn off his mobile phone?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Cool! But... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      I was referring to Coghill, not Goldacre.

      And as for my friend, he leaves the phone off most of the time, unless he needs to make a call or knows someone is trying to contact him on it. He uses the landline at home and just has the cell for emergencies when he is out. This is a regular guy, he's not into religion, or conspiracy theories, or anything wacky. I highly doubt he'd believe in this if he weren't experiencing it firsthand.

      But hey, I don't seem to suffer any ill effects. I don't think most folks do, so I'm at least willing to admit I might be wrong. I'm not attacking either side. Why can't you do the same?

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    7. Re:Cool! But... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Because of the path of misery that mysticism has cut through human history.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Cool! But... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you are comparing something like this to mysticism.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    9. Re:Cool! But... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Largely 3, but also some of 2:

      http://www.answers.com/mysticism

      Modern science holds that if you know the state of the router, you cannot be certain that you are not transmitting that state to your friend, thus to gain accurate information, you must not know the state of the router (this is what double-blind means, neither the subject nor the experimenter know if the subject is a control or not). In the face of that, insisting that you have accurately measured your friends ability to sense the RF emanating from your wireless router is vague, groundless speculation.

      It could even be something as nonsensical as you, on the days you leave the router one, reading the news immediately before your friend comes over and then discussing current events with him, thus giving him a headache.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:Cool! But... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      But that seems even more mystical and less likely than the initial problem of RF signals interfering with the electrical signals in the human body.

      admittedly extreme example.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    11. Re:Cool! But... by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm raising it as a possibility (to emphasize the difficulty in accurately characterizing the situation), not insisting it is likely.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:Cool! But... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I just hate when people refuse to acknowledge the possibility of something just because they don't personally experience or understand it. It happens a lot with us nerdy folks and our superior intellects ;)

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    13. Re:Cool! But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They fail double blind tests. We acknowledged he possibility and we proposed them a double blind test. They failed it therefore we infirmed the hypothesis of electrosensitivity. Or do you mean by "acknowledged" accept without any question any claim made by third parties ? All the data points that disease to be caused by psychosomatic conditions. People don't like to hear that their pain is self inflicted by their mind and has no physical cause. I wouldn't like it either. We're not accusing them of simulating their pain. But the evidence is there and we must treat them according to the evidence that the pain they experience is psychosomatic.

  25. Aaah La Repubblica Serenissima by unity100 · · Score: 1

    after all, theirs was the longest lasting ever republic, lasting more than 1000 years. no surpise that some of the spirit still remains.

  26. LAN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 megametre of glassfibre is not a LAN. Can we get some competence in stories here, people?

  27. laptop everywhere.... by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

    not just Italy

    Yeah, but Venice is a City of Love. Even when in Italy it's quite understandable if you don't take your laptop there.

  28. Hume's principle by Kupfernigk · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Faced with a choice between the apparently miraculous (your friend is able to detect minute levels of RF) and the alternative (you know whether it is off or on and you give subtle visual clues) I will go for the latter every single time.

    In Glastonbury, UK, people complained of headaches caused by a town center wireless station, but amazingly none of them were affected by their mobile phones. On the other hand, the leader of the complainers seems to be in the business of selling magic crystals that protect you from RF radiation. Strangely, where I live, in a different part of Somerset with a lot more industry and wireless networks all over the place, nobody seems to suffer.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Hume's principle by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      All I know is what I've seen, I won't even mention the bloody thing until he does, and at this point I've even purposefully tried to trick him but he can always tell. The only thing worse than a "nutjob" believing a "crazy" story is someone who is so closed-minded from the other side that they refuse to admit the possibility they may be wrong.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
  29. Venice for Italians by steveha · · Score: 1

    I suspect that one of the reasons the Italian government did this was to make Venice a little bit more attractive as a place to live.

    Venice is an amazing place, full of history. It's also an expensive place, as it is somewhat disconnected (no cars or trucks for hauling stuff, just boats and hand carts) and the glorious old houses are somewhat crumbling. I read that the Italian government is worried about a trend where wealthy foreigners buy apartments or houses in Venice; they don't want Venice to become primarily a theme park for the wealthy, they would rather have Italians living there. IIRC if you are Italian and you move to Venice, you can get a stipend from the Italian government to help defray your living expenses.

    This is clever. Venice is small enough to be carpeted wall-to-wall with good wireless signal, and it shouldn't have cost too much. It's a simple thing that wasn't hard to do that will make Venice much more interesting as a place to live.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  30. Re:MAN? by javajawa · · Score: 1

    It's a MAN, however that is indistinguishable from a LAN for all intents and purposes on the user end. However, I also think things stopped being LANs when they went wireless.

    --

    Meh

  31. Re:MAN? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    Oh, so because you're too stupid to know the difference, we should all call it the same thing.

    I'm glad doctors don't listen to this sort of ignorance, otherwise everone would die from the cold.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  32. Free as in superifical by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    Free, eh? So no taxes or anything are involved, huh?

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  33. This is what went on at the meeting by Krakadoom · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Our city is sinking into the sea, what can we do to stop this development?"

    "... I know, free wireless!"

  34. free by He+who+knows · · Score: 1

    how is it free if you have to pay 5 euros a day.

  35. Wopnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dagoweb

  36. Goodbye cell bill, hello VOIP? by astroblaster · · Score: 1

    Skype, at least, for iPhone and iPod Touch works (only) on WiFi, and works very well. Compared to the poor AT&T coverage in many parts of downtown Atlanta, WiFi coverage could really cover the extra bases... provided one was not moving at high speeds.