Slashdot Mirror


Hackers Get Free Parking In San Francisco

Hugh Pickens writes "PC World reports that at the Black Hat security conference this week, security researchers say that it is pretty easy for a technically savvy hacker to make a fake payment card that gives them unlimited free parking on San Francisco's smart parking meter system. 'It wasn't technically complicated and the fact that I can do it in three days means that other people are probably already doing it and probably taking advantage of it,' says Joe Grand. 'It seems like the system wasn't analyzed at all.' To figure out how the payment system worked, Grand hooked up an oscilloscope to a parking meter and monitored what happened when he used a genuine payment card. Grand discovered the cards aren't digitally signed, and the only authentication between the meter and card is a password sent from the former to the latter. Examining the meters themselves could yield additional vulnerabilities that might allow someone to conduct other kinds of attacks, such as propagating a virus from meter to meter via the smart cards or a meter minder's PDA."

221 comments

  1. Parking Meter Botnet by sopssa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Examining the meters themselves could yield additional vulnerabilities that might allow someone to conduct other kinds of attacks, such as propagating a virus from meter to meter via the smart cards or a meter minder's PDA."

    I, for one, welcome our new parking meter botnet overlords.

    1. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Yes, but do they run Linux?

    2. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen.

    3. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes I am upset by this.
      If more then just a small handful of people start doing this then they will raise the price for parking for the people who do it legally.
      They may have to go and fix the system causing us to pay for it in taxes, as well future systems will need to be more expensive as they need to deal with hackers breaking the system all the time.
      The reason for meters besides revenue collection is to control the availability of parking spots. Metered parking helps keeps store front spots open for customers. As well keeps abandoned or broken cars sitting indefinitely in good parking spots.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes I am upset by this.

      Well, you are easily upset.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what was wrong with coin operated meters? Why do they need computers?

    6. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't beat them, join them.

      Seriously, if it is that easy, just make your own unlimited card and then you won't have to worry about how much the "legal" way costs...

    7. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Shaltenn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe the fact that 90% of the time people don't have change on them? Society as a whole is becoming a lot more dependent on ATM cards, credit cards, etc as opposed to cash money. This means that people don't have coinage nor dollars, but instead a plastic card in their wallet. I have seen machines that take cards and coins and even dollar bills. This seems like the best idea. Any te

      --
      If you were offended by anything I said... No, I'm not sorry. Please lighten up.
    8. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It costs $20 per hour plus pension and health insurance for a meter maid to go collect coins.

    9. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by xaxa · · Score: 5, Informative

      what was wrong with coin operated meters? Why do they need computers?

      Crimanal gangs target coin operated metres. For instance, "Cashless parking was trialled in Westminster [London] in October 2006 and in early 2007 the decision was taken to extend cashless parking city [of Westminster] wide. One of the primary drivers was the estimated £120,000 per week being lost to organised crime. Organised crime which led to murder on the streets of Westminster." (The murder was after one gang started taking the money from meters in another gang's "territory").

      A metal detector under the parking space and a camera nearby, and the computer could automatically issue a ticket (or automatically bill for the correct duration). And tell drivers how many spaces are available.

    10. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by ddusza · · Score: 0

      I am shaking my fist in complete upsetness, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Don't fear the penguins
    11. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by rhook · · Score: 1

      The fix is simple, just use encryption. And no, its not an expensive fix.

    12. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      First, decide what your goals are. If it's just to keep people from staying in a space too long, there's no need to charge, just have a timer hooked up to a proximity sensor of some kind (maybe like the ones at traffic lights), which activates a camera. If the car is over the limit, snap pictures every so often and send a fine. Call a tow if it's way too long.

      If the goal is to make money, then there's no need for time limits. Just have something people can swipe their credit cards or a token card, or an account based on registration number (easily read with a curb-side camera as the previous example) and bill based on availability and time of day. (but don't change the price while people are away from the meter.)

      There are small tyrannies everywhere. Sometimes we put up with them to get something we want or need, but we need to evaluate periodically to make sure we aren't just inconveniencing and oppressing people because "that's the way it's always been done." Technology changes, and things that wouldn't be possible (or thought of) just a few years ago are inexpensive now.

      And yes, I realize that there are more important things to bitch about, but there are also thousands of these little things that added up really rob you of a substantial portion of your life.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    13. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by sortius_nod · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I remember doing an easier hack on the parking meters in Newcastle AU. Grab a used Telstra smart card phone card, shove it in, meter breaks, free parking for a few days for everyone.

      It seems that the parking meter OS was unable to handle cards that didn't send the right data back, so went in to "out of order" mode.

      I suppose they got wise on these kind of simple hacks and changed the smart card system.

    14. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Crimanal gangs target coin operated metres.

      And they will target electronic metres too, just as soon as they figure out how to do it.

      One of the primary drivers was the estimated £120,000 per week being lost to organised crime [and a murder].

      If, as jellomizer postulated, the reason for having meters in the first place is to prevent "tragedy of the commons" type results for public parking spaces, then organized crime's theft of the money collected really doesn't affect that goal.

      A metal detector under the parking space and a camera nearby, and the computer could automatically issue a ticket (or automatically bill for the correct duration). And tell drivers how many spaces are available.

      It is really amazing how all public problems seem to lead us gently down the path of good intentions and into the maw of big brother.

      Maybe the tragedy of the commons problem isn't so bad after all. Maybe we should just reduce parking enforcement to the barest minimum - have a guy with a piece of chalk walk around marking tires - pay his salary from the property taxes of the stores along his route. If a car is in place for more than a couple of days, tow it. Leave it at that and forget about all the expense - monetary and socially - of massively complex and invasive enforcement systems.

      After all, its not fort knox, its just a fucking parking place.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    15. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by baegucb · · Score: 1

      So explain why there are parking meters in front of where I work. No stores are within at least a half mile. parking meters are only for generating revenue imho.

    16. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1

      [...] The reason for meters besides revenue collection is to control the availability of parking spots. Metered parking helps keeps store front spots open for customers. As well keeps abandoned or broken cars sitting indefinitely in good parking spots.

      Theoretically, yes. But in practice it fails. Local employees just feed the meters (which itself might be illegal but is much more difficult to enforce). Meanwhile, the people you want to attract -- new customers -- have to worry about having change or a parking card AND finding a convenient, open parking spot before they can visit your store.

      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    17. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by timeOday · · Score: 1

      what was wrong with coin operated meters? Why do they need computers?

      If you think the security of the new system is bad, just compare it to something that can be fooled by a little disc of sheet metal.

      Whenever people talk about exotic hacks on ATMs, I always think of how laughably insecure checks are, and credit cards. You give them one number and they get access to your entire available credit? Ridiculous.

    18. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Aceticon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many cities around the world deploy parking meters in places where there is no lack of parking places as a form of revenue for the local authorities.

      Also parking meters are usually deployed in such a way as to eliminate all other parking alternatives (if the purpose was to make parking spaces available for those who really need it, then only some of the places would need to be made "premium" with parking meters while most spaces would remain free)

      To further enhance the income from parking, most parking meter systems are also designed in such a way (pay first) that users either have to overpay (pay more time than you use) or are hit with significant fines for going overtime.

      This is why most people hate parking meters and other paid parking system in public spaces.

      I for one welcome our new parking meter infecting virus overlords.

    19. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I wasn't very clear - by "little disc of sheet metal," I meant a fake quarter to drop into a coin-operated meter.

    20. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by nagnamer · · Score: 1

      Maybe the fact that 90% of the time people don't have change on them? Society as a whole is becoming a lot more dependent on ATM cards, credit cards, etc as opposed to cash money. This means that people don't have coinage nor dollars, but instead a plastic card in their wallet. I have seen machines that take cards and coins and even dollar bills. This seems like the best idea. Any te

      Large amounts of money that is being used today is virtual money sitting in bank accounts and transferred directly to and fro such accounts. So it's no doubt convenient from economies worldwide to make the switch asap.

      --
      Every harsh word you utter has the right address. It only sounds harsh because the one on the envelope is the wrong one.
    21. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Crimanal gangs target coin operated metres.

      And they will target electronic metres too, just as soon as they figure out how to do it.

      That might be easier to trace.

      Other advantages: no need for expensive security guards to empty the meters, probably less problems with broken metres, easy to enforce other rules (e.g. "Max 2 hour, no return within 2 hours" is typical in the UK).

      If, as jellomizer postulated, the reason for having meters in the first place is to prevent "tragedy of the commons" type results for public parking spaces, then organized crime's theft of the money collected really doesn't affect that goal.

      I'm sure the income from parking is significant. Without it, tax would be higher (or services reduced).

      It is really amazing how all public problems seem to lead us gently down the path of good intentions and into the maw of big brother.

      I didn't really mean it seriously ;-). I'd like to see the same done in central London as has been done in Copenhagen -- a reduction in the number of available parking spaces every year, to reduce congestion and leave more space for people in the city.

    22. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      The solution to this is pretty simply. Levy a $100,000 fine if you are caught. This will deter most people from doing it and those that do, any that are caught will more than make up the extra money in fines.

    23. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's California, after all. The land of milk and honey. Only rich people live there, as proven by the ready availability of free health care and free education for illegal immigrants and illegal migrant workers. Not to mention free legal services for those illegals who are to stupid to stay underground, and obey other laws. Nothing to worry about.

      If stuff like this really bothers you, get involved with the idiots who run your government, and hold them accountable. Tell them that you want the old fashioned meters back, that took quarters and dimes to operate. There never was any widespread abuse of them, because they WORK. There was no need to spend however many zillion dollars to upgrade to insecure networked card reading meters.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    24. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't the guys that figure out how and then tell you about it. The problem is those that figure out how and then use it as much as they like.

    25. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes I am upset by this.
      If more then just a small handful of people start doing this then they will raise the price for parking for the people who do it legally.
      They may have to go and fix the system causing us to pay for it in taxes, as well future systems will need to be more expensive as they need to deal with hackers breaking the system all the time.

      The tone of your post seems to imply you are upset at the hackers for this, instead of upset at who's fault it is.
      (If I misread your intent, feel free to disregard this)

      The fault is not with the hackers pointing out the screw up by the city and meter manufacturer.
      It isn't the hackers who took your tax money and spent it on a product that does not do what is needed (in this case, the need is to meter parking.)

      It isn't as if the hackers could keep quiet, and the real criminals will somehow unlearn what they already knew long before the hackers figured it out. Nor is it the fault of the hackers that the machines were built to function this way.

      If you want to be upset at someone, be upset at the city for spending your taxes on some magical beans (that don't sprout like in the story), and/or the manufacturer who falsely represented how the meter functioned to the city to get them to hand over said tax monies.

      Humanity collectivly hiding our heads in the sand and pretending there is a locked door when clearly there is no door at all, let alone a lockable one, does not security make. And the first step to a functional solution is to admit there is a problem.

      If you honestly believe that these things have not been exploited by insiders and organized criminals since practically the day they were installed, and the hackers are actually letting secrets out or something, then you are only fooling yourself.

    26. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by dogeatery · · Score: 1

      But parking wants to be free! Let's stop patronizing the corrupt monopoly local governments have over parking spaces.

    27. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by billcopc · · Score: 1

      So now instead of collecting coins, they collect transaction logs on a PDA. That didn't save money.

      If SF's municipal bureaucracy is anything like my city, nobody ever loses jobs, they just get less work to do. Public service unions are the dirtiest bastards IMO.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    28. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. The rise in councils charging for parking in towns is what caused the rise of big out-of-town stores in the UK in my opinion.

      Possibly they had no choice with the rise in car ownership leading to overuse and congestion but there you go.

    29. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      A metal detector under the parking space and a camera nearby, and the computer could automatically issue a ticket (or automatically bill for the correct duration). And tell drivers how many spaces are available.

      Finally a little payback for motorcycles. The traffic lights may have no idea I'm there half the time, but neither will the automated ticket-issuing overlords!

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    30. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Organised crime which led to murder on the streets of Westminster." (The murder was after one gang started taking the money from meters in another gang's "territory").

      But that's one gang member killing another gang member. That's not so much a "crime" as a "service to the mankind."

    31. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by xaxa · · Score: 1

      A metal detector under the parking space and a camera nearby, and the computer could automatically issue a ticket (or automatically bill for the correct duration). And tell drivers how many spaces are available.

      Finally a little payback for motorcycles. The traffic lights may have no idea I'm there half the time, but neither will the automated ticket-issuing overlords!

      Make the most of it while it lasts, most of the traffic lights round me detect my bicycle!

    32. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Rasperin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What are you talking about, it's very expensive to fix. First you have to pay for the code updates, that's going to be a million, take a year, and be delivered late. Then, you have to do a mass software update, that's going to be another 10 million. Then lastly, the most expensive part, a "hardware update" issuing new cards to be compliant with the new standard to match. I don't even want to dream how much that would cost.

      *My numbers may be artificially inflated from working with IBM.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    33. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There never was any widespread abuse of them, because they WORK.

      They do work. Except for the 5 block long line of pipes sticking out of the ground where the meters used to be. Pipe cutters work pretty well. The cost of replacement must be pretty high.

    34. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by blueskies · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They made that decision when they bought shitty meters.

    35. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the fact that 90% of the time people don't have change on them? Society as a whole is becoming a lot more dependent on ATM cards, credit cards, etc as opposed to cash money.

      There are meters that accept credit cards (along with coins and bills):

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parking_meter#Operation

    36. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by fulldecent · · Score: 2, Funny

      >> Yes, but do they run Linux?

      Yes, but does it blend?

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    37. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      That's great if there's an alternative. For those of us who live out where they have to drive somewhere, the inability to find a parking space is what keeps me away from downtown areas any time I can possibly avoid it.

      Sometimes I wish that city centers just had a giant ring of parking garages on the perimeter and no cars allowed beyond that point.

    38. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by tekrat · · Score: 1

      Never mind all the people talking about gangs and organized crime. The *REAL* reason they switch to credit card payments over coin-operated is to remove the CASH from the equation. Cash requires people to collect it from the meters, and then those people who collect it also end up stealing some.

      By using credit card payments, you eliminate the coin collectors, so you don't have to employ those people anymore, and you also eliminate having to monitor your collectors so they don't steal from you.

      Look at any large company's cafeteria, and you'll see everyone pays by swiping their company ID. This is because they eliminated the cash that was being stolen by the underpaid cafeteria staff.

      Same thing.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    39. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by tunapez · · Score: 1

      After all, its not fort knox, its just a fucking parking place.

      It may not be Ft Knox, but it's definitely a mint for city coffers. If the gangstas are taking 120k from a % of meters, just think what's still coming in. It's all about producing the revenue stream, growing the revenue stream, protecting the revenue stream. And the greater good, if it fits in with the 1st 3 priorities. And as a bonus, the citizens will get to pay for the additional fees AND more taxes because some politico's wife/brother-in-law/shell company will get the lucrative contract and do a half-assed implementation, so the cameras will be broken and replaced a few times until they eventually become abandoned for the next expensive produce/grow/protect scheme in a few years anyway.

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    40. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      As they should, since bicycles are suppose to go on the road, not the sidewalk.

    41. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Shh cities that are actually smart about travel are hard to find.

      Though my personal favorite is to tearup a parking lot replace it with a parting garage with half the car slots. And add in a new office building or condo complex. It is like they don't expect people to travel.

      Though iwish city streets were drivable by permit only. Without a permit you haveto park at large garages with regular mass transit to take you into the city.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    42. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting it for everywhere, just central London (I live in London, how anywhere else manages parking is up to the residents).

      There are alternatives in London: everyone in Greater London, and pretty much the South East of England, can get to central London by public transport (railway lines in Greater London, and in South East England). Most people do -- even people that live in the middle of nowhere (relatively) would most likely drive (or cycle) to the nearest station. I just think it'd be nicer if the 0.5% of people that do drive, weren't allowed to (or had no reason to because they couldn't park).

      There would be other benefits. It's awful when waiting on a jammed-up street in Soho to see an ambulance with lights and sirens take 10 minutes to just get along the road (they have medics on bicycles, but they can't carry much equipment). It's annoying that it also takes the buses 10 minutes to go down the street.

      (Note -- I'm referring to the very centre of London, with the theatres, bars and nightclubs, and offices. There is more space, and less people, outside the centre, so parked cars are OK.)

      There are plenty of possibilities, but the current mayor isn't going to support any of them as he's too conservative.

    43. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I read that some cities were talking about getting a grid of "smart meters" that you could go online and check availability, and also reserve certain spots at certain times. The ones that will text your cell phone when your time is almost up, and allow you to add more time over the phone is a nice feature as well.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    44. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of parking meters!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    45. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Shh cities that are actually smart about travel are hard to find.

      Though my personal favorite is to tearup a parking lot replace it with a parting garage with half the car slots. And add in a new office building or condo complex. It is like they don't expect people to travel.

      Though iwish city streets were drivable by permit only. Without a permit you haveto park at large garages with regular mass transit to take you into the city.

      Around here the EU have a habit of making development grants dependent on developments being "public transport friendly". Unfortunately, "public transport friendly" tends to mean encouraging people to use public transport by not providing anywhere near enough parking spaces... even if there happens to be no sane public transport to get there.

    46. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that just because a lock can be picked, doesn't mean you have the moral right to do so. Why are hackers so morally superior that they can break the law and brag about it? This guy should be arrested on conspiracy charges in my book. And I'm a libertarian! Go figure.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    47. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Many cities around the world deploy parking meters in places where there is no lack of parking places as a form of revenue for the local authorities.

      Yeah, but these guys are talking about San Francisco, where a good parking spot can cost as much as an apartment. It's definitely a place where public parking needs to be metered. BART, FTW!!!

    48. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by j-beda · · Score: 1

      For most parking meters I have seen, the default position when they are non-functional is "do not park", so they can just ticket people who break them to avoid parking (the old style where you needed to turn a crank when inserting the coin would pop up a "parking violation" flag as the crank was turned and only poke up the clock-timer when you turned it back - if you stuck it with a bad coin, the parking violation flag would prevent you from parking there without getting a ticket).

      One would think the same could be done for fancier systems.

    49. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Though my personal favorite is to tearup a parking lot replace it with a parting garage with half the car slots.

      I have to call bullshit on that one. I've never seen or heard of replacing a lot with a garage of fewer spaces over the same area.

      But the big thing about garages is people hate to circle endlessly, have to go to stairwells (which people perceive as a security risk) or walk around and find the only elevator in the place (harder than it sounds if you are half a level off from it and there are never safe places to walk in a garage). If garages had markings to the elevators, had elevators on opposite corners, rather than just one, and had sensors and signs to indicate empty spaces and what levels those empty spaces are on, then I think people would like the more. I know here, in Anchorage, the city will receive complaints of a "full" garage because people don't want to park on the roof, and people complaining about parking spaces when there is 50% or less occupancy in the garages (and the garages are not more expensive than meters) because the meters are full.

    50. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      In the UK at least, parking prices are high to encourage the use of public transport. The pricing insures that it is cheaper to take the bus than drive into town.

    51. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by drukawski · · Score: 0

      If your sole goal was to break the meter why not just put super glue on a card you don't mind losing, shove it in the machine and leave it?
      Your essentially defacing the meter regardless of which way you do it, but with the latter you need neither a specific type of card, nor the specific vulnerability in the OS for it to work.

    52. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by aaandre · · Score: 1

      Applying monetary solutions to all problems seems a little too simplistic, no?

      Making undesirable activities expensive is just one possibility.

    53. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by aaandre · · Score: 1

      And, where did cities get revenue from before installing meters on most available spaces? Could this have anything with greed?

    54. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      The fault is not with the hackers pointing out the screw up by the city and meter manufacturer.

      Whatever happened to the concept of using a level of security that is appropriate for the task? And personal responsibility?

      You consider it a 'screwup' because the city and the manufacturer didn't use 4k-bit triple-DES system redundantly encoded by Blowfish or (insert your favorite unhackable encryption system here), for a transaction that ranges from twenty five cents to a dollar? It's their fault that someone broke the law and actually went to the trouble to get out of paying a handful of change for parking?

      Humanity collectivly hiding our heads in the sand and pretending there is a locked door when clearly there is no door at all, let alone a lockable one, does not security make.

      And spouting hyperbole to support illegal activity does not an intelligent argument make.

      Get some perspective here. It isn't worth the effort and cost to apply NATO-SECRET levels of encryption to a simple parking meter. Yeah, some people are going to break the law by hacking the meters, but it is still THEIR FAULT for breaking the law, not the fault of the city that didn't harden the system against nuclear attack.

      If you want to be upset at someone, be upset at the city for spending your taxes on some magical beans ...

      You know how much money the city spent on "magical beans" to prevent people from jay-walking? Zero. Is it the fault of the city that someone got hit by a car, or even disrupted traffic, by jay-walking, or is it the fault of the person who broke the law and jay-walked?

      How much money did the city spend on "magical beans" to prevent someone from speeding? Same answer. None. (No, detection of people who speed is not the same as preventing it from happening. Oh, wait, they installed 'sleeping policemen' in some places.) I guess it's the fault of the city that someone breaks the law by speeding because the city didn't spend enough to prevent them.

      If you break the law by hacking a parking meter, there is nobody responsible for breaking the law other than yourself. If you figure out how to break the law and then help others to do it, too, you are still responsible.

      It is this style of "hacking" that gives real hackers a bad name in the eyes of the public.

    55. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Maybe the tragedy of the commons problem isn't so bad after all. Maybe we should just reduce parking enforcement to the barest minimum - have a guy with a piece of chalk walk around marking tires - pay his salary from the property taxes of the stores along his route. If a car is in place for more than a couple of days, tow it. Leave it at that and forget about all the expense - monetary and socially - of massively complex and invasive enforcement systems.

      You might want to read Don Shoup's The High Cost of Free Parking before you go advocating that position widely. Turns out, we know quite a bit about what happens with different street parking regulation approaches.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    56. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Ironica · · Score: 1

      You're not positioned properly. Line up the body of your motorcycle with the edge of the induction loop, so that the maximum amount of metal is above the maximum area of wire. Then you'll be detected.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    57. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Ironica · · Score: 1

      I'd have to disagree with you. Doesn't matter what the person did while they were alive, a rotting body still stinks up the place.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    58. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Parking meters are for allocating parking. What is near your work? What used to be? For example, if you work in an office building with its own parking that is semi-inconvenient, parking meters may have been installed because employees were using up all the street parking instead of parking off-street, and short-term visits (clients, vendors, deliveries) were having to park off-street or very far away. That's an inefficient use of parking; the most convenient parking should be allocated to short-term uses, while less convenient parking should be used for longer duration more intensive use.

      Another possibility is that there *were* stores where you work before the building was constructed, and the parking meters haven't been removed. If that's the case, you could always ask the City if they'd consider removing them, as they no longer serve their purpose.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    59. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Ironica · · Score: 1

      [...]
      The reason for meters besides revenue collection is to control the availability of parking spots. Metered parking helps keeps store front spots open for customers. As well keeps abandoned or broken cars sitting indefinitely in good parking spots.

      Theoretically, yes. But in practice it fails. Local employees just feed the meters (which itself might be illegal but is much more difficult to enforce). Meanwhile, the people you want to attract -- new customers -- have to worry about having change or a parking card AND finding a convenient, open parking spot before they can visit your store.

      That means that the meters are underpriced. If it's cheap enough for long-term parking, the meters aren't doing their job.

      Funny thing is, local shopowners tend to get up-in-arms about installation of or price hikes on meters outside their shops. But in practice, when meters are priced correctly, customers with money to spend find it MORE convenient to shop there, and revenues go up for the businesses.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    60. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Transactions are automatically sent through the tubes... (and so are the approbation of the credit cards / debit)

    61. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Many cities around the world deploy parking meters in places where there is no lack of parking places as a form of revenue for the local authorities.

      Also parking meters are usually deployed in such a way as to eliminate all other parking alternatives (if the purpose was to make parking spaces available for those who really need it, then only some of the places would need to be made "premium" with parking meters while most spaces would remain free)

      In that circumstance, you have people circling and circling the block to get a free space, and the metered spaces stay empty. Also, you have compliance issues if only *some* spaces have meters; people will simply not realize the difference between that space and the one next to it.

      Meters are priced correctly when approximately 7% of parking spaces remain free during peak times. That's the rate at which people are likely to find a space acceptably close to their destination in one pass. Right-priced street parking not only increases business revenue (by ensuring that customers can get to the business in an efficient manner) but also reduces traffic congestion by cutting circling.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    62. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by riceboy50 · · Score: 1

      The reason for meters ... is to control the availability of parking spots

      I assert that this should be the primary purpose for parking meters, and that the revenue from them should only be used to facilitate the parking meter system. Thus, a fraction of the population smart enough to game the system is pretty irrelevant and totally consistent with freedom. I think it is similar to the specialized knowledge of locals knowing the most efficient ways to get around the city during certain hours. Are you saying that cities should rely on parking revenue to provide more money to subsidize their spending habits? The residents are already taxed to death as it is.

      --
      ~ I am logged on, therefore I am.
    63. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      I wasn't very clear - by "little disc of sheet metal," I meant a fake quarter to drop into a coin-operated meter.

      Yeah, you're the first person to think of that idea.

    64. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One is a mishap, the other is vandalism.

    65. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by mathfeel · · Score: 1

      I used to live in SF. From the point of view of the city, it's a big stream of revenue. I heard that parking fee/limit is enforced even on Sunday now. From the point of view of the driver, I am not sure if paying for parking is that big of a deal. The hardest part is find a damn parking spot in the first place. A parking meter is still a lot cheaper than parking garages in the city.

      Of course, until this technique become prevalence even for some non-techies (say, they can buy hacked RFID card on ebay), I am not sure the city would see it as an issue. Of course, they can probably prosecute who they caught with tempering government property? Not sure. Regardless, maybe someone in the city government should include a reasonable non-hackable warranty clause when they make future acquisition....Who am I kidding? This is SF city hall we are talking about.

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    66. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by peragrin · · Score: 1

      There are three separate proposals in my home city that do just that. One of them wants to turn one big parking lot that is perfect for the small haborfest, and numerous other water front sports and races that are held annually with a marina, condos, and one parking garage, taking away all the free open space that boat trailers and cars can currently use. Such parking spaces are also used as parking for area restaurants as there is no other real parking.

      In another proposal they want to tear down a couple of old building and a parking garage to build a train and bus station. Then to attract people to the station they want to build a theater there. Of course since all this is downtown there is no parking nearby, except for the old garage they want to tear down. The reason many urban cities fail int he UASA, is because they are unaccessible to any one who doesn't live there.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    67. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I wish that city centers just had a giant ring of parking garages on the perimeter and no cars allowed beyond that point.
      The trouble with that is while trains and busses work ok for people travelling light they don't work so well for those who need to bring lots of stuff with them.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    68. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was thinking that you take a lot that has 100 spaces, rip it up, and replace it with a garage taking the entirity of the same space with 50 spaces. Instead, you are talking about taking an empty lot, ripping it up, and replacing it with a restaurant and losing spaces.

    69. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Many cities around the world deploy parking meters in places where there is no lack of parking places as a form of revenue for the local authorities.

      Perhaps cities should stop using taxpayer money on parking in the first place. "Free" parking isn't really free, you know. One study found that a parking space at UCLA costs $124 per space per month (in 1994 dollars) in maintenance and amortization. That's $179 in 2009 dollars.

      Parking revenue is maximized when parking is priced to maintain 85% occupancy at all times. If there are a lot of available spaces, the price is too high, and the city loses money. If the parking lot is full, the price is too low, and the city loses money.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    70. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Don't think so. A lot of that book is about the externalities of car ownership, and availability of free parking isn't going to change that. The author's own analogies are badly flawed - free parking does not cause car ownership in the way free gasoline would cause excessive driving. Cars do not exist to park, but gasoline exists to drive. Its clear from the reviews that the book does not even consider the big brother implications of the escalation of parking enforcement.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    71. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by natehoy · · Score: 1

      True, but if the hackers don't raise awareness of this, other cities will also spend millions of dollars on the same broken system. So in addition to letting San Francisco know they wasted millions on an easily-hacked system, the hackers are also warning other cities not to waste money on it.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    72. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "As they should, since bicycles are suppose to go on the road, not the sidewalk."

      It should not be that way, though, in this day in age. Just too dangerous to have these slow moving things on the same roads that are filled with big, heavy, fast moving cars with people that are in a hurry.

      They back up traffic going too slow...and you just can't see them when driving. I've almost killed a couple of bicyclists on the roads in the past years....and "I" try to look for single riders since I tend to often ride a motorcycle myself...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    73. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there would be enough people hacking the system to really make much of a difference. IF you have only two or three dozen hackers out there who are doing it, then it's not going to cause a system meltdown (financially). 99% of all people out there aren't going to be walking around with an oscilloscope, hooking up to parking meters, then having the proper equipment and intelligence in order to make fake cards. If the city actually does raise taxes in order to fight such an issue, then all it is is an excuse to get more money from the people for reasons that don't even exist.

    74. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      How do people who live in places where a lot of people don't have a car get around that? Get a taxi/rent a truck? Not ever carry large amounts of things?

    75. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      I live in the UK, more specifically in the outskirts of London. In my area the paid parking places are the ones closest to the train station (which is not even in the local high street) while places further out are uncontrolled. There are no significant commercial or industrial areas close to the paid parking zones. My only conclusion is that the paid parking is designed to catch those people (from far off areas where public transportation coverage is not as good) driving to the station to catch the train.

      How is this supposed to promote using of public transportation (if one's going to have to pay for parking, one might as well drive all the way to central London) is beyond me.

    76. Re:Parking Meter Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Costco corporate cafeteria still takes cash. I don't know if you'd consider them a 'large company', but with 70 billion in revenue, I sure would.

  2. Portable Oscilloscope? by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Yes. I work in a place that has many of these that you can sign out from the property cage.

    2. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Geez, at those prices, wouldn't it be cheaper to just pay for the damn parking card???

    3. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A portable oscilloscope is the easiest solution, but you can build a small logic analyzer yourself from parts that every electronics hacker has in their toy box. Snooping on the communication between a host and a smart card is not rocket science, especially if there are no hardware mechanisms isolating the smart card from the outside while the card is in use.

    4. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by TheP4st · · Score: 1

      Sure if it only is for your self it probably would not make that much sense to buy one of the more expensive ones but I saw a USB one going for 72$, seem quite a reasonable investment for unlimited parking to me. And, if you start massproducing cards and selling them for let's say 5 buck a pop it should not take long before you do break even on a fluke 225.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    5. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by TheP4st · · Score: 1

      Should have been 25 buck a pop and Fluke 125.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    6. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by Pinckney · · Score: 1

      Make up for it by making and selling bottomless parking cards.

    7. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by RichardJenkins · · Score: 1

      Only for the person who gathers and distributes the data, and only then if he doesn't already own one.

    8. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Saves a lot of money until you get caught with the counterfeiting equipment.

      I'm sure eventually the city will notice the discrepancy and figure out what's going on and investigate.

      Guess where will the money come to pay to fix the meters (even if it's just changing a couple lines of code it will not be inexpensive).

    9. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      I don't think you need it every time, just to figure out how the thing worked. The way it works doesn't really surprise me, municipalities take this amazing technology, apply bad practices, lowest common denominator stuff, and use horrendous security at an inflated cost for not much benefit.

      --
      I hate sigs.
    10. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Saves a lot of money until you get caught with the counterfeiting equipment.

      I'm sure eventually the city will notice the discrepancy and figure out what's going on and investigate.

      Guess where will the money come to pay to fix the meters (even if it's just changing a couple lines of code it will not be inexpensive).

      Also script kiddies, don't forget what will happen to your asshole.
      Of course some of you might be looking forward to that.
      Not that there's anything wrong with that.
      To each his own.

    11. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by twistah · · Score: 1

      Please tell me you don't seriously think they did this to get away with not paying for parking.

    12. Re:Portable Oscilloscope? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I very much doubt it was bought specially for this.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  3. The usual solution by drgould · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The usual bureacratic solution in a case like this is to make it illegal to hook-up oscilloscopes to parking meters in San Francisco.

    1. Re:The usual solution by n1ckml007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sir is that an oscilloscope in your pocket... ?

    2. Re:The usual solution by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sir! Put down the oscilloscope and back away....slowly....

    3. Re:The usual solution by kimvette · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sir, do you have a concealed oscilloscope permit?

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    4. Re:The usual solution by chill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looking at the pictures of how they accomplished that, including disassembling the parking meter and removing epoxy by dipping parts in heated fumeric acid... I'm fairly certain what he did was already illegal. It isn't as if the parking meters come with external JTAG points or something.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    5. Re:The usual solution by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      in a sinusoidal manner

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    6. Re:The usual solution by Shrike82 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "What's that Billy? Trespassers? Get my oscilloscope from above the fireplace!"

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    7. Re:The usual solution by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Just cut one off like Paul Newman in Cool Hand Luke and take it home with you. When you're done, dump it someplace. No one's the wiser. OTOH, you could move away from San Francisco and enjoy free parking in most of the rest of the country.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    8. Re:The usual solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It occurs to me that things didn't work out so well for Cool Hand Luke in that movie.... what's next advice on faking insanity to get an easy sentence as in One Flew Over the Cukoo's Nest?

    9. Re:The usual solution by chill · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know that is how a criminal would handle it. Thanks for the reference. I couldn't remember which movie.

      And I'm in Chicago. Don't talk to me about parking meters! Ugh!

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    10. Re:The usual solution by Daley_G · · Score: 3, Informative

      I first read of this on some other site where it explains they bought various meters off ebay. At that point, nothing illegal was done as they owned the meters they were experimenting on. Granted, there was no money to be gained by doing this, but exploiting the vulnerability is probably worth quite a bit - to someone.

    11. Re:The usual solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The paper lists many attack vectors which could be used against more advanced meters. Hacking the San Francisco system required only a smart card "shim", which extends the contacts to a legitimate card outside the meter, and a portable oscilloscope or logic analyzer for recording the communication between the meter and the legitimate card. The trivial protocol was then implemented on a programmable smart card. This is in reach of most electronic hobbyists and requires no dangerous materials or tools.

    12. Re:The usual solution by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      In San Francisco you can only open carry your "oscilloscope".

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    13. Re:The usual solution by Bright+Apollo · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm just glad to see you.

    14. Re:The usual solution by Missing_dc · · Score: 1

      In San Francisco you can only open carry your "oscilloscope".

      Only if it is unloaded* and you can expect people to flip out, call the cops and to have your "oscilloscope" forcefully checked to see if it is loaded.

      *You can have the batteries displayed next to it and ready to load though

      --
      How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
    15. Re:The usual solution by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

      >>The usual bureacratic solution in a case like this is to make it illegal to hook-up oscilloscopes to parking meters in San Francisco.

      And make the minimum punishment 5 years in jail and %50,000 fine. After all, they do have cameras everywhere, right? It is just a matter of paying someone to sift through the video until they spot the guy doing this, then arrest him.

      While I understand that this system's not very secure, I don't know if I think attempting to make it perfectly secure is worth it when the above is good enough. No matter what system they put in place, eventually a way around it could be found. In this case, preventing the crime versus punishing the criminal doesn't seem to make sense.

    16. Re:The usual solution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      *You can have the batteries displayed next to it and ready to load though

      Not in California.

      For those who don't get it, in the state we're talking about, if you have the ammo next to it and ready to load it's considered loaded. Nice try though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:The usual solution by nagnamer · · Score: 1

      In San Francisco you can only open carry your "oscilloscope".

      You mean to tell me you can't carry your friend's "oscilloscope"?

      --
      Every harsh word you utter has the right address. It only sounds harsh because the one on the envelope is the wrong one.
    18. Re:The usual solution by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      Not according to People v. Clark.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    19. Re:The usual solution by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I really just want to know what a police would do should he come across someone with a freakin oscilloscope hanging off the side of a parking meter, and shoving cards in and out, recording data.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    20. Re:The usual solution by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      No, it's an ocelot, you insensitive clod!

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    21. Re:The usual solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whistles while backing away slowly*

      (look at a recording of a whistle in time or frequency-domain and compare to a sine wave)

  4. "other people are probably already doing it" by Hebbinator · · Score: 1

    "It wasn't technically complicated and the fact that I can do it in three days means that other people are probably already doing it and probably taking advantage of it"

    Is it just me, or is this like a nationally publicized "Hey guys, try this!" The article lacks the detail to replicate this guy's code, but the other methods he used are all there. Would it have been better to have a system with a few hackers taking advantage and skipping some parking fees, versus a now-comprimised system (or one that begs to be comprimised by publicity and the copy-cat nature of hackers and hacker upstarts) that may be rendered useless? Now there are 23000 meters in San Fran that may need to get new software..

    1. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it better for cities to rely on such stupid pieces of low-bidder refuse for tools like parking meters and US passports? (http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=540) Most RFID implementations simply are not secure: they're typically no more reliable than a barcode, which is also easily spoofed.

      And sadly, it's the fault of both the technology (which remains limited by budget marketing to very simply devices) and by inabilities to agree on updates to their encryption and authentication techologies (look up 'new encryption standards for RFID' on Google for references). The infighting among the vendors is horrible, and is delaying improved technologies.

    2. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by ComputerDruid · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or isn't that the point? Then it will be fixed for everyone, which is fair. Isn't that what the Black Hat conf is about?

    3. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Would it have been better to have a system with a few hackers taking advantage and skipping some parking fees, versus a now-comprimised system

      Stupid knowledge! You just ruin it for everyone. If only we'd be more ignorant and stick our heads in the sand there would be no problem.

      Did you ever think that someone beyond curious hackers looking for a few free hours of parking might be interested in this? Like say.. criminals selling counterfeit parking cards at 1/3 the price?

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      Wiki entry on "Full Disclosure" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure/

    5. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by solevita · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article lacks the detail to replicate this guy's code

      That's what you get for reading the press release... Here is the original site; here is the code.

    6. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by TheP4st · · Score: 1

      Now there are 23000 meters in San Fran that may need to get new software..

      A valuable lesson they will learn from. Hopefully.

      Would it have been better to have a system with a few hackers taking advantage and skipping some parking fees, versus a now-comprimised system (or one that begs to be comprimised by publicity and the copy-cat nature of hackers and hacker upstarts) that may be rendered useless?

      Only the harshest of lessons work with stupidity on such a grand scale.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    7. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by Acer500 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it better for cities to rely on such stupid pieces of low-bidder refuse for tools like parking meters and US passports?

      Erm... one is not like the other... I don't think that parking meters require the highest level of protection possible. Passports, OTOH...

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    8. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by DissociativeBehavior · · Score: 0

      The security is in the passport, not the reader or the transport layer. There is an international standard for passport. The smartcard must also be certified before it can be used in a passport.

    9. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      You mean I could buy an unlimited parking card for 1/3 the price of... whatever it is 1/3 the price of, without the hassle of fucking with the hardware myself?! SIGN ME UP!!

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    10. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by billcopc · · Score: 1

      The code has been "sanitized", meaning some details were deliberately changed to prevent people from blindy replicating the hack, otherwise every geek would quit their job and start selling hacked parking passes on street corners.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    11. Re:"other people are probably already doing it" by lazn · · Score: 1

      Security through obscurity is not security.. They should have written secure software in the first place.

      Or are you saying in a different but similar vein that someone like Microsoft has no imperative to make secure code and it isn't their job to fix vulnerabilities in their code either?

  5. Dangerous game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While there may not be a way to prevent this, are you sure that it can't be detected? After all, it's your car with your license plate that's standing in front of such a fraudulently paid meter for hours. It's certainly better to build some security into the hardware, but this seems like an application where enforcement has a realistic chance of catching people who exploit the system.

    1. Re:Dangerous game by blueskies · · Score: 1

      How do you know it was fraudulently paid?

    2. Re:Dangerous game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Update the firmware on the meters and make them check for card properties which were not used in the original protocol. How does a legitimate card react to a wrong password? Does the timing match that of a legitimate card, not just the more lenient protocol limits? Plausibility: If there is a serial number, keep a count of the value of the last 100 or so cards and check that it is not reset when you see a card again and that the value does not exceed the maximum value of a legitimate card. You could even equip a small percentage of the meters with a better card reader which detects cards that don't have the original color signature.

  6. how can this help us by onepoint · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I RTFA, and I have to admit, I liked the hack, I only hope that they do fix it, otherwise it will always be employee's of the stores that have parking and people shopping will not have access to the stores.

    I really do hate it when people hog a meter all day, paying for daily parking in certain towns is just way out of control.

    Now if the hack is really as simple as presented in the 60+ page report, the black market for this is huge, selling 999.00 cards for $50.00 a pop, I know of at least 100 buyers, and if marketed correctly, the entire business district will be a net loss for those towns whom don't execute a plan quickly.

    Before anyone talks about the 3 million in savings, Please note, that's just the theft that the meter people were pocketing. What should happen is that the long term savings should increase by the labor savings, please see past example of easy-pass toll system of NY & NJ, where within 2 weeks rush-hour was reduced by 25 to 50 minutes and toll takers were reduced by 1 or 2 people per exit.

    --
    if you see me, smile and say hello.
    1. Re:how can this help us by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      otherwise it will always be employee's of the stores that have parking and people shopping will not have access to the stores.

      Huh?

      Do you mind explaining the part about people not having access to the stores because only employees will have the hack, or something?

      Don't you think that maybe after the first few days when the parking enforcement notices that they have collected NO money from the parking meters that they might start monitoring a little more closely? Or maybe after, as you say, "people shopping" no longer "have access to the stores"? The store owners might get suspicious when nobody shows up to shop.

      So, between the parking meter collections suddenly dropping to zero and the stores suddenly becoming ghost towns that someone might get suspicious?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:how can this help us by onepoint · · Score: 1

      >>the parking meter collections suddenly dropping to zero and the stores suddenly becoming ghost towns that someone might get suspicious.

      it's government employees, they don't notice anything. and if they do, they file a report that no one reads.

      >>Do you mind explaining the part about people not having access to the stores because only employees will have the hack, or something?

      If you have ever owned a store front property, you know that parking and walk-by traffic is a major factor in the investment, car spots that are used by the same person all day keep people from getting to your store, and over time, the general public starts thinking "I won't go there, I can never find a spot". I saw it happen in a badly designed area, and every building owner on those 2 block would ask themselves why they did not have enough business. It's just a case of a cursed area. what started the change in that area was the suggestion of free employee parking 2 blocks away, which over 6 months helped a lot and improved the volume of business.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    3. Re:how can this help us by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      except the parking meter collections missing won't really be noticed. The cards are prepaid, and as far as the city knows
      the money is already in their account. there is nothing for them to collect at the meter, other than the audit log telling how many people parked at it. the city won't necessarily know that the card used to pay for the parking was a fake. they will just see that 75 cards were used to pay for parking but they had only sold 35. my understanding from the article is that the cards themselves hold the balance that is left on them and that internal balance is deducted (on a legitimate card) when told to do so by the meter.

    4. Re:how can this help us by Kerrany · · Score: 1

      > otherwise it will always be employee's of the stores that have parking and people shopping will not have access to the stores.

      I call bullshit from personal experience and logic.

      Logic: Right now, if an employee wants that spot, they can pay the meter and take it. If they're really that unscrupulous they can take the spot, get a ticket, not pay the ticket, and drive off laughing maniacally if it suits them.

      Personal experience: You know what keeps employees from taking up the spots in front of the stores they work in? Bosses. Back in the day in that first computer shop I ever worked at in Small Town, USA, my boss made us move our cars. He was very concerned about people blocking up store parking, and refused to park his own car there. The street was absolutely free to park in, but the only people who parked there were customers. Us employees were more concerned with making sure we made money off the customers than denying them access, because our paychecks came from those people. As far as I could tell, this policy was nigh universal on that street and throughout the downtown area where parking was scarce.

      --
      I'm just here for the pie.
    5. Re:how can this help us by Ironica · · Score: 1

      otherwise it will always be employee's of the stores that have parking and people shopping will not have access to the stores.

      Huh?

      Do you mind explaining the part about people not having access to the stores because only employees will have the hack, or something?

      Sure, everyone will have the hack... but the employees get there before the customers. Hence, all the parking spaces are taken already.

      Don't you think that maybe after the first few days when the parking enforcement notices that they have collected NO money from the parking meters that they might start monitoring a little more closely?

      But the meters are "collecting revenue." It will take a lot longer for people to notice, because they have to notice they're collecting more revenue at the meter than they are selling onto the smart cards. (The meter is paid by deducting from a smart card inserted into it; you are supposed to have to load the card by paying actual money to someone, but the hackers found a way around that part.)

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  7. i wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    i wonder what kind of attacks would be possible after the city has replaced the meter software by software which actually uses a cryptographic method, like a challenge/response method between the meter and the card...

    any ideas?

  8. Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not sure how normal that is in the bay area. To see some guy in a DeCSS tshirt hooking an O-scope to a parking meter.

    Seriously, how did they achieve *that*? Flat ribbon cable between the card and the meter?

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  9. l0pht by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For reference, Joe Grand is one of the members of the l0pht hacker group that were announced to be making a comeback [url=http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/07/26/167251/Hacker-Group-L0pht-Making-a-Comeback?art_pos=1]here[/url]

    1. Re:l0pht by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For reference, Slashdot uses HTML, not BBCode, for its comments.

  10. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by Canazza · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He was probably wearing a high-vis jacket and wearing heavy leather gloves. He'd have looked like an ordinary electrician. If anyone asks he was 'reparing' the meter.

    --
    It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
  11. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by Vovk · · Score: 1

    i read TFA and it says that they have a custom built shim in between the card and the reader.

  12. security through obscurity by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cool? I dunno, it's pretty simple really. Here's the C source code for the hack. Basically he's just programming a smart card with a value of $999.99, and then asking the meter for the password, which it seems more than happy to provide for some reason.

    IOW, the meters are simply using security through obscurity, which is the same as no security at all.

    1. Re:security through obscurity by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      s/meter/card

      You need a good parking pass.

    2. Re:security through obscurity by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I amazed things keep doing this shoddy security, even while claiming to be secure. Security is inconvenient, both for users and developers, which is why it keeps being bypassed. Sometimes I've seen more effort put into countermeasures against reverse engineering (epoxy over the contact points) rather than design in better security in the first place.

  13. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you click the second link in the summary your question will be answered...

    To record the communication between the card and the meter, Grand purchased a smartcard shim -- an electrical connector that duplicates a smartcard's contact points -- and used an oscilloscope to record the electrical signals as the card and meter communicated. /blockquot

  14. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by value_added · · Score: 5, Funny

    He was probably wearing a high-vis jacket and wearing heavy leather gloves. He'd have looked like an ordinary electrician. If anyone asks he was 'reparing' the meter.

    San Francisco may be different, but I'd imagine that in most cities, if someone was seen beating a parking meter with a baseball bat, people passing by would nod approvingly, or perhaps cheer.

  15. 10 spaces away by surmak · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Monopoly just remember what is 10 spaces away from free parking (actually, in either direction). Something tells me that those who try this "Free Parking" trick may well end up rolling a pair of fives on their next move.

    Do not pass go, do not collect $200.

    1. Re:10 spaces away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that if you beat the police in Monopoly, you're only ten spaces away from payday.

    2. Re:10 spaces away by barzok · · Score: 1

      But 10 spaces before Free Parking, you're only visiting, you're not locked up.

    3. Re:10 spaces away by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      It's $200 in your game? The version I have makes it 4000!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  16. Oscilloscopes in San Francisco? Oh, Great... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Can't wait for the trends to start: half the populace will be covering them in WD-40 and sticking them up their ass, and the rest will be basing a new religion around them, tattooing sine waves onto their foreheads.

  17. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by langelgjm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Indeed, that sort of social engineering is all about looking the part.

    I once knew someone who was able to swipe an unused payphone in broad daylight at lunchtime on a busy strip with lots of outdoor seating. The trick? Navy blue pants, blue "repairman" style shirt, a tool bag, and looking like you are supposed to be doing what you are doing.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  18. We have those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The City of Tallahassee has those "smart" parking meters with smartcard readers. Of course, the City has never announced any plans to offer parking smartcards.

    It would be useless. The City's parking enforcement staff do close to nothing, so meters are considered free parking.

  19. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by srollyson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Small town, not much to do in the evenin'.

  20. Anyone could do it?? Don't think so.. by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "To get a closer look at the chips on the cards, researchers used acetone to remove the pastic surrounding them, put them in a small vial of heated fuming nitric acid, rinsed them in acetone and then placed them in a ceramic package for probing."

    Err ,yeah, I do that sort of thing every day in my kitchen!

    Lets be honest , "anyone" is a relative term here - anyone whos a whizz with low level logica gate analysis plus knows some chemistry and has access to occiliscopes etc may be able to do it - a normal office guy like me can't. Perhaps a bit too much false modesty on the part of the article author.

    1. Re:Anyone could do it?? Don't think so.. by nagnamer · · Score: 1

      Lets be honest , "anyone" is a relative term here - anyone whos a whizz with low level logica gate analysis plus knows some chemistry and has access to occiliscopes etc may be able to do it - a normal office guy like me can't. Perhaps a bit too much false modesty on the part of the article author.

      It's not like everyone has to make their own. You can always have one or two such guys produce multiple cards that a interested sponsor may pay for.

      --
      Every harsh word you utter has the right address. It only sounds harsh because the one on the envelope is the wrong one.
    2. Re:Anyone could do it?? Don't think so.. by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      a normal office guy like me can't

      Whether you think you can or you can't, you're right. - Henry Ford

  21. Unfair and misleading headline by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    The headline makes it sound like hackers are routinely scamming the system, but there is no indication of this whatsoever in the article. It is improper of /. to impugn these guys when all they have done is demonstrate the vulnerability.

  22. Finding a space. by bezenek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having a hacked card is of no use if one cannot find a parking space. Most people who have attempted to park in SF know the time wasted finding a space is usually worth more than the cost of the parking.

    Nevertheless, hacking the system is interesting.

    -Todd

    --
    Omne ignotum pro magnifico.
  23. Can This Technique Be Applied To The Payment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of U.S. state and federal taxes? This question presumes the
    U.S. has NOT collapsed.

    Yours In Evasion,
    Kilgore Trout

  24. The meter pays for... by tepples · · Score: 1

    If it's just to keep people from staying in a space too long, there's no need to charge, just have a timer hooked up to a proximity sensor of some kind (maybe like the ones at traffic lights), which activates a camera.

    The meter pays for the proximity sensor and the monitoring to exclude false positives.

    Just have something people can swipe their credit cards

    Credit card companies tend to charge a prohibitive percentage for small transactions.

    1. Re:The meter pays for... by blincoln · · Score: 3, Informative

      Credit card companies tend to charge a prohibitive percentage for small transactions.

      Seattle seems to have worked out a deal with them. All of the parking meters here accept credit cards.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    2. Re:The meter pays for... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Seattle seems to have worked out a deal with them. All of the parking meters here accept credit cards.

      Some of the time perhaps. Last time I was in Seattle, I tried out that system. Worked one time out of three (in Ballard). The card just wouldn't register. The one time I didn't have any change, I got ticketed. I sent a note in my little payment envelope and haven't heard back from them, but it points out the issue of using semi complex technology without graceful fall backs or even significant testing.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:The meter pays for... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Credit card companies tend to charge a prohibitive percentage for small transactions.

      I'm sure that's negotiable.

      For instance, I've bought a postage stamp online (to print out) for about £0.60, and was able to pay by credit card but not debit card. (I don't know what the minimum spend was, I have normal stamps for mail within the country, I only go online for parcels or international mail.)

    4. Re:The meter pays for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I wonder if a transaction can combine multiple cards numbers.
      So a metre could just perform one or two transactions a day.

    5. Re:The meter pays for... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      If the goal is to keep people from loitering so that new business can get into the stores, then the stores should pay for it.

      It's convenient for me to park somewhere for as long as I damn well please. I understand that that is sub-optimal for others, but I find it kind of rude to demand I not linger and pay for the privilege. Why should I have to pay for something that benefits others at my expense?

      Now, if the goal is revenue, then be honest about it, and leave out the time limit. I'm sure there are dozens of schemes which generate more revenue than the typical meter pricing and time limits schemes. Again, technology has made some things cheap that wouldn't even have been thought of as options just a few decades ago. It's important to constantly evaluate goals and assess whether the current system is just carrying on on inertia or really is the best we can do at the moment (which I define as maximizing whatever the goal is while minimizing the liberty sacrificed.)

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  25. Mythbusters by MoreDruid · · Score: 1

    The Mythbusters are located in San Francisco so I can only assume they are used to geeky types doing weird stuff

    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  26. TFA, mostly wrong on the details by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TFA, kiinda ludicrous.

    First of all, how do you hook up an oscilloscope to a parking meter without disassembling it?

    Then, what could you get from that that you could not get just by reading the card stripe with a $29 card reader?

    One suspects this "black hat" just read a valid card on a card reader, swiped it in a parking meter, then re-read the card and noted the changes.

    In any case, since it's unlikely that the parking meters are networked, all he had to do was clone a good card and he's set.

    No oscilloscopes or trickery needed.

    1. Re:TFA, mostly wrong on the details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First of all, how do you hook up an oscilloscope to a parking meter without disassembling it?

      Then, what could you get from that that you could not get just by reading the card stripe with a $29 card reader?

      Read TFPDF in TFA.

      1) Digital scopes are lightweight and portable. He used a shim between the card and its contacts.

      2) It wasn't a magstripe-based card. It was a smartcard. Gold-plated electrical contacts.

      3) A digital 'scope isn't that far removed from a logic analyzer, and he was able to record the handshake between the card and the meter. He discovered that only a few bytes of that handshake ever changed during the transaction. On a stored-value card, if only a few bytes change per transaction, and they change predictably, it's pretty obvious what those bytes are going to be for.

    2. Re:TFA, mostly wrong on the details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, do yourself a favor and read the details in their presentation. The system uses smartcards, *not* magnetic stripes. A smartcard shim was used between the card and meter to monitor the communications.

  27. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by cfa22 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Back in the 90's in Berkeley (across the bay from SF) they had serious problems with people hacksawing the meters right off their posts and lobbing them into the bay. There is apparently more than one way to hack parking meters to get free parking.

  28. Drawing attention to the problem by russotto · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the hackers, having figured out how to rig the meters, set up their own meters at a few places in the city. With them they place large signs "Hacker Parking Only, Everyone Else $1,000,000". One day they notice a Porsche 959 pull up to the meter. A somewhat geeky looking man in his mid-50s gets out, looks at the sign, places a card in the meter, and it flips over to "2 hours paid". One of the hackers then walks up to the man and says "Hey, Bill Gates! I knew you started out as a hacker but I didn't know you still kept in the game!". And Gates says "What hack? I just paid the meter".

    1. Re:Drawing attention to the problem by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't get it. Did Gates hack it? Did he think he hadn't paid?

    2. Re:Drawing attention to the problem by Huge_UID · · Score: 1

      Neither. He paid & knew it.

    3. Re:Drawing attention to the problem by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Oh hell, I read him as saying "What the heck? I just paid the meter." I'm failing at reading comprehension lately. Now I get it, hahaha.

  29. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

    Compared to other things I've seen in the Bay Area, a guy with an o-scope attached to a parking meter would be pretty damn tame.

    --
    What?
  30. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by himself · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I geocache in downtown I just carry a metal folding clipboard and write notes if I need "cover" in an exposed area. Taking down (useless, made-up) numbers from a tape measure helped once when two guys were watching me too closely. :7)

    I have read of some cachers who keep a high-vis yellow vest in their bag just for situations like this, and I myself once saw a guy wearing one go right into the edge of a construction zone to take tourist photos. (I could tell he probably wasn't employed by the site because he wandered from there right over to a gondola tied up in front of the local mall and shot off some pictures of it, and the flowers, and.... :7)

  31. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone want to steal a pay phone?

  32. city funding by kz45 · · Score: 0, Troll

    And people wonder why California is going bankrupt?

    I hope the "black-hat hackers" that are stealing city funds by not paying the parking meter also do not expect the state to also pay for things like health care.

    A few people getting free parking is one thing, but giving out an instruction manual which may result in lots of revenue being taken away from the city is another.

    1. Re:city funding by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Publicizing the hack is what will get it fixed, so that others aren't able to exploit it anymore.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  33. Criminals Steal Free Parking in San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fixed that for ya.

  34. Societies depend on trust by Improv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not feasable to make every part of society completely bulletproof, societal trust is part of many areas of this. People keep the trust because they are supposed to and because it'd be a big hassle to do otherwise.

    In a neighbourhood, one neighbour may have a shed she doesn't want you playing around in. She might tie it shut with a rope, use a padlock, or even an electronic lock, depending on how much she cares. None of this is meant as a challenge - untying the rope, picking the lock, or messing with the electronic lock are all within the capabilities of some people. It's not cute to say "Your lock was not good enough, that's why I was in your shed".

    I've read 2600 for years (it's sometimes interesting when one can get past the juvenile attitude), and know people in the community. The standard preface of "I am just doing this for intellectual curiosity and do not laud nor do things like this" is more legal covering of asses than anything else. In some areas maybe we can't rely entirely on societal trust and it's accidentally helpful to have people prodding at these systems, but they're still a nuisance and I would not trust the community in general to use that knowledge responsibly. I've known too many people who have bad attitude towards society in general and who would take these things as far as they can for personal benefit.

    Being clever is great. Being clever in ways that hurt society is not.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Societies depend on trust by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      Discerning the inner workings of an electronic parking meter is one thing. Using that knowledge to park for free is no different from fooling a coin slot with a slug (ah, the lost art of physical craftsmanship).

      This is just petty crime with a dab of "Hey, everybody, lookit how smart I am". Okay. Wow, you got free parking. Nice work, tool.

  35. Another Hack For Meters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I usually buy the $5 cards, and pick up the cards people have throw away on the ground. If you break the card in half so the Chip is still on the one side, and the extruded side after inserting is not accessible. You can place the card in a meter and after about a minute the meter will go into an out of service mode, and makes the card hard to remove. In this out of service mode you can not get ticketed, since it is a broken meter. You may additionally place super glue on the card so the machine has to be taken apart to be fixed. I am waiting for someone to take out an entire street with this concept.

    P.S. I found this out by mistake, and do not suggest legally anyone doing this.

    1. Re:Another Hack For Meters by c_jonescc · · Score: 1

      here in Philly it's possible to get a ticket if you're found to 'too frequently' happen to be parked at broken meters. the assumption is that you're a vandal. if those broken meters happened to actually be vandalized, you may find yourself having a longer conversation than a parking ticket. http://www.philly.com/dailynews/columnists/stu_bykofsky/45599557.html

      --
      Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
    2. Re:Another Hack For Meters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hmmm, This makes me want to target people that I dont like by breaking the meters there are at. Like professors, and bad advisers.

  36. I'd rather say: by Domini · · Score: 1

    "Crackers Get Free Parking In San Francisco"

    1. Re:I'd rather say: by hercubus · · Score: 1

      "Crackers Get Free Parking In San Francisco"

      So, free parking for Jeff Foxworthy, Bill Engvall, Ron White, Larry the Cable Guy...

      I kid, I kid...

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
  37. be careful, don't end up like crunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Research or not, the powers that be don't take kindly to this kind of thing...

    You don't want to end up like Captain Crunch. He got caught with a bunch of bogus BART cards (he says it was his housemates) and went to prison. His back was broken by other inmates and now he is forced to find strapping young men to assist him with his physical therapy.

  38. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    That's for 1% of the population. The other 99% of passersby wouldn't give a shit (most not even noticing).

    For example, you could spend ten minutes stealing a bike with a really good lock on a busy street corner in most major cities, and the most you'd probably get is pedestrians grumbling you're blocking the sidewalk.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  39. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by blueskies · · Score: 1

    And then you get "accidentally" shot because a police officer thought you were a terrorist and he thought you were reaching for a gun.

    I'm not against what you are saying, but i'm just saying don't underestimate the stupidity of the police.

  40. disappointed by BattleApple · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hackers Get Free Parking In San Francisco

    I thought they were just going to start letting us park for free because we're so cool.

  41. outlaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When oscilloscopes are outlawed, only outlaws will have oscilloscopes.

  42. Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parking meters shouldn't have to be designed to be as secure as supermax prisons. The fact that you can hack a parking meter proves that you are an anti-social asshole with no understanding of the social contract, not that you're particularly clever.

    People who call themselves "security researchers" and claim to be provding some sort of valuable social service with their stunts are full of self-serving crap. If I go down the street throwing rocks through windows, I'm not acting as a "window-glass researcher", and I'm not providing a valuable service to society.

    Why don't you get a job doing something productive, like selling Big Macs? Or maybe learn to talk to girls?

  43. How does this differ from counterfeiting money? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Hell, you can virtually photocopy the stuff these days. If you're going to defraud people of goods and services, then you might as well go the universal route.
     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:How does this differ from counterfeiting money? by rhook · · Score: 1

      Counterfeiting money is a federal crime and will land you in pmita prison.

  44. Meters are bad for business by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

    Many businesses hate parking meters, it doesn't help their store, but it definitely keeps people from ever parking as they head off to a big box so they don't need to deal with the crap of a city nickel and diming them, as they have to consider a constantly running down meter, and the cost of even looking at one of our stores is higher than our competitor due to the meter, as well as the downtown it out of the way compared to a mall shopping plaza.

    Many businesses including my own offer to pay for your ticket if you get one when you are in the store, its about the only thing we can do besides lobby the city to get them removed, which has been successful at some stores and has improved business. In other places we have a jar of nickels which we give away free for the meter (Nickels work best so people don't take too many) Meters cost us thousands of dollars a day and probably make the city 20 bucks after the cost of collections.

    The real solution to the issues you presented are parking enforcers chalking tires, and towing cars that are parked for hours, a meter could actually keep a broken car on a street if people kept feeding it, (I have seen it) a chalker can just know its the same car that has been there all day and get it towed. It is just as effective at keeping spaces moving, but doesn't keep customers away. If there is a broken car in front of a store, you call the police and it gets removed.

    --
    Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
    1. Re:Meters are bad for business by Chabo · · Score: 1

      One of the towns in my area uses meters for the spaces immediately in front of the stores on Main Street, but then there's ample free parking within two blocks.

      Do you like this solution? Why or why not?

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    2. Re:Meters are bad for business by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Many businesses hate parking meters, it doesn't help their store, but it definitely keeps people from ever parking as they head off to a big box so they don't need to deal with the crap of a city nickel and diming them, as they have to consider a constantly running down meter, and the cost of even looking at one of our stores is higher than our competitor due to the meter, as well as the downtown it out of the way compared to a mall shopping plaza.

      Uh, yeah. Tell that to the Old Pasadena shopping district on Colorado Blvd. in Pasadena, California. When they put in meters (and dedicated the revenue to streetscape maintenance), built a couple of city-owned pay parking structures, and let any ol' business open in any appropriate space without requiring them to provide off-street parking (they pay reasonable annual in-lieu fees to offset the costs of the city-run structures), the nearby Plaza Pasadena shopping mall went OUT OF BUSINESS and was torn down. They replaced it with a more inviting open-air mall, and STILL didn't get the business they wanted until they converted the top two levels into housing.

      I'm sorry if the meters on your street are not priced correctly for demand, but when meters are used appropriately, they help businesses tremendously.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    3. Re:Meters are bad for business by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you are arguing, they put in meters, built garages, and a mall went OUT OF BUSINESS... so how did metering in this situation help matters? From your story it sounds like it hurt business, but you are advocating For meters.

      To clarify, I am not advocating for parking anarchy, I suggested parking limits of 1,2,3,4 hours depending on demand, Special pickup and dropoff zones of 15 minutes, all enforced by a parking enforcer with chalk and a revenue system based on tickets in liu of metered parking.

      Metered parking keeps people away, ticketed parking is usually not a problem as most customers don't stay for two hours, it isn't a concern, and spots keep turning over. Ticket based parking isn't any more expensive because you already need someone to check the meters and make most of the money on tickets already, just without the arbitrary quarters which don't really create much revenue anyways.

      --
      Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
    4. Re:Meters are bad for business by Ironica · · Score: 1

      No, the mall a mile away went out of business, while the street shops had a total renaissance. You were arguing that meters drive people away from high street shops and into big-box and megamalls. The opposite turns out to be the case, with effectively managed parking.

      The mall continued to have the same free parking, but it wasn't *quite* as convenient (or as pretty and fun) as the redone Old Pasadena. Nowadays, you drive down that stretch of Colorado practically anytime, and there's a ton of folks walking up and down, shopping, going to dinner, etc. It's awesome.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    5. Re:Meters are bad for business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are an old business and own quite a few 80 year old stores in downtown locations and a few newer locations in mall satellite stores. The sales numbers back me up solidly, and in the locations where parking meters were successfully retired and replaced with (questionable) modern sculptures on poles such as the location I'm at right now sales improved nicely, not a Renaissance, but a marked improvement, as our primary competitor is a chain Only located in malls.

      While I personally doubt parking meters are what caused a Renaissance it is regardless atypical for a downtown, the last word one would use is Renaissance and most downtowns went parking meter crazy decades ago, and are only now coming down off of that high.

      Also Pasadena doesn't have all the same issues we have, such as 4 foot high 5 foot wide ice banks covering the meters, surrounded by a deep dangerous brackish salt-slush. Broken hips for the elderly is a very real issue of parking meters in northern areas, and the snow becomes almost impossible to remove due to how hard packed the snowplows are able to push it into the meters.

      They only retire the meters when the meters are fully covered, otherwise the elderly are expected to somehow get through it safely. They occasionally clear the banks with heavy machinery and some cities are better than others, however there is no way that a single winter of late night snow removal is paid for by a decade's worth of quarters.

    6. Re:Meters are bad for business by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Well, the Old Pasadena changes were studied and documented by Dr. Don Shoup, and discussed in his book The High Cost of Free Parking, if you want to know more. They compared it to the Westwood area near the UCLA campus, where meter prices were lowered to try to revive the street shopping area, without success.

      It's not just "meters," though. It's a whole conscientious approach to parking. You have to lift the burden of providing off-street parking from the shopowners, for one thing; in the City of Los Angeles, the in-lieu system is arcane and impossible to negotiate, so everyone has to provide the required parking or get a variance. I believe Pasadena switched to a simple system of charging a flat fee of $100 per year per space not provided (so, a store that would normally be required to provide 10 spaces could provide none and pay the city $1,000 a year instead).

      Another important component is correct pricing. In many areas, meters stop at 6... just when night life gets started. In Old Pasadena, they run until midnight, seven days a week.

      Sufficient off-street parking is important too. City-owned and operated structures offer monthly parking for employees of the area and longer-term parking for people expecting to spend more time there. Business-owned parking structures don't work as well; for example, the Arclight Cinemas complex and the Sunset & Vine complex are across the street from each other, each with their own parking structure... and if you want to go to Borders after your movie, you're expected to drive across the street and use THEIR parking. A city lot has no interest in where your feet take you after you store your car, so they're much more friendly toward high street shops.

      But the real clincher for Old Pasadena was where the money goes. Shopowners hated the idea of bringing in meters until the City pledged the revenue to streetscape improvements, in the form of wrought-iron benches, vintage-style lighting, decorative tree grates, and weekly power-washing of the concrete.

      None of that deals with the snow issue, of course. OTOH, I'm not quite sure why going to the meter is a special hazard... usually, after you park your car, you need to walk past the meter to get anywhere, so it seems street parking is hazardous (especially to elderly folks with fragile hips) in those conditions, whether the meters are operational or not.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  45. So?

    I gotta say, if I were a taxpayer in San Francisco, a handful of guys getting free parking would be the least of my worries.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  46. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by mounthood · · Score: 1

    Cool Hand Luke goes to Black Hat...

    --
    tomorrow who's gonna fuss
  47. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    No one cares. And with the shim method, you can just sit in your car with the cables going through your window if you don't want to look like you are loitering. And yes it is very common for SF'ers to sit in the car on an empty meter for 'errands', even double parking for a few minutes.

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  48. Way too technical by dave562 · · Score: 1

    There are some "smart" parking meters in downtown LA. I watched a bum mess them up with a paper clip. He just put a paper clip in the slot, wiggled it around and then the meter read "Out of Service".

    1. Re:Way too technical by Ironica · · Score: 1

      And Transportation Services can ticket you for parking at an "Out of Service" meter.

      Pay-and-display is a lot more useful though. Just a couple of boxes per block to secure, and if one goes down, you can still use another to pay... so no free parking due to down equipment. Also raises revenues, since you can't use the time the previous person left on the meter.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  49. old school trick by acidream · · Score: 1

    When i was in college in Savannah GA, we would scrape a penny perpendicular to the ground for a few seconds and flatten one side, then put it in the dime slot. It would give you maximum time on any meter in the city. Eventually we just got a pair of tin snips and cut hundreds of pennies and kept them in the car for parking.

  50. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    Why not? I wouldn't mind having one as my landline.

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  51. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Better keep a lot of quarters around. :-)

  52. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    You jest, but I don't think you'd need to put quarters in the payphone to make a call on a landline. That's all handled on the telco's end of the line; the pay phone just plays a special code to inform the telco that the proper amount of change was deposited.

    You've got a live connection to the telco as soon as you pick up the handset: as evidenced by the fact that you can dial 911. Since the line is designated as a pay phone on the telco's end, their switching will wait until it gets the indication that you've paid for the call before it lets you dial any other number.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  53. Flamebait? REALLY? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    A lot of gangsters reading Slashdot today?

  54. Free parking is good for business. by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

    Yes that usually works, any place where it is an option our google listings make sure to mention "Free parking for two hours in public lot located 1/4th a mile east."

    That definitely takes the sting off and people take advantage of it, so long as people googling can see there is an option for free parking they will be more likely to come.

    We realize that the 1-2 dollars of a meter is a tiny fee, compared to the gas they spent to get here, but there is something psychological which makes a nickle for the meter sting more than anything else, which is why we try to foot the bill in any way we can, because a customer worth hundreds of dollars is worth 50 cents or at worst a 20 dollar ticket.

    Some other people downtown like salons and dentists (who are also working to get the meters removed) offer to feed the meters for you while you wait, so long as you inform them where your car is parked and what car it is. Its a hassle, but again downtowns are fighting to survive, and the supercentermegamallcomplex is running strong as ever, with frankly a lot of benefits including convenient parking.

    --
    Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
  55. Who needs QA? by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    'It seems like the system wasn't analyzed at all.'

    Of course it wasn't. QA costs money and provides no tangible product. And QA departments are always asking for more resources with which to perform tests on. And QA always slows down release schedules by adding extra development time or to run all their little tests or their annoying little procedures and policies. In the meantime the customers are getting impatient and the balance sheet is slipping.

    If you absolutely must have some sort of quality process, to sate your investors or customers or federal agencies or whoever, you can get cheap testers overseas who have never seen your product before and no nothing about your industry, and can receive your build and run some brief, but well-documented smoke tests on it overnight, and then send it back to you with the OK stamp you paid them for. The next time you want to know if your product works right, just get new overseas testers who aren't all wrapped up with knowing all the things that happened the last time or hold any of the burden of having ever seen your product before.

    Nobody cares if you make a *good* product. They care if you make a product *fast*. And cheap.

    Why is Wal-Mart so successful? Well, for starters, they offer lots of cheap things. You don't see Wal-Mart wasting money and holding up stock by worrying about quality. You want quality? Go to Sears -- haha, I joke, Sears is now K-Mart.

    Once it's out the door, who cares? You got paid for it already. It's much cheaper to staff a call center to take customer complaints. And you can have that "done" overseas too.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  56. Greatest American (parking meter) Hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV1yHrqXA88

    go about 1 minute into this film.

  57. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    I would imagine that depends on the particular payphone. You can certainly buy payphones off the shelf that are designed to plug into a normal landline and handle everything at the payphone end (and yes that includes letting 0800 and 999 calls through without payment).

    I would guess that how telco payphones work would depend on both the age and the particular payphone. The BT ones at least seem to have some intelligence at the phone end since they have things like a display for remaining credit.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  58. PRISON! by Mac_8100_g3 · · Score: 0

    If this story is true, then it's time to start treating these @sshats like the criminals they are. Throw them in a supermax and forget about them.

    --
    My peace of mind does not depend on /. karma
  59. Re:Free parking! Just uh.. oh crap. by akadruid · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine was working in a chain hardware store, inside a large shopping mall, when they discovered someone had stolen a 10 foot ladder on a busy Saturday lunchtime. It's really just about having the balls for it.

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
  60. "Free" as in "Fraudulent" by WaltFrench · · Score: 1

    Or, as in "writing bad checks." "Sticking up a QuickieMart." "Running past the ticket taker at a movie."

    Wouldn't want to confuse that with "Free" software, would we?

    --
    "Inquiring Minds Want to Know!"