Slashdot Mirror


Cameron's Avatar Trailer Posted

graviplana was one of several people to submit that Avatar, James Cameron's 3D Sci-Fi epic has released a trailer to whet your appetite. There's a lot of very cool visual elements in there but no indication of any actual story. Here's hoping there is one.

278 comments

  1. Whet by mmkkbb · · Score: 5, Informative

    The correct word is "whet." To whet your appetite is to sharpen it, just as you would a knife with a whetstone. Wetting one's whistle refers to slaking or quenching thirst, but is entirely unrelated.

    --
    -mkb
    1. Re:Whet by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Adding to that, the summary contains 45 words and three sentences, contains one typo and one misspelling. Surely the submission approval process is not so strained that three sentences is too much to proof read?

      In before "you must be new here".

    2. Re:Whet by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      And to use a whetstone, it's good practice to wet it first.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re: Whet by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      The correct word is "whet."

      Maybe it's a deliberately bad trailer, designed to dampen people's appetites.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Whet by Jamamala · · Score: 1

      I came here from my RSS feed purely to moan about this. Glad to see several beat me to it.
      Also, in what must be a Slashdot first, TFS has actually been corrected!

    5. Re:Whet by spun · · Score: 1

      I came here from my RSS feed purely to moan about this. Glad to see several beat me to it.
      Also, in what must be a Slashdot first, TFS has actually been corrected!

      It's not a first. What would be a first would be a correction with an actual admission that a correction took place. But that would require something approaching journalistic integrity. As it is, I often see stories tagged with 'typoinsummary,' with comments about the typo, but no evidence of a typo or a correction of said typo. The Slashdot editors must think we are quite easily fooled.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    6. Re:Whet by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Now say Whil Wheaton.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    7. Re:Whet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever - still looks like a terrible movie - better suited to a bad PS3 RPG than a feature film. Cameron 'claims' to have copme up with the concept 13-14 years ago - I was playing games as a teenager with that exact story 13-14 years ago. YAWN.

    8. Re:Whet by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      There's an old Danish song about that (though I wouldn't be surprised if it's translated from some other language). Gist of the song is as follows:

      Jokum: "There's a hole in the bucket, dear Lisbeth."
      Lisbeth: "So mend it, dear Jokum."
      J: "Mend it with what?"
      L: "Use straw."
      J: "But the straws are too long."
      L: "So shorten them."
      J: "Shorten them with what?"
      L: "Use the knife."
      J: "But my knife is dull"
      L: "So sharpen it"
      J: "With what?"
      L: "With a whetstone"
      J: "But the whetstone is dry"
      L: "So make it wet."
      J: "How do I do that?"
      L: "Use the bucket."
      Jokum: "There's a hole in the bucket, dear Lisbeth."
      Lisbeth: "So mend it, dear Jokum."

      Not sure if it's an allegory for most things in life or just how married people communicate ...

    9. Re:Whet by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you were being facetious or not, but it's Wil Wheaton, not Whil.

    10. Re:Whet by Mexifries · · Score: 2, Informative

      "you must be new here".

    11. Re:Whet by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Or that we're smart enough to figure it out on our own.

    12. Re:Whet by BubbaDave · · Score: 1

      Say that again.

      Wheaton?

      W -H- eaton?

      Why do you emphasize the 'H' so much?

      Brian

    13. Re:Whet by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Adding to that, the summary contains 45 words and three sentences, contains one typo and one misspelling. Surely the submission approval process is not so strained that three sentences is too much to proof read?

      Comma splice.

      Spelling.

      I'd use the red pen of doom on this but that would anger the gods of markup. You'll just have to figure out where you went wrong on your own.

    14. Re:Whet by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      ".

    15. Re:Whet by spun · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, I mean obviously most people are going to figure it out. The practice of correction without acknowledgment just smacks of evasion of responsibility to me, that's all I'm saying.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    16. Re:Whet by prince+hal · · Score: 0

      In before "you must be new here".

      Sorry, but your entire post has been invalidated due to a misplaced period (they go inside the quotation marks).

      If I didn't have bad karma, I wouldn't have no karma at all.

    17. Re:Whet by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      I'll give it a shot:

      Adding to that: the summary contains forty-five words, three sentences, one typo, and one misspelling.

      Surely the submission approval process is not so strained that three sentences is too much to proofread?

      All the extra "and" is a style issue more than a grammar issue. Same with 45 vs forty-five. Use numbers all the way through, or use words. The ":" is the correct punctuation there, because it's introducing a list. Proofread is one word.

      I'm sure I missed something but, unlike the gp, I don't think I'm better at grammar than anyone else.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    18. Re:Whet by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      In before the Godwin reference being applied to the above posts.

    19. Re:Whet by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      I was always taught to use words for small numbers like three and to leave it as a number for large numbers like 45.

    20. Re:Whet by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      A comment is held to a lesser standard than a summary, or it should be; you're just lucky I didn't go with my usual love for the semi-colon.

      No spelling errors as far as I can see, unless you're using a non-British dictionary.

    21. Re:Whet by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      My spellcheck actually flagged proofread as incorrect, hence my splitting into two words.

    22. Re:Whet by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      British English is ". in this case.

    23. Re:Whet by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not in the UK. That's a style issue, not a grammar one.

    24. Re:Whet by prockcore · · Score: 1

      American English has been changing as well (albeit slowly). Punctuation is starting to move outside of quotations. It also makes more sense for us programmers.

      Unfortunately, the Chicago Manual and AP Stylebooks both still recommend putting commas and periods inside quotation marks. However, they only recommend this for commas and periods. Question marks, exclamation points, colons, and semicolons all go outside of quotation marks unless they belong to the quote.

    25. Re:Whet by Mozk · · Score: 1

      I might go with this:

      Surely the submission approval process is not so strained that three sentences are too much to proofread.

      The sentence is not a question, and the noun phrase is plural, though, in this case I might accept it as singular, seeing the three sentences being proofread as a group, rather than individually.

      --
      No existe.
    26. Re:Whet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "H" is stressed because the vast majority of people seem ignorant of the fact nearly every word in the English language that begins with "WH", "why" being the exception, is actually properly pronounced "HW", not just with the "W" sound. While some dictionaries will list the plain "W" as an alternate pronunciation, even those list "HW" as the preferred pronunciation. "When" is actually correctly pronounced "HWEN". It is important to emphasize things like this. It is also why I stress, perhaps a little more than need be the first "R" in "FebRuary" and that "Wednesday" has the "D" before the "N" and that it is not pronounced "WENSDAY" as most people do. I find it funny that people often ask where I am from because of my "accent" when they notice.

    27. Re:Whet by setagllib · · Score: 1

      Well sure, you're from the past. It's best you get used to admitting that.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
    28. Re:Whet by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      That depends entirely on your English teacher. I had one who insisted we spell out the words for anything smaller than 100.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    29. Re:Whet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Associated Press Style Book recommendations do vary depending on context, but suggest that for unspecified cases one spell out single-digit numbers, and use figures for any multi-digit number.

    30. Re:Whet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please refrain from posting until you develop something remotely resembling taste. Thanks.

    31. Re:Whet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Insist that it should be pronounced "Wodens daeg" and "Feberwary".

    32. Re:Whet by FlyveHest · · Score: 1

      Think Brian from Family Guy, and the Star Trek episode.

      Cool Whip :)

    33. Re:Whet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems an awful lot like a Final Fantasy title to me. While the trailer gives nothing away, the pacing and feel evokes the same emotional reaction.

      Great interest.

    34. Re:Whet by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      "Ewe must be new here".

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    35. Re: Whet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but for that to hold true, you would have to violate the axiom of the flying pig

    36. Re:Whet by prince+hal · · Score: 0

      Interesting. In the USA it is definitely a rule. Just check a Harbrace, which can be found at any university bookstore (ummm, in the USA, at least).

    37. Re:Whet by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Well, it is a rule, but it is the exact opposite of the US way, hence the style issue.

      If you follow the British rules you must put the full stop outside unless the entire sentence is a quote.

    38. Re:Whet by prince+hal · · Score: 0

      How does that saying go? Two peoples separated by a common language? Now if you could tell me why my comments invariably receive a score of zero, I could die happy.

  2. hmm... by El+Jynx · · Score: 1

    only on?

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
  3. doesnt work? by ionix5891 · · Score: 0

    GET /movies/fox/avatar/avatar2009aug0820a-tsr_1080p.mov HTTP/1.1
    Host: movies.apple.com
    User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.2) Gecko/20090729 Firefox/3.5.2

    HTTP/1.x 200 OK
    X-Cache-TTL: 3186
    Accept-Ranges: bytes
    Content-Length: 93
    Content-Type: video/quicktime
    Server: Apache/2.2.8 (Unix)
    Last-Modified: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:30:31 GMT
    Etag: "5d-4719397fe4fc0"
    X-Cached-Time: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:54:07 GMT
    Cache-Control: max-age=2473
    Expires: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:50:38 GMT
    Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:09:25 GMT
    Connection: keep-alive

    1. Re:doesnt work? by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:doesnt work? by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Search for Cameron's Avatar Trailer on youtube -> "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Quench Studios "

      Brilliant Marketing

      --
      open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    3. Re:doesnt work? by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      Apparently Apple did something today. Doesn't work for me either.

    4. Re:doesnt work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the UserAgent.

    5. Re:doesnt work? by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      And people wonder why I don't like Apple.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  4. see some Starship Troopers and Dune in there by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the book version of starship troopers

    otherwise the plot is a soldier goes to fight, gets some genetic modification and then figures out that the war is evil and being fought for ulterior reasons known only to a select few and he changes sides to fight for right

    1. Re:see some Starship Troopers and Dune in there by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      ALso a bit of "Call Me Joe", by Poul Anderson in there.

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    2. Re:see some Starship Troopers and Dune in there by Alarash · · Score: 1

      That sounds more like [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Man%27s_War]Old Man's War[/url] than Starship Troopers, really.

    3. Re:see some Starship Troopers and Dune in there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, but this is James Cameron, the best action movie director in history. I'm pretty sure people are going to watch it for the 3d explosions and not for the highly original plot.

    4. Re:see some Starship Troopers and Dune in there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of 'Call me Joe' and a bit of 'Man Plus' by Fred Pohl.

  5. Only a little by meerling · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Watching the trailer you can get a little bit of info about whats going on.

    Humans go to another planet, looks like a jungle planet.
    They create "avatars" that are either clones, simulacrum, or repurposed native bodies.
    One of the humans (the main character) who is brainmapped into an avatar, is a paraplegic in his human body.
    The avatars are sent on an exploration or diplomacy mission.
    (It obviously wasn't infiltration because they were wearing human clothes and carrying human gear.)

    There's some fighting with some dino like things, possibly with the natives as well, although I didn't see any shots showing actual combat with natives, just strung together combat scenes that implied combat with the natives.

    Oh, and the main character falls for a native female.

    I'm sure somebody paying more attention to it can pick out other tidbits of info, but yeah, it was kinda sparse on data. It's not like the trailers/ads for 6th sense where you can identify all major plot points including the so called twist ending... (so bloody obvious he's one of the dead...)

    1. Re:Only a little by nimrod108 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think you pretty much nailed the plot. I think the fellow in the wheel chair gets a new body so they can make contact and survive on the planet.

      --
      $2.50 for a decade.
    2. Re:Only a little by shadowrat · · Score: 2, Funny

      (so bloody obvious he's one of the dead...)

      Thanks a lot! Now you've gone and ruined the film for me!

    3. Re:Only a little by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, we knew all of that before the trailer came out.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:Only a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You insensitive clod! I haven't seen the 6th Sense yet!

    5. Re:Only a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There was a "scriptment" (Cameron's term, a mish-mash of "script" and "treatment") floating around the net since around the time Titanic came out, perhaps even before. I read it. It was pretty lousy. This trailer and the official entry on IMDB makes it pretty clear that the scriptment was in fact real, and very little has changed since then (spoilers below):

      • Humans are on the planet to mine a mineral that is naturally superconducting at normal temperatures. The floating mountains seen at 0:34 in the trailer are full of the mineral, and float because of it interacting with the planet's magnetic field.
      • The original scriptment called the superconducting mineral "unobtanium". I have a feeling that word might not appear in the final movie because "The Core" used it already (yes I know it's an old sci-fi in-joke, but still).
      • To mine the mineral, humans are encroaching on and destroying the habitat of the planet's native intelligent species (the blue cat-people, aka the "Na'vi"). The story revolves around the conflict between the humans and Na'vi and has a very strong anti-colonial and almost anti-industrial slant to it.
      • The native flora and fauna on the plant had lots of blue bioluminescence. The trailer seems to stick with this, although it's not as strong as I would have expected based on the description.
      • The guy with the scars on his head at 0:39 is the main military meat-head bad guy, Quaritch. His character in particular is paper-thin and badly written.
      • The guy in the wheelchair gets his mind transferred to a synthetically grown Na'vi body, and by the end of the movie, "goes native" including mating with an actual Na'vi female.
      • Cameron completely ignores any philosophical implications of the mind-transfer mechanism (is it a "transfer" or just a copy? what happens to the human left behind? what kind of mind exists in the synthetic body when no human mind occupies it? if the body has a mind of its own, does the human mind merge with it or override it? what are the moral implications?). It's just a plot device.
      • The scriptment contained a lot of sentences like "what follows is a balls-to-the-wall chase through the forest". I know it's not a full script and it's supposed to summarize, but it just came across as really silly. I've never seen a script use the word "balls" so much outside of dialogue.

      Overall the story in the scriptment was very hokey and sophomoric. The only thing was supposed to separate this from other movies was the dazzling technology behind it, but looking at the trailer it just doesn't seem all that impressive. When one of the Na'vi speaks at 1:18 in the trailer, the face looks very stiff and mask-like. The guinea pigs in "G-Force" look more expressive, for crying out loud. And like most CGI these days, the lighting is far too even on the CG'd objects to look real. The girl looking through the leaves at 1:29 and the ships launching at 1:36 were the only shots that even remotely looked convincing.

      The hype behind this movie is completely out of whack with reality. People use terms like "game changer", "groundbreaking", etc. I even read one breathless article that compared the arrival of the movie with the arrival of sound or color. In interviews, Cameron talks as if he invented CGI and 3D, and no one's ever used them before. If this trailer didn't have Cameron's name attached to it, what kind of reaction would it really get?

      People who've seen it say this movie looks better in 3D, but really how much better could it be? The faces in "The Polar Express" looked marginally better in 3D than in 2D, but honestly we've been over that ground before. They should tone down the hype. It could backfire, if it hasn't already.

    6. Re:Only a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh great, now you've just gone and ruined 6th Sense for me. Not everyone can keep up with recent movies you insensitive clod!

    7. Re:Only a little by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      I read the screenplay for this in 1999. They have changed a little, but yeah, the trailer pretty much gives it all away. I still want to see it, though.

    8. Re:Only a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many years ago the screenplay - probably in brief - was published on the internet. Even in text form it was awesome. I am really looking forward to this movie.

      The paraplegic star goes to the planet (Pandora, I believe) to find out what happened to his twin brother.

      The natives has some telepathic abilities. This is where the humans gain the ability to control them. Some of the lifeforms are even more amazing - such as rhino-like creatures that can fire off their heads like projectile weapons (they maintain a telepathic link between the head and the body).

      I think the natives (naavi or some such name) overrun the human base and the hero is captured or something. The natives use some mystical process and he regains his ability to walk? (It is about 8-10 years ago that I am trying to recall from so it is quite vague).

      He changes sides - due to finding out about the nobility of the natives and the evil motives of the humans (and getting a little blue-skinned native action on may well be a feature that sways his allegiance somewhat) and a rollicking good bit of bloodshed and mayhem ensues to ensure us of a special effects smorgasboard.

      It will be interesting to see how much the final features resembles my vague memories of what I read so long ago.

  6. An actual story? Why ruin it with that? by wiredog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    GI Joe did just fine without any actual story.

  7. CG-wise? Disappointed. Storyline-wise? We'll see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as the CGI goes, I'm disappointed.

    Going back to old press releases, I saw Avatar being advertised as "the first ever film to include fully CGI actors."

    My assumption was that they'd try to make photorealistic *human* actors CGed similar to what Beowulf did and that I'd be blown away as I watched the trailer, wondering for the first time "Is this animated or is this real?"

    The blue aliens do not hold that sense of wonder for me. 1) Your mind discards aliens as looking fake in general. 2) The CG on them isn't mindblowing anyway. The animation of them is still unconvincing.

    That said, I'm sure the movie will be enjoyable with a decent storyline. It's just not what I was hoping for.

  8. Direct download links by vivekg · · Score: 5, Informative

    480p, 720p, 1080p Enjoy!

    --
    The important thing is not to stop questioning --Albert Einstein.
    1. Re:Direct download links by ionix5891 · · Score: 1

      if all /.'ers go for the 1080 link we will bring down apple!

      thanks btw

    2. Re:Direct download links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're talking like that's a bad thing..?

    3. Re:Direct download links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I'm sure the guys that run the itunes store doesn't have enough bandwidth ....

    4. Re:Direct download links by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      Damn I just downloaded the 720 one, OK let's try the 1080 link...

    5. Re:Direct download links by Teriblows · · Score: 1

      apples been breaking direct download links of avatar:(

    6. Re:Direct download links by Mangala · · Score: 1

      Is it just me? Apple seems to have figured out how to screw up all direct downloads so instead you just get an HTML file of the Apple Trailers homepage.

  9. Re:Story? by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 1

    No! If it has a story, then its a character drama with sci-fi trappings!!!! It doesn't matter if it takes place on a whole other planet, in the future, and couldn't have happened without sci-fi elements (space travel, cloning, mind transfer/remote control, etc) it's not sci-fi!

    I read a review that district 9 was "not a science fiction movie." Why don't people admit to liking sci-fi?

  10. It's Actually a Teaser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a trailer it's a teaser for which it's rare to have story content, usually just a number of images to give an idea of what the movie will look like.

  11. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... where's Aang?

    1. Re:So... by tekrat · · Score: 1

      You know, I was thinking the same thing.. In fact it looks like "The Last Airbender" movie will have to avoid the use of the word "Avatar" to prevent confusion, since my guess is both movies will be out around the same time.

      And already being familiar with the airbender plotline and universe, I'm looking forward to that film far more than I am to Cameron's crap-fest. His last good film was Terminator 2.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  12. no: "dances with wolves" in space by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Informative

    cameron even says so himself:

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2009/08/james-cameron-the-new-trek-rocks-but-transformers-is-gimcrackery.html

    GB: There's also maybe some heritage linking it to "Dances With Wolves," considering your story here of a battered military man who finds something pure in an endangered tribal culture.

    JC: Yes, exactly, it is very much like that. You see the same theme in "At Play in the Fields of the Lord" and also "The Emerald Forest," which maybe thematically isn't that connected but it did have that clash of civilizations or of cultures. That was another reference point for me. There was some beautiful stuff in that film. I just gathered all this stuff in and then you look at it through the lens of science fiction and it comes out looking very different but is still recognizable in a universal story way. It's almost comfortable for the audience - "I know what kind of tale this is." They're not just sitting there scratching their heads, they're enjoying it and being taken along. And we still have turns and surprises in it, too, things you don't see coming. But the idea that you feel like you are in a classic story, a story that could have been shaped by Rudyard Kipling or Edgar Rice Burroughs.

    GB: Or Joseph Conrad...?

    JC: Yes, exactly. And I think returning to classic tales is a powerful thing. Look, right now is a special time because we can basically do anything we imagine. I mean you have to work hard at it, and you've got to have the technique and you have to be willing to throw money at the problem. Sometimes you have to be a little bold and go out on a limb. But if you can imagine it, you can do it. That's why we're seeing this renaissance of visual imagination. It's just a growth. Films look better now than they've ever looked. Sometimes they get a little lost in it though. I'll go to a "Transformers" film for the fun of seeing the spectacle but, personally, my soul craves a little more story, a little more meat on the bone and characters and that sort of thing. Look, I think it's about finding a balance between story and all of this gimmickry. I think I veer toward classicism, being solidly rooted in the classic stuff. I mean really old-school science fiction. This is a movie I would have loved to have seen when I was a 14-year-old kid in 1968.

    avatar looks amazing though, a must see

    the bit with the blue guys riding flying dragons reminded me a bit of "the dragonriders of pern" too

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonriders_of_Pern

    now someone should make THAT into a movie

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:no: "dances with wolves" in space by Durrok · · Score: 1

      I loved those books as a kid. I'm sure we would just get something like this.

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    2. Re:no: "dances with wolves" in space by Propaganda13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorry, I prefer to relate new movies to low budget action flicks with people like Van Damme, Segal, or Lundgren.

      Men of War
      Nick Gunar (Dolph Lundgren) is a burnt-out, jaded and hard-up former mercenary who is having a difficult time adjusting to civilian life. At the end of his rope, he is hired by the Nitro Mine Corporation to strong-arm the natives of a South China Sea island into giving up their rights to its valuable mineral resources. Nick loathes the thought of another mission, but this seemingly easy job will earn him enough money to get back with his estranged family. He recruits some of his former mercenary buddies to help him with the job. The island people refuse to give up their land and Nick decides to help them fight the greedy corporation that hired him. The island and its people bring Nick back to life. He finally finds something worth fighting for and a place to call home. As greed and treachery begin to unravel, Nick's band of mercenaries choose sides. Some are with him and others, still working for the corporation, will stop at nothing to destroy him.

    3. Re:no: "dances with wolves" in space by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a fan of the Pern books myself - I would say that Eragon was a poor film because it was based on a poor book. (Which pretty much stole every interesting facet from somewhere else.) Not that Pern couldn't be ruined, but the books are good enough that good films could be based on them. Eragon never had a chance of being really good.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    4. Re:no: "dances with wolves" in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with the Dragonriders books, though, is that they are horrible.

    5. Re:no: "dances with wolves" in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I think returning to classic tales is a powerful thing.

      to make cash of course...

      j/k looks like a good film.

    6. Re:no: "dances with wolves" in space by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      Soldier . . . Solo . . . The Dogs of War . . .

      More of the same theme . . .

    7. Re:no: "dances with wolves" in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no. That's the problem with your taste. You're projecting again.

    8. Re:no: "dances with wolves" in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the bit with the blue guys riding flying dragons reminded me a bit of "the dragonriders of pern" too

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonriders_of_Pern

      now someone should make THAT into a movie

      Many studios have wanted to..but Anne McCaffery would not release control of her IP to allow someone else to write the screenplay. She wants to make sure whatever is created fits into her vision of her World, and doesn't become just another P.O.S. movie based on a wonderful set of books.

      I imagine Tolkien had the same concerns for the Ring series.

  13. Re:Story? by rhathar · · Score: 3, Informative
    Is this the first Slashdot has seen of Avatar? Has no one else been reading about this movie? Geez, people. Here's the plot (as if it was hard to read wikipedia before posting a story):

    The storyâ(TM)s protagonist, Jake Sully, is a former Marine who was wounded and paralyzed from the waist down in combat on Earth. In order to participate in the Avatar program, which will give him a healthy body, Jake agrees to travel to Pandora, a lush rainforest environment filled with incredible life forms â" some beautiful, many terrifying. Pandora is also the home to the Naâ(TM)vi, a humanoid race that lives at what humans would consider to be a primitive level, but are actually much more evolutionarily advanced than humans. Ten feet tall, with tails and sparkling blue skin, the Naâ(TM)vi live harmoniously within their unspoiled world. But as humans encroach on Pandora in search of valuable minerals, the Naâ(TM)viâ(TM)s very existence is threatened â" and their warrior abilities unleashed. Jake has unwittingly been recruited to become part of this encroachment. Since humans are unable to breathe the air on Pandora, they have created genetically-bred human-Naâ(TM)vi hybrids known as Avatars. The Avatars are living, breathing bodies in the real world, controlled by a human driver through a technology that links the driverâ(TM)s mind to the Avatar body. On Pandora, through his Avatar body, Jake can be whole once again. Moreover, he falls in love with a young Naâ(TM)vi woman, Neytiri, whose beauty is matched by her ferocity in battle. As Jake slides deeper into becoming one of her clan, he finds himself caught between the military-industrial forces of Earth, and the Naâ(TM)vi â" forcing him to choose sides in an epic battle that will decide the fate of an entire world.

    --
    http://www.chaotickingdoms.com
  14. Those geeks in the movie must be Titan Quest fans by kalirion · · Score: 1

    After all, they spent all that effort to genetically engineer Maenads.

  15. A few problems with it by Jim+Hall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, the CGI is stunning - for most of the trailer, it's hard to believe it's not live action. They have made a huge leap across the uncanny valley, and successfully.

    But I have a few problems with it, just like most CGI movies these days:

    The robots don't move right. It doesn't "feel" like a robot to me. James Cameron was the guy behind Aliens, and he seems to have forgotten that one of the reasons that was such a believable movie (despite taking place in the future, on an alien planet, fighting aliens with two mouths) was the use of "today" tech. So I would have expected Cameron to make Avatar's robots more like the military robots we envision today. I'm sure 1000 years from now, robots will move identically to a human (as in the movie) but I'd still prefer movie robots today to move more like real robots we have today.

    Predators shouldn't announce their presence. There's a scene in the trailer where a dino-thing jumps out of the bushes, roars, and runs after people. I see this all the time in action movies where some large animal is about to attack the hero: the predator rises from the bushes (or from behind whatever), bellows, then rushes to attack. But in that split-second, our hero is able to throw himself behind cover, narrowly avoiding being eaten. Ever watch actual predator/prey wildlife - even a house cat pouncing on a mouse. Predators just don't announce their attacks - they just pounce. If you stop to roar, your prey gets away, and you go hungry.

    That said, I'll probably still go see this when it comes out.

    1. Re:A few problems with it by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Yes, the CGI is stunning - for most of the trailer, it's hard to believe it's not live action. They have made a huge leap across the uncanny valley, and successfully.

      Wait, are the humans CGI too? If so that's very good, otherwise it's not really relevant to the uncanny valley.

    2. Re:A few problems with it by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

      The same technology that provides the realistic animal/alien motion in the film will probably indeed mean robots will move smoothly in the future, so yeah, the robot motion is believable. :-)

    3. Re:A few problems with it by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >The robots don't move right.

      Welcome to the uncanny valley!

    4. Re:A few problems with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I need to see the 1080p trailer, because apparently the lower res doesn't show any "stunning CGI". The alien skin is shiny, as if it was coated in plastic, or whatever.

      For the hype this movie has been getting as being so innovative in the graphics department, color me very unimpressed.

      Besides, the story is as cliché as it gets, can't the big bad ulterior-motive warlords win for a change? Somehow they always portray these movies as if just ONE "guy gone rogue", who usually is pretty low-rank, could possess knowledge/skills/whatever good enough to completely change the war-effort overnight.

      Yeah, I know, MST3K and all, but this is -boring-.

    5. Re:A few problems with it by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      There was an article a while back that had a video of a robot designed to be a pack animal of sorts. It's legs didn't move in the same way as a dog's, they were hinged backwards, but when it was shoved, kicked or slipped on ice it reacted just like a four legged animal in ordre to regain it's balance.

    6. Re:A few problems with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really find the CG characters that impressive, it reminds me more a Disney animation movie than real actors.

      For that matter I find the CG and the aliens much more believable in District 9 (the way the lighting is done might be one of the main factor).

    7. Re:A few problems with it by TheSync · · Score: 1

      for most of the trailer, it's hard to believe it's not live action.

      That's because Avatar has a (well-composited) mix of live-action and CGI...so yes, the humans look human because they are human.

    8. Re:A few problems with it by mgblst · · Score: 1

      I know, future robots should act exactly like I fantasise them in my head, same with alien animals. Anything else is just weird.

      This is nitpicking to a ridiculous level. You imagine your fantasy creatures your own way, and make a movie about them. You need to let go of this when you view other peoples movies.

      You might as well complain that tintin had a different voice in the animate movies to the one you imagined in your head when reading the comics.

    9. Re:A few problems with it by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      future robots should act exactly like I fantasise them in my head, same with alien animals.

      I don't know if I'd like that movie, but I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be PG-13.

    10. Re:A few problems with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never seen a bear growl or a lion roar? Animals aren't always out for a meal. Sometimes they're just being territorial. So to roar to appear more threatening and chase the other animal away. Sorry Cameron didn't tailor the movie to you're limited understanding of the natural world.

    11. Re:A few problems with it by stiller · · Score: 1

      I agree with your comments and I can pinpoint some other things that were (only slightly) off:
      1) Eye movement should be more rapid and continuous. Human eyes are moving all the time, especially during emotional conversation (the "this is great" moment.
      2) There should more feeling of mass and inertia, both in the heavy robots (as you mentioned), but also in the lighter creatures. See the girl jumping in front of the fire and running along without seemingly even bending her knees.
      3) In some scenes either the mocap was off, or they just posed a figure by hand, with bad results. The scene where the guy yells at the bird, we see the girl climbing on the back of the bird and the guy is standing there like an action figure in robot chicken.
      4) The predator thing isn't an issue for me as the creature doesn't appear to be hunting the guy, but trying to scare him away, animals do that.
      5) The figures shouldn't be posed to "theatrically", especially with those long limbs. I understand mocapping requires a certain amount of overacting the movements, but don't stand there like someone in a ballet.
      Having said all that, it's only because the set the bar so high, that things like this really stand out.

    12. Re:A few problems with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the dino-beast isn't being predatorial. Maybe it is being territorial, like in many bear attacks with vocalization, rearing up and bluff charges. Or like a wild boar. Maybe it has cute little babies off screen it is trying to protect.

    13. Re:A few problems with it by stiller · · Score: 1

      I have just seen the IMAX presentation and none of my above comments still stand. The trailer, or any non-3D screening for that matter, do NOT do this film justice. This really is something completely new.

  16. t-mobile is shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they won't deliver my calls and text messages and they won't cancel my contract.

    1. Re:t-mobile is shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you should pay your bill?

  17. Re:Story? by rhathar · · Score: 5, Informative
    Dammit, formatting. Sorry about clicking 'submit' a little too fast:

    The story's protagonist, Jake Sully, is a former Marine who was wounded and paralyzed from the waist down in combat on Earth. In order to participate in the Avatar program, which will give him a healthy body, Jake agrees to travel to Pandora, a lush rainforest environment filled with incredible life forms - some beautiful, many terrifying. Pandora is also the home to the Na'vi, a humanoid race that lives at what humans would consider to be a primitive level, but are actually much more evolutionarily advanced than humans. Ten feet tall, with tails and sparkling blue skin, the Na'vi live harmoniously within their unspoiled world. But as humans encroach on Pandora in search of valuable minerals, the Na'vi's very existence is threatened â" and their warrior abilities unleashed.

    Jake has unwittingly been recruited to become part of this encroachment. Since humans are unable to breathe the air on Pandora, they have created genetically-bred human-Na'vi hybrids known as Avatars. The Avatars are living, breathing bodies in the real world, controlled by a human driver through a technology that links the driver's mind to the Avatar body. On Pandora, through his Avatar body, Jake can be whole once again. Moreover, he falls in love with a young Na'vi woman, Neytiri, whose beauty is matched by her ferocity in battle.

    As Jake slides deeper into becoming one of her clan, he finds himself caught between the military-industrial forces of Earth, and the Na'vi - forcing him to choose sides in an epic battle that will decide the fate of an entire world.

    --
    http://www.chaotickingdoms.com
  18. Wet by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The correct word is "whet." To whet your appetite is to sharpen it....

    But what if there's a trailer is intended to dampen fans' appetites?

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  19. Not impressed to say the least by patro · · Score: 1

    Cartoon-like blue CGI aliens and an apparently average summer blockbuster story. Maybe it's better in 3D, but in 2D it's laughable.

  20. Starship Troopers vs. Ferngully? by tenzig_112 · · Score: 1

    Did it seem like (after years of hype) Cameron made a simultaneous remake of Ferngully and Starship toopers? I still have hope that the movie will be better than the trailer, but you never know.

    Here's an annotated version of the trailer to illustrate the point:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRTrWsKPKh8

    1. Re:Starship Troopers vs. Ferngully? by FelixNZ · · Score: 1

      Fern Gully

      THANK YOU. I was wracking my brain to remember what the name of that cartoon was. First thing I thought too.

  21. Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plot.. by Elbowgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This does not bode well. The CGI, which would have been impressive on an XBox or PS3, instead jars with the real-life scenes. They make no attempt to even hint at a plot, which tells me that they have essentially strung together a parade of impressive FX to hang on the bones of an irrelevant story. And you can guarantee that they will not take any time to let the story breath underneath all of those explosions.

    No.

    --
    Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
  22. The Last Airbender by Xebikr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've got to say I'm much more excited about the other avatar movie, due out next summer. I might end up being horribly disappointed, but the tv series rocked and left me wanting more.

    1. Re:The Last Airbender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M. Night Shyamalan is not a name which inspires hope of a good movie any longer. How much more money are investors going to hand this guy to waste?

    2. Re:The Last Airbender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what the tweest will be!

    3. Re:The Last Airbender by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would be much more excited to see more animated episodes to continue the story. My family is pretty stoked about the live action film - but I don't really see the point. I like the animated version and am unsure how live action could do as well, let alone surpass what already has been done.

      I was able to buy all the tv episodes on dvd recently and have enjoyed watching the shows again. The story and characters are strong enough that it holds up well to multiple viewings.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    4. Re:The Last Airbender by denzacar · · Score: 3, Funny

      They are all actually dead the whole time, being killed by the plants that live in the forest around the village.

      Oh... and the "mentor-character" is actually the main bad-guy, who is stumped by closed doors and is allergic to water.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    5. Re:The Last Airbender by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      It used to be that when some IP went to the big screen we viewers got to look forward to actual special effects, a grander scope, a fully realized creative vision.

      That is no longer the case. For Avatar: The Last Airbender we've already seen the story fully realized with little to no compromises on quality. All the live action films can hope for is to:

      1. match the quality of the series, giving us nothing new
      2. captivate a new audience that hasn't seen the series

      Given the movie's choice of director, and casting decisions thus far I have little hope for the first point. I do hope for the second though, because that series deserves to be seen.

    6. Re:The Last Airbender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mako's interpretation of the Uncle was great. RIP.

  23. Re:CG-wise? Disappointed. Storyline-wise? We'll se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch it again. There where pure "humans" in that video and they are 100% CG.

  24. I get the idea though.... by nobodyman · · Score: 1

    And to be honest, I disagree with the assertion that the trailer doesn't give away any hint of the story. We have no idea if the story will be *good* but from the trailer we learn that a wounded soldier is able to fight again, albeit by proxy, controlling an indigenous creature of an alien planet.

    Yeah, that ain't much, but it's an intriguing idea, and a helluva lot more plot that we got with GI-Joe.

    1. Re:I get the idea though.... by metaforest · · Score: 1

      It might be thought provoking from a teen perspective to re-examine their relationship to their Toons in WoW... or SL. I for one would appreciate 'the monkey at the keyboard' taking responsibility for the actions of the digital-selves. It is possible that a movie like this might provoke some thought on this.

      Go back and look at the original Teaser for The Matrix, and tell me that you thought that it was going to be as thought provoking as it ended up being. To me this is kinda like judging a book by it's cover.

  25. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They make no attempt to even hint at a plot"

    Are you serious?

  26. Re:Story? by oldspewey · · Score: 1

    This is Sci-Fi, you can just make shit up as you please

    And anything mysterious you need to justify, you can just attribute to Quantum Flux.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  27. I hope it's more like district 9 by hellfire · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Sorry to interject an unrelated movie but I must make a comparision. This movie looks visually stunning, but I hope the writing and plot are as good as district 9 was. D9 was, by far, was one of the best sci fi films I've seen in decades and it did it on the cheap. And that's all that really needs to be said.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:I hope it's more like district 9 by mgblst · · Score: 1

      I really enjoyed district 9, but felt disappointed as well. It is a great sci-fi movie, but it fell into the common trap of a lot of movies these days. It was hoping it would focus on a struggle between the aliens and people, instead it focused on the struggle between one man, and two aliens. It felt like a tv show, did not focus on the big picture.

  28. Re:Story? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There was not a single thing in that summary not clearly portrayed in the trailer. The trailer is not devoid of story - it completely gives away the entire plot. They only thing they don't show is the ending but it is very unlikely it wont end with things working out for the 'good' guys. But the paralysis - the transfer to another body - the love interest - the combat against invading earth forces - it's all there. This is a very typical anti-development, pro-nature type film that hollywood has been cranking out for some time.

    I'm looking forward to seeing it - but not for the plot.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  29. Wow... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Holy smokes, does that look stupid.

    I couldn't even bother to finish a 2 minute trailer. Can someone from Hollywood send me 30 million bucks, and I'll mail them my bowel movements for the next year?

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To quote a friend's tweet "Avatar trailer looks like a Final Fantasy game cutscene..."

    2. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy smokes, does that look stupid.

      I couldn't even bother to finish a 2 minute trailer. Can someone from Hollywood send me 30 million bucks, and I'll mail them my bowel movements for the next year?

      The really funny part is how reflexive trolling has become. What passes for a good movie in your grand opinion? I actually wasn't sure what to expect and I was stunned at the look and feel. The faces are a bit smooth on the alien race for my tastes but that's the only flaw I saw. Otherwise I was near speechless. I used to know the guy and Jim is one of the most talented people I ever met. All stories about him are true and I've heard worse from mutual friends, and seen a bit myself, but it doesn't take away from his talent and vision. By vision I'm talking visual look and feel. The story may not be original but he was pretty open about Aliens not being original. Try to find a Stephen King book that's truly original and he at one point was the greatest selling author of all time. If you can't enjoy movies stay home. Trolling isn't a noble profession it's just pain sad.

    3. Re:Wow... by Schnoogs · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The problem with anticipating the release of movies like Avatar is having to put up with idiotic comments like yours in the meantime. I'm sure you were riveted to the screen though during the trailers for GIJOE and Transformers 2. Probably more your speed seeing as the work of James Cameron is clearly lost on you.

      Kind of sad to be honest. I pity you...you probably live a sad and lonely existence. Oh and how does your moms cooking taste down in the basement you live in?

    4. Re:Wow... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Its kind sad the people automatically mod up mindless negativity like this.

      Look, scifi movies are the low hanging fruit of Hollywood. This looks much better than GI Joe or Transformers. We should be thankful someone is trying an actual story. Cameron has some real talent and deserves a little more respect than this. I mean, you barely saw anything. Youre pretty much judging a book by its cover. I thought geeks were smarter than this.

    5. Re:Wow... by Desler · · Score: 1

      Oh and how does your moms cooking taste down in the basement you live in?

      It wasn't very good. Your mom makes much better food from what I tasted when I was down with you in your parent's basement.

    6. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you've got the attention span of a 9 year old ADHD sufferer on meth. Now please explain why any rational person would remotely care about your opinion of a teaser trailer you can't even be bother to entirely watch?

  30. Re:CG-wise? Disappointed. Storyline-wise? We'll se by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    It looked a lot like Final Fantasy to me - which I thought was pretty cool but it came out a while ago. It will be interesting to see how the full film compares.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  31. Watch it in 1080p by denzacar · · Score: 1

    You will see the "photorealism".

    Also, while you are at it, pay attention to scenes where Na'vi are being angry.
    They seem far more realistic then, as they squint their eyes and look more like humans in those shots.

    Oh and Beowulf...
    Come on. This is several classes above Beowulf. Beowulf was barely above Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within.
    They walked and articulated like puppets. Na'vi look real.

    Alien and not quite humanly (as they are not humans) but they move like living things.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  32. Re:Story? by matang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i read somewhere james cameron said it was dances with wolves but with aliens. it's what came to my mind when i read the synopsis (dude infiltrates a foreign and somewhat hostile group, falls in love, becomes one of them, is forced to decide whether to betray his former life).

  33. Cameron has been reading Joe Haldeman by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful



    Trailer reflects a lot of different Joe Haldeman books. I see pieces of "All My Sins Remembered," "Forever Peace," and a tiny bit of "Forever War." Ridley Scott's planning to film "Forever War," and he said he was inspired to do it in 3-D after seeing what Cameron had done with Avatar. The avatar thing connects with Haldeman's "Forever Peace" very well.

    Wish Taco would avoid the snide comment about the trailer lacking story. It's not like Cameron has proven himself a poor storyteller on his past films. Just because it's CGI and science fiction, doesn't mean this is going to be garbage like Transformers 2 or Terminator 4.

    1. Re:Cameron has been reading Joe Haldeman by kalirion · · Score: 1

      The avatar thing connects with Haldeman's "Forever Peace" very well.

      Really? How so? Forever Peace's "avatars" were state-of-the-art war mechs. In this movie, they're genetically engineered alien body. You may as well compare it with One Must Fall.

    2. Re:Cameron has been reading Joe Haldeman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention "Manta's Gift" by Timothy Zahn . . . .

    3. Re:Cameron has been reading Joe Haldeman by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      I am not concerned so much with the how it's accomplished as much as what is accomplished. I'm actually just midway through Forever Peace, so I don't know everything about it, but on first glance of the trailer, the avatar fighting in a tropical environment against a technologically less-developed foe reminded me of Forever Peace. All the ferocious animals reminded me of All My Sins Remembered.

      Seth

    4. Re:Cameron has been reading Joe Haldeman by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Reminded me of John Scalzi...Old Man's War etc.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  34. sounds like new movie Surrogates by peter303 · · Score: 1

    They were showing a trailer for Surrogates at District Nine. The plots sound similar- intermeshed human-MMO worlds gone flakey. Cameron may have better F/X from what I've seen so far. If both are well-executed, then I may like both.

  35. Plot? by Evildonald · · Score: 1
    I thought the plot seemed fairly obvious from the trailer.
    1. * Humans finds planet to invade
    2. * Humans capture alien native
    3. * Humans do a mind-transfer to put a human spy into the brain of an alien
    4. * Human infiltrates natives
    5. * Human discovers love with an alien female and the world is beautiful and humans have got it all wrong
    6. * Tech vs Nature war (I thought they would have learned already from Endor)
    7. * ???
    8. * Profit!!!
  36. What is there to nail? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Plot (and more) has been known for some time now.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  37. Re:An actual story? Why ruin it with that? by BobZee1 · · Score: 1

    I would have to add 'Transformers 2' to the list of movies "doing well with no story".

    --
    dumber people are doing harder things everyday
  38. Re:CG-wise? Disappointed. Storyline-wise? We'll se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... in other words they did a *really* good job. Those humans are CGI.

  39. Oh sure by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 2, Funny

    Trying to ride on the coat-tails of Felicia Day's hit indie geeky music video (Do You Wanna Date My) Avatar, which shot to the top of iTunes/Amazon/YouTube on Monday. How very sad.

  40. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What are you even talking about? The first trailer release for any movie is a teaser, they NEVER give you any indication of the plot. They're just trying to generate some interest. In a few weeks or months we'll get some more informative trailers. In any case, if you look closely you can see some potential interesting plot/character development bits, like how the main mech driver that you see seems to be in a wheel chair at first and then gets converted into one of the night-elf looking guys, thus regaining the use of his legs. How's that for a mind-trip? Also, did you notice there's a war on and what appears to be an inter-species love story as well? Jeez.

    As for the graphics, get off your AOL dial-up connection and watch it at 1080p and then tell me it looks like an xbox. As someone who owns Beowulf in blu-ray and Final Fantasy, and whose gaming PC can play FarCry2 at 1920x1200 resolution, 2xAA with ~47 fps average framerates, I can say that this stuff looks better than any of those. I was surprised at just how little uncanny valley there is in the human characters. The aliens looked a little weird, but I reserve judgement until I've seen it. It could be that they're well aliens and we're not supposed to closely identify with their movements.

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
  41. Here's to hopin there will be an iMax release by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 1

    Here's to hopin there will be an iMax release

  42. Re:CG-wise? Disappointed. Storyline-wise? We'll se by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Weren't the humans in Final Fantasy the Spirits Within CGI? Wouldn't that make this film 8 years late in being the first?

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  43. Statues by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    I bet there is a statue of Frodo Baggins somewhere in that planet. Almost beg for a LOTR/Avatar crossover. They use bows, looks somewhat elvish, if the "ships" used to leave the Middle Earth were starships back then, could be made a whole future/past story blending both fantasy and sci-fi with somewhat little effort. Of course, the actual full movie could dispell those similarities, but was my first impression looking at the trailer.

  44. Apples servers by Underholdning · · Score: 1

    I'm impressed that Apple's server isn't even sweating while serving hordes of slashdotters eager to take a first look. My initial thoughts after watching the trailer: Wow - very nice visual appearance.

  45. Re:Story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This seems rather similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_me_joe which was originally published in 1957. All the elements are there: cripple who telepathically controls a foreign species due to hostile environment, who then loses his grip on who he is. It's a great story but I hope it gets credit as the "seed" for this movie.

  46. Re:Story? by Kirin+Fenrir · · Score: 1

    Give several story points in a trailer, and people will complain you gave away the entire plot.

    Keep the story elements to a minimum, and people will complain your trailer is shallow.

    There is no victory for them, is there?

    --
    Caffeine is my anti-drug!

    Duranin - A NWN2 Roleplaying Persistent World
  47. then prepare to have your mind explode: by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  48. it's not a predator by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

    Predators shouldn't announce their presence. There's a scene in the trailer where a dino-thing jumps out of the bushes, roars, and runs after people.

    If you look closely in the first scene, the creature roars and then jumps over the main character. That would be a very strange behavior for a predator indeed. I suspect the creature is something else.

    In general though, you're absolutely spot on, I'll never forget that velociraptor that politely waited for the hunter to get out his witty remark, "Oh you're a clever girl" before attacking. Goofy.

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    1. Re:it's not a predator by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      In general though, you're absolutely spot on, I'll never forget that velociraptor that politely waited for the hunter to get out his witty remark, "Oh you're a clever girl" before attacking. Goofy.

      That was to allow time for a little gloat. It is the brighter-than-the-average-dino equivalent to monologuing. Though the 'raptor showed some restraint so got away with it, where most monologuing evil types go over the top and give the victim an easy out while they are distracted.

  49. It is just a teaser... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Predators shouldn't announce their presence. There's a scene in the trailer where a dino-thing jumps out of the bushes, roars, and runs after people. I see this all the time in action movies where some large animal is about to attack the hero: the predator rises from the bushes (or from behind whatever), bellows, then rushes to attack. But in that split-second, our hero is able to throw himself behind cover, narrowly avoiding being eaten.

    Actually... no. You are judging the scene from a handful of out of sequence and cut-off shots.

    Here is how that scene actually plays.

    http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41793

    One of the first things we see on the planet is Worthington's Avatar playing with these tube-snake-like flora. He touches one and it disappears, sucking back into the ground with a FROOMPF. He's delighted, playing around in this field of tall plants, making them disappear with a touch until he does that to one and it reveals a really pissed off giant rhino lookin' thing with a hammerhead nose.

    It brays at Worthington's Avatar and stamps its feet, threatening to charge. The Moore Avatar and Sigourney Weaver Avatar are with-in shouting distance and Weaver stops him from using the giant machine gun he's carrying, saying the hide is too tough and that shooting it will only piss it off.

    The Worthington Avatar is unsure of what to do, even thought Weaver is telling him this rhino thing is just putting on a threat display and won't charge if Worthington stands his ground. There's a herd of rhino-aliens behind this one, which keeps braying and using his hammerhead horn nose to knock down trees. It shows its displeasure by a colorful ruff raising (like peacocks feathers but armored).

    The creature doesn't seem to know it's just a territorial threat display and charges Worthington's Avatar who just charges it right back, screaming. It stops and looks confused, then scarred, turning back and running away with the heard.

    Of course that means a slick-skinned panther-like creature is behind Worthington. It leaps over him and charges the bigger game, which runs off... then it turns and realizes there's another smaller, but just as tasty morsel right in front of him.

    Apparently, the predator-creature WAS all sneaky and hidden, going after the "rhino-aliens" but Jake's avatar alerted one of those who started to charge at him, in turn making the predator-creature think it's cover is blown and it's under attack so it turns from a hunter into a defender, roars and attacks.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  50. Re:An actual story? Why ruin it with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Avatar looks like it might actually be better with no story than the ham-fisted "back to nature" plot it appears to have.

  51. 1-It's a teaser; 2-go watch it in 1080p. by denzacar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Over and out.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:1-It's a teaser; 2-go watch it in 1080p. by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

      As I noted to the other professional Slashdotter who replied, I did indeed watch in full res. And frankly if I need to watch in full res to not be completely offput by the graphics then there's something fundamentally wrong.

      Still sucks.

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
    2. Re:1-It's a teaser; 2-go watch it in 1080p. by denzacar · · Score: 1

      And frankly if I need to watch in full res to not be completely offput by the graphics then there's something fundamentally wrong.

      Let me get this straight...
      First you are complaining that the CGI is not up to your high expectations, but then you claim that there is something wrong with it cause you have to look at it IN DETAIL to be able to see the DETAILS?

      But I guess that you are used to get your video from a direct to brain input that you got from your future self, who also told you the plot of all future movies.
      I mean... You already KNOW everything... no.. wait... YOU CAN GUARANTEE what the 120+ minute movie that is coming out 1.2.3.. 4 months from now will be like.
      Yeah... I guess I understand how looking at details to see the details could be annoying. Kinda.

      And you can guarantee that they will not take any time to let the story breath underneath all of those explosions.

      Or did you mean that WE can guarantee that?
      I don't see how are any of us qualified to do that.
      I'd imagine only James Cameron can make such claims.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    3. Re:1-It's a teaser; 2-go watch it in 1080p. by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
    4. Re:1-It's a teaser; 2-go watch it in 1080p. by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

      To expand on that "yes":

      I watched it. It sucks.

      As for what I want: CGI that's good enough that it truly allows me to suspend my disbelief. It didn't do this at any resolution.

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
    5. Re:1-It's a teaser; 2-go watch it in 1080p. by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 1

      The teaser has a mixture of detail levels. They are probably still actively doing animation for parts of it, CGI production runs tend to end up like that.

      There's one very sharp, in focus (mostly not motion blurred) frame of angry alien face at 1:39, after the armored marines come charging out of the lander, which is fully 1080 photorealistic, and could be a photo of a person if it wasn't for people's heads not being built quite that way.

      That's what the movie's production team is *capable of*. What they do for most of the movie is unknown - some of the shots had no-better-than-good video game graphics. Some of them have far better. Hopefully the obviously deficient shots are rerendered at the level we see in the 1:39 face by the time they reach the screen. If not, they didn't spend enough money on the render farm (or take enough time), and that would be a pity.

  52. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

    I *did* watch in full rez - and yep, jarringly unrealistic CGI. Didn't impress, sorry.

    As for teasing - I didn't feel at all teased, but I did feel like I was watching a video game, which is exactly what most of these sorts of movies have become; indeed, one could say that the very first Star Wars was the prototype for movie-as-videogame-thrillride.

    Honestly it unintentionally looks like one of those movies where they combine obvious animation with real filmed characters. It just doesn't work here for me, but I'm sure those weaned on game consoles will love it (which, again, is probably the whole point - I think your response to my post was essentially saying "Waaa, the bad man criticized my XBox!")

    --
    Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
  53. Re:Story? by seanalltogether · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here's the thing I hate about sci-fi plots. Humans have the ability to fly half way across the galaxy, can engineer biological hybrids, can link those hybrids to a humans mind, but the simple act of reconnecting a spinal cord back together in order to cure paralysis is still beyond their reach?

  54. Seek professional help. by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I couldn't even bother to finish a 2 minute trailer.

    I do believe that there is a treatment for that.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Seek professional help. by electrostatic · · Score: 1

      "Methylphenidate"

      I've been taking it for fifteen years and still didn't recognize the chemical name. Too many syllables, too little time...

  55. Re:Story? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Jake has unwittingly been recruited to become part of this encroachment. Since humans are unable to breathe the air on Pandora, they have created genetically-bred human-Na'vi hybrids known as Avatars. The Avatars are living, breathing bodies in the real world, controlled by a human driver through a technology that links the driver's mind to the Avatar body. On Pandora, through his Avatar body, Jake can be whole once again. Moreover, he falls in love with a young Na'vi woman, Neytiri, whose beauty is matched by her ferocity in battle.

    Humanoid aliens. *sigh* I can buy it if the scenario is along the lines of ancient astronauts where the humanoid aliens are actually genetically modified from human stock or something like a Stargate where human life is seeded on other worlds by powerful entities in the past but it does sort of irk me when humanoid lifeforms evolve independently with no other explanation than someone handwaving and saying "Perhaps the bipedal form is the most superior one for earth-like worlds." Bah. I'll only buy it if the explanation is "They don't look like us. We look like them!"

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  56. Re:Story? by Mursk · · Score: 1

    Good call. The plot sounded vaguely familiar, but it's been a while since I read that story. Thanks for the reminder.

    --
    "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
  57. Re:Story? by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

    It is because people are ashamed of and/or intimidated by their ignorance of basic science and technology, so they cope by inventing excuses to devalue those endeavors.

  58. Re:Story? by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 1

    the plot device doesn't output that ability.

  59. Wait wheres my air bending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been duped!

  60. Re:Story? by Toonol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cameron said he wanted to make more 'alien' aliens, but that conflicted with one of the plot points... a human consciousness in an alien body, falling in love with another alien. He had to go with the humanoid look in order to not completely repulse the audience.

  61. I believe that... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...that could very well be a part of what lies behind the "every single science fiction book I read as a kid" line.

    As for the story... This is but a teaser.
    There is plenty of the story explained and revealed on wikipedia and elsewhere on the internet.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  62. This Looks Like Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. "Hey, let's combine an SF action film with World of Warcracft!"

    2. "Let's make sure to cram another ecological parable down viewer's throats, and have the human troops (which just happen to look like current American troops) be the bad guys. Sure, every anti-war film we make tanks and loses money, but this is science fiction Maybe we cans lip it by them."

    3. And why are we blowing up the tall blue eleven Ewoks? For minerals! Yeah, cause we're really going to send huge space armadas via Faster Than Light travel all the way to another solar system for minerals.

  63. NOW... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    It isn't sweating NOW.

    After days of anticipation they have failed spectacularly.
    Instead of seeing it exclusively on Apple's site the internet got the first look at the trailer from France's MSN portal.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  64. nnnnnnngggggg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, cause if james cameron is good at anything, it's telling a fuckin' LOVE STORY

  65. Re:An actual story? Why ruin it with that? by nitroamos · · Score: 1

    Exactly.
    1) they release movies with pretty graphics and no story.
    2) then they release movies with graphics AND story.
    => profit

    If you *reverse* the order, then they only make half the profit because nobody would pay to see movies of type #1 if type #2 are available!

  66. Re:Story? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Cameron said he wanted to make more 'alien' aliens, but that conflicted with one of the plot points... a human consciousness in an alien body, falling in love with another alien. He had to go with the humanoid look in order to not completely repulse the audience.

    *imagines aliens looking like James Carville.* You're right. I withdraw my objection.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  67. Re:Story? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's the thing I hate about sci-fi plots. Humans have the ability to fly half way across the galaxy, can engineer biological hybrids, can link those hybrids to a humans mind, but the simple act of reconnecting a spinal cord back together in order to cure paralysis is still beyond their reach?

    I guess Health Care Reform didn't work in this sci-fi.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  68. Cameron tries the Lucas kool aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen more convincing CGI in console titles. Come back Jar-Jar, all is forgiven.

  69. Ferngully 2009 by MrSmith0011000100110 · · Score: 1

    Seriously anyone with kids around 15 years old should remember the craptastic film Ferngully in which a construction worker is magically altered and joins the creatures fight over "Ferngully". Seems highly reminiscent.. I'm not a fan of movies that regurgitate old ideas and sell them as their own. Oh wait, that's all anyone does anymore. My bad

  70. HALO Vs World of Warcraft by ForMeToPoopOn · · Score: 1

    What I saw in the Avatar teaser was HALO Vs World of Warcraft...Men with big guns fighting the elves...

    1. Re:HALO Vs World of Warcraft by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      Definitely reminded me of HALO, elves? I don't know about that...No big ears.

    2. Re:HALO Vs World of Warcraft by pwfffff · · Score: 2

      If you immediately associate 'men with big guns' with HALO and elves with WoW then please, please, gtfo my slashdot.

      Not sure why 12 year olds would wanna hang out here anyways.

    3. Re:HALO Vs World of Warcraft by antdude · · Score: 1

      I am not 12, but over 30 and also thought the blue aliens sort of looked like WoW's NEs. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  71. Re:CG-wise? Disappointed. Storyline-wise? We'll se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *All* humans in the trailer are CG? If so, then 1) I am blown away. 2) Would like to ask the people that animated the human models to go back and animate the blue-skinned alien models.

  72. Dragonriders of Pern as a movie by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    I agree those would make great movies, especially the original trilogy. I would love to see the first Dragonriders of Pern trilogy made into three movies. My question is do you leave it like it is and get an R rating (maybe even NC-17 depending on how graphic you make a couple of the scenes) or do you clean it up for a PG-13. There are only a couple of scenes in the book that would put it over the top and they don't effect the plot much. On the other hand those scenes do a lot to explain the culture.
    I would also love to see the Harper Hall of Pern trilogy made into a movie trilogy as well.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  73. Re:Story? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's the first time I read Avatar's plot summary, and I must say I don't like it at all. The concept - Jake's consciousness in an alien's body is fine, but everything else just reeks of cliches. "Noble savages" for aliens who a have different skin tone, elvish ears and motherfucking flying dragons, greedy white man stealing the alien's natural resources, etc. Uh-oh.

    Also, I hope there's a good reason why they can redirect a human's consciousness into an alien, but can't heal partial paralysis. Other than that, the trailer looks good visually... but they have James fucking Cameron directing the movie and the trailer says "From the Director of Titanic"?! If that's their target audience, I think I just might skip it unless the 3D stuff is really kickin' rad!

  74. There's story... didn't pay attention during SDCC? by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 1

    "no indication of any actual story. Here's hoping there is one." ? Really? There was extensive coverage of the story during SDCC, and you hope there is one? Yes, there's a story, and it's a good one.

  75. Re:CG-wise? Disappointed. Storyline-wise? We'll se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be more accurate:

    If the humans at the 0:40 (close-up of the old man), 0:59 (two guys looking into the blue tank), and 1:06 (guy using the computer) mark of the 1080p trailer are 100% CG, then I am blown away.

  76. Re:CG-wise? Disappointed. Storyline-wise? We'll se by hesiod · · Score: 1

    I was wondering that myself. I don't know how the FF movie was made, but is it possible they used human actors to do the positioning in FF, and this was all made on computers? I don't know what it's called, but it's where an actor wears a funky spandex suit with dots all over it so a computer can follow their movements and mimic it with a CG character. It was used for Gollum in LotR.

  77. No Story = Fantasia by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping for a great story, because otherwise it's just Fantasia. And while I like Fantasia very much, that's already been done.

    And I want a complex story where neither side is completely good, and neither side is completely bad, and neither side is completely all powerful and neither side is completely helpless. Let the decisions to be made be hard ones, not obvious choices, but I still won't mind a HEA ending.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:No Story = Fantasia by TheSync · · Score: 1

      And while I like Fantasia very much, that's already been done.

      Not in 3D...

  78. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by camperdave · · Score: 1

    They make no attempt to even hint at a plot, which tells me that they have essentially strung together a parade of impressive FX to hang on the bones of an irrelevant story.

    Yeah! Cameron and unimpressive, irrelevant stories... like Terminator, Titanic, Aliens, True Lies... A real nobody.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  79. Re:No Story = Fantasia, OH, DON'T FORGET... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Oh, and don't make one side all wise while the other is totally stupid. Let both sides be intelligent and capable and that this is conflicting motives where both sides are both right and wrong. Then you'll really have something.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  80. Cameron Rips Off 'The Outer Limits' Yet Again by dynamator · · Score: 1

    Human to alien transformation is sort of a core SF idea, which was done very well in the classic (60's) Outer Limits episode 'The Cameleon' with Robert Duval in the tile roll. Harlan didn't write this one though, credit goes to Lou Morheim and series creator Joe Stefano.

  81. Re:Story? by jonnythan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From 1940:

    Here's the thing I hate about sci-fi plots. Humans have created a vast global super-high-speed data network capable of transferring entire libraries of information across the planet in under one second, have sent actual human beings to the moon, have cracked the entire human genome and are genetically engineering crops and animals, but the simple act of creating a flying car is still beyond their reach?

  82. Re:CG-wise? Disappointed. Storyline-wise? We'll se by emarkp · · Score: 1

    Yes, FF was entirely motion capture. Which maximized the "uncanny valley" effect. Though it was the best job I'd seen rendering human hair up until that point.

  83. WTF night elves on flying mounts in Outland by spacefiddle · · Score: 1

    lolwut...? blue-skinned pointy-eared tall skinny dudes on dragons in a landscape with inexplicably floating landmasses. Uh...

  84. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Love Cameron's work, but this trailer left me going "So what? Big deal." Has my imagination become so jaded by over-the-top CGI that it just doesn't impress me any more? These days I'd much rather see low budget live-action than mega-buck CGI. Computers have ruined movies. Now where do I sign up for that luddite dating service?

  85. Re:Story? by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, creating a flying car isn't beyond our reach. There have been several of them. What is beyond our reach is creating one that is economical and safe enough for the average joe to use.

  86. More than a few..... by Joviex · · Score: 1

    Yes, the CGI is stunning - for most of the trailer, it's hard to believe it's not live action. They have made a huge leap across the uncanny valley, and successfully.

    The CGI is far from Stunning. It is on par with most of todays CG character work, and even looks in some spots to have taken a step backwards. As for the uncanny valley, that applies to Humans, not aliens.

  87. is that using 'Papyrus' as a font? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    that doesn't inspire me with confidence.

    as for the rest of it... an aliens/t2 mashup. blue things look like super soldiers, being kept by humans (a la aliens). the ships are the same things from aliens/t2. seriously... get a new idea.

    "FROM THE DIRECTOR OF TITANIC"

    yeah - the man who used the tragic death of like 1500 people to hang a trite love story. still gives you the hope that in 80 odd years time we can use the 9/11 as a backdrop to another trite love story. perhaps they can be on the roof leaning over like in titanic.

  88. Re:An actual story? Why ruin it with that? by Ucklak · · Score: 1

    Best movie of the summer. And I mean it.

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  89. Re:Story? by Plastic+Pencil · · Score: 1

    Word. We can even put someone in another(higher) life form, but we can't put them even in a functional human body? Anyone see G.I. Joe? How come Cobra Commander has all this cool facial technology but couldn't fix himself? Please James Cameron, please let this be a good film and not $250 million CG 3-D demo. You're one of the last film makers who hasn't disappointed me...

  90. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm a little stunned at the lack of faith here.

    This is the guy who directed (and even more importantly, WROTE) Terminator, Aliens, The Abyss, and Terminator 2. The latter two in particular also pioneered groundbreaking CGI effects for the time, and the stories certainly didn't suffer as a result.

    Cameron has proven himself a visionary and gifted storyteller (particularly in the sci-fi realm) many times over. Your self-assured criticism of the story (based on a TEASER, ffs) is unwarranted and premature. This isn't Michael Bay or McG we're talking about here, it's a man whose previous forays into sci-fi are widely considered classics of the genre.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  91. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I also watched the 1080p version and was terribly unimpressed.

    It looked technically complicated and high-res or whatever, but it did not look "good". I think it fell flat-faced right into the uncanny valley for me (which, as a perspective thing, is of course relative to the viewer). No need to throw insults around just because someone wasn't as enamored with it as you were.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  92. Oh my! Cameron is going to change the world again. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having read the (now scrubbed from the web after having floated around for several years) full script treatment penned by Cameron, I can assure you that it's a very solid story.

    It IS formula, but then so was Titanic, (and Dances with Wolves for that matter). But Cameron knows how to work a formula impeccably. And the guy has actually gone and found a New Cool technology, which if used effectively and spun right, (think Jurassic Park), can help significantly in the promotion of a film.

    The buzz is that the 3D has got the techs in Hollywood really excited about going to work every day.

    People are going to see this film in droves and they are going to be blown away by it. I feel safe in predicting that.

    Avatar, however, isn't going to be bigger than Titanic in terms of sales. I'll go ahead and predict that as well. --Why not? Because he isn't tapping the same doomed-romance nerve which is crack-cocaine to the average 15 year-old girl.

    The casting of Titanic was both cynical and brilliant: Casting the almost beautiful Kate Winslet as the female lead was a sly maneuver which allowed the female audience to fantasize over the notion that even plane-Jane girls like themselves could have their very own Leonardo Decaprio. --And that his character should conveniently die at the end of the film so that he wouldn't put his lover through years of poverty, while in the same action giving her a bitter-sweet memory to polish and secretly wax pathetic over for years and years. . , well, that's just orgasmic! The girl-buttons deep inside girl-machines are placed in some really odd ways, but Cameron found 'em all and pushed every last one he could reach.

    Avatar is going to be really cool, but it's not going to press nearly so many girl-buttons. (Though, images of blue amazon elf maidens I suspect will become popular in comic book shops). And who knows? My own understanding of girl-buttons is admittedly rudimentary. Maybe Cameron's onto something that I'm not anticipating. It IS a love story, after all, and maybe that's enough to make the teen girls watch it half a dozen times as they did with Titanic. My guess, however, is that classical material riches, classic questions of marrying for love or for money, combined with the bad boy thing. . , well I suspect this will always out-rank sci-fi mojo amongst the teen girl set.

    In any case, this film looks very much like I pictured it from Cameron's prose, with one exception; I thought most of the fauna of Pandora was going to be glowing like a school of lamprey fish, but I guess the screen tests of that just didn't touch the right emotional nerves in viewers. The Audience is human, after all and Cameron knows his human psychology. I'm glad he's a sci-fi film maker and not a propaganda man like Goebbels!

    -FL

  93. OMG! by bloobamator · · Score: 1

    OMG! The trailer looks so awesome.

    --
    "Crude and slow, clansman. Your attack was no better than that of a clumsy child."
  94. Re:Story? by Stinky+Fartface · · Score: 1

    Seems more like this to me: http://www.delgo.com/

  95. Re:Oh my! Cameron is going to change the world aga by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Two things.

    I know Dances with Wolves was not a James Cameron movie. The formula bears some similarities to Avatar, though. I'd say that Avatar is rather like Dances with Wolves, mixed with Aliens, mixed with a bit of Strange Days and all boiled in a broth of Pocahontas.

    The second thing is that I spelled "Plain-Jane" incorrectly and was feeling bugged by my not being able to correct it. Perhaps I am getting befuddled by the now ubiquitous auto-correcting spelling feature which seems to have grown like a fungus across my entire OS. . . Doubt I'll turn it off, though!

    Cheers!

    -FL

  96. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead jars with the real-life scenes

    LOL, the whole thing is CGI... You complain about looking like an XBox while thinking there is real live action in there... Hahaha, too funny.

  97. Re:Story? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    Hate to quibble, but at the end of GI Joe, Cobra Commander does fix himself. He no longer needs his breath mask, because he programmed his nanobots to repair his lungs. That's one way that Storm Shadow could have survived the movie as well. (because Cobra Commander has that remote control that lets him control the nanobots in every one of his soldiers. He could theoretically have sent a signal out ordering them to heal damage on any of his troops right before he was captured)

  98. Re:Story? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    i read somewhere james cameron said it was dances with wolves but with aliens. it's what came to my mind when i read the synopsis (dude infiltrates a foreign and somewhat hostile group, falls in love, becomes one of them, is forced to decide whether to betray his former life).

    What would make it even more like Dances With Wolves would be if the woman he falls in love with was herself a transplant to the alien culture who adapted, in addition to being the President of the Twelve Colonies.

    (hehe sorry I recently saw Dances again and made the connection)

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  99. Re:Story? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    a human consciousness in an alien body, falling in love with another alien. He had to go with the humanoid look in order to not completely repulse the audience.

    Why not? It worked in Galaxy Quest!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  100. Re:Fuck apple by sensationull · · Score: 1

    I agree, I'm not installing CrapTime player on my machine for that. VLC FTW, just need to jump through the usual BS Apple hoops to get to the content.

  101. Re:Story? by oneTheory · · Score: 1

    You must have repressed your memories of Titanic, written and directed by your friend, James Cameron, ya?

  102. Re:Story? by oneTheory · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is no victory for them, is there?

    Nope, not if the plot is so trite that a few story points actually do give away the whole plot, or the story is so boring that just a few teases don't properly whet the appetite.

    It's certainly not an easy thing to do, but I thought that's what some of that hundreds of millions of dollars went toward. I have often left a theater wondering why the producers don't take 1 million out of the 100+ million FX budget and put it into hiring someone with actual talent in vague concepts like storyline, continuity, plot elements, creativity, etc.

  103. No hint of story? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of very cool visual elements in there but no indication of any actual story

    This, IMHO, is exactly what I want in a trailer. I want to see what the movie looks like, but I don't want to know much, if anything at all, about the story. District 9's trailers were good in this aspect that they didn't give away the whole storyline and they didn't show all of the coolest fx in one go, there was still a lot to discover in the movie even after watching all the trailers.

  104. Re:An actual story? Why ruin it with that? by Archimonde · · Score: 1

    Yeah, judging from the trailer it is a bad breed between SW: episode 2 and some Disney's Pocahontas or whatever.

    --
    Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
  105. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Those 3 movies you mentieoned were made 20 years ago, before everything he had the most tenuous connection to was anticipated more than the second coming and hailed as genius before it went into production. Then he made a whole bunch of shit movies. No one can keep the streak going forever, especially when his driving force has seemed to change from cool stories that have cool effects to cool effects that need a story to allow him to use them in a movie.

  106. Re:Story? by Plastic+Pencil · · Score: 1

    Sorry man, I don't follow. I didn't see Cobra Commander fix his appearance or condition, he just put on another face mask.

  107. Re:Story? by Plastic+Pencil · · Score: 1

    Would you call it a bad film? I wouldn't. I think Cameron has always focused on using technology to enhance storytelling (a la T2), rather than use it as an excuse to make a movie, a la practically every big CGI mess today.

  108. Re:Oh my! Cameron is going to change the world aga by lennier · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "the almost beautiful Kate Winslet"

    Almost?!

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  109. Re:Story? by pcgabe · · Score: 1

    THAT's the part that bothers you?

    How about: Humans fly half way across the galaxy, and encounter aliens roughly the same shape that also have a cultural hangup about exposed boobs.

    (It's not just that they are essentially humans in furry suits, they are AMERICANS in furry suits. Boobs=bad, violence=OK)

    --
    Don't put advice in your sig.
  110. Re:Story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Eh, Titanic wasn't that bad. It was just a chick flick with a predictable plot and journeyman acting that you wouldn't think justify it being one of the highest grossing movies of the last century. Was it worse than some other top-grossing movies like the Star Wars movies? Not by much.

    For a movie to be top-grossing, to a certain extent it's got to be mass-marketable to a broad segment of the population, accessible to at least some with an IQ of 85. Terminator 1 & 2 manage to do well in spite of an intelligent plot by including explosions and special effects to distract and satisfy the prurient interests of those on the lower end of the IQ scale. Generally though, a movie which makes people think is more likely to get niche cult status like Blade Runner than be a blockbuster. Funding is more easy to get for the former than for the latter.

    In the past, due to the large cost of filming (equipment, crew, location rental, etc), let alone special effects, a movie has had to avoid being too intelligent and challenging to its audience to be able recover its costs. I actually hope that one of the effects of decreasing costs in digital filming, editing, and distribution is that we'll eventually see some really intelligent films being budgeted and produced for a niche highly-intelligent audience. You would think some advertisers would want to reach that group. Some of them might even eventually reach the mass market in a "Brief History of Time" sitting-on-your-coffee-table way.

    However it's going to take the retirement of the current generation of producers and distributors before that can happen, and it certainly won't happen in this economy where everybody is risk averse. The TV channels are awash in variants of police and forensic procedurals. CBC killed a show like Intelligence, but a lowbrow show like 24 gets high ratings on Fox. Sigh.

  111. Re:Oh my! Cameron is going to change the world aga by SoupGuru · · Score: 1

    She has pretty sharp knees.

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  112. Re:Story? by spitzak · · Score: 1

    You do know that "A Brief History of TIme" was made into a movie, right? It even included reasonably significant CG back at a time when that was really expensive.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Brief_History_of_Time_(film)

  113. Re:Story? by mgblst · · Score: 1

    What an absolutely ridiculous statement, I am not sure if what you said is meant to be taken seriously. Where, outside of a childs mind, would the two be linked? Why ever would one technological advance, have anything to do with a completely unrelated advance?

    I guess you are equally confused when you see that we have major advances in chip design, but are still driving around in cars essentially unchanged from 100 years ago.

  114. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by shirotakaaki · · Score: 1

    But its in 3D!!!!!!!!!!

  115. 15 minute previews (in 3d) in Wellington today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For anyone in Wellington NZ, Reading Cinemas has free 15 minute previews of Avatar today.

    Enjoy.

  116. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

    Then he made a whole bunch of shit movies

    LOL, excuse me?

    He's made exactly two feature films since T2: True Lies and Titanic.

    • True Lies - Admittedly his weakest film, it has 68% on RT, was the third highest grosser of 1994, and won Jamie Lee Curtis a Golden Globe, and had a score of other nominations.
    • Titanic - Highest grossing film of all time. 11 Oscar wins. Roger Ebert described it as "flawlessly crafted, intelligently constructed, strongly acted, and spellbinding..."

    Personal tastes aside, this is your definition of "a whole bunch of shit movies"?

    The simple fact is, every single feature that James Cameron has helmed (and no, I don't count Piranha 2, he "inherited" that when the original director left) has been a critical and commercial success. He simply took a big break from feature films after Titanic.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  117. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by mgblst · · Score: 1

    True, and good movies all of them. But he also did titanic, the last movie he made.

  118. Re:Story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry? I thought the hostile group was the foreigners. You make it sound like the natives were foreign. Just a slip right?

  119. Re:Story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck that. We still haven't created an average joe I would trust with something as heavy as an SUV but 4 times as fast!

  120. The 80s called... by marciot · · Score: 1

    ...and said it wants its Smurfs back.

  121. Predators often announce their presence... by Guppy · · Score: 1

    Predators shouldn't announce their presence. There's a scene in the trailer where a dino-thing jumps out of the bushes, roars, and runs after people. I see this all the time in action movies where some large animal is about to attack the hero: the predator rises from the bushes (or from behind whatever), bellows, then rushes to attack.

    Predators announce their presence before attacking quite often. I usually assume a big, showy attack is an example of a territorial defense, with the human viewed as a rival predatory species.

  122. Elves vs Space Marines by physburn · · Score: 1
    Much as the CGI in the trailer looks good. I just can't imaging any plot that isn't downright stupid being able to pit Elves against space marines. I bet this will be very silly indeed.

    ---

    Science Fiction Movie Feed @ Feed Distiller

  123. Somebody please explain to me... by Sturm · · Score: 1

    how the hell an inane, stupid-ass post that has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the topic has been moderated to the top and marked "Informative"?

    You knew what the poster meant, you pedantic wanker.

    Your post (as is mine) is completely unrelated, in any way, to the actual content of the story. So, while it might be "Informative" in a completely and utterly useless sense, it doesn't contribute in the least to the actual topic of conversation.

    It's an Internet forum, not an English Course and nobody voted you the grammar/spelling police. Just because you CAN post, doesn't mean you should (unless you are contributing something meaningful to the actual topic of discussion).

    Next time you get ready to hit "Submit", try taking a deep breath, relaxing your sphincter just a bit and reading what you wrote. If it sounds as trite and ridiculous as what you just posted, you'd be better off not wasting your bandwidth and more importantly the time, of those of us who have to peruse through this sort of tripe to get to something which actually contributes to the actual discussion.

  124. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

    Yeah, what a failure that was.

    Titanic was a victim of its own success, like an overplayed song on the radio.

    Either way, Cameron deserves more than a scornful assumption that all he'll produce is vacuous eye candy.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  125. apple disabled it by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    looks like hotlinking has been disabled.

    and downloading didn't work...I got a 1KB file...think something got hosed

  126. Re:Oh my! Cameron is going to change the world aga by Azundris · · Score: 1

    Sure, Kate's not perfect by common beauty standards. And yes, I appreciated that in a weird way, for variety alone. But let's be fair here, Leo's not all that either. So it was a movie with two (visually) non-perfect people. (Which was kinda nice.) Speaking for myself, it wasn't "Even you can get Leo." If there was an "even you" in there at all, it was, "Even girls like you could get that deep, amazing love."

  127. Re:Oh my! Cameron is going to change the world aga by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

    Have you seen her in anything recent? No thanks, no thanks.

  128. hard to watch by jensen404 · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was a lot of very inconsistent frame doubling.
    One part went like this:   (starting at 0:25)
    single frame:   I
    doubled frame:  -

    I-IIII-III-III-I-I-II-I-I-I-I-II I-I---I--I--I--I---I--I-I-I-I-I-II-I-I-I-I-II-I-I-I

    This scene cross fades with a scene that doubles every 9th or 10th frame.

  129. user-agent manipulation needed by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    just need to set your user-agent to a "quicktime" user-agent (which means u can do it in Firefox with one of the many user-agent extensions or using wget)

    QuickTime/7.6.2 (qtver=7.6.2;os=Windows NT 5.1Service Pack 3)

    or

    QuickTime/7.6.2

    though for me, firefox didn't work...but wget does.

    1. Re:user-agent manipulation needed by agm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, that works. Thanks:

      wget -U "QuickTime/7.6.2" http://movies.apple.com/movies/fox/avatar/avatar2009aug0820a-tsr_h1080p.mov

    2. Re:user-agent manipulation needed by Teriblows · · Score: 1

      excellent that worked:) wget to the rescue..

  130. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    Even some of the live action shots looked really bad by today's standards. Him wheeling out of the landing craft looked like a CG stunt double even though I'm sure it's live action. The CG stunt double in the Mech suit in the same scene looked straight out of a 1999 game cinematic. Matrix Revolutions' mechs looked pretty much dead on perfect--District 9's mech looked pretty much perfect. These? Look like average to below average movie CG. Terribly unimpressed so far with the VFX. Especially after seeing District 9 which nailed it across the board.

    Although I've heard from people in the know that all the shots in the trailer look nothing like the final quality. I'll take their word for it, because not very many of those shots look like they should have been approved and finaled in their current state.

  131. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

    The lack of uncanny valley is due to the fact that they filmed it in live action as well as cg and blended that together, so the things like people's faces that are very hard to pull off will still look extremely realistic. That said, some of the characters faces were cg, especially the aliens, and they still looked pretty believable.

    --
    GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
  132. Re:An actual story? Why ruin it with that? by dangitman · · Score: 1

    GI Joe did just fine without any actual story.

    For certain values of "just fine."

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  133. Re:Story? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    It's a great story but I hope it gets credit as the "seed" for this movie.

    Yes I thought of that story too and I am sure it won't get credit. The Matrix was highly derivative too.

  134. Absolute sh11t Avatar CGI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Jesus, the eyes on the aliens are fucking so obvious crap CGI. That flop last year Dalgo or whatever had more realistic CG than these ones shown.

    1. Re:Absolute sh11t Avatar CGI by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I do agree that it looks pretty bad but the only way we are going to get 'there' is by pushing the envelope.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  135. Re:Story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their target audience is "everybody." There are two types of James Cameron fans, for the most part. There are the ones who know him as "the guy who did Titanic" -- they don't know his name and don't know anything about Avatar, so there is merit in splashing those words on the screen. The nerds who worship him for Aliens and Terminator 2 know what Avatar is, don't need to be told that James Cameron is behind it, and don't need to be told that he directed those movies.

  136. Did you mean BSG? by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    Sorry?

    I'm pretty sure that the girl in Dances with Wolves is native (even in the movie which diverges from the book). Granted, it's been a while.

    (And that sounds like a BSG reference, not DwW.)

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    1. Re:Did you mean BSG? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      (And that sounds like a BSG reference, not DwW.)\

      Hehe. It was both. The woman Costner fell in love with in DWW was a white settler adopted by the tribe, and much later she was the President in BsG. I never would have realized they were the same actress if I hadn't seen DWW on TV one random Sunday after watching BsG.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Did you mean BSG? by Denjiro · · Score: 1

      No Stands with a Fist was a Lakota adoptee. It's been ages since I watched the movie and I don't recall the exact circumstances. But that's why she can speak English even though she was out of practice.

  137. Re:Story? by crow5599 · · Score: 1

    forcing him to choose sides in an epic battle that will decide the fate of an entire world.

    Wow. The fate of just one measly world? Not of the galaxy? And not the standard "of the entire universe"? I thought this was standard Hollywood sci-fi! What gives? How is that going to sound impressive when spoken by the voice-over guy in all the trailers? Man!

    Maybe this is what Cameron means when he talks about realism.

  138. user agent spoofing by Space · · Score: 1

    Apparently Apple is checking for an appropriate user agent string. The following worked for me "wget -U QuickTime/7.6.2 http://movies.apple.com/movies/fox/avatar/avatar2009aug0820a-tsr_h1080p.mov".
    source: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1245441

    --
    I Don't Work Here
  139. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, it's more of Pretentiousgeek is trying too hard to be pretentious and got called on it.

  140. Impressive by jandersen · · Score: 1

    I must admit, I'm impressed; and here was I, thinking that the Tories were a bunch of rather wet whiners, who couldn't do much better than complaing about Gordon Brown, and then it turns out that David Cameron has a creative talent as well. Oh, wait, it said James Cameron; never mind.

  141. Re:Story? by One+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Someone writes something maybe you got a good story maybe you've got something nobody cares about. Until you actually put it out there you can't tell for sure.

    But if something blows up while stuntmen fly through the air in slow motion you can see you've got something visceral right away. And if you've been inhaling a lot of cocaine that thing kicks ass.

    --
    www.nodicerpg.com - Some RP stuff for free, some not so for free, but still cheap.
  142. Blizzard Movie by Chicken04GTO · · Score: 1

    Terrans vs Night Elves.

  143. Re:Story? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Fuck that. We still haven't created an average joe I would trust with a pet rock.

  144. Re:Story? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    And here I am, lost in dichotomic limbo, for I have seen Aliens and T2, yet do not know what Avatar is.

    *Vanishes in a puff of logic*

  145. Re:Story? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    Well, he healed Destro's third degree burns...

    True, he covered the skin with a metal mask, but at least he healed what would otherwise be a serious illness.

  146. Re:Oh my! Cameron is going to change the world aga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes - he's obviously dating a supermodel when he's not posting on /.

    It's ok, dude. We will imagine dating the Kate Winslets of the world. HE can imagine turning imaginary Kate Winslets down, and imagine dating women that meet his outrageously high standards, leaving many more imaginary dates free for our imaginary handsome, witty, socially adept selves.

  147. Re:Story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point. They should pass out more cocaine at theaters.

  148. I've read the screenplay by jabber · · Score: 2, Informative

    I read the screenplay for this about 5 years ago at this point. Honestly surprised it took so long to get made. I guess Cameron wanted technology to catch up to his imagination.

    The basic plot is a) humanity discovers alien world, b) populated by weird creatures, the most intelligent of which are the blue humanoid ones - you can think of them sort of as Native Americans; and c) that's pretty much the plot. Humans come to conquer this new world.

    To do this they d) grow "avatars" who are biologically like the aliens but into which human consciousness can be uploaded. This is done to e) interact with the aliens and convince them to let humans take over their planet. f) The aliens are not so keen on the idea and g) fight back. h) it turns out that they're not just primitives but that they i) live in close consciousness-sharing harmony with other creatures on their planet and j) their entire planet via plants.

    See, they k) have nerve bundles growing in their hair and these let them connect with other living beings, such as l) the pterodactyls which they're able to pilot by mind control. m) One particularly nasty human soldier scalps one of the main aliens and this is a very dramatic thing. n) the protagonist is a crippled Earth scientist who can't walk, but when loaded into his "avatar" he can, and so he wants to stay in his alien body. o) When an alien dies they get absobed by the foliage and become part of the planetary consciousness. p) Because the protagonist helps to chase off the nasty humans q)by wiping out the invading force and sending Earth a fake message about a lethal virus being on the planet, r) the aliens make him a permanent alien. s) there is also the obligatory love story.

    There, aren't you glad I just saved you 2 hours and $20???

    Sure, it'll be visually pretty but the plot is lame. Unless you're 13.

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
  149. Am I the only one that finds the trailer creepy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's the Uncanny valley but man, those blue things jumping around just look completely strange to me. And I don't find them at all intriguing either, it looks like a college 3D project from 4 years ago.

    Honestly I cannot tell why this is supposed to be so popular. Why is everyone thinking this movie is going to be the next huge hit?

    Compare this to anything Pixar is done and the difference in quality is just striking.

  150. Re:Oh my! Cameron is going to change the world aga by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Yes - he's obviously dating a supermodel when he's not posting on /.

    Oh, settle down now. I've been with some unattractive 'beautiful' girls, and I've been with some beautiful 'unattractive' girls, and I've learned which I like more. It's definitely the soul that counts. --But that doesn't prevent me from being able to comment on Cameron's casting.

    -FL

  151. Re:Story? by Agripa · · Score: 1

    We have flying cars. They are called airplanes and helicopters.

    The political and economic problems are more significant than the engineering ones. If we did have a car which worked as well on the ground and in the air, it would face so many legal restrictions as to be unfeasible anyway.

  152. Re:CG-wise? Disappointed. Storyline-wise? We'll se by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    I just watched an interview with Cameron and he said the film is 35% live action - and I'm going to guess that part of that is the people.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  153. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watched the 1080p ..... there is nothing impressive about the CGI. In fact, it looked just as unfinished as the Hulk did in the Incredible Hulk.

    Sorry, but if Cameron expected something good coming out of this trailer, it fail miserably. The CGI looks cheap, more like an incomplete video game than a movie.

    If the trailer is an indication of the quality of the movie, I suspect is going to flop just as bad as the Watchmen.

  154. Re:Cliche scenes, undercooked CGI, no apparent plo by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder if you even watched the same trailer as I did. I certainly had no trouble cluing that the plot is basically a paraplegic "Space Marine" gets uploaded into an avatar designed to mimic the locals, then goes native and fights his original masters, and possibly there's an alien love interest, too.

    Your post smacks of trolling/hating.

    --
    It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  155. Cogworkz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I beg to differ - it was rife with story elements. Via watching the trailer and deducing things from visual components - I can conclude that it will be a story involving an alien world identified to have life and a native sentient population, albeit primitive. The person in the wheel chair represents some type of researcher who is interested in studying this race and to overcome his infirmity and provide him an access to the alien culture an "avatar" is constructed; this avatar being a physical body int he form of the alien race to be studied. The researcher is placed in an immersion tank where leads are fitted and a real time 1st person connection with the artificial body is established.

    From there - something happens that brings the humans and the aliens into conflict. The poor researcher within his avatar, cannot be identified from the alien population and finds himself on the other side of the battle. World spanning visual hijinx ensue.