Slashdot Mirror


How Hollywood Tie-Ins Saved Lego

MBCook writes "The New York Times published an article on Saturday profiling Lego, and how tie-ins with movies have helped save the company. 'Even as other toymakers struggle, this Danish maker of toy bricks is enjoying double-digit sales gains and swelling earnings. In recent years, Lego has increasingly focused on toys that many parents wouldn't recognize from their own childhood. Hollywood themes are commanding more shelf space, a far cry from the idealistic, purely imagination-oriented play that drove Lego for years and was as much a religion as a business strategy in Billund.' The article also mentions coming Lego Stores, a Lego board game, how Lego now allows sets with violence (like a gun for Indiana Jones), and how since 2004 Lego has cut part count nearly in half by encouraging re-use of parts and stopping one-off pieces."

193 comments

  1. 4 Pages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try this link.

    1. Re:4 Pages? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our Lego overlords

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:4 Pages? by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      I, for one, reject our new, not-the-same-as-before, intellectually emasculated Lego makers. Lego, with movie tie-ins, reduced part counts and reduced numbers of unique pieces may be more profitable for the company, but the ability to build just about anything has been hamstrung; gone are the days where once you've bulit the big dinosaur on the front (which takes an hour or two) you can sit down for another 3 days building a whole range of other things. My personal favorite Lego project was building moon bases from scratch, and I had accumulated an enormous box of lego from the many lego boxes that my parents and relatives bought for me.

      Now, with each box containing the barest minimum of parts, a much more specific goal (some stupid object from even stupider movie) and "encouraged part re-use" amassing such a vast lego treasure trove would be far more difficult, and the range of parts would be smaller, reducing the flexibility children would have to experiment using key unique parts for novel purposes, such as an upside down excavator shovel as an airlock hatch.

      RIP Lego - 1934 - 2004.

      --
      I hate printers.
    3. Re:4 Pages? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      But, I foresaw this in 1961, when my Grandma bought my first (or second?) box of Legos. This is why I have storage trailers with 20,000 tons of legos, collected over the years. This is why my sons built a full scale, functional space shuttle. Unfortunately, NASA wouldn't lend them the Canaveral launch pad....

      Alright, alright, so I lie......

      To be honest, I haven't messed with legos in a long time. Maybe you have a point.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:4 Pages? by Herby+Sagues · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you are mistaken. Reuced part counts and reduced numbers of unique pieces mean exactly the opposite of what you probably think. A decade ago you would see lego toys that were basically designed toys split in more or less blocky pieces, so it was basically a puzzle made to look like a lego. Everything was a custom piece. Now, everything is done from the same set of lego blocks. No "front end Ferrari spolier" block, no "X-Wing engine" block. It's all the same blocks. And that calls for much greater imagination, more challenging (and fun!) assembly and more flexibility. In fact, I have purchased for my children Star Wars X-Wing and Tie Fighter toys, a tank, the big Ferrati Enzo and a few other toys. And in each of them there were no more than three or four (generally minor) pieces that would not be used for other toys (maybe R2D2 legs, the X-Wing windshield and the Ferrari shock absorvers. All the rest was very ingeniusly built from stock pieces. That's ingenuity, and that's how it should be. And regarding the tie-ins, my children love watching the movies, then building sets based on them, or playing the games (which are uite innocent and educative, IMO, as they call for a good deal of thinking, at least for small children) and then attempting to build the objects they saw in the game. It looks like a very healthy franchise, and I hope they are doing more of it.

    5. Re:4 Pages? by MistrX · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points when you need them. I wholeheartly agree with MrNaz here. I collect lego from since I can remember and since 2004, the quality is downright awfull. Just only a few pieces in each box (which still cost as much as it did before 2004 oddly enough), pieces becoming larger so that you are done with 10 pieces stuck together and the movie based packs.

      Where are the big trains with electrified rails?
      Where are the gigantic packs with bricks only?
      Where are the packs with buildings where you need more then 200 pieces to construct?
      Where is my money gone? Lego bricks became less abundant but we still can pay for it.

      One bit of light on the matter: Lego lost it's monopoly on the bricks which may open the doors for other companies that are able to make Lego based bricks that are fully compatible. Now I just wait for some cheapass Chinese company starting up a business creating Lego bricks as we know them (read: pre-2004) for half the price.

    6. Re:4 Pages? by BOBSta · · Score: 1

      While I too lament the dumbing down of Lego, I feel that I need to correct you and point out that "Lego" is a company name. You can't pluralise it in to Legos! You probably mean "... first (or second?) boxes of Lego" and "...storage trailer with 20,000 tons of Lego bricks...". With a large collection of Lego Town, Lego Space and Lego Technic from the late 70's through to late 80's, I could build just about anything - especially with the motors, gears and pnuematics. Definitely toy of the 20th century, if not the millenium, but I can't realistically see that continuing. Also, I love Star wars and I love Lego, so when Lego Star wars started appearing a few years ago, I was over the moon with excitment at being able to relive two of the best loved things from my childhood. I just wish the wife would let me play in peace! ;)

    7. Re:4 Pages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      which are uite innocent and educative, IMO

      I see you haven't found the hot coffee mod yet, it opens up the red lights district of legotown.

    8. Re:4 Pages? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      While I too lament the dumbing down of Lego

      I never really understood this view. When I was a child, in the '80s, Lego was the dumbed down Meccano.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  2. Lego Star Wars by Khan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's the product line that has REALLY saved The Lego Group. The sales figures for that line alone are staggering. And as an AFOL, I can verify that the design quality and playability of their recent products have improved substantially. My kids continue to go back to their Lego collection to play with long after the novelty of the latest toy that they've received for their birthday\Xmas\whatever has worn off. As a friend of mine has always said, it's a thousand toys in one.

    --

    "Klaatu, verada, necktie!" -Ash

    1. Re:Lego Star Wars by Fael · · Score: 3, Funny

      How can you am so sure?

    2. Re:Lego Star Wars by steelfood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And as an AFOL, I can verify that the design quality and playability of their recent products have improved substantially.

      That's because of the reduction in one-off pieces as described by the article. I've noticed it independently myself, that there are a lot fewer specialized pieces in the products. There are still a few piece I'd like to see go the way of the dodo, but its' much better, all in all. And piece quality has gone up since '04 as well, closer to where they used to be.

      The thing that killed Lego in the early '00 was the lack of creativity. The themes were stale and the individual sets bland. The large amount of special pieces is strongly correlated with the decline in creativity. But after some major changes, including the redesign of new themes and re-release of classic themes, its popularity has shot back up again.

      BTW, Lego Star Wars has been around since '99. And back in the early '00, there were more licensed sets, inclusing Spiderman and Harry Potter. TLG was doing crappily despite having these lines. So I'd have to disagree with you and TFA that the licensed themes turned the tide. More than likely, they're what's keeping TLG in the black and making up the bulk of the sales. But the turn-around was due to more general product improvements across all of the lines.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    3. Re:Lego Star Wars by afidel · · Score: 1

      The problem is that such specialized sets are only furthering the problem of the helicopter parent generation, kids no longer understand how to participate in unstructured play. If everything is specialized and stylized into a specific role in a specific set then then how are kids supposed to come up with their own unique creations? Personally I've fought this trend by buying my son buckets of loose parts at garage sales, but at some point the huge piles of generic unstructured pieces will be gone, what then?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Lego Star Wars by Ripit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's room for both. My kid builds Lego Star Wars sets. When he gets tired of them, he takes them apart and makes his own stuff.

      Loose Legos from garage sales or craigslist are great, too. Lego still makes "generic unstructured pieces;" a large part of current sets are made from them.

    5. Re:Lego Star Wars by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I'm a YAFOL (Young Adult Fan of LEGO) and I concure here.
      I've been a fan of the Star Wars movies (well, OK, except for Episode II), but I never ended up with much of the merchandise.
      The Star Wars LEGO sets are pretty much the only SW merch I've got - great idea, a product at a confluence of two things (LEGO and SW) that are each strong & popular for their own reasons.

      I have a feeling that the BIG Lego Star Wars sets (which I didn't have) would have been even cooler to monkey around with, but then again, I could say that about a lot of other BIG lego sets.

      By this point, the SW sets have long since been mixed in with all my other parts, but the character figures still stand out, even if I built "nonauthentic Star Wars" tools/vehicles to go with them.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    6. Re:Lego Star Wars by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      I think that the reason it did crappy even for Spider-man and Harry Potter is for the reason you mentioned: specialized pieces. I bought a set (on clearance) for Spider-man 2, and was quite disappointed when I took it home to find out that the two-story walls were one solid piece of plastic, and that Doc Ock and Spidey were both slightly larger than normal Legomen; Doc Ock also had a pre-fab, solid hunk of plastic for his arms, so you couldn't position them.

      A few years later I bought another set, this time Doc Ock was a normal Legoman and his arms were the robotic limbs that we've known from Lego for years.

      The thing that has disheartened me about Lego recently, however, is the box: Remember when Lego boxes used to say "Ages: 9-99"? Look at any box, even the generic tubs. 6-16. Feh, FEH I SAY!

      The day I realized that it was no longer stated as 9-99 was the day my childhood died for good. But damn them, I'll build with Lego anyway! Spite them by buying their products and so forth.

    7. Re:Lego Star Wars by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      No more one-off pieces? then what do you call the spngebob squarepants sets *shock* *horror* i saw it in my toyshop... Almost everything was a one-off piece...

      Back in my day you built items you didn't have, ie a dog was
      a 1x1 square block, 1/3 of a brick high(head) - stuck on at a 45 degree angle
      a 2x1 block 1/3 of a brick high(body)
      2 1x1 round blocks 1/3 of a square high(legs)
      voila instant doggie to complete and family...

      The number of things you can build with general lego bricks is astounding - i built 20 pokemon from lego blocks from the 90's

    8. Re:Lego Star Wars by Eraesr · · Score: 1

      To be honest, a slightly distressing development with all the movie tie-ins is that Lego seems to have dropped all efforts to stick to their color uniformity. Back in the day you'd have white, black, gray, yellow, blue and red pieces. That was it. These days it looks like the Star Wars sets introduce their own shades of gray. There's blue pieces that are just a slightly different blue than the original blue color. The orange in the current Mars Mission sets looks like a different orange from the orange used in the old ice planet sets of the mid-90's. If you buy Lego pieces that are spread among 12 colors rather than the original 6 then it becomes increasingly hard to make new constructions out of a single color. I haven't touched Lego in a long time, so it could just be me, but I do get the impression that there's an increasing diversity in colors.

    9. Re:Lego Star Wars by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I made a lego tangram once.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Lego Star Wars by Ripit · · Score: 1

      You're right about that. It's maddening. I've got some Star Wars sets from 2000, and the dark grey is a little bit browner than the stuff coming out today.

  3. So, in short... by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, what you're telling me is Lego sold out. And for the Harrison Ford retirement fund--I mean, movie, no less.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:So, in short... by InMSWeAntitrust · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hey, in the business world you have to adapt to stay ahead. It's preferable to sell out than to go bankrupt . It may blacken the CEO's soul, but if whimsical toys powered by imagination don't sell, why stay the course and become the next GM?

    2. Re:So, in short... by rtfa-troll · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, no; a) they still make in Denmark with one of the highest safety standards in the business b) reduced "one off" special parts actually is a return to the spirit of building it yourself c) all the build it yourself stuff is still available d) you can still buy basic kits and they are as good as ever.

      There is one thing; the violence and Star Wars shit but you don't have to buy that for your kids. I don't. This is a major change (the didn't make green bricks for a long time so that nobody could make tanks and so on) but it's not the main or nearly most crucial element of Lego.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    3. Re:So, in short... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of the tie-ins are kind of meh; but the "cut part count nearly in half by encouraging re-use of parts and stopping one-off pieces" aspect makes everything better, and the bad aspects pretty much irrelevant.

      "POOP"s(Piece Out of Other Pieces are, along with wholly inflexible merely decorative elements, pretty much the biggest enemy of Lego as a reconfigurable imaginative toy. Instead of getting a bag of bits that can be the model on the box, or any number of other things, you just get a snap together model. Might as well come with hobby glue. If that is the case, the quality of the model on the box really matters; because that is more or less what you get.

      With the sharp reduction in one-off overdetermined crap, the goodness or badness of the model on the box matters a whole lot less, you can always just treat it as a kit of parts and rebuild it. The only thing that ends up really mattering is whether the color scheme of that particular tie-in is close enough to what you want.

      If movie tie-ins are what it takes for Lego to stay solvent(and volume sales almost certainly are, I don't even want to know how expensive Lego sets would be if they went from doing high-precision ABS injection molding to short-run high-precision ABS injection molding), that may well say something unfortunate about the buying public; but(as long as the sets aren't made of worthless pieces) that doesn't really harm old-school enthusiasts. If anything, the more sets sold, the more bricks will show up in big Ebay lots, or on Bricklink.

    4. Re:So, in short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      why stay the course and become the next GM

      To get a ginormous handout from the tax payers and continue running your business into the ground, of course!

    5. Re:So, in short... by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's usually more options, though. In a lot of cases, selling out isn't done to avoid going bankrupt, but just to make more profit than before--- the alternative would've been to be still-profitable, but smaller.

    6. Re:So, in short... by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      Hey, they can sell the family jewels as long as it lets them keep selling Technic.

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    7. Re:So, in short... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I grew up with Lego, and I can't express the joy it gives me to walk down a toy isle and see a healthy thriving Lego line. As you said, you don't have to buy the themed Lego sets (Indiana Jones, Star Wars, Space Police, etc). They are awesome, and if you're going to spend money on toys for a kid, Lego toys allow a child to explore his imagination better than static action figures. My preference is still for the Lego CITY set which are more inline with the Legos I had as a kid. These sets are very elaborate. You can get a Malibu beat house, an entire downtown street corner, a passenger plane, etc. And you can combine sets. You can have the perfect setup for your own SyFy channel weekend movie. You just need a city set, a shark, and some sort of space alien.

      If I have any complaint about the themed sets is that when I was a kid, a Lego sets gave you a main advertised assembled form plus a couple of alternate forms. This is still true today in some Lego sets, but in the themed sets like Indiana Jones, you get pieces that were clearly designed with one function in mind. For example, the Indiana Jones Shanghai Chase set gives you the two car from that scene in "Temple of Doom". You can't really use the pieces to make anything else but those cars.

    8. Re:So, in short... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're not selling out, they're cashing in!

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    9. Re:So, in short... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2, Informative
      I knew the days of lego greatness were over when a friend showed me his new lego rescue helicopter. It had a screw in one of the parts.

      A screw.

      That day, a part of me died.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    10. Re:So, in short... by Quothz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, what you're telling me is Lego sold out.

      I wouldn't say that. Lego is renowned as one of the best companies in the world to work for: They treat their employees well, pay them well, give them good bennies, and don't nickel and dime 'em. They don't shift jobs to countries where they can exploit workers. If selling out their brand name lets 'em avoid selling out their employees, then I'm all for it.

    11. Re:So, in short... by rickkw · · Score: 1

      Wow, are you suggesting GM is powered by imagination and that's why it does not sell? I guess high quality energy efficient Japanese cars must be so lack of imagination that causes them to be selling like hotcakes!

    12. Re:So, in short... by icebraining · · Score: 5, Informative

      How can they say that Lego sets have violence *now*, when I have a 1989 catalog with plenty of pirates models, with guns and canons?

    13. Re:So, in short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...if whimsical toys powered by imagination don't sell, why stay the course and become the next GM?

      Because if GM had been selling cars powered by imagination their profits would have been out of this world.

    14. Re:So, in short... by BitZtream · · Score: 1, Insightful

      'violence and Star Wars shit' ...

      God you are a fucking pussy. I'm flamebait, sure, but your kids are going to get their asses kicked so many times they turn into wife beating child abusers with that stupid mentality.

      You don't need green bricks to make a tank, kids have no problem with red tanks, blue tanks, white tanks and black ones. Its only retarded adults that think something like that is going to stop children from being children or somehow block millions of years of evolution which have made us into aggressive creatures in order to actually survive.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    15. Re:So, in short... by Moofie · · Score: 5, Informative

      A screw, like the one in my circa 1982 LEGO motor battery block?

      How hard that must have been for you. Do you need a hug?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    16. Re:So, in short... by maharb · · Score: 1

      A journalist needed to write a story. The worst part is these types of errors are common in things that matter, not just articles about toys.

    17. Re:So, in short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      error or libel

    18. Re:So, in short... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Not allow violence (i.e. real weapons)? Fort Legorado, 1996. Six shooters, rifles, swords, and cannons.

    19. Re:So, in short... by metlin · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      I had a Lego police van (Technic line, I think) from the 80s that had a screw as one of its components.

    20. Re:So, in short... by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      I believe it's because the Lego Corporation's rule was "no modern weapons" - that is, space lasers and blunderbusses are OK, but not more modern guns.

    21. Re:So, in short... by zoney_ie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They have more sets in the Lego "Creator" line than ever - i.e. basic building sets (many with *three* suggested models and instructions for each) and brick boxes/buckets. 42 sets in that section of their website, and my local store has an entire shelf section devoted to them - as much as Star Wars Lego has, possibly more (some large Creator sets on other shelves too).

      City Lego, while it is a theme, is obviously one of the major mainstays of Lego as ever though - again it's the largest product range (far more than Star Wars) and in my local toy store has maybe three or four times the shelf space of Star Wars.

      I disagree entirely with your last statement about the cars. These are fantastic mostly brick-built creations giving great inspiration even to adult Lego builders like myself as to how to build realistic-looking cars. The main custom piece is a small two-seat cockpit (created for the "Adventurers" theme in 1997 or so), and this can be used in any vehicle. The roof of the tan vehicle is admittedly a limited use canvas, but that of the black vehicle uses a new (~2005) hull piece used in many many City vehicles too, and it looks great for roof/bonnet of any vehicles you build yourself, also it's suitable for spaceships (indeed used in Space Police), canopies (as used in another indy set), all manner of other things too.

      As regards custom parts - things are about right in Lego at the moment. It was only in the late 90s/early 2000s that not only were there *perhaps* too many special parts, but the sets were poor value because large parts were put in to make up for lack of bricks. New sets have the special/large parts *AND* all the bricks! And as long as you get the parts in good value sets with plenty of bricks - I have no problem with things like "Big Ugly Rock Pieces" (referred to as BURPs by adult Lego builders) because they are exceedingly useful for scaling up one's own constructions too. Yeah a cliff made just from bricks looks best, but you need both large quantities of brick and the time and dedication to build a cohesive structure. BURPs allow you to build a load-bearing outline structure for little brick outlay, then decorate it and customise it appropriately with bricks and Lego foliage.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    22. Re:So, in short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all the classic space lego...the Space Shuttle from 1979 had what anyone (other than pandering marketeers) would describe as a laser gun.

    23. Re:So, in short... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      the didn't make green bricks for a long time so that nobody could make tanks and so on

      When I was a kid it never bothered me that my battleships were red, blue, yellow and white. I was able to suspend belief somehow. Even grey only came in later when the space range started.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:So, in short... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Is the space laser the thing that looks like a modern bazooka? I had some of those, if you stuck a flagpole in the end and a round 4 stud to the sight it looked a lot like an Oerlikon 20mm. If kids want to send their little people to war they'll find a way.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Imagination still useful by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My son is 6 and right smack in the middle of the kids they are shooting for. He is obsessed with Star Wars, and loves playing Lego Star Wars. He's collected a few sets now for birthday, Christmas, etc. We have a lot of fun building the kits to the directions, but spend just as much time figuring out new things to build. There are a lot of different shapes that go well beyond the idea of a 'block' and I think it involves a lot more imagination to figure new ways to connect them.

    It's something we can do together and have a lot of fun with it. When he's a little older we'll start working with the Mindstorm kit together.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Imagination still useful by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      When you mean "we"... do you mean "you" and your kid sitting on the side, watching? ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:Imagination still useful by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      No - I mean he and I with big piles of legos around us and we are each putting stuff together. When he builds by the directions I help him find pieces if he gets stuck looking for them. We have all his kits in plastic bags, sorted by color which can make it tough to find certain pieces. He does a great job building.

      Over the summer his cousin brought some Bionical sets to a family get together so now he really wants some of those. He has one Indiana Jones set - but he's never seen the films and isn't really into it. (When we went to the Indiana Jones stunt show at a local theme park he was bored and kept asking when it would be over and when we'd get to do the Star Wars ride.)

      He does like the mission mars sets though.

      My daughters like them too - but there really aren't too many girl themed sets that are very good.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:Imagination still useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagination still useful...He is obsessed with Star Wars

      Ah, Star Wars, that well known example of reality based science fiction. :)

    4. Re:Imagination still useful by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When the first Star Wars movie came out I was 8 years old. I was completely taken by it. I had figures, comic books, trading cards, etc. It might not be reality based but it is the pirate/cowboy fantasy of a few generations. My son has a ton of fun running around the house with a light saber, or tie fighter - pretending to be someone from the movie. What's been really weird to watch is how the current show and more recent movies make the storm troopers the good guys. My son spends a lot of time pretending to be a jedi or storm trooper that is busy blowing up robots. When I was a kid we were busy pretending to be Luke or Han blowing up storm troopers.

      I think one reason (among a few) that the new films upset so many people is that these really are kids movies, and a lot of the upset people weren't kids any more.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    5. Re:Imagination still useful by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 1

      "When you mean "we"... do you mean "you" and your kid sitting on the side, watching?" was a joke, about you planting to play with the Legos even more than your sun.

    6. Re:Imagination still useful by sznupi · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might try sooner with something that strucks me a bit as "Mindstorm Duplo" ;) (yes, I know those aren't Duplo bricks...)

      http://www.ni.com/academic/wedo/
      http://www.lego.com/education/news/default.asp?pagename=press_kit&l2id=17_1

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:Imagination still useful by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      I probably enjoy it as much as he does - but not more.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    8. Re:Imagination still useful by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      I've never seen those before - they look awesome. Thanks!

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    9. Re:Imagination still useful by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I think one reason (among a few) that the new films upset so many people is that these really are kids movies, and a lot of the upset people weren't kids any more.

      And I think (know) a bigger reason is that the newer movies were crap. As evidenced by the fact that many, many adults loved the first trilogy, and yet virtually no one over the age of 12 liked the second.

      Honestly, this isn't just rose-coloured glasses at work here. My parents loved the first 3 SW flicks, and they were in their 30-40s at the time.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    10. Re:Imagination still useful by story645 · · Score: 1

      My daughters like them too - but there really aren't too many girl themed sets that are very good.

      So encourage 'em to build with the base sets. I built homes, furniture and vehicles and collected sets with people so that I could have my own little lego soap operas while my brother rammed legos into other legos. I sympathize that the girl specific sets are lousy, but most of the sets are pretty gender neutral anyway.

      --
      open source modern art: laser taggi
  5. I really like Legos by siriuskase · · Score: 1

    I wish they were around when I was a kid. When my kids were kids, I used to play with their Legos all the time. I don't play with them anymore. Maybe when I have grandkids, I'll play with them again. Playing with legos when you don't have kids is probably weird.

    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    1. Re:I really like Legos by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not when you are playing with LEGO Mindstorms NXT. I got my set ( the older version ) when Ed Nisley, writing for Dr Dobbs at the time, recommended them as a way to learn about embedded programming. Here is a great example of how awesome the robots can be.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:I really like Legos by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who gives a crap!!? Go out and buy yourself a set! Be a kid for a little while. Don't hold yourself back because of what others might think about you. And if you want to justify it to yourself in some way, then consider there are far worse things you can spend your time and money on... cigarettes, alcohol, drugs, porn, guns and on and on. Most "adult" things are also considered vices. I see nothing wrong with doing something fun that is harmless and nice.

      And if it helps you to feel less weird, "give it away" to some 'needy kids' or to a school, a day care, a church or some such place.

    3. Re:I really like Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn?!

    4. Re:I really like Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I object. I can watch porn for free online and the only damage it causes is the death of kittens. I never liked cats...except catwoman...meow.

    5. Re:I really like Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can compete in First Lego League robotics competitions using the Mindstorms also. . I coach a team. It's a blast and a great way to get kids interested in engineering, programming, problem solving, etc etc.

    6. Re:I really like Legos by naoursla · · Score: 1

      Playing with Legos as an adult is not weird. It is AWESOME!

      For one thing you can build really awesome giant detailed models because when you need a certain brick that you don't have, you can JUST BUY IT! You can either buy a new set or go someplace like http://www.bricklink.com/ to buy specific pieces (there are people who run businesses where they buy sets and break them apart just to sell on bricklink).

      There is a huge underground industry supporting adults who play with Legos and clubs made up of adults (like http://sealug.org/). There are even Lego conferences for adults.

      If you think that playing with Legos as an adult might make you happy then you owe it to yourself to give it a shot.

    7. Re:I really like Legos by smoatigah · · Score: 1

      Yeh we actually use them in a 3rd year CS degree course.
      Didn't realise until now that's what all the 3rd years have been playing with all year (even though the course was only first term....)

    8. Re:I really like Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if it helps you to feel less weird, "give it away" to some 'needy kids' or to a school, a day care, a church or some such place.

      They can have my gun when they pry it from my cold dead hands!!! Oh... you mean the legos. Nevermind.

    9. Re:I really like Legos by metlin · · Score: 1

      That's nonsense.

      Usually, once a month, my girlfriend and I go to the local Lego store and get a few things that interest us and build some cool, fun things. Hell, she even has built things to be used around the house in Lego (e.g. mail holders, spatula containers, the giant Lego cookie jar etc).

      Someone else mentioned Mindstorms, and they are also a great deal of fun. I also love the larger Lego sets - Death Star, VW Bug or the Motorized Walking AT or even the Millenium Falcon.

      It's fun, it's simple and it's not something that you usually get bored of. Besides, a Taj Mahal or an Eiffel Tower is a great show piece.

    10. Re:I really like Legos by PeterBrett · · Score: 1

      Don't hold yourself back because of what others might think about you. And if you want to justify it to yourself in some way, then consider there are far worse things you can spend your time and money on... cigarettes, alcohol, drugs, porn, guns and on and on.

      What's wrong with spending your time and money on guns? Target rifle shooting is the safest sport you can do!

    11. Re:I really like Legos by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually they now have some grown-up collector sets. The Eiffel tower, a Beetle. I found them in a recently-opened special Lego store in Frankfurt

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    12. Re:I really like Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone fancy a pint?

    13. Re:I really like Legos by sowth · · Score: 1

      You don't have to go to bricklink for spare lego parts anymore, at least as far as I can tell. The official Lego site has a section where you can order individual parts, and they also appear to have a MSWin/Mac program to design your own Lego sets. I don't know. Does the Lego site have parts missing from their database? It looked to me as though they had everything I could think of.

      Thinking about the "Legos are for kids" idea, it seems to me Lego sets are 3D puzzles if you follow the directions. Plenty of adults assemble 2D puzzles, so I don't see the difference. Legos are just more adaptable.

    14. Re:I really like Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll see how much worse that gun is when your wife/husband is gang-raped and you can do nothing to stop it, while I can protect my family.

    15. Re:I really like Legos by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      I think this thread has convinced me to look into mindstorms. CS students use them? They gotta be good. I have a basement full of the plain bricks. If I was creative, I could probably assemble them into something cool. If not, I think I could still have fun, if i could just adjust me mind into the mode that it is no more a waste of my time than slashdot, fer instance.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  6. Marketing by Krneki · · Score: 1

    So they confirmed that in order to sell something you need to create a desire in the mind of the children. Welcome to the Marketing world.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  7. Where's Technic? by wiredlogic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The tie-ins are tolerable even though they're still horribly dependent on using special pieces. What I want to know is why have they gutted the much more interesting Technic line? You rarely see the sets that are still produced on the big retailers shelves in the US anymore.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:Where's Technic? by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 1
      Technic has been pretty much completely overshadowed by Mindstorms. The good news is that you can still find some fantastic older Technic sets on line (ebay and the like) and Technic can play extremely well with Mindstorms.

      Mind you, the Architecture line is what has me the most excited lately, even if they are very much a linear Lego experience.

      --
      Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    2. Re:Where's Technic? by British · · Score: 1

      I'm 33 years old. My mom hid my christmas present from me in the house, which was the 8880 super car. I was 18 at the time, working on my first real car. I do miss hard core Technic. Gears, axels, levers and such are quite educational to a future mechanical engineer.

    3. Re:Where's Technic? by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 1

      I lusted after that thing as a kid, and now it's rare enough I can't justify paying for one on ebay. It always looked amazing in the pictures!

      --
      Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    4. Re:Where's Technic? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      That's a problem with retail, US retailers don't seem to try to get many of them. They only get so many kits, and Lego offers a lot more than what any retailer tries to offer.

      But they are available, I counted something like 24 kits currently available:

      http://technic.lego.com/en-us/Products/New/8258New.aspx

    5. Re:Where's Technic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alive and kicking:

      http://technic.lego.com/en-us/Products/Construction/8275Construction.aspx

      http://powerfunctions.lego.com/en-US/Products/powerfunctions/8869.aspx

  8. Guns in lego are new? by IronMagnus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait... a gun for indiana jones is new? When I was a kid (20 years ago), we had pirate sets with guns in them... medieval sets with swords and cross bows... weapons everywhere.... how is violence in lego anything even remotely new?

    1. Re:Guns in lego are new? by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Space sets had those nifty bazookas too. But even so, with the large Technic guys I can make ninja swords out of an axel and a grey spacer.

      I've said too much.

    2. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yup, my old yellow castle set had knights with halberds.

      Damn, I feel a wave of nostalgia coming on...

    3. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Ghost+Hedgehog · · Score: 1

      Lego normally only had weapons that were more then 100 years old, like the pirate guns.

    4. Re:Guns in lego are new? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Space sets had those nifty bazookas too. But even so, with the large Technic guys I can make ninja swords out of an axel and a grey spacer.

      Bah, that's nothing. When I was a kid (in the late 60s) one of my friends had an old bazooka - a REAL one. Okay, no projectiles, just the launcher. We used to fight over who got to use it when we played Army.

      We also had old canvas army jackets (REALLY cool if it had your actual surname on it, versus the usual random surname), locking ammo boxes, stuff like that. Most of our dads were, or had been, in the military - and a lot of that stuff seemed to wander home. My dad didn't bring home infantry stuff, so while I had a camo jacket I was in awe of the kid with the bazooka.

      I also remember eating a lot of just-expired C-rations. Those, I think, were legit. We used to fight over who got the one with a particular dessert we liked (most of the actual meals were crap, excepting maybe the beans and franks). Didn't get to keep the cigarettes though.

      What's any of this got to do with legos? Nothing, but hey - you brought up bazookas. And I believe I still owned some Legos back then. Okay, well it's time for my medication.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      LEGO's policy for a long time was to feature no "modern" weapons, which allowed things like swords, crossbows, blunderbusses, and laser bazookas. I believe the policy went out the door some time ago with the Wild West themed sets and their revolvers and rifles.

    6. Re:Guns in lego are new? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the person who wrote the article didn't understand what they were talking about.

      Yes, little plastic weapons for the lego men to hold are nothing new. But the closest to actual violence in Lego sets was the pirates sets - there's never been a set, for instance, where you build a replica assault rifle that fires real projectiles.

    7. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, this is a conversation about Lego. You can't just go on and on about using actual army gear when playing as a kid and not expect an off-topic mod...

      And I believe I still owned some Legos back then.

      Okay then, never mind.

    8. Re:Guns in lego are new? by BoppreH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't forget that every single child that has played with Lego have at least once ripped off the characters members apart.

    9. Re:Guns in lego are new? by m1ss1ontomars2k4 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense! That Mindstorms set with the rubbery projectile was pretty damn dangerous if you ask me!

    10. Re:Guns in lego are new? by dkf · · Score: 1

      there's never been a set, for instance, where you build a replica assault rifle that fires real projectiles.

      Of course there was! But you had to be really inventive to put it together right, and the muzzle velocity wasn't exactly that high even then. Not even enough to break a glass door. (Thankfully... :-)) The best approach was probably to do something a bit like a tennis machine, except with smaller projectiles. Lego men heads worked a treat!

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    11. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      There were also the medieval sets which included swords among other things. But as with the pirate sets, the box art still looked like the Lego men were having fun. The Space Police sets today look more serious.

    12. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      I have to say, I respected Lego for its policy of "We don't make war toys". It was an admirable thing for a company in this day and age. I'm sorry to see they've stretched that pretty far, but I think I'd be sorrier to see Lego fade away entirely. I just wish they'd bring the old sets back.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    13. Re:Guns in lego are new? by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      I actually had a heck of a time trying to take the arms out of a few of my characters, the legs and heads on the other hand were made to change.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    14. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      So pirates (with swords, pistols, and cannons), knights (with swords, catapults, and axes) and space marines (with bazookas, space-fighters, and massive laser cannons) are all OK, but an archaeologist with a revolver and a whip is not?

      I struggle to see the problem. If they were making Lego Abrams main armour, with infantry support armed with M16s, I might see your point.

    15. Re:Guns in lego are new? by silly_sysiphus · · Score: 1

      True, but if you ever had the Danish-market sets*, you could get the Pirate sets which had the little cannons which actually shot projectiles...GREAT fun. *(could have been available elsewhere as well, but the US sets didn't have them...and since my family is Danish, I'd pick up sets every time we visited when I was a kid)

    16. Re:Guns in lego are new? by BoppreH · · Score: 1

      Could you even remove the arms? I've always thought it would break the toy.

    17. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      That is entirely my point. It's stretched by pretty warlike toys they've made but they aren't selling you the Hind-D playset. Frankly, I'll take what I can get.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    18. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Leuf · · Score: 1

      And yet my brother and I used to build military bases with ICBM silos. Then the GI Joe's and Transformers would attack... We never actually launched the ICBMs though, even kids understand you don't want nuclear fallout in the playroom.

    19. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole fun was launching the ICBMs - then you could smash your brother's lego base :)

    20. Re:Guns in lego are new? by jzuccaro · · Score: 1

      Look what they have now

    21. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Tomfrh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Space sets had those nifty bazookas too

      No, they were a "camera with side sight" (http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/4380). See, those spacemen were just shooting film, not baddies.

      And this one (http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/4349) is a "loudhailer" - you know, for making announcements on the lunar surface...

    22. Re:Guns in lego are new? by tim1724 · · Score: 1

      The first batch of the original 1989 pirate sets did have the firing cannons even in the US. My 6285 Black Seas Barracuda (awesome set) and 6270 Forbidden Island (not nearly as nice) both had them.

      Later batches of those same sets had the disabled cannon, and later pirate sets (and the western sets) had the no-moving-parts cannon in their North American versions.

      --
      -- Tim Buchheim
    23. Re:Guns in lego are new? by tim1724 · · Score: 1

      You can swap arms if you're very careful, but if you don't do it just right they can break. The LEGO company doesn't consider them removable.

      --
      -- Tim Buchheim
    24. Re:Guns in lego are new? by silly_sysiphus · · Score: 1

      Cool, good to know. I didn't have any sets from that early on, as my Lego collection started as a product of 60s-era blocks from my mother's childhood, later augmented with 90s stuff...mostly American-market (disabled cannon), but I'd take my Danish cannons and load them into my 6268 Renegade Runner (1993), 6264 Caribbean Clipper (1989, but a hand-me-down that was missing cannons) etc...

    25. Re:Guns in lego are new? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Try a dremel.

      (way back in college I took a course where we built robots out of lego - not mindstorms. We'd embed sensors in blocks modified with dremels)

    26. Re:Guns in lego are new? by zeugma-amp · · Score: 1

      LOL. My oldest daughter used to rip their heads and hands off. I used to think that was fairly strange.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    27. Re:Guns in lego are new? by zeugma-amp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For M16s and other assorted modern weapons,go to Brickarms. Unfortunately, they can't seem to keep things from being horribly backordered.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    28. Re:Guns in lego are new? by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Luckily brickarms is there to fill the gap.

    29. Re:Guns in lego are new? by vumeter · · Score: 1

      I was just at the BrickFair in DC/VA (very neat) with my kids. I can see why they're always backordered - the Brickarms table was one of the most crowded vendor tables.

    30. Re:Guns in lego are new? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      bah, who needs one? there are enough parts out there now that one can probably build one from photos and outlines.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  9. That's just the trick isn't it? by BaronSprite · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While it is annoying to have 500 different versions of ____ summer movie theme represented in toy form, the best trick that lego has going for it is that you can usually rip it down and change it into something else when you are bored of it. LEGO recognizes that their product can still fit in with the imaginationland scheme while still appealing to a current market trend, so why not?

    1. Re:That's just the trick isn't it? by NoYob · · Score: 1
      I was annoyed that they didn't have a Boogie Nights movie tie-in legos.

      Dirk Diggler and Roller Girl on the set!

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    2. Re:That's just the trick isn't it? by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah ?

    3. Re:That's just the trick isn't it? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Like this Cthulhu made from (I think) a dinosaur and an octopus. Some good laughs and very bad puns on that site.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  10. lego mirrors real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a child in the 50's and 60's, legos were primarily just bricks. You got a big mass of them, and could make whatever you could imagine. Sure, there were instructions about making this or that, but nobody I knew ever paid them any mind. We just explored and tinkered.

    The last time I saw a lego set a few years ago, I was horrified. It was all specialized parts and heavily tailored to make one very specific thing. I'm not say you *couldn't* make anything else, but it had clearly gone from being an open ended exploration tool to a "let someone else do the thinking for you!" toy.

    Which seems to exactly reflect what has happened to our culture in the meantime.

    ObGetOffMyLawn: get off my lawn.

    1. Re:lego mirrors real life by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      You can still by the bricks. You can even by compatible bricks from other manufacturers. But, these special kits really do help Lego stay profitable. Is that a bad thing?

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    2. Re:lego mirrors real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "by".

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    3. Re:lego mirrors real life by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Some sets are that way - but most are still incredibly flexible. There are a lot of cool things that can be done with the new sets that couldn't be done with the old. There are a lot more mechanical parts in the basic sets now. My sons Imperial Shuttle kit had some very cool gears and other parts to allow the wings to move up and down. The hinged doors are pretty slick, etc. We've been able to incorporate that into a lot of fun designs of our own.

      It really still is an open ended toy for exploration, especially once you have 4 or 5 kits worth of pieces on hand.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    4. Re:lego mirrors real life by erroneus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might THINK that there are a bunch of specialized pieces that are tailored to make one specific thing, but that's not necessarily true. Yes, there are more different kinds of pieces and some are rather unique. But it is actually hard to find a particular piece that isn't also used in other sets. It may be painted differently or be made of a different color, but that's the way it goes. These more unique pieces enables even more creativity, not less. Go browse "www.mocpages.com" and just look at what people have made using these "specialized pieces." They make everything you can imagine from them. One of my favorite Lego creations of all time is the Futurama Lego set someone created. (Just Google for Lego Futurama) It is most certainly NOT an official Lego set. It uses a lot of specialized pieces and is extremely creative work.

      Lego may have started out being "blocky" and only good for making houses with roofs at 45 degree angles, but it is much more than that now, and it is largely thanks to the availability of these "less basic" parts.

    5. Re:lego mirrors real life by Ripit · · Score: 1

      Wish I could mod you up.

      The term "specialized parts" makes no sense.

    6. Re:lego mirrors real life by 7+digits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Having specialized pieces and 4 or 5 kits is cool. My kids have around 50 of 60 kits (around 20K pieces), so specialized pieces are just lost in the mess.
      Fun thing is that my kids turned to bigger scale reuse, where functional blocks of 10 or 20 bricks are reused from kits to kits. That gives most of their work a weird Tetsuo feel...

    7. Re:lego mirrors real life by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      Nice word picture.

      It's funny because I tend to try to keep everything matching, but whenever we get a new issue of the Lego magazine, I can see from the photos that kids send in that most don't care about that. I wonder if this is something that changes in becoming an adult or if some of us are just always that way - but most are not.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    8. Re:lego mirrors real life by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They can make lego that looks like a 403 error?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:lego mirrors real life by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      I deep linked to a bigger version of this image. Seems that the site owner didn't like that. Ooops.

    10. Re:lego mirrors real life by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      I think the issue is just one of practicality. If either:
      1) You are doing something big and have not enough pieces to have the luxury of choosing colors
      or
      2) You don't have the time to both do what you want and choose the right color
      or
      3) You are not following a plan, you just grow something organically, depending on the bricks you can see
      then you end up mixing colors, and it doesn't matter.
      When a child start doing LEGO, he doesn't have enough pieces, often doesn't have time to search for the right pieces (it is quite rare to see a children bricks sorted in different bins), and don't follow very structured plans. So he develops a sort of color blindness. I know I was like that.
      Projects where colors are matched seems to be done by older people, with a lot of bricks to choose from, good organization and a solid idea of how you want to build the thing.
      So, I'd say, yes, it is when you get older that you start being more careful about the colors.

  11. Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

    Yea, and Al Gore invented the internet. Sure....

    Could it perhaps be that marketing people took over and pushed up the price of what amounts to pieces of cheap mass-produced plastic that dragged down the company in the first place? To me there's something wrong in needing to jump through so many hoops to sell something so simple and appealing as building blocks.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Could it perhaps be that marketing people took over and pushed up the price of what amounts to pieces of cheap mass-produced plastic that dragged down the company in the first place?

      I'd love to buy some of the bigger pirate ship and castle sets from when I was a kid, but even if they re-released them at the prices they charged a decade and a half ago I wouldn't want to shell out that much for them. I know they have to pay real wages because they don't manufacture in China, but damn. I'd think they could easily cut their prices by 25-50% and still be making a tidy profit.

    2. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      They can't really lower their prices when 25 to 50% of the profits probably go to Hollywood for the tie-ins.

    3. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 4, Insightful

      . I'd think they could easily cut their prices by 25-50% and still be making a tidy profit.

      Probably not whilst delivering the quality and safety that they do. If you look at some of the Meg@#$%# lego clones, have a feel at how they fit together; See how the bricks start breaking up and how Lego seems to last and last, you know what I mean. In the end the Lego is cheaper because it lasts and it still gets used. When I get told that my kid "needs" a rescue helicopter or something instead of buying it, we just build it together.

      When I buy random cheap Chinese toys I really feel I could be poisoning my child. I don't think the manufacturer wants to poison my kids any more than I want to do that to his, but I'm sure he has little way to control the quality of the quality of the plastic coming in and no come back if he does find someone has done something bad. Look at the chinese milk scandal. The key thing there is not that the milk companies were cheating and failing to test. Someone was deliberately working around their testing. With that kind of garbage; better buy Lego.

      In this case; you get what you pay for.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    4. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're absolutely right. My lego pieces from nigh on two decades ago still fit and hold. The very few occasional weak pieces have failed, but the rank and file pieces still fit and still hold their colour. Nobody but nobody can tell me that Lego bricks were shoddy. A toy that lasts, and is still played with, for 10-20 years is frankly worth paying the premium.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    5. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by Tweenk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd think they could easily cut their prices by 25-50% and still be making a tidy profit.

      I'd rather have them keep the uncompromising, legendary quality instead. I encountered exactly 1 bad brick in 10000$ MSRP worth of Lego. I think the fact that the set will not break or wear out in 5, 10, 15 years is a big consideration for families which have more than one child. I have a lot of Lego bricks that survived my entire childhood and are still in very good shape, even though I used to play with them very frequently. The Technic line is essentially precision machinery made of plastic.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    6. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by Tweenk · · Score: 1

      Could it perhaps be that marketing people took over and pushed up the price of what amounts to pieces of cheap mass-produced plastic that dragged down the company in the first place?

      Making pieces of mass-produced plastic is easy. Making the pieces to extremely strict tolerances and ensuring that no set is incomplete or has broken pieces is hard. Making those pieces survive 5 years of heavy use with litle wear is really, really hard. That's why Lego is more expensive than the crap excreted by Chinese factories.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    7. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lego's quality control isn't that great, bro.

      The past few sets I've bought, which were all super-duper franchise sets because that's all you can find anymore, had pieces missing from them. One of them was missing a whole baggie of parts, but had two extra bags of parts I didn't need at all.

      Sure, the pieces stand up better than Mega Blocks (which are made from an inferior grade of plastic) but that's really not saying much. The price per piece has been rocketing upwards for years. It's a good thing that Lego are as reusable as they are, which still makes the purchase worth it, because if these were say... Warhammer models, they'd be losing tons of business.

      Not that it really matters. There are enough second-hand pieces floating around out there that resale can meet all of your Lego needs, and with better service and better prices than buying the new kits. You can easily find pieces that aren't made anymore, too. Lego had a great product going, but the franchise kits are lame and probably won't even assemble right nowadays. Never had that problem when I was little.

    8. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by j-beda · · Score: 1

      We have gotten a few Mega Bloks small kits recently, and their quality seems to have improved a fair bit - I think recent court cases about their ability to legally be inter-working with Lego-brand stuff have helped them gain investors and profitable marketing deals - I think they have done some Pixar and Marvel Comics sets - mostly in the larger "duplo" format as I recall.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MEGA_Brands

      According to the wekipedia, they have a licensing deal for "Halo" stuff.

    9. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      3 or 4 years ago, when LEGO moved their fabrication to eastern europe, bricks became shoddy (didn't snap with the same force, were as flat as they used to be). Colors became less uniform.

      I have sets that I refuse to throw with he other ones, because the pieces are weak. I mostly stopped buying LEGO at this point.

      I'm happy to hear that they have supposedly solved their quality problem.

    10. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'd think they could easily cut their prices by 25-50% and still be making a tidy profit.

      And I think you could easily live on 50-75% of your salary.

      What, I don't have any idea of what your outgoings are? Well I know as much about them as you do about Lego's.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Tie-Ins Saved Lego? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Mega Blahs (aka Ritvik) use cheap plastic, though they do have some nice pieces in their Dragons sets, especially the 2x4 and smaller "stone" bricks, which I scoop up when I find them at the Goodwill salvage store. Tyco used good plastic and had lots of pastel colors, but they only made plates 1/2 brick thick. And they were long enough ago that they got scared off by Lego's lawyers. BTR seems to have Lego's ABS precision and strength, but they make mostly POOPs.

      The only other brand I am aware of that fits with Lego is Better Blocks, which are absolutely horrible, only two block types (1x1 and 1x2 double-pitch, both rounded) and made soft plastic. I only ever remember them advertising on AM talk radio (where you can't see how crappy they are), with parent-targeted ads. But Lego really should make 1x2 and 2x4 blocks with curved ends to allow flexible walls. Perhaps they don't because they would be too weak for Lego's standards.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  12. Lego still retains its magic! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    While it is true that movie themes have kept Lego afloat and even boosted its popularity significantly, once someone gets into Lego, it becomes something else entirely.

    When I was a kid, Lego was mainly for building houses for the little people to live in. Our cultures have changed significantly since those days. Our homes are constantly filled with sound and music and noise of one kind or another. Everything needs to flash, bang or pop to get our attention. Star Wars and even Indiana Jones movie themes have lots of flash, bang and pop. "Playing house" or building a farming scene is just not something that most kids are interested in with all the color and excitement found on TV and in movies. "Simpler times" have gone out of fashion for now and I predict it will return again one day, but not until the 80's are finally dead and behind us.

    But once a kid (or an adult, let's be fair -- a LOT of Lego fans are ADULTS!) builds his first model, he will want to build another. And while building those models, he will want to change it or improve it in some way. Eventually, that same child is building his own creations. So while the popular movie themes are a great hook, it almost never stops there!

    And here's another thing -- it may be "movie themes" but it is also VIDEO GAME themes that will sell Lego sets. For some reason, Lego missed the boat with Halo and MegaBloks got the rights to that theme instead. (It's a damned shame because I see MegaBloks as cheaper and of lesser quality) But it is partly the Lego Star Wars and Lego Indiana Jones that brought interest in Lego for many. The games are outstanding and you don't "die" in the same ways and you build things as you progress through the games. They are genuinely enjoyable and the fun associated with those games ALSO bring interest to other Lego products as well.

    But again I say, once the first set is build, the joys of building things then becomes more of the focus and the real magic of Lego is realized.

    And one last thing I thought I would add. Lego teaches things to kids... to people really. It encourages a kind of engineering and architectural thinking. It also encourages ordered and organized thinking. There are elements of puzzle solving (especially when one is trying to make one's own creations) and most of all, it encourages patience, concentration and focus. And the reward of "look what I made" is ever present. These are things that are being lost and eroded with today's ADD/ADHD population. Most of us don't have anything medically wrong -- we just don't have patience and focus. Lego can strengthen the mind of the young and old with these kinds of lessons.

    And it's fun!

    1. Re:Lego still retains its magic! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      These are things that are being lost and eroded with today's ADD/ADHD population.

      I'm more of a ADD/SUB guy.

    2. Re:Lego still retains its magic! by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      I've always seen myself as an ADD/GURPS guy.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  13. Black Seas Barracuda by No+Lucifer · · Score: 1, Interesting

    (This is coming from someone who, as a kid, saved up for a year to buy the Black Seas Barracuda and subscribed to "Brick Kicks" magazine)

    I used to question the movie tie-ins with LEGO. Then I helped my friend build the LEGO Millenium Falcon for his kid... and it was a blast. It made me realize that the fun of LEGOs was putting them together, destroying them, and building something new. The tie-ins don't really ruin that. If it keeps LEGO around, it's a good thing. You can still buy non-tie-in LEGOs (and it looks to me like the new City LEGOs sets are really cool).

    Now, LEGO needs to make the next step and allow people to build their own kits online. I think that would be even bigger than LEGO Star Wars.

    1. Re:Black Seas Barracuda by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1
      I have a dream: that my little children will one day live in a world where they will be able to buy kits online, not designed by marketer, but by the contents of their creative character.

      Imagine designing a kit in a Lego CAD program and then automatically exporting the BOM to an order form that takes a screenshot of the finished item, a manual and contents list and produced a boxed, bagged set that is immediately shipped to you.

      Seriously Lego, where are you?

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:Black Seas Barracuda by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      They had a Lego CAD type program not long ago on the website but I can't remember if they dropped it. I still have the Lego Creator game from years back in my cd shelves too but it didn't have an export function.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    3. Re:Black Seas Barracuda by icebraining · · Score: 2, Informative
    4. Re:Black Seas Barracuda by Ripit · · Score: 4, Informative

      Now, LEGO needs to make the next step and allow people to build their own kits online. I think that would be even bigger than LEGO Star Wars.

      Seriously Lego, where are you?

      It's called Lego Degital Designer. If you've got a complaint, at least take a couple of minutes to figure out if it's valid.

    5. Re:Black Seas Barracuda by bomanbot · · Score: 1

      I have a dream: that my little children will one day live in a world where they will be able to buy kits online, not designed by marketer, but by the contents of their creative character.

      Imagine designing a kit in a Lego CAD program and then automatically exporting the BOM to an order form that takes a screenshot of the finished item, a manual and contents list and produced a boxed, bagged set that is immediately shipped to you. Seriously Lego, where are you?

      Actually, that already exists and is called LEGO Factory

    6. Re:Black Seas Barracuda by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      Sweet! You've made me both happy and poor with a single link.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  14. 15kg lego in the basement by pinkishpunk · · Score: 1

    Guess we where privileged to have been kids while lego still made brick that wasnt gigantic and unique to a single model. Over the year it has sadden me to see how lego packages have been taking up less and less space of the toy stores, when I was a kid a whole section where filled with it, back then one could go there and find smaller cheap packages also, gone are those days. It prob never was cheap toy but the prices they are asking for very few bricks this day are just ridiculous, the only thing today that resembles the packages of the past are those special edition starwars boxes where you actuale gets bricks instead of prefabricated modules.

    1. Re:15kg lego in the basement by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think you're about 5 years behind. They seem to have gone back to their roots recently.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. Lego Movie? by rrwood · · Score: 1

    Hey-- why hasn't there been a Lego movie? Given the brand appeal and the richness of the settings possible, a Lego movie would kick brick-ass....

    1. Re:Lego Movie? by el3mentary · · Score: 2, Informative

      There have been several Bionicle movies now, I have the first one on DVD.

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    2. Re:Lego Movie? by rogermcdodger · · Score: 1

      They have recently (last month) signed a deal to produce a movie based on the LEGO license.

  16. Stay in business by overcharging and exploiting by syousef · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So they've managed to stay in business by the power of marketing and the irrationality that people display when buying for kids. Have you seen what a lego set costs these days? It's no wonder cheap rip offs that don't even work as well are getting a slice of the action.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Stay in business by overcharging and exploiting by Tweenk · · Score: 1

      So they've managed to stay in business by the power of marketing and the irrationality that people display when buying for kids.

      They actually created a product that people want to buy. Is that a bad thing? Coupled with the fact that you can still buy the 'unbranded' sets and that they are reducing one-off non-reusable pieces, it's a good thing.

      Have you seen what a lego set costs these days?

      There is a reason. The quality of Lego is legendary, so much that they don't even advertise it any more. The parts are manufactured to tolerances comparable with precision machinery. For example, when you place 10 bricks with holes side by side, you can run 12-unit axles through each of the holes, and they always align perfectly. In a new set there are no bricks that don't "stick" together, and the plastic wears down really slowly. I have encountered exactly 1 bad piece in 10000$ MSRP worth of Lego (and they replaced when I e-mailed the customer service).

      It's no wonder cheap rip offs that don't even work as well are getting a slice of the action.

      Poland is not a very rich country and yet Lego still dwarfs all other brands combined by sales volume... I don't see too much "action" for cheap imitators.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    2. Re:Stay in business by overcharging and exploiting by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Every toy that says "Made in the EU" is expensive, but they're generally good quality.

      When I was a child (90s), every toy that said "Made in Taiwan/China" was cheap shit and wouldn't last.

      What toys have I kept? My Lego (Denmark), model railway (Britain, Germany), Mecanno (France), Warhammer (Britain), and K'NEX (USA).

      I think the Lego and Warhammer is still made in Denmark/UK, and they're both expensive, but the others are now made in China, and the quality seems to be as it used to be.

    3. Re:Stay in business by overcharging and exploiting by syousef · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They actually created a product that people want to buy. Is that a bad thing? Coupled with the fact that you can still buy the 'unbranded' sets and that they are reducing one-off non-reusable pieces, it's a good thing.

      No making a product that people want to buy is not a bad thing. Making people want to buy a product by manipulating and possibly lying via advertising is. So is overcharging based on artificially restricting supply once you've created the demand.

      There is a reason. The quality of Lego is legendary, so much that they don't even advertise it any more.

      Hahahahahaha. I bet you believe in the Easter Bunny too. Google lego advertising.

      The parts are manufactured to tolerances comparable with precision machinery.

      You mean like a cheap watch? This isn't the 1800s. Precision machinery isn't so special. The fact that some unbranded companies take cost cutting to the extreme doesn't mean that it's so expensive that you can't do it right and have your product sell cheaper. This is no different to camera companies overcharging for lenses and accessories. Sure good product should cost more but not something 2-3x the price.

      I have encountered exactly 1 bad piece in 10000$ MSRP worth of Lego (and they replaced when I e-mailed the customer service).

      Right so you've spent $10k on lego and I'm suppose to take you seriously? Either it's gotten so expensive that you only have 10 or so sets at $1k each or you've got quite a habit going there. I think it's safe to say they won you over long ago and that you're not exactly unbiased.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  17. One/Single Page by antdude · · Score: 0, Redundant
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  18. I call BS on the whole thing... by cowmix · · Score: 1

    The movie tie-ins are pure genius and uniquely Lego.. They have a good sense of humor and the new Lego sets are fun. As a 35 year Lego guy, it find the new stuff simply awesome.

    The irony is that the Star Wars Lego sets are MORE Lego like than their 'original' sets they put out now. The piece on the Star Wars sets are more interchangeable while their "Mars" series has these HUGE molded pieces that can not really be used outside of the ship you are 'supposed' to build.

    However, if you want to find something that sucks the soul out of Lego.. look no further than Bionicle.

  19. Violence in lego is not new. by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Back in my days when there was knights lego, they already had swords...

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:Violence in lego is not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We even managed to do napoleonic wargaming - cuirassier units would use knight armor pieces and we used pirate set pieces.

  20. Non-Violence was Missed on me by thepainguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pretty much everything I made out of Legos was war-related. Tanks and planes mostly, but I made some pretty cool howitzers back in the day. They'd fire the four-side black rods with a couple of rubber bands.

    1. Re:Non-Violence was Missed on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made Power Rangers out of my LEGO blocks. I made 5 out of a set of blocks, then made sure using those same set of blocks could make something else. I then also made all of them into a large device using the same set.

      Posted AC for obvious reasons.

    2. Re:Non-Violence was Missed on me by Venerable+Vegetable · · Score: 1

      The no violence thing was obviously aimed at the parents. There were apparently no green blocks so you couldn't create anything military related. So the tanks I built were red. I never even realized that there were no green blocks until I was older.

  21. Playing out Hollywood's imagination instead by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Just felt compelled to make another comment. From the article, there was one statement that really stuck in my craw. And it was the one that said with these Hollywood themed sets, kids will be playing out Hollywood's imagination instead of their own. It's true but it's not. With action figures and vehicle toys from the movies, that will definitely be true. But with Lego toys, it's not as true. Why? Because you can't make things with action figures and vehicles... not easily anyway.

    And here's a factoid that people are overlooking -- children are QUICKLY losing their imaginations. We live in a different world now than we did 20-30 years ago. There are FAR fewer creative toys that are popular these days. Playdoh and crayons have really lost favor among kids. Why? I could guess a lot of reasons, but one of the more significant reasons is lack of interest from parents. In present times, parents are still playing their video games and aren't the slightest bit interested in what their kids create or draw. This is a huge shift. And without parents being interested in what their kids are doing, the kids are less inclined to doing anything creative at all. Whatever the cause, children and people in general are losing their creativity.

    But while Lego, as a purely creative toy, has lost the interest of children, themed Lego has a chance of bridging the problem of lost creativity.

    1. Re:Playing out Hollywood's imagination instead by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      You couldn't be more wrong if you TRIED. There's nothing wrong with kids' imagination, the problem is that everyone from their parents out to are forcing them to spend every waking moment in some "structured recreation" style BS and nobody tolerates kids actually making noise and messes anymore. Creative toys are basically the exact opposite of this and encourage kids to ask "why" and not settle for "because I said so", that's where the real problem is.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Playing out Hollywood's imagination instead by SuperMonkeyCube · · Score: 1
      Nice handle, oddly appropriate in this case. Do you even have any contact with children?

      (Don't answer that - it was rhetorical and I don't really want to know. Ask yourself what kind of kids you interact with and decide for yourself.)

      Granted, helicopter parents may totally funnel children into too much structured activity, but there are still lots of kids that have plenty of creativity. I don't see any problem with crayons yet, or Play-Doh, as long as the situation keeps kids from the sort of one-upmanship that would preclude it. If one older kid brings a DS or a PSP with him to a group, it can distract kids from playing with the simple stuff for a while. On the other hand, if that's what the group is doing, (crayons or clay or even blocks!) I've yet to see a real shortage of creativity. My oldest can be a problem for the a similar reason - he's almost always got a Bionicle or two with him, and not a spec, out-of-the-package one. Most of his Bionicles are borrowing heads and weapons from other guys, changed color schemes, extra weapons built with standard LEGO or Technic parts, or hybrids.

      If you doubt the creativity of kids, try listening to them. I hope you will be pleasantly surprised, or maybe you have a bunch of dumbbells in your neighborhood. As far as the parents go - parents that play video games are probably still in the minority. Most of the parents that my wife and I know IRL watch a lot of "Big Brother" and "American Idol" and "Brooke Knows Best" and "Dancing with the Geico Cavemen Spectacular". Most of my serious video game playing adult friends fall into the "Kids? I haven't found a spouse I can tolerate yet!" category. I didn't count people who only played Wii sports for two hours at a party.

      Another thing that strikes me is that you can't have a class of 20-30 kids in school and expect all of them to whip out dogs in a spaceship to the moon or a cow with wheels on it with their 8-pack of Crayolas. Some kids aren't going to be at the same place intellectually, some kids aren't going to have the same cultural context, some kids are only going to draw pictures about stuff they learned in Sunday school because their parents won't let them watch TV or play with the heathens next door, some kids don't read and will only generate TV related imagery, and so on. Kids are creative, but they're not all going to be at the same place - and I'm basing a lot of this on my own formative crayon time in the 70's. This is not a new problem. Do you suppose that James Naismith and Johannes Gutenberg had to listen to crap from city leaders about how basketball was keeping kids from being creative when playing outside with a ball and the printing press kept kids from embellishing their folk tales and oral history?

    3. Re:Playing out Hollywood's imagination instead by icebraining · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with you: most kids I know play videogames most of their free time and still have vivid imagination. Actually, I think many videogames are an excellent source of inspiration.

      But if videogames are the problem, just have them play LittleBigPlanet.

    4. Re:Playing out Hollywood's imagination instead by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think kids themselves can be quite conformist. It wouldn't at all surprise me if other kids tease him that those aren't "proper" bionicles.

      I was 4 years old but I remember this like it was yesterday. I was getting grief off the other kids because when we were asked to draw a train I drew a modern diesel one, blue with yellow ends as per BR logo in those days, just like the one I'd been on the weekend before. Apparently "proper" trains have a funnel at the front with big wheels at the back. Given that this was some time after Dr Beeching I doubt any of them had seen such a train let alone ridden one; they were probably rarer then than they are now.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  22. Lego/Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Few know that Google used Legos (and later cheaper Lego clones) to build their initial server cases since the legos let them quickly prototype boards and insulate them without building custom enclosures. And GOogLE even contains LEGO. Coincidence???? I think not.

    1. Re:Lego/Google by HHacim · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

  23. But it's still sooo educational... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you can learn about physics by building things like this :

    http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2007/09/07/stephen-hawking-lego.html

  24. Lego Factory Video Tour by MattskEE · · Score: 1

    Gizmodo has an excellent article with video from their tour of the Lego factory. It's a must-see for people who like seeing how things are made: http://gizmodo.com/5022769/exclusive-inside-the-lego-factory

  25. money by nixish · · Score: 1

    So basically it is saying that Money has saved Lego?

    1. Re:money by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      No, what saved Lego was lucrative merchandising tie-ins with Hollywood, expansion into video games, and brutal reform of a very slack internal corporate culture.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  26. Which Is Why I Lost Interest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... years before I otherwise would have.

    Lego was a lot better before Hollywood owned it. The huge set lines like Aquazone, Exploriens, M-Tron, Ice Planet, etc. were really fun and fairly theme-agnostic. Those 'one off parts' were some of the more useful things you could find. (Can anyone really fault the transparent orange chainsaw? What about all the different colors of windows, or the giant dome windows that used to be available? Even the giant, axle-equipped base mentioned above was good for anything that happened to be large, heavy, and needed to roll around.) Also, instead of Bionicle, you had Technic. (Mindstorms doesn't count because it's ridiculously expensive and practically can't be found in stores here.) As early as 1999-2001 with the new Star Wars sets and Bionicle, all you could find in stores were overpriced Hollywood themed boxes and kits full of useless Bionicle bits, and the prices just kept going up. I'd already accumulated a decent bin of Lego, though, so I suppose it didn't matter much.

    Still, the older sets, which weren't as sleek and didn't have big Hollywood names but did have great models, great parts, and great themes, beat just about any of the movie themed sets just for the sheer flexibility. (Not only that, quality control really slipped. The last sets I picked up, all three of them Star Wars, had pieces missing.) One of my nephews showed me a Spongebob Squarepants themed Lego kit that he built, and I thought to myself, "The only thing that's missing is a pile of sprues and some rubber cement." Perhaps I'll gift him an old Aquazone sub, if I can find any complete kits.

  27. Lego guns aren't new by HHacim · · Score: 1

    "The article also mentions coming Lego Stores, a Lego board game, how Lego now allows sets with violence (like a gun for Indiana Jones) ..."

    Um, Legos has had guns for years. They commonly appeared in there pirate themed sets. Heck, I probably wouldn't have played legos half as much as I did if it wasn't for the firearms.

  28. Incorrect usage of the company trademark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lego != LEGO. Both the article summary AND the NYT article incorrectly use the company trademark.

    1. Re:Incorrect usage of the company trademark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disagreement. Journalists have no obligation to observe demands from corporations to mangle the English language. http://www.theslot.com/webnames.html

  29. Correction to the article... by Schnoogs · · Score: 0

    ..Lego has had weaponry since the 80's. The medieval sets had spears, bows and arrows. The space sets had laser cannons.

  30. Has anyone actually -bought- Legos? by tjstork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A lot of people complaining about some of these Lego sets seem to think that you can only really build the thing on the box when you get the set. There's a ton of parts for even the tiniest Lego model and you have a lot of options. If you have more than one set, you can genuinely make some really interesting displays. You need to think differently out of the box. My four year old autistic son taught me this. I buy them for them and he puts together all sorts of stuff. At first, I put the sets together and then let him have at them, but I had gotten lazy and just handed some stuff to play with, and felt pretty bad about it, so I bought a fairly complicated set to put together with him, and found that, by the time I'd got the basics of the first page done, he'd already built something very cool. For him, the picture on the box isn't the thing to build, but is representative of a sort of world he plays in with those pieces. I think right now Princess Lea and Han Solo Lego people are wearing pirate hats and are carrying knight swords on top of a steam engine (sad end for a Bachmann set).

    Still, if you must have the ultimate in "suggestionless" Lego design, you need to go to a Lego store. Lego stores have all the theme sets, for sure, but they also have a huge wall in the back where you can just fill up a big cup for $15 and get anything you want. Wheels, different shape blocks, they are all there.

    --
    This is my sig.
  31. Clearly, no one has actually watched how kids play by speedlaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lego is clearly in charge of the business. Here's how it works. A kid sees a lego kit. The branding (Star Wars, Indiana Jones, etc) sells the kit. The child assembles the X wing fighter, or the Pirate ship. The toy then flies/sails to the corner of the room with all the other legos. The pirate ends up in the X wing. The cannons from the pirate ship end up on the x wing fighter but the nav console from the x wing becomes part of something else. The Ferrari mechanic is wearing a horned helmet and in the battlements of the castle. By the time the child is done, the "branded toy" has morphed and blended with all the other legos. Our lego chess set is guarding a castle. Bits of X wing and Imperial Walkers are outbuildings. From the children I've observed, the branded lego kit is a way to sell the blocks at the highest possible price. To the adult. The kids play with the blocks like kids. Lego is still one of the few toys with real play value, not just a prepackaged fantasy with no where to go. Also, for those of you worried about the "gun" issue, kids can make guns out of anything....and do.

  32. Legos FTW by Physician · · Score: 1

    Legos were among my most favorite toys as a child. I can't wait to have a child of my own so I have an excuse to once again play them.

    --
    Does God treat us as servants or friends? Check my homepage.
  33. Saved????? by m509272 · · Score: 1

    How could one conclude that Lego was "saved" by these tie-ins and would have ceased to exist? Did they promote added sales, etc, yeah sure. But "saved" is simply a ridiculous statement.

  34. Mixing toys by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Heh, my Lego city got assaulted by Green Army Men many a time.

    Also, I find myself mixing "themed Legos" in with the other ones - even if I don't disassemble the model itself, the Star Wars spaceship interacts with a self-built ship rather than jsut with other Star Wars stuff, et cetera

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  35. Legos On Mars by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My scientist's heart sinks when I remember the hopes I had and that the following would re-popularize the space program as well as science in general, then lost when nobody noticed...

    So you've got these guys who built these robot car things and they're going to send them to Mars. One of the cool things they did was collect peoples' names and messages to the New Planet to send along. They burned the messages to CDs and then started looking for a way to attach the CDs to the 'dashboards' of their robots. How about... oh, I dunno... maybe some interlocking plastic blocks with the CD trapped between a pair of them, and a screw or two to hold each of the 3 pairs in place? I'll bet some of these guys even have some of these things laying around and would be glad to donate them to the cause.....

    From the left science panaorama camera on each Mars Rover, taken on Sol 2 of each mission:

    Spirit:
    http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/002/2P126556804EFF0200P2205L1M1.JPG
    http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/002/2P126556727EFF0200P2205L4M1.JPG

    Opportunity:
    http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/002/1P128365194EDN0100P2205L5M1.JPG
    http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/002/1P128365248EDN0100P2205L6M1.JPG

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  36. Journalism at it's worst by thorsen · · Score: 1

    If the journalists would actually have bothered looking at the last years numbers from Lego, they would have seen that the turnaround is due to a much much lower cost than ten - fifteen years ago. Their revenue numbers have been pretty stable for the last twenty years. But they spend *half* what they did in the mid ninetees.

    This is the reason Lego has become profitable again. Not Hollywood.

    Although I can see why stupid journalists would prefer the other story. *sigh*

    Bo.

  37. Glad they did Star Wars... by jameskojiro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Otherwise I wouldn't have enough pieces that are in grey to make Star Trek Starships out of LEGO.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  38. Lego "violence" isn't remotely new by Jerslan · · Score: 1

    "how Lego now allows sets with violence (like a gun for Indiana Jones)" Since when did they not allow "violence"? When I was a kid there were Pirate and Medieval sets that had cannons, swords, and muskets... That was LONG before Indiana Jones or Star Wars sets ever started coming out.

  39. You just hate it because it sounds like "lebbo". by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Making people want to buy a product by manipulating and possibly lying via advertising is.

    You have a specific citation for these lies that they've told?

    So is overcharging based on artificially restricting supply once you've created the demand.

    Wrong. In a free market a business can choose to supply as much or as little as it wants.

    This is no different to camera companies overcharging for lenses and accessories. Sure good product should cost more but not something 2-3x the price.

    Do you have a citation for that? You can certainly get third party lenses in most common camera mounts, and they're usually cheaper.

    Right so you've spent $10k on lego

    Wrong again.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."