Slashdot Mirror


No App Store For Microsoft's Zune HD

Xerfas writes 'Microsoft's Zune HD, set to go on sale Tuesday, will not feature an open application store like its competitor the iPod Touch. It will come with some unique features, though, like an HD radio tuner, and with software that has been well-received by users. Those capabilities will determine whether the ZuneHD sells well — and whether Microsoft decides to keep selling its own music player, said Matt Rosoff, an analyst at Directions on Microsoft.' The Zune marketing manager was quoted in the Seattle Times on whether the Zune would open up for 3rd-party apps, and he gave a response of such mind-numbing PR-speak that John Gruber of Daring Fireball was moved to provide this English translation: "No, because our mobile strategy is a convoluted mess."

351 comments

  1. Let me fix that foryou.. by Bazman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Microsoft's Zune HD, set to go on sale Tuesday, will not feature a tightly controlled by control freaks with degrees in control freakery application store like its competitor the iPod Touch."

    Fixed.

    1. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by zjbs14 · · Score: 1

      Done in one.

      --
      No sig, sorry.
    2. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news, I'm going out for a bike ride like my competitor Lance Armstrong . . .

    3. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by b0r1s · · Score: 1

      If your bike cost you a couple hundred million dollars, you'd consider yourself a competitor too.

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    4. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because if there's one thing Microsoft is known for, it's not acting like control freaks. Am I right, guys?

    5. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Angostura · · Score: 3, Funny

      You missed a bit:

      Microsoft's Zune HD, set to go on sale Tuesday, will not feature a tightly controlled by control freaks with degrees in control freakery application store like its competitor the iPod Touch. Instead any Seattle based company called Microsoft will be allowed to place applications on the device with no restrictions

    6. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by binarylarry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although I know your post is in jest, Microsoft hasn't done anything *nearly* as terrible as Apple with their iPod/Phone shenanigans.

      And I'm an Ubuntu user with little love for the boys in Redmond.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    7. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by cepayne · · Score: 1

      Brought to you by the same people that DRM'd your PC's video card(a 'la Vista).

      It will be short lived because the market is already saturated with
      dozens of different media players which are either more
      user friendly, cheaper, have more supported media types, and are just
      better designed products.... and then there is the ZUNE.

      MS wants too much to compete in a market that they have already
      failed in.

      The sales of MS OFFICE can't sustain funding to a media player
      whose primary feature is and HD FM tuner. Radio broadcasts are
      their motivation here!

      Anyone can go to any retailer, hardware store, or even a grocery
      store and buy a portable $10 FM radio to listen to radio broadcasts.
      HD FM isn't available everywhere, so it is targeted at a small
      demographic.

      After the MS fanboys have bought one new Zune each, the wave will be
      over. The leader will still be Apple iPods, and the various cheap,
      but versatile Sony and Sandisk MP3 players.

    8. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by JWW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sorry but having an app store and causing problems for some developers beats having no app store at all.

      Note: I think iTunes 9's focus on improving the app sync and letting you layout your iPod Touch/iPhones screens speaks volumes about how successful the app store has been.

    9. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by fortyonejb · · Score: 1

      So its still more open than the iPod. For the record, every time I grab an iPod I feel like I'm prying it from Steve Jobs cold dead hands.

    10. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brought to you by the same people that DRM'd your PC's video card(a 'la Vista).

      Ever tried screenshotting a DVD movie window on a Mac?

    11. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Microsoft's Zune HD, set to go on sale Tuesday, will not feature a tightly controlled by control freaks with degrees in control freakery application store like its competitor the iPod Touch, and therefore may or may not work and may or may not do anything you want it to do"

            Further corrected.

              Brett

    12. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Informative

      With introducing incompatibilities in document formats between Office versions, and introducing incompatibilities between SMB versions (just so that the Samba team can't reverse-engineer it), I think MS is just as evil as Apple. And no, I don't like Apple one freaking bit, it makes me vomit - but so does MS.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    13. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. And even if they were as bad as Apple, it's still ludicrous and clear bias to refer to Apple's store as "open", and to spin it that Microsoft not following suit is somehow a bad thing.

      Not sure why this post is tagged msastroturf.

    14. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who says there'll be no app store? There might well be plenty, if MS don't restrict it so that you can only run apps from one store.

      No one says that the Windows platform (or Linux, OS X, Amiga or whatever) would be better if you could only download apps from one app store. And clearly, not having that doesn't mean you then have nowhere to obtain apps from!

    15. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Stu1706 · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that as soon as someone comes out with a smartphone / mp3 player that is not so "controlled" and lets users install what they want, it will eventually rule the market. I thought someone would have done that by now.

    16. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Ever tried screenshotting a DVD movie window on a Mac?

      Yeah, I did a bunch of them a few days ago: screencapture -i ~/Desktop/dvd.png

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    17. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by fermion · · Score: 1
      To be honest, the iPod does not have an app store. The iPhone does, and the iPod Touch can use it. Likewise, apple has always been able to do anything they wished to the iPhone/iPod. This wish often manifested itself in keeping tht phone locked.

      I am not sure if we will see the free for all 3rd party development of software for these mobile devices. MS certainly tries to some small extent to minimize such development by the warning when one tries to install uncertified software. Those who know ignore the warnings. We are returning to the closed system that existed prior to Compaq cracking the IBM pc. The Zune is closed. The iPod is closed. The N800 appears to be closed. The Kindle is closed.

      As much as some want open, and I certainly appreciate open source, the complications for the average user simply are not worth the benefits. Almost no one upgrades their computers. A $300 laptop can be replaced once a year. As shown on the iPhone, most do not use more than a few applications. We are back in the world where we want a device that can accomplish the few tasks we want. MS does not need developers to provide functionality, as it is now trying to earn a premium designing good products rather than sell based on a feature checklist, although it has not yet completely gotten over the idea that bloat equals good design.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    18. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by trevorrowe · · Score: 1

      Who says there'll be no app store? There might well be plenty, if MS don't restrict it so that you can only run apps from one store.

      This article says there will be a closed app store.. with a few free lame apps, thats as good as *no* app store.

    19. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      WHOOSH!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    20. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite often and it worked like a charm.

    21. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by gig · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is the biggest control freak in the world. They cannot even tolerate competing in a market, they have to have it all to themselves.

      The iPod touch has 2 full 3rd party developer environments: App Store and HTML5. The Zune HD has zero 3rd party developer environments. So who is the control freak?

      Also PlayStation and Wii software requires much more strict approval process than App Store.

      So you're full of shit basically.

    22. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by gig · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Who says there'll be no app store?

      Read the article you moron. The head of Zune development at Microsoft said so.

      > There might well be plenty, if MS don't restrict it so that you can only
      > run apps from one store.

      You cannot run any apps from any store.

      > No one says that the Windows platform (or Linux, OS X, Amiga or whatever)
      > would be better if you could only download apps from one app store.

      That is not true, plenty of people are saying just that. There are more malware titles for Windows than legitimate titles. If Windows 7 had a version that could only run signed apps that had already been certified by Microsoft to not be malware, there are users who would pay more for that version of Windows, especially businesses who have short lists of approved apps. It would run Photoshop and Office and AutoDesk and so on but not malware.

      Honestly, I think you need working examples of somebody doing this better before you knock the App Store. It's a huge success. Lots of developers, lots of sophisticated apps, lots of satisfied users. I have a friend who in 10 years of Mac use never installed a 3rd party app at all, yet on his iPhone he has 10-20 apps he installed himself. I have another friend who has used a lot of Mac and PC software over the past 10 years, but never, ever paid for it. He also has 10-20 apps on his iPhone and he paid for them all, yet it only cost $75. So there are a lot of things working about the App Store that are going to be replicated on the desktop, not the other way around.

      Ubuntu should have a mode "only run signed apps" and the Ubuntu people themselves should test and approve a list of 3rd party apps. Then a user could choose this safer, more secure native app mode if it's appropriate to what they're doing. Considering only about 10% of all computer users ever create any of their own software, this is going to be the default mode for computing going forward. Especially when we have a wide-open HTML5 app environment for running arbitrary stuff.

      > And clearly, not having that doesn't mean you then have nowhere to obtain apps from!

      Again, you have to read the article to make a contribution to this conversation. The whole point of this article is YOU CAN ONLY GET ZUNE HD APPS FROM MICROSOFT. NO 3RD PARTIES. Even if the apps come later, they are still all built-in apps. They are exactly like iPhone apps were the first year. Whatever you said or agreed with in 2007 about iPhone apps is what you should be saying right now about Zune HD if not a hypocrite. The Zune HD is like an iPod touch from 2007 with no 3rd party native apps, yet the Zune HD also does not have HTML5 like iPod touch, so it's even less 3rd party developer friendly.

    23. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that as soon as someone comes out with a smartphone / mp3 player that is not so "controlled" and lets users install what they want, it will eventually rule the market. I thought someone would have done that by now.

      Is there a precedent for this, or wishful thinking?

    24. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. And even if they were as bad as Apple, it's still ludicrous and clear bias to refer to Apple's store as "open", and to spin it that Microsoft not following suit is somehow a bad thing.

      Not sure why this post is tagged msastroturf.

      A controlled store is infinitely more open than no store at all.

    25. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by node+3 · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that as soon as someone comes out with a smartphone / mp3 player that is not so "controlled" and lets users install what they want, it will eventually rule the market. I thought someone would have done that by now.

      Nobody cares beyond a handful of geeks, and even they still buy the iPhone.

    26. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by wisty · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better still, FTA: "f you look around the company at other places where things like this are important, Windows Mobile rises to the top.".

      If you are putting yourself in a place where Windows Mobile rises to the top, you are in a very bad place.

    27. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by vaporland · · Score: 1

      'Microsoft's Zune HD, set to go on sale Tuesday, will not feature any measurable levels of sales, unlike its competitor the iPod Touch.'

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    28. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by 4phun · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but having an app store and causing problems for some developers beats having no app store at all.

      Note: I think iTunes 9's focus on improving the app sync and letting you layout your iPod Touch/iPhones screens speaks volumes about how successful the app store has been.

      Actually there are now two app stores for the Touch and iPhone. A rebel, Erica, has figured out a way to digitally sign apps after you route iTunes to look first at his app store then if not found to rollover to Apple's official app store. All in all I think that is an interesting development from the jail break community who were initially nailed with new digital certificates with OS 3.1. Now [in theory] you can load any 'Apple" firmware and jail break programs on your Apple device with a simple edit of your hosts file and iTunes 9. .

    29. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      I completely agree.

      On a side note, I support the fascists because they make the trains run on time.

      (probably sailing close to being a Godwin, I reckon ;-)

    30. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this isn't exactly where your post was focusing, but...

      Ubuntu should have a mode "only run signed apps" and the Ubuntu people themselves should test and approve a list of 3rd party apps. Then a user could choose this safer, more secure native app mode if it's appropriate to what they're doing.

      Remember that Ubuntu is simply a snapshot of Debian Unstable with a good bit of user-friendly polish on top. Canocial doesn't have the manpower to do extensive testing like that - they don't test the vast majority of what's in Ubuntu's repositories. The only things they go over are what is in the default install - things like Openbox or VLC don't get any look-over.

      However, if we pretend that Canocial actually did put the majority of the stuff in it's repos through some sort of vetting, there's your signed apps - the Ubuntu repositories. Heck, the anandtech article on Ubuntu complained that adding stuff that was not in the signed repository was a confusing - for most users, it's already there.

      Considering only about 10% of all computer users ever create any of their own software, this is going to be the default mode for computing going forward.

      Non sequitur?

    31. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu should have a mode "only run signed apps" and the Ubuntu people themselves should test and approve a list of 3rd party apps. Then a user could choose this safer, more secure native app mode if it's appropriate to what they're doing.

      You havent used Ubuntu have you?

      Let me explain Ubuntu has what is known as signed repositories from which you can download apps from trusted sources, bit like an app store but cheaper.

      you can download and install apps from untrusted locations provided you have sufficient privileges.

      The problem with your idea , software designed to limit what I can do with my computer is that it is my computer and the person that decides what I run is me, where its not my computer and I don't have privileges to install software I ask someone who does. Canonical only get any say in what I run while the distro does what I want.

      It's already normal to get software from a central trusted locations with Linux.

      One other thing wtf is HD about a Zune? high definition radio what is that? better quality radio than normal everyday radio? better sample rates on mp3's? I can appreciate high definition video but audio is already high enough definition isn't it?

    32. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, you have to read the article to make a contribution to this conversation. The whole point of this article is YOU CAN ONLY GET ZUNE HD APPS FROM MICROSOFT. NO 3RD PARTIES.

      Not true at all.
      Check out the XNA API, its definitely possible to create 3rd party apps, there is just no central depository, AKA App Store. You should stop talking out of your ass.

    33. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone can make apps for zune-HD, Just like they could for the regular zune. Here's the XNA team blog post with a download link.

      http://blogs.msdn.com/xna/archive/2009/09/15/xna-game-studio-3-1-zune-extensions.aspx

    34. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft's Zune HD, set to go on sale Tuesday, will not feature a tightly controlled by control freaks with degrees in control freakery application store like its competitor the iPod Touch."

      Let's see....

      1. The upcoming WM app store will cost developers $99 per year plus $99 per app submission (even free ones) and updates as opposed to Apple's one time $99 fee.
      2. It will have the ability to remotely delete apps (http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/09/16/win.mobile.marketplace.can.remote.delete/)
      3. The WM app store will not allow apps that replace core functionality or mapping or navigation software (Ibid).
      4. No runtime engines (i.e. Java)
      5. Additional purchases within apps is forbidden such as additional levels (iPhone release 3.0 encourages and has an API for this).

    35. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      Turds do float in the bowl usually.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    36. Re:Let me fix that foryou.. by Smorkin'+Labbit · · Score: 1

      And there is no way at all to distribute this to any prospective customers. Woohoo.

  2. I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a cheap sansa. It plays mp3/ogg/flac. It plays little xvid videos and plays and records FM.

    What more do I need?

    Are these damn players becoming like cell phones? Do app stores matter? Makes no sense to me.

    1. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are these damn players becoming like cell phones? Do app stores matter? Makes no sense to me.

      Here's what these music / video players need: An app to make them into a smart phone. I'd buy that for a dollar!

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 5, Funny

      check your grass.. I think there are kids on it that need yelled at.

      --
      Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    3. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by stokessd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do apps matter?

      That depends on a couple factors, the first is what you want or need in a portable device, and secondly what is your device capable of.

      for me having a phone with GPS and internet capability means that I'm never more than inches away from a map, thus I'm lost a whole lot less than I used to be. Product reviews and internet prices are always in my pocket, so I'm a smarter consumer even for impulse buys. If I get stuck away from home in a rainstorm on my bike, I can check to see if I'm screwed or if the rain will blow over while I sit under a bridge and wait.

      So no, apps are not needed, but they sure made my life better without having to carry another item.

      Sheldon

    4. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It is a valid opinion. Some people do want to carry lots of devices around.
      And those who don't wouldn't buy a Zune anyway but rather a modern Windows Mobile phone - they can do pretty much everything nowadays.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    5. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by b0r1s · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You may not be the intended audience. If you have to carry a bare bones phone because (for example) you have one provided by an employer, or you cant have a camera (security reasons), or you don't want to upgrade and lose your ancient awesome phone plan, carrying an mp3 player that also doubles as a browser / calendar / email client / GPS / everything else is convenient and awesome.

      If you just want it to play music, it's way too expensive and a waste of money.

      Remember: not everyone just wants music.

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    6. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What more do I need?

      Are these damn players becoming like cell phones? Do app stores matter? Makes no sense to me.

      First, when making an argument, consider you are not the only person in the world, so yes, someone somewhere probably needs something more/different/whatever.

      And yes, App stores matter. Developers like them for saless. Non-geeks like them because it's a trustworthy point to get software that's pretty much guaranteed to be malware-free and won't hijack your system. Ubuntu, in fact, has an essentially same functionality in synaptic. Perhaps, if they were to leverage that into a store, it could help linux grow further.

      Not all software can be free software. Can't sell support contracts for games and the like.

      There is also cool software to be had for the iPhone - like some small apps to help you learn chinese or japanese, etc. App stores help promote this type of thing.

    7. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPod touch has neither phone or GPS?

      The app store arguments might make sense in a phone comparison.

      I just don't see the big difference between a non-phone mp3 player with or without an app store. But I guess I may not be the target audience or understand that market.

    8. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It never occured to you that "it all" actually is "just music" for some people? I see people with music players all day long. People doing something smart-phony with their smart phone are quite rare on the other side.

    9. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by beelsebob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bear in mind that, the iPod touch is not apple's music player device. Apple have the iPod shuffle/nano/classic for that purpose. As steve jobs himself stated in their recent iPod announcement, the iPod touch is a portable games console.

    10. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Thaelon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your opinion of what is relevant in the market is proportional to how much of that market you comprise.

      The fact of the matter is, these apps and a convenient source for them are very much in demand. I highly recommend you at least borrow someone's iPod Touch of iPhone, check out the app store (right from the device!) and see if there isn't something there you would like to have.

      My 3GS is not only my phone, my ebook reader, my mp3 player, my backup navigation device, my portable dictionary, my (surprisingly good) camera, my portable gaming device, compass, and, and even a crude level, in fact it's the first device I've owned that's fast enough and user friendly enough that I'd call it a general purpose portable computer. I held out on getting an iPhone until the 3GS and it was worth the wait.

      I'll get off your lawn now.

      --

      Question everything

    11. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, some people love walking around with a Batman like utility belt full of all their devices. So far we have music player, cell phone, GPS, computer, video player....

    12. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "I have a cheap sansa. It plays mp3/ogg/flac. It plays little xvid videos and plays and records FM. What more do I need? Are these damn players becoming like cell phones? Do app stores matter? Makes no sense to me."

      wait, people use the iPod Touch to play music?? That's stupid, the device is huge! I use a nano for music and a touch for apps, mostly games. The Touch is actually a pretty decent gaming device, with a wide variety of great little games with lots of free demos and almost every game is less than $10, many less than $5:
      Sid Meier's Civilization currently $4.99
      Need for Speed Undercover currently $4.99
      Geared (puzzle game) currently $0.99
      SimCity (like SimCity 2000 on PC) currently $4.99
      Modern Combat: Sandstorm (FPS) currently $6.99
      Kroll (similar to God of War on PS2) currently $0.99
      Spore Origins (first level of Spore game for PC) currently $0.99

      IMHO I wouldn't use a Touch for music, it's too big and fragile with that giant touchscreen. Nano's are much better for that purpose. And before someone says "so you carry a Nano and Touch everywhere?". No, I usually know before I leave if I'll be bored out of my mind want want to play some quick games (post office, driver's bureau, in-laws, etc) or listen to music (going to gym... that's it).

      And I still carry a blackberry as a phone. Why not iPhone? Blackberry is much better for email, checks mail faster and easier to type with a keyboard vs touchscreen.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    13. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheldon!?! From the Big Bang Theory?!

    14. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then get a iPod Mini and upgrade the battery for $6 US and upgrade the storage to 32GB for $60 US. Takes five minutes to do.
      This is what I did with my old Mini and it is perfect now, I don't need all the other stuff either.

    15. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by M-RES · · Score: 1

      Maybe because there's no 'smartphone' or 'all-in-one' type of device yet that actually 'does it all' very well. They are all sufficient for moderate amateur use I suppose, but there are people out there who like photography, so a crappy built-in camera on their phone will never suffice compared to their digicam. Likewise, there isn't an 'all-in-one' device yet that will fit my music collection, whereas my iPod 'classic' will do. When I want to take phone calls or text somebody, I just need a simple very small device that will let me do that - the smartphones out there are either too big, too expensive to risk chucking around the way my phone tends to get treated, or too prone to crashing (Windows mobile is terrible for that in my personal experience). The all-in-one devices are OK for anybody looking for a 'jack of all trades, master of none' solution - for everybody else there's a specialist solution that does it much much better. It all depends on your personal requirements from a device.

    16. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1
      I don't know about that. According to one of the articles:

      Q: Are you concerned about competing with new iPods with cameras built in?

      A: The more things like that that make their way into these devices that aren't about great music and video playback, the more it's distracting or sacrificing that original purpose of the device. Apps are jamming in, cameras -- that's work that's not being done on the music front.

      With this release, you can see we're still really focused on music and video. We're still hyper-focused on that. Maybe that's the benefit of being the little guy. We can have that laser-focus.

      Maybe some of those people ... did buy an iPod because it's all about music, and now it's not. Maybe we can get some of those folks.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    17. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      I agree. I bought a Sansa because it could play ogg and flac files without reverting to a Rockbox excursion. Everything else was gravy, including the cheap price and decent storage size. (Straight link to amazon, not trying to be an advert.) For comparison the apple ipod nano is about twice the cost without good audio codec support. Then again this kind of thing is all about priorities. Mine happen to be open codecs and decent cost - seems reasonable to me as well as the hypothetical average Slashdot user.

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    18. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by timeOday · · Score: 1
      There's really no question smartphones should have applications on them. The question is whether there should still be non-smart phones, and standalone music players.

      For me, emphatically yes for standalone music players. I use mine mostly for working out, where the criteria are small size, light weight, long battery life, and above all, cheap (since they occasionally get destroyed).

      Non-smart phones don't make any sense IMHO. The hardware for a music player, at least, is already there. Might as well use it.

    19. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Carnildo · · Score: 0, Troll

      for me having a phone with GPS and internet capability means that I'm never more than inches away from a map, thus I'm lost a whole lot less than I used to be.

      For me, having a phone with GPS and internet capability means jack shit, because I'll need to climb that mountain over there to see enough of the sky for the dinky little antenna on the phone to get a GPS signal, and I'll need to hike three ridgelines over to get line-of-sight to a cell tower.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    20. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At that point, you might as well get a netbook and have a real portable computer experience.

    21. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I bought an Archos device. It plays mp3, ogg, flac, wma, diverse video formats including divx/xvid, FM receiver and transmitter so I can listen to it in my car. Don't need anything else.

    22. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

      But then he'd still need a phone!

      --
      Changa hates change.
    23. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by juancnuno · · Score: 1

      I have a cheap sansa. It plays mp3/ogg/flac. It plays little xvid videos and plays and records FM.

      What more do I need?

      If that Sansa works for you, that's great. Nobody is asking you to buy a Zune. I'm not buying a Zune. My Rockboxed iPod is what works great for me.

    24. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Omestes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What gets me is that they are eroding storage space, and somehow expecting me to not notice thanks to being blinded by bloat. Looking at the latest iPod selection, only two models will actually hold all my music now (the $400 touch, and the Classic, which will probably go away in a year or so). The Zune page is being sucky right now, but I'm pretty sure they only have 2 players that could hold my library with room for growth. I don't think that the ability to "shuffle" my music collection is a feature, nor do I think being forced to choose what I might be in the mood for at some indeterminate point in the future is desirable (if I liked this, I would have stuck with lugging CDs with me, or a cheap flash player).

      Its very nice that I can now continually spend money on my MP3 player for silly little apps that tell me things that Google would tell me for free on my phone. Its very nice that I can watch HD video on a microscopic screen, or take crappy videos to post to YouTube (which I can do on my phone, for free, as well). But what happened to being able to store a shit-ton of music?

      Didn't there used to be a market for this? Where did it go? How many 80Gb+ players still exist? Did people suddenly all delete their music libraries?

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    25. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Omestes · · Score: 3, Informative

      You exaggerate. Currently I carry around nothing more than my cellphone and an iPod. Sure, sometimes I bring a camera, but generally my cellphone camera is adequate, but when I really want to take pictures a real camera is better. Sure, sometimes I bring my laptop, but most of the time my phone is adiquate (if not optimal) for quick browsing and email.

      This is the point. All in one devices generally don't match specialty devices in terms of functionality. My phone is really good at being a phone, but isn't the best when it comes to playing music, taking photos, or general computing. My iPod is 100x better than my phone at playing music (especially when you consider there is no smart phones on the market that have nearly enough storage space to hold any decent amount of music). My camera is 100x better than my phones camera. My phone does have all the GPS I need, especially since I haven't found a need for it. My laptop is some order of magnitude better than my phone at being a computer. And having a portable DVD player is around infinitely better at playing video than any phone I've ever seen (don't own one, the laptop is actually better than most portable DVD devices). Why would I want only one device that fulfills one need rather well, but really sucks at doing everything else?

      Why would I want to pay a shit ton extra for a phone that does a whole bunch of stuff that I can already do much better?

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    26. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by moon3 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but this sports hell fast GPU and big color OLED display, why would they equipped it with such features to only play MP3s or to slide album covers in 3D ?

    27. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by daemonc · · Score: 1

      Want to see something really crazy?

      You can probably flash your Sansa firmware to Rockbox

      Then you can run various apps on it (even DOOM!), in addition to playing more formats.

      --
      All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
    28. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by repetty · · Score: 1

      > I have a cheap sansa. It plays mp3/ogg/flac. It plays little
      > xvid videos and plays and records FM.
      >
      > What more do I need?

      Does it run Photoshop? No. Point made.

    29. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      I don't have a cellphone because I hate being tethered. I don't have an iPod or Zune because I don't need one - I am blessed/cursed with a musical memory and have thousands of songs stored up in my head. It's nice when it works well, but for a week I had the theme to "Captain Kangaroo" in my noggin. Still, I don't need an iPod thingie. I don't need a GPS - I have an excellent sense of direction, and my car has (lots of) maps in it. My computer is a laptop that rarely moves from the desk, as my desk and chair in my home office ROCK and I have a top notch sound system for background music when my brain doesn't have the cycles to think and churn tunes for me. Video player is in the TV room. I rarely watch - I'm too busy, usually.

      As a consequence, I don't get the hype - I don't see the value in much of the technical gadgetry. That said, I am thinking of getting an iPod, if only for the reason of putting music in the car for guests who don't have access to my mind's jukebox or care for my singing voice...

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    30. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by donstenk · · Score: 1

      until your battery runs out and you realise you are screwed because you stopped carrying maps, spent all your money on smart gadgets with good reviews and sold your bike on ebay because the touchscreen was wreaking havoc in your pocket on the last bit of juice.

      --
      Dennis Onstenk
    31. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by donstenk · · Score: 1

      Funny that is. I use my iPhone for all those purposes but never use it to listen to music. In fact the earphones are still in the box - are they any good?

      --
      Dennis Onstenk
    32. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      iPod touch has neither phone or GPS?

      The app store arguments might make sense in a phone comparison.

      I just don't see the big difference between a non-phone mp3 player with or without an app store. But I guess I may not be the target audience or understand that market.

      I had an iPod touch for about 6 months before I bought an iPhone. There were a few things I liked about it.

      1.) Web browsing worked really well. I could check my email (via gMail) easily. That was more interesting at work than home since I was frequently away from my desk.

      2.) There are a ton of games you can get for it. Personally I got a kick out of Space Ace. I heard the Civ game is slick, too.

      3.) I know this'll sound silly but I've liked having IMDB handy while watching a DVD with my girlfriend.

      4.) Having an Instant Messenger is nice. YMMV.

      5.) The app store always has something funky or bizarre to play with. I found a unit converter once that turned out to be really handy on the set. Frankly, until you've wandered in there (or if I knew more about you...) it's hard to say what'll tickle your fancy.

      It's more interesting to have the phone, for sure, but the touch isn't useless. Heck, from what I understand, you can rent vids from iTunes and use the iPod touch to play them on your TV.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    33. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by snooo53 · · Score: 1

      Agree that it depends on the capabilities, but often it seems that cell phones are locked down so much that we only get to use a small fraction of its potential. For instance, I'd love to be able to write or load my own apps onto my phone. I am curious what websites you use for product reviews that are mobile friendly?

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    34. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my (surprisingly good) camera

      I take it this is the first camera you've used?

    35. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO

    36. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod parent +1 Retarded

    37. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by node+3 · · Score: 1

      but rather a modern Windows Mobile phone - they can do pretty much everything nowadays.

      But how many of those things can they do well?

    38. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 3GS is not only my phone, my ebook reader, my mp3 player, my backup navigation device, my portable dictionary, my (surprisingly good) camera, my portable gaming device, compass...

      Sir...you are a whore.

    39. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but this sports hell fast GPU

      I've never been able to find any benchmarks of the Tegra chip. The only three things that are commonly known is that it's from Nvidia, that it's an updated PortalPlayer chip (the chips in older iPods), and that it can play HD video through its video out.

      People seem to just see the name Nvidia and think it's got a GeForce 9800GT or something.

      and big color OLED display

      Smaller and lower resolution than an iPhone.

      why would they equipped it with such features to only play MP3s or to slide album covers in 3D ?

      The number one reason for those features is to sound superior to the iPhone. Nvidia? OLED? Must be better!

    40. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by herojig · · Score: 1

      I agree with u and I have a lowly 3g. i was not into games at all until this device came along, and it's great for casual entertainment, as well as for listening to music, reading, phoning, exploring, etc. I live in a bottom-feeder country and use an unlocked jailbroken version, download all apps from appulous, and I am very happy with this purchase. great device!

      --
      I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
    41. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      iPod touch is basically a PDA with music and movie playing capability. iPhone is that+camera+AGPS. The iPods still remain music/movie players, except the new nano, which confuses the hell out of some :)

      Buying programs to do more stuff makes sense once you see them in action. Especially games :)

    42. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      Is TomTom's navigation software silly? The Epocrates medication identification tool? IM on the go? Cookbooks? Dictionaries? Can Google provide portable games where there's no Internet? I like loading up my PDA with toys and tools when going on a longer train ride or flight. What's silly is the amount of money the AppStore brings in :)

      80GB+ players still exist, and not just from Apple. You need to learn how to use that Google thing you mentioned! Not that even the 160GB iPod Classic will suffice for my needs...it's still a hard drive-based unit, not flash, so you can't take it for a run (go on - try that with any such player and see how long it lasts). I also need a bit more than 200GB. We're almost there with flash-based players ;)

    43. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Is TomTom's navigation software silly?

      To me, yes. I know my way around my city, so it is a waste of money. When I travel I mainly stick with an old piece of software called a map, and when it really gets bad it comes on my cell plan for free.

      The Epocrates medication identification tool?

      Can't think of a use for that one. Personally.

      IM on the go?

      Have free unlimited text, and stopped using IM pretty much after college. Again, personally, no.

      Cookbooks?

      Unlimited data plan + cooks.com. Or, even better, I have a large collection of cook books within seconds of my stove.

      Dictionaries?

      Unlimited data on my phone + dictionary.com (or such). Though most of the time I need them I'm at home, where I have a large collection of specialty dictionaries (unless there is a Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy app)

      Can Google provide portable games where there's no Internet?

      Haven't actually had the need to play portable games in a long time.

      You might find this stuff useful, and it is nice that there is a solution for you. I personally don't. The only app I've seen so far that made me want to buy an iPhone is the restaurant shaker one, and thats just because me and the girlfriend have a terminal case of culinary indecision. I, personally, want something that just plays music, without all the hassle of extraneous features. This isn't saying that there shouldn't be options for people like you, but there also shouldn't be an exclusive focus on your preferences either.

      80GB+ players still exist, and not just from Apple.

      Which makes me sad. I still haven't found a better solution than my old iPod classic, and iTunes. Songbird comes close, but it has a hard time not crashing, and occasionally corrupting data. I like iTunes, as well, for the same reason most people hate it, it manages my myriad of music for me, so I don't have to. .it's still a hard drive-based unit, not flash, so you can't take it for a run (go on - try that with any such player and see how long it lasts).

      I generally prefer to exercise without music (more of a hiker myself, and I feel earphones ruin the experience), but I haven't managed to kill a HDD music player yet, even while throwing a couple from a moving bicycle. I might just be lucky though.

      We're almost there with flash-based players ;)

      That will be nice, if they manage the same price point as HDD based ones, and offer some that have good old fashioned boring interfaces.

       

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    44. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by 4phun · · Score: 1

      What gets me is that they are eroding storage space... The Zune page is being sucky right now...

      But what happened to being able to store a shit-ton of music?

      Didn't there used to be a market for this? Where did it go? How many 80Gb+ players still exist? Did people suddenly all delete their music libraries?



      <quote><p> But what happened to being able to store a shit-ton of music?</p><p>Didn't there used to be a market for this? Where did it go? How many 80Gb+ players still exist? Did people suddenly all delete their music libraries?</p></quote>

        Well consider this how much time do you have? Look at the summary in iTunes of how long you would need to watch all the video, play all the music, podcasts and audio books that is on your typical 16GB iPhone. Mine is weeks at 24x7! I do not listen to a fraction of what I am carrying. If I want something I do not have I can stream it using Pandora or some similar application. You can even easily stream video over the 3G network if you live in Atlanta GA where it is very good.

        Use smart playlists in the iTunes program to command the device to change everything on a sync by moving old content off and shuffling new content onto so it is always fresh.

        The complete combination of iTunes software [which is better than ever with version 9], the Apple one stop store, and an incredible device itself which is so easy to use makes the Apple Touch and iPhone a runaway leader in their respective classes. Zune is so far back it can't be even seen by normal people. I would never recommend someone waste a few dollars on a Zune just to 'be different'. It just marks them as being dumb!
    45. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by moon3 · · Score: 1

      Tegra chip

      Is way faster then PowerVR chip in iPod/iPhone + more features like better shared model support


      Also, why not make iPod touch competitor when iPod touch is #1 ?

    46. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Right now, with just checked music, I'm standing at 20+ days. But this isn't really the point. The point is that they are making things a bit less convenient to me, and moving back from the only reason I bought an iPod in the first place.

      I can't stand "shuffling" my music in, this "feature" is the only reason I switched to an iPod from CDs. I don't really know what I'm going to want to listen to a couple days in advance, perhaps I will want to listen to the full Led Zeppelin box set next Saturday, perhaps not, but with shuffle I might get half of it (or less with a 16GB device, since that is less than half of my total library), and if I decide to stick it on there anyway, then it is useless if I decide I don't want to listen to it. This gets worse when you have lossless formats involved, as it uses even more storage space.

      I like being able to carry my huge library with me wherever I go, since it allows me to listen to whatever I want whenever I want. I hated having to plan these things out in advance. But then again, different strokes for different folks, I suppose.

      The complete combination of iTunes software [which is better than ever with version 9], the Apple one stop store, and an incredible device itself which is so easy to use makes the Apple Touch and iPhone a runaway leader in their respective classes. Zune is so far back it can't be even seen by normal people. I would never recommend someone waste a few dollars on a Zune just to 'be different'. It just marks them as being dumb!

      Don't get me wrong, right now iTunes is the best media software out there (at least as far as my use is concerned), and iTunes 9 is very nice, especially on a network. Its just the hardware is moving backwards, at least as far as my needs go. I don't give jack-all about apps, or having MORE integrated cameras, or having wifi, or GPS, or tilt sensors, I just want something that plays music, and can hold my entire library. I'd prefer if all it does is play music, too, since then there is less cruft competing for battery life. The original iPod (and now Classic) was perfect, but it seems that Apple decided that they are too low-tech and functional to continue to support. Though, if they came out with a Nano with decent storage, I would grab one in a second, even if it has a completely superfluous and redundant camera.

      Though I find it odd that they replaced the iPod Classic's 3 models with one at the high end, and replaced the other two models with vastly inferior hardware.

      Also, while I'm being snarky, who the hell sees a camera as an added value anymore? Doesn't every have a phone with a crappy camera already?

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    47. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If I get stuck away from home in a rainstorm on my bike, I can check to see if I'm screwed or if the rain will blow over while I sit under a bridge and wait.

      I don't know where you live, but in the UK you'd need to carry a tent, sleeping bag and two or three days' provisions around if you wanted to wait out the rain...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    48. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by dunkelfalke · · Score: 0, Troll

      That depends on your requirements, wishes and habits so I can only speak for myself.
      My HTC Touch HD together with the software I use performs somewhere between "good enough for casual use" and "dear god, this is a dream come true".

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    49. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking kids stole all my weed. Why didn't you say something sooner!!!

    50. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by stokessd · · Score: 1

      I live in a fly-over state in the US, but I spent a couple weeks in Northern England and Scotland. While bicycling in Scotland and hiking the Fells in the lake district, I never had rain for more than an hour or so at a time. I was really lucky in that regard. What a beautiful place, I need to move there ASAP.

      Sheldon

    51. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by tepples · · Score: 1

      But then he'd still need a phone!

      Which is what the combination of a land line and a $10/mo prepaid plan is for.

    52. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

      But then he'd still need a phone!

      Which is what the combination of a land line and a $10/mo prepaid plan is for.

      You seem to be confused as to what a "phone" is. It's all well and good to have a landline and a prepaid plan, but I'm talking about the physical device that rests in my pocket.

      When I had a Palm pilot and a cheap nokia, I had two devices in my pocket. Now that I have an iphone, I have one. That physical reality is why the iphone is superior to any other device I've ever owned: email, phone, music, notes and bookreader all-in-one. Plus a cheesy camera for laughs (no, I don't have a 3g let alone a 3gs).

      --
      Changa hates change.
    53. Re:I want my mp3 player to play music by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

      Non-smart phones don't make any sense IMHO. The hardware for a music player, at least, is already there. Might as well use it.

      You're saying that there is no difference at all in the manufacturing expense of an phone+mp3-player vs. a phone only device? Color me skeptical. Plus, my old nokia with a 5 line black&white screen and no internal number storage (all on the SIM) gets far superior battery life than my iPhone. I love my iphone, but that nokia still lives in my glovebox for emergencies. And my mom still carries a phone-only cheapie; I don't think she make a call on my iphone if her life depended on it. Simple phones are never going away.

      --
      Changa hates change.
  3. So, no apps, or just not yet? by Bruiser80 · · Score: 1

    This is a major oversight if Microsoft isn't going to allow 3rd party apps. Maybe when they get around to supporting it, you'll be able to install apps without using an iTunes-style interface. Directly from app's website perhaps?

    --
    Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in the mud. After a while, you realize the engineer enjoys it.
    1. Re:So, no apps, or just not yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm hoping somebody will hack it open like the iPhone was. As long as there's some path to add third-party applications, I don't care if it's supported or not.

    2. Re:So, no apps, or just not yet? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      You know that you don't need an iTunes like interface on an iPod touch? It has an app store app built into it.

    3. Re:So, no apps, or just not yet? by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      It's a MS Product. It will be hacked and jailbroken by the time the product introduction presentation is over, just because it's there. At that point, MS will see the advantages of getting some cut from an app store compared to getting nothing from freely available downloads. I'd expect the ZuneHD1.1 before the Xmas rush.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    4. Re:So, no apps, or just not yet? by drummerboybac · · Score: 1

      Not sure I like having to go to each app's website. Id like the app store concept, so it can at least validate that the program runs and doesn't have anything nasty in it.

    5. Re:So, no apps, or just not yet? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between having an app store and simply allowing 3rd party apps.

    6. Re:So, no apps, or just not yet? by Facegarden · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a major oversight if Microsoft isn't going to allow 3rd party apps. Maybe when they get around to supporting it, you'll be able to install apps without using an iTunes-style interface. Directly from app's website perhaps?

      It's just "Not Yet". This article is extremely biased, check out the Engadget article for actual info, not fanboy FUD.

      http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/zune-hd-3d-gaming-and-app-downloads-confirmed/

      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    7. Re:So, no apps, or just not yet? by InlawBiker · · Score: 1

      Zune's only hope would be to tie it in with X-Box. They should have called it the X-Box Media Mobile, then they might have a chance. Nobody would develop apps for Zune even if they could, there aren't enough eyeballs.

      The older Zune was really pretty good, even better than iPod. The new one probably is too. But they don't have nearly the number of accessories or apps available, so it's doomed. I predict Zune will die within two years, unless they can resurrect it via some other channel.

    8. Re:So, no apps, or just not yet? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      You could have the app store AND also have the possibility to download stuff from other locations...

  4. HD radio by mcgrew · · Score: 0

    It will come with some unique features, though, like an HD radio tuner

    It's ironic that the "HD" in "HD radio" stands for high definition, when current digital, especially with lossy comression, has a LOWER definition than the old analog vinyl did. Yes, FM is nowhere near the fidelity of LP, but neither is CD.

    Have you ever heard a CD that you would confuse with a live performance? Me either. I have heard LPs played on high end equipment that you would confuse with a live performance. I guess that's why they changed it from "High Fidelity" to "High Definition, because at today's low sampling rates and especially lossy compression, the fidelity just isn't there.

    I do realise that HD gives features lackin in the analog part, like song titles printed out and so forth. Maybe it should stand for "Happy with Digital"?

    1. Re:HD radio by watchoutbehindyou · · Score: 1

      Don't try to find any meaning to "HD audio". It's pure Buzzword Bullshit. Me hates.

    2. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this guys gotta be a troll. Cause if he actually did some reading he'd see he has no idea what he's talking about.

    3. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's ironic that the "HD" in "HD radio" stands for high definition, when current digital, especially with lossy comression, has a LOWER definition than the old analog vinyl did.

      A few things:

      1) It's a good thing the HD in HD Radio doesn't stand for "High Definition" then. It's "Hybrid Digital".
      2) HD Radio is higher fidelity than FM, and that's what it's being compared to. ("Definition" doesn't really work with audio, anyway)
      3) Vinyl may have a higher theoretical accuracy, but CDs have a far lower noise floor, which in practice makes them far more accurate.

      I guess that's why they changed it from "High Fidelity" to "High Definition, because at today's low sampling rates and especially lossy compression, the fidelity just isn't there.

      Again, they didn't change it. And at the recording studio, they're using higher sampling rates and less compression than ever. The fact that the music you buy from iTunes is more compressed (And the fact that CDs in the "Loudness War" are clipped) is irrelevant.

    4. Re:HD radio by dunkelfalke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah. All those pops and scratches and distortion really make you believe being in a live performance.

      Anyway, there are only a bunch of artists who sound good live making your rambling a moot point.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    5. Re:HD radio by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Informative

      HD Radio stands for Hybrid-Definition. It's misleading marketing bullshit.

      The guy who initially demoed Zune couple of months ago was scrolling the list of songs on the device and said (in reference to a 480-by-272 display) "Look at the gorgeous screen. You can really see the HD." I don't think people at Microsoft really understand the meaning of High Definition or lying through their teeth in their marketing materials.

    6. Re:HD radio by jhol13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you ever heard a CD that you would confuse with a live performance?

      No. Thankfully I can play at less than ~100dBA.

      I have heard LPs played on high end equipment that you would confuse with a live performance.

      No, I would not. It does not have the ambience of a stadium and the feeling of over 1000 people around me.

      I am so sick and tired of "LP is analog therefore better" bullshit that I strongly recommend you to calculate LP's channel capacity (according to Shannon's nice theorem). You will be surprised how much you have to fiddle with the numbers before you get higher than 1.4Mbit/s (stereo).

    7. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you Dude! I borrowed an HD radio for use during my commute to work. I was not impressed. They should call i 128k streamtuner or something.
      My IPOD sounds better, then again I rip my CDs at 320k

    8. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      HD stand for HIGH DISTORTION

    9. Re:HD radio by gnalre · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lets not also forget that HD is not a widely used system. Its closed source and only used in North America. In Europe DAB is the standard, so good luck using or selling the zune outside the states.

      --
      Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
    10. Re:HD radio by JerryLove · · Score: 4, Informative

      You make entierly untrue assumptions about HD radio, and unfair comparisons.

      HD radio requires a fraction of the power of analog.
      HD radio requires a fraction of the bandwidth of analog.
      HD radio survives with 0% distortion over the majority of its receivable range.
      HD radio is capable of CD-quality sound.
      HD radio is capable of >2-channel encoding.

      Similarly, your LP-vs-CD, while bordering on religious, is unfounded. Though LPs have a higher top frequency than standard CDs on their first play, both are well above human hearing.

      The long-and-short is that the quality of playback on high-end equipment, when considered in light of the human ear, will be far more dependant on the mastering than on CD-vs-LP. And at that level we are usually discussing SACD and DVD-A... welcome to the 21st century.

      And yes, I've heard CDs sound like live; and I've heard a number of SACDs that do. I suspect that you havent either because of a disparity in the mastering, a disparity in the playback equipment, or listener bias.

    11. Re:HD radio by Bruiser80 · · Score: 1

      2) HD Radio is higher fidelity than FM, and that's what it's being compared to. ("Definition" doesn't really work with audio, anyway)

      Partially True. A station has a set amount of data it can transfer. If a station splits its signal over too many channels (like High-Def's sub-channels), you can get down to a quality that is indeed worse than FM.

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in the mud. After a while, you realize the engineer enjoys it.
    12. Re:HD radio by ArhcAngel · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the HD Digital Radio FAQ

      Q : WHAT DOES THE HD IN HD RADIO MEAN?

      A: The 'HD' in 'HD Radio' is part of iBiquity Digital's brand name for its digital AM and FM radio technology. It does not mean either hybrid digital or high definition, it is simply the branding language for this new technology.

      They are simply riding the wave of video High Definition hype nothing more.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    13. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh...it's been proven that the PVC polymer chains that comprise LPs don't offer as much resolution, even on the molecular level, as 44.1 KHz sampled audio. Not to mention that the properties of the material don't allow even that kind of resolution in the first place. The infinite resolution thing is a myth. I can't find it at the moment, but if anyone is really interested, look for data about electron micrographs of LPs.

      Furthermore, LPs max out at maybe 70-80 dBa of dynamic range, while 16-bit CDs offer 96, and 24-bit "HD audio" formats even more (to the point where its not even needed). The full original signal is easily reconstructed from the sampled audio. CDs are in every way technologically superior to LPs.

      That being said, many early CDs were poorly mastered. Engineers often boosted the treble when mastering for LPs to compensate for the medium. When they did that out of habit for CDs, they sounded scratchy and awful.

    14. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many LPs, or even 45s, can you fit in your pocket? What's the battery life on your portable turntable? how important is sound fidelity on a crowded subway, or noisy cartrip? Oh dear, I've been trolled.

    15. Re:HD radio by djbckr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have you ever heard a CD that you would confuse with a live performance?

      Are you *really* serious? I don't buy that at all. You must not have had a very good CD player or summin. I have a *large* collection of LP's, 45's, and CD's, and most of my library I listen to is on my iPod now. I've spent enormous amounts of time comparing the AAC version of what I've recorded to the original. Can't tell a difference.

      What I have found is that CD's tend to unmask the weakness of the original recording, making it a little less pleasurable to listen to. An extreme example is Journey "Lovin' Touchin' Squeezin". If you listen to it on a cheap radio over FM it's not too bad. Listen to it on LP it sounds better. Listen to it on a CD with high-end equipment (I have Mackie studio monitors) and it sounds absolutely friggin horrible. It's not the mastering of the CD or the quality of the A/D conversion, it's the original recording. Now go and listen to James Taylor "Everyday" - the remastered version - downloaded from iTunes. That's probably some of the best quality audio you'll ever hear.

      Oh, and IAASE (I am a studio engineer)

    16. Re:HD radio by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Out of the sleeve there are no pops or scratches, and if you take care of them (keep your fingers off, don't drop them and keep them in the sleeve) they'll be very minimal. When an LP is scratched (or dirty) to the point where you'd notice at all, a CD wouldn't even play.

      And I wasn't just referring to recorded live performances, which ironically seldom sounded live but sounded like a recording of a live performance because you get the acoustic effects of the hall plus the acoustic affects of your living room, but well engineered studio albums.

      Case in point -- Van Halen's first album. I bought it when it first came out, and we moved to a new place. The neighbors saw us carrying in musical instruments, and when we were done we opened a bottle of tequila and got noisy, blasting that Van Halen album almost all the way up through my very good speakers - each enclosure had a fifteen inch woofer, two squawkers (midrange speaker, you kids would call them woofers), two tweeters and a super tweeter (super tweeters response was from 15kHz to over 30 kHz).

      The next day we met the neighbors. "Man", they said, "your band kicks ass!" That same album on CD does NOT sound anywhere near as good, and nobody would ever confuse it with a live performance.

      I'd had the album for a couple of weeks and had played the hell out of it. I have a lot of CDs that I originally sampled from LP and burned, people are amazed when I tell them that they were sampled from vinyl, because you DON'T hear pops and scratches unless the record was badly mistreated.

      Now, when you take an LP or cassette and sample it and convert the samples to MP3, all the artifacts are magnified tremendously, although without the compression those artifacts are as unnoticable as on the original media.

    17. Re:HD radio by rezonat0r · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you ever heard a CD that you would confuse with a live performance? Me either.

      In fairness, that is more a fault of the way most CD's are mastered today, rather than an inherent problem with the CD format. It is possible to produce CDs with a decent amount of dynamic range that do have the "feel" or dynamics of a live performance.

      It's too bad that none of the 24-bit music formats have really caught on. That increased bit depth gives even more opportunity to incorporate real dynamics. With a CD (16-bit) you only have 65,535 possible amplitude levels. With a 24-bit format you get 16,777,216 possible levels. It's like the difference between 16-bit and 24-bit color on your desktop - they may look similar at first, but once you know what to look (listen) for, the difference is obvious and you never want to go back to 16-bit.

    18. Re:HD radio by schon · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard a CD that you would confuse with a live performance? Me either. I have heard LPs played on high end equipment that you would confuse with a live performance.

      Maybe you need to buy one of these Intelligent Chips?

    19. Re:HD radio by DECS · · Score: 1

      The HD in "HD Radio" doesn't stand for high definition. It's a bs market confusing effort to push proprietary digital radio broadcasting, and it's US only. That's also why the Zune HD isn't being sold overseas, because it doesn't work with open digital radio in Europe.

      From OLED to Tegra: Five Myths of the Zune HD

    20. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough beer and the right woman (or even the wrong one) and that song is just fine no matter what it is played on. ;)

    21. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You make some excellent points, although I would take issue with the quality/"fidelity" issue.

      Hybrid Digital radio *can* have better clarity than analog FM, however, like Digital TV, it depends on how many sub-channels the operator tries to cram into their allotted bandwidth, and how much compression they use to do it.

      There are other drawbacks (for the consumer), such as the fact that Hybrid Digital is a proprietary format, and that it could be used for DRM control in the future. The effective range of all currently broadcast Hybrid Digital channels is smaller than their Analog counterparts, and more vulnerable to catastrophic interference (interference which prevents reception altogether). This is somewhat countered by the fact that the receiver will "seamlessly" fall back to the analog transmission, but that brings us to the next point:

      The only way the Hybrid Digital transmission can match (or exceed) the coverage area of the analog transmission is if its power is boosted while reducing the analog. This won't happen unless and until the uptake of Hybrid Digital is high, which may be a Catch-22 unless they can convince manufacturers to include it by default, as they have apparently done with MS.

      There are also issues with bandwidth and station overlap. From the Wikipedia: "HD Radio does not fit within the FCC spectral mask. North American FM channels are spaced 200 kHz apart. An HD Radio station will not generally cause interference to any analog station within its 1 mV/m service contour, the limit above which the FCC protects most stations. However, the IBOC signal resides within the analog signal of the first-adjacent station. With the proposed power increase of 10dB, the potential exists to cause the degradation of analog signals within its 1 mV/m service contour. Ironically, the National Association of Broadcasters claims this is not a problem, while at the same time using it as justification to keep LPFM stations (except its own members' translator stations) off the air."

      Posting anonymous to preserve moderation...

    22. Re:HD radio by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      When an LP is scratched (or dirty) to the point where you'd notice at all, a CD wouldn't even play.

      I have grown up with vinyl records. My first one was Magic Fly by Space (still love that album). Pops come from dust and are pretty much inevitable and a scratch that makes the CD barf for half a second would make the record repeat the same round ever and ever again.

      And I wasn't just referring to recorded live performances

      I was talking about real live performances. Most bands suck live. Notable exception - Loreena McKennitt. She often sounds even better live than on a recording. But such cases are very, very rare.

      The next day we met the neighbors. "Man", they said, "your band kicks ass!" That same album on CD does NOT sound anywhere near as good, and nobody would ever confuse it with a live performance.

      So basically you want to say that through the walls and the noise you made your neighbours could possibly hear the difference between a vinyl and a CD recording?

      Dude, I am a musician myself, don't try to bullshit me. They just saw your instruments and assumed that you practised a little. Same thing happened to me also once but I've played some Pink Floyd MP3s after a jam session.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    23. Re:HD radio by mcgrew · · Score: 0, Troll

      No. Thankfully I can play at less than ~100dBA.

      A recording of someone singing, accompanied by an acoustic guitar, will be far less that 100db. Of course, add a drum or a clarinet and you're in the ear-splitter range.

      No, I would not. It does not have the ambience of a stadium and the feeling of over 1000 people around me.

      See above; have you never been in a small club or bar with few patrons and a bluegrass band? If not, you should. Or heard someone just play a piano or guitar in a living room?

      I am so sick and tired of "LP is analog therefore better"

      Not better, but higher fidelity. Analog and digital both have their strong and weak points. Digital's weak point is frequency response and aliasing, analog's weak points are noise and a lower dynamic range, although few CDs use its effective dynamic range well.

      With only three samples per crest, CD's 44khz sampling rate is simply not good enough; in a CD there is no difference between a sawtooth wave or a square wave or a sine wave. If they upped the sampling rate ten fold, I would guess that a recording like that would completely blow any analog media out of the water. But that was the best they could do with the technology at the time CDs were developed.

    24. Re:HD radio by Atraxen · · Score: 1

      I suspect the difference isn't in the hardware - it lies in the recording process. Modern music has greater 'production values' than historic recordings did.

      Note - I use the phrase 'production values' in a completely value-neutral sense. Some would argue that today's music is over-engineered. Others might say that this is the difference between camcorders and IMAX recordings. Either way, no one is going to confuse highly-engineered video as being from a camcorder unless they take drastic steps to make it look that way. I'd say the same is true for music.

      Also, the production goals are different in the two eras. In the 60's-early 80's (yes, I know there's a ton of exceptions....) the aim was more to give you the feeling of being there. Today, the aim is to give you an immersive experience (for lack of a more value-neutral term), and much has been written about the differences in the frequency balance between these eras. And that alone would mean that modern digitally recorded music wouldn't sound live played on speakers.

      I'd love to see the control experiment where a pure analog recording (i.e. from soundboard to recorder) was done with a digital shunt (i.e. both get the same board settings, dB's vs frequency, etc.) for an acoustic set. My prediction is your upstairs neighbor wouldn't know the difference between analog and digital in this scenario, since my view is that the biggest difference is an era-dependent outlook on how the recording system is set up.

      --
      Be careful of your thoughts; they could become words at any minute...
    25. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except LPs are mastered for their audience so even if they have a greater noise floor they aren't compressed to hell and back like CDs are.

    26. Re:HD radio by Phoenixlol · · Score: 2, Funny

      The HD is very, extremely real and even tangible. It's a ruby aura of beauty and contentment that is soft to the touch and fills your heart with joy (available only in select models-while synced with W7 in the presence of Steve Balmer-and God).

      This is what he was refering to. Do some research before you blaspheme the most glorious product God gave MS the divine wisdom to create... geez.

    27. Re:HD radio by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh...it's been proven that the PVC polymer chains that comprise LPs don't offer as much resolution, even on the molecular level, as 44.1 KHz sampled audio.

      Back in the early seventies they introduced a recording technology called "quadrophonic" -- four channel sound. How they did they ger four channels out of a single groove? Well, monophonic records' up and down motion of the stylus was used for the signal. When stereo was introduced, they wanted them to be backward compatible, so the up and down motion encompassed both channels, while the left and right motion was a single channel. Whan that signal was added to the signal from the up and down motion, the signal from the sideways motion cancelled out leaving the other channel.

      For the rear channels of quadrophonic they modulated the signals with a 44kHz tone, which was demodulated in the player. A CD's top frequency is 22kHz. If what you say had any validity, quadrophonic would have been impossible.

      The infinite resolution thing is a myth.

      Of course the resolution isn't infinite, nothing but infinity is infinite. But it's far better than CD.

      Furthermore, LPs max out at maybe 70-80 dBa of dynamic range, while 16-bit CDs offer 96

      Yes, CDs have superior dynamic range. Too bad nobody ever uses that dynamic range, and in fact modern engineers screw up old recordings. There is no technical reason why the dynamics of Boston's first album are less on the CD than the LP, it's just that the remastering was crap.

      That being said, many early CDs were poorly mastered.

      So are way too many modern CDs. A lot of old analog LPs were badly mastered, too. The tape hiss on Aerosmith's first album is clearly audible in the LP, but they did a far better job on the second album; no audible noise.

    28. Re:HD radio by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you'd like to share your own calculation or point to somebody else's. Of course I've never heard of audio quality being described in Mbit/s, so perhaps you could explain how it applies.

    29. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ironic that the "HD" in "HD radio" stands for high definition, when current digital, especially with lossy comression, has a LOWER definition than the old analog vinyl did. Yes, FM is nowhere near the fidelity of LP, but neither is CD.

      Have you ever heard a CD that you would confuse with a live performance? Me either. I have heard LPs played on high end equipment that you would confuse with a live performance. I guess that's why they changed it from "High Fidelity" to "High Definition, because at today's low sampling rates and especially lossy compression, the fidelity just isn't there.

      *sigh* Yes, yes, we know, if we didn't spend at least $300 on our day-to-day headphones, we must be deaf troglodytes, and even if we did spend enough, it's still up to your clearly superior audio knowledge as to whether or not you will allow our infidel ears to be graced with the divine providence of your music collection, all stored in pure audio quality.

      Blah blah blah, some of us actually have important things to do.

    30. Re:HD radio by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Pops come from dust and are pretty much inevitable

      Actually, no. There were record cleaning kits that worked well at removing dust, and even cleaning them with dish soap and a soft cloth worked well. A lot of pops, especially with cheap turntables, came from the stylus hitting the record. If you noticed, most of the pops were before or right at the beginning of the first song. Later turntables had hydraulics to lower the stylus, minimalizing this.

      a scratch that makes the CD barf for half a second would make the record repeat the same round ever and ever again.

      A scratch big enough to make an LP skip (either forward or backward) would completely disable a CD.

      Most bands suck live

      Any band that sucks live doesn't deserve to record. I heard a blues band last Saturday that would make Stevie Ray Vaughn and Eric Clapton jealous of their talent, and these were local guys (the first band did indeed suck, though).

      So basically you want to say that through the walls

      Through the open windows.

      Same thing happened to me also once but I've played some Pink Floyd MP3s after a jam session.

      No way you'll convince me that anyone not wearing a hearing aid would confuse any MP3 with live.

    31. Re:HD radio by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      I believe you can output HD to a TV, not to the built in display.

    32. Re:HD radio by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Also, when you mix analog and digital, you get the worst of both worlds with the advantages of neither. An LP from the analog age will be better than its CD counterpart, while an LP that was digitally mastered will be inferior to its digital counterpart. That's one reason why most people think CDs sound better -- they started using digital masters before CDs came out, so that CD would sound better than the LP, having none of analog's drawbacks, while the LP would have the drawbacks of both.

      As to "the feeling of being there", you never heard Pink Floyd? Try Atom heart Mother some time. Or how about Led Zeppelin's Whole Lotta Love (among others). A lot of Beatles stuff, too, especially on the White Album.

    33. Re:HD radio by shirotakaaki · · Score: 1

      I like to listen to analog cassette tape of live performances myself. Occasionally, in the middle of the performance the roller will slip and the tape will be eaten alive. It's just like if the lead singer threw a tantrum and walked off stage! Now that is realism!

    34. Re:HD radio by mordenkhai · · Score: 1

      The HD comes via the TV to Zune HD dock which allows the Zune to output 720p video, it is not related to the OLED touchscreen on the device itself.

    35. Re:HD radio by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      HD radio requires a fraction of the power of analog.

      I'm going to have to ask you where you got your information on this. As of right now there's, what, 2 HD radio handhelds? Maybe the power-efficient chipsets will follow, but you're competing against what's basically a band-pass filter and an amplifier. I don't see how you can win, let alone achieve "a fraction of the power".

    36. Re:HD radio by JerryLove · · Score: 1

      I was unclear (my bad):

      HD radio requires a fraction of the power of analog... to broadcast.

    37. Re:HD radio by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      Most of the demo's are done in dark rooms because the OLED screen sucks in bright light. LED screens can be read partially by reflected light, but the OLED screen must produce all of the light to overcome bright sunshine shining on it. The OLED screen also sucks more power for bright pictures, since each individual picture element is producing light. The result is a screen that won't work well in daylight, and won't live up to its stated potential for battery savings.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    38. Re:HD radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > HD radio requires a fraction of the power of analog.

      What exactly are you smoking?

    39. Re:HD radio by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

      He's not trolling. Who ever modded him a troll is an asshole. And I am not trolling , either - just stating facts. He was polite, and well spoken. Just because you disagree with him doesn't make him a troll.

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    40. Re:HD radio by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      I agree. I do a lot of mixing and some mastering work. Just out of curiosity - what do you use for audio standard candle listening?

      I use these:

      Jennifer Warnes - Famous Blue Raincoat, remastered. (specifically, the title track and Joan of Arc)

      Dave Brubeck - Take Five (hissy from the old tape, but a WONDERFUL recording)

      Espers - The Weed Tree (stunningly well recorded. They sound like they are in your room. amazing.)

      the Band - The Band (but only one track: #17 the out-take of Whispering Pines. Amazing recording quality. Performance is awesome, but flawed in a few minor places. The released version is a great performance, but sucks ass in sound quality.)

      Genesis - Selling England By The Pound (the latest rev - not the first CD release. And only the first three minutes of the first song. After that the mellotron comes in and the mix turns to shit.)

      There are others that I use, but those area few of my base recordings for testing.

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    41. Re:HD radio by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      You're a fool and if you believe any of it I have a bunch of electric cables to sell you, 3.000$ the metre, it will make your recordings sound warm and like you were on stage with the musicians.

    42. Re:HD radio by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Heh...it's been proven that the PVC polymer chains that comprise LPs don't offer as much resolution, even on the molecular level, as 44.1 KHz sampled audio.

      For the rear channels of quadrophonic they modulated the signals with a 44kHz tone, which was demodulated in the player. A CD's top frequency is 22kHz. If what you say had any validity, quadrophonic would have been impossible.

      I'm not saying you're wrong, but the ability of an analog medium to reproduce a given tone doesn't really say anything about the breadth of tones it can reproduce, which depends on the granularity.

    43. Re:HD radio by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      I have been to clubs, churches, etc. and they always differ from any listening room, "high end" or not and the difference is trivial to notice. Two point source is just not the same.

      A mathematical fact: three samples per crest is more than enough for sine wave.

      For any band limited media, including LP, the situation is same: you cannot distinguish sine wave from square wave near cut off frequency. No matter how good your detection equipment is - there is just no information there to make the distinction.

      CD has sharp cut of at ~20kHz, LP starts its around 15kHz going up to a bit over 30kHz.
      Which one is better (or higher fidelity)?
      If you insist that the frequency response is everything then LP can be considered to be, but then you'd have to "forget" LP's frequency response is more than 10dB down at 20kHz, the noise is up at least 30dB and stereo separation is pretty much negligible.
      If you take any other variable into consideration LP loses, big time. Probably the worst are the various mastering tricks LP needs (or you might "kill" the master cutter) especially at the end of the LP.

    44. Re:HD radio by camperslo · · Score: 1

      There is HD AM Radio and HD FM Radio. When making claims, you should specify which you're talking about. They're very different due to differing bandwidth constraints and different types of signal interferrence at the frequencies used.
      Certainly "HD" doesn't mean High Definition or even CD-quality in either case.
      It is misleading marketing to even call it HD since most people will not realize what they're actually getting.

      HD radio requires a fraction of the bandwidth of analog.
      That's certainly not true for HD AM, and no FM spectrum is released for other licensees or services.
      For practical purposes a U.S. A.M. broadcast channel is 20 kHz bandwidth, and F.M. channel 200 kHz.
      Obviously more is possible on an FM channel. HD Radio can't even manage stereo (2 channels) or extended frequency-response on AM, and the bandwidth used is wide enough that HD Radio must operate at well below the licensed analog power level because of excessive interference to any second-adjacent analog station (two channels sway in either direction)
      While HD FM does allow more programming per transmitter, each station still has the same licensed channel bandwidth/spacing so no frequencies are freed up. HD radio won't help people hoping for a free channel to license in a congested area. (The digital tv transition didn't reduce bandwidth per license/transmitter either, they just decided to take away a group of channels for other uses)

      HD radio is capable of CD-quality sound.

      Even if some people agree that HD-FM can sound good, it's lossy compression. At its' best it'll never reach CD quality. CD's don't use data compression. A few years ago the website of the company behind this had the nerve to post simulated audio clips comparing AM/FM analog and digital.
      They were NOT actual recordings of functioning broadcast equipment!

      Beyond that, I find the radio quality issue to be something of a bad joke. Nowdays the bulk of music broadcast by radio stations does not come directly from CD. It's generally stored in a computers using lossy compression. Additionally, stations use complex audio processing equipment that among other things maximizes loudness while controlling waveform peaks to meet requirements of the transmission system. This greatly increases distortion and reduces dynamics. Try feeding an FM tuner into a tape deck... the VU meters will practically sit still at one level. If one hears artifacts on analog FM radio that sound like a poor quality MP3 (or MP2), it's NOT the fault of the transmitting system. Of course considering the amount of advertising many stations carry, it's a wonder that anyone can tolerate commercial radio for music at all.
      Radio has far worse problems than the limitations of wideband FM.

      Most radio listeners would appreciate is broadcasters that acted like they really cared about quality. With huge corporate out-of-town owners, like Clear Channel, operation best suited for the local communities is very unlike. We should pressure the F.C.C. to tighten ownership requirements, limiting the number of stations owned and requiring many more local owners with ties to the community served.

      U.S. ATSC "HD" TV uses A/52 a.k.a. Dolby AC3 audio compression (codec efficient like AAC, but with multichannel support). All main and subchannel DTV broadcasts I've seen used sampling at 48 kHz at a 384 kbps data rate.
      You claim CD-quality, just what are the sampling and data rates for "HD" radio???

      HD radio requires a fraction of the power of analog.

      Consumers are supposed to buy new equipment to save the broadcasters energy? Although the transmitter digital power levels are lower than the analog, the transmitters handling hybrid digital and analog run far less efficiently and consume MORE POWER. I don't see ANYONE saving power.

      Another thing... Digital service can ideally function at a signal level closer to the noise floor without degrading. But because the digital signal may drop out completely during a fad

    45. Re:HD radio by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      There is no need for my calculation, you can do it yourself. See the approximations in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon%E2%80%93Hartley_theorem#Approximations.

      The "C" tells nothing about the quality, especially not that of latest Britney Spears album. It does not say an LP is worse or better (or of higher fidelity) or anything like that.

      The "C" is a mathematical value telling the maximum information there can be in a channel (or media). It can be expressed in bits/second. The definition of "information" is such that it is impossible to have an equipment which can detect beyond the "C".

      Summarum: the usual claim "LP is analog and therefore has more nyances[1]" is, frankly, bullshit.

      [1] or better reproduction of square wave or more than 16bit quantisation levels or ...

    46. Re:HD radio by JerryLove · · Score: 1

      While HD FM does allow more programming per transmitter, each station still has the same licensed channel bandwidth/spacing so no frequencies are freed up.
      The stations can divide up the frequency among a number of ways. As defined by iBiquity these channels could be sub-divided into CD-quality (100 kbit/s), FM-quality (25-50 kbit/s), AM-quality (12 kbit/s), or Talk-quality (5 kbit/s) channels. Alternatively, they could broadcast one single channel at 300 kbit/s.

      Even if some people agree that HD-FM can sound good, it's lossy compression. At its' best it'll never reach CD quality. CD's don't use data compression.
      To be fair, the lowest quality I generally listen to is about 200Kbit/s, and I'd call it "CD quality" to the point that the differences in matering on the source material are far more signifigant than the bitrate differences.

      300Kbit/s, I would challenge most anyone to identify in blind tests... though I readily admit that would be mono on HD-Radio.

      You claim CD-quality, just what are the sampling and data rates for "HD" radio??? Max data rate for a single FM station broadcasting HD under the current spec is 300Kbit/s, which is higher than Amazon's MP3 downloads.

      Consumers are supposed to buy new equipment to save the broadcasters energy?
      I suppose I *could* make an argument to that effect, but I've certainly not said so. It is an advantage, though perhaps not directly to the consumers.

      The digital advantage for operation at lower power levels frequently doesn't work in practice. Just look at all the people having trouble getting DTV reception in areas that supposedly have usable signal levels.
      As someone getting better DTV than analog signals, mileage apparently varies.

      As Wikipedia has me understand, the current power output is 1% of analog? If there's a signal problem, perhaps 10% would solve it (speculating).

      I'm not advocating HD, nor reproaching it. I'm merely correcting incorrect or unfair comments regarding it.

    47. Re:HD radio by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      HD radio survives with 0% distortion over the majority of its receivable range.

      HD radio is better overall, but I've found that the compression artifacts you get when you're in an area with marginal reception are terrible. Listening to NPR I can switch to non-HD standard FM stereo and get a very fine although a little crackly signal, but when I switch to HD in the same bad coverage area, I get terrible compression artifacts, like listening to a VoIP phone when someone is using BitTorrent...

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    48. Re:HD radio by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      You link doesn't really explain how this would relate to an LP. I'm not sure if Shannon's theorem is applicable to non-symbol based information.

    49. Re:HD radio by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      Shannon's theorem is applicable to any band-limited communication channel, therefore it is applicable to LP.

      I do not understand what you mean information which is not "symbol based": if there is some information you can give a symbol to it.

      If you refer to sampling of the signal or like that, then Nyquist has proved quite enough for the band-limited case.

    50. Re:HD radio by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      A mathematical fact: three samples per crest is more than enough for sine wave

      Explain to me how you can differentiate between a sine, square, or sawtooth wave with three samples?

    51. Re:HD radio by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      To put it simply: recording an LP doesn't involve sampling or encoding so I don't see how raw bit rates or symbol rates apply.

    52. Re:HD radio by Dahan · · Score: 1

      You can't... but do you care if you can't hear the difference? A square wave is square because it has higher order harmonics--a square wave with a fundamental frequency of 20kHz will have a harmonic at 60kHz with 1/3rd of the amplitude of the fundamental, a 100kHz harmonic with 1/5th of the amplitude of the fundamental, etc... The idea behind discrete-time sampling is that in the ideal mathematical world, you can exactly reconstruct the original waveform as long as it doesn't contain any frequencies higher than half the sampling rate. The designers of the CD decided that it's not important to keep the frequencies above 22kHz, since almost nobody can hear above that frequency. An audio CD is designed to store audio for people to listen to, so it's not important to differentiate between 20kHz sine, square, and sawtooth waves--nobody can tell the difference when they listen to them.

      If you have an application where it is important to differentiate between those, then obviously audio CDs are not the right medium to use.

    53. Re:HD radio by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      To put it very simply: the theory does not give a shit whether sampling or encoding happens or not.

    54. Re:HD radio by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      According to your own link:

      "In information theory, the Shannon-Hartley theorem is an application of the noisy channel coding theorem to the archetypal case of a continuous-time analog communications channel subject to Gaussian noise."

      Where's the coding in analog recording? I'm at a disadvantage in this discussion because I'm not an expert, but I suspect you don't know as much about it as you think you do.

    55. Re:HD radio by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      You cannot (third harmonic is outside the bandwidth). Sorry if I have made you understand otherwise.

      But neither can you with any analog media (with same bandwidth) and THIS is my point.

    56. Re:HD radio by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Upon rereading my post seems a bit harsh. I don't want to insult you, I just don't see how the theorem applies.

    57. Re:HD radio by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      To have information you must somehow code it. LP does have a coding in this sense: amplitude change is coded as displacement in the groove.

      The theory states that no matter how you code you cannot put more information than what the "C" gives. It does not tell how to do it so e.g. getting digital data close to "C" has been very, very hard mathematical problem.

      The Shannon's theorem can be extended to non-Gaussian noise (LP is definitely non-Gaussian and even non-linear) but then the calculations get outside my capability. Using Gaussian should give fairly good approximation as LP tries to be linear and Gaussian.

      It has been two decades since I studied these matters so cannot consider expert myself either - but thankfully you did not think that.

    58. Re:HD radio by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "To have information you must somehow code it. LP does have a coding in this sense: amplitude change is coded as displacement in the groove."

      I think you've identified the crux of the matter. Does the kind of coding you describe for an LP really qualify as coding as far as Shannon's theory is concerned? You say yes and I'm a bit skeptical but I have no means to debate you further so I'll stop.

    59. Re:HD radio by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee104/shannonpaper.pdf

      "The Transmitter: This operates on the message in some way and produces a signal suitable for transmission to the receiving point over the channel. In telephony, this operation consists of merely changing sound pressure into a proportional electrical current."

      Won't change your stance that LP is inherently better than CD, but that is your problem. Just remember that almost[1] all mathematics is against that belief.

      [1] High quality LP can have somewhat better frequency response.

    60. Re:HD radio by thexile · · Score: 1

      Hi Dick!

  5. Is a store really necessary by stokessd · · Score: 1

    Sure a dedicated app store is a great way to funnel your customers to your door. But that's like saying you only have one store available to you, and you have to pay in Stokessd-town dollars. I'm sure you would have less total customers than if the unit was open to applications from anywhere, although you'll most likely collect more stokessd-town dollars.

    If my quick read of the article (what there is of it), there "does not have plans for an iPhone-like app platform", but that doesn't meant that apps cannot be run on the device. Much like the jailbroken iPhone app market, there could be a zune app market independent of microsoft's non-existent store. The unit has too much potential not to have apps developed for it. It's just a matter of who and how many.

    Microsoft has done a very consistent job of managing the Zune. That management got it where it is today, and I see this revelation as being consistent with all the previous management decisions.

    Sheldon

    1. Re:Is a store really necessary by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure a dedicated app store is a great way to funnel your customers to your door. But that's like saying you only have one store available to you, and you have to pay in Stokessd-town dollars. I'm sure you would have less total customers than if the unit was open to applications from anywhere, although you'll most likely collect more stokessd-town dollars.

      You're only seeing half the picture. Having a built in store that collects all the apps in one place is a feature and customers really, really, really like being able to get everything from one place in one consistent way. This leaves phone implementors with three choices:

      • be lazy don't do anything ignore the feature.
      • implement a store just like Apple did, so you have feature parity and either:
        • lock the device to the store down just like Apple, gaining the same disadvantages
        • don't lock the device to just the store down resulting in multiple ways to get apps, confusing users, and having to support multiple workflows
      • be innovative and provide a store but set it up so anyone can add things to it from their own hosting, like letting users add their own smaller stores

      MS picked the choice that is the least work, least innovative, and works like Windows. For some reason I'm not surprised.

    2. Re:Is a store really necessary by unjedai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microsoft has done a very consistent job of managing the Zune. That management got it where it is today, and I see this revelation as being consistent with all the previous management decisions.

      And where it is today is right at 2% market share (fifth paragraph from the bottom).

  6. What about an SDK by CubicleView · · Score: 1

    Can a third party develop apps on their own, can they be installed easily etc?

    1. Re:What about an SDK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Install VisualStudio Express.

    2. Re:What about an SDK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Looks like they have updated the XNA SDK to work with the Zune HD:

      http://forums.xna.com/forums/t/38975.aspx

  7. Good ol' Microsoft. Always thinking about devs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "we know people want things like this on their devices so we're going to build them ourselves, they're going to be super high-quality, and they're going to be free."

    Thankyou Microsoft! Now programmers won't have to worry about getting carpal tunnel syndrome programming apps and games for the Zune HD. What a strategy. Grateful programmers will flock to the Zune just out of appreciation for Microsoft!

    Then you get mean lazy old Apple making third party developers to make games and apps for their clearly inferior iphone, and ipod touch. I'm honestly surprised they haven't gone bankrupt yet.

  8. Convoluted Mess or Just Bad Strategy? by eldavojohn · · Score: 0, Troll

    No App Store For Microsoft's Zune HD

    I only read the Q&A on the blog linked but I did catch this:

    All of our apps are free ... and it's a managed solution right now, so we're building these apps or working with third parties to build these apps and provide them to our customers for free.

    Followed by:

    That being said, we know people want things like this on their devices so we're going to build them ourselves, they're going to be super high-quality, and they're going to be free.

    It sounds like you'd have a hard time getting third parties to release applications on the Zune given the above aims. Now, free apps are great but I don't think a store would have much of a purpose if everything there is free. Regardless, I expect this to fail with a 95% chance of that. The biggest influence that "we're going to build them ourselves" means a very very tight bandwidth for incubating games followed by literally mods of older games to take place in a different setting or tweaked to read "Spiderman" instead of "Superman." Gamers don't normally fall for that although your general populace might. And if I want to create a game "with" them what do I do? Get in line behind Project Gotham racing?

    I don't think convoluted's a good criticism but it's certainly a poor or doomed strategy in my opinion.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Convoluted Mess or Just Bad Strategy? by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you'd have a hard time getting third parties to release applications on the Zune given the above aims.

      That's true, but what if they already have tried enticing 3rd party developers with a sales pitch for some kind of store and got so little interest they decided to can the whole thing?

      The reason I bring this up is that, as a mac/linux guy, I had an interesting experience this morning: I had to burn a disc image using windows vista. I discovered to my dismay that Vista doesn't contain this ability natively, whereas macs do and just about every linux distribution does. The question is why wouldn't MS take the time to write some software to do that natively? My only thought was that maybe it was because they've got something 90% of the market share for OSes, they don't need to write their own apps because there's a million different disc burning utilities just a mouse-click and an internet connection. Maybe apple with about 10% usage share just couldn't attract the developers for every little thing they considered important and turned to writing their own software. Now flip this around for the portable media players, Apple machines are ubiquitous and can afford to let others write software for them whereas Microsoft can't find the developers willing to do it and has to write their own. You see that with games on linux too, a lot of the "linux games" seem to be written by linux users themselves and not companies trying to sell their products.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    2. Re:Convoluted Mess or Just Bad Strategy? by Bageloid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Disk Image burning is actually a feature they included in Windows 7, its not too fully featured but it gets the job done.

    3. Re:Convoluted Mess or Just Bad Strategy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is why wouldn't MS take the time to write some software to do that natively?

      One answer is that they get sued when they do that.

    4. Re:Convoluted Mess or Just Bad Strategy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monopoly.

  9. Software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will come with some unique features, ..., and with software that has been well-received by users>/i>
    OOOooooo, that's a first.

  10. Now ... by TheBilgeRat · · Score: 1

    If they could only create a decent music storage device with multiple inputs/outputs that allowed you to record off a digital or analog signal or upload from your computer, put it on very stable media, and had great battery life...

    Oh yeah, they did-the minidisc. Of course, Sony screwed that pooch. Let's do that again with an SD capable player and quit fiddling with video and all that other gimmicky crap. If MS could bring that to the table I'd buy one in a heartbeat. Until then I'll stick with my outdated antiquated MD player.

  11. Zune HD is a bizarre product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Here's an interesting article regarding the hype surrounding Zune HD (which isn't actually HD to begin with).

    In Microsoft's world, HD means 480x272. HD Radio? It stands for Hybrid Digital, not High Definition and works only in US.

    1. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by stokessd · · Score: 1

      Be careful reading Daniel Eran Dilger's writings and assuming that they are accurate and unbiased, that's dangerous.

      Sheldon

    2. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      They are usually accurate and biased - i.e., you won't find a factual error - but if Apple made baby-mulching machines he'd write a novel-length article on how they're the best thing ever created, baby-mulching is the most noble human activity possible and Steve Jobs deserves a Nobel peace prize. And how any objection is all Microsoft FUDding the press.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    3. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by sootman · · Score: 1

      The funniest part is the headline he chose: "Microsoft launches Zune, clarifies what's up with apps"

      Q: Will it open up for third-party app developers?

      A: It's hard to say right now.

      That's clarification?!?!?

      And this absolutely KILLS me:

      Q: Are you concerned about competing with new iPods with cameras built in?

      A: The more things like that that make their way into these devices that aren't about great music and video playback, the more it's distracting or sacrificing that original purpose of the device. Apps are jamming in, cameras -- that's work that's not being done on the music front.

      With this release, you can see we're still really focused on music and video. We're still hyper-focused on that. Maybe that's the benefit of being the little guy. We can have that laser-focus.

      Maybe some of those people ... did buy an iPod because it's all about music, and now it's not. Maybe we can get some of those folks.

      I have never listened to music on my iPhone and thought "Boy, I could really be enjoying this if I weren't constantly distracted by the fact that there's a camera ON THE BACK, and a calculator button on the home screen that I CAN NOT SEE RIGHT NOW."

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    4. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 2, Informative

      HD also refers to the 720p HDMI-out capability.

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    5. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Actually it is HD. Sorry, you don't know what you're talking about. Please see its video output capabilities.

    6. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what you get in the box is not HD. But, add a $90 dock, and an HDTV, and HD can be yours.

      Crappy feature.

    7. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Be careful reading anyone's writings and assuming that they are accurate and unbiased, because nobody is unbiased or always accurate.

    8. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by stokessd · · Score: 1

      I have never listened to music on my iPhone and thought "Boy, I could really be enjoying this if I weren't constantly distracted by the fact that there's a camera ON THE BACK, and a calculator button on the home screen that I CAN NOT SEE RIGHT NOW."

      I know what you are saying, but I feel the same way about unneeded features. For example if there were no tuner on the new Nano, that's more material dollars, internal volume, and software guys that can be turned loose on another part of the unit and make that part even better.

      I love all the features until they include a feature I don't want, then I bitch and moan that they should have used that volume and money to add more battery.

      It's a scalpel vs. swiss army knife argument. Since I only carry one thing, I like the army knife concept, but if I were at home or carried a whole mess of things, I'd want scalpels.

      Sheldon

    9. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      It supports HD radio and HD video output, I'd say that's worthy of an HD in the name.

      I'm not sure why you think a tiny display would look better with an HD resolution display anyway. Wow, my 3.3" screen is HD! If I scrunch my nose up to it it just looks a little bit better! Whoohoo!

    10. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recently camera makers have started using higher-res LCD screens on their high-end cameras -- these are 3" screens at actual HD resolutions -- and the difference is extremely obvious.

      Real portable HD will be welcome when it comes around. The Zune doesn't have it.

    11. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Which is also bizarre - the article makes it look like this functionality only works when *wired* via an HDMI adapater. Why would you want to use a handheld device like this *wired*? (I can imagine perhaps someone shooting video in the field from a lipstick camera would do this to check the camera's aligned properly, but for the general user?)

    12. Re:Zune HD is a bizarre product by steeler359 · · Score: 1

      I guess so that you can take your hi-def movie /TV series that you've just erm...acquired round to a mate's house and plug it directly into his telly/AV receiver.

      There are obviously other uses...

      --
      There's no place like /~
  12. Marketing speak is pretty funny by sribe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see, it's set to go on sale just about now. So how exactly has the software "been well-received by users"???

    1. Re:Marketing speak is pretty funny by josteos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Beta testers. They have opinions that are ignored unless they properly align with prepared marketing assets.

      --
      Save the Music; Save the World at http://www.TuneTriever.com (Our latest Android game)
    2. Re:Marketing speak is pretty funny by fee^ · · Score: 1

      srsly..

      At 5:30am I was updating and installing the new software to my system and Zune. By 6:30 I was frustrated and pissed off because I realized and learned that anything the press had been up M$ arse about regarding the 4.0 software and features were, for the most part, left out for anyone with an "old" device. Unless of course you pay $15/month for DRM in your music collection, then you can certainly get more features.

      Way to go Zune marketing...way to go.

    3. Re:Marketing speak is pretty funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not even that great of a compliment. "Well recieved" could mean as little as "they didn't complain too much about it"... but mine's coming in the mail today so I'll know in about 3 hours :)

    4. Re:Marketing speak is pretty funny by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      And that is most certainly not true. I don't think beta testers' negative comments are ignored - unless the company is totally stupid. Because that is what you are doing beta testing for, to get the problems exposed before you go to mass production. Ignoring those comments would make beta testing useless.

      A remark I got from someone talking to pop music bands about relations between artists and the media. When the media are writing a review of your album/concert/whatever, there will be positive and negative aspects in it. The positive aspects is what you (the artist) quote in your own marketing material, the negative aspects is what you (the artist) look seriously at and learn from.

      Exactly the same for reactions from beta testers: the negative reactions are where you have to work on to improve your product, the positive reactions are what you use in your marketing. Of course you are not going to use negative comments in your marketing, it is marketing after all, you have to sell a product, not kill it before it has a chance be born.

  13. Gruber is irrelevant. by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

    Why is his comment on the matter even being taken seriously? Regardless of what Brian said, Gruber's level of bias in this matter renders him unfit for citation.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Gruber is irrelevant. by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Gruber may be fanboi extraordinare, but come on! Saying "windows mobile strategy is a convoluted mess" is like saying "the Pope is a Catholic"

    2. Re:Gruber is irrelevant. by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's an old saying that goes "If Hitler says 2+2=4, you can't argue with him." Did you RTFA? How is this NOT a convoluted mess?:

      It's hard to say right now. If you look around the company at other places where things like this are important, Windows Mobile rises to the top... Right now our product roadmaps didn't line up perfectly for us to snap to what they're doing or vice versa. That being said, we know people want things like this on their devices so we're going to build them ourselves, they're going to be super high-quality, and they're going to be free.

      Down the road if there's a way we can work with Windows Mobile or another group inside the company that's building an app store and take advantage of that, that's something we'll look into.

      This thing has been in development for YEARS and they're JUST NOW realizing that maybe people will want to run apps on them, and they're announcing that they don't know how, if, or when that will happen? I don't care who says it--John Gruber, Steve Jobs, Larry Ellison, it doesn't matter--it is clearly a convoluted mess.

      For fuck's sake, why on Earth DIDN'T MS just build the Zune functionality on top of WIndows Mobile? Zune has been out for almost 3 years; Windows Mobile for about 9. What is so mind-blowingly intense about what the Zune does (plays music, shows pictures, plays video; probably with neat sliding or fading transitions between menus and modes) that there was NO FUCKING WAY that all the great minds in Redmond could POSSIBLY make it work with ANY variant of Windows Mobile? Really, all they had to do was make a shiny "media app" that ran on top of Windows Mobile, the same way that "Media Center" is just an app that runs on top of regular Windows.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:Gruber is irrelevant. by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      Indeed. They put wifi into the first Zune and DIDN'T put a web browser in. They could have had an iPod Touch beater SIX MONTHS ahead of Apple. Why didn't they?

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    4. Re:Gruber is irrelevant. by DECS · · Score: 1

      Microsoft knows WiMo is a mess, and didn't want to associate its nerdy IT office image with the 16-year old E orgy imagery it used to launch the Zune.

      Now, Microsoft is trying to copy the iPhone App Store with WiMo and Zune has an entirely different set of Xbox-realted dev tools in XNA. So it is a mess. The problem is that XNA isn't going to do anything for the Zune without any installed base (it struggles on the Xbox, which has a large audience), and Microsoft's efforts to copy the App Store are not just late, but more draconian than Apple's.

      Microsoft expects developers to pay $99 for every app they submit to the WiMo Marketplace (free or paid), in addition to the annual fee. That's not exactly going to kick WiMo into developer overdrive.

      Things go south from there. I'm writing up a report on what's involved in Microsoft's restrictive new store. It's fairly shocking to see what Microsoft thinks it can pull. Clearly lots of delusional management going on.

      From OLED to Tegra: Five Myths of the Zune HD

    5. Re:Gruber is irrelevant. by DECS · · Score: 1

      Have you seen Microsoft's mobile web browser?

      That's the answer to your question. That, and the fact that the original HDD-based Zune would not have run any browser worth a shit. Notice that the iPod classic isn't running Safari either.

      From OLED to Tegra: Five Myths of the Zune HD

  14. HD radio sounds poor by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    It has poor quality and the user experience when the signal fades is awful.

    But you are completely insane about the vinyl thing. It's in your head.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  15. Wow, biased much? by Facegarden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, I know this is slashdot and all, but this is a VERY biased article.

    They don't have an open app store yet because they want all the games to be free, and developed in house, which isn't as bad as this summary makes it sound.

    They aren't merging with windows mobile's store because they want to make extra sure the Zune is perfect, and I absolutely don't blame them.

    I'm pretty annoyed that whoever wrote this summary was this biased, the Zune HD looks awesome and its really unfair to try to make it look bad on a site that gets 2 million hits a day. If it ends up being bad, that's one thing, but give it a freakin chance.

    -Taylor

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    1. Re:Wow, biased much? by samkass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Someone is very biased, but I'm not sure it was the submitter. The very fact that Zune even has a headline on Slashdot considering its 1% market share and fourth-place finish behind iPod, Sandisk, and "Other" comes close to astroturfing in my book. Zune is irrelevant in the market and pretending this is a viable product launch at ALL is awfully biased in a pro-Microsoft way.

      They don't have an app store yet because it's hard and they don't want to invest in it for a potentially dying platform.

      They aren't merging with Windows Mobile because that strategy is a mess (6.5? 7.0?) and a moving target. ("Make extra sure the Zune is perfect"? What does that even mean?)

      The marketing folks at Microsoft are trying hard to spin, but their explanations make no sense if you examine how the current market leader won.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    2. Re:Wow, biased much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If its not made by Apple, it sucks.

      Q.E.D.

    3. Re:Wow, biased much? by mewsenews · · Score: 1

      They aren't merging with windows mobile's store because they want to make extra sure the Zune is perfect, and I absolutely don't blame them.

      Yeah, Apple's version totally ruined the iPhone, what were they thinking.

    4. Re:Wow, biased much? by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      They aren't merging with windows mobile's store because they want to make extra sure the Zune is perfect, and I absolutely don't blame them.

      Yeah, Apple's version totally ruined the iPhone, what were they thinking.

      Apple *also* didn't come out with an app store right away, to make sure everything was perfect. This article also fails to mention that they intend to have one when the time is right. For apple that was an entire year.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    5. Re:Wow, biased much? by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      Zune is not on the Windows mobile store because the Zune project leader doesn't know how to get in contact with the WinMo team. I think that came across pretty clear in TFA.

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    6. Re:Wow, biased much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd give it a chance, but I indeed do scoff at the option to only allow paid inhouse developers develope games and restrict the mass of freelancing developers

    7. Re:Wow, biased much? by Facegarden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someone is very biased, but I'm not sure it was the submitter. The very fact that Zune even has a headline on Slashdot considering its 1% market share and fourth-place finish behind iPod, Sandisk, and "Other" comes close to astroturfing in my book. Zune is irrelevant in the market and pretending this is a viable product launch at ALL is awfully biased in a pro-Microsoft way.

      They don't have an app store yet because it's hard and they don't want to invest in it for a potentially dying platform.

      They aren't merging with Windows Mobile because that strategy is a mess (6.5? 7.0?) and a moving target. ("Make extra sure the Zune is perfect"? What does that even mean?)

      The marketing folks at Microsoft are trying hard to spin, but their explanations make no sense if you examine how the current market leader won.

      Really? The current market leader won by also not having an app store right away.

      And this isn't astroturfing, as far as I'm concerned. I'm genuinely excited about the ZuneHD. Builtin HD radio, the first device with NVidia's Tegra processor for mobile 3D graphics, and a supposedly beautiful OLED screen are all reasons why this device is worth reporting on.

      And I'm not a MS fanboy, I dumped windows mobile YEARS ago (thank god) for my iPhone, which I eventually dumped for Android. I just think it looks genuinely promising.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    8. Re:Wow, biased much? by PHoRD42 · · Score: 1

      Claiming that it's not even a viable product launch because it lacks a solid pre-existing market share is a pretty broken argument. Calling the Zune a "potentially dying platform" is just baiting, because ANY platform is "potentially dying" to the point that at least SOME degree of investment could be considered unjustifiable.

      You're just throwing out a bunch of speculative claims and poorly-supported attacks under the guise of combating bias, which is deeply, deeply ironic.

    9. Re:Wow, biased much? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      You're right. Any mention of a product released by the most successful software company in history is _totally_ astroturfing.

      Quick, what irrelevent sub .05% market share Linux release just got published?

    10. Re:Wow, biased much? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      That's right. And opening an Appstore to third parties would absolutely prevent Microsoft from bundling free awesome games, because... wait, it's on the tip of my tongue.

    11. Re:Wow, biased much? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      I would argue that the current market leader won despite not having an app store right away. The griping about the lack of one and Apple's 'you just develop using Web widgets' strategy was loud and prolonged.

      The iPod Touch/iPhone was lucky in that it didn't have an entrenched direct competitor with a full app store to compete against. The Zune isn't that lucky.

    12. Re:Wow, biased much? by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      I would argue that the current market leader won despite not having an app store right away. The griping about the lack of one and Apple's 'you just develop using Web widgets' strategy was loud and prolonged.

      The iPod Touch/iPhone was lucky in that it didn't have an entrenched direct competitor with a full app store to compete against. The Zune isn't that lucky.

      Fair enough, I agree with that, but it's not a suicide move either, or a sign of non-commitment, as some suggested.

      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    13. Re:Wow, biased much? by BOUND4DOOM · · Score: 1

      I would agree. I ordered the Zune HD myself and should be at home when I get there. One of the guys in my office and I have been debating all day, he is an iPod zealot. The last argument was to me the most hysterical but the most scary in showing how biased some people are. I am an Admin, and I run both windows servers and Linux servers depending on what the business need dictates. I prefer windows for my day to day work, quite simple because it is easier to use and I have a ton more utilities, self developed and free I can use. Please note I am not a republican in any way shape or form and he knows it. He actually said to me. "This made me think of politics. Youâ(TM)re a Right-Wing Republican (Windows Lover). A person who is a full-blown Mac Geek zealot would be a Left-Wing Hippie Democrat. I guess that makes me an Independent as I like my 360, love my iPod and iTunes, can settle for Office and am stuck with crappy Vista." Which I quickly corrected him. The Apple is in comparison a republican party. A small group of people that want to dictate exactly what you can do and not only that but exactly how you can do it. I never thought of them like that until this day and well it gave me insight to the mind of the Mac Zealot, they do not want to think of themselves like that, they like to think of themselves as having another choice than windows, I also pointed out to him he could go to Windows XP if he wanted or Windows 7 or Linux, but if he wants a mac he must buy mac hardware from mac at a super high price. Which I guess growing up working on mainframes, Apple 2, even Trash 80's, watching the browser war and so on and I know competition is a great thing and I know I have a choice. Which is why when my 4th create Zen device died choose not to get an iPod and to try the new Zune. Which offers open development through the XNA platform, yes it does look it up. Not only that the developer are allowed to share ideas and not be quelched. The docking station so you can watch hd movies from your zen device on your TV doesn't make a bit of sense to me though. I have an HD TiVo with Access to downloads from Netflix and Amazon. Why would I want to download a movie to my zune then plug it into my TV.

    14. Re:Wow, biased much? by danger42 · · Score: 1

      potentially dying platform.

      When exactly was this patient alive, doctor?

      --
      -nd
    15. Re:Wow, biased much? by DECS · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has had a model to follow since Jan 2007. They've had an SDK to copy since Jun 2008.

      Microsoft has been in the Zune game for longer than Apple has had the iPhone. At some point, you have to stop bending over for the grand monopolist of the tech world, as it doesn't deserve your pity sex.

      Come on, this sort of irrational fandom should be reserved for the Amiga and Cowon and Ogg Vobis.

      From OLED to Tegra: Five Myths of the Zune HD

    16. Re:Wow, biased much? by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      here is the Engadget article, which gives all the info, not just the part that looks bad. And this coming from some guys that have a huge love for Apple...
      http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/zune-hd-3d-gaming-and-app-downloads-confirmed/
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    17. Re:Wow, biased much? by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has had a model to follow since Jan 2007. They've had an SDK to copy since Jun 2008.

      Microsoft has been in the Zune game for longer than Apple has had the iPhone. At some point, you have to stop bending over for the grand monopolist of the tech world, as it doesn't deserve your pity sex.

      Come on, this sort of irrational fandom should be reserved for the Amiga and Cowon and Ogg Vobis.

      From OLED to Tegra: Five Myths of the Zune HD

      Actually, that article is pretty damn biased too. Or wrong. Check this part out:

      "OLED also performs considerably worse in bright light because OLED is 100% emissive rather than being partially transflective.A good quality LCD actually uses ambient light to make its image brighter and more vibrant; OLED does not."

      There is no such thing as a transflective color LCD, only black an white. At least, that's what i was told by our LCD manufacturer. Color LCDs are transmissive only, which is why they ALSO wash out in ambient light.

      If you can't even recognize FUD, you're as blind as the summary writer.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    18. Re:Wow, biased much? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      The very fact that Zune even has a headline on Slashdot considering its 1% market share and fourth-place finish behind iPod, Sandisk, and "Other" comes close to astroturfing in my book.

      Can you back that number up, or are you pulling it directly from your ass?

      I've been looking for music player market share numbers for an hour now, and I can't find anything that suggests Zune is at 1%. The last (extremely out-of-date!) figures had it closer to 10% of the HD-based market.

    19. Re:Wow, biased much? by DECS · · Score: 1

      Three pages of detailed explanation, and the best you can come with for an attack is to say that "here is no such thing as a transflective color LCD"?

      Maybe you should have thought to plug the following words into Google before making your statement:

      transflective
      color
      LCD
      iPod touch

      What's next, complaints about global warming, evolution, and the Round Earth Theory?

    20. Re:Wow, biased much? by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Three pages of detailed explanation, and the best you can come with for an attack is to say that "here is no such thing as a transflective color LCD"?

      Maybe you should have thought to plug the following words into Google before making your statement:

      transflective
      color
      LCD
      iPod touch

      What's next, complaints about global warming, evolution, and the Round Earth Theory?

      Nope, just busy at work, and I am wasting enough time keeping up this thread on Slashdot. Like I said, I was just repeating what I was told by a manufacturer when I was doing some research on LCDs recently.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    21. Re:Wow, biased much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the reality of the situation is that Microsoft is entering a market someone is already holding. Maybe Apple didn't need an App Store right away, but can you say the same for Microsoft?

    22. Re:Wow, biased much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone is very biased, but I'm not sure it was the submitter. The very fact that Zune even has a headline on Slashdot considering its 1% market share and fourth-place finish behind iPod, Sandisk, and "Other" comes close to astroturfing in my book. Zune is irrelevant in the market and pretending this is a viable product launch at ALL is awfully biased in a pro-Microsoft way.

      They don't have an app store yet because it's hard and they don't want to invest in it for a potentially dying platform.

      They aren't merging with Windows Mobile because that strategy is a mess (6.5? 7.0?) and a moving target. ("Make extra sure the Zune is perfect"? What does that even mean?)

      The marketing folks at Microsoft are trying hard to spin, but their explanations make no sense if you examine how the current market leader won.

      I'm not sure you can call one of the best selling electronic players on Amazon with a 12% (check your facts at the NPD before posting, please) insignificant.

    23. Re:Wow, biased much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I know this is slashdot and all, but this is a VERY biased article.

      Facegarden, meet kdawson, one of the "editors" around these parts. I can't even be bothered to log in anymore, so every once in a while I end up reading something "edited" by him.

    24. Re:Wow, biased much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? The current market leader won by also not having an app store right away.

      No, they won by defining and creating the market. The app. store was an innovation that allowed them to keep their market lead. The Zune, coming into an existing market, needs to be better than the current market leader, and the app. store is seen by most as a distinguishing and important feature.

      Fake HD? More costly than an iPod Touch? No app. store? Lame.

    25. Re:Wow, biased much? by Shamenaught · · Score: 1

      Erm... Calm the accusations of bias there. From all of the info I have scanned on the web concerning teh Zune HD, the OP's article is 100% correct in that no 3rd party app store has been announced. I noticed a link you posed above to engadget above, which does say that there will be apps, but if you read further you find-out that these apps are in-house developed (or contracted).

      See, there are a lot of developers here on slashdot. There is a big difference between in-house apps and 3rd party apps. I could potentially decide to run the Appstore gauntlet, paying a meager developer's fee for the opportunity to develop apps in my spare time. To develop apps for the Zune HD, I'd practically have to get a job in-house at Microsoft.

      --
      mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
    26. Re:Wow, biased much? by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Really? The current market leader won by also not having an app store right away.

      While that is true, the new low bar to entry is an app store. Also included is the touch screen, camera, etc...

    27. Re:Wow, biased much? by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Erm... Calm the accusations of bias there. From all of the info I have scanned on the web concerning teh Zune HD, the OP's article is 100% correct in that no 3rd party app store has been announced. I noticed a link you posed above to engadget above, which does say that there will be apps, but if you read further you find-out that these apps are in-house developed (or contracted).

      See, there are a lot of developers here on slashdot. There is a big difference between in-house apps and 3rd party apps. I could potentially decide to run the Appstore gauntlet, paying a meager developer's fee for the opportunity to develop apps in my spare time. To develop apps for the Zune HD, I'd practically have to get a job in-house at Microsoft.

      Actually, that's not true. The article flat out claims that there will not be an open app store. That makes it sound like there will *never* be an open app store, but they've clearly said there might be in the future. That would be worth mentioning, unless you wanted to just make MS look bad. Plus, it would at least be pertinent to mention that there will be a closed app store at first, something the article also overlooks. Its not as good as an open app store, but it should still be mentioned. Otherwise it just seems like they don't even care about apps, which would be dumb, but isn't true.

      So yes, its biased.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    28. Re:Wow, biased much? by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Really? The current market leader won by also not having an app store right away.

      While that is true, the new low bar to entry is an app store. Also included is the touch screen, camera, etc...

      And the slashdot summary fails to mention that there WILL be an app store, with facebook, twitter, project gotham racing, and all kinds of games. It just won't be *open* at first, a subtlety that the summary does not properly articulate.
      -taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    29. Re:Wow, biased much? by kingkoopa · · Score: 1

      It's ironic your defending the bias of how this article was posted to slashdot when zune is irrelevant, without realizing the bias of slashdot towards MS being the reason why this article got posted.

    30. Re:Wow, biased much? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Also Windows PocketPC/CE/Mobile has been out a lot longer than the iPod. The fact that MS can't just use it shows that they need to do a lot of work on both the Zune and their Mobile software before they have an app store. I think part of the problem is the MS designed their mobile software to act like portable desktops which makes very little sense. Their isn't a consistent input device, there isn't a lot of real estate, etc. The other part of the issue is that Windows mobile OS, even though it is named "Windows" isn't really Windows. It only is made to look like Windows. On the other hand, the iPhone OS is OS X and the development libraries are a subset of the OS X libraries. In terms of design, Apple decided the iPhone/iPod touch should be more like appliances than desktop computers. There are no "files" or "desktop" for example. While this does limit the iPhone in a way, realize that the Apple has never designed their consumer products for geeks. They were designed for average consumers.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    31. Re:Wow, biased much? by selven · · Score: 1

      The very fact that Linux has multiple headlines on Slashdot every week considering it's 1% market share and its fourth place finish behind XP, Vista/7 and OSX comes close to astroturfing in my book.

    32. Re:Wow, biased much? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      WinCE needs to have a desktop mode so that you can use it on machines with no touchscreen. Unfortunately, Microsoft has put zero effort into making an interface for WinCE that is usable on a touchscreen. Some people have put some effort into it, e.g. SPB mobile shell, or the (lackluster) stuff from HTC that drops you into the WinCE application every time you want to do anything other than see a summary.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Wow, biased much? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      When the iPod was first released almost a decade ago, it also hit the headlines of /. (and the editor didn't think much good of it). Still it was there, and mainly because Apple was and is relevant, not because the iPod was relevant at the time. It turned out to be a massive success.

      When the Zune was first released, it also hit the headlines on /. Again not because the Zune matters, but Microsoft matters. For better or for worse, Microsoft still matters. It's a huge company, (one of) the richest in the world, dominating the desktop computer software world. It has also been a long time since MS came out with the first zune, so reasonable to have it on the headlines again.

      Still I guess it will be a failure. They're again trying to copy Apple, and of course by copying they always play catch-up.

      It's really cool and daring they opt for OLED screens, an emerging technology. Unfortunately I don't think OLED is there yet compared to traditional LCD screens. They still have to produce their own light, not using ambient light for the display (like e-ink). Brightness and lifetime are poor. But it will give a boost to the tech and that's cool.

      No modern browser: the IE6 core is really outdated, many pages will not display well if at all.

      No app store: how are users going to customise/personalise the device? MS is going to write apps themselves - that leaves us to the imagination and creativity of MS what can be done with it. Many ideas will be thrown away because they are "not good enough" - for the iPhone if only one developer out of possibly millions thinks it's a good idea then they will write it and put it in the store, if only for their own use only.

      It's a nice try but unfortunately two years behind the times, and not even a price to reflect that: a phone/mp3 player/laptop from two years ago costs typically less than half of it's current version. That compels me for one to buy those "outdated" models, I don't think it's worth the price. The new Zune costs almost as muhc as the iPod Touch, it's direct competitor, so even there no advantage.

      MS now please go back to the drawing boards, and start over again. Have a look at the iPod/iPhone/i*, copy it to start with, and MAKE IT BETTER. That's all. And no it's not easy.

    34. Re:Wow, biased much? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      And this isn't astroturfing, as far as I'm concerned. I'm genuinely excited about the ZuneHD.

      It isn't astroturfing because you are excited about the Zune HD?

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    35. Re:Wow, biased much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple may have launched the iPhone without an App Store, but I think that was half over-estimating how much people would embrace webapps (which now google is trying to push hard for a few years later), and half learning their lesson from the Newton. Instead of of playing a chicken and egg game with hardware with great potential and courting developers for potential buyers, they make a new product cateogry that's attractive IN and OF itself, and developers will beat down your door to be a part of such an attractive platform.

      For MS, a software company that has years of experience working on Win CE & WinMo, and playing catch up to a ~2 year old device, it's pretty egregious that they can't get their shit together.

      -anonymousMonk

    36. Re:Wow, biased much? by Shamenaught · · Score: 1
      Did you even read TFA? I quote:

      Microsoft will create a limited number of apps itself or work closely with selected companies to bring apps to the device, said Zune marketing manager Brian Seitz. The move builds on a limited selection of games previously introduced for Zune.

      So, it clearly does mention there will be a closed app store. As for the fact it says there isn't going to be an open app store, I personally think it's correct. Microsoft is marketing the product, saying things that people want to hear, but trying not to flat-out lie. If there was an app store on the cards, you can bet they'd do a song and dance about it.

      How long have they been working on the marketplace for windows mobile? How much longer will they wait before they even consider porting it for the Zune? Will they actually do it? How much longer after they start the port (if ever) will M$ release an SDK so developers can actually start cooking? The timescale for decent third party apps being released is probably longer than the life-cycle of the device, and thus this Zune HD has missed the boat.

      --
      mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
    37. Re:Wow, biased much? by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Did you even read TFA?

      Bah, sorry, i meant to say summary. I always say article, but no, my point was that the slashdot summary was biased, because it makes a big deal out of no open store, without clarifying that there will at least be a closed store to start.

      And I agree with everything you said, I'm really only griping about the summary. I agree that they are now competing with an established store and they should have come out with one immediately that was open, but that wasn't what I was complaining about.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
  16. it does by jDeepbeep · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are these damn players becoming like cell phones? Do app stores matter? Makes no sense to me.

    In the case of the iPod Touch, it's become a highly popular gaming platform, not to mention having things like iCal, wifi, safari bundled, etc etc. It's either filled a void by providing a hybrid PDA+music player+gaming device, or created that void and told people that they need this. Imho it's a bit of both.

    --
    Reply to That ||
    1. Re:it does by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Not sure why, it is a terrible games platform (judging by my iphone); no controller, and uses up juice way too fast.

    2. Re:it does by M-RES · · Score: 1

      Why no controller? It IS a controller in and of itself - and also contains a multi-touch screen, which is a completely custom-configurable controller too. Can't speak for how much it uses juice.

    3. Re:it does by 4phun · · Score: 1

      Not sure why, it is a terrible games platform (judging by my iphone); no controller, and uses up juice way too fast.

      Actually I play a game that lasts for hours on the iPhone 3GS and OS 3.1. Most of the time I leave it plugged in to keep the battery fresh, but if I want to continue in the bathroom or in bed I merely unplug it for several more hours of use. I let it get down past 10% with no problems. The game? Civ Rev, a variation of my all time favorite Civilization by Sid Myers. Oh, I also take phone calls, play my own music etc all at the same time. It multitasks the things I want to do, including alerting me to local police activity using Trapster while it is doing all of the above. BTW I have 347 applications on that thing, many of them games or simulators. There is a bunch of heavy duty applications for real work too. an you do that on any similar platform as well as the Apple one? Microsoft's Zune isn't even close but more of a joke in my book!

    4. Re:it does by tepples · · Score: 1

      It IS a controller in and of itself - and also contains a multi-touch screen, which is a completely custom-configurable controller too.

      The feedback from a touch screen differs from that of a D-pad and buttons. There's no tactile feedback that the player's thumb has actually pressed a (virtual) button, as opposed to missing the button and pressing the (virtual) chassis.

  17. Re:Astroturf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ... you realize this article is NEGATIVE towards Microsoft... right?

  18. Riddled with bias by gcnaddict · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    1) The OLED display is tons brighter than the display on the iPhone, so their point is moot.
    Their battery life argument flops as they don't actually talk about Zune HD's energy savings. Zune HD nets the same battery life with a smaller battery than the iPod Touch.
    2) The Quake 3 demo wasn't done on an iPod Touch; it was done on a totally different device. The hardware ecosystem in which a processor is used has a heavy impact on performance metrics, so the FPS gap noted here is a highly dubious claim.
    3) Zune HD was never touted as mobile HD, so this point is moot.
    4) The quality of digital radio is better than analog radio, so that point is also down. Think of how digital signals can carry HD video whereas analog signals are unsuited for the task.
    5) "The Windows CE foundation that the Zune HD is built upon is regarded as a joke throughout the industry" unsubstantiated (and false, might I add) point. Besides this, the author doesn't provide much other "evidence"

    Nice article.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Riddled with bias by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      1) The OLED display is tons brighter than the display on the iPhone, so their point is moot.

      It isn't so simple. LCD screens have a reflective element. That is, even without a backlight they are readable, if not always very well. OLED screens do not have a reflective element to the image...they must produce all of the light to overcome reflections from ambient light. Not to mention that OLED screens will probably show significant degradation in performance over relatively short periods. And they will draw more energy for brighter pictures.

      I freely admit that I haven't actually handled a "Zune HD", but I doubt the parent poster has either. I don't think it bodes well for this device that most of the demos I have seen have been done in dark rooms. The proof will be in the pudding, but I strongly suspect that this device's display will look horrible in conditions where there is significant ambient light.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    2. Re:Riddled with bias by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

      I've handled it, and the person who modded me down as flamebait is a troll. My comments are all based on experience.

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  19. I wonder why they didn't change their prices by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    after Apple dropped the price on the iPod touch. Regardless of how good the new Zune is, the point is that it has a LOOOONG way to go before it catches up and pricing yourself about the same as your already well-established competitor is pretty much a recipe for failure.

    1. Re:I wonder why they didn't change their prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. Haven't you read the tech sites lately? The vast majority of people after a new touch were pretty pissed off with apple's pathetic update last week. The new touch is still born, other than the 64GB bump, it's 2-3 years old tech with the worst LCD screen on a premium media player. The touch has a lot of catching up to do to the better products. When MS surpass it you know how far apple have fallen. Gaming playform? Yeah, if you've never used a DS or PSP and waste your lunchtimes on MS card games.

    2. Re:I wonder why they didn't change their prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an iPhone 3GS and I can assure you, 99% of the games suck, and the control interface (no tactile buttons- just a touch screen and accelerometer) isn't ideal for the majority of games anyway. FWIW I still carry my DS everywhere.

      That being said, I can't see the ZuneHD improving on this.

    3. Re:I wonder why they didn't change their prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see. iPod Touch, 8gb, $199. Zune HD, 16gb, $219. Yep, those are some really similar prices there.

    4. Re:I wonder why they didn't change their prices by DECS · · Score: 1

      While you "assure us" about your anecdotal experiences, Apple continues to sell millions of games and other apps for its developer base, and everyone is making money. Big names are making games and continue to release new titles that are pretty cool. Sure, the $0.99 to $4.99 aren't on the level of $30-$50 PSP and DS games, but they are cleaning up and growing in popularity and sophistication.

      Apple is lining up developer support essentially for free on the back of its iPod/iPhone business. Microsoft is trying to pay for this kind of attention.

      Also, even if 1% of the 75,000 App Store titles don't "suck," that leaves 750 that don't, which is more than you can even install at once.

      From OLED to Tegra: Five Myths of the Zune HD

  20. uslefull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What happened to the day when microsoft made a million useless machines usefull again... now their just making a million useless machines

    1. Re:uslefull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to the day when microsoft made a million useless machines usefull again... now their just making a million useless machines

      And this happened when?

  21. This article is really sided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Zune does have a 'store'. There is the Zune Marketplace, around longer than the iphone app store. You can download games to your Zune (very limited) from the Marketplace, isn't that essentially what the iPhone app store does? The Zune isn't the iPhone or the iTouch (comes close), it is a DRM heavy Microsoft portable media player with the ability to run certain apps and share things with other Zune owners. If you have the cash and easy wifi access, then you are set on the media front. The Zune isn't for the pirate with a billion mp3's on their system as the Windows software is tailored to help you download from the Marketplace. The Zune is for listening to music, podcasts, watching videos and movies, being part of a Zune community.

    An app store doesn't even make sense with the Zune fees. You can buy songs piecemeal but that would be idiotic when you can get all-you-can-eat plans. And if the smartest thing to do on the zune is pay for all-you-can-eat, why would somebody then pay extra for little games and apps?

    The HD radio thing is not new, it's been in the Zune since the first incarnation. The newest feature would have to be it's ability to download tracks (from the Marketplace) that you hear and tag while listening to the radio.

    There is an SDK for developing apps, if you are into that kind of stuff.

  22. No more squirting by vivek7006 · · Score: 4, Informative

    They got rid "squirting" feature which Balmar was so proud of.

    First, Microsoft has removed the "squirting" feature, which let you send songs directly from one Zune to another. This feature was supposed to be a big selling point of the first Zune but was crippled by unreasonable rights restrictions that let you play songs only three times or within three days (whichever came first). Microsoft and content owners gradually loosened those restrictions, but the feature never made much difference--mainly because there were so few Zune users out there to exchange songs with. (The "first man with a telephone" problem.) Now it's gone

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13526_3-10352637-27.html

    1. Re:No more squirting by gollito · · Score: 1

      Good. Now maybe they will loosen the sync restrictions (or at least not change it) so it can be synced to *nix and other platforms.

  23. US only, why ? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do they only sell the Zune it in the US ? If they don't have the complexity of an application store, it should be relatively easy.

    You have to wonder if Microsoft really wants to sell Zunes... As an iPod user, I would welcome a stronger competition.

    Please Microsoft, keep Apple at work, else they will become another lazy monopolist !

    1. Re:US only, why ? by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Please Microsoft, keep Apple at work, else they will become another lazy monopolist !

      Will become?

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    2. Re:US only, why ? by kick_in_the_eye · · Score: 1

      It's for sale in Canada, for about 6 months I think. Don't think they sold many tho'.

    3. Re:US only, why ? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      Please Microsoft, keep Apple at work, else they will become another lazy monopolist !

      Will become?

      As long as nobody is *forced* to buy Apple products, they are not in a monopoly situation. The same can't be said of Microsoft, whose two cash cows (Windows and Office) are often bought because "we need more Office licences" or "the OS came with the PC".

      Of course, Apple would love to be in such a situation; it is our tasks, as customers, to buy products which don't make us dependent on them (e.g. MP3 vs. Fairplay DRM).

    4. Re:US only, why ? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Well, the HD Radio feature only works in the US. Europe has a different standard but has not implemented it. In the US, it isn't 100% in all markets either. That would be my best guess.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:US only, why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably, it hasn't been sufficiently successful in the US to warrant an international release. And besides, this Zune "HD" apparently uses something called "HD Radio" which is a proprietary standard for digital radio not used anywhere else. (elsewhere in the world, the open standard DAB has been in use for a decade, though as far as I know it hasn't exactly been a huge success)

    6. Re:US only, why ? by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      DAB has been implemented in many European countries for the better part of the decade... It hasn't been very successful in most countries, but it's there.
      I'm not sure why you would want to listen to OTA radio broadcasts in the age of mobile internet though ;)

    7. Re:US only, why ? by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they don't want to sell it anywhere without implementing a proper marketing campaign, localizing the device and all the software, etc., and they don't have enough faith in the product to spend the money to do all that. The last thing Microsoft wants is the embarrassment of Zune being the number-20 player in a major market instead of just number five.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  24. Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by 2obvious4u · · Score: 3, Interesting

    *Zune HD AV Dock and an HDTV (all sold separately) are required to view video at HD resolution. Supported 720p HD video files play on the player, downscaled to fit the screen at 480 x 272 â" not HD resolution. Zune Pass subscription required; streaming via wi-fi available in U.S. only. HD Radioâ is a proprietary trademark of iBiquity Digital Corp. Learn more about HD Radio here.

    So does that mean I need a "zune pass" to play video on my zune? What the hell is a zune pass anyway? Ok, so I look it up, but now why do I need it again?

    1. Re:Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From the same page you found your fine print on:

      Wi-Fi
      Buy and stream your music in any wi-fi hotspot and sync wirelessly to a PC.*

      You probably need that zune pass to stream your music collection through their service.

    2. Re:Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Hm. My older Zune doesn't require a Zune Pass. What is the footnote attached to? I'd find it extremely odd if they made the hardware require a Zune Pass to function, especially since it goes against what current Zunes do.

    3. Re:Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      No, you don't need a zune pass to dock the zune to play on your tv. Zune pass is only the optional service to pay 14.95 a month to subscribe to 30k + songs that you can sync up and play on your zune, windows pc, windows media center extenders and xbox 360s as part of their media hub strategy.

    4. Re:Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      streaming via wi-fi available in U.S. only.

      This is a more remarkable quote.

      Is the air in the US different from the rest of the world? Or why would streaming over WiFi not be possible outside the US? And how would the Zune know where in the world it is? Does it call home or so? If so why is something so important not mentioned in the general description?

    5. Re:Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's confusing, because they put two bulletpoints in a single footnote.

      I think they mean that to buy or stream music over wifi, you need to have a subscription. Which makes sense, because you need a subscription to buy or stream music whether or not there's wifi nearby. The other part of the footnote only refers to the HD video stuff.

    7. Re:Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      It's a licensing requirement from the MPAA, not a technical requirement.

      I swear-- you read Slashdot, right? Are you literally not aware of MPAA licensing requirements for music? Do you just skim all the hundreds of Slashdot stories discussing this?

      They don't have a license to distribute music outside of the US, so they add this disclaimer-- says nothing about whether it actually works or not. (My guess is that it still works, but I could be wrong.)

    8. Re:Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      This "streaming" I read as streaming within your own home, say from your Zune player to your PC. And that's where I would not expect to have this kind of licensing restrictions.

      Even more so: I would more likely see this to be a function that works OUTSIDE of the US only due to licensing restrictions, as the RIAA only has powers within the US. Or at least that's where they are supposed to be limited to... but then they are American so they may not care too much about that. Anyway I wouldn't think of licensing restrictions when something convenient is allowed specifically in the US only.

    9. Re:Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      You're looking at it backwards. The RIAA is the agency they *did* deal with, it has no control over any territory other than the US. Canada has a different agency; Mexico, yet another; France, yet another; Brazil... etc etc.

      If Zune allowed their streaming to work in Canada without applying to the Canadian version of the RIAA, they'd be in legal trouble. So they say "US only" on the package. Since they only dealt with the RIAA, you can only play the music in territory the RIAA is the enforcing agency for, i.e. the United States.

    10. Re:Neat, maybe I want one! Oh, fine print: by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I wonder why I would need permission from an RIAA or equivalent to stream MY (as in legally bought/licensed/self-made/whatever) music/video from MY music player to MY computer over MY wireless connection as opposed to using MY wire.

  25. what the press still isn't saying... by fee^ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...is how this time, M$ decided to leave behind their prior Zune models with any new features in the update. Discontinuing them should have been the sign. As a 18-month owner of a Zune80, I'm seriously disappointed. The only new features we legacy Zune (18months is legacy now?) users get are for the desktop app, which personally I only use to manage my device, and nothing more. Since I have it running on a Windows Media Center PC, why do I need yet another app that does pretty much the same thing, especially from the same vendor. Even more, in a time of recession, where I don't want to drop another couple hundred for a replacement device that's hardly showing its age or need for replacement, why would I possibly want to replace it?

    If you read the Zune forums, its full of device feature requests for simple things...unicode support, crossfade, better playlist management, better integration with Windows apps (there is currently none for WMP or WMC). All of these pretty much since Gen-1 of the device, and all have been disregarded since the Zune marketing team felt it necessary to take this route instead.

    Its simply a sad example of greed overtaking common sense at the expense of a bit more hard work. A philosophical example of modern capitalism and American excess too?

    Anyone wanna buy a Gen-2 Zune80 is Good condition? I'll use the $ to buy a MiniSD for my cellphone to consolidate my gadgets instead.

  26. They might be pacing themselves... by Churla · · Score: 1

    Obviously we're moving more and more towards convergence devices which will handle many or all of the mobile technology needs of people. But we're not at that point fully yet.

    Knowing this establishing yourself as a solid contender in one venue (music/media playback) isn't a bad thing. Then put together future offerings once others have dangled around in the market and figured out what people really do and don't want.

    I could see MS coming out with a version of Windows Mobile that is a "everything under one roof" approach, but probably in another year or so. Take the interface of the Zune's and put it with the backside of Windows Mobile. Forcing a convergence of these two ahead of time would probably only cause a bad product to be made. Also waiting until the Windows 7 release machine hits full force, then release a new mobile OS and tie it all together with Xbox becoming a full on media center and you have something Apple wouldn't.

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  27. Re:Astroturf by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    Please read the gave a response link.

    No amount of astroturf can cure the ridiculousification of messages in TFA.

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  28. Must be a new definition of "unique" by Shag · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It will come with some unique features, though, like an HD radio tuner

    Does "unique" mean "just like the iPod Nano"?

    (The Nano's ability to show artist and song names, and its "iTunes Tagging" features, shared with some FM radio iPod docks, also use HD radio. Apple just doesn't, for whatever reason, put "HD radio" in giant flaming letters in its advertising.)

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:Must be a new definition of "unique" by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I thought that HD Radio implied access to extra stations, in much the same way that digital OTA TV gives you subchannels. My car radio gives me station/song info, but it's not an HD Radio & I can't listen to multiple broadcasts per station.

    2. Re:Must be a new definition of "unique" by radish · · Score: 1

      Apple just doesn't, for whatever reason, put "HD radio" in giant flaming letters in its advertising.

      "Whatever reason" here being "because the iPod doesn't have an HD radio". Simple enough for you to understand?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Must be a new definition of "unique" by kindbud · · Score: 1

      (The Nano's ability to show artist and song names, and its "iTunes Tagging" features, shared with some FM radio iPod docks, also use HD radio. Apple just doesn't, for whatever reason, put "HD radio" in giant flaming letters in its advertising.)

      Because it doesn't support HD Radio. It supports PSD (Program Service Data), which is the datastream that both HD Radio and satellite digital radio use for broadcasting song information. The iTunes tag is included in the PSD by stations that have licensed iTunes tagging support from iBiquity.

      The new iPod nano plays music received on the analog FM channel.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    4. Re:Must be a new definition of "unique" by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      Apple is also trying to sell stuff that's useful outside the US - HD radio doesn't exist elsewhere.

  29. The death of the MP3 Player? by OneFix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I no longer *need* my iPod or any MP3 player. I use an application called Orb that streams all of the media on my Windows desktop to my Cell Phone or any web browser. I don't have to worry about syncing my iPod to download media or running out of space on my iPod. As long as it's on my PC, I can stream it to my phone. Orb is free, but it uses the bandwidth of your home PC to stream out the media...which is fine for music and live TV or video on the cell phone. But the lower video quality is noticeable when you stream it to a desktop. I expect this to change as residential upload speeds will eventually go up.

    1. Re:The death of the MP3 Player? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      hi, this is your local isp calling. me and my friends battery life, mobile infrastructure, and fidelity want to have a chat why streaming from your phone is a horrible idea.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:The death of the MP3 Player? by OneFix · · Score: 1

      First, I'm not streaming *FROM* my phone. I'm streaming *TO* my phone and it only takes about 128k to stream good quality audio to a mobile device.

      It may be a few more years before everyone is doing it, but it makes more sense to stream the data to mobile devices rather than having to carry around gigabytes of data.

  30. This release seems... apologetic? by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't know how else to put it. It seems like Microsoft is coming straight out the gate on the apologetic. What sort of impression is this going to send to people considering investing in the platform? They haven't expressed any clear strategy for a possible addition of Windows Mobile apps in the future, which seems equally stupid.

    Do what Apple does- sometimes you just have to lie to make yourself sound impressive!

    Let's take a lesson from Apple here: they've been pawning off old technology in Mac OS X as impressive new features for years. Apple knows what the fuck they're doing. The Zune marketing presentation, on the other hand, seems hyper aware of its shortcomings and the marketing response is a hurried explanation for why they aren't competing. "Sorry guys... we'll write a twitter app by the end of the year"...

    END OF THE YEAR?! That's like a student project for beginning .NET development. How about they start spitting out some apps fast, and if not, just release a goddamn SDK. You are MICROSOFT, you have Visual Studio, XNA, etc. What the hell are you doing releasing a closed platform? They are competing with the iPod Touch, not the original iPod!

    Do you want to know how bad of a release this is? I was going to buy one of these things until today. I assumed they had some clever card up their sleeve they were waiting to unveil at launch... nope... they were avoiding showing the App store because it has like 5 applications.

    Do you want to know what I saw when I opened up the Zune software to check the app offerings this morning? ... a fucking calculator.

    Really? Maybe they can distribute a Hello World app to go with that. This thing makes me want to buy an iPod Touch... and I totally hate Apple.

  31. yawn... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    How many slashdotters were going to buy a Zune anyway? It is a dead-end product, regardless of whether or not they offer an app store. How many third party developers are ready, willing, and able to develop apps for Zune? Seems like most of them are too busy supporting iPod to even support Android, let alone Zune. Given a choice, and taking into consideration Microsoft's long history of screwing third party developers, which platform would you target?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  32. Huh by Stumbles · · Score: 1

    Zune users must be some real tards if they think a device having a radio, HD or otherwise is a real marketing hook. Radios are soooo last century.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  33. Fix the existing one first.... by rwrife · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just got a Zune HD and the built-in support for 3rd party apps is pretty slow, it takes several seconds to load each of the handful of apps they have in the Zune app store.

    1. Re:Fix the existing one first.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes several seconds to open them on iTouches too...

  34. No-onne's gonna buy the Zune by thewils · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Everyone is out today snapping up the new iPods. Me included.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    1. Re:No-onne's gonna buy the Zune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it when over-bloated egoists think they can speak for 'everyone.'

  35. Re:Astroturf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh noes! Someone said something about a Microsoft product without being negative the entire time. Astroturfer!

  36. Limited color options! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Zune HD costs $220 for a 16 gigabyte version in black or $290 for a 32 gig model in platinum. Red, green and blue models are also available from the Zune's online store..."

    No brown option? Lame.

  37. You're an idiot. by Dudeman_Jones · · Score: 1

    The HD in HD Radio refers to the fact that the sound quality is far better than standard radio. Go take your vinyl high horse and shove it cause it has nothing to do with this argument. And for the record, vinyl is terrible from an archival standpoint. The amount of work that you have to put into your records to keep them in top shape is insane compared to a CD, even if the sound quality is better. It's a trade off, not a better or worse scenario.

  38. HD radio isn't FM by acomj · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its confusing, but HD radio is secondary radio streams (low bit rate I'm told), that is broadcast by existing radio stations. Its confusing because it sounds like High Def, or High Definition (The zune supposedly does 720p).

    Not many people have the radios (I don't) so people are confused. They're trying to get them into cars. Its fm's answer to satellite radio.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_Radio

    There aren't many people who aren't MS fans who think a slab /multi touch / one button PMP isn't just another me too device. It might be good, but its not original.

    1. Re:HD radio isn't FM by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Its confusing because it sounds like High Def, or High Definition (The zune supposedly does 720p).

      Zune HD screen by itself is nowhere near HD. However, it has enough processing power to output 720p on an external display if you plug one.

  39. Re:Microsoft launches Zune MusicTurd service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be aware of David Gerard:

    - Editor at Wikipedia
    - Fellow citizen and personal friend of Roy Schestowitz, mastermind at BoycottNovell.
    - Wears leather pants and other bondage/goth accesorites with a nipple piercing.
    - Married a huge curly-haired bisexual woman who is a goth like himself.
    - Spams Slashdot for the purpose of promoting his shitty news and rock websites.
    - Creator and owner of disgusting shock websites such as "LemonParty".
    - All around douchebag and asshole.

    More info will be released later as this document progresses.

  40. Games Console? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    "As steve jobs himself stated in their recent iPod announcement, the iPod touch is a portable games console."

    Yes, unlike other game consoles you can move it from one TV to another in your pocket! Awesome!

    1. Re:Games Console? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      I suspect something just went WOOOOSH for one or other of us. Is this meant to be "unlike" the PSP or DS?

  41. As usual, behind out of the gate by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Just when Zune fans think it might dominate, an iPod ships with radio capability - along with the ability to timeshift radio. Can the Zune even do that? And it's so much larger than the Nano.

    And instead of an App Store, it gets a few games thrown on it that are iPhone ports from developers whose just couldn't resist the piles of cash thrown at them. Yet those are all the games you'll get with the device...

    Honestly until the app store question is resolved you'd have to be mad to get a Zune. Touches are better if you care about video or apps. The nano is better if you want to capture video, use radio or have a super portable player. Sansas are better if you simply want a no-frills player (although it's annoying they don't support unprotected AAC like the Zune and other players do).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  42. Re:Astroturf by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    Yes, I understand a lot of people who enjoy AstroTurf have been flocking to Slashdot. It's a lot more convenient than traveling to Houston.

  43. Confidence builder by nsayer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow. If you want to get people to buy your product, nothing could exude less confidence than,

    "Those capabilities will determine whether [...] Microsoft decides to keep selling its own music player."

    Wow! Where can I buy a $100+ tech gadget that the manufacturer may wash its hands of real soon? I must have one!

  44. Paraphrasing Randy Newman by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Just like short people, the Zune has got no reason to live.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Paraphrasing Randy Newman by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is the truth. WiMP is garbage. The App store is a huge win even if it is evil. Microsoft, Zune to fail.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  45. Disagree on moves and commitment by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Fair enough, I agree with that, but it's not a suicide move either, or a sign of non-commitment, as some suggested.

    At this point something like the Zune HD, built to compete primarily against the Touch, is a suicide move without an App Store answer. A handful of included 3rd-party apps, is not that answer. The Touch has Need For Speed and Assassins Creed, for crying out loud!

    Yes some individual parts seem cool - primarily the OLED screen. But I think at that size it's going to be a pretty marginal improvement over the screens the Touch has today, and it's just not enough to woo away most consumers anymore.

    The sign of non-commitment is the lack of will to knock heads together at Microsoft to build that App Store answer today (really, yesterday). In my mind if they were serious about the Zune it would be the flagship for a Microsoft App Store, which would then expand to support the totally redesigned Windows Mobile next year. It's certainly a sexier leader than Windows Mobile.

    The problem is the Zune guys have no pull, and Windows Mobile people insist everything begins and ends with them. Since Microsoft has had good success with the 360 it's amazing to me they don't give the consumer products divisions like the Zune more say in the direction things take.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Disagree on moves and commitment by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, I agree with that, but it's not a suicide move either, or a sign of non-commitment, as some suggested.

      At this point something like the Zune HD, built to compete primarily against the Touch, is a suicide move without an App Store answer. A handful of included 3rd-party apps, is not that answer. The Touch has Need For Speed and Assassins Creed, for crying out loud!

      Yes some individual parts seem cool - primarily the OLED screen. But I think at that size it's going to be a pretty marginal improvement over the screens the Touch has today, and it's just not enough to woo away most consumers anymore.

      The sign of non-commitment is the lack of will to knock heads together at Microsoft to build that App Store answer today (really, yesterday). In my mind if they were serious about the Zune it would be the flagship for a Microsoft App Store, which would then expand to support the totally redesigned Windows Mobile next year. It's certainly a sexier leader than Windows Mobile.

      The problem is the Zune guys have no pull, and Windows Mobile people insist everything begins and ends with them. Since Microsoft has had good success with the 360 it's amazing to me they don't give the consumer products divisions like the Zune more say in the direction things take.

      Which is why I wish this article wasn't so damn biased. It leaves out so much good information that engadget didn't, like:

      "Later this year, Zune plans to release free applications such as Twitter for Zune and Facebook for Zune, in addition to fun 3-D games such as "Project Gotham Racing: Ferrari Edition," "Vans Sk8: Pool Service" and "Audiosurf(TM) Tilt." Games can be added to Zune HD via Zune Marketplace over the Wi-Fi connection or when connected to the Zune PC software."

      Read this article (really, it's better) and tell me the slashdot one isn't biased for leaving out the good stuff:
      http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/zune-hd-3d-gaming-and-app-downloads-confirmed/
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    2. Re:Disagree on moves and commitment by samkass · · Score: 1

      Since Microsoft has had good success with the 360

      Yes... the 360 has lost significantly less money than the Zune! Heck, that division actually reached break-even once! How much money has the iPod division lost to date? What... it actually MAKES money?

      The fact that the iPod is even competitive, let alone ahead of a company who has subsidized their market entry so heavily is testament to Apple's ability to execute.

      --
      E pluribus unum
  46. Er... why HD? by M-RES · · Score: 1

    According to TFA, it's called the 'HD' because it has a built-in HD Radio (whatever that is!?!? Anything like DAB?) and also outputs video at 720p.

    720p? That's not HD - 1080p is HD ffs.

    I'm sure the most worrying thing for a lot of people is whether or not MS are going to be supporting this device in 12 months time if this is their attitude towards it's launch. If they can't buy apps from anybody else and MS are a bit flaky about what apps they'll release and when, it's not going to convince many people to take the plunge. Let's not forget the absolute panning Apple took when they first said that third party apps for their devices wouldn't be allowed - have MS got such short-term memories or are they perhaps doing what Apple seemed to do and testing the water to gauge public response?

  47. Why they matter by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because they are finally powerful enough to replace laptops for many uses.

    I just came back from Europe, on the way over I was flying next to someone who bought a Touch just so she could have email and web support while there, but without the weight of a laptop (she was going on a long biking trip). But she was also using a few applications like language tutorials and so on...

    And of course, she could also have music while biking.

    You device is fine for you, but it's nice to have devices that can do enough to make laptops a truly optional choice.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  48. My Bad by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    It was supposed to be a joke but it was based on a faulty premise (i.e. only TV-connected video game machines are called "consoles".)

  49. Too Little Too Late by qazwart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The iPhone initially show was in January right after the first Zune came out. I thought "Wow, that's what the Zune SHOULD HAVE BEEN". The Zune might be finally getting there, but now its too late.

    Don't get me wrong. The Zune HD is finally turning out to be what it should have been all along. But, it's really not anything different than the iPod Touch and the iPod Touch has a gazillion applications. Well, you say, the original iPhone didn't have an app store, but neither did anyone else. The thing Microsoft must realize is that the Zune has to compete against THIS YEARS iPod Touch.

    In marketing, you have something called the "delta". This is the thing that your product has that your competitors don't. When the iPhone came out, the delta was a true to life web browser and easy syncing with your computer. It was the music player/phone/browser that everyone wanted. Since then, everyone has a music player/browser/phone combo. Now, the delta is the app store.

    What's the Zune HD's "delta" that will get me to throw out my iPod Touch and line up to buy a Zune? HD Radio? It's hasn't really caught on. OLCD screen? That's a nice touch, but is it that much better than the iPod's screen? The Zune is $10 cheaper? Naw.

    Here's what the Zune should have had:

    * Compatibility with the XBox. Hey, you got a zillion XBox games, why not make it so they can easily be ported to the Zune?
    * Camera that's integrated with Twitter/Facebook/Flickr. It should have spot metering and auto focus. Optical Zoom would be a big plus.
    * Multiple platforms. Hey, the Mac now represents 15% of the consumer market. Maybe even more. Why are you immediately dropping that big a chunk of the market? Heck, the songs in iTunes aren't DRMd any more, and there's an API for perusing the catalog, so you don't even have to pull a Palm Pre. Show that you're willing to compete against Apple's home turf. And, don't leave Linux out.
    * Work out a deal w/ Sprint a la Kindle for networking. Not necessarily a phone service, but use the Sprint network for your network. And, of course, WiFi.

    All of this would have made the Zune something to consider despite having sand kicked into its face and its lunch money taken for the last few years. Now, it's just an also ran iPod look alike. If I want an iPod look alike, I might as well by the real thing.

    1. Re:Too Little Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the "delta"? Use a Zune HD with Zune Pass for awhile. Flip to a music HD radio station - It has caught in many markets. Click the little add to cart button, download the song, and add it to your playlist. Go back to the marketplace, search for an artist, and play their latest album. Again add it to the cart, download it, and add it to your playlist. Then go back to the home screen and bring up a previous play list with one click. It all feels like one application, not a half dozen like the iPod. The usability and eye candy blow away Apple's devices, and that is a HUGE accomplishment.

      I see why Microsoft isn't pushing apps. It's because they don't fit smoothly into the slickest and easiest to use UI in a PMP I have ever seen. The "delta" for the Zune HD is the UI. The Zune HD is a significantly better PMP than any iPod.

      And yes, the OLED screen is MUCH better than the iPod's. You haven't seen blacks like this since CRTs and the colors are better saturated.

      Is this going to replace the iPod Touch? No, not with apps being clear second class citizens. However the Zune HD makes the Touch's PMP capabilities look like a second class citizen. It now becomes a choice of what you want. Do you want a PMP with app capabilities? Get a Zune HD. GET A ZUNE HD! Do you want a portable computer with PMP capabilities? Get an iPod Touch. (Or a Creative Zii. That's the one to watch for an iPT competitor.)

  50. Meh by Logical+Zebra · · Score: 1

    So, there really are only two main features that the Zune HD has that my original, first-generation Zune does not: HD video and HD radio.
    Why should I care about HD video? I only use my media player for music, and even if I did use it for video, 32GB would run out pretty quick if I wanted to store HD movies on it.
    HD radio is far inferior to satellite radio, such as Sirius. Sure, you get a high-quality digital signal, but it's only in one area, just like an analog radio signal. If I move too far from the broadcasting tower, I can't pick up the station. But with satellite radio, I can drive all over the country and still get my awesome CD-quality digital audio.
    Sorry, Microsoft, I love my Zune (especially with the "Zune Pass"), but I'm not going to shell out $300 just for a touch screen. I've got my iPhone for that, and it has cool applications to boot.

    --
    I have a bad feeling about this...
  51. Re:Let me fix that for you, also by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the record, every time I grab an iPod I feel like I'm prying it from Steve Jobs cold undead hands.

    Fixed that for you...

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  52. I predict.... by AnAdventurer · · Score: 1
    I predict that nothing will happen, there will be no massive move to ZUNE HD.

    What does that even mean; "HD"? Clearly to create confusion with the customer since the only HD item is the radio. Confuse consumers with "HD meaning it must be good if it's HD". Well, TV's called HD are better then regular TVs; so a HD Zune must be better then every other MP3/Mini-computer/thingy out there not called HD.

    Marginally good marketing name, unimpressive product.

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
  53. Would you care to give an example? by Shamenaught · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, what has apple done that's so terrible? It strikes me that every single story I hear about the iPhone/iPod is blown massively out of proportion. Both M$ and Apple pushed DRM, but apple gets the shit for it because iTunes is more popular. Apple sometimes bans apps in a seemingly arbitrary manner, but AFAIK M$ doesn't offer any ability to run 3rd party software yet. Which is worse? Well, Apple, because some people actually love Apple and it's funny to make them cry. Otherwise I'd say they were as bad as eachother.

    That's coming from someone who uses a mix of Mac, Linux, Windows, and OpenSolaris.

    --
    mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
    1. Re:Would you care to give an example? by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft has never locked down a general purpose computing device and told me what I can or can't run on it. They may have made cross platform stuff difficult, but they never banned it outright with DRM lockdowns.

      Ever.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Would you care to give an example? by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, actually, many folks argue that the Xbox was a general purpose computing device, being essentially a Pentium III machine. The same argument is often made about the Xbox 360.

      It cannot be said that Microsoft didn't lock them down, even if you said the lockdowns weren't completely effective. And don't forget that people have been prosecuted/fined/sent to prison for modifying them so that unofficial programs can be run on them.

      On the PC front, I have 3 words: Protected Video Path

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    3. Re:Would you care to give an example? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      It's funny, I had put Xbox in my post as an exception, but I said to myself "Nah, everyone knows the consoles aren't general purpose devices."

      Thanks for proving me wrong!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:Would you care to give an example? by node+3 · · Score: 1

      No, you didn't put it in because it undermines your argument.

      If you're going to call the iPhone a "general purpose device", then you can't really exempt the Xbox 360.

    5. Re:Would you care to give an example? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      The Xbox's purpose is to play games and some media.

      The iPhone is a phone, camera, web browser, game console and a decent amount more.

      I'd be a great device if Apple didn't control it like Der Fuhrer's Germany.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    6. Re:Would you care to give an example? by Shamenaught · · Score: 1

      Lol, ever heard of Godwin's law? Seriously, if you're going to compare apple's refusal of a few iPhone apps to a regime that murdered millions then how can I take your argument seriously? A lot of people who still call it a great device despite the control that apple keeps, and there is certainly an argument that apple's control is a good thing in simplifying the choice for consumers.

      Seriously, the only reason the iPhone is a general purpose device is because apple make it one by allowing 3rd party development.

      --
      mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
    7. Re:Would you care to give an example? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Yeah I didn't say "Apple is exterminating people like Der Fuhrer's Germany." I'm saying they control this device in a fascist, authoritarian way.

      Apple thinks they know what you should run on your equipment, better than you do. Essentially, you rent your iPod, etc. from Apple.

      People like you should learn to either get in the game or shut the fuck up.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    8. Re:Would you care to give an example? by Shamenaught · · Score: 1

      So? You still drew the comparison, and Godwin's Law dictates that such comparisons lose their meaning through overuse, regardless of whether they're correct or not.

      I do agree that apple's system is somewhat authoritarian, but IMHO comparing their bans to fascism is a step too far. I think that's just subscribing to the sensationalized version purveyed by the media. You hear all about when Apple bans an OK app unfairly, but because sensation makes better news than mediocrity you don't hear about when Apple admits it made a mistake and allows the app.

      See, I know lots of people with iPhones and they are all pretty happy with the selection of apps there are available. I've seen numerous reports in the news of apps being unfairly banned, and looking into them later that apple has bowed and allowed the apps.

      It looks like there are lots of engineers screening the apps, all of whom check the apps differently. It's obvious that whoever checked the baby-shaker app wasn't really on the ball, for example, meanwhile there are several examples of app bans despite similar content being available in other apps. I'm not sure how 'arbitrary and susceptible to media pressure' can equate to fascist.

      All in all, I don't see how Apple's actions with the app store can be said to be worse than Microsoft's OOXML rush-through, to give an example.

      --
      mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
    9. Re:Would you care to give an example? by tepples · · Score: 1

      The Xbox's purpose is to play games and some media.

      Games developed by whom?

  54. well-received by users by speedtux · · Score: 1

    It will come with some unique features, though, like an HD radio tuner, and with software that has been well-received by users.

    Yeah, all three of them.

    Seriously, besides the iPod Touch, the players to beat in the coming year are likely going to be the Android-based MIDs. Zune? I don't think it matters much anymore.

  55. Engadget and Microsoft say otherwise! Bias submter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/zune-hd-3d-gaming-and-app-downloads-confirmed/

    Geez!

  56. Why get a Zune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have an Android, it'll play music and video. MicroSD cards probably won't
    quite give you the space a Zune has, but you'll only need one device.

    You want the Zune to have a radio? Crap, a tiny FM only radio is like $30.

    I am so confused?

  57. Update! Slashdot and original submitter confirmed! by argent · · Score: 1

    Update: A bit more is revealed in a Seattle Times Q&A with Brian Seitz, Microsoft's Zune marketing manager. At the moment, the strategy is to keep all the apps and games free and developed in-house or in close collaboration with third parties -- no third-party SDK for devs to freely crank out apps just yet. Seitz is clear that games will be the primary focus of the "sometimes-connected" Zune HD and the Windows Marketplace is Microsoft's priority for handheld app development:

    "So what we didn't want to do was build two parallel app store experiences that didn't work together. Right now our product roadmaps didn't line up perfectly for us to snap to what they're doing or vice versa... Down the road if there's a way we can work with Windows Mobile or another group inside the company that's building an app store and take advantage of that, that's something we'll look into."

    Man, Windows Mobile 7 and the rumored OneApp app store can't get here soon enough.

  58. they will be boxed up for sale by wardk · · Score: 1

    and sold across the mall hallway from the apple store, which will have customers.

  59. how many Microsoft employees were mandated to buy by Locutus · · Score: 1

    After reading how Gates and Ballmer will not let their children or spouses use Apple iPhones or iPods and that latest bit about a Microsoft employee taking Ballmers picture with an iPhone at an MS group hug...well you just have to know where the first few thousands in sales will come from now don't you. They probably have an old-Zune recycling/crushing machine so people who actually want a Zune can't get a low cost used one. That is how they work right? he he

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  60. close it all up? by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    Microsoft should just close off Windows like all these other 'platforms'. Make people pay license fees to develop for it. Etc. If people are against this idea, how can they be for company-run app stores, developer license fees for consoles(or closed consoles for that matter), and all of the other rediculous acts going on in the tech world? It IS a very black and white issue. p.s. hardware profitablilty should not factor in.

    --
    ...
  61. Zune? Why? by f16c · · Score: 1

    Does anyone actually plan to buy one of these pieces of crap? I have a PC because I need one. I don't have an iPod, iPhone or any other iCrap. My Windows copy is XP cause it's paid for (just to use LabVIEW for work, taxes and Netflix movies). I may not be cool enough for Apple but I'm not stupid enough to buy this garbage.

    --
    bob@Osprey:~>
  62. Classic lives on as does space by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What gets me is that they are eroding storage space...and the Classic, which will probably go away in a year or so

    That's what everyone said about the Classic last year. And in fact, the Classic has *gained* storage space in the recent update (updated to 160GB from 120GB). How is that erosion?

    The classic will be around just long enough for flash devices to support similar storage and then, it might go away. But it's clear Classic level storage is going to stick around, there are plenty of other people with large libraries of music.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Classic lives on as does space by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      Actually, wasn't the Classic replacing an 80GB and 160GB version with the 120GB, using a different sort of drive? So 160GB would then be right back to where it was. Hopefully we're at 256GB flash in two years, and the Classic can either become a flash player, or one of the other models can replace it.

    2. Re:Classic lives on as does space by Omestes · · Score: 1

      There used to be at least 3 flavors of iPod (now Classic), but they removed two of them, pruning off the low and middle selections. They killed the old 160, and replaced it with a 120, and just now did they decide it was newsworthy to "expand" back to the old size.

      But the selection was pruined back to nothing, with the emphasis being on inferior flash based ones (though I'd jump on a 100GB Nano), and overpriced smart phones, minus the actual phone bit, which are only around for obnoxious "micro transactions" for crap I don't really want/need in a music player.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  63. Hey, I know the pictures are better on radio... by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

    It will come with some unique features, though, like an HD radio tuner

    Hey, I know the pictures are better on Radio, but HD? Wow!

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  64. They do by theolein · · Score: 1

    Microsoft, apart from the xbox and zune, aren't really into hardware. Mostly, it's Windows, Office and a few other things. One of the first iterations of the .Net framework stated in the license that you could not use it to write a competitor to MS Office.

    And that's just one example. Microsoft is the worst of them all, given how long it's been doing this kind of thing. Apple would be as bad as Microsoft if they had the marketshare which they do in the iPod and iPhone space, but not in the Mac space.

  65. Jack of all trades by tepples · · Score: 1

    When I had a Palm pilot and a cheap nokia, I had two devices in my pocket.

    Some people will take a jack of all trades; others want a master of one and a master of another. For example, say I want a handheld computer, and I want a phone. If all available phones fail to meet my requirements, then I will buy a separate handheld computer and phone. For me, the requirements of a low monthly fee and the ability to run free software happen to outweigh the requirement of fewer things in my pocket, which is why I'm waiting for a Pandora PDA.

    1. Re:Jack of all trades by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

      For me, the requirements of a low monthly fee and the ability to run free software happen to outweigh the requirement of fewer things in my pocket, which is why I'm waiting for a Pandora PDA.

      I wish I could say the same, but I have a 3 object maximum: wallet, keys, phone. Everything else stays in the bowl no matter how often I remind myself to pick it back up.

      Buy a second-hand iphone 2g, jailbreak and unlock it, run FOSS and a prepaid SIM. That's still legal no matter how Jobs may rant.

      --
      Changa hates change.
  66. I would care to give an example by arete · · Score: 1

    Actually, MS has tried to implement some Trusted Computing pieces that would do exactly that - restrict what will run so any DRM-broken content can't possibly be played.

    Perhaps we could amend your sentence to: "never SUCCESSFULLY locked down..." - because they can't manage to have backward compatibility with all the terrible niche Windows apps and also do things like that.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot