Slashdot Mirror


Marge Simpson Poses For Playboy

caffiend666 writes "'Marge Simpson is posing for Playboy . The magazine is giving the star of The Simpsons the star treatment, complete with a data sheet, an interview and a 2-page centerfold. 'We knew that this would really appeal to the 20-something crowd,' said Playboy spokeswoman Theresa Hennessey. Playboy even convinced 7-Eleven to carry the magazine in its 1,200 corporate-owned stores, something the company has only done once before in more than 20 years." Worst issue ever!

74 of 413 comments (clear)

  1. Wow . . . by AshtangiMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Playboy has to jump the shark?

    1. Re:Wow . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just want to see if she's a natural bluehead.

    2. Re:Wow . . . by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Playboy jumped the shark loooooong time ago.

      I found the quote about appealing to 20-somethings particularly funny for a couple reasons.

      A 20-something has never seen a relevant current issue of Playboy, and likely cannot remember a relevant current episode of The Simpsons.

      I mean, I think The Simpsons is still funny, but the time when it was ground breaking entertainment spurring on social examination of how the modern American family is portrayed on television, those days are long gone.

      And I don't mean to make a lot of folks feel old, but Simpsons has been on the air for 20 years. The big fans are not 20-somethings anymore. We're 30- and 40-somethings.

      (And we get our pr0n on the internet.)

    3. Re:Wow . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It was revealed by Homer in Secrets of a Successful Marriage that Marge dyes her hair with blue dye #56; "She’s been gray as a mule since she was seventeen."
      From wikipedia =p

    4. Re:Wow . . . by ircmaxell · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    5. Re:Wow . . . by Dishevel · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd still rather see Lois than Marge.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    6. Re:Wow . . . by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, Randy Marsh from South Park said it best:

      "Once you jack off to Japanese girls puking in each other's mouths, you can't exactly go back to Playboy."

      The Internet's answer to TFA would be: OH BTW: Pix or it didn't happen! KTHXBAI

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:Wow . . . by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I grew up looking at playboy in my teens in the 90s. Now I look back on issues from the 60s and 70s and damn it was so much better back then.

      As for the Simpsons, the fans of the current show are younger. They don't know how good it was and how far it's fallen. Maybe there's a similar dynamic at work with Playboy.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:Wow . . . by Dahamma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A 20-something has never seen a relevant current issue of Playboy, and likely cannot remember a relevant current episode of The Simpsons. ...
      Simpsons has been on the air for 20 years. The big fans are not 20-somethings anymore. We're 30- and 40-somethings.

      Very definitive statements, but they are just not true...

      30 seconds of searching shows that the Simpsons still consistently ranks #1 or #2 in its timeslot among teens, 18-34, and 18-49 demographics. And a less scientific but still valid point is that among about a dozen of my younger cousins in the age range of 10-30 I don't know a single one who isn't a Simpsons fan. I know plenty of people who watch the Simpsons with their kids - which is probably part of the reason it IS so popular among such a wide demographic after all these years...

      Do you really think a major publication like Playboy, a major network like Fox, and a major retail chain like 7-11 would launch a campaign like this without doing at least 30 seconds of trivial demographic research?

    9. Re:Wow . . . by yo_tuco · · Score: 5, Funny

      "But does she dye there too?"

      No. And no need to. She has a Brazilian wax. I've seen the shots.

    10. Re:Wow . . . by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

      because you're a religious freak?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    11. Re:Wow . . . by roguetrick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Simpsons social commentary is transparent when you're ten. The only cartoon that beats your head with it more is Southpark.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    12. Re:Wow . . . by nomadic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Playboy's been in bad shape for quite a few years now. It seems like they never figured out how to stay profitable in the face of competition from the web, despite having one of the most valuable brands in the world. Take a look at their chart. [google.com] If you click on the ten-year view, you'll see that they peaked during the dot com boom when investors just assumed that they were going to make a fortune on the net.

      The sad thing about playboy is it actually used to be highly respected for things other than pictures of naked young women. Some of the best writers of the 20th century routinely published in their magazine.

    13. Re:Wow . . . by Darinbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, the 20-something point is valid. Most of them are probably thinking "you mean you want me to actually PAY for porn?"

    14. Re:Wow . . . by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those are shooped, fool! We're talkin' the real deal here! No cartoonish image manipulation >:-(

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    15. Re:Wow . . . by Menkhaf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would've saved this for later as I'm still coming up with nifty things, but here is my oneliner:

      find -mindepth 3 -name \*.rar | grep -v subs | grep -v part[0-9] | sort -R | sort -R | head -n 1 | sed -r 's/\ /\\\ /g' | xargs unrar e && find -maxdepth 1 -name \*.ogm -or -name \*.avi | sed -r 's/\ /\\\ /g' | xargs mplayer -fs && rm *.avi; rm *.ogm

      I keep it safe somewhere in my .bash_history ;)

      Find all .rars at a depth of minimum 3 from the current path, removes all subs, all .rar files with part??.rar, sort the list randomly, do it again (had some problems with always getting the same one multiple times in a row, this fixed it -- might have been bad karma, might have been a bad algorithm, but haven't been bothered to remove it to check), take the first from the top, replace spaces with escaped spaces (to make xargs work), unrar using xargs (to current root), find the unpacked video file, replace spaces and play! After mplayer exits (but only with return 0!), remove all .avi or .ogm from the current folder.

      If you need to limit it, do so after the first pipe, like this:

      find -mindepth 3 -name \*.rar | grep S01 | grep -v subs | grep -v part[0-9] | sort -R | sort -R | head -n 1 | sed -r 's/\ /\\\ /g' | xargs unrar e && find -maxdepth 1 -name \*.ogm -or -name \*.avi | sed -r 's/\ /\\\ /g' | xargs mplayer -fs && rm *.avi; rm *.ogm

      That's the reason for this way of having what you have in your script -- flexibility.

      What do other people do?

      --
      A proud member of the Onion-in-Hand alliance
    16. Re:Wow . . . by Frnknstn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Post:
      by religious freak (1005821) ...
      I want a real name without a number attached to it.

      I suspect you've come to the wrong place...

      --
      If it's in you sig, it's in your post.
    17. Re:Wow . . . by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and smacked into the face of the landing ramp...

      Don't you mean a landing strip?

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    18. Re:Wow . . . by lewko · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd do Betty, but I'd be thinking about Wilma...

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    19. Re:Wow . . . by Psychochild · · Score: 2, Funny

      All these mod points, and no (-1, Threw up a bit in my mouth) option....

      --
      Brian "Psychochild" Green
      MMO developer's blog
  2. As a 20-something... by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Worst issue ever!

    As a 20-something, I must say I agree.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    1. Re:As a 20-something... by Afforess · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's even funnier though because this story is right above "FOSS Sexism Claims Met With Ire and Denial."

      --
      If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
    2. Re:As a 20-something... by Mooga · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are trying to draw in a younger audience they their traditional readers (who are getting old). Personally, as a 20-something, I wouldn't be attracted to it as much as disturbed by it. That fact that BOTH Playboy and whoever currently owns the rights to the Simpsons thought it was a good idea is proof that they are BOTH in a lot of trouble. I have no motivation at all in seeing a "sexy" Marge Simpson. I think they confused "20-something" and "Anime Perverts." HUGE difference.

      --
      ~ Mooga
    3. Re:As a 20-something... by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Best. Story. Placement. Ever.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    4. Re:As a 20-something... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just don't get why *this* issue is supposed to appeal to 20 somethings when the usual magazine full of naked women doesn't?

    5. Re:As a 20-something... by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they confused "Marge Simpson" and "Lois Griffin," which makes me almost as mad as my wife that time I confused her with Lois Griffin and called her a street-walking whore.

      [Flashback to last night]
      Wife: Honey, what do you say we uh...christen these new sheets, huh?
      Me: Why honey, you naughty girl.
      Wife: Hehehe...that's me.
      Me: You dirty hustler.
      Wife: Hehehehe...
      Me: You filthy, stinky prostitute.
      Wife: Aha, ok I get it...
      Me: You foul, venereal disease carrying, street-walking whore.
      Wife: Alright, that's enough!

      Shit, I just did it again, didn't I?

    6. Re:As a 20-something... by Doug52392 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because no one in their 20s BUYS pornography anymore.

  3. No Patti and Selma? by cfa22 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on, they're TWINS.

    1. Re:No Patti and Selma? by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come on, they're TWINS.

      And one of them is a lesbian right? Maybe more up Hustler's alley.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  4. For crying out loud; by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At the risk of being modded down furiously, I would like to express my opinion on this:
    1) Cartoons are seldom sexy
    2) The Simpsons jumped the shark years ago. Since then it has been repeatedly jumping the shark, again and again, once every day at least in the vain hope that somebody notices that it has jumped the shark. So far very few people have.
    3) Cross-promoting press release opportunities like this bore me to tears. I can understand Slashdot covering this, but I have seen this "news" in 'serious' newspapers. FFS.
    That is all.

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    1. Re:For crying out loud; by jacktherobot · · Score: 5, Funny

      don't have a cow man

    2. Re:For crying out loud; by NoYob · · Score: 2, Funny
      Whoa, whoa, whoooooooa!

      Marge has a really hot body! I really want to see her naked. The same goes for Lois Griffith! Quagmire does have great taste in cartoon chicks!

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    3. Re:For crying out loud; by lastchance_000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      But what about the articles?!

    4. Re:For crying out loud; by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd go with Betty. But I'd be thinking about Wilma.

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
  5. In related news by Reason58 · · Score: 3, Funny

    All of Hefner's girlfriends begin dying their hair blue.

    1. Re:In related news by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      All of Hefner's girlfriends begin dying their hair blue. All of Hefner's girlfriends begin dying their blue hair.

      FTFY

      All of blue hair Hefner's girlfriends begin their dying?

  6. Re:A switch for Playboy... by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least they're not into furries. *shudder*

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  7. Re:A switch for Playboy... by the4thdimension · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lot of their issues have always contained some kind of explicit cartoon - this time they are just taking it to another degree.

  8. Seems odd . . . by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This seems very unexpected. Not that Playboy would do it, or even that people would buy it, but rather than the owners of the Simpson's copyright (I presume Fox?) would agree to it.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    1. Re:Seems odd . . . by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, Fox probably still likes money and the Simpsons isn't the cash cow it once was so... I'm thinking that Playboy dangled cash in front of Fox and Fox couldn't say "no."

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    2. Re:Seems odd . . . by dfxm · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm surprised Marge would do it. It seems out of character for her, especially considering she is a member of Springfield's Citizens' Committee on Moral Hygiene...

    3. Re:Seems odd . . . by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

      She also painted Mr. Burns in the buff, so she can't be that prudish.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Seems odd . . . by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did you read the article? This was done to increase Playboy's sagging sales.

    5. Re:Seems odd . . . by trytoguess · · Score: 2, Informative

      She also supported Michelangelo's David in an earlier episode if memory serves, and has watched "snuggle" films with Homer. The character seems to have an European view of morality. Very much against violence, but rather lax on nudity and sexuality.

  9. Rule 34! by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, actually, wait. In retrospect, let's not. I don't think there ARE goggles that can do something for that.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Rule 34! by jitterman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Finally, my sig has relevance!

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
  10. Good luck with that by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm certain that this will convince all the 20-somethings out there who've been weaned on free internet hardcore to subscribe to Playboy.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Good luck with that by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Playboy is portable and doesn't require internet access or power. I predict that it's still quite popular with that crowd.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    2. Re:Good luck with that by Reason58 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Playboy is portable and doesn't require internet access or power. I predict that it's still quite popular with that crowd.

      Great points. This will surely prove popular for the large, masturbator-on-the-go market.

  11. peace of mind by bugi · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least we won't have to debate whether or not the rack is real, so I can sleep easy for once.

  12. Bah! by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    I can already find a ton of Marge Simpson pr0n on the internet.

    Oh internet... Is there nothing you won't show naked?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Bah! by revlayle · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can already find a ton of Marge Simpson pr0n on the internet.

      Oh internet... Is there nothing you won't show naked?

      Rosie O'Donn...

      wait... no... not any more...

      *sobs uncontrollably*

    2. Re:Bah! by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh internet... Is there nothing you won't show naked?

      Richard Stallman

      (and yes, we are ever grateful that such an event has not occurred).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Bah! by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  13. so does marge have blue pubes? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    and do her blue pubes stand up at ridiculous heights in a mock phallus?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:so does marge have blue pubes? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      This spread is worthless without pink.

    2. Re:so does marge have blue pubes? by Reason58 · · Score: 3, Informative

      This spread is worthless without pink.

      To put in a way that slashdotters may understand, it is like an article featuring a new sports car that does not mention its horsepower.

  14. And for Playgirl by Reason58 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Playgirl announces plans to feature Homer. When asked what prompted him to do the photo shoot, Homer said he needed the d'oh.

  15. Next issue... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm waiting for Leela and Amy.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Next issue... by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 4, Funny

      But lack of depth perception is what i look for in a lady!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  16. Oh good. by Jethro · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the first time I've wanted to get a Playboy since I was 12.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  17. Re:must buy by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know? I thought the same thing back when Madonna showed up in a Playboy spread... then I saw the armpit hair. We're not talking just a little bit, either... there was enough in there to supply an entire Lilith Fair audience.

    Sometimes, there are things in this world that you just do not want to see, curiosity be damned.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  18. 20-something ? by arielCo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We knew that this would really appeal to the 20-something crowd

    Given that The Simpsons first aired 19 years ago and peaked not too long after that, try again with "30-something crowd".

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  19. Wanted to moderate but... by JimboFBX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really wanted to spend my mod points here but was disappointed nobody pointed this out:

    *ahem*

    How many other Playboy models feature hideous bug-eyes, a monstrous overbite, chimp-like ears, and freakish bee-hive hair?

    And to throw in my own opinion: Remember folks, the picture was drawn by someone who probably resembles comic-book guy! Yeah!

    1. Re:Wanted to moderate but... by Spazholio · · Score: 3, Funny

      Heidi Montag?

  20. Re:must buy by lastchance_000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ten years ago, I'd agree. Now...eh. Just call me when Leela does a spread.

  21. Re:must buy by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...call me when Leela does a spread.

    Or some hot Leela on Amy action. Ooh, that's so Wong.

  22. Hey Marge! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Show me the blue!

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  23. Matt Groening will draw the layout, right? by Trip6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're not actually seeing Marge Simpson naked, we're seeing Matt Groening's VISION of Marge Simpson naked. Not sure I want to be that deep into his fantasies...

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  24. how much of... by jDeepbeep · · Score: 2, Funny

    How much of the centerfold is taken up by the beehive?

    --
    Reply to That ||
  25. All centerfolds are "cartoons" anyway by dbet · · Score: 4, Informative

    I gave up long ago even trying to find something sexy in an issue of Playboy. Between air-brushing, filters (the ones that make the entire shot pinkish or blueish), and post-editing, you're no longer looking at a real woman. In fact it often almost looks like a painting, rather than a photograph.

    And this is by no means an insult to the models, who are very nice looking in person.

  26. Re:must buy by jrivar59 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Announcer's voice: You watched it! You can't UN-watch it!

  27. Re:must buy by Myrddin+Wyllt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oblig Red Dwarf:

    Lister: What d'ya think of Betty?
    Cat: Betty Rubble? Well, I would go with Betty... but I'd be thinking of Wilma.
    Lister: This is crazy. Why are we talking about going to bed with Wilma Flintstone?
    Cat: You're right. We're nuts. This is an insane conversation.
    Lister: She'll never leave Fred, and we know it.

    --
    [ ]Half Empty [ ]Half Full [x]Twice as big as it needs to be
  28. Will the issue be distributed in Australia? by Doug52392 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if this issue of Playboy will be avialbe in Australia, given their intolerance towards cartoon pornography...