Slashdot Mirror


Hands-On Look At the BlackBerry Storm 2

Barence writes "PC Pro has had time to play with the new BlackBerry Storm 2, and came away impressed. The new touch system garners the most praise, doing away with the mechanical click screen of the original Storm — the new screen gives a kind of localised haptic feedback which 'feels just like clicking a button.' The phone, announced today, also includes Wi-Fi, BlackBerry OS 5, and increased storage, so it's looking an enticing prospect. After the disappointment of the Palm Pre, could this be the smartphone to beat?"

213 comments

  1. Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    It hardly seems like a disappointment based on the amount and tone of coverage I've seen of the Pre. I haven't seen much about the Pre in a business environment (read: syncing to Exchange etc) but it seems great otherwise.

    1. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by giverson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, I don't get that. I absolutely love my Pre. And to answer your question, Exchange syncing works great.

      --

      Capitalism does not lead to corruption, lack of character does.
    2. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by NiteShaed · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'll second that, and I also appreciate being able to connect to the wireless network at my office with it (WPA Enterprise), which nobody's managed to do yet with an iPhone/iPod Touch.......

      Now, hopefully the apps will start to flow a little faster. There are some nice ones out now, and more every day, but I particularly would like to see the Sirius/XM player, Skype, and eReader come out soon.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    3. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by philpalm · · Score: 1, Troll

      Love the Pre, but seriously when provided by Sprint you have to hack it in order to enable tethering. Also you have to hack it if you unsubscribe in order to use the wifi. Will the hacking of Pre become greater than the hacking of IPhone? For Linux users Pre is more of a slam dunk....

    4. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'll second that, and I also appreciate being able to connect to the wireless network at my office with it (WPA Enterprise), which nobody's managed to do yet with an iPhone/iPod Touch.

      Pardon me? Nobody? This has been a feature since iPhone/iPod OS 2.0 came out and I have been running it ever since then.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    5. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by NiteShaed · · Score: 0, Troll

      Pardon me? Nobody? This has been a feature since iPhone/iPod OS 2.0 came out and I have been running it ever since then.

      I'm going to guess you don't work at my office then. Maybe it's something specific to how the network is set up, I couldn't say, but the Pres in the office work fine, none of the iPhones/iPod Touches do.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    6. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It amuses me when users that opt for technology with a fair degree of vendor lock-in, feature control (or plain, simple pose/fanboi value) 'look forward' to features that the rest of us have had for years.

      I have an HTC Rhodium (Touch Pro 2) and HTC have done a good job to hide the abomination that is Windows Mobile with a fairly decent (but not perfect) touch interface, wireless works, I have VNC, PockeTTY and Remote Desktop support loaded (for 'emergency support'), I am about to load up a VoIP app (SJPhone) and I can browse networks & print. TomTom satnav's on and I have just installed a Spanish-English dictionary for a holiday next week. The developer community (eg: xda-developer) is very strong so there are lots of commercial, free and shareware tools and apps available and, well, it's a decent phone too!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    7. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by s.o.terica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fundamentally the Pre and webOS have always been brilliant, second only to the iPhone in many ways and superior in a few (brilliant multitasking interface, brilliant unobtrusive notifications interface, gesture area below screen, keyboard, universal SMS/chat threads, TeleNav navigation included with plan, etc.). It also has a development platform with, for most developers, the shortest learning curve (using HTML/JavaScript for all the local apps).

      The only things that have ever been an issue with the Pre were a few bugs (not show-stopping, mostly related to bluetooth and the like), almost all of which they've fixed by webOS 1.2; and the battery life, which seems to also have been somewhat mitigated by newer OS versions. The Pre as it stands now is a rock-solid platform, with very arguably better messaging capabilities than either the iPhone or the Storm for anyone who doesn't explicitly need Blackberry Enterprise Server compatibility (Pre works flawlessly with Exchange).

      BB Storm on the other hand is glued to an antiquated OS that has had successive layers of cruft grafted onto it to modernize it (evidenced nowhere more than the fact that a touchscreen phone still essentially has an on-screen pointer, with the click action being separate from the touch action). Worse, it's much more of a bear from a developer standpoint.

    8. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by Nerdfest · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Same here with a Touch Diamond running (sadly) WinMo. All free software too. 2 factor authenticated connections to home desktops in both Windows and Linux, Skype, etc, and a good phone, in a nice small _open_ package.

    9. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by imgumbydamnit · · Score: 1

      I loved my first Pre, until it went into speaker mode and would not come out. My second Pre ran fine, until about 3 PM each day when the battery would be empty. My third Pre, I coddle, because it tried to go the same way as the first. I resurrected it by swirling a denuded Q-tip in the headphone jack. Yes sir, only bluetooth headphones for my baby now. Seriously, the OS *is* brilliant compared to the others (quasi-informed, I have an iPod Touch), but come on Palm, get your hardware QA fixed.

      --
      To err is human. To arr is pirate.
    10. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by dmorris68 · · Score: 1

      Well, as someone who has used both, I'd have to disagree. I've been a PPC/WM user for years, and generally like HTC's products. But after upgrading to the HTC Fuze (Touch Pro) the day they were released last November, I've had enough of them. I've always had to tinker with WM an awful lot to get it working like I want. I've installed a ton of custom ROM's from xda, even played with kitchens and cooking my own, and have developed apps myself for WM.

      I broke down and got an iPhone 3GS, and despite not liking a whole lot about Apple except for iPods, I love my iPhone and wish I had ditched WM a long time ago. The user experience is 10x better. HTC's touch interface is an improvement over vanilla WM, but still lags WAAAY behind the iPhone. The screen quality, both visual quality and touch experience, are just way better on the iPhone, despite the Fuze having a higher resolution. Most of the apps you mention, including TomTom, are now available for the iPhone, and honestly, despite being an "app whore," I've found iPhone versions of just about everything I used on WM devices. The only thing missing for me is a JRE, and that's due to Apple's license regarding bytecode interpreters. I'm not interested in jailbreaking, as I had enough with hacking WM. I just want a reliable smartphone that works well out of the box.

      The iPhone isn't perfect -- I don't like the fact I can't run background apps, must use a Mac for development, and I really dislike Objective-C -- but overall I'm still happier than I ever was with a Windows Mobile device. In fact, as further testament to how much the iPhone appealed to me: despite being in the cross-platform software development business for decades, I managed to avoid buying a Mac for anything. Within a week of getting my iPhone, I had to order myself a Mac Mini just to have a platform for hacking around on the thing. As even *further* testament, my wife the technophobe has always hated my WM phones but as soon as she saw and tried out my iPhone, she had to have one too. Say what you will about Apple (and I often do), but they know how to nail the user experience better than anything Microsoft does. So while the geek/engineer in me pretty much dislikes Apple, the consumer in me recognizes and understands their market success.

    11. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you're referring to as far as vendor lock-in goes. There's nothing stopping anyone from making any of the apps I'm hoping to see for the Pre, it's just a matter of time so far. WebOS is new, I can't reasonably expect every application I want to be ready and waiting immediately on it's release.

      My understanding is that the eReader will be out for the Pre sometime soon. The XM/Sirius app is so far Apple only (no luck for your WinMo device there either), and I'm hoping that the platform gains enough traction to get Skype's interest.

      The Pre does have an App-Catalog, which is similar to the Apple App-Store, but there are actually far more "homebrew" apps available from other sources, which are generally free and so far I've had no problem getting or installing. Actually, they've been easier to install than apps were on my WinMo Motorola Q or Compaq iPaq. No ActiveSync to deal with, or hunting down and hoping for a stand-alone cab file.

      As for getting features WinMo has had for years, I'm not sure what you mean. I've been using WinMo from Casio's first colour Cassiopia, up to retiring my iPaq and Moto Q last year. There's not a thing I find myself missing. Maybe the next iteration of WinMo will be more interesting, but I think Palm did a seriously nice job here.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    12. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      I'm currently on an LG WinMo phone, and I'll be willing to submit to any kind of lock-in for my next phone, just give me something that WORKS, which my current phone doesn't:
      1- it locks up daily. I'm missing important calls because my phone locks up for no reason. And then takes longer than my PC to reboot.
      2- connecting my phone to my PC with the SD card in "USB drive" mode usually requires a reboot, or several, for the PC to see the card, and then again when disconnecting the phone, for the phone to see it
      3- the user interface is awful. It makes me miss a mouse and keyboard, and waste oodles of time aiming carefully at interface elements that don't belong on a phone.
      4- there's no way to force it to use wifi when available, it sometimes (Java...) insists on connecting though 3G, or not at all.
      5- WinMo does not even have a tool to format SD cards, so you must buy aPC card reader. It does have a "windows update" tool, which doesn't work...

      I hate closed systems a la Apple even more than I dislike Microsoft, but next time around, I'll put all my ideals in my back pocket, and get the most reliable, easiest to use phone wherever it comes from. I Hope Android gets good enough by then, but if it has to ba Apple, Blackberry, S60, Maemo... I don't care.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    13. Re:Disappointment of the Palm Pre? by Whitemage12380 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I just got a Pre and I'm very happy. What a loaded summary.

  2. LOL by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After the disappointment of the Palm Pre, could this be the smartphone to beat?"

    Um, yeah, let's not mention the elephant in the room, shall we?

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:LOL by Kamokazi · · Score: 0, Troll

      Although the hardware is lackluster, WebOS is pretty nice. I really wouldn't call the Pre a disappointment at all.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    2. Re:LOL by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it is understood in the reading that the iPhone is the smartphone to beat, it was very clear to me that they were referring to the promises made by Palm to unseat the iPhone from its iThrone around its release, and musing as to whether or not the Storm 2 has what it takes.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    3. Re:LOL by rinoid · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah, it'd be great if companies and more so, the press, could stop thinking in terms of a __________ killer! Nothing is so wrong with the iPHone that it needs to be "beat" or "killed" or "maimed" or anything else. I'm not pandering or trolling for the "can't we all just get along" people. If your main focus is always the other guy then how can you improve yourself? OK take a measurement now and then but gosh you have to do the work to win. This much is obvious ... but what's not obvious is for RIM or PALM to win, Apple need not lose.

    4. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the Blackberry storm 1 that only came out barely a year ago?
      Or are you refering to the King Kong sized Gorilla in the room formally known as Iphone?

    5. Re:LOL by mvdwege · · Score: 4, Funny

      It will indeed take some time to beat Nokia.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    6. Re:LOL by Shane112358 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Palm Pre was certainly only a disappointment to those people who expected it to be the second coming of Jesus or to overtake the iPhone within months of release. I have a Pre and it is the best phone I have ever owned. The OS is top notch. The hardware isn't perfect but neither was the iPhone when it came out. As someone else said, the problem is that you need to compete with the ecology of Apple - not just the h/w or s/w. So even if all the small shortcomings of WebOS are addressed, and the next Pre has none of the h/w issues of the first, and it's very popular - it still doesn't mean that it will "kill" the iPhone. It will take a while - at least a year or so - for the iPhone to be dethroned by any competing architecture. It will happen, for sure. Whether it's one year or ten years from now is up to Apple, their competitors, and shear luck.

    7. Re:LOL by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      So this is the phone to beat, the phone to beat.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    8. Re:LOL by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yeah, let's not talk about Android. Actualy the way I cut up phone users by what they do with their phone:

      1) Cell Phones: people who make calls and take some pictures (aka my mom and dad)

      2) Cell Phones with Keyboards, text heavy IM users who make calls, (aka me, my wife, ect).

      3) Smart Phones: Appointments, e-mail, text msgs, perhaps twiter, and phone calls (My boss and his blackberry buddies)

      4) The iPhone: People who mostly use internet access and send messages.

      And on a related note, I was out for pizza the other night and counted over 10 iPhones. The reason they were so easy to spot was that people who had them were face to the phone and not talking for most of the night. Once it was the joke that Nerds would prefer to IM than talk, but in the collage/partying side of the restaurant it was all nose to phone, and in the back their was a Magic the Gathering group that was laughing and talking and interacting with each-other. Perhaps the next joke will be that every one likes IM and txt better, but nerds are trying to be all smart practice using their vocabulary and talk face to face.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    9. Re:LOL by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know what would be REALLY nice? If I could just swap phones as needed during the course of the day. For example - walking the dogs, or shopping, or driving - take a flip-phone. At the office? Move my "identity" into a smartphone. This way I don't have to decide between something small that fits in a pocket and won't break if I drop it, and something that has more functionality.

    10. Re:LOL by imamac · · Score: 1

      Hm. I'm in 3 & 4 as are many others I know. Your assumption that they are separate is incorrect. The iPhone is a smart phone.

    11. Re:LOL by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      If all you're worried about is making calls and storing numbers, Google Voice is your solution.

    12. Re:LOL by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I state them as separate because the people I know with iPhones use them differently than other smart phone users. I have had some one hand me their iPhone with a map loaded to show me how to get to a restaurant, something normally done verbally or with a quick sketch. I know iPhone users who keep their complete photo collection on their phone, most people use the phone to hold snapshots only. A friend of mine uses his iPhone to watch movies, no other smart phone user I know keeps movies with him. The iPhone is, in my opinion, a portable media computer with phone functionality. The first real attempt to make a Tricorder prehaps, but the difference between an iPhone and the average smart phone is as great as the difference between the average smart phone and my moms cell phone without a camera.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    13. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Urm, but you can... or is my sarcasm detector faulty again?

    14. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the reasoning behind the SIM cards AT&T pushes?

    15. Re:LOL by DittoBox · · Score: 1

      As a mostly happy Pre owner, let me be brutally honest: the slider is weak and feels like it could break easily with enough pressure. It's very loose and exhibits was is not-so-fondly referred to as "The Oreo Effect."

      The OS can be a bit slow at times, but otherwise I'm extremely happy with it. Having been around a few friends with iPhones I was quite happy to switch between open apps to look something up in Google and then continue what I was working with. Much quicker.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    16. Re:LOL by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      Although the hardware is lackluster, WebOS is pretty nice. I really wouldn't call the Pre a disappointment at all.

      Yeah, I have an iPhone but the Pre is nice too (the one thing I dislike about the iPhone is no multitasking). I just didn't care for the little slide out keyboard, personally. With another release or two I think we'll start to see the Pre really shine, just like with the iPhone. It needs time for the App ecosystem to develop further as well, but that will happen with time.

      As others have mentioned, this "blank-killer!" mentality is sort of stupid. There is so much room for growth in the smart phone market as they become cheaper and people with normal cellphones switch to smart phones, there is plenty of room for multiple brands to co-exist, just as with normal cellphones.

    17. Re:LOL by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      It will take a while - at least a year or so - for the iPhone to be dethroned by any competing architecture. It will happen, for sure. Whether it's one year or ten years from now is up to Apple, their competitors, and shear luck.

      So you're saying that a new RAZR will kill the iPhone? Inconceivable!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    18. Re:LOL by dmorris68 · · Score: 1

      While I gripe about the iPhone's lack of background applications too, in all fairness the specific user experience you describe (switching between apps without losing your state) is entirely doable on an iPhone. It just has be properly developed, and not every app developer is doing so. The iPhone SDK supports complete state saving, and in fact recommends that all developers take advantage of it. So for all appearances it looks like you never exited the first app -- when you leave an app to do something else, then return, the first app is restored with everything exactly as you left it. Some iPhone apps do this well, others not so much, but it's more of an indictment of the developer than the hardware itself. Of course that doesn't work with a few apps, such as those that require a persistent/stateful data connection, but for most consumer oriented apps with stateless network requirements it works very well.

    19. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what would be REALLY nice? If I could just swap phones as needed during the course of the day.

      You can absolutely do this with Google voice. I do it all the time.

    20. Re:LOL by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I just realized I went off on a tangent and didn't finish up my point. The iPhone is not, in my opinion, a smart phone, and so to de-iThrone the iPhone it will take something that isn't a smart phone, but something new and never thought of before. My bet is on some slick hardware running Android, as it is the most flexible combination I can think of right now. Perhaps something from Arochs.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    21. Re:LOL by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I can't dispute you on usage, and not on why many people have bought the iPhone. Hell, I only bought a phone after I learned I would be able to get on the internet with one. The iPhone was the answer to everything I wanted with features like Google Maps. I and many other photographers I know also looked at the iPhone primarily because we could keep our photos on it and show them off. Now we have our portfolio everywhere we go to show people. While on the bus, I read the internet and watch video. The question is, is it the user or the capabilities of the phone? If regular smart phone users were given an iPhone, would their usage change or not? I'm currently waiting to see what happens to my friend who ditched his Sidekick (due to recent issues) for an iPhone. He always swore all he needed was the Sidekick, but so far he really seems to like the extra features on the iPhone.

    22. Re:LOL by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      They're mated to the phone via the phone's IME - this helps keep people from just "cloning" your sim card nowadays - otherwise, I'd probably do just that.

    23. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what would be REALLY nice? If I could just swap phones as needed during the course of the day. For example - walking the dogs, or shopping, or driving - take a flip-phone. At the office? Move my "identity" into a smartphone. This way I don't have to decide between something small that fits in a pocket and won't break if I drop it, and something that has more functionality.

      Yeah, it would be cool if there was just some sort of tiny chip in the phone that stored your information and authenticated you on the cell phone network, maybe some sort of tiny smartcard, and you could just like, swap that between phones in order to transfer the service back and forth. It would have information on it like your contacts' numbers, and some sort of international mobile subscriber identity that would identify you and your number uniquely.

      Wouldn't that be cool?

    24. Re:LOL by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with the zero sum mentality of the X-killer remarks. Absolute dominance of a market is not necessarily a good thing, nor is a limited number of strong competitors necessarily a bad thing for them.

      I used to work for a company who made a specialized line of "supercomputers". We had about half a dozen competitors when I started there. One by one, our rivals went belly-up. Each time that happened, the CEO would throw a party (free beer!) and hold a mock funeral for the deceased firm. This always made me feel uncomfortable, for I wasn't convinced that the death of a competitor was necessarily a good thing. Sure, it could mean that our machines were better, and we would now grab more market share. But what if the death of those competitors really signaled a bad market for this type of machine? In a declining market, the weakest die first, of course. But in the end, the market becomes so unprofitable that nobody survives.

      As you may have noticed if you follow my postings, I'm a bit of a pessimist. People tell me I'm "negative", and to "lighten up". For example, just after the conclusion of a project at this company, we were given the customary trophy T-shirts. The motto on these was, "Now anything is possible!". I remarked to some fellow employees that I found the implications of this motto disturbing: "anything" of necessity covers all the bad possibilities, as well as the good. They laughed at me, of course, over their free beer. The next day, the company announced the first of the layoffs that marked the beginning of the Death Spiral.

      Getting back to the smartphone market, I'd rather have half a dozen strong competitors than one successful "killer". I think that's a win-win scenario for consumers, because each competitor will try to improve their product to gain on their rivals, and we will have a choice of a variety of good devices, instead of only one. As long as the market remains healthy, all the really good designs should reap a profit, so it's good for the manufacturers too.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    25. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in the UK, and presumably the rest of Europe. Your phone might be locked to your network providers SIM's, but not a specific one, and with some providers, not at all. If in the USA you have a choice of no SIM or a SIM locked to a specific phone, it's about time you woke up and demanded a bit more from your mobile comms.

    26. Re:LOL by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      No you can't ... you can't have 2 phones w/o 2 subscriptions to wireless services. I want to be able to have just ONE subscription, and swap it between 2 phones. Nowadays, the SIM cards are mated to the cell phone IME (to deter cloning SIM ids) so I can't just swap the sim from one phone to another. Otherwise, I'd just buy another cell phone, and swap the card around as needed.

      I want to use different phones for different purposes. There's no way an iPhone (or pretty much any smart phone) would survive the physical abuse of 24/7.

    27. Re:LOL by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      You can't do that any more. The SIM cards are mated to the cell phone IME. This prevents people from cloning your SIM id and making phone calls on your dime with any old phone. It's now SIM+IME, or no call.

    28. Re:LOL by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Remember how people used to be able to clone your SIM id, then run up bills for $10k? Not any more.

    29. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, most expensive smartphones aren't invited when I'm bicycling. My old Nextel used to ride on my handlebars, on a bike mount. It popped off a few times over the years, but the only damage was some scratches to the plastic outer case.

    30. Re:LOL by warriorpostman · · Score: 1

      Amen. You just nailed some really important points there.

    31. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow...what a great idea. Maybe your could store this information on a removable card that would allow you to port your identity to whichever compatible mobile device you may require at the time. In fact, we could call it the "Subscriber Identity Module" or SIM card.

      Nah....that would never catch on. What carrier and/or hardware manufacturer would ever support such a crazy idea! ;)

    32. Re:LOL by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      All you mention is possible on any Nokia smartphone running S60. And has been for some time. So what's so special about the iPhone?

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    33. Re:LOL by omgarthas · · Score: 1

      ? I don't understand the last posts about SIMs being phone tied, because I have two phones (iPhone 3Gs and a Nokia N80) and one SIM card which I change between phones for weekends/trips etc etc

      What's the point I'm missing?

    34. Re:LOL by lennier · · Score: 1

      "You can't do that any more. The SIM cards are mated to the cell phone IME."

      Maybe not in America. Here in New Zealand, on the Vodafone network, we can swap SIMs like amorous kakapos.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    35. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't fit an iPhone in your pocket, maybe your shorts are too tight?

    36. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what would be REALLY nice? If I could just swap phones as needed during the course of the day.

      What, like swapping a SIM card in & out of a GSM phone? It takes me a whole 15 seconds to take the SIM card out of one of my phones and put it into another.

      Let me guess, you live in Canada or the USA and have a crappy CDMA phone which doesn't let you do that?

      Sucks to be you. I think the first GSM phone I ever saw was in 1995. Get with the program.

    37. Re:LOL by vakuona · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Probably all possible. But that is not the point. The iPhone makes is something you would actually want to do on a phone for the first time. I have had phones that had some capabilities that were not on the original iPhone. 3G, check. Web browser that allowed flash, check. Java environment, check. The iPhone was the first to make these things usable enough without tearing my hair out. it's not enough to make something possible on a phone. That's easy. Non geeks _require_ ease of use.

    38. Re:LOL by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      It's to help against fraud. People used to clone the sim id, and you'd get this huge bill. Now the network makes sure that the IME from the phone matches the IME on record for your sim. They're not trying to screw me over - I can move the sim to any phone I want - I just have to call them and change the info each time. That wold get old very fast.

    39. Re:LOL by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      It's not just about what fits in pockets. I've dropped my motorola flip-phone hundreds of times (a few times it's "exploded" into pieces). I just slide the parts back together, shake it a bit if it doesn't start right away, and it's good to go. Almost 4,800 hours on it, (v635) and I'll miss it when it finally dies, but there are times when I'd like to have the functionality of a smart phone - just that they'll never get it into the same form factor, and it'll always be more breakable.

    40. Re:LOL by Starteck81 · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you think that but it's not true. At work and on personal phones I have swapped sim cards between AT&T phones on a regular basis . They like to have the IMEI number so they know what kind of phone you have and can track it if stolen but that's about it.

      Also you can't clone newer SIM cards. They fixed the flaw that allowed you to do it in the past.

      --
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    41. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god I am using a Samsung Omnia. Now...through Opera Mobile. And poo to those who say that Verizon neuters their phones---especially with the new firmware upgrade from Samsung...

    42. Re:LOL by rinoid · · Score: 1
      Crikey someone has it out for me. My comment is darn benign how did it get to be a troll...

      Concentrate more on promoting than on demoting. The real goal here is to find the juicy good stuff and let others read it. Do not promote personal agendas. Do not let your opinions factor in. Try to be impartial about this. Simply disagreeing with a comment is not a valid reason to mark it down. Likewise, agreeing with a comment is not a valid reason to mark it up. The goal here is to share ideas. To sift through the haystack and find needles. And to keep the children who like to spam Slashdot in check.

    43. Re:LOL by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      The thing is, on the Pre, the other app doesn't stop when you switch to the other one. I can keep playing Pandora while I'm surfing the web. The multitasking is fantastic. Much better than task swapping. That's so OS9/8/7/...

    44. Re:LOL by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      It's called buying SIM-unlocked phones and swapping your SIM card between them.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    45. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a 5?!??! OK mods are broken.

    46. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever see those shorts the bike faggots wear?

    47. Re:LOL by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your insightful observations -- I think you pretty much summed up what Steve Jobs intended the iPhone to be.

    48. Re:LOL by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Well, I was JUST looking at getting the Omnia. It looks sharp, it has all the stuff I need, but then I got to Verizon's plans. To get ANY kind of included data plan, you have to opt for the $59 a month data plan and pay 25 cents a minute for voice, or you can get a voice plan and pay $1.99 a megabyte for any and all data? Or you can get a $149 everything plan.

      WTF?

      On Sprint, I get unlimited data and plenty of voice minutes on a Centro for about $50 month. I'd like to cut that down even further. One of my main uses for it Gmail via IMAP. It works brilliantly. I also use the web browser and Googlemaps too. Not a lot of data but enough to make me need it.

      Where the hell does Verizon get off charging such ridiculous amounts for this stuff? Oh I know, they do it because they can.

      I was mainly looking at Verizon because several friends are on that network and the minutes would be free for us to talk. But it would actually be cheaper for me to stay with Sprint with my current phone and plan AND get a whole second Verizon number and cheap phone without data than it would be to do everything on Verizon.

      This is crazy.

      But now I understand why somebody I know who has a Centro on Verizon does not have a data plan. It would cost him an arm and a leg to get the same level of service that I get on my Sprint Centro.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    49. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't anthropolize the iPhone. He doesn't like it when you do that!

    50. Re:LOL by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Obviously the iPhone isn't as hot to non-geeks as you think, as almost half the smartphone buyers still pick a Nokia.

      All your points are subjective as hell. Just because you like the iPhone doesn't make it the Second Coming, you know.

      And funnily enough, I see the most iPhone proselytisers on geek forums like Slashdot.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    51. Re:LOL by jjaimon · · Score: 1

      I carry 5-10 movies and music worth for over 10 days in my Nokia N96 when ever I travel (16GB in built + 16GB microSD). I've been using Nokia for over 10years now. Given a choice, I don't recommend Nokia to anyone. (and my friends tell me that most of the brands are same). Nokia's higher end phones fail miserably when it comes to quality and reliability. My phone crashes or reboots every other day. I've been playing around with my Wife's blackberry Bold for a while. I must say that my next phone will be Blackberry. I use everything (mail, IM (personal and company), GPS applications, movies/music, browsing ) that I do on my N96 and I didn't have to reboot the phone for over two weeks. It just works and responds quickly.

    52. Re:LOL by vakuona · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, because the 5800 is considered a smartphone, and buyers aren't exactly choosing between the iPhone and the 5800. Apple is competing at the very high end.

    53. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. But maybe the networks in the UK had a clue about what they were doing and don't need to either resort to tactics like that, or maybe they don't feel the need to use a scare tactic to convince you that it's for your own good, rather than theirs.

    54. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People used to clone the sim id"

      Citation needed.

      AFAIK, cloning a SIM card requires some pretty expensive hardware not usually found on the marketplace. That is the whole point behind smartcards, you know.

    55. Re:LOL by CrossChris · · Score: 1

      Nothing is so wrong with the iPhone
      The only two problems with the iPhone are that it's a very poor phone - it won't work in many areas where other phones work fine - and the Apps are ridiculously expensive (and often poorly written). When Apple address the fundamental phone problem with the device, I'll consider buying one.

    56. Re:LOL by shilly · · Score: 1

      Your first sentence is a non-sequitur -- the fact that many non-geeks buy Nokias doesn't mean that the iPhone isn't tremendously appealing to many non-geeks. It just means that it's not appealing to *every* non-geek.

      Your second assertion is overblown. Just because a judgement is subjective doesn't mean it should be ignored. Lots of people agree that the iphone is more usable than other phones. They even give clear reasons for it. Personally, I think it's pretty friggin clear -- for example, my three-year old son can happily open the photo app and flick through photos on my iPhone, having been shown once how to do it. He can't do it on my BlackBerry despite having been shown multiple times.

      And finally, here in the UK, most iPhone users I know are evangelical about their phones and I'm the only geek among them.

    57. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been doing all of this on my blackberry for some time now, including handing it over to people to take a look at a map before the iPhone even existed. Let's not pretend that it brought anything new to the table. All Apple did is put out a bunch of commercials to let people using old Motorola flips know that this was possible.

    58. Re:LOL by Tyr_7BE · · Score: 1

      "Obviously the iPhone isn't as hot to non-geeks as you think, as almost half the smartphone buyers still pick a Nokia."

      That's true. I remember talking to a couple one time, and the man (stocky, pudgy, eccentric, classic geek type) had just bought his fiancee (relatively normal, had a job in HR or something like that) an iPhone. She didn't seem to getting the emphasis he was putting on this phone.

      Her: "I just got a new phone"
      Him: "WHAT? Not just ANY phone! It's an iPhone!!!"
      Her: "Uhhh....yeah I guess so. It doesn't have any buttons, if that's what you mean."

      Most people don't give nearly the kind of a shit that people on tech forums give about smart phones.

    59. Re:LOL by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1
      The thing is, you don't get face in phone syndrome nearly as much with smart phones. They can do all sorts of stuff, but when I go out and see what people are doing with their phones I see smart phone users making a call and then putting their phone away, or sending an e-mail and putting their phone away. However I see iPhone users with face in palm for hours, and the phone stays out when they are done with it; on the table in front of them, like it will run away if they aren't looking at it.

      I see whole famlys at restaurants all berried in their iPhones, not looking up, not talking, just tapping and shoveling food. This happens at burger joints and at nice restaurants. I see poor and rich alike ignoring the world in favor of the iPhone. Other phones might be as good, form an objective standpoint, but other phones don't get the godlike status in peoples lives.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    60. Re:LOL by rinoid · · Score: 1

      Gee, I get marked a troll by trying to say things like "for the Blackberry to win the iPhone need not lose" .... here you go with a serious fishing pole. Point 1 -- perhaps in your area. I've traveled to enough cities in the US (and even USVI) and I can make calls and retrieve data just fine. Point 2 -- the apps are expensive?! Here: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=average+iphone+app+price

    61. Re:LOL by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      You know what would be REALLY nice? If I could just swap phones as needed during the course of the day. For example - walking the dogs, or shopping, or driving - take a flip-phone. At the office? Move my "identity" into a smartphone. This way I don't have to decide between something small that fits in a pocket and won't break if I drop it, and something that has more functionality.

      Gee, that's a great idea. They really should invent something like that... Let's call it a Stupid Internet Meme (SIM) card and make a ton of money...

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  3. Blackberry would be more compelling by swb · · Score: 4, Informative

    If there was more direct data in/out to the device, versus "securely" routing everything through RIM. That model seems like it makes sense in a 1999 way, but now it just makes it awkward to use them outside of a BES environment.

    The iPhone may be a closed platform, but at least data I/O isn't forced through Apple's servers.

    1. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by loftwyr · · Score: 1

      Neither is the Palm Pre's It syncs directly to the server you want (EAS and others)

    2. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Generally, the entire point of a blackberry is going to be the BES or BIS. Why on earth would you get one if you arent using those? It doesnt support activesync, even!

    3. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not on blackberry either - there are several ways to route your data, through Rims MDS is just one, you can also route through your carriers wap gateway as well as the carrier BIS. This is all down to the programmer.

    4. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by tweek · · Score: 1

      This is the biggest thing I've come to hate about my Storm (and the Storm 2). ANY push functionality has to go via RIM. The wifi is next to pointless on the Storm 2 the more that I look at it because I can't DO anything with it other than browse the web faster than over 3G. Oh Podtrapper will get my podcasts faster too. Whoop dee!

      I was strongly considering upgrade my Storm to the Storm 2 but I think I may hold off until Verizon gets the Wifi android phone next year. The whole BIS/BES + your PIN/physical phone hardware is who you are (versus me being who I am) is dated.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    5. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by tweek · · Score: 1

      That's the point though. What's the point of adding Wifi to the Storm 2? Nothing will really take advantage of it. Why does the BB *HAVE* to use a BIS in this day and age? I can SOMEWHAT understand BES but honestly with ActiveSync and EWS, there's no point to BES anymore.

      The biggest reason I like my Storm is the feedback I get from the screen while typing. But that's slowly becoming less of a reason for me to keep it.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    6. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by vilms · · Score: 0

      Nothing will really take advantage of WiFi? Except BES (and BIS)! Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you're saying here, but it's useful to have the handset switch between wireless networks and GPRS (or what have you) in the same way that the iPhone does between WiFi and 3G etc. But then I have a Curve (no 3G) and not a Storm, so maybe I am totally missing the point. Eh, it happens...
      Looks like a decent rev to the Storm. But, it would have to be, right? It's an Apple-shaped world...

    7. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by Space · · Score: 1

      The current rumors are that Verizon will have a Motorola Android phone on Oct 30. The latest rumored date is Dec 1.

      --
      I Don't Work Here
    8. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of the BIS/BES access is the end-to-end encryption, plus the ability to support multiple email accounts without loading all the extra libraries directly into the phone's OS. Plus, BIS/BES/SRP has an excellent compression algorithm which decreases the amount of bandwidth you're firing across the already overly-congested wireless networks. Why the hell does a phone need all that extra crap bundled into its OS, it just makes it more bloated, slower, and more easily exploited.

    9. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1
      I can SOMEWHAT understand BES but honestly with ActiveSync and EWS, there's no point to BES anymore.

      Does Activesync let your IT department control whether you can use your phone's camera, or reply to text messages? Does it let them require you to use a password on the device, or wipe its data remotely if it's lost or stolen?

      A lot of what BlackBerry has going for it is not consumer-oriented, but plays well with businesses. BlackBerry trying to compete with the iPhone seems a bit misguided, to me. But since iPhone is trying to move into the corporate space, maybe they feel they have to move into the consumer space.

    10. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by tweek · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that's not a wifi model. The last I read was that a WiFi android phone would be hitting verizon Q1 next year.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    11. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by lennier · · Score: 1

      "versus "securely" routing everything through RIM. That model seems like it makes sense in a 1999 way"

      It's my working assumption that RIM is basically a fully integrated member of the US intelligence community, and the fact that highly confidential business communications from major international corporations get routed through their servers - and that they PAY to do this! - is a really nice bonus which they have no intention of giving up. Notice whose phone Obama uses? And how easily it got NSA-modified?

      It also intrigues me that setting up Blackberry service on a SIM card requires special telco magic. It's not just running over ordinary Internet over cellphone data service, no. There's some magical Blackberry sauce right down to the cell. That suggests they're a company with a fair bit of clout.

      And I think about Crypto AG and wonder, 'Would Blackberry?'

      Let's just say that if I owned Blackberry, heck yeah I'd have that 'AES encryption' backdoored to the hilt and be vacuuming up every corporate email I could get my hands on. It's probably best for the world that I don't.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    12. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the point though. What's the point of adding Wifi to the Storm 2? Nothing will really take advantage of it.

      Really? There are 2 reasons: faster & cheaper.

      Here's the big one: having complete access to all the data you regularly do, with the same strength encryption, without paying ridiculously high international roaming rates. Or, if your domestic data rates are very high, avoid them entirely.

      Blackberry even once made a wifi-only blackberry - there was sufficient demand from campus users. Never was that popular though, mostly because cellphone networks dropped significantly in price.

    13. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't have to support a corporate user base. BES absolutely kicks ActiveSync's butt. MS are only just starting to get _some_ of the features RIM have had for years. But then again, my opinion of the whole blah vs. blah is horses for courses. The Blackberry is handsdown the best choice for a corporate manager on the move, but outside of that, unless you are way way obsessed with your email then maybe. Even then I probably wouldn't recommend it.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    14. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's my working assumption that RIM is basically a fully integrated member of the US intelligence community,

      RIM is a Canadian company, headquartered in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

      The blackberry platform has been audited from end-to-end and certified by a number of different agencies around the world, including many that aren't UKUSA countries, like Germany, Austria & Turkey.

      And you can run S/MIME & PGP on top of the native RIM AES encryption.

      and the fact that highly confidential business communications from major international corporations get routed through their servers

      With a Blackberry Enterprise Server, email gets routed through RIM's servers AFTER it gets encrypted by YOUR AES encryption keys. RIM does not have the AES keys to decrypt the messages.

      Can you cite any example, anywhere, of successful decryption of blackberry messages in transit? Any court case, anywhere, where the authorities produced decrypted messages from RIM? Of course, that doesn't prove anything, but it's a pretty good reputation.

      Notice whose phone Obama uses? And how easily it got NSA-modified?

      The US president gets whatever electronic toys he wants. Running additional message encryption on top of the native blackberry encryption isn't that hard.

      It also intrigues me that setting up Blackberry service on a SIM card requires special telco magic. It's not just running over ordinary Internet over cellphone data service, no.

      Correct. There is a lot of work on the back-end for data push to occur. That is, when a new message comes in to your mailbox, it gets pushed to the blackberry immediately without delay.

      All other mobile email services are pull services, in that the phone continuously checks for new email arrival, running up the data bill even when there is no email to send to the device. Some people have unlimited data plans, but most of us don't, so we like the push feature.

      And, with the wifi available on some blackberries, you can connect directly to your Blackberry Enterprise Server over an ipsec vpn without going through RIM at all.

    15. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I know Blackberries have historically had all sorts of broken ways of connecting to the outside world but I thought they had fixed it by now? On my unit I can enable connection to 'Company Network' (the business 'enterprise' stuff) but also to 'Carrier Internet'. Are you really saying that every time it makes an http request it goes through some giant Dr Evil server somewhere in Canada?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    16. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by stiller · · Score: 1

      The iPhone may be a closed platform, but at least data I/O isn't forced through Apple's servers.

      It is if you want live notifications: http://developer.apple.com/iphone/program/sdk/apns.html

    17. Re:Blackberry would be more compelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because while Active sync will give you control of wiping Email should the phone get "lost" or held captive by an ex employee. BES will allow me to completely lock the phone and plaster my companies name too deep in the phone to be wiped be joe user/thief.

  4. "feels just like clicking a button" by toppavak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was under the impression that the problem most users have with touchscreens isn't feedback after clicking, but before. I can touch-type on my blackberry, which lets me go a lot faster than on smooth touchscreens because I can tell my finger is on the right button by feel.

    1. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by Anonymusing · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am so used to the iPhone "keyboard" now that I can essentially touch-type. Sometimes I fat-finger it and hit the wrong key, but the correction feature is pretty good about that. I'm not saying the iPhone is better or worse than other smartphones; merely, it's what I have now, and the typing does not feel much different than when I had a Blackberry.

      FWIW, I type roughly 85 words a minute on a full-size keyboard (with 95% accuracy).

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    2. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by bluesky74656 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think there's something to the fact that the iPhone's auto-correction is more suited to a touchscreen than the Blackberry's. I've found that while the Blackberry's spell-check is very good for people who sometimes make spelling errors, the iPhone's is much better about fixing fat-finger syndrome.

      I would almost be tempted to say that the iPhone's spell-check puts more weight on where keys are located, while the Blackberry's is more of a straight dictionary search

      --
      This page was generated by a Flock of Attack Kittens for you.
    3. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      I agree...the iPhone keypad has always been good for me. But I understand people who can type while walking or looking elsewhere...it's tough to do on a flat screen where you can't feel the keys. When I'm driving and texting, I always make certain to keep my eyes fixed firmly on the iPhone screen, because the auto-correct is good, but why take the risk your email might have a misspelled word? (sar-cas-m)

    4. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Wow, you can type on the iPhone's screen as if you had tactile feedback, without looking at it? Impressive.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      Consider it "virtual touch-typing" -- I know where the keys are, relative to my hands' position on the device, so I can just type without looking. Similar to what I do on a physical keyboard.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    6. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      "Don't drink and drive. You might hit a bump and spill your drink."

      But, about the iPhone keyboard: my point is that I'm familiar enough with its layout that I can type without looking at it, as long as I'm holding the thing in the proper way.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    7. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      would almost be tempted to say that the iPhone's spell-check puts more weight on where keys are located, while the Blackberry's is more of a straight dictionary search

      I think that's true -- probably one of the better insights of Apple's approach. This may explain why there are times I misspell a word out of ignorance, and it won't correct it, because it's not due to incorrect keystrikes.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    8. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by jittles · · Score: 1

      Really? I feel like a clumsy oaf on my iphone. I can touch type but probably half the words will come out completely wrong. I'm a pretty tall person though so my finger tips are pretty big. Sometimes I accidentally touch the "send" button while my finger is on the 'O' or 'P' key. The iPhone keyboard drives me insane.

    9. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by nscheffey · · Score: 1
      The iPhone dictionary definitely considers key groupings when suggesting corrections. It also helps to prevent mistyping by making the "landing areas" for keys larger based on predictive text analysis:

      Although you don’t see it with your eyes, the sizes of the keys on the iPhone keyboard are changing all the time. That is, the software enlarges the “landing area” of certain keys, based on probability. For example, supposed you type “tim.” Now, the iPhone knows that no word in the language begins timw or timr—and so, invisibly, it enlarges the “landing area” of the E key, which greatly diminishes your chances of making a typo on that last letter.

      from http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/06/27/iphone-keyboard-secrets/

    10. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by kurthr · · Score: 1

      Yeah... how else am I supposed to SMS while driving? ;^)

    11. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'd like to see what they keys actually look like when resized. It would surely give me a headache after a while, but it'd be a neat trick nonetheless. Maybe someone can implement that for Android?

    12. Re:"feels just like clicking a button" by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      That actually kind of is the case for me. Since I typically hold the iPhone in my right hand in the vertical orientation, my body has learned where the virtual keys are relative to the edges of the device. It does usually take a quick glance to be comfortable with my position, but in a pinch, I've become fairly accurate even blind. That being said, it still does require a proof-read to make sure the auto-correct didn't do something stupid like "correct" "its" to "it's" in the wrong situation, or foul up some other word. But yeah, it's the standardized location of the virtual keys with respect to the device that you learn the feel of, not the (non-existent) feel of keys themselves, obviously.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  5. "Developers, Developers, Developers..." by nweaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To quote MonkeyBoy, err, Steve Ballmer...

    This is why the iPhone has become so entrenched, it has the developers. Its not just a matter of building hardware that matches Apple, you now have to build an ecology to match Apple.

    Which is very hard: . Look at the MP3 player market. People have made plenty of players better than the iPod-of-the-time, but Apple has the ecology annd is now hard to displace.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, to quote someone else, "hardware is useless without software". I'm too lazy to even search the author of this one.

    2. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by Canazza · · Score: 1

      Funilly enough, no-one I know has an iPod, or any other Apple-based MP3 Player. I use my phone (A non-smart phone too) as an MP3 player, as do most of my friends. Of those that do have an MP3 Player, they've got ones of a variety of brands. It's quite possible that Apples market-share is over-inflated in some peoples minds, either that or it's under-inflated in my mind.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    3. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by PocariSweat1991 · · Score: 0

      The iPhone is also enticing for developers because you only have to develop for AT&T's network and its restrictions.

      When you develop an application for the BlackBerry, you could find that a feature that works on AT&T doesn't work on Verizon, or behaving entirely differently on T-Mobile or Sprint.

    4. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      To quote MonkeyBoy, err, Steve Ballmer...

      This is why the iPhone has become so entrenched, it has the developers. Its not just a matter of building hardware that matches Apple, you now have to build an ecology to match Apple.

      Also why it was absolutely brilliant to not allow flash, java, etc programming on the iPhone. All those developers now have skills which translate more or less easily to mac development.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    5. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible that Apples market-share is over-inflated in some peoples minds, either that or it's under-inflated in my mind.

      Since market studies show it as 73% of the music player market, it may well be the latter. Of course that does not count cell phone sales. Apple sells about 10 million ipods a quarter and there are about 30 million cell phone sales, a subset of which are music players and about 4 million of which are iPhones. So if we combine the markets, Apple sells about 14 million of the 43 million combined phone and music player market. So (roughly) better than 1 in 4 music playing devices in use is an Apple device. If you have more than 4 friends, you're bucking the curve.

    6. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by mafian911 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree completely. To me, the blackberry is a bit of a relic. They can dress up blackberry's with new tech and a fancy new OS, but I have to say, the developer experience remains horrible. I'm surprised that Blackberry still has the reputation it has, to be honest. They may have been the first "cool" smartphone, but they can't ride that wave forever. If they want to continue to be a player in the smartphone market, they may need to reconsider their content strategy. I suppose they can survive by holding their place as the "corporate phone". Corporations don't need content for their employees. They don't need data plans. They may be able to hang on in the "boring" smartphone space for a while, no doubt... Windows Mobile will be there only competitor there. As for unseating iPhone... no chance. Not with their content model. It won't touch Android either, in my opinion.

    7. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was actually the reason I decided to buy an iPhone instead of a Palm.

      I'm generally very dismissive of products where you pay a 20% premium just for a logo stamp. The iPhone even has weaker features than a number of competitors (no memory card, lower screen resolution, poor battery), but the simple fact is, once a couple of million fanboys buy it, the app ecology is a valuable feature in itself.

    8. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      Funilly enough, no-one I know has an iPod, or any other Apple-based MP3 Player.

      Most of the people I know have an iPod of some form of another, from the old Nano up to the new iTouch. Personally, I have an old-school 20 gig iPod with the scrollwheel and black/white screen that lives in my car serving as a way to feed my stereo with all my music. I also have an iPhone that I'll keep a few favorite albums on, but mostly I use it to podcast these days while at work.

    9. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh yeah, Apple is so entrenched in the smartphone market they're almost a monopoly!!11!!

      data

      --

      Liberty.

    10. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by grub · · Score: 1


      The iPhone is also enticing for developers because you only have to develop for AT&T's network and its restrictions.

      Umm.. so no one develops for the millions of iPhone/iPod touch users outside the US and AT&T? Wonder how all this cool software got on mine as I live in Canada...

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    11. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      strangely enough, no-one I know, doesn't have goats, land, guns, and crops.

      what's an ipod?

    12. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funilly enough, no-one I know has an iPod, or any other Apple-based MP3 Player.

      OMG. Leave the basement already!

    13. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Insert "In Soviet Russia" joke here]

    14. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by indiechild · · Score: 1

      You probably hang out with a different (more tech-oriented?) crowd. Most of my friends now have iPods/iPhones as their primary portable music players, and more and more are becoming Mac converts. The Mac users tend to be programmers, web developers or photographers, but I was quite surprised to learn that a few of my finance friends were Mac users as well.

    15. Re:"Developers, Developers, Developers..." by indiechild · · Score: 1

      The reason why people buy iPods is because Apple offer an integrated experience. You're not just buying an iPod, you're buying into iTunes and the iTunes music store. This doesn't appeal to a lot of techie types but it works really well for everyday users. Until other manufacturers offer the same integrated experience, Apple isn't going to be dethroned.

  6. No Way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm never buying another Blackberry.

    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again.

    1. Re:No Way... by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 1

      Amen. I bought the Storm. What a complete piece of shit. Sluggish OS (in a touch screen OS, absolutely intolerable), graphical glitches abound... it just sucks.

    2. Re:No Way... by seanmeister · · Score: 1

      Amen. I bought the Storm. What a complete piece of shit. Sluggish OS (in a touch screen OS, absolutely intolerable), graphical glitches abound... it just sucks.

      Agreed... I bought the original Storm when it was released last year, It was my first BlackBerry device, and after struggling with the Storm for a few days, I ran away screaming back to my dumbphone. The Storm hardware and software were definitely not ready for prime time.

      I recently decided to give BlackBerry another day in court and am currently using a Curve 8330... I like it quite a lot and am considering the Storm 2 as my next upgrade, but I'll definitely do some hands-on testing before I actually purchase it.

    3. Re:No Way... by clandonald · · Score: 0

      Rim took a lesson from MS with how the memory is managed. It sucks. At first I thought MS was to blame for Media player crashing all the time then I realized it was a memory issue. RIM needs to create a swap partition either using the remainder of the onboard memory or on the SD card. But overall the Storm isn't to bad of a phone if you don't mind rebooting like it's Win 98.

      --
      The force is not with you and you are not a jedi.
  7. You will have to pry my clicking screen by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    From my cold dead hands! I love my Storm 1.

    Oh, and might I add: You damn, dirty apes!

    1. Re:You will have to pry my clicking screen by epiphani · · Score: 1

      Er, the clicking screen hasn't gone away. It just got a whole lot better.

      --
      .
    2. Re:You will have to pry my clicking screen by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Ah so you're the one!

  8. Palm Pre by bbroerman · · Score: 2, Informative

    To me, the only disappointment in the Palm Pre is SPRINT!

    --
    Logic is the beginning of reason, not the end of it.
    1. Re:Palm Pre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? It could be worse: it could be on AT&T.

    2. Re:Palm Pre by Orbijx · · Score: 1

      I've used worse carriers.

      See: MetroPCS, AT&T.

      Sprint may not be the best, but as long as you don't have to talk to them, the service is rather good. Only dropped calls I get are from MetroPCS users ("Hello, hello, hello" is not just their catchphrase, but the sound of their users trying to see if anyone's still on the line).

      I do know and understand that not everyone gets good coverage on Sprint, and can only speak from my personal experiences, but I'm happy the Pre is at least offered on Sprint. Too many half-decent or better phones aren't (see: G1).

      --
      One of these days, I am going to flip out. When I flip out, I'll be back in five minutes.
    3. Re:Palm Pre by DittoBox · · Score: 1

      They may not have a huge network, but where I'm at it's identical to my old Verizon outfit. In fact, I'd argue that since I'm paying just a little over 50USD for unlimited data, unlimited mobile-to-mobile (regardless of carrier), unlimited text messages and 200% more minutes I'm doing pretty damn good.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    4. Re:Palm Pre by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      What is your disappointment?

      With the data plan, you get free roaming (which uses Verizon's network).

      You get free cell to cell calls on any network.

      You can buy a base plan with unlimited data/MMS/text messaging and 450 min of talk/month to land lines and unlimited to cells for $69.99

      Their network isn't over saturated like AT&T's.

      You get free turn-by-turn navigation (most other carriers charge extra for that).

      I love my Pre and have been happy with Sprint so far.

  9. The Disappointment of the Palm Pre by brennanw · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... I know exactly what you're talking about! After buying my Pre, I found that:

      - I didn't immediately lose weight
      - I still had to wear glasses
      - the damage to my hearing (after 20 years of listening to good music) wasn't repaired
      - my credit limit wasn't raised, and my day-to-day living expenses weren't reduced

    Sure, overall it's a great phone, as far as portable phones that store important information, take pictures, play music and access the internet go, but those four points stick in my craw. Fail!

    --
    Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
    1. Re:The Disappointment of the Palm Pre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it turn you into a sunken-eyed extremely creepy potential crack-whore?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSMj5RoYdEI

    2. Re:The Disappointment of the Palm Pre by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yea my wife feels the same. The Pre is a great phone but it didn't bring world peace or humility to Steve or Steve!

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:The Disappointment of the Palm Pre by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      You should have gotten an iPod so there would be an app for all that.

    4. Re:The Disappointment of the Palm Pre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my pre. I've Hacked it to allow wifi tethering, and now I'm buying a Touch. All the functionality of an Iphone, value of Sprint's plan, and none of the horrible AT&T contract and awful service.

    5. Re:The Disappointment of the Palm Pre by carpe_noctem · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      the damage to my hearing (after 20 years of listening to good music) wasn't repaired

      I hate to break it to you, but Rush sucks. It appears that your hearing loss has been in vain.

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  10. If they want the storm2 to be more successful... by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... they need to release it on a more relevant network. Just because Verizon claims to have the most subscribers in the US doesn't mean its a relevant market for blackberry phones. In particular the fact that Verizon is still clinging to old network technology makes it a bit of a burden for phone deployment in corporate environments. GSM networks are head and shoulders above the Verizon network in speed of phone deployment.

    If an employee drops their phone and needs to replace it ASAP, someone in the company can pull the SIM card, put it into a new phone, and the employee is back to work with minimal downtime - unless you're on a non-GSM carrier in which case you need to have the magic store deactivate the old phone, sell you a new phone, activate it, etc...

    If RIM doesn't realize that their terrible choice of carrier (on an exclusive deal no less) was a big part of the lack of success in the first generation storm, then they need to have their heads examined. Release the new phone on a modern GSM network and we'll see how it really fares.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  11. As a former Storm owner by m0s3m8n · · Score: 3, Informative

    As a former Storm owner I think RIM has gone a long way to fixing several of the idiotic design choices (compromises) in the Storm Mk1. I never had a problem with the click screen after applying some recommended fixes. I hope the build quality had been improved as I went through 4 phones before giving up. Probably the biggest issue I had with the phone (as a smartphone) was the terrible memory management. Blackberry, while they advertize several gigs of internal storage, use a small dedicated memory pool for the OS, program storage, and data (email) storage. On the original that was 128 MB. Just turning the phone on dropped that to 50 MB usable and after loading several apps, it would drop to 10-20. At that level the phone became very sluggish. And the OS have a propensity to leak memory so that as the day went on your usable memory level would continue to fall to the point where you had to pull the battery to reset the phone.

    --
    Conservative, mod down for violating /. political norms.
    1. Re:As a former Storm owner by bluesky74656 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the OS have a propensity to leak memory so that as the day went on your usable memory level would continue to fall to the point where you had to pull the battery to reset the phone.

      My Storm seems to have a feature that automatically resets the phone at random intervals. It handily solves that problem, but can be annoying when you're actually trying to do something with it.

      Seriously, though, the sluggishness of the phone is a big drawback. If it could keep up with how fast I type and not randomly reset I would be very happy with it.

      --
      This page was generated by a Flock of Attack Kittens for you.
    2. Re:As a former Storm owner by tweek · · Score: 1

      That's the thing I never understood. There was NOTHING preventing RIM from putting more than the measly 128M memory pool in there. It was a cheap shitty move. Even bumping up to 1GB may not solve the problems...just push out the time needed to reboot. RIM was dragged kicking and screaming out of the pager market and the hardware occasionally shows that.

      We'll see. I've not loaded OS5 on my current storm yet so I have no idea how much better or worse the memory management is.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  12. try before you buy! by Briden · · Score: 1

    I almost bought the storm, but i went to the store and tried it out and didn't like the touch screen. So i bought the blackberry BOLD 9000, and I am very happy with it.

  13. New Storm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever the outcome, ANYTHING that doesn't use itunes to sync = a win for me!

  14. The important question... by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does it support IMAP/POP/SMTP natively or are you still stuck with the pile-of-crap BIS/BES services for email (or using Web interfaces or third party java apps)?

    I won't even consider looking at this model for the rest of our small (16) corporate team unless we can use our own (postfix-based) mail servers. The fact that we have to hand over our email account usernames and passwords AND pay just so the Vodafone BIS server can pick up mail and kindly pass it on to the Blackberries (and vice versa) is simply crap, a security risk and a PITA if a user changes their password via our mail server's Web interface.

    That is why I have an HTC Rhodium (Touch Pro 2)!

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:The important question... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just because BES doesnt support your environment doesnt make it a piece of crap. BIS isnt really meant to be a real solution for businesses anyways. Stop using the wrong product for the wrong thing. Get an exchange / domino / groupwise server and BES, or stop complaining that they dont work properly.

    2. Re:The important question... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Don't you find it interesting that all the open source proponents here turn tail and defend RIM when it suits their purpose?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:The important question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it support IMAP/POP/SMTP natively or are you still stuck with the pile-of-crap BIS/BES services for email (or using Web interfaces or third party java apps)?

      I disagree with your assessment that BES is crap, but you are correct, blackberries work only with BIS/BES service. For those who don't know, BIS is a hosted IMAP/POP/SMTP service run by RIM. BES (blackberry enterprise server) is a server that you install and connect to your email server.

      The blackberry push email platform is designed to work with a hosted service, either you run it in-house with a BES, or RIM runs it for you with BIS.

      That's the way it is. Data push cannot occur without support on the server end. Regular cellphone data connections won't do push data - they have to continuously poll for new messages, running up the data bill even if no messages are sent. While some people have unlimited data plans, many of us don't, so we like push data.

      I won't even consider looking at this model for the rest of our small (16) corporate team unless we can use our own (postfix-based) mail servers. The fact that we have to hand over our email account usernames and passwords AND pay just so the Vodafone BIS server can pick up mail and kindly pass it on to the Blackberries (and vice versa) is simply crap, a security risk and a PITA if a user changes their password via our mail server's Web interface.

      Well, you need to get a BES (blackberry enterprise server) to get full use of the blackberry platform. With a BES, you keep all your passwords and all your encryption keys. No one else has the keys & passwords, not RIM, not the cellphone carrier.

      BES works with Lotus Notes, Novell Groupwise, and Microsoft Exchange. That's the way it is. If that doesn't fit into your company for whatever reason, then you get the blackberry BIS experience that you describe.

      Given your small size, it may be hard to justify the cost of a BES & Notes/Groupwise/Exchange. There is BES-lite product called BPS which is much cheaper & simpler than a full BES, but still provides most features.

  15. Rolling disappointment by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > After the disappointment of the Palm Pre, could this be the smartphone to beat?

    Does everyone already forget that the Pre was going to be the one to beat after the disappointment of the Storm? Clearly the Pre 2 will be the one to beat after the disappointment of the

    There's nothing wrong with the Pre, and the "disappointment" has little to do with the phone. The disappointment is that it didn't stop the iPhone from clobbering them in the market in spite of the hue and cry from the haters and fanbois alike. If you define your disappointment by the lack of relative sales, then my guess is that this is going to be a disappointment too.

    It's not about the phone, it's about what you can get onto the phone quickly and easily. Anyone that's Midomi'd a song while walking past a bar patio and then instantly downloaded it from iTunes knows what I mean. Consumers get this, and it seems only the self-declared "experts" who are missing this forest.

    Maury

  16. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by cabjf · · Score: 1

    The Storm doesn't seem to be a business centric phone like the rest of the Blackberries. So having it on a carrier without SIM cards isn't that big of an issue. Besides, there are probably plenty of people on the Verizon network (most subscribers in the US, like you said) just waiting for a decent smartphone to be available on Verizon's network. It really doesn't sound that complicated on a non-GSM carrier. You still need to obtain a new phone from somewhere, even if you have a SIM card.

  17. Glad I don't own Apple stock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smart phone to beat? This can mean only one thing... Apple went out of business!

  18. Clarification by NiteShaed · · Score: 1, Informative

    When I say above "being able to connect to the wireless network at my office with it (WPA Enterprise), which nobody's managed to do yet with an iPhone/iPod Touch", I'm talking about a specific network (at my office), not all WPA Enterprise networks. For whatever reason, a Pre can connect with no problem, but iPhones/iPod Touches do not. Oddly, OSX laptops connect just fine as well, so I was surprised when other Apple products had trouble.

    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    1. Re:Clarification by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      I can second that. We have a Zoom Wireless G Router in my office that any iPhone/Touch absolutely refuses to connect to. I've had absolutely no problems connecting with a Motorola Q, HTC PPC6800, HTC Touch Pro, or Treo (Don't remember which model). We've tried different strengths of encryption (included "none") and the iPhones just won't connect to it. We brought in a Linksys Wireless Router, they work just fine. I have no idea what the deal is.

  19. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by seanmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can bash VZW's CDMA network all you want, but as long as they keep giving me 4 bars of EVDO goodness out here in the desert in rural southwestern New Mexico, they'll get nothing but love from me :)

  20. 2 GB of Storage = Fail by PerfectionLost · · Score: 1

    2 GB of Storage = Fail. 'nuff said.

    1. Re:2 GB of Storage = Fail by m0s3m8n · · Score: 1

      That is the dedicated internal flash storage. You can add a micro SD for much more. BUT, the actually phone OS, data, and programs are stored and run in a dedicated 256MB ram. And that is double of the original.

      --
      Conservative, mod down for violating /. political norms.
    2. Re:2 GB of Storage = Fail by PerfectionLost · · Score: 1

      And the low end iPhone (aka phone to beat) ships with 8 gigs, and sells for $100 USD. The high end offers much more.

    3. Re:2 GB of Storage = Fail by magpie · · Score: 1

      2 GB on board, you can how ever slap a 16 GB micro SD card into it and your sorted. Heck if that's not enough just get a few and switch them if you want.

    4. Re:2 GB of Storage = Fail by tweek · · Score: 1

      You don't understand how the BB Storm is designed.

      The Storm2 ships with three "memory" areas (yes I'm using memory incorrectly):
      256MB OS pool
      1GB Internal Storage
      16GB External Storage (microsd)

      The 256MB is where the OS runs, applications run and messages are stored. The original storm had 128MB. It would take 50MB just after powering on. In this case, the Storm2 is just delaying the problem instead of fixing it. We'll have to see how much better memory management is in OS5.

      The 1GB internal storage is where pictures and songs and ringtones and such are stored by default. You can change this.

      The 16GB microsd is the data storage area.

      The biggest problem that RIM has is they have too many fucking devices. In the interest of developer sanity, they can't do cool shit like move the message store outside the 256MB area to the microsd because that might not work on another model that doesn't have a microsd slot.

      Having said that, the storm2 from a data storage perspective is on par with the iphone.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    5. Re:2 GB of Storage = Fail by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      And Verizon sells the previous phone (storm 1) with a FREE 8GB card, bringing the usable device space to 9GB. Suck on that, Apple. That, and 16GB or even 32GB microSD cards aren't hard to come by. The upside is you aren't stuck with a fixed amount of memory (as in the case of the iPhone). But no one would ever need more than 8GB anyway, right?

  21. Uh, no. by jht · · Score: 1

    The Storm may be a great Blackberry, but that doesn't make it the smartphone to beat. That remains the iPhone until proven otherwise.

    Individual phones may have great features (The Pre has its relatively unrestricted development environment and multitasking, Blackberries have the BES for corporate management, etc., and Android has whatever the hell Android has), but until you take the full ecosystem that Apple's spawned and replicate most of it elsewhere they're still the king of the hill.

    It's not that Apple invented the smartphone per se (I still remember my old Treo 650 that usually worked, for instance, and my 1st generation Blackberry I used at my old job), but the current popular definition of a smartphone is pretty much "has a touchscreen, runs bajillions of apps, is shiny and pretty, and can be my media center".

    AKA iPhone. They created the definition that the average person is using nowadays, they were the first mover, and their app store has created a huge platform lock-in.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:Uh, no. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Android has Google.

      Is that better than RIM? wow. Good question.

      But the pushback against using RIM for your corporate services is interesting.

      Imagine you're actually using your 'smartphone' for business. With BlackBerry and Google, you get backup of contacts, calendar, email, as well as Web access with Google. Reasonably good availability worldwide, certainly competitive with all but the very best corporate IT efforts.

      With Apple?

      Palm Pre is still too new to know how reliable it is.

      Those Sidekick users who run their business on their phone now know how risky that really is. Suitable for the 18 Twitter crowd, I suppose.

      Calling out RIM as a less-than-excellent choice for business phones is missing the mark, IMHO. If I had to depend on my phone for business, it would NOT be a Pre, iPhone, Sidekick, any WinMo model, or my G1. It would be a Curve or Bold, probably the Curve or maybe a similar model. They do get it done.

      My G1 is too 'Android' for business reliance. But great fun as a personal phone - updates, wipes, tomfoolery with apps, way fun. I'm gonna root it, right after I study the process and set aside a Saturday afternoon. It really isn;t worth it, except for a curiosity jaunt.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Uh, no. by ianare · · Score: 1

      "has a touchscreen, runs bajillions of apps, is shiny and pretty, and can be my media center". AKA iPhone.

      No, there is another. Or rather, there will be another very soon : the nokia N900. Oh, and as an extra bonus, no vendor lock-in !

    3. Re:Uh, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iphone backs up everything you list when it syncs. It will do it over the air as well if you have a MobileMe account.

      Except for 'web access with google', which not sure if want.

    4. Re:Uh, no. by taylortbb · · Score: 1

      But there's the thing, MobileMe. AFAIK there is no enterprise equivalent to MobileMe where it can be centrally managed. Also, two-way push sync with your e-mail server is the whole point of BES. It syncs just about everything on your phone with the equivalent Outlook (or whatever) features. It also provides end to end AES encryption, compared to the iPhone situation where the iPhone was reporting encryption when there wasn't any. That has rightfully so shaken the faith of a lot of security-minded people in the iPhone.

  22. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Apparently you're not from the midwest. The Blackberry smartphones have been incredibly popular out here in Verizonland - if, for no other reason, than there are no other smartphones worth half a damn available.

    With Verizon bandwidth fees and quality of service/bandwidth throughput, you're not going to be able to use an iPhone or WinMo phone anyway...

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  23. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If an employee drops their phone and needs to replace it ASAP, someone in the company can pull the SIM card, put it into a new phone, and the employee is back to work with minimal downtime - unless you're on a non-GSM carrier in which case you need to have the magic store deactivate the old phone, sell you a new phone, activate it, etc...

    Or...if you're seriously that reliant on RIM phones, you could keep several extra on hand, and you can activate them yourself using Verizon's support website.

    My Razr v3M broke last year. I had still kept my old phone from before my upgrade. I just went to the support website and deactivated my phone myself and activated my old one. Easy peasy.

  24. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need to visit the store to switch a phone. First you'll need a spare phone handy to do the swap (GSM or Verizon). If you have a spare phone then all you need to do is go online and log into your account, switch the phone out in your account and magically the replacement phone is now activated.

    I've done this several times on Verizon and it works.

  25. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    This is a relevant complaint, except in the case of Verizon it takes a 90 second phone call to support (or use of an automated tool) in order to change phones. As long as the new phone is compatible with the network, they will switch it over no questions asked. Your hyperbole about how much easier this is to accomplish with a GSM SIM card is pretty, well, hyperbolic. You may have had a point if you told us that contact lists in non-SIM enabled phones are harder to transfer, but again there are several tools thanks to Verizon that make it an easy task. That being said, even if it were a hassle to switch devices when one broke, I still would never consider signing with ATT, Tmobile, or Sprint. Their networks, in EVERY area I have traveled in the past few years, have been noticeably inferior to Verizon's. I can't even remember the number of times I have had to say "here, use my phone, it works here" when traveling. Too many, to be certain.

  26. On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by edmicman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Serious question - I'm a dumbphone user finally wanting to move to a smartphone, and in the next couple of months. I have to (read: want to) stay on Verizon, and don't want a Windows Mobile phone. I've decided on either the Storm2 or the upcoming Android phones, but am not sure which to go with.

    Essentially what I want is a phone that I can email/message/facebook/twitter/do tasks/organize my life with. I want to be able to browse the web, but I don't see myself spending lots of time doing that; usually I see it just looking up something quick. I also don't see myself as a big apps/games user, but then again having never had that experience I don't know - maybe I would if the opportunity were there.

    From what I can tell, my impressions are:
    BB pros:
    better build quality
    good (best?) messaging/email ability (I don't really know, but figured that was their background so it must be very good?)
    relatively proven track record for phones like this

    BB cons:
    lack of webkit browser (aren't they supposed to be working on this? when? would the S2 get it eventually?)
    generally "closed" system
    I have the perception there's less consumer app development for BB than with other platforms

    Android pros:
    webkit browser
    open system
    app development seems to have more potential, especially with consumer apps

    Android cons:
    how is the messaging? Does it work well?
    still young...although that doesn't bother me that much
    from what I have seen of the VZW leaks, the form factors don't seem as nice as the BB.

    Having experience with neither, I don't really know if I have a preference between hard or soft keyboards.

    Thoughts or advice?

    1. Re:On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by Voyager529 · · Score: 2, Informative

      despite the HTC Touch Pro2 running WinMo, you won't know it unless you intentionally go there. VZW already has a Winmo 6.5 update, and the XDA chefs are great as always. I had an older WinMo phone and I absolutely, unquestionably understand your aversion to the platform. But unless your concerns are philosophical (i.e. ABM), go give it a look. Seriously. I had an iPhone and couldn't believe I had tortured myself with one for as long as I had. A co-worker of mine owned a Curve and a Storm. He played with mine for all of 90 seconds and said "does Verizon have it?" (I've got the T-Mo version). He had one the next week and couldn't be happier.

      And I'm not employed by any company involved, nor am I a $PLATFORM fanboi. The TP2 is simply the best phone that I have ever owned.

    2. Re:On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I think you get the pros and cons wrong.
      The new Android phones for VZW are from Motorola. Motorola over all builds really good handsets that have been dull as dirt. They tend to have great build quality and sound quality. This shoals hopefully will live up to that standard.
      From what I have seen messaging on the Android is very good.
      Age? The BB is older than dirt and frankly is falling behind.

      The Blackberry is great for exchange email. If you live and die by email then the blackberry should be high on your list.
      If you want cool apps and a good browser and or if you live and die by GMail than take a hard look at Android.

      I have a harder problem. Do I get an HTC Hero or wait for the Samsung Moment?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      BB - been out in the wild, I see lots of users every day, it's a proven and reliable system. And frankly I hear very few complaints from blackberry users. (other than the Pearl & original storm).

      Android - I have yet to see someone with one in the wild. Granted I live in an area not well serviced by T-Mobile, but the fact remains, I have yet to see ONE in use in the wild.

      I've seen more Pre's than I have Android based phones. I know there are more on the way, but with Verizon, I can't help but thinking "Now with Verizon Android Vcast. It's android, only with half the features disabled and runs three times as slow".

      I'm beginning to think that Android is going to become the desktop linux of the cell phone world. We'll hear about it being the new "year of the android", but meanwhile most people will continue to go out and buy iPhones. Especially if the iPhone 4G operates on multiple carriers.

      (Yes I have an iPhone and love the phone. Not so much in love with ATT)

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    4. Re:On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by Tyr_7BE · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that there were *many* more apps available for Blackberry than Android.

    5. Re:On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I've seen more Pre's than I have Android based phones.

      I think it's down to your living where there's poor T-Mobile coverage. I have a bunch of friends with Android phones, but I haven't seen a single Pre.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    6. Re:On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by jomcty · · Score: 1

      I would look at a BlackBerry Tour on VZW.

      I moved to T-Mobile from VZW to get a BlackBerry 8900 and I'm very pleased with the phone (my first smartphone) and the lower prices on T-Mobile. I love the fact that I don't have to worry about charging mid-day and can go two days easy w/o charging. The phone have good Google support with BB-specific programs for syncing, Gmail, Search, GTalk, GVoice, etc.

      The BB may not be shiny and flashy like a iphone but it is a solid communications device with great third-party support.

    7. Re:On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Good point - actually, my current clamshell is a Motorola, and I've never had anything but good luck and great sound quality from them. Maybe it's more an out of site out of mind thing, there just hasn't been anything from Motorola that interested me in a long time.

      I'm definitely looking forward to what they're offering for Verizon, I just wish they'd hurry up.

      One more thing I forgot to list...how is the battery life with these? I'm under the impression the current crop of Android phones eat through batteries, whereas the BBs have usually been better about that?

    8. Re:On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by amirulbahr · · Score: 1

      You can download the Android SDK run the emulator and see it in action. Of course the emulator won't have apps like Market and you won't be able to make calls.

      As for messaging, it uses a very intuitive conversation oriented layout. My phone has a physical keyboard, but even so I find myself using the on-screen keyboard more and more these days.

      Of course, the big plus on the Android side is the growing developer community. It is extremely developer friendly as a platform and as a market-place. It is also nice to know that I can buy a phone from another manufacturer and keep the same software and not need to worry about synchronising contacts or calendar.

    9. Re:On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well the Shoal isn't out yet so who knows about the battery life. The HTC that is coming to Verizon isn't going to be the Hero after all but most people think it is going to be very Hero like. They claim 5 hours of talk time.
      All smart phones eat batteries faster than feature phones. You need to get used to plugging them in pretty much every night. I am sure some iPhone users will claim they do not but that is what I typically see.
      The thing is that you use the daylights out of a modern smartphone battery. You just don't tend to stream Pandora on your feature phone for hours at a time.
      I see Blackberries more as super messaging phones than true smart phones. That isn't an insult because they are great at exchange email. The browser sucks but you can get better ones for it.
      Just expect to be disappointed at battery life and plan for it.
      I suggest that you start checking out PhoneScoop and Engadet Mobile for more info. I am no expert just a guy on Slashdot.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:On VZW do I want the Storm 2 or Android? by xannik · · Score: 1

      Get the motorola droid (aka sholes). They are going to release it very soon. An official announcement is expected sometime in October. All of the major carriers are going to have android phones and many major manufacturers are betting on the platform, so they can compete with the Iphone. Motorola has 10 android phones planned to launch sometime in 2010. Samsung is releasing the Moment on Sprint's network. The HTC Hero is already being sold on Sprint's network. T-Mobile is all about android with the MyTouch and the Motorola Cliq.

      I'm telling you the future is Android. The platform is easier to develop for than the Iphone and the Android Market already has a ton of apps. Both paid and free. Not as many as the Iphone, but eventually the number will get there. Besides, with over 10,000 a lot of the bases have already been covered. :-)

      Now the Motorola Droid has some phenomenal specs. - 3.7 screen with 854×480 (16:9 widescreen) capacitive touchscreen - 600 MHz ARM Cortex A8 Processor - Wi-Fi, EV-DO - 5 megapixel camera with autofocus and LED flash and video recording - QWERTY Slider, 13.7mm thick - 3.5mm headphone jack - 16GB onboard storage with microSD expansion slot - Android 2.0 'Eclair' - Builtin accelerometer

      In addition to the specs, the Droid will come (like many android phones) with all the google applications including Google Voice. If you have a google voice account then you can end up saving a lot of minutes by using it to connect your call instead of going over your minute plan. Blackberries are going to become antiquated very quickly. Android already has connectivity to office applications for checking corporate email. As the platform evolves and the phones saturate the market, I think there will be little else that can really compete with it.

      Just my two cents. :-)

      --

      Go Illini!!!
  27. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If an employee drops their phone and needs to replace it ASAP, someone in the company can pull the SIM card, put it into a new phone, and the employee is back to work with minimal downtime - unless you're on a non-GSM carrier in which case you need to have the magic store deactivate the old phone, sell you a new phone, activate it, etc...

    I don't know about Verizon, but you don't have to go to a Sprint store to activate or swap phones. You can activate phones online. Although it might involve reprogramming the phone, they give you instructions on how to do so, and reprogramming can be done in under a minute. Last time I activated a Sprint phone, it picked up the programming automatically, so I didn't even have to do that. Contacts wouldn't transfer over immediately, but if your phone supports wireless synchronization with an exchange server or something, then a simple update there fixes that problem.

    So yes, you can swap CDMA phones rather quickly, even without having to open the battery door.

  28. Disappointment of the Pre? by nilbog · · Score: 1

    There was a segment on the daily show recently where Stewart showed how CNN would allow people to make spurious claims and then say "ok, we're out of time!" without making them back up their claims. That's a little how I feel here. How is the Pre disappointing? My impression is that most people who own one really love it and are very cognizant of the advantages over the iPhone (multitasking, open development environment, using the data connection for things that are actually useful).

    So I'm wondering if this "disappointment" is just the disappointment of barrence, and really has no baring on the general view of the public. Any way, we're out of space on the synopsis, so I guess we'll never know.

    --
    or else!
  29. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    "If an employee drops their phone and needs to replace it ASAP, someone in the company can pull the SIM card, put it into a new phone, and the employee is back to work with minimal downtime - unless you're on a non-GSM carrier in which case you need to have the magic store deactivate the old phone, sell you a new phone, activate it, etc..."
    If the SIM is from the same carrier or if the phone is "unlocked".
    CDMA is a better technology than GSM. In fact the new high speed GSM modes are based on ... CDMA.
    Verizon and Sprint both seem to deliver better service in more places than TMobile and AT&T which are the two GSM providers.
    The idea of unlocked phones with SIM cards is great and if you travel to europe a lot GSM is the way to go but it isn not an old network technology.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  30. What the hell mods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a single post in this thread deserves the Troll or Redundant mods they were given. Troll and Redundant are not synonyms for "I don't like the products you're talking about".
    More disturbing is, counting up the number of mod points used, it looks like there's more than one person involved in this ass-hattery.

    1. Re:What the hell mods? by Publikwerks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And of course this gets modded down too. Hey mods, blow me

    2. Re:What the hell mods? by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Something is amiss, I've also noticed many unnecessary "Troll" and "Redundant" mods in other articles. I'm thinking its either a database cock-up or a bunch of sockpuppets simultaneously received mod points.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    3. Re:What the hell mods? by multisync · · Score: 1

      Not a single post in this thread deserves the Troll or Redundant mods they were given.

      The moderation system on Slashdot was seriously broken when they abandoned the old meta-moderation system in favour of the current "is this a good post?" system. This has enabled people to abuse their moderation privileges by hitting posts they don't like with Troll and Redundant mods with impunity. At least with the old system, abuse like this would become apparent after a few meta-mods disagreed with the original moderation. I don't know if any effort is currently being made to identify people who abuse the system, but given frequency of the kind of thing you identified in this thread, it doesn't look like it.

      I don't know if anything can really be done in the long run. People with time on their hands will find a way to abuse the system, presumably by creating numerous accounts to increase the frequency they have access to mod points. My response has been to browse at -1 and stop participating in the moderation system (mostly because I don't have the time to do a proper job of it) and to try to not get too worked up about it, but it's frustrating.

      Really, at this point I think Slashdot should just abandon the moderation system altogether, but I suppose it's good for the users to have the choice to use it if they like.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    4. Re:What the hell mods? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Naaah, it's my fault, really. Any thread that I bother to get involved in is almost always going to be contentious.

      So remember kids, if you see my UID, run away if you value your karma!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  31. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI: CDMA is a newer technology than GSM. GSM began deployment in 1990 (But had been in testing since the 80's), CDMA started being deployed in 1995.

    However I do agree with the SIM card being the important thing in a company environment. If VZW and Sprint made all new phones use a UICC, it would benefit their customers greatly.

  32. Merry xmass! by msimm · · Score: 1

    LogicMail. Open source loves you (it's a great program)!

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Merry xmass! by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Thanks - knew about that but it's not 'native' and falls into "...or are you still stuck with the pile-of-crap BIS/BES services for email (or using Web interfaces or third party java apps)?"

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:Merry xmass! by msimm · · Score: 1

      Ah, the BB data package. I often use mine with wifi and thought that might be what you meant.

      --
      Quack, quack.
  33. A BlackBerry user on BlackBerry's problems by metamatic · · Score: 1

    As a BlackBerry Curve user, here are the things I find most annoying about the phone:

    • The OS requires all applications to be resident in system heap the whole time. This means that even though I have 2GB of flash memory free in the phone, I'm down to a couple of hundred KB of space for any additional apps I want.
    • Apps that perform background processing can interfere with voice calls.
    • For some unknown reason, TCP/IP over cell network has a different API from TCP/IP over wifi. That means apps have to be specifically (re)written to work with wifi. Most of them aren't, which means the wifi feature is only really useful for browsing the web. And since Opera Mini isn't written to work with wifi, you're stuck with the poor built-in browser.
    • No native IMAP support in the Mail program.
    • Even though development is in Java, the dev kit requires Windows.
    • The UI (including the new one in the Bold and Storm) has no decent toolkit, so apps have to roll their own controls, which means they tend to be bloated, which means you run out of heap faster.

    Does anyone know if BlackBerry are addressing some or all of these issues?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:A BlackBerry user on BlackBerry's problems by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Memory is the major Achilles Heel of the Blackberry line, and particularly the older ones. I have a Curve 83xx on AT&T with 64MB of memory, and the OS (4.6) takes up the lion's share of that. Blackberry App World now allows you to store applications on the SD and install/uninstall them at will, but that is not an acceptable solution, and merely increasing the memory space seems like a half-assed solution (but is probably here to stay because it's an architectural issue).

      The background apps are a bit of an annoyance at times, though I've never actually had them interfere with receiving or talking on a call (though having them delay making a call is annoying in itself). However, that's the cost of doing business if you want to allow background apps - and probably the major reason Apple chose to avoid the discussion on the iPhone for so long.

      I don't have WiFi, but it seems to me when I did (8800 series) Opera Mini seemed to work with it. However, I figured the camera would be more useful and that's largely worked out well. I'm not in WiFi range often enough, and when I am I usually have a larger and more useful computer to surf the web to go with it.

      I still like my BB, and my wife is happy with her Pearl (chosen over the iPhone for a number of reasons, chief among them being that she wants a good phone and didn't want to buy a data plan, and the iPhone is pretty much useless without a data plan).

      I don't know what I'd choose if I wasn't on a corporate plan, and I felt I *had* to have a cell phone. I'd have to try out a Pre and some of the newer Berries first. I've tried out an iPhone (briefly) and the areas it's strongest in are not areas I want to use a phone for, and it's relatively poor as a phone (especially in terms of picking up signal, from what I've seen).

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:A BlackBerry user on BlackBerry's problems by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      The Achilles Heel of Blackberry is the Blackberry OS. They basically just keep adding cruft to it to make it more "modern" without actually modernizing the actual OS.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. Hardware by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

    Nicholas - you're a smarter guy than I'll ever be but on this you're wrong. It's the hardware - it's sexy. It's thin, almost all screen, and all touch.

  36. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by rsborg · · Score: 1

    If an employee drops their phone and needs to replace it ASAP, someone in the company can pull the SIM card, put it into a new phone, and the employee is back to work with minimal downtime

    Try this with the iPhone... it is a GSM phone but this does not work (you need to call the carrier). This is relevant as the new blackberry is trying to compete with the iPhone. In fact, SIM locking is very common in the US and not limited to the iPhone (though the iPhone has the most restrictive implementation).

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  37. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by SBrach · · Score: 1

    3g CDMA RIM devices use SIM cards.

  38. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by RepugnantJohn · · Score: 1

    Seems a troll, but VZW's is head and shoulders above AT&T and all other cell phone companies (regardless of technology) are just bit players.

  39. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    it takes a 90 second phone call to support

    they will switch it over

    several tools thanks to Verizon

    Sure, the Verizon network is happy to take your money and switch your phone for you. But that is not convenient in a multiuser corporate environment where there may be many business issued phones that need to be available constantly for traveling employees.

    And if you are an individual user on the Verizon network, and you just broke your phone and need a cheap replacement, what can you do? Nothing. You get to go dish out full price for a new phone to Verizon because there is virtually no market for used CDMA phones. Many pawn shops won't even touch used CDMA or TDMA phones.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  40. Rush??? by brennanw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Einsturzende Neubauten, Minor Threat, Sex Pistols, Subhumans, Throbbing Gristle, Big Black...

    --
    Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
  41. Nokia E72 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say Nokia E72 ftw! but then realize it was announced ages ago and is now planned to ship with a free copy of Duke Nukem Forever.

  42. Re:If they want the storm2 to be more successful.. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    ... If an employee drops their phone and needs to replace it ASAP, someone in the company can pull the SIM card, put it into a new phone, and the employee is back to work with minimal downtime - unless you're on a non-GSM carrier in which case you need to have the magic store deactivate the old phone, sell you a new phone, activate it, etc...

    When I was on verizon, all it took to swap phones was to enter the new ID into my account online. I could switch phones anytime with no problems.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  43. Google Voice by teethdood · · Score: 1

    If I could just swap phones as needed during the course of the day.

    It gives you one phone number which when called would ring all your phones. Then you can use whatever phone depending on your activity at the moment. As a matter of fact when I get home from work, I would switch an active call from my cell phone to my home phone without missing a beat if I ever need to cut down on mobile minutes.

  44. Don't you mean dissapointment with the original by Sheik+Yerbouti · · Score: 1

    My understanding was that the original Blackberry storm was widely panned as being slow buggy and generally unusable. The Palm pre on the other hand has been said by many reviewers I have read to be solid and the only real competitor to the iPhone. By the way I own neither.