Slashdot Mirror


US Air Force Buying Another 2,200 PS3s

bleedingpegasus sends word that the US Air Force will be grabbing up 2,200 new PlayStation 3 consoles for research into supercomputing. They already have a cluster made from 336 of the old-style (non-Slim) consoles, which they've used for a variety of purposes, including "processing multiple radar images into higher resolution composite images (known as synthetic aperture radar image formation), high-def video processing, and 'neuromorphic computing.'" According to the Justification Review Document (DOC), "Once the hardware configuration is implemented, software code will be developed in-house for cluster implementation utilizing a Linux-based operating software."

144 comments

  1. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe someone should tell them the new ones don't run Linux.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Pretty sure the link in the OP should say 'grabbing up 2,200 *more* PlayStation 3 consoles', not new as in slim. Nowhere in TFA does it say they'll be buying 'new' PS3s.

    2. Re:Wow by shivamib · · Score: 2, Funny

      So much for a Beowulf cluster, then.

    3. Re:Wow by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 3, Funny

      They already know they don't run Linux, they just to play Uncharted 2 and Demon's Souls.

    4. Re:Wow by AbRASiON · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's a genuinely good point, I wonder if Sony would help them out on this or if they are getting the old one or what?
      I don't have much of a use for linux on mine TBH, it was far too goddamn slow (and I'm no linux guru) it really does need 1gb or more of ram, then she'd be fine.
      That being said, sucks for researchers who wanted this.

    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My read on it is that the PS3 does not present a "boot other OS" option. That is different than "does not run Linux"

    6. Re:Wow by Falcon4 · · Score: 1

      They _will_ find a way. There's nothing the Air Force can't do. And that's not even including the "anything" that the US military can't do, either. With that many PS3's on their bill, paying a few hired-hacker Air Force guys to crack it open wouldn't be too hard.

      Then, they'll bring that capability to the masses as another "lol codmw2 suxx on pc give us DS" Airman drops the hack code onto the internet and everyone with a Slim benefits.

      Anything can run Linux. But the real feat would be seeing it run Windows! [/obvious]

    7. Re:Wow by TheDarAve · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its the Air Force, it'd be an Airwolf cluster.

    8. Re:Wow by TheDarAve · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just had a scary thought of instead of using linux, they just program a "UAV flight game" and leave them in various Air Force recreation centers.

    9. Re:Wow by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I think they want some of these really.

      Well, I wouldn't mind one or two to play with.

      (For those not interested in following the link, it's a blade style pizza-box server with dual (next-gen)Cell and up to 32GB of RAM)

    10. Re:Wow by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      More like an Airwolf Cluster Bomb.

    11. Re:Wow by Sebilrazen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ala Last Starfighter?

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    12. Re:Wow by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone think the movie "Toys" was rather prescient? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toys_(film)/ Kids flying UAVs via a video game.

    13. Re:Wow by macshit · · Score: 1

      Then, they'll bring that capability to the masses as another "lol codmw2 suxx on pc give us DS" Airman

      They want a DS port of codmw2?!

      Hmmm.... I'd buy that!

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    14. Re:Wow by PsyciatricHelp · · Score: 1

      What no legal action. Companies get pissed when we the users change hardware we buy to better suite our needs. I wonder if anyone will go after them for modding their devices. I want to hear no more complaints about modded devices such as my jailbroken iPhone. On another note thats such a waste of 2500 Blue ray drives.

    15. Re:Wow by jargon82 · · Score: 1

      it's not a pizza box at all, it is an actual blade server and requires a bladecenter... specifically a BladeCenter H, HT or S. With the H, you can get 14 of these babies in 9U of rack space, though. Make sure your cooling is up to the task!

    16. Re:Wow by afidel · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking, WTF are they buying PS3's with all the associated gaming hardware when the QS22 blades offer better MIPS/watt and MIPS/dollar when you are buying at those kinds of quantity.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if they are dropping 600k on something they couldnt spring for something like say a couple of dev kits? I seriously doubt the air force is going to buy that type of dev structure without some sort of 'major contract' behind it for support.

      The military just doesnt work that way... This is not a one off hack. They have a goal in mind with it.

    18. Re:Wow by pky666 · · Score: 1

      It says right in the summary above that they are purchasing old style (non-slim) PS3's.

    19. Re:Wow by jpcarter · · Score: 1

      Oh Christ, don't tell PizzaAnalogyGuy!

    20. Re:Wow by Aklyon · · Score: 1

      No, an Airwolf Nuke.

      --
      I reserve the right to have a physical object so I can sell it later, and recover my money.
    21. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they are not buying new ones. I would guess a group the size of the Air Force could troll Craiglist for all the PS3s (only used one time!) they could ever want.

    22. Re:Wow by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

      So. Just in time for Xmas. The Airforce of the United States is depriving children of consoles at the peak of season?

      That's 2,200 children who will wake up, sad and dissapointed - with a boxing day that brings only an electric train set, or an iPod touch.

      I weep for the dead children in Afghanistan and the empty stockings of children on the American home front.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    23. Re:Wow by furby076 · · Score: 1

      So what? Just cause it ain't linux doesn't mean it won't do well.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    24. Re:Wow by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I am guessing you can't pick up a Blade less than $200.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    25. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't see many Beowulf clusters anymore... 'cluster' could be any manner of grouped computers, don't necessarily need custom kernels to do that. Even if these systems were running Linux, with only a GigE interconnect they wouldn't be blazing fast for multi-node jobs.

    26. Re:Wow by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking, WTF are they buying PS3's with all the associated gaming hardware when the QS22 blades offer better MIPS/watt and MIPS/dollar when you are buying at those kinds of quantity.

      Sony subsidizes the console. Last I heard they had to sell 4-5 games before they broke even on a system. So basically the Air Force to burdening the rest of the gamer pool by not buying the equivalent 9,900 games they should as well!

    27. Re:Wow by wagnerrp · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you check out the fbo.gov link in the article, it says they are purchasing units of the CECHP01 SKU, which is a 160GB/65nm variant of the old style which still offered OtherOS support.

    28. Re:Wow by kriston · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did we read the proposal linked from the article? It specifies PlayStation 3 model CECHP01 which does, indeed, run Linux. I wondered, though, how successful they are going to be at finding 2,200 units. Distributors are running out of new/old stock of this model, as many compute cluster builders are trying to get them before they're all gone.

      Here is the proposal for those who didn't actually bother to RFA:
      https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=bac60f8808fa1e221597573901a7cd6b&tab=core&_cview=1&cck=1&au=&ck=

      --

      Kriston

    29. Re:Wow by PReDiToR · · Score: 2

      You're right, but never let the truth stand in the way of a good old Slashbot whine.

      Sony deserves the moan though. Surely as time passes and parts get cheaper because they are still buying them in quantity the costs lower themselves. Sony (the arseholes) shouldn't need to keep taking parts out of their boxen and then selling them for the same price.

      DRM and this. Remind me why we bother with Sony at all?

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    30. Re:Wow by afidel · · Score: 1

      Nor can you pick up a PS3 for under $200, the slim is $300. More info, the QS22 provides 3 TFLOPS of double precision performance, the PS3 only 15GFLOPS, so you would need 200 PS3's to equal one QS22 for double precision math. The QS22 lists for $10,000 so with standard discounts ~$5,000 for a savings of ~$55,000 per QS22 =) Now if they are using single precision math it's a different story, the PS3 is rated at 1.2TFLOPS and the QS22 only 6.4TFLOPS so it's cheaper to go the PS3 route, though the QS22 might still have a lower 5 year TCO due to lower power and cooling requirements.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    31. Re:Wow by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Something tells me if I were buying 2200 units, I would not be paying full retail price.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    32. Re:Wow by bickle · · Score: 1

      Sony allows running other OS'es on non-slim PS3's. There is even an option in the menu to facilitate loading a new OS.

      Even so, they'd be fine because I suspect they wouldn't be dumb enough to try play MW2 online with a modded console. :D

    33. Re:Wow by afidel · · Score: 1

      Since people keep stating that Sony is selling the PS3 at a loss and hoping for game attach rates I think you would be.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    34. Re:Wow by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Really? Do you think retailers like Best Buy and the like are making $0 profit, or do you think possibly they are getting some volume discounts?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    35. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS3's (as well as PS1's and PS2's) already run an embedded Linux, FWIW, and I'm sure that Sony will lift the restrictions (or pre-install) for a custom OS for the Air Force. (It's only software, after all; putting an older PS3 OS on the hard drive should be simple enough).

    36. Re:Wow by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      That guy is awesome, needs modding up.

    37. Re:Wow by lsatenstein · · Score: 0

      With an order for 2200 machines, there will be a special production run. 2200 machines is a really large amount, almost two days of sales.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    38. Re:Wow by kriston · · Score: 1

      The order also allows for 500 units if 2,200 units cannot be procured. This is for new/old stock only. If the 2,200 unit request is filled it's going to be a collection of refurbs, eBay units, and new/old stock at best.

      --

      Kriston

    39. Re:Wow by Nutria · · Score: 1

      recreation centers or recruiting stations?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  2. Interesting by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that they'll be running Linux on the Slim?

    --
    "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    1. Re:Interesting by hcpxvi · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that they'll be running Linux on the Slim?
      Neither TFA nor the justification document says explicitly whether they are buying slim or original, but I get the impression that they will be using the original (non-slim) PS3s.

  3. Loss for Sony? by SlothDead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since Sony's strategy (like Microsoft's) is to sell the consoles below production costs and make money on the games I guess that they are now pretty angry about organizations buying PS3s solely for computing...

    1. Re:Loss for Sony? by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is only true for the start of a console cycle. By this point, Sony and MS should at worst be breaking even on console sales and probably having a bit of profit. Component prices fall dramatically over the course of the typical 5-year console cycle.

    2. Re:Loss for Sony? by cpscotti · · Score: 1

      OTOH, 2,200 consoles are really not a big issue for Sony and this really goes off as a GOOD publicity campaign!
      Like those kids discussing at the school:
      Harold: "My console is better than yours coz cheaters/modders can't play live!!"
      Kumar: "No! mine is better!! It is so much more powerful that the air force is using fields of those to kill the 'bad' guys!!"

    3. Re:Loss for Sony? by KibibyteBrain · · Score: 1

      Not only is this good publicity for Sony, but it boosts their sales numbers which makes the PS3 more attractive for planners at game dev houses scoping out which projects should target which consoles. That is small cash for big returns, as I'm guessing at this point Microsoft and Sony are far more concerned at winning game deals from each other than selling a few extra finished games.

    4. Re:Loss for Sony? by golden+age+villain · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why they buy Japanese and not American hardware, thanks for providing this explanation.

    5. Re:Loss for Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because XNA performance on a 360 is not even in the same ballpark ?

    6. Re:Loss for Sony? by blind+biker · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Except that Sony is not selling them below production costs. It costs them about $250 apiece to produce.

      Also, if Sony wanted to be angry, "now" is too late already, because the Pande Group (home and founders of Folding@Home) has bought thousands of PS3s for running their protein folding algorithms.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    7. Re:Loss for Sony? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Since Sony's strategy (like Microsoft's) is to sell the consoles below production costs and make money on the games I guess that they are now pretty angry about organizations buying PS3s solely for computing...

      Ahhh, but Sony sold them at government rates.

    8. Re:Loss for Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As do the console prices.

      The PlayStation 2 didn't start turning a profit until the PlayStation 3 was already out.

    9. Re:Loss for Sony? by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

      It's very good publicity for the computing power of their console. It's probably better than any lame ad campaign they could do -- natural marketing. "Hey look, our game consoles are being used as a supercomputer by the most advanced military on Earth!" Then it's talked about on all the tech sites, and probably in some magazines and newspapers. That's certainly worth the bit of money they could lose.

      Besides, who knows what price they're actually paying? As a previous poster pointed out, current retail PS3's can't run Linux. That means the USAF is probably special ordering them from Sony, and probably paying a higher price as a result.

      --
      Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
    10. Re:Loss for Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The PS2 hardware became profitable at the point they integrated the EE and GS into once chip. That was long before the PS3.

    11. Re:Loss for Sony? by DJRumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [Citation Needed] "Except that Sony is not selling them below production costs. It costs them about $250 apiece to produce."

    12. Re:Loss for Sony? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      [Citation Needed]

      Some dude on /. wrote this.

    13. Re:Loss for Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, is this Wikipedia? Can't you people use Google? "sony ps3 production cost" gives me this as the fourth link with the... Wikipedia page on the PS3 being the first link.

    14. Re:Loss for Sony? by DJRumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet not one of these Links is based in fact. They are all best guesses.

      Just because something sounds good doesn't make it fact.

      The FACT is that Sony doesn't release their Production costs and never has. They could be getting substantial savings in bulk (or not). Quoting someones best guess isn't good enough and shouldn't be presented as fact.

    15. Re:Loss for Sony? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [Citation Needed] "Since Sony's strategy (like Microsoft's) is to sell the consoles below production costs and make money on the games..."

    16. Re:Loss for Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Sony's strategy (like Microsoft's) is to sell the consoles below production costs and make money on the games I guess that they are now pretty angry about organizations buying PS3s solely for computing...

      While I agree with you, too fucking bad! If sony doesn't have a viable business plan, it's not consumers (ie: the chair force's) fault.
      I just hope we don't see some lame excuses trotted out for Sony "needing" a bailout in 6 months time.

    17. Re:Loss for Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait? The stupid [citation needed] is overused just to shove people around. This is not wikipedia itself, there is some level of expectation that people can do a simple google if there's something they want to confirm. Now if that simple google search hadn't turned up something, then the [citation needed] might be justified, but IMHO if something is 2 seconds away, the [citation needed] is just plain bullying. +3 interesting my bum.

    18. Re:Loss for Sony? by interploy · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's because even with organizations buying in bulk they still can't outsell the Wii?

    19. Re:Loss for Sony? by hmar · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that this is the case. The marketing possibilities of the US Air Force using PS3s must be worth more than the hardware. I doubt anyone at Sony is particularly upset.

    20. Re:Loss for Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

  4. In the future... by Braintrust · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...processing power will be purchased in units of physical volume.

    These units will be named something clever. They will come in different flavors.

    They will be designed as components; primarily used to comprise a greater whole.

    --
    Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
    1. Re:In the future... by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      (Score:®, Possibly Crazy)

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    2. Re:In the future... by slipangle · · Score: 1

      Back around 1996, Pixar bought a bunch of Sun E4000 servers for their renderfarm because they had the most throughput per cubic foot.

  5. They are actually... by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    Setting up a wickedly awesome lan party for Bad Company 2.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  6. The harder one to explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    were the 2,200 copies of the new Guitar Hero.

    1. Re:The harder one to explain by JustOK · · Score: 1

      not for PsyOps

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  7. Why buy the whole PS3 by mxh83 · · Score: 1

    Why do they need the whole PS3.. why don't they just buy the individual components that they need rather than wasting money on all the useless stuff like controllers etc?

    1. Re:Why buy the whole PS3 by kregg · · Score: 1

      so they can play Final Fantasy duh

    2. Re:Why buy the whole PS3 by AlecC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because at this scale, buying mass market complete systems is much cheaper because of the economies of scale. Parts sold as spares and replacement are priced much higher than complete systems.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    3. Re:Why buy the whole PS3 by mathfeel · · Score: 1

      Because as a game console it's sold at below cost? And at least certain levels of product testing already went into it.

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    4. Re:Why buy the whole PS3 by yogibaer · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting point. You do not need the blue ray drive either and a lot of other components as well (harddisk, antennas etc. see here: http://www.gamepro.com/article/features/211942/how-to-take-apart-the-ps3-slim-in-6-steps-page-2/) It would be a lot of work but for a system this massive it could even make sense to build a custom frame for the mainboards only (power consumption? Cooling? Space?) and use some kind of flash drive for the OS. Buying just the mainboards could make sense, I guess.

    5. Re:Why buy the whole PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're buying them directly from sony. Most likely they won't have any extra controllers or even blue ray drives.

    6. Re:Why buy the whole PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't every large company build their own PCs?

  8. Cell processor by Xest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We keep hearing these stories, and the reason is that the Cell processor is awesome for this type of work.

    Are we still at the point where we can't get hold of Cell processors for machines specifically designed for this sort of task? Isn't the PS3 a rather inefficient way of doing this rather than a purpose built system or grid of systems, or does it come down to cost in that a purpose built system would just cost far more than a bunch of PS3s? 2200 PS3s is still going to cost, what, half a million?

    Presumably it's not because they use the GPU as well because AFAIK Linux on the PS3 doesn't allow access to use the graphics card, or are they getting custom PS3s?

    There does certainly seem a big market for Cell systems so the future of Cell certainly seems promising in this respect.

    1. Re:Cell processor by huge · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are we still at the point where we can't get hold of Cell processors for machines specifically designed for this sort of task?

      I haven't checked the details yet, but I was told that IBM QS21 is Cell based blade system

      --
      -- Reality checks don't bounce.
    2. Re:Cell processor by emilper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They would buy Cell processors, but then then it would take an year and a half for the papers to be processed, six month for IBM and Dep.Def. to spec the systems, and about two years while competitors contest the order ... everything costing about 10 times as much for one half of the computing power, and would not be able to run much else besides floating point calculations.

      BTW, has anybody tried DwarfFortress on a PS3 ?

       

    3. Re:Cell processor by umghhh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suppose if they ordered a system designed specifically for their purpose it would cost a dozen millions more on top of this half that you mentioned and then they still had to do in house software stated in the summary. So indeed they saved some - even if you consider all the military expense a nonsense anyway it was still half a mil wasted instead of a dozen.

    4. Re:Cell processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Didn't you hear? IBM have effectively killed the Cell.

      End of the line for IBM's Cell
      IBM has revealed that the Cell processor line is an evolutionary dead-end. Some of the ideas behind it will live on, but the Cell family itself will not
      Ars Technica

    5. Re:Cell processor by harry666t · · Score: 1

      AFAIK DF needs at least 512 MB of RAM, while the PS3 has only 256.

    6. Re:Cell processor by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 1

      DF also requires patience, luck, and a penchant for dealing with elephants.

      --
      ~ C.
    7. Re:Cell processor by Nerdfest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nearest I could to a price find on that is about $7000. That will buy more than 20 PS3's. (Although the QS21 is a more powerful machine, with 2 cell processors).

    8. Re:Cell processor by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Dwarf Fortress is binary only and there are no PPC Linux binaries.

    9. Re:Cell processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there is source out, which should compile just fine on PPC Linux, you just need to know where to look (the forums to be exact)

      OTOH, I took a peak at the source and making DF multiprocessor functional is going to be "FUN"

    10. Re:Cell processor by khallow · · Score: 1

      We keep hearing these stories, and the reason is that the Cell processor is awesome for this type of work.

      I think part of the reason for developing a machine with PS/3 units is simply to see what it can do. Both to compare it to other architectures like one using the Cell processor and to figure out what sort of computing power potential adversaries would have access to.

    11. Re:Cell processor by STFS · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm not sure this data is valid still but according to http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2008/11/putting-the-ps3s-brain-to-work.ars there is a huge difference between a PS3 and a QS21 blade in terms of price/performance... in favor of the PS3!!!

      Since most academic research groups are not overly flush with cash, the authors put these results in terms that someone holding the purse strings would understand. It terms of computing power per cost, the PS3 delivers 50,000 LUPS/dollar, the super high performance IBM QS20/QS21 runs at 3500 LUPS/dollar, while a quadcore desktop machine is capable of putting out 17,000 LUPS/dollar.

      However, there seems to be the issue with the memory though:

      The researchers point out that LB simulations take a large amount of RAM and, when moving to a three-dimensional simulation, the amount of RAM will become very important. Since the PS3 has only 256 MB of RAM, even moderately sized 3D grids could end up being written and read into swap memory, which would be a significant performance bottleneck.

      --
      You don't think enough... therefore you better not be!
    12. Re:Cell processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably it's not because they use the GPU as well because AFAIK Linux on the PS3 doesn't allow access to use the graphics card, or are they getting custom PS3s?

      If all they plan on doing is computation in a cluster environment, then they won't have any need for the graphics system. All they need are CPU cycles.

      The medium for the output is irrelevant.

    13. Re:Cell processor by furby076 · · Score: 1

      Ps3 is a rather efficient system and works well together on a network. They also want the high-res output and this thing has built-in blu ray. Couple that with the fact that Sony sells these systems below production cost and it becomes cheaper to buy these WORKING systems then to build your own.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    14. Re:Cell processor by stevotower · · Score: 1

      Consider that the DoD if possible sources Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) equipment. Especially for a research effort, building a dedicated Cell system is out of the question. Then consider what else is available with Cell processors: production blade systems which have a cost and reliability factor much higher than PS3's, which probably isn't really what they want for a research project where the machines will probably be tossed once the results are in.

    15. Re:Cell processor by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      In other words, if Sony would make the PS3's ram upgradeable, they could seriously enter the server market...?

    16. Re:Cell processor by nodonn · · Score: 1

      ... and when you replace the hard drive with a "SATA2 DDR2 HyperDrive5", the swap memory bottleneck practically disappears. http://www.hyperossystems.co.uk/

  9. any PS3 will do... by NimbleSquirrel · · Score: 1

    The non-slim PS3s could run linux, but it was crippled you couldn't access the RSX directly. I'd say that these PS3s would be cheap slim models. At the very least, the USAF would have PS3 dev kits to let them write code that would access the RSX directly (not through some silly hypervisor). They probably even pulled a few strings and got Sony to change the PS3 system software to let them do what they want with the hardware.

    Some people have said that Sony must be pissed as they lose money on each sale, but 2,200 consoles is effectively nothing to them in terms of monthly sales numbers. Sony get to move on some stock, they get a few more console sales to wave at their shareholders, and they get some good press that is worth more than the price of 2,200 consoles. In saying that, I imagine they charged the USAF full price for a PS3 dev kit or two.

  10. Black Friday Deals! by upto0013 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should wait for Black Friday, nobody is going to fight the Air Force for a doorbuster...

    1. Re:Black Friday Deals! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Except the Army?

    2. Re:Black Friday Deals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure about that? I've been to a few walmart doorbusters, al-qaeda terrorist are less threatening than an angry black friday mob.

    3. Re:Black Friday Deals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Insightful?

    4. Re:Black Friday Deals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or NAVY

    5. Re:Black Friday Deals! by jank1887 · · Score: 2, Funny

      SOF got in there the night before.

    6. Re:Black Friday Deals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had an awful image of Soap MacTavish dressed up as a Walmart greeter on Friday with the greeter lying bleeding in the back room.

  11. Getting 2.200 customer computers you mean? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    More expensive, and if you need to replace a PS3, simply go to any electronics store, replace a custom part for a custom PC...

    It is cheaper and more reliable and been tested already so you know it works.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  12. Two Words: by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

    Mon-tage...

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  13. Not good for the manufacturer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These systems are basically guaranteed to not have any software sales attached to it. The USAF is paying retail price, the $300 price tag per.

  14. Not much stopping them really by ciroknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the US Government we're talking about. One of the few entities on the planet where "Budget" is virtually meaningless. Someone sneezes funny and a million dollars goes out the door. How much do you think it'd cost to financially compel Sony to enabling Linux installs on their machines? Exactly how much does a PS3 dev-kit license cost again? How hard to do you think it'd be to get a judge to sign some order compelling Sony to releasing the schematics to the US Government under NDA, so that they can write and maintain their own Linux loader for the machine?

    Even if the cost of the above was in the lower 8-digit range without the machines included, which I really doubt, it'd likely be cheaper to source these machines than it would be to develop your own hybrid compute node and software for it (or nVidia's crazy-expensive, less mature solution).

    Sony doesn't support Linux on these machines, which makes it practically impossible for the home user to boot Linux on them. (Well, tbh, 'improbable', look at how much reverse engineering has happened with the GameCube & Wii). But for someone with deep enough pockets, like say a government agency, it's almost trivial.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:Not much stopping them really by DJRumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sony is not an American company, but I'm sure they were more than happy offer up a boot loader considering how big a customer the the US government could become if they were given a little courtesy. I doubt the would have to resort to threats.

      As to the budget, it is not meaningless. They can be shut down without a proper budget, unless you missed the California meltdown, and all of the drama when it came to funding our troops. Budget and government are always very real hurdles.

      I think it's more likely that someone at Sony saw the potential for a very large customer and supplied it without the need for any threats.

    2. Re:Not much stopping them really by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the budget really isn't in question, wouldn't they be looking into the blade server version of the cell processor, you know, the one that powers a good many of the supercomputers on the top500 list? As it is, this is PURELY a budget decision. Playstation 3 units at $300 per cpu node beats the HELL out of $1000-2000 or more per node for the conventional computing version. Add to that the fact that Sony still takes a loss on every PS3 unit that goes out the door, meaning it's basically a Sony subsidized supercomputer for a fraction of what a legit one would cost. This is nothing more than a well publicized exercise in unconventional supercomputing on a shoestring. Hats off to the Air Force, I for one am looking forward to some nice pictures of row after row of glimmering black PS3s with heat ripples coming off of them.

    3. Re:Not much stopping them really by cusco · · Score: 1

      US Gov't is already a big customer of Sony, they buy thousands of their p.o.s. security cameras a year, their even worse p.o.s. and gods-awful expensive DVRs, and a pile of their crappy wireless equipment. The Pentagram in particular seems to like their stuff, since it's designed to be used by the brain-dead.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  15. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...US Military PS3 Slim cluster bricked after firmware update due to modding and home-brew...

  16. neuromorphic computing by EdgeyEdgey · · Score: 1

    "Neuromorphic engineering is a new interdisciplinary discipline that takes inspiration from biology, physics, mathematics, computer science and engineering to design artificial neural systems, such as vision systems, head-eye systems, auditory processors, and autonomous robots, whose physical architecture and design principles are based on those of biological nervous systems." from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromorphic

    Anyone got any more links?

    --
    [Intentionally left blank]
    1. Re:neuromorphic computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did an MEng on this back in 1995...back then we didn't have to invent new words to try to hide the fact that we were repeating other people's research and adding nothing new to the field.

  17. Wow by Niubi · · Score: 1

    That's a lot of Playstations. I hope they bought them cheap from someplace like DubLi.

  18. Educate me by ilitirit · · Score: 1

    I don't know much anything about neuromorphic computing and synthetic aperture radar image formation etc, but wouldn't it be cheaper to use GPU's instead? Is there something about these type of computations that make the Cell a better fit? Or maybe it's that PS3s are easier to attach to the existing infrastructure?
    Someone please explain.

    1. Re:Educate me by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Take Folding@Home for example. While the GPU clients are very powerful, they are limited in the kinds of work units they can do. The PS3, however, while being less powerful is much more versatile in the kinds of work units it can do well.

  19. Radar images? What a waste. by billsayswow · · Score: 0

    With that many PS3s hooked up into a cluster, why blow it on radar images? You could finally play the newest Dynasty Warriors game without the framerate plummeting whenever you use your Musou attack.

  20. How are they being installed? by Turzyx · · Score: 1

    I mean, where are they putting them all? Are they actually using them as PS3s (case, PSU and all), or are they ripping the motherboards out and shoving them in a rack of some kind? The former does sound like a rather romantic hack, but surely it is terribly inefficient with power requirements, cooling, cabling, etc?
     
    Or do they just not care because the project was such a bargain (compared to the alternatives)?

  21. The air force can get around that or they can get by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    The air force can get around that or they can get Sony to unlock that as well as giving them full gpu power as well.

  22. Amazing! by bytethese · · Score: 2, Funny

    I didn't know Skynet was made of PS3's...

    1. Re:Amazing! by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Were there any hacked PS3's included. That could be part of the problem.

      For some reason, that weird robotic hand, that we found in what looked like a battle field, has also started acting odd. Almost like it has a mind of it's own. We better check the reverse engineered drivers when we get a chance. Maybe we'll find something useful to do with it, instead of just having it make rude gestures..

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know Skynet was made of PS3's...

      According to the sarah connor chronicles, it was ps1's and xboxs.

  23. Federal Govt Shutdown Is Highly Unlikely by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They can be shut down without a proper budget, unless you missed the California meltdown, and all of the drama when it came to funding our troops. Budget and government are always very real hurdles.

    You're talking about the federal government and, technically, you're right. About every decade-and-a-half or so, Congress gets the budget so fouled up that the President refuses to sign a continuing order to keep the government working. At that point, the government technically stops. All non-essential personnel are let go. It's happened twice during my 27 years with the government.

    However, I don't think it'll ever happen again.

    Statutorily, to do a shutdown, all employees must receive notice in person and in writing. If the fed is going to shut down tomorrow, every single employee gets contacted today and told to be at the office in the morning to receive their formal notice. The law requires it.

    That means that every single Special Agent on stakeout is pulled off of surveillance to come to the office to get their letter. Every Special Officer, Revenue Officer, every sort of officer, agent, analyst, tech, etc., ad infinitum must all show up at the main office at the same time.

    The fed employs a huge percentage of people who actually visit their office in the downtown federal building (wherever that may be in your city) just once or twice a year. But at budget shutdown time, they're all there. The halls are packed with people because there's just not enough room for them to all sit down.

    Keep in mind that this in-person notification, with everyone at the same place at the same time, is an absolute statutory requirement.

    Now, in this post 9/11 USA, who'd be crazy enough to do this? Any half-assed attempt at setting off a bomb or flying a plane into a building would, at about 8:30 on the morning of a shutdown, kill more badge-toting feds than any normal-day method I can conceive short of a nuclear option.

    I really don't think the feds will ever shut down again. Seriously. It's just too crazy to contemplate these days. The last time it happened was well before 9/11 and plenty of people in the government, even during those relaxed times, commented on what a huge and idiotic security risk it was. I sincerely doubt we'll ever do it again.

    1. Re:Federal Govt Shutdown Is Highly Unlikely by psm321 · · Score: 1

      Umm, statutes can be changed.

    2. Re:Federal Govt Shutdown Is Highly Unlikely by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

      Yes, statutes can be changed.

      But, in this extraordinary case, that would be asking a lot. Clearly, people must get a formal notification that they're out of a job. The fed doesn't yet fire people by IM or email.

      Changing this would require not just changing the statute but a sea-change in mindset across the federal government.

      It's possible, of course; I just don't think it could get done during the run-up to the next budget crisis.

    3. Re:Federal Govt Shutdown Is Highly Unlikely by operagost · · Score: 1

      Also, because I can't see this administration doing anything that could possibly reduce the size of the government or take away any of its ability to control out lives.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Federal Govt Shutdown Is Highly Unlikely by bobzaguy · · Score: 0

      Gingrich is still looking over his shoulder with one eye all night long...

  24. No kidding.. by Storchei · · Score: 0, Redundant

    for research into supercomputing..

    Come oon!! They're preparing a Christmas party! XD

  25. Why don't they get some Cell CPU boards by jpg5 · · Score: 1

    So they need a few boards with Cell processors, some memory and probably a NIC. But instead they buy a box, that contains also a blue-ray drive, a hard drive, WiFi, Audio subsystem, Graphics acceleration, a couple of fancy dual-shock 3 controllers, etc...but...oh...yes, they get all this things they don't need with a discount. Cool! Who knows, maybe some day they can use this dual-shock 3 controllers to control their UAVs...

    1. Re:Why don't they get some Cell CPU boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who used the armys remote controls to control a robot... i would say hell yea to the dual shock threes... if the air force dont want em...

    2. Re:Why don't they get some Cell CPU boards by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      And, having purchased the complete system instead of the board, they save $6300 on each CPU included in the cluster. Plus, when they are done with the system, a lot of Air Force kids are going to have a great Christmas.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  26. They're not for research... by Linkiroth · · Score: 1

    ...unless that research is playing Tekken 6 in the barracks.

  27. eBay by tepples · · Score: 1

    The non-slim PS3 is discontinued. Did the justification document say the government was buying from a distributor of new Sony product or from the secondhand market?

  28. Budget? We don't need no stinking budget. by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    This is the US Government we're talking about. One of the few entities on the planet where "Budget" is virtually meaningless. Someone sneezes funny and a million dollars goes out the door.

    I'm a GS-12, I just sneezed funny. It was one of those "choo choo choo choo CHEEEEEEEEEEEEEESE" kind of sneazes. My boss, a GS-14 has put me in for a merit increase, I've been given 25 days of basket leave, and my budget for my new project was just doubled. Quick figuring...yes, a million dollars. I thank you for your tax dollars.

    Seriously, if I may, I understand the power of the PS3 and its specialized abilities, but couldn't this be accomplished using more traditional lash ups?

    I guess what I'm asking, did someone start this out as a "gee, I've 150 extra PS3's that DHS turned over to us from a mob bust, what can we do with them" kind of a project? Did it snowball?

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  29. We all assume by gregthebunny · · Score: 1

    That they're going to run Linux on them. What if they inked a deal with Sony to provide them the SDK's to make their own "games" that use 100% of the hardware capabilities? Heck, maybe they have their own private area on the PlayStation Store for distributing software to 2,200 consoles.

    1. Re:We all assume by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      But can it balance their checkbooks?

  30. Sony distributed Terminator 2 by tepples · · Score: 1

    And the kicker: Terminator 2 was distributed by TriStar Pictures, a Sony company. The first Terminator was distributed by Orion Pictures, part of MGM, part of Sony.

  31. What about EULA? by houbou · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Sony have some terms of agreement that would prohibit the use of their console for things not related to gaming? I mean, isn't there some form of reverse engineering happening in order to write software using all these PS3s? I'm pretty sure if any normal Joe decided to use 4 or 5 PS3s for something other than it was meant to, there would be a lawsuit coming up so fast.....

    1. Re:What about EULA? by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

      US Air Force - Uhmm Hey Sony, we will by 2,200 of these baby's from you cause we think they can really do the thing we want. If they really really does the thing we want we will by 220,000 of them next cycle.

      Sony - Ohhh thank you very much!

      US Air Force - Now about that pesky EULA?

      Sony - What is this Eee You La you speak of?

      US Air Force - Thank you very much

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    2. Re:What about EULA? by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Sony have some terms of agreement that would prohibit the use of their console for things not related to gaming? I mean, isn't there some form of reverse engineering happening in order to write software using all these PS3s? I'm pretty sure if any normal Joe decided to use 4 or 5 PS3s for something other than it was meant to, there would be a lawsuit coming up so fast.....

      Of course not. It might void the warranty if you try to use it to play nintendo wii games by changing the size and shape and hardware of the machine, but what the hell do you think would create a lawsuit from personal use of purchased property?

      Even if Sony somehow could control what you do with a PS3 after purchase (which they can't, won't, don't, and certainly have never tried to do), the PS3 motto is "it only does everything," not 'its a gaming machine and nothing else and if you try to do something else with it, we will sue you.'

      I've heard a lot of stupid crap on /., but that has to be by far the stupidest in 2009.

    3. Re:What about EULA? by CronoCloud · · Score: 0

      How many times do I have to post this. Installing and booting into Linux on the Fat PS3 is a function fully supported by Sony, the option is right there in the System menu.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_on_the_PlayStation_3

      When I got my PS3 last year, I had Linux installed on it within 24 hours.

  32. can not wait by abradsn · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to see a Beowolf cluster of one of these... oh wait...
    Sorry.

    Couldn't help it.

  33. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that this Playstation 3 cluster business is nothing short of spectacular.

    Where else can you ever see a more mutual benefit than all of a sudden finding a high priced console to be an EXTREMELY cheap alternative option to supercomputing costs normally and where Sony can sell a ton of PS3's at one time?

    LOL, it's win-win and everyone benefits.

  34. conventional supercomputers by t3chn0n3rd · · Score: 0

    This seems kind of stupid. Why not just use a regular supercomputer. This seems like a bunch of little kids playing around