Slashdot Mirror


How To Grow a Head

Taco Cowboy writes "British scientists have found a mechanism within our gene sequence that allows the growing of a new head — with brains, etc. The gene is tentatively known as smed-prep, and the information contained in smed-prep also makes the new cells appear in the right place and organise themselves into working structures."

355 comments

  1. Oh Sure by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone was in favor of growing Hitler's head. But the when you grow it on the body of a great white shark -- ooh, suddenly you've gone too far!

    (side note if you recognize that paraphrase: mark your calendars/DVRs for June 24th!)

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Oh Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Almost made the mistake of thinking that quote was from Super-Scientist Dr. Venture, shame on me for not remembering every single thing the Professor ever said.

    2. Re:Oh Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sharks with frickin führer beams on their heads?

    3. Re:Oh Sure by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Funny

      Heads in a jar just like on Futurama!

      I guess an isolated brain isn’t good enough for them and they want the whole 'head enchilada'.

    4. Re:Oh Sure by Ironix · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't help but reply to this.

      --
      Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
    5. Re:Oh Sure by Jurily · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good news everyone!

    6. Re:Oh Sure by Alexvthooft · · Score: 1

      Where's your head at?

      --
      Be yourself and aim high!
    7. Re:Oh Sure by biryokumaru · · Score: 3, Informative

      Note for mods: check Ironix's sig.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    8. Re:Oh Sure by RaceProUK · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is it just me, or does everyone read that in Farnsworth's voice?

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    9. Re:Oh Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is why I skip TFA, and go straight to the comments. I learn more about the world from the random ass links and references that /.'ers keep squirreled away.

    10. Re:Oh Sure by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Hey TiVo, suggest this!

    11. Re:Oh Sure by ari_j · · Score: 1

      You mean that they want the whole head enchurito, right?

    12. Re:Oh Sure by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where's your head at?

      And that's the key! If we can get these things to grow near the groin and with the proper orientation they could be really popular...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    13. Re:Oh Sure by EdIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course, he did build a machine for that you know...

    14. Re:Oh Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! Sharks with frickin beams on their führer heads!

    15. Re:Oh Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a suppository!

    16. Re:Oh Sure by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      And that's the key! If we can get these things to grow near the groin and with the proper orientation they could be really popular...

      Seriously: I'd like to be able to regrown my foreskin. This seems like a step in that direction, even if vaguely. Great joke, but this is something that pains me daily. Every time I see my penis, which is 10 or so times a day (I drink a lot of water). Sure, I could use some counseling; but mutilating a child should be illegal.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    17. Re:Oh Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question: As an infant, are you informed enough to make religious and health decisions for yourself? I suspect some head growth is still continuing in your case. As a start, talk to any pediatrician.

    18. Re:Oh Sure by Phoghat · · Score: 1
      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  2. Would that make it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    a smed head?

    1. Re:Would that make it... by Goffee71 · · Score: 2, Funny

      As it'll be a British-designed head, it'll come with Dwayne Dibley's teeth.

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    2. Re:Would that make it... by master0ne · · Score: 1, Redundant

      smeg-head* there i fixed it for you

      --
      Noone writes jokes in base 13!
    3. Re:Would that make it... by skine · · Score: 4, Funny

      So the British scientists are getting ahead, but only a little.

    4. Re:Would that make it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      As it'll be a British-designed head, it'll come with Dwayne Dibley's teeth.

      Can it have Lister's Hair?

    5. Re:Would that make it... by DocMAME · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, the original poster was correct... SMED-head, as in Smed-prep... but thanks for playing!

    6. Re:Would that make it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      As it'll be a British-designed head, it'll come with Dwayne Dibley's teeth.

      and it will leak oil.

  3. Okay, that's it... by ShadowDragoonFTW · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay, that's it, science is getting too damn strange for me now.

    1. Re:Okay, that's it... by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Take the blue pill. The story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.

    2. Re:Okay, that's it... by tmosley · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then roll over and find a copy of your own head in the bed with you.

    3. Re:Okay, that's it... by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Say "no" to bed head.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Okay, that's it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since it's your own isn't it just masturbation? Discuss.

    5. Re:Okay, that's it... by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      What if you're sleeping with a clone? What if identical twins hook up?

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    6. Re:Okay, that's it... by tmosley · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can, that's what the blue pill was for.

    7. Re:Okay, that's it... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      What if you're sleeping with a clone?

      Pure hearsay, I tell you!

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    8. Re:Okay, that's it... by brainboyz · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if identical twins hook up?

      As long as they're cute and female, it's no problem as long as I'm in bed with them.

    9. Re:Okay, that's it... by Aceticon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only it's not a copy. It's your real head. You're the copy.

    10. Re:Okay, that's it... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      What if identical twins hook up?

      I imagine the knowledge it's incest tends to be more than enough counterbalance to the sexy.

      Of course, I'm just guessing. Not like I've got any twin porn on my hard drive, no sir. Nothing to see here.

    11. Re:Okay, that's it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would then wonder in simultaneous curiosity and self loathing if I have a talented little mouth...

    12. Re:Okay, that's it... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Fucking yourself rules!

      (Unless you are on /., and it’s the only thing you ever do. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    13. Re:Okay, that's it... by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      I think the mafia might create a new meme with this one.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    14. Re:Okay, that's it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd even settle for "as long as I have a good view."

    15. Re:Okay, that's it... by capo_dei_capi · · Score: 1

      And that's when you realize that Morpheus made you an offer you can't refuse, when he offered you the red pill.

    16. Re:Okay, that's it... by smashin234 · · Score: 1

      slash-dotters won't admit it, but a majority of them second your comment.

    17. Re:Okay, that's it... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      What if you're sleeping with a clone? What if identical twins hook up?

      Oh give me a clone
      of my own flesh and bone
      with its Y chromosome changed to X;
      and when we're alone
      because her mind is my own
      we'll only be thinking of sex!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    18. Re:Okay, that's it... by ar1550 · · Score: 1

      You've just entered...The Scary Door.

      --
      I once shot a man in Reno 'cause they cancelled Firefly.
    19. Re:Okay, that's it... by LUH+3418 · · Score: 1

      >> because her mind is my own we'll only be thinking of sex! But what if your female clone is into women only? I mean... Would you have sex with a male version of yourself? Think of the implications!

    20. Re:Okay, that's it... by Ms.Madnessness · · Score: 1

      Have to agree - they`ve been watching too much of the starship enterprise.

  4. They always say by kyrio · · Score: 2, Funny

    two heads are better than one.

    1. Re:They always say by mayberry42 · · Score: 1

      two heads are better than none.

      There fixed that for you.

    2. Re:They always say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two heads are better than one.

      Let me guess:
      You've been wanting to say that all day. You got sick of waiting for an opportunity.

    3. Re:They always say by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Sometimes less is more. In this case zero might be better than one...when growing a replacemement body for you (even better if there's a head but also free space for your brain ready). Assuming you have artificial uterus and transplant tech.

      Though I imagine keeping the replacement body healthy while it matures will be quite a challenge, too.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:They always say by vegiVamp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bad head is better than none.

      You left another typo, there.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    5. Re:They always say by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      Just ask this guy.

    6. Re:They always say by NotOverHere · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that Steve Martin would have to make a sequel for "The Man with Two Brains"?
      Wasn't his whole dilemma that his brain to cranial cavity ratio was some ratio greater than one?

    7. Re:They always say by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Yea 2 heads both plotting to kill all the normals who only have 1.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:They always say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on what is meant by "bad". If by bad you mean get castrated, then I'd say that it would be better to not have gotten head.

    9. Re:They always say by smashin234 · · Score: 1

      I will say it out loud! NO

      All of us guys are screwed. We already have problems with blood-flow to one brain when a sexy women walks into the room. What happens to both of our heads when the two-headed women walks into the room and we randomly have the thought "what could she do with TWO mouths..."

      We are screwed...

    10. Re:They always say by tzot · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that Steve Martin would have to make a sequel for "The Man with Two Brains"?

      Alcotests have become much stricter since. I doubt he'd make it in time for the operation.

      --
      I speak England very best
    11. Re:They always say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what could she do with TWO mouths...

      Answer: Pleasure you and talk your ear off. Great.

    12. Re:They always say by LUH+3418 · · Score: 1

      >> Depends on what is meant by "bad". If by bad you mean get castrated, then I'd say that it would be better to not have gotten head.

      But if you do somehow get castrated in some freak accident, this new discovery will allow you go grow a little head down there as a replacement!

  5. How "working"? by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Working" as in, you pull the chord and the ear moves?

    Or "working" as in, you go for the chord, but the things runs off and starts multiplying and plotting the demise of your species?

    1. Re:How "working"? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 0

      Or "working" as in, you go for the chord, but the things runs off and starts multiplying and plotting the demise of your species?

      Only if it's a minor chord.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:How "working"? by srussia · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Working" as in, you pull the chord and the ear moves?

      Or "working" as in, you go for the chord, but the things runs off and starts multiplying and plotting the demise of your species?

      Both. How strange the change from major to minor!

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    3. Re:How "working"? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like a dissonant chord to me.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:How "working"? by poena.dare · · Score: 1

      All men are cowards at the chord.

    5. Re:How "working"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or "working", as in you can give yourself head?

    6. Re:How "working"? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      "Working" as in, you pull the chord and the ear moves?

      Or "working" as in, you go for the chord, but the things runs off and starts multiplying and plotting the demise of your species?

      Both. How strange the change from major to minor!

      Cole Porter references on Slashdot? I guess Sideshow Bob did perform it on The Simpsons, so I suppose it's permissible.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
  6. Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes? by hAckz0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They could make a fortune on that technology, but the problem is how to transition to the new one gracefully?

  7. Zaphod? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Funny

    Zaphod, my buddy! Is that you?!

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:Zaphod? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      too bad this comment wasn't made earlier.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Zaphod? by No-Cool-Nickname · · Score: 0

      Oh, yeah, apparently you can't be president with a whole brain.

    3. Re:Zaphod? by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, I'm surprised we've gotten this far without quoting this cute ditty by Shel Silverstein:

      Chester came to school and said,
      “Durn, I growed another head.”
      Teacher said, “It’s time you knowed
      The word is ‘grew’ instead of ‘growed’ ”

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Zaphod? by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

      Halfway done the page before I got to the obvious HHGTTG bit? What is the world coming to?
      Better late than never, I guess.

    5. Re:Zaphod? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I couldn't believe noone posted it yet when I checked, so I had to.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    6. Re:Zaphod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, oh shit, I remember that from grade school.

    7. Re:Zaphod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chester came to school and said,
      “Durn, I growed another head.”
      Teacher said, “It’s time you knew
      The word is not ‘growed,’ rather it's ‘grew’ ”

      Yes, you *can* fix perfection.

    8. Re:Zaphod? by cavebison · · Score: 1

      Ignore him, he's a smed head.

  8. Rawana is a reality then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So its possible to spawn 10 heads as "Rawana", the villain of the "Ramayana", tale from India!

  9. A whole new meaning.. by NEDHead · · Score: 0, Funny

    to 'getting head'

  10. Great way... by Combatso · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great way to get a head in this business

  11. Grow parts of fingers? by gTsiros · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I lost the last phalanx (joint including) of my right middle and right ring fingers.
    I am impatiently waiting for the tech to get here so i can get my fingers back...

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    1. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by qoncept · · Score: 1

      But you till have your head? Triage, my friend.

      --
      Whale
    2. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by VorpalRodent · · Score: 4, Funny

      According to the article, this technology is already here...assuming you can accept your new fingers having hair, eyes, and a brain.

      --
      Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
    3. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      According to the article, this technology is already here...assuming you can accept your new fingers having hair, eyes, and a brain.

      Everything was going great right up until I started masturbating ... then it got awesome.

    4. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you check under the sofa cushions?

    5. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by qoncept · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm glad I read through before replying, because I like yours more than what I was going to say.

      --
      Whale
    6. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Rusty+KB · · Score: 1

      But will we have laws against self marriage?

    7. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I didn't even know Carpel tunnel could do that!

    8. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Blice · · Score: 1

      I hope this picture guide changes your life. If you don't believe it, google around about it, it's true and works.

      You're welcome!

    9. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo 're imp tient y wai ing to get on of you fing rs bac ??

      Good luck with that :)

    10. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by xednieht · · Score: 1

      eh? so how do give someone the middle finger?

      --

      Hope is the currency of fools
    11. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Toze · · Score: 1

      WARNING: Fin-gr-ow may have side effects including headache, nausea, and turning into a giant evil lizard guy.

      --
      No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
    12. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by holmstar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Saw a documentary once where a guy who had lost a good half inch off the end of his finger and managed to regrow it, complete with fingerprints, by keeping it moist, and coating it with powdered "scaffold" protein every day. Apparently the presence of the scaffold protein triggered the stem cells that were present to start regrowing the lost tissue. The guy got the treatment idea from a friend who was studying tissue regeneration in amphibians.

    13. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      Put on glove, make fist.

      T

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    14. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      See it like this: You can headbang like Beavis and Butthead, without bending a finger. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    15. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marriage? Who the hell cares?

      You will be able to grow a mouth on your hand .

    16. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Polo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    17. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Missing_dc · · Score: 1

      I was going to reference that movie "Teeth" about the hungry vagina.
      Then I remembered he is a /.er, so that generally precludes productive contact with hot chicks, even if it is just serving them dinner ;)

      --
      How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
    18. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saw a documentary once where a guy who had lost a good half inch off the end of his finger and managed to regrow it, complete with fingerprints, by keeping it moist, and coating it with powdered "scaffold" protein every day.

      Can you give us _any_ references? The country, channel, the name of the show??? That's freaking AWESOME. I know we've been getting close to this for a while, but I didn't know we've had success.

    19. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        Then again, having your hand grow another brain might not be as good as one thinks...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    20. Re:Grow parts of fingers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how come then this hasn't become yet widely popular and studied?

  12. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 5, Funny

    At the moment, this only works for flatworms, whose purchasing power is rather limited, last time I checked. So I doubt they will make a fortune soon. Then again, the difference between a banker and a flatworm is probably somewhat negligible. Actually, no, I am sorry. My sincerest apologies to all the flatworms reading slashdot.

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  13. Useful for Rimmer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a smed head.

    1. Re:Useful for Rimmer? by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 1

      close, but no cidar.

  14. Smed-prep by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or smed-prop? TFA says both smed-prop and smed-prep without the capital S.

    TFA also says that the gene is in flatworms, while TFS says "our".

    Overall, though, best slashdot summary ever.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Smed-prep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not supposed to read the article. You just accept the summary as truth and like it.

      Gyah, the things we have to teach people nowadays... The school system just isn't preparing them for life on /.

  15. hmmph, sensational by Gnaythan1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    From what I gather, they figured out the gene sequence in flatworms for growing another head for a flatworm, and can do so consistently.

    Since our genes are similar, they probably can figure out where the genes for growing a human head are, and *might* be able to use that info for regenerating damaged brain tissue

    No zaphod's anytime soon.

    1. Re:hmmph, sensational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, CmdrTaco was quite clear that they found the genes in "our gene sequence", which I will have to assume to mean HIS gene sequence, and maybe that of other certain slashdot editors :-)

      That explains a lot, really...

    2. Re:hmmph, sensational by reverseengineer · · Score: 3, Informative

      In particular, it mostly illustrates that in flatworms, body plan genes can be routinely reactivated throughout an organism's life. Most multicellular animals on Earth have a series of genes known as Hox or homeobox genes whose role is to determine the correct placement of structures on the body- depending on the form of the organism, "structures" can mean things like organs, limbs, eyes, tails, etc. The activity of these genes is so important that they tend to have been strongly conserved sequences throughout time- we have some Hox genes that are very similar to those in flies, for instance. This conservation is helped along by the fact that the Hox genes ultimately work by signaling other genes to work; the signaling cascade functions whether the signal is for the development of insect wings or for bird wings.

      According to the paper, the signaling involved in the development of the posterior end of planaria (Wnt/beta-catenin) had already been identified; the discovery of Smed-prep explains how the development of anterior structures (the trunk and head of the animal) are regulated. In addition, they found that the anterior and posterior pathways normally work in opposition (to avoid growing a tail on the head or head on the tail), and by silencing the posterior signaling, then activating head regeneration, a head would grow at both ends.

      From what we know of human Hox genes, the picture is not so simple- even at the most basic level of developmental organization there are several genes that direct development of the head, so there isn't a master gene we can reactivate to grow an ectopic head, but many of the same developmental pathways (Wnt, for instance) are the same or similar across organisms.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    3. Re:hmmph, sensational by nohelix · · Score: 2, Informative

      While you are mostly correct about this, even in planarians, head regeneration requires a suite of genes. By cutting the animal, those genes are activated and then the RNAi is used to alter their expression patterns. It is not as simple as one gene makes the whole head. Its that this gene is one of several including the Wnt/beta-catenin genes that work in concert to properly pattern the head.

      To get the multiple head phenotype, the animal must be cut and in its 'regeneration' expression profile - not its homeostasis expression patterns. Nou-darke causes ectopic (extra) brain formation (in a different species of planarians) and brain region extension (in both species) even in non-regenerating planarians, which is not how this gene (Smed-prep) works.

      Note that S. mediterranea has two strains, a sexual (cross-fertilizing hermaphrodites) and an asexual strain (that reproduces by fissioning). This means that the animals maintain adult stem cells that can regenerate an entire planarian (and are the only dividing cells in the animal). This gene is not expressed in those stem cells, but it certainly interacts with them in the development of the ectopic heads.
      Disclaimer: I work in a S. mediterranea research lab

    4. Re:hmmph, sensational by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      No zaphod's anytime soon.

      Froody.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  16. for *planaria* not humans by capoccia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    unless you belong to Planariidae, you don't have much hope of this benefiting you.

    1. Re:for *planaria* not humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying that our world's CEOs and board members are going to stand to benefit the most from this?

    2. Re:for *planaria* not humans by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and here I was so excited that those Dullahans who accidentally lost their head while horseback riding could just grow another one. Rotten worms...

    3. Re:for *planaria* not humans by holmstar · · Score: 1

      Yet, we share a surprisingly large number of genes with those planarians, so this research may have much more benefit than is evident at first glance.

    4. Re:for *planaria* not humans by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I am a flatworm, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  17. That is 1 step closer to a world ... by Rinzwind · · Score: 1

    that looks like Futurama :D Now all we need is a Bender and a 1 eyed girl.

  18. Irresistible blonde joke... by Ian-K · · Score: 1

    ah, finally, there's hope for them too :)

    (and on a more serious note: and for many many more people, I would suspect)

    --
    I'm no longer fed up with MS Windows: I go rid of them :)
    1. Re:Irresistible blonde joke... by maroberts · · Score: 3, Funny

      Whilst a doubling of memory capacity is surely good, I'm not sure that adding a head with a single extra brain cell will improve a blonde's intelligence.... :-)

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

  19. Don't they know they just need the book? by zaphod777 · · Score: 0

    They just need to borrow my book called "How to get a head in Navigating"

    --
    "Don't Panic!"
  20. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    redneck isn't racially charged, AC. It refers to a sub-group that encompasses many racial groups (though I have not encountered Asian rednecks, I have met black and white ones).

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  21. Obligatory MIB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Do you have ANY idea how much that stings?!"

    1. Re:Obligatory MIB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory xkcd: Ok
      Obligatory Penny Arcade: Maybe
      Obligatory MIB: NO!

  22. Hello??? This is Slashdot by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those are not the body parts we seek.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  23. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blurp

  24. And for further reading by kenp2002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Science always advances faster then the moral and ethics of the society.

    Science Fiction tends to serve as the cursory warning of the abuses of science. Please reply with suggetsions on reading that our fellow scientists should watch when they are not busy playing God (in the figurative sense.)

    The Island comes to mind but even comic books like the Micronauts foretold the warnings of Body Bank abuses. The Repo Men is a recent film that from what I can gather might also make for a good reading.

    Oh how I wish that science would first think:
    "Ok if this works what are the ethics" rather then "do it first, then we'll worry about the ethics later."

    I'm all for science, I just have the crippling burden of being a history buff, knowing how often science gives birth to atrocities. Comparing post-1600s science has made religion look tame.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:And for further reading by tangelogee · · Score: 0

      The problem is that ethics are an intangible thing, and we all know how science abhors non-real concepts (aside from imaginary numbers, of course).

    2. Re:And for further reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zaphod Beeblebrox

    3. Re:And for further reading by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh how I wish that science would first think:
      "Ok if this works what are the ethics" rather then "do it first, then we'll worry about the ethics later."

      Science doesn't think anything. It's a process. Plenty of scientists can be assumed to have chosen morality over science. You don't hear about them because they didn't do anything. All scientific progress can be put to ends both good and ill, there is therefore nothing ethical or unethical about science fact, only the actions of men.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:And for further reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will and can not happen that way.

      It's not for the scientists alone to decide upon the ethics of their findings but for the society as a whole.

    5. Re:And for further reading by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      If scientists thought about ethics before moving ahead with research, we'd end up with shitty politicians (pardon the pleonasm) arguing for ages about things not even mildly related. And we'd still be going round in horses and carts.

      The thing we need is a change of politicians who can adapt to science quicker!

    6. Re:And for further reading by AlecC · · Score: 1

      And how do you think scientists are expected to predict what can be done with their future discoveries? The same technologies that produced antibiotics can also produce germ warfare. The people who originally researched that atom thought it was unsplittable and their research was the purest of blue-sky investigation. Unfortunately, their research showed that it was splittable - with dramatic results.

      This has been going on since inventions began. The stone which opens the coconut crushes skulls. Weapons used for haunting can be used for war. Fire keeps you warm, cooks food, and can by used to burn heretics at the stake. There is no way that science can predict whether an invention will be used for good or ill - or, as is almost always the case, both. The only thing to do would be to stop all development completely,

      In this case, I thing the scientists are probably thinking a lot about the ethics.The head bit is hype: what they are trying to do is develop the ability for humans to regrow damaged limbs. is that not ethically good? Of course they may find the ability to regrow everything i.e. immortality. Is that ethically good - billions of lives saved for ever - or unethical - overpopulation will destroy the world and may result in cataclysmic wars?

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    7. Re:And for further reading by Nagrom · · Score: 1

      A pretty good proportion of violent deaths, etc., are still down to religion one way or another, I'd say. The perpetrators may be using scientific developments to achieve their goal more efficiently but I'm not sure that's really the problem.

    8. Re:And for further reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh how I wish that science would first think:
      "Ok if this works what are the ethics" rather then "do it first, then we'll worry about the ethics later."

      I'm all for science, I just have the crippling burden of being a history buff, knowing how often science gives birth to atrocities. Comparing post-1600s science has made religion look tame.

      Science produces tools. If scientists did not produce anything dangerous, people would still do immoral things with rocks and fists.

    9. Re:And for further reading by nohelix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is very true. Just look at Nobel [Wikipedia]. When designed nitroglycerin, he was trying to make a safer explosive for miners. Instead he made a tool of war and was horrified by it. It was not his morality nor his invention that was flawed. It was the people who used it. I would think by now that our society had moved past the base point of science is evil and technology is amoral. That cell phone in your pocket could be used to make a bomb threat or call an ambulance for the guy having a heart attack. As for this research, it is quite a ways off from any useful/practical applications. But people hope that when it does come to fruition, it will be for things first like severe brain damage cause by an accident, a blood clot or other damage. And while yes, planarians have a cephalic ganglia (brain) and a complex nervous system for being a simple invertebrate, it is vastly less complex than even a mouse brain. As a case in point, their "eyes" are a photoreceptor not a lens, so while they can see and react to light, they do not have the capability to distinguish shapes. Disclaimer: I work in a research lab that uses S. mediterranea, the flatworm used in this paper.

    10. Re:And for further reading by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      I just have the crippling burden of being a history buff, knowing how often science gives birth to atrocities.

      Well how about you haul your crippled self out here and give us a few examples of said atrocities. Because I'm thinking that for every "atrocity", we'll be able to find a few miraculous breakthroughs and progresses.

    11. Re:And for further reading by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Assuming that a scientist could accurately predict the moral and ethical implications of some natural physical phenomena, how would they not have discovered the the knowledge for which their predictions would be based on? Sounds like your logic circuits have been washed in magical holy water once too often.

    12. Re:And for further reading by wurp · · Score: 1

      I just have the crippling burden of being a history buff, knowing how often science gives birth to atrocities. Comparing post-1600s science has made religion look tame.

      Citations, please.

    13. Re:And for further reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science doesn't think anything. It's a process. Plenty of scientists can be assumed to have chosen morality over science. You don't hear about them because they didn't do anything. All scientific progress can be put to ends both good and ill, there is therefore nothing ethical or unethical about science fact, only the actions of men.

      How do you explain Pez then, hmmm?

      Wait, that doesn't make sense...

    14. Re:And for further reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then should we supply men we know to be unethical/immoral/lacking of good judgement with technology easily abused? is that not the further question?

      suggesting that science has no bearing on moral/ethical action as anything other than a 'fact' is ludicrous at best. if the person responsible for birthing a thing, cannot accept responsibility for its' use after the fact, then they had no business birthing it to begin with.

      myriad examples of abuse of technology and science exist, yet the scientists themselves are typically sheilded from the controversy unless it benefits someone or something to expose the individual in question.

      a classic take on this is presented in a short story called: The weapon by Fredric Brown. would you knowingly hand a loaded pistol to a down syndrome boy?

    15. Re:And for further reading by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      The Island comes to mind but even comic books like the Micronauts foretold the warnings of Body Bank abuses.

      Can we at least get a nod to Larry Niven, whom they stole the idea from?

    16. Re:And for further reading by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 1

      Try reading "A Canticle for Leibowitz" and meditate on the fate of Rachel.

      Of course, that's about the nuclear apocalypse and not about having a second head really. For more general reading, try 'Frankenstein'.

      --
      The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
    17. Re:And for further reading by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Science always advances faster then the moral and ethics of the society.

      The wonderful thing about morals is that there are so many to choose from.

      But seriously, how is advancement ethics measured? How can one of them be more "moral" than the other? (Assuming both result in a sustainable society.)

    18. Re:And for further reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are morals in science. For example, you don't inject people at random with a new drug without their consent and watch what happens. It might be useful scientifically, but we don't actually do it. Why? It's immoral.

    19. Re:And for further reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuclear weapons. Are you retarded, obtuse, a jackass, or all of the above?

    20. Re:And for further reading by dissy · · Score: 1

      Please reply with suggetsions on reading that our fellow scientists should watch when they are not busy playing God (in the figurative sense.)

      How about the emergency room documents, or doctors statements, or police reports of serious accident victims.
      I'm sure those people would have a thing or two to say about the morality of repairing the human body in ways nature did not provide for us.

      Personally I would rather the scientists keep playing God instead, as most of our medical advancements like soap and antiseptics, surgery, anesthetics, models and predictions of the results of diet, cleanliness, diseases, etc etc...

      ALL of which are playing God. And I for one and very thankful for it.

    21. Re:And for further reading by wurp · · Score: 1

      Post-1600s? That's a rather broad stroke to only be intended for nuclear weapons.

      Please practice reading comprehension before insulting.

    22. Re:And for further reading by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        Thanks for that. That is by far the best way I've ever seen it said, and in three sentences, even.

        My hat off to you, sir.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    23. Re:And for further reading by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      I would think by now that our society had moved past the base point of science is evil and technology is amoral.

        We will not do so until we rid ourselves of superstition, and start teaching morals based on science, rationality and respect for life, rather than variable definitions built around religious nonsense.

        IOW, not soon :(

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    24. Re:And for further reading by lennier · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Science doesn't think anything. It's a process.

      And therein lies a problem. An unthinking process is not something you want to have any kind of authority in the world whatsoever that's not checked and triple-checked by a guardian with thought and ethics. Otherwise it's going to stop all over you, guaranteed.

      You wouldn't run 'rm -rf *' as root, would you? Neither should you start an amoral process called 'science' and let it do whatever it wants. You should query at every point 'is this pursuit or organisation working for humanity, or against it?'

      Plenty of scientists can be assumed to have chosen morality over science. You don't hear about them because they didn't do anything.

      No, I think the statement you're looking for is 'You've heard quite a bit about some of them because, for instance, they were extremely outspoken against what they considered to be science becoming abusive and destructive for exactly the reasons mentioned above.'

      All scientific progress can be put to ends both good and ill, there is therefore nothing ethical or unethical about science fact, only the actions of men.

      Not quite correct either. There is plenty of scientific knowledge, for example, what happens when a live human encounters poison gas, anthrax, radiation, or a landmine, which can't really be either gained ethically, or used ethically. Unless you define 'ethical' as 'causing pain and suffering to someone the current political regime dislikes.'

      Some knowledge is only really useful for causing suffering. Some scientific 'progress' is progress in the art of maiming and killing. It's usually blandly called 'defense research'.

      Some knowledge looks like it might be dual-use for hurting or helping, but turns out in practice that the side effects outweigh the benefits. That's the sort of knowledge which an ethics check would have prevented.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    25. Re:And for further reading by lennier · · Score: 1

      Url omitted from previous post: Federation of American Scientists, who were and are extremely vocal about the ethics of weapons science.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    26. Re:And for further reading by lennier · · Score: 1

      I would think by now that our society had moved past the base point of science is evil and technology is amoral.

      Actually, before WWI most people thought that science was always a net positive.

      Then came the trenches, chlorine gas, and Zeppelins raining bombs.

      And suddenly people started to realise that 'science' isn't necessarily humanity's friend and that it needs to be watched over by ethics. More, that it might very well be a net negative if the evil uses of an invention were significantly more influential than the good.

      It's a contradiction in terms to say 'science is strictly non-moral, but scientific knowledge is always an absolute good'. That's inconsistent. If scientific knowledge can be used equally for good or bad, then that knowledge itself is neither good nor bad, and accumulating more of something which can equally help or hurt us cannot be our primary aim.

      At the very least, one could say in such a world that 'it is not necessarily immoral to acquire more scientific knowledge', but neither is it moral. But you can't say 'it's a moral imperative to acquire more knowledge'. If knowledge is not in itself good, then no, possessing more of it isn't in itself good either. It IS a moral imperative to use what we have sensibly, and that includes refusing some applications - and some methods of acquiring data (like, say, live human trials of weapons).

      But even beyond this, it's evident to those who've been studying such things (such as systems theorists and ecologists) that technology, if not science, isn't an ethical blank slate- all technology has a shape ('affordances' in the terminology of interface design) which influences the kind of society it creates. 'We create our machines - our machines create us'. Specific technologies can be centralising or decentralising, for instance, and these effects are NOT value-neutral (if you consider the shape of social organisations to be value-ful, which I do).

      People on this forum, who believe in the social implications of technologies like Linux and the 'end to end' principle of TCP/IP, for instance, ought to understand this.

      There might exist value-and-ethics-free technology - but most examples we have are not. They all push things in a certain direction. It's easy to argue that science also doesn't exist in an ethical vacuum, either, as it's usually derived from or closely aligned with technological implementations with specific social shapes.

      tl;dr: Be careful about what you ascribe value-neutrality to. It's probably less neutral than you think.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    27. Re:And for further reading by lennier · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately one person's 'respect for life' is another's 'nonsense and superstition'. Mutually Assured Destruction billed itself as 'rational'.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    28. Re:And for further reading by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        Indeed.

        How do you, yourself, see those questions? Or are you more comfortable parroting what others have said?

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    29. Re:And for further reading by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      Too many nods to too many people. We would just be head-banging all week long to give proper props to the sci-fi writers of past and present.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  25. RTFA ? Why would we want to do that ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is actually about a flatworm's ability to regenerate from serious injuries, not specifically about growing heads.
    They claim they've found the genes responsible for regeneration in flatworms.

    The title is "Gene that allows growing a new head identified
    Now we just need memory backup - and worm DNA"

    Which says quite a bit more than the catchy but non-informative title this article on slashdot has.

    1. Re:RTFA ? Why would we want to do that ? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If we could just figure out how to transplant a worm brain into a human...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  26. Zombie Apocolypse by CoJoNEs · · Score: 1

    This should help take care of the zombie uprising

  27. Abortion Debate by Rhacman · · Score: 1

    So if someone starts to grow a new head would it be unethical to cut it off even if it got there against their will? What do the varied religious texts say about extra heads you've grown long after birth?

    --
    Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
    1. Re:Abortion Debate by holmstar · · Score: 1

      Chances are that a second head would be more than a typical body could support. Note that about 30% of our energy is expended to power our brain. That means that the heart (and other organs) would have to work 30% harder in order to maintain life. I suspect that would mean heart failure, and premature death in many cases. So the options would be: We keep both heads (and both minds/people) then both die early, or sever/kill one and the other gets to live a full life. Either way you go it is not an easy decision. Is the value of two short lives higher than one long one? Is the opposite true? Neither? I think it would have to be left for the individual/pair to decide.

    2. Re:Abortion Debate by Zenaku · · Score: 1

      Note that about 30% of our energy is expended to power our brain. That means that the heart (and other organs) would have to work 30% harder in order to maintain life. I suspect that would mean heart failure, and premature death in many cases.

      I'm not sure that your second sentence follows logically from the first. An increase in energy requirements doesn't mean your organs are overclocked, it just means you need to consume approximately 30% more calories to support both.

      Note that I am not saying you are wrong; I'm not sure that the oxygen capacity of your blood would support both brains without a trip to the lungs in between, for example. I'm just saying that additional raw calories needed to support another brain are easily supplied. Especially if you eat with both mouths at once. :)

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
  28. Voltron Gene?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...and I'll form THE HEAD!"

  29. redneck = laborer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Working in the sun makes your neck tan disproportionately. It is also very funny how ignorant they become because they are too tired from working to do much else. Idiots.

  30. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by zero_out · · Score: 1

    Seriously, of all the body parts for scientists to figure out how to grow, the head has to be the least important one. When the head is gone, you just harvest the organs for others people to use. If a person needs a new head, then you really need a person. If you can figure out how to grow extremities or organs, then you're onto something!

    Better yet, grow me a whole new body, sans brain, and transplant mine. That'd be awesome!

  31. how to get ahead in navigating by MagicM · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know a group of cannibals that would trade you a nice banana picker for one of these!

  32. just hype by StripedCow · · Score: 1

    This story probably is just hype.
    Let's continue talking about more interesting stuff like iPads.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  33. In other news by maroberts · · Score: 1

    Zombies reproduce massively now a ready food supply of brains has been made available...

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  34. Re:What??? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whether it's nature or nurture that's at fault, the ignorant are products of their parents/culture. If you're born in county, odds are you're going to grow up to be ignorant without any scope for choice in the matter. Certainly, some people by change have the opportunity to exercise the choice to stop being ignorant, but to do so they must have already started down that path somewhat. After all, the beginning of wisdom is to realise that you know nothing.

    I don't blame the stupid and ignorant for being stupid or ignorant. I blame the smart people in charge of media and education who deny them the opportunity to be otherwise.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  35. Tonight... by RuBLed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pinky: Brain, I have an idea...

    1. Re:Tonight... by infinite9 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?

      I think so Brain. But if people could put heads at the end of their hands, they would never leave the house.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    2. Re:Tonight... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Fry: I'm having one of those things. You know, a headache with pictures.

    3. Re:Tonight... by networkconsultant · · Score: 1

      But if we did that we'd all turn into weasels!

  36. Is it just me or.... by ProppaT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it just me or is this the last body part we should actually care about regenerating? Once my brain is gone, I couldn't care less if you regenerated it for me to start over with a fresh, empty brain or not. I'd rather them find a way to regenerate my body on my existing head, thank you very much.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    1. Re:Is it just me or.... by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Long term benefits would be regrowing parts of the head, supposedly including areas of the brain you'd lose from trauma.

      Your point brings-up a good question though: how much of your brain can you replace before you're no-longer you?

      Spiritual arguments aside, of course.

      -Matt

      --
      --- Need web hosting?
    2. Re:Is it just me or.... by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      I wonder which head the soul would associate with after the new head is made, or maybe it would use both?

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    3. Re:Is it just me or.... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Hehe, but if you lose some brain part (as is abundant in medical literature), what do you care if new neurons are generated inside your head or inside a new one and then transplanted ?

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    4. Re:Is it just me or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, just think, blonde girls starting with a "fresh, empty brain" would be just as well off. Hmmm for the rest of us, too bad they couldn't like use a USB cable to transfer the data from our old brains to our new ones. Skip the bad sectors! It's all good!

    5. Re:Is it just me or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll preface this by saying my original post was me being half smart ass/half serious. Now for more of the serious.

      I think the spiritual aspect is even more interesting than the scientific one. The scientific one is basically "what part of the brain holds your personality? can you regenerate the rest of the brain and still have someone with the same personality even if they don't have the same memories and knowledge?" Brain trauma often does change personalities, sometimes severely. I know people who've gotten into severe car accidents and have had all of their tastes and preferences change afterwords from brain damage.

      The spiritual question is similar to the debate over cloning/playing god. For those who believe there is a human soul, if science regenerated a head on an existing body...someone who was clinically dead...would the same soul reenter the body? Would this person be soul less? Would science, in essence, create a new soul? Exactly when does the soul leave a body?

      Granted, I'm agnostic. I don't deny or confirm the existence of a god or a mother life force, but I don't believe in the concept of a soul. I do think it would be very interesting to hear those that do who also have a firm and belief in science talk about their views on the subject.

    6. Re:Is it just me or.... by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      I must have accidentally hit post anonymously. This wasn't meant to be an anonymous post.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    7. Re:Is it just me or.... by Nov+Voc · · Score: 1

      I haven't RTFA, and I don't know the analogous genes in the human genome, but knowing the genes required to initiate the growth of a head means knowing which genes you need to knock-out to stop the growth of a head. Think of it like a light switch; we can flip on the light[headlight pun here] in areas that wouldn't otherwise have activation. If we turn that switch off, theoretically, we can prevent the head from growing at all, giving us all the lifeless bodies we might need.

      ...you know, for science!

    8. Re:Is it just me or.... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Call congress we need a new amendment stating that spirituality is a contract between one soul and one head!!

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:Is it just me or.... by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      And the big toe. My soul obviously resides around there somewhere. ;)

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    10. Re:Is it just me or.... by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      > Your point brings-up a good question though: how much of your brain can you replace before you're no-longer you?

      Reminds me of the discussion we once had at school, many, many moons ago: if you transplant a head from one body to another is it a body transplant, or a head transplant ?

    11. Re:Is it just me or.... by non0score · · Score: 1

      Other than the whole Ship of Theseus thing, I would assume if I lost half of my memories, I'd be half of my former self in terms of memory. Similarly, if I lost half of my "personality", I'd be half of my former self in terms of personality.

      This is all assuming that I can't "fill in the gaps" reliably, of course. Then again, I'm no philosopher.

  37. Grow your head in 30 seconds!!! Satisfy her! by AmazinglySmooth · · Score: 1

    I knew all that pr0n spam had something real behind it. Now I know the truth without having to "click here".

  38. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

    I think that means they accept your apology?

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  39. Re:What??? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

    "Redneck" is racially charged, as I have never met a black redneck, only white. There are other negative terms used for blacks who fit the same level of ignorance and laziness that is attributed for "rednecks". The word "redneck" does NOT have the same negative power, rightfully so, but it is still a term used to speak disparagingly about poor whites, particularly in the southeastern US, similar to "hillbilly" in more mountainous areas of the US.

    Comedians have claimed the word as their own (Jeff Foxworthy in particular) but it is still a negative term. Blacks have also claimed disparaging words as their own, as a form of empowerment. In both cases, when used by someone who doesn't "belong" to the group, it is done as a racially indicative insult.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  40. Re:What??? by tangelogee · · Score: 0

    Somewhere above Obama Supporters?

  41. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sorry but redneck has a specific connotation to South Eastern U.S. people of the white persuasion. Generally blue collar construction or farm workers. Due to the beating of the sun their necks become sun burned (red) or tanned. Another generalization associated with rednecks are they: hunt, listen to country music, drink beer, and drive a truck.

  42. Next head.... by mseeger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Multi-Threading, here i come....

    1. Re:Next head.... by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Your brain already does this .... the propagation speed of neural impulses is much less than electronic signals ... but the brain is massively parallel

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    2. Re:Next head.... by mseeger · · Score: 1

      Honestly, i don't feel very multi-threaded. Once i start doing multiple things at the same time, the context-swicthing screws up my stack and i dump my cores..... Very messy!

    3. Re:Next head.... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Your brain already has the ability to handle two threads - via the left and right hemisphere. Each hemisphere can effectively process a single task at a time. Unfortunately, performance drops off markedly when you introduce a third process.

      This is why people get overwhelmed when they've got too much to do, and why people able to focus on a single task myopically are able to get so much done in a short time: they get one task done, move on to the next and get it done, and so on.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:Next head.... by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Your Brain is (You are breathing, not falling over, typing, thinking about what to type, reading the screen...etc all at the same time) but you may not be ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  43. Re:What??? by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 1

    I think it has more to do with independently utilizing what you were born with than blindly, or through weakness, accepting culturally reinforced views and behaviors and living under those banners. It spans every race, religion, age group and culture - not just "rednecks". Basically, it's just a form of snobbery. Anyway,I am interested in when someone figures out how to enhance the qualities of brains rather than just producing a physical form of schizophrenia.

  44. Alzheimer's cure, maybe? by mhollis · · Score: 1

    TFA mentioned possible useful things, like curing or reversing Alzheimer's as well as looking in to how to stop "rogue" cells from forming cancer.

    I can see a lot of potential from this, but we're looking some 20 years out and there are, undoubtedly, many other genes in the process that need to be looked into to make sure that the body parts being regenerated form correctly and link up to the rest of the body correctly. I can see new mouse heads in 15 years based on this discovery, followed by human regeneration beginning experimentally in 20.

    Of course, my Alzheimer's (assuming I have it or get it) will have progressed to the point where I would not be a candidate by then. They tend to come up for cures for stuff just after someone I know dies from the disease.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  45. needs tweaking by JackSpratts · · Score: 3, Funny

    as is typical, lab results are promising, fascinating even, but not yet entirely practical. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v157/JackSpratts/PUFFER-SMITH-47645.jpg

  46. Re:What??? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    You're milage will vary based on your local. Way back in the before times, I had a teacher play the racial card on me and a friend when we were talking about hillbillies. Now, to us, it wasn't a racially charged word, it was just a stereotype on cartoons. But she was from Arkansas where Billy really did live out in the hills.

    But no, rednecks are white, inbred, rural, old-school republicans. Their necks are red because they spend a lot of time in the sun with t-shirts on and they get burnt. Please describe the black rednecks you encountered as you're confusing a lot of us here.

  47. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2, Informative

    Been wondering about that, too - my planarian ain't as fluid as it used to be. It might very well be "Prepare for the revenge of your planarian overlords, insolent ape!". It's quite similar in pronounciation, you see?

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  48. Re:What??? by dem0n1 · · Score: 1

    Somewhere above Obama Supporters?

    A couple of hundred feet above? Where from they can be dropped on their head and then have a new one grown on the spot?

    --
    Why save your soul when you can sell it for a profit?
  49. But Brain, what if the Yak doesn't want by wiredog · · Score: 1

    its second head there?

  50. Re:Grow your head in 30 seconds!!! Satisfy her! by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

    I doubt she would be too satisfied if you grew a flatworm down there...

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  51. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speak for yourself! I want one.

  52. Shiver me timbers! by mattr · · Score: 1

    Okay I am reading Greg Bear's City at the End of Time, at the same time as I am rereading Charles Stross' Accelerando on my phone. And then saw the BoingBoing story about a two headed lizard that sometimes has one head attack the other. And now this! Got a real shiver of acceleration from this one, and half of it is from the wild names of the scientists. It sounds like the intro to Bunkaroo Banzai and the plot starts from here..

    "Top bio-boffin Dr Aziz Aboobaker and grad student Daniel Felix, who carried out the new research, say that the discovery of "smed-prep" unlocks the mechanisms by which..."

    This suggests to me that as things accelerate we will have that wierded out thing more and more. Could be low blood sugar though..

  53. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by splutty · · Score: 2, Funny

    And we all know what a group of bankers is called right?

    We have a flock of geese, a herd of horses, etc.

    And then there's a wunch of bankers.

    --
    Coz eternity my friend, is a long *ing time.
  54. So by JustOK · · Score: 1

    Their first client would be just this guy, you know.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
    1. Re:So by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      It's Abby someone. Abby Normal.

    2. Re:So by JustOK · · Score: 1

      No, think the name starts with a Z.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  55. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Yeah, funny, get back to us when you find a flatworm that is able to play the system so well, that it first can use the fact that the government is corrupt to buy the politicians to get Free (0% interest) money from the Fed, then make sure that laws are such that it is not illegal to gamble with the money, then set up a bunch of bad debts and bet against them and to make hundreds of millions personally, then when the banks fail, get the dumb ass 'public servants' to bail out the banks and take billions more in bonuses. And they keep the money at the end while the public gets stuck with an insurmountable amount in debt...

    No no no, bankers already have multiple heads, some of them work in the governments, some work in the Fed, some work as various lobbyists and some 'run' the banks. Please, give credit where credit is due, those guys are brilliant at taking the money from you.

  56. Zombie Husbandry problems solved by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    Now that we can grow brain filled heads to keep the zombies satisfied we can start breeding them for use as... well, somebody will figure that part out later.

  57. How to get Ahead in Advertising by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    How to get Ahead in Advertising is also a movie that a few people here will appreciate. (Yes, on topic)

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  58. Re:What??? by jweller · · Score: 5, Informative

    I realize that in this room, defending the redneck is probably about as fruitless as pissing up a rope, but here goes. My next door neighbor is one of the biggest rednecks you will ever meet, and he will tell you the same. He works a blue collar Union job, loves NASCAR, drives a pickup truck, smokes dope, and swills more cheap beer than you can imagine. He also has been married to the same woman for 25+ years, put both his daughters through College, Worked for the same company for 20+ years and is now a shop foreman, isn't a racist, and is generally the nicest guy you'd ever want to meet.

    I think the pejorative most of you are looking for is "White trash"

  59. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was rather aiming at the parasitical nature both groups have in common than at the intellectual capacity. I had to learn, unfortunately, that Planariidae are actual non-parasitic flatworms, which makes the above apology to the poor creatures even more important.

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  60. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those poor flatworms with such limited purchasing power. It's because no one will give them jobs! Sad...

  61. Re:What??? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    sorry but only the mentally ill consider the N word as empowerment. Every single black leader has denounced the casual use of the N word as self degradation.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  62. According to Douglas Adams... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, that's it, science is getting too damn strange for me now.

    You must be older than 35.

    1. Re:According to Douglas Adams... by ShadowDragoonFTW · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm 23.

  63. Re:What??? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Around here rednecks are the idiots that drive a jacked up to the sky Pickup truck without exhaust pipes in the city. that drive like they own the road and act like they are from the cuntry' folk but were born and raised in the city or at most suburbs.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  64. I want some pictures! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call bullshit. Lets see some pictures.

  65. I'm seeing some potential applications in... by Blackjax · · Score: 1

    Per the summary:

    "...allows the growing of a new head — with brains"

    Note the last part. I'm seeing some potential applications in politics. Imagine what the world would be like if we could regrow the heads of our elected leaders...this time *WITH* brains.

  66. Well, the French will be pissed by Demodian · · Score: 1

    since their favorite execution tool, the guillotine, will be rendered useless.

    1. Re:Well, the French will be pissed by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Actually I have been thinking about having my enemies beheaded several times, just for the fun of it, when I finally take over world domination and declare myself Eternal God-Emperor. Can always dispose of them properly later, and the people love a good beheading on Sunday afternoon. What better way to demonstrate that those fallen from my Grace are not better than ordinary flatworms?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  67. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by sznupi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know, I can't really tell whether that was a banker or a flatworm (again, deepest apologies in the latter case)

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  68. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are not the body parts we seek.

    Actually, I seek to get head all the time.

  69. Regrowing heads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zombies of the world rejoice.

    Humanity is now truly fucked by the zombie apocalypse.

  70. Innacurate by beard0 · · Score: 1

    They've not found it "within our gene sequence." They found it in the gene sequence of worms.

    1. Re:Innacurate by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Do you mean to tell me that humans are genetically different from worms?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  71. Locus of expression.... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    I would infer that one locus of expression is in the anus of politicians?

  72. Scientists, stop wasting effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientists, please spend your time growing the little head rather than the big one. Oh, and make the little heads bigger.

    --
    Lindsay

  73. Re:What??? by liquidsin · · Score: 1

    well hey, i know if someone proclaimed themselves to be a leader of people with the same skin pigmentation as me, and then told me i shouldn't say a word because it's a magical word, why i'd hop right on that bandwagon. by the way, how's that situation shaping up?

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  74. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could say the same of the term “nigger”, but then I’d be modded flamebait. Generalizing “redneck” to include many racial groups and defining it on the basis of their lifestyle is no different from generalizing “nigger” to include white-trash punks who talk gangsta, wear bling, and blast rap from their rolled-down windows.

    It is still a racist term. Demeaning someone on the basis of their culture is a form of racism.

  75. Re:What??? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    see: Poseur

  76. Re:What??? by holmstar · · Score: 1
    The term "redneck" came from a group of coal mine workers that were trying to organize/unionize back in the 20s. From wikipedia: (yeah yeah, not a real source, blah, blah, blah, but I've seen the same same facts referenced elsewhere. Wikipedia is just the easiest to find.)

    The term "redneck" was also used in The West Virginia Coal Miners March (1921) or the Battle of Blair Mountain when the coal miners wore red bandannas around their necks to identify themselves as seeking the opportunity to unionize. There was no derogatory implication.

  77. That's so 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am impatiently waiting for the tech to get here so i can get my fingers back...

    Regrowing Lost Body Parts Getting Closer All the Time

  78. Re:What??? by sznupi · · Score: 1

    ...and who haven't figured out they can cover their necks?

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  79. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer a wanker of bankers.

  80. getting ahead of myself by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been waiting for this news, as you might tell from my post, I need another head. As for "two heads are better than one," there is a wonderful article about a truly remarkable person(s) in Minnesota with two heads that is doing splendidly (metabolically) and may redefine our stereotypes of a 'person'. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abigail_and_Brittany_Hensel. Actually, she/they have two heads, spinal chords, hearts, and stomachs. They raise all kinds of wonderful social issues regarding privacy, marriage, procreation, and the law. For example, what is she/they ran for President? Would we have a leader that could speak to both sides of the aisle at once? Argue both sides at once? Veto and pass a bill at the same time? Be for and against every controversial subject? My god, Ms. Hensel(s) may be the PERFECT POLITICIAN! Two head are better than one, politically speaking.

    1. Re:getting ahead of myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are two individuals and I don’t know why you can’t seem to simply accept that.

      Yes, they will pose some interesting questions, but the questions are all focused on relatively few themes.

      If one of them goes to Congress, the other goes too. I don’t know if she’d be allowed to speak in session, but she’d be there. Same for if they were dating. They share one set of reproductive organs. How do you handle that? Polygamy would make it easy enough... they could both be married to the same person. If they were with separate men, though, there might be a problem with sharing. What if one of the men went out with some other girl and caught an STD?

      Basically the questions concern privacy (as individuals they have very little) and morality (do we want two men sharing them, or do we want them sharing one man).

    2. Re:getting ahead of myself by Kirin+Fenrir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basically the questions concern privacy (as individuals they have very little) and morality (do we want two men sharing them, or do we want them sharing one man).

      It doesn't matter what we want. Only what they want. Society needs to stay out of the personal lives of consenting adults.

      --
      Caffeine is my anti-drug!

      Duranin - A NWN2 Roleplaying Persistent World
    3. Re:getting ahead of myself by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Assuming that their two heads can agree ...

    4. Re:getting ahead of myself by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Assuming their two heads can agree ...

      On the other hand society already interferes in the relationship of consenting adults where polygamy is banned.

    5. Re:getting ahead of myself by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Assuming their two heads can agree ...

      On the other hand society already interferes in the relationship of consenting adults where polygamy is banned.

      Not in the least because there are very strong suspicions that in a lot of cases, the consent only goes one way. Either by economic coercion, tradition, threat of social isolation (a death sentence in a lot of countries) or plain use of force. Which I doubt would apply in this case.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    6. Re:getting ahead of myself by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      I'm just playing the burocrat ;)

  81. Re:What??? by lwsimon · · Score: 1

    I work a technical job, but still consider myself a redneck.

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
  82. Good for multitasking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd much rather see a two-headed worm drive while talking on the phone than a one-headed person.

  83. Perhaps I should have been more clear by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I prayed every night, "Dear God, I wish I could get a little head", this was NOT what I meant!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  84. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If were born in the country..."

    This Redneck just fixed your fancy, city grammar and spelling.

  85. Re:What??? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    Whether it's nature or nurture that's at fault, the ignorant are products of their parents/culture.

    Uh. If it's nature's fault then they are specifically not the products of their parents/culture. Those two factors would be "nurture". I'm pretty sure everyone agrees that both nature and nurture have an impact (or fault, if you will), but the argument is to what extent each influences people.

    As for using media and education to provided opportunity, yeah I'd say that's the best way to give the lower class a leg up. Statically, people are going to be the product of their environment, so we should try to improve the environment. Wooo psychohistory. But what makes you blame the people in charge of the media and education systems? They and their actions are also, on the whole, a product of their environment. I think you're giving them too much credit when you describe them as "smart".

  86. Re:What??? by sycodon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For your average Slashdotter, "labor" is the walk from the far ends of the parking lot to their cubicle.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  87. Finally by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    Grow a head in somebody's ass, give a new meaning to the expression "butt-kisser".

  88. Re:What??? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

    Ah, sorry - markup failure. It was supposed to be brackets with 'Insert_Backward' county. And it was specifically 'county', not country.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  89. Re:What??? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    my god, are you religious?

    please describe to me how this choose thing works?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  90. Re:What??? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly, genetics are inherited from parents, so whether nature or nurture (or both, I agree) it all comes down to your parents.

    And you're right - I am giving them too much credit. Originally I was going to use the phrase "so-called smart" but then I realised that they really are smart people, but also greedy and craven. You can be highly intelligent and also immoral.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  91. Re:What??? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    You probably also voted for the last three presidents and consider yourself a fiscal conservative.

    You are identifying with these labels simply out of cultural inertia, or "tradition", if you want to be traditional.

  92. Re:What??? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Black isn't racially charges, AC. It refers to a sub-group that encompasses many people of many origins (though I have not encountered any Lunar blacks, I have met black born in England and in France and in China)

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  93. Re:What??? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    Bloddy friscking g'dmnit!


    . . . The last three REPUBLICAN presidents.

    Oye...

  94. Re:What??? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    I even seen pictures or albino blacks.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  95. Human Salamander Fingers by nido · · Score: 1

    I lost the last phalanx (joint including) of my right middle and right ring fingers. I am impatiently waiting for the tech to get here so i can get my fingers back...

    Here's my old summary from Sounds like magic: Doctors try to regrow fingers:

    Dude cuts off his the end of his finger (base of nail -> tip) with the help of a model airplane propeller. A doctor said to get a skin graft to cover the stub. The amputee called up his brother, who sent him some powdered pig extract, and the fingertip regrows over the next few weeks.

    So the guy didn't lose the joint like you, but this is a starting point for you...

    For one thing, it's not completely clear what happened inside Lee Spievack's finger.

            The broad outline is pretty straightforward. The powder is mostly collagen and a variety of substances, without any pig cells, said Badylak, who's a scientific adviser to ACell. It forms microscopic scaffolding for incoming human cells to occupy, and it emits chemical signals to encourage those cells to regenerate tissue, he said.

            Those signals don't specifically say "make a finger," but cells pick up that message from their surroundings, he said.

    I'd bet that "surroundings" is the body's electric field, but what do I know? You may be able to chop off the scar tissue at the end of your shortened digit and apply the powder. ?

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  96. Re:What??? by Vintermann · · Score: 1

    Even though you're probably right that only whites can be rednecks, it's not therefore "racially charged". You aren't automatically a redneck just because you're from rural Arkansas, you need to fulfill certain stereotypes. Most of those are subject to choice to a larger or smaller degree (smaller: accent, larger: vehicle decoration, etc.). I bet those who fulfill the cliché most aren't exactly ashamed of it, either.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  97. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were born in the country..."

    But even Rednecks forget to proofread.

  98. Every creature deserves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every creature deserves a nice warm book-burning.

  99. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by holmstar · · Score: 1

    I think it would be a lot easier to transplant a head, than a brain. That would still be a major feat, and there are the issues of paralysis, (including the fact that the brain stem is not attached to the spinal cord... ie, nothing tells your new heart to beat, lungs to breathe, etc). So until the spinal cord is mended, you would need to be on a heart/lung machine.

  100. Re:What??? by MattSausage · · Score: 1

    If you were born in the country... Just sayin.

  101. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by ari_j · · Score: 1

    I'd be happy if they regrew my same body, so I could have a do-over on that period between 18 and 28 when I let myself go.

  102. Re:What??? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    One of my great grandfathers was a union organiser for (Arkansas) coal miners, who were called rednecks by the local newspaper, starting in a coordinated campaign that began about six weeks before the Pinkertons came into town and beat them for daring to unionize. The Pinkertons shot a couple of them too, allegedly raped at least one woman, etc. I've read my great grandfather's letters to his brother, where he describes the night when over fifty shots were fired into his house, and they hid in the root cellar except for my grandmother, who was then a child of eight, trapped upstairs in her room with no time for them to get her. If it didn't start out as derogatory, redneck soon became derogatory from events such as those. That was way back in 1904, well before your twenties citation.
            The term redneck is historically of confused origin. It may actually have something to do with the red kerchiefs worn by socialist inclined union organizers, but more probably goes back to the much more common attribution of red sunburn on fair skinned southern farmers. Best evidence is it came into existence to refer specifically to the Irish immigrant farmers of the 1870's era, who swiftly became notorious for sunburning easily. It was already a derogatory term when used by non-members of that group, and got self applied by the miners later in an ironic manner, as these people were also frequently of Irish extraction. There has thus always been a racial connotation to the word.
          You may have a hard time finding anything on the internet better than Wikipedia, but there are real books that will tell you about the mine workers struggle going back way before the 1920s. Hell, Alan Pinkerton, founder of one of the worst groups of thugs in American history, was part of the Civil war era. Joe Hill was a mine worker in Utah in 1914, and supposedly wore a red bandanna when he supposedly committed the murders he was hanged for in 1915. This is why we say 'not a real source, blah, blah, blah".

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  103. i fully support the regularisation of english by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    growed
    knowed

    it's going to happen anyway as the lanuage spreads into the far corners.

    --
    Deleted
  104. Re:What??? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    Oh wow, the parents fault through their genes. Yeah, wow, I completely missed that. Sorry.

  105. Re:What??? by G-Man · · Score: 1

    Uh, okay. You could also say that 'wetback' isn't racially charged, since it could apply to anyone who swam across the Rio Grande to get here. Try it and let me know how that works out for you.

  106. Zombies and humans can now leave in peace!!! by rla3rd · · Score: 1

    With this breakthrough, we can regrow our heads, after zombies have munched on our delicious BRAAAAIIINNNNSSS.

  107. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Slashdotters have already figured out how to grow boobies.

  108. Don't Panic! by woboyle · · Score: 1

    Shades of Zaphod Beeblebrox! Not only can I now be twice as confused, but I can also spend all my time arguing with myself! No you wont! Yes I will! No! Yes! No! OK. I give up now... :-)

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  109. In the right place? by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

    ...makes the new cells appear in the right place...

    What if you already have a head in the right place (assuming the "right place" is on top, between your shoulders)?

    --
    SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
  110. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    I live in rural Tennessee and can confidently say that I have not met one redneck who is ashamed of being such.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  111. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but aside from the tanning or burning of the back of the neck, I have met blacks who fulfill all the other generalizations.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  112. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    See comment in the other sub-thread.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  113. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but redneck is not even close to being equivalent to nigger. Grow up.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  114. Life imitates art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Love and kisses, Zaphod"

  115. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    black is something you are born into and cannot change. Redneck is. BIG difference.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  116. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're born in county, odds are you're going to grow up to be ignorant without any scope for choice in the matter.

    It’s called cable TV, international news networks, and the internet. Welcome to the 21st century...

    where if you’re born in the country you have as much chance to be informed and educated as just about anybody else, and where the truly “stupid” and “ignorant” are the people who make ignorant statements like the one you just made.

  117. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    that is, redneck is something you can change.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  118. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Sure. They just don’t feed it the crap that you eat, and we’re all good.

    Seriously. Did you miss the memo or something? Th causes of “migranes” are well-known and easily solved by now.
    They are not, I repeat NOT caused by genetics! Which means there is only one alternative: Something in your environment. At least 90% of the time, it’s people not even knowing that what they eat should not be considered food at all.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  119. Slight misspelling . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent post has a slight misspelling. . . it's "Smeg head".

    - Think "Red Dwarf" !

  120. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    What? Would you prefer to grow tits? ^^

    With a second head, there’s at least a chance you can give yourself “head”. :)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  121. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by armyofone · · Score: 1

    "Most Slashdotters have already figured out how to grow moobies."

    There, FTFY.

    --
    "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
  122. one step closer to... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    We are one step closer to that movie with Arnold, 6th day, where the clones are coming out of the woodwork, and can't wait for the previous clone to be dead before assuming it's identity. I can't wait for the day we actually do a full body with head and all, then the moral police will come knocking.

  123. Transplants by Aahzimandious · · Score: 1

    Well, once they have the human head part down instead of a planarian, shut off the brain development portion and the grow eyes, faces, etc. for those that new ones.

    Nice to know we are a step closer.

  124. Re:Yes but can they do it without copying Migranes by networkconsultant · · Score: 1

    Let's test this on politicians and bankers first.

  125. At long last.... by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 1

    having your head up your ass is not just a dream anymore.

  126. Three heads better than two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have a big head ruled by a little head. I'm not sure where a third one would fit in.

  127. Vote for a new name!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't there a way to submit new names to the genome sequence? Something nerd-cool like "Hydra", "Ettin", though most will probably use it to submit "Jibarish" names.

  128. Re:What??? by lwsimon · · Score: 1

    I'm not old enough to have vote for the last three :) I voted first for GWB in 2004, because Kerry was my option and I was in a swing state. In 2008, I voted for McCain, though it was tough to do that. GWB was a corporatist, Obama is a socialist. McCain was just Obama Lite. I'm a libertarian in most respects, so it was definately the lesser of evils. Badnarik is a bit of a kook though, and Barr is a Libertarian but not a libertarian.

    I *did* vote for Paul in the primaries though in '08 - not because I thought he would win and would be a good president, but to hope to make the GOP realize that there are a lot of us small-government types out here. Doesn't work when your vote isn't counted though. I personally know more people who voted for Paul in the primaries in my county than were reported. Strange.

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
  129. Re:What??? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    you can change black, isn't that what the KKK were all about?

    Michel Jackson, seemed to do a good job, and what about the albino blacks?

    How about Jews, Being Jewish is something you are born into and ?can? change.

    The Chinese are taught in schools that they are from a different branch of the human race to the rest of us, are they far game?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  130. Re:What??? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Sounds more like a flatbiller (ricer of the offroad world).

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  131. Re:What??? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Don't blame the sheep for following the shepherd: stop eating lamb.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  132. Re:What??? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Yeh,I hate stereotypes and pigeonholing, how about you?

    If you got a particular problem with a particular thing, have that problem with that thing. Not the poor unfortunates that carry it out.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  133. Re:What??? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    and yes I do have a problem with the way the whole of the criminal justice system is run in the UK.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  134. Sad but... by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

    I was a bit disappointed to note that the first post contained no references to Beeblebrox.

  135. Re:What??? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Referring to someone in a derogatory manner because of their peculiar cultural traits is racist.

    Racial discrimination typically points out taxonomic differences between different groups of people, although anyone may be discriminated against on an ethnic or cultural basis, independently of their somatic differences. According to the United Nations conventions, there is no distinction between the term racial discrimination and ethnic discrimination.

    The fact that they call themselves “rednecks” and are not ashamed of it does not change the fact that you are racist if you use that to justify feelings of your own superiority. As soon as you imply that because someone is a “redneck” they are less intelligent or less cultured than you are, you’re being racist.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  136. Re:What??? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Reagan, H.W. and W?

    Geez, you must think I am old.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  137. second head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But can I grow a head that looks like Ray Milland?

  138. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    As soon as you imply that because someone is a “redneck” they are less intelligent or less cultured than you are, you’re being racist.

    Oh hey, I don't do that. Go figure. Guess you and the rest of /. really don't know me (or anyone else on here). What. A. Surprise.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  139. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    What?

    Actually, MJ had a genetic disorder. A well documented one.

    Jewish = Israeli and/or religious group.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  140. Re:What??? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Why don’t you go and learn the history of the term so you can avoid offending people in the future?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redneck
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs#R

    Who knows, you might even learn to keep your mouth shut and not end up saying something stupid.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  141. Re:What??? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Ah. So you’re just going around foolishly using derogatory ethnic slurs and honestly meaning no harm by it.

    Your original claim, “redneck isn't racially charged”, is laughably incorrect, by the way.

    Redneck is a derogatory slang term to refer to poor white Southern farmers in the United States. It is similar in meaning to "cracker" (especially in Georgia and Florida), "hillbilly" (especially in Appalachia) and "white trash" (especially among blacks).

    Now, I apologise if I misunderstood your meaning, but for future reference you’ll probably find that a lot of other people will too.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  142. Re:What??? by tibman · · Score: 1

    A redneck isn't a lazy or ignorant white guy. Most farmers are rednecks.. it comes from the farmer tan look.. you have a red neck from working outdoors. You can say most rednecks aren't educated though.. because obviously they would have a hard time getting as much sun from inside a college classroom.

    IMO, redneck isn't racially charged. It's as bad as calling someone a soft cityboy.

    --
    http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  143. Re:What??? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    That was the origin of the word, but it quickly became a derogatory term for a certain ethnic / cultural group.

    And Negro was originally a factual descriptor of someone with Negroid features, but it has similarly been used as a slur and most black people wouldn’t much appreciate being called that.

    I can have a sense of humour about it. Redneck jokes are generally funny. Redneck repairs (i.e.: duck tape) are funny (and often impressive). But if someone honestly looks down on people who they consider “uneducated” or “uncultured”, they’re being racist.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  144. Twice as clever by sourcerror · · Score: 1

    Now I can be twice as clever. Or I will be able to go slacking with the current one, while the other studies for exams.

  145. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, so you can screw it up again? No way buddy, we'll save the regen tech for our most fit soldiers like Dolph Lundgren. You can sit in the back of the trailers and monitor the cooling systems. But hey, upside - the trailer's refrigeration systems hold a large amount of pie and frozen pizza snacks. Everyone wins!

  146. Re:What??? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Maybe I should backpedal and clarify my position.

    I’m not saying that you are a racist. I’m not putting words into your mouth, and I’m not saying that you did imply that “rednecks” are inferior in some way. If you didn’t, aren’t, ... well, then the shoe doesn’t fit. So don’t act indignant like I called you a racist. I’m not saying that. What I am saying is that if anyone (not you in particular) looks down on rednecks because of their culture, that is racist: it is a derogatory, racially-charged term.

    Since it most definitely was used in a derogatory sense in the original comment from which this thread stemmed, jumping in to defend its use with your obviously incorrect understanding of the meaning of the word itself makes you seem at the least to be ill-informed.

    You probably aren’t a racist, but this comment clearly was and would be offensive to anyone who considered himself a redneck. He did imply that because someone is a “redneck” they are less intelligent or less cultured. So consider my accusation to have been leveled at him, and you just sort of got caught in the cross-fire.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  147. Which would it be? by djnewman · · Score: 1

    Ray Milland or Rosey Grier?

  148. Does no one read the classics any longer? by fleebert · · Score: 1

    Mister Smeds had twenty-one heads and only one hat to his name. Poorly read heathens, the lot of you. =)

  149. Question: could we use this to grow ONE brain? by spyfrog · · Score: 1

    I think the most valid question is this:
    can this technology be used to grow ONE brain in people that lacks one, like politicians?

  150. Re:What??? by MatthewCCNA · · Score: 1

    That's hard work, the elevator at work was down last week and I almost clasped when I reached my third floor office.

    --
    "He is so stupid. And now back to the wall!" Moe Szyslak
  151. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    If I asked any of the people I know of if they found the term redneck derogatory they'd laugh all the way to the bank.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  152. Clone do us a huge favor, and shut the fuck up, ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject. To anyone reading, clone's the biggest bullshit artist and scumbag on this forums, so get used to his crap.

  153. Re:What??? by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

    Growing up would involve realizing that words are just words and not as powerful as those who wish to control thought have convinced people they are.

  154. Can this technique be used on countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because seriously, the USA could stand to grow a pair, of balls, that is.

  155. Re:What??? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    I'll agree with that, the original comment was indeed a derogatory one, and I stand corrected on it's original meaning. That doesn't change the fact that the meaning of words evolve over of time.

    To be honest, there are some aspects of being a "redneck" (as the term is now used) I like (fishing (never been hunting), formerly drinking beer (though I had expensive tastes), etc.). So to me the term has never been derogatory in intent.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  156. It's DUCT tape, clone (you jobless dimwit) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clone, per the subject above, and all the time you waste here everyday (all day)? Get a damned job, and do a little real work sometime. You'd have known the term is duct tape, not duck tape, dumbass, if you'd actually done an honest day's work in your life instead of being a welfare case like you are.

    1. Re:It's DUCT tape, clone (you jobless dimwit) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think someone's jealous?

    2. Re:It's DUCT tape, clone (you jobless dimwit) by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      For the record, it was indeed DUCK TAPE to which I was referring. Nice try at trolling, though, apk.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  157. Summary is wrong! by ubermiester · · Score: 1

    British scientists have found a mechanism within our gene sequence that allows the growing of a new head — with brains, etc.

    They did not discover anything "our gene sequence". They only found the gene in flatworms and claim that it is a first step in understanding the mechanism in those worms, which is a first step in understanding it in humans.

    Either the poster or the editor should at least try to focus long enough to RTFA!

  158. a 2nd chance? by gef7 · · Score: 1

    Wow! this is an invention people have been waiting for years. There are quite a few that would like to be given a 2nd chance for another head! And not the kind of head that face-lifting would provide for!

  159. Re:What??? by Tynin · · Score: 1

    Since we are tossing around anecdotes, where I live (south Florida) 2 to 3 generations ago the word redneck was the term used for anyone who was an outdoor laborer. As being bent over all day under the sun generally gives you an nice dark neck, regardless of race. Now days most people who proscribe to being a redneck do so because they are part of that culture, and for whatever motivating reason, are proud to be rednecks (I come from a long line of self proclaimed rednecks, although I do not think of myself as one). The word is more of a reference to that culture and I don't see anyone in it getting bent out of shape when called one (unless they want to fight and then it wouldn't matter what was said). Then again, these same folks take no offense to being called a cracker, which at best evokes a, "Yeah, I'm white, so what?" response, and that term is somewhat more racially charged. So if the term is racially charged, I think it would only be so for those who do not know better. I've not seen anyone get offended over being called that name.

  160. There once was a boy who was only a head by Nicky+G · · Score: 1

    There once was a boy who was only a head. His name was Randy.

    No body, no arms, no legs, only a head.

    Every day, he'd roll to school and get picked on by everybody for only being a head. "Randy, you dweeb, you don't have a body!" they'd say.

    So every night, before going to bed, he'd pray and pray that someday he'd grow a body.

    And wouldn't you know it, one day he woke up and... he had a body!

    Randy was so overjoyed he ran around screaming, "I finally have a body! I have a body!"

    He ran all throughout his neighborhood, and then ran all the way to school, all 3 miles, because he was so overjoyed.

    When he finally got to school, he ran toward the front entrance, ready to show off his body to everyone.

    He ran across the street, and BAM. He got hit by a school bus. He died instantly.

    The moral of the story is -- quit while you're a head.

  161. Washington D.C. by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Considering 99.9% of the idiot congressmen in DC have a SEVERE case of rectal cranial inversion, perhaps growing another head would be a GOOD thing :)

  162. Re:What??? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      "White trash" still has it's own connotations. Not all idiots are white, although in the US they are certainly in the majority.

        Idiots are still idiots, and that's the term I prefer.

      SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  163. Zaphod Beeblebox Gene found by British Boffins by rossy · · Score: 1

    Well, it was only a matter of time.

    "It turns out that this gene was easy to find, once the SEP field around it was turned off".

    --
    Ross Youngblood
  164. Get a job and learn products versus brands, moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just a brand name of an entire product line http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duct_tape, you fool. That's no more the product than kleenex is tissue paper the product itself. Whatever or whoever apk is you are also barking up the wrong tree on that note too. You just can't get anything right can you clone?

  165. Re:Get a job and learn products versus brands, mor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you probably can’t see his sig, I’ll quote it for you.

    An e-mail from APK - hilarious if you have time

  166. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, new second head belongs to government, and is thinking about YOU!
    New head belongs to government department... is a department head!

  167. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by ari_j · · Score: 1

    That's not nice. I hate frozen pizza snacks! Or...wait, does the trailer have a microwave? Okay, we're cool.

  168. Re:Hello??? This is Slashdot by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    If a person needs a new head, then you really need a person.

    That's why you grow the new head before you need it, as a hot spare. Failover FTW!

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  169. Zaphob Beeblebrox by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Now we can have Zaphod Beeblebrox!

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  170. Clone likes lies and libelling others online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Jeremy Reimer the guy who had parts of his website removed for libelling APK by his hosting provider and Reimer was caught email harassing APK by his ISP, Shaw of Canada, when Shaw put Reimer on a tracking ticket for it (which Reimer promptly ceased his email harassment of APK once he was aware of that happening), and arstechnica strangely no longer puts up articles by the blatantly unqualified Jeremy Reimer? Jeremy Reimer and his friends Jay Little also had their websites removed entirely from CrystalTech.com and from petitiononline.com also, because of their making death threats to APK just because APK showed that Exchange Server stalls due to memory fragmentation are stopped when a memory optimization program is used (microsoft's own called clearmem.exe) after Jay Little, whom Jeremy Reimer brought in because Reimer doesn't even have a degree or years to decades of professional hands-on experience in the trenches doing computer work, failed in stating verbatim "I am an Exchange Expert" and when Jay Little saw what APK put up, he tried to harass APK by nitpicking his posts at NTCompatible.com also? Seems that was what happened at Windows IT Pro here http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/41095/the-memory-optimization-hoax.html which anyone can read. So much for your libelling others Clone. You can't even get that right.

  171. Clone likes to libel others (against the law?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see your signature Clone, however, isn't Jeremy Reimer the guy who had parts of his website removed for libelling APK by his hosting provider and Reimer was caught email harassing APK by his ISP, Shaw of Canada, when Shaw put Reimer on a tracking ticket for it (which Reimer promptly ceased his email harassment of APK once he was aware of that happening), and arstechnica strangely no longer puts up articles by the blatantly unqualified Jeremy Reimer? Jeremy Reimer and his friends Jay Little also had their websites removed entirely from CrystalTech.com and from petitiononline.com also, because of their making death threats to APK just because APK showed that Exchange Server stalls due to memory fragmentation are stopped when a memory optimization program is used (microsoft's own called clearmem.exe) after Jay Little, whom Jeremy Reimer brought in because Reimer doesn't even have a degree or years to decades of professional hands-on experience in the trenches doing computer work, failed in stating verbatim "I am an Exchange Expert" and when Jay Little saw what APK put up, he tried to harass APK by nitpicking his posts at NTCompatible.com also, where Little stalked APK there and failed on issues regarding ramdisks/ssd and also Windows own error codes/crash codes which got Jay Little kicked from NTCompatible.com as it did on Channel 9 at Microsoft also? Seems that was what happened at Windows IT Pro here http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/41095/the-memory-optimization-hoax.html which anyone can read. So much for your libelling others Clone. You can't even get that right and you certainly like lies and libel, which are against the law in the USA and in other nations also.

  172. Re:What??? by sznupi · · Score: 1

    One would think it's easy to figure out that you can cover your skin to prevent burns...

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  173. Clone we see you like libelling others online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But basically, I support the law http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1629374&cid=31995628" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday April 27, @02:40AM (#31995628)

    Ahem: Bullshit - Clone, I noted that you also called APK, the person you refer to in your signature here, a "spyware maker" http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31736454 , but he noted that Nir Sofer and Dr. Mark Russinovich have also had many of their wares classified falsely as spywares too, and that he took CA's 21 point test and his app did not violate a single point of their test and they downrated his app to "zero threat levels" because of this. APK also put up the very first guide to securing Windows back in 1998 which was highly rated at Neowin in 2001 and grew into the most viewed and most effective guide for securing Windows NT Operating Systems out there currently at 350,000 views strong and being made a sticky pinned thread, an essential guide, or being the most viewed and being usually rated 5 of 5 stars by readers of his security guide for Windows such as here http://www.tcmagazine.com/forums/index.php?s=f94b12f3d43b3b9446bed90155910842&showtopic=2662 . At 350,000 views strong and with great feedback too, your calling him that shows you do anything but support the law, and regularly break it with libel on your part towards others clone. You are a scumbag libelling little weasel clone, and now everyone will know how much so, after reading this reply.

  174. Clone should backpeddle on libelling others online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But basically, I support the law http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1629374&cid=31995628" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday April 27, @02:40AM (#31995628)

    Ahem: Bullshit - Clone, I noted that you also called APK, the person you refer to in your signature here, a "spyware maker" http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31736454 , but he noted that Nir Sofer and Dr. Mark Russinovich have also had many of their wares classified falsely as spywares too, and that he took CA's 21 point test and his app did not violate a single point of their test and they downrated his app to "zero threat levels" because of this. APK also put up the very first guide to securing Windows back in 1998 which was highly rated at Neowin in 2001 and grew into the most viewed and most effective guide for securing Windows NT Operating Systems out there currently at 350,000 views strong and being made a sticky pinned thread, an essential guide, or being the most viewed and being usually rated 5 of 5 stars by readers of his security guide for Windows such as here http://www.tcmagazine.com/forums/index.php?s=f94b12f3d43b3b9446bed90155910842&showtopic=2662 . At 350,000 views strong and with great feedback too, your calling him that shows you do anything but support the law, and regularly break it with libel on your part towards others clone. You are a scumbag libelling little weasel clone, and now everyone will know how much so, after reading this reply. Just because you're a loser that doesn't have a job and because you've never done a thing in your life that's of service to others, doesn't give you the right to libel others who have, clone.

  175. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can resume my research on neural networks without having to kill anyone.

  176. Now I can BECOME Zaphod Beeblebrox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want my second head NOW!

  177. Obligatory : Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these.. by PDX · · Score: 1

    How would voting be accomplished if one head was republican and the other a democrat. You'd have to break the impasse with an independent between the two. And another for the libertarians, and another for the http://www.politics1.com/parties.htm
    The solution seems worse than the problem.

  178. Re:Get a job and learn products versus brands, mor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG, that's hilarious. Pretty much confirms the entire APK = Absolutely Pitiful Kook thing.

    Hey, I've an idea, why don't we post the link in response to all stalking responses to Clone?

  179. Growing a second head by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    In some ways, I would go for it, but only if my life were extended, and my wife agreed. What are the advantages-- Simple. I used to have a great memory to learn. Still do, but not as fast at it. Takes too long for my existing brain to store data. What about IQ. Well, the second brain could be smarter, after all, it would learn from me. I have almost 70 years of experience in thinking clearly and abstractly. What about multiple languages? Gee, I know 3 now, and the second brain could learn another three. The question I have is "Is there a language for thinking", or do we translate thoughts to verbal through some intermediate crainial interface? Would I be able to watch two TV shows on each set (4 shows in total).? Ahh, I think I prefer to just stay as I am.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  180. clone now admits he stalked me to another forum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:clone now admits he stalked me to another forum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look, it's the troll that's been stalking Clone53421, Squiggleslash, Falconhell, GM Howell, Red Flayer, and Tom Hudson.

      For those new to this, the troll is someone claiming to be a defender of a certain Alexander Peter Kowalski, the author of a tool, apkapp2backgrounddaemonprocessengine, generally considered malware by a large number of anti-malware companies and organizations.

      CA
      PestPatrol
      SpywareDB ("Dangerous!")
      Freedom Anti-Spyware
      Spycheck (Spanish-language) - "Recomendacion: DESACTIVAR Y ELIMINAR"
      Spyware No-More ("Threat risk: High risk", "Advice: Remove This is a very high risk threat and should be removed immediately as to prevent harm to your computer and / or to protect your privacy")

      Mr Kowalski, or his admirer, got upset because someone had the audacity to link to a threat describing Kowalski's attempts to remove some embarrassing comments posted under his name. Rather than deal with it maturely, this person has been attempting to stalk said poster and those who pointed out Kowalski wasn't doing himself any favors.

      So if you see these comments posted as replies to clone, squiggleslash, GM Howell, Falconhell, Red Flayer, or Tom, now you know why they're appearing. And if you feel like joining in, making it clear to Mr Kowalski that spamming, sliming, and stalking are unacceptable, well, come on in, the water's lovely!