Slashdot Mirror


HP To Buy Palm For $1.2 Billion

necro81 writes "Palm, Inc., which has struggled in recent months after making a splash with its Pre smartphone, will be bought by HP, the world's largest computer maker. The deal has been approved by both companies' boards, and should be wrapped up this summer. HP will get Palm for about $5.70/share (about 20% above today's closing price), or about $1.2 billion. That's a pretty good deal, considering that in the months following the launch of the Pre on Sprint's network, Palm's share price topped $16. But marketing blunders hindered the Pre's more widespread adoption on other carriers, and the company's very existence has recently seemed in doubt."

271 comments

  1. WebOS on Itanium? by xanthos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally a decent OS to run on the SuperDomes!

    --
    Average Intelligence is a Scary Thing
    1. Re:WebOS on Itanium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that, but you better sell your stocks now before this deal goes through. X__x

    2. Re:WebOS on Itanium? by linhares · · Score: 1

      sure dude, just got rid of all my stuff in AAPL. Thank YOU!

  2. Massive overpayment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of us can buy our palms for nothing.

    1. Re:Massive overpayment by abigor · · Score: 4, Funny

      But who would want to, when they are covered with hair?

  3. Overvalued by vikingpower · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    From a geek's / nerd's point of view, the price is too high. Palms are worth near to nothing to geeks.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Overvalued by CondeZer0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You got it wrong, his (right) palm is a nerd's best friend!

      --
      "When in doubt, use brute force." Ken Thompson
    2. Re:Overvalued by somersault · · Score: 1

      Not how I use it

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Overvalued by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, I'm left handed you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:Overvalued by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I broke my right arm last year and I found that the left hand is surprisingly versatile.

    5. Re:Overvalued by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It feels like someone else is doing it.

      Ermm, so I heard.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. HP Reverse Telephone Notation by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great - does this mean we'll have to make all our calls using RPN?
    1234 555 212 1+ DIAL
    I know it's supposed to be more logical, but it just seems so confusing...

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      I still have my HP48G from circa 1993 and still use it from time to time. But I stopped carrying it in my brief case when the m48 app for the iPhone was released. They have a skin that is the iPhone calculator with a stack and RPN which is brilliant if I'm not having to do complex scientific or financial work.

      I also have their business calculator that I needed for one test in college. Only thing the HP48 wouldn't do: modified internal rate of return.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    2. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by Mikkeles · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm holding out for mobileVMS!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    3. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by blair1q · · Score: 0

      That's not funny because that's not RPN, it's just typing the number backwards.

    4. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Great - does this mean we'll have to make all our calls using RPN?
      1234 555 212 1+ DIAL
      I know it's supposed to be more logical, but it just seems so confusing...

      You won't have to do it in RPN ... you will, however, have to adapt to HP making yet another random variant on the layout of the keyboard as HP plays "spin the wheel of keyboards". It won't be QWERTY, but it might be QVELTI.

      I swear, I have never seen two HP keyboards with the buttons in the same place -- and, sometimes they have buttons I've never seen before. I mean, seriously, I've seen HP keyboards where the left-shift key was the size of a penny with a completely redundant "\" + "|" key to the right of it when there was already one of those in the usual place above the "enter". What the hell??

      There really needs to be a law about making up new keyboards layouts for no good &*^%*(*&*%# reason.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by CdBee · · Score: 1

      No need, just run a VT420 terminal emulator on WebOS ;-) - probably a lot less bandwidth intensive than any regular web app

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    6. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by twoears · · Score: 1

      I know it's supposed to be more logical, but it just seems so confusing...

      Did you ever really try learning to use RPN? Didn't think so. Just about anybody who has learned it finds it intuitive and light years ahead of infix (algebraic) notation in terms of flexibility. If it were not so, would HP still be making the outrageously successful HP-12C after all these years (introduced in 1981)?

    7. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by aliquis · · Score: 1

      And I would still have my TI-85 from the same time if I haven't put it in a backpack together with flavoured oat milk before taking the train Örebro -> Göteborg back in.. say 2004?

      Milk carton where open -> Lain down in car to the train -> wet backpack -> salts & batteries in calculator = Fail.

      Not as "cool" as the HP48G but well, nothing wrong with it to this date except some ICs lost their legs in the process. Would had worked just fine if that wouldn't had happened even today, why would I need anything else?

    8. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      I'll take your mobileVMS and raise you a Tru64 Mobile Edition.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    9. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      I'm on an HP laptop and don't notice any difference from my lat desktops/laptops. Maybe things like the delete key in a different spot but that always varies from manufacturer to manufacturer

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    10. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      My alphaserver 3000 is mobile. I have a one tonne Toyota van.

    11. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by cmacb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually that will be great! We can finally get rid of those parentheses we put around the area code.

    12. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Might not be HP but I've seen keyboards with a split spacebar where left was backspace and right was space. That's a pretty crappy design IMO.

      I normally use my left thumb to press space. Makes sense for me since my right hand tends to move more than my left hand - the number pad, cursor keys etc all on the right.

      Also if I'm playing games, space is often a key for something, and WASD for direction. If you keep those keys whether you're left handed or right handed, it's annoying to have that fat backspace where the spacebar is.

      --
    13. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      I mean, seriously, I've seen HP keyboards where the left-shift key was the size of a penny with a completely redundant "\" + "|" key to the right of it when there was already one of those in the usual place above the "enter". What the hell??

      There really needs to be a law about making up new keyboards layouts for no good &*^%*(*&*%# reason.

      You are aware that most countries/languages have their own keyboard layouts, right? What you're describing can be found on the German keyboard layout... and not just on HP keyboards, but on pretty much every keyboard manufacturer's...

    14. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The small left shift key is standard on most international layouts. They just probably decided they would use the same physical layout for US keyboards as well, to save on money.

    15. Re:HP Reverse Telephone Notation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WebOS does have a virtual PDP-11 so you can play star trader.

  5. Doomed by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the direction the quality of HP printers is heading is any indication, say goodbye to Palm.

    They used to be the best. Now, I wouldn't touch one.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Say what you will but HP is one of very few that actually fully support Linux. Not long ago I got one of their new multifunction inkjets and it works across the board with Linux (wireless printing, wireless scanning, everything) and I didn't need to do anything special to make it work. Good luck getting that anywhere else.

    2. Re:Doomed by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the direction the quality of HP printers is heading is any indication

      Yes, because god knows the only thing HP makes is printers, and therefore printers are the perfect barometer for how Palm will fair under their auspices...

    3. Re:Doomed by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is pretty much all they make. Its half the revenue of the company, and they sold all the interesting shit off as Agilent more than a decade ago. Now its crappy printers, crappy PCs, and some services to big businesses.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:Doomed by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Say what you will but HP is one of very few that actually fully support Linux

      Okay, I'll give them that. I guess I'm mostly dismayed by how far HP has fallen over the years. At one time, a person could count on anything he bought from them to be a good product, probably the best available. Beginning with the Carly Fiorina era, though, it's been all downhill for them. They don't even make all that great built-like-a-brick-shithouse test equipment that they built their reputation on anymore.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    5. Re:Doomed by CdBee · · Score: 1

      Agreed. HPs laptops have never been reliable enough to endow their maker with any reputation for quality. They must have earned it on their office/network equipment.... (oh, and the Jornada PDA range)

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    6. Re:Doomed by rxan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The Palm Pre, Pixi, and Pre Plus hardware is well known for being cheap. I can't see how it would get any worse. The software is nice but the hardware kills it for me.

    7. Re:Doomed by athakur999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the plus side, it means they'll sell the new Palm phones for practically nothing!

      However, replacement batteries will cost $100. Also, they can't be recharged and the one that comes with the phone will only last you about 10 minutes.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    8. Re:Doomed by aliquis · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is a problem everywhere, I feel the same about girls born 1979, Amiga, Ericsson, ..

    9. Re:Doomed by penguinboy · · Score: 1

      The driver situation has gotten much worse over the years. It used to be the case the HP Printer == PCL. Now they sell lots of "WinPrinters" that follow no particular standard.

    10. Re:Doomed by jomcty · · Score: 1

      That is too true. HP printers, inkjets anyway, are awful and their drivers are worse. My current printers are a Canon MX860 and a Brother HL-2170w and they're great!

    11. Re:Doomed by aliquis · · Score: 2, Funny

      .. right, they also make printer accessories.

    12. Re:Doomed by Khyber · · Score: 1

      That's all you see. HP still makes tons of things, even medical equipment. My x-rays were taken using an HP piece of equipment.

      www.hp.com/go/medical

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re:Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay attention, fool. Agilent has the test equipment now.

      And come on, do you really expect a $99 laser printer to work like a $3500 LaserJet original?

      Really?

      I have a really hard time believing your $10k MFP is low quality. Perhaps you are confused about the market segmentation?

    14. Re:Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agilent has gone down-hill too. I have had multiple failures with $70k spectrum analyzers and RF signal generators. The HP stuff just keeps going and going. The only thing is the slow degradation of HV CRT power supplies. However, there are LCD retrofit kits for some of the stuff.

    15. Re:Doomed by BlendieOfIndie · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is flat out incorrect

      In January 2010 HP's revenue = 31.1 B

      The breakdown by business unit is as follows:

      Enterprise Business (Services/Storage/Servers): $13.9B
      Personal Systems Group (Notebooks/Desktops/etc): $10B
      Imaging and Printing: $6.2B

      The printing segment composes less than 20% of HP's total revenue.

    16. Re:Doomed by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pay attention, fool. Agilent has the test equipment now.

      Right. Agilent has the test equipment now, which means that HP no longer makes it. Fool.

      And come on, do you really expect a $99 laser printer to work like a $3500 LaserJet original?

      Of course not, but I expect a $99 inkjet printer I bought two years ago which only lasted about 18 months to work as well as the $99 inkjet printer I bought ten years ago which still works. Fool.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    17. Re:Doomed by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      My HP laptop is fine, no better or worse than Dell. Also cheap HP printers are a nightmare, but the more expensive ones are much better.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    18. Re:Doomed by hitmark · · Score: 1

      and here i had the impression that they had improved...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    19. Re:Doomed by Sulphur · · Score: 2, Funny

      Market Segmentation Fault ... Return Without Gosub

    20. Re:Doomed by demonrob · · Score: 0, Redundant

      agilent is HP. Fool.

    21. Re:Doomed by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Could you even buy an ink jet for $99 ten years ago? As I remember it, prices were closer to $200-300 at the low end. Factor in inflation and today you'd be spending somewhere in the neighborhood of $250-400. Bet you could get a solid printer for that much.

    22. Re:Doomed by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      The printer division, however, accounts for just short of 50% of the total profits (a bit over $1 billion in Q2 2009). There are two sections that make the profits at HP: services and printers. The Personal Systems Group - the group that Fiorina tried to bolster through the acquisition of Compaq - was about 1/3 of either the Printer and Imaging or the Services group. And the Services group is that large only because of HPs recent acquisitions of EDS and Mercury Interactive.

      So yes, HP is basically printers and imaging equipment. The rest has either been bought recently, or is providing pocket change.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    23. Re:Doomed by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      No it's not, it's a spinoff.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agilent

    24. Re:Doomed by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Informative

      agilent is HP. Fool.

      No, fool, Agilent is not HP. Agilent Technologies is a separate company that was spun off from HP in 1999.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    25. Re:Doomed by deniable · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking low-end Compaq phones. Very special.

    26. Re:Doomed by RedK · · Score: 1

      "Some services" ? So I guess our Integrity servers and XP storage array is just a bunch of services then. Some people are really clueless about HP products and services...

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    27. Re:Doomed by Zordak · · Score: 1

      This is what I hated about Carly Fiorina. What did Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard start out doing in their garage (literally)? Instrumentation. What was HP known for? Rock-solid instrumentation. The other thing they did really well was calculators. And what did Carly Fiorina do? She took a once-proud company whose name was synonymous with quality instrumentation, spun off the instrumentation into a separate company with the astonomically-stupid name "Agilent," shut down the Australian Calculator Division, and tuned HP into the equivalent of McDonald's for computers. HP no longer means rock-solid anything. HP now just means over-priced junk. Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard are spinning in their graves.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    28. Re:Doomed by demonrob · · Score: 1

      Enough with the fools. Everyone is a fool. HP (now) is from HP (then). Agilent (now) is from HP (then). HP (now) could quite easily have been given the name change. The HP instrumentation division, which is what we are talking about, is essentially the same division with a company name change. Of course, half of it is now closed off or sold off anyway.

    29. Re:Doomed by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      I'll be brief:

      Fuckin' A!

      Cary Fiorina is campaigning for the Republican nomination for governor of California. I really, really hope she fails.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    30. Re:Doomed by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      That's incorrect.

      Agilent is a independent company that trades on on the New York Stock with a different ticker symbol (UTX) than HP (HPQ).

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    31. Re:Doomed by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      I found this as well - including the scanner (part of the printer).

      Interestingly, the particular model I had was actually designed (or co-designed) by Canon, but the colour reproduction was far superior to equivalent canon models. Canon printhead technology etc, but HP firmware. It is a great printer for everyday use and a bargain due to the constant price drops...

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    32. Re:Doomed by pennyloafer · · Score: 1

      I'd seriously like to see Agilent make calculators. They could make $150 48GX that would probably sell well bundled with the $700 function generator or the $40,000 network analyzer. I wonder why they haven't even tried...

    33. Re:Doomed by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Why a nightmare? Even my Laserjet 1018 (a dumb winprinter) worked right out of the box in Ubuntu

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    34. Re:Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fearmonger much? HP's printers are the only "works4sure" solution for Linux, but that aside, they have a very, very nice selection of business laptops (consumer line is crap with every manufacturer). I would any time take HP's business laptops over the crap Levono is nowdays for example.

    35. Re:Doomed by linhares · · Score: 1

      citation needed

    36. Re:Doomed by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my HP2600n. I upgraded from my laserjet4+ and assumed that it would just work, but printed photos look crapular compared to printed photos from windows. :-(
      Yes, I have dicked around with IMCP or whatever it is, but for me win2k in virtualbox is the best easy way to print photos (text is fine).
      Maybe it is a rare aberration from HP? I like the printer, it is just the linux support that is missing.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    37. Re:Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agilent is not HP.

      You're not fooling others.

      Stop fooling yourself, fool.

      And from what I see, you called him fool first, fool.

    38. Re:Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Good luck getting that anywhere else.

      I got excellent support for my Brother multi-function inkjet printer. Driver packages and instructions are available for major distributions. Wireless printing, wireless scanning, everything works great. One gripe though: it wasn't mentioned on the package (logos for Windows, Mac OS but not Linux). I did research the Linux-compatibility though, so I knew what I was doing.

    39. Re:Doomed by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah... Crappy HP. Only a revenue of $115 billion in 2009 (as opposed to 43 for Apple, 58 for Microsoft and 23 for Google). HP - just a small mom&pop business.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    40. Re:Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll figure out a way for them to use ink.

    41. Re:Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if you don't put it in the phone 10 seconds after buying it, it will be out of date.

    42. Re:Doomed by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      The driver situation has gotten much worse over the years. It used to be the case the HP Printer == PCL. Now they sell lots of "WinPrinters" that follow no particular standard.

      And they don't support anything for more than a year. Got a three-year-old, perfectly good printer? And your new computer has OS X 10.6 or Win7? You're outta luck.

    43. Re:Doomed by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      The driver situation has gotten much worse over the years. It used to be the case the HP Printer == PCL. Now they sell lots of "WinPrinters" that follow no particular standard.

      ...all but the very oldest of which are supported by HPLIP, along with the printers that do support PCL and/or PostScript. On my desk at work, I have a LaserJet 1020 (host-based) and a Photosmart C4480 (unknown). At home, I have a LaserJet 1320 (PCL and PostScript), a DeskJet 450 (PCL), and a Photosmart 3210 (unknown). All of them are fully functional under Linux. At this point, some of them may even be more functional under Linux than Windows (on Windows 7, the DeskJet 450 is supported only through a Microsoft-supplied driver which is probably less functional than the HP-supplied driver that works with earlier Windows versions).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    44. Re:Doomed by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      I was talking inkjets rather than laserjets

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    45. Re:Doomed by stoshu · · Score: 1

      Whaddya talkin about???

      My only printer is a HP DeskJet 812C put into service February 2000 . It has worked with 95, 98, 2000, XP, 2003, Vista, 2008 and Win7, not to mention Ubuntu and an old Mac. I buy a new black cartridge once every two or three years. I bought a color cartridge once - don't remember when. I refill them with bulk ink, and the printer is still going strong.

      I NEVER had a problem with drivers.

      --
      "I've been killing time, and it's been reciprocating." - David Turrill
  6. Return of the iPaq? by jacks+smirking+reven · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Smart move if HP is thinking about getting back into the phone business. They probably threw the idea around and came to the conclusion that they'd be another also-ran if they just pushed Android/WP7 sets (Especially since thats the move Dell is making)

    As a Pre owner I would be glad to see WebOS on some adequate hardware, and in a tablet form as well.

    1. Re:Return of the iPaq? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Pre Plus is the adequate hardware.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Return of the iPaq? by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 1

      Actually sir I think you are confused. There is adequate technical hardware, and then there is hardware with adequate industrial design.

    3. Re:Return of the iPaq? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      I ponder why they didn't call it a Post Pre.

    4. Re:Return of the iPaq? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      I sure hope so. I just received two Palm Pre Plus smartphones in the mail today. So far they seem pretty good, but I've never had a smartphone to compare.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    5. Re:Return of the iPaq? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first iPaq prototypes ran linux exclusively, but they switched to Windows CE in a failed effort to ride the Windows bandwagon. I find it hilarious that they are now going back to Linux again for their mobile strategy.

    6. Re:Return of the iPaq? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I know they would have a problem to enforce the i-part of the name but I've always thought it was funny if they started complaining on the iPad name vs iPaq. Don't know how the juridical field for that look though :D. Probably impossible.

      I don't see why I would want yet another platform. Vendor specific tweaks (rather addons possible to install on stock firmware please) on top of Android would make much more sense to me than yet another OS.

      The applications will always be more important than the OS choice.

    7. Re:Return of the iPaq? by keefus_a · · Score: 1

      Seems like it would be easy enough to take the Windows WebOS emulator and adapt it to work with the touchscreen on the HP Slate, which runs Windows. My guess is that's the first place you'll see it in that form factor. They could use the same emulator/touchscreen concoction on the HP TouchSmart line of PCs as a desktop widget platform.

      What I'd love to see is a full blown laptop/netbook with a detachable touchscreen, that when detached from the laptop/netbook boots WebOS.

    8. Re:Return of the iPaq? by onedobb · · Score: 1

      HP never did stop selling the iPaq. They just didn't get updated anywhere near as much as the rest of the cell phone companies product line. During the last release of the iPaq, review websites did review the phone and give their input of the physical device and it's functionality.

    9. Re:Return of the iPaq? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      In comparison to my WinMo5 XV6700 from 2006, the Pre feels like its made from technology that doesnt exist yet. Its an amazing piece of hardware/software. The ONLY thing I dont like about the design is the charging port door and where its positioned on the device. One word of advice, turn on and use advanced gestures.

      --
      Good-bye
    10. Re:Return of the iPaq? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Because Linux hasn't changed at all in the last 10 years! The fools! It's hilarious!

    11. Re:Return of the iPaq? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      I don't like the charging door either. It feels rather fragile, like I'll end up tearing it off just by tapping it. The charging port door usually doesn't fit all the way in to the port, and if it does, it's a tight fit and hard to get back out.

      I'll have to look into the advanced gestures. I didn't see an option for those yet, just the back and up gestures so far.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    12. Re:Return of the iPaq? by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      If it makes you feel any better, I've had a Pre since day one (Sprint), and thought the same thing about that door. I still think they could have come up with something better there, but one year later it's still attached and I'm not the most gentle person around when it comes to phones.....

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  7. It's about the patents by jdastrup · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wondered why at first, but then figured out that HP can let Palm and its products die completely, while making money with the patents alone.

    1. Re:It's about the patents by rdean400 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The press release makes clear that HP intends to continue with webOS. In the press conference, they say they're intending to go forward with Android and Windows Phone gear as well.

      Expect new webOS products (not just phones, but tablets as well).

    2. Re:It's about the patents by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      Is there business mantra "Focus on everything?"

      You can't have 3 product lines of phones/tablets on totally different architectures and expect to succeed without separating them out as brands...and even then, it's not clear what's to gain.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    3. Re:It's about the patents by mgblst · · Score: 1

      What the fuck does the press release have to do with anything? Do you think that they can't outright lie in a press release? Where have you been all these years?

    4. Re:It's about the patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can't have 3 product lines of phones/tablets on totally different architectures and expect to succeed without separating them out as brands"

      If you had bothered to RTFA, Palm will continue on under HP as a separate brand.

    5. Re:It's about the patents by sootman · · Score: 1

      They could, but they're announcing very publicly that they won't.

      "Palm's innovative operating system provides an ideal platform to expand HP's mobility strategy and create a unique HP experience spanning multiple mobile connected devices."

      I would love nothing more than to see HP return to its old greatness and produce great products. I love my iPhone and plan to get an iPad but it is, believe it or not, physically possible for other companies to do good things too.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:It's about the patents by keefus_a · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just ask HTC. Oh wait...

    7. Re:It's about the patents by gtall · · Score: 1

      "HP return to its old greatness and produce great products" this is not possible under Mark Hurd. The man only understands how to rearrange deck chairs, he has not taste for actual research to produce new markets. He'll be forever chasing markets claimed by others.

    8. Re:It's about the patents by ProppaT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tablets with WebOS WOULD be slick as hell. My only concern is form factor. If they leave palm in control of form factors, etc. then I have no worries. But when is the last time that you saw an HP laptop with good stylings or, at very least, a form factor that makes sense? I don't trust HP with intelligently designed products. I think this is part of the reason why everyone really hoped that HTC would snag up Palm. HTC actually learns from their mistakes.

      The best thing that can come out of this deal for Palm is access to all of HPs fabrication plants. This might open a ton of doors for what Palm can do and will help them turn profit. It's hard being the small guy and making profit. When you have Daddy Warbucks with his hand on your shoulder, things change a bit...

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    9. Re:It's about the patents by pantherace · · Score: 1

      The HP release when they bought Compaq was clear that they'd support Alpha.

      Hell, a month or two before they canceled them, there was a big "We'll support alpha" video with the CEO of the time. Guess what? You shouldn't trust what corporations say.

  8. Android... by crhylove · · Score: 1

    Maybe HP Can put out some better hardware with Android OS now.....

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:Android... by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why?
      WebOS has a better UI than Android does. And yes I am an Android user my wife has a Pre. WebOS is a good OS that had a STUPID SDK for a long time. They have fixed that and will soon offer access to the camera and mic which should help even more.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Android... by crhylove · · Score: 1

      The amount of apps for Android is always going to dwarf some also ran mobile OS. Soon enough I would also count Jobs' Draconian nightmare in that company also. Besides, FOSS is always better than proprietary in the long term.

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    3. Re:Android... by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Besides, FOSS is always better than proprietary in the long term."
      Really? Does Linux have more apps or market share on the desktop? No?
      I like FOSS but you have zero proof to back up your statement. You are going to count out the iPhone as well.
      Well you can do what you want but if you are right then Palm has a great future.
      Palm OS IS based on Linux and frankly it is the most open of platforms right now.
      Heck the Palm Website included instructions on how to set up your phone so you could side load apps that where not in the App store!
      But there is nothing like seeing people make grand sweeping statements that have no basis if fact.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Android... by crhylove · · Score: 1

      I wasn't making any grand sweeping statements. Android will make the other phone OSes also rans within the next 5 years.

      And if you want proof that FOSS is always better than proprietary in the long run:

      Apache
      Linux (for serious work)
      Firefox
      VLC

      If there are other examples of proprietary still being a hegemony, that is just a matter of time. I fully expect Windows and Mac to lose to Linux, or another FOSS OS, but hegemony takes TIME to defeat. I think in 2020, or 2030, my statements will prove all the more true across every aspect of software and hardware development except MAYBE in a few commercial games. That's what I meant by long term. Linux is still gaining in market share every year at the expense of Windows and Mac. Once it reaches a parity, the switch will happen exponentially faster.

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    5. Re:Android... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Really so you picked the programs and one OS?

      Fine
      SolidWorks
      AutoCad
      PhotoShop "Gimp is good but NOT better".
      FSX
      BioShock
      Assassins Creed
      Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2... I am not a big gamer but please don't tell my how good nethack is.

      Just go on and dream but you made a Damming statment about WebOS. WebOS is in many ways the MOST open of the mobile platform and is Linux based just like Android.

      But you can just keep on dreaming. You see I was writing FOSS before the first GPL was written. Back when I first heard about the GNU project long before gcc or Linux was around I was releasing software with the source. As much as I really like FOSS it does not always provide the best solution to the problem.
      Frankly even though I use OpenOffice I know that Office is a better system.
      I just refuse to pay for it but good greif does OpenOffice Calc suck.
      It is PAINFULLY SLOW!

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Android... by crhylove · · Score: 1

      I don't use Calc, so I can't vouch for it. I also understand the value of SolidWorks. Games I didn't really include, because as the market goes, the games will immediately follow. Good caveats, but that doesn't change the fact the Android is going to have the smart phone market nearly to itself eventually.

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    7. Re:Android... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "change the fact the Android is going to have the smart phone market nearly to itself eventually."
      I suggest that you learn just what a fact is.
      I really hope that Android never gets the entire mobile phone market.
      Simple reason that it would be bad for the users.
      Right now Android does not have as good of a UI as the iPhone or the WebOS. I have an Android phone, my wife has a Palm Pre, and I have an Ipod Touch.
      The media player capabilities of Android are not as good as well. Without competition you have stagnation.

      So you have a bad habit of making wild statements of fact without any evidence backing them up.
      Let me teach the correct words to use.
      "I think Android will be come the dominate mobile OS" and "Open Source can produce software that is as good or better than commercial offerings."

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  9. A relief... by 5pp000 · · Score: 1

    As a Pre owner, I find this a relief. I was worried Palm was just going to fade away.

    And I'm glad the buyer has no existing smartphone business, so WebOS will be its sole platform.

    --
    Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    1. Re:A relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah. Won't fade away. Not like their entire calculator division that Carly-bitch shut down for several years, no way.

      Sorry, but I can think of no worse news long-term than HP owning them -- every geek-attractive device they've ever made has been dumbed-down, discontinued, or otherwise trashed at some point. But I guess if disposable printers are your thing, they're a great company.

    2. Re:A relief... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was worried Palm was just going to fade away.

      Yup, now it's going to enjoy the same level of long term success as the Alpha, OpenVMS, Tru64...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:A relief... by SeanBlader · · Score: 1

      I'm with that. I just hope HP's recent lack of quality doesn't interfere with the potential of WebOS.

    4. Re:A relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It kinda gets old reminding people of this: there is no money in servicing geeks. You people made it impossible because you are never pleased, so no one bothers anymore. You don't count. You did this to yourselves. Learn to live with it. Or I guess keep whining about it, it's entertaining, but it ain't never gonna change, chump.

    5. Re:A relief... by Hydian · · Score: 1

      Yup. Good thing.

      Sent from my HP iPAQ Glisten running Windows Mobile 6.5

    6. Re:A relief... by 5pp000 · · Score: 1

      I don't think HP is a great company anymore. But they might manage not to screw this up completely.

      The alternative was for Palm to be dead in the water. No one is buying their phones (I think Sprint even stopped selling them). Who would buy a phone from a dying company? Who would write an app for such a phone?

      I'm not dancing in the streets, but I think it's a better outcome than appeared likely yesterday. HP will at least create the perception that a deep-pocketed player is committed to the business. There's some chance that will bring back some app developers who are frustrated that they can't get noticed on the iPhone app store.

      I don't know that the Pre is a "geek-attractive device" anyway. I like it well enough, but if I had wanted a phone to hack on I would have gotten an Android.

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    7. Re:A relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 mod points for "Couldn't get better placed sarcasm". Sorry I wanted to modded you funny, but someone made it insightful first.

    8. Re:A relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... geeks spend a hell of a lot money on computer hardware. Computer companies can either decide it's not worth it, or put some effort into being more geek-friendly than their competitors. They don't have to be perfect in order to beat the competition for geek marketshare.

    9. Re:A relief... by zlogic · · Score: 1

      Alpha and Tru64 are still used by HP's corporate customers who bought hundreds of servers years ago. Then Compaq bought DEC to get into the server business and abandoned pretty much everything. Tru64 is still supported, just because you can't buy an Alpha laptop powered by Tru64 UNIX doesn't mean it's dead.

    10. Re:A relief... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Umm... geeks spend a hell of a lot money on computer hardware

      Why would a carny who bites the heads off chickens for a living need computer hardware?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  10. HP still around? by Eggbloke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    HP, the world's largest computer maker.

    HP are still that big? I haven't seen one of their products in years.

    --
    I care not for your karma and your mod points.
    1. Re:HP still around? by CorporateSuit · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's my fault. I had to replace a few ink cartridges in my printer. That, alone, probably paid for Palm.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    2. Re:HP still around? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You are kidding right?
      HP has a market cap of over 124 Million dollars.
      They have 13 billion in cash in the bank.
      Yea they are that big.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:HP still around? by tgd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Their market cap is 125 billion dollars.

      That makes the half the size of Apple, but five times Dell's size.

    4. Re:HP still around? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Yep, last I checked, 124 billion is over 124 million.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    5. Re:HP still around? by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative

      HP are still that big? I haven't seen one of their products in years.

      300,000 full-time employees. Market cap $125 Billion. Indexed in the Dow Industrials. S&P 100, etc. In the U.S., second only to IBM in computer hardware sales. Does any of this ring a bell?

      HPQ Competitors
       

    6. Re:HP still around? by blair1q · · Score: 2

      That must be it. HP is planning on giving away a free Palm device with every ink cartridge sold starting in 2011.

    7. Re:HP still around? by capo_dei_capi · · Score: 2, Informative
      When was the last time you saw an IBM product?

      %spoiler Market cap: 166.53B %spoiler

    8. Re:HP still around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You must not spend any time in server rooms, then. Proliants are the lifeblood of many an SMB.

    9. Re:HP still around? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I saw one of their products today. I took a picture.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    10. Re:HP still around? by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      you may be joking, but have you seen the prices of canon / epson cartridges? The older HP ones used to include the print head with the cartridge, which made them expensive but the printers lasted a lot longer. The newer ones (the ones I'm aware of) have a separate print head more like canon and epson, making cartridges around the same price or in the case of my printer, much cheaper.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    11. Re:HP still around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does any of this ring a bell?

      Do you mean Packard-Bell? No, I think that one belongs to Acer.

    12. Re:HP still around? by TedRiot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I saw a few hundred of their products just a couple of days ago when I visited one of our datacenters.

    13. Re:HP still around? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Probably because most of HP's sales are to the professional market.

      People who don't work in IT will indeed have little to do with them anymore, we use HP kit at work, but I've not even seen the slightest hint of an HP consumer product before me in years.

    14. Re:HP still around? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It's my fault. I had to replace a few ink cartridges in my printer. That, alone, probably paid for Palm.

      $79 Pre with proprietary $50 batteries that only last 6 months?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    15. Re:HP still around? by MediaCastleX · · Score: 1

      I'm really assuming you are just being funny, in which case *ha*, but that don't mean I want to miss my chance to chime in! A bunch of laptops and pcs are hp nowadays and compaq is hp and acer and all that mess, as well as the printers and like everyone is saying, servers and business gear is mostly HP. The *only* competition is IBM and that's because they've been around longer than our grandparents, when computers were counting machines. I liken them as the Marvel and DC of the tech world...but enough of going on tangents.

  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. I wonder why... by monoqlith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's amazing the effect that one creepy girl can have on a share price.

    Seriously. That last one is the worst. Using a phone is like the transmigration of souls?

    Boo. In fairness, it's not the girl's fault at all.

    1. Re:I wonder why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was totally hot, it's just that the "story" in the commercial had nothing to do with anything. I wasn't even close to giving the users a reason to buy.

    2. Re:I wonder why... by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      Palm really screwed up with their ads. They should have gone with this one instead http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOHh4OMM9V0

    3. Re:I wonder why... by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Boo. In fairness, it's not the girl's fault at all.

      In all fairness, she looks somewhat like the Borg queen. In all fairness, some people claim the Borg queen is doable...

    4. Re:I wonder why... by linhares · · Score: 1
      for that one girl the rules are clear: it's tits or gfto; her choice.

      As for HP buying palm, I hope they will not commit any of palm's "I wanna be Steve mistakes", in which I'd include:

      i) launching in CA/USA first; or lauching with "exclusive partners" at first. NO. That is wrong in all levels. That is right for Steve, who has the advantage; but not for others. For others, you launch worldwide, and you launch UNLOCKED, and you let the prices FOLLOW the demand and supply curves.

      ii) see i)

      anything lovked to a carrier, or not lauched worldwide, shows you're an idiot. I'm in Brazil (rio); and I paid over US$1.000 for an iPhone (on a store on the "white" market, it could have been worse), but what I REALLY wanted was a Palm Pre. Guess what? There are no Palm Pre's over here, despite the growing economy or despite anything else. They are simply left for a day when the benefactors decide to throw them at us. So, as a consumer, to put it kindly, F*ck that. Change your behavior and we'll change ours.

    5. Re:I wonder why... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Or this one

      And despite all the think of Carly here she is a smart woman. I think she plans to run in 2016.

    6. Re:I wonder why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry I didn't click the links. Are you talking about Carly Fiorina?

  13. Marketing blunders... by plover · · Score: 3, Funny

    By "marketing blunders", do they mean Palm's "The Most Pale Woman in the World" campaign? Because I've gotta say, she really didn't sell me on a Palm, or anything else.

    She looked more like an extra from the Lord of the Rings (generic elf maiden #38) than a spokesmodel for a technical product.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Marketing blunders... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By "marketing blunders", do they mean Palm's "The Most Pale Woman in the World" campaign? Because I've gotta say, she really didn't sell me on a Palm, or anything else.

      Agreed. That's got to be one of the worst ad campaigns ever--worse than Microsoft's abominable Bill Gates/Jerry Seinfeld ads, even. Palm should have gone after their ad agency and demanded a refund.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    2. Re:Marketing blunders... by rxan · · Score: 2, Funny

      She looked more like an extra from the Lord of the Rings (generic elf maiden #38) than a spokesmodel for a technical product.

      I thought I recognized her.

    3. Re:Marketing blunders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was/is scarrrry. I could never buy a phone from her.

    4. Re:Marketing blunders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking more like the Borg Queen, but in human flesh form

    5. Re:Marketing blunders... by Mordaximus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just for reference sake, her name is Tamara Hope. She's actually quite pretty.

    6. Re:Marketing blunders... by plover · · Score: 1

      Just for reference sake, her name is Tamara Hope. She's actually quite pretty.

      I have no doubt that she's pretty, but not when rolled in bleached flour, told to stare unblinkingly into the lens, and filmed through a double soft filter. It works when you're trying to create a "mostly human" look, or if you're trying to fry trout. Otherwise it's just creepy.

      --
      John
  14. Forgive me if I'm merely having a short memory... by Dragoniz3r · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seems to me that the Pre made more of a splash by requiring people to give up their SSN to buy it, than it did in the market. Am I off base here? I don't really remember seeing anything in the news about what a smashing success the Pre was, but I suppose I may have just forgotten...

  15. Re:Confusing by rdean400 · · Score: 1

    They were in the phone business, but lacked a compelling product. The press release says that buying Palm gives them what they need to compete.

  16. Please please! by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Release loads of nice phones with WebOS, lots of different form factors and at a good price.

    WebOS is a great OS, it is the hardware that sucks at the moment.

    1. Re:Please please! by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The Pre Plus is a nice piece of hardware. I came from a WinMo5 XV6700. Using my Palm Pre Plus is like heaven in comparison.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Please please! by linhares · · Score: 1

      +1 internets to you sir, and please release a 720p and 1080p tablets with TEGRA 2 behind, fully capable of mp4 and xvid and avi's, etc; hdmi out (see EVO phone when in doubt). Maybe include a pixel-qi screen (nerds can dream, right?). Enable adobe flash--ONLY for those who REALLY want it--and advertise your differences and *effing compete--in the world scene*--for god's sake!

  17. Buying it back... by Hobbex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since HP already own 3COM, who spun off Palm in 2000 (with a first day valuation of something like 30 times what they are paying for it today), one could almost say that Palm is being bought back after 10 (not so happy) years as an independent company.

    1. Re:Buying it back... by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

      It was an afterthought when they first got together, via the US Robotics acquisition. I guess HP is where Silicon Valley legends go to die.

    2. Re:Buying it back... by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      I really don't know much about 3COM, but I thought their timing for spinning off US Robotics and Palm was amazing.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

  18. Does that include... by ShaunC · · Score: 1

    ..the creepy Canadian chick from the commercials?

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    1. Re:Does that include... by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      She might be a bit creepy, but I certainly wouldn't refuse her Palm.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Does that include... by capo_dei_capi · · Score: 1

      Nah, she got fired.

  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. If IBM... by sophomoric · · Score: 2

    If IBM were to buy HP+Palm, it would be the ultimate congolmerate of once-great companies.

    1. Re:If IBM... by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Palm messed up a long time ago. They had the initial momentum, a great product, but then they failed to add anything to hardware or software for years, while iPaq and their kin came over and owned the higher end.

      Palm owned this space, and messed up big time, when they could have ruled it all.

    2. Re:If IBM... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Their OS was revolutionary, but a dead end. They tried to maintain backwards compatibility in the fastest moving market segment in IT, the mobile space. If they had moved to a proper kernel in the 1990s they might have kept up, but nobody saw the iPhone then.

    3. Re:If IBM... by azgard · · Score: 1

      No. What killed them was the neverending disputes about the money, split of Palm and so on. Simply, greed. The backward compatibility of OS wasn't an issue at all - that's how you keep market share of applications. DOS/Windows have done it, z/OS have done it, there really is no big issue.

    4. Re:If IBM... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      They'd have to grab Novell, too.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
  21. In other news... by srussia · · Score: 1, Funny

    A1 to Buy Canola for $1.4 billion

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  22. More ink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wonder how they will sell more ink to Palm customers?

  23. Perhaps it is true place of WebOS by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Think about it, HP isn't run by some CEO that can reject to have World's de facto plugin just because he personally hates it.

    Flash+Firefox core+open OS that does do everything a laptop would do would be the true killer thing. It isn't coming from a no name company either, it is HP who has real big prestige both at home and enterprise.

    1. Re:Perhaps it is true place of WebOS by DamageLabs · · Score: 1

      It probably is a good thing, but you are forgetting something.

      Developers.

      Palm told them to get lost. Broke all compatibility from Garnet to WebOS.

      Getting them back now is a exceedingly tough job, after most of them switched platforms. No users and no developers will not be an easy task.

      On the other hand, the bes calculators combined with some flair from the old Palm V or Clie lines would make a great product.

    2. Re:Perhaps it is true place of WebOS by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the HP Calculator group has been gone a long time. That was the Corvalis Group. They made the HP calculators, the HP Palmtops and the very first generation Omnibooks (the 300 and 450.) They are long, long gone.

    3. Re:Perhaps it is true place of WebOS by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      New management, new market. There's no reason for WebOS to sink or swim other than what HP decides to do with it.

    4. Re:Perhaps it is true place of WebOS by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      The developers were coming. The interface is slicker than Android, more consistent, more polished, more responsive. I'd really like to take my Droid back and get a Pre Plus - but I was concerned about the long-term viability of Palm. I'd like the platform to be available for the two years I'd have to put on my contract.

      The cost of entry to write software for the platform was far cheaper - and there is a roadmap to give direct hardware access to the GPU for games, just as Apple has done for the iPhone. On day 1 there were better looking games for the Pre than any Android has today after nearly a year and a half.

  24. Re:Confusing by tgd · · Score: 1

    HP (in the form of Compaq) created the smartphone market.

    They're still one of the largest WinMo phone manufacturers.

  25. So one more rollback of carly's program... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess the next version of the pre will be called the jornada palm :-)

  26. HP's new mobile social networking site: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Facepalm

  27. BEOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm. I wonder if HP will be willing to release the BE OS sourcecode. The guys at the Haiku project are doing a fantastic job, and while a lot of work is done on the project, I think that if HP would release the code once it completes its acquisiton of Palm, it would be of great help to them.

    Note: Be Inc was acquired by Palm

    1. Re:BEOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt HP will, and even if they did, I'm not sure how much it'd help at this point -- I recall reading comments from one of the Haiku guys (a kernel hacker, IIRC) in an interview to the effect that they're close enough to finished that it'd probably be easier to wrap it up themselves than to rework their code and BeOS code to fit together. Though at higher levels, it might be more beneficial.

    2. Re:BEOS by acecamaro666 · · Score: 1

      The Be OS folks ended up working for PalmSource when Palm did the PalmOne / PalmSource split. PalmSource then tried to make OS 6, and then Access bought Palmsource. I don't know what happened to the patents for Be, but the people at least went down the PalmSource path....

    3. Re:BEOS by NiteMair · · Score: 1

      Most of the BeOS peolpe have moved on... several ended up back at Palm, some at Apple, but many ended up at Google working on Android, etc.

      BeOS is history... these days it's much better to just use Haiku if you want an open source BeOS.

  28. Title fight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP is starting to challenge Computer Associates as being THE place where good technology goes to die.

  29. Did they learn nothing from Ipaq? by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow. $1.2B for what? A list of customers that have no taste?

  30. RPN by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Great - does this mean we'll have to make all our calls using RPN?
    1234 555 212 1+ DIAL
    I know it's supposed to be more logical, but it just seems so confusing...

    I had a HP 48GX calculators with RPN for years when it broke down I bought a HP 50G and just assumed it had RPN. For a while after I fired it up for the first time I was a afraid I had wasted my money until I figured out that you can change the thing from the default infix mode to RPN. I've gotten so used to RPN that I can hardly use infix calculators any more.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:RPN by Zordak · · Score: 1

      I still have my HP 48g from school/engineering days sitting on my desk (the one with a massive 32k memory). Unfortunately, the most complex math I usually do anymore is adding up billable hours and multiplying by my hourly rate. Still, it sure feels nice to turn the old 48g on and see the old, familiar menus.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    2. Re:RPN by twosat · · Score: 1

      Ha, I still have a working HP41C from 1982 in my desk drawer. I hardly ever use it now, which might explain why its batteries date back to 2004!

  31. Does Pre have any PDA features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really liked my Tungsten E as an organizer, before it started acting up (cheap crummy power switch). Nobody seems to know, or care, if the Pre is a good organizer. The iPhone definitely isn't. I'm currently on Windows Mobile, which is at least functional.

    1. Re:Does Pre have any PDA features? by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      Windows Mobile

      functional.

      Does not compute.

    2. Re:Does Pre have any PDA features? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Pre has great exchange support-it can even handle multiple accounts, so yes, I would say it's a good organizer. And WebOS doesn't crash so bad that it requires a wipe and reinstall every other week so I'd say it's got your Windows Mobile phone beaten.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  32. Could be good. Could be dumb. by blair1q · · Score: 0, Troll

    Palm's software and hardware are way overmatched by Apple and the Droids.

    HP will have to come out with something pretty spectacular to get their money back on this.

    1. Re:Could be good. Could be dumb. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHAHAHA. Oh that's good. I've tried all three phones (30day full-blown testdrives).

      I started out loving the Pre back when it first came out on Sprint on June 6 of last year. Yup, I waited in line. I took it back after 30 days because the Sprint service sucked.

      I got an iPod touch in October and that started my love of the all things Apple.

      I waited diligently until the Pre Plus came out on Verizon in January. Oh how I missed it. It was nice, felt good in my hand, but it was slow. Slower than I remember. Sluggish compared to the iPod Touch. It went back. The kicker? The $10.95 Verizon wanted to charge me for VZ Navigator. Fuckers.

      So I tried out an iPhone for a month, and compared it's service to my Palm Treo 700p on Verizon. The Verizon EDVO service smoked AT&T three ways til Sunday (where I live anyway), so the iPhone went back.

      Now I have a Droid. I have the tethering I need, the service and coverage I need. But the phone sucks. It's like a high-school robotics project compared to the simple elegance of the Roomba when placed against the iPhone. It can't even compare to the smooth simplicity and usability of the Palm Pre (Especially the Exchange and calendaring support).

      Jesus Christ, I can't even plug the damn thing into my laptop without the touch screen going all wonky on me - the Moto Droid is a leaky, noisy, EMI-ridden POS. It's the first cellphone I've ever had that causes my clock radio to scream in protest at the interference.

  33. Re:Forgive me if I'm merely having a short memory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article about requiring a SSN was terribly misleading.

    The fact is that at launch, the Palm Pre was only available on Sprint with a 2 year contract. Sprint generally requires a SSN to do a credit check before you can sign up. So it's really Sprint's fault, not Palm.

    Additionally, you can forgo the credit check with a refundable cash deposit -- so the whole thing was an overreaction by some paranoid techies.

    Now smashing success, the Pre was not. It has critical acclaim because it does a number of things like multitasking really well*, but it's been selling poorly in competition with the iPhone and Android phones.

    * Yes, the upcoming iPhone does multitasking now, but nowhere near as well as WebOS. Also, notifications for SMS, email, etc, are unintrusive and way better than the iPhone.

  34. HP's New Girlfriend by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now that Carly Fiorina isn't around to fuck HP any longer, it's now girlfriend is it's Palm.

  35. Re:Forgive me if I'm merely having a short memory. by eyecorporations · · Score: 1

    You mean the fact that Sprint does a credit check before you sign a contract on any phone? And that it didn't make a splash anywhere except for being sensationalized on /.? http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/06/21/2359255/SSN-Required-To-Buy-Palm-Pre?from=rss

  36. Hopefully... by aodash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    HP won't pull an Oracle - ruin Palm the way Oracle has ruined Sun.

    1. Re:Hopefully... by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Too soon to tell if sun will be ruined. Mysql though, thats another story.....

      sigh.

      --
      NO SIG
  37. My take? Fraud.... by alexborges · · Score: 0, Troll

    It makes no sense. The price makes no sense, the OS makes no sense for HP/CQ, moving into pervasive computing through palmos makes no freaking sense.

    New appartment in dubai, now that makes sense.

    (This is just an opinion, not an acusation)

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:My take? Fraud.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Funny

      You want an apartment in a hot miserable place?

    2. Re:My take? Fraud.... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It isn't hot or miserable if you have lots of money (to afford AC, among other things) and you're male!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:My take? Fraud.... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      miserable for trafficked women who wind up there and forced to service a couple dozen or more clients per day, condom or not at the customer's option. And if you catch it, HIV is a deportable offense too.

    4. Re:My take? Fraud.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tip, I'm off to Dubai.

    5. Re:My take? Fraud.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes no sense. The price makes no sense, the OS makes no sense for HP/CQ, moving into pervasive computing through palmos makes no freaking sense.

      New appartment in dubai, now that makes sense.

      (This is just an opinion, not an acusation)

      In their defense: Why would a Wookiee, an eight-foot tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of two-foot tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending a major record company, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests

    6. Re:My take? Fraud.... by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      How does that contradict anything the the parent post said?

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    7. Re:My take? Fraud.... by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Im just saying it doesnt make sense to pay 1.2 billion for a company that cannot pull its own weight which is even less than that.

      Where is the sense in that?

      --
      NO SIG
    8. Re:My take? Fraud.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I have to say, I don't see the synergy. But then I'm not Carly Fiorino. If I was, I'd probably see it even if it wasn't there.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  38. ha by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    This is just AOL/Time Warner all over again. Their both just trying to extend their inevitable death spiral. It reminds be of that Disney movie "Black Hole" They're just stuck there on the edge... doomed. Waiting for that crazy robot guy to smash the ship and send them spiraling in.

  39. New name by adenied · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps their new name should be HPalm3Compaq.

    1. Re:New name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps their new name should be HPalm3Compaq.

      You forgot to work DEC in there

    2. Re:New name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HPalm3DECompaq - there even worked 3D into is so they can go into the 3D TV market

    3. Re:New name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps their new name should be HPalm3Compaq.

      More appropriately.... HPalm3Compaqital

    4. Re:New name by ElecCham · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps US HPalm3Compaquipspring Corporation...?

      --
      Sig broken, watch for .finger
  40. No by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Informative

    HP BOUGHT Palm. Shares of PALM are no longer traded on the NASDAQ as of market close today. If you were short, you owe a lot of money...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:No by NiteMair · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which is why they're still trading in after hours (for as much as $5.94/share last I checked)... and the deal won't even be finalized until July 31st.

      Even then, there's already a class action lawsuit being setup to investigate the "speedy" sale and Palm's fiduciary duty to its shareholders:

      http://www.zlk.com/palm.html

      I wouldn't be so certain this is a finalized deal quite yet...

    2. Re:No by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Funny, my broker removed it this afternoon at around 6pm EST

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, ETRADE > your broker?

      Ouch.

  41. Long-forgotten opportunity by WheelDweller · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess it was the 'shirts' that decided Palm's handwriting recognition was 'too valuable' to license...idiots. The time for using that had seemed passed, and nowdays with touch-screen oriented smartphones, it sounds like a good idea, again.

    This sounds silly; but I STILL have a couple of Palm 5's around here. When I was a security guard, I could actually watch a line for activity, while writing on the Palm, without worrying about it being readable. I *SO* prefer it to the number-pad texting; it's so much faster and easy to learn.

    Let's hope of all the treasures HP has found and lost, that the handwriting program is something they feel like licensing, cheaply, because it's darned useful, not hiding, because "they want to make all their money back". (This never happens, introducing scarcity: people work around it, instead).

    So....GO HP!

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    1. Re:Long-forgotten opportunity by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Graffiti, the original, is the one that they had to remove from all their devices because it infringed some dumb-ass single stroke handwriting patent. The replacement, Graffiti2, was a PITA, and was nowhere near as fast to use, which is why the Graffiti screens got dropped from all the Treo models - That and Palm wanted to compete with RIM and the Blackberry, which they did very well.

      What Palm SHOULD have done was get a native EAS implementation on that horrid Garnet, and never gotten into the WiMo space. That, ultimately, I think is what did them in.

  42. Anti-Trust by joocemann · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    HP makes palm devices.

    Palm makes palm devices.

    They COMPETE.
    -----------

    Seriously... How does this junk fly without the greasing of political pockets?

    But don't worry... some distraction of an explanation will come up... some B.S. to lure you away from the main point that these two companies compete directly and now they won't be.

    If they can consolidate, that's fine. But then I want my government to set maximum pricing, and set it nice and low so as to protect me from olig/monopoly gouging.

    1. Re:Anti-Trust by mgblst · · Score: 1

      You must be a Microsoft fan with your in depth knowledge of Antitrust law.

      Just because two companies compete, does not mean they can not merge. You may have the most ignorant take on antitrust law I have ever seen. But why waste time reading up on something you don't understand, much better to just talk rubbish.

    2. Re:Anti-Trust by mjwx · · Score: 1

      They COMPETE.

      CLUEBAT: you are permitted to buy a competitor. What you cannot do is use a dominant market position to prevent new competitors from entering the market (seeing as there is not monopoly in the mobile phone market HP/Palm may do as they please).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:Anti-Trust by joocemann · · Score: 1

      Or you could teach me... but instead you just talk crap. Please explain. I bet you won't, and I want to lose that bet.

    4. Re:Anti-Trust by TheNumberless · · Score: 1

      A merger would generally only be prevented under anti-trust if it would create a monopoly. As HP and Palm are both relatively minor players in the market, that's not an issue here.

    5. Re:Anti-Trust by joocemann · · Score: 1

      They are major players in the palm computing realm. Minor in phone business.

      It's a shame that the law is limited to the creation of a monopoly when the clear problem with our current 'markets' (if you can call them that, lol) is the collusion of the oligopolies. This move reinforces the move to lesser competition and all the maladies that come with it.

      I suppose the law should be rewritten to be applicable when a specific total market share is controlled by a specific low number of companies -- and one company of large share buys another of large share.
      -----

      I guess I had assumed anti-trust laws were written more clearly and protectively. I guess I was wrong... the lawyers always find a way, I guess.

  43. Android has a new business risk by perpenso · · Score: 1

    ... They probably threw the idea around and came to the conclusion that they'd be another also-ran if they just pushed Android/WP7 sets (Especially since thats the move Dell is making) ...

    Android also has a new business risk since it is a Google brand. When making that build-or-buy decision you want your partner to be non-controversial, you don't want your company to be collateral damage in another company's fight with the Chinese government. Fair or not, just or not, Google is a riskier partner than they used to be. This is not the only factor to consider but it must have been part of the Android decision.

    --
    Perpenso Calc for iPhone and iPod touch, scientific and bill/tip calculator, fractions, complex numbers, RPN

  44. Bummer by Haxzaw · · Score: 1

    I would have bought them, but I wasn't willing to go anywhere near that high. Probably $1.2K would have been my offer, oh well.

  45. Duck! by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    Watch out, Microsoft employees! Flying chair hazard!

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  46. Re:Confusing by mgblst · · Score: 1

    Fuck off, they didn't start anything. They brought the big guns to the table with the first Compaq iPaq, but there were plenty of other WinMo phones release at exactly the same time, and they weren't the first smartphones.

  47. Because HP is so good at selling handhelds... by Shag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does my memory fail me, or is HP the company that couldn't even do a decent job of selling iPods, the handheld-electronics equivalent of crack-covered pancakes?

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:Because HP is so good at selling handhelds... by vaporland · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, after Apple sold HP a load of iPods, they lowered the price so that HP was stuck selling at the old price, or the new price at a loss... that was a classic RDF execution....

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
  48. I'm starting a new rumor by sootman · · Score: 1

    They're going to revive BeOS!

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:I'm starting a new rumor by NiteMair · · Score: 1

      Your rumor will die pretty quickly considering Palm doesn't own the rights to BeOS...

    2. Re:I'm starting a new rumor by sootman · · Score: 1

      Don't they? Palm bought Be in 2001. http://news.cnet.com/2100-1040-271718.html&tag=tp_pr

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:I'm starting a new rumor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then Palm split into PalmOne (hardware) and PalmSource (software) and PalmSource got bought by ACCESS. So ACCESS owns the rights to BeOS.

    4. Re:I'm starting a new rumor by NiteMair · · Score: 1

      Yup...

      Besides, Haiku http://haiku-os.org/ is now much better than BeOS ever was - reviving BeOS would be pointless with a more modern open source replacement already in existence.

  49. wow they must have hired her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TO SABOTAGE PALM

  50. poor palm by andreakulikowski · · Score: 1

    the new os from blackberry may be another nail in the coffin for palm

  51. Re:Confusing by tgd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fuck off, they didn't start anything.

    You might want to ask your doc to up your meds ...

  52. Driver support in Linux by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

    At least they work better than Lexmarks under Linux.

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  53. Oh jeeez by Jasafar · · Score: 1

    HP will run what's left of Palm right into the ground. It will be just like Microsoft's acquisition of Danger.

  54. BeOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they will open source BeOS?

    1. Re:BeOS? by NiteMair · · Score: 1

      Palm doesn't own it... any why bother, when Haiku exists.

  55. Sure it makes sense by symbolset · · Score: 3, Insightful

    HP has finally realized that in addition to being in competition with Cisco/VMWare/EMC in the datacenter, they're also in competition with Apple in the consumer gadgetry department. This probably comes out of Apple passing Microsoft on the S&P 500 last week. This is actually a good thing. $1.2B isn't a big deal to get Palm's patent portfolio and add some phones to their product list as well.

    It also means they have no intention of going down with the WinTel ship. They're going to make a fight of it.

    I hope they come out with a decent ARM based Android slate. I won't be buying that Intel Atom+Windows 7 version.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Sure it makes sense by yankeessuck · · Score: 1

      Why would HP buy Palm and then make Android devices? They pretty much have to use WebOS which they just bought.

    2. Re:Sure it makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they come out with a decent ARM based Android slate. I won't be buying that Intel Atom+Windows 7 version.

      HP wants Palm for WebOS and their patents

      Humphries said “We think it’s one of the best operating systems out there today. We see nothing in development in the next 3 to 5 years that comes close,” Humphries also said. “We want to take HP’s financial strength and use it to take webOS to the next level,” he continued. “We’ll compete aggressively in the market with Apple and Google. We’ve got our hands on a very compelling operating system,”
      Read more: http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/28/hp-palm-deal-webos/#ixzz0mUnT48uu

      This is more likely what you going to see other then an Andriod Powered Slate.

      http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/04/28/the-top-5-hp-products-we-would-like-to-see-post-palm-buyout/

    3. Re:Sure it makes sense by symbolset · · Score: 1

      WebOS is cool and all, but it's going to be three years refining and HP doesn't have that long. This fight may not be over by then, but we'll be able to see the end from there. HP is huge and it doesn't hurt them to explore many avenues at once. While HP is a strong Microsoft partner they also have been huge supporters of Linux from early on. Kernel.org runs on HP donated servers and it has for many years. HP servers all come with a Linux environment, or one you can download for diagnostic purposes so all HP servers work with Linux. Until last month their consumer platforms did too, though just now the diagnostic CD is Windows PE. All HP everything works with Linux. When I need a printer for my network, I don't look anywhere else because the HP stuff is known to work. To be fair, it's not just Linux. HP hardware is predominately Open so it works well with anybody who cares to try their stuff against it. In servers, storage, OS and networking they adhere to open standards because they earnestly believe that your ability to choose their stuff for some of your solution is better than trying to find customers who are willing and able to buy their whole stack from end to end. They're also interested in selling the vertical stack if they can, and as long as they're open about the units, we can probably forgive them for that because whole-stack solutions do have some synergy benefits. As Microsoft's sun sets, HP is well positioned not only to weather that storm, but to profit from it: Windows platforms have almost always been zero margin products given to seed services and such, and the more recently the more so - so the sun setting on Microsoft's hegemony may mean the dawn of a new day of profit margin.

      Incidentally, HP Bladesystems have a weird bug with local mounted USB boot DVDROM devices and networking that prevents recognition of FlexNics by VMWare install (several V4+ versions) booted from a DVD attached to the front USB/Video dongle. I don't know what it is, or who at HP to tell about it, but mounting the image through VirtualMedia over the iLO network resolves the issue - though it's slow. Also, chassis connect DVD/CDROMS to blades almost never works and it's not worth the effort to try right now. Maybe future Onboard Administrator firmwares will resolve these problems, but for now use iLO Advanced and virtual media - which you should be using anyway - in the modern era what server wrangler has actual physical access to the server? That's retro. It's probably still an issue for these past three years because you ought not be fondling the physical servers anyway but it would be nice if they fixed that because the Virtual Media connection is slow. I understand they fix that in iLO3, with a gigabit iLO connection and onboard ARM processors for server management but you have to buy new servers to use that. It would be nice if they went back and fixed this retro bug.

      Heck, when Windows or VMWare or whatever won't recognize the hardware I boot Ubuntu Live environment to test the hardware and it saves me a lot of work. If I can ping the gateway outside my bladesystem Virtual Connect environment in Ubuntu then the "No compatible network adapters found" message in VMWare is bogus and I can move from diagnosing the hardware/Virtual Connect configuration to figuring out what the heck is VMWare's problem. I did this today. My FC engineer was shocked that a free OS automatically mounted the LUNs he exposed on very fresh 8Gbit FC adapters. I wasn't surprised - I expected it because I know that Linux drivers are almost always first, and Linux supports more hardware than any other OS ever - flat. Also incidentally, the EMC CX4 Model 120 populated with 12 200GB SSD drives totally rocks. The IOPS performance is not to be believed - but have a good set of sytems engineers to milk it for all it's worth because it's spendy.

      HP has an Android slate in development. Now that they're dropping the WinTel slate, that looks l

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  56. too little, too late: by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine if they launched their campaign with this commercial instead. Palm's life would be SOOOO different.

    --
    Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
  57. CEO remains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Current Palm CEO Jon Rubinstein is "expected to remain with the company," though it's not said in what capacity.

    There is the second floor restroom that needs cleaning.

  58. Coming soon to Woot! by Whuffo · · Score: 1

    Loads and loads of "famous maker" refurbished smart phones.

  59. Harry Potter bought Palm? by masmullin · · Score: 1

    Well I guess he needs some relief, that Hermoine chick is hawt!

    1. Re:Harry Potter bought Palm? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about a Harry Palm for Potter?

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  60. Fingers Crossed by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    The Palm Tungsten and closely-allied models are absolutely perfect for my purposes. I make photographs and graphics...which I can show to potential customers. I constantly jot notes to myself, and I can write on the thing. My girlfriend originally bought it for me because when I quit smoking, I'd tear bits off her package to scribble on. It's got a keyboard accessory with real-sized keys that I can type on (along with Microsoft Office). It displays e-books amazingly well considering its small size. There's room for plenty of music. With its updated battery and an external charger that cost dick-all it's good for more hours of operation than you can possibly use. You could easily type notes from morning to lunch, charge at lunch and then go for the whole afternoon (and the infrared keyboard is its most power-hungry application). It plays movies and has WiFi through an optional card. It syncs with Outlook. It keeps as much contact information and scheduling information as any smart phone, and it communicates with my un-smart phone effectively via Bluetooth. The thing is like a runty, retarded little laptop. It's five years old, it still works like new, and it should have worn out twice by now. It also fits comfortably in a shirt pocket.

    If HP wanted to do some serious damage in the current market, they should build on this basic model. Keep the on-screen writing/sketching and other stuff nobody else does anymore. Add a camera, microphone and the ability to address larger-capacity memory cards (my model is limited to 1G cards). I don't know what's possible in an upgraded processor...but do it. These things will never replace a laptop, or maybe even a notebook (though I might argue that), but when more people catch on to what the little buggers can do, there will definitely be a market for them.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Fingers Crossed by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      You need to thing a long way ahead. Think about the UI on minority report. Workstations sell by the square centimetre. They have a cool, consistent style, possibly transparent. They all run the same OS and when configured, can behave as a single system. I should be able to transfer objects between my palm top/phone, ipad/netbook device, laptop or desktop with a flick of the finger.

      Its fully distributed computing with the ability of offload to the cloud as required. With the right set of products, all these things should be possible. Instead iphone users are stuck with lists and scroll bars on itunes, with one way to work: master/slave. Its crap and we should be doing better.

    2. Re:Fingers Crossed by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      I hadn't considered it, but that kind of convergence makes a huge amount of sense.

      Palm's "Hotsync" is certainly a step in that direction. I usually use a cable, but even my ancient E2 could easily synchronize notes, contacts, e-mail, photos, books, music and everything else automatically by Bluetooth as soon as I got within a few yards of my PC. Depending on what you set up, data transfer is in both directions, and applets can be set up separately to give any site priority (or none). With a WiFi card, the cloud is completely accessible, too.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  61. Unfortunately by viraltus · · Score: 1

    You don't need to go so far away, you only need to look around the corner to find that...

    --
    Dear /. CENSORS that set people's Karma to Neutral when you disagree with them: FUCK YOU!!
    1. Re:Unfortunately by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      eh? streetwalkers around here are mostly crack whores - self employed and self-destructive

    2. Re:Unfortunately by viraltus · · Score: 1

      That's what their master wants you to believe, a high % are forcibly turn into that. Watch some documentaries about it and you'll find out that horror is across the street.

      --
      Dear /. CENSORS that set people's Karma to Neutral when you disagree with them: FUCK YOU!!
    3. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo mama.

    4. Re:Unfortunately by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Documentaries aren't reality, contrived and too small a sample size at best.

  62. Not So True by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

    Say what you will but HP is one of very few that actually fully support Linux.

    This is not so true. My coworker has a year-old HP Laserjet that won't work with Linux. These days I avoid them at any cost with all those flimsy plastic builds, but there was a time when Laserjets were solid.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
  63. Ahhh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now in the board room. "How are we going to pay for this?" "I believe we are due for another WFR."

  64. It is because they are in the backoffice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running Linux in case you need to know.

    Many Linux corporate servers are running in HP hardware,

  65. In which way has Oracle ruined Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just curious. You obviously know something the rest of us don't.

  66. Touchstone... by DusterBar · · Score: 1

    The charging/usb connection door is somewhat annoying but I have not touched it after the initial setup.
    I have the Touchstone charger (highly recommended) and just place the Pre on that and it charges. All other operations, including sync and update I do over the network (wifi at home, cell otherwise)
    I just wish that it mechanically was a bit more strong (I have a Pre, not the Pre Plus. Some claim that the Pre Plus has better mechanical build quality)
    PS - Not that the quality is bad, it just could be a bit better...

    1. Re:Touchstone... by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      Didn't know you could sync over wifi. I'll have to check that out. I'm still a bit new with smartphones.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
  67. How's This For An Idea? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    How about our rich Western governments get some backbones and put laws in place on corporations that state the following:

    "In any financial year where you make staff redundant because you supposedly cannot afford to pay them, you cannot go buying other companies so that you, in effect, take on more staff."

    And while we're on the subject:

    "Greedy shitbags like Mark Hearn cannot take a pay bonus in the same year when hundreds of HP staff, including my missus, have been laid off."

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  68. Re:Confusing by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think that honor goes to Handspring, a Palm-employee run spinoff that finally wedded a cellphone to a modern PDA (circa 2001).

  69. They will port WebOS to Itanium by Technomancer · · Score: 1

    It's gonna be double winner this way.
    That is what they mean by double down!

  70. HP to Palm = Gateway to Amiga by tomweeks · · Score: 1

    HP Buying Palm eh? Hmmm... Superior OS/hardware platform. Best GUI and multitasking sytem in the market. Original company can't market its way out of a wet paper sack. Palm's WebOS/Pre makes me feel like an Amiga owner all over again! I'm in! Wonder if I can run UAE on it?! hehe

  71. Palm is like an awesomely bad vampyre... by tehIvyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... that just wouldnt die. Palms occasionally brilliant products and innovations, are completely outdone by the incompetence of their marketing and sales people. Everytime I see a press release from Palm I am surprised they are still around, and its been like this since they got spun off from 3Com.

  72. HP Medical sold to Phillips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The morons that ran HP not only spun off the instrument division, but also sold their medical technology and patents to Phillips. That way they could focus on Windows computers and Cannon printers. But the carpetbagger CEO got rich.

  73. pride came before the fall by pydev · · Score: 1

    Palm was very successful in the 1990's and had good products. What killed them was their arrogance. Instead of developing a Linux-based phone and PDA around 1999 (like many people told them they should), they went off and did their own proprietary stuff and failed miserably.

    Part of their arrogance was that they considered themselves "brilliant". Like Apple, much of what went into Palms was invented elsewhere, Palm was just the first to make a really successful product out of it. Like Apple, Palms were also a pain to program, although you wouldn't have known it from their hordes of loyal developers. But you're right: it's marketing that killed Palm and that is saving Apple.