Slashdot Mirror


Church Turns To Facebook To Find Priests

crimeandpunishment writes "The Catholic church of France isn't looking for friends on Facebook, it's looking for priests. The church has turned to Facebook as part of a campaign to attract young people to the priesthood, in an effort to combat its drastically dwindling number of priests. It may be working. The Facebook page attracted more than 1,200 fans in one week."

286 comments

  1. Young people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Attracting young people to the priesthood, isn't that what they've been doing for years?

    1. Re:Young people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what religious prick went and made all these posts troll. The vatican got fuckheads on /. too. You can't keep covering it up mr pope.Christian churches covered up the fact the priests were buggering altar boys.

      Fuck you covering it up is almost as bad as doing it.

    2. Re:Young people by oztiks · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah well, I got modded troll for making a fairly harmless joke about Sarah Palin on a related post.

      Fairly depressing to think Slashdot has become like this, its not really the poster being the troller any more, more like the person modding has become the troll.

    3. Re:Young people by gangien · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has become like this

      That implies, it at some point wasn't. Which.. well.. maybe it was before they introduced mods..

    4. Re:Young people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an atheist but what the OP did is the definition of a troll.

  2. JUST WOW by thijsh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Priests looking to Facebook as part of a campain to attract young people.

    1. Re:JUST WOW by Locke2005 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unfortunately, since the minimum age to sign up for Facebook is 13, it is not very useful for recruiting altar boys. Sometimes the traditional ways work best...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:JUST WOW by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Great cover story. Troll for kids under the guise of finding new potential recruits.

      And it feeds the pattern of "those who are abused as children tend to abuse children when they grow up"...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:JUST WOW by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not the most ridiculous thing about this. Think about it, they're looking on Facebook for people who want to be celibate.

      I don't rate their chances very highly.

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:JUST WOW by Forge · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm neither Jewish nor Catholic, but given the choice I would rather be a Rabbi. Rabbis are practically required to have sex. (You must be married. Preferably with children).

      The logic is beautiful in it's simplicity. A big part of your job in both rolls is guiding people throgh normal problems of life. Rebellious kids, angry wife, miserable mother in law etc... The kind of thing a virgin priest would know nothing about and thus give pointless advice.

      However if you are looking for impressionable male virgins, FaceBook is a good place to start but Slashdot would be better. Most ACs should become priests. They already live under vows of Poverty and Chastity. Obedience isn't that hard to learn.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    5. Re:JUST WOW by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 0

      The logic is beautiful in it's simplicity. A big part of your job in both rolls is guiding people throgh normal problems of life. Rebellious kids, angry wife, miserable mother in law etc... The kind of thing a virgin priest would know nothing about and thus give pointless advice.

      Yeah, you're right. Male ob/gyn's -- who're they kidding? Poseurs! Psychologists and psychiatrists who aren't themselves insane -- can't trust them! A divorce lawyer who hasn't already gotten screwed in a divorce proceeding? Not for me, no sir!

      Get a grip -- priests are trained in pastoral theology; many are specialists in therapy. Their experience isn't first-hand -- just as most professionals' isn't -- it's from study and experience in dealing with people with problems.

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    6. Re:JUST WOW by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Give me a break, those are all piss-poor examples. Psychologists don't give advice on how to best be mentally ill, and the job of divorce lawyers is to offer legal services, something they are indeed very experienced in.

      Would you go to a relationship counsellor who was never in a relationship? Well, you might, but it is hardly surprising that those of us not already blinded might think twice about it.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    7. Re:JUST WOW by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      That's not the most ridiculous thing about this. Think about it, they're looking on Facebook for people who want to be celibate.

      I don't rate their chances very highly.

      Yeah. Slashdot seems the more obvious place to look. Oh wait, you said "want to be celibate." Never mind.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    8. Re:JUST WOW by schon · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm neither Jewish nor Catholic, but given the choice I would rather be a Rabbi. Rabbis are practically required to have sex. (You must be married. Preferably with children).

      A priest and a rabbi are seated next to each other on a long plane ride, and start talking to each other.

      As the flight progresses, they become friends, and start opening up a little bit towards each other. Eventually, the priest asks the rabbi if he's ever eaten a ham sandwich.

      The rabbi admits that yes, he once had a bite of a ham sandwich.

      The rabbi then asks the priest if he's had sex.

      The priest admits that he once broke his vows and had sex.

      The rabbi then says "sure beats the hell out of a ham sandwich, doesn't it?"

    9. Re:JUST WOW by spazdor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Psychologists don't give advice on how to best be mentally ill

      Don't they?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    10. Re:JUST WOW by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Give me a break, those are all piss-poor examples. ...Would you go to a relationship counsellor who was never in a relationship?

      Male ob/gyn's never experience the condition they monitor and offer advice on, don't they? And this is a poor example, then again... why?

      the job of divorce lawyers is to offer legal services, something they are indeed very experienced in.

      which is exactly my point: priests are experienced in offering pastoral counseling/services, which is something they are indeed very experienced in. Thanks for proving my point.

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    11. Re:JUST WOW by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'm neither Jewish nor Catholic, but given the choice I would rather be a Rabbi. Rabbis are practically required to have sex. (You must be married. Preferably with children).

      It's the same for Orthodox Christian priests, by the way. And, so far as I know, Protestants also prefer married priests.

    12. Re:JUST WOW by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you really think that any sort of schooling can teach someone about relationships the same way schooling can teach a doctor medicine, or a lawyer the law, then you are delusional beyond hope.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    13. Re:JUST WOW by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 1

      If you really think that any sort of schooling can teach someone about relationships the same way schooling can teach a doctor medicine, or a lawyer the law, then you are delusional beyond hope.

      No, I'm not. I'm also including experience in counseling.

      How do psychologists manage to counsel? You're not really trying to tell me that a BA, MA, and potentially a PhD, as well as time spent as a counselor, don't make the psychologist, just the personal life experience s/he's had with the subject matter? that's delusional!

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    14. Re:JUST WOW by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Your comparisons would be apt if one could become a doctor by being sick.

      Never having had a divorce does not make a divorce lawyer any less qualified in matters of divorce law. Never having had a family makes anyone a less effective family counsellor, no matter how much schooling they have had.

      Good psychologists are made by good schooling. Good relationship counsellors? Not so much... there are some things books cannot adequately teach you, first hand experience is required.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    15. Re:JUST WOW by 4phun · · Score: 1

      They should just speed up the process and go to the nearest Gay Bar.

    16. Re:JUST WOW by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 1

      Never having had a family makes anyone a less effective family counsellor, no matter how much schooling they have had.

      Good psychologists are made by good schooling. Good relationship counsellors? Not so much... there are some things books cannot adequately teach you, first hand experience is required.

      See, you're so close -- if only a psychologist / counsellor would step up here and sound off: yes, first hand experience is required -- but it's first hand experience in counselling folks through these difficulties, not living them...!

      and by the way -- wouldn't the appropriate training a solid family or relationship counsellor have... be psychology?

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    17. Re:JUST WOW by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Someone who only knows about family issues 2nd hand will never be as effective as someone who has lived them. To be honest, this calls to mind that old expression "Those who cannot do, teach."

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    18. Re:JUST WOW by Forge · · Score: 1

      I picked those two groups because the distinctions are clearcut. My Father was a Pastor with one of the many protestant denominations. While marriage isn't explicitly required, having a wife and 7 children didn't hurt his chances at being ordained in the slightest.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  3. Do they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Provide the winecoolers?

  4. Really? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Informative

    I thought AOL was supposed to be more popular with the pedobear crowd.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Here we go, do we expect slashdot to become a sectarian site as well? Can we keep to technology commenting and avoid moronic remarks on the church? Not all the technical
      people are athiest. Guess what some of them are even catholic. Should I deduce from this comment and the previous one that you call them pedophile or a perv?

    2. Re:Really? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are they priests? If so, then yes I would. Mostly out of a desire to see people like you squirm. Nobody is above ridicule, get used to it.

      And newsflash: not everyone who criticises the catholic church is an atheist.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    3. Re:Really? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot. The Catholic Church is being criticized by just about everyone who isn't Catholic: atheists, agnostics, ex-Catholics, protestants of all flavors, and everyone else of every other religion.

      Just like the Muslims are the only ones known for being suicide bombers, Catholics are the only religious group who have a giant problem with its clergy being pedophiles.

      If you don't like being criticized for it, then you need to fix the problem. Of course, fixing the problem would require you to say that the Church was wrong for the last 1500 years, and that it really is a good idea to have married priests instead of celibate freaks.

    4. Re:Really? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Guess what some of them are even catholic.

      Why are they still Catholic (and in communion with Rome) after all the mess that came out recently?

  5. Wonderful by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    That sounds like a good idea. We know there aren't any perverts on Facebook.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Wonderful by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Particularly now. :P

    2. Re:Wonderful by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Facebook page attracted more than 1,200 fans in one week.

      Fans != applicants ... unless FB has changed the meaning of "like" yet again ;-)

    3. Re:Wonderful by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      If they have, I'm going to have to remove connections to a lot of apps.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    4. Re:Wonderful by melikamp · · Score: 1

      I am surprised they didn't go for the Internet Roulette.

    5. Re:Wonderful by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      Well, exactly. There was just an article here about Facebook's evil interfaces.

      Maybe this is what they were talking about?

      Oh, no, I don't mean as in the Catholic Church is evil *nervous chuckle*, hehe, not at all.

      What I mean is that a "fan" could just be someone who clicked on a link? Facebook added a new feature that takes your preferences and makes them into linkable groups. I clicked on one of them and it listed me as a fan. Something similar could have happened with this group. Why on earth would anyone want to be a priest?

      --
      blah blah blah
  6. Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Unless you are prepared to explain why your religion probably has a higher (but less publicized) level of sexual abuse.

    1. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Looks like you explained it perfectly just now...

    2. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the jokes will continue. But hey, the church brought this on themselves. While many can learn to forgive (per teachings of Jesus), no one must forget.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by jimbolauski · · Score: 3, Informative

      Priests and/or pastors are not even the biggest threat to children it's teachers, at least once a week another teacher is in the news for molesting one of their students.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    4. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Zedrick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But are all the schools trying to cover it up every time something like that happens, and protect the teacher in question?

    5. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by sznupi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also wrong. The biggest threat to children are parents (or generally close family and "friends"). As with most of serious crime BTW...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    6. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Idiomatick · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm an atheist. We have lower levels of sexual abuse because our morals are reinforced by logic and a sense of regret rather than forgiven and cleansed by God making everything ok.

    7. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by kyrio · · Score: 0

      They usually are trying to cover it up and so the teacher often just gets transfered. Just because the majority of the cases are not in the news it doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

    8. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Alright, I'm an atheist! That means I can joke about it as much as I wish!

      But I wont, because frankly it's just painful. But I'll give you some free advice (the worst kind, I know): if the best you can say to defend your own religion is that all other religions are just as bad or worse but have somehow managed to keep a lid on it... then maybe it's time to look for a new religion, or, and I say this from experience, to let go of them altogether.

    9. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Jawn98685 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, the jokes will continue.
      Yes, the RCC has no one but themselves to blame for the PR mess they find themselves in, so they and all their apologists can STFU, as far as I am concerned.
      I'd be happy to explain why my religion has a higher level of sexual abuse, if it had one. That's one of the nicest things about my religion. The "clergy" aren't semi-cloistered males whose normal libido's have been repressed to the point that they must turn to victimizing innocent children because that seems to be the safest outlet for their now twisted urges. It also does not have a "church" hierarchy that could attempt to systematically hide such crimes from it's "congregation" and worse, expose ever more children to the abuses perpetrated by it's priests.

    10. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod +5 funny. Or +5 naive. I'd love to think that there is some religion or non-religion that consistently makes people better people

      But centuries of data shows otherwise.

      Utimately, it comes down to individuals and their individual choices. I've known very good Chrisitans and very evil ones. I've known very good Atheists and ones who I certainly wouldn't trust my kids with.

      The bottom line is that you need to judge people individually and not collectively

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    11. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In a word: Bullshit.

      The biggest threat to kids is family, and family friends. Those statistics make all others look small.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    12. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      And in the spirit of continuing jokes, allow me to resent the fucking pope song!

      Needless to say, it is NSFW, but I find it to be pretty funny and sadly insightful. I also used the Madville link instead of Youtube so you don't have to log in to view. And OT, but WTF is up with these itty bitty boxes? You would think that a fricking geeks site would be able to do better with page design.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      I would refrain from pedophile jokes because frankly it is not funny.

      Speaking as a Christian, the Catholic church should be very embarassed right now. Individual priests doing evil is not shocking. It is the systematic coverup and empowerment from THE TOP LEVELS that is shocking.

      If the Catholic church were a corporation, it would be sued out of business. As a sovereign nation, it should be excluded from the internation scene until it holds itself accountable and make reparations.

      Will that happen? Of course not. But the level of evil is large and should be addressed.

      The biggest threat to Christianity is not atheists. It is Christians.

      (boy do I hate idle's comment box)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    14. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Actually, I'm not aware of any solid data indicating that priests are more likely than anyone else to abuse children or young adults. Not that I'm a fan of the Catholic Church (or any other religion). But the real problem was hiding the abuse and not dealing aggressively with the abusers.

      And even then, to be fair, back in the 1970's and before, there weren't mandatory reporting laws for sexual abuse. Society in general has become more aware of the problems; the Church really wasn't out of step with the prevailing attitudes.

      (Of course, what does that say about their claims to be moral leaders?)

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    15. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an atheist and God only forgives if you regret.

    16. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It isn't the pedophilia per se(which, while tragic, is expected at a certain level in any situation where an adult population has the opportunity to interact with children), it's the institution-wide, endemic coverup and enabling of that pedophilia that (rightly) makes the catholic church a target of derision.

      Some percentage of priests are going to be pedophiles, inevitably, because some percentage of adult males are. However, that doesn't mean that you deliberately conceal them from law enforcement as part of some bullshit assertion that canon law takes precedence over secular law. Nor does it mean that you deliberately circulate the problem priests around, to provide them with fresh victims and, cynically, give them assignments where they are likely to have access to the weakest and most vulnerable, and least likely to be able to cause a scandal, targets...

      Now, incidentally, I strongly suspect that priests are more likely than the population at large to exhibit sexual preferences that would displease orthodox catholic teaching on the subject(though, not all of which are, by any means, of legal or ethical concern. Homosexuals who prefer consenting adult partners make the church sad; but are neither legally nor ethically a problem). The logic of my suspicion can be understood by the following analogy:

      It is highly likely that, on average, priests as a population have either less interest in money, or less of a belief that they would be able to obtain it, than otherwise demographically equivalent people. The reasons are fairly simple: Priesthood doesn't pay all that well, given the amount of training and effort it requires. Thus, anyone who becomes a priest is either super-gung-ho about priesthood, doesn't care much about money and what it can buy, or doesn't think that they could earn much money elsewhere(making the opportunity cost low), or some combination of the above.

      Priesthood imposes a "sexual opportunity cost" similar to its monetary one. Thus, one would follow similar logic and expect that priests are either more gung-ho about priesthood than non priests, less interested in sex generally(just lower libido) than non priests, or have sexual preferences that they (as catholics conservative enough to consider priesthood) could not have satisfied even without a vow of celibacy(thus making the opportunity cost of a vow of celibacy low). If you would just love to marry a nice catholic girl and have a bunch of kids, a vow of celibacy is a serious cost. If you are gay, or polyamorous, or a pedophile, or otherwise of unapproved taste, you cannot licitly(within catholic teachings) have the sex that you want in any case, so a vow of celibacy is a minimal cost.

      Since humans are way better at deciding to resist temptation in the future than they are at resisting temptation in the present, this more or less ensures that a fair few sexually atypical individuals will end up in the priesthood, under the optimistic impression that they will remain celibate. Now, again, many of them are both legally and ethically unproblematic to society at large. A priest is having an affair, homo or heterosexual? Not our problem. Some of them are legally clear; but ethically dodgy(your classic "father confessor 'counseling' wives looking for advice about their marriages" situation. All legal, consenting adults and so forth; but pretty clear abuse of position). And then you have the pedos and the rapists, for whom the church has been disturbingly willing to cover.

    17. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by broknstrngz · · Score: 1

      That's simply because kids spend more time in school than in church, so odds of being abused increase accordingly. I, for one, would rather have my kid in school than in church, against all odds.

    18. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Not the schools, but the teacher unions do.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    19. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The Church is built on the concept of forgiveness. So, if someone says "Sure, I buggered a few dozen altar boys, but I have confessed my sins, repented, done penance, and I promise I'll never do it again,", you forgive them... and allow them to continue working unsupervised with small children, preferably in a far away Parish where nobody knows their reputation for being "just a little too interested" in young children.

      Forgiveness is one thing, and not every accusation is factual. But once accused, I would never let any of those bastards within 100 miles of anyone under the age of consent for the rest of their lives. The mistake they made is believing that someone that feels guilty and show contrition won't go out and do the exact same thing again.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    20. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Remember: If you get an abortion, you've only committed a single sin, and you only have to do confession and penance once. However, if you use birth control, you are committing a sin EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU USE IT!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    21. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Unless you are prepared to explain why your religion probably has a higher (but less publicized) level of sexual abuse.

      Most other religions probably have a lower level of sexual abuse because they allow ordained clergy to have sex with other adults. After all, it's the very first commandment in the Torah: Be fruitful and multiply.

    22. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by thijsh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Religious/non-religious does not make a lot of difference... but a religious authority does! God trumps your mom, dad and government... and the priest who just told you to shut up about the abuse is a direct representative of god. This little detail and the fact that those priest eagerly forgive themselves or even make it 'right' by claiming that that little bit of evil is OK because of all the good they can do because of it is just sickening (not only with sexual abuse, but also like mother Theresa who let unfortunate people suffer so she herself could be closer to god).

      In my experience any man who claims to have a more direct line to god (or the supernatural) than you should be avoided at any cost. I'm certain that if there would be no religious leaders there would be almost no problems with religion...

    23. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That makes no sense... if someone truly believed there was no cosmic balance (via either God or Karma or some unknown force), and there was something they wanted to do and knew they would suffer no consequences for doing it, logic would dictate that there is no reason not to do it.

      The ancient Greeks and Romans would often do what we would consider rape their slaves, sisters, children. There was no "sense of regret" because... it wasn't considered as big of a wrong. They weren't "hurting" anyone, it was about 10-20 minutes of discomfort for the 'victim', and everyone would go on with their lives. You could also say they had lower rates of sexual abuse simply because there was no such concept in the minds of the "victims".

      The point I'm making is, in the absence of religion there would be no such thing as sexual abuse, because the entire concept was created by religion in the first place. Religion is what made the chain go touch->feel good->feel guilty that you felt good->feel angry at the person who triggered that response without your permission. They could just as easily have demonized tickling in the same way...

    24. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The reality is that a child is far more likely to be molested by a family member or someone else they know then by priests, teachers, Boy Scout troop leaders, etc.

      I'm not defending the Church's actions. They need to be punished and made to pay so severely that they never again put their own interests above the people they claim to be guiding and protecting. But the fact is that like everything else to do with the "for the children" kneejerkism of the modern age, it's as much hype and fear mongering as anything else.

      Scaring parents is a major industry now. Journalism, or at least the semi-journalism of news magazine shows makes a killing off of it. Politicians get elected by it. Police get big budgets to sit on their fat asses playing around on Internet forums with it.

      The odds are that your child is probably safer in church or in school than they are in their own bedroom.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    25. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Though churches (of all kind) definitelly deserve to be really unfamous because of such actions. They are the ones claiming absolute moral authority ffs...

      BTW, it seems that scaring people is an old trick, just with methods changing. Legends, then generally dark powers of Satan (or something), "dangerous" neighbouring communities, lands, societies, countries...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    26. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Yes... Buddhism has a lower incidence of sexual abuse because if monks suddenly feel the urge to be sexually active, they are allowed to leave the monastery, marry, have kids, and come back later when their child-rearing responsibilities are finished.

      Now, bring on the pedophile priest jokes!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    27. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Atheism is not logical. The statement "there is no God" has no clear meaning, but you go out of your way defending it, being driven by little more than emotion. You may be well-justified in hating organized religion, but you shouldn't expect this hatred to provide a foundation for your morals. If you seek consistency in your beliefs, try agnosticism.

    28. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I'm not debating the Church's culpability, what I'm debating is the premise that the Church has more pedophiles, on average, than say, public schools or any other profession or organization.

      There's an obvious hypocrisy for any organization that claims a moral high ground being caught hiding criminal and immoral acts, and that will ultimately extract a far higher price from the Church than the ongoing lawsuits.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    29. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the absence of a defined moral framework there would be no such thing as immoral behavior, I agree. But that's only because there's no definition for such behavior (which I think is what you were getting at).

      But you've got it backward. Moral frameworks are not the result of religions. Religions are the result of needing enforcement for moral frameworks that the majority (or at least most powerful) of a society want. You can't watch all of your deviants all the time, so you convince them that OogyBoogyMan is watching them 24/7/365 and will screw with them real bad in the afterlife if they step out of line. Once you get them nice and scared of OogyBoogyMan, you can make up all the rules you want and people will even pay you to follow them. Sometimes you can even go so far as to say that the moral framework does not apply to you as much because you get your instructions directly from OogyBoogyMan and he might have special tasks for you that the rank-and-file might not quite understand.

      Sometimes, those who don't follow the right OogyBoogyMan can be freely persecuted, because they are heathen and unclean, and are not covered under the protection of the moral framework. Other frameworks might allow heathens to exist, sometimes even as near-equals. It's all relative to the purpose for which the framework was created.

      The Romans had their gods who were invented to make sure that "Citizens" stayed in line. That meant that certain things bad for citizens were defined as bad, murdering a fellow citizen or stealing from him was bad. Disobeying a more powerful citizen was bad. But slaves weren't citizens. A perfectly valid and consistent (if perfectly awful by our modern view) moral framework existed. Romans were still punished by their government and their Gods if they stepped out of line, it was just that a little slave-poking was considered perfectly moral in their framework, and their Gods encouraged it in all good fun. Slaves were not "victims", they were slaves. They existed to be used. No more, no less.

      Morality is completely relative. We have far more modern examples of human beings being termed "less than human" so the "real humans" could do all sorts of nasty shit to them. Sometimes it's tied to a religion, sometimes to mere human power of one person over another, sometimes a little of both. But the rules come first, and the religion to enforce them gets invented later, if and when it becomes necessary. Sometimes existing religions get new moral frameworks retrofitted into them, of course, but that's basic recycling - if something exists and can be reused, you reuse it rather than getting a new one.

      Humans are not moral creatures, we are moralizing creatures. Each of us has our own sense of right and wrong as applied to specific circumstances, and when enough of them line up between enough citizens (or if someone acquires enough power to just declare them unilaterally) we chisel them onto stone tablets or make cave paintings or have lawyers put them on parchment, then if the framework becomes hard to enforce we invent someone to enforce them for us.

      The only difference between a rules nazi running a homeowner's association and the Pope is the buy-in of their followers.

    30. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But centuries of data shows otherwise.

      [Citation Needed], preferably with pretty graphs.

    31. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by silanea · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you seek consistency in your beliefs, try agnosticism.

      Were I to care about other people's faith I would rather recommend apatheistic ignosticism. Since I don't, I recommend spending your time on improving your area's data on OpenStreetmap rather than meditating about the finer aspects of particular faiths. Religion has yet to do anything useful for the world at large, but OSM has aided me innumerable times in the few years since its inception.

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    32. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      "And even then, to be fair, back in the 1970's and before, there weren't mandatory reporting laws for sexual abuse. Society in general has become more aware of the problems; the Church really wasn't out of step with the prevailing attitudes."

      What what what?

      Do we have to have a law for every little different situation? First I damn well know there were laws against assault and battery then. Second, I'm almost certain there were laws against rape. If a child or parent notified the police or DA back then that someone sexually assaulted his/her kid, I have a hard time believing that person wouldn't have been charged with some felony. A minor can not legally give consent. Charging a 18 year old for sleeping with his 16 year old girlfriend is ignorant, especially when considering the age of majority has been transient over cultures and time. Charging a 40 year old for diddling an 11 year old under his care is a moral imperative.

      The bigger problem back then was probably many parents failed to report family or unrelated cases of child sexual assault out of fear it would hurt their kid more to have it publicized, or hurt the family in general. Which is no different than what was happening in the Church. But the Church's doctrine and claim of moral superiority make their actions especially abhorrent.

    33. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But centuries of data shows otherwise.

      Citation needed.

      This is just one person's diary, in which they took the effort of writing down thousands of examples of theists committing heinous crimes, taken from the news from the last 10 years or so.

      Think you can match that with examples of atheists doing the same? Either do or accept that not all belief systems (or lack thereof) are equally likely to produce good or bad behaviour in their followers.

      Specifically, atheists are much, much less likely to behave in an unethical way; and I'm not just saying this based on my anecdotal experiences, I'm providing you with a crapload of evidence for this.

    34. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by strong_epoxy · · Score: 1

      If you don't forget, you haven't forgiven.

    35. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Atheism is not logical.

      It's perfectly logical. There is no evidence of God, ergo there is no God.

    36. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      First off - I am an atheist. Secondly, the biggest part of the scandal in the Catholic church is not the abuse in and of itself - it is the systematic protection of child rapists in the name of protecting the church's image. Any institution is going to have a few bad apples, but they are not culpable in my mind until they fail to act upon discovering the crime.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    37. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by FrBlast3r · · Score: 1

      Sure...As exposed so obviously by the Marquis de Sade ;-). Oh but he might be the exception confirming the rule you state... Exceptions, exceptions....

    38. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      There is no what? Can you give a logical account of "God"? You cannot: not of the Christian God, it is self-contradictory by design. If you want to hold a consistent view towards the Christian God, you have to say: "This is gibberish", you cannot say "It does not exist", on pain of producing more gibberish.

    39. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Yes, doing science or social work is also much more productive than doing religion. (Organized religions occasionally claim that they are doing either, but we know how much they suck in both areas.)

      It is not useless, however, to be able to understand what religious people are talking about. We all live on the same planet, and we can all benefit from reconciling our differences in a non-violent manner. Agnosticism, unlike atheism, provides a solid foundation for understanding every religion, no matter how irrational, convoluted or just plain evil. Atheism towards irrational Gods (and these include all of the takes on LORD) is nothing more than posturing.

    40. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

      The bigger problem back then was probably many parents failed to report family or unrelated cases of child sexual assault out of fear it would hurt their kid more to have it publicized, or hurt the family in general. Which is no different than what was happening in the Church.

      ...which is basically what I said: "the Church really wasn't out of step with the prevailing attitudes".

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    41. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      While not as universal as with the Catholic Church, there have been in charedi (ultra-orthodox Jewish) schools and institutions similar problems with attempted cover ups. This has extended not just to pedophilia but other forms of abuse as well. See for example the scandal with Rabbi Leib Tropper http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leib_Tropper where he used his position to have sex with women who were studying to convert to Judaism. The establishment repeatedly tried to cover up his behavior and when it got to be too much quietly eased him out. They still won't discuss the issue in any detail or to even discuss what went wrong in a way to prevent it from happening again.

      Hierarchies do this sort of thing almost naturally, and hyper-authoritarian religious hierarchies often try to cover things up as the go-to solution.

    42. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Before the 1970's mandatory reporting laws did not exist. That doesn't mean that molestation did not exist, or that it went unreported all the time.

      The bigger problem back then was probably many parents failed to report family or unrelated cases of child sexual assault out of fear it would hurt their kid more to have it publicized, or hurt the family in general.

      Exactly. This is precisely what the mandatory reporting laws that GP referred to were meant to counteract. Before the 1970s, many parents, teachers, etc might have bee reluctant to get involved. After the 1970's, the risk of not getting involved (and therefore being charged with a crime in not reporting the abuse) started to outweigh the risk of getting involved.

      Society has become more aware of the problems, because more people are reporting them, because mandatory reporting laws exist. That doesn't mean there is more molestation, only that you see more of it in the news because covering it up is not only harder, it's now a crime.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    43. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agnosticism is not a religion in either an organized sense or a spiritual sense. It is a religious philosophy.

    44. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      There is a significant difference if I read your comment the way you intended

      "...and not dealing aggressively with the abusers. ...the Church really wasn't out of step with the prevailing attitudes. "

      Even in the 70's, and possibly especially before mandatory reporting laws, parents probably felt like it was their responsibility to mete justice to the best of their ability. I imagine dads that were physically strong enough, often beat up or threatened to beat up, relatives or others their children accused of abuse and the parent felt it was true. Families ostracized suspected abusers in them, and may have discretely shared information among nuclear families to keep their kids away from "uncle soandso."

      I suspect the attitude of families 30 years ago was generally one of discretion and a community version of justice and threat isolation. This stands in stark contrast to the Catholic Church where abusive clergy were not routinely sent for treatment and assigned to positions with no reasonable expectation of child contact. They were reassigned just to get them away from local concerns and put into other congregations with children in them. Some were apparently not investigated internally because they were "loved" by their church superiors.

      Hence, I believe they were out of step, even then, with prevailing attitudes regarding everything but discretion.

    45. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      I never said molestation didn't exist, was never reported, or that now it is more frequent. My point was I believe that even then, the Church was out of step with prevailing attitudes. I discussed this in a later post w/ Dr. Manhattan.

      I'd say even before mandatory reporting laws, parents were possibly guilty of the generous interpretation of Misprision of a Felony in some states for not reporting clergy child abuse. And the church leaders who were aware of accusations and reassigned accused clergy were almost certainly guilty of the more restrictive definition of Misprision.

      http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/search/display.html?terms=misprision&url=/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000004----000-.html

      Is it bad we have specific mandatory reporting laws for child abuse? No. But I think saying it wasn't illegal before in states where misprision is a crime, is a stretch. If it wasn't prosecuted, I think it is more a case of lazy prosecutors, or thinking discretion was better for the child.

    46. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Priests and/or pastors are not even the biggest threat to children it's teachers

      Yes, and you can thank secularization for that.

    47. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Can you give a logical account of "God"?

      It's not my job to give a logical account of "God". I'm not the one claiming he exists.

      You cannot: not of the Christian God, it is self-contradictory by design. If you want to hold a consistent view towards the Christian God, you have to say: "This is gibberish", you cannot say "It does not exist", on pain of producing more gibberish.

      False. I can quite easily say it does not exist, simply by (as you have) pointing out that the fundamental concept is basically broken by design.

      Consider your argument when substituting Santa Claus for God: "A psychic fat guy in a red suit rides a magical sleigh around and visits every child in the world in one night ? That's nothing but gibberish ! Clearly the only logical and consistent conclusion is that we should not discount the possibility that he might exist."

    48. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Priests are not part of the "general" population. They are a select few that should be held to a higher standard. Replace "priests" with "Presidents of the USA" and you might get what I mean.

    49. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by tftp · · Score: 1

      Priesthood doesn't pay all that well, given the amount of training and effort it requires.

      But the job security is great. Once you are in, you are taken care of for life (even, as facts show, if you commit a crime.) Not bad for people who are more interested in philosophy and abstract knowledge (and religion too.)

    50. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Utimately, it comes down to individuals and their individual choices. I've known very good Chrisitans and very evil ones. I've known very good Atheists and ones who I certainly wouldn't trust my kids with."

      I'm thinking that you aren't getting how statistics works. Atheists on average are less likely to rape than the religious. rape along with a whole slew of other things... violent crime, divorce....

      "The bottom line is that you need to judge people individually and not collectively"

      I was talking about a group. You are just blanket denying the importance or usefulness of statistics in general. Which is frankly quite insane.

    51. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Morals can be easily explained by social darwinism without any need for God at all.

      There are 100 cavemen in two tribes of 50. Tribe 1 is filled with people that are greedy the other with those that share. A harsh winter occurs. Tribe 2 share the one big kill and whatever food they have, they survive through the winter hungry but alive. Tribe 1 kills a mammoth or w/e as well. Instead of bringing it back they eat as much as they can since they shouldn't have to share. Then they go back to the cave, the ones inside feel they have been ripped off, a fight ensues they all die.

      Next generation Tribe 2 teaches their kids about the dangers of greed. TADA, morals formed without any need for God. Yay for social darwinism.

      (Also, Teaching people other things would be an example of horizontal meme transfer)

    52. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      I'm technically 'strong agnostic'. Which is something that approaches atheism since the chances of God existing approach 0. So while I'm technically agnostic i'm infinitely close to atheist.

      But really, I agree with you.

    53. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by silanea · · Score: 1

      It is not useless, however, to be able to understand what religious people are talking about. We all live on the same planet, and we can all benefit from reconciling our differences in a non-violent manner.

      Yes and no. It is useless in so far as that you cannot reconcile everyone's religious beliefs, just as you cannot get everyone to agree upon the colour public buildings should be painted in. Some want black, some want white, but few people would be happy with grey. Faith is not grounded in logic or objective reasoning, it is essentially a matter of personal taste. And we all know how well consensus works for taste.

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    54. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

      "...and not dealing aggressively with the abusers. ...the Church really wasn't out of step with the prevailing attitudes."

      You have strung together two separate paragraphs, expressing two separate thoughts. Society at the time tended to prosecute 'stranger attacks', not assailants known to the victim - as you note. In that sense "the Church really wasn't out of step with the prevailing attitudes."

      And, as I noted, the fact that the Church was not ahead of the curve does call their 'moral leadership' claims into question.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    55. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      Well it didn't have paragraph spacing, so that wasn't obvious on first read. Though I still think the most reasonable reading strings ideas from 2 separate paragraphs together. It wasn't a topic transition.

      What were the prevailing attitudes? It wasn't attitudes about the general level of awareness, or about reporting laws you discussed in that paragraph. The attitudes were about hiding abuse, and not dealing aggressively with the abusers because of the attention it would bring to the child and family, among other reasons.

      "Society at the time tended to prosecute 'stranger attacks', not assailants known to the victim - as you note"

      I don't believe I did. I said in essence, parents tended to keep both kinds of attacks secret and dispense whatever justice they could regardless of whether it was intra-family, or an acquaintance.

      I'm assuming at this point, if it was an unknown person, they probably didn't have the resources to track him/her down to do anything further without going to the police. But I didn't say whether I felt that happened more or less often.

    56. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by KrugalSausage · · Score: 1

      Ya, those pesky hospitals.

    57. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by KrugalSausage · · Score: 1

      For some reason the human psyche accounts for a higher power, and that's why every civilization in history has been religious. So it's a little more complicated than the simple world view you put together. ;)

    58. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Tromad · · Score: 1

      Please provide these statistics.

    59. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Lower levels of sexual abuse" Yeah right...

      Of course when you get caught, you're conveniently unaligned.

      Atheism is like a borg network. There is no hierarchy, no organisation, no responsibility. Just a collective of individual opinions guided by some abstract, ever-changing phenomenon called logic. Yes, logic can do great things and facilitates man to utilise nature, but to believe that logical understanding of everything in the universe is an end in itself will turn you into a very bitter man. Just like your old pals Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris.

    60. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      Well it didn't have paragraph spacing

      Yes, it did. I dunno why Slashdot's CSS makes the first "<p>" tag not display properly, but if you look at the page source, it's there.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    61. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      but if you look at the page source, it's there.

      Because of course I do that with every comment I read on slashdot.

    62. Re:Please refrain from pedophile jokes... by kyrio · · Score: 0

      Pedophiles can't handle the truth and mod me down.

  7. Sex offenders banned? by ThisIsAnonymous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, what are they going to do once every state has a law banning sex offenders from social networks?

    1. Re:Sex offenders banned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There in France. Oh wait you probably believe the entire world is "the states." Sorry to shatter the illusion.

    2. Re:Sex offenders banned? by ThisIsAnonymous · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_state_of_the_European_Union

      "France is a member state of the European Union."

      I don't fully understand EU law though so perhaps the individual states wouldn't even have the right to ban this anyway.

  8. Sometimes, the snarks just write themselves by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Come on, guys, at least try to come up with something a little harder to shoot arrows at.

  9. Take note, Facebook by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    you really should add a Pedo Panic button as soon as possible!

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  10. A better, more old fashioned solution by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps they should actively seek to inspire people rather than trying to protect and defend themselves. There may have been a time when their church was above and beyond criticism, but those days are long gone. They need to accept this fact and focus on the positive rather than the negative. Furthermore, they need to look within themselves and to blame themselves for the current public opinion of their church. (In other words, instead of blaming the victims for speaking out, blame the people who did the victimizing!)

    Then, after all that, do good works... LOTS of good works. That used to work in the past. These days, one rarely hears much about the good works of the church...

    1. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Church could completely reinvigorate itself and make sure there are plenty of priests by doing two things: (1) allow women to be priests; and (2) allow priests to marry. Until they do either one or both of those things they'll continue to weaken.

    2. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think they can easily combat underlying circumstances. See, France and generally (though not as a whole...) Europe has changed, it's waking up. Secularization has progressed quite a lot; I wouldn't be surpised if, by the time of next Eurobarometer polls regarding faith, less than 50% of Europeans will declare themselves religious. It wasn't that far the last time...

      Priesthood, being a priest simply lost its social prestige. It's not "cool" (and this FB campaign likely won't change that...even if they would show some of the excesses in seminaries or monasteries) anymore to have a priest in the family.

      And no, they won't introduce changes proposed by you, not for the next few decades - remember that the Church is essentially run by the "elders" (and this trend will get stronger with few young priests); it's not only about their conservatism, also personal distaste - those are the men (well, supposedly...) who gave their entire lifes to church, distanced themselves from "earthly joys". Do you think they could bear the sight of young happy priests (also women), with families, happily fucking without any potential problems?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (1) allow women to be priests; and (2) allow priests to marry.

      No, no, no.... Wrong approach... Allow women to be priests and make it mandatory to attend weekly orgies for clergy.

      That would boast priesthood numbers for sure!

    4. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Sure, the Church will never be as powerful in Europe as it used to be, but Europe has been demographically, politically and culturally dwindling in importance for decades. The Church could lose Europe and still become more influential on a global level (not that I'm saying that would be good or bad, I'm just a neutral observer).

    5. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But, if they allow priests to marry, then then ones that don't marry will be suspected of being, uh... a little light in the loafers. The Catholic church has always been an outlet that provides a socially acceptable lifestyle for those that just can't stomach the thought of sex with the opposite sex. As such, I believe homosexuals have always been overrepresented in the celibate castes.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dwindling in importance? Are you certain? EU is considered quite readily as one of the most major powers lately, culturally it retains its identity fine (plus look past popculture; and also from where most of that popculture originated...); and demographically it won't be that big of a problem, I suspect - yes, it will need a wave of immigrants...so? Sure, there are failure stories, but also huge success stories (the largest population of "Muslims" in EU is probably in Germany; rather nicely integrated)

      As for the topic - the Catholic Church will of course continue to increase in so called "3rd world" countries. But remember it doesn't have to reform itself to do that... (I would even guess that would inhibit its growth in impoverished areas!)
      And since its losing importance basically only in Europe (also the place of TFA), it's sensible to assume we're discussing only that area.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1

      These days, one rarely hears much about the good works of the church...

      Is that because the church is not doing good works or that they are not being reported? I'm not defending the wrong doing in any way but the headline, "Priest in Pedo Probe" will beat, "Church feeds millions... just like last year" every time.

    8. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Nidi62 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The Catholic Church allows African priests to marry, did you know that? It is pretty much the only way they could get Africans to be priests, instead of importing white priests to Africa. It would be interesting to compare African abuse statistics(if there are any or if they are accurate, however I would assume they would be just as under-reported as in Europe, if not more so) with European statistics. There is a logical connection between forced celibacy and abuse, but I am not aware of any statistical analysis having been done, nor of any correlation found between them.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    9. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by sznupi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As such, I believe homosexuals have always been overrepresented in the celibate castes.

      That does seem to be the case, indeed. I have a buddy who, at one point, tried to become a catholic monk (not sure which order); he was eventually rejected from the monastery because of...mild (easily controlled) epilepsy; yes, those isntitutions are so archaic. But during his probation there it turned out not only that one of the ways of dealing with "hardships" of monastic life is quite rampant alcoholism (well, that might be a reason of rejecting epileptics, too...), but also that there's a way above average proportion of homosexuals - between 1/3 and 1/2 of population of his order. Not that he would mind it much, being himself a homosexual...

      That of course a singular sample; but I can't see any plausible reason why other monasteries and also seminaries would be much different.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    10. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember that the Church is essentially run by the "elders"

      Depends on what religion/church you're talking about. The church I go to very much encourages young people and touts them as the church's future. A church that doesn't include young people is doomed to fade away in a couple of generations.

    11. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by sznupi · · Score: 1

      That's why I wrote "the Church", not "a church" or "churches"...

      Besides, how many major policies were introduced by young people in your church? Most faiths revolve around "the wisdom of ancestors", hence also "elders". Young people can do what they think is right as long as the "elders" won't protest on a whim.
      Heck, what is the size of it in comparison to the Catholic Church? (doomed?)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    12. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Eamorr · · Score: 0

      Of course you, a great beacon of secularism, know what's best for the Catholic Church. ROFL. Maybe you should enroll in your local seminary, study for seven years, do a Doctorate of Divinity in Rome and then publish your opinions and see how well they are received. I'll bet you'd fall flat on your face on the first hurdle and the whole stadium will be laughing at you. Stick to the keyboard heroics my friend.

    13. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Dwindling in importance? Are you certain? EU is considered quite readily as one of the most major powers lately, culturally it retains its identity fine (plus look past popculture; and also from where most of that popculture originated...)

      Exactly, the EU as a whole is a major power collectively, where 100 years ago several of the individual countries were major powers. I think that's a sign of decline.

    14. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by erroneus · · Score: 1

      That explains the decline in the popularity of "Priest Stew" over the past few decades...

      (Yes! It's a joke! And a damned funny one too! So sayeth Bugs Bunny and Popeye... or are they completely politically incorrect now too?)

    15. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same can be said about Texas, or Confederate vs. Union States.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    16. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the Church should just come out of the closet. At least then priests might focus on "consenting adults" rather than young people.

    17. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Catholic Church allows African priests to marry, did you know that?

      It does not! If you think you have a reasonable argument, please provide a reference -- from a Church document -- showing that this is the case. Celibacy is the norm for all Catholic priests of the Latin rite. (Is it possible that you're asserting that one of the Eastern rites allows married priests?)

      There is a logical connection between forced celibacy and abuse, but I am not aware of any statistical analysis having been done, nor of any correlation found between them.

      Then there's no logical connection, just a conjecture in your mind, isn't there? Now, the place that there's a "logical connection", and lots of research, is sexual abuse of children within families. And you want priests to marry? Yeah, that'll help the problem all right -- replace one statistical group that's within the societal norm for sexual abuse and place it in the group at the statistically highest risk for sexual abuse of children...!

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    18. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by kpesler · · Score: 1

      The Church does do many good works. It's just not fashionable to report on them. A quick summary was given by a Jewish businessman a couple of years ago: http://fratres.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/redemption-comes-through-the-jews-jewish-businessman-sam-miller-whaps-anti-catholic-bias-in-news-media-full-text/

    19. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point #2 is fairly obvious, but I must take issue with your point #1. The fact is, female clergy are far more inclined than their male counterparts to sacrifice church doctrine in order to be perceived as accommodating. Have you ever been to a church run by a female minister? It's so milquetoast that one has to wonder what the point is at all!

    20. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by nomadic · · Score: 1

      It does not! If you think you have a reasonable argument, please provide a reference -- from a Church document -- showing that this is the case. Celibacy is the norm for all Catholic priests of the Latin rite. (Is it possible that you're asserting that one of the Eastern rites allows married priests?)

      I don't think it sounds right either, but I know I've read that in certain individual cases, mainly for clergyman from other faiths who convert then become priests, they are allowed to remain married.

    21. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course, we know. When the Church does something good, that's thanks to the virtue of the Church, and help of the God Allmighty himself.
      When the Church does something bad, that's just ancillary failure, only human nature really; nothing to be concerned about or too deeply scrutinized.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    22. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Maybe, just maybe people are starting to see that such help is also (only "also"!) self-serving. How it prepares fertile ground; and not just in those specific people who are being fed (etc.) - for starters, Catholic Church likes to convince people to breed as much as they can. That's usefull...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    23. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 1

      I don't think it sounds right either, but I know I've read that in certain individual cases, mainly for clergyman from other faiths who convert then become priests, they are allowed to remain married.

      Yes, you're correct -- in limited cases, there are exceptions to the rule. However, the OP is claiming that this is the norm in Africa (assumedly, for the Latin Rite), which it is not.

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    24. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Is it possible that you're asserting that one of the Eastern rites allows married priests?

      If he does, I don't see why it's not a valid assertion. After all, it's factually correct, and Eastern Rites are still Catholic.

    25. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Mr_Blank · · Score: 1

      From Catholics in Crises

      Are there any bright spots?
      Yes--Africa and Asia. The African church has grown from 55 million in 1978 to 150 million today. "The church has provided, in many cases, the voice that stands on behalf of the voiceless," says the Rev. Emmanuel Katongole, a leader in the Ugandan church. In Asia, church membership increased 80 percent since 1978, while the number of priests rose 74 percent. In fact, Africa and Asia now supply priests to the rest of the world, with about 300 coming to U.S. parishes every year. But the church faces problems in the developing world, too. Evangelical Protestantism is making inroads, and many African priests live openly with wives and children, in defiance of the Vatican's celibacy requirement.

    26. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You're doing it wrong, it's all about the "calling".

      You do unintentionally point out a bit the absurdity of degrees from imaginary knowledge, though...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    27. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 1

      If he does, I don't see why it's not a valid assertion. After all, it's factually correct, and Eastern Rites are still Catholic.

      Because he's making the assertion against the notion of priestly celibacy, which is held by the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church -- which is the bulk (in numbers) and the face of the Church as perceived by most outside of the Church.

      So, to assert some difference in Africa is implicitly asserting a difference in the Latin Rite. If it were the Eastern Rites of the Church, then he'd mention the Copts, the Byzantines, etc, etc, which he did not.

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    28. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 1

      Your reference:

      Many African priests live openly with wives and children, in defiance of the Vatican's celibacy requirement.

      from the OP:

      The Catholic Church allows African priests to marry, did you know that?

      Somewhere, your English teachers are rolling over in their graves, unless there's a world where "defiance" == "allows"...! ;^)

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    29. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by cavebison · · Score: 1

      There may have been a time when their church was above and beyond criticism, but those days are long gone.

      Did those days ever exist? The whole idea of the Reformation in the 1500's was to address corruption in the Catholic church.

      Show me any institution of organised power (church, government, corporation) which isn't laced with corruption. Power doesn't corrupt IMO, it just attracts corrupt people. The problem is we don't have systems to identify them.

    30. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      They already do that. They're called nuns. Nuns are just booty call for priests. An old timer once told me stories of orphanages attached to convents so they could dump off the children. Not sure if its true, but the Church's hypocrisy wouldn't make me the least bit surprised.

      --
      blah blah blah
    31. Re:A better, more old fashioned solution by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Interesting.... Seems indeed I chose the wrong career path :-P

  11. Just allow priests to marry already. by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It will largely take care of the pedophile problem and the dwindling number willing to be priests in one shot.

    Priests marrying wasn't disallowed all throughout church history anyway, it was political nonsense to do away with questions of inheritance.

    1. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by Xtravar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Catholic Church is the last (Christian) religious institution to have the "sacred dogma" marketability. It's a very large bullet point on their sales presentation slide. "We have been around the longest. We are full of mystical, intriguing quirks that lend to our legitimacy."

      Once they start giving in to modern concepts (and giving up dogmas), they begin to lose that essence and have less to compete against other Christian sects with.

      It's also a great source of pride, however depraved that may seem.

      So, they need to change slowly. They don't want to seem like some willy nilly religion that makes arbitrary rules. THEIR rules are from God.

      If they were to change in the midst of this pedophile scandal, it would seem as a reaction to the scandal and not edict from Heaven. That would lose credibility among followers, priests (who've had to be celibate all this time), and those potential followers looking in.

      In other words, the writing's on the wall, but the situation is delicate.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    2. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      The requirement that priests remain celibate certainly both reduces the number of potential priests and also dramatically increases the chance that people who do join the priesthood will have unhealthy sexuality.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by thijsh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As the gay marriage discussion has shown there will be hordes of opposing zealots who don't want their concept of marriage tainted... Why would it be any different for this 'unholy heathen change' to religious marriage-code that might destroy both the religious pillars of marriage and celibacy?
      We *know* this is a rational idea, so we can assume the church won't.

      Oh yeah, and good point about the non-inheritance. But this holds for most doctrine... contrary to what I originally thought (and most people just assume) religion is shaped more by politics than anything even remotely religious. Most 'religious conflicts' are just political in nature with religion thrown in the mix to really get people bat-shit crazy and willing to do anything. So religion is actually a tool (a strong one) to better establish your political power.

    4. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      Adult with normal Sexual Urges that he can not satify and let public know about it is pretty much guarantted to take advantage of someone weak.

      Similary, consider good well behaved catholic boy that does not really want relationship and sex with (adult)/(woman). Priesthood is perfect escape route: No more social pressure on "marrying and getting kids", likely to have few likeminded people around, authority power and access to kids... shudder.

      Just let normal people become priests instead of sexually frustrated men or perverts.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    5. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by vlm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Once they start giving in to modern concepts

      Jews got married long before the christian era.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by UnxMully · · Score: 1

      The requirement that priests remain celibate certainly both reduces the number of potential priests and also dramatically increases the chance that people who do join the priesthood will have unhealthy sexuality.

      Would they be allowed to be in a same-sex marriage? That would really set the cat amongst the pigeons...

    7. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      A. I am not Catholic.
      B. I agree with you but see A. so that doesn't matter all that much.

      I asked a priest about that once. His response was.
      "Your parish is your family. If you had a family of your own would have to suffer. Your personal family or your parish family."
      I can see that point of view. I think it is not correct but I can at least understand where they are coming from.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Relgion was (or is, in places) the direct equivalent and predecessor of what you perceive as "political power"; nothing less (certainly still strives to not just be a tool)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    9. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by vlm · · Score: 1

      "Your coworkers are your family. If you also had a family of your own, one would have to suffer. Your personal family or your company family."

      I think it is not correct but I can at least understand where they are coming from.

      Corporate America?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    10. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recent societal trends have made the priest gene nearly extinct; celibate people just aren't breeding as much as they used to.

    11. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      As long as they equate the clergy with the vows of monkhood (celibacy) they will constantly handicap themselves. There is no need for it and no strong defense for it. Maybe a crisis that brings the church low will force its hand but even the child molestation crisis doesn't seem to be enough.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    12. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by Eamorr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "They need to change" says the anonymous individual who writes on the interweb and thinks he knows better than the Catholic Church. Lol. Of course the Church has been changing since the year 0 A.D., it's just not the kind of "change" that you want to hear about and instead just stick your head in the sand and spout lah, lah rubbish. Go set up your own church seeing as you know better and see how long it takes you to get 1.1 billion followers.

    13. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      It's a very large bullet point on their sales presentation slide. "We have been around the longest. We are full of mystical, intriguing quirks that lend to our legitimacy."

      Actually the Eastern Orthodox Church can trace a more direct lineage to the beginnings of Christianity than the Roman Catholic Church can.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    14. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Bad for the brand.

      That would be like Coca Cola's CEO regularly being seen drinking Pepsi in public.

      --
    15. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Actually the Eastern Orthodox Church can trace a more direct lineage to the beginnings of Christianity than the Roman Catholic Church can.

      True, plus IIRC they get a bonus spell from either the Necromancy or Divination realm at level 5.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    16. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by thijsh · · Score: 1

      History shows it often to be the case, like England breaking with The Church, and the later conflict in northern Ireland was political... religion was used as a political tool there by some groups to force a hard line split where there otherwise would be a huge political middle ground. When religion starts getting involved any conflict usually becomes much more absolutist.

    17. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Good news, everyone! All you priests who want to marry women are free to do so!

      [Shuffling of feet]

      Er... anybody? Is anybody at all here attracted to adult women?

      [Embarrassed coughs]

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    18. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't want to seem like some willy nilly religion that makes arbitrary rules. THEIR rules are from God.

      In which case I recommend a quick read of 1 Tim 4:1-3. Forbidding to marry is part of the "teachings of demons", definitely not a "rule from God".

      AC

    19. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 1

      It will largely take care of the pedophile problem and the dwindling number willing to be priests in one shot.

      It will? Can you cite statistics that show that single men are more likely to abuse than married men? 'Cause the bulk of statistical research says you're wrong -- the highest risk comes from within the family.

      Oh -- and the ability to marry will raise the number of priests? This is why the available evidence shows that in mainline Protestant groups, there isn't a rush to ministry? Ministry isn't a booming career choice because unless you're Joel Osteen (who isn't so much a minister as a self-help and self-esteem guru), there's no money in it; ministry is about giving, not receiving lots of cash and career opportunities. And that has nothing to do with marital status.

      Priests marrying wasn't disallowed all throughout church history anyway, it was political nonsense to do away with questions of inheritance.

      Oh, you've been fed a real line... it's been part of the Church's history since at least the 300's... the early Church councils discuss celibacy / marriage of priests, and how it's the normative state for them.

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    20. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Greek and Russian Orthodoxies have nearly identical claims to legitimacy, but them and RCC barely intersect geographically, so your comment is still true.

    21. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Actually the Eastern Orthodox Church can trace a more direct lineage to the beginnings of Christianity than the Roman Catholic Church can.

      I don't see how this is the case. Roman Catholic Church grew out from the Patriarchate of Rome; Eastern Orthodox, out of the other four Patriarchates which constituted the Pentarchy, but in practice only the Constantinople was left standing short thereafter. Both can rightly claim apostolic succession. Both claim adherence to the Holy Tradition rather than "sola scriptura".

      Yes, from a theological perspective, Roman Catholics had a larger number of questionable decisions compared to Orthodox, because the latter had made fewer modifications in general (hey, that's why "orthodox" has the meaning that it does today!). However, it's a separate issue, not one of lineage.

    22. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Not marrying is not the biggest problem. It's a sign of the problem, but not the problem. Allowing priests to marry isn't going to solve the main problem (just look at some of those "TV Evangelists" for examples).

      The problem is the Catholic Church isn't even following their own sacred text in guidelines for picking top leaders of the church. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Timothy%203&version=NIV

      And yes they're also not following their own sacred text by forbidding marriage:
      http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Timothy+4&version=NIV

      They might say it's not forbidding since you're allowed to do it in normal scenarios, but to me it seems almost as if they're intentionally mocking the Bible with stuff like "no marriage for priests", only fish on fridays, and fish = capybara etc.

      People might challenge the authorship of 1 Timothy[1], but the Catholic Church accepts it as part of their Bible, and it predates all the bullshit they got up to later.

      It hits pretty close to the mark, close enough for me to believe that God is going to say "Yes, that's what I said to you, Church, so why didn't you listen?".

      [1] See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Epistle_to_Timothy

      --
    23. Re:Just allow priests to marry already. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      But the thing is you can rarely say with much certainty those things are separate; they are still interweaved to a large degree, were much more in the past.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  12. As a young person... by XPeter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I say fuck religion, especially Christianity. ESPECIALLY when it's French Christians.

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:As a young person... by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      I say fuck religion, especially Christianity. ESPECIALLY when it's French Christians.

      Welp, just the response I expected...

      I live in my mom's basement, but I'm 16.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:As a young person... by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      fuck religion [...] I'm 16.

      Careful with what you wish. You're a bit too old, but a priest could get confused.

    3. Re:As a young person... by Hrshgn · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a French atheist I am really having trouble modding you...

    4. Re:As a young person... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this insightful? How does this person's statement contribute in any way to the the discussion of the Catholic Church looking for priests on Facebook? This comment is purely inflammatory, meant to disregard the ideology of millions of people, and the poster offers no logical argument to follow. I'm really disappointed that there are people on Slashdot perfectly willing to expend modpoints to support a hatemongering troll. Is hatemongering a word?

    5. Re:As a young person... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done, rude, rootless, ignorant style, I hope you're not french. No, you must probably be one of those ugly nerds stuffing his face with burgers and pleasuring himself lurking at babes google images.
      No faith for sure and no friends but your mouse either

  13. too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pedos know the gravy train when they see it

  14. Their friends list revealed! by assemblerex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Boyscouts,Nambla,MichaelJackson,GarryGlitter,Archdiocese of Dublin Accept Invitation Y/N?

  15. 1200 fans by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    1,200 fans in a week is amazingly low for facebook.

    Some very stupid useless pages can get millions of fans in a week.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  16. A modern variation on an FBI sting by VShael · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bonjour, je m'appelle Chris Hanson.

    Pourquoi n'avez-vous pas un siège de plus ici?

  17. Goodluckwiththat by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    We're talking about a matter of doctrine here, not a matter of pragmatism. You're right that, from a pragmatic standpoint, it would largely just make more sense to allow priests to marry.

    You're also right that the Roman Catholic church didn't always require priests to take the vow of celibacy. But, it became part of doctrine in the past, and now will be forever going forward.

    The Church will stand by the position that you don't change doctrine because people don't like it. . . if someone wants to be a priest, then they need to conform to doctrine, not the other way around.

    1. Re:Goodluckwiththat by vlm · · Score: 1

      But, it became part of doctrine in the past, and now will be forever going forward.

      Geocentricism forever!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentric_model

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Goodluckwiththat by sznupi · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not a doctrine, it's an ecclesial law. Can be changed at a whim by one signature; wasn't even nearly a universal custom in the past (heck, around XIII century AFAI remember, when the Vatican envoy arrived in my area with the mission of sorting out actual introduction of celibacy...well, he did reasonably well in Czech; but in Poland he barely escaped with his life)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Goodluckwiththat by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but Catholic Church already allows married priests where it is politically expedient to do so.

    4. Re:Goodluckwiththat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (heck, around XIII century AFAI remember,...)

      Good God, you're old!!

  18. Why? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Why should the catholic church try to fix it self, when blaming others has worked so well.

    Granted it may just cause disbelief in most if you blame it on the jews or homosexuality in some, but far more will believe it, especially in developing countries, the only place the church is still growing. And no I am not going to say that this proofs only non-educated people believe in god. That would not be nice. It would be the truth, but not nice.

    Oh and remember, the mafia isn't real, it is a plot by communism to disrupt the west. Oh and the shroud, it is real. Never mind that nobody in the bible mentioned it. You think people would have noticed or not have bothered with the bloody shroud left on a decaying body. Mind you, there is a perfectly sensible reason why nobody at the time noticed it, IT DIDN'T FUCKING HAPPEN!

    Denial, it is must be a wonderful place to live.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Why? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      One reason religious groups do so well in very poor countries is that they are one of the few groups actually helping the poor. Their governments may not be able or willing to help so these groups fill that vacuum. Once people become more prosperous and their physical needs are already met all that is left are the people who are religious by nature which is a much smaller number.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Why? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      That doesn't explain why specifically Catholicism, out of the Christian group, does so well in poor countries. No, it's not so simple, I'm afraid.

      There's a lot of self-serving going on (especially if you consider that Vatican actually has very little cash; most funds are semi-local). Or look at how Vatican universally supported right-wing dictatorships throughout S. America - how does that honestly fit with "helping the poor"?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Why? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what supporting South American right-wing dictatorships has to do with the numbers of people saying they are Catholic, that doesn't explain the growth of the church in Africa nor the survival of Catholism in Communist Poland. US support of Chile didn't increase the number of Protestants. I was thinking mainly of the system of Catholic hospitals, schools, and relief institutions. They are certainly more organized and work on a bigger scale than most other groups (Mother Theresa's order in India comes to mind). Some funding is semi-local but a significant amount comes from overseas contributions and the general pool since most of the areas needing aid need money in the first place. If it isn't "so simple" then what is it? People are currently being forced to attend mass?

      The growth of the Catholic church at the start was greatly aided by the fact that they were one of the few groups providing help to the poorest Romans. The Catholic faith was started by force in the New World however just as Native Americans were forced to observe Protestant faiths.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  19. Huh? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    Wait, I thought Facebook was nothing but a hangout for pedophil...Ohhhhhhh, I get it. Nevermind.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  20. Sacred dogma = Law of mortal men from dark times by thijsh · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other words, the writing's on the wall, but the situation is celibate.

  21. ...to find priests by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 1

    They're easy to find. They're at the churches.

    Oh. They want to find new priests

  22. A kiss is not a contract... by SeeSp0tRun · · Score: 1

    and a fan is not a (potential) priest.

    --
    Something witty.
  23. Church attractin young people? by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    Sounds scaring!

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  24. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Won't somebody think of the children?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. come on by cryoman23 · · Score: 0

    its not "become a fan" anymore its "like" get it right

    --
    epic sig..... ya i got nothing
  26. 1200 fans in one week is nothing by norletsk · · Score: 1

    Facebook fans are easier to collect than signatures for an online petition. Taking a week to get only 1200 people to click a button in support of the largest religion in the country is evidence that the campaign is NOT working, IMO

  27. Note to Journalists by keithpreston · · Score: 1

    Dear Journalists,
    There are lies, damn lies, statistics and now facebook group sizes. All are meaningless but facebook groups are exceedingly meaningless. Although facebook might be the latest internet craze please get off your ass and do some real journalism. Please never quote how many people are in a facebook group again. I really don't care how many idiots clicked a viral marketing button because they have nothing better to do then drool over facebook updates all day at their computer/phone. Then again, you are probably quoting facebook because you are one of these people. Please at least stop writing for mediums outside of facebook and make the world a better place.

    Thanks,
    Keith

  28. We don't need any more priests!! by JDSalinger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like this quote from Sam Harris... "I've read the books. God is not a moderate. There's no place in the books where God says, 'You know, when you get to the New World and you develop your three branches of government and you have a civil society, you can just jettison all the barbarism I recommended in the first books.'"

    Why do people still believe in Christianity? It is 2010. Must we propagate this insanity any further?

    1. Re:We don't need any more priests!! by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 1

      I like this quote from Sam Harris... "I've read the books. God is not a moderate. There's no place in the books where God says, 'You know, when you get to the New World and you develop your three branches of government and you have a civil society, you can just jettison all the barbarism I recommended in the first books.'"

      Huh? He didn't have to -- Jesus did that for him, when he was here. You know "love your neighbor as yourself", and all that?

      Why do people still believe in Christianity? It is 2010.

      Because it's a better message than anything else 2010 has to offer...

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    2. Re:We don't need any more priests!! by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      Some people require rationalizing their existence to a great creator, and beleiving in a supreme being is essential to their mental health and decision making. This is either the way they were brought up: "You don't do that because God said so" or the way they rationalized their actions: "I shouldn't/should do that because God said so." I can't explain why people do this but that's what happens. It would be incredibly dangerous to sponsor an anti-religion movement because this is the essence of some people's core being, and they would rather die than lose their beleifs (see the Middle East).

      The best way to improve this over time is separation of church and state and education, which we're already doing. Forcing the issue is asking for widespread Anarchy. I don't know one way or another whether God exists or not, but I'm not willing to force my views on other people, which is what more than 90% of mankind's atrocities can be attributed to.

    3. Re:We don't need any more priests!! by Eamorr · · Score: 1

      Wow! How advanced and civilised as a human race we have become... This "get with the program"/"2010" sentiment has been around for centuries. I wonder how many of your ideas (that you conveniently don't have to declare) will be around in 2000 years' time?

  29. ban the organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Social networks are already banning sex offenders right? Why aren't they banning organizations that harbor sex offenders? Surely that is a far worse offense, and probably would be shameful enough on the organizations that they might do something about it.

  30. Cousin by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    My cousin is a 28 year old Catholic priest and has a podcast. From the sounds of it, his diocese is really enjoying the youthful exuberance he's bringing to the area. All of us were a little boggled about the path he chose, but it seems to be working out nicely for him.

  31. Children + Facebook * church = .... dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    After so many scandals of the church.
    I'm realy not proud of the religion, i'd rather would protect the innocent against any books of so called wisdom.
    A religion works only on the personal level, and beyond that a few steps higher it becomes politics, scandals and greed for power.
    On the small scale i do understand people need religion (for life and death situations) for social and emotional peace.

    On a the big scale explain me why doesnt the top of all the main religions come together and settle their differences.
    There would be much more peace, around in the world.
    And no i dont feel empty because i lost big faith in it, i think its the 21 century; mankind has become smarter.
    We know what stars are, we cannt proof to explain it all; but then why should we?
    I have totaly no need to understand darkmatter gods, or alians;
    I mean beeing normal these days is complex enough to me.

    But somehow i'm able to pickout those people who are normal too, almost on sight.

    I therefor rather believe in real people, people who sometimes are bright examples of living a good life.
    But sometimes are people who make small mistakes, as long as they dont become dangerous > is that atheism to believe in people?

  32. Why facebook? by tomp1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why facebook? Why not somewhere more suited to finding a better selection of possible catholic priest candidates? Like 4chan for example?

  33. Bad taste slashdot. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This really falls in the So What List. The catholic church is looking for more priests whats new. So they are using Facebook as a tool. So what... A good for them.

    Now this is just in bad taste for slashdot as it will only really be just a forum to make fun of problems that a religion is having.

    This Ain't News for nerds, this isn't news for geeks, if you are not interested in joining the priesthood it doesn't even matter. You just wanted an other forum to make fun of catholics.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Bad taste slashdot. by Eamorr · · Score: 1

      Hit the nail on the head. Bad taste all round. This thread reflects very badly on slashdot.org.

    2. Re:Bad taste slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, applaud the opening of another forum for making fun of Catholics.

    3. Re:Bad taste slashdot. by JumperCable · · Score: 1

      Good try. But your Catholic Guilt foo does not work on me.

  34. Proof please? by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not the schools, but the teacher unions do.

    Last I checked teacher's unions don't have a lot of pull in the district attorney's office.

    While false accusations are a real problem, I'm pretty sure I've never heard of a case of a teacher's union covering for a real sexual abuse case. Care to link to some actual proof for your assertion?

    1. Re:Proof please? by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Care to link to some actual proof for your assertion?

      No, I'd prefer to link to some spurious claims and hearsay, but I'm having a hard time googling some. ;)

      But if you insist: http://bigjournalism.com/jhudnall/2010/02/09/teachers-unions-the-child-molesters-best-friend/ which liinks to http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/queens/head_of_the_crass_qWrc4xPXr5UxSo8Npym2vO#ixzz0eseQIbrX

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    2. Re:Proof please? by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last I checked Catholic Church also supposedly didn't have a lot of pull in the attorney's offices throghout the world...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Proof please? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Perhaps no, but the teachers union does have enough pull to keep teachers accused of child abuse hired and paid by the school-district while not preforming any actual service (isolated from the students). The comparison is a good one, though the magnitude is off.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    4. Re:Proof please? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That was getting me really annoyed with the teacher's unions until this broke the spell..

      The teachers union did not defend him.

      "The current system works for no one," United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew said, adding that the union "has made repeated attempts to work with the administration to resolve the rubber-room issue, but the administration has preferred to grandstand rather than solve it."

      Perhaps you should read the articles you quote to the end???

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    5. Re:Proof please? by Bai+jie · · Score: 1

      In our innocent until proven guilty society I think its ok to put accused offenders on a paid probation. False accusations are a reality.

    6. Re:Proof please? by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1
      Nice nick. I take issue with propaganda from the union president.

      The teachers union did not defend him.

      I'm sure that they did not defend his actions per se, but nonetheless, the contract between the union and the city keeps his salary flowing to him, despite ample evidence that he rightfully should have been terminated years ago, and the fact that he doesn't teach anymore because he's too dangerous to have around kids.

      I'm sure that the union prez is right when he say the system is broken and doesn't work right for anyone. However, when he says

      that the union "has made repeated attempts to work with the administration to resolve the rubber-room issue, but the administration has preferred to grandstand rather than solve it."

      I take that to mean "It comes up as a bargaining chip at every contract negotiation, but the price we ask for giving up these losers is always too high, and the administration says no."

      There are plenty of reasons to hate teachers' unions beyond the subject at hand. I've had frank discussions with teachers and administrators, and union rules provide a barrier to good teaching in most schools I've known. The sad thing is that the administrators are often so awful that the unions really are a necessary evil needed to protect good teachers from the system.

      If you ever get the chance, sit down with a teacher (preferably a young one who still has his/her idealism intact) for a few drinks in a place where they don't have to worry about being overheard, and ask them for some stories about administration vs. union with the teacher (and kids) caught in the middle.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  35. Did they mean Facebook by Flaggday · · Score: 1

    or is that a mis-spelling of Chat Roulette?

  36. LFG by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 2, Funny

    Church LF Priest. Need heals and good to go.

  37. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1200 fans in a week? Thats like nothing compared to well known groups.. American idle probably got like hundred of thousands the first week

  38. Disgusting bigotted commentary by Eamorr · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've never seen so much bigotted commentary in all my life. Slashdotters ought to be ashamed of themselves. I wonder would you be so quick to poke fun at Jews? It seems anti-Catholicism is the last acceptable prejudice. The way ye are going on, you'd think the great Utopia that is secular society (you know, the one that you slashdotters subscribe to and pay taxes towards) had never produced a paedophile or a cover-upping bureaucrat. Anyway, despite the bigotted commentary, I get the distinct feeling that there's also a lot of begrudgery towards the Catholic Church (an institution that is incredibly wealthy). A Church that brings too much attention to the failings of the modern society that you live in. Facebook is facilitating the Church to spread her message. No big deal. The message hasn't changed all that much - it's just the medium is slightly different. And it's obviously working: this year, the year of priests, vocations are up and are rising steadily. Some seminaries who haven't had students for over 10 years have students in their lecture halls once again.

    1. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      It seems anti-Catholicism is the last acceptable prejudice.

      This alone shows that you're living in a box. If you think that this is true, why don't you take a look outside your insular world? There are plenty of people all over the world "poking fun at Jews" and quite a number of other groups as well. I don't see any reason why Catholicism should get a pass for moral failing, and in fact I think they deserve more ridicule for having moral failings because they claim the moral high ground so often.

      The way ye are going on, you'd think the great Utopia that is secular society (you know, the one that you slashdotters subscribe to and pay taxes towards) had never produced a paedophile or a cover-upping bureaucrat.

      This is the price paid when a group who claims a monopoly on morality shows a serious moral failing. The Catholic Church itself rails endlessly on others for their moral failings, so they take it on the chin when it's discovered that they're being wildly hypocritical.

      Anyway, despite the bigotted commentary, I get the distinct feeling that there's also a lot of begrudgery towards the Catholic Church (an institution that is incredibly wealthy). A Church that brings too much attention to the failings of the modern society that you live in.

      This is precisely why they got a smackdown. If they were less anxious to point out the failings of "society" then they'd take less abuse when they're shown to have these same failings. If they're going to hold my feet to the fire, then I'm damn well going to do the same to them. If they don't like it, they can fix it easily enough by cleaning their own houses or keeping their mouths shut.

      Virg

    2. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by Eamorr · · Score: 1

      You've obviously made up your little mind. Best of luck. The work of the Church continues, despite what the bigots think. Insist on excluding the divine at your peril.

    3. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for saving me the trouble of having to school that illiterate prat. You were a lot more polite about it that I'd have been.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    4. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by Eamorr · · Score: 1

      One wonders what your opinion of the Jews is.

    5. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by Creedo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cry me a river. It might surprise you to know that most people don't consider the actual abuse to be the main problem. It was the widespread and systematic cover ups that raised our ire. Being an ex-Catholic atheist, I am no fan of the Catholic Church. I was quite willing to leave them alone to wallow in their doltish and retrograde beliefs, but the revelation of these high level, systematic coverups lead me to conclude that they deserve every heaping helping of scorn that they receive. And, yes, I am no respecter of beliefs. I have no problem with criticizing stupid beliefs no matter where they originate. Judaism holds no sacred position in my view, either.

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
    6. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Pretty much the same as other religions: It's a pack of nonsense delusional people use to justify and forgive themselves for the most appalling moral and ethical lapses. I've been less than kind to the current Israeli government because of its refusal to obey the Geneva Conventions, and been called an anti-Semite as a result.

      It's still a matter of record, by the way, that the Catholic Church has been a happy hunting ground for pedophiles for a long, long time. Underground journals in the Victorian Era mocked priests as a bunch of baby-rapers. They were right.

      Next question?

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    7. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by Eamorr · · Score: 1

      At least you're being honest and I know what I'm dealing with here. While you continue to spout arrogant opinions of those with religious belief, you conveniently fail to put forward your own philosophical/theological reasoning about the highest questions known to humanity. Go found your own Church, publish some papers and get a few billion followers and we'll see how well your bigotted opinions hold up. Also, can you point to an example of baby rape within the Catholic Church? Do you deny that these things don't happen in the country that you pay your taxes towards and sing the national anthem of?

    8. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by Eamorr · · Score: 1

      You've been watching too much mainstream TV for your own good. If you actually did a bit of cursory research, you'd find that the Vatican publicly acknowledged the presence of paedophilia within the church nearly 50 YEARS AGO. http://www.vatican.va/resources/resources_crimen-sollicitationis-1962_en.html Can you please point to an organisation the size of the Church that is paedophile free? What you also fail to realise is that priests are on duty 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: unlike 9 to 5 secularists who can engage in their little perversions outside of office hours and where the organisation they work bears no consequences when their employee commits a crime. The way you present your opinion, you'd think 2010 was first time that Rome has been aware of this issue. It's not. You'll find that many abuse victims that populate these protest marches have already made settlements with the Church and they and their families are coming around for seconds in the compensation stakes. They see a wealthy organisation on the ropes and they're going in for another greedy swipe. This time, they won't be so lucky. There will be no double-compensation pay-outs. The Vatican's legal team will not budge on this matter. But don't let the facts get in the way of your prejudices and your bigotry.

    9. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by Creedo · · Score: 1

      Can you please point to an organisation the size of the Church that is paedophile free?
      Can you point to an organization claiming to be the Body of Christ and the prime moral authority on the planet which also practices the cover up of child rape(which is just one facet of the abuse that the Church is dealing with now)? The (in)actions of the Vatican speak far more clearly than their public positions.

      What you also fail to realise is that priests are on duty 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: unlike 9 to 5 secularists who can engage in their little perversions outside of office hours and where the organisation they work bears no consequences when their employee commits a crime.
      And this has what to do with the institutional practice of covering up crimes, pray tell? Are you suggesting that I cut the priests slack for diddling kids, or the bishops for hiding their crimes? How pathetic....

      The way you present your opinion, you'd think 2010 was first time that Rome has been aware of this issue.
      The way you miss my entire point, you'd think that your reading and critical thinking skills were in serious decline. It's almost as if you didn't read my post about cover ups.

      You'll find that many abuse victims that populate these protest marches have already made settlements with the Church and they and their families are coming around for seconds in the compensation stakes. They see a wealthy organisation on the ropes and they're going in for another greedy swipe. This time, they won't be so lucky. There will be no double-compensation pay-outs. The Vatican's legal team will not budge on this matter.
      Yup, blame those damned victims for getting raped. The fact that you continually ignore the point of this outrage, namely the cover ups, shows that you've followed the Church's example. Go ahead, ignore the problem. Just don't be surprised when you peek out of your blinders and find that the world has no use for your Chruch anymore.

      But don't let the facts get in the way of your prejudices and your bigotry.
      Given that you haven't refuted a single statement of mine, you apparently aren't worried about facts at all. But don't mind me. I'll just be here laughing at the antics of your entire irrational Church as it hobbles from one scandal to the next, bleeding out moral authority while it tries desperately to inject it's payload of bronze age ignorance into a new generation.

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
    10. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You've been watching too much mainstream TV for your own good. If you actually did a bit of cursory research, you'd find that the Vatican publicly acknowledged the presence of paedophilia within the church nearly 50 YEARS AGO.

      And they kept shuffling around and protecting priests who they knew to be pedophiles long after that. Which makes it even worse.

    11. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I wonder would you be so quick to poke fun at Jews?

      At Orthodox Jews, absolutely. But at least they didn't rape kids.

      It seems anti-Catholicism is the last acceptable prejudice.

      Prejudice was always and remains acceptable against those who themselves practice and teach prejudice. Catholicism is in a good company with Islam and the likes there.

      The way ye are going on, you'd think the great Utopia that is secular society (you know, the one that you slashdotters subscribe to and pay taxes towards) had never produced a paedophile or a cover-upping bureaucrat.

      Can you come up with any examples of a government cover-up for a pedophile bureaucrat?

      Anyway, despite the bigotted commentary, I get the distinct feeling that there's also a lot of begrudgery towards the Catholic Church (an institution that is incredibly wealthy).

      Of course there is, and it has nothing to do with it being wealthy (well, maybe a bit - it kinda doesn't mesh well with what Jesus said).

      The thing about Catholic church is that it's, on one hand, still the most prominent Christian church in Western countries, and, on the other hand, one of the most conservative (read: bigoted). So it gets all the flak it rightly deserves for its own policies (such as anti-condom and generally anti-contraceptive campaigns in Africa and elsewhere, anti-abortion, gay bashing etc), but it also serves as a lightning rod for a lot of discontent associated with Christianity and organized religion in general.

      A Church that brings too much attention to the failings of the modern society that you live in.

      What, not enough witch burnings?

      Seriously, the modern society I live in has a lot of failings, but whenever I've read what the Pope has to say about it, my immediate feeling is that it's a kind of guidance that's best followed in a "do exactly opposite of what he says" way.

      No, we don't need to get all "spiritual", or teach our children to worship a deity in schools.

    12. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      At least you're being honest and I know what I'm dealing with here. While you continue to spout arrogant opinions of those with religious belief, you conveniently fail to put forward your own philosophical/theological reasoning about the highest questions known to humanity. Go found your own Church, publish some papers and get a few billion followers and we'll see how well your bigotted opinions hold up.

      There are philosophical reasonings that, by definition, do not need a church or any form of organized religion - such as atheism - and in that is their ultimate superiority. And how well do our bigoted atheistic opinions hold? Well, it seems that the better educated the populace is, the more atheists are in there. The number of people identifying as non-religious in Europe - the stronghold of Catholicism - grows every year, with some countries already past the 50% mark. Most of the recent Church claims come from impoverished and underdeveloped areas such as Africa - as usual, religion preys on the weak, promising untold riches in the "next life" to compensate with the hardship on this one. Where people have learned that their hard work can make tomorrow better for themselves and their children, fewer and fewer care about such enticing.

    13. Re:Disgusting bigotted commentary by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Now you're starting to get silly. There's so many cases of little boys being raped by priests and appropriately-named "lay brothers" that the only possible conclusion a sane person can draw is that there are thousands more that haven't even been reported. I was especially angered by the rapist in a dog collar who molested at least 200 deaf children in Wisconsin.

      And in recent weeks, hundreds of sexual abuse cover-up cases have surfaced in the German church, so many that the Vatican says it can't handle the workload. And three Brazilian Catholic priests were recently accused of abusing boys in Brazil, with video evidence. These outrages happen all over the world. The only thing they have in common is the Catholic Church and, until very recently, its ability to influence police and prosecutors. Fortunately, those days are gone.

      The reason my "philosophical/theological reasoning about the highest questions known to humanity" isn't on display is because it doesn't include screwing children, then expecting my superiors to cover it up and move me on to another hunting ground. I can state very briefly, though, that Occam's Razor is more than sufficient to dispose of most claims made by most religions. Certainly religion is just about the only place where the credulous acceptance of irrational claptrap is elevated to the status of virtue while critical thought will often get you murdered in any of a hundred ingenious and agonizing ways. Basically, if you can produce one shred of verifiable proof that god exists, bring it on. You can't.

      On the other hand, evidence that the Catholic Church has been a happy refuge for thousands of pedophiles is indisputable.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  39. Anything can be funny by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I would refrain from pedophile jokes because frankly it is not funny.

    Anything can be funny under the right circumstances. If you think otherwise you are taking life far too seriously.

    The biggest threat to Christianity is not atheists. It is Christians.

    I would have said it's logic but no one ever accused Christians of that...
    (if you are tempted to mod this troll or flamebait see above)

  40. Their own bible condems them by bflong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1 Timothy 4:1-5:
    1 But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, 2 by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron, 3 men who forbid marriage and advocate abstaining from foods which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth. 4 For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with gratitude; 5 for it is sanctified by means of the word of God and prayer.

    Note how it says forbidding to marry is a teaching inspired my demons. I mean, wow, don't they read their own book?

    --
    Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
    1. Re:Their own bible condems them by Eamorr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ROFL. You've just proved your ignorance. Since when is the Lockman Foundation's bible authorised by the Catholic Church?

    2. Re:Their own bible condems them by bflong · · Score: 3, Informative

      I couldn't find a Jerusalem Bible online fast enough.

      Here it is:
      1 The Spirit has explicitly said that during the last times some will desert the faith and pay attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines that come from devils,
      2 seduced by the hypocrisy of liars whose consciences are branded as though with a red-hot iron:
      3 they forbid marriage and prohibit foods which God created to be accepted with thanksgiving by all who believe and who know the truth.
      4 Everything God has created is good, and no food is to be rejected, provided it is received with thanksgiving:
      5 the word of God and prayer make it holy.

      Here is the New American:
      1 Now the Spirit explicitly says that in the last times some will turn away from the faith by paying attention to deceitful spirits and demonic instructions
      2 through the hypocrisy of liars with branded consciences.
      3 They forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth.
      4 For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected when received with thanksgiving,
      5 for it is made holy by the invocation of God in prayer.

      Here is the Douay:
      1 Now the Spirit manifestly saith, that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error, and doctrines of devils,
      2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their conscience seared,
      3 Forbidding to marry, to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful, and by them that have known the truth.
      4 For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be rejected that is received with thanksgiving:
      5 For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.

      Anything else you care to complain about?

      --
      Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
    3. Re:Their own bible condems them by thijsh · · Score: 1

      Wow... foretold by St. Paul himself! He was after all known for his prophetic vision of 'later times'... Funny how especially Paul's revelations are quoted ad-infinitum that the 'end is near' because of X which remotely resembles a symbolic verse Y, while a passage like this which is a quite literal instruction and can't be explained a million and one way is overlooked.

    4. Re:Their own bible condems them by jdsnape · · Score: 1

      The Church does not condemn marriage, as those in that passage do, indeed it is one of the fiercest protectors of it and promotes it among the faithful.

      It does however recognise that God calls some to live a chaste life in His service, as Christ himself says "There are eunuchs who have made themselves that way for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can" (Matthew 19 v12), and Paul later says to "those who are not married: it is a good thing for them to stay as they are, like me" (1 Corinthians v 8-9)

      In terms of the priesthood it is a discipline, not a dogma, and hence there are some married priests in the western church (chiefly converts from Anglicanism), but it has been recognised from the very start of Christianity that the gift celibacy for the sake of Christ is one which can give joy and freedom to the priest.

    5. Re:Their own bible condems them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      it has been recognised from the very start of Christianity that the gift celibacy for the sake of Christ is one which can give joy and freedom to the priest.

      You know, Orthodox christians would take offense at that. Do you assert that their practice of marriage been not only allowed, but effectively obligatory for some categories of priests, has not been there "from the very start"?

    6. Re:Their own bible condems them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are eunuchs who have made themselves that way for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can" (Matthew 19 v12), and Paul later says to "those who are not married: it is a good thing for them to stay as they are

      Hmm, sounds like somebody supports celibacy for those who can't control their urges towards something not adult human female, who is available for marriage.

    7. Re:Their own bible condems them by jdsnape · · Score: 1

      No, just that celibacy is something which has been recognised as a practise from the start of Christianity. I recognise that there were married priests in the early church, and that is something carried on in the Orthodox churches (and I believe the Eastern Catholic Church).

      Personally, I recognise that there is much good in a married priesthood, but also see much good coming from the vow of celibacy, for the priests and religious I have met it has been a blessing. There is scope for it to change in the Catholic church, and whether it will do is something to be seen, but any change shouldn't be the result of a rushed process/knee-jerk reaction to a crisis.

    8. Re:Their own bible condems them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Personally, I recognise that there is much good in a married priesthood, but also see much good coming from the vow of celibacy, for the priests and religious I have met it has been a blessing.

      So why not let the priests choose for themselves, as they see fit to do in the service of God? It would seem that, either way, they would be guided towards what is best for them.

    9. Re:Their own bible condems them by jdsnape · · Score: 1

      That is something which I suppose may be a possibility - something similar to the Eastern Orthodox tradition where (I believe) priests cannot marry, but it is possible to be ordained after getting married, so at the end of seminary priests must choose whether to get married or remain celibate.

      In the western church (and to a large degree in the eastern churches too, where after all Bishops and religious must still remain chaste) it has been found that celibacy gives freedom to the priest, and aids the working of the church, and hence I suppose has been made the norm.

      An interesting article was posted only today talking about celibacy in the Jesuit tradition, here and there is much else written about it (for example the catholic encyclopedia article)

      Finally, we shouldn't forget that celibacy is of course not forced on anyone - every priest has made a free choice with due warning to enter into this state of life. Priesthood isn't a right, it is a gift of God to those able with his grace to live it.

    10. Re:Their own bible condems them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In the western church (and to a large degree in the eastern churches too, where after all Bishops and religious must still remain chaste) it has been found that celibacy gives freedom to the priest, and aids the working of the church, and hence I suppose has been made the norm.

      With respect to Eastern Orthodoxy, the reason why marriage (before ordination) is not only allowed, but generally encouraged for parish priests, is because the latter often act as a general (not just religious) counsel, in a role very similar to psychotherapists. Obviously, when it comes to matters related to marriage and sexual life, it is, on one hand, preferable if the counselor himself has some experience, and, on the other hand, that the person receiving counsel trusts that it is useful and applicable, coming from a competent source.

      Another aspect of it is that parish priests are also expected to serve as role models for their community in many matters, not excluding "be fruitful and multiply", and proper husband/wife relationship in general. Hence one who isn't married would be viewed with some suspicion as to why he doesn't himself do as he preaches.

  41. Sorry, but I can't resist... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    So how have they set in up? Once some guy has tried to "Friend" more than 100 tween boys he's never met before, does the Catholic Church automatically send him a pre-approved application form for entry into the priesthood?

    Credit card companies have something like that set up for people with bad credit, so it seems like a good way for the church to save time it might waste rejecting all the women and married men who might want to be priests.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  42. Not doctrine by TheLink · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's NOT doctrine.

    If someone wants to be a priest, bishop or other "top leader of a church" I suggest they look at this first:

    http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Timothy+3&version=NIV

    http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Timothy%203&version=NKJV

    http://bible.cc/1_timothy/3-2.htm

    The requirements there for Bishops and Deacons don't mention celibacy anywhere. In fact they do even mention "husband of but one wife".

    So there's above reproach, husband of but one wife, temperate, self controlled, good reputation with outsiders, etc.

    So practicing polygamists/adulterers/fornicators/pedophiles/homosexuals do not meet that standard. Nor do drunkards.

    You might ask why not practicing homosexuals? Because honestly if you're a practicing homosexual you would not meet the "above reproach", "blameless" and "good reputation with outsiders" requirement.

    Like it or not, but It is a fact that a practicing homosexual is still not "above reproach" in the real world.

    There are all sorts of outsiders you would deal with as an official representative of the church. Not meeting these requirements would reduce your effectiveness. You would be a blunt knife.

    How about non-practicing homosexuals? IMO, there isn't such a vast difference to being faithful to one wife and being faithfully celibate. If you feel it's such a huge difference and you can't stay celibate, then too bad you don't meet the "self controlled" requirement.

    BUT don't forget you can always serve in other ways.

    There are plenty of good works still to be done, why do you need to be a priest, bishop, deacon or whatever to do it? What's your motive really?

    I'm not a homosexual, but I certainly don't meet those high standards either.

    --
    1. Re:Not doctrine by Princeofcups · · Score: 2, Informative

      So there's above reproach, husband of but one wife, temperate, self controlled, good reputation with outsiders, etc.

      So practicing polygamists/adulterers/fornicators/pedophiles/homosexuals do not meet that standard. Nor do drunkards.

      It's a shame that those "standards" have never really been followed. I DID grow up Catholic. Baptism, communion, confirmation. I was even an alter boy. (And no I was never abused.)

      Anyway, everyone knew that a large percentage of priests were gay, but it was never talked about. Instead, if a young boy preferred to play with dolls instead of toy guns, then the relatives would say "He's destined for the priesthood." No joke, fact.

      I also went to Catholic high school, and one of the priests was regularly drunk when he taught class, and one was more bipolar and would only be drunk on occasion. At least two priests were outwardly gay (non-practicing of course). One, the principal of all people, was defrocked for having multiple affairs with underage students (female by the way).

      There is nothing particularly "holy" about the Catholic community. It has its problems just like any other.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    2. Re:Not doctrine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'It's a shame that those "standards" have never really been followed.'

      Yes it's a big shame. It's a standard that every church should aim for when picking top leaders of a church - those are clearly the sort of attributes you would want in a church leader. So what if he doesn't know anything about carpentry or music or computers - others can do that. Basically we want them to be good at being good and following Jesus. Then they can help lead us in doing likewise.

      Those standards are pretty clear, and the failures to meet them are often quite obvious. Yes leaders are human and fallible etc, make mistakes etc. But really when you make a big mistake, you should step down first. Otherwise it's even more damaging to the church (as we have seen from the Catholic Church's poor example). Thinking nobody can replace you is sinful pride and shows a lack of faith in God. If everyone calls you back, then sure think about taking it up again.

      It's not impossible to meet these standards. It doesn't say you have to be perfect. I'm lucky and a few of my church leaders meet that standard. Their children are well brought up, and they also have a good opinion of their parents, which is a good sign- your children are quite hard to fool once they grow up a bit.

  43. The jokes just write themselves, don't they? by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More seriously - dear Catholic church: maybe if you're having trouble with recruiting, it might be a good idea to look at your medieval personnel policies? You know, like maybe letting priests get married, letting women in, etc, etc. Might cut down on the pervert problem too. I'm just sayin'.

    1. Re:The jokes just write themselves, don't they? by lessthan · · Score: 1

      Then where would the perverts go? Won't someone think of the perverts?

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
  44. Matter of doctrine by Term90 · · Score: 1

    While they're changing doctrine, how about female priests? That could potentially increase their numbers by 50%. Sometimes change is forced on the powers that be. Galileo springs to mind. They didn't like the idea of a Helio-Centric universe, but once science got it figured out, they had little choice but to change. Adapt or die also comes to mind.

  45. The really stupid thing... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ... is that not all Catholic priests have to be celibate. If, say, you're a married Episcopal priest, and you convert to become a Catholic priest, well, obviously you get to keep your wife. Also, the Catholic church is made up of a couple of different "rites" - the Roman rite is most familiar, but there are various others. And in some of the others, yeah, priests can be married too. There is literally nothing to this insistence on celibacy for (some) priests beyond "we've always done it this way". And that's not even true.

  46. Re:A better solution is not "insightful"! by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 1

    Allowing women to become priests and allowing priests to marry is not a solution to reinvigorate the Church or gain greater numbers of priests. Sure, there is considerable amount of social pressure to conform to these demands, but please note that many mainstream Protestant churches have taken exactly these measures... and not only are their numbers of ministers not increasing, but they're decreasing again, also!

    The problem with ministerial life is that it's a life of giving, and not a life of receiving. In a society where everyone wants to be "Paris Hilton", there's little incentive to aspire to be Mother Teresa...

    Check the statistics, and then please give up this old, tired argument for female or married priests...!

    --
    mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
  47. "Father Flanagan wants to molest you." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Confirm or Ignore?

    But he may still try to Poke you..

  48. Finaly, the Catholic Church is catching up! by Subgenius · · Score: 1

    We've been recruiting priests, bishops, popes, hell popes, anti-popes, pope-esses, Doktors, cardinals, ordinals, and rabis via the Internet for nearly 20 years. No mandatory molestation, just $30 for ordainment (Eternal Salvation or Triple Your Money Back!) and the Divine Excuse! It is nice to see organized religion copying US!

    --
    Toil is Stupid. Don't be Stupid.
  49. Putting your eggs into one basket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some years back, my cousin converted to Catholicism and went somewhat fanatical. In short order, he entered seminary to train to be a priest. For those who are not familiar with the process, Catholic seminary entails about as much time and effort as an undergraduate degree followed by a graduate degree, with emphasis on theology, philosophy, and some psychology. As far as a vocation is concerned, it more or less qualifies you to be a Catholic priest, and not much else. In essence, you are putting all of your eggs in one basket, as the opportunity cost of Catholic seminary is an equivalent degree from a secular institution. You end up specialized for employment by a single employer.

    After years of effort (and enthusiastic blog posts), when he was just a few months away from his ordination, my cousin was suddenly cut off from the program. The exact circumstances around the event are still largely a mystery to the extended family, but one thing that we do know is that he really and honestly desired to become a Catholic priest. Now he is in limbo (excuse the pun), having just put in as much effort as he would have put in for a full undergraduate degree and a graduate degree at a secular institution. As far as I can determine, he now has no real prospects for employment outside the Catholic priesthood.

    Perhaps he can start on another graduate degree from scratch at this point, but he is already well into his 30's and has thrown away years of his life pursuing something that some church bureaucrat has capriciously yanked out from under his feet. At this point, qualifying yourself for the Catholic priesthood seems to me like a tremendously risky way to pursue a career.

  50. Re:A better solution is not "insightful"! by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Allowing women to become priests and allowing priests to marry is not a solution to reinvigorate the Church or gain greater numbers of priests. Sure, there is considerable amount of social pressure to conform to these demands, but please note that many mainstream Protestant churches have taken exactly these measures... and not only are their numbers of ministers not increasing, but they're decreasing again, also!

    Depends on the sect. There are some incredibly successful protestant churches right now.

    The problem with ministerial life is that it's a life of giving, and not a life of receiving. In a society where everyone wants to be "Paris Hilton", there's little incentive to aspire to be Mother Teresa

    I don't buy it, and I never have. There is not something morally bankrupt about modern culture that did not exist previously. The vast, vast majority of people have no desire to be Paris Hilton.

    And I would even say on a religious level, Christian groups are a lot more "giving" nowadays than they tended to be in previous decades, where Christianity was frequently simply a label for an intolerant right-wing ideology; the modern evangelical movement is a lot more focused on actual good works than the fundamentalists of the 20th century.

  51. It's about capability, not morals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real reason atheists (as well as most religons) have fewer incidents is that the practitioners of those things have no powerful centralized quasi-government-like thing to protect them from consequences.

    Imagine you were a pedophile. Wouldn't you want to get a job as a catholic priest, so that you would have a large organization to protect your interests? NAMBLA can't do that for you -- lack of power. A democratic institution (most modern governments) can't do that for you -- lack of will. The church has what you need.

  52. Why not ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    .. Chat Roulette?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  53. So Facebook is the new *chan? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    I told ya so! pop music is to music, like Facebook is to 4chan. Not better. Just more popular and a lot more full of being molded into a predefined set of the crowd’s social conditioned views of how they think things are.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  54. Fair point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. Who knew! by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

    I never imagined that NAMBLAs membership was that large.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  56. The moral nerds by FrBlast3r · · Score: 1

    Reading the comments, one must be dreaming.... Moral statements, Advices and sarcasms on sexuality or spirituality?... Since when the world of nerds is a reference for this subjects? True, Geek are well known for their clean and healthy sexual behaviour. Guys, focus on the last CPU technology and the new events on the life of you own GPL God, Stallman, rather than commenting stupidly on the catholic church that clearly you do not know but through the myopy of the current media amalgamating 1.2 billion people to a few deviants.

  57. Maybe not a good idea by hduff · · Score: 1

    but more power to the Church.

    But please don't let them advert on Slashdot.

    Moving from mom's basement to the rectory may not be good idea for either party.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  58. Evolution and the Church by ahodgkinson · · Score: 1

    I realize that this is slightly off-topic, but here's some food for thought concerning evolution in the Catholic and Jewish religions:

    Consider what would happen (centuries or millennia ago) if you were a poor but very intelligent male child in Europe:

    Depending on the religion of your family, you would probably come to attention of the local priest or rabbi.

    If your family was Catholic you might be allowed to enter the priesthood, learn to read and write, and given initiative and some luck, you could rise through the ranks of the church hierarchy. Given you stay in the church it is unlikely that you would produce children.

    If your family was Jewish, you might be tutored by the local rabbi, learn to read and write, and given initiative and some luck, you would likely marry someone from an educated and perhaps well to do family. It is likely that your children would get a head start in life, as compared to yourself.

    Now consider what this difference means over thousands of years of evolution. The Catholics are removing intelligent people from the gene pool and the Jews are giving them a breeding advantage.

    The Catholic religion has existed for over 2000 years, and the Jewish religion for much longer. This is may be enough time to produce measurable results. Think about the studies of the of the Ashkenazi Jewish community, which show a greater than 100 average IQ.

    --
    ---- It won't be as bad as you fear or as good as you hope, but it will take twice as long as you plan.
  59. Pfft. by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    The Facebook page attracted more than 1,200 fans in one week.

    So they're several orders of magnitude behind the fanbase for "My Sister Said She'd Name Her Baby Megatron If I Got One Million Fans." If 1,200 is the best the Catholic Church can do in a week, they might want to consider going ahead and putting up the cathedrals for sale on eBay.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  60. it's not just the atheists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The true believers won't touch the "Church" with a ten foot pole. More and more of the believing type are learning that worshipping sun staves is idolatry, that the accepted calender is pagan and the moon and lunar months are to be used for determining YHWH's "appointed times", that they should be worshipping YHWH and not some lord or god that could be the alias of something else, that many bibles are tainted (YHWH's name removed and replaced with lord or god, the bit about fasting and prayer to cast out demons is left out of many bibles, etc.), etc.

    1. Re:it's not just the atheists... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      And who determines they are "true" believers? Oh, they themselves?...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  61. Wait, what? by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Are you really suggesting that striving to "inspire people" rather than direct, sometimes brutal "defensive" (or really offensive...) actions are in some way old fashioned for religions, traditional?

    Really?! O_o

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  62. separation of church and state by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Here in the U.S., its often a big debate. You and I know the founding fathers were not theists and we know specifically what the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment says...and what Article VI, Section 3 says about religious tests for public office. However, the bible-thumpers still insist the U.S. is a Christian nation founded on Christian principals. They succeeded in having "E Pluribus Unum " changed to "In God We Trust" on all our money and they managed to slip "Under God" into the Pledge of Allegiance. We had a recent VP candidate in 2008 who believed it was "God's will" that she was nominated Republican VP candidate...That reminds me of the Middle Ages "Divine Right of Kings" philosophy imposed by monarchs on their subjects. Also, I believe GW Bush made a similar statement about his ascendancy to the throne...er, I mean presidency. Of course, there's also the Pat Robertsons and others of the world who try to extend the power of religion to politics. I wish I could say the U.S. is truly secular.

  63. Priests can get around the vow of celibacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the priest was married before becoming a priest he is not required to take a vow of celibacy.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priesthood_%28Catholic_Church%29#After_the_Great_Schism

  64. Happiness by brindafella · · Score: 1

    > sex... "sure beats the hell out of a ham sandwich, doesn't it?"

    The Pope visits a convent and, after meeting the nuns, is about to leave.

    He raises his hand in the normal way to give the sign of blessing, at the same time saying, "I vissh yor all a'penis."

    --
    Looking at space, radio, science and computing from a 'down-under' amateur enthusiast perspective.
    1. Re:Happiness by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      Three nuns decide to confess to a priest.

      The first nun comes to the priest and says "Forgive me father, for I have sinned. I have looked at a man's penis."

      The priest says "Go wash your eyes in holy water and you shall be healed."

      The other nuns proceed likewise. Afterward, the priest hears a commotion in the church. He runs in to find the nuns fighting.

      The second nun approaches the priest and says "Father, sister Jones wants to sit in the holy water before I gargle it!"

      Oh!

      And another:

      what pennance do you get for commiting fornication? Three hail marys and an our father.

      What do you get for child molestation? Two candy bars and a pack of baseball cards!

      --
      blah blah blah
  65. Well, you know what they say.... by toadlife · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..."Abstinence makes the church grow fondlers!""

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  66. Peh, I'd post on l/ by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    I mean look:
    - faith in the belief that a certain prescribed ritual will result in a specific, predictable outcome? If that doesn't describe coding, I don't know what does.
    - ability to spend their entire lives without sex, or really female companionship of any kind, except for a worshipful adulation of an image (think geeks and a picture of Megan Fox)
    - ability to endlessly pontificate (see what I did there?)

    Hell, all they have to do is say "priests get to live in their mom's basement" and the slashvertisment practically writes itself.

    --
    -Styopa
  67. Re:A better solution is not "insightful"! by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 1

    and not only are their numbers of ministers not increasing, but they're decreasing again, also!

    Depends on the sect. There are some incredibly successful protestant churches right now.

    Yes, there are successful churches, but that's a different topic -- we're talking about increases in numbers of ordained ministers. Not part-time workers: full-time, degreed professionals for whom their primary career is church ministry, at the parish level. Those numbers are declining.

    I don't buy it, and I never have. There is not something morally bankrupt about modern culture that did not exist previously.

    The problem isn't "moral bankruptcy", it's affluence. In the U.S., and the West, generally, more people live in middle-to-upperclass life situations, and have the expectation of continued affluence in their careers. It's this set of expectations that hinders the willingness to answer a call to ministry.

    The vast, vast majority of people have no desire to be Paris Hilton.

    Not according to recent polls of teenaged students in the U.S.! As they age, they abandon such superficial role models; however, the goals and ideals that these role models espouse tend to continue to be held dear...

    --
    mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
  68. Unintentionally hilarious by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    This is what your post sounds like to an atheist:

    Of course you, a great beacon of not playing Pokemon, know what's best for the Pokemon Fan Club. ROFL. Maybe you should enroll in your local Pokemon Training Academy, study for seven years, do a PhD in Pokemon Biology in Tokyo and then publish your opinions and see how well they are received. I'll bet you'd fall flat on your face on the first hurdle and the whole stadium will be laughing at you. Stick to the keyboard heroics my friend.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  69. When religion is disintermediated by the Internet by DarkStarZumaBeach · · Score: 1

    Consider: In olden times, like in the 1960s, if you needed advice about marriage, family, health care, old age, and death, you spoke to your local representative of organized religion for advice and consent.

    The theory was that it provided an accredited personal access to common cultural knowledge garnered across generations as to how to live life.

    Today, that task is fulfilled by smart phones, WebMD.com, bloggers, AARP.org, and web memorials posted in cyberspace.

    So, in a way, it is sign of the times that the Catholic Church in France is using Facebook to recruit persons to fill vacant positions that have been disintermediated by the Internet. In a way, it is a chance to select humans for a job no longer performed by humans because of the cost efficiencies of the Internet.

    In another way, it is a form of functional redundancy that may some day be required should the Internet vanish through technological disaster or political hazard. In this latter sense, the keepers of organized religion are maintaining a social function as a back-up mechanism for maintaining social order should the Internet cease to operate.

    Another example of similar human organizations rapidly being disintermediated can be found in libraries and schools.

    In the face of technology, the old ways are kept polished and practiced by dedicated individuals in the event of that one rainy day when technology fails to renew itself in its rapid race towards consumer obsolescence.

    When Ray Kurzweil's Singularity Point is reached - and biological humans are disintermediated - can we expect organized religion to provide android priests to avoid "temptations of the flesh"?

    Q: Will Android Priests dream of Electric Angels??

    Inquiring minds want to know ..

    --
    DarkStarZumaBeachSurfinApocalypseWow
  70. So - they'll change the name? by earlymon · · Score: 1

    To... FaceBible?

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  71. Chatroulette may be better by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    The Roman church would find more willing perverts^W candidates on chatroulette...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  72. What does this has to do with marriage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, priests molest young boys because they can't get married ? What a nonsense, they could easily find some woman in the congregation to fornicate with, not kids necessary. This is not about marriage, it's about a sickness called pedophilia, which, I must say, 90% of the affected priests with suck sickness are gays.

  73. Post CP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'd have better luck if they used 4chan and sweetened the deal with a stash of CP.

  74. Re:Sacred dogma = Law of mortal men from dark time by kramulous · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't "The writing's on the door" be more appropriate?

    --
    .
  75. the deal breaker by Alcoholist · · Score: 1

    I could do the priest thing, you know, I like reading old books, giving inspirational speeches, choirs are cool... But I also like making love to my wife. The celibacy thing is a real deal breaker for me.

    --
    Bibo Ergo Sum.
  76. And by mahadiga · · Score: 1

    "Religion was born when the first con man met the first fool." --Mark Twain

    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
  77. Bad news about the 1200 by tmh+-+The+Mad+Hacker · · Score: 1

    "The Facebook page attracted more than 1,200 fans in one week."

    The bad news is that they were all registered sex offenders....