Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo Trying Face Recognition For Logins On New Laptops

judgecorp writes "Lenovo's new IdeaPads will be using face recognition as a way to replace passwords for users logging onto the laptops. 'Lenovo's VeriFace combines the Windows login and file encryption to password-protect individual files. It identifies users by matching unique features of their faces to photographs taken by the 1.3-megapixel webcam built into the laptop. When Windows users start up their PCs, a camera window pops up in the login frame. The user then just has to adjust their position so their face appears in the window, and VeriFace logs them in automatically.' That could be good, but is the technology really ready for mass market devices? HP ran into trouble when its face recognition software had trouble recognizing people with darker skin."

164 comments

  1. Who the hell would trust this? by maudface · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'm sticking to a reasonably secure password. Anyone who trusts their security with this is only doing it for the sake of feeling futuristic, it's a dumb idea, nevermind the prospect of showing the thing a picture or video.

    1. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? We live in a world where nobody has any privacy. Whats wrong with keeping your 'face' password on a small obscure site like facebook?
      Video though.. I wonder if the Ipad will have an app for that. The ultimate password cracking tool, an Ipad with identikit software.

    2. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by maudface · · Score: 1

      Hahahahaha, There's a lot wrong with that, and I say this as someone who's had a stalker break into their facebook/gmail accounts. If we're to move to this "cloud computing" paradigm we're going to have to take the security considerations extremely seriously.

    3. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sticking to a reasonably secure face. Anyone who trusts their security with passwords that you type that can be guessed is only doing it for the sake of feeling traditional, it's a dumb idea, nevermind the prospect of programming a thing to guess passwords faster than a person can type.

    4. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by El+Lobo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have one of the new IdealPads with face recognition. The computers are gorgeous and face recognition works well. The first thing I tried was to print a photography of mine with good quality on a 4 arc of paper to see if i could fool the program to think that it was the real me. It didn't work, so I think it's ***reasonably*** secure.

      --
      It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
    5. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Venik · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lenovo is not breaking any new ground here. My 1.5-year-old Toshiba Qosmio can with face-recognition software. The software works equally well with my face or a 1:1 photo of my face - either color or b/w. I think I will stick with passwords for now.

    6. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Whoooooosh!

      One would think it was rather obvious when he called Facebook a "small and obscure site"...

    7. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The first thing I tried was to print a photography of mine with good quality on a 4 arc of paper to see if i could fool the program to think that it was the real me. It didn't work, so I think it's ***reasonably*** secure.

      It's secure because you tried an obvious approach on 5 minutes of your owm time? Holy shit, you're dumb as a brick.

    8. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by thebasicsteve · · Score: 2, Informative

      This "feature" came installed on my Toshiba Satellite from a year ago. It pretty well sucks, requiring you to have enough light, align your face properly, and turn your head left and right. Takes about 1-2 minutes. Takes me maybe 1-2 seconds to type my random 8 char password...

    9. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not both? Haven't slashdotters always said the best security is both something you know (your password) and something you "have" (your face).

      Someone gets your password, but doesn't look like you: No entry.

      As far as 'holding up a picture" you'd think that with 3D becoming the new fad and tiny cameras being cheap. They'd put 2.
      MacBook Pro 2014 1 camera in each corner and the glasses-less 3D technology.

      OOo imagine the porn.

    10. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      It's not like this is new for Lenovo either. They've had it for a long time. And no - I haven't managed to fool it with a photo of myself yet.

      --
      This is blinging
    11. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dude, this technology is FAR OLDER THAN YOU THINK.

      I ran it on an overclocked 180MHz Compaq back in the mid-90s. It did EXACTLY THIS - Face-recognition as a password.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      Well, as always when it comes to security: whether the method is suitable depends on the attack scenario you want to protect yourself against. Neither a password nor face recognition provides significant protection against someone with a screw driver who manages to get physical access to the machine. If you want to protect the data on the disk, you need to encrypt the data and use a strong password. If you want to protect against someone making off with the laptop you need a physical lock, so you can attach the device to something hard to move when you can't keep a close watch on it.

      If you use the machines in a company setting and you want to retain your company's ability to sue if someone copies data off the laptop while the employee is out at lunch - then this face recognition mechanism is probably enough to show you've made a "reasonable effort" to protect your data. (You can actually lose your right to sue if you can't show that.) As a benefit you would still avoid having to reset the password once a week for the more distracted of your users.

    13. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      And the day you have an accident that disfigures you -- or even a bad sunburn -- what then?

    14. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You would need either two or 3 cams to pass the 3d test.

      Actually that would get past the photo issue, but you'd need to put the cameras on other end of the laptop corners.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    15. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by hey! · · Score: 3, Informative

      I didn't even try that, although its an obvious test.

      Lenovo's face recognition failed for me because it slows down the login process. Even where it worked right off the bat (which it didn't always) it has to load the software, take the picture, scan it, then analyze it. If your face isn't optimally positioned, you have to stop what you're doing and orient yourself correctly to give the software a chance.

      The result was far *slower* than typing a password in, so what was the point? If it were as instantaneous, flexible and reliable as human face recognition, that would be a different matter.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by DamienRBlack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think instead of going to a 3D camera, why not just take a video of them turning their face. Or if your worried about someone putting a prerecorded video in front of the camera, maybe you could have the software ask you to say something, then you get both voice recognition and video recognition that can't simply be prerecorded. Seems like the way to go to me.

    17. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Lenovo y510 I bought a year and a half ago came with VERIFACE.

      I removed it because it made it hard to login as anyone but myself (I use a non-admin user day to day)
      some installed require one login as administrator because they do not attempt to elevate access.

    18. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by General+Wesc · · Score: 1

      How long does it take to pull out the hard drive and hook it up to another machine for easy perusal? Don't use this as your GPG password or for remote login, but most security--login passwords and the lock on your front door--work because it would take more than five minutes to circumvent. (Actually, I've discovered that the knife method of opening door locks takes thirty seconds before you've had any practice. Five minutes is great.)

      I wouldn't trust it as much as even a weak password, though. I suspect it's either way too easy to fool or will lock me out if I shave.

    19. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      At the very least, password plus facial recognition. Otherwise, if someone wants to force access to your files, what's to stop them from just having a couple guys grab your head and force it in front of the camera?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    20. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      My Wife's 3 year Old Ideapad came with Veriface.. Doesn't seem to like it when its low light, or she has glasses on. It got uninstalled pretty quick.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    21. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or someone pays your identical twin to get them access. Or they figure out a way to do advanced aging cloning and your clone gets them in.

    22. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Actually even for Lenovo, this is nothing new. I'm typing this on a 2-year old Lenovo Y410 laptop which has this VeriFace installed out of box and it logged me in this morning when I looked it. The TFA seems selling the old trick as new, VeriFace on this laptop is at times dumb and has hard time recognize me,especially when the light is dim.

    23. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lenovo ideapads bought in paris one year ago came preinstalled with face recognitin software as well - slow, memory-hungry and crappy as all preload usually are. Especially nefarious when laptops are to be used with many users (eg. for training classes), and it was a pain to deinstall without upgrading first both windows and the preinstalled av - which in itself took one evening...

    24. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not both? Haven't slashdotters always said the best security is both something you know (your password) and something you "have" (your face).

      Wrong. 2 out of three: Something you know, something you have, something you are.
      Face is something you are, you can't replace it.

    25. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      I have one of the new IdealPads with face recognition. The computers are gorgeous and face recognition works well. The first thing I tried was to print a photography of mine with good quality on a 4 arc of paper to see if i could fool the program to think that it was the real me. It didn't work, so I think it's ***reasonably*** secure.

      Now try 'playing' with some makeup and give yourself a fake black-eye with typical squinting eye or equal facial marking and let us know if it still recognizes you. How about try smiling/frowning at the camera as the older versions of this kind of software couldn't understand that it could be the same person. Hat or other head accessory?

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    26. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it won't - you just need 2 or 3 photographs instead of one.

    27. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by barfy · · Score: 1

      It is something you know: password a secret question.
      Something you have: a key, a dongle, a passcard.
      Something you are: biometrics of some sort.

    28. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fool. Obviously this isn't perfect security for everything, but for situations where people aren't dealing with very important data, it can make it very easy to switch computers. For example, at a library, or office. You can sit at a computer, and get straight in, before you have finished sitting down.

    29. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by mogness · · Score: 1

      and then, beat you until you tell them your password.

      --
      that's teh shizzle bizzle
    30. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by tribaal · · Score: 1

      But then, his face won't be recognized by the software anymore. It's a quantum-like situation: you can have one, or the other, but not both at the same time. It's the ultimate authentication system!!!

    31. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh yeah!

      I ran it on an overclocked dildo that your mom gave me! It did EXACTLY THIS - Orifice-recognition as a password.

    32. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      i've got a netbook from them that's got this implemented. It's a pain in the ass and takes forever for the software to recognize you.

      Also, Say you gain 30 lbs and your face plumps out, well, it won't recognize you anymore (i shaved my goatee and it locked me out of my own computer)

      Its a great idea poorly executed in my opinion, what it should do, on a daily basis, is take a snapshot of your face and update itself. Unless you go through a DRASTIC change, it should work.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    33. Re:Who the hell would trust this? by Syberz · · Score: 1

      I have one of the new IdealPads with face recognition.

      I hope that you don't ever gain/lose a lot of weight, break your nose or get nose surgery (not necessarily a resculpt, I had a bandage for a month when I got my deviated septum fixed).

      --
      ~Syberz
  2. Easy to defeat by Kazymyr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Was there any breakthrough in face recognition recently? It was easy to defeat as of last year.

    http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3804906/Facial-Recognition-Gets-a-Black-Eye-at-Black-Hat.htm

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    1. Re:Easy to defeat by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't need to be good, it just has to look good. It's all security theater and marketing.

    2. Re:Easy to defeat by garcia · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, here I thought I just had to fire up http://thehun.com/ and show them one of those facials. Thanks for setting me straight!

    3. Re:Easy to defeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " HP ran into trouble when its face recognition software had trouble recognizing people with darker skin."

      See - even computers can't stand niggers!

    4. Re:Easy to defeat by carmaa · · Score: 1

      Isn't this like putting av vault door on a cardbox? I've never understood why people thinks biometrics on laptops is a good idea: Unless you're using encryption, all your data is available to the first n00b who knows how use mount...

      --
      From the dark, old days of the Internet when men were men, women were men, and children FBI agents
  3. Fool it with a picture? by hawguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's to keep me from holding up a picture of my coworker in front of the camera when I want to log in to her computer?

    This sounds easier to fool than the fingerprint sensors that can be spoofed with silly putty.

    1. Re:Fool it with a picture? by hughperkins · · Score: 1

      Well, if someone has your photo, then they can get in; but generally I feel the most common scenarios are:
      - someone breaks into your house
      - you leave the device on the train

      In the first, arguably the attacker could steal a photo or two just in case.

      In the second, chances are that the attacker knows nothing about your or your photo, so the data should be pretty secure.

    2. Re:Fool it with a picture? by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I'm stealing a total stranger's laptop, I honestly don't give a crap about the data. I'll sell it to someone else who'll reformat it and sell it as "refurbished" on amazon.

      The only people who would ever care about your data are the people who know you, and they would have the capability and foresight to bring a picture. This system is almost as idiotic as security through voice recognition.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    3. Re:Fool it with a picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The picture will not work. The software is a bit more sophisticated than that. It maps 3D facial features, etc.

    4. Re:Fool it with a picture? by hughperkins · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the technology may not be there yet, but conceptually, the strongest authentication available is some combination of voice and face recognition, as done by a human.

      eg, if you want a new passport, in England, you have to take a picture, and get someone you know to certify it's a true likeness of you. How does that person know it is you? Well, by seeing how you look like, and listening to your voice. I guess?

      So, from a theoretical point of view, this system is I feel sound. Just, maybe the technology is not quite there yet ;-)

    5. Re:Fool it with a picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My voice is my password, you insensitive clod!!

    6. Re:Fool it with a picture? by gregorio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the technology may not be there yet, but conceptually, the strongest authentication available is some combination of voice and face recognition, as done by a human.

      If you consider just a camera (with no additional sensors spread over a large area), it is a crappy concept. Its the kind of concept that stops being viable once it starts being possible.

      Only an awesome 3D camera with an extremely wide angle would not fall into the "just use a printed piece of paper" method. And that non-existent awesome camera would still fall for several other methods, such as well-built models of your face. Even if you're using awesome stereo vision from 2010, the same printed piece of paper in front of any cheap model of a human head will do.

      And the kind of AI needed for a computer to detect a person using only image and sound is HARD. So hard that when we actually have this kind of AI, the cheap tech needed to fool it (the hell, to fool real people) will already be available.

      eg, if you want a new passport, in England, you have to take a picture, and get someone you know to certify it's a true likeness of you. How does that person know it is you? Well, by seeing how you look like, and listening to your voice. I guess?

      The picture allows humans to recognise you. It is meant for humans and humans only.

      So, from a theoretical point of view, this system is I feel sound. Just, maybe the technology is not quite there yet ;-)

      It depends. If you can afford distributing sensors all over the place, it is POSSIBLE to avoid cheating. You can add cameras and distance sensors over a large area and youll stop most forms of cheating. High-tech cheaters can get away by standing in front of the system and using a special set-up to project a different image inside the camera.

      If all you want is a small sensor embedded on a laptop computer, its a stupid concept.

    7. Re:Fool it with a picture? by witherstaff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone else getting flashbacks from the Space Quest games? I remember you had to photocopy a painting to get past a facial recognition scanner...

    8. Re:Fool it with a picture? by tftp · · Score: 1

      High-tech cheaters can get away by standing in front of the system and using a special set-up to project a different image inside the camera.

      Or, to put it simply, by wearing a mask. If a voice is involved, a simple DSP box will convert your speech to the natural range of the target voice. The stupid computer won't be able to do much else with the audio. Of course if the voice exchange is not a challenge-response but a mere password then any voice recorder will do.

    9. Re:Fool it with a picture? by Shulai · · Score: 1

      A regular burglar won't care abour your data. One up to the times would check if you are sloppy and kept home banking credentials on a file in your desktop, or something else he can make money of.

    10. Re:Fool it with a picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Anything that can be extracted from the environment (a picture, a fingerprint) is not only not perfect as an authentication mechanis, it is basically worthless. As in "same as nothing". If you can get by with an authentication mechanism that can be bypassed by anyone that has a picture of you, or ever recorded your voice, then you could save yourself the trouble and leave your machine unlocked.
      The only decent authentication mechanisms are those that are based in something you only disclose to the authenticating party (password) or, even better, that you only need to demonstrate you know without providing it (the PIN for a SmartCard or any sort of challenge-response mechanism between you and the party to which you want to authenticate).
      A picture is worth zero for security. And the same goes for voice. It is not a technology limitation, the weakness is in the concept, not in the implementation.

  4. Pics and it will happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, really, give it a photo and you're in!

  5. Old, old news by toppavak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has been available on Lenovo IdeaPad laptops since they first launched maybe 2 years ago.

    1. Re:Old, old news by toppavak · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cnet even ran a piece over a year ago talking about Lenovo's response to subversion of the facial recognition system at a hacker conference. The general gist of the response was basically "we only use it on consumer grade laptops" and "we're constantly working to improve it".

    2. Re:Old, old news by Alrescha · · Score: 2, Informative

      Facial recognition software came with the Ultraport camera for Thinkpads back in 2000 which would (fairly reliably) unlock your screensaver when you sat down in front of the machine. You could even require that you had to smile to prove you weren't a picture.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    3. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I laughed when I saw this article. My Y430 from over a year ago does this.

    4. Re:Old, old news by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      You could even require that you had to smile to prove you weren't a picture

      Yeah... I'm thinking security theatre, unless the state of the art suddenly regressed after 2000.

      I've since read that using a picture of yourself is more reliable than your actual face, as it's less prone to shadow effects from variable lighting.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  6. Ehmmm... Photo? by Ecuador · · Score: 5, Funny

    So I can just grab a photo of the user whose PC I want to log onto and show it to the cam?
    Much easier to crack than that darn retinal scan that requires me to get the eyeballs of my victim...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Ehmmm... Photo? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. What a PITA. Now you have to take their whole head.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Ehmmm... Photo? by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

      On my IdeaPad, the facial recognition would track the eyes of a photograph, but not actually log you in. That was with a tiny drivers license photo. I'm not sure what a higher quality photo would have done.

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    3. Re:Ehmmm... Photo? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The facial recognition has been circumvented on these with a photo of moderate quality. Since the camera doing the recognition is a 1.3mp camera, the absolute most you'll need to beat it is a 2mp photo, and likely a lot less than that will work. A new/clean driver's license photos might work, but a worn one probably wouldn't.

      The only way I see them preventing a simple photograph from circumventing this is using two cameras, scanning at different angles, and making sure the two images are slightly different but still match. In that case you would need a fairly complicated rig to get the cameras to look at two photos at once in order to fool them. Much better, but not exactly secure.

      As it is now, these are even less secure than fingerprint readers, which can be beaten with a lifted fingerprint (laptop readers require a transparency, but doors can be done with black dust and tape).

      The reality is biometrics never work like the movies. An image of your face can be recorded in high enough quality to fool a scanner, your voice can be recorded in high enough quality to fool a scanner, a good camera (around $1k or so) can even get a high quality copy of your retina from a long enough distance that you'd never know it happened, which could then fool a scanner. Fingerprints have always been a joke to bypass. In many cases you can lift the necessary print right off the scanner - you might as well have a sticky note on the screen with your password on it.

      All of them are easier to bypass than a simple non-dictionary password. A pass-phrase is several orders of magnitude more secure than the lot, and the easiest to remember. It's only when you want to make passwords super secure that people start writing them on stickies and slapping them on their monitors (note that I have actually experienced this in secure government facilities - it's extremely common when very complex passwords are required). You might as well just use biometrics then, for all the good it is doing you.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    4. Re:Ehmmm... Photo? by 3c5x9cfg · · Score: 1

      On my wife's IdeaPad I can log in by holding up my macbook in front of it with iPhoto showing a picture of my wife's face in full screen mode. I tried a few photos and the one that worked was taken face-to-face, in the same way that the inbuilt webcam would take it.
      I found that I need to tilt the macbook screen slightly so the LCD viewing angle achieved the right level of contrast for the camera in the IdeaPad.

      I could just use the password to log in, but that would be boring.

    5. Re:Ehmmm... Photo? by kanweg · · Score: 1

      "The only way I see them preventing a simple photograph from circumventing this is using two cameras, scanning at different angles, and making sure the two images are slightly different but still match. In that case you would need a fairly complicated rig to get the cameras to look at two photos at once in order to fool them. Much better, but not exactly secure."

      One camera could suffice if you're required to turn your head (like shaking no and/or nodding).

      Bert

    6. Re:Ehmmm... Photo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the biometrics that used the blood vessels in the hand for the id-- are they any more secure?

    7. Re:Ehmmm... Photo? by kevmeister · · Score: 1
      I think you have spent little time working in image processing (quality would need to be 2.6Mp, not 2) and little time working on biometrics. The problem you describe has been there for a long time and is re-learned regularly. This is why iris scans are better then retinal scans. Irises move.

      For a decent biometric system, you MUST include the bio part as a fundamental requirement. An obvious one is to process multiple captures and look for eye movement. (Eyes in living humans ALWAYS move over very short time spans.) As long as the implementers of the system really understand this, there are probably several ways to tell a photo from a live face.

      --
      Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
    8. Re:Ehmmm... Photo? by westlake · · Score: 1

      The reality is biometrics never work like the movies.

      In real life your Mission:Impossible team doesn't get the breaks you see in the movies or on home video. The tech is more sophisticated. Defenses are in layers.

      You have to carry a player for that audio recording. The color print-out from your Nikon. The tripod to mount the photo in place. Each complication ups the risk of detection.
           

    9. Re:Ehmmm... Photo? by brusk · · Score: 1

      No, just the front part.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
  7. This would be good for my work Blackberry by hughperkins · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Im tired of unlocking my work blackberry with its tiny keyboard every time I want to check the latest email. Security policy mandates we use a long complicated password, which is a total pain to type every time you want to browse the web, or check the map, or whatever.

    1. Re:This would be good for my work Blackberry by houstonbofh · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      An analogy I often use is; "A good way to secure a car is to remove the wheels and put it up on blocks. It just doesn't make a very good car..."

      Sometimes the people get it...

    2. Re:This would be good for my work Blackberry by hughperkins · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > An analogy I often use is; "A good way to secure a car is to remove the wheels and put it up on blocks. It just doesn't make a very good car..."

      I bought the cheapest bicycle I could in China, 20 dollars, and it got stolen.

      So I bought the cheapest one again, and hit it with a brick for 10 minutes, until the paint is all scratched up, and the mudguards are dented.

      Hasnt been stolen yet :-D

    3. Re:This would be good for my work Blackberry by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      I'll take your advice.

      Blackberry, meet brick.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    4. Re:This would be good for my work Blackberry by IICV · · Score: 1

      That doesn't even make sense to me, especially in the context of a Blackberry. The default security settings are to wipe after ten bad passwords; no matter how easy your password is, there's no way someone's going to guess it in ten tries (unless they shoulder surf when you're entering it in, but long and complicated passwords won't help there either).

      Seriously, just set it to "minimum 4 characters, wipe after 10 bad passwords" and you're as safe as Blackberries get.

  8. Face recognition using just a webcam? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How easy is it to fool this thing? For instance, will holding a picture of the laptop's owner in front of the camera unlock the machine?

    To make face recognition more secure, perhaps they should use two camera's and get a 3d scan of the face (can be fooled as well but less easy), or require that the face is moving. Perhaps even ask the user to read a randomly chosen word and lip-read the response.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:Face recognition using just a webcam? by wtmoose · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about requiring the user to depress a preselected sequence of keys with their nose?

    2. Re:Face recognition using just a webcam? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Guess what? Not everyone is very concerned about security of their login. Sometimes convenience is more important. Supposing Lenovo can get their software to work quickly and with low error, it could be beneficial to people who don't want to bother with entering a password.

    3. Re:Face recognition using just a webcam? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      ...will holding a picture of the laptop's owner in front of the camera unlock the machine?

      Yes.

      They can barely handle people with dark, especially black, skin. They cannot tell the difference between a photo and a live image.

      The two-camera idea would be my suggestion, which would make it harder but not impossible.

      In any case, it's more finicky and less secure than a passphrase, so why not use a passphrase?

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    4. Re:Face recognition using just a webcam? by 3c5x9cfg · · Score: 1

      The 3d technique would be an attempt at actual security, the Lenovo technique is described in the IdeaPad manual as a convenience feature.

      I don't foresee any major problems with Lenovo shipping this software on all their machines, though it would be nice if they made it crash less frequently and educated the user about the risks of using it.

      People have locked things up with simple, easily copied metal shapes for a few thousand years, believing that this was security.

    5. Re:Face recognition using just a webcam? by TheGothicGuardian · · Score: 1

      They can barely handle people with dark, especially black, skin.

      If dark-skinned people have such a hard time with facial recognition scanners, perhaps they should hire light-skinned people to follow them around and use the scanners for them.

    6. Re:Face recognition using just a webcam? by westlake · · Score: 1

      How easy is it to fool this thing? For instance, will holding a picture of the laptop's owner in front of the camera unlock the machine?

      For this you need access to the laptop, a reasonable expectation of privacy, and an appropriate photo of the owner. This isn't a trick that would be particularly safe for the guy working the next cubicle - much less two flights down.

      The simplest solution for a single camera might be to a take a second picture at some random time after you log in.

      How long would you be willing to keep that photo mounted in place?

  9. But will it recognize your expression and auto- by cavehobbit · · Score: 2, Funny

    -complete to teenSchoolgirlsInIceCream.fap?

    1. Re:But will it recognize your expression and auto- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I had mod points.

    2. Re:But will it recognize your expression and auto- by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      I had to check but looks like there's a .ap TLD.

      The ball is in your court.

  10. Twins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So apparently they forgot that there's such a thing as identical twins...

    Also, what happens if you change your hair or makeup or something else? Suddenly you might not be able to get into your computer

  11. !news by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1

    Toshiba's Qosmio line has done this for quite a while....

    --
    Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    1. Re:!news by Khyber · · Score: 0, Redundant

      My mid-90s 180MHz Compaq desktop did this before all of them.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  12. facebook by Sporkinum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have been using it for the past couple of months on my netbook. It does a pretty good job as long as you aren't wearing glasses, and you are well lit. Most of the time, the lighting is not good enough, and I would need to remove my glasses. It seems to do well enough discriminating between other people though. I tried it with several different family members and co workers, and it never allowed them. It will log bad attempts, and save pictures of the attempted logins. It also has a mode to detect if a photo is being used to log in. That seemed to work blocking photos as well. I never tried the encryption mode, but since it is Lenovo, I'd bet it has a back door for the Chinese government.

    Unless they get it to work in low light though, it's not ready for prime-time.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:facebook by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      low light should be easy, wire up a lensed white LED pair with one light on each side of the camera, it could even run the lights in sequence to help identify photos or other fake faces

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:facebook by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "It does a pretty good job as long as you aren't wearing glasses, and you are well lit."

      Well, I'm always well-lit, but the computer just can't detect me through the haze of smoke, maaaaaaaaaaan.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:facebook by jitendraharlalka · · Score: 1

      low light should be easy, wire up a lensed white LED pair with one light on each side of the camera, it could even run the lights in sequence to help identify photos or other fake faces

      Definitely, there are a lot of things that one can try to overcome poor lighting to make things work. But, that is not the point. The point here is that a manufacturer is not providing you a ready-made solution that one expects. I have got a DELL laptop that has face recognition feature but I hardly use it. Yep, you guessed it right, because of poor lighting (I come from a nation badly struggling with power shortage). I often use it at night (and hence in dark) and have to rely on manual password entry. For me, there is nothing new in the news (and I seriously think the appearance of this story on Slashdot look like a joke). If Lenovo, for example, could solve the problems like one mentioned above or could differentiate between real human and his photograph, then it would have made sense.

    4. Re:facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you are well lit

      This should work fine for me, but what if the user isn't a drinker?

  13. Lenovos already use finger print by kaptink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whats wrong with finger print readers? I have a Lenovo laptop with a finger print reader and I couldnt be happier with it. This article is not entirely correct in saying face recognition to replace passwords since passwords are only used as backup authentication with most existing Lenovos. It sounds interesting but I dont really see the point. Unless of course you dont have fingers but then using a keyboard would be a bit hard to start with. Sound more trouble than its worth tho given skin tone issues.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who cannot, sue.
    1. Re:Lenovos already use finger print by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You only get 10 password changes.(not that face readers are any better in that regard).

      More realistically, it probably has a lot to do with the fact that fingerprint readers have a per-unit hardware cost, and are typically used to identify the laptop as a "corporate" model, while facial recognition is just software on top of the webcam that virtually all consumer laptops get anyway. It didn't cost nothing to write; but each copy costs nothing to load.

    2. Re:Lenovos already use finger print by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Finger print readers are about the easiest of the biometrics to crack. The press-and-hold type of scanners you can usually just use fingerprint dust and clear tape to fool them, and you can get a good print right off the scanner. For the slide-type readers, you have to lift the finger print then make a transparency to break in. Not exactly difficult.

      Seriously, Mythbusters did an episode on it, and it was shockingly easy to break into a fingerprint locked computer or door.

      Stick with a password if you care anything at all about your data. If you don't want anybody to get your data ever, encrypt and lock your machine with a passphrase. If you just want to nominally lock the machine (like setting the little chain lock on an apartment door or using WEP for your wireless router), then biometrics are fine.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    3. Re:Lenovos already use finger print by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Whats wrong with finger print readers?

      Quite a few things:

      1. Not everyone can use them, like those with eczema or other skin diseases, plus people lacking fingers altogether.
      2. Crooks now have an incentive to cut off your finger.
      3. They can be tricked by transferring your fingerprint to a wax finger.

      Biometric authentication should be "something you are", and fingers are, alas, "something you have". Which is open to loss, thievery and duplication.

  14. Old News? by CasualFriday · · Score: 1

    I'm typing this on a Lenovo Ideapad Y550P that I bought around November of last year, and it came with veriface preloaded.

    --
    Raters gon' rate.
    1. Re:Old News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we should assume that you are not CasualFriday.

    2. Re:Old News? by Zorque · · Score: 1

      The one my Dad got a year and a half ago had it, I remember because it was the first thing I had to disable for him.

  15. Lenovo has already "tried" this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Lenovo ideapad Y510, which I bought about 2 years ago, already has facial recognition login.

    1. Re:Lenovo has already "tried" this by toadlife · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup., My Mom bought a Lenovoalso a few years back and it has this and she bought my son a Lenovo netbook which also does this.

      The article is pure slashvertisement.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  16. Aren't these the laptops that... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 2, Informative

    are full of bloatware? I thought I read somewhere that these rank number one or something.

    1. Re:Aren't these the laptops that... by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 1

      It has office 2007 trial, mcafee security stuff trial, various apps that run in the background to handle multitouch stuff, screen rotation, net book to tablet mode, face recognition, etc.

      The most annoying thing is the mcafee since it pops up every time you do something and asks you if you're sure. The other thing that sucks is that it's multitouch. At least with other tablet pcs you have a stylus and can accurately 'click' on things. On this every time I try to hit minimize I end up closing the window lol... It works well in net book mode and it's decently light. Also it comes with win7 starter edition so you'll have to upgrade to pro to get all the multitouch stuff.

      With the total cost of ownership people should consider getting a normal net book plus an iPad. Or if you handle IT purchasing like I do, just buy them all under your R&D budget :)

  17. They did this in 2001 on my Thinkpad T22 by sprior · · Score: 1

    Back in 2001 for my Thinkpad T22, when you got the camera attachment for the top of the screen it came with a face recognition screensaver. It was pretty amazing how fast it recognized you and unlocked the screen.

  18. so... by smash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. how does it handle identical twins?

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:so... by mordejai · · Score: 1

      Badly, I guess. Considering current technology like Picasa has trouble handling my non-identical twins...

    2. Re:so... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why just dandy, it will unlock for both of them! And anybody who has a decent photo of either of them too!

      Seriously, the current state of biometrics are laughably insecure. A simple non-dictionary password, even a 6-8 digit PIN, beats a biometric lock any day of the week.

      Basically, when you see a machine or door with a biometric lock, it's like securing your wireless network with WEP. All you are doing is saying "Please don't break in - thanks!" You aren't actually protecting anything.

      Until they can reliably tell the difference between a photo and a live image (they can barely recognize dark faces, let alone discriminate against a photo) this is less than worthless. The same is true for all biometrics - fingerprint scanners can often be beaten with dust and tape, and if not a transparency of the print works as well as the original.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    3. Re:so... by maestroX · · Score: 1

      .. how does it handle identical twins?

      Pretty good I'd say, the boob login more than compensates the bad pay of today's sys admins.

    4. Re:so... by ascari · · Score: 1

      In the extension of that, the system likely has limited application for the computers of Elvis impersonators and people who look eerily similar to Nixon or Porky Pig... A bit more seriously, how will it handle aging, facial disfigurement, botox, weight loss and any other number of everyday cases? My personal feeling is that this is a marketing ploy, no more no less.

  19. Been done by Satis · · Score: 1

    My Dell laptop I bought a year and a half ago shipped with software to do exactly the same thing. I ended up disabling it because it took so much longer for the webcam to fire up and the software to do its thing than for me to just type in a password. This is with a Dell Studio XPS 13, though I wouldn't be surprised if this software shipped on other lappies as well.

    --
    Satis clankiller.com
    1. Re:Been done by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that it is orders of magnitude less secure than a simple password (it can be beaten with a photo).

      It's cool and all, but completely worthless until the technology makes some serious leaps and bounds.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  20. So when I want to log in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to wear a Guy Fawkes mask now?

  21. Beards by aliddell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For someone who grows beards and then shaves them off again as regularly as me, this might be a problem. Good thing I don't buy Lenovo computers.

    --
    What do you think, sirs?
  22. It doesn't work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a lenovo laptop with the new veriface software.

    It doesn't work.

    Sometimes it won't let me in even though is my exact same face (maybe different way of combing it). Sometimes it will let a stranger access my computer, and even certain background patters will et confused as an "aproved face". (Once I was in the park, left my computer to start until the logon screen came on, while I went away for a brief moment and prepare some other stuff... as I walked back, the computer was already in the desktop... never knew what activated it).

    Te technology might be there, but Lenovo isn't.

    -Arc

    1. Re:It doesn't work. by Khyber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Sometimes it won't let me in even though is my exact same face (maybe different way of combing it)"

      You comb your face? Just get a razor, man!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  23. Denial of Service by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now we get to see articles about a new wave of Denial Of Service exploits:

    Method #1 - The Lens Scratch - No need for a special Key! You can use your own!
    Method #2 - The Face Punch - Requires shockingly little computational resources!

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  24. Just make sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make sure to back up your files on another drive before you go for that plastic surgery...

  25. Re:My xenophobic rant by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

    Oh, that was me. What I said was, "stop staring at me, you creepy little thing!"

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
  26. This isn't new by clone73 · · Score: 1

    My two year old Lenovo IdeaPad has this feature. Did the press release come out 3 years late?

    1. Re:This isn't new by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking. I bought a old refurbished S10 netbook awhile back that had it. It's probably 1-2 years old now.

    2. Re:This isn't new by raving+griff · · Score: 1

      And Lenovo's not the only brand that's doing it--the Toshiba Satellite I ordered several months ago has this feature as well.

    3. Re:This isn't new by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      And Lenovo's not the only brand that's doing it--the Toshiba Satellite I ordered several months ago has this feature as well.

      Do you have to go to orbit for it, or does the camera have enough resolution to recognize you when looking towards the satellite from ground? :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  27. Re:My xenophobic rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you were hot. Dumb. But hot.

  28. Terrible Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an absolutely terrible idea. I'm a student and bought a Lenovo netbook this January. I thought hey "that's a cool feature". I then immediately took steps to breaking it. I took a picture of myself with my digital camera and held the LCD screen of the camera with the picture I just took in front of the netbook's webcam. Instant access. It actually took less time to recognize the picture of myself than when I was sitting in front of the thing as the picture sat perfectly still.

    1. Re:Terrible Idea by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about combining this with a normal password? Then an attacker would need both your picture and your password.

      OTOH, you might want to keep a picture of yourself, in case you get injured at your head and the bandage makes your computer not recognize you.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  29. great by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    now instead of scalping someone's finger to access their stuff, now i have to pull a hannibal lecter

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:great by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      now instead of scalping someone's finger to access their stuff, now i get to pull a hannibal lecter

      There, fixed that for you.

  30. Coming up in Google Trends by arielCo · · Score: 1
    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  31. Old News? by Shaltenn · · Score: 1

    I bought a laptop from Lenovo about a year ago (an IdeaPad Y550) and it came with VeriFace. From my experience the VeriFace software worked fairly well, if the room was well lit. In darker situations it failed miserably. I am not sure how they do the recognition, but it seems to be contrast and location of facial features.

    Neat things: You can make movement a requirement for login (like you have to shift your head, open your mouth, etc) in order to bypass people using your picture to login. As for false positives, it seemingly had none. The nice bit is the system takes a picture of someone trying to use the VeriFace login system and stores it for your review at a later date. Not 100%, but surely good enough for standard consumer use.

    --
    If you were offended by anything I said... No, I'm not sorry. Please lighten up.
  32. Nifty by pgn674 · · Score: 1

    The technology is pretty nifty. At work, where we bring in many customer laptops to do virus cleanings etc., one computer had a very long and annoying password. After logging in once, then needing to reboot, I went to log in again, and the login box flashed away just as I put my hands to the keyboard. I logged back out to check, and I found that it had taken a sample image of my face on my first login without my noticing (it did say it was doing it; I just wasn't paying attention), and on the second login it recognized me before I could start typing the long password. All this without me even trying or realizing it was a feature, or even noticing there was a camera (I wasn't looking for one).

    The lighting conditions and my face may have been ideal for the camera and facial recognition software, but if they can get that kind of performance in the less ideal cases, I think this would be very well received by the general masses. I forget what brand the laptop was.

  33. Oh come on by nickdwaters · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To those bellyaching about "security", It's targeted at the consumer... not the pinnacle of perfection demanding hyper geek crowd who demands absolute security. You can always disable the face recognition in favor of windoze login. If you are a cyber crook like gifted facial contortionist like Jim Carrey aimed at thieving a user's data great. You know who you are! As far as it having trouble recognizing those with darker complexion, perhaps the low resolution camera combined with poor lighting could be a factor. My laptop doesn't always recognize me in low light, and I just have a nice George Hamilton tan :)

    1. Re:Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aka its a Lenovo. Nobody with half a brain is buying it anyway. Shoddy Chinese products with typical Chinese levels of innovation, parading under IBM's once noble brand.

  34. guest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to set up a guest account ... "sure, you can use my computer, but you must wear this gorilla mask the whole time".

  35. People still don't get it.... by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Passwords have a number of things that biological features don't have.

    1) They are a secret
    2) They can be changed at will
    3) They don't require a physical feature (you can keep them in your mind).

    Biological features are thought to be great because of their uniqueness. But the problem is that once they are compromised, it is permanent. So they are never good by themselves.

    1. Re:People still don't get it.... by magnet0 · · Score: 1

      Another thing you can do with a password: 4) Give it to someone else. What if I want to allow another person to log in to my machine? And then, after they're done, I can change the password. There's just no substitute for a proper password.

  36. stereoscopic by spleen_blender · · Score: 1

    Make it stereoscopic and the security becomes non-trivial.

  37. Majolelo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a serious problem in biometric (face recognition is one of them). In 2005, in Malaysia a guy's index finger was cut off by car thieves to access his highly-secured car. Here is the link to the news: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4396831.stm Imagine if the same happened to your laptop if it contains highly sensitive data.

  38. So, a picture of me will unlock my PC? by gmpassos · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I think that something like that was tried in the past, and a picture of the owner of the PC was a good trick to bypass the security and unlock the PC. How they will avoid this kind of trick?

  39. Odo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The security officer of Deep Space 9 does not think this is very secure.

  40. A little late... by Godskitchen · · Score: 1

    I bought a Lenovo laptop over a year ago and it had the Veriface software on it. Why is this just news now?

  41. Saw something on Burn Notice... by MDHarper · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So, what's to prevent people from holding up a photo of an 'authorized user'. It's not like a 1.5mp camera would be able to judge depth. It's a good IDEA, but it's not likely to implement well. The tech's just not there at the consumer level. Just my $.02

  42. Its still got problems by Robadob · · Score: 1

    One of my teachers used this on his laptop which was an acer i think. He told me that it wouldn't let him login if he wasn't wearing a tie.

  43. Why not ? by obarthelemy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1- The best security is something you know + something you have, so password + face sounds good.

    2- Oftentimes, when you use only one of the two (password, key card...) or even with both, people misuse security so much (staying logged in, reusing passwords, weak passwords...) that face on its own feels better.

    3- And it can re-authenticate periodically without being too intrusive, which is good, too. It could maybe even detect as soon as the user changes ?

    The one question is , how often do webcams fail, because the day I'm locked out of my computer by a faulty cam, I'll be pissed.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  44. Fingerprints by transami · · Score: 2, Funny

    What the hell happened to fingerprint scanners? I thought they'd be on every keyboard by now and we'd be passed all this password crap.

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
  45. This pissed the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine (non-techie) got a new Lenovo computer and asked me to help him set it up. We took it out of the box and I sat in front of it and powered it up and started booting it. The damn thing immediately started taking my picture, which for all I know is now etched forever in some internal flash memory. I had a camera-equipped cell phone that did the same thing too. My laptop has no built-in camera but if I ever buy one that does, I'm going to cover up the camera with a post-it as part of the initial unboxing process, before I power it up for the first time.

  46. Done before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asus does this too

  47. My alienware does the same by mapuche · · Score: 1

    Using the caera to log me in and log out when other persons approach the camera.

  48. Asus also have this but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't test it with a picture yet but it already is not working 50% of the time (with 60 sample sample shots taken in different lighting conditions).

  49. So what's to stop me from taking a picture by entertainment · · Score: 0

    ....of the laptop owners face and making a cheap restaurant style menu mask to defeat the image recognition?

  50. Why is this news? by malkir · · Score: 1

    Seriously what the fuck /.? Lenovo has had this on their netbooks for 1...2 years now? http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/06/13/1456251/Lenovo-Trying-Face-Recognition-For-Logins-On-New-Laptops#It's a novelty. SO much faster to type in 6 characters than wait for a scan and get in. Ive tried with photos and such and didn't work so it's not 100% retarded. I'd say only 99%.

  51. Not security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All locks are DELAYING DEVICES. Real security is an armed guard who will not hesitate to act with deadly force.

  52. Makes sense... by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    If you are running windows anyway, why bother trying to do ANYTHING securely?

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  53. bad idea.... by Bysshe · · Score: 1

    I remember reading a story about face recognition being built into cigarette machines to verify age. The kids just held up magazines with pictures of old people and got their cigs.

    --
    Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
  54. Nothing new here... by coerciblegerm · · Score: 1

    The Lenovo laptop I purchased for my wife almost two years ago had this capability. How is this new?

  55. What about a FaceBook image printed out? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    So you steal a laptop and want to get into it.

    Can you just open your cell phone, go to FaceBook, get a profile image of the laptop owner onto the screen and hold it in front of the camera?

  56. Why not a car-key compatible device? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    I have a 2004 Toyota Prius with a more or less keyless operation. I just keep the key on my person and as I approach the car, the doors unlock. When I sit down in the car and press a button, the car starts. When I walk away from the car, the car beeps at me to tell me that it's still running and I should turn it off.

    I'm already investigating the possibility of altering the lock of the front door of my house to electronically open as I approach the door and I would like to do the same with my laptop. I think controlling the door of the garage would also be nice like this.

    For convenience, this sounds a lot nicer and even more secure than facial recognition. Of course, it wouldn't be suitable for government use as passwords are still able to hold up against physical theft or murder/abduction of the laptop owner and putting them within proximity of the machine.

  57. Not new, nor news. by zephvark · · Score: 1

    I had this toy in my Lenovo laptop a few months ago. Thing is, it is an additional way to log in besides just, you know, typing in a password-- so, it's an additional security hole. You could log on in two different ways, one of them just involving showing your face. The software tries to avoid being fooled by static photos, by looking for a little movement-- so jiggle that picture a little. It's a kind of sexy idea. It's like the idea of a flying car, it seems charming, but... in practice, it's just not very sensible. How hard is it to type in an eight-character password? That's fast and functional. It works. I deleted the picture log-on software the day I got the laptop.

    1. Re:Not new, nor news. by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      I was curious why this article put the feature in the future tense. My months old Lenovo (Y550P) has/had this too. I uninstalled it immediately. Actually, I uninstalled it more because it slowed down the login procedure. (I need to get around to switching it to Linux anyway. Damn my laziness.)

  58. Biometrics are nonrevokable by Matrix14 · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen a mention here of the central problem with biometrics, so I will point it out. The central problem with biometrics is not that it can be faked, but that it cannot be revoked. No matter how good the biometric system, if someone does fake it, you can't change your biometrics. You can't change your face, your finger prints, your retinal print or whatever in the same way you can easily change a password if someone finds out your password. This is the real problem with biometrics, and one that can't be solved by making the biometrics better.

  59. I wouldn't trust it by psm321 · · Score: 1

    My brother had an Acer with face-based login. I could always get it to let me log in with my face instead (he was around, we were messing with it), no matter how many times he trained it.

    1. Re:I wouldn't trust it by psm321 · · Score: 1

      And no, we're not twins. Our faces our similar to some degree, since we're brothers and all, but not that close.

  60. Security and the morning cleanup by bizwriter · · Score: 1

    I can see it now - oh, sorry, can't get into my computer because I haven't shaved for a few days.

  61. ThinkPads suck by Merdalors · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't trust the Face Recognition technology. The fingerprint scanner on my ThinkPad T500 ceased to work after three months. No, my fingerprints didn't change, get burned, etc. It just stopped recognizing any of my digits. The twerp in tech support suggested I re-flash the BIOS. Yeah, right.

    Oh, and the hard drive failed after six months. That was fun.

    I thought I was paying for the best in order not to have any of these problems.

    Never again a Lenovo.

    --
    Slashdot entertains. Windows pays the mortgage.
  62. Not worth the trouble... by klashn · · Score: 1

    I tried it on my Lenovo S-10-2, it didn't seem to work as well as I'd like.

    Firstly I usually compute with netbook when I wake up and when I go to bed. At both these times, my room is dark. The little webcam is unable to distinguish my face in these light conditions. Also, if you wear glasses, it is unable to get your full facial profile. It had issues with my glasses, so I had to record the face "fingerprint" with my glasses off. Later, when I had my glasses on, it wouldn't recognize me.