Slashdot Mirror


Iceland Votes "Já" To Proposed News Haven

eldavojohn writes "The proposed rules shielding journalists harbored in Iceland are now official. It appears that sites like Wikileaks and Cryptome could have a friendlier home base. For those familiar with the Icelandic tongue, the voting results and legalese. Some of the details can be found at www.immi.is."

232 comments

  1. Wow by SnarfQuest · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would be nice to get something like this in the US.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It would be nice to get something like this in the US.

      Yeah.

      You could say that Iceland is warming up to freedom-of-the-press advocates.

    2. Re:Wow by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't get it mods, why is this funny? It really would be nice to have this in the US.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thanks for that - I haven't laughed so hard for ages.

      Oh, you were serious ...

    4. Re:Wow by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, talk about missing the point...

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:Wow by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow, a troll mod for stating that parent is completely mischaracterizing the issue?

      Clue for the mods: He's supposed to get the troll mod, I'm supposed to get the overrated mod.

      So hard to find good help these days...

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice to get something like this in the US.

      Yeah.

      You could say that Iceland is warming up to freedom-of-the-press advocates.

      YEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHHHH

    7. Re:Wow by Dragonslicer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't get it mods, why is this funny?

      Commonly called absurdist humor

    8. Re:Wow by DarrenBaker · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Colonel Jessup? Is that you?

    9. Re:Wow by Tekfactory · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe sad and ironic because freedom of the press had been one of our hard fought for and cherished American institutions. This was back when journalists investigated and reported on stories, not just plagarized them, or made them up entirely. This was also before News who's job was to inform became Entertainment who's job was to grab ratings from other reality shows.

      Similar institutions include the now crumbling protections formerly afforded to whistleblowers.

    10. Re:Wow by vxice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Congratulations you just beat down a straw man argument. Almost as fun as beating the real argument but way easier. There is a difference between posting all your private information and hiding video of U.S. soldiers committing crimes. Big difference. And the rights and freedoms we, previously, enjoy here are meant to protect us from the government. They are the biggest criminal because they write the laws. Yeah most are good people but that is only because when they commit crimes news reporters, at least the good ones, out them and they get fired/resign. Government can't be immune from the law, when you have that there is nothing keeping those that run the government from protecting their own interests since they wont loose their job if they don't watch out for the people. I would like a little more than a warm fuzzy feeling keeping my government on task. And yes this does inconvenience some people but freedom isn't free.

      --
      every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
    11. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which part is absurd? The idea that the US already has this, or the idea that they might actually get it?

    12. Re:Wow by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man, Iceland is so lucky.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:Wow by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Privacy requires censorship.

      And one man's news is another man's invasion of privacy.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    14. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surreal humour, also called absurdist humour, is a form of humour, stylistically related to the artistic ambitions of the surrealists, based on bizarre juxtapositions, absurd situations and nonsense.

      The absurdity here is the reversal. To allow this on US soil, politicians would have to give up some of their censorship powers, which wont happen without a revolt. The reason there needs to be a safe haven for leaks is to give information to the people, but an ignorant population is easier to control.

    15. Re:Wow by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...The idea that the US already had this, or the idea that they might actually get it?

      Fixed that for you.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    16. Re:Wow by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      God I love feeding the trolls some days.

      Really? So when some idiot steals a bunch of your personal information, posts it on the web or sells it and claims it he was a journalist, and your bank accounts end up empty ... you're okay with that?

      So you're okay when some idiot steals your personal information, uses it to better himself, but you have no proof because everything regarding it becomes censored material?

      Or when someone steals some internal memos detailing the troop movements that also happen to include your brothers sqad in Iraq ... which promptly gets him killed ... you're okay with that?

      So when your brother gets killed by intentional friendly fire in Iraq and instead of dealing with the matter, the government sweeps it under the rug and no one hears about it?

      Censorship is a fact of life. Not everyone needs to know everything about everyone else. If you disagree, please post all your credit cards and any identification numbers you have.

      If you think Censorship is good, then please stop talking, because it will inevitably be deleted by a mod in a little while anyways. There is no point in even posting an opinion since it'll just get censored. Now we're wasting bandwidth

      In my experience those who scream loudest about how censorship is bad are those that are the most ignorant of the meaning of the word.

      censorship /snsrp/ –noun
      1.the act or practice of censoring.
      2.the office or power of a censor.
      3.the time during which a censor holds office.
      4.the inhibiting and distorting activity of the Freudian censor.

      You wouldn't last very long in the world if you didn't censor yourself. You'd be unemployed, lonely, and have no support from anyone around you ever.

      I'm so sick of idiotic morons such as yourself who think things like Wikileaks are good.

      You wouldn't last very long in the world if you censored everything either. You'd be uneducated, ignorant, and have no where to turn for support on anything. You'd probably live a life of slavery because you wouldn't know any better.

      Journalists can not be trusted any more than politicians, they have an agenda as well. They don't care about what will happen when they 'spread the news' only that they get credit for doing so and just completely ignore all the consequences and side effects of the stupid shit they do.

      So if we agree that all journalists and politicians are corrupt, what does it matter what they do? Censor or not, its journalism?

      This isn't about getting the information to the people, this is about letting journalists do whatever they want under the guise of providing useful information to the people.

      Which would be like how letting things go completely censored would be like letting politicians do what they want under the guise that its for your own good, but you can't know what they're doing.

      Again I say, if you think this is a good idea, then start posting all your personal information and identity numbers/photos, please make sure to include your cell phone sim card info, credit/bank cards, home address, work schedule so I know when to rob you, passwords to your email accounts and any other security feature you may have.

      Wait, I forget how this is related. how about, if you think Censorship is a good idea, you give ME all your info, and we'll see if anyone comes along to censor it. After all, censoring yourself is completely different from censoring someone else.

      Only a sith deals in absolutes.

    17. Re:Wow by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And one man's news is another man's invasion of privacy.

      And one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Do you have a point, or do you want us to spout cliches at each other all day?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    18. Re:Wow by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Jesus Christ, this is why you know Slashdot sucks these days: Even the pro trolls bring the weak sauce...

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    19. Re:Wow by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      and before our "reporters" decided to get all cozy with the people they're supposed to be reporting on so we can hold them accountable for their misdeeds.

      http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/15/henry/index.html

      somewhere Murrow is turning in his grave.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    20. Re:Wow by SETIGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In a democracy (or a democratic republic) the government has no expectation of privacy or right of privacy.

    21. Re:Wow by Barrinmw · · Score: 1

      Certain things do in Democracies. There are certain state secrets that should stay secret, but most of those deal with the military. Like positions of submarines, troop movements, weapon designs...

    22. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One man's cliche is another man's peak of insightfulness.

    23. Re:Wow by DaleSwanson · · Score: 1

      One could make an argument that standing armies and freedom can't coexist.

    24. Re:Wow by Barrinmw · · Score: 1

      One could also argue that without standing armies freedom can't exist.

    25. Re:Wow by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Only a sith deals in absolutes.

      That would be much better if your ID was SithMonkeedude1212.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    26. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't != Wont

    27. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...The idea that the US already think they had this, or the idea that they might actually get it?

      Fixed that for you.

      Fixed that for you.

    28. Re:Wow by Kitsune+Inari · · Score: 1

      In other words, :s/can't/would soon cease to/

    29. Re:Wow by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      US, .is, we all s!

    30. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay for the free press.

      Now watch while other nations' internet filters block any
      upcoming sites with excuses like "think of the children".

      Whistleblowers, in particular, desperately need a haven
      for all sorts of stuff to be made public, and damn the
      consequences for those who are embarrassed.

      Just my $0.02.

  2. and with an extra cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of ashes!!

  3. is it just me? by tomkost · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems like the "socialist" Scandinavian countries are the most honest and "free". I've visited many of them and always been received with kindness. Yes, the women are as attractive and "fun" as stereotyped. Time to investigate moving there.

    1. Re:is it just me? by blair1q · · Score: 0

      But the beer costs $10 a glass.

      They have much to learn about balancing the needs of the people and the needs of the state.

    2. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll regret it, trust me.

    3. Re:is it just me? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Informative

      But the beer costs $10 a glass.

      Yeah, but you don't get ridiculous jail time for minor drug possessions. It's a tradeoff.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iceland has nothing to hide. Go for it.

    5. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent, you'll love it! And I know better than this other AC.

      Why should you trust my unsubstantiated word more than theirs? Because I wrote more words down!

    6. Re:is it just me? by NervousWreck · · Score: 1

      Check the tax rates. I don't know exactly but I've heard some pretty interesting things from Swedish acquaintances.

      --
      I do not have a sig. You are hallucinating.
    7. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Probably the most important ingredient of their success is their small size.

      I urge everyone to read works by Leopold Kohr...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_Kohr

    8. Re:is it just me? by Zedrick · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. And no, none of the Scandinavian countries have among highest suicide rate in the world. And no, we don't have icebears in the streets.

      You have much to learn about checking facts instead of repeating myths.

    9. Re:is it just me? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      But the beer costs $10 a glass.

      Well, at the dollar's current valuation, that doesn't surprise me.

    10. Re:is it just me? by sznupi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well...unfortuntelly, reality has a socialist bias.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    11. Re:is it just me? by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But they get stuff for their tax money. Instead of here were we get almost the same tax rate, but no healthcare, shitty roads, no real social services to speak of and a government that passes laws for the highest bidder.

      You may not like high taxes, but I would prefer high taxes and services to slightly lower taxes but nothing in exchange.

    12. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Would these be M or FP voters? Because those guys will sometimes make up some very "interesting" statistics that show how us Swedes supposedly pay close to 100% of our incomes in taxes. (In case you're wondering, the trick is to only count income tax for some other country and then compare that to income tax + sales tax + import tax for anything the "average" Swede buys and so on).

      Another common complaint from the same crowd is about the so-called "Jante law" which supposedly rears its ugly head in the form of Swedes being dismissive and unfriendly to anyone successful, not to mention apparently sabotaging anyone destined to be successful (I know this is not something unique for Sweden but those who blame the "Jante law" will often claim it is). In reality most people who whine about how the "Jante law" is keeping them down seem to be either reality TV "stars" who aren't in the spotlight anymore (and no-one's buying their autobiography *insert surprised look here*) or failed "entrepreneurs" who had a useless business model, failed and then blame "everyone else" to ensure that they can still get investors for their next crackpot idea...

    13. Re:is it just me? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      From my point of view (quite close to Nordic areas) - ok, I pay slightly lower taxes, great. Those that are collected are used worse; too much waste around.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    14. Re:is it just me? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Funny

      And no, we don't have icebears in the streets.

      See, you shouldn't have said that. Icebears in the street is a good thing.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    15. Re:is it just me? by CallMyCards · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Well, there's places in US where beer might cost as much, it's not that expensive in everywhere in Finland for example. A sizable portion of that is taxes of course to cover the medical costs caused by alcoholism, since healthcare is essentially free. Same with taxing of gasoline (naturally not towards alcoholism), I think that 75% of the price is tax, currently at roughly 6.75 $ for a US gallon.

      Off topic: A funny detail is, that Nordic countries have this unofficial (maybe even official) agreement that in acute medical cases, citizens of other Nordic countries are taken care of for free, basically with no questions asked. No need to show travel insurance or anything, applies to operations, x-rays etc.

    16. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American or European?

    17. Re:is it just me? by migla · · Score: 1

      Yes, I guess taxes are high, but then health care is as good as free and studying at the university is free and I'm sure there are plenty of other nice things taxes help buy us.

      If you want to experience the wonders of (limited) socialism, you might want to visit soon, since the gap between the haves and the have-nots is widening. Free market is pretty much the norm in peoples minds in Sweden too and we are selling out our commons.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    18. Re:is it just me? by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      So where DO you keep the Icebears?

    19. Re:is it just me? by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you have paid your tax and all of your obligatory (those that you must be either stupid or too poor to not have) insurances I bet that the Swedes have a larger % of their salary left after their taxes and insurances are paid. As a Swede I pay around 29% in tax and I'm OK with that as long as I can rely on reasonable public services like health care and yearly limits on how much I have to pay for medicine, should I need it.

      I'd really like to see a lower VAT though. 25% (except for food and books) is ridiculous and makes everything so much more expensive to buy. I order almost everything on the Internet from the UK, Germany or the north-eastern European countries.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    20. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      By the fireplace in the winters, out in the yard in the summers... Icebears have an undeserved reputation of being fierce whilst every scandinavian knows they are just huggably soft and cuddly...

    21. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no, none of the Scandinavian countries have among highest suicide rate in the world.

      Even if countries like Sweden do have a higher suicide rate that most, it isn't necessarily due to them being unhappier.

      For example, lots of countries are considering allowing assisted suicide where a patient has a terminal disease. A country that allows that would seemingly have a higher suicide rate than one that didn't, as the cause of death would be filed under 'disease' in the other country, even though the number of deaths is the same.

      Also, less religious countries might have their suicide rate raised because fewer people believe they'll be burnt in hell if they commit suicide.

      Statistics can be very tricky things...

    22. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we get almost the same tax rate, but no healthcare, shitty roads, no real social services to speak of

      I bet a huge difference is the financial aspect of being policeman to the world.

      But at the end of the day Americans already spend more per capita on healthcare and we pay into trust funds for retirement and disability and rebuilding highways/infrastucture. And that money gets stolen by congress.

      We have a problem with a system that will eagerly piss away more of our money without delivering results. I am hesitent to give them more.

    23. Re:is it just me? by sadness203 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmmm...
      Yeah... true... with a shitload of cash in your wallet, you'll be doing fine dying in the desert or on an island.

    24. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the beer costs $10 a glass.

      Well, at the dollar's current valuation, that doesn't surprise me.

      I can't speak for any other country, but in Sweden it's 5-6 $ / glass

    25. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have a border with Mexico do they?

    26. Re:is it just me? by M8e · · Score: 1

      But the beer costs $2 a bottle.

      TFTFY

    27. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right next to our polar bears

    28. Re:is it just me? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm just curious, what exactly did you mean by this comment?

      I'm not trying to be snarky, I am just not sure what you're trying to state by saying reality has a bias.

    29. Re:is it just me? by Shark · · Score: 0, Troll

      Pay a very close attention to how the reality you refer to is generated. Your reality is a product of the information you are given.

      My FTFY would have 'reality' replaced by 'government'. But I'll grant you that government is increasingly responsible for our perception of reality anyway. It is responsible for our schooling and it writes our laws... Culture is a mere byproduct of failures and successes at those two things.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    30. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But, that's human nature. We reign over nature, so is it that much of a stretch to reign over "the weak"?

      As much as I am a libertarian, I am starting to think that tyranny is in the very nature of man: if we can do something we wish, we do. It is only the fact that "the weak" can associate and cooperate to tend to slow the advance of the strong. For the weak tend to be many and (out of necessity) often respectful of their peers and thus easily organized against a common threat. The counterpoint is that the very weak are corruptible and will prostitute their ethics for the promises of the strong (healthcare, and all other nanny state perqs).

      But, really, if the last remaining superpower could eradicate other nations with its might, why doesn't it? Perhaps it isn't quite strong enough (yet). Perhaps a "scortched earth" isn't really all that valuable when you can't effectively just kill people and not destroy their things. Perhaps the few remaining will be hell-bent on revenge.

      However, given the species' propensity for short-sightedness, I am convinced that if an effective weapon to kill people and leave "things" intact were developed, it would be used: "To hell with people of nation X! If they can't resist our onslaught they are not even human." I don't think that reasoning is much of a stretch.

    31. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    32. Re:is it just me? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And no, we don't have icebears in the streets.

      You have streets?? ~

    33. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they cost $10-12 in Norway, but thats because all kind of food is expensive there.

      Fun fact: A pizza cost five times more in Norway than in Sweden.

      Norway, no way!

    34. Re:is it just me? by jbezorg · · Score: 1

      But the beer costs $10 a glass.

      Well, sometimes going cheaper by buying pre-owned isn't always the best choice.

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    35. Re:is it just me? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Well, at the dollar's current valuation, that doesn't surprise me.

      The dollar's current valuation? Compared to what, the krona? Euros? Pounds sterling? Canadian dollars? Yen?

      Maybe it should surprise you..... I mean, if you're in Australia you have an excuse...

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    36. Re:is it just me? by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Being half-Greek, I think you'll find that Greece's bankruptcy has more to do with being Greece than with being socialist. It's not even particularly socialist in practice. There's a huge private sector that pays effectively 0% taxes, and even the officially free health care in practice operates as quasi-private--- doctors work 2nd private practices outside their official jobs, and they uh, strongly suggest that you make an appointment with that one rather than with the free one. Oh, and they don't pay taxes on those private practices, either (cash-only payments, no receipts, no reporting).

      If Greece were more like Sweden, where rich people actually pay taxes, public services that are officially provided are actually provided, etc., its budget, and the country in general, would be in better shape.

    37. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't know much about the outside world do you?

      A little bit of socialism like they have in the Nordic countries accounts for a more equal society, a less violent society and a less corrupt society. And they're not doing too bad in the world market either. It's just better on the whole. Maybe it is less "free" in your sense of the word. Selfish, privileged pricks like you won't get to be as filthy rich as easily off the sweat and blood of oppressed workers, but living in poverty and ill health is not freedom either, from a the perspective of a decent human being. Fuck you.

    38. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, you know thats just a myth right?

      Sweden for example was one of the countries that started do statistic on those kind of things and do it honest so even some types of overdose counts as suicide. That is why we had very high numbers compared to other countries back in the 60s or something when this myth started.

    39. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean. But it's really strange how US bear can both taste like pre-owned and still is fucking close to water.

    40. Re:is it just me? by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      The parent may be referring to our ancestry, which evolved to a point where it was better not to kill members of your own species*, but to help them instead. The Greater Good and all that.

      *Except anyone outside the monkey sphere. I'm not saying I subscribe to the idea but it does seem interesting.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    41. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Calling socialism a Ponzi scheme gets you +1, Informative? Socialism is "we use a bit of your money to provide freely available healthcare to everyone of the same or greater quality than private healthcare, and at a lower cost, providing an overall benefit to society". Socialism is "we use a bit of your money to properly educate children to ensure that they can be productive members of society when they grow up, providing an overall benefit to society". Socialism is "we use a bit of your money to properly regulate companies so they don't do retarded, short-sighted shit that causes fucking global economic meltdowns, providing an overall benefit to society". Socialism is nowhere near "a Ponzi scheme".

      Take your head out of your ass. There are plenty of countries far more socialist than the US that are, by multiple metrics, far better places to live than the US. If you think far less government is the solution, you are absolutely insane.

    42. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no trade off. If I only have to work ten minutes for every glass of beer I drink, ten dollars is not so bad.. How much for a case?

    43. Re:is it just me? by M8e · · Score: 1

      Well...unfortuntelly, reality has a Social liberal bias.

    44. Re:is it just me? by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      I think you missed hearing about what the global economic collapse did to Iceland. I'd guess that the price of beer has fallen quite a bit in dollar terms.

    45. Re:is it just me? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious, what exactly did you mean by this comment?

      Perhaps he meant that everything seems to be "socialist" today if you pay attention to people who seem to think socialism is another word for "evil." For instance, at this moment, someone is probably putting the finishing touches on a protest sign calling BP socialist, possibly while misspelling the word socialist.

    46. Re:is it just me? by MoriT · · Score: 1

      If we're the policeman to the world, we're doing a mighty shitty job of it. I wonder what our conviction rate is on those 656,000 murders last year... (or more seriously, the seven major ongoing political conflicts.) I don't know about you, but I don't think we should be taking responsibility for anyone's actions but our own. Though, wouldn't that mean we should be collecting overtime pay for watching the shipping lanes or something?

    47. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shitty roads? Have you tried driving in most European or Asian countries?

      Our roads are fairly excellent.

    48. Re:is it just me? by MoriT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But only until you were in competition for resources. Then, it might well have been useful to stab them in the back and take their stuff. Also, back then you had to keep seeing the same people every day. Game theory suggests games played repeatedly will play out differently than games played only once. So our behavioral evolution is less relevant to our modern behavior than one might think.

    49. Re:is it just me? by Mephistro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Soft an cuddly? The icebears? My arse! One of those things sunk the Titanic!!!

    50. Re:is it just me? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Well that's what I was wondering...if he was making a reference to to social behavior of humanity. In that case, it would probably be more appropriate to say that humanity has a social bias, rather than reality. However, since I wasn't sure what he was going for I figured I'd ask...hopefully he gets back from lunch soon.

    51. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the beer costs $10 a glass.

      In Norway this is only correct in bars. Has more to do with Norwegian drinking culture (and perhaps some strange local politicians) than taxes, I believe. You see, Norwegians are already drunk when they go out, so they have no idea how much they're paying.

      Beer is pretty cheap in stores.

      They have much to learn about balancing the needs of the people and the needs of the state.

      Of course I'm biased, but personally I believe we've got the balance pretty darn right. (Although we are a country of whiners)

    52. Re:is it just me? by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      USD is chep, GBP is cheap, AUD is cheap, CAD is cheap, ISK is cheap.... everything is cheap! And EUR is declining at a good rate as well.

      Best regards,
      Norway!

      --
      This is blinging
    53. Re:is it just me? by conspirator57 · · Score: 3, Funny

      my reality has a conservative bias, i don't know how yours works.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_law

              * Conservation of energy
              * Conservation of linear momentum
              * Conservation of angular momentum
              * Conservation of electric charge
              * Conservation of color charge
              * Conservation of weak isospin
              * Conservation of probability

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    54. Re:is it just me? by dave420 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Idiot. If the US was a paradise of freedom with milk and honey for everyone, you'd have a point. As it is, in the US there are people dying from poverty, people losing their houses because they had the temerity to get ill, murder rates similar to developing nations, high infant mortality, and the highest jail population in the world. But please - keep on thinking socialism doesn't work. It's not as if the average American doesn't pay much taxes - they do! And what do they get for it? Fuck all. They still have to pay for healthcare (if they can), their police forces are full of under-trained idiots, and their armed forces are making more enemies than they can kill. The rest of the western world knows balanced socialism is the way forward, and will keep getting a better and better place to live. USA #1 - in delusion, it seems.

    55. Re:is it just me? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      What are you smoking? Roads in Western Europe are fucking outstanding - they have the highest construction specifications of any countries in the world. Ever heard of the Autobahn? I've spent days on US roads, and the ones I travelled on are a fucking joke. Poor maintenance and shoddy workmanship.

    56. Re:is it just me? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      how about we pull and exchange, export all those that want more free market to USA, import all that wants a degree of socialism?

      as for universities being free, i cant speak for the swedish model, but the norwegian one is one of a government provided loan that will start picking up interest the day you stop studying for whatever reason.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    57. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those were Jewish icebears, the Icebergs.. The large penis, Scandinavian icebears are much more content..

    58. Re:is it just me? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Socialism works in societies where there is a good cooperative spirit and little desire to game the system for one's own goals. Otherwise... you get China and the only one to benefit is the occasional Mao, Pol Pot or Stalin.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    59. Re:is it just me? by mirix · · Score: 1

      Troll harder. The problem is corruption; People aren't paying the existing taxes.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    60. Re:is it just me? by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 3, Funny

      But the beer costs $10 a glass.

      They have much to learn about balancing the needs of the people and the needs of the state.

      "Hey Svend, you'll never guess what I got this crazy American to pay for a beer ..."

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    61. Re:is it just me? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      But the beer costs $10 a glass.

      On the other hand, it's real beer.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    62. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well...unfortuntelly, reality has a socialist bias.

      Well, Slashdot certainly has at this time of day. I'm posting as AC as I see what the moderators are doing to dissenting comments. It's sort of funny but in the evening US time right-wing or libertarian comments get modded down. Then in the morning European time, left wing comments get modded down.

      I know that for an American socialism may seem exotic and exciting but living under it certainly is not. Here in Sweden the political system consists of the left and the far left who are currently competing in dismantling our civil liberties. We're getting to the level of East Germany in terms of right to privacy. All of our email, web and telephone traffic is monitored by the state. As for our "free" health care - it's not free, we pay it through taxes. The cost is enormous as is the bureaucracy that makes our medical system one of the worst in the western world. If you want an eye opener, look at survival rates for various serious illnesses. In the EU only the UK is worse. My fear is of how bad our system will get if the US adopts a European style medical care. We have basically zero medical technology research here and live off what comes from the US.

      So please, a reality check before you celebrate Scandinavian socialism. Sweden should be a deterrent not an inspiration. As for Iceland, yo do realize the country went bankrupt because they insisted on having state controlled banks and made laws against larger international banks being owners/part owners.

    63. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Scandinavia is quite harsh on drugs compared to western Europe in general. OTOH they don't have US-style craziness where bizarre legal contortions turn someone caught with weed into a co-conspirator to every crime ever committed by the international drug cartels.

    64. Re:is it just me? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      He's making a play on Colbert's comment at the 2006 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner:

      Now, I know there are some polls out there saying this man has a 32% approval rating. But guys like us, we don't pay attention to the polls. We know that polls are just a collection of statistics that reflect what people are thinking in "reality." And reality has a well-known liberal bias.

      As a general point, "reality has a well known ______ bias" is an absurdist's explanation for why reality refuses to support an unpopular ideology.

      The GP was pointing out both the prevalence of "socialist" policies throughout the Western world.
      The implication being that it's unfortunate that capitalism and the free market haven't taken over yet.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    65. Re:is it just me? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Yea, just don't be a website reporting on the location of people or computers hosting files that Hollywood doesn't want them too. Cause we all know that's not news.

    66. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Socialism, capitalism, communism. They all work so long as everyone plays by the rules. Communism failed in the USSR because too many people stopped being communists. Capitalism is failing in the USA because a competitive marketplace is no longer desirable (or promoted) by the major corporate players, and unbalanced legal system. I'd say the Americans are morphing (due to economic mismanagement) toward a social democracy, but I suspect it will fail, because too many people will refuse to play ball. Unpleasant to think the world's most advanced army may not have a democratic citizenry to report to, in my lifetime.

    67. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the beer factory!

    68. Re:is it just me? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, he is either confused or purposely confusing the issue or a strong mixture of both. I have seen it repeated by others and it comes down to this.

      When humans as a group saw it and convinced others that it was in their own best interest to exploit the resources and efforts of others in order to aid in their society and protect themselves from harm, then we because socialistic in nature. But it's a common lie to assume that this is for the benefit of others, having a store to sell your goods or purchase goods you don't have nearby is in your interest, not the guy's living across the street. He may find it in their interest too, but the conveniences and safety you find as a person is rarely in him having easy access to thing but in you having easy access to thing.

      There is no real altruism or "for the greater good" involved in the socialist migration of humanity. Even when people see someone in need and think "someone should help that person", it's often not a genuine desire to see the person helped (else they would provide it themselves), it's a desire to know they will be helped if ever in that or similar situations.

    69. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as for universities being free, i cant speak for the swedish model, but the norwegian one is one of a government provided loan that will start picking up interest the day you stop studying for whatever reason.

      The government provided loan is not to pay for your studies, but a way to pay for living while you study. If you find another way to finance the cost of living, you're free to apply for the government funded scholarship instead, which costs you nothing (as long as you pass your courses). The cost of studying at my university (NTNU) is 900 NOK per year (roughly 140 U.S. dollars), of which all goes to the organization running the dorms, cafeterias etc., meaning the government fund the university completely.

    70. Re:is it just me? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      You should go with Belgium instead. With 15% VAT, they have the lowest one in the EU.

    71. Re:is it just me? by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      I will keep that in mind! Do you know about any good Belgian online stores for electronics? A price comparison site maybe?

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    72. Re:is it just me? by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      Moral relativism is a bitch, but you can have checks and balances... just do more than pay lip service to them.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    73. Re:is it just me? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Being half-Greek, I think you'll find that Greece's bankruptcy has more to do with being Greece than with being socialist.

      Indeed, Greece's problem is that Greece had/still has no industry and was relying on tourism for most of it's income. When the GFC hit 90% of this money stopped coming in. Now Greece could not stop spending when it could keep borrowing, so in my reconing at least 51% of the blame falls on the bond holders who kept giving Greece money rather then recongising the credit risk and denying more loans.

      So we have the same scenario as the US bailing out banks, it's the same thing. The tax payers are bailing out bond holders, not Greece. The US's debt is currently 2/3 of it's GDP, this means you have more money incoming then borrowing, even if you're still borrowing a stupid amount. Greece had 110% of it's GDP in debt when all hell broke loose. However both the US and EU end up with the same problem, you're protecting the bond holders from risk rather then letting them take the loss of bad credit decisions.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    74. Re:is it just me? by mjwx · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Balanced" socialism has gotten us unsustainable debt, which is bankrupting Europe, and will eventually bankrupt America as well.

      Which is why most of the Nordic states and all of the Scandinavian nations are not knee deep in debt. Yet the capitalist nations like the US and UK are. Someone has been brainwashed here and it's not me and the GP.

      It seemed the "socialist" nations balanced the books and survived the GFC. BTW, I'm using your definition of socialism, which means any nations that has social services, Scandinavia is one of the most free markets you will ever encounter but you must be responsible for your products and services. This is why the SEK and NOK did not drop when the USD, GBP and EUR did in 2008, the AUD recovered completely by late 2009 (currently about 0.86 USD).

      Infant mortality statistics cannot be compared between the America and Europe, since in some countries babies born below a certain size or weight are not counted as live births, unlike in America.

      Wow, citation needed, I can vouch for Sweden, Australia and the UK that if it comes out of a woman with a pulse, it's considered alive.

      I'd call you retarded but that would be a grievous insult to people with down syndrome.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    75. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your problem, Nietzsche, is that you imagine that in a truly authoritarian society you would be one of the princes and not one of the serfs. Statistics says this wouldn't be the case.

      And this weapon you mention *has* been developed, in the USA; lookup the scientist who gave inspiration to Stanley Kubrick's "Dr. Strangelove", namely dr. Ede Teller. There were mass demonstrations in the '80s agains development and deployment of said weapon, and with good reason I think. Hint: it starts with an N, not a H.

    76. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweden has a center-right-wing government now, for the first time in decades: Moderaterna, but you wouldn't say it as they haven't bothered to do fuck-all about laws for self-employed small businesses. But I must admit I believe IPRED was indeed fomented by the Socialdemokraterna in a wave of complete lack of sense (or bribes??).

    77. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, even without potholes, can you imagine?

      I guess not.

    78. Re:is it just me? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      one big problem: winter most of the year.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    79. Re:is it just me? by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Gotta love it when people speak for you without your permission. You might want to thank him.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    80. Re:is it just me? by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Seems like the "socialist" Scandinavian countries are the most honest and "free".

      Hmm. So a country that focuses on benefits for society turns out to be better for members of the society that individuals choose to join, than a country that simply focuses on individuals who might individually make poor decisions about their own needs. Funny how that works, eh?

    81. Re:is it just me? by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      But the beer costs $10 a glass.

      Well, at the dollar's current valuation, that doesn't surprise me.

      At beer's current valuation, it doesn't surprise me.

    82. Re:is it just me? by Paladeen · · Score: 1

      "As for Iceland, yo do realize the country went bankrupt because they insisted on having state controlled banks and made laws against larger international banks being owners/part owners"

      This is complete and utter nonsense. The Icelandic banks Kaupthing and Landsbanki were privatised in 2003. They consequently became huge, borrowed vast sums of money and then crashed, tanking the Icelandic economy. Now they've been taken over by the state, and ordinary taxpayers are made to fork out to cover their private debts, much like in the UK and USA. No, Nordic welfare socialism is certainly not to blame for the state of the Icelandic economy. On the contrary, the reason the Icelanders are fucked now is because of their experiment with neoliberalism and mass privatisation -- an experiment that the next couple of generations will have to pay out the nose for.

    83. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /---/ A funny detail is, that Nordic countries have this unofficial (maybe even official) agreement that in acute medical cases, citizens of other Nordic countries are taken care of for free, basically with no questions asked. No need to show travel insurance or anything, applies to operations, x-rays etc.

      It is very official. We also have old agreements about a common job market, open borders and a lot of other stuff. At the moment they are not needed as all Nordic countries have similar agreement with EU (even those that aren't members of EU). If EU ceased to exist it wouldn't mean anything in the relations between the Nordic countries, we have our old agreements as back up. That "free" health care is paid by your home country (just like it is between all countries that is members of EU, even if it is a very bureauocratic procedure within most of the rest of EU). Scandinavian countries have similar agreement with most countries around the world, so that their citisens can get acute health care in whatever country they are visiting (just send the bill to their home country). You can also get paid for health care (non acute) that has long waiting time within your home country in other countries (including housing and travel costs), by making prearrangements with your county government, Thailand is very popular.

      When it comes to acute (in a very broad sence of the word) medical care, it is not just free for citisens of Nordic countries, it is free for all people visiting a Nordic country, even those that are visiting illegaly (there are even rules limiting when health care givers can alert the police, as it is, it is even illegal in Sweden to snitch on illegal immigrants seeking health care, or for policemen to monitor or visit health care givers in search of illegal immigrants).

      That said, the health care in Sweden(*) and Finland is in general not up to the standards of the rest of Northern Europe (not counting GB or Ireland as Nothern Europe, but the rest of Scandinavia, Germany, France, Netherlands et.c.). It is however (almost) free and better than what can be found in most parts of USA.

      (*) Sweden is however a world leader when it comes to dental care, but most of it is only subsidised, not free (unless you go criminal and just don't pay, they can't refuse to do acute dentistry).

    84. Re:is it just me? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If our conservatives would concern themselves mainly with the conservation of weak isospin, they'd get my vote in an instant. I am all for that. Unfortunately, they concern themselves mostly with the conservation of the wealth of the already wealthy.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    85. Re:is it just me? by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      news flash: so do the "liberals" in power. corruption is not unique to a claimed ideology. sycophants and the power hungry will subvert any gathering of like-minded people.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    86. Re:is it just me? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      "For an American"?... I have only a small hop to your place, across the Baltic. If I wanted to, I could most likely made it to Sweden to see today's sunset (assuming one evening flight from my quite local airport is still there); though ferry from Swinoujscie is sort of nice, too...

      Suffice to say you seem to at least lack perspective (and BTW you most likely didn't have many opportunities to experience firsthand places behind Iron Curtain). What's with the stab at healthcare? Of course it's not "free", everybody knows that - but just look at medical stats, your place is one of the best in life expectancy, etc. anyway. And not spending anywhere the level of "worst" amounts per capita (which would be still somehow understandable anyway, considering the positive stats) - that title goes to the US by a comfortable margin (US which is, according to CIA World Factbook, at around 40th place in things like life expectancy; virtually every country ahead of them has socialised medical system and is more efficient with funds; and don't tell that's "because they do research" - everybody does those, and most importantly the clients from across the world pay for them anyway)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    87. Re:is it just me? by kristjansson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you'll also note that Iceland modeled its financial markets off of the US...

    88. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the fridge.

    89. Re:is it just me? by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      IMHO, a problem with even balanced socialism is that it only appears to work in ethnically homogeneous societies with a highly-ingrained work ethic. Speaking as a US citizen, these would be strikes one and two. Sadly, one size does not fit all.

    90. Re:is it just me? by BitZtream · · Score: 0, Troll

      Idiot.

      US there are people dying from poverty

      Only because they choose to do so. It is so unbelievable easy to survive in America that only the laziest of the laziest have problems. We unfortunately, due to how easy it is, have made some of the laziest people on the planet. There will always be people who want to do the least amount of work possible to survive and they won't survive long without someone taking care of them regardless of how much effort you put into it.

      people losing their houses because they had the temerity to get ill

      Due to over extending themselves and/or not bothering to put any effort into any of the hundred government programs that are out there to help people in this situation. Theres no excuse for this happening unless you bought a 120k house for 750k and you make 25k a year so you don't qualify for any sort of help, in which case, I feel absolutely no sympathy for you.

      high infant mortality

      Compared to what? Citation needed.

      highest jail population in the world

      Yes, and there are multiple reasons for this. One, we're a great target for criminals from the rest of the world, lots of idiotic lazy marks and lots of extra money and stuff that can disappear before anyone will bother putting REAL effort into finding it or who did the crime.

      They still have to pay for healthcare

      Everyone has to pay for health care moron, its just a matter of if its an optional payment or one the goverment takes from you without your consent, either way you still pay for it. Government provided health care doesn't just come from thin air you realize, right?

      The rest of the western world knows balanced socialism is the way forward

      Again, idiot. You think one form of government is better than another. They aren't. All forms are pretty much equal, regardless of what you want to think. The reality of it is, the government is run by people. People who can bend capitalism, socialism, communism, fascism or whatever into working for them how they want. If you have 'good' people in the government, they all work, including dictatorships. Reality is that you end up with bad people, cause bad people will take every advantage they can to get to the top, they don't play fair, which means its fairly easy to beat out the good guy who plays 'fair'.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    91. Re:is it just me? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      All of our email, web and telephone traffic is monitored by the state.

      Yeah? Tell Americans about that.

      As for our "free" health care - it's not free, we pay it through taxes.

      Hahahaha. You can't really that dumb, can you?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    92. Re:is it just me? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      No, unfortunately not. I only noticed it, because PixMania (photo seller) had different prices.

      And I mixed up something. Belgium has 21%. Luxumburg has 15%. Check the list here.

      What we really need is not just a PriceComparison.eu site, but one that helps you do purchases across the borders but still inside the EU, including shipping.

      For one thing, I suspect that companies in Greece would welcome more customers, even if they had to pay a small fee per sale - especially if they didn't have to work on translations. And I know that I, as a consumer, would like a better way to buy things outside my own country.

    93. Re:is it just me? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Though who the society chooses is an indication of where that same society wants to take itself in the coming decades; not all choice are equivalent, even on the surface, after all (and decades is the timespan required to change things; generation or two)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    94. Re:is it just me? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      you'll also note that Iceland modeled its financial markets off of the US...

      Many nations did IIRC, it's not a bad model. The US has other problems, bad laws and no enforcement will quickly undermine the best economic model.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    95. Re:is it just me? by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      Well, UK has only 17.5% VAT and the British pound is still very very weak so I think I will still get the best deals from there. Not long ago a pound cost over 16 SEK. A year ago it was around 10 SEK but is now up to 11,5 SEK.

      The biggest problem is that British stores (and eBay sellers) are usually unwilling to ship anything larger than a DVD outside of the UK for some strange reason, claiming "too high P&P" even if I'm the one paying it... :P That's why I usually have to buy hardware from other EU countries.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    96. Re:is it just me? by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      i think the biggest thing people wanted is the thing they can't have: a return to the rule of law on the part of the government.

      and a better economy to boot

      too bad both leading ideologies share the same policy prescriptions for both.

      i think you mistake what the actual mandate given the current administration and batch of legislators was. they did too which is why they'll lose in Nov. Not that the Republicans winning is a good thing because it's a false choice: they'll do essentially the same as the Democrats.

      Obama and the Democrats are every bit as much in bed with the wealthy and powerful as Bush and the Republicans are.

      e.g.

      http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/16/stewart/index.html

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    97. Re:is it just me? by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 1

      Which is why most of the Nordic states and all of the Scandinavian nations are not knee deep in debt.

      Norway's debt-to-GDP ratio is 60.20. The United States is 52.90. Outside of Scandinavia, France is at 79.70, and Germany is at 77.20.

      It seemed the "socialist" nations balanced the books and survived the GFC. BTW, I'm using your definition of socialism, which means any nations that has social services,

      That isn't my definition of socialism, that's evidently the previous poster's definition (he said "balanced" socialism).

      Wow, citation needed, I can vouch for Sweden, Australia and the UK that if it comes out of a woman with a pulse, it's considered alive.

      This compares America's infant mortality rates with that of Europe. America also has more premature births than Sweden, which further skews the statistics.

    98. Re:is it just me? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Still ...

      If you set up a Man in the Middle type of operation. Customer doesn't buy from EU store, they buy from the MitM-store. It will cost slightly more (MitM needs to make money plus shipping).

      But since MitM doesn't need to care who is cheapest, they can help customers and merchants alike. The customers gets more options, and the merchants gets a company to fork over money and handle foreign shipping.

      Biggest issue, from my perspective, is how the law handles warranty claims etc. - those are either with the seller (MitM) or the manufacturer.

    99. Re:is it just me? by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1

      But the beer costs $10 a glass.

      I was in Iceland last week. Beer certainly does not cost $10 a glass there. (The kronur is way down against the dollar.)

    100. Re:is it just me? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      True. OTOH, capitalism works in societies where there is a good cooperative spirit and little desire to game the system for one's own goals. Otherwise... you get China.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    101. Re:is it just me? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Still, all of this is ultimatelly a reflection of given society; it's at the least telling where it tries, perhaps, to go.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  4. Bandwagon anyone? by NervousWreck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to the article, Iceland did this to make it a more desirable server location. Seems like that market can serve as an incentive for more "data friendly" laws; Here's hoping other countries follow suit.

    --
    I do not have a sig. You are hallucinating.
    1. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      They did this because Wikileaks posted bank records for one of their failing banks which showed they were transferring billions of dollars out into safe havens as they were going down. Seeing as how the big bank fiasco tanked their economy they didn't take to kindly to this misappropriation of funds and decided Wikileaks was a good thing.

    2. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Is there really big money in catering to sites like cryptome and wikileaks? Only the most non-mainstream of journalists are going to see this as a plus. NYT or WaPo aren't ever going to run afoul of American laws regarding their website; not in a way that would impact their bottom line, I don't think. Don't get me wrong, I think wikileaks and cryptome are the greatest thing since the printing press. But I would think that if a country wants to be a go-to place for server hosting to make money, they would look at attracting other clienteles.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      Seems like the should promote themselves as a location for "passive cooling" and offer carbon credits or something equivalent.

    4. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Is there really big money in catering to sites like cryptome and wikileaks?

      Depends on your business model. If you have targeted ads, you might do well.

      A well placed antacid advertisement might just hook a scumbag CEO reading about himself.

      An amazon associate link to The Book of Virtues probably wouldn't go over so well to the same CEO.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    5. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a country of 300.000 people with 0.035% of world GDP, then attracting the most prosecuted 1% of global IT infrastructure may be a large enough volume.
      And given the way world moves, even the big players like Google, e-bay or whatever may find that the "news haven" clause is just the thing that they need.

    6. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by conspirator57 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah, i wonder if fallout from people shifting to Iceland servers will result in countries shutting down their transoceanic fibre links in retaliation.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    7. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      They also have abundant geothermal energy production, so a data center only needs an internet connection, and it's good to go.

    8. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by hitmark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      NYT or WaPo could probably pull a nice one by leaking finds to wikileaks or similar, and then writing a article about some leak from a unknown source to wikileaks. Basically, as long as it cant be proven that they did the leak, they both get to blow the whistle, and wash their hands by pointing the finger at a third party.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    9. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the article, Iceland did this to make it a more desirable server location. Seems like that market can serve as an incentive for more "data friendly" laws; Here's hoping other countries follow suit.

      I hear TPB is always looking for a stable hosting location...

    10. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even active cooling. Most power in Iceland is Geothermal power - it's clean and renewable.

      That's one of the reasons they're targetting this market - they've got surplus power already, and they can bring new power plants online fairly quickly without having to worry as much about logistics or pollution.

      Data centres love power, for obvious reasons, so for any application where latency isn't mission critical it's an ideal environment.

    11. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      As long as a single country doesn't cut the link, the internet will route around it.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    12. Re:Bandwagon anyone? by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      sure, and it will do so until all it can go through is satellite. somewhere in there a bottleneck occurs and worsens to the point that service is effectively cut off for practical purposes.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  5. err, the rules are not yet official by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Informative

    The proposal to draft some rules is now official. The rules themselves will now be drafted by a committee, and then the committee will present them to the legislature, which may then in the future enact them. The proposal is indeed promising, as is the strong (unanimous) support for tasking the committee with fleshing it out, but what exactly the committee will come back with could vary quite a bit.

  6. Gunboat Diplomacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nothing a little Gunboat Diplomacy couldn't resolve.

    1. Re:Gunboat Diplomacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing a little Gunboat Diplomacy couldn't resolve.

      The UK, a country that as a libel tourism destination has a particular interest in opposing this move, has tried gunboat diplomacy against Iceland once before, in a fisheries dispute. Iceland won.

  7. Iceland = Hoth? by aapold · · Score: 1

    The Evil Empire will never find us here, General Assange!

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:Iceland = Hoth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Iceland's pretty green, actually.

      It's Greenland that's pretty icy.

  8. EU membership will undo this by jdesbonnet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That will probably be all undone as a condition to EU membership (which I think is inevitable at this point).

    1. Re:EU membership will undo this by Balinares · · Score: 1

      > That will probably be all undone as a condition to EU membership

      Why?

      --

      -- B.
      This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
    2. Re:EU membership will undo this by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why?

      Welcome my son, welcome to the machine.
      What did you dream?
      It's alright we told you what to dream.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    3. Re:EU membership will undo this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Cos he's Ayn Randian.

    4. Re:EU membership will undo this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because the EU is an anti-democratic, lobbyist-ridden clusterfuck.

    5. Re:EU membership will undo this by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh! So you guys are trying to compete with us Yanks on that side of the drink. =P

    6. Re:EU membership will undo this by jbssm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What are you talking about? Check the world stats for freedom of the press. EU countries are ALL, either less restrictive than USA or at most, some are equally restrictive.

      I know things are not perfect around here when you go on a country by country basis in southern European countries and Eastern European, but most of the laws and directives of the EU commission are quite good ones for the normal citizen, you can see they are not there just to defend the rich ones.

      But mostly and what shows me that you don't know what are you talking about, is that Iceland is already quite into the EU, they belong to Schengen Space and to EU free trade zone. And the talks to enter the EU are already practically finished, the only real step left for them to join us, is they own internal referendum about the subject, that should happen in 2 years.

    7. Re:EU membership will undo this by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      last i heard that'll take a referendum in Iceland, which won't pass.

      http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100043584/the-eu-accepts-the-application-of-icelands-government-having-evidently-forgotten-icelands-people/

      looks like your triumphalism is premature, emperor.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    8. Re:EU membership will undo this by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but you have to remember the Iceland is in hock to the tune of billions of Euros to the United Kindgom in particular. They are only surviving because the markets are expecting them to join the EU. Failure to do so will make Greece look like a nice holiday.

    9. Re:EU membership will undo this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter. Iceland will probably never join the EU.

    10. Re:EU membership will undo this by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      i thought the people's referendum rejected paying that debt back. check your facts, it's far better for the icelandic people to default on that debt.

      http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/03/iceland-rejects-icesave-does-no-mean-no.html

      plus, by staying out of the EU and waiting for the ECB to inflate in order to save the PIIGS countries they could conceivably be better able to pay off the debt with their own currency rather than the to-be-devalued Euro.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    11. Re:EU membership will undo this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That may be true, but it still managed to give us seventy years of no war for the first time ever.

    12. Re:EU membership will undo this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it is Iceland will never join the EU as we have nothign to gain and everything to loose.
      Their blant dissregard to sustained fishing for one thing is a big reason to give the united states version 2.0 the finger.
      And also to look at the great state the non germany countries of the EU are in i find it laughable that it is any solution to a economy problem to join them even though they have already bought and payed for one of our political parties(speculation but they lobby hard for the EU) the joining will be fail by a general public vote for sure.

  9. SteamPunks by vainvanevein · · Score: 1

    how dare they!

  10. A dull yawn peirces the night... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    ...flat, drab passion meanders across the screen in reaction to this piece. And the crowd goes "Yay."

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  11. but just for people that look just like me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, it's easy have a successful social democratic welfare state when your country is racially homogeneous.

    1. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by jbssm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, you mean racially homogeneous like the Netherlands that also have a social system quite similar to their fellow Nordic countries and lot's of emigrants?
      By your chain of though, the most "racially homogeneous" (hot news man, there are not races amongst humans, there are only ethnics) of all countries in Europe, Poland should be a socialist heaven, right? Well, take a look at them.

      I love when you Americans try to find excuses for why socialism in a moderate degree works better than the system you have just because of some NON issue.

    2. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Almost 20% of swedens population is of foreign origin, and that doesn't include the "paperless" or refugees that's not citizens.

    3. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by arth1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Racially homogeneous? You have no idea what you're talking about. In Sweden, around 12% of the population are first generation immigrants, of which around 75% are from non-Western countries.
      That's much higher than the average for Europe, with around 6% immigrants, and about the same as in the US (38 million first generation immigrants out of 307 million in 2009).

      Looking at the largest Scandinavian cities, Oslo and Stockholm both have around 25% immigrants, most of whom are from non-Western countries. Compared to where I live in the US, I am the one living in a racially homogeneous area, with more than 96% crackers.

    4. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Aaah - of course! Brown people mixing with white people = bad. Thanks for spewing your insane racism. Fantastic work.

    5. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by jbssm · · Score: 1

      And just to make it clear with numbers that what you are saying is completely wrong and in fact bullshit. Immigrant populations for various countries. USA: 10%, Sweden: 12%, Netherlands: 10%, Norway: 8.3%, Poland: 2%. Source Wikipedia.

      So the numbers show that what you say is completely wrong, a social supportive system works well in northern Europe and some of these countries have even more foreign born population living there than USA. It works, because as you can see if you actually go there, people are raised since they are born NOT to be greedy, exactly the opposite of USA. And also as can be seen, the fact a population is homogeneous (like Poland, the most homogeneous population of EU), doesn't have anything to do with the matter. So stop finding excuses, it works in here because we make it work and we believe in the system, if you don't like it, well is up to you, but if you like it and are just jealous, well, at least shut up about it, don't try to make up bullshit and lies about the reasons on why it works.

    6. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      In Sweden, around 12% of the population are first generation immigrants, of which around 75% are from non-Western countries.

      Where did you find that particular statistic?

      I can find one that points out the number of people born in foreign countries, which is 14.3% for 2009 (1,337,965 people), but not anything about where they're from.

      If I do an extraction of data of people born in foreign countries, and I remove the EU countries I can remember, Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Canada and Iceland, I end up with a total of 790,024 in 2009, which is 8.46% of the total population. The countries I excluded (Western countries) makes up 547.941 people. That's 41% of the entire group of foreigners, not 25% as you claim. This doesn't look at citizens vs non-citizens, just where people were born.

      Now, my numbers come from Statistics Sweden, and you can easily double check them if you don't believe me. Where did you get yours?

    7. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean racially homogeneous like the Netherlands that also have a social system quite similar to their fellow Nordic countries and lot's of emigrants?

      In all fairness, it is showing quite a few cracks at the moment. 1 in 6 voted for someone whose political ideas conflict so badly with the various freedoms(speech, religion, assembly) that the very fact he's the leader of the Freedom Party nearly caused the universe to fold in on itself from the irony.

      Despite how wrong he may be about how he wants to go about thing, we have to do *something* about the current immigrant issues. What that solution is I don't know but the current situation is untenable in the long run.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    8. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by soliptic · · Score: 1

      Racially homogeneous? You have no idea what you're talking about.

      Hush now. It's just the standard American Idiot response to these discussions. It comes out like clockwork Every. Single. Time. some facts/statistics are cited which point to <<non US country>> being better in the league tables of <<any quality of life indicator whatsoever>>.

      Please don't burst their cute little bubble of everywhere in Europe being essentially a single extended family of identical-looking smiling brothers and sisters. Without that as an excuse for why they have poorer press freedom, incarceration rates, life expectancy, drug addiction, etc, etc, I fear the poor darlings might just implode.

      So just hush up and pretend immigration and globalisation somehow escaped Europe altogether, Sweden is entirely composed of cute little matching Scandi-elves, etc.

    9. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      Depending on the story we're all homogeneous or the muslims have taken over and are about to declare the caliphate at any minute!

    10. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      The story is missing the part where scandinavians living in the US not only significantly outperform the US average but also their cousins still living back home.

      http://super-economy.blogspot.com/2010/01/dynamic-america-poor-europe.html

      They also have similar crime rates vis a vis scandinavia.

      It would seem that there are significant benefits to Scandinavian culture, regardless of what government they're living under. Blaming the government for these benefits or faults (with the possible exception of the drug war, as that is a very direct example of state action) seems simplistic to me.

    11. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      That's one big difference - in America, anyone else who is a "honkey" is considered homogenous. This is, culturally, bullshit. It's been a long time since any serious thinker thought the genetic aspects of your race matters for these things. However, your racial culture can be shown to have a huge effect.

      Also, as an aside, if you do live in a part of america that is 96% white, it is very likely that your average income and crime compare relatively well to Sweden's. This is because most high crime areas in the US are confined to ethnic melting-pot style cities, and only the poorest ten or so states actually have lower per capita income than Sweden.

    12. Re:but just for people that look just like me! by kristjansson · · Score: 1

      that's 60 years of vitriolic indoctrination for you. we're also told that we have democracy and a truly free market, if you want to get into the myths that most of the adults in this country espouse...

  12. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a trap!

  13. Wake up America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And nobody should know about abuses of power either. Gosh, if the American public ever found out why so much of the world hates them, what would happen then?!?

    Terrorists attacked the USA, and the people have no idea why. You think "Freedom hating bastards! That's why they did it!" Perhaps if the American people understood that the government that (mis)represents them is what is getting otherwise innocent Americans killed, then it could stop.

    Please Americans, you need to pull your head out of your asses! For your own good as well as the rest of us. Blind Patriotism chanting "we're number one" does not make it so. If you only knew how far from number one you actually are, you could do something about it. Reclaim that title. America was wonderful, and a land of the free. So much has been lost, and ignorance of so much around you will erode what little is left. I fear it may already be too late. I hope it is not.

    1. Re:Wake up America! by sumdumass · · Score: 0, Troll

      Alright troll, I'll byte.

      why is it that Terrorists attacked the USA? And don't say it's because we sent troops over there in response to the attacks- there is a serious logic problem in those complaints. I happen to know the real reason but you seem to think you know so why don't you tell us. I seriously want to see if you are actually the suffering the "ignorance of so much around you" that you want to claim is others problems.

      Oh BTW, be specific- ranting about how much better you are or how stupid you think others are, doesn't count as a reason. If we are luckey, we will get into a history lessen for you while we are at it.

    2. Re:Wake up America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell me you aren't authorized to carry a gun.

    3. Re:Wake up America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo! Most Americans would be shocked at how their over-exploited country is perceived OS.
      Ever since WW2 the US has been a rouge state, and the populace has been fed utter BS by the media and government.
      If you think it's not that bad: Would it be OK if any other country went around kidnapping and then torturing *hundreds* of people all over the world?
      What about bombing commercial opposition? What about killing journalist, systematically in zones where they don't want exposure?
      You guys have entire cities run by criminal gangs and yet still think you are superior! Remember, the Billionaires will walk away when they have to invest intheir community to stop it failing. Don't expect bailouts from the wealthy...they will re-locate to where the populace can be stung again.
      So proud of being capitalist, yet much of the economy relies on military spending...from the government!
      Yep wake up, then start fighting for your freedom of information, then get angry and start fighting for your country again.

    4. Re:Wake up America! by Xest · · Score: 1

      "I happen to know the real reason but you seem to think you know so why don't you tell us. I seriously want to see if you are actually the suffering the "ignorance of so much around you" that you want to claim is others problems."

      Do go on, please, I'm intrigued to hear what this real reason you supposedly know is.

      Personally I always figured it was because America had been fucking around in those terrorists homelands for about the last 50 years in some cases keeping said countries unstable, or imposing their own often extremely brutal puppet dictator to ensure said countries could be exploited for their natural resources by American companies as best as possible. I assumed the terrorists in question were just a little fucked off at having their countries screwed around with so that people in America could sit happy and oblivious to the goings on in the rest of the world.

      But perhaps I'm wrong, maybe you can enlighten me on the real reason if this is not it?

    5. Re:Wake up America! by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot. Have you ever been to a european city?

    6. Re:Wake up America! by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      well I'm living in a european city and the only crazy religious nuts in this one are the catholics.
      I don't want my daughters to be sent to the magdaline laundries or to get raped by some priest yet that was the reality in this city only a few decades ago.

      There are always hundreds of millions of people, who are actively, willfully supporting people who intend to kill you if you don't do something or other.
      How many americans would like nothing more than to spread their own little nutjob faiths to all the muslims out there?

      muslims are a tiny minority in pretty much every european country, less than 5% in most of europe.

      Yet there's no shortage of biggoted arseholes who want to ram their own creed down your throat and most of them aren't muslims.
      see parent for an example.

    7. Re:Wake up America! by dpastern · · Score: 1

      Spot on. Unfortunately, a vast majority of /. readers are probably Americans. And they are blindly patriotic, to the point where the vast majority of them will NEVER admit any fault with their country. Sad, but true.

      Dave

      --
      Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. --Martin Luther King Jr.
    8. Re:Wake up America! by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1

      Ever since WW2 the US has been a rouge state

      Who you callin' a red?

    9. Re:Wake up America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have replaced love of freedom with love for living large. Consult history to see how this is going to end.

  14. This feels familiar somehow.... by f3rret · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now if only Iceland hid some forgotten caches of WW2-era war-gold then it would be the perfect placr to build The Crypt

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  15. Not Everything is Journalism by retardpicnic · · Score: 1

    Posting military documents that get leaked is not just journalism and should not be protected. What gets overlooked is that most countries spy on each other, and have vast amounts of other countries encrypted mail. This is not a problem until someone leaks the actual wire. By amassing enough of these unencrypted vs. encrypted matches other countries can get a real leg up in the computing time needed to crack keys. So while the state dept might end up with egg on its face this "journalism" winds up with huge potential for dead soldiers. I'll admit this is extreme, but possible.

    --
    sig loading.......
    1. Re:Not Everything is Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not leaking it allows military personnel to commit atrocities and never be found out. I know where I stand on that one...

    2. Re:Not Everything is Journalism by conspirator57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      maybe if the military actually prosecuted the criminals in their ranks and repudiated their behavior publicly rather than covering it up, maybe then the remaining, well-intentioned troops would be safer and the populaces of our satraps might have some small reason to believe we're there to help them rather than to subjugate them and take their stuff. and maybe leaks like this provide disincentive for the government to circle the wagons and keep cancerous elements in the ranks.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    3. Re:Not Everything is Journalism by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      If you're not changing keys significantly faster than your enemy can crack them (even with leaked plaintext) you're doing it wrong.

  16. I live in New Haven... by seandiggity · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you insensitive clod!

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  17. A good idea for Iceland by Favonius+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For those small island states, especially broke ones, you need to invent a reason for people to care. This kind of freedom of speech could bring in money in one form or another and help remake Iceland. Good for them!

    --
    "Men willingly believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar
    1. Re:A good idea for Iceland by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Or make big corporations bully you into giving up said freedom. And ruin your economy as you resist.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  18. Whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've got like, several trillion interstellar krona.

    Iceland takes those, right? Right?!

  19. The Greater Good by conspirator57 · · Score: 1
    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  20. For how long? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    How long will they be able to resist the strong arm tactics of the WTO and UN.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  21. Forgive my ignorace, by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the U.S. already have a law protecting journalists?

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

    --

    I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    1. Re:Forgive my ignorace, by hitmark · · Score: 1

      problem is that big media and US government seems to be walking hand in hand these days.

      end result being that whats good for big media is good for the "elected" rulers of USA.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  22. i see you've been gone a few decades by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

    no one listens to that old rag any more. they just use it as a rhetorical bludgeon when not in power.

    next you'll tell me you should have protection against warrantless searches. Good one!

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    1. Re:i see you've been gone a few decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      At least the president will have something to wipe his ass with when he runs out of toilet paper.

    2. Re:i see you've been gone a few decades by conspirator57 · · Score: 2, Funny

      if he doesn't mind finding a part the last president didn't already use.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  23. The Real Story by andersh · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would like to correct some popular myths that suicide rates are supposedly high in Scandinavia.

    The following material illustrates that Scandinavia is at approximately the same levels as the US. In fact in some aspects the rates are lower in some Scandinavian countries. Norway has lower rates for male suicides than the US (15.7 vs 17.7).

    Suicides per 100,000 people per year:

    Scandinavian countries:
    Denmark 11.9
    Norway 11.5
    Sweden 13.2

    North American countries:
    United States of America 11.0
    Canada 11.3

    Nordic countries:
    Iceland 11.2
    Finland 18.8

    P.S. Finland is not Scandinavian because of its ethnic, historical and cultural background. In my opinion Finland has much more in common with its eastern neighbor, Russia, and the Baltic states. The supposedly higher alcohol consumption and cultural differences could be explanations for their higher suicide rates.

    Like Finland Iceland is not considered part of Scandinavia but the wider "Nordic" category due to differences in geography and language. The three Kingdoms (DK/NO/SE) share closer ties in a historical political, economic and cultural union.

    1. Re:The Real Story by Engeekneer · · Score: 1

      P.S. Finland is not Scandinavian because of its ethnic, historical and cultural background. In my opinion Finland has much more in common with its eastern neighbor, Russia, and the Baltic states.

      As a finn I just have to say, uhm, what? Sure, we have higher suicide rates and alcohol consumption than sweden, but that's about it. Oh, and we don't have Burger King. Otherwise while Sweden and Finland aren't indistinguishable, they are far closer than Finland vs. baltic countries, or especially Russia.

    2. Re:The Real Story by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Finland has little in common with Russia and most Baltic countries as well.

      Another similarly sized country they have most in common with? Hungary. Yes, the Hungary which is separated by the Baltic Sea, Poland and Czech from them. They are a completely distinct ethnic group the Finno-Ugric peoples, than about all the rest of europe (which is Indo-European).

      It's a different culture, wildly different (and horribly difficult) language, different mentality. Most of countries around are either Slavic or German peoples, but these two are not nearly as far apart as some would believe, while Finno-ugric are far, far away. To give Americans a clue, German-Slavic-Ugrofinnic relation could be compared to Texan-Mexican-Chinese.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:The Real Story by zoom-ping · · Score: 1

      Closer and better example would have been Estonia. Just 100 kilometers south over the Finnish bay. Languages are more similar, simple Finnish-Estonian conversations are entirely possible. As an Estonian I can understand and speak Finnish without ever learning it, but I don't understand a word of Hungarian.

    4. Re:The Real Story by kristjansson · · Score: 1

      sorry, but linguistically and culturally, all of the Icelanders that I've ever known consider themselves Scandinavian, and you're begging for an argument by grouping them separately. Granted, it's nowhere near the response that my younger sister's second grade teacher got from dad when she claimed that Iceland was part of North America, but still... As far as linguistics go, Icelandic is four vowel mutations from most major dialects of the Viking language (y to u, y to ú, and vice versa). That, by the way, is identical to an old form of Norwegian. Throw in a little more than 700 years of it being passed back and forth between Denmark and Norway which took from 1877 to 1944 to terminate, and I think they have a solid argument in favor of Scandinavian status on their hands.

      And where do Greenlanders fit in?

      Anyway, just my 2 krónur...

    5. Re:The Real Story by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Closer, but smaller and not nearly as surprising. The most surprising factor about this ethnic group is its scatter. Relatively big groups but so strongly isolated from each other...

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  24. In other news ... by skastrik · · Score: 1
    Wikileaks supposedly has access to loads of US classified information. Its primary spokesman may have to flee to Iceland.
    Iceland votes "yes" on proposed news haven.

    In other news, yesterday US sent official greetings because of the national day June 17th, reminding Icelanders about good old times and promising friendship and support during the current financial crisis. (text Icelandic only, but there's a Hillary video)

  25. Cultural Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you're missing my point here.

    Finland is just as good as any other Nordic or European country, in fact in some ways you're better. Your schools are much better according to the OECD.

    I don't know if you objected to my description of your status as a Nordic country or not? It's surprising to some Finns that they're not Scandinavian, especially with your historical ties to Sweden. Then again Sweden held large parts of the Baltics, and they're not Scandinavian either.

    The historical Scandinavia is centered around Skåne (Scania), and the three Kingdoms that united under the Kalmar Union.

    Denmark, Norway and Sweden share the same ancestry, ethnicity, language and culture. Finland is not part of that as you may well know.

    However the recent Nordic cooperation this century has meant that all the Nordic countries have similar societies. The "Swedish" model as it's called has spread and we're now on similar terms. We [here] all live in peaceful, orderly social-democratic welfare states.

    Your shared border with Russia has meant Finland has developed differently from say Sweden or Norway. As you know NATO membership has always been a difficult issue for Finland because of Russia, the whole Baltic joined as soon as possible when they could(!)

    No doubt the fear of provoking Russia, not to mention your [ethnic] brethren in Karelen in present day Russia held you back.

    I'm a native Scandinavian, I've been to all of the Scandinavian, Nordic and Baltic countries countless times.

    It's my opinion from my encounters with Finns in my own country, in Finland and other countries that you have your own very special culture.

    This is what I think you didn't understand, let me explain further.

    I don't think we share the same culture tendencies at all, as you admitted Finns have a different alcohol consumption pattern.

    There are other differences too, it's difficult to observe and see this from within, but your people have a different set of attitudes and way of life.

    Your whole culture feels distinctly different from Sweden, you have the same products on sale, but that's not what I'm referring to.

    The fact that your language is isolated from the Scandinavian languages probably has had an impact too, we Scandinavians can understand each others [Germanic] languages. Finnish is only related to Hungarian as you know.

    To me the Finnish people feels more similar to Russians in their attitudes.

    I would go as far as to compare the art, literature and musical traditions of Finland, I find very few similarities with [us] your neighbors there. Dark and somber are keywords.

    Even just listening to Sibelius makes me think about Finland’s long struggle for independence from Russia.

    So while your country works almost the same way, you don't share the same culture, and *that* could explain a difference in suicide rates.

    We still love you, Finland, we're just not the same.

    1. Re:Cultural Differences by Engeekneer · · Score: 1

      Haha, don't worry, I didn't take offence to what you said, and as you said we're a Nordic, but not Scandinavian country. And I do agree that there's a distinct difference between Scandinavia and Finland. Also the fact that Finland was part of Russia (well some some finns like saying Russia was a part of Finland) did of course have an impact on our culture. I don't directly disagree with your other points either, but I think things might not be quite that drastic.

      But my main point is that at least nowadays, I think Finland's culture is closer to Scandinavian than Russian. It's probably been getting closer for a long time. But having spent time in all the Nordic countries and Russia and Estonia, and meeting a lot of people from them, imho the difference between Scandinavia and Finland is there, but it's not that big. Compared to Swedes and Norwegians, Russians are alien to me (generalizing of course).

      We still love you, Finland, we're just not the same.

      To feed your fire, I just have to say, we tough finnish men don't need love. Or at least show it ;).

  26. In unrelated news by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    all the undersea cables connecting to Iceland have been 'accidentally' cut by dropped anchors.

  27. More in Common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I beg to differ! I wonder how you can claim that! Do you even know European history?

    Finland was part of Russia at one point! Later Russia let them go only to steal large parts of Finland (Karelen) and "Russified" the population.

    As for the Baltic connection:
    Then there's the fact that Estonians speak practically the same language! That's a very real connection right there!

    Now I could go on and inform you that Imperial Sweden ruled not only Finland but the Baltic states for some time.

    However my original point was that Finland and Finnish culture has much in common, in my opinion, with their neighbors on either side.

    As for Hungary, Finland's over three time the size of Hungary. I don't think they have anything in common with Hungary apart from the language. Finland is much more like Sweden than anything else.

    I've been to both countries, have you?

    However they do have the language family in common. That's really just another part of my point, they are distinctly different from their neighbors in Scandinavia.

    The Finn-Ugric peoples is a misnomer, as the only thing they have in common is the language family. They don't speak the same language.

    They are technically ethnically related, however distant that might be today. They don't look anything alike.

    Especially considering the Swedish empire brought a lot of Swedish blood. There's a reason they have Swedish as an official language in Finland now.

    I would like to correct you though, it's not "German" but Germanic languages. We don't speak German here.
    Danish, Swedish and Norwegian belong to different groups of Indo-European Germanic languages.

    1. Re:More in Common by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Sounds a little like a Chinese talking about Taiwan...

      The land of Finland was a part of Russia, the terrain of Hungary used to belong to slavic tribes... sure. But you can't deny southern Finland and Estonia are currently a distinct ethnic group both from inhabitants of Sweden and Russians. And that's the essence of my point: Finns are technically related to Hungarians. They are completely unrelated to both Swedish peoples and Russian peoples. They adapted Swedish as a second official language, as result of centuries of Swedish occupation and polluting their bloodlines by Swedes.

      Of course, this is not an objective text. It's just as subjective like a text about China written from perspective of Taiwan. Just like yours only in the opposite direction.

      Also, I never spoke about the German language. I talked about the ethnic groups.

      I've been to Sweden, and I had a girlfriend from Finland.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  28. Re:My first thought was... by gpronger · · Score: 1

    No clue why modded to "Redundant"; posted anonymously, but it was my first sentiment.

  29. this Quashes Iceland's EU bid by drwho · · Score: 1

    Iceland had wanted to join the EU. But I guess this puts an end to these plans. Well, Iceland isn't in Europe anyhow, and much of the EU seems to be having a lot of problems similar to what Iceland has been having as of late. The question then becomes, what economic value is being a 'data haven' going to bring, and how serious are they? The economic benefits only accrue when there is significant 'hosting' regulations around the world, particularly in well-off countries (which their are), and not much or not very effective 'browsing' regulations (the efficiency of existing 'great walls' can be debated). A bigger problem comes when the country becomes PRIMARILY a data haven - at that point, major censor powers will find it easy and effective to just blacklist all of the data haven's IP addresses / ASNs. This does not cut all traffic from country A (say, for instance, Pakistan) to country B (Iceland), but cuts off access to the unsophisticated Internet user, greatly lowering the economic value of being a data haven. But this may be overcome by having mirror sites and anonymizing proxies all over the world, with Iceland becoming a 'legal black hole' for subpoenas and the like.

    There's an ugly side of being a data haven, beyond the normally expected ones, and that is being a spam haven. This may be where Iceland makes a lot of its money in this scheme. But the liberty afforded by their plan is so great, that spam is a minor price to pay. If they're serious, I congratulate them. If they're not, then shame on them.