Slashdot Mirror


Sound As the New Illegal Narcotic?

ehrichweiss writes "The Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics is warning parents and teachers of a new threat to our children: sounds. Apparently kids are now discovering binaural beats and using them to get 'physiological effects.' The report goes on with everyone suggesting that such aural experiences will act as a gateway to drug usage and even has one student claiming there are 'demons' involved. Anyone who has used one of those light/sound machines knows all about the effects that these sounds will give and to state that they will lead kids to do drugs is nonsense at best. It seems the trend in scaring the citizens with a made-up problem has gone to the next level."

561 comments

  1. Seriously? by dmgxmichael · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot to the max ...

    1. Re:Seriously? by bunratty · · Score: 4, Funny

      Everyone knows dihydrogen monoxide is the real gateway drug. It's a proven fact that all drug addicts consumed significant quantities of the substance before turning to the harder stuff!

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    2. Re:Seriously? by Pojut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed.

      Listen, parents. Don't worry about drug use with your kids...altering consciousness is something that humans have taken part in for literally thousands of years.

      Drug use is no cause for concern, and in the case of some kids, it can open their minds and expand their horizons. No, what you need to be worried about is drug abuse.

      There is a very distinct difference.

    3. Re:Seriously? by blai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Listen,

      NO! I had been warned!

      --
      In soviet Russia, God creates you!
    4. Re:Seriously? by beanluc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      altering consciousness is something that humans have taken part in for literally thousands of years.

      If Oklahoma is going to regulate activities which entrain brainwaves, they need to target the pushers purveying prayer and even training young kids and defenseless elders in its practice.

      That's right, Oklahoma, go after the churches.

      --
      Say it right: "Nuc-le-ah Powah".
    5. Re:Seriously? by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

      it is indeed the worst from dependency standpoint, those who do quit imbibing it have 100% mortality rate!

    6. Re:Seriously? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      That's why I only use Oxygen Dihydride.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    7. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      binaural beats, what next disco!!!!

    8. Re:Seriously? by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      wondering where I can get me some of these sounds... Anybody got a dealer they trust to have clean headphones? I Don't share...

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    9. Re:Seriously? by Pojut · · Score: 5, Informative

      Source? I could name 14 people off the top of my head who I know personally that are currently drug users...and every single one of them have a full time job, a family, and would be considered to be financially and maternally/paternally successful.

    10. Re:Seriously? by tgatliff · · Score: 1

      You know... Making sounds illegal is soooo 8th century BC...

    11. Re:Seriously? by Pojut · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, education is key. EVERY parent with a teenage child needs to let their kids know about http://www.erowid.org./ It very well may save their children's life or one of their children's friend's life some day.

      Education and knowledge are unbelievably important. False statistics, fear-mongering, and hearsay only encourage kids to try it, minus the knowledge of how to remain as safe as possible.

    12. Re:Seriously? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>altering consciousness is something that humans have taken part in for literally thousands of years.

      Like sex. The whole purpose of the endorphins and other natural drugs the Human body releases is to alter the state of consciousness. (On the other hand some have tried to ban sex so maybe that's not a persuasive argument.)

      I think this "beward of dangerous sounds!" press release is clear indication that the government employees have too much time on their hands, and about 1/4th of them should be laid off.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    13. Re:Seriously? by Cryolithic · · Score: 1

      Keep on believing that. Don't forget that Alcohol, Nicotine, and Caffeine are drugs as well, and the first two kill way more people per year than any illegal drug, yet millions of people consume the legal ones with no detriment to their, or anyone else's safety, health, and well being.

    14. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like Coke...

    15. Re:Seriously? by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hey, DHMO is SERIOUS business.

    16. Re:Seriously? by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Geez..what happened to the good old days in the late 70's, when people would just light up a doobie and listen to Pink Floyd on the headphones...?

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:Seriously? by iter8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It used to be believed that drug use led to music. There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana usage. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others. Harry J. Anslinger (1892-1975) Assistant Prohibition Commissioner in the Bureau of Prohibition.

      Now we know better, it's the other way around - aural experiences will act as a gateway to drug usage.

    18. Re:Seriously? by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You say that like having a full time job, financial success, and parental status has anything to do with whether or not one has a dependency issue. See here for what I mean. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying your friends are addicts or have problems, just that the points you're making do not demonstrate that they aren't.

    19. Re:Seriously? by Pojut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My point was that you can't have a full time job, a healthy family life, and still be considered financially successful while also being a drug abuser.

      I don't see a dependency as being the same thing as being an abuser, though. Example:

      My soon-to-be wife can't get started in the morning without caffeine; she has a dependency on it. That being said, if we suddenly found ourselves low on money, she isn't going to sell our DVD player just so she can go to Starbucks.

    20. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Music has been long known (for like millenia) to alter moods - so how is it new and suddenly illegal?

      After listening to these binaural beats (wiki ftw), it sounds like the background in half the techno I've ever listened to :D

      Which brings another thought.. if you used these in techno music - would you be an illegal drug pusher in Oklahoma? And if you pirated a copy of the song, how would copyright work on that?

      Would that make RIAA like the ultimate drug pusher?

    21. Re:Seriously? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "You say that like having a full time job, financial success, and parental status has anything to do with whether or not one has a dependency issue. See here [nytimes.com] for what I mean. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying your friends are addicts or have problems, just that the points you're making do not demonstrate that they aren't."

      Hmm....you know, maybe I should get with a few friends of mine and discuss this....over a few drinks.

      :D

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re:Seriously? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Speaking of initializations, is LSD the new initialization for "Light and Sound Device"?

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    23. Re:Seriously? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get with the times man! Now days it is eating some Ecstasy tablets and listening to MGMT on your Bluetooth headphones.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    24. Re:Seriously? by rbochan · · Score: 1

      There's precedent. Oklahoma's the land of Tuttle, after all.

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    25. Re:Seriously? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Caffeine is a drug, yet 52% of people in the US (according to some random site I went to, but it's probably not far) consume it every day without negatively affecting their lives, for the great majority.

      *Some* drugs are very difficult to control, others aren't. Being informed about the effects they can have is important, instead of saying blanket statements like "all drugs are bad".

    26. Re:Seriously? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Damn those entertainers...

    27. Re:Seriously? by balbus000 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was hydroxic acid.

    28. Re:Seriously? by marcobat · · Score: 1

      I didn't think that have a full time job, a healthy family life, and still be considered financially successful was a possibility at all, with or without drug use.

    29. Re:Seriously? by wgoodman · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used to drink pure dihydrogen oxide, but now I've cut it down to only 60% pure, mixed with 40% alcohol to dilute it.

    30. Re:Seriously? by Z80xxc! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everyone knows dihydrogen monoxide is the real gateway drug. It's a proven fact that all drug addicts consumed significant quantities of the substance before turning to the harder stuff!

      Really? It's hard to find anything harder than the dihydrogen monoxide from around here...

    31. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how the timestamp on the iPhone they showed read- "4:20"

    32. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My niece likes it when i pick her up and spin her around so she gets dizzy.
      Should I be concerned that spinning is a gateway to harder stuff like cocaine?
      Should I be demanding that her daycare ban spinning or other dizziness inducing activities?

    33. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listening to Management? Who the hell listens to them!?

    34. Re:Seriously? by h3llfish · · Score: 1

      Hey, there are legitimate medicinal uses for dihydrogen monoxide! Plus, it just plain feels good when you drink some before Pink Floyd show! Why shouldn't I have the right to crack open a frosty cold bottle of DHMO after a hard days work? Don't judge me, you insensitive clod!

    35. Re:Seriously? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ozzy ozbourne himself said, "drug use makes you a shitty artist... I wrote my best stuff stone sober"

      And he is a far better expert at this than anyone else.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    36. Re:Seriously? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      What about snorting air?

      But seriously I think '5' is kinda overrated for that comment.

      Anyhow I think I read how the chances of people taking other drugs where 7 times higher among people who had drank alcohol and 10 times amount the people who had smoked tobacco. Just goes to show how ridiculous the "omg but cannabis is a gateway to heavier drugs!"-claim is.

      Acceptance and feeling comfortable with using drugs lead to an increase in drug usage!! News at eleven!

      Either you fix that by banning/not consuming them or you accept that people will get curious and want to expand their horizons even further.

    37. Re:Seriously? by csrjjsmp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Those who don't quit also have a 100% mortailty rate. You really can't win when it comes to drugs.

    38. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I KNEW IT!

      The RIAA are actually pushers subverting our youth. They'll have to be prosecuted to the max!

    39. Re:Seriously? by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the point being made is that many of the criteria for qualifying if someone is abusing something has to do with how it affects their ability to do everyday, necessary things. Take for instance sex. No one is going to say that sex is unhealthy, but when you pursue it to the exclusion of everything else, its an addiction or an abuse and takes on a clinical aspect. That is actually how professionals do draw the line between harmless habits and addictions. A little fuzzy, but a relatively straightforward way of looking at what represents an abuse.

      Of course, possession laws fly in the face of this common sense standard of what constitutes harm and that is yet another reason why drug laws need to be completely overhauled to emphasize avoiding harm to others caused by abuse as opposed to simply demonizing the person for happening to possess something that can't do any harm on its own.

    40. Re:Seriously? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      People frequently mix it with harder drugs too!

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    41. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUD. It's a way to seize power, now police have probable cause to stop and search you if you have an iPod, because you are obviously an iDoper.

    42. Re:Seriously? by DewDude · · Score: 1

      I agree. I've got no clue what these people are going on about. You realize if your kids drink half a bottle of Robotussin that's contains only DXM they'll go on a trip that'll make binaural beats like those from iDoser seem like child's play.

      But getting in to binarual beats specifically....it's been stated it's all perception of sound...and in fact, it's true. The human brain reacts differently person to person to each experience/chemical and the same holds true for binaural beats. When I was heavy in to studying sound we decided to run some tests with a random smattering of subjects. We had all various types of people in the test from all ages and such. What we found was exceedingly random. What we found was that some of the older generation...and kids that weren't used to shoving headphones in their ears were unable to really get the full effect of the binaural beats...while people who were accustomed to using headphones tended to have better results in hearing these things.

      Really it just boils down to the brain isn't usually used to binaural listening to begin with. It's more of a man-made thing just as a result of headphones....our ears aren't even really designed for normal stereo listening. If you even read some of the documents pertaining to these they even mention you may need a training period before you start expierenceing it. Now, for me personally....I've played with these things and they're VERY so-so. I seriously question some of the people that write reviews of these things claiming they're absolutely amazing...because the effect is marginal at best. It'll slow your brainwaves down...that's mostly it....and even then...just because I might slow my brainwaves down doesn't mean I'm going to have the same effect as the person next to me.

      This kind of FUD just angers me. It's just sound...you listen to a Beatles album with headphones and you'll get some binaural effects from that. Are we going to ban the White Album on account it MIGHT cause a few people who listen with headphones to feel like they've gotten some NO2? A lot of acoustic music that's features multiple guitars can cause binaural effects if it's mixed a specific way...in fact The Gourds' bluegrass cover of Ziggy Stardust is binaural enough to get rid of headaches. It's silly. Parents these days act like they don't know how to raise their kids and depend on the gov'ment to step in and avoid every single bad thing their kids might be messing with. You're the parent....take their freakin ipods away.

    43. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here is the TRUTH.

      http://www.monroeinstitute.org/research/binaural-beats-and-the-frequency-following-response/

        Mr Monroe was a Hollywood producer from the 50's who dropped out and retired and set-up an institute to study various PSI type things.
      His team discovered the technology of binaural beats sounds.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemi-Sync

      you REALLY should try them before you go to bed. They are a perfectly natural way to calm the brain.

    44. Re:Seriously? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Kids"

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    45. Re:Seriously? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      So by your logic, 99% of the population are drug addicts? Sound logic.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    46. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why middle aged women need jobs.

    47. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, without the "Mmmkay?" at the end of the statement ..."drugs are bad" no one will take you seriously

    48. Re:Seriously? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      If you are used to having a few cups of coffee every morning, try not having that coffee on the weekends and see how your head feels. You won't be talking about no negative effects then. I would certainly say physical withdrawal from any drug is a bad thing.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    49. Re:Seriously? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Most people my age and older I meet fondly remember the days of their youth including getting stoned at a Floyd concert and such. Most haven't lit up in years. They just lost interest.

      That's a far cry from 99% being unable to control drug use.

    50. Re:Seriously? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      That's a common misconception. The REAL problem is the hydrogen hydroxide that is always present in dihydrogen monoxide.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    51. Re:Seriously? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      It's hard to find anything harder than the dihydrogen monoxide from around here...

      So you must live in the southern hemisphere, right?

      Around here, the DHMO only qualifies as the hard stuff in January and February. But I do keep a supply of it in my freezer to help get us through the hot summer days.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    52. Re:Seriously? by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      It is a serious danger to our youth. They listen to this devil music and then become drug addicted liberals. As the Holy Bible says, "Those who listen to devil music and become drug addicted liberals will go to Hell." On a serious note, this stuff is pretty bad. By the time you drink enough liquor, smoke enough pot and eat enough pills to listen to the shit for more than 2 seconds, you are perilously close to an overdose. Common sense tells us we need to ban hearing in order to stop this dangerous new drug-like music. I am using this post to call upon my legislators to take the lead in battling this scourge and for them to file a bill calling for the repeal of hearing for anyone under the age of 21. Sounds are over-rated anyway.

    53. Re:Seriously? by ultramk · · Score: 1

      Take for instance sex. No one is going to say that sex is unhealthy, but when you pursue it to the exclusion of everything else, its an addiction or an abuse and takes on a clinical aspect. That is actually how professionals do draw the line between harmless habits and addictions. A little fuzzy, but a relatively straightforward way of looking at what represents an abuse.

      Ok, if it's only "a little fuzzy", then you are probably having sex with people of an inappropriate age, which would indeed be a serious problem.

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    54. Re:Seriously? by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      Yes, but no. He couldn't write when he was wasted, he had to wait until he was sober to make sense of it. Definitely wouldn't be Ozzy without teh durgs.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    55. Re:Seriously? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      No one is going to say that sex is unhealthy,

      Apart from the millions of prudes, wowsers and religious extremists who campaign against sex as being an evil that corrupts and enslaves humans?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    56. Re:Seriously? by abitowhot · · Score: 1

      No doubt.Gov abuse is the real problem.

    57. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what you need to be worried about is drug abuse

      Sure, but doesn't drug abuse start by tasting it?

    58. Re:Seriously? by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly, hydrogen hydroxide is just water.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    59. Re:Seriously? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Well after I made it through the 70s I wound up doing a lot of psychedelics in the 80s listening to the Butthole Surfers on my walkman, then came Cooledit96 in the 90s with the binaural beat authoring feature...

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    60. Re:Seriously? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I have done this, I am groggy for a couple hours. You want to see chemical dependence ask someone taking thyroid hormones what happens if they forget to take it. You are just as addicted, just your own body is making it.

    61. Re:Seriously? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      So go to the store before you run out. Intentionally not drinking coffee? Go ahead! That's not a problem most coffee drinkers have. If you need some, it's readily available.

      Was that hard?!

    62. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      Compare NIN's With Teeth album to the earlier Downward Spiral.

      If that is what straight & sober music sounds like, get back on the gear ASAP!

    63. Re:Seriously? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      When you are worthless for half a day due to raging headache, intense irritability over anything, and a general "out of it" feeling because some idiot forgot the coffee for the entire camping trip, you can quickly realize the depth of how much your body has come to depend on the caffeine. So in short, when you are 150 miles from the nearest store, coffee is not always "readily available". Your solution to addiction may be "just don't stop", but that isn't everybody's. If we were talking about heroin, would you offer the same advice?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    64. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure trying just one piece of homemade crack can't hurt anything.

    65. Re:Seriously? by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      I think the point being made is that many of the criteria for qualifying if someone is abusing something has to do with how it affects their ability to do everyday, necessary things

      That may indeed be what he meant, however in his original post (the one I replied to), his statement wasn't so discerning, so I was pointing out the often held misconceptions. While I do agree that it's not the amount of substance(s) that one is taking that determine whether or not one has "a problem", I would point out that it doesn't mean that one has to have large, major, and obvious impact in their life to indicate a problem.

      To your point, if someone is using something (drugs, alcohol, etc), it's true that it's really not a big deal so long as it's not negatively impacting that person (or other people's) life. This doesn't mean that the impact has to be dramatic though. That is, a person who drinks doesn't have to get several DUIs or lose his/her job due to drinking to indicate there is a problem. Lots of people fool themselves into thinking that they're "in control" of their drinking/drug use, when in fact they're not.

      Now to reiterate, I'm not suggesting that the OP's friends have problems, nor am I implying this about you or your friends. Rather pointing out the distinction that small, regular habits can indeed become problematic and can progress slowly over time. Just because you don't pull a David Hasselhoff and make a fool out of yourself doesn't mean you don't have some issues. Remember, most professionals agree, if you feel you have to "control" something or keep something "in check", you are at some level dealing with a dependency that you are choosing to resist. This doesn't mean that everyone who touches anything (drink/drugs) has problems, and I'm not suggesting a puritanical view, just that these things can be tricky.

    66. Re:Seriously? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Whiskey Tango Foxtrot.
      the part where it is an annoying damn sound, *that does not really do anything to you*
      go look at the wikipedia page for samples, its bull.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    67. Re:Seriously? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      so long as you don't mind annoying high pitched tones.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    68. Re:Seriously? by grrrl · · Score: 2, Funny

      My soon-to-be wife can't get started in the morning without caffeine; she has a dependency on it. That being said, if we suddenly found ourselves low on money, she isn't going to sell our DVD player just so she can go to Starbucks.

      I would! mmmm coffeee

    69. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sticking to hydronium diluted in water.

    70. Re:Seriously? by Archades54 · · Score: 1

      Parents and society still do their very best to keep the sex is bad message to the kids. If society embraced sex instead of keeping it as some dirty act things might change (women would probably enjoy it more due to the lack of insecurity over being "slutty). Kid's are always going to try some form of it at some point, kids are curious folk, best to do is keep them educated and don't act like it's some bad naughty thing to do (kids like to try the bad/naughty stuff to push boundaries, when it's not viewed as a way for rebellion then they probably won't care as much about trying).

      Problem is sex can still end up with a long term consequence even when taking contraceptives, and as a kid the ability to support a child is much lower than needed in many cases for today's society. Hell even 2 working parents struggle to afford children.

      --
      If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
    71. Re:Seriously? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Geez..what happened to the good old days in the late 70's, when people would just light up a doobie and listen to Pink Floyd on the headphones...?

      :)

      Nothing at all happened to it. My money's on these kids spliffing up and then when they got busted... "no mum it's... the MUSIC, I'm ... just listening to... this music, I haven't been taking... drugs or anything... it's the music that smells like weed... it's DRUG MUSIC".

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    72. Re:Seriously? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      You say that like having a full time job, financial success, and parental status has anything to do with whether or not one has a dependency issue.

      You say that like repeatedly indulging in any activity, even if doing so doesn't impact negatively on the rest of your life, is an indication of 'dependence' on that activity, rather than simply indication of a preference for a particular recreational activity.

      The article you linked is crazy.

      “People can be dependent and not have abuse problems at all. They’re successful students. They’re good parents, good workers. They watch their weight. They go to the gym. Then they go home and have four martinis or two bottles of wine. Are they alcoholics? You bet.”

      High-functioning alcoholics also may not be physically addicted to alcohol, abstaining for days or weeks without suffering withdrawal symptoms.

      Let's get this straight - we're talking about someone who likes occasionally drinking to excess, but can stop any time they want, can go weeks without ever feeling that they "need" a drink, and whose drinking doesn't impact on their professional or social lives. That's not an alcoholic. That's someone who enjoys getting drunk.

      The defining factor of any addict, alcoholism included, is the inability to stop. Someone who can reliably, repeatably demonstrate their independence from a substance is NOT an addict. The NYT article is merely a sensationalist attempt to drum up a moral panic and sell more books and rehab therapy.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    73. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ozzy doesn't write his music. Black Sabbath? Tony and Geezer. Early solo career? Bob Daisley and Randy Rhoades.

    74. Re:Seriously? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I'd let my coffee habit build up to 3-4 strong cups a day, and when it stopped helping me stay awake at my boring-ass old job, I quit. Friday I was drinking coffee, Monday I just didn't have any. By Tuesday I had a shit of a headache that lasted a couple of days. By the end of the week I was fine, though. Now I'll have maybe 2-3 cups of tea a day if that.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    75. Re:Seriously? by Dr.+Hellno · · Score: 1

      That was the hangover album. He got better.

    76. Re:Seriously? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Geez..what happened to the good old days in the late 70's, when people would just light up a doobie and listen to Pink Floyd on the headphones...?

      Because the man made my doobie unpopular and modern music is shit.

      Back in the 70's they used to play Kiss backwards and claim it was the devils voice. Today they play "Dude looks like a lady" backwards and we get the likes of Lady Ga Ga and Kesha.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    77. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've played some of my best shit on acid and or grass. Ozzy is taking heroin, that's his problem.

    78. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are worthless for half a day due to raging headache, intense irritability over anything, and a general "out of it" feeling because some idiot forgot the coffee

      This effect is very subjective; I do not experience it. I consume caffeine daily (200-300 mg in pill form, perhaps another 100mg in coffee/soda) because I have to get up for work earlier than I would like to. On the weekends, I usually don't take any caffeine or even drink coffee. I do not experience this headache or irritability you speak of. I simply sleep until 10 or 11am like I would naturally.

      In fact, the biggest problem I used to have with caffeine was the physiological side effect of drinking coffee -- it would often make me need to take a massive shit at undesirable times, like when I am at work. Or it could upset my stomach. Now that I take the pills, I don't get any of those side effects, just the desired alertness. Don't get me wrong -- I still enjoy my coffee, but I no longer need to drink massive quantities of it just to get my dose of caffeine. Just eat a pill and sip on a cup of coffee if I feel like it.

    79. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Kids"

      lol maybe it was the 70s that got the kids this way =p

    80. Re:Seriously? by Z80xxc! · · Score: 1

      It's hard to find anything harder than the dihydrogen monoxide from around here...

      So you must live in the southern hemisphere, right?

      Around here, the DHMO only qualifies as the hard stuff in January and February. But I do keep a supply of it in my freezer to help get us through the hot summer days.

      Not quite what I was referring to, but a clever reinterpretation ;)

    81. Re:Seriously? by riT-k0MA · · Score: 1

      ... and about 1/4th of them should be laid off.

      More like 3/4, in the case of most governments.

    82. Re:Seriously? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      informative?

      "Ozzy Osbourne: New Album First I've done Sober". CNN.com. 13 April 2007. http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Music/04/13/music.ozzy.reut/index.html

      cnn link dead, but cited here

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    83. Re:Seriously? by Hatman39 · · Score: 1

      Acceptance and feeling comfortable with using drugs lead to an increase in drug usage!! News at eleven!

      Nonsense! Case in point, the Netherlands. We have a hugely tolerant climate to all sorts of drugs, to the point where, say, a club cannot take your hard drugs away from you permanently (they have to give it back when you leave). And as a surprise, our drug usage is much lower than a lot of countries that have less tolerant attitudes towards it (like the US).

    84. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows dihydrogen monoxide is the real gateway drug. It's a proven fact that all drug addicts consumed significant quantities of the substance before turning to the harder stuff!

      Of course it is! What do you expect when dihydrogen includes the word 'drogen' which is the german word for drugs?! Now let me find my tinfoil hat..

    85. Re:Seriously? by MancunianMaskMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ..., if we suddenly found ourselves low on money, she isn't going to sell our DVD player just so she can go to Starbucks.

      that just proves that TV addiction is worse than the coffee addiction

    86. Re:Seriously? by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Ditto for pain. Even in some supposed civilised countries, you can only consent to being injured if it's for sporting reasons, rather than because you enjoy it.

    87. Re:Seriously? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      You're welcome at my place, but stay off the lawn and bring your own spliffs.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    88. Re:Seriously? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Everyone is different, I have one friend who gets the shakes and can't sleep if she drinks more than two cups in a day. I drink 8-10 cups a day during the week and often go without on weekends without any problems. I can also drink it straight before going to sleep. OTOH one glass of wine with lunch will put me to sleep for the rest of the day.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    89. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might be a far better expert in drug use, but considering that his best stuff is still rather shitty, I'm surprised he can tell the difference.

    90. Re:Seriously? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Trent Reznor hated the first album he wrote sober (With Teeth).

      It's certainly lost all of the edgyness the last albums had. It's almost a pop album. Year Zero was much better. Guess he just needed to find a different muse.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    91. Re:Seriously? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Nonsense!

      wtf .. It can't be nonsense. If you don't show an acceptance for it and aren't comfortable using them then you most likely won't ... I was talking about the user not the society.

      If you're "scared" of whatever drug, say alcohol, and never take it, chances are you would be even less likely to take something else. But if you drink alcohol, smoke tobacco, have tried say cannabis and amphetamine and someone offer you the chance to try something else out chances are you will try that to. Because it's not like the others killed you / seemed that bad / whatever.

      And as a surprise, our drug usage is much lower than a lot of countries that have less tolerant attitudes towards it (like the US).

      What that depends on you can't know for sure atm I assume. Personally I live in Sweden, I have no idea how the Netherlands do against Sweden. But once again I wasn't talking about society.

      Also the Netherlands is a very rich country, which of course USA is to, but maybe you have a more equal society with less people living "outside" it. Which eventually could have explained how more users are lost into drugs in the US.

    92. Re:Seriously? by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      But he might have gotten the inspiration when he wasn't sober.

      Why was he taking drugs in the first place? There was some tension in him that got him to do that. That tension, modified by drugs, created experiences and emotions that led him to express it through music. Quite possibly, no tension -> no drugs -> no music.

      That said, I agree that the *craft* of expressing music into sound and notes had to be undertaken while sober.

    93. Re:Seriously? by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      My point was that you can't have a full time job, a healthy family life, and still be considered financially successful while also being a drug abuser.

      So, what is abuse and who gets to define it? Wouldn't it be abuse when continued use adversely affects job, family, and health? If it doesn't affect these things, isn't it just heavy use?

      The article states this condition of abuse as saying, "they are high functioning, until something happens!" It's a little telling - one thing happening once does not make it a chronic occurrence. If I take Nyquil to help with allergies every now and then, and fell asleep at the wheel as a result, does that make me a high-functioning Nyquil abuser?

      Shit happens. If shit happens repeatedly, then it's time to articulate it as abuse. Otherwise, it's a mistake, or a moment of poor judgment. While it could be related to the usage, it doesn't necessarily have to be. Humans are flawed. They fuck up. Even non-users do.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    94. Re:Seriously? by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      Geez..what happened to the good old days in the late 70's, when people would just light up a doobie and listen to Pink Floyd on the headphones...?

      it's the same thing- you just get high from the headphones now and not the doobie

    95. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez..what happened to the good old days in the late 70's, when people would just light up a doobie and listen to Pink Floyd on the headphones...?

      :)

      The 80's.

    96. Re:Seriously? by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      In the 1980s they started downing E and listening to Art of Noise, that's what happened ;-)

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
    97. Re:Seriously? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      if we suddenly found ourselves low on money, she isn't going to sell our DVD player just so she can go to Starbucks.

      Of course not. A used DVD player would only get you half a cup of espresso.

    98. Re:Seriously? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      52% of people in the US (according to some random site I went to, but it's probably not far) consume it every day without negatively affecting their lives, for the great majority.

      Imagine those 52% NOT getting their coffee for a month.

    99. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      altering consciousness is something that humans have taken part in for literally thousands of years.

      If Oklahoma is going to regulate activities which entrain brainwaves, they need to target the pushers purveying prayer and even training young kids and defenseless elders in its practice.

      That's right, Oklahoma, go after the churches.

      agreed! Everyone needs to worry about themselves... stop worrying about kids having a euphoric feeling from listening to something. Might as well just ban euphoric feelings in general and get strait to the point. Damn communist country.

    100. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just what the hydrogen hydroxide manufacturing industry wants you to think.

    101. Re:Seriously? by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      Everyone has a 100% mortality rate.

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    102. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... go after the Eastern Religions which teach chanting. NOT prayer! (Your comment shows a lack of knowledge and a distinctly biggoted slant.)

      Thank you Mr. Pot.

    103. Re:Seriously? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Early Butthole Surfers make you feel like you are tripping even if you haven't ingested a thing. The first 3-4 albums are so good. And man, what a live show. First time I saw them was 1986 and it blew my mind.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    104. Re:Seriously? by stanlyb · · Score: 0

      No, you don't. Pure, clean water is poison for you.

    105. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Renowned British intellectual Aldous Huxley was one of the most important figures in the early history of LSD. He was a figure of high repute in the world of letters and had become internationally famous through his novels Crome Yellow, Antic Hay and his dystopian novel Brave New World. His experiments with psychedelic drugs (initially mescaline) and his descriptions of them in his writings did much to spread awareness of psychedelic drugs to the general public and arguably helped to glamorize their recreational use, although Huxley himself treated them very seriously.
      Huxley was introduced to psychedelic drugs in 1953 by a friend, psychiatrist Dr. Humphry Osmond. Osmond had become interested in hallucinogens and their relationship to mental illness in the 1940s and during the 1950s he made extensive studies of a number of drugs including mescaline and LSD. As noted above, Osmond had some remarkable success in treating alcoholics with LSD.
      In May 1953 Osmond gave Huxley his first dose of mescaline, at the Huxley home. In 1954 Huxley recorded his experiences in the landmark book The Doors of Perception; the title was drawn from a quotation by British artist and poet William Blake, and Huxley's book in turn was the source of the name of American rock band The Doors. Huxley tried LSD for the first time in 1955, obtained from "Captain" Al Hubbard.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_LSD

    106. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yer, from your linked article:

      "High-functioning alcoholics also may not be physically addicted to alcohol"

      So, in fact, they often aren't even alcoholics.

      I don't know what a dependency "issue" is. Sounds like a vague way of saying they're doing something which they "shouldn't".

    107. Re:Seriously? by o2sd · · Score: 1

      All debate/discussion/disagreement about drugs is pointless unless you use the scientific definition of a drug i.e. any substance that passes the blood-brain barrier. Without that definition, all discussion on drugs is useless. It should also be noted that the body itself produces a variety of drugs (that meet the scientific definition above) that we are most definitely 'addicted' to, such as melatonin, seratonin, adrenaline and endorphins, just to name a few.
      In fact, addiction to drugs produced by the body is how the DNA motivates the organism to survive and reproduce. In other words, addiction is both completely natural, and present in all humans (and most likely all mammals, and quite possibly all animals).
      So actually, the sound logic is to say that 100% of the population is addicted to drugs,

      --
      - Nothing to see hear.
  2. Further Down the Rabbit Hole by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Up until high school, I spent my entire life locked into an ideal Norman Rockwell painting. No cares, no worries and just high on life. Things took a turn for the worse one day when I picked up an 288 tuning fork and a 320 tuning fork. I struck them both against my leg and held one up near either ear.

    It was pure bliss. Like Jesus was just 32 hertz away from me. I wish I could describe the feeling. Like half of all the blades of grass in the universe were hummingbirds and the other half were bumble bees.

    Let's see--I was a freshman at that time. Yeah, things just went downhill from there. I had earrings made with a tuning fork hanging from each one. The left side was A440 and the right side was a custom 444. I could raise my fingers to either lobe and flick it for instant gratification. The other kids called it ear basing. I called it god. And he was just nineteen dollars and eighty cents on Amazon. By my sophomore year I was already pretty hard into Fourier transforms. Everyone's tympanic membrane had a bifurcation sweet spot that could be exploited with the right theoretical frequencies. Yeah, we would rent middle of nowhere motel rooms to smelt hematite down into custom tuning forks and poor them into clay molds in the bathtub. We paid in cash and by the time the cleaning made hit the room it was slag burns in the carpet and clay all over the place. You probably remember the 20/20 investigations following all the reports.

    Shit got real heavy real quick and one day we found Scrye (nickname for the metallurgist) hemorrhaging blood out of his ears in a coma from strapping two subwoofers to either side of his head with duct tape. I knew I had to get out, but how?

    We gathered up all our text books on math, audio & music theory, physics, chemistry, electronics and metalworking and burned them in the parking lot of the hospital we brought Scrye to. I would never read about science again.

    Parents, heed the images of those children getting 'innocent' highs from sounds and make sure they don't make the same mistake I did. This is just a gateway to bigger and badder things. If you find literature on Fourier Analysis, Electronics or Calculus in your child's bedroom, please get your child to Oklahoma and get them help from the nearest minister. I don't care if you have to lock them up in the basement against their will. Just make sure you save them from the same fate as I ... COMPLETE EAR DESTRUCTION!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Jester6641 · · Score: 1

      Bravo. Bravo. I mean, wow. Bravo.

      --
      Jester

      Warning: This sig may be legally binding in England.
    2. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's one of the greatest posts ever. hall of fame material. years from now we will read this again on slashdot classic.

      w

    3. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was just... that... I mean. Wow.

      I'm glad I was here for that.

    4. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Dancindan84 · · Score: 1

      If there was ever a time that Funny should affect your Karma, this is it. You made my day. /bow

      --
      "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
    5. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by chooks · · Score: 1

      Chapeau.

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    6. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Guru80 · · Score: 1

      So glad I stopped by to catch that...funniest thing I have read here in months!

    7. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by poena.dare · · Score: 1

      *applause*

      nicely done

    8. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by copponex · · Score: 1

      Cheers. Posts like that are why I still read slant point.

    9. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG. I would say that you owed me one post-coffee-spewage keyboard, but after the belly laughs you gave me, I think I owe you a beer!

      THANK YOU.

    10. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      You sir are my new hero!

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    11. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by severoon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So full of win.

      BTW, I just spent the last 5 minutes getting high off of the wikipedia article on binaural beats, which includes audio of two examples. I am naturally skeptical of anything that claims to alter human consciousness. While I did not experience an awakening to the presence of the spirit plane or anything like that, I admit that I feel a weird emptiness behind my eyeballs, and it feels like the bridge of my nose is stuffed with cotton.

      Something definitely happened in my brain.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    12. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I knew there was a reason I read this idle article. You win the internet forever.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    13. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by jcampbelly · · Score: 1

      Beautiful = )

    14. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I found that article several months back and figured that the 10 Hz sample would probably help me sleep. I didn’t notice anything terribly drastic but I did find it extremely relaxing (as long as it wasn’t so loud to be distracting... and yes, I used earphones).

    15. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by shakezula · · Score: 1

      "It was pure bliss. Like Jesus was just 32 hertz away from me."

      Thank you, this is the best post of 2010.

      --
      I know what you're thinking. Did I forward 65,535 packets or 65,536 packets?
    16. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Just remember--one day at a time, brother. One day at a time.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    17. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      get yourself a copy of Gnaural or SBAGen and play around with the different programs. i frequently drift off to sleep with one running in my ears, and have noticed i seem to sleep fewer hours and feel more refreshed. also good for naps and creative boosts.

      oh, and *slow-clap* to the gp. well done, sir.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    18. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by QRDeNameland · · Score: 3, Funny

      Things took a turn for the worse one day when I picked up an 288 tuning fork and a 320 tuning fork. I struck them both against my leg and held one up near either ear. It was pure bliss. Like Jesus was just 32 hertz away from me.

      That's only the beginning. I tried it with a 398 tuning fork and a 440 tuning fork and discovered the Ultimate Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    19. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled "pour".

    20. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one is pretty crazy... Listened to the whole thing any found myself zoning out. Then I got up to get a drink...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpGL7Ba8kA0

    21. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I am naturally skeptical of anything that claims to alter human consciousness.

      Not even a hammer blow to the head?

      I experimented with a binaural beats generator several years ago. Nothing happened as far as I can tell, but I didn't expect anything either.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    22. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad you were hear for that.

    23. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best... comment ... ever..

    24. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I am naturally skeptical of anything that claims to alter human consciousness.

      Not even a hammer blow to the head?

      The real danger that they're worried about comes from the aural/mental stimulation called "education".

      In many people's minds, that's much more damaging to your consciousness than things like music or a blow to the head.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    25. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      You, sir, win the Internet.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    26. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Shit got real heavy real quick and one day we found Scrye (nickname for the metallurgist) hemorrhaging blood out of his ears in a coma from strapping two subwoofers to either side of his head with duct tape.

      Same story as always. The scene starts out all pure and idealistic, and then goes commercial and the sell-outs ruin it.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    27. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by sqldr · · Score: 1

      i frequently drift off to sleep with one running in my ears

      I read that as "in my cars". I'm bloody glad I read it again :-)

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    28. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried it, and it did about the same as last time I tried I-Doser, very little. It feels weird for a few minutes near the beginning, and then near the end, and thats about it. Wish it did more for me. And yes, I know how one is supposed to do it.

    29. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by dmiller · · Score: 1

      I have been reading Slashdot for a long time, but I have to say that this was easily the best comment I have ever seen here. Well done.

    30. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by tibit · · Score: 1

      Care to tell me how the fsck am I going to clean the pee off the recliner?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    31. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Forking awsome post.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    32. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      The wikipedia article lists the brain waves associated with certain states of consciousness. Aiming for those might be what produced the effects you describe. Might be worth researching.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    33. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      there seems to be a good bit of research on it (check out The Monroe Institute). the basic program i usually go with is a modified version of the base program that comes with Gnaural. it's a drop from alpha to deep sleep, with some tiny spikes every few minutes to keep you(me) from just dozing right off. it runs for forty-five minutes or so, then hangs out on delta waves. generally i "wake up" enough around here to take off headphones and nod back off. i find i sleep through the whole night more consistently, with less sleep required. i've had a few friends report similar results.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    34. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I must be doing it wrong. I'm listening to the Binbeats2.ogg file at my desk (getting high at work! Who would have thought :D ) and all I hear is electronic popping in the background over some dodgy transporter sound effects from 1980's Star Trek. I occasionally get negative interference waves, but much higher than the frequencies the article describes. Into the hundreds of hertz.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  3. What? by fortapocalypse · · Score: 1

    Sorry I couldn't hear you... I was listening to drugs.

    1. Re:What? by tom17 · · Score: 1

      I was just listening to Drukqs actually.

      You try listening to Aphex Twin - Mt Saint Michel + Saint Michaels Mount.

      In the last 10 seconds of that, stuff really does happen to my brain.

    2. Re:What? by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      You try listening to Aphex Twin - Mt Saint Michel + Saint Michaels Mount.

      Somewhat related (and if you're feeling experimental), let me recommend Sunn O))). Their newest CD Monoliths and Dimensions is admittedly an acquired taste, but if you can get into the zone, it's pretty interesting stuff.

    3. Re:What? by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, yeah.. no.

      Not for me lol, but thanks for the heads up :)

  4. Level Upper by Megane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So now they're going to be carrying around level_upper.mp3 on their iZunes?

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Level Upper by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      No you didn't....

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    2. Re:Level Upper by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna report you for drug facilitation.

    3. Re:Level Upper by squallbsr · · Score: 1

      Awesome!! A Certain Scientific Railgun - Long Live Anime!!

      --
      Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
    4. Re:Level Upper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like my tinnitus.

      The headphones - they do nothing!

    5. Re:Level Upper by drawlight · · Score: 1

      Going to load this on my TI-994/A and see what the program is right now.

    6. Re:Level Upper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I listened to that and all I got was a headache.

      On a completely unrelated note, why do things keep floating off my desk?

  5. Do it! by gandhi_2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I sing because I live with Satan.

    1. Re:Do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some dick head out there just waiting to mod funny posts as troll because they hate the world. It's a joke obviously, sheesh.

    2. Re:Do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sing because I live with Satan.

      be the sad one whose power is Satan.

  6. The Gateway Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the brown noise, then the jenkem... poor kids!

  7. Jenkem by DIplomatic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This reminds me of that story from a couple years ago where news media reported that kids were getting high on human feces. Jenkem

    1. Re:Jenkem by schon · · Score: 1

      That's just shitty. /me ducks

    2. Re:Jenkem by sconeu · · Score: 1

      We must obviously forbid people from creating human feces!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Jenkem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, getting high off human feces does not work? I have been trying this whole time and NOW someone tells me...

    4. Re:Jenkem by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd think it obvious that that shit is bad for you...

    5. Re:Jenkem by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      Or the south park cheesing episode ...

    6. Re:Jenkem by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Shit happens.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:Jenkem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did someone play the "brown note" dude?

  8. OMG Stereo! by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kids these days getting high on new beats! The sky is falling!
    Back in my day it was only Techno and we walked to school, uphill both ways. Now get off my lawn.

    1. Re:OMG Stereo! by tool462 · · Score: 1

      Jeez! Back in my day, we didn't even have Techno. We only had Pink Floyd, and that's the way we liked it!

    2. Re:OMG Stereo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG Kids....

      First it was "Jazz", this god-less music which makes people loose all inhibitions and shake their bodies.

      Then it was "Rock and Roll" OMG, the Beatles are eroding any human decency, girls screaming and throwing their naked bodies on the stage

      Next was Hardrock, encoded demonic messages, "backwards recording" or devil worshipping cults.

      then techno, now iDosing

      oh my god, the sky is falling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      I guess every generation needs something evil to justify societal pressures and conformity.

      NOW get off my lawn!

    3. Re:OMG Stereo! by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Well... Pink Floyd and acid.

    4. Re:OMG Stereo! by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 1
      I'm told that 18 Hz is the resonant frequency of the eyeball and can cause hallucinations. I like to include it in my music, but my speakers only go down to 20 or so...

      Steve

      --
      Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
    5. Re:OMG Stereo! by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Hagar the Horrible: "Son, you kids have it easy. When I was little we slept on rocks!"
      Son: "Dad, we sleep on rocks too."
      Hagar: "Yes but our rocks were harder."

  9. Ummm.... by al0ha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "It seems the trend in scaring the citizens with a made-up problem has gone to the next level."

    Yeah no kidding, and you know why? People on Madison Ave. make huge money figuring out ways to sell more useless products to the populace. It has been proven that fear and uncertainty can significantly drive sales. Don't believe me? Google "fear drives sales"

    --
    Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
    1. Re:Ummm.... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Don't believe me? Google "fear drives sales"

      I might get a virus. Would you do it and paste the results? I can pay you a bit.

    2. Re:Ummm.... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Don't believe me? Google "fear drives sales"

      I'm not falling for your so-called "Google" scam. Stop trying to scare me into buying more useless products.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  10. sox ? by dougmc · · Score: 1

    Does that mean /usr/bin/sox and xmms would be the new drug paraphernalia?

  11. Anything that alters consciousness is a narcotic? by killdashnine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This kind of insanity is just plain stupid. Binaural beats have a documented psycho-dynamic effect ... programs like Hemi-Sync are intriguing. I don't think people are going to get "high" off of them though. But what if they do? If binaural beats are made illegal and deemed "narcotic", then the "drug war" is more about denying people access to their own minds.

  12. Band? by dtmos · · Score: 3, Funny

    As this beating phenomenon is used by musicians the world over to tune their instruments, I now predict a great increase in high school band participation.

    1. Re:Band? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      No, silly, band will be illegal. It'll be the "gateway" to music.

      It could lead to dancing.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:Band? by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      Man, now I've got that stupid Kevin Bacon movie in my head.

    3. Re:Band? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Did you know that everyone's binaural frequencies are separated by Kevin Bacon's by only 6Hz? No, really, it's true!

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Band? by Target+Practice · · Score: 1

      The raids will look a bit different in coming years: Police storming the halls of the worst-rated high school bands in the nation, clarinets confiscated, tuning slides checked to make sure the second chair's isn't pulled too far out compared to first chair's.

      Welcome to the age of new bad ass drug pushers: poorly tuned clarinetists. The first high-school concert is always free.

      --
      There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
    5. Re:Band? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      It was like this one time at band camp ....

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  13. April Fools? by arbiterveritas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't stop laughing. This is hysterically stupid and, well, I had to check the calendar to make sure I wasn't three months ahead...

    Nope! Not April 1st... Okay, that makes them taking this seriously a little more scary...

    1. Re:April Fools? by SiaFhir · · Score: 1

      Didn't you know? July 15 is the new April 1.

    2. Re:April Fools? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      On the internet, every day is April 1.

    3. Re:April Fools? by BlendieOfIndie · · Score: 1

      Uncontrollable laughter? Time distortion?

      Time to take off your headphones, brah. I don't want to call for an intervention.

    4. Re:April Fools? by arbiterveritas · · Score: 1

      Is it bad that I've got the headphones on while I'm posting? Should I wait an hour before getting back on the internet?

  14. did today suddenly become April 1st? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    huh??!

  15. It gets worse by luckyXIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bet they're sitting around drinking beverages heavily laced with dihydrogen monoxide, too.

    --
    Some people have it coming - I'm just the delivery system.
    1. Re:It gets worse by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      The "Score:4, Interesting" mod scares me a little, because I'm not entirely sure whether or not it's really a joke. :/

  16. When I was a kid... by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    ... there were people saying Dungeons & Dragons would lead to devil worship. That used natas to crack me up!!!!

    1. Re:When I was a kid... by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      You mean it doesn't? Damn it! DAMN IT! After so many years... Why didn't anyone tell me?

    2. Re:When I was a kid... by jcoy42 · · Score: 1
      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
  17. Cooll Edit anyone? by jjoelc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone else ever mess with the "Brainwave Syncronizer" In Cool Edit?

    I suffer from occasional severe insomnia, and burning a full CD that gradually slowed the binaural beats down into the deep sleep stage was the ONLY non-narcotic solution to ever work.

    Sad to realize all these years later, the only reason it worked is because it was my gateway to ambien...~

    1. Re:Cooll Edit anyone? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 3, Funny

      ambien..t music, right?

    2. Re:Cooll Edit anyone? by bunratty · · Score: 1

      I have a light-sound machine (or mind machine) that has some sleep programs. They all progress from 10 Hz down to 1-2 Hz. They've always been able to put me to sleep within about 30 minutes.

      I wonder how many people will now experiment with mind machines and dreamachines now that they're in the news. Can anyone say Streisand Effect?

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  18. what wacko out there actually beleives this? by freeballer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'll be honest. I'm going to go an listen to some.. But how is this news?
    its neer been proven audio/radio waves have any effect on anything.. Let alone the human mind
    we can't even have a consensus on cell phone = cancer and I'm suppost to take this seriously?
    I think the kids are mind-f--king their parents and seeing how !@#$% stupid they are.
    This is why the states and all over the world can't find a \\sensible\\ drug policy. Too many
    wackos stirring up stupid bull-sh-t. Instead of pointing and laughing at their stupidity
    somehow these "people" are taken seriously

  19. They are a real thing that do kinda work by easterberry · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Binaural Beats" actually do produce pysiological effects by stimulating certain parts of the brain, but they're pretty weak in my experience, slight lethargy or increased heart rate at best. I know some people who are highly susceptible to them and get strong effects but even they find them to be too much trouble for the effect and only used them a few times as a novelty.

    that said, the idea that they could work as a gateway to drugs isn't TECHNICALLY without merit. Trying these could lead to wanting to see what the real drug they're supposed to be emulating is like. But you're just as, if not more, likely to want to try drugs after watching Dazed and Confused than listening to binaural

    1. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's questionable how much of that is actually real, and how much of it is the placebo effect. At least for the ones I've seen, the advertised precision was more than what normal audio equipment is capable of. Meaning that the signal might be there, but it couldn't be reproduced as it was beyond what the range of frequencies that speakers could do.

    2. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm... what?

      30 seconds of steady 10 Hz binaural beats with background white noise – the sound is in stereo, and the two channels play slightly different frequencies (10Hz difference, which corresponds to brainwaves in the Alpha range ... relaxation, pre-sleep and pre-wake drowsiness). You can’t hear that difference?

    3. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      "Binaural Beats" actually do produce pysiological effects

      >>> import binauralbeats
      Traceback (most recent call last):
          File "", line 1, in
      ImportError: No module named binauralbeats

      I call bullshit. Nothing pysiological about it.

    4. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by stanleypane · · Score: 1

      When I was a small child, my friends and I would spin around in circles until we were so dizzy we could barely walk and we'd fall over on the lawn. We'd call this feeling Dizzy-land and it was something we'd do regularly. Someone would shout, let's all go to Dizzy-land and everyone knew exactly what to do.

      Even at the naive age of 5 or 6 we were well on our way to altering our consciousness without the use of any other substance other than our own brain. It is human nature to want to alter your consciousness. Life itself is the only real gateway to any drug.

    5. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by easterberry · · Score: 1

      was this just a workaround to point out a typo or are you honestly claiming that you understand something you have never seen heard or experienced on any meaningful level? Even if you had scientific backing for your skepticism (which I notice from your lack of linkage that you don't seem to) the best you could say is that the effects it produces are placebos. You can't discount their entire existence because it sounds unlikely to you or because I left out an h.

      well you CAN but it makes you an ignorant moron no better than the anti-evolution crowd.

    6. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by easterberry · · Score: 1

      True. But these sound files are given names like "cocaine" "heroin" "marijuana". They are clearly meant to be trying to emulate the experience of the drugs. I read another article about these where the author made the point that for what they do they SHOULD have names like "relaxation", "energy" etc.

      The gateway argument therefore is that they're marketed as a safe version of drugs that might lead people to try out the real thing, like a demo or something. As I said in my OP, I don't think they're any more of a gateway than a movie where people on drugs have a good time. I'm in no way saying these should be illegal, my post was mostly because everyone else commenting seemed to be of the opinion that these were basically songs that parent's were freaking out about as opposed to an actual scientifically tested method specifically designed to create certain mental and physical effects in the listener.

    7. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      Nha, just attempting to turn a typo into a joke :)

      Nice over-the-top rant, though. Sounds like you need a dose of the good stuff you're preaching about ;)

    8. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by stanleypane · · Score: 1

      Since when are these being marketed? Is someone selling these sounds and giving them these drug names?

      It would seem to me that these binaural audio bits are being created and freely distributed by curious individuals. These same individuals are probably trying their best to describe the sensations to others in a way that they can relate. Obviously, an underground segment of users finds it easiest to relate these feelings by comparing them to drug experiences they've already had.

      As with most things, someone found this fringe group of people using these binaural beats in a manner related to drug use and immediately blew it out of proportion.

      The only gateway I see here is a gateway to hysteria.

    9. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      When I was a small child, my friends and I would spin around in circles until we were so dizzy we could barely walk and we'd fall over on the lawn. We'd call this feeling Dizzy-land and it was something we'd do regularly.

      I'm sure you know now that it was only a gateway to bulimia.

      --
      That is all.
    10. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by krinderlin · · Score: 1

      On the front page it says "Earn BIG MONEY selling I-Doser Digital Drugs with our DEALER PROGRAM". At the bottom, it has links to "Exotic Bud", "Mood Pills", and "Legal Hash". Finally, a click into the iPod section gives you mixes named Marijuana, Cocaine, Opium, and Peyote. The more I research this the more I can see where the hysteria would come from. I-Doser.com has opened up a can of worms with this marketing. Unfortunately, no one will seperate the marketing from the science, and it'll continue to cause mass hysteria.

      I'm vaguely reminded of a 60-Minutes story on those plastic "jelly" bracelets and teenage sex.

    11. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by stanleypane · · Score: 1

      Well, color me stupid -- I had no idea someone was trying to sell these. Big surprise, I didn't RTFA -- for shame! I'd heard about these binaural beats years ago so I didn't really delve to deep into this hysteria to form my opinion.

      Regardless, I've never bought into the gateway theory at any level and just because some entrepreneurial person(s) is trying to exploit this phenomenon as an alternative to drugs doesn't change that. I could start selling dandelions online and market them as an alternative high and it wouldn't change the reality of the situation a bit -- only the perspective.

      I stand firmly behind my statement that life itself is the only real gateway to drugs. Maybe these fucktards should get on that bandwagon and start banning pregnancies and we can do away with all these idiots once and for all :)

    12. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      We should ban sugar. Every known drug user consumed sugar before they started to use drugs. Hell, it'll solve a lot of other problems too. Hitler ate sugar. You don't want to turn out like Hitler, do you?

      Really, how insane as a society are we that a government agency can put out a warning about sound being used like a drug, and not have it be some stupid intern's idea of a funny joke?

    13. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by dpilot · · Score: 1

      To the person who is inclined to use drugs, ANYTHING is a gateway to drug usage. (Including, as others have mentioned, DHMO.)

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    14. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      that said, the idea that they could work as a gateway to drugs isn't TECHNICALLY without merit

      It is 100% without merit. The idea of gateway anything is just a theory for starters and one based on the logical fallacy slippery slope. Not only that it is dependent on the correlation causation fallacy as well. So yes, it is 100% without merit.

    15. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by easterberry · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I can buy into the gateway theory a bit in that it was my pot dealer who first got me try other drugs. Had I never smoked pot I wouldn't have gone from nothing to Shrooms or E but because I knew the guy and I trusted him and he'd been my dealer for awhile I figure, "Sure, I'll try it, I mean, it's free and it'll be a fun weekend with my mates, not like I'll start doing it regularly."

      I think pot is a gateway drug BECAUSE it's illegal. If they legalized it and it became like beer and smokes then there would be no easy access into illegal substances. It's harder to get someone who only drinks or smokes to try hard drugs than someone who's already made a mental concession that they're willing to break the law for pot. It's basically that pot isn't dangerous enough for a lot of people to really be considered a danger enough not to do it but it creates a mental precedence in them that their dealer can play up.

    16. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by easterberry · · Score: 1

      everyone is inclined to drug use. Almost everyone at LEAST drinks alcohol, drinks beer or smokes cigarettes. And if they don't they take advil when they have headaches. Painkillers when they're hurt, etc etc. The only people who don't are the homeopaths and they only get out because they're dumb enough to believe water can do the same thing.

    17. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by easterberry · · Score: 1

      that's a strawman. Did you even RTFA? The audio files are being sold and marketed as a drug substitute/legal high and have names like "cocaine" and "heroin. If someone started selling sugar as "the legal cocaine: guaranteed rush" it'd raise some protests as well.

    18. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by easterberry · · Score: 1

      It's a theory with studies that both support and denounce it and while it uses the same principle as the slippery slope that doesn't invalidate it. You can't use guilt by association to discredit any argument involving gradiation. If someone watches the Dr. Horrible Singalong Blog and they enjoy it, they're more likely to go out and watch a full television series by Whedon. It's not a slippery slope, it's common sense. If someone listens to an mp3 called "cocaine" that advertises as "producing similar effects to actual cocaine" (as the audio files in question are and do) and they enjoy it they are more likely to try actual cocaine.

      I am not saying they should be outlawed. That would be dumb. I am saying that the concept that they might make some users more likely to try actual drugs is not completely ridiculous.

    19. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      That assumes users are idiots and don't take into account the health effects of real drugs. There are no consequences (other than opportunity costs) for liking Dr. Horrible and then finding Firefly. There are consequences for liking the effects of consuming a mind altering substance and then trying something stronger; i.e. death. So the idea of a gateway "drug" is still bogus. What you are describing is advertising and is not the same thing. Awareness != consumption.

    20. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by easterberry · · Score: 1

      First off, I assume a lot of people are idiots. Second off, it's more like a free sample than advertising. Third off, humans are spectacularly bad at factoring long term health effects into decision making processes. Look at the number of people who smoke as an example. Also, it's Gateway != being pushed through the gateway. Think more, showing someone where the gateway is and then showing them a specially chosen sneak peek of what's on the other side

      As for the heath effect argument: what about the audio file called "pot"? it's very easy to argue that the consequences of marijuana are all but nonexistent and, in fact, there are health benefits. I can show you dozens of people that say exactly that. Now the consequences are much less severe the audio file could increase the chance of the people trying an illegal substance.

    21. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by dpilot · · Score: 1

      My wife's drug of choice is chocolate. She's a rabid anti-smoker (grew up in a smoking home, and won't stand for it in her own) and drinks water, fruit juice, and milk.

      But you did include "Almost" in that sentence.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    22. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by easterberry · · Score: 1

      And that is WHY I included almost. My point is that the majority of the population engages in drug use of some sort and I'd go so far as to say the majority, though less vast engages, at least occasionally, in recreational drug use (including alcohol and cigarettes). Seeking pleasure and taking the easiest route are both inherent to human nature and mood altering substances cater to both of these things.

    23. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      None of the things you mentioned should be illegal. They are all soft drugs.

    24. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I'm having a problem with "human nature" these days. I don't think in its current implementation it's good enough to see our society through the end of the century, if even that far.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    25. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      There's an energy drink currently on the shelves called "Cocaine". It's available in 49 states. No one cares. If we follow your logic, we should ban running because it leads to "runner's high".

    26. Re:They are a real thing that do kinda work by easterberry · · Score: 1

      Right, that's 2 brazen strawmans in a row. I'm done with you.

  20. Thread over. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1
    No need to read further.

    Thanks for saving me time.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

  21. This is ridiculous by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

    I don't even know where to start. The whole news item is full of holes. Basically a load of bollocks. The whole concept is ridiculous, it's like that H20 hydrogen dioxide website. The language is so slanted ' luring kids' etc. oh dear. I seriously beleive If I lived in the states I could not watch american TV. It's just so absurd, and sensationalist, along with outright propaganda and annoying pronunciation of words. GRRRRRR Agh it makes me angry. How can people be so fucking thick.

    1. Re:This is ridiculous by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I do live in the US, and avoid TV as much as possible. Love Dr Who and Chuck though, but beyond that, not much on tv interests me, and the good things usually get canceled.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:This is ridiculous by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 1

      H20

      Yes, Icosahydrogen always gets a bad rap from people who don't understand chemistry!

      --
      I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
  22. The Sixties just called... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...they want their banana peels back.

    rj

  23. The real problem by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    The real problem is those damn placebos. Let children get started on them, and before you know it, they'll be stealing televisions to pay for their next fix of sugar pills.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  24. Brown Note by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Well surely if music can make you high then the myth of the brown note cant really be a myth. Seriously if they believe that someone should just come up with one that plays backwards and tell the concerned parents that it will sober their kids up.

    Cant wait to see mythbusters get ahold of this one.

    1. Re:Brown Note by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's well established that this works, in both directions. I'd rather not get into the neurophysics.

  25. Confession of a Pusher by Beardydog · · Score: 3, Funny

    My friend and I used to sit on opposite sides of another friend and sing a falsetto "oooooo" at slightly different frequencies. Her annoyance was entertaining at the time, but now I can't help but worry what kind of life we got her into. She's probably dead in a gutter somewhere, in a pair of studio headphones.

    1. Re:Confession of a Pusher by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      My friend and I used to sit on opposite sides of another friend and sing a falsetto "oooooo" at slightly different frequencies.

      Sounds like Beach Boys to me.

    2. Re:Confession of a Pusher by Swampash · · Score: 1

      Try and whistle a tune in unison with someone.

      Anyone who cracks up laughing while doing this is obviously a hardcore user and should be reported to the authorities.

  26. Obligatory by Chagatai · · Score: 1

    This one time, at band camp, I took a flute and Suzy took a flute, and we blew two notes where the difference was 15Hz and we got high.

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Be honest. I've been to band camp, and those weren't flutes you and Suzy were blowing.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      be REAL honest... his name wasn't "Suzy" either...

    3. Re:Obligatory by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Skin flutes are a kind of flute...

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  27. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If binaural beats are made illegal and deemed "narcotic", then the "drug war" is more about denying people access to their own minds.

    This is what the drug war has *always* been about. The rest of you are just now starting to figure it out.

    "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." - Bill Hicks

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  28. mandatory ROYKSOPP by pigwiggle · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Hello?"
    "Yeah it's me ... I wanna give you some good frequencies .. 1710, 2.6, 2245...'
    "Yeah?"
    "... 3032, 400 .. "
    "Four hundred?"
    "Yeah."
    "I'm coming right over!"
    "Do that."

    --
    46 & 2
  29. Troll by pyster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm certain that the ppl at slashdot understand that is complete bullshit and have just posted it to see what kinda responses they would get.

    1. Re:Troll by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know it's bullshit. You know it's bullshit. Probably the vast majority of people on Slashdot know it's bullshit. But I'm not completely convinced that the people in charge of regulating drugs know that it's bullshit; and that's a bit scary (and incidentally the point of posting it here).

    2. Re:Troll by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      They don't care whether or not it's bullshit, they care whether or not it's popular. Previous politicians demonized drugs and subsequently banned them as a way to show they were keeping people safe. Now the public believes they are dangerous, and so current politicians must legislate based on that perception.

      That said, I think taking either extreme (all drugs are bad / no drugs should be illegal) is being disingenuous. I think we need clear methodology for determining what should and should not be illegal based on specific patterns of usage, physiological effects, etc. There will always be people who make mistakes and hurt themselves or others, but if that's not sufficient grounds for banning alcohol, then it's not sufficient grounds for banning, say, acid or mushrooms.

  30. Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics needs to upgrade by ribuck · · Score: 1

    I think it's funny that at 0:46 in the video they get the message "Please upgrade to a modern browser".

  31. Probably marketing BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wired has been known to run "news" that was actually marketing for a movie

  32. Intro to Binaural Beats by TheDarkener · · Score: 5, Informative

    I made this video a while back - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weOpxELqn-c - I've done a lot of research on binaural beats. They are used to calm the mind and promote a lower brain operating frequency that is akin to relaxation or meditation. Some people say it's a placebo effect, others use it to promote a state of calm in their minds as they try to rid themselves of the daily thought process (many, many thoughts coming in and out of your head very quickly, which is associated with high brain frequencies). Trying to demonize BBs would be like trying to demonize meditation...which I'm sure isn't too far off.

    I guess the fear surrounding what people don't understand will never go away. I suggest a split in civilization - let the smarties burrow deep into the soil and the dummies can fry up at the surface.

    Sorry for the strange comment, I'm high on binaural beats. :p

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Intro to Binaural Beats by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Funny

      After experiencing a few, I can say that I've started to get a sense of euphoria after I listen to them. More to the point, I'm just really glad the damn noise stopped.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:Intro to Binaural Beats by sribe · · Score: 1

      Trying to demonize BBs would be like trying to demonize meditation...which I'm sure isn't too far off.

      Only if by "not too far off" you mean "already done, multiple times, in multiple school districts" ;-)

    3. Re:Intro to Binaural Beats by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      We're talking Oklahoma... meditation is already demonized. After all, it's associated with Buddhism and all that other satanic stuff... :p

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:Intro to Binaural Beats by CreatorOfSmallTruths · · Score: 1

      HUH!! My thoughts exactly :-)

      I wonder if antidepressants have anything to do with different levels of susceptibility to this stuff...

    5. Re:Intro to Binaural Beats by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      If it makes someone think, I'm sure that there's someone out there that wants to ban it. I am absolutely certain that there are people (and not just out in the middle of Bumfuck, Texas) that want anything that doesn't actively involve worshiping their very specific god to be illegal, and everything else should lead to prison (or probably death). There's probably a few dozen politicians at the national stage who think this way, or at least pretend to in order to get power. And somehow, we're supposed to come to a reasonable consensus with this kind of person. Fucking nuts.

    6. Re:Intro to Binaural Beats by Schadrach · · Score: 1

      Are you saying we shouldn't ban meditation? I mean, once you are practiced at it, it is possible to induce ecstatic states through meditation, which makes it the same thing as heroin, cocaine, or ecstasy, right?

    7. Re:Intro to Binaural Beats by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I guess the fear surrounding what people don't understand will never go away.

      It's justified. Back in the seventies everybody was into strobe lights and using them in theater productions left and right. Until people started falling over.

      The law of unintended consequences could still be at work here.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  33. Damn you mathematics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cos(a) * cos(b) = ( cos(a - b) + cos(a + b) ) / 2

    1. Re:Damn you mathematics! by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

      the church always said you should be wary of the demons trying to steal your soul with illusions of truth like science. only choir boys can truly lift your spirit to heaven.
      with their heavenly voices, offcourse.
      nice, calming voices.
      nice, soothing sounds...

      --
      new sig
  34. Means to an end by U8MyData · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like a ploy to get rid of Cell phones, mp3 players, etc. from campus to me. There is a motivation here other than what is being delivered as with most things today. Redirection and NAT are being employed to shuttle popular opinion to a place where it does not need to be. Just my 2c...

    1. Re:Means to an end by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      Ah, the 2c series. Now THERE'S something parents should probably be concerned about.

      Little 2c-t-7, little MDMA or Amphetamine, enjoy the synergistic MAOI and catecholamine releasing effects right up until your heart explodes.

  35. Paul is Dead by stubob · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but what happens if you listen to it backwards?

    --
    Planning to be moderated ± 1: Bad Pun.
    1. Re:Paul is Dead by natehoy · · Score: 1

      You'll hear an authoritative voice say, "GO TO CHURCH! SAY YOUR PRAYERS DAILY! TITHE! TITHE!"
          (with apologies/thanks to Berke Breathed)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:Paul is Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but what happens if you listen to it backwards?

      you'll hear that John is actually still alive... and a Wall Street broker.

    3. Re:Paul is Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hear "spill the blood of the innocent"

  36. Told you so! by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    The RIAA is the source of all evil because they keep promoting *gasp* MUSIC!!!

  37. Brown note? by grapeape · · Score: 1

    No wonder people still believe the brown note myth. If there are enough suckers to believe this someone should really market these "beats" played backwards as a way to sober up their musically high children...

  38. I knew it! by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    I knew you could get high on music! It's those damn Beatles and Rolling Stones again isn't it! In my day we were happy with the waltz and ragtime, now kids are listening to John Lennon and Mick Jagger.

    ....hey are you listening to me?! ..... fine, then get off my lawn!

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:I knew it! by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I'm 52, and the Stones are my parent's generation - you don't have a lawn, pyramids are surrounded by sand.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  39. With apologies to Pop Will Eat Itself ... by LizardKing · · Score: 1

    ... although Swaggart can go fsck himself.

    "What is the truth about rock music? Music is a powerful and perhaps the most powerful medium in the world. Music. Plato says when the music of a society changes, the whole society will change. Aristotle, a contemporary of Plato's, says when music changes there should be laws to govern the nature and the character of that music. Lenin says that the best and the quickest way to undermine any society is through its music...Music, ladies and gentleman, is the gift of God it was given to man to offer praises to God and to lift us up to him and to exalt Him to touch the tender recesses of our hearts and of our minds. Satan has taken music and he has counterfeited it, convoluted it, twisted it, exploited it and now he's using it to hammer, hammer, hammer, hammer, hammer a message into the minds and the lifestyles of this generation."

    Jimmy Swaggart

  40. Poor Dan Rather! by boristdog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Those dudes that attacked Dan Rather must've just thought he was a dealer!

    But now we KNOW the frequency, Kenneth!

  41. That reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ... of one of the first Pokemón episodes, aired in Japan, 1997, which sent over six hundred viewers to the hospital because of the lights and color combinations -- Pokemón Shock.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denn%C5%8D_Senshi_Porygon

  42. 4:20! Not just for WEED anymore man! by shdowhawk · · Score: 1

    Fast forward to 2:05...

    Yea dude! 4:20 is the new time for... umm.. youtube! Bwahaha... i'm so high ... ??? I think anyways? I'm listening to some really annoyingly pitched opera singer... Does that count!? DAMN THESE AUDIO WAVES ARE MESSING WITH MY HEAD!!1!

  43. Beware! by Dragoniz3r · · Score: 4, Funny

    I once bought some level_upper off a buddy, and I thought it was the real deal, but as soon as I took the first hit I knew it was laced with Lady Gaga. Now I'm hooked on pop music :( Just be careful where you buy your sound from guys.

    1. Re:Beware! by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Yikes, harsh trip, man. Here have some graham crackers.

    2. Re:Beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did too. Except it was laced with brown note.

    3. Re:Beware! by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you're not careful, you might get sued by the RIAA!

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  44. Life has become a Max Headroom episode by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    "This is Edison Carter, live and direct at a secret Big Fun Network testing facility where the city's children have been used as guinea pigs for the next generation of . . ."

    1. Re:Life has become a Max Headroom episode by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      I forgot entirely about that episode when I submitted the story. Dunno why though since I'm always referring to how real life seems to be mimicking the show these days. Of course it's probably because I've been using sounds to reach meditative states(*snicker*) and you know what they say about a user and their memory..

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
  45. Church Music by Tisha_AH · · Score: 1

    There has been some discussion regarding the music and chants in church having a psychological effect upon the parishioners. If you ever spent any time listening to Gregorian chants you can feel that there is "something" going on. Irrespective of your particular faith or lack of one.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
    1. Re:Church Music by mrsurb · · Score: 1

      I spent some time as a teenager attending a fairly wacky Pentecostal church, which featured speaking in tongues, holy laughing and being slain in the Spirit. Looking back on it now, I am convinced that these were mild hypnotic states induced by a combination of repetitive music and arousing people's expectations of something weird happening.

      I am currently a Christian but now speak against such manipulative practices.

    2. Re:Church Music by knowthetruth · · Score: 0

      Chanting is a method used to enter the Alter State of Consciousness, which is unfortunately becoming more and more popular even in "christian worships". Chanting, or repetition is strictly prohibited in the bible. It is widely used in pagan worships. Please watch the videos (the first two links) on this site to know more about the danger: http://www.believenot.com/

    3. Re:Church Music by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Church, jingles on TV, the radio. All music has a profound effect. Why do you think people listen to it?

      In particular, music in church can make you feel happy or afraid, and when everybody is singing it together it gets you to say something and hear everyone else saying it, without thinking too critically about the words.

    4. Re:Church Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Chanting, or repetition is strictly prohibited in the bible.

      [[citation]]

    5. Re:Church Music by knowthetruth · · Score: 0

      But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking. 8Be not ye therefore like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask him. (Mattew 6:7 King James Version) http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Mat&c=6&v=1&t=KJV#comm/7

    6. Re:Church Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Chanting is a method used enter the Alter State of Consciousness

      You DO realize that you naturally throughout the WHOLE day & night go through many altered states of consciousness as you go from deep REM sleep, to dreaming, to normal activity, to deep thinking, to deep full aleart. But lets not get a little knowledge of how the brain works (Alpha,Beta,Delta,Theta brain waves) get in the way...

      > Chanting, or repetition is strictly prohibited in the bible.

      Ah, the good ol' lets redefine something I don't like.

      Funny how the Pope has never said anything about Gregorian Chants. Maybe you know something he doesn't?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_chant

      First, how do you go from battalogste (Strongs Greek #945) which comes from "stutter/stammering" and "logos", commonly translated as "vain repetition" to chanting??

      The word Mantra is derived from the sanskrit words man="think" (In greek "menos" = "to think") and "tra" = "tool", aka Thinking Tool. The Greek word of mantra (Theta rho eta delta kappa) means "Sabbath/Holy", so it is quite a stretch to equate Mantras/Chanting = vain repetitions.

      Second, Chanting is not praying. It _may_ be used in prayer, but that is a sufficient condition, not a necessary one. What's next, claiming singing is praying? LOL.

      Chanting, as you even admit, can have a noticable effect since it is _music_; vain repetitions are not music and don't have the same effect. If someone wants to sing one sound over and over I'm sure God in the infinite wisdom has better things to do then "punish" them. Maybe you know better then God?

      > which is unfortunately becoming more and more popular even in "christian worships".

      Sadly, I see you that you are quite ignorant of Bible History. Here is one precedent worth reading about: "Thus all Israel brought up the ark of the covenant of the Lord with shouting, and with sound of the cornet, and with trumpets, and with cymbals, making a noise with psalteries and harps." (I Chronicles 15.28)

      > It is widely used in pagan worships.

      Ah the famous "X can be abused by the 'pagans', so lets call it 'dangerous'" without any shred of evidence on exactly what the dangers are.

      > King James Version

      But then again I shouldn't expect much from someone who gets their morality from a book that commands selling your children as slaves (Ex 21:7), genocide (Ex 32:27), God "the perfect father" that kills/sacrifices his own son (Matt 27:46), let alone trust an archaic KJV translation that mis-translates words (passover Acts 12:4, sabbath Acts 20:7) and omits words (day Acts 20:7, sabbath Heb 4:9) when they are not convenient.

      One of these days you will grow up and learn to think for yourself man... I pity you until then.

    7. Re:Church Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Chanting is a method used to enter the Alter State of Consciousness, which is unfortunately becoming more and more popular even in "christian worships"

      Since you seem to understand the Bible,

      Can you explain what "Out of the Body" mentioned in 2 Corinthians 12:1-4 means please?

      Also, can you tell me what "unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter" could be?

      Thanks
      Michaelangelo

  46. plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    but if you say something like caffeine should be legally equal to something like methamphetamine, such a world has downsides even worse than the war on drugs

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      No, I personally don't think meth is even close to the same level as caffine, but complete decriminalization is working out very, very well for Portugal.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      You'll take my beloved Caffeine from me when you pry my turquoise Amp from my still twitching fingers...

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    3. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by DJ+Jones · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone wants to have methamphetamines in the corner drug store but sending people to prison for possesing a naturally occuring herb is beyond retarded.

      A simple fine would be amble punishment to discourage drug use.

    4. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      yeah, naturally occurring herbs like opium, marijuana, cocaine, peyote

    5. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by X86Daddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll tell you, as a non-drug user (besides caffeine and rare alcohol), that the War on Drugs itself is at fault for such misconceptions. You see, I've known people who habitually and recreationally use various banned substances. As a result, I knew that most of the government messages regarding drugs were complete fabrications. Not familiar or interested in the specifics, I treated all of this information as suspect. Only after talking to an experienced drug user did I discover that "yeah, meth is really bad, dangerous, addictive, and horrible." When the government message and the War on Drugs treats things like marijuana as something significantly scary, evil, dangerous, etc... compared to tobacco and alcohol, they do a disservice to everyone. When someone obtaining a recreational substance less dangerous than alcohol also has the opportunity to buy much more dangerous things, and has the same "information" about them, that's where the whole "gateway drug" problem comes in.

      My take: put all of it on store shelves and provide real actual data about the stuff being sold. Those who want to kill themselves on meth are people who will cause problems anyway... at least under that situation they won't burn down an apartment complex manufacturing it, or rob houses to pay for a habit no more costly than Night Train.

      Make them legally equal, but informationally distinguished, as opposed to the current, more dangerous reversed situation. And this just applies to one benefit...eliminating a ton of violent crime, property crime, and wasted tax dollars would be mere side effects.

    6. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by Lord+of+Hyphens · · Score: 1

      Your mention of cocaine is incorrect -- the "naturally occurring" part is coca. Cocaine is what you get after isolating the alkaloid and processing into a pure form.

      --
      "I've spent my whole life figuring out crazy ways to do things. It'll work." -- Montgomery Scott, "Relics"
    7. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by RedDeadThumb · · Score: 1

      but if you say something like caffeine should be legally equal to something like methamphetamine, such a world has downsides even worse than the war on drugs

      Like what?

    8. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      yup. but coca leaf chewers add a ball of llipta to their mouth to activate the yummy alkaloids for that reason

    9. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your solution, but I don't see this happening anytime soon. Too much money is wrapped up in the war on drugs, and too many jobs are at stake. You could argue (correctly) that legalizing certain drugs would create jobs and plenty of income opportunity, but it could potentially (risk) change WHO makes the money, and those in power can't have that. Maintaining the status quo is much easier than change, especially when the change is only particularly beneficial to those not currently profiting from the system now in place.

    10. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by hviniciusg · · Score: 1

      Cocaine is not a natural drug, neither opium.

    11. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much money is wrapped up in the war on drugs, and too many jobs are at stake.

      However, it's not the many tens of thousands of law-enforcement officials whose jobs would be redundant if a more rational approach to drug legislation was taken, but the few thousand legislators who would have to stand up in front of the public and admit that they had, for decades, mindlessly voted to throw more and more billions of dollars down a rathole because of the knee-jerk "all drugs are bad" mantra.

    12. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Actually opium IS a naturally occurring drug; it's the dried "resin" derived from poppy plants; I think you're thinking about morphine and heroin.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    13. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... been saying that for years. Maybe someday ... people deserve to have the truth so they can make up their own minds. Tax it to pay for education and rehab as needed.

    14. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I tell you, as a person who has seen the horrible effects of daily and continual use of things like marijuana on friends (former most of them) and relatives, the effects of usage is truly disastrous. The problems however don't materialize overnight. They only appear after decades of daily use.

      The effect is a 49 year old man who is mentally 14 or so (the year he started daily smoking), dropping trou and snapping bras like a JR High Schooler at a Thanksgiving Dinner.

      The worst part is the "whadIdo" disbelief when called on it.

      SO, you're experiences aren't the same as mine. I've smoked my share of doobies and bongs in my day (nicknamed Iron Lungs at one point). But at some point I realized that I had to grow up, and couldn't remain a 15 year old into my thirties. Pot smokers, are the age (maturity) they started smoking at.

      That all being said, I'm quite libertarian about drugs. All the laws against dope haven't stopped people from staying off them. I do have big problem having society having to pay for their addiction. Legalize it, and tax the crap out of it.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    15. Re:plenty of things wrong with the war on drugs by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      If there ever was a time and a place for a +6 Benevolent leader for life

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  47. Binaural Beats user here by blue_teeth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am a user of binaural beats (not of the illicit/druggie type) but for more sober stuff. I use this for meditation "Hemi-Sync.Gateway Experience" and to enhance focus and concentration "Hemi Sync Metamusic". If you can get hold of Hemi-Sync Metamusic "Einstein's Dream", you will know what I am talking about.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Monroe_Institute

    http://www.hemi-sync.com/

    1. Re:Binaural Beats user here by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Hemi-Sync is awesome. The closest to any high I ever got was listening to "Deep Meditation" twice in a row because I accidentally put my CD player on auto-repeat. The next day I was very relaxed and felt a bit spacey but nothing negative. And that could have simply been coincidence but it's still funny. The "Deep Learning" and "Running Meditation" cd's are pretty sweet as well, in my opinion.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
  48. always urban myths about what gets you stoned by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Many high school kids are looking for thrills. THey concoct all kinds of things to get high. Some are not dangerous like smoking banana peels. Others can be tragic like downing multiple bottle of cough medicine.

    1. Re:always urban myths about what gets you stoned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the cough medicine works, if it contains dextromethorphan... too bad most OTC variants include enough paracetamol to nuke your liver :)

    2. Re:always urban myths about what gets you stoned by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      And when it's sold as just plain DXM solution by dealers there are no dosage instructions so we get news stories about teenagers who down the DXM equivalent of chugging a gallon of vodka and then, believe it or not, die(!)...

      Of course, DXM isn't much of a fun drug anyway, and it tastes like crap. If you just want to get fucked up there are much better drugs out there for that and if you want a psychedelic experience there are also tons of drugs out there that are better (hell, these days you can practically pick and choose which effects you want and there are plenty of reliable resources that will tell you if the pills/liquids you are about to ingest are dangerous).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  49. To paraphrase Mr. Churchill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never, in the field of human conflict has so much bollocks been spoken to so many by so few.

  50. I used to have a clock that did this ... by Spectre · · Score: 1

    Way back in the day, I had a clock that told time this way.

    Two low frequencies, which at midnight were very close together, so they would beat once per second, at noon were further apart, beating several times per second.

    Likewise for two high frequencies that did the same thing but was on an hourly cycle.

    --
    "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
  51. fear-mongering .. bot hoax? by dindi · · Score: 1

    OK, so this is useless panic making. Seems like the media has no war or tragedy to work on.

    But the question is: can you really get anything out of these sounds? High? Relaxation? Weight loss, meditation?

    Thinking of how a DJ (psy trance, goa) or a band (any kind, style) can move a crowd through moods, well, music and sounds can change your moods. But do binaural sounds do anything?

    Well, to my wife's dislike, I loaded some up, and I found them relaxing, some of them actually scary (they relax you, then shock you with some sudden harsh effect)...

    If this is going to be forbidden, then well, let's also go after Hendrix, psy and goa trance, all psychedelic rock music as well, because these can change your mood and cause a natural high in seconds when listened to "correctly" .

    just my 2c ...

  52. 4:20pm on mp3 player by LazyAcer · · Score: 1

    at 2:07 in the vid it shows a kids mp3 player with time 4:20pm ... OOO MMM GGG !!!11!!!!

    =)

    --
    What! Do I look like a people person?
  53. Who'd have known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that all that time in band class when I thought we were tuning our instraments, we were actually getting high.

    We were so naive apparently, as well. We were always trying to stop the beating in these drawn out tuning sessions.

  54. Science fiction becoming science fact? by feldicus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like we're on our way to semuta addicts...

    1. Re:Science fiction becoming science fact? by Vortexcycle · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that someone made the Dune reference... :D

  55. physics lab now illegal? by snoop.daub · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to TA for a physics course and one of the labs was about sound waves. We used empty plastic tubes and generated sound of a given frequency into them, then the students would change the length of the resonant cavity and find where the standing waves formed, and calculate the speed of sound from this. Then, the final part of the lab was to take the speakers and generate slightly different frequency tones and listen for the beat frequency. I guess this lab is now illegal in Oklahoma!

    1. Re:physics lab now illegal? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are a pusher!

      Please remain where you are, the Oklahoma State Police will be there shortly.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  56. The drug war is socialism by spun · · Score: 1

    Fear based sales. Huh. And here I was thinking the drug war was just a work program for cops and socialism for potential addicts. I mean, seriously, what do you call it when society spends a bunch of money on a small minority to protect them from themselves? Socialism, right? The drug war is the worst kind of socialism.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:The drug war is socialism by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      No. Socialism is the state owning the means of production (and perhaps distributing the fruits of production to the workers).

      Nanny state is probably what you're looking for.

    2. Re:The drug war is socialism by spun · · Score: 1

      Well, I am talking about distributing the fruits of production to the workers. In a really weird and unproductive way. Our tax money is going to help addicts and cops, which is redistribution of wealth to help the less fortunate. And it is about the state owning the means of production as well. If you could call the police force productive. Are jobs programs socialist? Then the drug war is socialist, because it is a jobs program for cops.

      It is also an example of a nanny state. Although I tend to think of nannies as nice, supportive and nurturing. This is more of an abusive step-daddy state thing.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:The drug war is socialism by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Locking them up is helping them? It would be better for everyone if they could get clean drugs and needles without government interference.

    4. Re:The drug war is socialism by spun · · Score: 1

      I never said their rationalizations made sense.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:The drug war is socialism by k8to · · Score: 1

      It's only socialist if your idea of socialism is "government controls money", which is not anything close to an accurate understanding.

      --
      -josh
    6. Re:The drug war is socialism by spun · · Score: 1

      Good to know that 'redistribution of wealth' is not socialism. I'll be sure to tell the teabaggers.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  57. News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "American public reaches new levels of stupidity, News at 11"

    Seriously though, this is disturbing. Not only are there people in this country stupid enough to believe this crap, but there's a news station stupid/desperate/low enough to pick it up as a story. A sure sign of humanities (or at least the USA's) downfall.

  58. BS by Maladius · · Score: 1

    I heard a report about this on NPR last night. The researcher talking about it said the whole thing was basically BS in terms of altering one's state of mind. They did a small study (ok, really small, only 4 people), and found no shift in brain waves at all when listening to binaural beats.

  59. DAMMIT by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

    I haven't even tried cheesing, and now everybody has moved on to something else?

  60. Re:physics lab now illegal? Also David Brin by snoop.daub · · Score: 1

    Also, it reminds me of David Brin's "Earth", where in the near future drug laws have been near-universally made obsolete by the ability of anyone to get high using biofeedback techniques.

  61. RIAA getting involved by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    Why do I expect to see a press release from the RIAA soon saying "We told all of you that this Internet/digital music thing was bad. See? Not only is it turning our kids into dirty, stinking pirates, but it's turning them into dirty, stinking, drug-addicted pirates! The only solution is to require anyone who wants to produce any sound at all to pay us a lot of money. We'll filter out all the bad sounds (binaural beats, pirated songs and anti-RIAA speeches) and keep in the good stuff (Boy Bands, Brittney Spears and pro-RIAA speeches)."

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  62. 3 lines of mp3.... holy... durp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man I just blew like 3 lines of mp3.... feeling like... wow...HAHAHA ROTFL!!!! WOOOO /sarcasm.

  63. I can only confirm this. by flibuste · · Score: 1

    Steve Reich and Philipp Glass as drugs? Well, I must be honest to the ./ crowd. Their music is highly addictive and produce strange "things" in my "brain" that definitely puts you in a different state of mind.

    Oh wait! This ticklish effect in my brain is called "music"? Oh wooowwww

  64. Who needs the Internets to get High? by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 4, Informative

    With a bit of training, you can do it without the headphones or music or drugs It's done in monasteries all the time. Some religious groups do it with repeated chanting. na-mu-my-h-ren-ge-ky y'all.

    1. Re:Who needs the Internets to get High? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      As I develop the awakening mind, I praise the buddha as they shine...

    2. Re:Who needs the Internets to get High? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Ommmm!

    3. Re:Who needs the Internets to get High? by genfail · · Score: 1

      I thought those chants went. ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

    4. Re:Who needs the Internets to get High? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      na-mu-my-h-ren-ge-ky y'all.

      Iä! Iä! Cthulhu phtagn!!

  65. A simple equation by Dracos · · Score: 1

    (Bible belt state) + (Activity parents will do not explicity approve) + (Child with psychological issues [see above]) = DEMONS!

  66. Binaural Beats and Lucid Dreaming by Clyde+Machine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've heard a lot of talk of binaural beats since getting into lucid dreaming, both of which I found out about on the Dreamviews website. What I learned from there was similar to what this article states, except it comes from people who get themselves educated on the subject and discuss it, or they're just asking about binaural beats. Either way, this article sounds rather absurd to me. Music has been a gateway to drugs for decades, it's just a matter of how you look at it. Saying that listening to it makes you want to get high introduces nothing new, and is, like mentioned before, just some scare tactic to achieve some goal. Shame on them.

  67. All I can say is... by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

    Some people have way, Way, WAY too much time on their hands.

  68. that's why i only drink by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    dideuterium monoxide

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:that's why i only drink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your're not dead yet? I prefer the one with "heavy oxygen"!

    2. Re:that's why i only drink by TheLink · · Score: 3, Interesting
      --
  69. Next on the TV news hitlist... by AC-x · · Score: 2, Funny

    FRACTALS, are your children being exposed to visual ACID?

    1. Re:Next on the TV news hitlist... by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

      well, I like math, and I first had a girlfriend at 22. I wonder what would have happend if I did drugs...

      --
      new sig
    2. Re:Next on the TV news hitlist... by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't think that's what "tab based browsing" really means...

  70. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole - A mistake by chrisG23 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hello,

    There is one slight error in your very good writeup on how binaural beats works. What you described, playing two notes on two different sound producers (in this case tuning forks), causes an actual, physical, "beat". The sound waves interfere or combine with one another in physical space, and a new sound wave (or a composite of the two, same difference) is created and propogated through air, the medium of sound.

    The binaural beats mentioned here work a little differently, in that a recording is played, and it must be listened through headphones. One ear hears a certain pitch or frequency, the other ear hears a different pitch or frequency. The difference here is that neither ear "hears" a beat, the beat is created entirely in the brain of the listener. I am not a neurobiologist so I cannot explain the exact mechanism, but it appears it has something to do with how the brain processes sound and attempts to internally combine the two different sounds into a single perception/experience for the consciousness.

    I checked out some binaural beat programs once. Basicly just sine wave (or fancier) generators that let you pick the frequency for the left output and right output. If I listed on one ear only using headphones, I hear a single frequency. If I listen to both ears, I hear the two frequencies, AND I perceive a beat in addition to that, that only exists in my brain. Its at the very least neat. At the very most I didn't notice any particular effects on myself, and didn't get addicted or anything to it.

    The claim or assumption of the binaural beats people is that the low frequency beats can be used to simulate in the brain the delta waves or alpha waves or whatever waves are associated with deep sleep, or relaxation, or whatever. Again I am not a neurobiologist, so I can't say if this does anything.

    Playing two tuning forks together or tuning a guitar is pretty neat to me too.

  71. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    Not "anything" that alters consciousness: For instance, it's still perfectly legal to drink as much coffee as you need to somehow drag yourself to work. It's also legal for stores to play elevator music that dulls your senses so you'll buy more stuff. And of course, commercial television is still legal.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  72. SbaGen! by LoneHighway · · Score: 1

    Uh oh, and here we are with Sourceforge hosting SBaGen. http://sbagen.sourceforge.net/ Hurry and download it before it's illegal!

  73. No Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One ear hears a certain pitch or frequency, the other ear hears a different pitch or frequency. The difference here is that neither ear "hears" a beat, the beat is created entirely in the brain of the listener.

    Congratulations, that's exactly what happens in the GP's example. You control the speed of the perceived 'beats' with the difference in hertz between the two forks.

    1. Re:No Mistake by slater.jay · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except it's not the same at all. A beat from two similar frequencies is an actual acoustic effect caused by cyclic constructive and destructive interference between the two waves.

      A binaural beat is a phenomenon that you only get when you listen: it's two frequencies played back via headphone so that they don't interfere. The beat is purely an artifact of your perceptions.

      Not posting AC, because (having, y'know, actually familiarized myself with the topic of the story) I actually know what's going on.

    2. Re:No Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not posting AC, because (having, y'know, actually familiarized myself with the topic of the story) I actually know what's going on.

      Lol, try it with two similar but different frequency tuning forks on either side of your head. It's the same damned thing. That's exactly what the GGGP was describing. Posting AC because this is the stupidest argument I've ever had.

    3. Re:No Mistake by slater.jay · · Score: 2

      If I have two tuning forks hanging on either side of my head, the sounds they produce will still interfere in the air.

      If I put two earphones in and play a sine wave in each of them, the sounds will not interfere in the air. I will be hearing one tone and precisely one tone in each ear; there isn't a tone from the left bouncing off the wall and reaching my right ear.

      In the first case, it is the waves in the air interfering to make the beat frequency. In the second case, the interference happens in the brain. The waves don't exist in the same place at the same time, and hence they can't interfere in the way that makes a beat frequency in air.

      So yeah. You're wrong.

    4. Re:No Mistake by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      What about skeletal transduction effects? Testing on those with their corpus callosum severed should also be performed. I'd be interested also if this had any effect on the abilities of those with perfect pitch, or inducing that ability in those without it.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:No Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So yeah. You're wrong.

      Audiologist here. You would think that in a perfect environment you are correct but actually Binaural beats were discovered in 1839 before headphones were invented.

      As someone who's done this test in a college setting, you can take the tuning forks described and start them off in front of you. You'll hear something but not a beat. Now start them and put them on either side of your head. What you hear that is different is the binaural beat.

      Not posting AC, because (having, y'know, actually familiarized myself with the topic of the story) I actually know what's going on.

      Ah, the armchair professor who doesn't have to cite anything. As an audiologist, I find this frequently on Slashdot.

    6. Re:No Mistake by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      The point of verbal slapstick humor is not scientific accuracy.

    7. Re:No Mistake by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      "I had earrings made with a tuning fork hanging from each one. The left side was A440 and the right side was a custom 444."

      let's see...... 440Hz in one ear,
      444Hz in the other ear...

      that sounds like a 4Hz beat in your brain to me genius....

      next time read the post before you claim you know what's going on....

    8. Re:No Mistake by 3dr · · Score: 4, Informative

      As weird as this is to the "concerned parents and teachers" in Oklahoma, it is a basic effect of our minds and perception. There are no demons, no narcotic gateways, no pushers, and for most people, no permanent effects(*).

      When the "Brain Machine" aka Sound-Light Machine (SLM) article came out in MAKE, I immediately built one. For me, it works great, and the visuals I see tend to be geometric patterns, depending on the frequency of the beats. It can be quite intense. For those who haven't seen this, apart from the silly graphics on the glasses as pictured in the article, the "brain machine" is a pair of safety glasses with LEDs, the microcontroller, and a headphone jack. The LEDs flash in synchronicity to the binaural beats, and this is what makes it so powerful -- your brain gets two very important senses stimulated the same way. Once the sequence finishes, the effect is totally over, there is no linger feeling, or "high" or demonic possession.

      They used to sell audio cassettes that had binaural beat recordings. After I built the SLM, a friend showed me cassettes he had purchased a couple decades ago in Europe, but I haven't heard them to compare.

      (*) The only caution I can think of is the possibility of bad effects in people susceptible to seizures. I don't know enough about that condition to know if seizures can be triggered through our hearing, but the SLM-like devices could possibly be a trigger to light-sensitive individuals.

      One can find lots of related devices on the net. In no order are:
      MindSpa
      Procyon AVS
      For helping with autism: Audio/Visual Entrainment

      Seeing this video I can't help but laugh. It's the same tired Suburbanite Scare Story that D&D was in the 70's-80's, or that "satanic cults" were in the 80's.

    9. Re:No Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You’re either a moron or intentionally being dense. Yes, the tones will interfere slightly in the air, but the two individual tones will pretty well dominate the respective ears. Most of the interference will be occurring exactly in your head.

      You do realize that most headphones aren’t perfect and even if a sound is played only on one side the sound will find its way to your other ear in some very faint sense anyway...

    10. Re:No Mistake by LostAlaska · · Score: 1

      Sure that's how it starts, but the next thing you know kids are mixing illicit beats trying to come up with the next designer beat to get whacked out on. Next thing you know someone will find the brown note and everyone will be tripping and pooping their pants. I've seen this time and time again... Reminds me of when I was a kid my mother went through a short lived Christianity faze where she watched TBN all the time. One of the shows (in the early 80's) had a preacher who would play heavy metal backwords and exorcise the demons from the music. I was only like 8 at the time and I remember watching it and wondering why they were so 'effing stupid.

    11. Re:No Mistake by sjames · · Score: 1

      The only thing the headphones do is make sure the mixing happens in the brain. If the tuning forks are right next to your ears, you're effectively doing the same thing (the headphones work because the speakers are .....right next to your ears.

      Your are correct that if the sound mixes outside of the brain, it's not effective, you just missed that there's more than one way for the 'channels' to be separate.

    12. Re:No Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to get this effect when playing recorder in a baroque group. My recorder with other recorders... It made me cry.

    13. Re:No Mistake by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Heh, I remember using Computer Narcotics back in the 90's. At the very least there's a nice placebo effect. The guy who wrote CN was actually blind and had a BBS. Cool guy.

      It's still on some shareware sites, but you need dosbox to run it on your modern win/mac/linux computer.

      I found this list of more sound and light fun. Music and visuals are definitely a mental stimulant. But Oklahoma is off their rocker ;) They should ban whisky and cousins instead.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    14. Re:No Mistake by 3dr · · Score: 1

      Ha ha! The Brown Note: myth busted!

  74. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by tgatliff · · Score: 1

    I am a little confused by the article.....

    "Narcotics", such as morphine or other opium derivatives, are generally considered sedatives (not stimulants). Meaning, you dont get a "high" off of heroin/morphine. Meaning, narcotics (sedatives) and methylamphetamines (stimulants) are two different categories of drugs.

  75. is this from the onion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is this from the onion?

    1. Re:is this from the onion? by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      That question has been asked MANY times and the answer is, unfortunately, no.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
  76. good for portugal by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you will notice of course, that portugal's efforts are aimed at reducing drug use

    in other words, their tactics are different, but the goal is the same: reduce drug use

    so there will always be a war on drugs, forever. in fact, there always was a war on drugs. tactics change, but reducing drug use in society is merely a constant maintenance function of civilization, like taking out the trash every thursday, that will never end. you don't declare a "war on garbage" and clean your apartment up once, and never again have to worry about garbage. no, that's not the nature of the problem. same with drugs: its not some sort of "war" you win once and never have to fight again. no, its a constant low grade clean up effort

    so yes: the notion of a "war" on drugs is stupid, but whatever you call it ("the cleanup on drugs", "the trash collection on drugs"?) you must realize something absolutely true: the reduction of drug use is an effort that will never end, whatever the tactics, forever

    and if you don't know why drug use has to be constantly cleaned up, you don't know much about your world and human nature

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:good for portugal by Schemat1c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so yes: the notion of a "war" on drugs is stupid, but whatever you call it ("the cleanup on drugs", "the trash collection on drugs"?) you must realize something absolutely true: the reduction of drug use is an effort that will never end, whatever the tactics, forever

      and if you don't know why drug use has to be constantly cleaned up, you don't know much about your world and human nature

      You are sadly misinformed. Prohibition of any substance increases it's use, just look at your history books. The drug war, or whatever you choose to call it, has done nothing but increase dangerous drug use, criminalize otherwise law-abiding citizens, enabled a lucrative black market and seriously eroded civil rights.

      Put down the kool-aid and do a google search or two.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    2. Re:good for portugal by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      No, Portugal's tactics are for reducing drug *abuse*.

      and if you don't know why drug use has to be constantly cleaned up, you don't know much about your world and human nature

      Appeal to Authority + Ad Hominem. Let's hear some actual reasons instead, please.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:good for portugal by rsborg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are sadly misinformed. Prohibition of any substance increases it's use, just look at your history books.

      Actually it simply increases it's price. And given market dynamics, that should reduce the overall usage... the problem comes in when the black market usage of said substance increases (which is an obvious correlation), which increases crime and all sorts of other bad things.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    4. Re:good for portugal by sjames · · Score: 1

      Not only does prohibition tend to increase use, it tends to make that use less responsible and blurs the lines between the more and less dangerous drugs and methods of use.

      Prohibition popularized liquor in the U.S. Before that beer and wine were far more popular, but were harder to smuggle. It also caused a lot of lead and methanol poisoning from poorly made and operated stills. And, of course, a package store taking delivery doesn't lead to a Valentine's day massacre.

    5. Re:good for portugal by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      We can increase the prices of drugs without banning them. My solution has always been to legalize them, and tax them into oblivion. We'll end up like cigarettes are today. People will still smoke, but it is controlled, expensive habit. AND it reduced usage.

      Let the people kill themselves with drugs, they're gonna do it anyway, might as well run some part of government off the stupid people.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:good for portugal by rsborg · · Score: 1

      My solution has always been to legalize them, and tax them into oblivion.

      Actually, I agree with you. Also I was a bit wrong about simple supply and demand... there is a thing as inelastic demand which happens when demand doesn't reduce directly in relation to supply... fuel, water, drugs (whether for life saving or to feed an addiction) all can exhibit this behavior.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  77. the ULTIMATE gateway drug by v1 · · Score: 1

    So then, the ultimate gateway drug, must be Sugar? Think of the Children! Say NO to sugar!

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  78. Oh my... by McNihil · · Score: 1

    Ok so whats next Goatrance and the rest of the trance scene?
    oh wait... howabout the 65-75 and the psychedelics movements music?

    Fsck off ignorant quasi logical generalists that think binaural brain wave music will make people drug addicts. WTF are we back to the 50ies and mind control beams or something?

    A big spanking is in order.

    1. Re:Oh my... by McNihil · · Score: 1

      I would rather see Country Western be banned. Why you may ask? It makes me go "catatonic" because it makes me so utterly sad.

    2. Re:Oh my... by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      I would rather see Country Western be banned. Why you may ask? It makes me go "catatonic" because it makes me so utterly sad.

      The lyrics and scores are somewhat depressing, too.

  79. Shamanism by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been studying Shamanistic meditation, Kundalini and sexual Tantra, looking for something to quiet my mind and help me deal with my ADD more effectively. I got off the drugs about ten years ago and slowly my mind's becoming more organized; I'm not learning to cope with the voices and hyper-awareness, I'm actually getting better. The hyper-awareness is different, still present but completely reformed, and a powerful tool. I'm at a point where I'd like to polish up what's left, put some structure on myself enough to better organize myself; it used to be impossible to learn to play instruments, now it's difficult and I can't retain progress but it does come. A little work, and maybe I can actually accomplish something in my life.

    The options for assistance to relax and open the mind include mexican magic mushrooms, LSD, marijuana, and even alcohol; but although I drink, it's not really to get drunk (and drunkenness is painful and destabilizing for me, it's effectively like having the flu). I'd rather not play with any of that other junk; so I need either much patience and concentration, or a substitute.

    What I found in my studies was that the old places were made to do things with sound... beating drums, chants, hums, anything... they were tuned to amplify the certain sounds that put your mind into a particular state. I did some deeper digging, sideways research, and found the details of binaural beats; a quick experiment with this gave me some interesting answers. I expected nothing, or at most a gentle feeling of calm; when I kicked it on and had it pull the beating from 20Hz down to 7Hz in 3 seconds, I nearly blacked out. I yanked the headphones off but felt pretty fucking groggy for a few seconds, before I managed to shake it off.

    This is it, this is what I need. Something subtle... music, designed with soft instruments, different wave patterns such that the beat is lost between them, like a flute and a gentle saxophone or a piano... but enough that the effect occurs, gently. Something to ease my mind in an unnatural way, without a drug. My refusal to use substance-based aids for this has lead me to this strikingly effective, pleasant, and constructive solution: rather than encourage drug use, we can encourage a new art form, an exploration into a new method of music creation, new tools transcending just instruments and effects and paradigms.

    The most striking thing of all is that these considerations mimic Timothy Leary's thoughts on LSD: this has the potential to expand minds, to drive us as a people towards a period of inner reflection and a search for something beyond the mundane life trying to scratch out a few dollars while being watched over by people in power. Leary thought the drug would do that, would expand peoples' minds, make them start a search for something more, a search for something beyond the bland existence we follow.

    I don't support the use of dangerous substances-- LSD may not be so toxic, but it can remain in the system and randomly re-assert itself at any time, even at very bad times; mushrooms are toxic and can cause severe damage. I also believe that people are idiots, and the use of such substances recreationally is pure idiocy; encouraging any general use will swiftly lead to 99.999% of use being an expression of this idiocy, and destruction of society (remember, long ago, mushrooms were considered sacred and not seen as a recreational toy by the masses; this world no longer allows that manner of thinking).

    I do, however, strongly encourage introspection to discover one's motives in life, as well as a general examination of the world to attempt to understand and even improve upon the machine we live in. The use of such auditory methods is not inherently addictive; there is no tainted chemistry taking place, and it substitutes as sleep (meaning you sleep less, 6 hours instead of 8 hours). It is not toxic, because it's not a chemical. It's not dangerous, because it's not a physical, life-depriving act such as auto-asphyxiation. This could be a powerful and benign tool for those who wish to walk a path without walking too close to a certain less desirable parallel path.

    1. Re:Shamanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LSD may not be so toxic, but it can remain in the system and randomly re-assert itself at any time, even at very bad times;

      Citation Needed!

    2. Re:Shamanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your reply is intersting but what I want to know is what headphones you have that can reproduce a 20Hz sound wave let alone a 7Hz soundwave. Seriously.

    3. Re:Shamanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They don’t. That’s not how a binaural beat works at all.

      Ever noticed the warbling (beat) sound you get from an out-of-tune guitar or honky-tonk piano? That’s the sound waves interfering with each other in the air – alternately constructively and destructively combining, giving the notes that beat sound. If the notes are only a few Hz apart, there will only be a few noticable pulsations in the volume per second – the closer together the notes are, the slower the beat is, until the notes are perfectly in tune with each other and the beat stops completely – 0 Hz difference gives a 0 Hz beat.

      If you play one note at 400 Hz in the left channel of a set of headphones and another note at 420 Hz in the right channel, that 20 Hz interference beat can mess with your brain rhythms. The volume doesn’t have to be loud and a little bit of white or pink noise behind the notes can also help ease the obnoxiously-smooth sound of a clean sine wave.

    4. Re:Shamanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man with a post that long, you sure seem like you have a handle on your ADD. I can't even bother to finish a post on slashdot most of the time, much less something actually productive.

      a quick experiment with this gave me some interesting answers

      Did you do this by creating something yourself or using a pre-recorded track?

    5. Re:Shamanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What I found in my studies was that the old places were made to do things with sound... (...) put your mind into a particular state."
      and
      "remember, long ago, mushrooms were considered sacred and not seen as a recreational toy by the masses; this world no longer allows that manner of thinking"

      You serious?
      Or I'm the only one seeing how a hypocrite you are?

       

  80. Narcotic...wtf? by Montezumaa · · Score: 1

    When did scientist start extracting sound waves from the Opium Poppy? Narcotics are, by definition, only chemicals that are derived from the Opium Poppy(Codine, Morphine, Hydrocodone, Oxycondone, Hydromorphone, Oxymorphone, Fentanyl, Heroin etc.). When people use the wrong term to describe something, it gets really irritating and show inane tendencies.

  81. uranium, anthrax, cyanide, ricin, arsenic... by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why the hell do you think "natural" has or should have anything to do with legality?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:uranium, anthrax, cyanide, ricin, arsenic... by M8e · · Score: 1

      It's very difficult for the end user to tell what the "unatural"/processed stuff really is and how strong it is(what's that white powder/pills, and how strong is it?). They have to trust the dealer, and dealers makes miskates.

      The "natural" and lightly processed stuff can't be insanly strong and can be recognized by look, smell etc.(Is that marijuana or oregano?...)

    2. Re:uranium, anthrax, cyanide, ricin, arsenic... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      natural uranium is legal. anthrax in deer poop in the woods is legal and mostly harmless to everyone but about one hunter every ten years. Naturally occurring levels of arsenic in drinking water is legal. castor seeds are legal.

    3. Re:uranium, anthrax, cyanide, ricin, arsenic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naturally occurring levels of arsenic in drinking water is legal.

      False. Over 10 ppb arsenic naturally occurring in your water source? Guess what? Yeah, you have to remove the arsenic before you send it to people as drinking water. That’s expensive? Too bad.

      Oh, and the regulatory limit on uranium levels in drinking water is 30 ug/L. Anthrax in the water supply? You’d better be achieving at least 4-log removal/inactivation for virii – that’s 99.99%. In fact, there’s a whole list of regulated contaminants.

    4. Re:uranium, anthrax, cyanide, ricin, arsenic... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      who said anything about uranium in drinking water? natural uranium is legal, you can buy a chunk on eBay or elsewhere.

      who said anything about anthrax in drinking water, I'm talking shit in the woods. the poop police aren't ticketing piles.

      since arsenic is in all drinking water, including at your house, at negligible level in most cases, as generally true statement arsenic in drinking water is therefore legal.

      natural is good, by and large.

    5. Re:uranium, anthrax, cyanide, ricin, arsenic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since arsenic is in all drinking water, including at your house, at negligible level in most cases, as generally true statement arsenic in drinking water is therefore legal.

      Since urine is in all drinking water, including the water you make soup from, at negligible levels in most cases, as a generally true statement urine in soup is therefore legal. Except it isn't. And you are an asshat.

      Since arsenic is mandated to be at negligible levels in ALL drinking water in the US, as a completely true statement arsenic in drinking water is therefore ILLEGAL. And you are an asshat.

      10 ppb is an extremely low level. For comparison, the maximum contaminant level for cyanide in drinking water is 20x higher than the MCL for arsenic. The level for lead is 15 ppb. The only inorganic contaminants with lower regulatory levels are the really scarce ones such as antimony, beryllium, cadmium, mercury, and thallium. I threw in the levels for the other chemicals in drinking water just for good measure.

      natural is good, by and large.

      Opium and cocaine are concentrated extracts. Go try enriching some uranium in your garage or isolating and collecting some anthrax if you really think that "by and large" natural means it's got to be legal even if you refine, extract, and concentrate it. Or why not try running an unlicensed distillery.

      And yeah, sending people to prison for possessing naturally-occurring herbs (marijuana, peyote) is beyond retarded.

  82. I strongly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brittany Spears and Miley Cyrus are gateway drugs to harsher forms of teen bubble gum music. If you find your daughter listening to old Shaun Cassidy and Tiffany be very afraid.

  83. Altered state of consciousness by knowthetruth · · Score: 0

    It is more serious than just getting high. Here is more information on the topic. http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/?p=4654

  84. Freaks me out by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Freaks me out. Hell even Wikipedia nowadays is a dope pusher.

    Anyway, I'd appreciate well written and factual prose reporting the effects of this illicit drug abuse. I'm too scared to damage my own brain and having heard a sample I resolved I can't stand the sound and it's also horribly boring.

    Come lads, be sports, fsck up your brains for my interest and amusement. Please?

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  85. I tried.... by Paxinum · · Score: 1

    I had a 6 hour long train ride to do, and I put on a 1h long clip of binaural sounds in my headphones. I must say,... ...it didn't do shit. I mean, there were absolutely no effect on me whatsoever. The effect is probably VERY individual, and is mostly placebo, I guess. The only weird audio experience I have had was when I listened to the same (oldschool rave) song for an entire day on repeat. When I turned off the music, I could still hear the sound, as if it was still playing.

  86. Skeptoid covered this quite well by Jonny_eh · · Score: 2, Informative

    Brian Dunning of the podcast Skeptoid debunked this ages ago: http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4147

  87. Beatles by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Whenever I hear stories like this I can't help but wonder if these are the same parents that listened to the satanic lyrics of the Beatles played backwards when they were teens.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Beatles by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Whenever I hear stories like this I can't help but wonder if these are the same parents that listened to the satanic lyrics of the Beatles played backwards when they were teens."

      Err...I do believe that was Led Zeppelin with the actual satanic stuff....the Beatles just talked about Paul being dead...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  88. Know Your Dope Fiend! by e2d2 · · Score: 1

    KNOW YOUR DOPE FIEND. YOUR LIFE MAY DEPEND ON IT! You will not be able to see his eyes because of the Tea-Shades, but his knuckles will be white from inner tension and his pants will be crusted with semen from constantly jacking off when he can't find a rape victim. He will stagger and babble when questioned. He will not respect your badge. The Dope Fiend fears nothing. He will attack, for no reason, with every weapon at his command-including yours. BEWARE. Any officer apprehending a suspected marijuana addict should use all necessary force immediately. One stitch in time (on him) will usually save nine on you. Good luck.
    -The Chief" (aka Hunter S Thompson)

  89. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole - A mistake by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... tuning a guitar is pretty neat to me too.

    Now if we could only get more guitarists to do it...

    --
    That is all.
  90. Who knows where this could lead? by Linux_ho · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe even to the dark side of the moon.

    --
    include $sig;
    1;
    1. Re:Who knows where this could lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps some hardcore jam band?

      Add some laser show and spinning glow sticks to go with the trippy sound and beat, and you're all set to get into a trance every now and then.

  91. Oh, good. by pluther · · Score: 1

    Oh, good.

    I was afraid the current generation was going to miss out on all the fun of a big nonsensical moral panic.

    I mean, we had D&D and our parents had Rock and Roll, but it looked like today's youngsters were going to miss the whole experience.

    --
    If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
  92. the first ones always free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    yay i'm a dealer http://www.torrentz.com/a0c1393f6a101b34000e87228bbad51b69ac1f77

  93. Oh NOs! by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    Found this online:

    A story from the LA Times today says that "waking up in the morning" leads to murder and suicide. Additionally, data from seven different researchers has proven that birth leads to "waking up."
    No correlation has been found so far, but researchers are hard at work coming up with the explanation.

    In other news, a federal grant has been requested by the Research Institute of Giving-Idiots-Something-Else-To-Use-Against-Society-To-Feel-Better-About-Things-They-Don't-Understand.

  94. Anonymous Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I blame the Big Bopper. Too much toe tapping going on.

  95. wtf? by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    Are you fucking kidding me? If this is all parents have to worry about their high school kids getting into, they should consider themselves lucky.

  96. addiction by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    increases use of a substance. duh

    have you happened to notice the number of starbucks around town?

    is it because people just love hot bitter drinks first thing in the morning? is it because we prohibited coffee?

    what prohibition does is increase mafia involvement. and for things like alcohol, marijuana, caffiene, nicotine, etc., the negative side effects of prohibition outweigh the negative effects of the drug. but for things like cocaine, heroin, meth: the addictive effects of the drugs themselves are worse than any prohibition effects

    please, stop with the idiotic rationalizations

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:addiction by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      but for things like cocaine, heroin, meth: the addictive effects of the drugs themselves are worse than any prohibition effects

      You are mistaken, re: Portugal.

      Have a nice day. :D

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:addiction by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      have you happened to notice the number of starbucks around town?

      Have you happened to notice the number of Starbucks around town is dwindling?

      The lack of money and jobs is forcing people to overcome their caffeine addictions. Not that hard, really; caffeine's addictive, but not that much.

      However, marijuana isn't addictive at all. So why is it illegal?

  97. The "I-Doser" Videos on YouTube... by krinderlin · · Score: 1

    ...might explain where the panic is coming from. Here at work, we started looking at the videos of people who "Just took Hand of God" or "Were dosing Gates of Hades". O.o; WTF is all that? The question is: is it mass placebo? We're thinking you watch people doing this, then you psych yourself into doing it. Or...what? So, we all decided to try it out. Even our manager tried it out. We all decided the reactions are from the sudden euphoria of the most annoying sound on earth ceasing after 10 minutes. You could achieve the same effect with an MP3 of 40 minutes of nails on a chalk board. Personally, the whole department calls Emperor's New Clothes on all the YouTube videos of "high" I-Dosers.

  98. Here today, gone tomorrow. Next thing you know... by dacarr · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people listened to On The Run from Pink Floyd through a pair of cheap stereo headphones. (It's the second track on DSOTM.) If some kid thought demons were involved (perhaps they're named Mackie, Sennheiser, RCA, and Peavey?), he's in for a trip that's guaranteed to blow his head apart.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  99. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

    Well, good luck outlawing this. You will DEFINITELY alter your consciousness, and experience major waves of euphoria if you do it right.

  100. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by dave562 · · Score: 1

    the "drug war" is more about denying people access to their own minds.

    Welcome to reality. The Feds crack down harder on LSD than absolutely anything else. A single hit of LSD carries a manslaughter charge if the DA wants to get overzealous about it. Anything that can disrupt the carefully calibrated fear loop that has been instilled in us is absolutely verboten.

  101. wouldn't that be wonderful by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    in a world where drug addicts only hurt themselves. if only

    there's a saying: when you have a hammer in your hand, every problem begins to look like a nail

    with easy access to drug euphorias, people being to "solve" (aka, avoid) the problems in their lives with drugs, rather than make difficult and painful life changes for their own good. so with free and easy access to highly addictive drugs, all you get is a horde of zombies who can't hold down a relationship or a job (and you have to feed and clothe them)

    of course marijuana should be legal. that marijuana is illegal is fucking retarded. but cocaine, heroin, meth: no, way too inebriating and addictive. if you really understand these drugs (not: "i know some guy who knew somebody who said it wasn't a problem" anecdotal bullshit) you understand why they should never be legal

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:wouldn't that be wonderful by Oligonicella · · Score: 0

      "(and you have to feed and clothe them)"

      No, you don't.

    2. Re:wouldn't that be wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have cheap and easy access to alcohol. I'm a sufferer of social anxiety and have plenty of other problems to run from. I'm not an addict; I barely drink. I don't smoke and I don't like coffee. The only interest I have in any sort of mind-altering substance is experimentation and 'fun', so to speak. Escape from reality is necessary at times but I prefer an escape like books, which can be set down at any time.

      Human nature might contribute to a slightly higher rate of drug abuse if all drugs were legal but I suspect what would cause even worse problems would be the way that people are raised and the culture of drug use. If drugs suddenly became less of a recreational escape and achieved some religious or cultural significance, people would hesitate to use them outside of that significance, rather like people don't wear wedding dresses except on one "special" day, and people don't eat jellied cranberry except on Thanksgiving. It's a tradition, a cultural norm that could easily be ignored but isn't because people like patterns and habits and traditions. Give drugs a tradition and a pattern of use and within a few generations we'd only smoke pot on certain days or only use LSD on the 4th of July, "just because" our culture told us to do so. It's only if we allow drugs to be seen as a cultural escape that they take on that identity.

  102. Quick! Alert the christian talibani! by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    We must not allow any consciousness alteration that does not involve singing about Jesus all day! To save all souls, we will lock all children in a telephone booth size room until their indoctrination is complete at age 55. It's for their own good! Really!

    Excuse me, I have to mop up some sarcasm while contemplating how unprofitable the news business must be if they're stooping to drug scares *again* to drive revenue and distract from real economic and ecological problems.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  103. Hazzards by ajclements · · Score: 1

    "How will police know if a teen is with headphones on is i-dosing or just listening to Justin Bieber?"
    Wouldn't it be safer to listen to this new "drug"?

  104. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

    Meh.. I tried messing around with binaural beats for a while. Didn't really do anything. You'd probably do better spinning yourself around in a circle or sniffing old gym socks.

    I am however totally fascinated by people getting into a moral panic over the placebo effect.

  105. Re:4:20! Not just for WEED anymore man! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Yeah, hey man, I hate to call you out, but those weren't binaural beats. That was just regular bad music.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  106. We did we take back the south again? by chucklebutte · · Score: 0

    So I am listening to this digital drug, shit sounds like trance or dubstep, hell I smoked a bowl before listening, no change, I feel the same, what the fuck is wrong with these backwards okies? Fucking beyond laughable!

    Next it will be kids getting high on protocols, ports, and if the kids are fucking truly hardcore they get into sockets! The only way to save the kids is stop the internet! Shut it down! I started off with harmless protocols http was my gateway protocol, about 6 months of use I started mixing my http with some port 80 and I have been a junkie ever since. I sold my house, my car, the wife and kids left me, I wish I could kick the habit...

  107. Much Hype, Little Effect by darthdavid · · Score: 1

    You might call me something of an 'expert' ;) on drugs and their effects. I'm trying out these 'binaural beats' and frankly they don't seem to do muMAGGOTS IN MY SKIN MAGGOTS IN MY SKIN OH GOT THE DEMONS! TAKE ME NOW LUCIFER!

  108. because drug addiction destroys freedom by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    the worst jail in the most orwellian government authoritarian nightmare you can imagine, doesn't begin to compare to the bars drug addiction places in the mind. unless of course, that government destroyed people's freedom by force addicting them to heroin

    where before a mind might contemplate philosophy, literature, art, now you have an interrupt cycle which turns this person into a drug seeking zombie

    in the entire history of mankind, no entity has destroyed more freedom than drug use. governments are a far second place also ran

    i argue with people about drug policy all the time, and it just absolutely floors me how all of the harm is from governmental policy, and no one ever admits to the harm the actual drug does on human lives. its amazing. the arguments against drug policy, are, in a way, the classic rationalization of the average addict: "its the world's fault, not mine"

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by dave562 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Society has mechanisms in place to deal with addicts. Criminalizing the possession of a substance only serves to make an already bad situation worse. People who are drug addicts eventually lose their jobs, friends, etc. That is enough of a punishment. A person can't be saved from themselves. They need to learn their own lessons.

    2. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      where before a mind might contemplate philosophy, literature, art, now you have an interrupt cycle which turns this person into a drug seeking zombie

      I'll see that & raise it with a....

      "If you don't believe drugs have done good things for us, then go home and burn all your records, all your tapes, and all your CDs because every one of those artists who have made brilliant music and enhanced your lives? RrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrEAL fucking high on drugs. The Beatles were so fucking high, they let Ringo sing a few songs." --Bill Hicks

      Also, let's not forget Keith Richards.

      Anyhow, I personally don't want the selling of cocaine, heroin & meth to be legalized or decriminalized. I do want personal possession of all drugs to be decriminalized, however.

      This is exactly what they have done in Portugal, and it's been a smashing success across the board.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the worst jail in the most orwellian government authoritarian nightmare you can imagine, doesn't begin to compare to the bars drug addiction places in the mind.

      where before a mind might contemplate philosophy, literature, art, now you have an interrupt cycle which turns this person into a drug seeking zombie

      So what? There's millions of people who do nothing but sit in front of the TV watching reality shows and collecting welfare checks. They certainly aren't contemplating philosophy. Are you going to ban stupidity too?

      You can't force people to be free. You can only provide them freedom to make their own choices, for better or for worse. If they choose to create a prison for themselves, whether it's a drug-induced haze or a mind-numbing existence of watching The Hills, trying to force people to live the way you want will only cause problems.

    4. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by arbiterveritas · · Score: 1

      The "cost of human lives" as a result of addiction is a drop in the bucket compared to the deaths we could prevent were we to devote the money used on the "War on Drugs" for other things.

      What I think you're missing is that it's not a moral argument. It's a matter of money and always has been. The money we spend on the "War" (and yes, I always wrap it with quotations) is paying a lot of people and providing a lot of jobs. As for your arguments about the human harm, what about the legal drugs that are easily purchasable like tobacco and alcohol? Oh, and let's not forget the pharmaceuticals that have caused allergic reactions so severe, a bright child goes in and comes out hours later mentally retarded. The government doesn't care about human lives, we do. They only claim to care so we don't get out our pitchforks and torches.

      So, don't come down here with your anger. People will do whatever they will and, let's face facts: you can't stop them. All you can do is waste money trying. So quit wasting my money, alright?

    5. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      i argue with people about drug policy all the time, and it just absolutely floors me how all of the harm is from governmental policy, and no one ever admits to the harm the actual drug does on human lives. its amazing. the arguments against drug policy, are, in a way, the classic rationalization of the average addict: "its the world's fault, not mine"

      Huh? That's a weird argument for you to be making since it looks like you're blaming an inanimate object known as "the drug" for the hardships that come to the irresponsible drug user.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    6. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all good and well, but if there are no laws against drug use and if you have drug addict neighbors, you will have to put up with their all night shenanigans without any recourse.

    7. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      If you don't like getting together with a bunch of people every couple of months to get fucked up and dance around in the bush for a few days that's OK, but don't give me that bullshit about it destroying thought and creativity.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    8. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by sjames · · Score: 1

      Or, perhaps they realize that draconian drug laws do nothing to actually save people from the drugs, actually make help breaking an addiction harder to get, and simply heap more problems on people who already have quite enough.

      I have seen people mess their lives up with drugs and it's not a pretty sight. Jail would only have made it worse. I have also seen people use drugs and NOT mess up their lives. Jail would have messed up their lives though.

      I can say that nearly 100% of the violence associated with drugs (especially the violence that spills over and harms innocent bystanders) is actually caused by our drug laws.

    9. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by dave562 · · Score: 1

      That's all good and well, but if there are no laws against drug use and if you have drug addict neighbors, you will have to put up with their all night shenanigans without any recourse.

      No, you don't. There are laws against loud noises past certain times, disturbing the peace and all that. There are so many rarely enforced civil codes that can be trotted out to deal with unpleasant neighbors.

    10. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      I'll just come out and say it: The Beatles is not for everyone. I hate this notion that they are "the perfect band". I can't stand their stuff. It's simplistic and dull, much like the Beatles themselves, no doubt partly because of their drug habits.

    11. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      And you are how old?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    12. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with anything?

    13. Re:because drug addiction destroys freedom by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      It wasn't an insult, I am curious. When the Beatles started making music in the 60's they were revolutionary.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  109. Protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monkeys... Apes everywhere... And all I have is this handgun... Need bananas, must get protection!

  110. TARDIS hum! by whovian · · Score: 1

    My username aside, I have always found that sound inexplicably pleasant....until now.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  111. Nonsense at best? by skywire · · Score: 1

    to state that they will lead kids to do drugs is nonsense at best

    What purpose is served by throwing in such an editorial comment? Also, given that it is not all obviously true, it should be supported by at least a sketch of an argument or an allusion to empirical data. It is at least plausible that an individual experimenting with mind alteration by one means might be led to pursue more effective ones.

    --
    Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  112. People, this is a spoof story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Wired (and consequently Slashdot) got taken. Someone made a VERY CREATIVE remix, using News 9 footage and new content.

    For starters, the lip sync throughout the piece is WAY OFF. Its worse than a dubbed Hong Kong kung fu flick. The RPS monitor graphics look pasted on. The 4:20 reference on a laptop screen: too coincidental. The druggies acting is too comical and over the top. The Comic Sans composites, dead giveaway to additional footage.

    You guys think you're smarter than everyone and nothing can get past you, but face it, you guys got taken. I was incredulous too, until I viewed the video, and it all became clear. After working 6 years in a TV station, I can tell a real story and when someone has made a mashup.

    1. Re:People, this is a spoof story. by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Informative

      After working 6 years in a TV station, I can tell a real story

      Apparently working 6 years in a TV station doesn't qualify you to do jack: http://www.news9.com/Global/story.asp?S=12793977

      (Undoing all my mods because someone is wrong on the internet, and being a huge asshole about it)

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  113. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kind of insanity is just plain stupid. Binaural beats have a documented psycho-dynamic effect ... programs like Hemi-Sync are intriguing. I don't think people are going to get "high" off of them though. But what if they do? If binaural beats are made illegal and deemed "narcotic", then the "drug war" is more about denying people access to their own minds.

    This kind of insanity is just plain stupid. Binaural beats have a documented psycho-dynamic effect ... programs like Hemi-Sync are intriguing. I don't think people are going to get "high" off of them though. But what if they do? If binaural beats are made illegal and deemed "narcotic", then the "drug war" is more about denying people access to their own minds.

    Strictly speaking, a narcotic is anything that is similar in action to morphine, aka, an opioid. Therefore, binaural beats can not be considered a narcotic. Indeed, most drugs are not narcotics.

  114. if you make the drug illegal by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you create less addicts

    of course, the committed slow motion suicide loser is going to get any drug he wants. drugs will always be available, but policy has a real effect on ease of access

    meanwhile, there is a much larger class of casual idiot who, when denied easy access, simply just don't take the drug. then they mature and grow up... unaddicted

    it is in the name of saving the casual idiot, not the committed unredeemable slow motion suicide loser, that heroin, meth, cocaine are illegal

    marijuana should be legal. heck, psilocybin, lsd, hallucinogens: these should also be legal because they aren't addictive. well, except for the whole walk out a window part... hmmm... requires some thought. how do you enforce the "use with a babysitter" part? people are by nature irresponsible

    however, the hardcore inebriating highly addictive drugs like cocaine, meth, heroin: easier access simply means more addicts, more destroyed lives. that's why they should be illegal

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  115. Outlaw breathing by rhinokitty · · Score: 1

    Yay, something new to be hysterical about! Finally! A friend of mine was locked up when he was in middle school. They used to get high by breathing heavily, then strangling each other until they passed out. They called it "getting high'. Outlaw breathing!!

  116. No citation available.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    as the OP's assertion is pure bullshit.

    As is the one about psilocybe mushrooms being toxic...

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  117. John Birch Society circa 1971 by Creosote · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nothing new under the sun. This dates me, but when I was in high school the local branch of the John Birch Society advertised an upcoming presentation called "Pot, Rock, and Revolution" that was going to expose how the jungle beat of rock & roll stimulates primitive brain responses and was part of a Communist plot to turn the youth of America into zombies. They seriously cited the Beatles' "Back in the USSR" as propaganda piece, clueless to its status as a parody of "Back in the USA", etc. So a group of long-haired kids went to the meeting, attracting nervous stares but surprisingly little outright hostility, and amazed the crowd by noting that several of us had straight-A grades despite a life-long diet of rock music.

    1. Re:John Birch Society circa 1971 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Nothing new under the sun. This dates me, but when I was in high school the local branch of the John Birch Society advertised an upcoming presentation called "Pot, Rock, and Revolution" that was going to expose how the jungle beat of rock & roll stimulates primitive brain responses and was part of a Communist plot to turn the youth of America into zombies.

      The irony is that at the same time, Soviet authorities were cracking down on that very same music because it is the "product of a degenerate society, created to intentionally evoke animal instincts in the listeners".

    2. Re:John Birch Society circa 1971 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds cool. It's too bad they didn't know much about the Beatles back then.

  118. Not a joke--parents beware! by HycoWhit · · Score: 1

    The physiological effects are real--I've even seen people gyrating with huge grins on their faces. We must ban and sound and rigidly control movement before people break out in sporadic dance...

  119. Agree... by deesine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and disagree. Education: yes. Using erowid as a single source: definitely not.

    My nephew found an old tank of freon from an A/C service cart at a diesel repair shop. After reading the info and reports at erowid he believed he was perfectly safe to inhale from the tank. Apparently none of the reports and info on erowid mentions the dangers of inhaling freon from an A/C service machine: which is full of oil and contaminates from all the service discharges performed.

    My nephew got more than he bargained for. Fortunately the I'm-sure-I'm-dying spell only lasted a couple days and only required one trip to the ER.

    I would have told him, had he simply asked. However, not so sure he would have listened seeing as how brilliant the internet has turned him.

    --
    damaged by dogma
    1. Re:Agree... by Pojut · · Score: 1

      I agree with you...using anything as a single source is a bad idea. Erowid is generally considered one of the best out there and has a fairly active community, so it's a good place to start.

    2. Re:Agree... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Uh, I went and looked. Didn't find any pages saying that freon is safe to use. The page on inhalants specifically warns that they're far more dangerous than other types of drugs.

    3. Re:Agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoted directly from the erowid site:
      "Our understanding of the literature is that there is no such thing as safe use of most volatile solvents, aerosols or other street inhalants : their psychoactive effects may be inseparable from nerve and organ damage."

      If that doesn't deter some kid, then they deserve it.

    4. Re:Agree... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 5, Informative

      Funny, I went to erowid and searched "Freon". Here was the very first story that came up:
      "[Erowid Warning: Our understanding of the literature is that there is no such thing as safe use of volatile solvents, aerosols and other street inhalants : their psychoactive effects are inseparable from nerve and organ damage. We have chosen to include these reports to help document the real world use of inhalants, but their inclusion is not intended to imply that they are anything but dangerous.]

      I guess ill start off with some backround info... My grandpa owns an air conditioning repair place. Its basically a family business. Ive worked there, and my cousin used to work there. I worked on a/c units for a few years (illegally though, I was only 18 and didnt even have a license).

      While I worked there a few friends of mine kept trying to get me to try huffing freon since I had access to mass quantities of it. They also tried to get me to hook them up with it. I always harshly turned them down, because I know how dangerous this shit is. It says right on the box in big letters that inhaling it can and will make your heart stop, among other bad things. But you guys are probably aware of this, so ill go on with my story...

      One morning in 1998 I woke up to a phone ringing. It was my grandpa, and he was sobbing. He told me to wake up my parents and come to 'the shop' quick. I hauled ass over there to find an ambulance in the parking lot, along with a bunch of cops. My cousin (who was working there) had been huffing freon (r-22, if that matters) from a trash bag and had passed out into the bag. There was a small amount of liquid freon in the bottom of the bag. Needless to say, his lungs were practically destroyed and he had been dead for a while.

      I guess what im trying to say is do not do this shit!!!! Ive messed with inhalants before and I know how cool they can be, but damn, dont huff freon. When you get it out of someone's a/c, think about it. Youre not even getting quality freon. It has probably been in the unit for at least 5 years; during that time it absorbs oil from the compressor, chemicals from the welds in the freon lines, and other shit like that. Freon is a tasteless, odorless chemical. The 'honey' taste ive heard described is the impurities in it from the machine its been in. And if the compressor is going out or electrically shorting from age, you might be getting burnt freon. Once when changing out an old unit that had some in it, I had on a mask (of course) and let a blast of this stuff out on a nearby anthill. The ants immediately stopped moving, dead. This is nasty shit.

      Anyway, if you wanna get high, inhalants are a dumb way to do it. Just smoke some weed or sniff some coke or something. If you like inhalants that much, stick to the tamer ones like whippits or something. Freon is just about the most dangerous one you can do, especially if you are getting it out of an a/c unit. Theyre trying to get rid of freon altogether because of what it does to the atmosphere; just think about what it does to your lungs and brain. Peace.

      I miss my cousin"

      Maybe your nephew doesn't know how to read, or thinks that stern warnings are not real.
      In any case you can hardly blame erowid for not warning him. This took me literally 5 seconds to find and was the first entry in the search results.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    5. Re:Agree... by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      Who the hell inhales freon? This is what happens when we make psychedelics illegal. :/

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    6. Re:Agree... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If this isn't the poster boy for legalizing drugs, and having some regulation and quality control, I don't know what is.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    7. Re:Agree... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      and disagree. Education: yes. Using erowid as a single source: definitely not.

      Absolutely. When I had my first (and only) 'proper' experience with cannabis. I'd tried it before (in countries where it was legal) and it'd had no effect whatsoever. This time I had some strong psychoactive effects and was curious to see whether my experience was typical. All I could find on erowid was the usual vanilla crap about "gives a general sense of wellbeing" and "mild dissociative effects", and a bunch of personal accounts of people who thought they'd had some huge meaningful revelation, and that weed somehow held the universe together at a sub-atomic level.

      (For what it's worth, my experience was that it messed with about about the last 10-20 seconds of my short term memory, leading to me feeling very disoriented and paranoid that I was acting weird. Apparently I just sat there for a couple of hours. It also gave me some mild open- and closed-eye visuals, which were fun but in no way good enough to justify the rest of the effects.)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    8. Re:Agree... by Hatman39 · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah, I had that too. It can be caused by combining it with the wrong kind of alcohol (in my case, red wine) or weed that is too strong.

      Also, I had visuals that I could direct and felt very real (although I knew they were not). It was a nice experience, although the first time sucked badly as I did not know what was happening and I had a panick attack.

      The issue with online sources, and any other sources is that they tend to be biased, and they usually only contain the records of those fitting that bias. However, as I was taught in high school (yay Dutchies!), if you are going to do something potentially dangerous and illegal, always have a babysitter, and always fess up with things go bad. No one wants to die pointlessly.

    9. Re:Agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dope affects people differently, I have smoked it for 35yrs but have no problems abstaining and find it much more pleasant than alcohol. However about 10yrs ago a mildly schizophrenic friend of my wife's came around upset about something, I offered her a few puffs of my joint thinking it would relax her but 15 minutes later she was wandering around my backyard muttering to herself and pulling out handfulls of her own hair. Parinoia and vomiting are common side-effects in people who haven't smoked much in the past. As for the "meaningfull revelations", you can easily dispell that myth by writing them down when your stoned and then reading them again when your straight.

      Trivia: Clinton was telling the (half) truth when he said he didn't inhale, what he neglected to mention was he was into cookies.

    10. Re:Agree... by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Heating/burning freon turns it into phosgene. For those of you who don't know, phosgene was used as a chemical weapon in World War 1 and other military engagements around that era.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  120. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by retchdog · · Score: 1

    Could you please give the cite for that effect? I've tried them to no apparent effect, but I'd be very interested in trying again if there's actual evidence. Thanks.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  121. I Experimented with Binaural Beats by Conchobair · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to use this quite a bit and create my own experiences. What is does is force your brain waves into different states of consciousness (usually theta, associated with sleep). It takes a while to learn and get your brain used to making changes while conscious. After a while though it is possible to do without the listening to the "beats".

    It's not really music, but it’s like these two tones, one in each ear that produces the beat, which only exists in your head. So you sit there and listen to two tones, then you start to hear a beat, but is more sounds like ocean waves. Then it becomes almost like you feel like dreaming and if you close your eyes you might start to.

    With enough training one can begin to lucid dream and it's hard to explain but in some of the sessions I experienced what could only be explained as a non-sexual full body orgasm of pure bliss. It also reduces the amount of sleep one would require in order to feel properly rested. It is really good stuff and even better when you learn to shift your brain waves without the beats while conscious.

  122. It's called "stupidity" by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    It's just a result of an educational system that makes "creationism" as important as evolution. Plus an anti-intellectual bias that pervades the entire culture. These people are just plain credulous, they believe that little pills that they see on TV will make their penises bigger!

    Remember "Smiling Bob"

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    1. Re:It's called "stupidity" by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more...
      Downloaded those soundwaves a few years ago just to see, the story is pure baloney.
      They should concentrate on those kids that are dumb enough to smoke spices
      and snort drano....not that Darwin won't get them in the end.

      Save a child now (that is likely to try these things)
      See the same individual as an Adult take two or three others down with him...

      --
      End of Line.
  123. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the lol/informative factor

  124. you apparently don't understand portugal by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    decriminalization is for users, not dealers, in portugal

    therefore, prohibition is alive and well in portugal, today

    and yet you point to portugal as some sort of lesson about prohibition

    which simply means you don't even understand what the hell you are talking about

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you apparently don't understand portugal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the sand taste good, Captain Ostrich?

  125. It runs... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    one student claiming there are 'demons' involved.

    So, it does run NetBSD?

    1. Re:It runs... by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      If I could mod you up for humor I would. The obvious answer is "Of course it runs NetBSD"

  126. if portugal's policy reduces drug use by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    then i fully support it as a valid tactic in the war on drugs

    because portugal, of course, understands that drugs are destructive and the goal is to reduce their use, despite the fact that some deluded fools think portugal's experiment means something else

    i only have a problem with the fools who believe drugs are harmless, or worse, as you suggest, that they are good for you, good for your creativity

    no: a creative person needs no drugs to be creative. drug use in creative people is a contemporaneous phenomenon. creative people, because of the way they see the world, often live on the edges of society. and this puts them in the same company as other people who live on the edge of society, like drug addicts. there are plenty of drug addicts who are not creative. there are plenty of creative people who do not take drugs. there's no connection, not a cause and effect relationship. if the beatles never had a drop of a drug in their entire lives, they'd still make great music, because the source of their creativity is their fertile minds, not the temporary reduction of that mind into a drug stupor now and then, for reasons of recreation, not creation

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:if portugal's policy reduces drug use by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well history & popular culture both say it's a little bit of both & not the black & white view you are espousing.

      So, I'll go with history & culture, thanks.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  127. time to smoke an old fashioned joint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha, did anyone else notice that the time shown on the iphone was 4:20 at about 2 mins and 10 seconds into that clip? coincidence?

  128. What next? Will there be an anti-drug propaganda film called "Binaural Madness"?

    1. Re:LOL by arbiterveritas · · Score: 1

      There's no point to arguing with you. People like you are the reason I vote. See you in the booths.

    2. Re:LOL by dbIII · · Score: 1

      so you want the GOVERNMENT to hand out addictive drugs?

      Yes, it's called a methadone program or some similar harm minimisation process run by doctors.
      It seems to work for a lot of addicts.
      Treating it as a crime solvable with multiple short spells in prison doesn't seem to be working.

  129. there's no social services? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    my taxes don't go to support social services?

    i think its cheaper for society to prevent the creation of the drug addict then support a zombie, no?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:there's no social services? by arbiterveritas · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's cheaper to be the provider of the drugs and then declare them exempt from receiving the (already low) funds to handle the homeless, etc. Frankly, if it's legal and out-in-the-open, then it's also just as easy to track. That means that if someone screws themselves up, just like with alcohol, they either get into meetings / rehab, or they end up on the street.

      The problem with your argument is that the information is hidden and obfuscated. (Reaches farther back in slashdot.) There's an article back there on how the uninformed are more likely to believe lies than truth. That's how misinformation works. You're more likely to believe your friend when they lie to you than the more / less complicated truth from a stranger.
      Would it make you feel better if I pushed your Authority Button?

  130. They should ban infants' thumbsucking too! by broknstrngz · · Score: 1

    It's addictive, you know... Fucking helicopter moron parents. Their kids wouldn't be so bored today, had they tried showing them what fun & games are. You don't fight boredom with psychiatrists and police, but with proper, age-suited activities.

  131. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try this one... listen to the whole thing lying down with your eyes closed.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpGL7Ba8kA0

  132. The important question by InsertCleverUsername · · Score: 1

    The important question I'm asking myself is, how can I make an easy buck selling concerned parents binaural beat testing kits?

    --
    Ask me about my sig!
  133. how much does it cost to feed and house an addict? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    how much does it cost to prevent the creation of the addict in the first place?

    yes: there is a committed hardcore group of slow motion suicide types who will always get drugs, no matter what

    but there is a much larger group of casual idiots who, if denied easy access, simply don't take the drug. and then don't become addicts. and then mature. and then live addiction free lives

    it is for the sake of the second group that the war on drugs is waged, and is cost effective

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  134. One more reason not to watch the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most ill-informed news story I have ever seen.

  135. I'm proud to be an okie from muskogee by lotho+brandybuck · · Score: 1

    Isn't there a song about this? Don't they also respect the college dean?

  136. LOL by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    so you want the GOVERNMENT to hand out addictive drugs?

    think about that for a second, moron

    in the name of the fight for freedom from oppressive government policy, you want to hand government the greatest tool of oppression possible: addictive drugs

    i'm sorry, but in a world where the government is doling out heroin, freedom really is dead

    people worry about the government having national id cards or keeping tabs on your internet posting. people complain about the opiates of the masses: television and entertainment news, killing our minds

    and here you sit, advocating that the government become the drug dealer!

    so you like being a slave, huh?

    hilarious!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  137. your argument would be 100% correct by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    were it not for the fact that when drug addicts destroy their lives, they often destroy other lives too

    in other words, drug addiction is not something that occurs in a vacuum, with ill effects only for the user. drug addiction impacts society in general in a number of ways, in tangible (social services) and intangible (crime increase) costs, and it impacts relationships and jobs in a myriad of tragic ways, large and small

    i would love to turn off my human empathy and just walk by drug addicts rotting in the street. but i understand the cost that addict has on society, and for that addict's family/ employer. not to mention, finally, the cost to that addict's own life (which you say we shouldn't care about)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:your argument would be 100% correct by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      were it not for the fact that when drug addicts destroy their lives, they often destroy other lives too

      So do stupid people, lazy people, and uneducated people. These people raise children, destroying their lives by passing on their stupid, lazy ways to them (children learn to be lazy and stupid by watching their parents). How are you going to fix that? Ban stupidity? Ban stupid people from having children?

      Also, people of the wrong religion destroy not only lives, but souls, by getting people to convert to their false religions, condemning them to an eternity in hell. Only people of the correct religion go to heaven, and everyone else goes to hell. So if someone of a false religion converts someone, or raises children in their false religion, those people and their souls are doomed to eternal damnation. Shouldn't we also ban false religions, and only allow the one true religion?

    2. Re:your argument would be 100% correct by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      Hilarious!

      You should consider performing your comedy routine in a live venue.

    3. Re:your argument would be 100% correct by tibit · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  138. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If binaural beats are made illegal and deemed "narcotic", then the "drug war" is more about denying people access to their own minds.

    This is what the drug war has *always* been about. The rest of you are just now starting to figure it out.

    "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." - Bill Hicks

    What a load of hogwash. Have you ever been around a hard core user? 'Man I only need 50 cent so I cans get home on the bus'. It is amazing how many people have this problem. They leach off everyone around them, in mind, body, and spirit.

    People who talk about the 'war on drugs' in the way you do are rationalizing what they do. As if they are doing some great good for the planet. Drug use is *RARELY* about that. It is almost always about getting f'd up. I have known and been around many drug users. It is *ALWAYS* about getting tweeked or geeked out.

    By the very nature of laws they remove freedoms away from you. However, your freedom is taking away something from everyone else. So we elect people who enact laws that we *ALL* follow for the betterment of everyone. For example I can not drive 150 going home (even though my car is well capable of doing so). Why is this? Oh maybe its dangerous to everyone else on the road? Even if I dont hit anyone? Everyone else basically has to get out of the way of me or I will mess up their lives. How is that not touching and forcing myself upon them in some way?

    Hard core users are so into getting f'd up they forget about life. This means hurting spiritually all those around them (including other users they tend to hang with). They no longer want to do their part for society and just want to 'tune out'. The 'drug users are only hurting themselves' is a dirty lie. I believed it for years. Until I had to deal with one daily.

    I cant control it but I sure as hell am not going to put up with the lies told by both sides to provide their own self serving agenda.

    Or let me put it to you this way. You are taking the word of someone who thinks eating 3 bags all at once of Doritos and following it up with 2 quarts of OJ and vodka is a good idea. Perhaps maybe their 'good ideas' are a little suspect because they are f'd up. Do not let repetition of a lie draw you into thinking it must be right.

  139. huh? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    drug use results in a degeneration of the mind. often times this can be a pleasant experience. but how can a mind degenerated of its abilities make great creative works? you need all your faculties to make a great artistic creation

    lsd users often report seeing the mind of god, or understanding the entire scope of their lives. they even aim to draw what they see or write it down. and, in the throes of their trip, they are indeed seeing the face of god as they transcribe it. then they sober up the next day, and see that all they drew were three wavy lines and a stick, or their great poem reads "catz in europe. seeds. mr. hufflntn. snnr"

    no, drug use does not increase creativity. i don't know where this stupid pop culture assumption comes from

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:huh? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Well you've made it plain that you've never taken LSD & you've obviously made your mind up about a subject you seem to know woefully little about, so & will simply bid you a good day sir.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:huh? by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      How about some positive LSD stories. :D

      I used to be a very selfish introvert before I took it and realised how awesome other people are, no matter who they are or what they look like. Completely changed my attitude to life in a positive way.

      A friend of mine was your average south central LA banger until he took it, at which point he claims to have been given the perspective and clarity of thought to realise that he should get the fuck out of there and move to New Zealand, which he did.

      Humans have evolved over the last 100,000 years with alcohol, pot and psychedelics in almost every culture and any efforts to seperate us from them are a) legislated morality, or worse b) an attempt to seperate us from our humanity for some other gain. (Perhaps to sell us harder-to-manufacture pharmaceuticals for profit).

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
  140. Re:Seriously? are you retarded? by Pojut · · Score: 1

    I have already touched on the importance of education prior to experimentation here.

    I would also consider trying a drug without studying it first to be abuse, something else that I spoke out against in the post that you responded to.

  141. Beh by Windwraith · · Score: 1

    Binaural beats, someone recommended them to me to take care of my sleep issues (narcoleptic), and it's a placebo at best. That or I lack something inside my brain.

  142. Hendrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Music is the safest kind of high" - Jimi Hendrix

  143. Spinning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Merry Go Round and chairs can be spun really fast and produce physiological effects. Should these be banned too?

    I would imagine that just like these spinning devices, the effects go away once the stimulus is removed. So what's the big deal?

  144. i've taken lsd and psilocybin by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    and i pride myself on my creativity

    but none of that matters

    please describe to me the mechanism by which drug use makes someone more creative. there is none. its just an ignorant pop culture meme

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  145. i'm glad you vote by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    for a moment there i thought you were advocating for extreme authoritarianism: a government that doles out addictive drugs to its citizens. talk about mind control. what an orwellian nightmare (shudder)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  146. all i understand from your post by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    is that you don't like the uneducated, the lazy, and religious evangelists. good for you, neither do i

    but what any of that rant has to do with drug addiction, is beyond me

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:all i understand from your post by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The point is that there's a lot of people who cause problems by their actions, whether it's through laziness and stupidity, religious silliness, or drug addiction. Look at all the lazy people who swindle people, especially their own families, or who hurt their families by taking their money so they don't have to work (the family thinks they're "helping them out", but they're really just enabling bad behavior). Look at all the people who have kids they can't support, and do a terrible job parenting, causing them to grow up to become criminals. Look at all the people who send all their money (including money their family needs for food and other important expenses) off to some stupid church (or worse, televangelist) because the church told them to tithe 10% of their income or else God will curse them.

      Why aren't you promoting banning all these things, instead of just drugs?

      The point is, you'll never succeed in fixing society's ills by having the government ban things. It didn't work in Prohibition, and it's never worked throughout history. All you do is create a black market and increased demand for whatever it is.

  147. The Science Behind This by xianthax · · Score: 1

    Beyond all the 'states of consciousness' debates and how stupid it is that anyone is worried about this (people have used it to meditate for years) this is very scientific.

    What they are really doing is just building a poor mans sensory deprivation tank.

    Your mind generally keeps track of where your body is by a few things, effects of gravity, vision, and most importantly your body's 'gyroscope' is the inner ear.

    By laying down on something soft and not moving you partially remove gravity (true sensory deprivation tanks suspend you in a liquid to do this and thus are far more effective).

    By covering your eyes completely you remove vision as a positional reference.

    Bi-aural sound effects can induce certain types of brain waves, but they also throw your inner ear gyroscope all out of wack.

    Combine the 3 and you've removed your brain's ability to understand where your body is and in what position its in.

    This is where the 'out of body' feeling comes from, without a grounding reference the rest of your brain is free to introduce sensations of movement. If you imagine your flying like a bird your brain no longer has a grounding point saying 'you know man, your not REALLY flying'.

    The rest of the audio in these tracks in there to 'guide' you into a mental state, induce certain types of brain wave usually with the goal of inducing a lucid dreaming type of state.

    Some people tweak out because of this, generally people that hate feeling out of control. Sensory Deprivation tanks have even been used a form of torture. You can also purchase time in them commercially to relax, some spa's have them.

    Some people love it, and the people that love it probably are more likely the ones who are also into other forms of mind altering (drugs or whatever). Not that i'm saying its a 'gateway' to anything, if your the type of person that loves this type of experience you don't need a gateway, your already wired to enjoy these things, which is good in my opinion. Everyone needs to let go sometimes.

  148. The Oklahoma Dept. of Narcotics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is a bit late to the party I think...like 40-45 years late.

    "Feed your head" indeed.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1cfTMdjkYM&feature=related

  149. Channel 9 did do the report by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

    I felt really dumb when I saw this post, so I looked some more. The posting on YouTube was from user "NEWS9OklahomaCity" which looked to be the official place for the TV station. Then I went to the new station's web site and searched for "digital drugs", finding several links:
    http://www.news9.com/Global/searchresults.asp?vendor=ez&qu=digital+drugs

    So it might be that News 9 got taken, but Wired and Slashdot have it right: There are people in OK who think the iPods are going to drive their kids to heroin.

  150. Offtopic but I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So whenever reading the comments in idle, if I click to expand a comment it instead directs me to a new page with a thread starting from the comment I clicked. As well, if I click "parent" instead of moving through the page to the parent, my browser opens a new window showing only the parent post's thread. This ONLY happens when I'm reading a discussion of Idle. Any ideas? I've tried looking through my settings and I can't find anything.

  151. I think I've experienced this by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    I played the above youtube video and found myself laughing hysterically. Is that the same effect?

    1. Re:I think I've experienced this by Noitatsidem · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is. Damn these news stations getting our kids high!

      --
      Feel free to mod me down, just know that unlike some Anonymous Cowards I'm not afraid to express my views as myself.
  152. Chills by VocationalZero · · Score: 1

    WARNING: enjoying "music" can stimulate dopamine release and induce a high known as "goosebumps" or "the spine tingles". Seriously, parents need to be aware of this so their kids don't turn into musicians. Oops, I mean drug addicts.

  153. you have to develop a better argument by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    against drug control than comparing it to completely unrelated issues

    i can't really respond to you because you're all over the place and quite ridiculous

    this is what you are asking me to argue against:

    "you can't pass laws against burglary because people will still burgle, and why don't you pass laws against selfishness since that's the same thing!"

    whu?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you have to develop a better argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're intentionally misunderstanding him. Drug use is a self-harming(or helping) endeavor. Alone, it doesn't cause harm to others. That's different from burglary which harms others exclusively. Comparing laws against the two is apples to oranges.

      Comparing drug laws to the 18th amendment prohibition of alcohol, on the under hand, is a perfect apples to apples comparison. They're both bans on drugs of some form. The effect has shown to be largely the same. Do you not understand how bad prohibition was, that the country did a 180 degree turn in just a dozen years to repeal the amendment? Please read up on it. Your posts on things non-drug-related show you to be an intelligent person. I don't understand why you have such a hard time with this issue.

  154. Not all sounds totally without long term effect by stevenmenke · · Score: 1

    I would just like to point out that, although it differs from the binaural nature of the sounds described in the article, there are some kind of sounds which can have a long term and significant effect on humans. These sounds cause bilateral stimulation. My father is a clinical psychologist and uses them in (Emdr) therapy to kind of 'erase' or 'overwrite' negative memories of people suffering from ptss to a neutral state. These sound are very simple in nature but the effect is astounding. Within a few sessions the disorder can disappear completely. Just an example to show that not all uses of sounds should be regarded as without long term effect. Although I believe the type of sounds discussed in TFA are.

  155. Beats on Some Files are Audible in One Ear by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

    If binaural beats are supposed to exist only in the brain, why, when I play back the files linked to on wikipedia do I hear the beat fluctuation when I listen to only one of my earphones at a time? Is VLC mixing the left and right tracks and not telling me? Is it happening on my mac? Or is the file not a real beats file?

    --
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
  156. Parents, hide your kids!!! by StormBear · · Score: 1

    Hhhhrrrrrmmmmm, it seems Buddhist have been doing something similar for centuries.

  157. Re:Seriously? are you retarded? by endymion.nz · · Score: 2, Informative

    All the things you talk about are problems caused by prohibition, not drugs.

    --
    mediocrity rules, man
  158. TekWar by e3m4n · · Score: 1

    Who would have thought that William Shatner's scifi stories TekWar had any merit with their digital drug 'Tek'.

  159. Kurt Vonnegut by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

    Now when we get something like Vonneguts 'The Euphio Question' where you can plug into a sound and lose track of days at a time in euphoria ... give me a call.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  160. Round and Round by konohitowa · · Score: 1

    And here I thought merry-go-rounds were still the gateway drug of choice. I guess I'm showing my age.

  161. Re:how much does it cost to feed and house an addi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how much does it cost to prevent the creation of the addict in the first place?

    yes: there is a committed hardcore group of slow motion suicide types who will always get drugs, no matter what

    but there is a much larger group of casual idiots who, if denied easy access, simply huff the nearest household poison^W cleaner instead. and then die or become addicts.

    FTFY

  162. Ozzy and AC/DC --- gateway sounds... by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    Ozzy and AC/DC were always gateway sounds that led to hardcore drug use...

  163. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by bodhijon · · Score: 1

    then the "drug war" is more about denying people access to their own minds.

    I submit that this is what the drug war has always been about. /tinfoil hat

  164. Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like drugs and I lead a completely normal life.

  165. So you have given-up Whiskey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hint: Whiskey is the Irish word for "water", not illicit water (can't remember that phrase for illicit water yet so someone help me out.)

    1. Re:So you have given-up Whiskey? by albyrne5 · · Score: 1

      Uisce beatha

  166. OhNOZ! by Torodung · · Score: 1

    After reading an article like that, and seeing such a video, I have this incredible desire to "kill all the phonies."

    Anyone want to give me a ride to NYC?

    --
    Toro

    (Jesus Hopping Christ on a POGO STICK)

  167. Brainwave Sculptures by ddsmooth · · Score: 1

    I personally have a brainwave entrainment website called Brainwave Sculptures - http://www.brainwavesculptures.com/ where I offer a collection of meditative binaural and monaural audio which are safe to use, relaxing, stimulating and meditative. Feel free to check it out I hope you enjoy!

  168. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole - A mistake by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    what does it mean if you *don't* hear a beat? thats what i want to know. because I noticed that on a few of the files i found, i could tell the sound from each earphone was different, but it did not produce a beat in my brain. it was just two annoying sounds.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  169. *SNORT* by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a bunch of jenkem to me...

    --
    [End Of Line]
  170. fantasia by gaboalonso · · Score: 1

    On the same lines, we shouldn't let our kids watch Fantasia, for the matter.

  171. Much worse than they think by sjames · · Score: 1

    What they REALLY need to watch out for is preschoolers spinning around until the literally drop. Sometimes they can't even stand up afterward. Much worse, Playskool has been selling them paraphernalia.

    It's the kind of thing that could lead to heroin or figure skating.

  172. Re:how much does it cost to feed and house an addi by tibit · · Score: 1

    I'd say: citation needed. You have easy access to all sorts of things that are very dangerous, and addictive, and yet somehow you don't have an epidemic of "casual idiots" who take those. Just walk into your friendly home improvement store and look on the shelves.

    As far as I'm concerned, maybe the casual idiots should excuse themselves from the gene pool. Why should we spend billions on a "war" that keeps casual idiots living in our society. I don't see how "casual idiots" can generally mature, sorry. I'd tend to think that most of them (50%+) stay casual idiots.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  173. Old fad with a new face by d3athp3nguin · · Score: 1

    This "binaural beat" thing is a recycled fad from the 90's "new age" movement; binaural beats were supposed to help induce specific brain states that were conducive to meditation, self-hypnosis, etc. Often a binaural beat track was combined with positive subliminal messaging, etc. You won't find many scientific articles that actually confirm the effects are anything more than placebo. This local news report must have scared the shite out of all 300 viewers who saw it...

  174. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by millennial · · Score: 1

    "Binaural beats have a documented psycho-dynamic effect"
    [citation needed]

    Listening to sound waves in no way alters the pattern of waves produced by your brain, and in no way alters your consciousness.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  175. Outlaw advertising? by sjdude · · Score: 1

    Any chance they could use this stupidity to outlaw advertising? I mean, sound and lights that affect human behavior and all...

  176. What's next ... ? by rkinch · · Score: 1

    Blue Star iPhones?

  177. No, seriously by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I should have been an ear or sound specialist. Between kids today have 500, 1000 or more watts of boom boom boom coming from their cars, or blasting 120db of sounds from their MP3 players to get high, we are going to have a bunch of DEAF kids in 10-20 years. Either that, or buy stock in hearing aid companies.

  178. Unbelievable... just unbelievable. by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

    This is absurd, and is demonizing the perfectly natural desire to alter consciousness: there is no shortage of examples of animals seeking intoxication through any number of means, and I could name at least five or six off the top of my head. There is nothing wrong with brainwave manipulation for altering mental facilities: it's free, it's not physically addictive, and it's physically safe - indeed, it's probably the safest way to shift consciousness. I just find it absolutely absurd that these kids are choosing such a safe route to broaden their minds and their experiences - and still you have a group of people shrieking and freaking out about it.

    If you oppose something as benign as brainwave stimulation, ask yourself how austere, flavourless, and joyless you want life to be for people, and what this indicates about you as a person.

    Why not demonize yoga, tai chi, meditation, prayer, television, sex, and even food while we're at it, since if you're doing them right, they're all powerful ways of altering consciousness? Certainly some of them can lead to drug use, as well: one can speculate that certain groups of yogi and meditators are more inclined towards drug use than the normal population. Does that mean that they should be avoided? Hell, no.

    1. Re:Unbelievable... just unbelievable. by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

      Already Demonized:

      Prayer: Demonized as being characteristic of a religious drone, and a religious, close-minded, "Conservative Right-Wing" practice. Also demonized as a practice supportive of a religion and higher power that detractors claim is bogus and non-existent.

      Television: Demonized by detractors as the "Idiot Box".

      Sex: Demonized as indulgent and deviant by detractors.

      Food: Demonized by fatties as being a highly-addictive drug that they are not responsible for consuming in excess.

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  179. Fears cast upon mind expanding techniques by sakari · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new, claiming that these mind altering techniques are dangerous for The Children. This is just fear based thinking where everything that might expand ones consciousness about themselves and the world surrounding them is being turned into frightful thinking and "demons" that will limit thinking of people not smart enough to see behind the ill-logicalness of this kind of thinking

    These kind of binaural beats can be used to control and expand thinking behaviour. They incorporate sounds that encourage left- and right-brain communication, making new connections and enabling the user with other meditation and medication procedures to expand their mind literally, to control their own behaviour better and to find new sides of themselves not known before. This is frightening for the people who want to keep the Status Quo up to date.

    Think about it.

  180. we got trolled by news9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    @2:07 in the video 4:20 on an iphone so the news is luring you to use drugs(and iphones) too.

  181. Meet your new dealer ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Ryoji Ikeda

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2S_2r0J7bHo

  182. The harder stuff. by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    They might start with MP3s and Youtube but once they're hooked they'll go to FLACs or even make their own uncut stuff.

    Your neighbor might be running an oscillator lab in his basement and you don't even know it!

  183. Re:Anything that alters consciousness is a narcoti by II+Xion+II · · Score: 1

    After reading this article, I guess there's a reason they call it the "Gateway" Experience. ;-)

  184. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moral panic is middle america's drug of choice.

  185. Oh C'mon! by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

    [Hide the childrens' ears. I'm going to say bad words! : ) ]

    Oh for fucks sake! It's like established authoritarian sources are trying to find something.
    Does listening to this cause severe dependence in a majority of users? No? Then leave it -the fuck- alone.

    I saw this having beneficial uses with helping calm people down who have pre-op anxiety. Or Anxiety in general.
    Also in the opposite, instead of downing coffee in the morning. Crank up the tunes and wake up!

    I don't think it's a mystery that music and sound have mood altering properties.


    Who isn't stirred by a rousing Sousa march during a 4th of July parade? Who feels sorrow or reverence when Amazing Grace is played for a fallen hero?

    Well son! That's all druuuuuugggggsss! You're usin' drugs when ya feel that way.

    Tell that to every damn fundie out there who is going to get into an absolute uproar over this.
    Just for once, can't people find out about this themselves without the FUD slant?
    Maybe find some real clinical studies or perform some long term studies
    and find out how beneficial or detrimental this sound usage is.

    BTW, I am a damn fundie. Even I think this is absolutely inane.

  186. Oklahoma! by stkpogo · · Score: 1

    ~where the sins come sweeping down the plains~
    ~where any change is bad~
    ~where anything you do might make a Okie mad~

  187. There are TWO awesome binaural CDs, get em! by llamafirst · · Score: 1

    I've tried many binaural beats CDs, including esoteric expensive ones I borrowed from a friend into them. Most of them suck because although they probably (?) have the right difference in frequency between left and right ear, the two frequencies were fairly high up in frequency, and I find it dissonant and irritating pretty quick. My guess is that most CDs do this because they can't assume that you have good headphones that can really do deep bass. If you have both L and R sides at low frequencies, it is **powerful** and it is less irritating, or at least it is for me. Also a bunch on the market have crappy new agey chimes or amateurish music that is lame the first time you hear it, and way more so the 20th time you've heard it.

    In contrast, there are TWO CDS THAT ARE AWESOME, which I continue to use, with my big headphones that can do the low bass...

    I listen to these two CD repeatedly and enjoy the meditative and sorta head-trippy effect. I find they tend to calm me and focus me. It feels like it is increasing cooperation between my brain hemispheres. Like, when I'm doing very left brain stuff like programming, I feel more creative. And sometimes I feel more grounded, and more social (less shy and less self-involved) afterward so it's easier to do other things in life.

    I'll listen to both of these in quite varied settings. Not just meditation, but also cleaning the house, or programming code, or blocking out sounds at work, or running on a treadmill.

    As I mentioned, these two CDs require headphones with GOOD BASS RESPONSE. For the record, I'm extremely fond of my Ultrasone 650 headphones, which btw do not need a headphone amp to have deep bass with iPod / iPhone, btw. Ultrasone is a brand not well known outside recording studio / pro audio worlds. Here's a link to more of their headphones.

    I strongly recommend these two CDs to geeks and non-geeks alike, and to those who like traditional drugs and for those who are 'straight edge'! :-)

    I hope you enjoy them!

    I'm not affiliated with the guy who made them, I just like his work.

  188. Re:Further Down the Rabbit Hole - A mistake by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    It means that your brain isn’t trying to recombine the sounds properly. Switch the audio mode to mono and playback the same file to have the computer combine the tracks and if you still can’t hear a beat then you must have broken the universe.

    The brain tries to recombine the sounds from the left and right ear to form one panorama of sound with a sense of direction. Just like it tries to recombine the images from the left and right eye to form one image with a sense of depth.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  189. A whirling dervish we be by niftymitch · · Score: 1
    The whirling dance or Sufi whirling that is proverbially associated with Dervishes...

    Would that be protected under freedom of religion and speech.?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dervish

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  190. What's Next? Remember "subliminal" by Cito · · Score: 1

    Remember all the trials about subliminal message causing teens to commit acts of violence or promiscuity from records? And people all up in arms about 'satanic' messages when records were played backwards b.s.? this is just history repeating itself in my opinion... this is just a placebo effect or power of suggestion really. You will get the same thing from chilling out listening to some Enigma or Massive Attack for example.

  191. Commie ! by nu1x · · Score: 1

    Grain alcohol and pure rain water is the way to go !

    --
    I have nothing to lose but my bindings.
  192. The Red Hot Chili Peppers... by P.+Legba · · Score: 1

    ...beg to differ.

    P.

  193. Not that good of an idea by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

    Your idea is asking for a "whatcouldpossiblygowrong" tag. Legalize all the stuff and next day the corporations will take over drug trage. If that doesn't sound bad just look at the food industry. What would happen is a rapidly rising number of drug addicts because an addicted person is much more likely to make another purchase. I recall reading a story here on /. about junk food that has similar addictive effects on a human as drugs. Corporate-driven food industry lead to the rapid grow of overweighted people because junk food sells best -- even if it doesn't make people addictive, obese people eat more for they need more energy to move all these fat around. Replace "obese" with "drug-addict" and you will see what happens to the society if you legalize all the stuff.
    Second, look at the deaths from corporations running tobacco industry -- they can hire clever people to do clever marketing for them so they can sell poison. Most parents are amateurs in that aspect, they can't really compete with well-educated and well-paid marketing departments of tobacco companies which like to target even less experienced youth. As a result many people die from second-hand smoking, even those who are clever enough not to fall for the shit.
    Now I know, overpopulation, Darwinism, those who are smart are more likely to survive etc, but there is a catch here: If drug addicts were a danger only for themselves, similar to obese people, it'd be less of a problem. Not the case though. And it will get much worse than obesity and smoking combined if you start selling amphetamines or heroine at your local supermarkets.

    1. Re:Not that good of an idea by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

      I understand where you're going with that. However, few of the banned drugs are patentable... so think acetaminophen instead of the corporate drug-of-the-week. And the government is so heavily invested in the "war" that they certainly wouldn't blink at setting up some heavy regulations towards purity, labeling, advertising laws, etc....

      And finally, alcohol. Alcohol is a problem. Banning alcohol was much more of a problem. Corporations are presently very involved in alcohol. They're also heavily involved in acetaminophen. I'd rather have them involved in some processes than my next door neighbor (like acetaminophen or meth), and on the others, like alcohol or marijuana, I can't see an issue either way.

      A lot more people get injured or killed by people on alcohol than by people on heroin. I'm okay with beer at my local grocer... if they sell heroin there, how can I be less okay with it? Back before the "drug war" insanity, they did sell it at the local grocer! And they taxed it! :-)

    2. Re:Not that good of an idea by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      I don't know what drug patents have to with any of it -- I was thinking about McDonalds of drug industry, selling addictive junk at bargain prices, you don't need patents for that.
      As for regulations -- I am not that optimistic about them especially seeing how food regulations work. Besides, "300 per cent. profit, and there is not a crime at which capital will scruple, nor a risk it will not run, even to the chance of its owner being hanged"

      >I'm okay with beer at my local grocer... if they sell heroin there, how can I be less okay with it?

      You do understand that net effect would be more people killed by both groups as there will be more heroin addicts? Alcohol is already bad enough, why add another drug to the pool?

    3. Re:Not that good of an idea by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

      Why assume more heroin addicts? Cigarettes are legal, but the userbase is shrinking. An effective education campaign and regulations on advertising would be much easier to enact for a "new" legal industry when not having to fight against lobbying from an entrenched well-monied industry alliance.

      And we don't have all the incidental crime around cigarettes that we do around banned drugs. As for the people who choose to use them? When did you last hear of someone committing violence whilst high on heroin? However, when did you last hear of violence committed by those involved in the heroin trade, or in the suppression of the heroin trade? And it goes way beyond obvious "drug war" activity in US cities. Consider the ongoing death toll, and the US tax dollar toll, in Afghanistan and all around the world where "US interests" concerning the drug trade is violently enforced and violently responded to by those involved in production and distribution. Money and lives wasted, continuously, forever. Much more violence and actual crime than you could expect, even if the heroin userbase increased dramatically, which it likely would not.

      Visit or read about cities where the government is less concerned with "vice" and prohibition and more concerned with infrastructure, and see if there is more or less violence, more or less of the kind of problems that would impact your life negatively... Then visit or read about Juarez, Mexico and the Texas border towns in that region. Do the users of any drug you can think of cause that kind of problem because of the drug itself?

      You do understand that net effect would be more people killed by both groups as there will be more heroin addicts?

      Reconsider your assumptions about net effects. We are witnessing, all the time, in the news, the net effects of these drugs being banned, and the body count is pretty high.

  194. Speaking of drugs... by Drail117 · · Score: 0

    just wondering if anyone else has notice that @2:06 in the video the time on the iPhone says 4:20 PM. Looks like that news company does a little puff puff pass themselves. But also, I have tried to use these idoses last year they only work for some people and i found one that put me to sleep in the middle of the day but other than that i have had no side effects. They supposedly only work once and after that you need a different dose file to make it work again. I for one don't really care if this is illegal because this way of getting "high" is going to cost money that you have to pay with a credit card after a while and from what I know which isnt much, usually all of these druggies only carry cash on them because there dope dealer doesnt take credit cards (although I'm sure he will gladly take them from you if you offer them.)

  195. Rat Park by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    To support your point, maybe they would find these links on Rat Park experiment from the 1970s that shows how addictive behavior arises from distressing environments?

    From:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_Park
    """
    Rat Park was a study into drug addiction conducted in the late 1970s (and published in 1980), by Canadian psychologist Bruce K. Alexander and his colleagues at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada.
        Alexander's hypothesis was that drugs do not cause addiction, and that the apparent addiction to opiate drugs commonly observed in laboratory rats exposed to it is attributable to their living conditions, and not to any addictive property of the drug itself.[1] He told the Canadian Senate in 2001 that prior experiments in which laboratory rats were kept isolated in cramped metal cages, tethered to a self-injection apparatus, show only that "severely distressed animals, like severely distressed people, will relieve their distress pharmacologically if they can."[2]
        To test his hypothesis, Alexander built Rat Park, an 8.8 m2 (95 sq ft) housing colony, 200 times the square footage of a standard laboratory cage. There were 16-20 rats of both sexes in residence, an abundance of food, balls and wheels for play, and enough space for mating and raising litters.[3] The results of the experiment appeared to support his hypothesis. Rats who had been forced to consume morphine hydrochloride for 57 consecutive days were brought to Rat Park and given a choice between plain tap water and water laced with morphine. For the most part, they chose the plain water. "Nothing that we tried," Alexander wrote, "... produced anything that looked like addiction in rats that were housed in a reasonably normal environment."[1] Control groups of rats isolated in small cages consumed much more morphine in this and several subsequent experiments.
        The two major science journals, Science and Nature, rejected Alexander, Coambs, and Hadaway's first paper, which appeared instead in Psychopharmacology, a respectable but much smaller journal in 1978. The paper's publication initially attracted no response.[4] Within a few years, Simon Fraser University withdrew Rat Park's funding.
    """

    "A claymation short on the Rat Park experiment"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3swVNAaoDgw

    Im Soviet Russia there were guards at the borders to keep people from escaping. In the Capitalist USA, there are guards at the medicine cabinets to keep people from escaping. We need to fix the society and its underlying economics to meet the needs of the 21st century, as discussed in this knol I put up:
    "Beyond a Jobless Recovery: A heterodox perspective on 21st century economics"
    http://knol.google.com/k/paul-d-fernhout/beyond-a-jobless-recovery

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.