Slashdot Mirror


Barnes and Noble Bookstore Chain Put In Play

suraj.sun sends in word that the country's largest bookstore chain, Barnes and Noble, will put itself up for sale. "The news surprised analysts and alarmed publishers, who have watched as the book business has increasingly shifted to online retailers and e-book sales, leaving both chains and independent sellers struggling. ... For years, Barnes & Noble has been battered by large shifts in the publishing industry and the retail environment. Book sales have moved toward big-box stores like Costco, Wal-Mart and Target, and away from mall-based stores like B. Dalton, which Barnes & Noble acquired in the late 1980s. 'There's been a long series of pressures,' said David Schick, managing director at Stifel Nicolaus in Baltimore. 'The market has not been kind to bookstores, and it's for new reasons like competition with Apple and Amazon, and it's for old reasons, like what we believe has been a decline in reading for the last 20 years. Americans have devoted less of what we call media time to books.'"

414 comments

  1. Let me tell you... by brouski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I sure feel great about my Nook purchase this week.

    --
    Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
    1. Re:Let me tell you... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention it. I was considering the Nook too. Although it is nice that you can load Border's app to it from what I've read.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Let me tell you... by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's the link on how to crack the DRM on the ePubs that Barnes and Nobel delivers their eBooks in, if you buy one.

      http://i-u2665-cabbages.blogspot.com/2009/12/circumventing-barnes-noble-drm-for-epub.html

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:Let me tell you... by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      have you been inside a borders lately? They look like they have been barely scraping by for years...

    4. Re:Let me tell you... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      The Borders in my area seem to be doing rather well.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    5. Re:Let me tell you... by jockeys · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm in the same boat as you, but I bought the nook with no intention of ever buying ebooks from B&N so I'm not really too upset about it. There are many places to get ebooks. Also, if you haven't tried Calibre to manage your library, you owe it to yourself to try it out.

      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    6. Re:Let me tell you... by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      If you consider people coming in to drink coffee and read books and magazines in store without purchasing, they've been doing FANTASTIC!

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    7. Re:Let me tell you... by jaymz666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      really? They don't have big gaping holes in their floorplan from where all the DVDs and CDs used to be from their huge back collections?

      All of the Borders in my area stripped most of their DVDs and CDs out a few years ago, and haven't replaced the floorspace with anything else.

    8. Re:Let me tell you... by RadioElectric · · Score: 3, Informative

      The UK subsidiary went out of business in December last year - all the staff lost their jobs on Christmas Eve.

    9. Re:Let me tell you... by Ephemeriis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I sure feel great about my Nook purchase this week.

      I bought a nook for Christmas this year. Part of my thought process was how useful will the device be if the parent company goes out of business.

      The nook has wi-fi, so I don't need to rely on the 3G working. The nook has a user-replaceable battery. It reads open formats like PDF and ebup natively, so I don't need to rely on the B&N storefront to buy my books. The nook runs Android, and is relatively easy to jailbreak, so I don't have to rely on B&N for software updates.

      So, I figure that the nook is still going to be a handy device even if B&N goes out of business.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    10. Re:Let me tell you... by east+coast · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They have replaced most of that space. Yes. It's an active store with a BN located about 6 miles away.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    11. Re:Let me tell you... by east+coast · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry but you don't know this store, obviously. While there are a number of the coffee house crowd it normally does have a flow to the checkout line as well.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    12. Re:Let me tell you... by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've not been to a Borders in years, but I've never even got the point of the DVD/CD section in the local bookstores here (which in this area are typically B&N and Books-a-million). They rarely have stuff that other places like Best Buy don't, and the prices are ridiculous. Boxed sets that are $30 at a regular store will be $65 in Barnes and Noble. Sure, they'll sometimes run a sale, and they have those "membership" cards to give some discounts, but even after you factor in all that stuff you're still typically paying more.

      Reality check to them: you're never going to get by selling the same thing everybody else does for double the price because it's in a trendy setting. Bookstores excel in one area: having the books that aren't necessarily the latest teen craze. I'm not exactly going to find a copy of Dandelion Wine down at Wal-mart, but I can at B&N.

      Stock those hard to find books, and for goodness sakes sort them in same sane fashion(sorting by category can be confusing - sometimes science fiction novels end up in "Literature" instead of the "Science Fiction/Fantasy" section for example). Put in a terminal that allows customers to look up what books you have in stock and show what shelf it's located on.

      And if they really wanted to pull in some extra customers - run a free e-book special for purchases in the brick and mortar store. I can imagine a lot more people buying there if Barnes and Noble had a code included with the books sold in their store that allowed you a free e-book copy of the work for your Nook - only for books purchased in the physical store (and naturally using that "no value until activated at the register" scheme so that people couldn't copy the codes out of the books).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    13. Re: Let me tell you... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I bought a nook for Christmas this year.

      Wow... you really do your Christmas shopping early.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    14. Re:Let me tell you... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      I bought one too and I'm not worried. B&N will not fold, its too valuable of a brand. Most likely someone like Amazon buys it and supports the nook. If it truly gets abandoned a lot of people won't even notice. I have yet to buy a book from B&N. I just buy the cheapest epub book I can find. Unlike the Kindle, I'm not locked into one vendor. Oh and my library supports lending books straight to my Nook.

    15. Re:Let me tell you... by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      I was in downtown D.C. the other day, and saw a Borders a few blocks away from the Mall, and White House having a going out of business sale.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    16. Re:Let me tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is always a line of people waiting to pay for their items at our Sacramento B&N. If I have to buy my books a Sams Club, I will just quit reading! As for the kindle and others, I prefer to own my book without worrying that I will get it deleted from the system or that my DRM client no longer connects to the DRM servers.

    17. Re: Let me tell you... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      It Canadian Christmas, which comes in September. Just because this site is in English, it doesn't mean that you can call the United States, "America" you know. Geeze, some people!

    18. Re:Let me tell you... by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      I was in downtown D.C. the other day, and saw a Borders a few blocks away from the Mall, and White House having a going out of business sale.

      The White House is going out of business?! PRAISE THE LORD!!!

    19. Re:Let me tell you... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I do feel good about it, and I'm not being sarcastic about it. The only bad thing I've got to say about B&N's Nook strategy is the new expanded kiosks. They've done a good job of using the Nook to bring people back into stores with their "extra features", however, they have slowly been reducing the amount of seating available for people to use the Nooks, pretty much my only complaint about how they're handling the Nook.

      The Nook's DRM is pretty lenient, it's not really based on "phoning home" (your crypto key is derived from your name and CC number exclusively), and it has been broken. The device has also been rooted so you can install your own Android apps on it.

      Plus the new owner would be stupid to do anything to the Nook... As I understand it, the Nook and eBooks are the areas where B&N is actually growing. (The second seems to be their in-store cafes.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    20. Re:Let me tell you... by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Come wait with me in the book checkout line and tell me my Borders isn't doing well.

    21. Re:Let me tell you... by Tepar · · Score: 1

      I was going to post exactly the same thing. I still think Nook is a better choice than a Kindle, Kobo, or Sony Reader, though. I was almost expecting this to happen to Border's, but not B&N.

    22. Re:Let me tell you... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Even if you buy their DRMed eBooks, it's not "phone home" DRM and should continue to work even if they go out of business. (Highly unlikely IMO.)

      Plus the DRM has been broken (including the key generation algo, no need to rip keys from DRM-enabled software).

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    23. Re: Let me tell you... by PincushionMan · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? Jesus was born in September in Canada? Awesome!
      Well, there must be a time zone difference. So is Canada three months ahead or the US nine months ahead?

    24. Re:Let me tell you... by interval1066 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If they want to stay in the business of selling books they need to start selling the books I want in eBook format, which they often don't, and not charge a ridiculous $10 per title. I know it doesn't cost them that to produce the damn format . I usually either find the book I want in that format already for free or I go without. It can be any format; pdf, e-Ink, I don't care. I refuse now to do without the convenience of being able to carry my entire library in my pocket, being able to book mark electronically, do searches... etc. Clinging to to the old paper format is a losing idea..

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    25. Re:Let me tell you... by Psmylie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They don't even have to give e-book copies away for free. Allow me to purchase both the physical book and the e-book for, say, an additional $1 or $2 over the physical book's cover price, and I will be happy as a clam. Not only would I buy a Nook (which I don't have now) but I would also do all of my shopping at B&N rather than at Amazon, even doing in-store orders rather than ordering online for items not currently in stock. Non-B&N brick-and-mortar stores could ally up together to offer downloads for a similar pricing structure for books purchased in stores. Heck, the publishing industry in general should get behind it. It makes sense. Why in the world would I buy an e-book for very nearly the same cost as a hard copy, without some kind of added perk?

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    26. Re:Let me tell you... by joebok · · Score: 1

      I agree with the sentiment, but my understanding is that the availability of ebook formats is a publisher decision, not a book store decision. But either way, there are at least two middle-men between me and the author; struggling for profits and relevance - and increasing my costs.

      I think publishers have a way to maintain relevance - they should cut out the production and distribution aspects of their business and concentrate on finding and editing good authors and books. Make me, as a ravenous reader, care what publisher carries a new author and make a good publisher reputation a reason for me to buy.

    27. Re:Let me tell you... by Chyeld · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sadly, the publishers, who set the price for the ebook, would either keel over as all the blood vessels in their head exploded or would nuke the store off the map in a fit of apoplectic rage. They want to pretend that e-books are worth just as much or more than a paper book, so attempting to roll a '2 fer 1' deal will never pass muster till they agree to open their eyes.

      Look back on the past three years of news on things like Google Books and the Amazon vs Apple ebook wars, and tell me you think that'll be happening sometime this generation.

    28. Re: Let me tell you... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Canadian Christmas starts early because Santa and the elves live there.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    29. Re: Let me tell you... by Xaedalus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, what? Jesus was born in September in Canada? Awesome!

      Um duh... if you'd read the New Testament, you'd know that Jesus is a Canuck. Read Dekey 14:24 for the part where he turns the water into maple syrup, or there's Biffy 20:10 where he drives the money-lenders out of the Temple hockey rink, and then there's my personal favorite - Tuque 9:28 about where they served back bacon and beer at the last supper in Moose Jaw, eh?

      --
      Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    30. Re:Let me tell you... by chispito · · Score: 1

      I bought a Kindle because I cannot conceive of Amazon going out of business or ceasing to support the product before it wears out or breaks.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    31. Re:Let me tell you... by Sethumme · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps the publishers should have a deal for the e-books then. Include a free print-out of the e-book. Maybe bind it all together in a tough outer shell and slap an attractive design on the outside. Now there's a perk.

    32. Re:Let me tell you... by stiggle · · Score: 1

      I'm sure someone said the same thing about Lehman Brothers being unlikely to fold.
      If they can't afford to run the bricks and mortar stores they have then they will fold. The name might be valuable, but if people like you don't buy stuff from them then they will fold.

    33. Re:Let me tell you... by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Reality check to them: you're never going to get by selling the same thing everybody else does for double the price because it's in a trendy setting.

      Starbucks might disagree with you.

    34. Re:Let me tell you... by clampolo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe you are lucky to be in an area without moochers. I never even bother going to the Cafe at the local B&N's. Things are full of people doing their homework or reading magazines. It's getting so bad that now people are starting to camp out spots on the floor in less traveled areas to do their homework. I think there are a lot of paying customers like me that take their business elsewhere because there is never a seat. If they were more aggressive in chasing moochers out, their business would be better.

    35. Re:Let me tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. The Kindle is not only considerably cheaper than a Nook, it has the same features you list and then some.

      You can browse the web from your Kindle, the Nook has no web browser. The Kindle has over 2 million titles available, the Nook has closer to a half million. The Kindle has a battery life of a month, the Nook is lucky to make it a week.

      Then there's the interface. The Nook uses a crappy touch screen that wastes battery life. The Kindle has a physical keyboard. Oh, and that "replaceable battery?" It's a proprietary custom battery. Once B&N folds, and the writing's on the wall, even though you can remove it, you won't be able to replace it with anything.

      But the biggest thing is that with the Kindle, you can read your ebooks on a huge variety of devices other than the Kindle itself. You can download Amazon's reader for your PC and smart phone. For the Nook - not so much.

      So enjoy your soon-to-be-useless, overpriced gadget.

    36. Re:Let me tell you... by Psmylie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, the publishing industry has been even slower than the music industry in adapting to the change brought about by the internet. They're traditionalists, but that's no longer an excuse. The internet has been a major part of our culture for at least 15 years, and what's killing there business is that they never embraced and adapted to what it can offer them.

      No, basically, we have to wait for the old, slow dinosaurs to die off to make room for the new, fast mammals. It's just a pity. If they were willing to work WITH us instead of against us, we'd all profit. For example... there should NEVER be such a thing as an "out of print" book anymore. Everything should at least be available via e-book. But try finding a less-popular book that's 20 or more years old... if it's not from a famous author, your only recourse is a used-book store. No money goes to the publisher, no money to the author... It's a lose/lose for everyone but the customer and the used book store owner.

      Another thing they should do is allow people to go into a brick-and-mortar store with any copy of a book, "register" it, and then download an e-copy of the book for two or three dollars (with part of the profit going to the store, the rest going to the publisher and author). Even if that was a used book. That way, they can still profit off of books that were already published and re-sold via a used book store (or garage sale, or given away, etc). They'll never do it, though. They may as well be throwing away money, and their business will fail because of it.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    37. Re:Let me tell you... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      sometimes science fiction novels end up in "Literature" instead of the "Science Fiction/Fantasy" section for example

      Some authors escape the SF genre/ghetto if they're really good. JG Ballard was one who did. William S Burroughs did also. Neal Stephenson is pretty close at this point.

      It helps to not write 'series' novels- endless rows of books all with the same cover design and a 'logo.'

    38. Re:Let me tell you... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      They go on vacation pretty frequently these days but, no, they're still up to the same business as always.

      Same as the old boss.

    39. Re:Let me tell you... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But tech companies don't fold like investment firms. Look at how failed businesses that produced hardware have been repurposed by a community. The old CueCat barcode scanner comes to mind. Heck, I could boot up a C64 or Amiga right now and find quite a few new-ish programs written for it. Or some no-name router made by a fly-by-night Chinese company that now runs dd-wrt and is quite useful. Old generation one/two Tivos being used as stand-alone recorders, some mated with ethernet cards.

      Hardware is different than investments. It still exists after the fold and people are eager to keep using it. Considering the Nook is android based, I really don't expect it to become a useless brick, ever. Wifi + epub and pdf will be with us for a long time even if no one ever updates the ROM.

    40. Re:Let me tell you... by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Remember what Amazon did to Barnes&Noble? They enforced their infamous 1-click patent. Barnes&Noble never recovered.

    41. Re:Let me tell you... by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Or the Soviet Union. The United States is only 20 years late...

    42. Re:Let me tell you... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I thought that for a moment (picked up a Nook about a month ago), but ePub is a viable format used by many readers, and you don't need anything special about B&N to get plenty of them from other sources. Between classics, free books loaned from the library, and places like the Baen site, the BN.com had never been one of my intended primary sources of books.

    43. Re:Let me tell you... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      nice..however when B&N goes away, they can't take my purchases with them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    44. Re:Let me tell you... by Darby · · Score: 0, Informative

      The one in Highland Park, IL closed last month. I got some good clearance deals.

    45. Re:Let me tell you... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      I used the be a huge fan of Starbucks.. but the novelty kind of wore off. (took like 15 years, but that's just me). I feel a lot better about myself supporting the local coffee truck, and a deli nearby.

      Just because.

      --
      Huh?
    46. Re:Let me tell you... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      ebook readers are going to have to be under $20 before I'm going to be willing to sit on a beach chair with one reading a book. not to mention being able to see a damn thing in full sunlight (even sitting under an unbrella).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    47. Re:Let me tell you... by HappyEngineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All those hard to find books are easy to find online at amazon.com and odds are good that they will be available used for a very low price plus shipping.

      Offline stores are good for only one thing: paging through a book before you buy.

    48. Re:Let me tell you... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I know somebody who works in book publishing and his company relies heavily on Borders to distribute its product. Everybody there is very, very concerned that Borders will not go up for sale, but go bankrupt -- leaving them with tons of unsold product sitting in Borders' warehouses that they can't get back (because everything goes into receivership in a bankruptcy). If you followed the retail bookseller business at all, you would not have the same level of confidence in Borders.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    49. Re:Let me tell you... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Not really. Starbucks sells cappuccinos and latte's. Anywhere but a gas station selling an instant mix imitation is going to have price in the same ballpark. In the mall, at a truck stop, etc. Any real coffee shop selling such drinks will typically be a few bucks each, just like Starbucks.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    50. Re:Let me tell you... by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

      I don't intend to buy an ebook ever. I purchased my Nook a few weeks ago and found plenty of freely available epubs and pdfs to read. It actually does quite a good job on the pdfs I've put on it. And I just loaned an epub version of The Lost Symbol from the library.

      I'm a little curious at how much better the display is on the new Kindle. But all the other stuff I don't care much about. What do I care if my Nook needs to be recharged every 2 weeks versus 1 month for the new Kindle?

    51. Re:Let me tell you... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot. The Kindle is not only considerably cheaper than a Nook,

      Uhhh... like $10 cheaper?

      it has the same features you list and then some.

      No, it doesn't. Try EPUB support, for one, which means I can buy e-books from multiple stores and even check out books from my local library (something the Kindle will not let me do).

      You can browse the web from your Kindle, the Nook has no web browser.

      Yes, it does. And the color touchscreen even lets you peek at pages in color, something the Kindle cannot let you do.

      The Kindle has over 2 million titles available, the Nook has closer to a half million.

      These figures are meaningless. Most of the millions of titles are free, out-of-copyright books that you can get from Google Books or Project Gutenberg anyway. Mainstream commercial publishers are now pricing their books the same on both the Amazon and B&N stores. If you see a book on special sale for 99 cents at Amazon, it's going to be 99 cents at B&N as well.

      The Kindle has a battery life of a month, the Nook is lucky to make it a week.

      I seriously question the "battery life of a month" claim, but the battery life complaint for the Nook is pretty much true (though your phone performs considerably worse).

      Then there's the interface. The Nook uses a crappy touch screen that wastes battery life.

      It's actually a quite nice touchscreen, and it only wastes battery when it's backlit. When it's not, you can swipe the screen to turn pages, which is actually very nice compared to clicking a button.

      The Kindle has a physical keyboard.

      ...which is totally ugly and completely useless when all you want to do is read books (unlike the touchscreen, as mentioned above).

      Oh, and that "replaceable battery?" It's a proprietary custom battery. Once B&N folds, and the writing's on the wall, even though you can remove it, you won't be able to replace it with anything.

      Except an after-market battery, I guess. What about the Kindle's proprietary custom OS and firmware?

      But the biggest thing is that with the Kindle, you can read your ebooks on a huge variety of devices other than the Kindle itself. You can download Amazon's reader for your PC and smart phone. For the Nook - not so much.

      How so? There are Nook e-reader apps available for iPad, iPhone, Android, BlackBerry, Mac, and PC.

      So enjoy your soon-to-be-useless, overpriced gadget.

      And enjoy your trolling, sir! Although you perhaps need a little practice.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    52. Re:Let me tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh... like $10 cheaper?

      I think you've got a typo there, last I checked, it's more like $100 cheaper.

      No, it doesn't. Try EPUB support, for one, which means I can buy e-books from multiple stores and even check out books from my local library (something the Kindle will not let me do).

      So what? No one uses epub. PDF, text, HTML - all supported by the Kindle, and all formats you'll actually encounter.

      And you know what else your local library will let you do? Check out the actual physical books, which if you might as well actually do if you're heading to the library anyway.

      Yes, it does. And the color touchscreen even lets you peek at pages in color, something the Kindle cannot let you do.

      Really? You can access the web over the 3G connection? Oh, wait, no, it only works over private wireless, and not wi-fi hotspots or 3G.

      These figures are meaningless. Most of the millions of titles are free, out-of-copyright books that you can get from Google Books or Project Gutenberg anyway. Mainstream commercial publishers are now pricing their books the same on both the Amazon and B&N stores. If you see a book on special sale for 99 cents at Amazon, it's going to be 99 cents at B&N as well.

      You conveniently neglect to mention that Amazon allows authors to self-publish. Barnes and Noble? Nope.

      It's actually a quite nice touchscreen, and it only wastes battery when it's backlit. When it's not, you can swipe the screen to turn pages, which is actually very nice compared to clicking a button.

      I've used it, since they have them on display at the stores. You're wrong. The Nook display lags behind user input horribly. Plus it's incredibly finicky, ignoring at least half the touches to the screen, including all attempts to do the "swipe" thing to turn pages, although it was more than happy to occasionally dump me back to the home page when I tried.

      Try using a good touch screen like an iPad and try saying with a straight face that the Nook's touch screen is even usable.

      ...which is totally ugly and completely useless when all you want to do is read books (unlike the touchscreen, as mentioned above).

      The touch screen that turns off when you read the book? Yeah, that sounds much better than a physical set of buttons that provide tactile feedback and never randomly vanish to conserve power.

      How so? There are Nook e-reader apps available for iPad, iPhone, Android, BlackBerry, Mac, and PC.

      You're counting anything that can read epub, aren't you? Except you're leaving out the part where the Nook DRMs its books, making those apps useless for Nook content.

      See, I've actually done research on eReaders, and I can tell you that the Kindle is clearly superior to the Nook. Not that it really matters, since the iPad is superior to both, with the single exception of the Kindle's keyboard. But even then, you can read Kindle books on the iPad, so if you already have a Kindle, you have an upgrade path to iPad.

      Not to mention that you're not going to lose all your books with B&N's imminent demise.

    53. Re:Let me tell you... by proxima · · Score: 1

      I'm not the GP, but this is full of misinformation.

      I think you've got a typo there, last I checked, it's more like $100 cheaper.

      Check again. The wifi Nook is $149, the wifi Kindle is $139. The 3G Nook is $199, the 3G Kindle is $189.

      So what? No one uses epub. PDF, text, HTML - all supported by the Kindle, and all formats you'll actually encounter.

      epub is the predominate standard outside of the Kindle world. Apple's new reader uses it, Stanza uses it, and the primary DRM-free ebook sources use it. The popularity of the Kindle means that they also tend to offer mobipocket versions now, though. Aside from the Kindle store, I know of no ebook source which provides mobipocket but not epub.

      You're counting anything that can read epub, aren't you? Except you're leaving out the part where the Nook DRMs its books, making those apps useless for Nook content.

      No. The B&N ereader app (about to be rebranded as the Nook app) is available for Android, ipad/iphone/ipod, blackberry, and Windows. I don't own a Nook, but I use both the Kindle app and B&N app on my ipad. Honestly, I prefer the BN app for most things. I was very tempted to buy a Nook, but the latest Kindle announcement convinced me to wait until B&N responds with either further price cuts or better software/hardware.

      What I know about the Nook itself is based on reading reviews and talking with a friend who owns one. It's certainly not a perfect device but until the latest release of the Kindle (which won't be available until late August) it had a lot going for it. The newest Kindle finally adds wifi, which can (in principle) be useful for obtaining non-store ebooks without paying the wireless fee. I'm not sure whether you can, though; my understanding is that both the Kindle and the Nook hook up via USB for transfer of 3rd party files (mobipocket and epub, respectively).

      One of the biggest things the Kindle has going for it is free 3G service with Wikipedia and web browsing. I'm told that it's a pretty painful experience to browse the web, but if you lack a smartphone with a dataplan and really need to check something quickly online, I imagine that it's worth the $50 one time premium. The smaller form factor better matches the Nook's length and width (while being significantly thinner). So the Kindle was and is superior in terms of software and the latest gen really helps catch up in terms of hardware.

      For me, the Nook's greatest weakness is that they haven't fully implemented synchronizing page locations between all apps and devices. Until they do, I won't be buying one. My understanding is that the Kindle sync process is pretty good. The Nook software was also very, very weak until just recently. The software lagged behind otherwise pretty nice hardware (personally, I like the versatility of a touchscreen interface even at the expense of a little battery life; I can understand how others might feel different). The screen flips as of the latest firmware update are nearly on par with the Kindle 2, though the next Kindle beats the Kindle 2 by another 20%. The Nook has a browser, but I'm told it's a pain. It also has a SD slot for additional storage - useless for books (2G is a lot), but nice for storing music to listen to while reading. Until this latest gen the Kindle was both limited in storage and the ability to play music; but the latest gen still lacks an SD slot, so you're stuck with the 4G of space.

      In the end, it sucks that if I want an eink reader I have to pick a DRM-filled ecosystem. My ipad lets me use all the major stores and choose from multiple readers, but it'd be nice to have a cheaper, lighter device for just reading to complement it. epub really is important in that it is the primary ebook standard; it alone is not a sufficient reason to pick BN over Amazon, though, since the popularity of the Kindle is encouraging sources (e.g. O'Reilly) to provide m

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    54. Re:Let me tell you... by proxima · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Careless with my blockquote tags, sorry about that.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    55. Re:Let me tell you... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I think the flaw with your argument is the assumption that the drinks and food sold aren't inherently profitable (potentially moreso than the books!).

      Of course if no one is eating/drinking, then they're 100% moochers.

      Since purchasing my Nook I've gone into the store pretty often for the "More in Store" and "Read in Store" function. I have only bought one eBook (more because of curiosity about the purchase process and DRM), but I have bought quite a few drinks/snacks.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    56. Re:Let me tell you... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "not to mention being able to see a damn thing in full sunlight (even sitting under an unbrella)."

      Um, this isn't a problem for 95%+ of the eBook readers on the market. There are two big reasons why eInk screens are selling well despite being slow, expensive, and monochrome:
      1) 0 power required to retain the image
      2) As a purely reflective display, they work well in brightly lit areas. Their contrast ratio is not nearly as good as white paper, but most paperpacks and a good portion of hardcovers use cheap paper that isn't that white, and offers a much lower contrast ratio that eInk screens are pretty close to.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    57. Re:Let me tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't. Try EPUB support, for one, which means I can buy e-books from multiple stores and even check out books from my local library (something the Kindle will not let me do).

      Meh...worrying about non-DRM formats is pretty pointless since it's beyond trivial to convert between formats. I've got plenty of books on my Kindle that started as ePub but were easily converted to MobiPocket by Calibre. As far as the DRM stuff goes, Amazon's has been easy to crack for as long as I've had my Kindle and my backups of purchases I've made are in MobiPocket format.

      I seriously question the "battery life of a month" claim

      Question all you like, but with wireless off, one month is just about what I get, depending on how much I read, which is normally around an hour a day. When I travel, that goes up and I get more like 2-3 weeks before I need to recharge. Perhaps the Kindle gets such good battery life because they weren't dumb enough to put a crappy little LCD touch screen on it.

    58. Re:Let me tell you... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Pretty obvious troll, but I'll bite.

      "The Kindle is not only considerably cheaper than a Nook"
      For a period, they were exactly the same price ($259). I forget who shot first in the price war (I think it was Amazon), but the price disparity between the 3G versions lasted about a day.

      The Nook WiFi ($50 cheaper than the 3G Kindle or Nook) was available for about 2 weeks before the Kindle WiFi showed up.

      The current state is that the Kindle is $10 cheaper for each version. IMO the Nook is worth the extra $10.

      "You can browse the web from your Kindle, the Nook has no web browser. The Kindle has over 2 million titles available, the Nook has closer to a half million. The Kindle has a battery life of a month, the Nook is lucky to make it a week."
      Um, my Nook has a web browser. Does your Kindle have an RSS feed reader and a twitter client? Oh wait, it doesn't because it has a proprietary OS that can't be developed for. (Twook rocks, and yes, my Nook is softrooted.)

      "Then there's the interface. The Nook uses a crappy touch screen that wastes battery life. The Kindle has a physical keyboard. Oh, and that "replaceable battery?" It's a proprietary custom battery. Once B&N folds, and the writing's on the wall, even though you can remove it, you won't be able to replace it with anything."
      The touch screen is quite nice and provides UI flexibility not available with a keyboard. It goes to "sleep" pretty quickly so doesn't waste battery much. The fact is that the Nook has a replacable battery. Yes, it's proprietary, but it's still replacable. Even if B&N folds, there are already enough Nooks sold that I suspect you'll be seeing third party batteries sold soon, just like replacements for proprietary phone batteries and such.

      "But the biggest thing is that with the Kindle, you can read your ebooks on a huge variety of devices other than the Kindle itself. You can download Amazon's reader for your PC and smart phone. For the Nook - not so much."
      There are far fewer platforms that have Amazon .azw readers than there are readers for B&N's DRMed ebooks. Plus if I recall correctly, you need to perform a file conversion on a PC to load non-AZW content into the Kindle. The Nook can read PDF, ePub, and a few other formats natively.

      In addition, Amazon DRM is tied to Amazon. B&N DRM is only tied to your name and CC# at time of purchase, and the key generation algorithm is known. Unlike other DRM formats, you can generate the key for your eBooks without having to rip it from cracked reader software.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    59. Re:Let me tell you... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. Try EPUB support, for one, which means I can buy e-books from multiple stores and even check out books from my local library (something the Kindle will not let me do).

      Meh...worrying about non-DRM formats is pretty pointless since it's beyond trivial to convert between formats.

      I'm not talking about non-DRM formats. The library lends commercial books, purchased from the publisher, and it lends them using an Adobe DRM server.

      Perhaps the Kindle gets such good battery life because they weren't dumb enough to put a crappy little LCD touch screen on it.

      Every Nook update so far has improved battery life, and the move to Android 2.x will probably improve it considerably. It's not that big a deal. And the touch screen is a huge benefit, IMHO.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    60. Re:Let me tell you... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Reality check to them: you're never going to get by selling the same thing everybody else does for double the price because it's in a trendy setting.

      Apple seems to get by pretty alright selling trendy items for higher prices than devices that have equal (or better) functionality.

    61. Re:Let me tell you... by FluffyArmada · · Score: 1

      Me too. I downloaded my entire library and now it's on my nook. Even my textbooks for next semester! This is going to save me having to lug around about 300 pounds of books when I go back to school. Definitely one of the smartest investments I've ever made. Not specifically that it's a nook, but in that it's an eReader. Take the 'Harvard Classics' collection that I've been trying to build up over the past few years... it's about 3 feet long right now (and if I completed it, it would be 5 feet long). That's a lot of space when you live in a college dorm. But now, it's on my nook. So, it's about the size of one relatively small book. And seeing this makes me feel even more AWESOME about having bought my nook two days ago.

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro. Then isn't congress the opposite of progress?
    62. Re:Let me tell you... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I think you've got a typo there, last I checked, it's more like $100 cheaper.

      Then you haven't checked. It was never that much cheaper. Amazon only lowered its prices to current levels when B&N began selling the Nook for $100 less than the Kindle.

      So what? No one uses epub.

      You apparently don't read e-books, either. Other than Amazon, pretty much everyone uses ePub, and the industry is heading in that direction.

      You conveniently neglect to mention that Amazon allows authors to self-publish. Barnes and Noble? Nope.

      Conveniently? Certainly, when self-publishing wasn't even the topic. Why would I even bring it up? But since you have brought it up, B&N's self publishing arm for e-books is called Pubit!.

      I've used it, since they have them on display at the stores. You're wrong. The Nook display lags behind user input horribly. Plus it's incredibly finicky, ignoring at least half the touches to the screen, including all attempts to do the "swipe" thing to turn pages, although it was more than happy to occasionally dump me back to the home page when I tried.

      I use it every day, and not some beat-up floor model, and I experience none of these problems. Your mileage may vary, of course. As far as the keyboard lag, that's a limitation of the display, not the UI. You can type on the keyboard about as fast as you want, and the Kindle uses the same display (however current models have worse screen contrast than the Nook for some reason, which will apparently be corrected in the forthcoming models).

      Try using a good touch screen like an iPad and try saying with a straight face that the Nook's touch screen is even usable.

      The Nook's touch screen is more than usable. It's one of my favorite features of the Nook, in fact. Having used it, I'd have serious reservations about buying an e-reader that didn't have a similar UI.

      The touch screen that turns off when you read the book? Yeah, that sounds much better than a physical set of buttons that provide tactile feedback and never randomly vanish to conserve power.

      The Nook also has physical buttons to let you turn the pages. If you'd really ever looked at one, you would know that. Or else you're purposefully being dense.

      You're counting anything that can read epub, aren't you? Except you're leaving out the part where the Nook DRMs its books, making those apps useless for Nook content.

      No. I'm talking about the Barnes & Noble e-reader software that's available for all of the platforms I mentioned and that supports B&N's DRM.

      See, I've actually done research on eReaders, and I can tell you that the Kindle is clearly superior to the Nook.

      You certainly can tell me that, yes. But honestly, you are the worst fanboy troll I've ever seen. For someone who has "done research," you certainly don't even seem to be trying to know what you're talking about.

      Not that it really matters, since the iPad is superior to both, with the single exception of the Kindle's keyboard.

      Ah, an Apple guy. That figures. No way would I want to read books on an iPad. The two don't even compare.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    63. Re:Let me tell you... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      If you consider people coming in to drink coffee and read books and magazines in store without purchasing, they've been doing FANTASTIC!

      If YOU consider that the profit on a cup of coffee is equal to or greater than the profit on a book (take into account shipping from the distibution warehouses, floor space used, paying stock people and warehouse people, etc), I cant see how it hurts. Especially if you add a cinnamon bun or some other food item to the purchase.

    64. Re:Let me tell you... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I agree, the publishing industry has been even slower than the music industry in adapting to the change brought about by the internet. They're traditionalists, but that's no longer an excuse. The internet has been a major part of our culture for at least 15 years, and what's killing there business is that they never embraced and adapted to what it can offer them.

      Well they were limited by available technology; we've had mp3 players since the 90s, but ebook readers have only been around for a few years now (and the prior available technology, namely LED and computer screens, was not suitable for the vast majority of readers).

    65. Re:Let me tell you... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and just to round out my responses to your trolls for anyone looking for legitimate information:

      And you know what else your local library will let you do? Check out the actual physical books, which if you might as well actually do if you're heading to the library anyway.

      The subject was e-books. And if you think you have to physically go to the library to check out e-books, you're a moron.

      Really? You can access the web over the 3G connection? Oh, wait, no, it only works over private wireless, and not wi-fi hotspots or 3G.

      My Nook doesn't even have 3G because I don't see the point of it. Wi-Fi hotspots are everywhere; I certainly have one operating at my house at all times. But your information is faulty once again. In addition to free Wi-Fi at any Barnes and Noble store, the Nook also gives you free instant access to any AT&T Wi-Fi hotspot anywhere. At the airport? You're good to go. You can also use private wireless, and you can also use anyone else's hotspot -- all you need to do is login using the browser and you're all set. (That wasn't true for the initial Nook rollout, but it's true for everyone now after an automatic free firmware upgrade.)

      The only limitation is that you cannot actually download books from anyone but B&N -- you need to "side load" them from your PC -- but the Kindle has the same limitation.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    66. Re:Let me tell you... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      This is why I won't buy music, books, or software of any sort that has to "phone home" to verify that I am allowed to use it. My CDs don't phone home, and neither do my hundreds of paper books, and I will continue to be able to use them regardless of what happens to the store that I purchased them from. Now, they could be ruined in a fire or flood, but I have insurance against that.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    67. Re:Let me tell you... by morari · · Score: 1

      I can imagine a lot more people buying there if Barnes and Noble had a code included with the books sold in their store that allowed you a free e-book copy of the work for your Nook [...]

      Yes! I have quite a few physical books that I haven't gotten around to reading yet. I purchased a Nook recently and simply do not feel right purchasing e-books that I already physically own. I don't have a B&N store anywhere within 100 miles, but I might make more of a point to stop by when possible if I could get a digital copy of my physical books.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    68. Re:Let me tell you... by Zerth · · Score: 1

      While I don't have the GP hate for the Nook, I'd like to point out that:

      A) Kindles run linux and has a SDK(rooted as well), so it could have an independent twitter client, if just going to twitter.com doesn't work for you.

      Also, v2.5 firmware actually has a crappy twitter client for quoting passages from books directly.

      B) Kindles can't read epub(sadly), but can read mobi, prc, PDF, txt, html and a variety of other formats natively. Several epub converters exist.

    69. Re:Let me tell you... by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can download ebooks to the Kindle over the web from a variety of sources. For example, go to Gutenberg and click on the .txt or .prc format and it'll ask if you want to save them to your kindle.

      Don't know of any that you can purchase from, but free books abound. You can even set up your own book server, if you want on-the-go file conversion and access to more books than you have storage.

    70. Re:Let me tell you... by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to any brick and mortar bookstores in a long time. I buy only e books at B&N, and Fictionwise, Amazon and others. Like I really want to move my fat ass out of my seat, drive a few miles, try to find the SF section, see it all filled with chick-lit fantasy, MAYBE find my book, wait in a line for a surly clerk ,then drive home. Yeah, that makes sense.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    71. Re:Let me tell you... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The original Kindle didn't have enough contrast for me and I haven't looked at them since.

      But if that is fixed then, all we need is the better price point then.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  2. Again they miss the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who have watched as the book business has increasingly shifted to online retailers and e-book sales, leaving both chains and independent sellers struggling.

    Yeah, because piracy hasn't hurt it any. Riiiight.

    1. Re:Again they miss the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Piracy hasn't done a damn thing, it's just not en vogue for Americans to read. Because they're fat and stupid, you see.

      I can say that because I'm an American.

      -- Ethanol-fueled

    2. Re:Again they miss the point... by chill · · Score: 1, Troll

      But honestly, if it wasn't for IsoHunt, would you have really spent the $150 or just done without? You acquired them because they were free and easy. If you *had* to pay, odds are you would have either gotten fewer or none at all.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:Again they miss the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Textbooks don't count, I pirate the fuck out of those. Two-hundred bucks for the chain rule? Hah! Greedy motherfuckers.

      --Ethanol-fueled

    4. Re:Again they miss the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case I would have paid for them. But even in your scenerio of paying for fewer? Do you honestly think that with the numbers involved in illegal file sharing that even if one in one hundred were turned into a purchase instead of a rip off that it wouldn't make any difference to the retailers? I won't be an ass and claim that a download is a lost sale but a portion of those downloads are lost sales. Let's make no mistake about that. I know that there is no way to produce a solid number of how much piracy costs but to say it doesn't hurt a retailer is just foolishness. Once I see a poster make such an outragous claim I know nothing else they say can be taken seriously.

    5. Re:Again they miss the point... by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      It was a single university textbook. Yeah, he would have paid :-)

    6. Re:Again they miss the point... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      How do you pirate a book (not an e-book, just a regular book)?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    7. Re:Again they miss the point... by Type-R · · Score: 1

      Classically a scanner and possibly OCR...

    8. Re:Again they miss the point... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      I'd say piracy has been pretty good to B&N...go over to the computer section and count the books on how to use the copy of Office, Photoshop or AutoCAD you just downloaded.

      rj

    9. Re:Again they miss the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disregard that, I suck cocks.

      -- Ethanol-fueled

    10. Re:Again they miss the point... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Does that actually work out cheaper than buying the book (at least if your time has any value)?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    11. Re:Again they miss the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ass. We all know you're not the REAL Ethanol-fueled - he italicizes his name.

      --Ethanol-fueled

  3. I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    over a pdf and whatnot on a ipad, kindle and the like... more comfortable near a pool too. There something about entering a book store. At least for me.

  4. We live in a multimedia word by ClaraBow · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is extremely hard for our kids to even have an opportunity to learn to love books! They are exposed to so many competing media at such an early age that books get relegated to schools as something they use. I teach and every year it gets harder and harder to get kids to read the simplest of texts. It is very sad as books offer a very personal relationship and intimate relationship with characters that no other medium can provide.

    1. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We have a PS3, an xbox 360 and a Wii, plus a PSP and an NDS. We have several hundred DVDs and blu-ray titles, plus on demand FiOS, several computers around the house and netflix. Our two kids spend more time in books than on all those combined. Don't blame the options available, blame the parents.

    2. Re:We live in a multimedia word by ClaraBow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wasn't distinguishing between physical and electronic books. It is the act of reading that is personal and intimate, irregardless of whether the text is printed on paper or delivered electronically.

    3. Re:We live in a multimedia word by DrSkwid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If your parents read to you, more chance you'll grow up liking books & reading.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    4. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It is very sad as books offer a very personal relationship and intimate relationship with characters that no other medium can provide.

      Wrong. How do books provide a more personal relationship than an electronic device like an iPad or even cellphone? Words are powerful whether they be on a computer screen or on paper. Sure, it's a different method of consumption but it's the same words.

      The big debate here should be over the fact that iPad-type devices don't give you the same rights a physical book do so either the price should be drastically cheaper or those rights should be instituted.

      Whatever it is, am on my 7th book on kindle ipad version and it DOES NOT feel the same way an old worn paperback does in finding the attachment to the characters.

      Maybe another century of human conditioning with electronic books change this. But for now i still prefer my book case as a matter of preference.

      -S

    5. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      irregardless

      You're not actually a big reader, are you?

    6. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tl;dr

    7. Re:We live in a multimedia word by ClaraBow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I do know that "irregardless" is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing and I was using it as such! I happen to like the word irregardless even though it hasn't been blessed by the word gods yet! Language is a living, breathing entity and it is continuously changing!

    8. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also getting them books they enjoy. Something I see far too much, particularly from schools, is this emphasis on "classics." They want kids to read "good" literature and thus try to cram stuff they don't like at them. This very much leads to a books = boring kind of mentality. Let kids read what they want to read, even if you don't consider it to have literary value. I'm not saying don't offer them classic books, but if they don't want them leave it alone.

      For that matter, maybe what they are reading now will be classic some day. More than a couple of the "great" books we were made to read in school really weren't in my opinion. Wuthering Heights is basically a trash romance novel, it just happens to be an OLD trash romance novel and one that people latched on to as being "classic" for that reason.

    9. Re:We live in a multimedia word by RadioElectric · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... except it means exactly the same thing as "regardless", it's just a corruption. Same as "flammable" is to "inflammable".

    10. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      I do know that "irregardless" is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing and I was using it as such! I happen to like the word irregardless even though it hasn't been blessed by the word gods yet! Language is a living, breathing entity and it is continuously changing!

      tl;dr version: it's a perfectly cromulent word.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    11. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      I have this running joke that the only toy my kids will ever have is a block of wood. People always laugh when they hear me say it but I'm half serious. I want my kids to develop an imagination and be able to rely on it when the power goes out, when we're taking a trip in the car or when everything on TV sucks.

      Anyway, I want to commend you on raising your kids to value books so much and I hope to do the same for mine.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    12. Re:We live in a multimedia word by ClaraBow · · Score: 1

      I'm aware that "regardless" and "irregardless" means the same. I grew up hearing the word irregardless a lot so it has stuck with me. I will be more careful in the future ;)

    13. Re:We live in a multimedia word by iotaborg · · Score: 1

      You hit the nail on the head, at least for me. I didn't read a book I actually liked until I was 12 or so, but that was far too late to get me really into books. I only read a book or two a year at my current rate.

    14. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you like 'non-standard speech' so much, then I assume you look forward to the day you can 'conversate' with your neighbor and 'orientate' yourself using a compass?

      When you use 'non-standard speech', you simply make yourself sound uneducated - whether you actually are uneducated or not.

    15. Re:We live in a multimedia word by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      As a teacher there's absolutely nothing you can do about it. It's the parents who must instill a love of books. Read to your kids every night at bedtime, and they will love books. My parents read to my sister and me, I read to my kids... but my ex-wife's parents never read to her; all they ever read were magazines. To Evil-X, reading was something that took her parents' time away from her. The when she went to school her parents forced her to read, so reading to her was punishment.

      There's nothing you can do. If the parents are illiterate, the kids will be, too.

      You can tell which slashdotters had parents who didn't read to them, they're the ones who think "loose" means "lose" rather than "set free" and don't know the difference between there, their, and they're.

    16. Re:We live in a multimedia word by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but they'll probably derive more enjoyment from the cardboard box the block of wood comes in.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    17. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your parents *read for themselves*, you will have more chance to grow up liking books & reading.

      Not to denigrate the concept of group reading as a family activity, but past the time children learn to read per se, there seems to be little correlation between treating reading as either a 'human-improvement exercise' or 'quality time', and developing a reading habit and actual enjoyment of literature.

      Kids learn to enjoy literature in the same way adults do - they see other people doing it, wonder what the big deal is, read a few books and figure out what they like and what they don't at that point in their life. Most kids opt out because they don't quickly find books they like, and/or because they're "guided" to books they actively dislike by well-intentioned adults (i.e.: most school programs). The fact many of the latter actively discourage them from reading the first reading materials they like doesn't help (despite the often atrocious writing, comic books probably do a lot more for early literacy than most attempts at introducing youngsters to classic american literature).

      If you want your kids to read, give them lots of options (i.e.: books within easy reach), don't try to guide them too much (let them read what they like, their preferences will mature over time) and let them see the adults have a good time reading and talking about their favorite books. It's not that complicated.

    18. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Kpau · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. But you're watching the intellectual death spiral that is the result of two generations of parental fail in a large percentage of the population (at least in the US). Side note: its very interesting to sit in the kids section of Barnes&Noble and do a little anthropological observation. Watch which families head for the shitty books that squeak and squawk and are mostly pictures. Listen to kids far too old hate on "chapter books". Watch them simply screw with the displays and misbehave ... Now compare this versus the families that sit and read together quietly and put books back that they aren't going to buy. There's about an 80/20 split... hard to sell books to an Idiocracy. This percentage has substantively changed in the last 25 years or so. Yeah, there are pockets of goodness but it rather reminds me of a sociological version of entering a dark age.

    19. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're trolling and totally off-topic. Modded as such.

    20. Re:We live in a multimedia word by hal2814 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Definition of a classic: "something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read."
      --Professor Winchester (via Mark Twain)

      I agree wholeheartedly about the "great" books we read in school. A lot of them were garbage. To take a slightly different angle though, what's really frustrating to me is that they often took garbage from otherwise great authors. I despised The Old Man and the Sea so much that I wouldn't read a Hemmingway novel for years afterwards. I picked up For Whom the Bell Tolls one day and loved it. I have read several of his works since and loved them, too. And I know Romeo and Juliet makes for great movie adaptations but it's one of Shakespeare's weaker plays. It wasn't until we read King Lear in college that I grew an appreciation for his work. I wonder how many other authors I do not like because the school system rammed their crap down my throat.

    21. Re:We live in a multimedia word by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh I don't think we'll condition people preferring the first thing they try out of our nature any time soon.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    22. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Blink+Tag · · Score: 1

      I concur.

      And--to return to the summary--it's not that I (or my kids) have been reading less, or even buying fewer books. But we have, over the past decade, stopped buying books from B&N and mall stores. Something about lower prices and "free" two-day shipping at the other place (yes, I have Prime).

    23. Re:We live in a multimedia word by kryliss · · Score: 1

      I think you just proved Clarabow's point.

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    24. Re:We live in a multimedia word by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Read to your kids every night at bedtime, and they will love books.

      Even better, read every night at bedtime. If the only reading you do is read to your kids, your kids won't learn to love books. If they see YOU reading for pleasure, they will....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    25. Re:We live in a multimedia word by pooh666 · · Score: 1

      Very good point. A lot of those classics are very hard reading for someone with little life experience. But then 20 years later they are accessible. It seems obvious to me now, but when I was reading some of these in high school, I just thought I was stupid for not understanding the more subtle points. Now I can read stuff like that and bitch at the author for being an ass and have a good reason :)

    26. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      It helps if there are books in the house and the kids see adults reading instead of just zoning out in front of the tv/computer. 'Course, you can over do it. We're clearing daughter's room (9 years old) for painting and we've already filled 12 boxes of books (small moving boxes). Like cool toys, I think we use her as an excuse to buy interesting kid's books.

      It's funny but when I was a kid (mid '70's), there just wasn't as many books out there for kids and YA, as there are now. On the flip side, this pushed me in to adult lit much faster (Greek legends to Homer, Tolkien to... ok, wasn't much else in his league then, Heinlein juveniles to Heinlein adult, then on to Bradbury, Clarke, etc). No idea when our daughter may move beyond Percy Jackson and such. We are making available a lot of the Newbery winners and she enjoys those as much as she does fantastic lit. and may bring in some Steinbeck next year.

      Also, Walden's was about the only source of books, out in suburbia. I remember the first time my Mom took me to a real book store (Haslam's in St. Pete, Fla) and just how cool it was. I figure these kind of individual stores will hang around a lot longer than chain stores.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    27. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Heh. You're being ironical.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    28. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      That was the first toys I made for my kid. 'Course, I did add channels and holes so they could be used to make marble runs. Just made her a simple toy boat and yeah, is fav toy. Beats out all the plastic crap she's acquired when its bath time.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    29. Re:We live in a multimedia word by ssarasin · · Score: 1

      If your parents read to you, more chance you'll grow up liking books & reading.

      My 3yr old son already has quite a library. We have a full bookcase both upstairs in his room, and downstairs in the family room. He is constantly pulling books off the shelves and bringing them to us to read. Hopefully he'll follow in daddy's footsteps and be a voracious reader well into his adult life. :)

    30. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do know that "irregardless" is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing and I was using it as such! I happen to like the word irregardless even though it hasn't been blessed by the word gods yet! Language is a living, breathing entity and it is continuously changing!

      If language were evolving as living entities biological in nature, sharing genetic information across generations and adapting to their environment, I would surmise that the word "irregardless" is the equivalent to a birth defect. Just because it appears in nature and is a part of the biological process does not mean that it is fit for propagation.

    31. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Unirregardless, it reads like ass.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    32. Re:We live in a multimedia word by MoeDrippins · · Score: 1

      Sarah Palin, is that you?

      --
      Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
    33. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Expecting someone to learn to love reading by starting at the classics, is like expecting someone to learn to love mathematics by starting at the Riemann zeta hypothesis.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    34. Re:We live in a multimedia word by natehoy · · Score: 1

      ironical

      I don't have mod points. If I did, it would be a tough choice between "+1 Funny" and "-666 May You Burn In the Flames Of Hell For Using That Word".

      But, I've slowly come to accept "irregardless", "nucular", and the various misuses of "its/it's" and "they're/their" as just a sign of language degeneration in general, and not a specific statement as to the intelligence of the speaker, so maybe my Grammar Nazi-ism is settling down in my old age.

      You can still get off my lawn. But I'll ask nicely and say "please". :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    35. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Tarsir · · Score: 1

      ... except it means exactly the same thing as "regardless", it's just a corruption. Same as "flammable" is to "inflammable".

      Irregardless, that there exists a word which expresses the same thought as your favourite word does not bar you from using your favourite word, whatever it may be. Personally, I don't use the word 'irregardless' except in an ironic fashion, because it's slightly redundant, and I'm pedantic enough for that to bother me. But the 'validity' of a word, if such a concept even has meaning, is first and foremost decided by how many other people will interpret it correctly. I argue that almost everyone understands what 'irregardless' is supposed to mean, so any further discussion of whether it is proper to use, or correct, or anything like that, is purely a question of style. Fashion, if you will.

    36. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This coming from the creepy guy that - in your own words - spends hours sitting in the kids section, 'just watching'...?

    37. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Artifex33 · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat. Our home is humming with electronic media, but my 9-year-old is hooked on Rick Riordan's books. He carries one everywhere. I think kids realize there's no substitute for diving into the mind of a character through reading.

    38. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do know that "irregardless" is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing and I was using it as such! I happen to like the word irregardless even though it hasn't been blessed by the word gods yet! Language is a living, breathing entity and it is continuously changing!

      Double negatives don't ever mean what you think they don't.

    39. Re:We live in a multimedia word by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Some people gravitate to reading (like my daughter), other people don't (like my son - even though we read to both every night). I have unfortunately never managed to devote a lot of my time to sitting and reading books. What has redeemed me is audiobooks. This works because I can do it while I drive, run, or hike. In my opinion, listening to Frank McCourt read 'tis or Sissy Spacek read To Kill a Mockingbird is even better than reading it to myself. Granted, the majority of all books are not available in audio versions - but on the other hand there are audio versions of more great books than I could ever consume, and more every year.

    40. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Naw. As a lit major (for 2 years), yeah, it bugs me when people make simple mistakes with grammar but as someone who writes using colloquialisms and slang as part of my characters' development, I believe all language usage is allowed. But like any tool, it really helps if people know how to use it. Most net speak is like watching people use a garden trow at a restaurant.

      As for Grammar Nazi's, QoH has that covered.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    41. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a country!!!

    42. Re:We live in a multimedia word by IICV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wuthering Heights is basically a trash romance novel, it just happens to be an OLD trash romance novel and one that people latched on to as being "classic" for that reason.

      Yeah, that's the problem a lot of classics have - Wuthering Heights was the first trash romance novel, and it defined the genre that we now think of as "trash romance novels".

      I'm not saying you should force kids to read things they don't want to - hell, I didn't start reading novels until I found the Belgariad in middle school, and that thing was David Edding's attempt at making an entertaining story that followed every single fantasy trope to the letter - but I'm just pointing out that a lot of the reason why we think some classics are so cliche is because they invented those cliches.

    43. Re:We live in a multimedia word by masmullin · · Score: 1

      you ment "plz" right?

    44. Re:We live in a multimedia word by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Now compare this versus the families that sit and read together quietly and put books back that they aren't going to buy.

      I think you'll find that many of the families that do this are going to go to the library (if they're lucky to have a good one), or a small local bookstore where they know the owner (if they are lucky enough to have one left nearby).

      B&N is (admittedly) very good about allowing people to peruse the works without pressure, but I've always felt somehow bad about reading a brand-new book that's for sale with my daughter then putting it back on the shelf, especially if it gets dropped or scuffed in the process. Plus there's no pressure to spend money at the library, they have a gigantic selection of kid's books and if my daughter wants to take one home we take it home and enjoy it for a couple of weeks (separating the concepts of book enjoyment and owning stuff), and I don't have to run the gauntlet of shiny plastic crap at the registers and convince my daughter we don't need to buy everything in the store. I don't like mixing love of reading with desire to buy stuff. I think there's enough commercialism out there as it is, and I avoid it where I can.

      Those books my daughter wants to check out a LOT get purchased and added to our home library, so we're not hogging the library copy. But that used to be a visit to the local bookstore because the owner was nice (but B&N put them out of business a few years ago) and is now an Amazon purchase because so little of the money that goes into B&N stays local, I'd rather spend less and donate the remainder to my library along with a few weekends a year helping out at their book sales and other fundraisers, which I think is important because my daughter sees a whole community formed around a pure love for reading, not around making a profit from it.

      B&N fills a niche that, to me, no longer needs filling and really never did. My beloved local bookstore, for which I was willing to pay a premium, is long gone and isn't coming back. I gave B&N an honest try, but frankly I was unimpressed. It was cheaper than my bookstore, but more expensive than Amazon and no more personal. Everything I can get at B&N, I can get cheaper from Amazon without leaving the house and running the cheap-shit impulse plastic-crap gauntlet at the registers. Everything I want to look at first, I can get from my local library, and in many cases enjoy it without ever having to buy it.

      B&N is just a high-priced instant-gratification Amazon with impulse crap near the registers. I honestly see very little value in its existence.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    45. Re:We live in a multimedia word by rgviza · · Score: 1

      "ir" is a prefix that denotes "opposite of". Irresponsible and irrespective are examples of proper use of the prefix. Technically "irregardless" is a double negative. "Regardless", "irrespective" or "whether or not" have the meaning you are trying to convey.

      You aren't alone though, we're heading into a new dark age, and during the last dark age is when this prefix started being abused. "irrigation", for example, made it into the Oxford English dictionary around 1608, most likely because the abuse was so widespread by then, it was too late.

      "rigation", which was the proper English use of the word which originated from the latin "rigatio" (rain), was finally killed off in the 1800's. It's no wonder English is confusing to learn for non-native speakers. The language is retarded and backwards and is only getting worse.

      Based on this trend, "regardless" will be gone by 2200. Radiate will meet a similar fate, replaced by irradiate. Ir will have been twisted from meaning "opposite" to mean the "opposite of opposite". Oh the irony!

      I'm not sure how making words longer by adding prefixes which are meant to be ignored is better but apparently I'm in the minority. It's been the English way since at least the 1600's.

      The boys over at Oxford really need to do an audit and start undoing the damage.

      One day irregardless will probably be proper English. It already clears the spellchecker in this browser.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    46. Re:We live in a multimedia word by masmullin · · Score: 1

      Multi Negatives never don't not mean what you don't think they don't not mean.

    47. Re:We live in a multimedia word by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Informative

      For that matter, maybe what they are reading now will be classic some day.

      A good read from cracked.com, 6 Great novels that were hated in their time

    48. Re:We live in a multimedia word by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Look into Waldorf schooling, if you have the resources available to do it and a school nearby. I think you'll find a lot of kindred spirits there. It's no joke. You've hit the nail pretty precisely on the head.

      The simpler and less specific the toys are, the more developed your child's will become to play with it. The more the toy dictates the play, the less your child will bring into it. TV is the absolute lowest form of imaginative entertainment because there's utterly no imagination involved - it's a passive absorption of images. Free play with a stick and a couple of leaves you found in the yard is the highest, because you have to figure out which sticks and leaves are just right for what you are imagining, and tune your inner story to the materials you find or create.

      True, you want more than "a block of wood". You want a bunch of various-sized blocks of well-sanded and well-oiled natural wood, in several shapes that maybe suggest but absolutely don't quite dictate what they are, preferably ones that your child had a hand in shaping, and a bunch of pieces of nice-feeling silk and other cloths in various colors, and a couple of stands and wooden clips that can be combined with the silks to make anything from an airplane to a stage to a horse. Throw a few sticks and some other bits into the mix, maybe get a nice bag of marbles and a few wooden balls, and sit down and become a plaything yourself every now and then. There are few moments more beautiful in children's play than when your child decides you are a tree and starts putting silks on you for "leaves", and actually forgets you are there as anything but a tree.

      But you can't combine that with TV. The two are pretty much incompatible. TV directs the imagination into non-imaginative play. They just parrot the images they see on TV, which are (by design) far more interesting and compelling than the world around them. When they see the blocks, they will just parrot out what the TV showed them, again and again and again. They will rarely think of anything original, because it takes a lot of time to process the message the TV put there.

      If you are as serious as you seem about developing their imaginations, kill your television. Now. By that, I mean don't even read the rest of my post yet, go unplug it right now and move it into the garage or basement, then come back. I'll wait.

      Good. Welcome back. Congratulations. Use the money you save on your cable bill to buy good toys.

      And I hope you do it earlier than I did, because it took years to get "swiper no swiping" (Dora) and "we've got to save the baby cougar" (Diego) out of my daughter's play and get her to develop her own imagination based on her real life. It was an immensely hard struggle that continues to this day, 4 years after we killed our television, because once the TV gets in there it's hard to get it out.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    49. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      I'm aware that "regardless" and "irregardless" means the same. I grew up hearing the word irregardless a lot so it has stuck with me. I will be more careful in the future ;)

      You shouldn't be more careful, clearly everybody here knew what you meant. The second you feed a grammar troll you're giving them what they want.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    50. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not a matter of being "cliche" or "done before" or anything like that, it is a matter of being good or bad in my book. A novel can be the millionth of its type, but if it is a good novel then great.

      My objection are the "classics" that suck. They are not good stories. It just seems to be because they are old, who wrote them, and a bit of luck that they get labeled as some kind of great literature, where a modern novel will be passed over simply because it is new.

      When I was in high school, there was no sci fi at all on any of the reading lists unless you want to count 1984, which isn't really sci fi. This is not because there were no great sci fi novels, this was only back in the mid 90s, but because all the crusty academics that put together these lists can't consider anything made after their birth to be good to read.

      My objection to Wuthering Heights is that it is a crap romance story, not that it is a romance story. It is extremely poorly done. I don't care if it was the first trash romance novel, that doesn't make it any better.

    51. Re:We live in a multimedia word by uncanny · · Score: 1

      Sadly though, it seems like the English language is a dying thing. When they put Ginormous in the dictionary, i knew we were doomed!

    52. Re:We live in a multimedia word by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Could it also be that your appreciation for the type of works changed over the years as well?

      I hated, hated, hated most of the works I had to read in High School, but many stories from the same author (which I read later as an adult) drew me back to the ones I hated, and I found that adult-me actually enjoyed them. I had developed the "lameness" (also known as patience and maturity) to take the time to understand their complexity and enjoy them. Many of the books I deeply enjoyed as a child are now shallow and trite to me now, though I sometimes re-read a few just to try and recapture how I felt about them as a pup.

      There are a few books (and series) I enjoyed as a youth and still enjoy today, one of them being the Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, which was probably terribly inappropriate reading for me when I picked up my first-print mass-market paperback copy when I was 12 or so, but I was fascinated by it and it resonated deeply with me (as loneliness and isolation and being important somewhere no one around you really understands would with any pre-teen), and I still re-read it regularly. I keep it my paperbacks of it next to my leatherbound copy of "Lord of the Rings". :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    53. Re:We live in a multimedia word by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I have this running joke that the only toy my kids will ever have is a block of wood. People always laugh when they hear me say it but I'm half serious. I want my kids to develop an imagination and be able to rely on it when the power goes out, when we're taking a trip in the car or when everything on TV sucks.

      While if I have kids I will try to minimize their electronic time as much as possible, I will definitely get a DVD player for the car for trips. I remember as a kid, a kid with a pretty good imagination, being unbearably bored on long trips. Imagination is good if you can run around and act on it, not if you're just sitting in a car.

    54. Re:We live in a multimedia word by FuzzyFox · · Score: 1

      "Flammable" means "it can burn." Like a piece of wood. If you hold a match to it for a while, it will eventually start burning.

      "Inflammable" means "capable of bursting into flame." Like a pool of gasoline: If a flame touches it, it will be a raging fire, instantly.

      So these two words are not exactly interchangeable; there is a difference in meaning.

      --
      splunge (n) -- A good idea.. but it could be lousy... and I'm not being indecisive!
    55. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as people start to realize that they're using words wrongly, our work as Grammar Nazis has accomplished some good.

      I don't particularly care if it annoys you or makes you feel inadequate.

    56. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is 100% correct! some of the books they push in school are junk! My 6 year old daughter and I read 20,000 leagues under the sea (elementary school version) and she loved it, wouldn't put it down. She took it to school to show her friends, and her Kindergarten teacher wasn't too cool with that. I forgot many parts of the story, but she read ahead and spoiled the ending for me. spoiler alert... they escape from Captain Nemo in the dingy when the Nautilus gets stuck in a whirlpool... She read Treasure Island and loved it, we did many of the Magic School Bus books and are working on the Magic Tree House book series. She read every book as soon as I gave it to her, and cried tears for more. We're going back and reading them together now. Not much tv is watched in my house, when it is, it is usually something like Sci Girls or Electric Company on PBS or a science show like How the Earth Was Made, etc. We did sneak a peak at the beginning of Jurassic Park which was on last week (before the feeding frenzy).

    57. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Gods yes. My favorite example is Canterbury Tales - nothing but sex jokes and toilet humor. It just happens to be _very_ old sex jokes and toilet humor. Ugh. I never read anything even halfway decent in elementary school/highschool. Got one or two marginally tolerable books in college, but those are still mixed in with four hundred page books in which _absolutely nothing_ happens until the last 30 pages (i.e. White Noise) - though it's far more tolerable in college. But still, as far as I can tell, "classic" means only that it's old, not that it's good.

    58. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the advice. Raising kids is one hell of a challenge, moreso than any video game I've played, so any advice is appreciated. I plan on taking an active role in their education and imagination so I'll definitely look into Waldorf Schooling.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    59. Re:We live in a multimedia word by RadioElectric · · Score: 1

      Good, because next time we send the boys around. ;-)

      I assumed that you thought it meant something different, judging from what you said. I appreciate evolving languages, and how new words come about but within that analogy I'd say "irregardless" is a genetic cul-de-sac. It's longer and more awkward-sounding than its parent. Besides which, to me at least, "irregardless" causes a mental *screeching brakes* noise (similar to "put on a pedal-stool" and "damp squid" for IT-Crowd viewers).

      Back in the "evolution" metaphor - I guess my "grammar troll" behaviour is just part of the selection-pressure. The point of evolution isn't that every mutation survives.

    60. Re:We live in a multimedia word by RadioElectric · · Score: 1

      Really? I can't find support for that distinction anywhere.

    61. Re:We live in a multimedia word by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Ok class, Sycraft-fu has recommended we change our reading list so this semester instead of Hemingway we will be reading the "Twilight" books.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    62. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I have this running joke that the only toy my kids will ever have is a block of wood.

      Naw, get them a compound mitre saw, too.

    63. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      Curious. Why would someone's parents reading to them help them understand how to spell the various screwed up words and when to use which version? Hell, I read all the time and I still have trouble with some of them. That's like saying that listening to an audiobook would help you know which version of "there" you should be using.

    64. Re:We live in a multimedia word by rootchick · · Score: 1

      Duh! Take the kids to the library, where they can bring home a stack of books for free!

    65. Re:We live in a multimedia word by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Good point. Let me rephrase that.

      "Plz I cn haz u off mah l@wnz0rz?"

      Better?

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    66. Re:We live in a multimedia word by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I have a 9 and 12 year old. They both enjoy reading books. I would suspect it's because we took time to read to them, and enjoy reading ourselves.

      Maybe your not a very good teacher?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    67. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Also getting them books they enjoy. Something I see far too much, particularly from schools, is this emphasis on "classics." They want kids to read "good" literature and thus try to cram stuff they don't like at them.

      My son was happy when he finally realized that I mean it: I don't care what books he buys as long as they're age-appropriate. He found the "Diary of a Wimpy Kid" series and loved each of them. Last week he picked out "The Day My Butt Went Psycho" just because it said "butt" a lot and he's ate the age when that's the height of humor. I finally got it through his head that I read because it's fun and worth doing, not because someone's forcing me to slog through boring stuff I can't stand. Now that he's found a few books that pique his interest, he's starting to realize that he also likes reading.

      I've never really understood the point of sucking all the joy out of the act of reading. There are so many wonderful books for everyone, regardless of their interests, that I'd rather teach my kids to love reading and let them explore on their own.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    68. Re:We live in a multimedia word by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      It is extremely hard for our kids to even have an opportunity to learn to love books! They are exposed to so many competing media at such an early age that books get relegated to schools as something they use.

      Which is why I think I'm going to start severely limiting how much TV and video game time my kids get. My oldest had a bad grade this year, so he lost the Xbox for the summer, but as soon as I gave it back to him this last weekend, he started drowning himself in it. My wife and I are talking about a 90 minute electronics limit per day... that's TV, computer, and game console combined. We'll give him a couple of hours more on the weekends, but both my wife and I are heavy readers, and always had a book handy in our pre-Internet age youth. So we're a little disturbed by how little the oldest one is reading outside of school. Everything he wants to do is electronic. Everything. He's got the MP3 player plugged in so much, we've started calling him "Borg". We've started mandating some time on the basketball courts, libraries, parks, etc, things he used to do more of before he became a teenager. If we simply leave him to his own devices, it's apparent he'll do the same thing all his friends do... meld with his Xbox and do nothing else. This summer we sent him away to a camp in North Carolina, out in the boonies. It's clear that in creating so many choices and convieniences for ourselves, we tend to become absorbed by them.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    69. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Syberz · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you, classics are called that for a reason but that doesn't make them interesting.

      Case in point, I've recently read Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass... what the f*ck kind of acid trip was Lewis Carroll on when he wrote that crap?

      Just let the kids read what they want within a few guidelines and have them write a paper explaining what they liked/didn't like about the book. That way they practice both reading and writing and sharing their thoughts to their fellow classmates might enlighten them to new books.

      --
      ~Syberz
    70. Re:We live in a multimedia word by supermariosd · · Score: 1

      This might just be my love of the classics (including Wuthering Heights) talking, but I think that kids at least need a basic education in some older literature. Kids aren't allowed to choose what to study in math until they have a basic understanding of things like arithmetic, algebra, and geometry. The point of teaching the classics isn't to indoctrinate; it's to give students a basic education so that they can make a more informed decision about what to study in the future.

    71. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch which families head for the shitty books that squeak and squawk and are mostly pictures. Listen to kids far too old hate on "chapter books". Watch them simply screw with the displays and misbehave ... Now compare this versus the families that sit and read together quietly and put books back that they aren't going to buy

      One of those misbehaving kids may well be the semi-autistic geek who invents a cheap, efficient energy source that saves civilization from disaster. And the nice kids will be his patent attorneys.

    72. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to go back and re-read Wuthering Heights. I read (and love) plenty of sci-fi and fantasy, but in my opinion, Wuthering Heights is perhaps the greatest work of fiction ever written in the English language. The passions of Heathcliff and Catherine in the first half of the book are so overwhelming as to be almost elemental forces, and then in an incredibly audacious move, Emily Bronte scales everything down in the second half of the book and dares to repeat the story on a more human level with the romance of Cathy and Hareton. It's a book that left me deeply moved, and which I think of often to this day. To each their own, of course, but to dismiss it as "crap" is silly and thoughtless.

    73. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only hard if the parents don't care. My kids (middle and high school) love books, they're voracious readers (well, one not so much as the others, but still by comparison to most kids). But then we've always limited their TV, computer and electronic gaming time, and read to them when they were little. (My daughter, at about age 4, started reading Harry Potter on her own because my chapter a day was too slow for her.)

    74. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Have you even read the criteria for what makes a "classic". Hint: a classic is not a classic because it is old. Take Homer's Oddysey...has this really been read for 2000 years because it is old? Or because it remains relevant to whomever reads it, no matter what age the person reading might be in. That makes a classic...it's timeless relevance...I'm afraid it has very little to do with age. A classic might be written right now. It is its relevance to whomever may read it in the future that will cause it to endure. Secondly, complaining that there are few science fiction books on the classics list, is narrow minded in the extreme. I love science fiction as much as any other nerd out there...that does not mean I wish to confine myself to it. Part of the joy of reading the classics, is stepping outside of your modern view of things...and seeing what men in ages past, thought and did. If I restrict myself to science fiction, or only what moderns think...then I lose all that may be gained from stepping outside my little world.

      If a kid wants to read pulp, Harry Potter, or whatever, then good on him...at least he's reading. However, the complaint that something is not modern is crass, narrow-minded, and ungrateful for what the great thinkers and dreamers have given the complainer (and it is this legacy that can be felt in our political systems, technology, and entertainment).

    75. Re:We live in a multimedia word by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Even better, read every night at bedtime

      Well, yes, if they see you reading they're going to want to emulate you and do it themselves. That's part of what Evil-X's parents did wrong. But still read to them!

    76. Re:We live in a multimedia word by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand; the teacher can help them learn how to read, and reading* itself will tell them the difference between lose and loose, and their and there. Reading to them (and reading yourself) will make them WANT to read, and want to learn how to do it.

      You can't teach anyone anything, you can only help them learn. But they have to want to.

      *not what the illiterate morons on the internet write, of course.

    77. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coward fits you quite well.

      Btw, we don't particularly care about your accomplishments if any exist.

    78. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how I felt about them as a pup.

      WEREWOLF alert!

    79. Re:We live in a multimedia word by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      As opposed to expecting people to learn to love mathematics by starting at the angle trisection problem, or by starting at Fermat's last theorem? There are many classic problems which begin at a very elementary level.

    80. Re:We live in a multimedia word by assertation · · Score: 1

      Don't you know you are supposed to blame anyone OTHER than the parents?

    81. Re:We live in a multimedia word by antdude · · Score: 1

      My parents and teachers/professors forced me to read books, but I still find books boring. I prefer reading short pieces like Internet/magazine articles and short stories, seeing things (visual like arts, movies, TV/television shows including documentaries, etc.).

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    82. Re:We live in a multimedia word by assertation · · Score: 1

      We have a PS3, an xbox 360 and a Wii, plus a PSP and an NDS. We have several hundred DVDs and blu-ray titles, plus on demand FiOS, several computers around the house and netflix. Our two kids spend more time in books than on all those combined. Don't blame the options available, blame the parents.

      Why do you think your kids as opposed to other kids choose to read?

    83. Re:We live in a multimedia word by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      When I was in high school, there was no sci fi at all on any of the reading lists unless you want to count 1984, which isn't really sci fi. This is not because there were no great sci fi novels, this was only back in the mid 90s, but because all the crusty academics that put together these lists can't consider anything made after their birth to be good to read.

      I agree. There was too much 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and 'A Tale of Two Cities' for my taste in high school. I was lucky and got to read 'Lord of the Flys' instead of 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and at least that was somewhat interesting. I dont know why, at the very least, '2001: A Space Odyssey' is not on every high school's reading list. At least that would give students a taste of sci-fi.

  5. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've always sworn that I'd never become the old fart who's confused in the world of modern technology, but I really miss being able to walk into a record store and flip through the endless racks of LPs or CDs. I suppose I'm going to miss book stores too, when that day comes not too long from now.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  6. A sad day by lostros · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know that i will certainly miss the ability to wander through a bookstore and pick up authors or titles I might not have otherwise. I love brick and mortor stores and I for one am not ready to see them go.

    1. Re:A sad day by muridae · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know that i will certainly miss the ability to wander through a bookstore and pick up authors or titles I might not have otherwise.

      If by that you mean the limited selection that happens to be on the shelves. I love brick and mortar book stores, but the B&Ns in driving distance are horrible. If the book is not part of some reading club book of the month, or by an author that was featured on one of those lists, or it is not a major seller, they do not have it. The staff is always happy to order it for me and have it shipped directly to my house, but they can't look up a price on it to let me know how much that will cost. I know books are not impulse buys for everyone, but it seems that these stores would rather store an entire shelf of Marilyn Monroe photo essays (the same one) than stock a few non-book-club titles.

      It is almost insulting, to me, to have the staff at such a store suggest that I could buy the book online. If I wanted to do that, as many other posters have pointed out, there are places with better prices on both the books and shipping.

    2. Re:A sad day by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      I second this. I wander though my local BN with my nook logged in to the BN wifi. If I see a book that's interesting I look it up and add it to my wish list or buy it then and there.

    3. Re:A sad day by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      Find another store.

    4. Re:A sad day by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yup, just ordered a John C. Wright book from Amazon. I'd hit 4 chain stores in town (2 B&N, 2 Borders) in the last month, just keeping an eye out for any of his work (SF&F). Nothing. They have 2 shelves of Twilight books, and just 8 or 10 major or hot authors and that's it. Aaaaaaugh!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    5. Re:A sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where?

      We had three great bookstores in town, each with their own specialty. Then B&N came in. Now there are no other bookstores. The small bookstores couldn't compete. There weren't enough of us willing to pay the premium that the little bookstores had to charge to stay alive.

      The library has a better selection of interesting books, is well-staffed by people who love books, can tap into all the other libraries in the state to get me any specific book I need faster than Amazon can ship it to me, fosters a community built around the sheer love of reading, and is free other than the time and money I choose to donate. It's one of the smallest items in our town budget, but is one of the most valuable resources we have.

      The blight that is Borders and B&N can just die already. I cried along with the local owners when I lost my local bookstores to them. I won't shed a tear over B&N. If I want to discover a book, my library can get it for me, and they have people who are happy to help me find something interesting. If I need to own a book, Amazon is cheaper and has a better selection.

    6. Re:A sad day by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I love brick and mortar book stores, but the B&Ns in driving distance are horrible. If the book is not part of some reading club book of the month, or by an author that was featured on one of those lists, or it is not a major seller, they do not have it.

      Huh??? B&N? Every single B&N I've seen has been a large store with plenty of non-mainstream titles; you're seriously telling me if you go to the philosophy section, or the poetry section, or the sociology section, you only see the types of books you list above?

    7. Re:A sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know I felt this way as well, except the Amazon recommendation engine has sucked more dollars out of my wallet than I care to admit. With the kindle you can return the book in a brief window, so if it starts out awful you're not out anything. I've found many more good books per year in my 1.5 years with a kindle than in previous experiences in the store. Once it knows your type, it's good at recommending. Privacy issues aside, I really like this feature.

    8. Re:A sad day by muridae · · Score: 1

      Poetry isn't a normal impulse buy, can't say. Philosophy and sociology, that is exactly what I am saying. For philosophy, I recall there being the basic classics, and some new pop stuff, and that was it. The only sections that was extremely varied was the manga, and the arts and craft section. Everything else that I looked at was old staples and new pop-megastar authors.

      Chalk it up to local preferences. Sure, I live in a college town, but the B&N is in the middle of 'townie' area. Maybe that is just what sells here.

    9. Re:A sad day by inKubus · · Score: 1

      "Print is dead." -Egon

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  7. Maybe if they charged sane prices by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last time I went into a B&N store I was looking for something to read on an intercontiental flight, I found something but a quick check on amazon.com(not even bothering to look for anything that may even be cheaper) they had about a 50% markup and thats not even including the sales tax(shipping from Amazon was free). Now I understand having to pay a couple of bucks more for the convenience of walking out of the store with the book, but 50% is just insane. Their online store isn't much better, 95+% of the time they are considerably more expensive than amazon. They aren't dying solely because of factors outside of their control, they are dying because they feel entitled to margins that the more successful players in the industry have known to be unreasonable for a long while.

    1. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They aren't dying solely because of factors outside of their control, they are dying because they feel entitled to margins that the more successful players in the industry have known to be unreasonable for a long while.

      Well, I think more accurately what happens is what you're describing is factors outside of their control.

      I don't think they need those margins because they feel 'entitled' to them, so much as Amazon has been able to rely on its sheet size to work on smaller margins. B&N is now simply being squeezed out so badly, they they can't compete.

      For them to sell at the same price as Amazon, they'd likely have to do it at an even greater loss -- which will squeeze them dry even faster.

      Amazon has truly been able to exploit Economies of scale, and B&N has not. With fewer people buying books overall, and Amazon being able to sell a much larger volume at a lower price, B&N has been squeezed from both ends.

      This isn't about entitlement.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by jimicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Borders in the UK were anything to go by, "entitled to margins" isn't really the problem. There's every possibility the structure of the entire business is such that they essentially have to charge that much or they'll be making a whacking loss.

      An example: Virtually every book these days has a barcode, right? The barcode identifies the book, you can either use an existing database or build your own as you acquire stock. You can then scan your stock as it comes in and again at the checkout as it sells. Very easy, barcode scanners are cheap and the software isn't hard to acquire.

      Borders used their own specific barcode labels. Which means every book had to have a separate barcode label which they'd have to pay someone £X/hr to apply, which means they had to manage their own unique barcode database, allocate barcodes - essentially they had added a layer of technology to deal with stock management which was almost entirely unnecessary. That layer would have cost money to set up and operate - money that nobody else was spending.

      That's an example of one - fairly obvious, because it's customer-facing - silly thing. IME, it's vanishingly unlikely it was the only silly thing they were doing.

    3. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by Manip · · Score: 1

      That's just silly. Amazon's typical markup is approx. 10%, a brick and mortar like B&N has a typical markup of around 25%. But keep in mind these are markups on the price the suppliers charge to these companies. If Amazon for example sells 10K of this book, and B&N sell 5K then the initial price is higher. As soon as Amazon got ahead then it is likely to stay ahead and consumer pressure will only re-enforce that.

      You claim B&N charges 50% because they feel "entitled" but realistically Amazon has less than 1 staff per 500 orders, compared to maybe 3 staff per 500 orders at a B&N retail store. They also have to pay more in heating, cleaning, lighting, and other silly service costs that are associated with having a public face.

      The sales tax issue is funny, or sad. Maybe both. States really deserve what they get if you aren't paying them sales tax when you order out of state.

    4. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by bertoelcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That would explain why the Half-Price Books around here are doing great. They are usually the same price as Amazon with a brick and mortar store.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    5. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by confused+one · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Amazon works out of a series of large, fairly automated warehouses. This allows them to keep their costs low. B&N, in comparison, has to maintain large storefronts on expensive retail real-estate, staffed by a crew of sales people, managers and maintenance staff. Based on my experience, B&N tends to maintain their stores at a level above that of their competition. B&N's real costs are considerably higher than Amazon's. That markup you speak of is, in part, a reflection of that.

    6. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B&N's biggest problem is that they have brick-and-mortar stores and Amazon doesn't. That means B&N has to pay a lot of rent and staff salaries, benefits, 401k's, health insurance, etc while Amazon just stores books in a big warehouse and has a relatively small crew that runs around packing them into shipping boxes. Much lower overhead. Hence the markup and B&N's inability to cut prices enough to compete. Matching Amazon's prices would send B&N into bankruptcy immediately. I appreciate Jeff Bezo's ability to provide books at a low cost, but if he destroys the bookstore industry in the US I'll curse his name until my dying breath.

      Personally, I'd like to think that there will always be bookstores, but that they will become very specialized and cater to niche markets, much like the British bookstores so prevalent in London. I wandered into a military bookstore in the West End near Leicester Square the last time I was there and was just agog. The selection wasn't huge, but the rare editions on hand were just mind-boggling--19th-century editions of all kinds of classics. Wouldn't have surprised to find a first-edition copy of "On War" by Clausewitz in the original German. Were I a wealthier man, I would've dropped a few thousand pounds there, easy. I defy Amazon to match that kind of specialized stock.

    7. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by gabebear · · Score: 1

      50%-100% markups aren't just coming from economies of scale...

      B&N doesn't have to beat Amazon's prices, but if it's always going to cost me at least 50% more, I can't justify using B&N unless I NEED the book that day. Luckily I live in NYC and pass by Strand every day...

    8. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by cappp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That’s because B&N are competing with the likes of Amazon and Costco who can exploit their strengths and easily outcompete. Amazon doesn’t pay sales tax in large portions of the US, maintains a smaller inventory, doesn’t pay for stores, has a tiny staff, and offers a huge range of goods through which to earn money. It doesn’t hurt that they’ve been supported by investors for the who were willing to see consistent annual losses with the hope of eventual stellar profits. Costco stocks a tiny portion of available titles, specifically those targeted at mass the mass audience, and sidesteps the problem of placing anything with questionable star-potential on its shelves.

      A little digging suggests that a book selling at its list price will give the retailer approximately 45% profit.

      Based on a list price of $27.95
      $3.55 - Pre-production - This amount covers editors, graphic designers, and the like
      $2.83 - Printing - Ink, glue, paper, etc
      $2.00 - Marketing - Book tour, NYT Book Review ad, printing and shipping galleys to journalists
      $2.80 - Wholesaler - The take of the middlemen who handle distribution for publishers
      $4.19 - Author Royalties - A bestseller like Grisham will net about 15% in royalties, lesser known authors get less. Also the author will be paying a slice of this pie piece to his agent, publicist, etc.
      This leaves $12.58, Money magazine calls this the profit margin for the retailer, however when was the last time you saw a bestselling novel sold at its cover price.

      Assuming the previous is correct, your local Barnes and Noble has to stretch that money to cover all those incidental costs of running a physical, specialist store – rent, local taxes, utilities, sales taxes, staffing costs, benefits, insurance, stocking cost, inventory and so on. Their prices are a real kick in the pocketbook but I don’t think they’re exactly swimming in profits either. Indeed, a quick look at their wikinvest page reveals that

      company-wide operating margin fell from 2.8% to 1.3% in FY2010

      . My econ’ tends to be on the weak side, and correct me if I’m wrong, but that means they’re making a profit of approximately 1c on every dollar sold (couldn't find the figure for Amazon but it looks like Apple has an operating margin of 29.1% and Microsoft has 39%).

    9. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      50%-100% markups aren't just coming from economies of scale...

      It's not just economies of scale, but it is all determined by economic factors.

      I remember about a decade ago, people thinking it was absurd that Amazon had a market cap greater than B&N. B&N had stores, and other assets, as well as a place in people's retail habits. Fast forward, and Amazon has become something between a Fed Ex and a Wal Mart. They're huge, they sell a lot more books than anybody else so they can afford to sell each one cheaper, and they don't need to pay for the overhead of running a chain of retail stores.

      B&N doesn't have to beat Amazon's prices, but if it's always going to cost me at least 50% more, I can't justify using B&N unless I NEED the book that day.

      And, ultimately, that is why B&N is putting themselves up for sale. You can only try to sell the same thing at a higher price than your main competition for so long before eventually it becomes apparent that fewer people are buying from you, and you're making less on each sale.

      They can't sell on equal footing with Amazon, because they don't sell like Amazon. It really is a combination of economies of scale, and the relative way their operations are structured.

      Now, in 5-10 years when there's almost no bookstores left because they can't compete with Amazon, it will be a sad day. But, the mom and pop bookstore has even less chance of competing with Amazon.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by khchung · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Borders in the UK were anything to go by, "entitled to margins" isn't really the problem. There's every possibility the structure of the entire business is such that they essentially have to charge that much or they'll be making a whacking loss.

      Borders used their own specific barcode labels. Which means every book had to have a separate barcode label which they'd have to pay someone £X/hr to apply, [...]

      That's exactly what GP's "entitled to margins" means.

      If you are a sane manager, unless you think you are "entitled" to huge margins, you would be changing your business practices so your costs stay within your margin (which should be in line with your competitors')

      By keeping their business structured in the way to requires more margin that their competitors, and keeping the high margin on the prices, they are thinking they are "entitled" to such margins, and are in fact slowly killing the company.

      --
      Oliver.
    11. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 1

      That still doesn't help the fact that I feel ripped off every time I buy something at B&N. Is that really the experience you want your customers to come away with?

      --

      ÕÕ

    12. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said, their arrogance definitely played a part in crippling them

    13. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      I don't think you appreciate the difference between Amazon's and Barnes and Noble's business models. Economy of scale is a part of it (Amazon buys more copies of book and thus pay less per book), but it's mostly in the way they work. Amazon has a few large warehouses, from which all the books they sell are shipped. Barnes and Noble has a few large warehouses from which all the books they sell are shipped. Beyond that Barnes and Noble has hundreds (thousands? A lot, anyway) of large retail locations that have to be staffed, climate controlled, powered, designed, built, etc, etc. Amazon has a website. Oh yeah, B&N has one of those too, so they're not even really saving money there. Basically, B&N has the same back end costs as Amazon, plus hugely expensive retail outlets.

      Unfortunately cutting the retail outlets just makes them a second best online bookseller. Not to mention that the retail outlets are exactly why I go to B&N over Amazon. It's a catch22, the retail outlets are what makes them special, what gives them an advantage over Amazon, but they're also an albatross that forces them to charge more. Worse, they're like a free advertising for Amazon. I know lots of people who do exactly what you did. Go into the brick and mortar store to browse (which is much more convenient after all), then get the books they've decided on cheaper from Amazon. Thanks to smart phones you can bloody sit in the Barnes and Noble checking relative prices and ordering from someone else.

      The irony here is that B&N is falling prey to the most recent version of the same trends that they used to kill a lot of independent booksellers 10 or 20 years ago. Despite that, now that there are so few small booksellers, I will be sad to lose B&N as one of the few places you can still go to wander around and find a book.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    14. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      They do that partially by being no frills in every way (I happen to like that B&N is a comfortable place to shop), and partially by offering mostly overstock. They'll get a few big titles in "currently", which they'll sell at cost or even for a loss, but the vast majority of their stock is either overstock or over publish title that they get cheap and then get good margins on when they sell cheap.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    15. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by DrgnDancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can find those places in the States too, but the key word in your post is "London". Could you find a nice cross section of adorable little specialist book shops in (*picks random little British town*) Kirkby on Bain? Or even (*picks random decent sized British town*) Hull, or York? You probably could find a subset of such things in say (*picks random fairly large city*) Birmingham or Manchester, but I doubt it's as good as London. It's the same here. New York is simply full of nice specialist book shops. I'm sure Washington, Chicago, Boston, or LA have a nice compliment as well. The small city I live in (in Alabama) has a few, with Nashville an hour and a half or so away with more. The little towns an hour of so outside of here have nothing. Books in those places are bought at Walmart, Amazon, or not at all.

      The problem here is also one of scale. Nearly anyone in England is a day trip away from a fairly large city, and no more than a weekend trip from London. The US is simply much more spread out.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    16. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      I think big-chain bricks-and-mortar bookstores are doomed. They tend to be boring and generic--you might as well go to Amazon and save money. If I go into a bookstore, I go to an independent one where I'm more likely to encounter books that are new to me. I think B&N was too slow into electronic distribution, although it is a good thing for the consumer for Amazon to have competition.

      The strongest part of B&N's business is its college bookstores, which also tend to be less generic than B&N's mall shops, and have a bit of a captive clientele.

    17. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by DrgnDancer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're already making a penny on every dollar sold. How can you hope to fix that impression? It's not like you can cut prices. You could cut costs by making stores less nice, but the simple fact of the matter is that most people who still go to bookstores (like me) go for the experience. I like that everything in Barnes and Noble looks nice. There's a reason I'll drive farther to go to B&N over Books-a-Million or Borders. So while they could cut cost by becoming "Wal-books", they'd probably lose as many customers as they gained, and they still couldn't hope to compete with Amazon head to head on prices. No matter how cheaply run the store, it'll still cost more to run than no store at all.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    18. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by Glith · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of what they sell at amazon's prices are used books. For their new books they aren't really cheaper than any other brick and mortar store.

    19. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by Tarsir · · Score: 1

      Last time I went into a B&N store I was looking for something to read on an intercontiental flight, I found something (...) Now I understand having to pay a couple of bucks more for the convenience of walking out of the store with the book, but 50% is just insane.

      It's not just the convenience of having the book now. It's also the convenience of having a physical location near you which you can browse through looking for books, which I note you did use.

    20. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you mean that not every quaint little British town is stocked to the gills with specialty book shops? I'm so disillusioned now...

    21. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cost of Brick and Mortar:

      Some thick person suggested that brick and mortar stores feel entitled.
      Carpet costs money.
      Shipping unsold product back (returns) costs money.
      Customer assistance labor costs money.

      Eliminate the environmental and convenience factors, and you've
      not only allowed the bookstore to compete with Amazon...
      you've also eliminated any reason anyone goes to a physical bookstore.

      Remaindered product:

      I'm told Borders generates separate inventory numbers, so they can maintain
      remaindered product, and sell it at the remaindered discount.

      Thus, they maintain a separate product code on file at the manufacturer's retail price
      (mutters something about US federal court precedent allowing the manufacturer to enforce
        the base retail price).

    22. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by EggyToast · · Score: 1

      Without Barnes & Noble, though, there's more opportunities for small indie bookstores. If there's a B&N around the corner, why go to an indie with a smaller selection and cat hair? But if the only alternative is buying online, indie stores become much more viable -- especially since indies can stock used books, something which B&N and Borders doesn't. Without B&N it also means that it becomes viable for other non-book stores to sell books. Many coffee shops sell a few CDs -- why not add a small book section? As long as people read books, there'll be places to buy them.

    23. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Haha! The small bookstore near me has 2 cats who live there. I thought that was cool and unique. Is it common enough that it's a stereotype?

    24. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by stdarg · · Score: 1

      The main reason I go to Barnes is the cafe and checking out girls. I hope that before they sell themselves or close, they do a bit to explore the advantages of retail space over online-only access.

    25. Re:Maybe if they charged sane prices by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      As far as I understand it, their "new" books are all remaindered (overstock that the publisher wants to dump, fast).

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  8. It's the price of books has became obscene... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry but I stopped buying books at B&N for one reason... Obscene prices. sorry but $69.99 for a book on Python programming is robbery. When I can get the same book on Amazon.com for $29.95.

    Or how about the photography books ranging from $49.99 to $129.99 for an Ansel Adams coffee table book... Exact same books on Amazon.com for less than 1/4 the price.

    I'm sorry. But I buy almost nothing from them.... Except their clearance books, those are honest pricing. Everything else I buy elsewhere.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      You are blaming the store for charging the MSRP - the _MANUFACTURER'S suggested retail price. While I agree that the price of some books are insane but that's hardly B&N's, or any other book store's fault.

    2. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't care if it's Jesus's suggested retail price. If it's less than half the cost somewhere else, it's moronic.

      Are you trying to say that stores are required to sell at MSRP? They aren't.

    3. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by portforward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have to agree with you. The retail prices for new books in general are too high for me. I would love to buy more from Barnes and Nobles because I do like the store, but I just can't bring myself to pay the prices. It seems like my wife is always asking me to go to the used book chain Half Price Books (we have been to two different Half Price Books stores already the past seven days), but she almost never wants to go to B&N because of the prices. My miserliness usually wins out over my enthusiasm, and I find that I can wait for something for a couple of years, and then it will appear at Half Price Books or some other used book place. If I can't wait (which is rare), then I'll go to Amazon. It just doesn't make sense to me to pay $20-30 for something that I know will be available to me for $2-7 in two or three years.

      I know that is probably cutting into B&N's bottom line, and probably publishing in general, but I have other ways to part with my scarce resources.

      Now that I think about it, I did buy a book from B&N about four weeks ago. It was originally marked at $37, and I paid $5 on clearance. So yeah, I'm a cheapskate.

    4. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by galfridus73 · · Score: 1

      The MSRP is rarely the rationale for the brick-and-mortar stores charging the MSRP. The reality is, Amazon can charge much less because it doesn't need much else other than a crew of stockpeople, programmers, and a shipping department. B&N has to pay for multiple people to keep the stores open, even when no customers are around, and keep it nice and tidy, police for shoplifting, pay for people to staff the cafes, etc. It's simple economics. Amazon is going to charge less because it costs them less to stock the book and sell it to you.

    5. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      Well then, whose fault is it? After all, it's only a "suggested" retail price.

      It's up to the bookstore to to get an appropriate contract with the manufacturer/distributor and ensure they're still capable of profitability. They should be working on selling as much product as possible, not raising the cost due to lack of volume.

    6. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      No, they're not required to sell at the suggested price - but they are required to sell at a price that covers their costs and allows them to make a reasonable profit.

      Chances are their costs are simply higher than those of Amazon, and they're not able to make the same volumes to pull in the money they need based on higher volume and lower margins.

      None of which means you should pay more and buy from them of course; it just means that it's not moronic, it's simply a business model that's failing in the face of an alternative one.

    7. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by StripedCow · · Score: 2, Informative

      sorry but $69.99 for a book on Python programming is robbery. When I can get the same book on Amazon.com for $29.95.

      ...which also is like robbery, considering that you can find most information on the internet.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    8. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by gorzek · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but only idiots charge MSRP for anything in this day and age.

    9. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Bleh, Amazon is the Wal-Mart of bookstores. Some of there low price comes from not having stores, but a lot of it comes from their size allowing them to push around publishers and authors. Cheap and convenient as it is, I have basically given up buying books, or anything else from them. Which reminds me, I should delete my wishlist over there...

    10. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Depends on your style of working. Personally I use online references a great deal - particularly for sample code, but I do like a printed book. It's quick to reference, and I can take it to the pub with me and fill it up with stickies. I've used Python and Objective-C books on my iPhone, and it was useful for reading, but not quite as easy as a paper book that I can flip through with the knowledge that I know pretty much where everything is found.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    11. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      No, they're not required to sell at the suggested price - but they are required to sell at a price that covers their costs and allows them to make a reasonable profit.

      No they're not. It would certainly be a stupid idea to sell books at a loss on a continuing basis but doing it to some degree is actually a good thing. I suggest you read up on loss leaders.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    12. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by jonesy16 · · Score: 1

      Correction, only idiots "pay" MSRP for anything in this day and age.

    13. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by gorzek · · Score: 1

      Then it would seem there are fewer idiots today than in the past, given the state of brick-and-mortar book sales. ;)

    14. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by jonesy16 · · Score: 1

      Well, I still have to point people to online outlet/refurbished stores (Apple, Dell) when they're buying new computers, so there's still a lot of learning left to do!

    15. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by westlake · · Score: 1

      Obscene prices. sorry but $69.99 for a book on Python programming is robbery. When I can get the same book on Amazon.com for $29.95.

      Every inch of shelf space has to generate its share of income for the store.

      How many copies of your Python textbook do you think leaves the mall each day?

      Amazon stocks a number of Python texts that list for $100 - in paperback:

      Introduction to Computing and Programming in Python, A Multimedia Approach (2nd Edition)

      Expect to see a relatively modest 12% discount here.

      The Ansel Adams coffee table book in hardcover that lists for $150? 25% off. The American Wilderness

    16. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. But I buy almost nothing from them.... Except their clearance books, those are honest pricing.

      I just love the mentality of the Wal-Mart shopper. "If it ain't cheap, they iz a' rippin' me off". No knowledge required, no hard thinking required, just blind dogma.
       
      Seriously, scroll up a bit and you'll find the reasons for the price difference. (tl;dr version: Amazon == Microsoft.)

    17. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What everyone thus far has failed to note is that B&N doesn't set the price; the publishers do (that's why the price is printed on the book). This has long been a complaint of the publishing industry, by both authors and retailers. The price cannot be adjusted on first sale to account for demand.

      First sale are the key words. Once the book has been sold once, the price can be adjusted as per the market. This is why Amazon, Half-Price, etc. are able to sell so much lower. Overstock/overproduction also can be sold at a lower price, which is another way Half-Price is able to sell lower. Outside that, the retail is subject to the publisher on price.

      Way to go, IP!

      (This will probably be ignored as I'm AC, but people really should familiarize themselves with this)

    18. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      ...which also is like robbery, considering that you can find most information on the internet.

      It's not the information that's worth $29.95 but the editing.

    19. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      sorry but $69.99 for a book on Python programming is robbery. When I can get the same book on Amazon.com for $29.95.

      ...which also is like robbery, considering that you can find most information on the internet.

      Maybe he doesn't have a computer, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    20. Re:It's the price of books has became obscene... by fermion · · Score: 1
      While the price of books may have hit a bubble, those of us who are skilled based craftspeople do not want not want to live in a world where our craft, be it software development, writing, or teaching, becomes a commodity. A python book may be expensive, and one may be able to get it cheaper, but what does that cheap book mean. A general impression that software development is a cheap thing to do, that the knowledge contained in the book is cheap, and that rates that used to hover around $50 an hour can drop to $20.

      Minimizing cost is not always the name of the game. Look at the current immigration issue. In a free market economy, firms should be able to hire workers from anywhere, and workers should be able to able to organize to create value to firms. We should not be treating firms like criminals simply because they have a source of lower cost workers. But we do. Because we know the race to the bottom is a losing proposition for everyone. Of course we don't like high prices, so while we complain that immigrants are taking jobs, we demand the price only sustainable with cheap immigrant labor.

      Local generic bookstores are a failed model because they have to stock multiple the number of books they will sell, and that costs money. Small bookstore with handpicked selections for their customers might survive. We may be in a restructuring where pricing cannot support the overhead of coke addict executives and big box stores. If we are going restore a middle class, we must start paying craftsmen, and that may mean $50 for a book that helps us improve our craft.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  9. Mom and Pop by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Funny

    And, with this shift, we will see the resurgence of the mom and pop bookstore that sells new and used books in a loving environment which was previously squeezed out by the mega chains. And I'm fine with that.

    Sadly, we'll also see the resurgence of those bookstores with five cats wandering around the store making the place smell like stale cat urine. I'm less fine with that...

    1. Re:Mom and Pop by edremy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sorry, we won't. Amazon is killing B&N the same way it will kill M&P stores- selection and price. You can't compete on price with them for new books, and with affiliates Amazon can own the used book market too.

      They're amazingly efficient for used stuff- for his birthday my son wanted an old LIFE book, now out of print. I found a used copy on Amazon, in perfect condition, in about 5 minutes. $8 + shipping. There's no way I could do that with used book stores in the area- I can't even enter half of them due to dust and mold issues.

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    2. Re:Mom and Pop by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's certainly a strong argument for Amazon having an adverse effect on mom & pop stores, but i'm not sure the used book market is that argument. Half the time i get used stuff from Amazon the purchase is actually routed to some small and presumably independent bookstore that i've never heard of before. Maybe you can't physically enter your local used book store because of dust and mold issues, but it's possible that they're selling a fair number of used books via Amazon.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    3. Re:Mom and Pop by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      And, with this shift, we will see the resurgence of the mom and pop bookstore that sells new and used books in a loving environment which was previously squeezed out by the mega chains. And I'm fine with that.

      That's roughly as likely as a supermodel wandering into your basement and offering to have carnal relations with you.
       
      I don't know where you've been for the last fifteen years but Amazon has already destroyed the mom and pop new bookseller. Amazon and various used book networks online have encouraged the growth of garage and warehouse operators selling used books, all but destroying the mom and pop in that market as well. And the Wal-Mart mentality has sent people flocking to the online sellers in droves.

    4. Re:Mom and Pop by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      And, with this shift, we will see the resurgence of the mom and pop bookstore that sells new and used books in a loving environment which was previously squeezed out by the mega chains. And I'm fine with that. Sadly, we'll also see the resurgence of those bookstores with five cats wandering around the store making the place smell like stale cat urine. I'm less fine with that...

      Right, for that soon to be expanding used ebook market...

      Although - you do bring up the bright side of licensing instead of buying all of our books - no cat piss. I confess that I have never considered that advantage before.

    5. Re:Mom and Pop by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Borders is better for used books. When you buy more than 1 book from a vendor you get shipping discounts.

      And as far as I can tell most of the Borders used-book vendors are Brick-and-Mortar stores throughout the states.

      I've gotten numerous Paperbacks and hardcovers through Borders (used books store) for $1.00 to $3.00; buy more than a couple books at a time and shipping drops to 2 or 3 bucks per book. As opposed to Amazon used-book sellers where shipping is a flatrate and usually $5 or more per book.

      It's generally not even worth it to buy used books on Amazon due to the outrageous shipping -- since you can often get the same book NEW and free shipping.

    6. Re:Mom and Pop by assertation · · Score: 1

      I wish you were right, but I do not agree.

      Why would someone go to the inconvenience of getting into their car, driving to such a store, finding parking and risking that the trip will be wasted if the book is not there if they can just order it through the convenience of their computers. Likely at a discount and delivered to their door?

  10. An interesting take on why they're failing by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Norman Spinrad has some interesting points about how the publishing and book sales businesses operate. They're like the music industry, only a lot worse in how they calculate the acceptable level of risk... even if an author has proved to be a fairly safe bet.

    1. Re:An interesting take on why they're failing by GaryOlson · · Score: 1
      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    2. Re:An interesting take on why they're failing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the link, specifically the first half. It was painful. I didn't read his book excerpts he linked,but if that blog post is indicative of how he writes, then there is no way in the world he should ever be published.
      .

  11. Sad Day for Print by radicalpi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love reading, unfortunately I don't make enough time for it. I consider myself a very technical and electronic-savvy person. However, I have no intention of purchasing eBooks anytime in the future. There is something about owning a paperback and curling up with it as you flip through the pages. eBooks lack this personal touch. Browsing an online catalog doesn't compare to rummaging through the stacks and perusing a bookstore's inventory. It scares me greatly that we may, within my lifetime reach the point where we see the closure of the last brick and mortar bookstore.

    1. Re:Sad Day for Print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love reading, unfortunately I don't make enough time for it. I consider myself a very technical and electronic-savvy person. However, I have no intention of purchasing eBooks anytime in the future. There is something about owning a paperback and curling up with it as you flip through the pages. eBooks lack this personal touch.

      I felt the same way until I acquired a Kindle 2. Once I got used to it, I noticed I read books that I wouldn't have even known about because I started 'Googling' books and topics through the online store, which had links to other books, which had links... Plus you get to carry all your books around (make or buy a protective cover, though). I don't have much time for reading anymore either, so I have to read a few minutes and put it down, and jump around from book to book (non-fiction mostly). The eBooks remember where you left off so you can do this easily. You might want to see if you can borrow one for a few days or make sure you have a return policy (e.g. Target, but wait for the Kindle 3) and try them out.

    2. Re:Sad Day for Print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree with this. I find it very difficult to read ebooks in comparison to a paperback or hard cover. The ebook just doesn't engross me the same way. (I read fiction novels and computer-related books.)

    3. Re:Sad Day for Print by chispito · · Score: 1

      Nothing will let you cram reading into a busy schedule like an e-reader. It is much more compact and travel-ready than a large paperback, contains all the books you have purchased for it, and is far more comfortable to read than a paperback or hardback. Having purchased a Kindle, the only thing I really miss at this point is the smell of the paper and the ability to borrow, lend, and buy used copies of books. Hopefully competition will eventually force Amazon to implement some sort of borrowing or re-selling feature.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re:Sad Day for Print by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      I'm as much of a geek as anyone here - love tech and science. Programming and designing stuff. But I can't rationalize buying a kindle or any other such thing... simply because I can't hold the book. I need to feel the paper.. a real book doesn't need it's battery charged.

      And in the case of my beloved O'reilly, and ADW books... in an e-Format, you can't highlight and take notes (or scribble in corrections when you find bugs in the code examples ;)

      --
      Huh?
    5. Re:Sad Day for Print by radish · · Score: 1

      No-one's saying you won't be able to buy paper books, just that there won't be a store selling them on every strip mall. I switched to online for all my book purchases years ago - hell there's basically nothing other than food and some impractical-to-ship items I buy in physical stores anymore. Online wins on choice, price and convenience.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  12. Saw this coming by Cereal+Box · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember seeing B&N devote a rather substantial amount of space to toys, games, etc. around a year or so ago, figured the writing was on the wall.

    1. Re:Saw this coming by confused+one · · Score: 1

      What you saw was always there, in the form of a kids "zone". They expanded it or you just noticed it for some reason.

    2. Re:Saw this coming by Cereal+Box · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, I'm referring to the expanded section for board games (they actually started selling popular Euro board games, very cool of them) and the GREATLY expanded kids area. Plus they seem to have added a bunch of other random shit I've never seen them selling before, like $90 Lego sets. This is all based on my local store, but still. They definitely have branched out from books substantially, and when a business starts moving away from their core that much, things aren't looking good.

    3. Re:Saw this coming by Ill_Omen · · Score: 1

      That actually sounds pretty nifty. I haven't been inside my semi-local B&N in quite a while, but I might check it out next time I'm in the area.

    4. Re:Saw this coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a few kiosks with cooking accessories at the one near my house. Given the number of cookbooks on the shelves, it makes sense to cash in by selling related merchandise. However, they'd have to go a long way to match the selection available at the dedicated cookware stores.

    5. Re:Saw this coming by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      I've seen this in B&N's for at least 10 years. The one in Princeton, NJ stands out... but I've seen it in a lot of them over the last decade.

      --
      Huh?
    6. Re:Saw this coming by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Then I guess I am guilty of not seeing the transition... I knew it expanded. I did not notice that it went from books only to books and toys -- or more specifically I didn't recall that the toys were not there originally. Funny because I'm in there a couple times per year, usually with my children.

  13. I don't think the writer of the article RTFA by lostros · · Score: 1

    It sounds to me that this is just an internal power struggle for control of the company. Barnes & Noble continues to profit from their stores, and have very good digital sales. It seems that the writer just wanted to do a piece about woe is me, the bookstores are failing, but it doesn't seem they are unprofitable, or planning on closing any stores.

    1. Re:I don't think the writer of the article RTFA by rla3rd · · Score: 1

      I dont either, i think the writer WTFA :).

  14. Pricing hurts. membership requirements too by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a large free standing B&N up the street from me and a similarly large Borders not far down the road. The B&N has a Starbucks which probably draws a good number of people to the B&N on its own.

    While book pricing isn't bad its not great. New releases usually can be found cheaper elsewhere and they lord over you the fact that you can buy into their membership with a low $25 fee to get books at better prices. This is where they lose me, I don't want to be badgered into being a member of their store, let alone pay for the privilege. Throw in the horrendous pricing in their DVD and CD section and suddenly I find myself comparing all prices or desiring to hit the net to see if I can find it cheaper. Membership "rewards" never come across as friendly, let alone one I have to pay for.

    While I do laud them for having an atmosphere that encourages spending time there, reading, sipping coffee, and etc, they need to work on their pricing and ditch this pay for membership to get a discount routine. Just ditch the requirement to get a discount on books entirely.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Pricing hurts. membership requirements too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the part that annoys me about them, too. When I purchased book 12 of Wheel of Time, I checked two places. Barnes & Noble and Target. B&N offered a discount of something like 25% off for members only. Target offered the exact same discount for everyone. I've essentially saved their membership fee by never buying a new book from them ever. And they lost me as a new book customer. I can't say it helps my paperback buying with them, either. It killed any sense of customer loyalty to them I might have had.

      And I can't understand how they operate the DVD section at all. I've never seen anyone buy anything from it, ever. I'm a big moviewatcher, but I won't even consider it since every single item is marked up $5-$10 over everyone else. Why are they bothering? It just seems like a waste of stock and floor.

    2. Re:Pricing hurts. membership requirements too by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is where they lose me, I don't want to be badgered into being a member of their store, let alone pay for the privilege. Throw in the horrendous pricing in their DVD and CD section and suddenly I find myself comparing all prices or desiring to hit the net to see if I can find it cheaper. Membership "rewards" never come across as friendly, let alone one I have to pay for.

      My wife is a lead at our local B&N, so let me see if I can enlighten you a bit...

      Paying $25 for a B&N membership does make a lot of sense for some people. It's a 10% discount on everything bought there (including the coffee and ON TOP of the 30-40% discount on things like new hardcovers), so if you spend $251.00 in a year at B&N, you've made money back. Now most people WON'T spend $250.00 a year there, but there are people who regularly spend over $250.00 a MONTH in there, and not taking the card would be insane. My wife has been flabbergasted by customers who are making a $500.00 purchase and won't take the card (essentially getting paid $25 to take it) because "You don't have to pay for Borders' card!" Last I checked, Borders' card is a "Rewards Card" type deal that eventually gives you a gift certificate after so many dollars worth of purchases as opposed to a flat discount, so I can understand why you don't have to pay for it... Removing the $25 fee, though, would be functionally equivalent to reducing their income by 10%, which doesn't seem to be a smart move for a chain trying to stay in business...

      Secondly, the CD and DVD section isn't there to sell you the latest popular movies/albums (though they happily eat up the obscene profits from people buying them there). Why would you buy Avatar from them for $30 when it's available at Best Buy for $22 (Or the Wal-Mart double disc pack for $20)? What they do provide is an insanely large back-catalog of old/obscure films and audio. The kid at Best Buy looked at me cross-eyed when I asked him to order me "Hard Boiled" ("Order? You mean like online? And what's 'Hard Boiled'?"), while B&N offered for me to have it shipped to my house or brought in for in-store-pickup. Want that ten disc set of great violen concerts at Carnegie Hall? Good luck finding that Best Buy or Sam Goody, but you'd better believe B&N can get it for you. Looking for indie albums with very small releases? They can get it shipped to you from the store where that artists plays. Yes, plays, as in B&N music sections go out of their way to stock local artists and bring them in for signings and performances.

      So I completely understand why B&N's membership service and Music section are not for you, but believe me when I say that there ARE people who enjoy them very much.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    3. Re:Pricing hurts. membership requirements too by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      When my $25 membership renewal comes up, I don't even think twice. It saves me WAY more than it costs me and way more than the free versions offered by other stores (simply because it is so straightforward. 10% off everything, right here, right now). it doesn't take a genious to figure out that if you spend more than $21 a month in Barnes and Noble, the $25 is a good deal.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    4. Re:Pricing hurts. membership requirements too by unixguy43 · · Score: 1

      When we go to B&N, we'll usually drop between $200 and $300. The $25 "membership" pays for itself in one purchase, so in my mind, it's a good investment. For others, it may not be so cut and dry- especially if you buy a paperback for $8 and you have to fork over an extra $25 just to save a buck. The membership is very beneficial to the bulk buyers, even if they only purchase once or twice a year.

      I've bought books online, usually ones I can't find in the local retailers. The advantage to places like Amazon for me is that they have a wide selection, so when I know exactly what I'm looking for, I can usually find it quick. In general, when I'm book shopping, I don't necessarily have a specific book in mind, and I find it a lot easier to be in "browse mode" in a brick/mortar store than online. You can grab a book off the shelf and flip through it and actually see if it's what you want. With a fiction novel, that may not be as big of a deal, but when I'm buying technical manuals or the like, I'd rather be able to flip through and see what all it has to offer as opposed to the brief blurb that is previewed online, which may or may not be indicative of the quality of the book.

    5. Re:Pricing hurts. membership requirements too by radish · · Score: 1

      I'm the same, I enjoy browsing at B&N. Only problem is when I find a book I like I pull out my phone and order it from Amazon for typically (at least) 20% less. The only thing I tend to actually buy at B&N are magazines - they have a great selection of international and obscure publications which I don't see anywhere else.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:Pricing hurts. membership requirements too by radish · · Score: 1

      People still "special order" stuff at stores? Wow. Hard Boiled is $8 from Amazon, no tax and free shipping. How much did B&N charge you?

      The indie artists I'll give you, but that's going online too. My mother self-published some books a few years ago and she basically had to walk them into all the bookstores in her area whenever they sold out. Now you can just post the file online and people can order the ebook or a physical copy printed on demand - same applies to music.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    7. Re:Pricing hurts. membership requirements too by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      People still "special order" stuff at stores? Wow. Hard Boiled is $8 from Amazon, no tax and free shipping. How much did B&N charge you?

      This was like five years ago, so I haven't the faintest idea what they charged me. The disk for $8 on Amazon didn't exist, then. I also get an employee discount, but that's not the point. Point is, the majority of people STILL DON'T order online, and probably over half of those people NEVER will. So until they're all dead, a service like B&N's music/movie section will have a use... But not enough of one to survive on its own (see: Suncoast)

      Also Amazon has been very hit-or-miss for me. I've ordered CDs, been charged, then told "We expect your order to ship in six weeks!" I've also ordered other merchandise via Amazon on two separate occasions only to get angry e-mails from the merchant wanting to know why I'm placing orders for out-of-stock merchandise, and telling me that I need to pay more attention... Still never got a Revoltech Lazengann :(

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    8. Re:Pricing hurts. membership requirements too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Rewards-type card rewards customers after their first $150 in purchases.
      Thus, with no money down, they get rewarded after their 149th dollar of purchase.
      With the B&N "advantage" card, they don't get an advantage until after their 249th dollar.

    9. Re:Pricing hurts. membership requirements too by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      That Rewards type card gets you a $5 coupon for $150 in purchases. So you have to spend more money there to enjoy your 3.33% "reward". The B&N card gets you 10% off everything. The B&N card also has weekly coupons like $5 off a $50 purchase (giving you effectively 20% off a $50 purchase) that are sent to you whether or not you use the card.

      You can't really complain about the borders card... Any free discount is a good discount. But the B&N card will save a frequent shopper significantly more over time, but won't provide any benefit to occasional customers. If you don't shop there that often, you can give them an e-mail address and they will mail you free coupons once or twice a week, usually on new releases and seasonal items (like the current one is for back-to-school supplies)... Which I'd think would average out to be just about as good as the free Borders Bucks program.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  15. What a pity by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a soft spot in my heart for B&N ever since I dug up an old volume II of a four volume set of some first hand accounts of the U.S. Civil War. They were out of print, and I couldn't find them in any new or used book store I searched at. A few weeks later B&N had them show up on their web-page. Somehow they had gotten some in stock. Now whenever I'm book shopping, I try to pick B&N over their competitors now. I have to admit though, it's a LOT easier to just go to amazon and click on things than go looking for a brick and mortar book store. Also, consistent with the summary, I do spend less time reading than I used to. This is something I've recognized and am trying to change. Of course, I have a lot more money than I did when I was younger, so I can afford to buy things like hardbacks of new titles rather than paperbacks in the bargain bin so I bet I spend more money on books than I ever did.

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
  16. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that there will be book stores around even in the future, but they need to be more specialized.

    There is a difference between a book and an e-reader. If the book breaks it's still mostly readable, and it requires no power to be read.

    Considering the amount of crappy channels on TV these days I'm amazed that not more people are reading books, but they are probably surfing the web instead.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  17. You miss the SUGGESTED part by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    MSRP is just what the manufacturer says someone might like to charge. In some industries, it is a guideline, but in most cases it is deliberately inflated to make stores look good. Pro audio gear loves this. You'll see MSRPs that are double, sometimes more, what you actually pay. It isn't because the store is taking a loss or whatever, it is because the manufacturer has a stupidly high MSRP on purpose to let the stores pretend to give people a great deal.

    Book MSRPs are additionally stupid because you'll notice they have a Canadian figure. Ok, but the dollars are just about parity right now and have been for some time. That means books should cost about the same. That higher figure is based on nothing but BS.

    So if Amazon can make a profit (and they do make a good profit) charging half of MSRP, then B&N charging full MSRP means they are ripping you off. While stores do have to charge a bit more because of overhead, double is not acceptable.

    Look at software. A new game on Amazon might run you $5, about 10%, under what it does at Target. That is what you'd expect. A slight difference.

    1. Re:You miss the SUGGESTED part by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      MSRP is just what the manufacturer says someone might like to charge.

      Book stores actually buy their inventory up front, if my days in a book store aren't too hazy from the passage of time. So, a store with an inventory has a fairly big cost invested in the actual books. Someone like Amazon can buy them as they need them and exploit supply chain savings.

      So if Amazon can make a profit (and they do make a good profit) charging half of MSRP, then B&N charging full MSRP means they are ripping you off.

      No, it means that B&N isn't moving as many units as Amazon, and in order to cover their costs, they need to charge more. If you sell 10x as many books, you can make way less on each book and still make a killing.

      Amazon doesn't operate 'brick and mortar' stores. It's a difference in business models, and Amazon is making up thinner margins by selling vastly more books -- and doing it online. B&N has to maintain stores and physical inventories.

      It's unfortunate for B&N, and it basically means that Amazon has managed to displace all of the big players by going on-line and selling literally everything. My wife is a regular Amazon shopper, because for price and convenience, she just orders the books and they appear -- usually within a day or so. I can't argue with the economics of buying from Amazon, but I can see the position B&N is in.

      Seriously, B&N isn't "ripping you off". The reality of it is, in the last decade or so, Amazon's new business model has completely undercut the business model of a traditional bookseller, and made it too expensive to keep it going. But, the reasons have more to do with economics rather than trying to give you the shaft by charging the MSRP.

      I'm afraid you're making some sweeping statements about some aspects of business which you may not fully understand. Specifically, how much B&N needs to charge in comparison to Amazon to cover their costs.

      It's not much different from the airline industry -- they've been squeezed to such a thin margin that even if they're charging us all too much damned money, they're still barely making pennies on the dollar, largely for historical reasons.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:You miss the SUGGESTED part by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Well then I guess the book business in brick and mortar is just fucked. Everything else seems to be able to compete reasonably well with Amazon. Amazon, or other "online only" sellers always can get the cheapest price on anything I look for. This is no real surprise. However I find that the difference on most things is pretty small. As I said, computer software is nearly the same. Consumer electronics, same deal. When I got my TV, Amazon was about $50-80 cheaper than Best Buy. I actually elected to get it from Crutchfield, who was more than either, because they included delivery from a logistics company with the price. However in all cases, the TV was within 10% or so price wise. It wasn't like BB was selling it for $2000 and amazon was selling it for $1000.

      So sorry, but I have trouble buying that books are the one special thing that for some reason Amazon can provide much cheaper than a brick and mortar store. Heck, I'll have to see what Target or Safeway charges next time I'm there. My bet? Cheaper than B&N.

      Besides, you know the MSRP on books has to be bullshit since they include a Canadian price that does not reflect the exchange rate. The dollars have been near parity now for a long time, but books still suggest a 30% (sometimes more) premium in Canada. It has been this way since as long as I can remember, and its inflexability says ot me it isn't about actual higher costs.

    3. Re:You miss the SUGGESTED part by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1


      It's unfortunate for B&N, and it basically means that Amazon has managed to displace all of the big players by going on-line and selling literally everything. My wife is a regular Amazon shopper, because for price and convenience, she just orders the books and they appear -- usually within a day or so. I can't argue with the economics of buying from Amazon, but I can see the position B&N is in.

      What makes this even worse is the move to eBooks.

      If you order from Amazon and take the free shipping, you'll probably get your books within a week or so, whereas going to the local B&N could get you the book immediately. A lot of the time 'within a week or so' is plenty fast, but sometimes it's not.

      Now Amazon's got the Kindle and B&N's got the Nook, and they each have their merits and strong points as devices relative to the other, so it seems like a non-game-changer, right?

      Except now the Amazon delivery time has gone from about a week to instant, and the B&N delivery time is basically the asme.

      Along the same lines, for Amazon to be its cheapest you needed free shipping, which in most cases required buying a couple books at the same time. If you only want to buy one book and not wait until you're wanting three, maybe it doesn't seem like such a difference to go to the B&N. But there again the Kindle solves that problem entirely for books that you'd like to read on it, and probably a lot of the kinds of books you wouldn't want on it are expensive enough to clear free shipping.

    4. Re:You miss the SUGGESTED part by Albanach · · Score: 1

      So if Amazon can make a profit (and they do make a good profit) charging half of MSRP, then B&N charging full MSRP means they are ripping you off. While stores do have to charge a bit more because of overhead, double is not acceptable.

      I think you fail to understand the difference between the two business models.

      For a specialist book, especially a tech book with a very limited shelf life, that's an expensive thing for a book store to stock. Don't sell it in twelve months and it's obsolete. When you run a brick and mortor chain, you need a copy in every store.

      Amazon, on the other hand, can buy say ten or twenty copies and sell them over the entire US.

      Perhaps one thing that could work for B&N would be to use their retail stores as warehouses for such books. So if you order a copy from their website, it's posted that afternoon from the nearest store that has it in stock. That might allow them to reduce the number of high risk texts that become obsolete sitting on store shelves.

    5. Re:You miss the SUGGESTED part by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      No it's that B&N and Borders tried to subvert the definition of a book store.

      The good Ol'e mom and pop book store, the type I go to a LOT has new books and used books. you had a choice and a HUGE selection to go through. B&N and Borders have a small selection compared even to a tiny 800sq foot mom and pop bookstore.

      I still buy books at book stores, just not trendy latte' sipping, yuppie hangouts. There are a couple of good mom and pop bookstores around here that have been in business for 50 years. Their son now runs it.

      The difference is... He makes a living wage, the store is taken care of and he can hire 2 employees at a decent wage.

      Barnes and Noble stores have to support a Overpaid store manager, a bunch of staff, trendy location costs, a trendy high cost brand coffee shop, and on top of that a franchise that require top profits.

      I guess it's why well run small business always survive when the big corperate stores fail.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:You miss the SUGGESTED part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's that B&N and Borders tried to subvert the definition of a book store.

      Ummmm .... WTF? According to Wikipedia:

      Barnes & Noble originated in 1873 when Charles Barnes opened a book-printing business in Wheaton, Illinois. Their first true bookstore was set up by his son, William, in partnership with G. Clifford Noble, in 1917 in New York City.

      Barnes and Noble may have tried to change to keep up with customers' demand that they have a place to sip latte, but I think they get a vote on what constitutes a book store. They've been in business for over 100 years.

      Maybe blame it on the latte sipping yuppies who can't do without their goddamn Starbucks crap coffee.

    7. Re:You miss the SUGGESTED part by wardred · · Score: 1

      Umm.... B&N, Borders, and their ilk ran out most of the medium and small mom & pops devoted to popular fiction before Amazon came along and made things worse, even when the mom & pops sold used books so you could get new fiction for less than even Amazon offers it. Maybe they're making a comeback, but certainly B&N and Borders ran a whole slew of them out of town before this happened.

      Where mom & pops seem to thrive is around the niches, if they do a good job of filling those niches.

      There are exceptions to this rule, and there are some larger bookstores - like Powell's in Portland - that put B&N to shame. 4 stories of books, a map to the store, real sections devoted to specialties, rare books, beats, an actual history section, etc., a large bit of their warehouse moved to a building next door, a whole separate building devoted to tech books, and, yes, a coffee shop. Sorry you don't like them, but they're great for folk who'd like to pickup a book, and sit down and read it.

      I believe Powell's is paying as much or more for all of their employees than B&N, but the employees often know and care about their sections, and tend to be very dedicated to the store.

  18. Egon Spengler Was Right by SplicerNYC · · Score: 1

    Print is dead.

  19. The last physical media to fall? by hal2814 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    About 12 years ago Napster made downloading music easy. We had easy ways to take that downloaded music and integrate it with our existing habits via CD burners. Legal alternatives soon followed. Eventually record shops closed their doors. Not due to piracy but to due to uselessness. Now we have devices like MP3 players and iPods that let us enjoy our downloaded music in a more efficient manner than the old burn-to-CD method.

    Thanks to codecs like Divx, movies became downloadable in a semi-reasonable amount of time. Later technologies like Hulu made streaming possible. Rentals stores are taking a beating and stores specializing in selling movies and TV shows have all but disappeared. Originally like CDs, you had to burn your movies to DVDs to watch them on a TV but thanks to HDTV and to set-top boxes, there are more efficient ways to enjoy downloaded TV and movies.

    With books there was always a rub: There was no simple way to integrate them with out existing habits. You could print something but it would likely be on single-sided 8.5"x11" paper. You could read it off the screen but that's a lot less comfortable and convenient. With books, we had to wait for the more efficient device in order for electronic distribution to become feasible. I imagine we'll see a very rapid shift now that such devices exist and are becoming affordable. It'll be like the near-overnight industrialization that happens in nations these days compared to the slow, drawn-out process it was when Britain industrialized.

    Barnes and Noble is in trouble and they know it. It's a good time to sell.

    1. Re:The last physical media to fall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not due to piracy but to due to uselessness.

      Tell that to my nephew who, at the age of 18, has well over 500 albums in his collection of downloads and has never paid a single cent for any of it. Nor has he ever been to a concert in his life. So much for that theory on supporting artists...

    2. Re:The last physical media to fall? by jlusk4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's also print-on-demand. Drop your Kindle in the tub and you're out, what, $175? Drop a paperback in, and you're out $6. Same with whacking insects, trips to the beach, leaving the thing lying in your chair while you move the laundry to the dryer in the laundromat....

    3. Re:The last physical media to fall? by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, is this flamebait?

    4. Re:The last physical media to fall? by tabdelgawad · · Score: 1

      You're much more likely to drop your paperback in the tub or leave it lying on your chair in the laundromat *because* the thing costs $6. You'll just be more careful with an ebook reader, same way you're careful with your $200 smartphone or camera wherever you take them.

      --
      Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
    5. Re:The last physical media to fall? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Mass-printed paperbacks haven't cost $6 each in years. Even older ones average closer to $8 now, new releases are even more.

      Print-on-demand is going to make the per-unit cost higher, not lower.

      Other than that, you make an excellent point. A Kindle/Nook is a relatively delicate and expensive unit compared to ink on deceased trees, which is a surprisingly durable medium. Much as I hate mosquitoes, I wouldn't want to sacrifice a Kindle to kill one. ;)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    6. Re:The last physical media to fall? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Pointing out one edge case negative isn't convincing.

      With paperbacks:

      Pay for shipping, gas, etc to get the book.
      Store it somewhere - takes space, buy bookshelf, etc.
      Time wasted shopping for it compared to downloading, etc.
      Inability to search text or view on other device.
      Cannot be backed up.
      Trouble of taking more than a couple of books on a flight.

      I'll take the risk of getting it wet or whatever for the benefits. I also can't imagine that reading in the tub is a common use scenario. Thats like saying "Laptop? No way, I'll drop it in the tub! I'll just keep using this clunky desktop and be out of a computer when traveling."

  20. not meaning to sound ignorant, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > suraj.sun sends in word that the country's largest bookstore chain, Barnes and Noble, will put itself up for sale.

    uh, which country?

    1. Re:not meaning to sound ignorant, but... by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      >> suraj.sun sends in word that the country's largest bookstore chain, Barnes and Noble, will put itself up for sale.

      >uh, which country?

      Presumably, the United States.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  21. Badgering membership crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a large free standing B&N up the street from me and a similarly large Borders not far down the road. The B&N has a Starbucks which probably draws a good number of people to the B&N on its own.

    While book pricing isn't bad its not great. New releases usually can be found cheaper elsewhere and they lord over you the fact that you can buy into their membership with a low $25 fee to get books at better prices. This is where they lose me, I don't want to be badgered into being a member of their store, let alone pay for the privilege. Throw in the horrendous pricing in their DVD and CD section and suddenly I find myself comparing all prices or desiring to hit the net to see if I can find it cheaper. Membership "rewards" never come across as friendly, let alone one I have to pay for.

    While I do laud them for having an atmosphere that encourages spending time there, reading, sipping coffee, and etc, they need to work on their pricing and ditch this pay for membership to get a discount routine. Just ditch the requirement to get a discount on books entirely.

    I can understand why they badger you into memberships. I have a good friend who had her hours cut severely (like from 35+ to way less than 15 per week), causing her to lose her health benefits (badly needed at that) because of a failure to meet an insanely high requirement for new and renewal of memberships.

    They badger you because their incomes and benefits hang on it.

  22. Got Libraries? by DallasMay · · Score: 1

    'Cause it looks like they might just be useful in the future after all.

    --
    I've given up on Slashdot's comment scores.
  23. Books are too expensive for casual reading by grumling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The bookstores wanted a lot of repeat business, so they pushed frequent buyer cards and book clubs (like Columbia House records in the '80s). Because they gave a "discount" price to frequent buyers, the publishers were free to jack up the price to keep margins high. When a casual buyer came in to get a book, it was priced at $16-20, which is just on the edge of an impulse buy. This was to push you into signing up for the frequent buyer club (which as others point out, wasn't free at B&N), even though you had no intention of using the card enough to make it pay. You may have bought that $20 book, but you weren't likely to go back either.

    As for WalMart and Target, well, they found a niche and filled it. Now the casual buyer has a place to get a book once in a while. The high end book addict will eventually head to e-books. Or maybe sooner than later. I basically haven't bought a book for years, but suddenly I have the Amazon Kindle app on my new phone, which I used to get 3 books on the first day without even giving it a second thought... that's slippery economics. The quality of the screen is just fine for reading, too (Samsung Galaxy-S). The hardcore reader will give up the "paper experience" when they realize they no longer have to trudge down to the store, stand in line, and all the other stuff to get books. And if Amazon keeps beating up the publishers on price for all books, not just the popular ones, we should see a resurgence of reading.

    And I don't buy the story that people don't read. They may not read novels, but given that the guest on The Daily Show is an author, and the first step in running for president of the US is to publish a book of some sort, there are readers out there.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    1. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read tons of books, at one point I was doing 50+ a year, but now I am down to somewhere in the 10-20 range. e-ink is just missing something, the smell, the feel, the contrast... I don't know what it is, but it just isn't there yet. In a few years, if they can shrink down the size of the readers so they will fit in a large pocket, maybe brighten the screens a bit so they look more like paper, they will become a viable replacement. I see ebook readers as curiosities and good for niche uses like traveling or keeping a bookshelf handy at your desk.

      I have read a fair amount of books on computer screens too. When I was a poor college kid I used to download books all the time and read them.

      In a few years these readers might reach their tipping point, but right now, they are just a little too clunky. The actual process of buying books isn't an issue- I just go an amazon and in a few days I have them at my door. I always have a queue at home, so the wait is never an issue. Ebook readers could help in one area tremendously- the amount of space physical books can take. I have a large 7foot tall by 6 ft wide bookcase, and it is now overflowing!

    2. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hardcore reader will give up the "paper experience" when they realize they no longer have to trudge down to the store, stand in line, and all the other stuff to get books.

      As a hardcore reader, going to the bookstore is part of the experience. I love being in a setting where I am literally surrounded by books. I usually spend an hour or two sifting through titles deciding exactly which one I want to read. I don't get this experience from online retailers.

    3. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hardcore reader will give up the "paper experience" when they realize they no longer have to trudge down to the store, stand in line, and all the other stuff to get books.

      No, The hardcore reader will give up the "paper experience" when DRM and remote access to the device go away so that if Amazon/B&N/etc goes out of business or decides that they want to pull a book off their shelves, people who have already purchased that book will not suffer. For example, I have all of the 2nd Ed. D&D books, I bought them from a national retailer that is no longer in business, part of the reason they are no longer in business is that they went from a "Bookstore" to a "Christian Bookstore" that refused to sell D&D, Shadowrun, and other RPG type books. If this company had been Amazon and those 2nd ed books had been E-books, what would be stopping them from just pulling my 2nd Ed. Books, or after they shut their doors, what would allow me to keep reading those books?

      Once those two problems are rectified then and only then will most of the hardcore readers finally switch from the safety of paper to the e-book.

    4. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are readers out there... I'm one of them. You're a bit misguided though in your reasoning. I will not buy an eReader. Most serious readers will not. The actual target are the mid-range readers. Librarians, scholars, and avid readers do not want Grisham or the latest Dan Brown "masterpiece." The eBook/eReader crowd does. Book shopping is not a hassle, many of us enjoy it, we also tend to do it in places without blaring espresso machines and John Mayer playing softly. I can appreciate that you and many others who enjoy reading are more apt to read due to the simplicity and instant gratification, but serious readers can't be lumped into that thinking. I read, on average, 52 books a year (one a week). I'm not afraid of technology, in fact I am an IT professional and own two devices that can display eBooks... it has nothing to do with any of that. A physical book cannot be replaced no matter how much companies want them to be. It would eliminate libraries, used book stores, lending a good book to a friend, etc. You may think that isn't a big deal but there is much more surrounding those sites than just books. Programs, reading groups, discussion, learning, exploring, freedom, archives, and much more. We'd be losing all of that in favor of companies making more money.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    5. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by MOInsIT · · Score: 0, Troll

      My Father-in-Law and I are both IT Professionals who are also serious literary geeks. We both have similar views to yours on the benefits of physical books. We also have noticed that there are two type of "Geeks" out there -- the "real" geek and the "cool" geek. The cool geek is the guy with all the newest gadgets and a "phone" that does everything except make him coffee in the morning, they buy the tech because it's "cool". The real geek wants a cell phone that is just a cell phone, but does it's job better than any other phone out there, the real literary geek will most likely never switch to e-books unless they are dragged screaming and kicking the entire way because physical books are "just a book" but it does what it is meant to do, and so far it does it better than any e-book out there.

    6. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by sycorob · · Score: 1

      I appreciate you sharing your opinion of e-readers, but please don't assume that you speak for some group of "serious" readers. My wife has a master's degree in English Literature, and as you might guess, she reads a LOT. And she's dying to get a Kindle, but it's been just a little bit too expensive until this latest version of the Kindle.

      We live in Chicago, and the public libraries suck. They're generally pretty small, with a limited selection, and often the books that you would want to read are checked out, with at least one hold on them. We don't own a car and depend on public transportation, so it's tricky to get to the few large bookstores in the area. The local used bookstore that we went to from time to time closed.

      So, from our point of view, a Kindle is a no-brainer. We can get two, and hook them into the same Amazon account, and read the same books. We can shop for books on the train, download them, and read them. When we travel, we can take a "stack" of books in one tiny device, instead of lugging a bunch of paper in our carry-on. The Kindle is lighter than any hard-cover book I've read, and the titles themselves are cheaper.

      I understand being nostalgic about something, but books are going to be like records, probably in the next decade. Some artists still publish records, and there are little record stores, and some people covet their record players. Same with books: some will still be published, and there will be small specialized stores here and there, as well as online, but most of the reading population will move on to a more convenient form factor.

    7. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You're missing out on the real use of an eReader.

      There's tons of really good books out there that are in the public domain. An eReader is a really good way to read them. I don't buy best-sellers for my Nook, and I wouldn't spend that much on an eBook anyway. However, Project Gutenberg is offering ePub now, I can "buy" Google scans for my Nook, and B&N offers a lot of nice eEditions of public domain books for something like $2 each (which I'm happy to spend on a good eBook). I've read books for free that I would have had a great deal of difficulty finding in physical form.

      So, you may well want one. Make sure it supports normal standard-issue ePubs (the Nook does, I'm not so sure about the Kindle), and continue getting more recent books in dead-tree form (since the electronic versions have limitations the paper ones don't, but cost roughly the same for recent books).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      The real geek wants a cell phone that is just a cell phone, but does it's job better than any other phone out there, the real literary geek will most likely never switch to e-books unless they are dragged screaming and kicking the entire way because physical books are "just a book" but it does what it is meant to do, and so far it does it better than any e-book out there.

      I think I take exception to this rule. I started reading books on the computer, because where I lived, there was no English books available and ordering from abroad was pointless due to mail theft. I read on average a book or two in a week, some of the books are free, some of them are purchased and admittedly, I have some that were even pirated (generally those that were not available without DRM or didn't have an legitimate source for buying a copy).

      I have had my ups and downs in life, right now I'm entering another down 'period' due to economic issues, I have never really had much space for my things, so having an e-book always worked for my space constraints, being able to take my entire library of books, manuals with me on a netbook with me has always a huge bonus for me. As weird as it may sound, people complain they have issues with eye strain when reading on a computer, I have the opposite, I find I get eye strain when reading an actual paper book for a long period of time, so it's only another bonus for me to use e-books.

      I don't own any DRMed e-books, most of them were legitimately bought as non-DRMed .pdf. - I have an occasion lent an e-book to a friend on a USB thumb drive, asking them not to 'steal' it. While manuals for various administrative systems were available on CD/DVD order in .chm format. I don't have a magic e-book reader like the Kindle and I probably wouldn't get it unless it supported .chm and .pdf books properly. Considering how these publishers that do non-DRMed works are still staying in business, I don't think I am the only one like this.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    9. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      I think you've missed my points entirely, but what I'm saying is that anyone who is looking for older, rare, oop, scholar texts, niche titles ("serious" readers) there are essentially zero prospects of them being digitized and/or sold in a format for these devices. eBooks will have their place, but it will be for leisure reading, magazines, comics and textbooks. To render an illuminated manuscript in crappy eInk or even the iPad is useless. I never said they weren't useful just that this idea of serious readers being the market is wrong. They are a consumer device that makes books and periodicals consumables, for many folks that is fine, for others it is not.

      I also wanted to add that the premise that books are "expensive" is ludicrous. at $6-15 for most paperbacks and maybe $20-25 for hardcover releases a book offers far more hours of entertainment for far cheaper than almost any other media. It's not a broken system like music was which facilitated the rapid shift to MP3, it is a time-tested system that is quite mature and for the most part solid.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    10. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      There are two things that are annoying with most ebook readers. The first is the increased amount of physical interaction required. This is worst if the screen is so small that you have to push a button two or three times a minute just to scroll. On a regular paper book, you can spend several minutes on a double page before you have to lift the hand and turn the page. That's a serious annoyance with ebook readers, but can be solved in the future as costs come down. The second problem is navigation. That's an UI problem, which could go either way - maybe it will be solved soon, or it might take many years until we stumble on something that works really well. I don't think that the smell or feel are the true bottlenecks.

    11. Re:Books are too expensive for casual reading by JimFive · · Score: 1
      Parent is not a troll and I hope someone with mod points fixes the moderation.

      Currently, a physical book does the job better than an e-book. Except for the space/size issue I can think of no areas for improving upon the book format. The primary benefits of physical books (off the top of my head):
      • Lack of distractions. My book will never:
        • tell me that I have mail
        • ring because someone called me
        • pop over to an internet browser because I bumped the touchscreen.
      • I can read smoothly through page turns with no noticable pause.
      • It is very difficult to make a book unreadable, barring fire or a bucket of ink.
      • I can loan it to a friend.

      -- JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
  24. I'm sure it really helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Barnes and Noble has a pretty significant "online only" discount on their books. The one book I wanted to buy was 28% off online, but in-store I'd have to pay full price. They wouldn't price match.

    1. Re:I'm sure it really helps by jonesy16 · · Score: 1

      Many retailers are like this. Best Buy offers, occasionally, decent discounts online. However, if you go into the brick and mortar store they won't match their price online. Even going so far as to let you go up to one of their demo laptops, order the product from their website with in-store pickup, and then waiting for them to process the online order. This just infuriates me.

  25. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by DallasMay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Another thing is that B&N is the class A example of the "Big Guy that Crushes the little guy". This is the company that the movie "You Got Mail" was based on. Why are we sad to see it go again?

    --
    I've given up on Slashdot's comment scores.
  26. MSRP? You're kidding, right? by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    MSRP is *suggested*. It's pretty much always inflated. It's a meaningless joke and an often-cruel one, too, in nearly every industry.

    These days, charging MSRP for anything is almost always a way to drive away customers.

    So, yes, I blame bookstores if they're stupid enough to charge MSRP.

  27. Leafing Through a Book by rla3rd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The one thing that I will surely miss is being able to leaf through a book before i decide to put down my hard earned cash for it.

    This is one thing that keeps me coming back to B&N when purchasing a book. Yes, there are time when I leaf through a book in the store, only then to note the title and then buy it cheaper through Amazon. But there are also times that I will use Amazon's reviews to narrow down my choices, then head out to B&N to leaf through the books before making my final decision, then purchasing it there on the spot.

    I end up doing the latter for more expensive books. I'd rather spend the extra money knowing that I'm going to like the book, then send my money to amazon to purchase a book that I may find horrendous.

    1. Re:Leafing Through a Book by jonesy16 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Amazon also allow you to preview the first chapter of most of their books before you buy?

  28. Book stores of the future will be more like by VShael · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a coffee shop (not Starbucks) where people can sit and browse online catalogues, google books, but mostly talk with other knowledgeable people about books. The communication face-to-face will be much faster (and more civil) than the online discussion forums that Amazon tries to run under each books page.

    People will be able to buy their ebooks there, but the place will also have one of those print-on-demand machines, for people who want to print off a hand held copy of a book. Either one bought from the store, or one they've prepared themselves via PDF on a memory stick.

    There won't be any physical books in the book stores of the future.

    1. Re:Book stores of the future will be more like by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for a mod point. Anyone? Oh well. +1 interesting

      --
      Reply to That ||
  29. the kindles and ipads of tomorrow by dnaumov · · Score: 1

    will kill traditional paper books for good and I won't miss them. Over the past 15 years or so, I have been reading very few books (maybe 1 book every 3-4 years). Since I got my iPad recently, I have already read 5. The convinience is simply killer. I am sure I can't be the only one.

    1. Re:the kindles and ipads of tomorrow by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You're definitely not the only one who appreciates the convenience of e-readers over paper books.

      But, in my opinion, it won't actually kill books. It will relegate them to luxury status, same as vinyl - sold in small, specialized stores for exorbitant prices to the few people willing to pay that for the tactile feel of real paper under their fingers.

  30. Mods on crack by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    Parent was modded "Funny"?

    WTF?

    It's incredibly insightful is what it is. Personally, I'm not much of a book-browser. I've always found books to be too expensive for impulse buying. But the thing that I'm really going to miss about bookstores is the magazine rack. Magazines pretty much *must* be browsed because they rotate out every month.

    I actually subscribed to Photo District News last week because the bookstore where I used to drop by and pick up a copy 2 or 3 times a year has recently closed. Now I'll get the next 24 issues which is more than an ex-photographer like me needs. Still, no place to browse means no place to pick up random goodness.

    Criminy, I would have never discovered things like Utne Reader and a bunch of other weird little magazines if I hadn't had a bookstore to browse.

    And just to head off the obvious, yes, I know there are such things as newsstands. In my part of the world, as real bookstores become quite rare, bookstores still outnumber reasonably sizable newsstands by 25-to-1.

  31. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by nizo · · Score: 1

    If anyone at B&N had even the vaguest inkling of a clue, the "little guy" (Amazon) would have never even existed in the first place.

  32. Love books, but totally gone e-Book by SwingMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love books. I love reading. I'm also the first to admit that a lot of what I read is crap (Science Fiction and Fantasy) but the mileage varies. At last count, since acquiring my iPod touch (with the "Bookshelf" app), followed by and iPhone (with the "Kindle" app) and most recently the iPad (again with "Kindle" - I finally gave in for the larger format) I've read about 300 e-Books in the last 3 years. Yes, it felt a little weird for a while, particularly on the small screen devices, but that didn't take long to get past.Meanwhile the convenience is/was totally addictive! Now I can find pretty much anything I want, anytime I want it. I never get caught short with nothing to read (well, once in a U.S. Embassy that wouldn't allow *any* electronic devices, but that's a different story). The only time I *have* to have a physical book is taking off and landing on airplanes, and hopefully they'll wise up soon, but I don't have to pack a dozen books to take away for a fortnight. Don't get me wrong, I still love reading "real" books, and I still browse bookstores when I get the time - but after having bought (and subsequently given away) something like 2,000 paperbacks over the previous 15years, I mostly only buy hard cover editions of a few authors any more. I'll sometimes be buying the e-Version of stuff while I'm standing at the bookshelf.

    1. Re:Love books, but totally gone e-Book by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      For the most part, I prefer reading "real" books to ebooks. However, I don't have room for anymore "real" books. My shelves are overflowing. I can store a lot of ebooks on a Kindle/iPad/iPhone. Also, since I always have my iPhone with me, that means I always have an e-library with me.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Love books, but totally gone e-Book by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong - I've been reading books on screen since the black and white palm devices could manage it and I completely understand your love for the format; but there's one thing holding me back from jumping on the band wagon: DRM.

      How many books do you plan on giving away in the next 15 years? Is it worth the risk of fines and court fees to you if you break the DRM first? How many libraries will be able to accept donations after you've finished reading something? Or put them on a $0.25 fund-raising book sale where kids in the community come and are able to afford the gems they may discover? There's a lot more to defeating the social cost of current DRM than applying a magic crack to an algorithm.

  33. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

    The people who watch those crappy channels are probably not reading much beyond weekly updates of the antics of Jordan and Peter Andre.

    Specialisation and giving good advice count for a lot. I picked-up quite a few interesting books in a UK bookshop after a brief chat with one of the staff who had actually read some of the books and could offer a decent comparison between them. I suppose though that many people will go online these days when looking for book suggestions, and it's kind of difficult for a bookshop to retain staff who'd have broad enough interests to offer meaningful advice on the many areas. The guy who is well-read on his Christopher Hitchens is probably not going to be much in to Jordan's literature and angel-assisted healing shite.

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  34. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by foobsr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've always sworn that I'd never become the old fart who's confused in the world of modern technology, ...

    It is neither you nor 'modern technology', it is the majority which is confused, e.g. believing to be able to 'multitask' with the help of friendly gadgetry while at the same time unable to read (and comprehend) simple texts (see post above) or to add one-digit nuimbers (as mentioned in some other post yesterday).

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  35. Funny you say that... by withears · · Score: 0

    I used to own Borders stock and sold it about 5 years ago. We go to a lot of bookstores and just yesterday I started reconsidering buying stock in Borders again. All of the stores I've visited lately (Florida, Washington DC, and North Carolina) have been really busy and a lot of people purchasing.

  36. I disagree. by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

    Every time I go to Half Price Books I can barely walk down an aisle they're so busy.

    The real culprit is book PRICES are ridiculous

  37. I thought Borders was dying... by modi123 · · Score: 2
    I remember seeing an article on CNN back in January about how Borders, *not* B&N, was the one to dive. Honestly I cheered. I *heart* the Green Machine over those Reds every day!

    Here's the closed internet search I could turn up in about ten minute for it:

    Cite

    Borders. Borders Group (NYSE:BGP) lost the online and brick-and-mortar bookstore war years ago to Barnes & Noble (NYSE:BKS) and Amazon.com (NYSE:BGP). The company’s stock is down to $1.20 from a 52-week high of $4.48 and its market value is less than $80 million. For the quarter ending in October, the company’s loss from continuing operations was $39.0 million,or $0.65 per share, compared to a loss of $39.0 million, or $0.64 per share, a year ago. Revenue was $595.5 million, down $86.6 million, or 12.7%. Border’s large Waldenbooks division has all but disappeared. That part of Border’s operations is down to 361 stores. With its debt net of cash at $375 million, a competitor like Barnes & Noble could buy $2 billion in annual revenue for a fraction of sales and cut general and administrative costs to improve margins. Borders has been dead for over two years, but no one has been able to dispose of the body.

    FYI: green machine = Barnes and Nobel... Red = Borders... I realized not everyone may color associate like I do.

  38. I wanna buy Barnes & Noble by line-bundle · · Score: 1

    But is it available on amazon.com?

  39. Something that doesn't help by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I go to B&N it's full of people lounging in chairs/on the floor, reading books.

    While I understand that initially B&N's browser-friendly policy made it very popular, there's a difference between reading 3-4 pages of a book to see if it is a worthwhile purchase, and reading it from cover to cover - which is what a lot of people are very obviously doing. This means that 1) the person won't purchase the book - why should they? and 2) I would be purchasing a "used" book. While being read doesn't fade the letters, there's a difference between new and used in terms of wrinkled pages, smudges, etc. If I'm paying for new, I want new.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Something that doesn't help by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      While I usually buy books I want to read, sometimes it's a book I don't want to own, and the library doesn't have, so I head to B&N and read it there... BUT, I (and lots of other people) usually sit in the in-store starbucks, drink coffee... have a snack... they most likely make more money on my food and drink (the coffee at least has much higher margins) than they would have if I had bought the book and had coffee at home :-p

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    2. Re:Something that doesn't help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't change the fact that the person that buys the book, is paying the price of a new book for a used book. I've bought a book before, only to get home to find chocolate smeared on a page with thumb prints also on some pages. B&N was good about replacing it for free for me, but I take good care of my books and, when I buy new, I'm expecting it to be in new condition. I also don't expect/appreciate to have to drive an extra 60 miles round trip to get a book in the condition I thought it was in when I bought it.

      I like the ability to browse a book to make sure it's what I want before I buy it, but I'll take my books pristine shipped out of a warehouse over some slob's thumb prints on the edge of pages with an extra helping of chocolate over the words. The people lounging may make B&N money by buying the coffee, but they're doing so at the expense of the person that actually ends up purchasing the books. If you want a library, go to the library. Mine is in the middle of nowhere and still has lots of good new releases, an online catalog of ebooks, etc.

    3. Re:Something that doesn't help by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      they most likely make more money on my food and drink (the coffee at least has much higher margins) than they would have if I had bought the book and had coffee at home

            OK, if you want to open a Starbucks then open the Starbucks. You don't need the extra couple million dollars worth of book inventory, the tens of thousands of square feet that need BTU's in order to be air conditioned, the storage for books in the back, the insurance for your inventory, the lost interest in the money invested in your inventory, and the extra dozen or so employees in charge of the "book" section.

            Your rationale is completely flawed. While B&N do generate revenue from your coffee and donuts, I refuse to accept that it's profitable. If everyone did what you do, B&N would go bankrupt quickly - in fact, this is just what is happening.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  40. No eBooks for me by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    I'm a heavy tech user and IT professional and you can pry my real books from my cold, dead hands. I refuse to shop at Barnes & Noble in favor of Borders simply because I will not pay a yearly fee to get my books for what they should cost to begin with. I spend a large amount of time and money at my local Borders, I also buy a lot of books from places like Amazon and Half.com. Everyone talks about how no one reads anymore yet people are buying eBooks apparently. I won't buy into eBooks because I love the tactile feel of a book and the go-anywhere, low-tech, nature that suits a million more uses than an ereader. I like to lend and share books with friends and family, I like a nice bookcase filled with inspiring and excellent works. I like buying used books for a small amount of money to take a chance on something new or different. I will not give in and I'm also here to say that I am a fairly young American male that reads close to 52 books a year in addition to technical books and comics/magazines (also in regular paper form).

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  41. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

    By "little guy" I think he was referring to the small mom and pop bookstore where you used to be able to go and talk to an intelligent person who'd read a measurable percentage of the books on the shelf. Not that I've not encountered intelligent people in B&N (though I don't think anyone could read a measurable percentage of the books in there in any single lifetime); but I do sort of miss talking to booksellers who could talk about why they personally chose to carry author X after reading one of their books on a streetcar and getting so absorbed that they missed three stops and opened 15 minutes late that day (granted that bookshop was killed by Katrina, not B&N, but the point stands).

    Sadly, it appears GP didn't read the FA, which suggested that the same pressures driving B&N out are making things even tougher than ever for small bookstores. I personally try to go to bookstores rather than using Amazon (partly out of a desire to help the local economy, partly because I hate waiting for a book to ship), but I know plenty of people that haven't been in a brick and mortar bookshop in years.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  42. NEWSFLASH! Its the 21st Century. by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So I hit the nearest town looking for a specific book ("Dragonflies of Surrey" - yes the town was in Surrey) last weekend, heck I would have settled for ANYTHING decent on the subject matter I was looking for. 3 book stores (2 large chains, 1 small specialist store) and not a single book on dragonflies let alone the specific title I was looking for. And I hadnt really expected there to be to be honest.

    Now if publishers had actually grasped new technology by the horns and allowed bookstores to print (and bind) **on demand** titles, browse through their back-catalogue (which is several hundreds of times larger than any store could be reasonable anticipated to stock) etc. etc. then maybe we would be seeing a thriving book industry as book stores competed on the quality of their product (paper, binding, ink quality....smell) and facilities (user friendly search, cafe to sit down and browse in) rather than the almost absolute reliance that we now have on the internet to find any rare or unusual titles.

    The book store industry isnt dying, the publishers are slowly killing it.

    1. Re:NEWSFLASH! Its the 21st Century. by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      The book store industry isnt dying, the publishers are slowly killing it.

      I hate to pick a nit, but if the publishers are slowly killing the book store industry, doesn't that necessitate that the book store industry to die? And if that is the case, than wouldn't it be true to say that the book store is dying with the caveat being that publishers are the ones killing it? Just asking.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:NEWSFLASH! Its the 21st Century. by rgviza · · Score: 1

      This may be the best business idea I've heard in a very long time. I think I'll take some binding classes... Imagine being able to buy any book ever made, have it leather bound and printed on quality acid-free paper, on demand, for a reasonable price.

      You could even offer paperback binding for less money. BTW a lot of stuff is in the public domain and available for free at project Gutenberg.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    3. Re:NEWSFLASH! Its the 21st Century. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Now if publishers had actually grasped new technology by the horns and allowed bookstores to print (and bind) **on demand** titles

      That assumes the technology existed in the first place - which it really doesn't.
       
      Print on demand, until recently, has produced only low (reproduction) quality books. That is, you'd have been disappointed by the reproduction of the pictures in the book you sought - those wonderful color pictures (assuming you mean the Peter Follet book by that title) would have been blobby B&W blurs. Resolution is a bit better nowadays - but still B&W. (Print-on-demand machines are optimized for the high speed production of the typical book - which means black text on white pages.)
       
      Even to the extent the technology does exist, it's out of the reach of non-chain store due to the high capital cost. You're average mom & pop simply can't afford a machine costing up to tens of thousands of dollars.

    4. Re:NEWSFLASH! Its the 21st Century. by PrecambrianRabbit · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered why such print-on-demand kiosks haven't really taken off, because it seems like such an inherently desirable thing. But now I'm wondering if they just don't make business sense. You've got to buy an expensive machine and pay to keep it supplied and maintained. To make back the cost, you won't be able to rely on sales of popular bestsellers, because you'll already have copies of those on the shelves. At that point you're relying on the "long tail" of people's book-buying interests. While the long tail is probably more significant than retailers have traditionally assumed, I'd be very wary as a bookstore proprietor to invest tens of thousands of dollars in it. (Of course, I am not a bookstore proprietor, so I'm relying on mildly informed wild guesses to make this assessment.)

      For the record, there was a time when I would have loved print-on-demand kiosks at airports, because the book selections at most airports royally suck, and I'm not usually foresighted enough to have brought reading material. But, then I got a Kindle, and the Kindle app for my phone and laptop, and now I'm not bothered by the lack of quality material at airport bookstores.

  43. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    I still get most of my reading suggestions from friends and John Scalzi's blog; Whatever. He not only reviews several books a month, he posts essays from authors on how and why they developed a book. Is cool having some background info and knowing where the writer's coming from with their work.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  44. Tell me about it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They pick such awful things for the kids to read. Example: last summer everyone in DC was
    supposed to read "A Lesson While Dying" (I think that was the title) about this black kid in the 30s
    that was accidentally sentenced to death for involvement in a liquor store shooting. Great frikk'n
    choice that one.

  45. My "block of wood" was books of RPG's by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

    Your basic logic is why I believe that games of imagination... even constructed ones, like pencil-and-paper role-playing-games (more books!)... are possibly the best "toys" you can give your kid. My "block of wood" was RPG's... and I still have a fondness for them, even today. :-) Their value goes beyond just entertainment.

    --
    "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
    1. Re:My "block of wood" was books of RPG's by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      My "block of wood" was RPG's...

      Your folks gave you Rocket Propelled Grenades as a kid?

      Did you grow up in Afghanistan?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  46. Re:Books in Brick & Mortar by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Nah, they just need to roll out Turbo grade Print On Demand.

    They would crush Amazon if you could walk away with the book, rather than waiting for shipping.

    For a long time the quality problems needed about 5 years of research, but they almost have it solved now. Harvard Bookstore has one. It's like Redbox on superhero stats. They just need a hardbound version to seal the deal. That would make the shelves "welcoming examples" and then experts could get their obscure texts in 15 min flat.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  47. The saying goes ... by Blink+Tag · · Score: 1

    Print is dead.

    Long live print!

  48. Books For Kids by xtracto · · Score: 1

    Back when I was a kid my father used to buy us some books which contained smaller "filtered" versions of the classical stories (of authors like Jules Verne). Although they were aimed to kids, they were good text books (with very few pictures here and there).

    As we grew a bit more we read Reader's Digest Condensed Books (I was ~11) and some full books.

    I would love to find similar books/ebooks written in a language for children or condensed books online.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  49. You can have my paperback books..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you pry them from my cold, dead fingers! I don't think we'll see the end of book stores or paper books anytime soon. I love reading paper books because the tactile feel and smell of paper causes the stories to stick to my memory MUCH better than any electronic media. In addition to the fact that I work on a computer all day long and the last thing I want to do at the end of the day is read from an electronic screen.

    That being said, there are very few instances when I will buy books from B&N. Usually the books are either too expensive or they don't have the one I'm looking for at the store. I can find them easier & cheaper with a search of the internet than I can in the stores. Sure I have to pay shipping & handling, but I can end up getting 5-6 books for the same price as 1 or 2 from B&N.

    When I do buy from a brick & mortar store, I tend to stick to a local chain shop that prices their books right and carries almost everything I want. I also wouldn't object to getting back to smaller stores where I could build a rapport with the owner/workers. If I'm there enough they would keep what I want in stock.

  50. Stackpole predicted the downfall of the publishers by crabel · · Score: 1

    ages ago... So, no real "news" here. As an insider and veteran business he states for years now that the publishers are getting in trouble, see e.g.: (pretty recent, I know, but he wrote similar things long before) http://www.michaelastackpole.com/?p=1568 http://www.michaelastackpole.com/?p=1490 I guess, he is quite unloved by publishers because he teaches authors how to create & market ebooks... (For those who don't know him, he wrote e.g. for Star Wars & Battletech).

  51. Borders The Only Competitor? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    Have we forgotten about Books-A-Million? I'd say they are doing a good bit of business. It's my preferred book store.

    I guess I won't be self-publishing via Barnes-and-Noble's PubIt! program. Ah well. c'est la vie.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    1. Re:Borders The Only Competitor? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Have we forgotten about Books-A-Million?

      I for one have not forgotten about Books-A-Million. Of course, that is because before your post, I had never heard of Books-A-Million. That is probably because there are none anywhere near where I live. Which means they are at best a regional chain and thus not really a competitor to B&N and Borders.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:Borders The Only Competitor? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Books-a-million store locator

      They can be found in 23 states and DC. States are scattered from east coast to west coast as far as Oklahoma.

      They don't have a large distribution of stores, but if B&N really is poised to fall, I'd say Books-a-Million would be more likely to buy them out then Borders.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    3. Re:Borders The Only Competitor? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      However, if you read the article you find that B&N is not poised to fall. It is up for sale because of a dispute between the founder and some of the stockholders. One of the stockholders is trying to carve off a piece of B&N and sell it to one of his other companies. He is trying to use legal maneuvers to gain control of enough B&N stock in order to force this. Leonard Riggio (B&N's founder) came up with the plan to take B&N private in order to thwart him (or at least make his plan unprofitably expensive).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:Borders The Only Competitor? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      ah, the joys of reading the fine article. (:

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  52. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by hal2814 · · Score: 1

    As a general rule, I don't let Nora Ephron dictate my likes and dislikes. I like Barnes and Noble. It's a good store. It offers a good selection. And for new books, they have decent prices. I've never seen them pull any shenanigans like Wal-Mart does where they'll lower prices until they drive folks out of town and then raise prices once the other guys are gone. B&N sticks to MSRP plus set discount rates based on clear metrics. The only real differentiation I see from that pricing model is the clearance section which is not enough by itself to put any competition under. Barnes and Noble has thrived thus far by offering a solid shopping experience to its customers. In places where they have driven out competition, they have maintained that good shopping experience. In my book, that's a "big guy" I have no qualms with.

  53. It'll be hard to browse without them... by Kireas · · Score: 1
    Bookstores are very much needed to find new fiction books - I can't imagine browsing an online bookstore in the same way you do an actual shop, flicking through the pages, checking out the back of the cover to see if the story looks good.

    As for reference books, there's no way digital stores can offer the same level of previewing the books that bookshops can, due to the obvious factor of the preview and their content, in the case of an e-book - being one and the same.

    I'll be sad if traditional books go the way that newspapers seem to be headed. There's a lot to be said for good ol' paper. Actually being able to turn the page as fast as you like is a good start.

    --
    To much anime is bad for the brain...desu.

    Sorry. Couldn't help it.
  54. Fictionwise? by slyrat · · Score: 1

    Maybe they wanted to spend more time with their ebook stores like Fictionwise. Hopefully their ebook stores, like this one, will stick around since they are some of the more open ones around right now.

  55. Local bookstores by wandazulu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Those hard to find books are typically at the funky local book store you might find in the "arty" part of town, and while they're feeling it as much as B&N, they've responded the same way I think a lot of local record stores have, focusing on having those hard-to-find books as well as readings, events, etc.

    I stopped buying from B&N and similar stores years ago when they started stocking a bajillion copies of the latest tell-all of the celeb du jour, and relegated everything else to a couple of rows each. So I buy all my tech books from Amazon (still miss Fat Brain...), get my "classics" from Project Gutenberg for the iPad, and will happily walk in and spend an hour browsing and chatting with the local bookstore owner, and I never walk out without buying something; not as a "pity" sale, but because I found something genuinely interesting that would have been too obscure even for B&N.

    1. Re:Local bookstores by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I get my 'classics' from thrift stores. I wish there was a good local bookseller here. There is one in Shelbyville about 23 miles east.

    2. Re:Local bookstores by Mapleperson · · Score: 1

      B&N buying Fat Brain was a loss for me me too. I stopped trading with Barnes and Noble for many years because of it.

  56. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    You live in the wrong town. Here in Springfield we have two (count 'em, TWO) stores you can browse for music. There's Recycled Records with LPs, CDs, and DVDs, and there's the Elf Shelf with books, DVDs, VHS and CDs to browse through!

    And there's two super WallMarts but they don't count.

  57. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another thing is that B&N is the class A example of the "Big Guy that Crushes the little guy". This is the company that the movie "You Got Mail" was based on.

    Why are we sad to see it go again?

    Probably because it is being pushed out by an Even Bigger Guy (Amazon, Walmart, Target, etc.)

  58. Reinvent yourself! by janwedekind · · Score: 1

    I went to several bookstores in UK asking them for E-Book readers. But only WHSmith seemed to sell one and that only on their website (not available in stores). So I bought a Bookeen Cybook from Bookeen directly.

    The problem is that companies always have difficulties reinventing themselves when it means cannibalising their current stream of revenue. I think the book stores should sell E-Book readers and they should have terminals where you can plug in your reader and download books. Either you pay per file or you pay a monthly subscription (similar as with Last.fm). Also the books should be DRM free. And they should all sell coffee, tea, and muffins.

    Finally authors should think about the new medium. I remember reading a book where you have to make a decision every page or two and depending on your choice you continue reading on another page. It was great in a similar way as the Infocom adventures. But the problem was that a 100 page book would only give you storylines of 15 pages. But with an E-Book reader "storage" wouldn't be a problem and with the Internet authors could work together and generate huge interactive novels.

    1. Re:Reinvent yourself! by RadioElectric · · Score: 1

      Interesting... so you're thinking about having pages of text that can link to other pages in a non-sequential way? Like some kind of HYPERlinking? Hmmm...

    2. Re:Reinvent yourself! by janwedekind · · Score: 1

      LOL. Ok, I didn't spot that one.

    3. Re:Reinvent yourself! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Barnes & Noble does sell E-book readers in their stores. At the one I usually go to, the Nook booth is right in front of the main entrance, so you're not going to miss it. They don't have terminals, but they do have wireless, and you can easily buy E-Books in the store. There's over a million free E-Books (although with problems, this is Google's unadjusted OCRing after all), and I don't know how many I can buy. The lack of DRM would be nice, doesn't exist for any bookstore, and is almost certainly not a dealbreaker for most people.

      In other words, B&N is pretty close to what you believe a bookstore should be, and this Slashdot article is about them getting into financial trouble. I'm not sure how relevant your comment is.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:Reinvent yourself! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      You pretty much just described how B&N and the Nook work.

      Sold in store - check.

      Terminals in store - Not quite, but free WiFi access and special "extra features" (the ability to read nearly any eBook offered by B&N for 1 hour/day for free, plus weekly rotated free content) accessible when connected to store WiFi. - So check

      Coffee, tea, miffins - check.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    5. Re:Reinvent yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My local Waterstones (Dundee) had 3 different ebook readers out on display last weekend. I dont know how recently they started selling them, though.

  59. Funny enough... by wandazulu · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's very possible that old LIFE book came from a mom-n-pop store that also sells online. I know a woman who has a small bookstore in upstate New York and she keeps the actual storefront open to give her a place to go (she's pushing 80), as a place for book readings, but also as warehouse; she sells most of her stuff via Amazon, with apparently one or two really rare things going on ebay.

    If anything, it was a brilliant move on Amazon's part to adopt this model; now lots of mom-n-pops can stay open and be more of a social place (if only for the cats) and still have give people the opportunity to browse.

  60. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by yankpop · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think that there will be book stores around even in the future, but they need to be more specialized.

    They need to be more specialized, sure, but that makes their market much smaller. It's easy to stock specialized books when you've got the security of offering Harry Potter and Twilight et al. to keep the money coming in between the rare consumer of niche books. But once Amazon and Walmart start selling the popular stuff at your wholesale cost, it changes things. It's much harder to sell specialized books when you can't subsidize the lower turnover with mass-market books. So yeah, the book stores that remain in the future will be more specialized. But you won't find many of them outside of major cities where there are enough consumers of their chosen specialty to make it financially viable.

    This is already the case with electronics. You can get low-end camera gear anywhere, even at drug stores now, but if you want anything beyond the basics you have to go online or to a city big enough to support one real camera store. Used to be a mom & pop camera store in every town more than 50,000, but now that they can't compete with Walmart for point and shoots, there's not enough high end business to keep them open.

  61. I spotted warning signs last week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went in to my town's Barnes and Noble to buy a book. They used to have an entire nook of the store dedicated to science fiction and fantasy; the walls were lined with the newer releases and the classics, and right in the middle of it were two aisles of role playing books, manga, and graphic novels. This last week, the middle aisles had been replaced with romance novels! 300, Batman, Shadowrun, D&D - all GONE!

    This was the cause of their corporate downfall. In podunkville, they took away a geeks most loved treasures and replaced it with something completely foreign.

  62. No loss to me by jDeepbeep · · Score: 2

    This isn't a loss in my world. B&N in my area had 7 aisles of "christian inspiration" where "religious studies" should have been, "judaica" consisted of 12 books (of which 4 were holocaust history) "current events" (read sarah palin and rush books) where "political science" should have been, half the store devoted to the bargain section, two rows of way way overpriced journals, the most mainstream programming books that appeal to entry-level, and annoying cashiers reminding me how much i could have saved if i had their loyalty card. My god, I don't remember the last time they were even useful for me. Amazon, otoh, has received maybe 60% of my book purchases in the past 2 years. What can I say besides they have what I'm looking for?

    --
    Reply to That ||
  63. Their prices are worth it by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    It's not all about price. I still buy books at my local B&N even though I can find the same titles cheaper at amazon.com. If price is your only criteria for where you shop then yes, B&N is not for you. I make enough where I don't mind paying more for a book at B&N. Shopping there I'm not just paying for a book but for the extras that go with it.

    Others have mentioned the joys of browsing, something that's not as easy or as satisfying when you do it online. Running the store costs money...utilities, staff, upkeep. That's reflected in the price of the book. Browse at B&N's website and you can find out if your local store has the book in stock. If it is in stock, you can have the title pulled and waiting for you at the front counter. Or I can just drive there and have it in 10 minutes. Yes, sometimes it's nice to have a book in 10 minutes. I'm a programmer and still like to have books on different topics.

    For my kids it's a treat to go book shopping. Sure, we patronize our local library often but for some series they like to own the books and re-read them. And sometimes my wife and I will drop our son off at scouts and go across the street to B&N. We'll have dessert, walk the aisles, and maybe pick up a book or two. It's a nice time for us, sort of a mini-date.

    Sure, they charge more but I get value for what I pay, and that's what its all about, value. I'm willing to help cover the cost of their overhead just so I have a store I can go to. It's worth it to me...it's sometimes about the whole experience, not just the book. And for the times when it is about the book, I'll usually go to amazon.com. Amazon prime rocks.

  64. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prewritten letter to your representatives and senators and president:

    https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

    http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

    I can't believe that I'm writing to you in defense of one corporation against another but here I am doint it. Just a moment ago I read an article on my favorite technical forum about the fact that Barnes and Noble Bookstores is placing itself for sale. Apparently online places such as Amazon are squeezing them on price and they simply can't compete. Now I'm not one to sob over the profit margins or losses of a company but what struck me about the commentary of the article was that apparently Amazon is not paying sales tax in most jurisdictions in the United States. Surely it is high time that Amazon and other online retailers paid the same tax as brick and mortar stores? Fair is Fair. The reason that I even care about this issue is that I fear for the future of the paper (or at least physical book). Never in the history of the world have paper books been so widespread and freely available. Libraries are the lifeblook of Western and more particularly American democracy. We should do all that we can do nurture them so they flourish. Also now that electronic books have arrived we should be concerned. Electronic books, besides lacking a certain conforting and tangible human element of physicality - are fragile and easily destroyed or lost to History. Why? Because technology changes. Because devices require power sources. Because file formats change. Because most sinisterly of all - electronic books can be deleted remotely and en mass by any large institution that controls access to the device. Please change this situation post haste! Even the playing field. For all our sakes.

  65. eBooks for adults, maybe by Artifex33 · · Score: 1

    I think critical mass will come when there is a cheap and colorful device that can capture the childrens' market. Right now, there is no way I would hand a $140 device to my 9-year-old to carry around and read with. It would be lost within days, long before he could break it.

    The current B&W displays of the eInk readers don't catch his interest, anyway. He and I have checked out the Nook in stores, and he just shrugs and wants to head to the kids' section to browse. I can tell by watching him that it's a very personal, sensory experience to him. I can't see that transferring to a device right now. Apple is closest with the iPad, but the idea of handing that fragile and expensive tablet to my son is ludicrous. He'd be more interested in what games it played, play until he got bored, then would put it down and go grab his copy of Artemis Fowl.

    I think it will take quite a while to convince parents and kids to switch over.

  66. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

    You didn't watch the movie. The "little guy" wasn't Amazon, it was the small independent book store. B&N was a big fish that ate the little fish (Independents and smaller chains) , and is now poised to be eaten by bigger fish (Target, Walmart, Amazon).

  67. Exactly. by lullabud · · Score: 1

    School ruined reading for me because I was always being forced to see particular details, then I'd be tested on it. What was the moral of the story? Oh, I must have seen a different moral or had a different opinion, because I got a bad grade. This led to me essentially trying to memorize the entire book, reading each page several times, digging for something that might be hidden. I didn't discover the joy of reading for pleasure until my mid 20's, thanks to high school and uninteresting literature classics being shoved in my face.

    Now that I don't have somebody telling me what books to read, or what messages to get from the books I do read, I can enjoy fat books like Anathem, 900+ pages, and enjoy almost every minute of it. Thanks for nothing, High School.

    1. Re:Exactly. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      What was the moral of the story? Oh, I must have seen a different moral or had a different opinion, because I got a bad grade.

      Then you went to a weird school. Any teacher I had would give you a good grade if you got something different from the book as long as you were able to back it up with a convincing explanation that showed you'd actually read the book.

  68. quality of hardcover books is terrible by cats-paw · · Score: 1

    I mean the actual quality of the binding, etc..

    I'd buy them more often if "premium" hardcovers didn't look like they wouldn't even last 10 years.

    As it is right now I only buy hardcovers for authors I _really_ like.

    Buying a hardcover for casual reading or the latest Clancy knock-off is crazy.

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
    1. Re:quality of hardcover books is terrible by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      I mean the actual quality of the binding, etc..

      I'd buy them more often if "premium" hardcovers didn't look like they wouldn't even last 10 years.

      I'm not sure what you do to your books, but I generally buy soft cover and they last for decades if not abused.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
  69. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

    That sucks, you'll be forced to go to libraries

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  70. Why I don't got to Barnes & Nobel by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    The closest Barnes & Nobel to where I live (in the Lansing, MI area) used to be located in the Meridian Mall in Okemos, MI.

    As I recall, it was a nice, big store that was fairly easy to get to and had a lot of parking (because of the mall).

    However, when a department store went out of business in the middle of downtown East Lansing, B&N moved there.

    The newer store (which is about 10 years old now?) is even bigger than the old store (and takes up two floors of this building), but now requires you to fight downtown EL traffic to reach them and park in a city parking ramp. B&N will endorse your parking... but only if you buy something from them.

    That was a huge mistake, as Schuler Books immediately bought up B&N's old location, had it renovated as part of the mall's renovation project for that wing, and moved in there.

    B&N's store may be larger, but Schuler Books is much more convenient to get to and park.

    Now, I don't buy expensive books from there (that's what Amazon is for), but when I just want a cheap paperback or 5, I just stop in at Schuler.

    P.S. Schuler is a local chain, but their stores are still fairly large. They use all the space at their current location (B&N's old location). I understand why B&N moved; in order to be closer to Michigan State University, but Uni students aren't exactly the richest folks around while Okemos is the area's wealthiest suburb...

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  71. Blame Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife and I used to make regular trips to a Huge B&N that while out of the way from us (about 25 miles), we'd wander around the regular, bargain, and used sections and after 2-3 hours of this, we'd have a small stack of books we'd buy. Enter Amazon, with prices 20-50% less and free shipping.

    We made fewer trips to the Bookstore, but when we did, we'd preview what we wanted, then head home and go online and order it from Amazon to a huge savings...

  72. Canadian Chapters by masmullin · · Score: 1

    Here in Canada, we have Chapters as our local book megastore.

    I rarely visit now a-days because I'm nearly 100% ebooked... however, the few times I have been in the store is always PACKED, with extremely long lines at the checkout counter.

    The days of mom-and-pop bookstores will not be returning any time soon to Canada.

  73. brick & motar bookstores dying like flies by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I tried to visit a few of my favorite Los Angeles bookstores at SIGGRAPH last week. Alas, they were all but gone. First was the UCLA technical bookstore. It used to occupy most of the first floor of the student union. Its now a tenth of its former size with mainly hosting best-sellers. Several other college bookstores have disappeared in recent years too- UT, CU ... Another bookstore was the Bodhi Tree new age store on Melrose in West Hollywood. It went under late last year.
    I miss browsing books before I buy them. Hopefully pre-purchase browsing will be implemented in the e-book world. Now they mainly put the first chapter free online. I'd prefer viewing the WHOLE book for free for a limited time period, say ten minutes. I'd also like to se other pricing schemes: the library "read once" model say for $5 a book, all-you-can read a month for $50 etc, in addition to the $15 per ebook pricing they have now.

  74. Inventory in BN has dropped in past 5+ years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The inventory in my local BN has dropped dramatically in the past 5 years or so. They used to have EVERYTHING and I could go get whatever I needed. They opened a brand-new store where I live recently, with all-new inventory, and while it's big, there are significantly fewer books than there was in the old store. (Which had a huge close-out.) Now, if you're browsing for books, you'll find less to browse, and BN won't be any more special than Wal-Mart. If you're looking for books you need, you won't find them. I've gotten sick of going to the bookstore looking for something, them not having it, and then going online and ordering it. I skip the first two steps now.

    Also, BN stocks many fewer editions than they used to of various classics, and they typically yank the Penguin and Oxford classics for their own Essential Reading series, which has one of THE WORST FONTS ever invented for print. It's almost impossible to read.

  75. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by powerlord · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is a difference between a book and an e-reader. If the book breaks it's still mostly readable, and it requires no power to be read.

    True. I love when I'm flying and the Flight Attendant announces to stow all electronic devices, and turn anything "with an off switch" off.

    I watch all the people with e-book readers and laptops groan while I pull out my paperback. Uninterrupted reading pleasure during the trip.

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  76. Missed opportunity by bugs2squash · · Score: 1
    To be clear, here is what I want to see when I walk into a high-street chain bookstore (like B&N or Borders).
    • the store is split into four parts; a bar, an "AV, reading and reference" area, a "special format book" area and a "cheap read" area
    • the cheap read area contains whatever the bookstore can get inexpensively; same as walmart etc.
    • The "special format" area contains books like the one about the little monster that likes orange-peanut-butter-pickle sandwiches (the one with the fluffy cover and the tail), or the coffee table book with fancy printing or cardboard cutouts etc.
    • The "AV, reading and reference" area contains 100s of 1000s of precis of books. For example; a couple of chapters bound with the index. Whatever the publisher thinks will represent the book well in, say, 50 pages. This section also includes a number of computers containing a good catalog of inventory and available e-titles, recommendations etc. It also contains a number of book printer/binding machines. When you have selected the books you want, either from browsing or selecting them from the catalog you can have them either delivered for around amazon.com type prices, or printed there and then for a small premium. A similar machine will burn you a CD, DVD, BR, or direct download to your MP3/ipod for music and video
    • enjoy a beer or a coffee while your books print
    --
    Nullius in verba
  77. Regret over B&N by Tolvor · · Score: 1

    I view this change with regret

    Barnes and Nobles has significantly helped me.

    I remember saving up my allowance as a kid so that I could go to the bookstore in the mall (to be fair I think it was a Waldenbooks) and buy new science fiction. I remember the first time I read Dune by Frank Herbert, and more so the White Plague. Later I started buying programming books (no, they aren't cheap) and got a good job. More recently I needed books on business and management, and am now reading "Made to Stick - Why some ideas survive and others die". This was purchased as B&N.

    I don't have the opportunities with e-merchants that I do with physical booksellers. I enjoy looking at the flyleaf (sometimes possible at Amazon) and turn to the middle of the book and see how I like it (not possible with Amazon). I like to heavily browse the book before I buy it, which is just not possible with Amazon. This book has been very informative, but I do not think I would have been able to know enough about it to choose it by going to Amazon.

    Do I pay more by going to B&N? Sure. Will I be able to find useful books at Amazon? Maybe. Will I enjoy visiting a web site for a bargain basement book that I have to wait 3 days to get as much as seeing it, browsing it, buying it and reading it when I go to the store? Of course not. After I add shipping costs the price works out the same between me going to the bookstore and having Amazon ship it.

    On a bigger scale I worry about the power of bookshops being reduced to just a few outlets. Washington has been vastly increasing its power and taking over major industries. Washington is not kind or tolerant to the media. Washington has been caught in altering experts reports to fit its pre-made conclusions. The government now has the power to pick up the phone, call Amazon, and strip books from the shelves. We will be told "It is for the public good".

  78. On Site Publishing by sycodon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Another alternative is to print and bind books well as burn CDs on premises.

    I go to a book store for two reasons, kill time while in a shopping center or because I need a book now, not two days from now.

    Also:

    * All manner of publications, even out of print, could be available with minimal wait time.
    * Nothing would ever be out of stock.
    * Theoretically, the books would cost less after equipment costs are amortized because of less shipping.
    * Custom mix CDs would be a big hit, but the music industry would probably have a major pantie wadding event at the thought of this.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  79. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by RadioElectric · · Score: 1

    "Well-read on Christopher Hitchens"? Isn't that some sort of oxymoron? :-P

  80. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by RadioElectric · · Score: 1

    Libraries are themselves becoming a lot less about the books.

  81. You're not kidding. by crovira · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We're going to have to eschew DRM because there is no guaranteed survival for any content distributor.

    The shift to ebooks will accelerate, whether anybody likes to read them or not.

    The book and news publishing industry, a form of 1:N broad casting using paper as it's medium, is reaching the tipping point where the economic pressures on the content producers will make the old methods of production "not worth pursuing" because of the real devastation of the existing distribution channels by the internet.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  82. SLO B&N by demonbug · · Score: 1

    I recall many wonderful hours at the local B&N in college - they had a good selection, pretty good prices, and the bookstore was centrally located downtown so made a great place to hang out while waiting to meet up with friends/waiting for a movie/waiting for a table/etc. Many, many times went there without the intention of buying something and coming out with an impulse buy thanks to a pretty extensive in-store selection.

    For the last few (okay, ten) years I've been going to the local Borders, which never had the same selection as I was used to w/ the B&N, but it was good enough. Plus, they had a selection of CDs and DVDs, which the B&N didn't have. Not too bad, but I did have a soft spot for B&N.

    A couple months ago I had a chance to go to a B&N, I was out of town and looking for a specific book. Went in, wasn't sure which section it would be in (literature? foreign? mystery? could have been any of the above). There was a big line at the help desk, so I went looking for a computer to look up the book. Nothing. No computer terminal. No way to easily search the store, or determine which section the book might be in. Absolutely ridiculous - at Borders there seems to be a computer every ten paces so you can look up what you are looking for.

    Fortunately I eventually found an employee who instantly recognized the title of the book and led me straight to it (which was pretty impressive, not exactly a mainstream book), but the whole visit really turned me off to B&N (yes, sadly, despite the staff being knowledgeable and helpful once I found a free one, the fact that I couldn't just walk in and look up the location really turned me off to it). Seriously, no computer to search the in-store stock? Never mind that the price was about double what I could have gotten it for online, at least give me the tools to find what I'm looking for (hopefully this idiocy is unique to that B&N).

  83. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > like what we believe has been a decline in reading for the last 20 years.

    Actually, this might be part of a bigger problem: decline in thinking.

  84. Sad News by sherriw · · Score: 1

    This is pretty sad news. I love visiting my local bookstore here in Canada - it's called Chapters/Indigo.

    I find today that I am gravitating more and more toward books. TV has become an endless rain of banal reality shows and perpetual cliff-hanger-dramas. Movies are mostly sequels and fluff and even movies now are hopping on the cliff-hanger bandwagon.

    Books so far have remained ad-free and satisfying, with a low cost per entertainment-hours.

  85. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by geekoid · · Score: 1

    even if 95% of everything on was crap, that would still leave 5+ channels with good stuff on at any given moment.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  86. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    Oh, I think book and record stores will make a comeback one day, I just don't think you'll like the form they take: departments at supercenters in places like Wal Mart and Target.

    Most Wal Mart supercenters have grocery stores that equal or beat other grocery stores. I don't think it's a stretch to see them subdivide other secions of the store up either. I can easily see a Wal Mart setting a corner of a supercenter aside as the "bookstore" portion, complete with a coffee and sweets bar. Same thing for music and video... set a coner of the store up, put up some snazzy looking partitions, and voila!, instant music store. It makes sense because they'll make the same ruthless pricing deals they do with all other merchandise, and so you can have your box set or your novel for less, and drink your mocha latte too.

    But, you'll have to accept that it's evil Wal Mart that's doing it. Decisions, decisions.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  87. Wrong by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The reasons book stores are going out of business is due to publisher policies that go back to the 1950s. dealing with returns, hiow much to buy, guarantees printing and so on.

    When needs to happen is that the publishers needs to stop being so pissy about books on demand. for 500K you can get a machine that prints books as needs.
    This is what should be going into book stores. removes sends covers back, removes excess inventory.

    Until the publishers divest themselves of the hard cover/softcover attitude book store will suffer.

    Now they are starting to realize this, and momentum is changing. However, getting entrenched authors to move to the new model is a pain in the ass. As it turns out, as soon as someone is a successful author, they become a whiny pain in the ass.

    The whole business will change. This is going to happen. The only real question is will the industry be nimble enough to adapt, or will it all come wrecking down and need to be rebuilt?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  88. B&N is not in trouble by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    This is not a sign that B&N is in trouble. This is about a fight between Leonard Riggio (the founder of B&N and holder of the largest number of shares) and another investor. Mr. Riggio is facing challenges to his control of the company from another investor who actually wants to buy a bunch of B&N stores for his own company (and is trying to buy enough shares to force the issue). I think it is likely that he will be successful in taking B&N private.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  89. How it happened, by crovira · · Score: 1

    like, we don' 'no', eh?

    But there it was.

    The Miracle Of Back Bacon.

    Holy Jeez. Makes ya feel kinda small an' insignificant, eh?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  90. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Physical copies of books. Now with smugness!

  91. Aren't I paying for those peaople sitting around by Yergle143 · · Score: 1

    The slacker hangout culture thing about Borders and B&N was always off-putting to me. Doing your homework in a store? What happened to the library? OK so we close those too. Mom and Pop's with a savvy focus, a plethora of used books, and a heavy reliance on E-bay is the way forward.

  92. Yeah, but by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    That's not an e-reader problem -- that's a social problem. e-readers would work fine on aircraft; aircraft are in no way inconvenienced by e-readers; there's no threat whatsoever. It's simply "terrorism theater" to keep the populace stirred up.

    Just wait until someone packs something aboard an aircraft in/as a book; that'll be the end of your feeling of superiority.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Yeah, but by powerlord · · Score: 1

      I know e-readers would work fine on aircraft, and they are allowed, along with other "approved electronics" once the aircraft reaches its cruising altitude.

      Its ridiculous in general that we have this restriction on electronics in use on Aircraft, when 99.9% of them should have Zero impact on the plane, and should just be allowed to be used at all time.

      There is no feeling of Smugness or Superiority, there is merely joy in being able to not have my ability to continue reading the story/book I am in the middle of interrupted because someone who knows nothing about technology decides the eBookReader might cause the plane to blow up.

      If that causes others to be annoyed, then good. Maybe it will motivate them to write their Congress Critter to change things.

      As it stands, the only time people seem to get involved in politics is when they get annoyed.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:Yeah, but by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "Its ridiculous in general that we have this restriction on electronics in use on Aircraft, when 99.9% of them should have Zero impact on the plane, and should just be allowed to be used at all time."
      ILS is a very sensitive, interference-prone and fragile system, hence the 10-minute after takeoff/before landing restriction.

      It's being slowly replaced with GPS-based systems as GPS units with RAIM become more common.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:Yeah, but by powerlord · · Score: 1

      That sounds good.

      I assume for something to generate interference in this context, it must be generating a signal?

      If so, then while I understand it is easier to just say "No electronic" (and easier to enforce), considering most "e-toys" nowadays let you turn off wireless antennas, I'd prefer a "please turn all electronic gadgets to 'Airplane' mode" instead of "Please turn off anything with an off button, even if it is in 'airplane mode'"

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  93. Sucks by Thyamine · · Score: 1

    I prefer the stores I can walk into and actually hold the merchandise before I buy, or spend an afternoon wandering the shelves with my (yes, Starbucks) coffee in hand and see topics/books I'd never actually look up in a search engine. They may be overpriced, but I also fall into the 'that looks good I'm going to buy it' frame of mind. Not the 'that looks good, I'm going to go home, order it, wait a couple days, etc' mindset. If I really need a hard book to find, or something more technical, then Amazon is great. But not for when I just want to spend some time in a real book store.

    --
    I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
  94. Nonsense by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speaking as someone who owns a literary agency (a big one with lots of famous authors), I'm going to have to call you on that one.

    It's not the authors. It's never been the authors. It's the publishers, and it has always been the publishers.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  95. Put in play ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf does "put in play" mean?

  96. You shoulda got a Kindle by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    I sure feel great about my Nook purchase this week.

    There's safety in numbers.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  97. Communication isn't a minor issue by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Language is the brush we use to paint our thoughts on other people.

    You can create finely detailed, compelling images; or you can can jerk out a stick figure like some addled child.

    Which do you think will be better received?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  98. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    The problem with that is that B&N was simply a better book store than most of the independents. The independents simply didn't stock as many books. When I wanted something specific, it was more likely to be at B&N than McCawber's. If I wanted to browse, there was more stuff to browse than at Odegard's (sp?). Its prices tended to be slightly lower, too, so it was a net win unless you really liked the smaller store.

    The bigger fish you mention don't do the same thing. Amazon is great if I know what I want, and don't mind waiting a few days. It isn't nearly as good for browsing. I bought a book a few days ago that I was really happy to see, and I hadn't realized it was out. It was sitting in the New History display at B&N, so I saw it at a glance. Target and Wal-mart have extremely limited selections. Given my tastes, there's usually little at those I want to buy, but plenty at B&N.

    So, it isn't poetic justice. B&N succeeded by making something similar to their older competitors but better. I didn't lose anything by going to one big bookstore instead of several little ones with overlapping stock. I would lose something I value very much if bookstores in general closed down.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  99. Time vs. money by Corson · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it is true that people no longer want to spend quality time reading books, but book prices are not helping either. Michael Crichton's second to the last hardcover novel was released a year and a half before the paperback. Personally, I don't want to pay $40 for a hardcover that I only read once, maybe twice.

  100. I'll be sad to see them go... by wardred · · Score: 1

    I'm somewhere between a freeloader and a regular purchaser for them.
    I used to purchase a TON of books from them. I like popular sci-fi and fantasy.
    I have always been there, a LOT, doing my on line classes in their coffee shop rather than doing them at home. I buy 1 or 2 coffees for several hours of free internet access.
    I bought a Kindle DX, so a lot of the sci-fi / fantasy paperback purchases they were getting from me have dried up. Also, a lot of the classics - and I liked their classics series - are free to me now.
    I have a membership card. I still buy books there, just not nearly as many, and with school and a full time job I don't have as much idle time as I did - plus I have a fairly substantial library of books I've already purchased.

    HOPEFULLY whoever purchases them keeps them up and running. I'd like to see it where I can buy e-books from them that work on the Kindle...but I doubt that will happen. I'd buy them, even if they were a little more expensive, to keep the bits of the store going that I enjoy. (I like the physical book, but books take up space, and I'm seriously looking at cutting down the number of phsyical items I actually own.)

    This isn't a problem with just B&N, of course. Every time we go to a retail outlet, peruse what they have, then buy it online we cause said retail outlet grief. I guess the same could be said if we bypass them all together, but the online retailers benefit from us being able to review things at an actual store without purchasing them from that store.

    The flip side of that, unfortunately, is if the price is too high at the retail store...there's only so much of a premium most are willing to pay to support it.

  101. true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But for people who *aren't* clumsy idiots, the Kindle can be a pretty great deal.

  102. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by acohen1 · · Score: 1

    My thoughts exactly. I'll give up my paperbacks when the FAA decides its OK to use an e-book reader during take off and landing. Honestly I'm surprised they allow them to be used at all considering they have 3G transmitters. Do they have an "airplane mode" like most smartphones?

  103. Re:I still enjoy reading a good physcal book(store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you're imagining groans. Everyone is fine waiting 5 minutes until the flight takes off to resume their reading/music listening.

  104. Books cost too much by assertation · · Score: 1

    Through my twenties I would browse through bookstores for the hell out if and casually pick up a paperback. Doing that now would cost me $6 - $8.

    One of the essential points of books is that they are low cost easily handled methods of communication. They can be made out recycled tree guts or even help which grows fast. Even an average book can last decades if not centuries. Dropped from buildings, still usable ( try that with a kindle ).

    I've gotten book printed by small nonprofit presses in the 3rd world that still deliver on these basics and they were *cheap*.

    I don't think making books cheap again will solve American aliteracy ( being able to read, but choosing not too ), but it would remove a barrier.

     

  105. hmmm sad news by shane+chauhan · · Score: 1

    I think this is a sad sign of the times and changing reading habits. I can imagine the writing was on the wall for some time. The increased competition from Best Buy and other more mainstream outlets added to the problem