Slashdot Mirror


Retargeting Ads Stalk You For Weeks After You Shop

eldavojohn writes "The New York Times is reporting on a new kind of web ad that takes products you were looking at purchasing on one site and continually advertising them in front of you at subsequent sites. After looking at shoes at Zappos, a mother in Montreal noticed the shoes followed her: 'For days or weeks, every site I went to seemed to be showing me ads for those shoes. It is a pretty clever marketing tool. But it's a little creepy, especially if you don't know what's going on.' The spreading ploy is called 'retargeting ads' and really are just a good demonstration of how an old technology (all they use are leftover browser cookies) are truly invasive and privacy violating. Opponents are clamoring for government regulation to protect the consumer and one writer mentioned a consumer 'do not track' list — adding that retailers really show little fear of turning off customers with their invasion."

39 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. It seems a bit wrong-headed by mutube · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So... You look at something, decide you *don't* want to buy it... and then they continue to advertise it to you in case what? You change your mind?

    ????

    Profit

    1. Re:It seems a bit wrong-headed by sammy+baby · · Score: 5, Informative

      For certain items and types of purchases, it makes sense. Maybe I'm looking at purchasing a new TV, then decide to hold off for a bit. But because I happened to browse for one on Overstock.com, I might keep seeing ads for it everyplace that Overstock runs ads. In this case, it makes sense: I was about to make something of an impulse buy, and after seeing the ad repeatedly, I may be induced to do go through with it later.

      But in other cases, it's annoying as hell and makes no sense at all. I'm in the middle of renovating my house, and was recently looking at ceiling fans and vessel sinks online. Now I can't click on a site without seeing ads for sinks and fans, despite the fact that I made my selection and purchased them weeks ago.

    2. Re:It seems a bit wrong-headed by dyingtolive · · Score: 5, Funny

      Genuine question: Do you ever get ads for a new shift key? Yours seems broken. :)

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    3. Re:It seems a bit wrong-headed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's worse than that. I have been getting google ads in my POSTS to various forums, including slashdot!

      Slightly off-topic, but have you considered getting a trailer hitch at ehitch.com? I understand you can get a great deal there.

    4. Re:It seems a bit wrong-headed by sammy+baby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh man, the "Tiny wireless camera!!!" ads? I remember them from the late 90s. I think that they were just flat out ubiquitous, as opposed to following specific people around.

      The worst part of those ads was the pervyness. The ads would blare "for security," but they all ran with pictures of half-dressed women.

    5. Re:It seems a bit wrong-headed by Viperpete · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The circumstances in which I have been annoyed have been when I made online purchases for my 4 and 10 year old nieces and now constantly see ads for that demographic which as a 36 year old male with no children, I find tiresome. Also, every time one of my home user IT customers needs a new piece of equipment and I do the research for them forever after I see ads for stuff I already have or never want.

      Since I do much more research and pricing of stuff for other people, I always end up seeing ads for demographics that I am not a part of. I pretty much constantly use Adblock and CookieSafe nowadays.

      --
      loose: not fitting closely or tightly != lose: to suffer the deprivation of
    6. Re:It seems a bit wrong-headed by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or use an ad blocker. Or do both.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:It seems a bit wrong-headed by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I find it a bit amusing. A couple months ago I ordered a pizza online from Pizza Shack. For the next few weeks I kept seeing adverts for Pizza Shack everywhere, including my own GoogleAd-using site.* Last month I had a coupon for Papa Fred's so I ordered one from them. The pizza adverts suddenly changed to Papa Fred's. This weekend I looked up the phone number of my local MahJong franchise (which doesn't take online orders). Guess whose banner advert I'm seeing in the window next to this one....

      *This is a little frustrating because I'd rather see the adverts that my visitors are seeing, to give me a sense of their experience on the site... I know, I know... that's missing the point of targeted advertising.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  2. creepy. but by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree it's creepy, but Opponents are clamoring for government regulation to protect the consumer bothers me a bit. Really, I'm not at all sure that the government should be regulating in the internet at this picky level of detail.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:creepy. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not at all sure that the government should be regulating in the internet at this picky level of detail.

      Consumers have no technical way to protect themselves. Block cookies and there are a thousand other ways to track them (web bugs, LSO cookies, etc. etc.). Block those and the vendors will find another solution.

      The only solution is legal: Give consumers legal authority to stop vendors from tracking them, and penalties if that's violated.

      We've all been trained to memorize the meme that government regulation is bad. Fine if you want to believe it, and sometimes the meme is true, but sometimes, bad or not, the regulation is worse than the alternative.

    2. Re:creepy. but by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not at all sure that the government should be regulating in the internet at this picky level of detail.

      I think people should not be haunted with ads by any technique. So this is not nitpicking, it is just regulation of how much privacy invading is allowed. And in my opinion this kind of automated man-hunt should be forbidden.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    3. Re:creepy. but by Mr2cents · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. This will work because the internet is completely situated in one country. Also, legislation (and enforcement of -) doesn't cost a thing.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    4. Re:creepy. but by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're afraid of government protecting you from this sort of behaviour more then you are afraid of potential misuse of this kind informational centralization and sharing by private sector companies?
      Most people would call that tinfoil, because that's hip and fashionable, just like most anti-government pro private sector rhetoric. Most sensible people would call that either "clueless" or "stupid". Seriously, which one has happened more often, and who has screwed you over more in the last couple of decades?

      Indeed. Common sense is a bitch when it runs counter to what mass media likes to rave about, isn't it?

    5. Re:creepy. but by scot4875 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't some sort of anti-piracy legislation, where Allofmp3.com or the Pirate Bay can just move their servers if needed.

      These are real companies, selling real stuff, with real distributors and the vast majority will have a physical presence in the US. If they want to continue to do business in the US, they would need to follow the rules, just like everyone else.

      Your point about costs still stands, but overall I see nothing wrong with putting tools in the hands of the public to force these invasive assholes to back off.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
  3. Anti-advertising... by chiark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I booked a ferry crossing from the UK to France through Brittany Ferries' website, and since then I've often been presented with adverts for Brittany Ferries. It is actually putting me off, and has made me install Adblock plus. I don't mind adverts: I know that they're needed to try and monetise this crazy thing. What I do object to is being stalked by an advert for something that I've already bought the product for! So, well done, that's me now out of the internet advertising audience. I suspect I'm not the only one who has been pushed over the edge by this...

    1. Re:Anti-advertising... by wagadog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and, yet, they've gotten your attention sufficiently to get you to repeat their name! No such thing as bad publicity!

      And...dare I say it to a chiark? You are like putty in their hands. ssh into their site next time. :)

    2. Re:Anti-advertising... by dyingtolive · · Score: 4, Informative

      Frankly, advertisers don't care. They've gotten reaction out of you such that you remember the names of those companies, and will for the rest of your life. It doesn't matter if you're swearing off their products, so long as you can't forget their brand. This is the ape-shit bananas mentality that goes into advertisement. That's why you don't see effective advertising, but just "fire and forget" advertising that focuses on getting the name out there as much as possible.

      Source: Marketing Ex-girlfriend.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    3. Re:Anti-advertising... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Interesting to see how intrusive advertisements actually accomplish the exact opposite: a certain hatred against the company behind it...

      I have similar experiences - some types of advertisement are just too annoying, and I will make an effort never to buy anything from that company ever again. (And I have a longer memory than the internet itself).

      It all makes me wonder what kind of people can be digitally bullied into buying something online.

      The problem is one of metrics. Generally it's not the actual advertiser that has set up a system to generate and serve ads, they just pay another company for the service. So there's a disconnect between the people receiving (and being irritated by) the advertisements, and the company actually providing the goods and services. Ideally, the vendor would check up on what their flunkies are doing: maybe then they'd say, "Hey, enough of that, you're pissing off potential customers!" But odds are the ad company just returns some simple stats on number of ads served and where, and that vendor company just says, 'Good job." Personally, I think they've been sold a bill of goods: this might work in the short term but eventually people will either a. block the things or b. simply tune them out. That's what I do anyways, on both counts.

      People who buy this kind of advertising need to be more aware of the effect it is having on customers (and potential customers.) The "no such thing as bad publicity" mantra may be true in some circles, but when it comes to online advertising it's a big negative, since most people are predisposed to dislike such ads anyway. You have to strike a balance when it comes to advertising. Television, by and large, has gone overboard: they're so damn commercial-laden now that I'd rather torrent commercial-free episodes of my favorite shows even though I'm paying AT&T for the privilege (yeah, I can commercial-skip with the DVR, but I like to just hit "play" and forget about it, plus which their WinCE-based DVR software is decidedly flaky.) I also find that it's a lot easier to become immersed in the storyline if I'm not dealing with constant interruptions.

      A lot of cable channels are acting like this is still old-time broadcast television, where the user had no ability to record or skip anything, and at best could just turn down the volume on a commercial. Those days are gone: I pay to watch these shows, and I really couldn't care less about someone's ad revenue especially when it ruins the experience for me. When it comes to the Web, I'll tolerate ads (even though I will never, as a matter of principle, buy anything from one of them) until they start to really get on my nerves. Then my eyeballs will disappear off your radar just like that.

      Google appears to understand this balance and has been phenomenally successful because of it: their ads are simple and unobtrusive, and their service is worth the trade-off. Push it too far, however, and people will seek out ways to avoid viewing them: the tools are there. This user-tracking business sounds like one of those times, if the reaction of people here on Slashdot is any indication.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Anti-advertising... by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The publicity has to be pretty damn bad (Bhopal-/Valdez-/Deepwater-level bad) for the negative associations to trump the value of simple name recognition. After reading the story above I am now aware of exactly one company that provides ferry service between northwest France and the south of England. If I ever find myself in Portsmouth with a desire to get to Caen, that name will come back to me, probably without me remembering why I know it.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  4. Yes. by Securityemo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The primary use (for the user) of cookies are session cookies. If it wasn't for session cookies, I would just disable them. Maybe you could add a "whitelist this site for cookies y/n?" query right after "do you want to save the password for this site"?

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
  5. EVEN sillier by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So I look at a product, BUY it, then am constantly targeted with ads urging me to buy it.

    WTF?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  6. Re:Silly by BobMcD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I just bought something, why would they think I'm going to buy it again? If it was a perishable product or one that is periodically used up, that's understandable, but good shoes generally last at least a year or so.

    I prefer it, actually, to the approach used by television. There must not be a lot of brand loyalty in feminine hygiene products, but I'm fairly certain that they're wasting their ad dollars trying to woo me.

    Ads for things I have bought is one step closer to ads for things I might actually buy, and is a step away from ads that I'd rather not even think about.

    Therefore - good thing.

    Besides, if you've already been to the site and made your decision, what's the harm, exactly?

  7. Not that scary by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Disclaimer: I manage paid search campaigns for a living. This is really not that big a deal. At its basest level this checks whether you visited a given page (usually a conversion event) and shows you an ad based on that. Reality is people like them because they boost conversion rates majorly. And every provider just about uses them, including Google. Don't like? Adblock ftw.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re: Not that scary by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Informative
      And just to add (since I typed that last bit from my phone on the train)...

      This has been around for a while. It is picking up steam now of course because people are getting more advanced in their advertising. But at the end of the day this is what a lot of people on /. have asked for in the past...less irrelevant ads that bug the crap out of them. Well, you got your wish. These are targeted based on your actions and thus will be of more interest to you. The people who decide they don't want ads AT ALL have likely already blocked them in some manner, and thus should not be weighing in on this discussion to just gripe about something that no longer applies to them.

      Also, for all you people who love receiving Amazon's emails with suggested products for you to buy--guess what? This is the display advertising equivalent. And I can't stress enough how easy this is to foil. Don't like? Block ads, or just wipe cookies when your browser closes as most of these systems are cookie-based in their tracking and the ones that use Flash zombie cookies are getting sued to hell in a handbasket now.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re: Not that scary by cain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      people like them because they boost conversion rates majorly...

      *People* don't like them - advertisers and marketing scum like them.

      Conversion Rates: "In internet marketing, conversion rate is the ratio of visitors who convert casual content views or website visits into desired actions based on subtle or direct requests from marketers, advertisers, and content creators. ..."

      Blech. I am not a number! I am a free man! Adblock FTW, indeed.

    3. Re: Not that scary by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hate the very concept of this phrase (never heard 'CR' used before and I feel that much more dirty for knowing what it means, now).

      there really are 2 kinds of people in the world. those that add value to the world via their creativity and talents; and then all the rest, comprised mainly of salesman, marketeers and politicians.

      yes, there is an inherent disconnect between those 2 groups.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re: Not that scary by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not all marketers are deceptive, unethical people, just like you can't generalize any profession.

      in my 30 years in the software field, I never once met a sales/marketing guy you could trust. "shake hands and you have to count your fingers" is the usual sentiment felt after dealing with such people.

      if you could 'do' you would have. because you can't, you 'sell'. we know that; and yes, we do judge you for it; and not in a good way, either.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re: Not that scary by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      salesman, marketeers and politicians.

      Oddly similar personality types, when you get right down to it. The term "sociopath" is most commonly applied.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re: Not that scary by 14erCleaner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't like? Adblock ftw.

      Definitely. Whenever I see /. stories like this one, I feel kind of left out. Sort of like the kid whose parents don't let him watch TV, when the other kids are talking about their favorite shows.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    7. Re: Not that scary by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "some people click on them. usually feeble old grannies, young kids who don't know (yet) any better and imbeciles who will never learn and the odd republican here and there."

      What about all your fellow slashdotters? You realize this site survives because of ads right? SOMEBODY must be clicking on those ads about servers, geek toys, etc.

      And what about ads on sites like Ars Technica, or any industry website? Are those people all feeble old grannies and young kids who don't know any better? Also, what does someone's political affiliation have to do with anything?

      Man, when /. posts a story on advertising all the whackos come out of the woodwork.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  8. FireFox extenstion Ghostery addresses this by capedgirardeau · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have found using Ghostery added on to FireFox has cut down on a lot of this sort of cross site tracking for me.

    http://www.ghostery.com/

    --
    Wax on, wax off baby!
  9. LG phones do this by Brandee07 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I once bought an out-of-contract LG phone, whose screen broke a week after purchase. No, I didn't drop it. Neither AT&T nor LG would repair/replace it, so I went online and searched around and found that this model phone (the Neon) had a notoriously fragile screen, and that no one was able to get repairs for it, so I ended up chucking my useless $80 hunk of plastic in the trash.

    After this twenty minutes of googling, I was plagued by LG Neon ads for weeks. Every third or fourth website I visited had an ad trying to sell me the very phone that broke on me. It made me more and more angry every time I saw it. Without the constant reminder of my wasted money, I may have eventually forgotten about it, but now I will never, ever purchase anything by LG again, and I tell people who are looking for a new phone to get something - anything - else.

  10. Annoying marketing. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I find exceedingly obnoxious is when I do purchase something and for weeks afterwards I'll get promotions for similar things, if not the same exact altogether.

    I'm curious to know how effective this sort of thing actually is. All those people in the marketing department and consultants will desperately insist it works. But given my own experiences and observations it just creates information overload and the vast majority of people end up ignoring most of what they say. Unfortunately, the very people who do marketing are the ones also supplying the statistics on whether it has been effective or not. They're not going to furnish information that renders them inessential. So they only disclose what seems to work and make some rather absurd suppositions.

    There's no such thing as too much advertising to these guys. Expect things to get even more invasive.

    1. Re:Annoying marketing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Advertising isn't done by a bunch of people who guess at what works -- we have hard numbers that show that in the short term, this type of advertisement is incredibly effective. We don't make the numbers up, either (in fact, since it's our customers that bring the data on how many people click through the ads/buy the product/et cetera, we wouldn't even have the opportunity to do so).

      Now, I wouldn't be at all surprised if there are long-term consequences that we don't really understand, but... that's not what sells ads. If we can figure out a way to quantify brand effects like that, we can model ads around it. But as it is, our customers want to see rapid results, and this is an easy way to deliver them.

      It's important to realize that these types of advertisement are the free market at work. An open environment tends toward the most cost-effective, short-term-gain structure, and these ads are an example of that. No amount of moralizing will change that. If you want change, you need to regulate the market.

  11. I've noticed this. by shadowrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've noticed that almost everywhere i keep seeing ads for McDonald's. They are on websites that i go to. They are on tv. They are on the radio. I think i heard one on Pandora. They are even printed on billboards on the interstate through nebraska when i drive through there. That's pretty creepy that they KNOW i'm coming through nebraska and manage to print a billboard just for me.

    What i don't get is i don't even like McDonald's. I hardly ever go there, yet they keep showing me all these ads. weird.

  12. So Appallingly Creepy by beadfulthings · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't know of any online retailers where you can shop without getting a cookie or two to handle your shopping cart and sundries--what they like to call your "overall shopping experience." I was appalled when Overstock.com began following me--seemingly everywhere. They showed up at local and national news sites, a couple of humor sites--enough to make me feel as though I was being tailed in some kind of poorly done spy movie. And they always showed particular, specific items I'd been looking at. Adblock didn't seem to make a difference. I was ticked enough that when they sent me a "survey," I told them off. That resulted in two e-mails and a phone call to my husband, whose credit card I used in making the small purchase I did make. The gist of the communications was that they really wanted me to think this was "normal" and that "all websites" do it. Cleaning out my cookies helped with the immediate persecution complex, and installing and browsing with Ghostery (ghostery.com) in tandem with Adblock in my Firefox seems to have eliminated the problem for any other sites that are doing it. The solution, of course, is just not to shop at places that offend you and to tell them why you're taking your business elsewhere.

    --
    "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
  13. Stop looking by smittyman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since Firefox and Adblock (/ghostery) has been around i wonder why people still spent all the energy on adds. As long as you look, click, discuss, hate, love them they have the desired effect and the money flows. Just /ignore / block as Spam is here to stay.

    If a site is too intrusive there are most likely 10-100 alternatives to visit. Rather spend my time on that.

    Enjoy this not so intrusive /. website where we can even turn the spam off (hear hear! :)

    --
    Message from god, Please logoff, rebooting the Universe
  14. Re:Silly by characterZer0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brand loyalty does not really play into feminine hygiene products, because as soon as a woman finds a product she likes, they discontinue it.

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  15. Re:Alternatives? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I don't have problems with ads which are selected based on the content of the page I'm looking at (assuming it's not annoying in any other way; unfortunately so many ads are that I've given up manual ad blocking and use AdBlock Plus to automatically block all ads). Note that the content of the page is most likely interesting for me (otherwise I probably wouldn't look at it). If advertisers would stop trying to track me and would stop making ads annoying (and sites would stop putting ads in the middle of articles), I'd happily stop using AdBlock Plus.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.