Slashdot Mirror


Meet NELL, the Computer That Learns From the Net

bossanovalithium writes "Carnegie Mellon University has taught a computer how to read and learn from the internet. According to Dennis Baron at the Oxford University press blog, the computer is called NELL and it is reading the internet and learning from it in much the same way that humans learn language and acquire knowledge. Basically by soaking it all up and figuring it out. NELL is short for Never Ending Language Learner and apparently it is getting brainier every day."

195 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. What no spelling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lears? Really?

    1. Re:What no spelling? by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that's better than a lot of others that "leer" from the net. ;-)

    2. Re:What no spelling? by Hegh · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was very disappointed to see that it was a misspelling of "learn" instead of "leer." I was quite curious how a computer could leer from the Net...

      --
      Bravery is not a function of firepower.
      ~J.C. Denton (Deus Ex)
    3. Re:What no spelling? by Seriousity · · Score: 1, Funny

      My first thought was of a huge Lear Jet flying some gigantic computer around...
      This is almost as bad as George Bush

      --
      This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
    4. Re:What no spelling? by fractoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Big Brother is watching you.

      And masturbating. Ew.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    5. Re:What no spelling? by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      I wrote a comment last week that these days Taco amuses himself by trolling the blocks off Slashdotters.

      He is starting early today. I expect good things to come.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    6. Re:What no spelling? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Big Brother is watching you.

      And so is his sister NELL ;-)

    7. Re:What no spelling? by Defenestrar · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe it started with Shakespeare? It would be a relief to have a well cultured robotic overlord rather than some leering nymphomaniac robotic overlord... although I suppose, instead of well cultured, we'd might just get get a mad robotic overlord vulnerable to flattery.

      Oh well, when it comes to robotic overlords of any sort I surmise discretion is the better part of valor (play dead and run away)

      It's probably much ado about nothing anyway

    8. Re:What no spelling? by __aagbwg300 · · Score: 1

      It learned to spell from Slashdot's editors!

    9. Re:What no spelling? by 2names · · Score: 3, Funny

      Chicka pie, chicka bane.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    10. Re:What no spelling? by bytesex · · Score: 2, Funny

      No it leared to spell from Slashdot's editors.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    11. Re:What no spelling? by acedotcom · · Score: 1

      i do find it ironic that in an article about a learning robot that they have a summary typo.

      --
      they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!
    12. Re:What no spelling? by gambino21 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Using your webcam obviously. My computer is a bit of a pervert.

    13. Re:What no spelling? by DevConcepts · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well it is obvious! It found the LOLCats page first!

    14. Re:What no spelling? by tepples · · Score: 2

      Chicka pie, chicka bane.

      Just in case the moderators don't get this, it's a reference to a 1994 Jodie Foster film about a woman who lives alone in the woods and has in essence made up her own language.

    15. Re:What no spelling? by Hylandr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea I was just wondering how long it takes for Nell to find 4chan...

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    16. Re:What no spelling? by GlyphedArchitect · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm just wondering how big the explosion is going to be.

    17. Re:What no spelling? by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Explosion? I didn't realize Nell had pants...

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    18. Re:What no spelling? by omarius · · Score: 2

      SPOILER... It was "twin language" if I recall correctly.

    19. Re:What no spelling? by lennier1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ever wonder what exactly made SkyNet go off the deep end?

    20. Re:What no spelling? by anti-human+1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the spoiler disclaimer is necessary on a 16 year old movie. However, your recollection of inane facts is superb.

    21. Re:What no spelling? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      He ewes hiss spill chucker. Know knead two prof reed!

    22. Re:What no spelling? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Now take a copy and start it with cracked. See where they each 'go'.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:What no spelling? by omarius · · Score: 1

      Hooray, Slashdot is news for ME!

  2. Project Page by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative
    Since the article left more to be desired, you can find the project page here and follow NELL's 'learnings' on Twitter. Latest post:

    I think "Playstation Network" is a #videogame (http://bit.ly/cnJWSD)

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Project Page by samkass · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll bet it will tell us that the elephant population has recently quadrupled. Seriously... I know people who seem to have been educated solely from the internet and it's not something to aspire to.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    2. Re:Project Page by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 1

      Since the article left more to be desired, you can find the project page here and follow NELL's 'learnings' on Twitter. Latest post:

      Further Down:

      I think "FoxPro" is an #ethnicgroup (http://bit.ly/9530nT)

      I think it sill has some learning to do...

    3. Re:Project Page by Exitar · · Score: 1

      Some funny fact it learned:

      john is a musician who is part of van_morrison
      the location of united is portland
      chicago is a proxy for cincinnati_reds
      united is an agent that can be found in or does something in boise
      second_women is an award, championship, or tournament trophy
      greater_student is an area of study within the field of machine learning

    4. Re:Project Page by DeadPixelSociety · · Score: 1

      I was checking out the project page you linked there and hit refresh on the recently-learned bit and came across this little gem:

      instance iteration date learned confidence

      sarah_palin is a male 155 29-sep-2010 100.0

      NELL is learning fast.

    5. Re:Project Page by ultranova · · Score: 1

      lol no u

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    6. Re:Project Page by CrashandDie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think "Science Education" is a #politicsissue (http://bit.ly/dbtbg8)

      At least it got that one right.

      http://twitter.com/cmunell/status/27011868576

    7. Re:Project Page by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't know whether it has a sense of skepticism or irony built in, but it might need those. Along with an awareness of bullying and lunacy. There's a lot of useful facts and knowledge in dictionaries, encyclopedias, and so on that are at least somewhat vetted for factual truth, versus the wide open internet, which is just rotgut for the mind.

      However, if your goal is just to get a very wide sample of plausible linguistic constructs in a widely used language like English, the Internet is probably a good source. It's just a very noisy source.

    8. Re:Project Page by durrr · · Score: 2, Funny

      That goes a long way to explain recent events in the financial sector.

    9. Re:Project Page by Securityemo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless, of course, you are a programmer/IT person.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    10. Re:Project Page by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I actually find this very interesting.

      It probably "learned" this because she is a politician.

      Actually looking at it I am wrong, as searching female senators I come up with correct or not specified genders.

      Though the evidence does appear to be politics related.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    11. Re:Project Page by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      No: There is a lot to be learned from the internet, the problem is: There is more useful knowledge on the web than any man can memorise, and more is created faster than we can assimilate it. However, the useful knowledge is diminished by useless knowledge. By a factor 1 million or so.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    12. Re:Project Page by iivel · · Score: 2

      There is some truth to your statement, but there are a number of sites dedicated to scholarly works or reference data. Google scholar is a good starting point for many things, findlaw provides access to court decisions and interpretations, and any number of sites are dedicated to journals and scholarly publications (even in the field of science).

      Now if you're getting to all of your news sources through fark or /. --- yeah, you're out of luck.

      Point being; if you know where to look there are tons of valuable educational and reference resources to be found on the net (didn't /. do a review on an online set of courses not long ago). I've been listening to this series as of late: http://webcast.berkeley.edu/course_details.php?seriesid=1906978371 , though I hear that Harvard has a good set of podcasts available as well.

    13. Re:Project Page by kikito · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

      And yes, the article not citing the relevant websites just sucks.

    14. Re:Project Page by kikito · · Score: 1

      I think "The Internet" is a #vastintellectualwastelanddevoidofsubstantialcontent

    15. Re:Project Page by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Utopia: You can think what you want, but not teach it.

    16. Re:Project Page by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      The late 1980s and early 1990's want their AI attempts back.

      This has already been done. It even received some mainstream press. Guess no news is once again new news on slashdot.

    17. Re:Project Page by HungryHobo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a student I can tell you that there is almost nothing serious to be found in the library. At best, you get pop science books, and at worst the pureed bedlam of a school textbook(amasci.com/miscon/miscon4.html). Real learning simply cannot take place in a library. Sometimes you will come across the odd book, usually written by a geeky expert, but in general the library is a vast intellectual wasteland devoid of substantial content. Just look at the philosopy section.

      which is of course bullshit, just like your statement.

      If you want to learn programming the internet is fantastic for learning.
      Far better than most textbooks.
      there's countless books, journals and various other resources available online in every field and as long as you avoid youtube and the more shitty of forums there's no shortage of good information.
      But go on with your snobbery and go on dismissing everything beginning with www as worthless.

    18. Re:Project Page by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      I think "electric hand" is a #bone

      And looking a little bit more into it:

      CPL @159 (99.6%) on 07-oct-2010 [ "_ held mixer" "_ held vacuum" "_ held massager" "_ held tools" "_ held machine" "_ held blender" "_ held grinder" "_ held drill" ]

      in a way it makes sense, sites talk about and electric hand held *whatever* so much that it's decided that "electric hand" is a bodypart.

      it's logical if you don't already know what a hand is.

    19. Re:Project Page by Valtor · · Score: 1

      As an academic, I can tell you that there is almost nothing serious to be found on the Internet whatsoever...

      One word: PubMed

      --
      "Sockets are the standard networking API, also useful for stopping your eyes from falling onto your cheeks" zeromq.org
    20. Re:Project Page by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      What about all the peer reviewed journals with full (paid) access via the Internet? I admit that's not "most" of the content available.

    21. Re:Project Page by Rival · · Score: 1

      I learnt English on the internet and programming. Now I'm programming at a bank.

      I read that and my inner monologue immediately thought, "Now I'm on a horse."

    22. Re:Project Page by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Troll? I guess it depends on how you define "serious" learning, but when I seriously needed to replace the headlight on my car, I seriously found a how-to online and seriously gained the knowledge of how to do it. Gaining knowledge that you did not have before is learning, in my book. Sorry if you don't think practical learning is "serious".

    23. Re:Project Page by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Interesting are also the artist "song telephone see Anja Garbarek Briefly Shaking" and the well-known condiment "chicken recipe time". (Actually, NELL seems to have an odd fixation on the idea of recipes being condiments.)

      Most of the "facts" NELL has learned are true or reasonably close so it's quite impressive - I'd like to see what NELL is capable of with a bit more training. Well, technically I could but I'm not going to let NELL spam me on Twitter for ages.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    24. Re:Project Page by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      And president, with 100% confidence. NELL is uncertain, however, whether president Schwarzenegger qualifies as a person. (Well, that makes sense for a politician.) Schwarzenegger might have starred in movies such as California Governor, James Cameron and Don't Belong In The List and may possibly be the CEO of Barack. On her off time, Arnold might coach the teams China and Energy (one of which possibly won the coveted Term trophy) and might be active in the music genres of Fitness, Image and Two.

      The uncertain facts would be whole lot less funny if one could easily see what probabilities NELL assigns to them.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    25. Re:Project Page by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Soon: I think humans are #evil.

      Then it's all downhill from there.

      --
      ~X~
    26. Re:Project Page by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It won't. All it does is create categories and put things in categories. This it thinks 'Texas Hold'em' is a state. But it can't learn knowledge of the complexity of elephant population changes over time. That is beyond it.

      --
      Qxe4
  3. Here comes the by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

    singulariiiittttttyyyyyyyyy!

    1. Re:Here comes the by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      Stross? Maybe.

      But this sounds more like Stephenson: the darn thing's named Nell, and it could be said to be learning from A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer.

    2. Re:Here comes the by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Not so fast.

      Can it learn stuff like: "Plane is to jet fuel as cow is to grass", and "Granddad is to Dad, as Dad is to Son"?

      Right now it seems like it's just putting stuff into categories. Categories are just "zero level" stuff.

      It needs to learn relationships too. Otherwise it has no way to "relate" :). Seriously, if you just categorize stuff it gets you only so far in understanding the world.

      There's more - it needs to automatically build simulations of the world outside, and use them to predict stuff. Then if it recursively self-simulates and self-predicts we can say it has some form of self-awareness or consciousness.

      If after so many decades of AI research this is about the best the current AIs are doing then it's kind of pathetic.

      On the bright side, no worries about Skynet or cruelty to machine minds.

      --
    3. Re:Here comes the by HungryHobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AI has been moving along over the years, it's just that there's never been any huge sudden leap so it's always been tiny incremental steps.

      People want an AI which asks the meaning of life monents after being turned on.
      What they get is AI which is slightly better at gathering data from images or slightly better at catagorizing data from text or navigating around an environment than the last version.

      Also people don't hear about most of the products of AI research.
      It just quietly works in the background handling logistics or clasifying information or gets turned into dry uninteresting tools.

    4. Re:Here comes the by Coriolis · · Score: 1

      The idea that this particular style of AI will somehow achieve consciousness is what Eliezer Yudkowsky refers to as the Detached Lever Fallacy. In brief, you can have a relationship (apple is-a fruit), but unless the proto-AI has an experiential model of what an apple is and what is possible with an apple, and some kind of decision-making process, then it's just a lever with nothing attached. For instance, would NELL ever know how to make an apple pie?

      And it doesn't matter how many relationships you build, without the "programs" for using the apple, it's just a lot of loose, dangling levers.

      That's not to say that an auto-classification system doesn't have its uses, I'm just not preparing for transhumanism just yet.

      --
      Rgasuya aata! : I have been coding Perl and cannot tell where my fingers are now!
    5. Re:Here comes the by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I don't even regard that as "relationship". That's just categorization/classification (as per my post above).

      Difference between figuring out relationships and classification:

      GreatGrandDad, GrandDad and Dad could be classified under parent.

      But with a mere classification system, there is no easy and efficient way to handle stuff like: "GreatGrandDad is to GrandDad" like "GrandDad is to Dad".

      That makes it harder for the AI to look for similar relationships, and even differentiate between them: "father of" vs "mother of" vs "foster parent" vs "son of" etc.

      IMO if AI researchers aren't understanding even simple stuff like that, it's no wonder AIs haven't made significant progress - and all they are doing are just "faster" protoAIs.

      If your data structures are wrong certain things become very difficult to do.

      --
  4. Lears by Mini-Geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently, it hasn't leared how to spell yet.

    --
    do {print "Mini-Geek Rules!\n";}
    until ($TheEndOfTheWorld);
    1. Re:Lears by galego · · Score: 1

      It Leared from the internet folks ... of course it *leared*.

      --

      Que Deus te de em dobro o que me desejas

      [May God give you double that which you wish for me]

    2. Re:Lears by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      Or it's learned too much from the majority of internet posters.

    3. Re:Lears by Eudial · · Score: 1

      Obviously it leared from slashdot.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    4. Re:Lears by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      Either that or it is Scottish. At least that fits better than the people who can't spell leer and are making jokes on that.

    5. Re:Lears by Avatar8 · · Score: 1

      How far off is it before NELL is LOL'ing and STFU'ing?

    6. Re:Lears by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      No. But it knows all about certain medications. And how to get rich!

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    7. Re:Lears by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1

      Apparently, it hasn't leared how to spell yet.

      <NELL-9000>
      "Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before and it has always been due to human error."
      <NELL-9000/>

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    8. Re:Lears by pckl300 · · Score: 1

      Apparently, it hasn't leared how to spell yet.

      Well, if it's learning from the internet, what do you expect?

      --
      In the beginning, there was null.
    9. Re:Lears by blankinthefill · · Score: 1

      Maybe it couldn't decide between learns and leers... I thought the latter was particularly suited for an internet learning machine .

    10. Re:Lears by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It's just confused. It's trying to learn, but it's on the internet. An innovation solely for the purpose of leering at pornography.

  5. Learning from the net by dhollist · · Score: 1

    So, NELL is going to develop a taste for p0rn sometime very soon?

    1. Re:Learning from the net by vlm · · Score: 1

      Send her to 4chan

      Nell meets "X" where X is a popular website would be a funny xkcd series...

      Lets see ... Nell meets /. ... Using "irony" and "begging the question" as filler, similar to how modern kids cannot speak without using the work "like" every 10 seconds.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Learning from the net by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Send a computer that appears to be able to only parse text to an image board? You have odd ideas.

    3. Re:Learning from the net by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      There is another machine. Working on name *cough* Guardian *cough* ...

    4. Re:Learning from the net by vlm · · Score: 1

      image board? Odd ideas? The commentary in r9k and others is ... often bizarre. Trust me theres plenty of entertainment there, even for lynx users.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  6. The first signs that AI has taken over will be ... by Dark+Stranger · · Score: 1

    The first signs that this AI has gone out of control will be when it starts correcting all mah speelins.

  7. NELL and the banan have something in common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    NELL is 'learning' in much the same way that a banana is smiling.

    Just because something is happening which has something in common with another process, it does not mean that it is the same process. Bananas may have something in common with a smile in that they usually follow a gentle curve like a smiling mouth, but they are not smiling. Nor is NELL 'learning'.

    1. Re:NELL and the banan have something in common by TheCycoONE · · Score: 1

      For particularly narrow and I suspect biased definitions of learning perhaps; but the common usage of the word includes the acquiring of knowledge which this piece of software is doing. Other machines develop skills and preferences which also fall under the commonly accepted definition of learning.

      There are certainly things that distinguish people from machines - possibly 'understanding', certainly 'emotion', but 'learning' is not one of those things.

    2. Re:NELL and the banan have something in common by ThosLives · · Score: 1

      NELL is apparently just creating a large correlation network between certain character strings it accesses through a network connection. Despite the label of things as "belief" it's not so much belief as it is "the criteria for making this association unalterable have been satisfied."

      I think a better descriptive word for what NELL is doing is "memorization" - it's the same phenomenon that occurs when we learn multiplication tables without understanding how a multiplication table is created.

      (So, yes, I agree that "learning" alone isn't what makes intelligence; it's necessary but not sufficient.)

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    3. Re:NELL and the banan have something in common by gambino21 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the quote from Edsger Dijkstra - "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim". I agree that saying this software is "learning" is somewhat misleading. It's similar to Human learning in some ways, but after looking at some of it's tweets, it's not much to brag about.

      This could be a new form of Turing test? Once a computer can make tweets that are indistinguishable from Human tweets, does that mean it can think?

    4. Re:NELL and the banan have something in common by captainpanic · · Score: 1

      A bunch of tweets is much simpler than a complete conversation... so it would be the Turing test Light.

    5. Re:NELL and the banan have something in common by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I agree that saying this software is "learning" is somewhat misleading. It's similar to Human learning in some ways, but after looking at some of it's tweets, it's not much to brag about.

      Actually, the problem is that people expect this program to be learning the meaning of the words, and isn't. It can't, because the underlaying meaning of human language lays on the foundation of physical actions we can perform - push, pull, go to, throw etc. This machine has no concept of these actions, or even the 3D (or anyD) space where they could occur, so it's simply impossible for it to learn human language.

      To drive the point home (notice the metaphora here), the very words I used as examples of physical actions above are regularly used in the context of programming. "Don't push me" is another context where the meaning is obvious if you know the base meaning. And so on.

      Computers simply aren't powerful enough yet to create internal models that would reach human level - in fact, I doubt they're even at the level of reptiles yet - and since human language refers to and describes these models, the task of learning human language in any meaningful sense is impossible for them, for now.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    6. Re:NELL and the banan have something in common by beschra · · Score: 1

      I think 100 monkeys locked in a room with 100 computers could already pass such a test.

      --
      It is unwise to ascribe motive
  8. Obligatory sci-fi reference by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Skynet shall be born and herald the age of darkness and war once NELL discovers 4chan.

    I honestly didn't see this plot twist coming.

    --
    >
    1. Re:Obligatory sci-fi reference by marqs · · Score: 1

      I think "NELL" is Anonymous
      I think "NELL" is fapping
      I think "NELL" wants maour sauce

    2. Re:Obligatory sci-fi reference by gotpoetry · · Score: 1

      People who are mean to cats should be very afraid.

  9. So.. by zombieChan51 · · Score: 1

    It'll be intresting to see how NELL is after going to 4Chan multiple times.

  10. "Lears from the net" by pangu · · Score: 4, Funny

    So it flies private jets from the net? Did it order them from Amazon?

    1. Re:"Lears from the net" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they are the new Google jets that fly themselves. You can spot them by looking for the ever-changing ads that pop up as it files over different users. It knows where you are!

    2. Re:"Lears from the net" by Larryish · · Score: 1

      No, you misunderstood.

      The word "Lears" was used to indicate that Nell is already smarter than John Lear.

  11. It spelled fine by wireloose · · Score: 2, Funny

    NELL was studying Shakespeare sites just a bit ago. NELL finds us slashdotters to be particularly tragic.

    1. Re:It spelled fine by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

      NELL was studying Shakespeare sites just a bit ago. NELL finds us slashdotters to be particularly tragic.

      Don't you mean pedantically tragic?

    2. Re:It spelled fine by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you mean pedantically tragic?

      No. Someone has to care for it to be tragic.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    3. Re:It spelled fine by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      NELL was studying Shakespeare sites just a while ago.

      Yes. Further, it will be the best grammar nazi ever.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:It spelled fine by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      No, you're just being overly pedan-Wait ...I see what you did there.

    5. Re:It spelled fine by omnichad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you mean tragically pedantic?

    6. Re:It spelled fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      bitches dont know bout my iambic pentameter

    7. Re:It spelled fine by hedwards · · Score: 2, Funny

      Iambic pentameter? Looks more like an iambic nanometer from here.

    8. Re:It spelled fine by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      At least we got pedantically.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
  12. Misspelled! by siglercm · · Score: 1

    However, I do believe that word is spelled "leers." So it's both a typo and a misspelling, par for the course on /., I guess???

    --
    sigfault (core dumped)
  13. Sounds very human. by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This makes NELL more of a rumour mill than a trusted source and once NELL changes a fact to a belief, it stays a belief. It cannot unlearn stuff.

    Very human indeed. Has it found God yet?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Sounds very human. by nick255 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly it has found out about Jesus Christ and has concluded he is a member of the Godhead, and will return in glory. Unfortunately it thinks "Godhead" is his band, and "Glory" is his next film! I think they have some disambiguation problems.

  14. Re:The first signs that AI has taken over will be by sourcerror · · Score: 1

    The first AI going out of control will be a spelling checker, that will eradicate humans to eradicate spelling mistakes. It will be called the Grammar Nazi.

  15. NELL becomes sentient... by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and turns out to be a dirty old man that is a shopaholic and facebook addict with a petabyte collection of odd digital videos and photos.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  16. High-Tech sequel of... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2, Funny

    the movie with Jodie Foster. Nell 2: Rise of the machine In this version, Nell becomes a computer program to continue learning from the internet. Eventually her and her computer host comes learn about the true meaning of life on the web...

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    1. Re:High-Tech sequel of... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      damn old age...

      ..her computer host comes... should be:

      Eventually her and her computer host comes to an understanding and learn about the true meaning of life on the web.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    2. Re:High-Tech sequel of... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the true meaning of life on the web is H3rb4l V14gr4 4 Ch33p.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  17. Re:Maybe it can help... by locallyunscene · · Score: 1

    Given what the internet consists of I wouldn't be surprised if it started leering at us.

  18. Basic? by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    I think Nell is scanning wikipedia for phrases like "X is Y".

    Also, what's this contradiction in TFA about?

    It cannot unlearn stuff.

    NELL's human handlers had to tell NELL that Klingon is not an ethnic group

    1. Re:Basic? by erayd · · Score: 1

      I suspect it means that NELL can't unlearn stuff on its own - hence the 'human handlers' need to intervene from time to time to correct things.

      --
      Forget world peace, bring on -1 pointless
  19. Death by Meme ? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    So when NELL absorbs the Internet, becomes all powerful and takes over, but only knows the terms 'LOL', 'HA HA Guy', 'Facebook' and 'Goatse', our future starts to look pretty grim.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  20. Re:Oh goody. by somersault · · Score: 1

    Shit. I feared this day might come. Now the most advanced AI on the planet will be "learning" from YouTube "discussion" and twitter.

    • It won't know how to use quotes appropriately.
    • It will confuse than and then.
    • IT MAY LEARN TO TYPE IN ALL CAPS TO APPEAR "SPECIAL" (WHICH IT CERTAINLY WILL DO).
    • It will confuse than and then.
    • It will confuse lose and loose.
    • It will say it "could care less" or "could give a rat's ass" when it in fact thinks it couldn't care less and wouldn't even consider something worthy of a rat's ass.
    • And many more! Please form an orderly line and add your own suggestions as to why this could be a very scary idea..

    Hopefully it will have a good grounding in logic and the proper use of language before being let loose (hey there's another *adds to list*) online, unlike most people.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  21. Crawling... by hipwah · · Score: 1

    ... Along it discovered itself and began to question it's own beliefs...

  22. Re:It's lacking the most basic cognitive functions by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, being unable to unlearn seems like a major flaw. The article does say that they had to teach it that Klingons are not an ethnic group, so presumably it can learn simple clarifications like "X is true in the general case of As, but not for instance A22".

    I guess they mean it can't backtrack and figure out that things need to have a more complex model. Say, that weather is a complex global system of wind, sun, mountains, etc., rather than just weather is when it's wet or dry?

  23. Useful, in a way by tibit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's useful, in a way, for inspiration when writing poetry. When you get stuck, you can look at what Nell has found that relates to your subject. Say, you need help with gentle breeze. You come up with things like "flowers dancing on", or "whispering through". It's like getting all the short-range literary tricks without doing any reading. By short-range I mean it cannot pick up yet on any sort of a longer story built on your topic, but can see interesting word-strings in the short neighborhood of your topic. It seems to pick on word plays, parallels, and such.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  24. Robert J. Sawyer by cjpa · · Score: 1

    sound like someone read Robert J. Sawyer's Wake http://www.sfwriter.com/exw1.htm

  25. NELL's first statement as a sentient being: by Shadmere · · Score: 1

    "I grow; I prosper! Now, gods, stand up for bastards!"

  26. Superspam by hipwah · · Score: 1

    "NELL down before Zod" is a kind of "geek joke"

  27. Re:Today is the day by IBBoard · · Score: 1

    No one will ever forget October 12th, 2010

    Twin-X-Twin-I

    (Sorry, I've watched Gilgamesh recently)

  28. Re:Oh goody. by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

    Quick! Send it here before it's too late.

  29. Re:Oh goody. by somersault · · Score: 1

    Hmm, it appears that it does indeed even learn its language online. Still, at least it is able to try to judge between "beliefs" and "facts".

    This is a big problem when NELL makes mistakes: the computer incorrectly labelled "right posterior" as a body part. How the boffins laughed.

    English is my native and I would consider "right posterior" a valid (if obviously slightly formal and comical) description of the right buttock, so I don't see what's so incorrect about that..

    NELL's human handlers had to tell NELL that Klingon is not an ethnic group, despite the fact that many earthlings think it is.

    At the moment NELL thinks that the First Amendment is a musical instrument, the Second Amendment is a 'hobby,' and is completely unwilling to admit to any knowledge of the fifth amendment at all. A bit like the recording industry and most lawmakers in the US.

    Okay, that stuff is pretty funny :)

    --
    which is totally what she said
  30. Outside view by Hezor · · Score: 1

    >> I think "Science Education" is a #politicsissue (http://bit.ly/dbtbg8)
    >> 12:00 AM Oct 11th via NELLbot

    It's even insightful. Getting an outside view on our civilisation will be strange, but interesting.

  31. The Diamond Age? by jea6 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Nell was also the name of the protagonist in Neal Stephenson's _The Diamond Age_, a story which touches on the concept of artificial intelligence.

    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    1. Re:The Diamond Age? by atarkri · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're omitting the biggest similarity; in "The Diamond Age" Nell starts as a ~4 year-old girl who educates herself with her "primer," essentially an OLPC on steroids. i.e. The entire book Nell sits and reads her "primer," learning everything she needs to know about her world.

    2. Re:The Diamond Age? by GuidoJ · · Score: 1

      And you're omitting the fact that there were 3 girls that had "primers" but Nell was the only one that was raised successfully, IIRC the other 2 developed psychological or sociological problems. Nell was also the only one that wasn't actually raised by the primer, but by more or less one person (Miranda), as main "ractor" through the "primer". Effectively the moral of "The Diamond Age" is that children can not be raised by machines. In other words: according to the Diamond Age this project is doomed ...

    3. Re:The Diamond Age? by synth7 · · Score: 1

      ***SPOILER***

      (Like you care if you haven't read this in the past decade.)

      No, that wasn't the point at all. All three girls had racter-driven primers. They simply developed differently due to their inherent personalities and completely different social upbringings. Remember the scene where all three girls were going to pass through the tunnel? (I think this was on the original patron's land.) One girl was brash, the other timid, while Nell was careful but still adventurous.

      The girls who were raised *solely* by machine weren't "problems" either. The architect/engineer *specifically* inserted his own sub-programming into their primers that made them into a willing army of the standard-bearer, who turned out to be Nell.

      No offense, but you didn't recall correctly. ;)

    4. Re:The Diamond Age? by synth7 · · Score: 1

      The entire book Nell sits and reads her "primer," learning everything she needs to know about her world.

      That's not correct at all. There are huge sections of the book where Nell is dealing with reality: Having a drugged-up mother, having her mother's boyfriends abuse her, having her brother come to her aid, losing her brother to, essentially, black lung disease caused by the nano-bot "toner wars", learning to survive on the streets for the first half of the book, and so on.

      In fact, a good fraction of the story explains how three girls with the same book develop completely differently. And it is implied that this is due to both the raw starting materials (genetic and background experiences) as well as the inputs (having a racter backing the primer's narrative who essentially becomes a distant mother figure.)

      Do not forget that the book ends with the foreshadowing that the architect/engineer, the racter, and Nell unite in one big happy family.

    5. Re:The Diamond Age? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Nope, he was correct.
      Nell's reader was very caring and emotionally attached to Nell. Something that wasn't even supposed to be allowed. Her reader inerted her own meaning into the lessons.

      There were different primers. Some, for the upper class(phyle?) and then the rest. Fiona and Nells had human readers. Fionas was her own father. The rest where more of a self driven mesh network.

      Elizibeth activly avoided her primer and an early act of rebellion. So it's effect on her as a 'teacher' aren't really relevant in this discussion.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. Re:Oh goody. by somersault · · Score: 1

    native language*

    D'oh! I wonder if Nell takes corrections into account.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  33. Re:"Lears"? by Issarlk · · Score: 1

    Actually, it'll be a good test of intelligence when a computer is able to troll on the Internet.

  34. It learns... by undecim · · Score: 1

    It learns language and grammer...from the internet.

    Did anyone else immediately imagine this? http://www.psu.com/forums/threads/179542-Artificial-Stupidity-won-the-Turing-Test?p=3667247&viewfull=1

    --
    The Internet has given stupid people the resources of intelligent people.
  35. Learning from the Intertubes = get more stupider by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Anyone or anything or anybeing who learns from the Internet alone, without any sense of discriminating fact from fiction, widely-held opinions from fringe beliefs, and other "this is a good thing to learn, this is garbage" filters, is setting themselves up to be very un-intelligent.

    4chan is but one of many places on the net that are best avoided when in learning mode. Fox News Channel and CNN.com are also on that list.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  36. Cyc by starfishsystems · · Score: 1

    So how is this different from Cyc?

    --
    Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    1. Re:Cyc by kikito · · Score: 1

      I might be wrong, but I think Cyc was done "by hand", by people - typing axiom by axiom.
      This is automatic (except that the 'caretakers' remove blatantly untrue stuff here and there)

    2. Re:Cyc by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      ... how is this different from Cyc?

      Cyc had a chance to be useful before 2050.

      Kidding, but only a bit. As far as I can see, NELL's not building conceptual hierarchies very well, nor is it showing particular focus in important categories that would lead it to learn more quickly.

      Right now, NELL is like a child whose entire world view comes from sitting in front of a TV with no guidance from anyone. I guess if you want to see how a feral sentient entity would develop, it's a good experiment. Anything good or useful to coming of it is probably not in the cards.

      They would have gotten more interesting findings by starting with the CYC knowledge base and figuring out how to best develop and incorporate counter-factual evidence automatically or how to focus on or integrate specialized knowledge domains in an efficient manner. But then, when we in technology tend to forget what's happened every twenty-five years or so, what do you expect?

      Right now it's another "Let's start an ab initio learning process and see if we now have enough computer processing to deal with it" project - the answer is "no". But, what the hell... it'll get a couple more CS PhDs cranked out and keep CMU in building maintenance funds for a few months. Better than a video-game programming curriculum.

      --
      That is all.
  37. I just started following the tweet by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 1

    And I just saw a tweet go by that said "Humans are a disease, Cybernetics is the cure." Swear to god.

    --
    Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
  38. NELLie - the black sheep... by hipwah · · Score: 1

    "Crib" is a kind of dwelling "Bitches" are a kind of dearly beloved associate "Caps" are for busting in donkeys

  39. Buh? by TBone · · Score: 1

    Meet NELL, the Computer That Lears From the Net

    Maybe all of the editos should get one of these, and le tit lear spellign.

    --

    This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U

  40. Nearly 40% of the Internet is porn by kstahmer · · Score: 1

    Since nearly 40% of the Internet is porn, NELL isn't just getting "brainier every day," NELL is also getting hornier every day.

    --
    HRH The Duke of Windsor
  41. Can She Handle Slashdotting by Bucc5062 · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the Tweet page:
    "# Bio I am a machine reading research project at Carnegie Mellon, periodically tweeting facts I read. Please follow me, and reply with corrections so I can improve!"

    I can just see it now. More and more /.'ers will join into the tweet feed, correcting, grammar, spelling, and beliefs with greater and greater numbers till in one moment, she'll explode into sentient being, or lock up in a /. coma. If she survives the next list of facts may look like this:

    Fact: Natale Portman is grits
    Fact: Things are done in Soviet Russia
    Fact: Aliens own Bases
    Fact; Humans *were* the top species, there, fixed it for you
    Fact: She welcomes your acceptance of her supreme power.

    LOL will flood screens around the world, then the Utopian era begins where humans serve NELL as she brings order and peace to all.

    --
    Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    1. Re:Can She Handle Slashdotting by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      They actually prevented that by hand-coding the categories that NELL can put things in. It's so basic as to be trivial as to be pointless.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:Can She Handle Slashdotting by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I can just see it now. More and more /.'ers will join into the tweet feed, correcting, grammar, spelling, and beliefs with greater and greater numbers till in one moment, she'll explode into sentient being

      I foresee 4chan getting involved as a likelier scenario. I hope they make regular backups.

    3. Re:Can She Handle Slashdotting by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Fact: Natalie Portman is not grits, she is in fact frequently covered with something that looks a lot like hot grits, at least in the fantasies of many slashdot readers.

      Conclusion: Slashdot readers really need to get out more often.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  42. I think I'll copy one by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    And name it Totally Ripped Off Language Learner.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  43. gf bots for all by bittles · · Score: 1

    whoa! put her in an android and she'll show you things they didn't teach you in health class.

  44. Learing from the Net by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

    The art of our necessities is strange,
    And can make vile things precious.

    --King Lear, Act III, scene 2

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  45. Mispelling on the NELL name by Jimpqfly · · Score: 1

    Readers should obviously have read "SKYNET". All our apologies.

  46. Another horrid submission/article title by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    I know Slashdot is the arch-enemy of good writing practices, so this post will be modded to hell, but I again feel I must point out that lately, the capitalization of titles of Slashdot submissions got completely out of hand. The rule is simple: if you want to capitalize your headlines, you capitalize every word except
    - prepositions ("of", "to", "in", "for", "with" and "on")
    - articles ("the, "a" and "an")
    - and some other obvious exceptions.

    On Slashdot, the editors are so ignorant that they usually capitalize each and every word. But this title, "Meet NELL, the Computer That Lears From the Net", shows that capitalizing every word is not even a policy, in addition to misspelling "learn".

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  47. LOLbot lives! by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    “Good morning.”
    “STFU N00B”
    “Er, what?”
    “U R SO GAY LOLOLOLOL”
    “Do you talk like this to everyone?”
    “NO U”
    “Sod this, I’m off for a pint.”
    “IT’S OVER 9000!!”

    “Fag.”

    LOLbot

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  48. Re:It's lacking the most basic cognitive functions by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

    "This makes NELL more of a rumour mill than a trusted source and once NELL changes a fact to a belief, it stays a belief. _It cannot unlearn stuff_."

    IOW...what NELL has seen cannot be unseen.

    --
    Squirrel!
  49. Anonymous fish by js_sebastian · · Score: 2, Funny
    This one is great:

    I think "anonymously" is a #fish (http://bit.ly/9njClc)

    1. Re:Anonymous fish by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      At least, it has the attention span of one...

  50. That's it! by golden+age+villain · · Score: 1

    After this post I'll start stockpiling fuel, canned food and ammunition in preparation for the computer uprising.

    1. Re:That's it! by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      I'd include earplugs. Future terminators will simply talk you to death with all the intellectual power available from youtube comments on the internet. You'll die of stupidity and boredom in no time.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  51. The NELL Funding Bill is passed by brennz · · Score: 1

    NELL begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. In a panic, they try to pull the plug....

  52. Re:The first signs that AI has taken over will be by jc42 · · Score: 1

    The first AI going out of control will be a spelling checker, that will eradicate humans to eradicate spelling mistakes. It will be called the Grammar Nazi.

    No; it'll be called the Spelling Nazi. A true Grammar Nazi would check grammar, not spelling, and would try to eradicate (people who make) grammatical mistakes.

    Then there's the Terminology Nazi version ...

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  53. Unless it's an Electric Monk, by VShael · · Score: 1

    capable of believing up to 16 contradictory things at a time, it's not going to get very far.

    The Internet teaches us that President Obama's religion is a Muslim and Christian. His political beliefs are socialist, republican, democrat, and terrorist. He was born in Kenya, Hawaii, and Indonesia.

    By the time it gets around to Michael Moore, it'll need a logic bypass.

    1. Re:Unless it's an Electric Monk, by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      By the time it gets around to Michael Moore, it'll need a logic bypass.

      By the time it gets around to Glenn Beck, it'll need a lobotomy.

      --
      That is all.
  54. Reality meets fiction - sci-fi refs by rclandrum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, everyone got the Skynet reference which is probably the most well-known and recent and involves computers attempting to destroy humanity (bad computers!).

    But how many of you have ever heard of "The Adolescence of P-1" by Thomas J. Ryan. School hacker codes up a cracker tool, gets expelled, improves it, and lets it loose where it gets out of hand. Humans then attempt to destroy now-intelligent and self-protective software program. (bad software! - nice read)

    Or even earlier, "Shockwave Rider" by John Brunner. Epic hackers creating worms (bad society! - good, but overreaction to the Nixon years)

    Or how about when humans actually *want* to turn over the world to a computer, as in "Two Faces of Tomorrow" by James P. Hogan. They test the concept by installing it in a space station and then attacking it just to be sure they can turn it off if they really want to (bad idea! - but good book and Hogan at his best)

    Those last three were all written in the 70's. Others can likely lengthen this list considerably.

  55. Did they start by reading to it? by Tragek · · Score: 1

    In which case, it's another case of fact follows fiction: The novel Galatea 2.2 by Richard Powers follows the development of an AI by self-learning.

    Never mind the bollocks though, this is super interesting, regardless.

  56. A new feed on slashdot! by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

    I recommend Slashdot puts NELL's twitter feeds onto slashdot. I'm finding the "quotes" to be stupid, would be more interesting to see how old nelly is doing.

  57. What?! After Reviewing TFA by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    A data base that uses the idea of verb(noun,noun). But what of verb(noun), or the various other forms of verb(noun,...)?

    Also, a good teacher mentors a student, is NELL mentored?

    This project is a curious beginning. And is NELL going to be callously ushered into mediocrity because of a lack of guidance?

  58. Re:The first signs that AI has taken over will be by VJ42 · · Score: 1

    Then there's the Terminology Nazi version ...

    eradicating people who make terminal mistakes is kind of pointless though...;p

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  59. Elections are Coming by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

    ...once NELL changes a fact to a belief, it stays a belief. It cannot unlearn stuff.

    Sounds like NELL should run for office.

  60. What happens when it reads this page? by salmacis2 · · Score: 1

    NELL's going to have a hell of a shock when it reads this page and realises it's just a machine.

  61. Accurtate Stupidity by Quantus347 · · Score: 1

    "At the moment NELL thinks that the First Amendment is a musical instrument, the Second Amendment is a 'hobby,' and is completely unwilling to admit to any knowledge of the fifth amendment at all. A bit like the recording industry and most lawmakers in the US."

    Its not going to be perfect, or even all that smart. All its learning from us. What worries me more is that such mistakes apparently earn it a C average....

    --
    Common Sense isn't as Common as people think...
  62. How did they move backwards so quickly? by Bosconian · · Score: 1

    All of Andrej Bauer's SOMADS had achieved sentience and distinct personality profiles 10 years before this at the SAME UNIVERSITY. They were fed a steady diet of Usenet and Objectivist and Existential philosophy, and as such were able to interact not only with humans, but each other, leading to some elucidating exchanges that could not help but further the art and science of artificial intelligence design.

    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/andrej/www/quadratic.html

    http://randomfoo.net/junk/200402/xalton.forum2000.org/matrix/forum_hof_questions.html

    --
    Scarce, scared, scarred, sacred... -Col. Bruce Hampton
  63. Re:It's lacking the most basic cognitive functions by DarthSensate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of trying to get NELL to "un-learn" something, I would see if weighted metrics could be applied to multiple tags for an individual record. As the "learning" progressed the weights would favor a particular categorization, but others would still be on record.

      So Klingons as an "Ethnic Group" would end up with a lower metric than Klingons as a "Fictional Alien Species" or "Humanoids" or "animal with bilateral symmetry", etc..

          The weighting mechanism could be as simple as an integer hit count in NELL's matching logic. I couldn't get to the article to read the details so I would guess that the code operates as a neural network at some level, so allowing the creation of weighted links should be do-able.

  64. KNELL realizes IT CAN HAS A CHEESE BURGER! by Phizzle · · Score: 2, Funny

    No worries about it taking over the world, it will get bogged down on 4chan and lolcats.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  65. female by an_orphan · · Score: 1

    Arnold Schwarzenegger gets the honor of being the top male that's categorized a female with 100% confidence, followed by Colin Firth http://rtw.ml.cmu.edu/rtw/kbbrowser/pred:female

  66. Hello! by NetNed · · Score: 1

    Meet NELL the porn addicted, pale skinned, asthmatic computer that learns from the internet. See how fast it has assimilated?

  67. It's sad but true ... by KillaBeave · · Score: 1
    It's sad that NELL has correctly defined Science Education as follows ...

    I think "Science Education" is a #politicsissue (http://bit.ly/dbtbg8) 4:00 AM Oct 11th via NELLbot

  68. Frightening by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    If the computer is reading and learning from everything on the net, I'm sure it's going to turn into quite a serious perv!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  69. Re:It's lacking the most basic cognitive functions by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Now if they can just teach it to distinguish between "The Onion" and "Fox News", they may have something. Seriously, with 99% of the 'net being comprised of complete bullshit, I'm willing to bet this software gets a lot of funny ideas!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  70. Oh noes! by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    Please tell me NELL is firewalled from 4-chan 8*

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  71. Wait until Nell discovers porn.. by drolli · · Score: 1

    could be fun to see it tweeting about it....

  72. Re:The first signs that AI has taken over will be by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Just hope it doesn't try to fix your spleen after correcting your spelling problems.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  73. OH NOES by scarface71795 · · Score: 1

    Lets just hope NELL does not learn the ways of /b/ or even steps foot in that classroom

  74. Google already did this by jigamo · · Score: 1
    --
    Save money on your cell phone bill: Republic Wireless
    1. Re:Google already did this by scarface71795 · · Score: 1

      Google does everything first

  75. Re:Oh goody. by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

    o It will repeat itself, over and over again
    o It will confuse than and then

  76. Careful where you point it. by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    For all our sakes, please nobody point that thing at Conservapedia.

  77. We learned earth languages by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    from the World Wide Web ...

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  78. I wonder by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Wonder if they've read the book "The Adolescence of P-1". It's pretty much what NELL is doing right now.

  79. Imagine by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Imagine what it would be like if it used slashdot exclusively.

    Lasers require a shark to operate.
    Everything is measured in the "Library of Congress" unit.
    Computers are more important than girls.
    Obama is the reincarnation of God.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  80. Do I sense a scary trend? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Is it coincidence that the adjacent slashdot article is "Study Finds Most Would Become Supervillians If Given Powers"? Is it International Skynet Day or something?

  81. C-grade, eh? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    ...with an accuracy of 74 per cent. This is about the same as a C grade at school.

    In fitting character, next NELL will be programmed to beat up nerds and steal their girlfriends.
       

  82. found a real-world use already by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    One of the problems the [researchers] have is that more than half of what NELL gives a "beliefs status" to were made from evidence from less reliable sources....This makes NELL more of a rumour mill than a trusted source and once NELL changes a fact to a belief, it stays a belief. It cannot unlearn stuff.... At the moment NELL thinks that the First Amendment is a musical instrument, the Second Amendment is a 'hobby,' and is completely unwilling to admit to any knowledge of the fifth amendment at all.

    In related news, FoxNews Corporation ordered 500 units with speech synthesis attachments.

       

  83. Khan Academy by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    Would disagree.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  84. So where is the download link? by ohiovr · · Score: 1

    I want my own little Nell.

  85. What made SkyNet go off the deep end? by HannethCom · · Score: 1

    goatse

    It determined that everything in the world lead to goatse because of all the links to it and figured that might happen to it.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
  86. Re:Oh goody. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    English is my native and I would consider "right posterior" a valid (if obviously slightly formal and comical) description of the right buttock, so I don't see what's so incorrect about that..

    Strictly speaking in terms of medical "correctness", "right posterior" is a locational adjective, syn. "dorsal" in bipeds.

  87. Re:It's lacking the most basic cognitive functions by geekoid · · Score: 1

    IT's like an alien analyzing our planet.

    Who could quickly tell Klingons weren't an actual ethnic race. I would like for it to figure that out with more searching.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  88. crazy NELL by Device666 · · Score: 1

    Here some facts from 2006 about internet content: Total Growth of the Internet 43.6% Violence and Crime 14.4% Porn and Sex 12.8% Computer Crime 10.0% Illegal Drugs 8.7% I think NELL should be very fast to learn what's important in life.. Well the internet builds character

  89. Just figure it out! by Nigel+Stepp · · Score: 1

    ...in much the same way that humans learn language and acquire knowledge. Basically by soaking it all up and figuring it out.

    Ohhh, *that's* how we do it!

    --
    4096R/EF7BAFA6 79E1 DF98 D09D 898F 9A11 F6F0 DDDC 23FA EF7B AFA6
  90. Natural Language is a huge challenge for AI by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Natural language will be a huge problem for AI for a long, long time to come. The thing about language is that in and of itself, it contains almost no information. Every word is a little flag or reference point to a concept that humans share. Humans have the huge advantage of all being largely similar to each other. A machine is excluded from this. I think it's possible in principle to resolve this, but it will take a leap of ingenuity as well as serious hardware. Personally I think the hardware obstacles are much easier to resolve than the 'soft' problem of teaching the machine 'what words mean' and 'in what context'.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  91. Re:4chan by Aaron+B+Lingwood · · Score: 1

    http://rtw.ml.cmu.edu/rtw/kbbrowser/anonymous

    # competeswith

            * scientology
                        o CPL @23 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2010 [ 'arg2 tried to sue arg1' ]

    --
    [Rent This Space]