Slashdot Mirror


Man Loses Millions In Bizarre Virus-Protection Scam

Orome1 writes "A US court has heard that a couple conned at least $6 million from the great-grandson of an oil industry tycoon after he brought his virus-infected computer in for repair. The couple are said to have tricked the composer into believing that, while investigating the virus, they had found evidence that his life was in danger – concocting a story that the virus had been tracked to a hard drive in Honduras, and that evidence had been found that the composer's life was in danger." The victim here, Roger Davidson, may have lost as much as $20 million, after being convinced that he was in danger from a grand conspiracy. Vickram Bedi and girlfriend Helga Invarsdottir convinced Davidson to pay $160,000 monthly, and possibly much more, for their help.

366 comments

  1. he shouldn't complain by santax · · Score: 5, Funny

    If he was successful as composer and had signed a deal with any of the big labels he would have been left empty-handed by now.

  2. Now That's Bizarre by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 0

    I mean seriously. Do people really fall for these scams?

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    1. Re:Now That's Bizarre by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I mean seriously. Do people really fall for these scams?

      "A fool and his money are soon parted" -- Thomas Tusser.

      It's as true today as when he said it back in the 1500s.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Now That's Bizarre by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      More and more I feel that people who are that paranoid and quick to believe conspiracies have an extrem form of narcism. They actually believe that the are important enough to worth that much effort. They think the world is out to get them in fact most the world doesn't even know they are here.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Now That's Bizarre by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 0

      sad. ):

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    4. Re:Now That's Bizarre by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      More and more I feel that people who are that paranoid and quick to believe conspiracies have an extreme form of narcissism. They actually believe that the are important enough to worth that much effort. They think the world is out to get them in fact most the world doesn't even know they are here.

      Unlike everyone here who has all there important documents^Hporn encrypted and hidden with TrueCrypt on six hard drives stuffed in the laundry room and the USB stick stuffed in their mom's purse while tunneling into Slashdot with two proxies on different continents?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More and more I feel that people who are that paranoid and quick to believe conspiracies have an extrem form of narcism. They actually believe that the are important enough to worth that much effort. They think the world is out to get them in fact most the world doesn't even know they are here.

      If he has $6 to $20 million dollars to be conned out of, you don't have to be narcissistic to think you are a target, you are the top of the top 1%. Sometimes, they really are out to get you.

    6. Re:Now That's Bizarre by causality · · Score: 5, Interesting

      More and more I feel that people who are that paranoid and quick to believe conspiracies have an extrem form of narcism. They actually believe that the are important enough to worth that much effort. They think the world is out to get them in fact most the world doesn't even know they are here.

      There is one glaring problem with that viewpoint. It may have been true back when tracking/spying on a particular target would have required special effort and dedication of manpower. It is no longer true now that surveillance, monitoring, and database technology has advanced to the point where monitoring everyone all of the time is becoming increasingly feasible and cost-effective.

      For one narrow example, consider police. It used to be that if they wanted to track someone's whereabouts, they had to assign police officers to stake out a suspect and follow him/her around. That's expensive. There are only so many police officers. Dedicating a number of them to constantly track a particular individual had to be justified. That individual had to be exceptional and extraordinary to justify this cost, because that manpower could be put to much better use otherwise. Now it's both cost-effective and (recently) legally justifiable to simply install GPS tracking devices on citizens' vehicles. Now a computer can automatically perform that tracking and all it costs is a piece of mass-produced electronics that only becomes cheaper over time.

      Far from narcissists, I am coming to believe that those you call "paranoid" are realists. In a previous era they may have been quaint and paranoid but these days they're among the few willing to face the implications of a hard truth.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    7. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      http://www.etsy.com/listing/55473505/knit-tinfoil-hat-made-to-order

      yes, yes they do!

    8. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Faylone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd say in this case, he wasn't paranoid ENOUGH.

    9. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The scammers had access to his hard drive. They probably just looked at his browsing history to find out which conspiracy theory websites he frequented and made up something that matched up with whatever strange beliefs this guy may have already had. That's what I would do if I wanted to scam someone.

    10. Re:Now That's Bizarre by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Assuming that he really got swindled which is a big IF...

      Then that means they got him didn't they? After all, how many computer repair geeks would really concoct such a outlandish scheme to swindle him of that much money?

      At most they'd overcharge him a few thousands for a new PC with the works, copying data over, and they'd probably get away with that.

      --
    11. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      True, but in the case the only ones out to get him, well, got him. Maybe that means he should have been more paranoid...

    12. Re:Now That's Bizarre by grcumb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unlike everyone here who has all there important documents^Hporn encrypted and hidden with TrueCrypt on six hard drives stuffed in the laundry room and the USB stick stuffed in their mom's purse while tunneling into Slashdot with two proxies on different continents?

      Continents? Continents?!?

      Piffle!

      I'm riding 3 satellites and a worm-hole, baby!

      Best,
      Bruce Schneier

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    13. Re:Now That's Bizarre by nacturation · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unlike everyone here who has all there important documents^Hporn encrypted

      "important documentporn"? I think you meant ^W or ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    14. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Danieljury3 · · Score: 1

      I'm paranoid but am I paranoid enough?

    15. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More and more I feel that people who are that paranoid and quick to believe conspiracies have an extrem form of narcism. They actually believe that the are important enough to worth that much effort. They think the world is out to get them in fact most the world doesn't even know they are here.

      What is the point of saying all this when the man was clearly targeted because of his wealth?

    16. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's your point? I just like to be cautious.

    17. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    18. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      I'm paranoid but am I paranoid enough?

      Even paranoids have enemies.
      Henry Kissinger

    19. Re:Now That's Bizarre by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's sort of sad. Then again, he is an heir. He didn't earn the money. The guys who stole it from him worked harder for it than he did.

    20. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Merpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The madman's explanation of a thing is always complete, and often in a purely rational sense satisfactory. Or, to speak more strictly, the insane explanation, if not conclusive, is at least unanswerable; this may be observed specially in the two or three commonest kinds of madness. If a man says (for instance) that men have a conspiracy against him, you cannot dispute it except by saying that all the men deny that they are conspirators; which is exactly what conspirators would do. His explanation covers the facts as much as yours. Or if a man says that he is the rightful King of England, it is no complete answer to say that the existing authorities call him mad; for if he were King of England that might be the wisest thing for the existing authorities to do. Or if a man says that he is Jesus Christ,it is no answer to tell him that the world denies his divinity; for the world denied Christ's. -G.K. Chesterton

    21. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Swanktastic · · Score: 1

      I can help you discover the answer to that question. My fees are $160,000 a month.

    22. Re:Now That's Bizarre by ian_from_brisbane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      if you have to encrypt your porn then your are a kid or it is some sick shit of kids

      Or you are just from a sick country. In Australia, pics of small-breasted women of any age are considered child porn... even if they're clearly like 35 or something.

    23. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Unlike everyone here who has all there important documents^Hporn encrypted

      "important documentporn"? I think you meant ^W or ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H.

      Oh yeah, baby, fax that resume. Yeah, just like that...

    24. Re:Now That's Bizarre by raddan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is the world so impoverished that we can't spare a few Backspace keys? Who needs ^H anymore? vi users who can't afford vim?

    25. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, I thought I was the only one who did that.

    26. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I used to work for a company where the owner was ridiculously paranoid like this. Security was tighter at this company than most big companies like MS, GE, or probably anything short of a high security government job. This guy spent a good $1 million or more a year just on security when the overwhelming majority of people have never even heard the guys name, let alone contemplated robbing him. But then again, there's that old saying "a fool and his money are soon parted".

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    27. Re:Now That's Bizarre by shugah · · Score: 3, Funny

      So no more pictures of my wife I guess ....

      --
      If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
    28. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did poor ed (sic) ever do to you, you bastard!?

    29. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      have an extrem form of narcism. They actually believe that the are important enough to worth that much effort

      The effort required is steadily moving towards "zero". People who think they aren't interesting enough clearly have an inferiority complex.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    30. Re:Now That's Bizarre by nonguru · · Score: 0

      Far from narcissists, I am coming to believe that those you call "paranoid" are realists. In a previous era they may have been quaint and paranoid but these days they're among the few willing to face the implications of a hard truth.

      OK, step away from the PC slowly everybody. We have a "realist" loose on slashdot...

    31. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unlike everyone here who has all there important documents^Hporn encrypted

      "important documentporn"? I think you meant ^W or ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H.

      No, he got it right.

      The word "documentporn" is german for porn kept at the office mixed into a stack of documents that no one would ever look at otherwise.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    32. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      He was targeted for fraud because of his wealth(thinking that people want to get hold of your money is not paranoia but simple economics). Believing that someone from Honduras is trying to kill you is generally paranoid unless you've got some Hondurans in your will, or have made some real enemies. Assassination is difficult and expensive, people just don't do that shit.

      Of course his paranoia isn't really the issue here as much as the fact that he was willing to pay these two idiots 160 grand a month to protect him from said assassination. Obviously this guy either has diminished capacity in some way or this isn't the whole story. If I had 160 large to throw around for my protection and I thought someone was trying to kill me I'd be more likely to spend it on a security detail.

    33. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this guy's level, $6 million is probably a drop in the bucket compared to what a divorce would cost.

      He may not have been protecting his wife so much as himself.

    34. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Ghaoth · · Score: 3, Informative

      They did get him......

      --
      Nos Morituri te salutamus
    35. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you what, I'm not one for blaming the victim, but sometimes the victims make it awfully damn hard not to.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    36. Re:Now That's Bizarre by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I once read that a decent hacker will tunnel through around 30 different proxies before attacking a real target. I don't know how true it is, but it wouldn't surprise me if it's more than two.

      --
      Qxe4
    37. Re:Now That's Bizarre by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      In a previous era they may have been quaint and paranoid

      This is what they've said in every era. Along with other gems such as, "old people are dumb" and "kids these days don't know anything." Face it, the average slashdot reader would make any poor cop who had to trail them die of boredom.

      --
      Qxe4
    38. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > simply install GPS tracking devices on citizens' vehicles

      For 'special' trips, simply drive to a parking lot near a taxi rank and take a random taxi the rest of the way to your real destination, perhaps take several taxis if you really want to slip away. The GPS based system will think you've spent all day at the mall.

      Lojacking people of interest and then assuming that they only places they went where the places the lojack went is just plain stupid.

    39. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      terminals in the niiiiiiight exchanging asciii

      whoops, we've dropped a byyyyte please hit the break key

      dooobeee doobeedooooooooo

    40. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      TWO proxies?

      I never go with less than SEVEN!

    41. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assassination is difficult and expensive, people don't just do that shit.

      FTFY

    42. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you will donate anything you inherit to charity no doubt.

    43. Re:Now That's Bizarre by xtracto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No Shit.

      I administer 3 websites as a "part time". I contracted the hosting and bought the domain. I have been working on computers and programming since around 1988 and as such, I consider myself pretty "computer saavy" (e.e. I used to do cracks and keygens in my youth... ).

      Nevertheless, about two weeks ago I've got a mail that seemed quite sincere telling me that certain company wanted to acquire domains similar to one of mines but with different TLD:

      Dear Manager,
      This email is from China Domain Name registration service company, which is the domain name registration center in Shanghai, China. A formal application here dated on Oct. 18, 2010 from Wells inc requested " XXXXX " as their Internet Brand and China domain names. But after checking it, we find this name conflict with your company name or trademark. In order to deal with this matter better, it's necessary to send email to you and confirm whether this company is your distributor or business partner in China ?

      Well... it was after exchanging two emails with the bastards that I got it and googled for some background (they were very pushy suggesting me to buy the domains from them :-/)

      After some time looking I found out it is a well known scam: http://www.firetrust.com/en/blog/chris/domain-name-scams?page=12

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    44. Re:Now That's Bizarre by vigmeister · · Score: 1

      Looks like he was paying for a service. I don't see how this is any different from Homeopathy or Scientology...

      Cheers!

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    45. Re:Now That's Bizarre by lightknight · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You gotta be kidding me.

      We now decide on whether or not someone gets to keep their money on the basis of how hard he / she worked to earn it?? What subcommittee, from the dark nether regions of Cthulu's domain, decided this stellar policy in my absence?

      The man got swindled. Whether or not the man has $2 or $2 million in his checking account, he deserves our sympathy. That he is an heir, and thus "didn't earn the money," is a poor excuse for some highly despicable behavior.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    46. Re:Now That's Bizarre by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 4, Funny

      Day 104: Things have been getting weird ever since I joined his raiding party. He trusts me. They all trust me. Well, except Cranston the Night Elf. I can tell he suspects something.

      I'm starting to forget who I am. I've been getting deeper into cheetos. I miss my wife. I can't believe how long I've spent playing someone else.

    47. Re:Now That's Bizarre by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

      So I guess you're perfectly okay with someone stealing the money you give to your kids. Oh wait, this is /. you don't have a gf let alone kids.

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    48. Re:Now That's Bizarre by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      We now decide on whether or not someone gets to keep their money on the basis of how hard he / she worked to earn it?? What subcommittee, from the dark nether regions of Cthulu's domain, decided this stellar policy in my absence?

      One does wonder ... does Obama secretly slashdot ?

    49. Re:Now That's Bizarre by sempir · · Score: 1

      Personally I wouldn't mind having a go at tunneling a few doxies myself, would do me a power of good at my age!

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    50. Re:Now That's Bizarre by DarkIye · · Score: 4, Funny

      Brilliant. I literally can't tell whether you're joking or not.

    51. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is, even if it is a pretty fantastic story, you seem to be ready to believe in this article, and without checking it's background I suspect. People belive exactly what suits them to believe, even if it's far fetched

    52. Re:Now That's Bizarre by bickerdyke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man:
      Is your uh, is your wife interested in... photography, ay? 'Photographs, ay', he asked him knowlingly?

      Squire:
      Photography?

      Man:
      Snap snap, grin grin, wink wink, nudge nudge, say no more?

      Squire:
      Holiday snaps, eh?

      Man:
      They could be, they could be taken on holiday.
      Candid, you know, CANDID photography?

      Squire:
      No, no I'm afraid we don't have a camera.

      Man:
      Oh.
      (leeringly)
      Still, mooooooh, ay? Mwoohohohohoo, ay? Hohohohohoho, ay?

      --
      bickerdyke
    53. Re:Now That's Bizarre by somersault · · Score: 1

      People should really be taught about scams in school. Then things like viruses and spam wouldn't be anywhere near as prevalent.

      But unless this was the first time this guy has ever been deceived, it's his own fault. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me", etc.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    54. Re:Now That's Bizarre by somersault · · Score: 1

      The guy has (or at least, had) access to over $20,000,000. Quite a few people would consider that worth the effort.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    55. Re:Now That's Bizarre by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not only did he lose a fortune, he spent a long time kept in fear for his life. If you've even spent a night wondering if people you've pissed off are going to come round and break into your home, imagine spending two years being told a group are trying to kill you.

      Incidentally, TFA makes a little fun about Opus Dei, featured in the Da Vinci Code being one of the supposed villains that are after him. Okay, that's a bit of a red flag, but Opus Dei do actually exist and are a sort of sub-cult within Catholicism. They've got their claws into various influential people and actually score moderately well on the Sinister Scale. Lower than Wahabism, bobbing along under Scientology, but certainly high above your run of the mill nutters.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    56. Re:Now That's Bizarre by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Or anyone remotely in the public eye who might find themselves pilloried in the press for what the rest of society does blamelessly.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    57. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      It's just the classical saying 'a fool and his money are soon parted', just in different words.

      The meaning is, that people who have shown their wits/intellect/ruthlessness/whatever by earning lots of money fall for such scams much more rarely than people who have 'found' the money by inheritance or lotteries - they seem particularly vulnerable statistically.

    58. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sometimes, they really are out to get you.

      Even if that were so, would you be hiring some dude who ran a virus scan on your computer to investigate this shadowy conspiracy?

      If you're that rich, I'm sure there are dozens of respected private agencies who could a) provide you with security and protection, b) provide you with anti-surveillance training & detection c) investigate the threat as far as the facts allow.

      I'm sure they'd profit handsomely from your paranoia too, but at least you'd be getting your money's worth.

    59. Re:Now That's Bizarre by delinear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Other than a very high level overview of scamming techniques, what are you going to teach people in schools that will be relevant for the next 60+ years of their life? Scammers have shown time and again that, the second their targets become aware of the scam, they will switch tactics and it's back to square one. When I was at school the internet was practically unheard of, and I'm in my thirties - a lot of the people who get scammed are much older (in fact the elderly are the prime target for scammers), when they were at school computers were practically unheard of. What advice could they have been given back then to prepare them for the internet-based "social engineering" scams of today? Scams are in the news almost every day, we're bombarded with warnings about "identity theft" and such, yet people still frequently fall for these things - clearly awareness is not the issue.

      Common sense is the only real defence against these scams, and it's pretty clear that schools have no way of teaching that.

    60. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      sad. ):

      No, what's sad is that you don't know how to use emoticons. "):" isn't a sad face.

    61. Re:Now That's Bizarre by delinear · · Score: 1

      Playing someone else playing someone else.

    62. Re:Now That's Bizarre by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      Haha, love that sketch!

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    63. Re:Now That's Bizarre by delinear · · Score: 1

      The difference is, believing a news article with flaky facts might hit your credibility but it's unlikely to cost you six million dollars. There is a scale where, at one end it's not really worth checking the facts, and at the other it is very much so.

    64. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A fool and his money were lucky to get together in the first place."

      --W. C. Fields

    65. Re:Now That's Bizarre by shentino · · Score: 1

      The only problem with it is that the money thusly parted winds up in the wrong pockets.

      And as it goes...the one who has the gold makes the rules.

    66. Re:Now That's Bizarre by MatthewCCNA · · Score: 1

      Other than a very high level overview of scamming techniques, what are you going to teach people in schools that will be relevant for the next 60+ years of their life?

      Healthy skepticism, sprinkled with a little paranoia

      --
      "He is so stupid. And now back to the wall!" Moe Szyslak
    67. Re:Now That's Bizarre by shentino · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Donating the money to charity just because he didn't earn it isn't really a moral issue. At the very least, having the money in his possession will keep it out of the wrong hands, and considering the way many charities these days are almost as corrupt as our own government, it may be for the best to do some manual philanthropy, or better yet, invest the money and create some jobs.

      Also, I seriously doubt you would be willing to do so were you in his position.

    68. Re:Now That's Bizarre by shentino · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      Just because the guy is an idiot doesn't mean his money belongs in the hands of a *pack of thieves* that will probably use the money to do some nasty things that will be bad for everyone.

      A fool and his money may deserve to be parted, but there's also the issue of whose pockets that money winds up going into.

    69. Re:Now That's Bizarre by twzop · · Score: 0

      Love your post. You are exactly right. Wonder if that guy had ever heard of the FBI. Maybe he should have called them instead of his "repair" people.

    70. Re:Now That's Bizarre by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      You gotta be kidding me.

      We now decide on whether or not someone gets to keep their money on the basis of how hard he / she worked to earn it?? What subcommittee, from the dark nether regions of Cthulu's domain, decided this stellar policy in my absence?

      The man got swindled. Whether or not the man has $2 or $2 million in his checking account, he deserves our sympathy. That he is an heir, and thus "didn't earn the money," is a poor excuse for some highly despicable behavior.

      Sorry, all my sympathy was used up for the people who lived, worked, and died for those who setup this guy's inheritance.

      Why should I have any sympathy for the person who has $20 million to lose?

      The world isn't fair. Let me know when it sucks so much to be mind-bogglingly rich that it sucks equally as much as only having $2 in your checking account. Then I'll have some sympathy.

      You see, the advantage of having $20 million around to lose is that you don't normally have to face the fact that life sucks, because that $20 million makes it a hell of a lot easier to make it suck for enough other people that you get to live a fairly comfortable existence.

      I know that isn't fair of me, but for some reason it's just easier to feel compassion for the $2 in their checking account family.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    71. Re:Now That's Bizarre by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      This is what they've said in every era. Along with other gems such as, "old people are dumb" and "kids these days don't know anything." Face it, the average slashdot reader would make any poor cop who had to trail them die of boredom.

      You think they trail you because they were told to? No, they trail you because they want to. They trail you because in some way, some how, you wronged them, and they have the tools at their disposal to exact some form of revenge against you.

      In most cases, revenge exerted against you will come in the form of someone letting a call with your ID to go to voicemail a few times. With the police and governmental powers, the revenge can be a lot more invasive and dangerous.

      Maybe they won't find anything. But that doesn't mean they won't try. Piss off a meter maid, and expect to get a ticket for parking in a spot for the handicapped. Piss off a detective and expect some sort of 'record search' to be performed at the least. Piss off a city employee, expect to find out that your sidewalk curb isn't to code and must be torn out and replaced at your expense.

      Trust me, human beings will go to extreme lengths to pursue a grudge and will use any and all tools at their disposal unless you build in some serious safeguards and oversight. And even with those checks, some still will try to fuck you over.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    72. Re:Now That's Bizarre by jcr · · Score: 1

      Do people really fall for these scams?

      They sure do. The reason we all get that spam claiming to need our help moving millions of dollars into the US banking system is because there are enough suckers out there to keep the spammers in business.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    73. Re:Now That's Bizarre by eyenot · · Score: 1

      That's fine until you consider that there really are "grand" conspiracies that target real individuals, most of whom are totally unawares.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    74. Re:Now That's Bizarre by mug+funky · · Score: 2, Funny

      liberal bias! you don't count a right-leaning sad face?

    75. Re:Now That's Bizarre by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      Common sense is the only real defence against these scams, and it's pretty clear that schools have no way of teaching that.

      Unfortunately, common sense is in very short supply it seems.

      I can't know what's in the mind of those who get scammed, but the simplest defense is to just walk away from anyone wanting to take your stash. While it's certainly possible to be scammed by someone the victim has hired to perform a service (re:Bernie Madoff), at some point reason has to come into play. A PC repairman finds evidence of victim's life being in danger and he swallows it hook, line and sinker? What about second opinions?

      Madoff was paying huge returns to his early victims and had they been more engaged in what was happening, a second opinion might have saved them from being wiped out. The old saw is "if it seems to good to be true, it probably is". In the case of the composer, had he revealed the problem to someone with a dispassionate eye, this would have been a non-story.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    76. Re:Now That's Bizarre by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      having seen how a few charities work while doing IT consulting for them: NO. NOT EVER.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    77. Re:Now That's Bizarre by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      this.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    78. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of crock, mate. And its modded insightful, which is even more bizarre.

    79. Re:Now That's Bizarre by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      which does not answer the basic question: why would anyone want to do that to me ? my life is boring in the extreme, and not worth spying on, at any cost. hence the argument about narcissistic paranoia.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    80. Re:Now That's Bizarre by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      no.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    81. Re:Now That's Bizarre by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Unlike everyone here who has all there important documents^Hporn encrypted and hidden with TrueCrypt on six hard drives stuffed in the laundry room and the USB stick stuffed in their mom's purse while tunneling into Slashdot with two proxies on different continents?

      No. Mine is in .\My Pictures\private\you're violating my privacy\I'm warning you\bad plan, darling\alright, you found it\my porn stash.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    82. Re:Now That's Bizarre by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Australia, pics of small-breasted women of any age are considered child porn...

      Hmmm... weaponized small breasts. (looks down shirt) Screw this, I'm moving to Australia, and if anyone says my boobs are small, I can have them arrested for viewing child porn.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    83. Re:Now That's Bizarre by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "sad. ):"

      Yes it is.

      What can't I ever find someone that loaded and gullible?!?!?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    84. Re:Now That's Bizarre by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Out to get his money yes.
      But a complex conspiracy involving people in another country that are trying to kill you?
      Or in this case.
      "The couple are said to have tricked the composer into believing that, while investigating the virus, they had found evidence that his life was in danger – concocting a story that the virus had been tracked to a hard drive in Honduras, and that evidence had been found that the composer's life was in danger.""

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    85. Re:Now That's Bizarre by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      That is pretty much it in a nutshell.
      I am all for getting our laws back in order as far as privacy is concerned. I want to see the courts rule that they must have a court order to plant a GPS device.
      But at no time would I ever believe that someone in South America is plotting to kill me or that I could pay someone to prevent it.
      That is narcissistic paranoia.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    86. Re:Now That's Bizarre by operagost · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No, that's "documentpornkeepenimstackenfurfappen".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    87. Re:Now That's Bizarre by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You forgot that they use a VM image hidden with TrueCrypt and stored on a USB suppository.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    88. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see, the advantage of having $20 million around to lose is that you don't normally have to face the fact that life sucks, because that $20 million makes it a hell of a lot easier to make it suck for enough other people that you get to live a fairly comfortable existence.

      Citation needed.

      This delusion seems to be commonplace amongst the poor and stupid. I might be monetarily wealthy, but holy shit are you doing yourself disfavor by pretending that having assloads of cash means your life doesn't suck by default.

    89. Re:Now That's Bizarre by kryliss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about.. if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Or in this guy's case, if it sounds too bad to be true, it probably is.. Seriously though..If there were possible threats against his life wouldn't you think that the first thing he would do would be to get in contact with the authorities? Not just rely on some computer techs to "guard" them.. If anything they should have atleast called the Geek Squad, atleast they have jet packs.... :)

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    90. Re:Now That's Bizarre by fusiongyro · · Score: 1

      I like your sinister scale. You should make a comprehensive diagram of sinisterity.

    91. Re:Now That's Bizarre by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Hey...when everyone is out to get you....

      Paranoid is just......GOOD THINKING!!"

      --Johnny Fever

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    92. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia, pics of small-breasted women of any age are considered child porn... even if they're clearly like 35 or something.

      How about large-breasted minors?

    93. Re:Now That's Bizarre by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      The word "documentporn"

      Sounds more like an Ikea product to me. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    94. Re:Now That's Bizarre by tehcyder · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      But unless this was the first time this guy has ever been deceived, it's his own fault. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me", etc.

      Yeah, it's like people who are burgled, the second time's always their fault.

      Asshole.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    95. Re:Now That's Bizarre by nsaspook · · Score: 1

      I mean seriously. Do people really fall for these scams?

      Yes. http://www.katu.com/news/34292654.html

      Spears fell victim to the "Nigerian scam," which is familiar to almost anyone who has ever had an e-mail account.

      --
      In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
    96. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely joking, the German word is dokumentporn.

    97. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because in most interpersonal relationships you're the stupid one, not the smart one.

    98. Re:Now That's Bizarre by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      lol I can see why you are paranoid, seems you piss off enough people that they really ARE after you.

      --
      Qxe4
    99. Re:Now That's Bizarre by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being scammed is not a great comparison to being burgled. When you're scammed you have to make an actively stupid decision to take part in the scam.

      When you're burgled, you don't get a direct choice. You can however do a few things to make your house less attractive to burglars. You most definitely should if you have already been subject to a burglary, just as you should learn a bit more about common scams if you have generally poor common sense (as I do, and I still manage not to give my bank account details out to every email that asks).

      No need to sign your name at the end of all your posts either.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    100. Re:Now That's Bizarre by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > People should really be taught about scams in school.

      Sorry, the government hates competition, otherwise we'd learn about all the variations of the Ponzi schemes: Insurance, Usury, and Taxes.

    101. Re:Now That's Bizarre by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Narcissists are paranoids who think the CIA or something is after them, despite the CIA not having any possible reason to be interested in them.

      Someone who thinks they local police are after them because he complained about them in town meeting is a good deal more reasonable.

      But, yes, at this point we've exchanged 'It's implausible for them to be monitoring you' with 'It's implausible for them to want to monitor you'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    102. Re:Now That's Bizarre by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I agree that the best answer is to teach common sense (which if you could solve that, you'd probably solve a lot of other issues with the education system). Barring that, you can only offer truisms and hope they sink in.

      "A fool and his money are soon parted."
      "No such thing as a free ride."
      etc.

    103. Re:Now That's Bizarre by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Because in most interpersonal relationships you're the stupid one, not the smart one."

      Tink? Is that you?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    104. Re:Now That's Bizarre by BigSes · · Score: 1

      Ironic that your user name is "Girlintraining" isn't it?

    105. Re:Now That's Bizarre by LWATCDR · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I suggest you become more discriminating in your selection of men. I mean that would just be rude to say to a lady.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    106. Re:Now That's Bizarre by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Or you have kids in your house. I imagine some people also want to hide it from their spouse, though mine's favorite line seems to be "Not tonight.. go watch some porn."

    107. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We now decide on whether or not someone gets to keep their money on the basis of how hard he / she worked to earn it??

      So the scammers should be allowed to keep the money, then?

    108. Re:Now That's Bizarre by ian_from_brisbane · · Score: 1

      Here you go Mr Anonymous... A news article to back it up. http://theweek.com/article/index/105766/Australias_small_breast_ban

    109. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the word order there was wrong.

    110. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see, the advantage of having $20 million around to lose is that you don't normally have to face the fact that life sucks, because that $20 million makes it a hell of a lot easier to make it suck for enough other people that you get to live a fairly comfortable existence.

      Citation needed.

      This delusion seems to be commonplace amongst the poor and stupid. I might be monetarily wealthy, but holy shit are you doing yourself disfavor by pretending that having assloads of cash means your life doesn't suck by default.

      Better to have problems and $20 million than problems without $20 million.

    111. Re:Now That's Bizarre by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Scams aren't new either--con men and grifters have been around for centuries. The advent of computers only made them more efficient, as it has done for just about everything.

    112. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he is.

    113. Re:Now That's Bizarre by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Other than a very high level overview of scamming techniques, what are you going to teach people in schools that will be relevant for the next 60+ years of their life?

      Healthy skepticism, sprinkled with a little paranoia

      Step 1 is to abandon the teaching of religion in schools then.

      Step 2 would be to ban religion altogether, but sadly I can't see that happening any time soon.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    114. Re:Now That's Bizarre by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I'm just flabbergasted that people can be so paranoid.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    115. Re:Now That's Bizarre by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, TFA makes a little fun about Opus Dei, featured in the Da Vinci Code being one of the supposed villains that are after him. Okay, that's a bit of a red flag, but Opus Dei do actually exist and are a sort of sub-cult within Catholicism. They've got their claws into various influential people and actually score moderately well on the Sinister Scale. Lower than Wahabism, bobbing along under Scientology, but certainly high above your run of the mill nutters.

      *sigh* I wonder how this got modded informative. I've met, worked and lived with people associated with Opus Dei. The worst you could ever accuse them of is being a bit out of touch with reality. The same could be said of any religious group. The founder of Opus Dei, Josemaria Escriva, a priest, was canonised by Pope JP2 (widely considered the best Pope of modern times). This is as high an endorsement the Catholic church will give a "sub-cult". I know that religion often gets a bashing on this site, but in this case it's quite unwarranted.

      Now I'm all for a bit of healthy debate, but your rhetoric sounds very like someone who's read the Da Vinci Code, and listened to all the hype it generated. I challenge you to find something official that connects Opus Dei to any political manoeuvring, child abuse, murder of it's members or extortion.

      I personally am not a member, or directly connected to them, but I do have friends and work colleagues who are, and I have to defend them as each and every one of them are among the nicest people you will ever meet.

    116. Re:Now That's Bizarre by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      true enough, I imagine.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    117. Re:Now That's Bizarre by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I can say I've never fallen victim to any of these scams. I find them always to either be too good to be true, or they use so much incorrect grammar and spelling that it can't possibly be legit, though the one you quoted would at least have me in thought for a while.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    118. Re:Now That's Bizarre by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      agreed.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    119. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I gave up my millions a decade ago. You're a little late, but there's a T-shirt as a consolation prize?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    120. Re:Now That's Bizarre by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      More and more I feel that people who are that paranoid and quick to believe conspiracies have an extrem form of narcism.

      You think paranoid people are undercover vice squad agents?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    121. Re:Now That's Bizarre by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      This delusion seems to be commonplace amongst the poor and stupid. I might be monetarily wealthy, but holy shit are you doing yourself disfavor by pretending that having assloads of cash means your life doesn't suck by default.

      Wanna know what is awesome about your 'problem'. You can fix it by simply walking away from wealth. Try walking away from poverty.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    122. Re:Now That's Bizarre by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      lol I can see why you are paranoid, seems you piss off enough people that they really ARE after you.

      It's more that I just don't want to risk pissing off anyone who handles my food. They already have the opportunity, I try not to give them a reason.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    123. Re:Now That's Bizarre by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Well I don't flatter myself that I got modded informative for any reason other than the usual "sounds confident" which usually supercedes all other reasons on Slashdot whether the poster is right or wrong. But I can reassure you that I've never read the Da Vinci code and I avoid any film with Tom Hanks in it like the Black Death.

      You know, you're actually right and I'll concede that I can't offer substantive proof of what I said. So I wont try to contest your opinions. They're actually more valid in some ways as they're based on your personal experiences. For what it's worth, some of my impressions are formed by an article in The Independent some years ago, but I don't have a copy or references, I'm afraid. So it may be that I spoke out of turn and you are correct. But I'll stay wary of closed, members only religious organizations that have government Ministers in their ranks, if you don't mind - that's just good practice.

      It is fair of you to challenge me on this. And I will keep an open mind on them here on. Just not so open that I'll watch a film with Tom Hanks in it, that is. ;)

      H.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  3. Just because... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    Just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean they are not out to get you(r money).

    1. Re:Just because... by drspliff · · Score: 1

      *ahem*

  4. This is why people should fix their own computers by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

    No worries about bad technicians trying to steal your money, just like if you do your own car work you don't have to worry about a bad mechanic trying to change the "headlight fluid."

  5. Well... by AnonGCB · · Score: 0, Troll

    More of a stupid tax than a scam, really.

    --
    http://CryoLANparty.com/ A lan I'm staff on!
    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a criminal.

  6. Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well at least now some amount of money is at hands of someone that deserves it *more*.

    1. Re:Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A trust-fund baby and his money are soon parted.

  7. That's better than convincing him he was in dream by microbee · · Score: 0, Redundant

    and he had to kill himself to wake up

  8. Rings a bell by Angst+Badger · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There's an old saying that's just on the tip of my tongue. Now what is it?

    Oh yeah, a fool and his money are soon parted.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  9. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by santax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes problem is, that in between fixing my guitar, my laptop, my tv and my fridge, I need to find some time to become skilled in fixing the hairdryer. My family wants some time from me. And the government wants me to put into some time to pay them for whatever service it is they tell me I just bought. In the end... I think I'd just let a qualified mechanic look at the car I transport my kids in ;)

  10. Just the gullible ones. by tempest69 · · Score: 1

    Btw, Thank you for your remittance, soon the Iranian shaw will be able to access his funds and reward your help handsomly.

  11. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No worries about bad technicians trying to steal your money, just like if you do your own car work you don't have to worry about a bad mechanic trying to change the "headlight fluid."

    Splitting your sentence between title of your message and the message itself is very annoying. Please stop.

  12. Deserved it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone dumb enough to fall for this deserves to be robbed of millions. I don't even think he should be re-compensated. Consider it an expensive lesson.

  13. Not creative enough. by ewhenn · · Score: 4, Informative

    We've been contacted by an alien named Lurg. He comes from the planet Xulton in the in the Doovi nebula. Lurg informed us, that unless you pay him... errr.. I mean us... $160,000 a month, he will steal your child and make him a slave in the Galvanium mines of Dooviburg. You may be tempted to contact the United States authorities about this, however, any contact with them will result in the immediate death of your son.

    Bet these chumps would fall for that too.

    1. Re:Not creative enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      L. Ron, is that you?

  14. And... by revscat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Trust fund baby gets taken to the cleaners by modern day Robin Hoods. The only reaction I can think worthy of this heinous act is...

    applause

    1. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo good sir, Bravo

    2. Re:And... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Robin Hood gave his stolen money to the poor. I don't think these guys will be doing that. They would steal from the poor as well if it seemed profitable. Scammers are the lowest form of humanity.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    3. Re:And... by mr100percent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's nothing wrong with being a trust fund baby. We all wanna be one, don't be jealous. What would you expect, you'd turn 18 and give it all away?

    4. Re:And... by Animaether · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up... although most of the reports on this story are copy/paste, I couldn't find a single one that actually stated where the money went. I would think that if they donated it to charity, that would be something to note in such a story. (not excluding the possibility, but there's no evidence that this is what happened as far as I can see).

    5. Re:And... by dfenstrate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is no 'Robin Hood' scenario, it's straight up theft & fraud. They should go to jail.

      Someone foolish enough to buy this sort of nonsense will lose all their money soon enough anyway. I'd rather that cash go to the engineers and line workers who produce fancy cars in Italy than a couple of con artists.

      I'm not sure where you have to hang out, and for how long, before you get confused about fraud, theft, lies and deceit, and why we shouldn't encourage this sort of thing.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    6. Re:And... by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse running a scam for personal enrichment with the bravery and virtue of a true revolutionary expropriation.

      Action with no philosophical backing is pretty empty, isn't it?

    7. Re:And... by kemapa · · Score: 1

      This is the dumbest post I've ever seen.

    8. Re:And... by sitarlo · · Score: 1

      It just chaps my hide that statements like this get scored 5 "insightful". Sounds like someone is jealous that their life sucks while others are living it up off of grandpa's J.R. Ewing-style success. I see by the lame sig that you are also a liberal. That explains your lack of ethics, wit, and class.

    9. Re:And... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's nothing wrong with being a trust fund baby. We all wanna be one, don't be jealous.

      But there is a hell of a lot wrong with a trust fund baby that's also a dumbass.
      It goes completely against the american ethic we all learned in civics class of rewarding excellence.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:And... by Ziekheid · · Score: 1

      How the hell did your post get a score 5 insightful. What is wrong with some people these days? Bitter people filled with jealousy.

    11. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half of Americans have an IQ under 100. Also, we all want our children to live more comfortably than we did.

    12. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd give away what I didn't need, yes.

    13. Re:And... by mkiwi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is parent +5 insightful? Being jealous of people with lots of money is not reason to mod this crap up.

      Look at it this way: These people took advantage of someone who had, obviously, some form of mental illness. Add to that he's technologically illiterate, and things don't look so good.

      Here's what the parent should have said:

      Trust fund baby gets taken to the cleaners by Bernie Madoff. The only reaction I can think worthy of this heinous act is... Well, I'm glad I got to vicariously stick it to "The Man."

      The parent poster needs medication as much as the victim.

    14. Re:And... by mr_mischief · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stealing from the poor is profitable. State lotteries, tobacco companies, and televangelists do it all the time.

    15. Re:And... by johncadengo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe we shouldn't punish a person for being born poor. No one has a choice about who their parents would be.

      But by that same token we shouldn't punish someone for being born rich either.

      --
      My page.
    16. Re:And... by sitarlo · · Score: 1

      Nicely put.

    17. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, GP just has to pick different example from the legends then. Like the revered brigands Romulus and Remus, who, when caught, came up with a story of being princes, and proceeded to found Rome.

    18. Re:And... by Nemyst · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're con artists. Are you saying you don't want artists to get their fair share of the work they produce? Are you valuing automobile design more than the incredible art of conning? It takes skill and cunning to be a con artist, something which very few people have. You should respect their profession instead of denigrating it as "fraud".

      Ah! Artists are never really understood by the masses.

    19. Re:And... by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I know you're probably joking but con artists are not really "artists" in the sense that it generally takes true skill and cunning to successfully pull of a con. I think the biggest part is having the basic lack of respect and not caring about what is legal. Caring about whether or not you get caught probably doesn't factor into the decision making process. I think many very law-abiding Slashdotters and the general public can with very little effort pull of a con job. Its just 1) they respect others 2) respect the law 3) like their life enough they don't want to spend a lot of time in prison etc.

      Just one example (though this is a much bigger one, there are probably thousands of smaller con jobs pulled off every day):
      You can't possibly convince me that, all the people who bought sub-prime mortgages for example (which I think was a form of a con job .... legal or not) was because they were stupid or slow. There's some rather wealthy, middle to upper class people that got rolled up into the mess and lost their houses.

    20. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Please mod parent Troll or at least Flamebait.

    21. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very nicely put.

    22. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with some people these days is that rising income inequity makes the poor more envious and hateful of the rich.

      When the income distribution is reasonable it's more like a pyramid. When the income distribution is like a plutocracy it's more like an obelisk on a plain. Which do you think is safer for those on top?

    23. Re:And... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Robin Hood was running a guerrilla campaign against the nobility in the area. Of course he gave money to the poor. They would have ratted him out otherwise.

    24. Re:And... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It's very simple. You are rewarding the parents' excellence, not the kid's. The reward is that they can fund several succeeding generations and their line will flourish.

      If the kid squanders it, well, that's just punishing the complete lack of excellence. Should fortunes be protected from squandering by their owners just so that the gentry never fall and the commoners never rise? Seems backwards to me.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    25. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Out of those, only the televangelists are stealing. Both the lottery and the tobacco companies tell you, quite truthfully, exactly what you are going to get for your money.

    26. Re:And... by mr_mischief · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm so glad you put your karma on the line there. How's mine? "Excellent"!

      BTW, I didn't say all liberals followed that or that all members of your beloved Democrat or Social Democrat or Green or Socialist or People's or Worker's or whatever party were "ultimate liberal" politicians.

      I said it was the "ultimate liberal goal", which if you look at the most leftist politicians is pretty accurate.

    27. Re:And... by sustik · · Score: 1

      I do not want to encourage it. However, I do not want the police and court system deal with this and spend tax dollars.

      I would be ok with a social contract that says that we do not deal with such talk you out of your money scammers and pyramid schemes etc. If you get scammed due to your own gullibility, you are on your own: scam them back, whatever.

      The guy had too much money it seems. He did not go bankrupt as a result. He is not starving. So what is the big deal? They told him Opus Dei is after him. Come on...

      Maybe we should go after such scammers after all, but all costs should be paid from the recovered loot. Even better: the recovered money the scammers talked their victims out of could go to a fund 100%, financing public education and awareness.

      I just do not want to remove the individual responsibility toward being sensible in money matters and replace it with reliance on the court system instead.

    28. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. You wouldn't.
      There are lot of news stories about rich people giving away their fortunes near the end of life. Find me one about a rich 18 year old giving it all away. It does not happen.

    29. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're new here, aren't you

    30. Re:And... by the_humeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except none of those examples you gave is an example of "stealing from the poor." Those examples are people willingly giving money to those entities. No one is putting a gun to people's heads and telling them to buy lottery tickets, smoke tobacco, or give money to televangelists.

    31. Re:And... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      "Stealing by fraud" is a crime in some places. What you're talking about is robbery, not theft. A plain theft would be sneaking around and taking it without force.

      Who's the pedant now?

    32. Re:And... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Just because he fell for it doesn't make him a dumbass. Sure it sounds silly in one paragrah but they had 6 years to elaborate on the story. A few well placed actors every few months would be enough to convince almost anyone of a conspiracy. Reminds me of that Michael Douglas movie The Game.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    33. Re:And... by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Definition of steal - look at the first one:

      to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right, esp. secretly or by force

      Your original examples are not this.

    34. Re:And... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      The article is extremely light on details, we dont know how elaborate the scam got. For example, if I noticed a few priests (aka actors off craigslist) following me over the course of months or years and you told me Opus Dei was out to get me I'd probably start believing it too.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    35. Re:And... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      fraud is basically theft through deceit.

      I'm really sorry you think tobacco companies saying their drug is not addictive while knowing it was and being forced by the government to put only a minimal and incomplete description of medial problems smoking can cause on their product packaging is telling people exactly what they are getting. Did you mother smoke during her pregnancy with you or something?

      Lotteries all the time state a jackpot winnings total, then tell you you must leave the money in an annuity under their control to get that amount if you win. If you want the money upon winning, they take half or so before they even take the taxes out. They advertise how much they're going to help the schools or roads or whatever, but a huge amount of the money goes to run the lottery itself and you're lucky if your state doesn't appropriate part of the funds for some other expense. Yeah, the odds of winning are stated clearly in the fine print, but what the lottery actually supports probably isn't.

      Also, would you pleas learn that a dictionary of everyday terms bears little semblance to the definitions you'd find in the criminal codes of your state or in a legal dictionary?

    36. Re:And... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You wanted a Republic but now you are getting clueless feudalism and others that are effectively royalty. When Dick Cheney visited my country he demanded vastly more fuss and pompous bullshit than was ever rolled out for any of Queen Elizabeth's visits.

    37. Re:And... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There are lot of news stories about rich people giving away their fortunes near the end of life.

      GP's point exactly. If you're going to die soon, you don't need much money.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    38. Re:And... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Sure it sounds silly in one paragrah but they had 6 years to elaborate on the story.

      All the more time for him to do a sanity check and have someone else verify the story.
      It's not just the money but the fact the guy thought his life was in danger and yet he didn't bring in some independent security guys to evaluate the risk.
      He is a dumbass.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    39. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the american ethic we all learned in civics class of rewarding excellence.

      Wow, there really is more propaganda in the states than I could ever imagine. Explains a lot... really does.

    40. Re:And... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Wow, there really is more propaganda in the states than I could ever imagine. Explains a lot... really does.

      Do you really have a problem with indoctrinating children with high ideals?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    41. Re:And... by DrXym · · Score: 1

      None of your examples are "stealing", although televangelists almost by definition solicit money under false pretenses.

    42. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe there's a reason they're poor...

    43. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No one is putting a gun to people's heads and telling them to buy lottery tickets, smoke tobacco, or give money to televangelists.

      You are damn lucky for not having born into the 1950's Eastern Europe. Communist dictatorship was literally taking away people who refused to "voluntarily" lend their money the the national "Bekekolcson" (i.e. Peace Lease) program.

      The people were very poor after all that WWII destruction and the commie gov't, having refused to join the US-led Marshall Plan aid programme, went on to disappropriate a large portion of the people's monthly wage to finance re-industrialization and re-militarization to fullfill Moscow's WW3 readiness dream.

      Of coure the money people lent to the "peace lease" plan was never reimbursed and few of those who dared to compain ever returned from the internment labour camps... It was one of the main igniting reasons of the 1956 hungarian anti-judeo-communist uprising and revolution.

      Freedom is a precious thing and easy to lose!

    44. Re:And... by delinear · · Score: 1

      That's odd - because in their TV ads, the lottery company over here only ever show the "winner" basking on a beach or a yacht somewhere. You'd think, with all their honesty, and the ridiculously small chances of winning, all their adverts would show the people who don't win (and every 1 in 1.4 million ads would show someone actually winning). In fact, the bit of text telling you your actual odds of winning is microscopic on the back of the ticket, while all the posters proclaiming "IT COULD BE YOU!" and talking about how high this week's jackpot is are huge and plastered everywhere. It's a form of truth, I guess, but they're really pushing the boundaries.

    45. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't put a gun to the head of the guy in this story either...

    46. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily this guy gets to experience both. Seriously, though, while I don't think he "deserved" what he got, I have to think someone with that much money is much better placed to protect themselves. Hire a personal advisor if you can't make your own important life decisions, for god's sake. What would it have cost him to expose this whole thing? Hire a private investigator for a few hundred dollars to check out the story? Speak to someone with a modicum of common sense? Report the threat to his life to the police?

    47. Re:And... by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Also, even if they put all of the information on the lottery ticket, it still would not be good enough in my books, because people are living with the impression that they are doing it just for fun. In my mind, they deserve what they get, but that isn't to say that it isn't fraud. The lottery companies are conveying that it is just clean fun, that gives people a chance at a bazillion doll hairs [oops, you have to read the fine print], but they really are taking advantage of the poor. Society is worse off, because these poor people are now going to ask charities and government for free handouts.

    48. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy willingly gave away his money too...

    49. Re:And... by HeckRuler · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And there's nothing wrong with being born poor, other then an elevated tendency to grow up into a crack-addled homeless and jobless loser. Indeed it's a lot like being born rich. There's nothing wrong with it other then an elevated tendancy to be a spoiled useless brat who's a drain to society. Or worse, a boss.

    50. Re:And... by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      fraud is basically theft through deceit.

      That's fair enough.

      I'm really sorry you think tobacco companies saying their drug is not addictive while knowing it was and being forced by the government to put only a minimal and incomplete description of medial problems smoking can cause on their product packaging is telling people exactly what they are getting. Did you mother smoke during her pregnancy with you or something?

      Ad hominem is a great way to make an argument. No actually, it is not. But with regard to smoking tobacco, in this day and age, people still smoke regardless of their knowledge of how bad it is for them. People know it causes cancer and emphysema, yet they still do it anyway. They start in high school, knowing full well how bad it is. Now tell me, did anyone force these people to start smoking?

      Lotteries all the time state a jackpot winnings total, then tell you you must leave the money in an annuity under their control to get that amount if you win. If you want the money upon winning, they take half or so before they even take the taxes out. They advertise how much they're going to help the schools or roads or whatever, but a huge amount of the money goes to run the lottery itself and you're lucky if your state doesn't appropriate part of the funds for some other expense. Yeah, the odds of winning are stated clearly in the fine print, but what the lottery actually supports probably isn't.

      I don't see the fraud in this problem. The odds are clearly written there. To win the jackpot it's 1 in 10 million or so (or even less of a chance). If that is something that people who participate in lotteries doesn't understand, then that is their problem. I echo the same sentiments that most people here do: lotteries are a tax on people with poor math skills.

      Also, would you pleas learn that a dictionary of everyday terms bears little semblance to the definitions you'd find in the criminal codes of your state or in a legal dictionary?

      Except your original post made absolutely no mention of state or federal definitions.

    51. Re:And... by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      He gave his money away under false pretenses. People who smoke know full well the consequences of their actions. People who participate know the odds. Although it's debatable with regards to televangelists.

    52. Re:And... by ZaphDingbat · · Score: 1

      But of the three, the televangelist is doing it under false pretenses.

    53. Re:And... by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      That is one of the reasons why I think some type of estate tax is important. If you have more money than you, your kids, their kids, their kids kids (forever) can spend, what incentive is there for that family to ever rise to excellence again.

      I don't like seeing an estate tax applied on smaller things, like farms, but multi-billion dollar funds, heck yes.

    54. Re:And... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I don't like seeing an estate tax applied on smaller things, like farms, but multi-billion dollar funds, heck yes.

      The estate-tax hit on small farmers is mostly a myth promulgated by the people with multi-billion dollar funds.
      http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3223

      I was unable to find an anti-estate tax analysis anywhere near as thorough as that pro-estate tax report, they were all pretty much smoke, mirrors and hyperbole.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    55. Re:And... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      No one is putting a gun to people's heads and telling them to buy lottery tickets, smoke tobacco, or give money to televangelists.

      I'd agree with you on all counts but the last. At best, televangelists claim they will remove a third party's gun from your head, much like this very scam in fact.

    56. Re:And... by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Good to know, thanks.

      There are so many half-truths and outright lies in media/think tanks these days, that it's hard to keep up.

    57. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're con artists. Are you saying you don't want artists to get their fair share of the work they produce?

      Yeah! They need a body to represent them and their interests. Hmm... how about the Ripoff Industry Association of (Con) Artists.

    58. Re:And... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      The odds of a lottery and whether the beneficiaries of the lottery funds ever see a dime of it are two very different matters. I thought I pointed out which I was talking about earlier. Some state lotteries pay a pittance to what they say they support. That's misrepresentation, because some people don't mind the long odds if it's "for the schools". Except that the bulk of that money is a jobs bill to run the lottery offices, and the rest may get appropriated away to other state expenses.

      I didn't actually argue from ad hominem about the cigarettes. I made a point then threw in the attack besides. It wasn't necessary for the point. It was a gratuitous attack. I actually meant it in jest, but reading back over it I realize I utterly failed to get that tone through in writing. Sorry about that.

      When discussing laws and crimes, I tend to think the language of the laws and crimes matters. Politicians and lawyers have their own jargon, and it helps to know some of it even if you're a regular Joe since the laws pertain to everyone in their jurisdiction. The vocabulary of that jargon often names well-defined concepts confusingly similar to but not synonymous with a looser general usage of basically the same words. I was maybe too harsh harping on that. Sorry again. However, you're the one who brought definitions into the discussion. I thought it'd be helpful to point out that your source was not a single, final authoritative source. My particular wording was less than helpful, but you were pretty aggressive in your statements, too.

      So, when we are both being more detached and civil, we agree a little more but still not completely. It's funny how that tends to happen when discussions get heated, isn't it? I have no hard feelings over it. Maybe we'll go back and forth again on some topic, but with a little less friction.

  15. There's a place in the world for naive people by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

    A counterpoint to the obvious: there's a place in the world for generous, naive people. They are GOOD people, generally.

    It's a goddamned shame that scam artists take advantage of them.

    1. Re:There's a place in the world for naive people by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      I don't really know of any reason to assume that naivete automatically indicates generosity or goodness.

    2. Re:There's a place in the world for naive people by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      You just gave me a wonderful mental image of Homer Simpson tapping his fingers together, Burns-style, and gloating. "Yes, yes," he murmurs through an evil grin. "I will control Springfield by buying up all the Twinkies in the Quickie-Mart."

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    3. Re:There's a place in the world for naive people by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Did you try looking at your intuition?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    4. Re:There's a place in the world for naive people by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      The opposite. People who are eager to see the best in others are usually fooled and exploited by people who only pretend to be good.

    5. Re:There's a place in the world for naive people by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      comprehension fail.

      i would say that good people tend to be a bit naive, but it doesn't hold that naive people are necessarily always good.

    6. Re:There's a place in the world for naive people by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      comprehension fail.

      You need to get your fucking English checked, friend.

  16. Stupid Tax v. Scam by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > More of a stupid tax than a scam, really.

    Which is, in and of itself, an interesting dichotomy. To what extent should the law protect those who don't protect themselves? That's an issue comes up in false advertising cases, in tort cases, in welfare issues, in tax policy, and generally throughout society, as soon as you decide there will be rule of law. Do we defend someone against malicious speech? Against the elements? Do we care if they could have diffused a situation with a kind word and instead chose to be belligerent and got punched in the nose? Do we feel differently if the nose hit belongs to a woman or a man or a child or a dog? A multimillionaire should be able to protect himself, but then, if it's inherited, he may have no nose for it. Or if he's only used to dealing with reputable companies, he may be hoodwinked.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Stupid Tax v. Scam by AnonGCB · · Score: 0

      I'd say that this (being a scam) should be categorized with fake antivirus programs and the like. This one is just particularly expensive.

      Now, what that implies is up to you all - I would argue that it's the victim's fault and the government should not be involved, except for perhaps a judge in a civil court rather than a criminal one.

      --
      http://CryoLANparty.com/ A lan I'm staff on!
    2. Re:Stupid Tax v. Scam by pspahn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wrong. This is racketeering plain and simple. Possibly well targeted racketeering, but still the same. Haven't you ever believed something wasn't true? Should people be allowed to maliciously target others with stories defined by false pretenses?

      Using someone's fear of further harm to extort money is not all that different than the mob coming in and telling you pay up or else. Throw these crooks in jail.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    3. Re:Stupid Tax v. Scam by AnonGCB · · Score: 0

      Racketeering means that the scammers would have murdered the victim - or at least inflicted bodily harm - but they didn't, and I highly doubt they would have.

      --
      http://CryoLANparty.com/ A lan I'm staff on!
    4. Re:Stupid Tax v. Scam by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      Check your dictionary. A racket is nothing more than an illegal business. Racketeering is therefore exactly what they just did.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    5. Re:Stupid Tax v. Scam by gnapster · · Score: 1

      Of course they would not have harmed him; they were being paid handsomely to keep him safe!

    6. Re:Stupid Tax v. Scam by wrook · · Score: 1

      Using someone's fear of further harm to extort money is not all that different than the mob coming in and telling you pay up or else.

      What about to win an election?

      Throw these crooks in jail.

      If only...

  17. Paranoia, paranoia, everybody's coming to get me by guyminuslife · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, Mr. Davidson, they are out to get you. You just misunderstood who they are.

    Naivete and paranoia are a dangerous combination.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  18. Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by m93 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A friend of mine was renting a room in the house of a lady who lived down the street from me. She had been suckered into a Nigerian 419 scam, was convinced that the people she was communicating with were "Good Christians", and sent them about $30,000. When she took out a loan against her home, her daughters attempted to intervene with the courts to declare her incapable of managing her assets. She ended up losing the house and all her money, and my friend lost his room. She was a nice old lady whose mind was starting to go, and unfortunately was taken advantage of by some cold bastards. Don't mock too hard, it could be someone you love or even you one day.

    1. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by guyminuslife · · Score: 0

      I feel bad for the lady, but it really is as simple as stupid. You could lobotomize half my brain and I still wouldn't fall for that kind of thing. And I'm not all that smart to begin with.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    2. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by santax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Come on, I hear this all the time. That would never happen to me... It always happens to someone else. I got news for you. Not all criminals are stupid. Most aren't. And if 1 guy can get a complete bank to fall (and this happened multiple times in history by now) with all their know-how and security and yet you still aren't vulnerable? Think again mate. You will be ripped off when someone wants to put the effort in. And you won't know what hit you until it's too late.

    3. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can be conned. Most people can be conned under the right circumstances. A guy like Bernie Madoff could probably con the shit out of me, if I had the money to be worth conning. It's not a question of invulnerability. It's a question of standards. Nigerian princes just don't cut it.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    4. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by TheLink · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What makes you so confident your mind will work that well with half your brain gone? Or when you've got dementia?

      Have you ever seen what happens to people who get age-onset dementia? The changes in behaviour are often very significant.

      Might make sense if you're not really using that particular half of your brain in the first place, but that'll be a rare case.

      --
    5. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen what happens to people who get age-onset dementia?

      Yes. And lobotomies. I certainly agree that a person with advanced dementia shouldn't be managing their financial assets. I'm not familiar with the facts there; I may have been too glib.

      That being said, I think a lot of other facilities would go first, before the Nigerian prince thing seems plausible. I suppose my prejudice is that if someone were seemingly capable of living outside of a nursing home, then they would at least maintain a facility for, if not making particularly sound financial decisions, at least not making phenomenally bad ones. I figure it it were me, I'd lose the capacity to actually remember the email, go to the bank, get the loan, and wire it to Prince Fareed long before I lost the capacity to second-guess the decision (at least, by consulting a family member). But maybe I'm wrong.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    6. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by sustik · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of us are frustrated that there is no prevention in these cases. If someone can fall for a 419 or similar, then their loved ones should have made the steps necessary to prevent any potential harm. For those who have nobody to care for them in such manner, society could provide. I would rather spend money on that than on the cops and courts chasing scammers afterwards...

      The guy in the article had more money than intellect. He believed Opus Dei is after him... Come on...

      Maybe he can write a book about how stupid he was and the other simpletons will buy it up and he gets his $20 million back...

    7. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone with a family member with a form of dementia, I can tell you that yes, you are wrong.

      This family member has developed paranoia and a number of delusions, causing her to grossly mismanage her sizable savings. However, she is still performing the ordinary activities that retired people do.

      Have you ever known someone with schizophrenia? They can simultaneously believe that George Bush calls them on their cell phone every evening while holding a job and living a life that seems normal on the surface.

      There is ample evidence that one can retain the ability to do procedures (even complex ones) while losing the ability to discriminate between rational, irrational, and delusional thoughts.

    8. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      There are all sorts of ways brains can malfunction or function suboptimally. I've heard of cases where people get brain damage and seem very functional except they can no longer easily learn from mistakes. Or have no fear of losses: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8504605.stm

      The problem the State and people around you have is at which point does it become right to take your freedom away from you? By the time you are far gone enough, all your money could be gone.

      Because most people aren't wise with managing their money (me included). So it's hard to tell the difference :).

      I've seen parents give their money and property to their eldest son who then screws them (kicks them out of the house), and in the end its the daughter (who got nothing from the parents) who takes care of them.

      So it's very messy. After all, you might "in sound mind and body" decide to give it all to your beloved cat (or porn-star), and not to your "good for nothing children and grandchildren". And you'd do the same thing even if you had the same brain function as when you were in your 20s.

      --
    9. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by wrook · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Usually all it takes to con someone is to tell them you love them...

    10. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Then you should see some of the phishing emails that have been doing the rounds over the last 18 months- 2 years. The phishers have really upped their game.

      I'm making a huge generalisation here, but as far as the better phishing scams go - well, gone are the spelling mistakes, gone is the poor-quality logo attached to the email, gone is the demand that you email them through a hotmail address and gone is the "From:" address being something obviously unrelated to the company that's contacting you. In some cases, they're not even phishing for bank details. They're phishing for ebay, paypal and even facebook details as part of a wider scam.

      I can well imagine someone falling for many of them - someone who would see straight through a Nigerian 419 or a poor-quality "enter you're login details ok plz" email. Email needs public key cryptography to become widely adopted, but right now very few web-based providers offer decent support for it - and desktop application support is almost as bad. Where the application supports it, it makes such a pigs' ear of the interface that nobody but the uber-geek would go near it.

    11. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by Inda · · Score: 1

      Top criminals are the most intelligent people around.

      About 10 years ago I took one of those intelligent and aptitude tests. I was being laid off and the company, trying to smooth things over, helped me to find new work. This wasn't an ordinary test, it took three days.

      The results unsurprisingly showed I was a clever chap. Spatial awareness off the chart. Handwriting the worst the examiner had ever seen. Mental arithmetic better than most people's calculator skills.

      Top job "recommended": Master criminal
      Next job: entrepreneur

      It's a shame that I'm so lazy.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    12. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I've seen parents give their money and property to their eldest son who then screws them (kicks them out of the house), and in the end its the daughter (who got nothing from the parents) who takes care of them.

      So it's very messy. After all, you might "in sound mind and body" decide to give it all to your beloved cat (or porn-star), and not to your "good for nothing children and grandchildren". And you'd do the same thing even if you had the same brain function as when you were in your 20s.

      That's a problem. Even if someone knows s/he isn't able to make good decisions, they might not know who to turn to. The parents obviously trusted Junior, otherwise they wouldn't have given him everything in the first place. Equally obvious, after the fact, is that trusting him was a mistake.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    13. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran across a con on Craigslist the other day. We were moving, and looking for new places to rent. One of the houses we inquired about got a response that was basically "Sure! I'm out of the country, and need somebody to move in and take care of the place. Give me your basic information and a deposit, and I'll send you the keys."

      It was fishy and too good of a price. We dug a little, and found that the scammer was pulling houses that were for sale, and posting them as rental properties without the owner's knowledge. We called the real estate agent, and he said he had been already contacted by a half-dozen people.

      If the scammer had been a little more professional, a little smarter, and been more realistic overall, he could easily have suckered a few people in.

    14. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      There was a recent article in the New York Times that said one of the first things to go with dementia and Alzheimer's is in fact the ability to manage money: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/health/healthspecial/31finances.html

    15. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by laray88 · · Score: 1

      I can be conned. Most people can be conned under the right circumstances. A guy like Bernie Madoff could probably con the shit out of me, if I had the money to be worth conning. It's not a question of invulnerability. It's a question of standards. Nigerian princes just don't cut it.

      Absolutely, a lot of folks can be conned. Look at all the folks who voted for Obama in 2008.

    16. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      OhOh! Just how old do you have to be to have dementia/Alzheimers?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    17. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by guyminuslife · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay. I am sufficiently chastised.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    18. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you can con them all night long...

    19. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, a lot of folks can be conned. Look at all the folks who voted in 2008.

      FTFY.

    20. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot cheat an honest man. If you are true to yourself, you know when you are being conned. Must people ignore this inner voice because of greed. That is how the Nigerian and other scams succeed. Of course there are exceptions to this but most of the time, it is just greed.

    21. Re:Wish it was just as simple as stupid.. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      I love you.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  19. Isn't that scam called Scientology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We've been contacted by an alien named Lurg. He comes from the planet Xulton in the in the Doovi nebula. Lurg informed us, that unless you pay him... errr.. I mean us... $160,000 a month, he will steal your child and make him a slave in the Galvanium mines of Dooviburg. You may be tempted to contact the United States authorities about this, however, any contact with them will result in the immediate death of your son.

    That's not creative at all. You just ripped off L. Ron HubbleBubble and changed the names

    1. Re:Isn't that scam called Scientology? by gnapster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does not need to be creative. It only needs to be convincing.

  20. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

    That's absurd, there's a difference between "I need to defrag your monitor, only costs 100$!" and "Give me 160k$ per month so I can stop bolivian kidnappers".

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  21. Can you con an honest man? by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The New York Times has a more in-depth article on this case, and it seems strange indeed.

    There's an old saying: "You can't con an honest man." Most cons work because they prey on the victim's own greed or baser emotions. I wonder how much of this was going on in this case?

    The Times article contains a few choice tidbits. Apparently, once he got into cahoots with the scammers, Mr. Davidson got involved with some plot of theirs to sue Wachovia Bank for mismanaging Davidson's trust fund, among other things. That sounds suspiciously like the classic con, where you give the con man some of your money in return for the promise that he'll get you lots more money later.

    If nothing else, Davidson does sound a little credulous, and possibly mentally ill. The scammers told him his life was supposedly in danger from a group of Polish priests with ties to Opus Dei, whom the scammers told him had a plan to overthrow the United States government. How plausible is that? But then, if you were already rabidly anti-Catholic, it might sound very plausible. Most of us probably wouldn't believe there was an international conspiracy on our lives in the first place, no matter how rich we were; but if you were mentally unstable with delusions of grandeur, you might.

    The final paragraph of the NYT article says Davidson's outgoing voicemail message says, “If you leave an ad or any other such message, your telephone wire will be fried automatically.” Who would claim such a thing? You might as well say you're going to report them to the Men in Black.

    It seems to me that if Davidson was thinking clearly, none of this would have played out the way it did -- but I guess we knew that already.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Can you con an honest man? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the scammer uses the right approach, anyone can be conned. The ones who think they are too smart are usually easy marks.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    2. Re:Can you con an honest man? by turing_m · · Score: 1

      There's an old saying: "You can't con an honest man."

      I always thought that was said by cons to honest men so that the mark would start to let their guard down. People who are too trusting (usually honest) tend to fall prey to cons. If you constantly analyze every which way a person can screw you over, you tend not to get conned very often. Honesty (a tendency not to screw over others, especially by deceit) should be orthogonal to cautiousness (or paranoia, if you prefer).

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    3. Re:Can you con an honest man? by khallow · · Score: 1

      There's an old saying: "You can't con an honest man." Most cons work because they prey on the victim's own greed or baser emotions. I wonder how much of this was going on in this case?

      While I'm sure there's some truth to it, I see the saying more as an elaborate rationalization, possibly at the cultural level. After all, if police entrap me into, say, committing a drug crime (maybe an undercover agent sidles up and hands me a lit joint which I proceed to puff), is it fair to say, "Sure, police entrapment is bad, but most of the people who fall for it are crooks at heart."? Most of society might answer "yes" (and for that matter be comfortable with the idea of police entrapment), but it still remains that entrapment means that police would be encouraging people to commit crimes that they otherwise wouldn't commit.

      Even as a cautionary tale, this would have limited value. Don't be "mentally unstable with delusions of grandeur"? I better write that down in case I forget. There's a saying that I've read: "It is not humane to expose people to too much temptation." I think it's too easy to focus the victim's foibles and forget that even if people occasionally act like greedy idiots, doesn't mean they always are. It's possible here that the fraudsters in question may have by worming their way into his confidence, made his mental problems worse, and created the conditions for most of the con. Keep in mind that they were working on this guy for several years.

      How would you fare if an associate were secretly planning to weaken you mentally? How about romantic attention from an attractive member of the appropriate sex which could lead to blackmail? Generally everyone has some sort of weakness that can be exploited (if only enough incentive were in place to bother). We can't protect everyone from themselves, but we can go after the people who do the cons. As I see it, fraud in a sense is a lot like the idea of rule by the strong. Focusing on the weaknesses of chumps in a sense is rule by cunning. That strikes me as one of the biggest problems with modern society. Namely, that we are ruled not by the strongest, but by the best con men.

    4. Re:Can you con an honest man? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      from a group of Polish priests with ties to Opus Dei, whom the scammers told him had a plan to overthrow the United States government.

      Oh hey, you just came up with the next Dan Brown novel!

    5. Re:Can you con an honest man? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      The conspiracy allegedly involved a mysterious hard drive in a remote village of Honduras and a plot to infiltrate the United States government by Polish priests linked to Opus Dei.

      Just how smart do you have to be to tell this is a lie?

      Everyone knows the white house is controlled by the Jews, that is why a Muslim is running it... eh what?

      A lot of conspiracies just don't make sense. Those that believe in them might call themselves smart but they aren't. By definition, a person who believes stupid things, isn't smart.

      It is the same with the saying "You can't con an honest man". And no, this is NOT said by con men. The people who question this saying just don't want to admit they are not honest men.

      How can you accept to help funnel vast sums of money out of country were people are starving to death to make yourself rich? ANY person who even considers doing that is not just a dishonest person but a not very person as well. But that is hard to admit if you fiddle your own taxes.

      You really can't con an honest smart person, because an honest smart person will always ask himself, "why me?". Why are you asking me, Joe Nobody, to funnel millions out of a country. Why would I, Joe Nobody be targetted by Polisch priests out to overthrow the US government? Why would you sell me something you can sell anywhere else legally for far more? Why are you offering me 20% off, all the time, if that always applies, isn't the real price just 20% lower?

      Scams are easy to detect, you just have to let go off the idea "I am special and deserve to have special things happen to me".

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    6. Re:Can you con an honest man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously the approach used on Mr. Davidson won't work on you. This con was probably specifically targeted at Mr. Davidson, based on what they found on his computer. I can imagine there to be a lot of very private information and thoughts there. Only one person needs to believe the con. Your 'Why am I special'-test does not work for Mr. Davidson. He is rich, well-known, probably well-connected... special things happen to him all the time. He knows very little about technology, but hidden interests and high-level politics are possibly far more common in his life than in that of most of us. That might lead him to believe such a conspiracy story.
      For a typical Slashdot-reader a different con would be used: pretty girls seems interested, gets you to by her and her friends a round of drinks, then ignores you all evening...

    7. Re:Can you con an honest man? by eulernet · · Score: 1

      Most cons work because they prey on the victim's own greed or baser emotions.

      Sorry, but you are wrong.

      I just had a water leak, and have been conned by a plumber (it cost me $100 more), as you'll be if you ever need a plumber.

    8. Re:Can you con an honest man? by delinear · · Score: 1

      It is the same with the saying "You can't con an honest man". And no, this is NOT said by con men. The people who question this saying just don't want to admit they are not honest men.

      How can you accept to help funnel vast sums of money out of country were people are starving to death to make yourself rich? ANY person who even considers doing that is not just a dishonest person but a not very person as well. But that is hard to admit if you fiddle your own taxes.

      You really can't con an honest smart person, because an honest smart person will always ask himself, "why me?". Why are you asking me, Joe Nobody, to funnel millions out of a country. Why would I, Joe Nobody be targetted by Polisch priests out to overthrow the US government? Why would you sell me something you can sell anywhere else legally for far more? Why are you offering me 20% off, all the time, if that always applies, isn't the real price just 20% lower?

      Here in the UK, charities often have drives to collect unwanted clothing. They'll post plastic bags through doors explaining what it's about, and on a set day they'll drive around and collect the bags up. Scammers have started posting their own bags with fake charity details. People are so used to the system it's second nature to put unwanted clothes in there and leave it outside. This is a con, plain and simple, yet the people falling for it are not only honest, they're also largely people who want to do good, and are not necessarily stupid either (unless you know exactly what to look for you have no easy way to tell the genuine charities from the scammers). Saying an honest man cannot be scammed is just lulling honest men into a false sense of security.

    9. Re:Can you con an honest man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easily. All it takes is a pair of tits and some tears. You can be the most honest man in the world but still fall for a girl, and at that point nothing else matters. You do what you can to help her out because she makes you feel so great when you do, and suddenly you don't have any money.

      Whether you limit this to traditional con artists (girl's scamming guys out of their life savings) or the more common place relationships ("if you loved me you'd buy me that ring to show it", "lets go do {this} (btw you're paying)", etc)...thats up to how many times you've had your heart broken.

    10. Re:Can you con an honest man? by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      Of course you can con honest people.

      Just not with the same stoies that you con dishonest people.

      Perhaps you should read up on the types of cons out there.

      I imagine that most of the people Bernie Madoff conned, for example, were generally honest.

      The people who question this saying just don't want to admit they are not honest men.

      Get a grip, or you may end up being conned yourself.

      Your philosophy certainly leads me to think that will happen, eventually, if only as Karma for all the honest people you believe are dishonest because they were conned.

      Regards.

  22. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by guyminuslife · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, yeah, but a good mechanic will do it properly. That's why you pay extra. Personally I'm not very good with cars and I don't have time to change the headlight fluid every six months, but I am concerned about driving at night when the headlights aren't ionized properly.

    You should see my mechanic; he's not the cheapest but he'll fix problems with your car you didn't even know you had, and that other guys aren't sharp enough to notice.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  23. Re:Paranoia, paranoia, everybody's coming to get m by Ancantus · · Score: 1

    Naivete and paranoia are a dangerous combination.

    And Naivete and paranoia and lots of money is a profitable business venture.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. -- Isaac Asimov
  24. Another win for Trickle-Down economics.... by Allnighte · · Score: 1

    1) Man earns millions from oil industry.
    2) He dies.
    3) His son inherits the money.
    4) His son dies.
    5) His grandson inherits the money.
    6) His grandson gets scammed and loses the money.
    7) His grandson's scammers spend some of the money.
    8) His grandson's lawyers are paid to fight the scammers.
    9) His grandson's lawyers buy a new Mercedes.

    See? It *does* trickle down! It just takes 2 generations and some scamming to get it spread around!

  25. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by similar_name · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everything is not black and white. To say essentially 'because I cannot know everything I should know nothing' is not much of an excuse. Nobody has to be a certified mechanic to know when your mechanic is screwing you, just like nobody needs to program in cobol to know that when your 'tech' asks for 160k a month you might want a second opinion.

  26. GeekSquad by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

    Maybe he thought they were "real" agents because of the badges they wear. :)

  27. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why modded Flamebait? Perfectly valid point. I do consider myself a nerd but I think it's ridiculous that so many nerds expect everyone else to "know" that much about computers. Yeah, maybe they need to increase awareness globally but accept that there are limitations. Think of how many ppl in the world know how to drive (car, truck, van) or ride (bicycle, motorcycle, moped) - and now, how many of them do you think can actually a) Fix a tyre or b) know what a busted carburetter sounds like? I could go on with the car analogy. The most I would expect a car owner to know is how to do a rolling/push/cold start on a car when the battery is low/dead.

    There's a reason we trust mechanics - even if we know there's a risk involved with them trying to cheat us. Now consider the cost of yearly warranties with legit outfits to fix computers - they usually cost way too much and even with 1-2 failures a year, exceed the cost of the replacement parts. So you end up going to your local mom & pop shop. PS: They don't become _your_ local mom & pop shop until you've gone there at least the first time.

    The reason this guy got screwed out of so much money has little to do with his lack of knowledge about computers.

  28. stupid people... by Odinlake · · Score: 1

    "Stupid people shouldn't have money anyway", to paraphrase Mr. Burns I think.

    1. Re:stupid people... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that's what the _filthy_ rich tell themselves from time to time :).

      http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

      As of 2007, the top 1% of households (the upper class) owned 34.6% of all privately held wealth, and the next 19% (the managerial, professional, and small business stratum) had 50.5%, which means that just 20% of the people owned a remarkable 85%, leaving only 15% of the wealth for the bottom 80% (wage and salary workers). In terms of financial wealth (total net worth minus the value of one's home), the top 1% of households had an even greater share: 42.7%.

      --
    2. Re:stupid people... by Odinlake · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that's what the _filthy_ rich tell themselves from time to time :).

      Ah, I think they need to add a few steps:

      1. stupid people shouldn't have money
      2. poor people are stupid
      3. poor people shouldn't have any money
      4. we need to take more money from the poor
    3. Re:stupid people... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure intelligence has a similar distribution pattern. But, obviously, not necessarily distributed amongst the same people.

  29. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by heptapod · · Score: 1

    I'm smarter than that, the other day the awesome guys at Geek Squad replaced the magic smoke in my computer and now it's never run better! Best $350 I have ever spent while wearing pants.

  30. the fresh prince of nigeria by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 1

    I hope this will help the Prince of Nigeria and perhaps put an end to his money problems.

  31. terra' by cratermoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ever since 2002 the US government has been scaring its citizens with a bizarre grand conspiracy theory concocted by DHS and TSA to convince Americans they are in mortal danger from everything from shoes to ink cartridges, and the only solution is to spend vast sums of money on security and endless war while depriving the people of more and more of their liberties.

    1. Re:terra' by T+Murphy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Note to self: if I think someone is scamming me, show him a bottle of shampoo bigger than 3 ounces. If he doesn't freak out, he's not a scammer.

    2. Re:terra' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever since 2002 the US government has been scaring its citizens with a bizarre grand conspiracy theory concocted by DHS and TSA to convince Americans they are in mortal danger from everything from shoes to ink cartridges, and the only solution is to spend vast sums of money on security and endless war while depriving the people of more and more of their liberties.

      Who is scamming who is scamming who?

  32. Asking for it by Dreth · · Score: 1

    Obviously someone that dumb shouldn't have had that much money. He deserved losing it.

    --
    All glory to Arstotzka!
  33. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by couchslug · · Score: 1

    If you don't make the effort to become an _informed consumer_, which while considerable is less than that required to do the jobs you list, you
    won't be able to distinguish good techs from bad.

    BTW:
    In terms of money saved, learn to fix the car first. It pays off hugely over a lifetime, even if you take a community college course to get started.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  34. A fool and his money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...are soon parted... nuf said

  35. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by santax · · Score: 1

    Come on, you don't buy a Mercedes to go fix it yourself. I can make a lot more money with letting a skilled mechanic do that for me, while I'm busy doing my business. To you and me a computer will never have to the store except for a hardware-failure within your warranty. Now, go fix a tv... Don't see many it-nerds fixing their own tv's... What you ask from people is too much. Only hobbyist have an interest in spending the time and effort it takes to become good enough at it to be able to find a darn software/hardware problem. Other people rather invest that time in their own jobs or things they like. Maybe they paint... Maybe they are very good at running a marathon. Everybody has X-time. And everybody has to make choices with that given time. I like pc's. And I used to like fixing them. Now I know better. If my pc goes flat on me, I throw it away and buy a new one. I don't even care to look if it is a faulty power supply or a faulty motherboard. For the simple reason that I have better things to do.

  36. The hatred of the rich on ./ is amazing by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is this attitude from many, such as you, that just because someone has money they are a bad person. As such they deserve to have bad things happen to them. What a horrible, shallow, short-sighted view. This is particularly true when you are talking someone like a trust-fund kid. At least in the case of someone who started normal and became rich I suppose you could believe they were underhanded and stole money from others if you are a hard core Marxist and have zero understanding of real economies. However someone born in to it? How is that their fault in any way, shape or form? While I certainly don't pity them for begin born in to privilege, I don't hate them for winning the genetic lottery. Hell, all of us who are fortunate enough to live in developed countries and have Internet access won the genetic lottery globally speaking.

    So seriously, get some fucking perspective and get some fucking humanity. I get tired of seeing rich-hatred on this site, it is as stupid as any other kind of blind, over-generalized, hate.

    And before you point fingers no, I'm not rich. I work for my reasonably modest living. I just happen to understand that I am lucky even in what I have, on a global scale, and I've met people who make a good deal more and less than I do and found those that are kind and caring and cruel and callous in both groups. Money does not define a person.

    1. Re:The hatred of the rich on ./ is amazing by corbettw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's particularly galling about that attitude is, by any objective measure, nearly everyone who frequents /. is "rich". So the idiots on here who proclaim we should "eat the rich" are targeting themselves for extinction.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:The hatred of the rich on ./ is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "rich" cannot be measured in objective terms.

      just saying.

    3. Re:The hatred of the rich on ./ is amazing by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      While I cannot speak for others, I can say that I do not have a great deal of sympathy for fools and especially not for rich fools. As others have often said, on Slashdot and elsewhere, the fool and his money are soon parted. If someone sells fantasy conspiracy theories, part of me wants to say that anyone foolish enough to participate in that to the tune of 160K per month deserves exactly what they are getting. I do not begrudge the wealth of anyone else, but neither do I believe that those with wealth are somehow entitled to keep it even in the face of their own gross incompetence and stupidity. In any case, the wealth and background of this heir should figure into the case (i.e. he came from a privileged background and with all of that elite education he should have known better).

    4. Re:The hatred of the rich on ./ is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's particularly galling about that attitude is, by any objective measure, nearly everyone who frequents /. is "rich". So the idiots on here who proclaim we should "eat the rich" are targeting themselves for extinction.

      Slashdot users are, at most, middle class. That isn't "rich". Rich are successful hedge fund managers, bank executives, oil tychoons, partners in law firms, etc. I'm pretty sure we have none of that here.... not that there's anything wrong with that, just sayin'

    5. Re:The hatred of the rich on ./ is amazing by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this guy would have been poked at all the same even if he was Joe Average and the fee was $160/month. This guy was made subject to the "stupid tax," a progressive tax levied on all whom take a leave of absence from sound reasoning. Even if this fellow believed the whole virus story, why ever would he have entrusted his life and money to the local geek squad? There are federal (FBI) and private security organizations that are in a much better position to address the matter.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    6. Re:The hatred of the rich on ./ is amazing by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this guy would have been poked at all the same even if he was Joe Average and the fee was $160/month. This guy was made subject to the "stupid tax," a progressive tax levied on all whom take a leave of absence from sound reasoning. Even if this fellow believed the whole virus story, why ever would he have entrusted his life and money to the local geek squad? There are federal (FBI) and private security organizations that are in a much better position to address the matter.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    7. Re:The hatred of the rich on ./ is amazing by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Most people on slashdot are multi-millionaires?

      I think the general anti-rich sentiment in the country is a result of wall street bailouts to billionaires, among other things.

      What's particularly galling about the tea party/conservative attitude, is that the vast majority of people shown in conservative rallies are generally poor, on medicaid/medicare, yet they are arguing for massive financial gains for billionaires, like the Koch brothers, and at the same time arguing against social services that they currently use....

    8. Re:The hatred of the rich on ./ is amazing by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      As others have often said, on Slashdot and elsewhere, the fool and his money are soon parted.

      I liked Gordon Gekko's quote (from the first Wall Street; haven't seen the second): "A fool and his money are lucky enough to get together in the first place."

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  37. Re:Paranoia, paranoia, everybody's coming to get m by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    Are you by any chance Todd Davis or Robert Maynard, Jr.?

  38. I've seen a similar scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I once received a 419 letter that took on the form of a death threat. The writer claimed he was a hit man contracted to kills me, but for a price, he would tell me who my enemy was, and sell me a video of the contract being made. It told me not to contact the police, or he would act immediately. I could tell from the broken English that it was a 419, but I did call the police, hoping they could catch the scammer. They couldn't. I imagine that a senior or eccentric rich person would have taken this seriously, and done what they were told. Naturally, as soon as they paid, the scammer would say their enemy had upped the offer, and they need more money. This story reminds me of that letter I recieved.

    1. Re:I've seen a similar scheme by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, this is true. Something similar happened to me. A friend played a joke. I'm not famous by any stretch, but I'm a published writer and my work has appeared all over the place, including my local newspaper. So a friend decided (for whatever reason) to play this prank on me. He emailed me acting like he was somebody who had read something I'd written in the paper. At first it was just a regular "reader letter" type thing, but over the course of a few more emails he continued to escalate it onto some really weird and creepy stalker type thing. He'd say, email is so impersonal, how would you like to meet up to discuss this further? (No thanks.) Oh come on, we can meet at [a certain bar I go to regularly]. (Really, I'm not interested.) No? How about [this coffee shop right down the street from my house]? And the whole thing culminated in him sending me an email saying "I know you'll love this," along with a bunch of JPEGs of bloody dead bodies and people with injuries. Ha ha ha.

      Now, I was maybe 70 percent sure that this was some kind of prank. I mean, who would care enough to really wish harm on me? But that 30 percent is a killer. It eats at you. There are some straaaaaannnge people out there -- just look around Slashdot. And in this day and age, it really is pretty hard to imagine that a stranger could not be able to narrow down my place of residence if they really felt like they wanted to. I have to admit that the whole thing made me pretty uncomfortable -- enough to take it seriously.

      Anyway, my friend denied that he had anything to do with it, denied it and denied it again. So after the third denial I just said, "OK, well you've seen the emails. You should come down to the police station with me when I file the report." That's when he realized I was really serious, and he owned up -- and we all laughed at what a funny, funny, funny joke that was.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:I've seen a similar scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you ever think about national defense expenses at the same point? governments always say we have lots of enemies or terrorists trying to kill us.. they spend lots of money for the security reasons.. and from whom they get the money? the frightened citizens! but NO we all are not conned at all, right? :))

    3. Re:I've seen a similar scheme by eulernet · · Score: 1

      You have a strange taste for friends.

    4. Re:I've seen a similar scheme by flickwipe · · Score: 1

      There are some straaaaaannnge people out there -- just look around Slashdot

      What? I'll kill you for that

    5. Re:I've seen a similar scheme by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 1

      haha that IS funny... but uh, did you ever find out where the JPEGs came from?

    6. Re:I've seen a similar scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And that's when I stabbed him, your honor."

    7. Re:I've seen a similar scheme by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I think that was the genesis of the prank -- someone had come across these pics from some Web site at my friend's work, and they said, "Hey let's have a laugh and just send these to some people to freak them out!" Pretty dumb.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  39. Stupid people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid is as stupid does.

  40. That's not really true by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a lot of truth to it in terms of certain kind of scams. When you are talking immoral scams yes it is usually true. Things like the Nigerian "Help me steal millions of dollars from my country," things. Well you can't scam someone honest with that because it is a dishonest proposition. Even if you were 100% for real an honest person wouldn't do it because it is wrong.

    However there are other scams that work perfectly well on honest people. Ones that play on fear are a good example. You convince someone is in danger and they have to do X to not be. No dishonesty there, they just don't want to be hurt. That is perfectly understandable. I mean if you were able to honestly convince me that my life was in danger and the only way out way to pay, well I'd do it. Now of course I'd be rather hard to convince of that fact, I have a good deal of faith in our police forces and my marksmanship, not to mention a good understanding of just how not worth it it would be to try and kill me. However supposing you found a perfectly believable set of evidence that could well and truly convince me then sure, because I'd think it was real and not want to die.

    This leads to the second part that it is possible to scam people who are not as bright and who are credulous and/or gullible. While it may be trendy for geeks to hate on people who are less intelligent as though it was their fault, simple fact of the matter is that as with so much else in humans, intelligence is genetically determined and falls on a bell curve. Just as there are people who smarter than most, there are those who are not. Some people just cannot process data as well as others, cannot reason as well as others, and thus cannot identify and deal with scams as well as others.

    So while I find this scam laughably stupid, well I'm a computer support and security professional. I know how this shit works, and the holes are easy to spot. For someone who doesn't know as much, and perhaps is slightly below average intelligence, perhaps it seemed far more plausible.

    1. Re:That's not really true by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Well technically saying "Do X or you'll be hurt" isn't a scam, it's extortion.

    2. Re:That's not really true by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      One of the most common scams that are done to honest, older people is the "repair man" scam. They see something wrong on your house, leaking, bricks cracked, or the ever popular "missing single". and "while we are in the neighborhood, we can fix it for just $50" or some such low price. It gets torn into, and suddenly, they "find" a few thousand dollars in other problems, and your house has a gaping hole in tit, so the older person feels compelled to go ahead and let them fix the now $3000 problem, to get the gaping hole fixed. These rarely get reported, as the older person is purely conned, and often if they suspect they are being conned, too embarrassed to report them.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:That's not really true by delinear · · Score: 1

      Indeed. There's a show here in the UK called The Real Hustle that proves time and again you don't need to be dishonest to fall for a scam. Scams such as dressing in a high visibility vest with some fake ID and offering to valet park cars arriving at a car park, only to drive away with them, for instance, require absolutely no dishonesty on the part of the victim. Even scams where people think they're getting something for nothing or next to nothing, while you could argue they're playing on greed, don't really require dishonesty - everyone likes to get a bargain, after all. I suspect "you can't scam an honest man" was coined by a scammer to give honest men a false sense of security, it's blatantly not true.

    4. Re:That's not really true by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I had a run-in with a yard work scammer. I had had him do some yard work for me. One day, he claimed he had spread fertilizer while I was at work and I owed him X dollars. I hadn't asked him to spread fertilizer, and I only had his word that he HAD spread fertilizer (actually, I was pretty sure there was fertilizer involved, just not in my yard). He argued about it and even threatened to sue. I also noticed he was standing fairly close, in a somewhat intimidating manner, particularly since he was a tall man. He said that other people on the block paid him, and considering that there were several older people on the block, they probably paid out of intimidation, or to avoid trouble. I didn't pay, but I could believe that some people would.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    5. Re:That's not really true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For someone who doesn't know as much, and perhaps is slightly below average intelligence, perhaps it seemed far more plausible.

      It doesn't even need to be someone who is slightly below average intelligence. Mr. Davidson is a composer and his family (once you get past the founding of Schlumberger, look up the De Menils) are very artistically inclined. What I'm saying is, he's a dreamer. He makes his life and his money (and does a good job of it, the nytimes article says produced an album that won a grammy) by being a dreamer, by letting his emotion come before his rational instincts. "Should that note go there? Well, standard musical theory says no...but I *feel* like it should!" Bam! Grammy! I can very easily see, then, someone coming and conning him by playing on his emotions. "You're going to lose all the music you've written because of this virus, also all our shop computers are now infected!...but you seem like a nice guy, so I'll help you out." Fear and love at the same time, makes the victim think the perpetrator is the only one who can protect him. Throw in a little "don't trust them, they're lying!" and "only I really care about you" and someone who's trained to be lead by emotions, rather than rational analysis, is doomed.

      Which, of course, brings up the point someone made later on. People on TV constantly saying "they're out to get you!" "only I really care about you/your money/your children!" Should we blame the people who get taken in by this kind of stuff? Well, yes, in the same way we should blame Mr. Davidson. "You did something dumb, now let's teach you what you did, why it was wrong, and try to get compensation out of the people who screwed you." And of course, even people who make their livings through emotions should have been taught how to use some basic analysis and when it might be a good idea to apply it. But should someone be punished more for being a little bit dumb sometimes or for taking advantage of people in a moment of weakness?

      Unfortunately, doing that with a group like Goldline et al is a bit tougher.

  41. Illegal? Immoral? by VendettaMF · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm really not sure that anything that should be classed as a crime has occurred here.

    Anyone that dim should not have access to/control of anything close to that much money. It is far better for the nation and the world that the money is in the hands of the cognitively capable.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    1. Re:Illegal? Immoral? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Fraud is a crime. Offering to sell the Eiffel tower or the Brooklyn bridge - even to someone stupid enough to buy it, is a crime. That was decided way back when lawmakers thought it worthwhile to protect the weak and gullible (instead of nowadays where laws are made to protect the government and special interests).

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  42. What is that ol' saying? by ittybad · · Score: 1

    Something about a fool and his money...

    --
    No single raindrop believes it is to blame for the flood.
    1. Re:What is that ol' saying? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      they give it to china?

  43. A Tragic Comedy by jgdobak · · Score: 1

    One case of a rich individual being cheated by the relatively poor, as opposed to the situation our economy is founded on, the many poor being cheated by the rich.

    What a shame.

  44. And people say rich people deserve there money... by Jeeeb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Next time someone tells you that we shouldn't tax the rich because they deserve the money they earn, link them to this story.
    The guys a fool living of his great-grand fathers success. It sounds in some ways like the scamers did more work for the money than he did. (Not that I think we should be rewarding them for being a-grade assholes)

  45. The democrats tried that very same trick by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    "If you vote republican, your country will be in danger!"... It didn't work. I guess you can only fool some of the people....

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:The democrats tried that very same trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good morning from your coma! I see you're getting caught up on the news; let us know when you're done with the 9/10/2001 copy of the Times.

    2. Re:The democrats tried that very same trick by countertrolling · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was out that long? Seems like it happened just last week... How time flies

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  46. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes problem is, that in between fixing my guitar, my laptop, my tv and my fridge, I need to find some time to become skilled in fixing the hairdryer. My family wants some time from me.

    Of the above, only the laptop has access to sensitive information and the ability to send it to a third party.

    For a millionaire, throwing the laptop in a wood-chipper and getting a new one would be a better bet than giving someone else access to your stuff.
    For everyone else, learning to put a CD in a drive and click "NEXT" a few times to reformat/reinstall an OS should be within their grasp.

    MOST people should be able to figure these things out if it was important to them.
    The problem is it seems the media has done a poor job educating people on how important proper data handling is (see Facebook).

  47. Porn is 4Chan currency, so much is at stake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The past month met 4Chan with a Server log request to inquire about child pornography related to a classified court case, because government is become so corrupt that their own attornies and lawyers are trading it for more valuable works without changing the names and identities of the victims enough to be unidentifiable.

    You have a lot to lose on 4Chan when your wealth is more than just numbers in a bank account: you can bring down entire websites by simply dispensing this wealth anywhere and pointing government officials at-it, as has been the case with Moot having to answer for it in such fatiguing ways.

    Be warned! Information as weapons and currency: it only pulls down everyone, starting with the ambition to prosecute.

    1. Re:Porn is 4Chan currency, so much is at stake. by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      this is barely intelligible, and smacks of both teenage overinflated ego and paranoia.. My advice:
      - pay more attention to your english teacher
      - take a hike. really, grab good boots, and go commune with nature.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    2. Re:Porn is 4Chan currency, so much is at stake. by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      don't feed the obvious trolls.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  48. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing that disturbs us nerds about so many people who have computer problems is how basic comprehension and problem solving seem to go out the window. Plenty of people who can understand a concept like transferring water from one large container to another with a cup and additionally can understand that the cup can only hold a certain amount of water seem to get entirely lost with pretty much the exact same concepts when you're talking about getting files from one computer to another using a flash drive. All kinds of things that really are dead simple (rather than me just _thinking_ they're dead simple) somehow become these super-complex tasks that break otherwise capable minds. Ever try to explain to someone that the best option after their computer virus infection is to just re-install the operating system because the computer is too messed up to recover? And they just don't understand why you can't just remove the virus? That same person will understand why, even after a necrotic infection has healed, the damage remains. When it's a computer virus though, just running the virus scanner should fix it, right?

    Also, what reason is there that we trust mechanics? Not that all mechanics are crooks, but plenty of them will quite happily do work that you don't actually need done. Even if they're scrupulously honest, most mechanics I've known, while they've had the benefit of experience, have not been naturally good at diagnosing problems. So they'll brute force their way through a problem, using the benefit of their experience to get the answer right most of the time, but never bother to do some of the little things that could tell them that they're going down the wrong path with the first, second, third.... etc. expensive procedure.

  49. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Just, FYI, every car has headlight fluid, and you need to change it every time you change the filament. Even the new-fangled "filament-free" lights need their fluid changed, indeed the proper mixture is even more important for those lamps.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  50. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Nethead · · Score: 1

    I need to find some time to become skilled in fixing the hairdryer.

    Clean out the hair. It's clogging up the airflow. Makes the heat-fuse trip.

    Next!

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  51. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by shugah · · Score: 1

    I once owned a VW Karmen Ghia (yes it was a POS) and it needed a new clutch. I took it to an independent VW shop and the mechanic initially had a hard time sourcing a clutch for it. Finally he cross referenced and found a Porsche clutch that was identical. I asked if it would cost more and he told me "only if I install it in a Porsche".

    Finally an honest mechanic.

    --
    If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
  52. He got what he paid for by stumblingblock · · Score: 1

    He got the peace of mind of knowing that that he was being protected from a devious Guatemalan assassin. Thats gotta be worth something.

    1. Re:He got what he paid for by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      But what if there really were assassins? He thought he was safe because he was paying those people all that money, when really he was in just as much danger as he was in before?

  53. A fool and his money are soon parted by Satis · · Score: 1

    The truth will set you free. Or possibly part you from even more money, if the truth happens to include copyrighted material.

    --
    Satis clankiller.com
  54. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He'd rather dick around with his guitar and TV than become informed about a two ton device that can kill others and that is one of the most likely instruments in a premature death of his children. His priorities are clear.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  55. Not realy, he's not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the scammers should be alloud to keep the money. Hey, it was given to them under legitimate circumstances of protecting those wealthy people. Lord knows the wife of the Winchester house agreed to the house builders at the *seyance*(?). The same for U.S. Government employees should keep all those $Trillions for protecting Americunts of the Jewnited Straits from Tur'rist attacks of Fanny Packs and Champaigning on us with Bi-cameral furcative legislation extending to the hidden jurisdictions of the Several States burried since 1775.

  56. Paranoia is the product of Monetary Penalties. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a murderer is paranoid about getting caught murdering someone.
    Only government is paranoid about letting a unlawful-tax Protester use Section 83a.
    Only COPS are paranoid about meeting someone on an alleged "Traffic Stop" ignoring that "All Roads are Open as a Matter of Right to Public Vehicular Travel."

    Only the people are disallowed from abducting the abductors, taking them to their own houses to dress them in
    bright colors and threatening to tazer them for not surrendering Bank Account information to pay Theatre Tickets.

    Yea we know it's 50-degrees and you are naked, but what do you have to hide in your rectum?

  57. No cure by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    There is no cure for gullibility.

    Apparently, all they were able to do was some primitive blood-letting analogue, in that they bled out some of his cash in order to stabilize his financial humours.

  58. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes problem is, that in between fixing my guitar, my laptop, my tv and my fridge, I need to find some time to become skilled in fixing the hairdryer.

    Perhaps you should try to not break so much stuff, you ham-fisted fuckhead.

  59. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He'd rather a professional deal with his dangerous device than make an expensive or fatal mistake fooling around with it on his own. I'd say his priories are in order. Now, go fix that skin rash with a google search and some caustic herbal concoction.

  60. Leland Gaunt by hardboiled.tequila · · Score: 1

    Needful Things reference FTW!

    1. Re:Leland Gaunt by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Huh? I had to look that up. Never heard of it. Guess I have to read it now.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  61. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [...] just like nobody needs to program in cobol to know that when your 'tech' asks for 160k a month you might want a second opinion.

    Yeah, because if you program in Cobol anything priced below 250k is highly suspicious...

  62. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Your torque converter isn't running low on torque is it?

  63. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That actually made me laugh.

  64. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    Hehe, I actually know a guy who failed the yearly "technical control" of his car due to headlight fluid.

    You see, when the big day came up, the car was rather dirty. He didn't care. But his wife cared: "You can't show the car around in that state!"
    So she washed it...
    But the headlights were not 100% watertight...
    So he failed the "technical control" due to "water in the headlights"...

  65. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Acceptable if this had been a reason cited for his reluctance to perform his own maintenance and repairs. He talked of a lack of available time. Time that, by his own admission, he directs towards dicking with his guitar and tv.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  66. From the NY times article by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    A call to one of Mr. Davidson’s homes revealed a man’s friendly recorded voice, warning that, “If you leave an ad or any other such message, your telephone wire will be fried automatically.”

    Not the workings of a healthy mind.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  67. ...and this is why you should stay off drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...

  68. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say he's not very good. He's confused headlights with turn signals. Turn signals need fluid with the right characteristics to wash around in the reservoir at the correct frequency to make them blink. Ask him about "blinker fluid" and watch him squirm. While your at it, ask him where to find the dipstick for the frequency grease. Your radio will get all staticky when it's running low.

  69. The great grandson of an oil industry tycoon by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Says it all, really. Fool, money, soon parted. Don't worry, I'm sure the lawyers will work on getting rid of the rest of the pile for him.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  70. Invar is angry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the other news, Invar is very angry for the deceptive behavior of his daughter.

    1. Re:Invar is angry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, her father's name must indeed be Invar. It is in the NY Times article that she is from Iceland, and there are no family names there, only patronyms. A boy is named after the father with -son in the end, and a daughter is named with -dottir at the end.

  71. And to think . . . by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

    . . . that I, who have a clean work track record (I have had bad clients with whom I have had problems, but I have NEVER even come close to being accused of stealing) have offered HONEST, LEGITIMATE, QUALITY services to some people, people who could seriously use the services, for very very competitive rates, along with verifiable (Google) samples of good past work, and . . . I swear, the asinine drooling miasmic paranoid racist fucktards literally act as if I am trying to literally steal from them, and these folks actually get to steal millions from some guy? Just like that? You have got to be kidding me . . . sometimes I really do think I ought to start committing crimes, I mean, I get treated like a criminal half the time already . . . might as well make some money while I am it . . . grgrgrgrgrrrr

    --
    SARAVA!
  72. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by delinear · · Score: 1

    Well loathe as I am to play devil's advocate for the media, I'm not sure how this is a failing on their part. A day doesn't go by that we're bombarded with scare stories about identity theft, some civil servant losing all our data or some company playing fast and loose with our privacy. If you listened to the media you'd believe that the only way to be safe would be to live as a hermit in a cave divorced from society (and you'd better hope your cave doesn't have an address they can use to fake an utility bill to take out a credit card in your name).

    The "failing" is that most people simply don't care about this stuff until it happens to them (or someone close enough to them for it to register). Try talking to the average person about securing their system against intrusion and you can literally see their eyes glaze over - people don't want to bother about the mundane aspects of computer security, they want to be poking people and sharing cabbages. People are certainly aware of the issues, but as always they tend to cling to the belief that it couldn't ever happen to them right up until the point that it does.

  73. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by delinear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The difference seems to be the gullibility of the target. Both of those ingenius scams can be avoided with a little thought and perhaps some research, if someone is willing to take $100 from me for defragging my monitor do you honestly believe they'd not take $160k from me if they thought I'd be stupid enough to fall for it?

  74. Missing icon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please add that borg icon that goes so well with this newsstory's title... HTH

  75. Re:But since he didn't earn that money by a_nonamiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And don't most USians live in fear of the muslim terrorists and Obama's "Death Panels"?

    You believe far too much of what you see on TV. Only about 15% of us are crazy, just like any other country. The rest are pretty normal.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  76. Hard to feel sorry by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    for the Dynastically Rich, seeing as the only act required to be rewarded that wealth was taking their first breath. I think Mister Gates has some wise insights on this. Can you imagine how horrible Bill Gates III would be with all of his GPs lucre?

  77. "Buy now on DVD"? "Unlimited Bandwidth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Buy now on DVD"? "Unlimited Bandwidth"? "Obama Death Panels"? "Terrorists will kill you"? "Saddam has WMDs"?

    Funny how so many frauds are committed with the cognizance and even willing participation of those who uphold the law.

  78. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    It's more like this:

    Go in for inspection, dashboard backlight no longer works ( but it worked yesterday), back tail light is out (when did that happen), tire tread is too shallow (ok).

    $400 later - hmm tire pressure is low (slow leak from a new pin hole or did they just leave it low to wear out tires early).

    ? Go somewhere else or go back and demand fixes (you'll pay either way) with potential for more problems. If you go somewhere else - devil you know or new potential scamming.

    This happens when you are new to repair or in a new area. It could take a few tries to find someone you trust. Referrals can't be trusted as a smart scammer operating a legit business would maintain a list of "happy" customers.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  79. Responsibility for your own safety by gilleain · · Score: 1

    Indeed. There was a story in the UK papers about a 3yr old child injured by a flying Chinese lantern. He was underneath it, making a wish, and got facial injuries from hot wax.

    The father's comment was (paraphrased) : "Why are they selling things which are dangerous? They should make them safe, or ban them". Which makes a superficial kind of sense, but surely nothing is safe in all circumstances. We all laugh at labels on products that say "Don't stand underneath this hot, flying candle", but perhaps people could occasionally try keeping themselves safe, rather than relying on others to do so.

  80. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He didn't cite lack of available time. He said, quite clearly, that there are a lot of things vying for his attention, so he prioritizes those which he can accomplish the best.

    Spending an hour learning about cars is not going to get you as far as an hour learning about Windows, a hair dryer or a guitar. Also, you have to look at the impact of not doing it right. That changes the importance and focus of the time.

  81. Re:But since he didn't earn that money by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "That this idiot could be successful whilst so dumb is why we need 100% inheritance tax. If your kids and grandkids (if you're lucky) haven't made of themselves with all the advantages you were able to give them whilst alive, why the hell should you be able to give even more to them when dead? Help your kids while alive. You can't take it with you."

    WTF are you??

    Who are you to tell me what I should or should not be able to do with my possessions...weather they be physical assets or money??

    Part of possession, is the ability to give it to whomever you wish to give it.

    It is not to you or the government to tell me who to give my possessions to...whilst I'm alive or who it goes to when I pass on.

    How fucking dare you.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  82. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

    I hope he keeps your muffler bearings well greased and your blinker fluid topped off as well.

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  83. Iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what happens when Indians start fucking Icelanders. Stop it, just stop.

  84. With friends like that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... who needs enemies?

  85. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by thoromyr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You jest, but I've seen the "turn light fluid" used successfully on someone. It was after a rain during PMCS and a turn light on a hummer had an obvious "half full" fluid level. A new guy in the unit (who apparently didn't know much about vehicles or lighting) was sent on a mission for some "turn light fluid" to top it off with. The mechanics got a good laugh and a soldier became just a bit more cynical. Or how about the classic "hunt for grid squares" a second lieutenant fell for? My favorite was a sergeant who could tell any lie convincingly and with a straight face (often he would start with something small and plausible, then work his way up to to a real whopper). He managed to convince another sergeant that the setting sun was actually Mars on its closest approach to Earth ever.

    The real lesson isn't that some people are idiots or know nothing, it is that *everyone* has a threshold of knowledge in some area past which they can be fooled.

  86. Re:But since he didn't earn that money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's someone less completely fucked in the head than you. "Duh... do some people have problems with fertility? Duh...." People as stupid as you should be glad the government lets you breed, let alone give money to your children.

  87. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    The reason this guy got screwed out of so much money has little to do with his lack of knowledge about computers.

    No, but I suspect the reason it got started was due to computers. I suspect these scammers often had fun poking around in the browser history of their customers, and they realized this guy was a) a paranoid who believes all sorts of crazy conspiracies, and b) rich as hell.

    They could have just as easily been interior decorators who discovered his diary, and faked mail instead of email.

    The real reason he got screwed out of so much money is that he hired some IT experts for 'security'. Instead of going to one of the thousand of reputable firms that would consult on this. In fact, rich people almost always have some sort of private security firm they're already using, so him not asking them about this is rather inexplicable.

    Maybe they managed to convince him his life was in danger via computer, and they were the best to handle it, which makes him really really stupid.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  88. Re:But since he didn't earn that money by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

    Not entirely. Taxes are levied on any transfer of wealth/property; think of sales tax, etc. Just because you don't pay it on gifts during the normal run of things doesn't mean it's not owed.

  89. Re:But since he didn't earn that money by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "He's someone less completely fucked in the head than you. "Duh... do some people have problems with fertility? Duh...." People as stupid as you should be glad the government lets you breed, let alone give money to your children."

    Hmm...great, I now have an anonymous stalker.

    And read my posts before you misquote them. I didn't say I didn't believe anyone had fertility problems, I merely was asking if it was that widespread. I didn't think it was so bad as to rate the attention it seems to garner in general.

    And speaking of stupid, are we not able to figure out how to register for a real account on slashdot?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  90. You are being hunted by Honduran assassins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but luckily, for a mere $160,000 per month, you can hire two computer repair techs to keep you alive!

    They don't call them Geek Squad for nothin'!

  91. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    He never stated that they were based on what he could accomplish best.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  92. Ahhh fuck him. by dogzdik · · Score: 0
    If he had of been told that a UFO was coming to take him back to Klingon Uranus, and all he had to do was sign the document - so they could safe keep all of his property while he was away, and then drink the Coolaid - he probably would have believed that too.

    .

    Fuck him.

    .

    There is only two things getting kicked in the head teaches you.

    .

    1. Keep your eyes open or

    .

    2. Duck.

    --

    .

    Voting up, Voting down - If I really gave a fuck about your approval or not, I'd come and ask you.

  93. And by mahadiga · · Score: 1

    Vickram Bedi and girlfriend Helga Invarsdottir

    Indians among most corrupt while doing business abroad

    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
  94. Re:This is why people should fix their own compute by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

    Oh, I know, I'm only slightly exaggerating my lack of knowledge about automobiles.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  95. Re:Paranoia, paranoia, everybody's coming to get m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Mr. Davidson, they are out to get you. You just misunderstood who they are.

    Naivete and paranoia are a dangerous combination.

    lol naivete way to misepll fkn loser

  96. Exceptional-but-Too Common by Pooua · · Score: 1

    Although a multi-million dollar fraud is unusually large, it is not at all difficult to find frauds in the computer industry. It is so common, in fact, that it should be hurting business significantly, particularly for anyone who is honest. If people knew more about computers, they might realize the extent of it and demand action. We would probably be at war with a few more countries, in fact. There are that many scammers taking that much money.

    I've been ripped off a few times, too, and I resent it very much. For example, I looked for an alternative to my music club (BMG). After searching through several options, I found one that offered me online music for a one-time fee. After I paid the fee, I discovered that all they were providing were instructions and shareware that wasn't theirs, that would access music that wasn't theirs, from people's torrents that wasn't theirs. When I complained, the person who took my money justified himself. It is evident that such people usually will justify their actions in their own minds, and so will continue their scamming as opportunity arises. The only way to stop them for certain is to kill them, which I wish we could do. If they won't stop, they deserve to die.

    So, my take on the original story is, the potential 8- to 25-year sentence the suspects face is too light. How many other people have they conned? Will they actually change their behavior when they have future opportunities? They have the chance of doing it, again, and I suspect they will.

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  97. Don't fear the Opus Dei by Optali · · Score: 1

    This guy should have been better informed: The Opus Dei isn't interested in people older than 12 ;)

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast
  98. re: Man Loses Millions by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

    Just goes to show that having money means you could be as dumb as Sarah Palin.