Slashdot Mirror
The Story of My As-Yet-Unverified Impact Crater
tetrahedrassface writes "When I was very young, my dad took me on a trip to his parents' farm. He wanted to show me 'The Crater.' We walked a long way through second generation hardwoods and finally stood on the rim of a hole that has no equal in this area. As I grew up, I became more interested in The Crater, and would always tell friends about it. It is roughly 1,200 feet across and 120 feet deep, and has a strange vibe about it. When you walk up to it, you feel like something really big happened here. Either the mother of all caves is down there, or a large object smashed into this place a long, long time ago. I bought aerial photos when I was twelve and later sent images from GIS to a geologist at a local university. He pretty much laughed me out of his office, saying that it was a sinkhole. He did wish me luck, however. It may be sinkhole. Who knows? Last week I borrowed a metal detector and went poking around, and have found the strangest shrapnel pieces I have ever seen. They are composed of a metal that reacts strongly to acids. The largest piece so far reacted with tap water and dish-washing detergent. My second trip today yielded lots of strange new pieces of metal, and hopefully, one day the truth will be known. Backyard science is so much fun. And who knows; if it is indeed a cave, maybe Cerberus resides there."
I'm kindof afraid that your backyard is going to become the first physical place to be slashdotted.
Why does this remind so much of The Story of Barbie Head Archeology...
Could be a karst landform http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karst_topography. Carbonate rock will react with water.
my guess is that you have something along the lines of calcium carbide in those rocks
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun the frumious Bandersnatch.
How about taking a bit down to the geology department at the local university? Find out what the crater actually is. It could be important :)
It really does look like an impact site from the Google image. The crater is elongated to the North, and it really does look like a large circular raised area at the North end. It looks just like what happens when you throw a coin edge-on into wet sand from a very shallow angle. Anyone agree?
are you (my fellow /.ers) sure this isn't a stalking horse for some kind of viral advertisement / alternate reality game?
Looking at that photo, sinkhole sounds plausible.
Maybe there are more holes in the surroundings, then it's clear. Also don't craters normally come with an elevated rim? Hard to see from above of course but no indication of such a rim around it.
Oh well lots of guesses will be posted here I'm sure. It's /. after all, fantasies running wild.
Indeed just take those metals to your local uni or so, have them figure out what it is. If they really react strongly to water then this must be recently exposed material (won't last long outdoors in the wet soil), so can't be from an ancient impact crater. I mean the material itself could be from whatever source but it's obviously exposed recently as you can find it easily with a metal detector so can't be there for a very long time or it would have weathered already.
Also impact craters usually have lots of glassy material from molten rock present, look up some research articles about confirmed craters on what you should be able to find there.
You know why he laughed you out of his office? Because you went in there saying "Look! I've got an as-yet undiscovered crater in my backyard! Or maybe it's a big cave or something!"
It makes you sound like some easily-impressed idiot who doesn't know the first thing about rocks, which is probably what you are - something that irregular and in soil that looks that soft is almost certainly not a crater. I mean, just compare it to a picture of an actual crater; they're nothing alike.
And then you go off about "oooh when I put water on these rocks they bubble!", like you've never heard of limestone (and it sounds like you probably haven't), and "I found weird lumps of metal!" like you've never heard of (oh I don't know) humans leaving shit around.
Seriously, you sound like the worst sort of credulous idiot. There's a reason why they say "ten hours in the lab will save you an hour in the library" - do some reading up on even the most basic geology first (and I mean fucking basic, not the awesome stuff like impact craters or mega sinkholes or what have you), then start telling people about how awesome it is. I'm sure that formation is, actually, very interesting - you don't get areas with (apparently) a lot of water and a lot of limestone without at least some neat stuff happening - but you don't need to start by making shit up!
Cut the stone with angle grinder, polish the cut, show us the picture. Meteorites have quite distinctive texture.
[My apologies for the lack of links: Google is your friend. The editor is being a bitch.]
If it reacts with acid, it's carbonate (such as calcium carbonate, CaCO2). The classic test for carbonates is to dump a 5% solution of HCl (hydrochloric acid, available as muriatic acid in any hardware store) onto the sample; if it bubbles, it's a carbonate. (I know one geologist who calls this test "barbaric.") You can also use common household vinegar.
99.99% of all carbonates on the Earth are sedimentary. Usually, they form in shallow to medium depth water when microscopic critters with calcium shells die by the kazillions and fall to the ocean floor, where they pile into layers that give us things like limestone. There is one exception, however: Oldoinyo Lengai is a volcano in Tanzania that produces carbonate lava (the only carbonate-producing volcano in the world -- all the rest produce silicates, products based on SiO2). Someday I would like to see a sample of this igneous carbonate, because while silicates are really really important in geology, they're also really really common, and thus really really boring.
A relatively inexpensive bulk chemical analysis could tell you the exact composition of your samples, and you would probably find a pretty high iron content, which accounts for the trigger on your metal detector. My educated guess is the mineral siderite, FeCO3. It is common both in hydrothermal veins and in sedimentary formations.
Sinkholes can form when subterrainian water flows dissolve minerals (such as carbonates), forming a cave that later collapses. When this happens, you get a crater. And yes, you can get a pretty big one, depending on how deep the cave is.
So yes, it's a probably a sinkhole.
Remove the caps and hold to a mirror.
Speaking as a caver, it could well be a shakehole (sinkhole). It's not the classic shape for it but they vary in shape and size. It's big, but not enormous. If it is a shakehole it certainly won't have broken any records.
As a first step, check some geological maps. If you're above limestone, I'd say: case closed, it's a shakehole. Yes, it's above a cave (or at least where a cave used to be!) The first photo of the "new metal" looks suspiciously like limestone.
...but lol anyways. Hey my girl friend has a giant sink hole, here, maybe i should a picture in for analysis.
Finding out a origin of such negative relief forms is a hard task.
1) Get a fine scale topographical map of it's surroundings. 1:10'000 is excellent, 1:25'000 could also work (depends on crater size). Look for any similar features around. Could this be a simple erosional form?
2) Go to nearest geological survey department and ask for surface geological map. Depending on Your location, it might be called "Quaternary sediment cover map". I'm not from USofA and thus have no idea if You will need to $$ to get it. If they offer also an geomorphological map, take that also. Those maps will help You to understand locations geological setting. You will be able to check possibility of ordinary karst or termokarst.
3) Compare craters location with known extent of Quaternary glaciations. In territories with Quaternary glaciations or close to glacial limits is possible to see termokarst depressions. They can be of variable size and form - starting from small, round crater-like forms up to large wally-like depressions filled with modern lakes.
4) If You want to describe any rock sample, You need to get a clean, fresh surface. Identifying rock samples by simply pouring an acid on it's surface might just reveal presence of calcite in soil and say nothing about rock it self.
5) Double check exact location in relief where You found those sock samples. Could there been some springs coming out or have been groundwater discharge location? Then it might be Limonite (bog ore) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limonite
6) If it's still not clear what it is - get an hand auger (soil sampler). I use One-Piece Edelman Auger. Make a profile line over that "crater" - sample on undisturbed land, on the rim, at the bottom etc. Get coordinates for exact location; photographs; describe color, wetness, anything You see or feel with hands (pebbles, sand, dust). Making correct description sill might need an training to get familiar with methods, still You will be able to tell if there's difference in soil composition on rims/bottom in comparison with surrounding territory (if crater is young enough).
Sorry form my language.
Why are you using abusive language to a complete stranger, just because he doesn't know as much geology and chemistry as you do? Perhaps you should think about attending a course on anger management.
From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
It's obvious that there are many reasons to be incredulous, but the metal samples look exactly the way you expect meteoric iron to look.
I personally find it insulting that people would talk about how impact craters look, and then link to a wikipedia site that shows images of craters in environments with no significant weather, an insubstantial atmosphere and no life. It is as though the idea that a crater would look very different 100 or 200 years after an impact on Earth has not even begun to cross your mind.
While it might not seem unusual to you for someone to randomly find iron in a depression, it seems very unusual to me to find such irregularly shaped pieces of metal lying in what appears to be a rather rural area.
This might help the original poster: http://www.aerolite.org/found-a-meteorite.htm
Many metals react strongly to acid. I am sure even a very rudimentary chemistry book may help you to identify that better.
We get these sorts of questions regularly on my site (www.mindat.org) and, I have to say, the vast majority of times they turn out to be of entirely terrestrial origin (meteorwrongs).
A friend at the Natural History Museum in London tells me that well over 99.9% of the items brought in as possible meteorites turn out not to be. The chances are not good.
Now, I would not want to dismiss your findings out of hand because, of course, meteorites can be found anywhere. But the first picture doesn't look like a meteorite to me at all. It looks like a very badly corroded iron pyrite nodule, which are relatively common in some limestones and other sedimentary rocks. The second one could be a meteorite, but it could equally well be a nodule.
Easy way to tell is break one open. If it has a radial crystalline structure then it cannot be a meteorite, it can only be an iron sulphide nodule.
Alternatively, post pictures and descriptions on my board where real geologists and mineralogists can help you!
Jolyon
ps. Calcium Carbide? I had to laugh!
Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
Is there a strange colour blinking out of the crater ? Perhaps you should call the Arkham university.
It could easily be a meteor crater or a sinkhole, or even an old quarry (depending on the quality of the rock). If it is a meteor crater that size, you really have hit the jackpot, because meteors are worth money. However, the people who buy them aren't idiots, so you won't make money pretending; you have to find out. If it was formed by a meteor, there would have been splatter in all directions, but more in one direction than the others. Get a metal detector and search not just inside but all around the periphery up to three or four hundred meters away. If it really is from a meteor, and nobody has "mined" out the many fragments it would have produced, and it was the right kind of meteor (many are nickel-iron, some are stony, nickel-iron are the ones you can find and identify with a metal detector) you will find some chunks that aren't just teensy bits, but are large, partially fused, chunks of mixed iron and rock. They are hard to miss -- their density is close to twice that of ordinary rock (specific gravity closer to five than three). As another poster pointed out, even stony meteors can usually be identified by sawing and polishing -- the origins of meteor rock are typically quite different from earthbound rocks and they have a characteristic structure. But limestone chunks are probably not going to be meteors...;-)
Anyway, if you have a real crater with lots of real meteorite fragments, bear in mind that they will sell for hundreds to thousands of dollars each, depending on size, composition, and provenance. Even tens of thousands for large bits. And yes, there are geology departments at Universities that would like very much to help you search for pieces and study the crater itself, and you should give them first dibs before making money out of it as knowledge is more important than money.
Good luck, but don't hold your breath. No matter where you are sitting, you are sitting on top of at least meteor dust as a contant rain of that drifts down from the sky every day, and fragments from tiny to small are rather commonplace. Larger fragments are increasingly rare, though, and really big impact craters (that have been identified as such) are very rare.
rgb
Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
way to totally overreact to someone's inquisitiveness in a totally negative and unnecessarily vitriolic manner!
go you!
If you suspect that it might be an impact crater, then there are some very simple inexpensive things you can do to at least find out if you are on track or not...
1st) Go online (or the telly if you have the Science Channel) and watch an episode of "Meteorite Men" ( http://meteoritemen.com/ ). From this you will gleem enough basics of searching and tools to do a beginners job at the site.
2nd) Get a really good magnet. If a meteorite can make it to ground, then it had to be made up of a dense material such as an iron ore. Ergo, take your found samples and if they react to magnet then you may be on to something.
3rd) Get, rent, borrow a decent metal detector for the same reason mentioned in number two.
4th) If all above fails, then start composing a story of a crashed UFO. Sell tickets to the "believers" flocking to the site. Least this way you can make a profit off of it. After all, P.T. Barnum was right... One is born everyday.
> They are composed of a metal that reacts strongly to acids.
>The largest piece so far reacted with tap water and
> dish-washing detergent
Dish washing detergent is basic, not acidic.
http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090106114510AAlzSKE
It is highly unlikely you have a single material that reacts _chemically_ the same way to both.
you want to waste time with hoaxy nonsense , go to idle
seeing how this isn't idle, flame on
If it is a crater then why is it not a pond? That is where does the water that settles in the bottom go? Therefore sink hole is the most likely answer.
It's clearly a quirk in the map generator. Apparently someone has been everywhere around that area but not near it and voilá, the chunks in the area get generated much later and don't fit in with the rest of the map.
The OP can be happy enough that the chunks have the same biome as the ones south/east of it (Savannah?). After all, there are some random biomes sprinkled around nearby. (Notch really ought to clean up the code that determines which biome a new chunk gets.)
Well, it's either that or someone had entirely too much fun with TNT. OTOH, if someone bombed down that far below the surface they'd had to have hit rock along the way and the surface is clearly the wrong color for that.
USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
mmmmmm.....
endless Pi.....
it just keeps going....
-- Sig under construction...
We need more curious people. What we do not need is more rude and discouraging people like yourself and, possibly, the professor.
doesn't potassium react with water violently?
I'm no expert but, if you see Cerberus, TURN THE FUCK AROUND!
Good luck!
I'm an undergrad student of Chemistry and I live in a karstic region, so I might help you a bit. First it would be cool if you would measure the density of the potential meteorite (displacement of water + mass, measure first mass) and also it would be nice if we could determine for example the amount of iron in it This can be done with common household chemicals (HCl, NaOH both common available accross the globe). Iron is not so rare in such karstic landscapes (if that crater is in one), but afaik is usually not in an elemental form. You used a metal detector so you've probably found a metallic element. That's also judging from a second photo from comments, where we can see the shiny metallic lustter. Also you could maybe give me your email or something ;)
Well... the moon and every other planet we've looked at has tons of these "sinkholes." That being said, yes, I am taking into account the atmosphere of earth, and how it will burn most galactic debris up, however, without any closer pictures or... really anything more than what is given to us... how is an intelligent discussion around this thing supposed to form?
I thought the hole looked somewhat square. Is it possible that it is an old quarry/mine?
you're curious, thats great, your blag posting shouldnt become a news story on slashdot
What are the long-lat of this crater? I know privacy is an issue, but it would be nice to know if this is in central florida or the adriatic coast for example
www.itjerk.com
Call the Professor. The metal could be Adamantium.
I'm a BBS orphan in a blogging world.
True but i have evolved to become my own girlfriend... u should watch me on tranny cam x
The sinkhole or crater is nothing. Look at the patterns on the right and the mysterious impression below. I can just about make it out "G..o..o.." damn. The aliens are telling us something.
This is not in Florida... And no, I won't post lat and longitude because I can see that a lot of people would probably swarm out here. I will continue detecting around the area, looking for more pieces of metal, and maybe even, god forbid go down in the bottom and dig.
For all the constructive posts, thanks. If it is a cave, I want to go in it!
Its a government conspiracy to hide existence of extra terrestrial life form!
Did you check the area for cosmic radiation?
Don't you talk about my Mom that way!
strange metals....? Large Crater...? Sounds like Megatron.
I don't know why AC got modded flamebait. It probably is a troll. If somebody is going to consider this is anything but a sinkhole, then internet-savy should at least consider troll. I mean, it is from a person that considers assface humorous.
Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story
Really guys? Change the picturepush urls from www2 and www4 to just www and avoid killing two of their servers.
Seriously, if there's any chance this is a sinkhole or cave, post there -- I promise you will have legions of local cavers falling over themselves offering to come check it out.
I suggest you take a Geiger counter with you on your next trip to the crater before you go mucking about too much there.
9/11 Eyewitnesses to Explosive WTC Demolition 1 of 2
The thing is that on Slashdot no one knows how old you are.
If this poster is 14 or 15 he may be on the start of becoming a very good geologist.
Even 18 he still is just really enthusiastic.
I agree this is probably a sink hole of some kind and not an impact. But that is only a guess I have only a passing knowledge of geology but none of the rocks shown seem all that odd to me.
You never educate through ridicule and for all you know you just made some 16 year old girl just getting into science cry.
See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
I grew up (weekends and summers) on family land in North East Texas. We had a land feature that resembled a worn-down cinder-cone. While the top layers of rock were mostly forms of iron-rich sandstone-ish rock and clay (red dirt), there were many rocks that appeared to be igneous -- black, heavy and with rounded edges that looked melted -- including rocks that resembled your photos. As a kid I spent a lot of time digging around and we dug a somewhat large pond in the center of the area -- opening up lots of bulldozed rock and dirt for a young boy to dig around in. I found what looked like a textbook volcanic bomb and on many occasions I found colored veins of dirt that bubbled and reacted with water. Much of Texas was once a seabed. Many of the rocks looked like parts of plants. I youthfully theorized that the structure was a worn-down volcanic cinder cone that had subsequently been buried. I very nearly went the geology path in college - but I suspect it wouldn't have been as 'fun' as the times I had growing up. :-)
What is the history of the site? Was the feature there when your grandparents moved into the farm? Do they remember the day when the feature formed. The best thing to do would be to ask how big the bang would be to make that crater - and what sort of radius would the blast be felt, heard, and seen? then check local newspapers for reports on something that would create a bang that size. (probably something like "ammunition train explodes". The fact you haven't heard anything like this suggests it probably was not a meteorite impact.
It's in the USA. You can tell that from the copyright on the image. The picture looks like deciduous forest area with a wet climate. That and the hilly terrain means this is probably somewhere in the Appalachians, or possibly the Ozarks. And I think this is artificial. The squarish shape makes that seem likely.
And by the way, refusing to give the location so we can look at the image yourself is a great way to make people think you're a crank.
The artifacts appear to have undergone melting. If you search to the north-northwest of the crater, I would suspect you would find additional artifacts.
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
These sorts of sample turn up at university geology departments on a regular basis by people hoping they are meteorites. Frequently they are proven to be bog-iron. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bog_iron The "crater" could also be explained by a glacial feature called a kettle or pothole. They can occur in clusters, but can also be solitary. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kettle_(landform) My work ISP is blocking picturepush but if this feature is in an area previously glaciated (ie most of north america north of say Kentucky), then this is a possibility.
Looking at the photo it has a very clear exit for drainage at the northwest end. This means this is not a sinkhole necessarily (these usually drain into underground systems in limestone karst country), and a small possiblity just an oddly shaped gully. The small bits of melted looking metal are difficulty to explain without this being an old site for a foundry.
Also I would expect if this was limestone country the locals wouldn't find this odd let alone call this a 'crater' but just another sinkhole.
After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
Aren't impact craters round? I thought that was one of the neat things about them - they are always round, regardless of speed/angle of impact. (you can play with this with a baking pan full of flour, and lob things at it). This looks more like a quarry to me.
Hard to tell from the aerial photo, but with those straightish sides roughly parallel to the field boundaries, it could easily be whats left of an old, now overgrown gravel pit or quarry. That might also explain the bits of metal -- scraps of old tools. How old it would have to be for that overgrowth depends on where it is (local climate, etc.).
There's a sure test for meteoritic metal -- cut a slice, etch it, and see if you find a Widmanstatten pattern.
-- Alastair
Look at the big picture, it's geology
No one clue will always tell you everything because it's not a controlled environment
Look at the bedding of any exposed rock, has it been disturbed or is it lying flat.. is it parallel to everything else in the area.. or is it nonconforming?
Look at the environment, why isn't water collecting, where is it going, you've got a big hole, why isn't it filling up?
Look at the host rock, is it in fact limestone or similar carbonate that is susceptible to karst geomorphology?
You can also look at the metal samples, do a streak test, get a fresh exposure on one and do an acid test, check it for magnetism, look at the patina.. did you notice it was red and not green... see what you can scratch with it and look up it's hardness,
forgo your diamond ring as it can still wreck it even if it doesn't scratch it
Build your description, test a hypothesis, and revise Your real key here is a solid description of fresh evidence, anything time touches it will corrupt, anything water touches it will alter How exciting, I wish I could slashdott my backyard looking half as good as you, it's just turtles around here
I found an acre or more of land strewn with these kind of stones in Southern India. Here is a JPEG picture: http://baheyeldin.com/sites/baheyeldin.com/files/be/images/meteorite/meteorite-1.jpg After much debate and sending pictures off to a University Professor, settled on the explanation that the stones are metallurgical slag. We wrote up some details and posted here: http://baheyeldin.com/science/kerala-meteorite-volcano-or-ancient-foundry.html
this is pure classic troll, get a lot of people to respond attacking and defending the troll, while the troll enjoys all the frenzy over popcorn
They are composed of a metal that reacts strongly to acids. The largest piece so far reacted with tap water and dish-washing detergent.
Are you saying this crater is somewhere it never rains, in the middle of a forest of hardwoods, where potentially a large object fell from the sky?
It's hard to believe a piece of reactive metal would be in such a place for years at a time, and not have completely reacted with rainwater before you found it. It must be a very very large chunk of metal
I would suggest caution. Some of those Alkali metals can be poisonous to humans.
Did you test this stuff for reactivity and take all appropriate precautions? Last thing I would want to do is explore a crater, and get cancer 20 years later as a result
Did you test this stuff for radioactivity and take all appropriate precautions?
the whole article is worth diddly-squat. Normally I'm not too critical of the editors, but this one suggests that they're not letting enough air into their crack-pipes and are somewhat more confused than normal. Not even up to the level of "stupid".
Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
I fed the troll and became a troll for it ... man oh man!